Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Thursday January 28, 2021
1.) THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
2.) THE EPOCH TIMES
Red Rock Secured—Help Election—Proof Your Retirement with a Home Delivery Gold IRA. Delivered right to your doorstep.
There have been a lot of changes in America recently. Many of us here at The Epoch Times escaped living under communist regimes. And recently, we have seen more and more clear, obvious signs that communism is beginning to infiltrate America. We have seen the evil of communism. We have experienced it firsthand. And we have learned that the single most important way to stand up against communism is through Truth. Join us in our mission to report the news in Truth and Tradition by subscribing today at our best offer ever: Get an Unlimited Digital Subscription to The Epoch Times today for just $1 for your first 4 months. NOTE: This offer expires Sunday, January 31st, at 8:00 pm Western Time. “Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent.” CALVIN COOLIDGE
Uncertainty is leading at the polls as our political discourse has become a partisan charade that threatens to send economic growth into an historic tailspin…In 2021, the question is – what will the IRA’s, 401(k)’s, savings, pensions and retirement plans look when the dust settles? Retirement accounts, savings accounts, and financial portfolios are at the mercy of ever-growing global turmoil and dramatic political change. The good news: Gold dramatically outperforms other safe havens in 2021 and has officially become, “the currency of last resort.” Help Election-Proof Your Retirement with a Home Delivery Gold IRA.
“Communism is neither a trend of thought, nor a doctrine, nor a failed attempt at a new way of ordering human affairs. Instead, it should be understood as a devil—an evil specter forged by hate, degeneracy, and other elemental forces in the universe.” Copyright © 2021 The Epoch Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive newsletter communications from The Epoch Times.
The Epoch Times. 229 W. 28 St. Fl. 5 New York, NY 10001
With social media censorship sidelining many important headlines, our Morning Brief email is how we make sure you get the latest developments that our reporters have curated from around the world. It’s our way of keeping you truly informed so that you can make the decisions that align with your values. We hope you enjoy our coverage. Manage your email preferences here. |
3.) DAYBREAK
|
4.) THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.) MORNING BREW
|
BECOME SMARTER IN JUST 5 MINUTES
Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
6.) THE FACTUAL
|
7.) LIBERTY NATION
8.) FOX NEWS
9.) UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL
|
JANUARY 28, 2021 | |||||||
|
U.S. NEWS | |||||||||||||||
|
COVID-19 PANDEMIC | |||||||||||||||||||
|
ENTERTAINMENT NEWS | |||||||||||
|
ON THIS DAY | |||||||||||||||
|
PHOTOS | ||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
10.) JUST THE NEWS
11.) AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
|
12.) THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
13.) AXIOS
Axios AM
☕ Happy Thursday! Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,163 words … 4½ minutes.
Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios
Big Tech fed politics. Then it bled politics. Now it wants to be dead to politics, Axios’ Sara Fischer writes.
- Why it matters: Social platforms that profited massively on politics and free speech suddenly want a way out — or at least a way to hide until the heat cools.
Mark Zuckerberg said yesterday on a call with investors that Facebook will dial back on pushing political groups and content to users, and take steps to reduce the amount of political content in the News Feed.
- “There has been a trend across society,” Zuckerberg said, “that a lot of things have become politicized and politics have had a way of creeping into everything. A lot of the feedback we see from our community is that people don’t want that in their experience.”
- The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the philanthropy run by Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, announced it’ll spend $350 million to stand up a new group centered on criminal justice reform, which transcends partisan politics.
In the election’s long lead-up and explosive aftermath, it slowly dawned on platforms that political speech may be too tough for them to adequately police without themselves getting whacked politically.
- Ads: Twitter, TikTok and others have all banned political ads from the platform, while Facebook and Google have started to implement political ad limits around elections and sensitive events.
- Hyper-partisan news: Facebook and Google have tried to boost original reporting and quality news in an effort to steer eyeballs away from hyper-partisan outlets during breaking news events.
- PAC cash: Following the Capitol siege, most major tech firms said they would freeze political spending in an effort to avoid inadvertently funding members of Congress who voted not to certify the election.
The White House launched regular COVID briefings yesterday, led by response coordinator Jeff Zients. Photo: White House via AP
This is scary … The great Greg Ip writes in The Wall Street Journal (subscription) that COVID has become a shape-shifting virus: “The biggest shock to the global economy in a century is mutating — literally.”
- “More-transmissible and potentially deadlier variants of Covid-19 first identified in Britain, South Africa and Brazil are spreading, just as the rollout of vaccines had raised hopes for a broad-based economic recovery.”
The new risk is “a possible new variant that is resistant to the immunity conferred by existing vaccines and past infections, which could … require a new round of vaccinations,” Ip writes.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
A half-forgotten and unprofitable video-game retailer is, bizarrely and incredibly, on the lips of the nation: The GameStop saga touches economic and cultural forces that affect everyone, whether or not they own a single share of stock, Felix Salmon writes.
- Why it matters: In most Wall Street fights, the broader public doesn’t have a rooting interest. This one — small traders win a multi-billion-dollar bet against giant hedge funds by buying stock in GameStop — is different.
The appeal of fables: The core GameStop story is a simple morality tale. A scrappy band of Wall Street outsiders, armed with little more than moxie and their stimulus checks, have not only made millions for themselves, but have also humbled big-name fund managers.
- Schadenfreude: Gabe Plotkin is a hedge-fund gazillionaire who just spent $44 million buying two adjoining properties in Miami Beach. He’s also famous for short-selling — for betting that companies will fail. If he and his ilk lose money, many people would feel happy.
Shamelessness: The conspiracy to bid up GameStop stock took place in broad daylight, enraging old-time traders.
- Eat my shorts: There’s a highly complex financial system underlying the GameStop rally, involving discount brokerages, payment for order flow, short sales, margin calls, delta hedging of call options, and much else.
- Lots of people bear longstanding grudges against some or all of that system.
The attention economy: GameStop stock has risen in direct proportion to the number of people paying attention to it. It went viral in much the same way that a white-and-gold dress does.
- The internet has become reality: The GameStop story was born on Reddit, cultured on YouTube, popularized on TikTok and Twitter.
- Like any internet joke, the longer it lasts, the funnier it becomes — and the more attractive it becomes to memelords like Elon Musk.
- Share this story.
🗞️ How it’s playing …
Cases fall in 41 states …
New COVID infections fell for the third straight week — and no state got worse, Axios’ Sam Baker and Andrew Witherspoon report.
- But the U.S. is still averaging roughly 165,000 new cases per day, meaning the virus is still spreading largely unchecked.
- Nationwide, new cases are now at about the same level they were at in mid-December — down from their peak, but still a lot.
Risk is high everywhere…
At the beginning of fall, a New York Times risk assessment (based on cases and test positivity) found that residents of most counties were at “very high risk” of contracting COVID. Now, most are in the worst category — “extremely high risk.”
People who sold a median-priced home or condo last year made a typical profit of $68,843, the highest figure since at least 2005, according to real estate data provider ATTOM Data Solutions.
- Why it matters: While homeownership is still elusive for Americans on bottom income rungs, it’s proving to be a slot machine jackpot for the “haves,” Axios Cities author Jennifer A. Kingson writes.
Places with more than 10 million residents — megacities — are becoming more common as people from rural areas migrate to urban ones, Jennifer A. Kingson writes.
- Why it matters: The benefits of megacities — which include opportunities for upward mobility and higher wages — can be offset by their negatives, like the fact that they’re COVID breeding grounds.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Verified Twitter accounts last year shared more content than ever from deceptive sites, Axios’ Ashley Gold writes from German Marshall Fund research.
- Why it matters: Verified accounts are supposed to help social media users seek out trustworthy information and know who they’re hearing from. Constantly sharing false information defeats the purpose, and reinforces false narratives.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Two notorious white nationalist novels are seeing their online values surge as social media companies remove white supremacists, Axios race and justice reporter Russell Contreras writes.
- “The Turner Diaries,” dubbed the “bible of the racist right” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, lists on a number of sites for around $40. A few months ago, it went for less than $20.
Jonathan Karl, ABC News chief Washington correspondent, will be out next year with “The Aftermath,” a sequel to his New York Times bestseller, “Front Row at the Trump Show” (paperback out in March).
- Dutton will publish “The Aftermath” before the 2022 midterms.
Jon tells me it’ll encompass “the end — what becomes of Trump and Trumpism.”
- When I pointed out there are lots of Trump books coming, Jon said: “This is one of the most fascinating and consequential stories of our lifetime, so it should be a crowded field. To quote Lenin — the Russian, not the Brit: ‘There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.'”
Read an excerpt of ”Front Row at the Trump Show.”
This is N.Y. Times investigative reporter Susanne Craig with Chloe — a 60-pound, 12-year-old Labrador-basset hound mix who is her constant companion at a cabin in the Catskills. In a gripping piece, “An Unleashed Dog,” Craig writes:
Over the last five years, as I was holed up working on investigations about Donald Trump’s finances, Chloe’s job was to guard the president’s tax return information. She kept me sane. I kept her safe. Until now.
📬 Thanks for starting your day with us. Please invite your friends to sign up for Axios AM/PM.
14.) THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15.) THE WASHINGTON FREE BEACON
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16.) THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.) THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
18.) ASSOCIATED PRESS
Jan 28, 2021 View in Browser AP MORNING WIRE Good morning. In today’s AP Morning Wire:
TAMER FAKAHANY
The Rundown AP PHOTO/EVAN VUCCI Biden: ‘We can’t wait any longer’ to address climate crisis; US domestic terrorism alert warns of politically motivated violence
“We can’t wait any longer” to address the climate crisis, President Joe Biden said at the White House. ”We see with our own eyes. We know it in our bones. It is time to act.”
In the most ambitious U.S. effort to stave off the worst of climate change, President Joe Biden signed executive orders to transform America’s heavily fossil-fuel powered economy into a clean-burning one, pausing oil and gas leasing on federal land and targeting subsidies for those industries, Matthew Daly and Ellen Knickmeyer report.
The directives aim to conserve 30% of the country’s lands and waters in the next 10 years, double the nation’s offshore wind energy, and move to an all-electric federal vehicle fleet, among other changes. Biden’s sweeping plan is aimed at staving off the worst of global warming caused by burning fossil fuels.
EXPLAINER: Executive orders can be swift but fleeting.
Biden Economy: The president’s $1.9 trillion virus relief package is more than a sweeping rescue plan. It’s a test of the strength of the new administration, of Democratic control of Congress and of the role of Republicans in a post-Trump political landscape. Passage by Congress would give Biden a signature accomplishment in his first 100 days, unleashing aid to expand vaccinations, reopen schools and send $1,400 direct payments to households. Failure would show the limits of Democratic power, Lisa Mascaro reports.
Domestic Extremism: The Homeland Security Department has issued a national terrorism bulletin warning of the lingering potential for violence from people motivated by anti-government sentiment after Biden’s election. The bulletin suggests the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol may embolden extremists and set the stage for additional attacks. The department isn’t citing a specific threat. But DHS points to “a heightened threat environment across the United States” that it believes “will persist” for weeks after Biden took office, Ben Fox and Eric Tucker report. CHICAGO TRIBUNE VIA AP/ABEL URIBE White House projects virus will kill many more; Some US States lift restrictions gradually amid fears of new variant
The Biden administration launched its new level-with-America health briefings with a projection that as many as 90,000 more in the U.S. will die from the coronavirus in the next month — a somber warning as the government strains to improve delivery and injection of vaccines.
The tone of the hourlong briefing was in line with President Biden’s promise to be straight with the nation about the outbreak that has already claimed more than 425,000 U.S. lives, but was still a jarring reminder of the harsh road ahead. Zeke Miller and Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar report.
It marked a sharp contrast to what had become the Trump show, when public health officials were repeatedly undermined by a president who shared his unproven ideas without hesitation.
Dr. Anthony Fauci says there’s reason to be concerned about the impact of some coronavirus mutations on vaccines but scientists have plenty of options for adjustments to maintain the effectiveness of vaccines and treatments.
States Easing Restrictions: Several states are loosening their coronavirus restrictions on restaurants and other businesses because of improved infection and hospitalization numbers but are moving cautiously, in part because of the more contagious variant taking hold in the U.S.
While the easing could cause new infections to rise, health experts say it can work if done in a measured way and if the public remains vigilant about masks and social distancing, David Eggert and Don Babwin report.
Vaccine Minorities: The role that race should play in deciding who gets priority for the COVID-19 vaccine in the next phase of the rollout is being put to the test in Oregon. An advisory committee will vote today on whether to prioritize people of color, target those with chronic medical conditions or some combination.
The debate shows the growing commitment to put racial equity at the heart of the nation’s mass vaccination campaign as the virus disproportionally affects people of color. Experts say 18 states included ways to measure equity in their original vaccine distribution plans and more have likely done so since the shots started arriving, Gillian Flaccus reports from Portland.
EXPLAINER: Why it’s hard to make vaccines and boost supplies.
How many variants of the coronavirus are there? The AP is answering Viral Questions in this series. AP PHOTO/PETER DEJONG Unlike the vaccine, blame is not in short supply for the EU’s rusty vaccination rollout; WHO team in Wuhan departs quarantine; Battling virus deadly for Peru’s doctors
Many of the richest countries in the world are part of the 27-nation European Union — most with a universal health care system to boot. But that seems to be counting for little in the global vaccination drive.
The bloc is coming under searing criticism for the slow rollout of its vaccination campaign, Raf Casert and Mike Corder report.
The EU s not faring well in comparison to countries like Israel, Britain and the United States. While Israel has given at least one shot of a two-dose vaccine to over 40% of its population and that figure in Britain is 10%, the EU total stands at just over 2%.
Onerous regulations and paperwork in some countries and poor planning in others have contributed to the delays, so has a more deliberate authorization process for the shots.
Added to the simmering tensions, the EU and drugmaker AstraZeneca have been sparring over the delay of vaccine deliveries, a deepening dispute that raises concerns about the increasing competition for limited supplies of shots needed to end the pandemic.
