The Morning Dispatch: A Horrific Day in Afghanistan

Plus: A rare staff editorial.

Happy Friday. Let’s get right to it.

Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories

  • More than 100 people were killed in a series of suicide bombings outside the Kabul airport—including at least 13 U.S. service members and 90 Afghans—making Thursday the deadliest day for the U.S. military in Afghanistan since 2011. At least 18 American troops were injured as well, according to Central Command. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant-Khorasan (ISIS-K) claimed responsibility for the attack, and President Biden attributed it to the group as well, telling reporters he has ordered the Pentagon to “develop operational plans to strike ISIS-K assets, leadership, and facilities.” CENTCOM Commander Gen. Kenneth McKenzie said yesterday that the U.S. has evacuated approximately 100,000 people and plans to continue its mission, with about 1,000 U.S. citizens remaining in the country.
  • The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Biden administration’s updated eviction moratorium, issuing an unsigned order making clear that “if a federally imposed eviction moratorium is to continue, Congress must specifically authorize it.” The court’s three liberal justices dissented.
  • In an interview with NBC News’ Lester Holt, Lt. Michael Byrd—a 28-year veteran of the U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)—revealed himself to be the officer who shot and killed January 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt. The USCP announced earlier this week its internal investigation of the incident cleared Byrd of any wrongdoing, determining his actions were “lawful” and “within Department policy.”
  • The Department of Education announced Thursday that it will forgive $1.1 billion in federal student loans for people who attended ITT Technical Institute and left after March 2008 without receiving a degree. “This action extends relief to borrowers whose attendance at ITT overlapped with a period during which the institution engaged in widespread misrepresentations about the true state of its financial health and misled students into taking out unaffordable private loans that were allegedly portrayed as grant aid,” the Department said.
  • Initial jobless claims increased by 4,000 week-over-week to 353,000 last week, the Labor Department reported on Thursday.
  • Apple reached a settlement with app developers on Thursday that will allow developers to encourage customers to pay them outside the iOS app, which would save developers from having to pay Apple’s commission fee.

A Deadly Day in Kabul

Clothes and blood stains at the site of one of two explosions at the Kabul airport. (Photo by Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images.)

“Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to end a 20-year war,” President Joe Biden said Thursday, finishing his remarks on Kabul’s deadly suicide bombings with a flourish ill-suited to its occasion.

More than 100 people, Afghan and American, died yesterday in two attacks on U.S. military personnel and evacuating civilians bottlenecked outside of Hamid Karzai International Airport. Hundreds more were injured in the explosions and subsequent onslaught by armed fighters. Scenes of families scrambling to flee the scene—carrying their dead and wounded—quickly circulated across social media.

For American forces, Thursday marked the deadliest day of the war in Afghanistan since 2011, with a confirmed 13 servicemembers killed and 18 more injured as of Thursday night. For Afghans, the bombings were another  in long a string of jihadist attacks targeting the country’s civilian population.

Afghanistan’s Islamic State branch, often abbreviated as ISIS-K, claimed responsibility for the suicide vest detonation, in line with U.S. intelligence predictions. The group is known for carrying out high-profile attacks on noncombatant targets, including a May 2021 car bombing in Kabul that killed more than 90 people and injured 240 others.

As an adversary to the fallen Afghan government, the Taliban, and the U.S. and NATO allies, ISIS-K has been heavily targeted and driven underground in recent years, but continues to conduct terror operations in urban areas nevertheless.

The Biden administration reiterated concerns about the Kabul airport’s deteriorating security over the course of the week, advising Americans and Afghan partners to steer clear of the area unless given specific instructions. Statements from BidenWhite House press secretary Jen Psaki, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken alluded to possible attack as recently as late Wednesday.

“It’s hard to overstate the complexity and the danger of this effort. We’re operating in a hostile environment in a city and country now controlled by the Taliban, with the very real possibility of an ISIS-K attack,” Blinken said in a briefing. “We’re taking every precaution, but this is very high-risk.”

James Heappey, the U.K.’s armed forces minister, also issued a caution to those on the ground just hours before the bombing on Thursday. “The credibility of the reporting has reached the stage where we believe there is a very imminent, a highly lethal attack, possibly within Kabul,” he told a local television station.

“ISIS has lost a lot of territory in Afghanistan over the past couple of years to a combination of Taliban offensives and U.S.-backed government offensives, but it still maintains networks in Kabul capable of very, very, very deadly attacks,” said Wesley Morgan, author of The Hardest Place: The American Military Adrift in Afghanistan’s Pech Valley. “The U.S. military has known that this is a serious risk as part of the operation they’re conducting in Kabul, and they’ve broadcast that in recent days.”

Given the West’s apparent foreknowledge of an impending attack, how were Islamic State jihadists able to carry it out so successfully?

A Defeat of Choice

Over the course of our nearly two-year existence, The Dispatch has published only one staff editorial—on January 7, 2021. Today, we make it two.