WHO in Wuhan: A World Health Organization team has emerged from 14 days in quarantine in the Chinese city of Wuhan to start field work in a fact-finding mission on the origins of the virus that caused the pandemic. The researchers could be seen leaving their hotel and boarding a bus, but it wasn’t clear where they were going. The mission has become politically charged, as China seeks to avoid blame for alleged missteps in its early response to the outbreak.
Britain’s Lockdown: Prime Minister Boris Johnson has indicated that the lockdown in England will remain in place until at least March 8 as he ruled out any imminent return to school for most students. Johnson also confirmed new quarantine restrictions for travelers arriving in England from countries deemed to be high-risk. He said the U.K. remains in a “perilous situation” with more than 37,000 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, nearly double the number during the previous peak in April, Pan Pylas reports.
Peru’s Doctors: A large makeshift memorial stretches outside a bright yellow building overlooking Peru’s Pacific coast. The black-and-white photos of dozens of men and women are of Peru’s “pandemic soldiers” — the more than 260 doctors who have died from the virus. Their colleagues blame the lack of proper personal protective equipment and what they say is the government’s abandonment of the health care system. Peru’s health care workers have been holding an open-ended national protest for weeks to press their complaints of inadequate salaries, poor benefits and dangerous working conditions, Regina Garcia Cano and Mauricio Munoz report. Israel: Pandemic Contradictions
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces a coronavirus and election paradox.
The longtime leader and political survivor has turned to a straightforward strategy: Count on the rock-solid support of his ultra-Orthodox political allies and stamp out the coronavirus pandemic with one of the world’s most aggressive vaccination campaigns.
But with ultra-Orthodox communities openly flouting safety guidelines and violently clashing with police trying to enforce them, this marriage of convenience is turning into a burden, Josef Federman reports from Jerusalem.
Less than two months before March 23 elections,Netanyahu’s political partners are undermining his war against the virus. The clashes have also sparked a public backlash that threatens him at the ballot box.
Israel finds itself in a paradoxical situation. In just one month, it has vaccinated over a quarter of its 9.3 million people and is on pace to inoculate the entire adult population by election day.
At the same time, it has one of the developing world’s highest rates of infection, with some 8,000 new cases detected each day. This week it tightened a month-old lockdown by closing its international airport to nearly all flights.
A campaign strategist who has advised Netanyahu in the past says if the current troubles persist, “Netanyahu will be in big trouble.”
The ultra-Orthodox have long wielded disproportionate influence in Israel, using their kingmaker status in parliament to extract concessions from the nation’s leaders. Ultra-Orthodox males are exempt from otherwise mandatory military service. The community’s schools receive generous subsidies while providing subpar educations that focus almost entirely on religious studies and ignore critical subjects like math, English and science.
The system has long bred resentment among Israel’s secular majority, and economists have repeatedly warned that it is unsustainable. But political leaders have rarely been willing to challenge the system. Other Top Stories Pakistan’s Supreme Court has ordered the release of a Pakistani man convicted and later acquitted in the gruesome beheading of American journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002. The court also dismissed an appeal of Ahmad Saeed Omar Sheikh’s acquittal by Pearl’s family. Sheikh has been on death row since his conviction in the death of Pearl in 2002. Attorney Mehmood A. Sheikh, no relation, said the court ordered three other Pakistanis, who had been sentenced to life in prison for their part in Pearl’s kidnapping and death, also freed. “Today’s decision is a complete travesty of justice and the release of these killers puts in danger journalists everywhere and the people of Pakistan,” the Pearl family said in a statement. Several allies and supporters of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny have been detained in Moscow. The detentions early today came after mass protests last Saturday demanding Navalny’s release from prison drew tens of thousands to the streets in over 100 Russian cities. Navalny’s top ally Lyubov Sobol, Dr. Anastasia Vasilyeva from the Alliance of Doctors union backed by Navalny and Maria Alyokhina from the Pussy Riot punk collective have been detained for 48 hours along with Navalny’s brother Oleg. A court in Moscow will today consider an appeal against the Kremlin critic’s arrest. Republicans have a Marjorie Taylor Greene problem — again. Before she joined Congress this month, Greene supported Facebook posts that advocated violence against leading Democrats and the FBI. While some Republicans now condemn the activity, it’s hardly a surprise. Facebook posts surfaced last year showing she’d expressed racist, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim views. Top Republicans denounced her then. But the opposition faded when she won a seat in Congress. The GOP has largely embraced Greene lately, making it harder to distance from her now, especially when many of her views were already well known. The pandemic has transformed the annual Sundance Film Festival into a largely virtual event, but it has also reshaped many of the films that will unspool there. The wide majority of Sundance’s films were shot before COVID-19. But there are numerous films that managed the seemingly impossible feat of making a movie through the crisis. Sundance will supply the fullest look yet of moviemaking under the pandemic. Even in an independent film world predicated on a can-do spirit, the results are often striking for their resourcefulness. Sundance gets underway later today. GET THE APP
Download the AP News app to get breaking news alerts from AP on your phone, tablet or watch.
Unsubscribe About us 2020 THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 200 Liberty St. New York, NY 10128 |
19.) FORT MYERS (FLORIDA) NEWS-PRESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20.) CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
21.) CHICAGO SUNTIMES
Why Chicago can’t immediately vaccinate all its teachers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.) THE HILL MORNING REPORT
|
23.) THE HILL TIPSHEET
24.) ROLL CALL
|
Morning Headlines
They replay the day in their minds, hear threats when they pick up the phone, and try to keep doing their jobs. Congressional staffers are still struggling in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, whether they hid from the violent mob in their workplace or watched in terror from home. Read More…
Sen. Mark Warner announced Wednesday evening that he is quarantining after potential COVID-19 exposure, which could impact Democratic leaders’ plans to bring a budget resolution to the floor next week that would kick off the reconciliation process for a coronavirus relief package. Read More…
No surprise, American Catholics are as split as the nation over Biden
OPINION — Donald Trump gained a majority of white Catholic votes in the 2020 election, albeit with a smaller percentage than among white evangelicals, but Catholics of color backed Joe Biden. Was it a question of doctrine or how that doctrine is viewed through the prism of race and culture? Read More…
Click here to subscribe to Fintech Beat for the latest market and regulatory developmentsin finance and financial technology.
Winning wasn’t everything for Krishnamoorthi — then along came Obama
When Raja Krishnamoorthi first bumped elbows with a future president in 1998, he wasn’t looking for a winner. In fact, he had a pretty solid record of volunteering for candidates who lost. Barack Obama lost that first messy House primary, set his sights even higher, and the rest is history. Read More…
Brain drain to Biden administration comes at time of crisis for Capitol Hill
There’s a Democratic hiring spree going on in Washington, the likes of which haven’t been seen since 2008. For some who’ve been around Congress for a while, the current flurry of movement on Capitol Hill — staffers exiting, entering and generally jostling — reminds them of 12 years ago. Read More…
Fudge, having sought USDA job, to make case for HUD secretary
President Joe Biden’s choice to run the Housing and Urban Development Department, Ohio Rep. Marcia L. Fudge, can expect sharp questioning on her priorities at her confirmation hearing Thursday, but plenty of support from her fellow Democrats. Read More…
Union chairman rebuts Capitol Police chief’s riot claims
The Capitol Police officers’ union and the Architect of the Capitol are rebutting and clarifying aspects of acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda D. Pittman’s testimony this week before the House Appropriations Committee, casting more doubt on the department’s leadership. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2021 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
25.) POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: SCOOP: Inside the White House’s new thinking on Covid relief
DRIVING THE DAY
MCCARTHY TRIES TO MAKE NICE WITH TRUMP: House Minority Leader KEVIN MCCARTHY and former President DONALD TRUMP will meet around lunchtime at Mar-a-Lago — a face-to-face we’re told McCarthy requested after their relationship took a tumble in the wake of Jan. 6. McCarthy initially floated censuring Trump, angering the then-president. It’s their first in-person talk since the riot, and McCarthy hasn’t been shy about promoting it. “Kevin can’t shut up about it,” joked one top Trump adviser when we asked about the meeting. More on this below …
WHITE HOUSE LOOKS TO SPLIT COVID PACKAGE IN TWO — NEC Director BRIAN DEESE and Covid czar JEFF ZIENTS are scheduled to call into the weekly Democratic Senate lunchtime meeting today.
The two Biden aides will face an increasingly impatient caucus.
Deese has run two meetings with bipartisan groups in both chambers in recent days, one over the weekend with senators and another Wednesday with House members. Progressives are wary that President JOE BIDEN is too eager to cut a deal. Moderates are wondering why Deese hasn’t circled back with information they’ve requested.
Here’s what we’re told is the current White House thinking:
The Deese mission is to figure out what a “60-vote package” looks like. Biden aides are clear-eyed that such a deal will be far short of his $1.9 trillion proposal. A 60-vote deal would have skimpier funding for state and local relief (if any), and less money for vaccine distribution, unemployment insurance and nutritional assistance, or SNAP. It would have far more targeted relief checks. We are told by administration sources that a bill of this sort might be in the $600-$800 billion range.
The left would revolt. That’s where Part 2 of the Biden strategy comes into play. Its goal for now is to get the best deal possible that accomplishes a bipartisan result — a high-priority personal goal for the president — and then take everything that’s left out of the skinny relief package and add it to Biden’s “Build Back Better” plan. That would be passed using reconciliation, which requires a simple majority.
Voila! Biden can satisfy moderates with bipartisanship and progressives with the subsequent jobs bill.
BUT … The White House right now seems much more optimistic about the two-bill strategy than are Democrats on the Hill.
Said one progressive Dem senator: “My own judgment is that the space for a deal just doesn’t exist.” Even senior Democrats agree that a bipartisan deal is unrealistic.
The number that everyone keeps mentioning: 8.
That’s how many Republicans are involved in the current talks, which have produced nothing so far. Biden needs 10 Republicans for a 60-vote package.
But according to White House sources, if a 60-vote package never emerges, the backup plan is obvious: use reconciliation for both a large Covid bill and the follow-on jobs bill.
BIDEN’S THURSDAY — The president and VP KAMALA HARRIS will receive the President’s Daily Brief at 9:45 a.m. At 1 p.m., Biden will sign health care-focused executive orders in the Oval Office, with Harris attending.
— Press secretary JEN PSAKI will brief at 2:30 p.m.
MORE ON THAT MAR-A-LAGO MEETING: The McCarthy-Trump relationship has been quite the soap opera lately, as we and a million other reporters have written. First, McCarthy said Trump was to blame for Jan. 6. Then Trump called McCarthy a “pussy.” Then McCarthy backtracked to say Trump didn’t “provoke” the riot.
Today, McCarthy will try to smooth things over, a process he started a few days ago. In Florida to raise money, the GOP leader plans to drop by Trump’s resort to inquire about the president’s political plans, we’re told. Unlike Senate Minority Leader MITCH MCCONNELL, who reportedly doesn’t want to speak to the ex-president ever again, McCarthy believes it’s in his interest to be on Trump’s good side. Banishing him could cause problems for House Republicans and imperil McCarthy’s dream of becoming speaker one day. Trump is popular with the base and — as far as McCarthy is concerned — still the leader of the Republican Party. We can’t help but wonder if he’ll bring red and pink Starbursts.
Trump world is ecstatic about the visit, viewing the huddle as proof of a comeback in the making. “It’s the first solid bit of evidence that Donald Trump is still in charge of the party,” said the Trump adviser. The person predicted Trump is “going to give Kevin an earful about the 10 members who impeached him,” and added: “You’ll have Trump crossing his arms and smiling while he reminds Kevin that Matt Gaetz is going out to Wyoming to challenge Liz Cheney and that he could be next.”
But there’s also a clear upside for McCarthy: The Trump adviser said the get-together establishes that Trump still sees McCarthy as his guy in Congress.
RELATED: A CASE STUDY IN GOP MESSAGING UNITY — Per our Mel Zanona, “McCarthy urges House Republicans to stop attacking each other publicly”; Per Dan Friedman on Twitter: “Gaetz asks ‘Patriots’ to assemble to ‘STOP RINOs like Liz Cheney.’ That reads ominously after 1/6.”
PLAYBOOK READS
THE WHITE HOUSE
— “Biden taking first step toward bolstering Obamacare,” by Susannah Luthi: “The Biden administration on Thursday is expected to announce it’s throwing open the doors to the law’s enrollment site, HealthCare.gov, making it easier for the uninsured to get coverage during the pandemic. It is also expected to restore Obamacare marketing funds that the Trump administration had gutted, and it will soon begin the process of reversing the previous administration’s changes to Medicaid.”
— “Biden embraces order and routine in his first week. How will that fit this moment of crisis?” WaPo: “Biden’s first full week in office has showcased an almost jarring departure from his predecessor’s chaotic style, providing the first window into a tenure whose mission is not only to remake the White House in Biden’s image but to return the presidency itself to what he sees as its rightful path.
“The result so far is a 9-to-5 presidency — a tightly scripted burst of activity that was charted over the past few months, as Biden seeks to avoid heated conflict and stick to his plan of lowering the political temperature to a level that many Americans can tune out.”
CONGRESS
‘WE’RE ALL TOTALLY FREAKED OUT’: We’re hearing that lawmakers — particularly House Democrats — are reaching their wits’ end over the lack of guidance on how to protect themselves and their families amid heightened security threats. On Wednesday, the Homeland Security Department issued a bulletin that the domestic extremists behind the deadly Jan. 6 riot “could continue to mobilize to incite or commit violence.” Lawmakers want answers from Democratic leadership, who unlike the rank and file have their own security details. Expect to hear more on this when House Democrats return next week. “We’re all totally freaked out about this,” one tells us. More from the NYT
— “House members say they’re ‘targets’ and ask for more security in new letter,” CBS … The letter
SARAH FERRIS: “Progressives push Biden for recurring stimulus checks”: “[A] group of House Democrats, led by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), sent a letter to the Biden administration on Thursday calling for regularly delivered checks through the end of the pandemic, rather than a single $1,400 payment that is likely to fall short of expenses like rent or mortgage payments. The letter obtained by POLITICO — which was also signed by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chairwoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) — does not call for a specific dollar amount. But Omar and other progressives have been vocal in their support for monthly $2,000 checks.”
FROM POLITICO INFLUENCE: “K STREET COMES TO CHENEY’S DEFENSE: More than four dozen GOP lobbyists are set to host a fundraiser for Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) next month, as the No. 3 House Republican takes on friendly fire for her vote this month to impeach former President Donald Trump. According to an invite for the event obtained by PI, the Feb. 8 fundraiser will require a $500 personal donation to get in the virtual door, $1,000 to be named a co-host and $2,500 to be named a host.”
RELATED: “Trump poll shows impeachment backlash hitting Cheney,” by Alex Isenstadt
— JOHN HARRIS column: “Trump Loyalists Want To Punish Liz Cheney. So?”: “If the Washington news media thinks the Cheneys are doing right by standing up to Donald Trump over his role in the Capitol insurrection, father and daughter surely must wonder privately if they are somehow doing wrong.
“What’s notable, though, is that Liz Cheney has shed her old reputation for living off her father’s name and ideas, and vaulted into her new status — brave truth-teller in a party dominated by craven Trump enablers — mainly by drawing on a family legacy: Indifference to dissenting opinion. Liz Cheney surely knew there would be fierce backlash from within the House Republican caucus, where she is third-ranking leader, over her criticism of Trump and vote to impeach him. Her response, in essence, was: So?”
— “Most House Republicans silent over violent Marjorie Taylor Greene comments as Democrats condemn them,” CNN: “Most House Republicans were silent on Wednesday after CNN’s KFile reported that Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene repeatedly indicated support for executing prominent Democratic politicians in 2018 and 2019 before being elected to Congress.”
THE EFFORT TO EXPEL: “Rep. Jimmy Gomez drafts resolution to oust Marjorie Taylor Greene from Congress,” by Matthew Choi
— “Parkland Parents: Marjorie Taylor Greene Won’t Get Away With Lying About Our Son,” New York magazine
— MEANWHILE … WRCB: “Channel 3 crew threatened with arrest after asking Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene a question during town hall meeting”
— “‘He’s Saying One Thing and Then He’s Doing Another.’ Rep. Madison Cawthorn Peddles a Different Kind of Trumpism in a Post-Trump World,” Time: “‘I have built my staff around comms rather than legislation,’ [Cawthorn] wrote to Republican colleagues in a Jan. 19 email obtained by TIME.” Suffice to say this is something not many legislators would put in writing, even if it’s their m.o.
CENSUS UPDATE — “U.S. House data not ready until April, states’ data after July,” AP: “The U.S. Census Bureau is aiming to deliver the long-delayed numbers used for divvying up congressional seats by the end of April, but a holdup on redistricting data could disrupt several states’ abilities to redraw their own legislative maps ahead of upcoming elections, an agency official said Wednesday.”
IMPEACHMENT II (FEB. 8)
ABOUT THOSE IMPEACHMENT ‘ALTERNATIVES’: Some Senate Democrats are eager to be done with impeachment now that it’s become clear Trump won’t be convicted. But they ran into a bit of a problem Wednesday: their new leader. While rank and file spent much of the day floating the idea of censure or banning Trump from running again via the 14th Amendment, Majority Leader CHUCK SCHUMER insisted those ideas wouldn’t be an end run around a trial. He seems eager to put Republicans on record.
Still, those other proposals could resurface in a couple of weeks, we’re told. Sen. TIM KAINE (D-Va.) is fine-tuning his resolution invoking the 14th Amendment to keep Trump from ever running for office again. And other Democrats are privately talking about this, too, should Trump be acquitted.
While a conviction requires a two-thirds majority of the Senate, the resolution can pass on a party-line vote with Democrats alone. Still, there’s been some discussion about whether the resolution could be subject to filibuster. If it is, Democrats would need to find 10 Republicans willing to buck Trump — a move those GOP senators could find politically painful in the short run but freeing long-term.
LET’S GET THIS OVER WITH: Senate Democrats are coalescing around the idea of a speedy trial. “I would hope we could get this done in a week,” Sen. CHRIS MURPHY (D-Conn.) says in a recap by our Marianne LeVine on the latest trial thinking. But as Mike DeBonis and Paul Kane write in WaPo, “[S]ome Democrats complained that an abbreviated trial would be shortsighted, ignoring the historical mandate to document what happened before, during and after the riot.” Remember: A solid chunk of Republicans still think it’s a good idea to keep Trump around. Do Democrats at least try to persuade them otherwise?
BIDEN POLICY
— “‘This is going to be quite a show’: Biden’s arms control team eyes nuclear policy overhaul,” by Bryan Bender: “President Joe Biden is assembling a national security team with an unusually ambitious agenda to negotiate new arms control treaties, scale back the nuclear arsenal, and review decades of military doctrine. …
“But veterans of the last administration fear this newly empowered group of progressives may be naive about what can be achieved without undermining U.S. security, and are already warning them to prepare for a shock when they read the latest intelligence.”
— “Trump Had A Mandate To Target All Undocumented Immigrants For Arrest. ICE Has A New Plan To Change That,” BuzzFeed: “Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have drawn up guidance to direct officers to focus primarily on certain groups of immigrants, such as those suspected of being a national security threat, and require high-level approval for street operations as part of a draft memo obtained by BuzzFeed News that, if implemented, would likely lead to a significant drop in arrests.”
— “Blinken turns away from Trump-era approaches, starting with media relations,” WaPo: “Secretary of State Antony Blinken tried to reset the U.S. government’s relationship with the news media on his first full day in office, calling an independent press essential to the country’s global image and a ‘cornerstone of our democracy. ‘You keep the American people and the world informed about what we do here. That’s key to our mission,’ he said to reporters in the State Department briefing room Wednesday.”
ON THE WORLD STAGE
— “Biden Re-Examining U.S. Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia, U.A.E.,” WSJ: “The Biden administration has imposed a temporary freeze on U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia and is scrutinizing purchases by the United Arab Emirates as it reviews billions of dollars in weapons transactions approved by former President Donald Trump, according to U.S. officials.
“The review, the officials said, includes the sale of precision-guided munitions to Riyadh, as well as top-line F-35 fighters to Abu Dhabi, a deal that Washington approved as part of the Abraham Accords, in which the Emirates established diplomatic relations with Israel.”
— “Biden confronts Russia — and Republicans are listening,” by Andrew Desiderio: “Congressional Republicans quietly grumbled for four years that former President Donald Trump’s passive rhetoric about Russia didn’t match the severity of his administration’s actions targeting the Kremlin. …
“Now, President Joe Biden’s more aggressive public posture toward Vladimir Putin is begrudgingly refreshing for Republicans — and it’s something they wish they saw from Trump.”
THIS AND THAT
A MONTH?! — “You can rent D.C. home of Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner for $18,000 a month. Take a look,” by McClatchy
— “Biden brother touts relationship with president in Inauguration Day ad for law firm,” CNBC: “Frank Biden is a non-attorney senior advisor for the Berman Law Group. The firm is based in Boca Raton, Florida. Its ad featuring Frank Biden was printed in the Jan. 20 edition of the Daily Business Review, which is also based in Florida. …
“The ad focuses on a lawsuit the firm is leading against a group of Florida sugar cane companies. It features a photo of Frank Biden, along with quotes regarding his relationship with the incoming president and the family name. … In an email to CNBC, Frank Biden said he has not used his brother’s name to gain clients.”
SAN FRANCISCO DOES SAN FRANCISCO — AP: “The names of Abraham Lincoln, George Washington and other prominent figures including California Sen. Dianne Feinstein will be removed from 44 San Francisco public schools, a move that stirred debate Wednesday on whether the famously liberal city has taken the national reckoning on America’s racist past too far.”
FOR THOSE WHO ARE EVEN FLYING — WSJ: “The Best and Worst U.S. Airlines of 2020”
PLAYBOOKERS
SPOTTED: Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) dining indoors at Alberto’s on Capitol Hill on Wednesday night. … Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) having dinner together at Sushi Hachi. … Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) having dinner with Victoria Coates on Wednesday night at the Capital Grille.
MEDIAWATCH — Protocol has launched “Protocol | China,” featuring a slate of stories and David Wertime’s newsletter.
FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — Gillum Ferguson is now deputy comms director for Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.). He previously was press secretary for Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, and is a Department of Education alum.
— STAFFING UP: Francisco Bencosme is now senior adviser in the East Asian and Pacific Affairs Bureau at the State Department. He most recently was senior policy adviser at Open Society Foundations.
VIRGINIA GOV RACE HEATING UP — Jennifer Carroll Foy’s gubernatorial campaign has hired Sharon Yang as press secretary. She previously was deputy comms director for Jon Ossoff’s Senate campaign. … Glenn Youngkin’s new gubernatorial campaign has hired Matt Wolking as comms director (previously deputy comms director for the Trump campaign), Macaulay Porter as press secretary (previously associate director of comms at the White House) and Robbie Myers as digital director (previously digital director for HUD Secretary Ben Carson).
TRANSITIONS — Patrick Hovakimian is joining Pillsbury’s litigation practice as a partner. He most recently was associate deputy A.G. … Jordan Howard is now legislative director for Rep. Jerry Carl (R-Ala.). He previously was a legislative assistant and scheduler for Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.).
WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Sara Roszak, VP of pharmacy care and health strategy at the National Association of Chain Drug Stores and VP of research at NACDS Foundation, and Andrew Roszak, executive director of the Institute for Childhood Preparedness, welcomed Rachel Stella Roszak on Tuesday.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Justice Amy Coney Barrett … Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) … Reps. Antonio Delgado (D-N.Y.), Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.) … Lael Brainard … POLITICO’s Peter King … Bloomberg’s Justin Fox … former Reps. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.) and Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.) … Maria Comella … Skip Rutherford, dean of the Clinton School of Public Service … Millennial Action Project’s Baline Volpe … University of South Alabama Health System’s Danny Rickert … CNN’s Jay McMichael … USA Today’s Courtney Subramanian … Nicolas Sarkozy … Sheamus
Got a document to share? A birthday coming up? Did you record the Deese lunch meeting? Drop us a line at politicoplaybook@politico.com or individually: Rachael Bade, Eugene Daniels, Ryan Lizza, Tara Palmeri.
Playbook couldn’t happen without our editor Mike Zapler and producers Allie Bice, Eli Okun and Garrett Ross.
Follow us on Twitter
26.) AMERICAN MINUTE
Explorers circumnavigate Earth: Magellan & Drake to Space Shuttle – American Minute with Bill Federer
27.) CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
28.) CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
29.) PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Sycophant Press Can’t Cover for Biden’s Opening Train Wreck
Not Enough Lipstick for Biden’s Pig of a First Week
Happy Thursday, my dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. I’ve been going a little overboard with the kimchi these past couple of weeks.
I’ve been off on this thing about seeking out new experiences wherever and whenever I can lately. A lot of that has to do with the birthday I’ve got staring me in the face (I’ll be 146 in March — I moisturize) and also because I’ve been at home and working and not leaving town for almost a freakin’ year now and the stir crazy is all over my brain.
I began traveling a different kind of political path in 2016. While being immersed in politics at a time when emotions were running rather high, I discovered a way to just check out and not let it bother me anymore. I explored the journey in a short book I wrote titled Straight Outta Feelings: Politcal Zen in the Age of Outrage. If you’re thinking I was just looking for a way to get in a shameless plug for the book, you’re wrong.
There is no shame whatsoever involved when a capitalist plugs his work in an effort to make a buck.
I did have another reason though. Despite how I may seem to be here, my 2016 path continues. I want to make sure that every day stays that way.
What’s been happening since the first of the year is that I’ve been anticipating what might happen with this new president. That’s not exactly the road to calm. It’s the road to worry. Worry is agitating.
So I’ve decided that my new experience will be not trying to figure out what Old Joe is going to do. My new mantra is “Let Biden Happen.”
Well, he’s happening all over the place.
We’re soon going to need NASA computers to track the number of executive orders issuing forth from the puppet president. It’s no big secret that conservative folks like me aren’t thrilled with any of them. It would seem, however, that Biden may be doing some bipartisan stepping on of the toes.
My colleague Beth Baumann has a post at our sister site Townhall about the buyer’s remorse four congressional Democrats are already experiencing over one of those orders:
Democrats were all in for then-candidate Joe Biden. Their goal was simple: get President Donald Trump out of office. They were willing to do anything and everything to make sure that happened. And now, four Texas Democrats are regretting their decision to back Biden. The reason: his latest executive order putting a halt to federal land being leased to oil and gas companies for energy.
The four members of Congress – Reps. Vincente Gonzalez, Lizzie Fletcher, Henry Cuellar, and Marc Veasey – sent a letter to Biden, asking him to rescind the order.
One week isn’t much of a honeymoon for a new president.
The news for Ol’ Gropes gets worse when we take a look at how voters are feeling.
President Biden has signed more than 30 Executive Orders since his inauguration, but his rhetoric or priorities aren’t resonating with voters. While much of what he has done was entirely predictable, some groups, like labor unions, still seem astonished.
Biden’s first Daily Presidential Tracking Poll put him into negative approval territory at -2. It has gotten worse. On Monday, he dropped to -4. Tuesday, he moved down again to -5. This trend is quite a feat. President Trump started at +2 and rose to +13 in the first days of his presidency. He began to decline with an onslaught of negative and cynical coverage regarding the so-called Muslim ban.
Biden has received very little negative coverage, with much of the corporate media applauding his early moves because they align with the liberal gentry’s priorities. However, even groups that endorsed him have indicated they are disappointed in his energy policy decisions and the Executive Order on gender identity. That has not stopped the flurry of executive actions, though. Yesterday was “equity day,” and President Biden signed additional deeply unpopular orders.
Very little negative coverage indeed. I scour the news on the days that I do this Briefing and I’ve mostly been seeing a lot of gushing about Biden’s dogs and reminders that he is the greatest Catholic since Mother Teresa. The rest of the time the press is continuing airing out their myriad daddy issues by complaining about the president they couldn’t wait to get rid of.
If he’s not tracking well after getting fluffed for seven days by the mainstream media they may have to be honest about him on occasion here soon. I won’t be holding my breath, of course — I’m not anticipating, remember? Still it could happen.