When President Joe Biden addressed the country after the attacks, he offered somber and appropriate gratitude for the sacrifices of our servicemembers. But as he has so many times over this crisis of his own making, Biden also offered politically self-serving distortions that spun the reality of the unfolding crisis to a point that it was almost unrecognizable. He celebrated “an airlift and evacuation effort unlike any seen in history,” as if the chaotic retreat of American forces were a moment of triumph. He said “this is the way [our mission] was designed to operate, operate under severe stress and attack,” as if it was all part of the plan. He pledged that “these ISIS terrorists will not win” and emphasized that they are “an archenemy of the Taliban,” an awkward attempt to contrast the jihadists who conducted these attacks with the jihadists his administration is relying on as the U.S. military’s new counterterrorism partner.

It’s an absurd proposition. But the Biden administration—out of naivete, desperation or both—is determined to test it. Politico reported Thursday that the U.S. government provided the Taliban with “a list of names of American citizens, green card holders and Afghan allies to grant entry into the militant-controlled outer perimeter of the city’s airport.” This is the same Taliban whose deputy leader, Siraj Haqqani, has a $10 million bounty on his head from the State Department’s Rewards for Justice program. The same Taliban that has harbored al-Qaeda for more than two decades, helping those terrorists lay the groundwork for the 9/11 attacks and the war they knew would follow. The same Taliban that freed thousands of imprisoned jihadists—from ISIS, from al-Qaeda—as it took the country. The same Taliban responsible for the deaths of Americans in Afghanistan by the hundreds. The same Taliban that controls access to the airport and the very gates where ISIS terrorists were able to detonate their bombs. The enemy of our enemy is not our friend, no matter how much our leaders might wish it were so. The enemy of our enemy is our enemy.

Contrary to a common claim, the invasion of Afghanistan was never a “war of choice.” Politically, strategically, and morally, Congress and the president had as much choice to respond militarily after the attacks of September 11, 2001, as their predecessors did in 1941 after the attack on Pearl Harbor. We cannot dispute that the two-decade war effort was subject to deplorable mission creep and mismanagement. But it is no less indisputable that what we’ve witnessed over the course of Afghanistan’s cruelest summer is a defeat of choice.

Our case for remaining wasn’t about “nation-building,” but let us acknowledge that building a somewhat decent, falteringly democratic, society that let women get an education or a job was an ancillary moral and strategic benefit of protecting America and her interests. And even if you do not care about such things, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Afghans did. They cast their lot with us. Now those stranded souls—who understand the Taliban better than any expert in the Biden administration or pundit on cable TV—are shoving their babies over barbed-wire fences and hiding in the wheel wells of American planes. They aren’t merely “voting with their feet”—they’re voting with their lives, and the lives of their children.

Worth Your Time

  • In his latest Washington Post column, national security writer David Ignatius—well-sourced within the Biden administration—takes readers inside a “badly shaken” White House following Thursday’s attacks. “The catastrophe in Kabul has spawned some finger-pointing and second-guessing in what has been a congenial Biden administration,” he writes. “To some White House officials, the military followed Biden’s order to withdraw troops all too quickly, with its commander and most forces gone by early July. The Pentagon counters that the timetable was explicitly endorsed by the White House. Officials across the government complain that the State Department failed to reduce staffing at the embassy soon enough or to prepare visa paperwork for the thousands of Afghan civilians who would need to be evacuated if Kabul fell. And while the CIA warned that the Afghan government was shaky, even pessimists thought it might not fall until October or November.”

Presented Without Comment

Also Presented Without Comment

Toeing the Company Line

  • David felt a little strange writing a newsletter while Thursday’s chaos in Kabul was still unfolding, so his second French Press this week (🔒) simply includes a series of thoughts on the moment we’re living through. “If our long war on terror has taught us anything, it’s that granting terrorists safe havens exponentially magnifies the terror threat,” he writes. “Jihadist campaigns take time and resources to plan. It’s no coincidence that the 1998 American embassy bombings in Africa, the near-sinking of the USS Cole in 2000, and the 9/11 attacks took place when jihadists enjoyed the ‘time and space to operate.’”
  • Jonah is back in The Remnant saddle, joined Thursday by fan-favorite A.B. Stoddard for a conversation about intra-Democratic Party divisions, the coronavirus’ resurgence, and Afghanistan’s collapse. Which has most contributed to President Biden’s plunging approval rating?
  • Just more than 40 years ago, the town of Tomah, Wisconsin, welcomed thousands of Cuban refugees from the Mariel Boatlift. Today, the same town is getting ready to welcome Afghan refugees. Christian Schneider reports from Tomah.
  • Our defeat in Afghanistan has prompted many to rethink our foreign policy. Mike Watson of the Hudson Institute argues now is not a time for neo-isolationism, nor a time to double down on interventionism. It’s time for reform, he writes.

Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Ryan Brown (@RyanP_Brown), Harvest Prude (@HarvestPrude), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).