President Biden has an unhealthy preoccupation with undoing everything President Trump did but the simple fact is that a lot of Trump’s policies made Democrats’ lives better too. Biden and his handlers are being driven by blind ideology. They’re also all deep Swamp Washington elitists who have almost no connection to everyday Americans and have no idea what us commoners want and need.
Empty Joe is already firmly in the clutches of Big Green, and that’s a lobby that’s run by upper echelon financial interests that are wealthy enough to be insulated from the financial havoc they wreak. Mayor Pete’s promise of better, higher paying green jobs somewhere down the road is a load of garbage. The new Commerce Secretary nominee was cavalier about raising taxes to pay for the green agenda. How is that going to resonate with people who have just spent a year in the grips of financial devastation?
Team Biden will no doubt try to blame Trump for as many things as they can for as long as they can.
Broke people may not be very open to that spin.
An Incredible, Enduring Talent. #RIP
Cloris Leachman’s Heartbreaking ‘Last Picture Show’ Performance Is an Acting Masterclass https://t.co/btbUaRAcle
— Variety (@Variety) January 28, 2021
These Chats Have Become Pretty Epic. Come Day Drink With Us.
THURSDAY AT 3:30PM EASTERN: VIP Gold Live Chat with Preston, Kruiser, VodkaPundit https://t.co/xuutjCgk7d
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) January 27, 2021
Everything Isn’t Awful
Dancing duo encourages families to embrace the bond between father and son ❤️ https://t.co/soPTUITzpl pic.twitter.com/GUAOsP7OGz
— Good Morning America (@GMA) January 27, 2021
PJM Linktank
VodkaPundit: Insanity Wrap #133: China Virus, China Virus, China Virus
The Show Trials and Purges Are Just Getting Started
Tracing the Roots of the Left’s New Domestic ‘War on Terror’
Unity Watch: Biden’s Radical Abortion Policies Alienate Americans, Even Democrats
#MeTwo: There Will Be No 2021 MLB Hall of Fame Inductees, Thanks to the ‘Character Clause’
Washington, D.C. Won’t Become a State, But Not for the Reasons NBC Claims
Washington and Lincoln Canceled by San Francisco School Board
Treacher: When Will Biden Apologize for Accusing the Capitol Police of Racism?
How Many Millions of Jobs Will Be Lost if Democrats Raise Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour?
Democrats’ ‘For the People Act’ Is the Opposite of What the People Want
I’m @stephenkruiser on Gab. Now Having a Gab or Parler Account Can Get You Fired
Chick-fil-A Saves the Day, Fixes City’s Vaccination Snafu
Elder: Democrats Want a ‘Return to Civility’; When Did They Practice It?
V.D.H. The ‘After Trump’ Era Begins
VIP
Cancel Culture Comes for Disney’s ‘Jungle Cruise’ Because Cannibals Aren’t Bad or Something
Trump Derangement Syndrome, Evangelicals, and Christianity Today
Biden’s Gift to Iran on Holocaust Remembrance Day
VIP Gold
Biden Looking to Mandate COVID-19 Tests Before Flying Domestically, but Is It Worth It?
From the Mothership and Beyond
Joe Biden’s tech – what can the president use?
Schlichter: Stop the Third Party Insanity
I’d prefer he just shut up. John Kerry Should Lecture His Own Family About Carbon Emissions
Little late. Judge: Virginia’s ‘No Postmark’ Rule Change for Ballots Violated the Law
Church calls for change in UK medical practices after death of coma patient
Legislator Wants To Make Ohio A Second Amendment Sanctuary
NYPD Making More Than A Dozen Gun Arrests Per Day
Kansas Firearms Company Unveils 9mm “Smart Gun”
Tesla reports its first annual profit
Kira: Dear Teachers: Get Back to School or Hit the Pavement
Did Biden Just Plagiarize… AOC?
Biden Bans Term ‘China Virus,’ But Strangely, MSM Is Still Cool Calling Variants by Location Names
Adam Carolla Chews Up and Spits Out Newsom’s Ridiculous Lockdown and Sorry Leadership
Morning Consult: Half Of All Republicans Want Trump Playing A “Major Role” In The GOP
Politico Canceled Guest Slot For Guy Benson And MK Ham After The Newsroom Blowup Over Ben Shapiro
Results Of Another Vaccine Trial Will Be Available In A Matter Of Days
From WFH Write-Offs to Stimulus Payments: We’re Answering 7 COVID-Related Tax Questions
‘How dare they thwart’: CNN discovers how checks and balances can thwart President Biden’s agenda
Reconstructing the Menu of a Pub in Ancient Pompeii
Bee Me
Biden All-Female Communications Team Won’t Tell Nation What’s Wrong, Nation Should Already Know https://t.co/ausOAlNPwc
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) January 27, 2021
The Kruiser Kabana
— 11:11 (@11hr11min) January 24, 2021
Here’s Rickles doing an interview for a local show and killing. No audience, just the interviewer and the crew, and he’s bringing it. No let up.
There are dumb questions, by the way.
___
Kruiser on Parler
Kruiser on MeWe
Kruiser on Twitter
Kruiser on Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.
30.) WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
Editor
White House Dossier
http://www.whitehousedossier.com
P.O. Box 27211,
Washington, DC 20038
Unsubscribe Change subscriber options
31.) THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: What’s the Deal With GameStop?
Plus: Who might have been behind the thwarted missile strikes on Riyadh.
The Dispatch Staff | 9 min ago | 1 |
Happy Thursday! Today’s Morning Dispatch turned out totally differently than the way we drew it up yesterday morning. You’ll see.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- President Joe Biden signed a sweeping executive order on Wednesday geared toward addressing what he called a “profound climate crisis.” The order defines climate considerations as an “essential element of United States foreign policy and national security,” suspends oil and natural gas leasing on federal lands, and creates a new presidentially appointed position, the special presidential envoy for climate.
- Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Wednesday that interest rates will remain near zero. The Fed will also continue its bond-purchase programs until unemployment decreases and the United States reaches its goal of 2 percent inflation.
- Fulfilling a campaign promise, the Biden administration has reportedly begun staffing a bipartisan commission intended to study possible reforms to the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary. Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and former assistant attorney general in the Bush Department of Justice, is among those selected to serve on the commission thus far.
- The World Health Organization issued interim guidance this week recommending pregnant women avoid the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines unless they are at a high risk of exposure. “WHO recommends not to use mRNA-1273 in pregnancy, unless the benefit of vaccinating a pregnant woman outweighs the potential vaccine risks, such as in health workers at high risk of exposure and pregnant women with co-morbidities placing them in a high-risk group for severe Covid-19,” the report said.
- Acting D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee III said this week that another police officer who was on duty during the January 6 Capitol attack, Jeffery Smith, died by suicide on January 15. Capitol Police Officer Howard Liebengood also died by suicide on January 9, three days after the riot, and Officer Brian Sicknick died after sustaining injuries during the insurrection. “Between USCP and our colleagues at the Metropolitan Police Department, we have almost 140 officers injured,” Gus Papathanasiou, the chair of the Capitol Police Labor Committee said in a statement. “I have officers who were not issued helmets prior to the attack who have sustained brain injuries. One officer has two cracked ribs and two smashed spinal discs. One officer is going to lose his eye, and another was stabbed with a metal fence stake.”
- The Biden administration is reportedly temporarily freezing arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and launching a review of the Trump administration’s transactions with both countries.
- Chicago Public Schools once again delayed a return to in-person learning on Wednesday as the Chicago Teachers Union moves closer to a strike over coronavirus concerns despite evidence that schools do not significantly contribute to transmission of COVID-19. “Frankly, there is no good reason why we shouldn’t have an agreement at this time,” CPS CEO Dr. Janice Jackson said.
- The United States confirmed 151,194 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday per the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard, with 9.4 percent of the 1,601,364 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 3,800 deaths were attributed to the virus on Wednesday, bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 428,862. According to the COVID Tracking Project, 107,444 Americans are currently hospitalized with COVID-19. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 47,230,950 COVID-19 vaccine doses have been distributed nationwide, and 24,652,634 have been administered.
GameStop Goes Gangbusters
Readers of a certain age may remember GameStop as the place they used to swap used PS3 games in the mid-2000s; older readers may have hardly heard of it at all. But this week, the brick-and-mortar video game retailer has been at the center of one of the strangest stock market stories in years—one that’s pitted Wall Street hedge funds against a spontaneous mob of online iconoclasts who have a bone to pick with the financial system.
Many consumers have shifted to primarily purchasing digital copies rather than physical copies of games in recent years. This has been brutal for GameStop, which watched its share price sag lower and lower from 2015 until last year. For most of 2019 and 2020, the company’s stock could be had for less than $10 a share. But the company has recently seen a modest resurgence in its fortunes after e-commerce whiz Ryan Cohen acquired a large stake and announced plans to pivot toward online retail. The stock hit $20 on January 12, $30 a day later, and $40 a day after that.
But all that was pennies compared to what came next. Over the last few days, the stock simply exploded. $76 on Monday. $148 on Tuesday. Yesterday, shares closed the day at $347, and it’s unclear whether that will be the ceiling.
What fueled this insane spike? A gaggle of largely small-dollar traders in the Reddit community r/WallStreetBets, an online forum for hobbyists and professionals to discuss market speculation and day-trading. Bear with us here; this gets a little technical.
Earlier this month, members of the community had realized something: Despite GameStop’s improving fortunes, several large hedge funds and money managers were still heavily invested in shorts against the retailer. Put simply, this meant they’d put significant money on the proposition that the stock would soon drop back to more GameStop-standard levels.
Dual Attacks on Riyadh
Saudi Arabia’s capital of Riyadh was the target of two attempted drone and missile strikes over the past several days, but onlookers are having a tough time pointing to the intercepted objects’ origins. Charlotte turned to the experts for a piece on the site to uncover why two different insurgent groups may have been behind the thwarted attacks. One state actor—Iran—almost certainly played a hand.
What were the interceptions like from the ground?
Astute observers anticipated the collisions before they happened, having tracked flight diversions from the capital city and speculated about their purpose. Others—even those who heard the blasts first-hand—didn’t discover their source until much later. Although the U.S. Embassy released a statement informing Americans of the first thwarted strike and warning that they “stay alert in case of additional future attacks,” Saudi officials refrained from actively publicizing the attacks.
“I was home when the drone was intercepted Saturday morning. I heard a very loud double ‘Boom!’, one almost on top of the other. It was so loud I had one of those, ‘What the heck?’ moments,” Robert Godley, an American expat living in Riyadh, told The Dispatch. “I really had no idea what it was, but I am near a major city artery, so I thought it might be a car crash, though it didn’t really sound like one. I didn’t know it was a drone strike when a good friend and colleague showed me the video his brother had taken of the intercept.”
Why may Yemen’s Houthis have carried out the attacks?
Saudi Arabia entered the Yemeni civil war in 2015 amid concerns about the rebel group’s apparent ties to Iran and fear of insurrectionists on its southern border. In the years since, the conflict has escalated into one of the most devastating humanitarian crises worldwide. Iran and Saudi Arabia have been battling it out indirectly in Yemen, using the country as a testing ground for emerging weaponry.
“It’s been the single greatest number of missile defense engagements, as well as an extremely significant number of air and missile attacks, UAVs, cruise missiles, and other various kinds,” Tom Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told The Dispatch. “The Iranians have been using the Yemen conflict as a place to try out a lot of weapons over the past several years. In that respect, the two drone or missile attacks are part of a much larger phenomenon.”
Given the geographical distance between Yemen’s border and Riyadh—more than 400 miles—the Houthis have taken to attacking Saudi infrastructure elsewhere in the country. But striking the heart of the kingdom is not impossible, particularly given the influx of Iranian ballistic missiles to Yemen. In June 2020, the rebel group deployed eight armed drones and several ballistic missiles to Riyadh, Najran, and Jazan. Earlier that year, the Royal Saudi Air Defense Forces intercepted two ballistic missiles over the capital city. During 2017, four different ballistic missile attacks out of Yemen shook Riyadh.
Why may an Iraq-based militia supported by Iran be responsible?
Another group—a newly formed Iran-backed militia in Iraq called Alwiya Alwaad Alhaq—released a statement claiming that they, in fact, had carried out Saturday’s attack in retaliation for ISIS’s attack on Baghdad that killed 34.
Although it’s unclear where the new militia is situated within Iraq, the distance from the southern border of Iraq to Riyadh is only about 300 miles. And Al-Qabas, Kuwait’s newspaper, released a report last month confirming the deployment of precision-guided missiles and drones to south Iraq along with two units of officers.
“I think that this follows an emerging pattern of Iraq-based militias targeting Saudi Arabia. We saw this most clearly in May 2019 when there was an attack on a Saudi oil pipeline. Initially, everyone thought it was the Houthis, but the U.S. later concluded that it came from Iraq,” Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran, told The Dispatch. “You see Iraq becoming a very important theater for Iran to use to project its power and carry out its malign interference around the region.”
Worth Your Time
- Before the Capitol insurrection, the right’s economic populist politicians—namely Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz—thought they were in a good place. They’d spent weeks drumming up support among their colleagues to vote against certifying the Electoral College vote, and they were thought of by most bystanders as the natural successors to Trump’s nationalist populist GOP. Enter the January 6 Capitol siege—and weeks of “Stop the Steal” nonsense that preceded that fateful day—and now right-wing populism has become synonymous with insurrection and unthinking loyalty to Donald Trump. Looking toward the future of the movement, Ross Douthat now thinks that “any attempt to build a conservative populism after Trump is likely to be sucked into the vortex of crazy around the former president.”
- As the coronavirus has eaten away at our social lives, most people have tried their best to stay in contact with their closest friends and family members. But what about those individuals who linger on the outskirts of our lives? “They’re the people on the periphery of your life—the guy who’s always at the gym at the same time as you, the barista who starts making your usual order while you’re still at the back of the line, the co-worker from another department with whom you make small talk on the elevator,” writes Amanda Mull in The Atlantic this week. Maybe you’ve never spoken to the guy at the gym. Maybe you don’t know your barista. But to some degree, all of these people used to be a part of your daily routine. Perhaps the pandemic will help us appreciate the different categories of friendship that make life fulfilling. “My hope is that people will realize that there’s more people in their social networks that matter and provide some kind of value than just those few people that you spend time with, and have probably managed to keep up with during the break,” said one of the researchers Mull interviewed.
- This piece, from National Review’s Dan McLaughlin, is among the most thorough and well-reasoned cases for impeaching and convicting Donald Trump that we’ve seen. The essay is framed as a response to two writers who disagree, and McLaughlin calmly and politely dissects their arguments one by one. “One might say that Democrats mishandled the impeachment, but that assumes that they ever had any interest in conviction. They do not. It is Republicans who would benefit from Trump being formally sanctioned,” he writes. “The argument for acquittal is, in essence, the argument of nihilism and despair: that so long as a president has some popular base within his own party, it does not matter what he does, it does not matter what the standard for impeachment is, it does not even matter if his conduct in office is a direct, existential threat to the continuation of the American system bequeathed to us by the Founders.”
- A few days before Trump left office, then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo concluded that “[Chinese] authorities have conducted forced sterilizations and abortions on Uyghur women, coerced them to marry non-Uyghurs, and separated Uyghur children from their families.” As Eugene Kontorovich, director of the Center for the Middle East and International Law at George Mason University’s Scalia Law School, writes in the Wall Street Journalthis week, “it is now America’s official, bipartisan position that China is engaged in ‘ongoing’ genocide—the gravest of all international crimes.” How will private companies react? They “may carry on any lawful business they choose, and the genocide determination carries no concrete legal consequences,” Kontorovich writes. “But for companies that profess a commitment to some higher good, or to a doctrine of corporate social responsibility, this will be revelatory. Are their policies truly motivated by a concern for justice and minority rights, or by some combination of expiatory ritual and a narrow partisan agenda?”
- Today is the 35th anniversary of the tragic space shuttle Challenger explosion. Seven heroes died that day, when, just over a minute after launch, the spacecraft broke apart and disintegrated over the Atlantic Ocean. Millions of Americans witnessed the disaster in real time on their television screens. Today, it’s worth taking a few minutes to watch President Reagan’s address to the nation following the explosion, as a reminder of the power a leader’s words can have in times of crisis or anguish. Then, read Tevi Troy’s reflection on the speech. “One of Reagan’s many gifts was his strong sense of optimism, which informed his positive view of America,” he writes. “To Reagan, there was no obstacle that America could not overcome. In this speech, given in the midst of tragedy, it was essential to convey that tragedy would not get in the way of the essential American characteristics of innovation and exploration. While Reagan recognized the tragedy that had just taken place, and was careful to read the names of each of the seven fallen, he also did not express regret about the endeavor. In his praise of innovation was a recognition that there is inherent risk – and at times mortal danger – in order to attain technological and civilizational advancement.”
Presented Without Comment
Portman adviser Corry Bliss: “If you want to spend all your time on FOX and be[ing] an asshole, there’s never been a better time to serve. But if you want to spend your time being thoughtful and getting shit done, there’s never been a worse time to serve”
Also Presented Without Comment
Toeing the Company Line
- In his latest French Press (🔒), David gets at the heart of one of America’s biggest political fault lines: “The most important battle in American politics isn’t between right and left, but between truth and lies.” From QAnon to “Stop the Steal,” conspiracy theories are on the rise everywhere. Can defamation lawsuits break this misinformation fever? David argues we should use the “instruments of law to impose legal consequences for unlawful action while also engaging in good faith and open hearts with the vast bulk of the population that isn’t fully committed to its false narrative.”
- In the “deindustrialization myth busters” edition of his Capitolism newsletter (🔒), Scott Lincicome explains why we shouldn’t rely on protectionist trade wars and industrial policies to prop up the American manufacturing sector, given recent data on output, investment, and financial performance show “a large and dynamic industrial base that remains a global powerhouse.”
- On Wednesday’s episode of the Dispatch Podcast, Sarah and the guys discuss vaccine distribution logistics, Trump’s upcoming impeachment trial, certain media outlets’ rewriting of history, and the latest drama with former DOJ officials in the Trump administration.
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Haley Byrd Wilt (@byrdinator), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
1 |
32.) LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
33.) THE DAILY WIRE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
34.) DESERET NEWS
|
35.) BRIGHT
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
36.) AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
37.) LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
|
||||||||
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE— Republicans will be defending more Senate seats than Democrats in 2022, but both sides have some potential pickup opportunities — though a large gain for either party seems unlikely. — Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) would have been an overwhelming favorite to win a third term, but even with his retirement, Ohio’s rightward lean makes it an uphill climb for Democrats. — Democrats’ clearest path to gaining seats runs primarily though the Rust Belt, as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin seem to be their top offensive races, though they may finally get lucky in North Carolina. — We rate four states — Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and New Hampshire — as Leans Democratic, and these seem to be the most obvious GOP targets. — There will likely be more retirements this cycle, but they probably won’t change the fundamental picture. Another first-term Democratic Class III midtermA few weeks after the 2020 election, the Crystal Ball put out an early look at the 2022 Senate races. Since then, President Biden has been sworn in, and with dual wins in Georgia, Democrats went on to claim a 50-50 majority in the chamber, via Vice President Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote. As the 2022 election cycle begins in earnest, we’re putting out our initial Senate ratings. The last time 2022’s Senate map, known more formally as the Class III map, was up in a midterm year, voters were rendering judgement on another Democratic president who had just taken over after replacing a Republican. In 2010, Democrats, during President Obama’s first midterm, were on the defensive, as they had a hefty 59-seat majority in the chamber. While Republicans ended up netting six seats that year, and reducing Obama’s majority in the chamber to 53-47, Democrats were overexposed: Three of their losses were in Arkansas, Indiana, and North Dakota — by today’s standards, it may seem baffling that they held those seats in the first place. For 2022, the playing field should be much narrower. Republicans will hold 20 of the 34 states up to Democrats’ 14 — both sides have a few offensive opportunities, but a six-seat gain for either side, like we saw in 2010 with this class, seems unlikely. Democrats have not had a truly good year with the Class III map since 1986, when they netted eight seats, to take the majority, during Ronald Reagan’s second midterm. With the chamber tied at 50-50, both sides have little room for error. With that, here are our initial ratings: Map 1: Crystal Ball 2022 Senate ratingsThe problem for Democrats? In last year’s presidential contest, Ohio barely budged. Though there was some internal movement from 2016’s result — the suburbs generally shifted more Democratic while working class and rural areas continued to redden — Trump held the state by a 53%-45% vote. In an era where senatorial results are increasingly tied to a state’s presidential preference, Trump’s margins bode well for GOP prospects in Ohio, particularly with a Democrat in the White House (the president’s party often loses ground down-ballot in midterm elections). There is no shortage of potential Republicans who could run to replace Portman. Aside from Sen. Sherrod Brown’s (D-OH) Senate seat, the GOP holds all of Ohio’s partisan statewide offices, and has enjoyed a 12 to 4 advantage in the state’s House delegation since 2012. For years, state Democrats have been waiting for Youngstown-area Rep. Tim Ryan (D, OH-13) to take the plunge and run statewide. This cycle, he may be forced into it, and he announced that he was considering running on Wednesday. With the state set to lose a House seat, Ryan could soon find himself without a constituency. For 2012, Republican mappers drew Ryan into a safe seat — but his district has since become much more marginal, and it could easily take in more GOP-leaning areas or be dissolved entirely. With Portman out, we rate Ohio as Likely Republican. Democrats look to Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North CarolinaThe sole Toss-up Senate race to start the 2022 cycle is Pennsylvania. A reformist conservative with an interest in fiscal issues, two-term Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) has long advocated for term limits. In the House, he stuck to his pledge to serve only three terms (he went on to lose a Senate primary in 2004), and he’s called for a two-term limit for senators — in October, he was again true to form and announced he’d retire. Almost immediately after Toomey’s retirement news, Democrats began mentioning Lt. Gov. John Fetterman (D-PA). A towering figure who looks uncomfortable in a suit (to the extent one would ever see him wearing one), he ran for Toomey’s Senate seat in 2016, but lost the primary. With a base in the Pittsburgh area — he was mayor of Braddock, a borough just east of the Steel City — he had better luck in 2018. Fetterman, along with four other Democrats, took on the then-embattled lieutenant governor, Mike Stack, in the primary. Stack finished a poor fourth place, but geography was decisive. In Pennsylvania, a candidate’s home county is listed next to their name on the ballot — in statewide primaries, this makes for some intensely regional results. Against four candidates who were based in the Philadelphia metro area, Fetterman dominated in western Pennsylvania and got the nomination (Map 2). Map 2: 2018 Democratic lieutenant governor primary, PennsylvaniaOn the GOP side, Houlahan’s predecessor, former Rep. Ryan Costello (R, PA-6) is looking like a senatorial candidate. Though any number of other Republicans could run, Costello’s biggest obstacle is that the Philadelphia area is making up a declining portion of the state Republican electorate. According to historical voter registration data, in 2000, about one-third of registered Republicans in Pennsylvania lived in the Philadelphia metro area (the city proper plus the four “collar counties”) — as of June 2020, that number was down to less than one-quarter. On another historical note, if the general election ends up a match between Fetterman and Costello, it would be the first open Pennsylvania Senate race since 1980 to feature a western Democrat and an eastern Republican. Either way, as the sole Biden-won state to feature an open seat Senate contest (at least for now), Pennsylvania seems like Democrats’ best pick-up opportunity. Wisconsin is the only other Biden state that Republicans are defending this cycle. Originally elected in 2010 with support from the Tea Party movement, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) defeated then-Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), a progressive icon in the state. Johnson then, rather impressively, survived a 2016 rematch. In the heat of that rematch, he told voters he was running for his final term. Then, in early 2019, Johnson began backtracking on his pledge and now seems outright non-committal. If he retires, Republicans from the state’s House delegation or legislature will likely look at the race — though Johnson himself first won by running as a businessman with no prior elected experience, a template others could follow. Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, who is Black and has a base in Milwaukee, is seen as a top Democratic prospect and Outagamie County Executive Tom Nelson is running. As with Rep. Ryan in Ohio, if longtime Rep. Ron Kind (D, WI-3) is dealt an unfavorable hand in redistricting, he could finally launch a statewide run. Kind had the closest race of his career in 2020, and his western district could easily absorb redder turf. Until the playing field here is more certain, we’re giving the incumbent the benefit of the doubt in Wisconsin, and keeping it at Leans Republican. Though it’s an open seat, North Carolina joins Wisconsin in our Leans Republican category. In presidential and senatorial contests, the results in this light red state have often been close, but it’s wound up on the GOP side since 2010. Former Rep. Mark Walker (R, NC-6), who was squeezed out of Congress due to a court-ordered redistricting last cycle, was the first major Republican in the race. A pastor who rose to chair the large Republican Study Committee during his time in Congress, Walker seems like a candidate who could be broadly acceptable to all factions of his party. Former President Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara, is originally from the coastal city of Wilmington and is reportedly weighing a senatorial campaign. As an aside, Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, has also been mentioned as a senatorial candidate, in Florida — she’d be running in a primary against Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), though we don’t expect it to be one of the cycle’s marquee races. On Tuesday, Jeff Jackson, a media-savvy state senator from south Charlotte, entered the Democratic primary. Jackson has been a fixture in state Democratic politics for several years, but his biography as a white male veteran with legislative experience may trigger comparisons, fairly or not, to the party’s most recent senatorial nominee, Cal Cunningham. During the 2020 campaign, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) was criticized for the optics it created by heavy-handedly backing Cunningham over his main primary opponent, then-state Sen. Erica Smith, a Black woman. Smith is running again, though she didn’t do herself any favors with Democratic voters when she recently endorsed some Republicans. Former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley, the first Black woman to ever lead that court, was narrowly ousted last year and would be a potentially strong candidate. Though judicial races were non-partisan then, Beasley won a full term on the state Supreme Court in 2014, even as the late Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC) was defeated (state judicial races have been partisan since 2017). Justice Anita Earls, another Black woman who currently sits on the state Supreme Court is also being mentioned. Republican offensive opportunities are (mostly) in the Sun BeltRepublicans will be defending more Senate seats than Democrats in 2022, but they still have several pickup opportunities. Though the Crystal Ball doesn’t currently see any races as sure-fire flips, the four states that we rate as Leans Democratic seem like the GOP’s most realistic targets. Fresh off of overseeing the DSCC’s successful effort to win back the chamber’s majority, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) is running for a second term. In recent cycles, Democrats have generally won Nevada by slight, but consistent margins. In fact, of the 50 states, it saw the least movement between the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections — Biden’s 2.4% edge in the state was unchanged from Hillary Clinton’s margin. Essentially, Nevada may be to Republicans what North Carolina is to Democrats: a state that typically leans the other way, but is winnable under the right circumstances. Whatever candidate Republicans end up running against her, it’s safe to say that Cortez Masto will want to make sure the famous “Reid machine” is firing on all cylinders in late 2022. Named for her predecessor, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), the Reid machine can hold Republicans at bay. When the Democrats’ vaunted Las Vegas-area turnout operation is strong — like in 2016, 2018, and 2020 — it keeps the state blue. But when it’s not — like in 2014 — Republicans can win in Nevada. Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), who’s just now unboxing materials as he moves into his new office, will be up again next year. Though he won his runoff concurrently with now-fellow Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) earlier this month, Ossoff’s race was for a full six-year term, while Warnock was elected to serve out the last two years of the term that former Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA) won in 2016. The good news for Democrats is that Warnock was the stronger performer — he prevailed by 2.1%, instead of Ossoff’s 1.2%, and got almost 20,000 more raw votes — so it seems like, of the two, he’d be better positioned for an immediate encore performance. During the first phase of his 2020 campaign, Warnock had to navigate an all-party jungle primary (Georgia uses that method for special elections). This time, the race will feature the usual partisan primaries. Former Rep. Doug Collins (R, GA-9), who ran in the special Senate primary but was squeezed out of the runoff, may run again. In the House, Collins, who hails from northeastern Georgia, was a staunch Trump advocate — though with the former president looking to get involved in Peach State gubernatorial politics, Collins could enter that Republican primary as a Trumpier alternative to Gov. Brian Kemp (R-GA). First-term Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, GA-14), who vocally occupies a space on the GOP caucus’ far-right, may find the bigger stage of the Senate more enticing. We’re giving Warnock the early advantage. Another Democratic winner of a 2020 special election who must now run in back-to-back cycles is Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ). As the husband of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D, AZ-8) and with a background as an astronaut, he was arguably Democrats’ best Senatorial recruit of the 2020 cycle. Kelly defeated then-Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) to finish out the term of the late John McCain, who was last reelected in 2016. An Arizona legend, McCain’s mavericky brand of Republicanism played well with the general electorate: He never lost a race in the state, and the state’s two Democratic senators cite him as their role model. But, to the delight of Democrats, the state Republican Party seems intent on going in a different, more Trumpian direction — McCain’s widow, who endorsed Biden, was among some prominent Republicans that the state party voted to censure this month (something she quipped was a “high honor”). Arizona Republicans also censured their sitting governor, Doug Ducey (R-AZ), for some measures that he put into place to contain the COVID pandemic. At this time last year, the term-limited Ducey was seen as a leading potential Senate candidate. In 2018, as Democrats made gains across the board in Arizona, he was reelected by a comfortable 56%-42%. But Arizona has not contained the pandemic well — according to Johns Hopkins University, the state has, at times, had the highest infection rate of any region in the world. In mid-2020, polling from OH Predictive Insights put him among the nation’s least popular governors, and Ducey recently ruled out a 2022 Senate run (though there is plenty of time for him to change his mind, as politicians often do). Kelly was one of 2020’s top fundraisers, raking in just short of $100 million for the cycle. This made his final 51%-49% margin over McSally seem a bit underwhelming, as he was typically posting more comfortable, though single-digit, leads in polling. Still, in the presidential race, Arizona was the closest state in the country, by raw vote margin — Biden claimed it by 10,457 votes. Given that most Democrats in competitive Senate races ran behind, or only slightly ahead of, Biden, it’s possible that McSally could have prevailed against a Democrat who lacked Kelly’s star power. The final state the Crystal Ball puts in the Leans Democratic category is New Hampshire. Aside from Illinois, a seat that Republicans were always going to have trouble holding, the Democrats’ only senatorial pickup in 2016 was the Granite State. Then-Gov. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) ousted first-term Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) by just over 1,000 votes — it was the closest senatorial race of that cycle. Last November, New Hampshire saw an uncommon level of ticket splitting. The state’s other senator, Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), was reelected by a 57%-41% vote — the best showing for a Democrat in the popular vote era — and Biden carried the state by a still-robust 53%-46%. But Granite Staters gave their Republican governor 65% of the vote. Voters further strengthened Sununu’s head in 2020 by giving him a GOP legislature — during his previous term, Democrats held majorities in both chambers of the state General Court. Last November, New Hampshire saw an uncommon level of ticket splitting. The state’s other senator, Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), won a third term by a 57%-41% vote — the best showing for a Democrat in the popular vote era — and Biden carried the state by a still-robust 53%-46%. But Granite Staters gave their Republican governor 65% of the vote. In fact, after working with a Democratic legislature during his previous term, voters strengthened Sununu’s hand in 2020 by giving him a GOP legislature. Still, Republicans may not want to govern too aggresively. With his party in control, any perceived GOP overreach could weaken Sununu’s crossover appeal. Likewise, over the past decade, former or sitting governors have struggled to win Senate races in states that lean towards the other party in presidential elections. Of the former governors serving in the current Senate, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) is the only Trump state Democrat while no Republicans represent Biden states. For her part, Hassan is no electoral slouch. It’s not easy to defeat popular incumbent senators, and in 2016, Ayotte had a 58% approval rating when she lost to Hassan — this also marked only the second time that a woman incumbent was defeated by another woman (the first was the 2008 North Carolina Senate race). A word on a few Safe states — and retirementsBefore the last election cycle, we would probably have started Colorado off as Likely Democratic instead of Safe Democratic. But it just isn’t the purple state that it was a decade ago. In fact, Biden’s better-than 55%-42% margin made him the best-performing Democratic nominee there since Lyndon Johnson. Thinking shorter-term, Colorado was one of 14 states where Biden outperformed Obama’s 2008 result. Though he lost some ground in the state’s two rural congressional districts, Biden improved by over 10 percentage points in the 6th District, in suburban Denver — even the historically conservative 5th District, home to Colorado Springs, moved six points more Democratic between the years (Map 3). Map 3: Colorado, 2008 vs. 2020 by congressional districtThe Democrats’ large 2020 presidential primary field that also featured another Coloradan: Sen. Michael Bennet, who’s up for reelection this cycle. Bennet first won a full term in 2010 — his narrow victory that year was a bright spot for Democrats — but was reelected by a somewhat unimpressive 50%-44% in 2016. His previous two general election foes, now-Rep. Ken Buck (R, CO-4) and former El Paso County Commissioner Darryl Glenn, haven’t ruled out runs. Colorado’s electorate isn’t entirely made up of Denver-area liberals, but it’s starting to vote more like a Pacific Northwest state. Republicans certainly seem to have better targets — and as Hicklenlooper’s result shows, having a failed presidential run on his resume may not be a huge liability for Bennet. But do keep an eye on Colorado — if 2022 turns into another bad Democratic year along the lines of 2010 and 2014, we might see the race activate. The Democrats’ large 2020 presidential primary field that also featured another Coloradan: Sen. Michael Bennet, who’s up for reelection this cycle. Bennet first won a full term in 2010 — his narrow victory that year was a bright spot for Democrats — but was reelected by a somewhat unimpressive 50%-44% in 2016. His previous two general election foes, now-Rep. Ken Buck (R, CO-4) and former El Paso County Commissioner Darryl Glenn, haven’t ruled out runs. Colorado’s electorate isn’t entirely made up of Denver-area liberals, but it’s starting to vote more like a Pacific Northwest state. Republicans certainly seem to have better targets — and as Hicklenlooper’s result shows, having a failed presidential run on his resume may not be a huge liability for Bennet. But do keep an eye on Colorado — if 2022 turns into another bad Democratic year along the lines of 2010 and 2014, we might see the race activate. Going even further northwest, in 2020, the Last Frontier passed an electoral reform measure that we can see benefitting Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK). Measure 2, which voters narrowly approved, established an all-party primary where the top four candidates advanced to a ranked-choice general election. Murkowski is a moderate Republican who has cobbled together some diverse coalitions to claim pluralities in her previous campaigns. Though Trump promised to campaign against her, Murkowski would probably be the candidate who’s palatable to the broadest segment of the electorate, and thus would earn the most first or second-place votes. Finally, it’s still very early in the 2022 cycle. While there will almost certainly be more retirements, it’s unlikely that those departures would massively change the overall Senate picture. For Republicans, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Richard Shelby (R-AL), who are both approaching 90, seem like strong possibilities — Republicans would still be favored to hold both seats. Senate President pro tempore Pat Leahy (D-VT) was briefly hospitalized on Tuesday evening. While we wish Leahy well, he could feel some pressure to forgo seeking a ninth term in deep blue Vermont. With a 50-50 Senate, the majority is absolutely up for grabs. But the structure of the map gives the Democrats a fighting chance to hang on, or even establish a clearer majority — something Republicans did in 2018, albeit on a map that was much more favorable to them than this one is to Democrats. Read the fine printLearn more about the Crystal Ball and find out how to contact us here. Sign up to receive Crystal Ball e-mails like this one delivered straight to your inbox. Use caution with Sabato’s Crystal Ball, and remember: “He who lives by the Crystal Ball ends up eating ground glass!” |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
© Copyright by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia |
38.) THE BLAZE
View this email in your browser
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … President Joe Biden promised that families making under $400,000 a year would face no new taxes under his plans, but his nominee to head the Commerce Department must have not gotten that particular memo. Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo said during a Senate hearing Tuesday for her nomination that the administration would have to remain open to … Read more
You might like …
© 2021 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. Privacy Policy | Manage your preferences | Unsubscribe 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA
|
39.) THE FEDERALIST
|
The Federalist, 611 Pennsylvania Ave SE, #247, Washington, DC 20003, United States
40.) REUTERS
|
41.) NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Democrats seek to weaponize FBI against Parler
- Russell Moore is a useful idiot
- McCabe aware of exculpatory evidence before opening obstruction probe into Trump, documents show
- Is this the end of America?
- After murdering 15-yo girl in livestream, four teen girls eat lollipops and banter about their feelings
- Feds indict pro-Trump Twitter troll ‘Ricky Vaughn’ over memes shared during 2016 election
- Big Tech is suppressing information about writ of quo warranto, the ‘Trump play’
- How the destruction of grammar and logic got Biden into the Oval Office
Democrats seek to weaponize FBI against Parler
Posted: 28 Jan 2021 04:18 AM PST Author Robert Greene’s 15th Law of Power urges readers to “crush your enemy totally,” pointing out that “if one ember is left alight, no matter how dimly it smolders, a fire will eventually break out.” The left seems to be adhering to this when it comes to dealing with social media company Parler, which became popular among conservatives after dealing with biased censorship on other sites such as Twitter and Facebook. Article by Jeff Charles originally published at Liberty Nation. It was not enough to remove the site entirely from app stores and hosting services. Now, House Democrats are trying to use the FBI to take further action against the company under the guise of investigating the origins of the U.S. Capitol riot. But GOP lawmakers are pushing back. Democrats Call For FBI Investigation Into ParlerDemocrats on the House Oversight Committee have called for an FBI investigation to determine whether or not Parler was a “potential facilitator” in the planning of the assault on the Capitol building on Jan. 6. House Republicans on the committee argued that any FBI probe into social media should also include Facebook and Twitter instead of focusing only on Parler. They argued that the request, which came from committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, is “evidence” of the “growing alliance between Big Tech and Democrats.” Fox News reported, “Committee Ranking Member James Comer, R-Ky., and GOP Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., penned a letter to Maloney, D-N.Y., on Monday” after she made her request to the FBI. “Like you, we were disturbed and angered by the riot and we believe those responsible should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” they wrote. “But casting blame on a single social media company known for its conservative username while simply ignoring other social media companies known for sympathizing with liberal causes is blatantly and overtly partisan.” The lawmakers continued, “Moreover, your letter is additional evidence of the growing alliance between Big Tech and Democrats to muzzle certain viewpoints, opinions, and perspectives.” Republicans argue that Maloney’s insistence that Parler was a forum on which rioters planned their assault “completely omits the fact that other social media platforms were also facilitators of the January 6 riot.” They also pointed out that:
The representatives suggested that “[r]ather than limiting its investigation to Parler, then, perhaps the Committee should include Facebook and other social media companies in its request for an investigation into the antecedents of the January 6 Capitol riot.” Then, they took a thinly veiled shot at the relationship between Big Tech and Democrats. “Of course, doing so may upset Big Tech, which in turn could turn off the spigot of campaign contributions to Democrats.” But it wasn’t just an empty jab; the lawmakers brought up numbers. “During the 2020 election cycle Facebook employees contributed over $5 million in federal elections—92.79% of which went to Democrats,” they noted. “Twitter employees were even more generous to Democrats, with 98.41% of all federal contributions in the 2020 cycle going to Democrats.” The two lawmakers continued: “While Facebook, Twitter, and Parler seem to all share blame in allowing their platforms to be used to plan for the January 6 riot, one main difference between the three platforms is that Parler is the only one that hasn’t given generously to the Democrats.” What Does This Mean For Free Speech?It is hard to imagine that the Democrats are acting in good faith in this matter. As Steube and Comer pointed out in their letter, if Maloney and her allies were making an authentic plea for the Bureau to get to the bottom of the planning of the riots, including Twitter and Facebook in the assessment would be a no-brainer. Several left-leaning news outlets, such as Business Insider and Vox, noted that Twitter and Facebook platforms were used to plan the riots. Moreover, it is already known that radical leftist groups aligned with the Antifa movement have used these sites to plan their operations as well. Unfortunately, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee seem to be more interested in playing politics than realistically addressing the issue at hand, apparently willing to pull the FBI into their anti-free-speech efforts. They might be hoping that a federal investigation will give them even more ammo to destroy Parler. The nature of a potential FBI investigation into social media companies is not yet known, but if the Department of Justice acquiesces to the Democrats’ demands, it could set a dangerous precedent for other platforms that arise to compete with Twitter and Facebook. Needless to say, the thought of the Bureau being used as a weapon is chilling but not new. The nation saw some in the agency use their positions for political purposes in the 2016 election. Even if this particular effort to target Parler fails, it does not mean the left is finished. There will be more attempts to diminish conservative voices on the internet. The question is: How will conservatives fight back? ~ Read more from Jeff Charles. COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Democrats seek to weaponize FBI against Parler appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Russell Moore is a useful idiot
Posted: 28 Jan 2021 04:08 AM PST One of the easiest ways to oppose the church is to criticize Christians in communist magazines, like Time. Often Big Eva Woke Evangelicals have gained major publicity by badmouthing the church on a pagan platform, whether it be the New York Times, Washington Post, or in this case, Time Magazine. Russell Moore got to sound off on his thought on politics and the church to a pagan audience and it could not come across as more pretentious. The article is titled “Theologian Russell Moore Has a Message for Christians Who Still Worship Donald Trump.” Note, that this was not written by Russell Moore, but look at how Russell Moore is okay with being described.
Getting called God’s lobbyist is probably the most undeserved superfluous title that Russell Moore has ever been called. The article makes no mention of any accomplishments Russell Moore and the ERLC have had in their lobbying quest. After all where was the ERLC when government was locking down churches? Nowhere until Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed. But it’s not like the pagans will see through that. After going on about the false narrative of January 6th, Time writes:
You can tell by now that this is a fluff piece. If it’s not meant to read by pagans, it’s meant to be marketed to Big Eva from preventing some sort of no confidence vote of his performance and status. By being seen this way by Time Magazine, Russell Moore is improving his street cred for worldliness which Big Eva certainly values. Consider how the author continues:
The arrogant assessment of Russell Moore continues.
In this paragraph, we get some substance from Moore. Though unsurprising, he comes out in support woke Seminary presidents and professors. It cannot be any clearer that Russell Moore is an enemy within the church. Christians should not criticize the church in pagan settings any more than a husband should not demean his wife in front of his friends. There is a time and a place for Christians to debate the flaws of other Christian practices but communist magazines are never the place. COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Russell Moore is a useful idiot appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
McCabe aware of exculpatory evidence before opening obstruction probe into Trump, documents show
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 04:30 PM PST Then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe was aware of crucial exculpatory evidence regarding the firing of FBI Director James Comey when he opened an obstruction of justice investigation into then-President Donald Trump in mid-May of 2017 over Comey’s removal, according to documents declassified by Trump during his last days in office. Article by Ivan Pentchoukov originally published at The Epoch Times. Trump fired Comey on May 9, 2017, roughly three weeks after Comey told Congress that the FBI was investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, as well as alleged links between Moscow and the Trump campaign. McCabe opened an obstruction of justice investigation into Trump a week later, on May 16, 2017, citing Trump’s public comments about the firing as well as Comey’s memos, which stated, among other things, that the president had asked the FBI director for loyalty. But McCabe was aware, from a conversation with then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein four days earlier, on May 12, 2017, that the Justice Department had been planning to fire Comey since January that year, according to a memo by McCabe obtained by Just The News. “The DAG stated that based on conversations he had with the AG as early as January 2017, he knew Director Comey was going to get fired,” McCabe wrote in the memo. One day after McCabe approved the opening of the investigation into Trump, Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Mueller completed the investigation nearly two years later, finding no evidence to establish that anyone in the campaign colluded with Russia. In addition, then-Attorney General William Barr concluded that the evidence Mueller collected was insufficient to establish that Trump had obstructed justice. Among the newly declassified memos is a set of typed notes, in which McCabe described the May 16, 2017, meeting during which he revealed the existence of the Trump probe to Rosenstein. A more redacted version of the memo was previously obtained by Judicial Watch in 2019. The notes had shown that Rosenstein offered to wear a wire to record Trump; Rosenstein has since said he made the offer in jest. The newly declassified portion of the memo shows that Rosenstein had made the decision to appoint a special counsel a week prior to May 16, 2017, and that the execution of the appointment was thrown off by Comey’s firing. In another declassified portion, McCabe wrote that Rosenstein had looked into removing Trump via the 25th Amendment and had assumed he might have had the support of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly. Trump had considered hiring Kelly for the FBI director position, another newly declassified portion of the memo shows. “The President had requested that they interview Sec. Kelly. The DAG informed the AG that he did not believe Sec. Kelly would be a good candidate for many reasons and stated that making him FBI Director would be a strategy of disruption. The DAG told me that if Sec. Kelly were placed in the job, the DAG would request Sec. Kelly’s resignation,” McCabe wrote. An internal review by the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General determined that McCabe authorized a self-serving leak to the press and then lied about the matter to cover it up. Follow Ivan on Twitter: @ivanpentchoukov COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post McCabe aware of exculpatory evidence before opening obstruction probe into Trump, documents show appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Is this the end of America?
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 03:21 PM PST While Christians should understand that politics is not the end-all-be-all for us, as our citizenship is in Heaven first and foremost, the aftermath of the 2020 Election is an indication that America is crumbling before our eyes. This episode of The GateKeepers Podcast is an encouragement that no matter what happens on this earth, we must remember that God is sovereignly in control and our mission as Christians does not change. Matthew 10 is a great reminder to us of what we can expect moving forward. Child turning against parent. Friend against friend. Family member against family member. Is this not reminiscent of what we are experiencing today? The reality is that this will only get worse as we get closer to the return of Christ. However, we must remember that we are on the right side of the battle. Christ will win in the end. Many of us are extremely disappointed with the results of the 2020 Election, especially in light of the fact that it was more than likely a stolen, rigged election. However, ultimately, we must remember that God is in control and nothing changes in regards to our mission given to us by our Heavenly Father. We are still to proclaim the truth and preach the Gospel to the world. We must continue pressing forward and not lose sight of God’s plan. While this presidential election may have thrown us for a loop, it didn’t surprise Christ in the least. We can rest assured knowing that. This episode was recorded as a part of a livestream specifically for Plugged In members. Getting Plugged In is your way of supporting what we are doing here with The GateKeepers. When you become a member, you get access to exclusive content, including the recordings from our Destroy Social Justice Conference (featuring Mychal Massie, Greg Locke and Ken Peters), the weekly Live episode of The GateKeepers Podcast and 30% off in The GK Store. On top of that, we are launching a series of online conferences, starting with Infiltrated: Church & State on February 6th, and Plugged In members get free access. For more information and to join, please visit http://gatekeepersonline.com/pluggedin.
COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Is this the end of America? appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
After murdering 15-yo girl in livestream, four teen girls eat lollipops and banter about their feelings
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 02:35 PM PST An infuriating and unique story on multiple levels is being ignored by mainstream media because, once again, it doesn’t fit the progressive narrative. Four Black teen girls participated in the murder of another teen girl. They livestreamed their actions at a Walmart. Then, they continued the livestream from a vehicle with cold apologies to the family of the girl they had just murdered while eating popsicles.
With the Black Lives Matter movement focused solely on police actions against people of color while ignoring brutal killings like this one, it’s no wonder mainstream media is ignoring it. They’re so busy pushing the left’s anti-cop propaganda that they have no inclinations to cover heinous acts like this. As 100percentfedup reported: Social Media Giants Facebook, Instagram, and Tiktok livestreamed the murder of a 15-year-old girl by four extremely violent teens. Afterward, the four black teens can be seen on the footage gloating, defiant, eating popsicles and smiling. As Big Tech purges social media of independent and conservative voices for inciting violence, it seems to accept no responsibility for pedophilia or many other crimes on its curated platforms. In a shocking display of the state of social media and its effects on society, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok all carried the livestream of four incredibly violent teenagers, aged 12-14, murdering another 15-year-old teen at a Walmart. … At least one set of videos from the incident can still be on Facebook found, here. Shrieking and running ensues in the video, at which point one or more of the teens shout “I don’t give a f*ck!…Just stabbed that b*tch in the heart” The teens continue: “I don’t give a f*ck…if she killed her she killed her–oh f*cking well…If she killed her she killed her…nobody give a f*ck. If she killed her, she killed that b*tch. Oh well. F*ck dat ho’. She dead now.” They then begin filming again after getting into a vehicle. While in the vehicle, they calmly smile and eat popsicles. However, while smiling and defiant, one of the violent teens looks directly into the camera and goes on: “We din’t mean to sayin’ that we said…but, but, yeah, we sorry for sayin’ F dat girl. Ya’ll know I din’t meantuh say dat. When–when i get in my heart, I just start goin’ off!” She then gesticulates wildly for the camera, seeming to have no care whatsoever about what she has done, only caring about her own emotions. There’s so much here to break down. Let’s start with the fact that more than a day after the crime, Facebook still hasn’t taken down at least one of the livestream videos. They have participated in and in many ways egged on the cancelation of free-speech-oriented social media sites like Parler over violence on the platform while continuing to celebrate even worse violence on their own platform. As for the four suspects, what can we say? They’re apparent nihilism and the sociopathic tendencies seen in so many of today’s youths isn’t random. It’s coming from somewhere. We can look to the break from Judeo-Christian teachings as a major contributing factor. We should also lay at least some of the blame on the narcissistic mentality fostered by our livestreaming society. The parents are obviously to blame to some extent. Then, there are the teens themselves. They’re young but they’ve chosen to participate in adult-style violence. There is no remorse other than how their “fans” were reacting to them on social media. 100percentfedup put some of the blame on critical race theory and Black Lives Matter itself: The left frequently talks about ’emotional truth.’ Critical Race theory texts and university classes center themselves around deconstructing and dismantling paramount foundational Western paradigms, such as logic, reason, critical thinking, and Constitutional rule of law. They seek to replace those truths with a perpetually shifting seascape of choppy emotions and experience. Well, when the world is run on emotional truth rather than Western logic, critical thinking, and constitutional law, this is precisely the emotional ‘truth’ that will befall The West–and the rest of the world–as it is murdered by psychopaths who are no better or more intelligent than the girls in these videos raised by public schools and the government, rather than well-adjusted successful parents. This is the goal and result of people with the ideology of Black Lives Matter, who seek to dismantle the Western nuclear family, replace it with a government one, and hide their true intentions once reasonable people find out. It seems like every week there’s another story of teens committing violent crimes with no remorse. Our post-truth society, driven by Cultural Marxism and critical race theory, has fostered the nihilism we’re seeing in today’s youth. COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post After murdering 15-yo girl in livestream, four teen girls eat lollipops and banter about their feelings appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Feds indict pro-Trump Twitter troll ‘Ricky Vaughn’ over memes shared during 2016 election
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 01:43 PM PST Twitter troll Douglass Mackey, aka Ricky Vaughn, was arrested on Wednesday and faces ten years in prison for “tweeting” and “retweeting” joke memes on Twitter telling people they can “text” in their votes. Article by Chris Menahan originally published at Information Liberation.
From The US Department of Justice:
Here’s some excerpts from the full complaint: That’s a reference to people sharing photoshopped memes of Taylor Swift and others with MAGA hats on. The case was put together under the Trump administration by William Barr appointee Seth D. DuCharme, the Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. FBI special agent Maegan Rees appears to have led the investigation. The indictment says “at least 4,900 unique telephone numbers texted ‘[Candidate’s first name]’ or some derivative to the Text Code on or about and before Election Day, including many belonging to individuals located in the Eastern District of New York.” [Emphasis added] “Of the approximately 4,900 numbers that corresponded with the Text Code, approximately 4,850, or 99%, sent their texts after MACKEY first tweeted a Deceptive Image from MACKEY Account 2.” For the record, those memes were shared by tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of people as a joke. The meme was popularized on 4Chan. The indictment didn’t include any proof that these 4,850 texters were in fact disenfranchised, nor did it include any evidence they saw the meme due to Mackey’s account. The feds also tried to connect this indictment to the Capitol protests. “The co-conspirators were not named in the complaint, but one of them was Anthime Gionet, a far-right media personality known as ‘Baked Alaska,’ who was arrested this month for participating in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, according to a person briefed on the investigation,” The New York Times reported. The indictment accuses Mackey and his “co-conspirators” of the “unusual charge” of “conspiracy to violate rights” for sharing these memes: “The charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison,” The Times reported. Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter can conspire together to rig the entire internet in favor of Democrats without any issue but Twitter trolls who helped Trump win in 2016 are being charged over memes. This is absolute lunacy! The Biden regime told us they were going to deliver “unity and healing” — instead they’re conducting mass arrests of Trump supporters for so much as walking around the Capitol and vindictively persecuting them over memes they shared four years ago! Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Parler and Telegram. COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Feds indict pro-Trump Twitter troll ‘Ricky Vaughn’ over memes shared during 2016 election appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Big Tech is suppressing information about writ of quo warranto, the ‘Trump play’
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 09:16 AM PST President Trump has a play he and his team can make to challenge the results of the 2020 election. It’s a longshot, but it doesn’t fall into the realm of shadow-government-military-coup or some of the other theories we’ve heard lately. This one is legitimate, legal, and does not require suspension of disbelief. It’s called a “writ of quo warranto,” something we’ve covered a couple of times on NOQ Report recently. Unfortunately, unless you’re a regular reader of Leo Donofrio, 100percentfedup, or a handful of other websites, you’ve probably never heard of it. We’ve found a strong suppression of the facts and opinions surrounding this, a suppression that has hit close to home here. Google, after showing our original article on the first page for searches for the term, has removed the article altogether. Links of Facebook and Twitter were quickly censored. Now, Spotify and a pair of podcast hosts have dropped us inexplicably, coincidentally following the publication of our first podcast on the issue. Are they worried? Probably not. Like I said, it’s a longshot. With a writ of quo warranto, Trump or other aggrieved parties can file with the Department of Justice in order to present evidence that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris do not have the authority to be in office. The predicate for this would be voter fraud corrupting the election, starting the dominos falling for what eventually led to the January 20 inauguration. Precedent shows that if accepted, it can be heard in the DC Circuit Court and potentially work its way up to the Supreme Court. As Donofrio noted in a recent article, there’s another reason the Trump team should file before the coming impeachment trial in the Senate. If his writ is pending with the DoJ or in court, theoretically he cannot participate in an impeachment trial until the writ is resolved. On the latest episode of NOQ Report, I dove deeper into the censorship surrounding a writ of quo warranto as well as the possibilities surrounding the action itself. Nobody outside of President Trump’s circle is aware of the plan going forward, but this would be a smart move from multiple angles. What do they have to hide? Considering a writ of quo warranto is a longshot for President Trump, one would think it wouldn’t even be on Big Tech’s radar. It is, and that alone should get patriots digging deeper.
COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Big Tech is suppressing information about writ of quo warranto, the ‘Trump play’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
How the destruction of grammar and logic got Biden into the Oval Office
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 08:35 AM PST Many people snickered at the claim made in Texas v. Pennsylvania that there is only a one in a quadrillion chance that Joe Biden won all the swing states as currently claimed. The true meaning beneath the statistic is simple: the vote counts certified in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia are fake, so let’s cut through all the noise and decide what to do next. “One in a quadrillion” is a rarified way of saying it just didn’t happen. Texas’s case was shot down because in the United States both grammar and logic have been overtaken by rhetoric. The old trio: Grammar, logic, and rhetoricRhetoric is not the same thing as logic or grammar. Philosopher Richard Weaver championed rhetoric as a tool to share truth rather than skirt it. But ever since the ancient birth of “sophistry,” there have been rhetoricians who see logic and grammar as disposable tools to support a primary rhetorical agenda. (Some call this, basically, propaganda.) When people ask you, “how can 95% of doctors be wrong?” or “how can all the courts be wrong?,” you should keep in mind that the overemphasis on rhetoric has been universal in colleges since the 1980s, even in Christian and conservative colleges. Professional degrees in medicine and law followed undergraduate degrees in which rhetoric, rather than literature, was used to teach people writing. This was the fruit of the endless battles over “general education” requirements. Consider some stupid ideas that have attained a consensus in the worlds of medicine and law. The same medical community that concluded that racial justice rallies were not dangerous during a COVID pandemic but patriotic rallies were also concluded that there is no purpose to indicating on birth certificates whether someone is male or female. The Supreme Court (even with its mythical conservative majority) that decided, indirectly, that birth certificates can be issued showing two fathers and no mother has also claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not mean that citizens in all states have equal protection of their voting rights (see here). To come up with the latter, they appealed to the question of “standing” — which is a rhetorical move rather than a rational or logical examination of the claims put forward by Texas. So, now, the faux consensus on election fraudMany liberals who insist there is “no evidence” of election fraud refer us to the fact that so many courts have rejected lawsuits filed by people alleging fraud. From this trend one can conclude two things. First, it is commonplace in the United States for people to confuse credentials for evidence, and therefore to think a summary of what credentialed authorities say about evidence is as good as, or better than, or the same thing as, a summary of evidence. They believe such things because they have been taught to think rhetorically — asking what is most persuasive — rather than logically (what is actually true) or grammatically (what is rational). Second, courts are run by the most educated people in America, which means they went to colleges where rhetoric was literally forced on every student and logic and grammar were systematically devalued. Every composition and rhetoric teacher in English 101 begins by telling students to consider their audience before writing an essay. Judges are the teacher’s pets who always did what their composition teacher told them; that is how they got straight As and rose up the ranks of respectable society. So while their audience is vesting all their authority in judges, the judges are doing what rhetoricians taught them. They are basing their rhetorical responses on what their imagined audience wants to hear. Liberals — those who most resemble their English 101 teachers from college — are the audience that judges have in mind when they write their opinions. In citing judges, liberals are merely stating their own rhetorical position through deceitful ventriloquism, which has nothing to do with the facts or what a reasonable person would conclude from looking at facts. The rhetorical reading of election fraud claimsIn a world where rhetoric has replaced logic and grammar, standards and thresholds become easily adapted to the “situation” and “audience.” I compiled a list of questions that election fraud–deniers cannot answer logically or rationally here. With grammar now deemed less important than rhetoric, terms such “beyond a reasonable doubt” can seamlessly turn into “a strong case in response to one particular reasonable doubt.” The audience has no clear understanding of conjunctions, prepositions, articles, or subordinate clauses. One can transform any phrase rhetorically into the opposite of what it means grammatically. Grammar is key to ratios and therefore to mathematical reasoning. The ratio of Joe Biden votes to total votes is not the same as the ratio of Joe Biden votes to Trump votes. Votes counted divided by votes cast is not the same ratio as votes cast divided by votes counted. People who have no command of grammar have no real defense against propagandists. Skilled rhetoricians can construe “preponderance of” to mean “convincing possibility in.” A video emerges of Georgia workers throwing out Republican poll-watchers based on false claims about a broken water pipe, then surreptitiously scanning ballots taken from a hidden suitcase. The fact that authorities lied, threw out observers, and then did things they were not legally entitled to do shows a preponderance of evidence that they committed an election crime. People who committed one election crime would probably be capable of committing another election crime (reporting fake results), so their credibility as witnesses should be received with suspicion. The audience trained to think rhetorically will interpret these facts irrationally (that is, against the “ratio”). There exists one possible explanation — they were just putting away papers and doing some regular housekeeping. This excuse is far-fetched but comforting to some. The audience sees the preponderance of evidence favoring the anti-Trump position because of the irresistible option to see the image as innocent rather than incriminating. Within the evidence, there exists a possibility — they weren’t scanning ballots, but doing some other wholesome paperwork after hours — and the innocent possibility sounds more convincing to the audience. So even this obvious video evidence is “debunked” and deemed “not credible,” despite the fact that affidavits signed by Republican poll-watchers before they knew of the video’s existence matched the events and timing caught on video, while the Georgia state officials made statements that were completely disproved by the video. In the ungrammatical and illogical world of rhetoric, the fact that an election authority broke one law and got caught can be interpreted as proof that he didn’t break other laws and therefore merits credibility as a witness. How does this work? The audience likes the suggestion that if such people had committed more crimes, they would have been caught engaging in them (a presumption that runs utterly against the reality that people are usually creatures of habit). The fact that these accused parties are actively preventing any investigation that would reveal more crimes is then taken rhetorically as proof that they must be innocent. The Los Angeles Times, for instance, argues that the election fraud of 8,000 ballots in the small city of Hawthorne proves that national fraud could not affect the outcome of a presidential race. This too baffles a rational reader. The officials at the Times say that if a scheme involving 8,000 ballots could be caught, then a much bigger scheme would certainly come to light. But the Hawthorne case runs counter to the repeated pre-election claim by liberals that election fraud was close to nonexistent in the United States. There are countless reasons why a small crime ring in Hawthorne might be discoverable while larger conspiracies might involve people shrewd and powerful enough to cover up what they did. The main lesson learned is that the liberals were wrong about the nonexistence of fraud before. Yet they emerge from the Hawthorne scandal with more credibility. This is an utterly irrational application of “credibility as” a source of information on election fraud. We see the same trend with digital forensics. Since the perceived audience doesn’t understand grammar or ratios, its members look at two irrefutable facts — (a) we have done digital forensics on only one county’s tabulation system representing less than 1% of the ballots counted by a certain software company, and (b) in that one county, we found erroneously reported data that falsified the winner of the presidential election — and they conclude that fewer than 1% of the ballots could have been falsified and the election should stand. Proven fraud proves that no fraud happened. Hence, a liberal will be confronted with evidence that, let us say, 9,000 dead people’s names appeared on the rolls as having voted, and the liberal will mention that one person was incorrectly reported as dead. To the liberal, the “preponderance of evidence” standard has been met for a Biden win because one mistake by the Trump team overturns all Trump’s findings, but one convincing excuse from the Biden team (even if it is still speculative) overturns an infinite number of proven Trump claims. When shown video of Democrats affixing boards over windows to prevent observers from seeing them count ballots, liberals claim that this disproves fraud because no observers can state that they witnessed any illegal activities during the tabulation process. The fact that the Democrats were bold enough to hide possible crimes from observers looks to liberals like proof that they must not have committed any crimes. Logic involves the use of reason to examine different claims and decide which one is most plausible or certain. Grammar involves the effective use of language to convey meanings honestly and efficiently. Rhetoric is different. It is the art of argumentation, a “craft” tailored to the goals of the speaker and his audience. A good rhetorician can convince an audience of a certain proposition even if the proposition is false. Good logicians and good grammarians will not fall for the tricks of a good rhetorician. By the 1990s, people who received Composition/Rhetoric Ph.D.s overwhelmed Ph.D.s in literature, philosophy, and linguistics, largely because it was so easy to place graduates of Composition programs. Almost every university requires that all students take a distribution requirement in writing. Composition/Rhetoric programs marketed their grads as uniquely trained to run them. We now live with the result of bad education. To believe in Biden’s win, we would have to believe that since nobody has given a clear reason for the simultaneous stoppage of vote-counting in key swing states, no nefarious reason could exist for it. We would have to believe that Republican observers were expelled in multiple districts simply because all the election officials were in the same bad mood. We would assume that all affidavits provided by Trump’s team are lies, but all statements provided by Biden’s team are truthful. We would have to believe that millions of voters who favored Biden by breathtaking margins mailed in their ballots late enough that they arrived after the Election Night, to be counted with no observation, but no large contingent of Trump voters mailed in ballots on such a late date. We would have to believe that Democratic activists who support amnesty for people who defrauded immigration processes or asylum claims, and who spent four years equating Trump to Hitler, would miraculously show restraint and report nothing but honest vote totals. We would have to believe that honest mistakes caused the computer glitch in a Michigan county, but nowhere else, even though authorities are actively preventing the Trump team from inspecting the software and hardware. That anybody believes that the Biden win was certifiable is a sad irony. That half the country believes it is an indictment against our nation. As a former English professor, I say, give credit where it is due. Blame the English departments. Robert Lopez can be followed on Twitter, bobbylopez.me, and Gatekeepers Online, where he hosts the Big Brown Gadfly. COVID-19 lockdowns are taking down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the resurgence of lockdowns that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $17,300 to stay afloat through March when we hope the economy will be more open, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. In November, 2020, we hit 1.2 million visitors. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post How the destruction of grammar and logic got Biden into the Oval Office appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
42.) ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 15 new items) |
- Term Limits Actually Make Things Worse – Here’s What to Do
- Goya Board Threatens Can-Sell Culture
- Why We Must Feed the Better Angels of Joe Biden’s Nature
- President Biden’s Flimsy Coalition and the Left’s Piñata Party
- Fanning The Flames, Attacking Our Founding, Never Again
- Media May Ignore It, but Biden Presidency Is Already Radical
- Maoist Roots Of Deprogramming
- The Great School Reset
- Sen. Susan Collins: ‘Extraordinarily unlikely that the president will be convicted… just do the math’
- Out With the New
- Impeach Obama for Inciting Black Lives Matter Riots
- Why Biden’s Immigration Policy Will Harm Americans and Migrants Alike
- Gun Rights are Equal Rights
- The Roots of Our Partisan Divide
- A Stolen Country – Part 1
Term Limits Actually Make Things Worse – Here’s What to Do
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 10:05 PM PST
by Seton Motley: I appreciate Senator Ted Cruz’s effort – and his many other efforts – but his bill ending endless Congressional terms isn’t a solution. I am loathe to question Senator Cruz on Constitutional questions – but his bill raises Constitutional questions. We had to amend the Constitution to term-limit presidents. I would imagine we’d need to do the same thing to do the same thing to Congressmen. And it almost certainly isn’t a practical solution. How many members of Congress will vote to limit their time as members of Congress? Meanwhile, term limits just turn more elected officials more rapidly into more lobbyists. And term limits accidentally, massively over-empower residual Hill staffers – who aren’t elected and aren’t term limited. All of which is demonstrably worse than what we have now. To solve the problems – we must address the actual problems. Implementing term limits doesn’t do that. In the House – that means ending gerrymandering. For the Senate – we must repeal the Seventeenth Amendment. In the House: “‘Cracking’ (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party’s supporters across many districts). “And ‘packing’ (concentrating the opposing party’s voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).”Gerrymandering is government officials choosing us – rather than us choosing them. Term limits replace old Nancy Pelosis with…young Nancy Pelosis. Because 80+% of Congressional districts are gerrymandered to an overwhelming Democrat or Republican advantage. Hyper-churning hyper-partisans in and out of Congress solves nothing. Ending the creation and empowerment of hyper-partisans does. That means ending gerrymandering. In the Senate: Unfunded mandates are federal laws that force state legislatures to spend money – without giving them any. If Senators were again accountable to their state legislatures – unfunded mandates would receive almost no Senate votes. That means awful bills like Obamacare – never, ever would have passed. “Hello, state legislators. It’s me – US Senator X. I know I just dumped a metric ton of new spending mandates upon you. “Since we’re not giving you any money to pay for them – you will have to dramatically increase state taxes. Which I know will make you all even more popular with our constituents. “Well, despite all of that – I’d really like you to send me back to Washington to continue screwing you all in this fashion.” How do you think those state legislature votes for those Senators will go? So, we have uber-warped, overwhelmingly-one-sided House districts. And overly-politicized Senate seats that are instead supposed to be filled by – and accountable to – state legislatures. And then we stare blankly at DC – and wonder why it has all gotten so partisan and awful. And stare blankly at our country – and wonder why it’s riven with irreconcilable differences. Term limits is a top-down, DC-centered “fix” – to problems caused by top-down, DC-centered “fixes.” That actually fixes nothing. And actually makes things worse. The real solution is to fix the actual, original problems. End gerrymandering – and repeal the Seventeenth Amendment. And restore the proper accountability, roles and responsibilities of government at every level. Tags: Seton Motley, Term Limits, Actually Make Things Worse, Here’s What to Do, Ted CruzTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Goya Board Threatens Can-Sell Culture
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 09:37 PM PST by Tony Perkins: Praise Donald Trump — get canceled. Praise Barack Obama — get canceled. Raise your company’s sales by 1,000 percent — get censored. Welcome to the life of Goya CEO Bob Unanue. The conservative folk hero, who Americans rewarded for his conviction by sending profits through the roof, is back under fire — this time from his own board of directors. Apparently, shattering company sales records doesn’t matter if you don’t have the right point of view. His comments, the family said, were unacceptable. On Fox Business last week, Bob was very candid about where he thought America was headed. “I think this is mission accomplished,” he said frankly. “Mission accomplished by the union, the partnership, the conglomerate of social media, Big Tech, big media and government, big government, for ushering in the dawn of a new world order. This great reset… with an unverified election. And the big prize is the United States.” Unanue’s family, who makes up the majority of the board, was appalled. By Friday, they’d convened to punish Unanue, voting that he “must now obtain board permission before making any more media appearances.” “Bob does not speak for Goya Foods when he speaks on TV,” third-generation owner Andy Unanue insisted. “The family has diverse views on politics, but politics is not part of our business. Our political point of views are irrelevant.” That might have been refreshing before last summer, when Bob made headlines for refusing to back down from his partnership with Donald Trump. After all, corporate neutrality is all most Americans have ever wanted. But Goya’s situation is different. Their CEO was viciously attacked by the Left for praising Trump—and yet, when he did the same for Barack Obama, he was lavishly applauded. It was the kind of cancel culture double standard that conservatives have grown to despise. When Unanue refused to apologize, Americans didn’t just cheer — they stacked their carts with rice and beans. Now, after cashing in on their CEOs courage, the board (following the example of Chick-fil-A’s capitulation) seems intent on snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. “I could be fired tomorrow,” Bob admitted. “It’s touch and go.” All of this despite his public willingness to give the new administration a chance. “I was very thrilled to hear Biden call for unity and prayer,” he has said. “I respect him.” But respect isn’t enough. This corporate mob wants absolute loyalty to the extremists of the Democratic Party. And that, Caroline Glick warns, is the scary part. By saying that conservatives shouldn’t have jobs or banks or places in society, liberals are taking America to some very dangerous territory. “This incredible hatred,” she explained on “Washington Watch,” “the demonization of 74 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump… is unprecedented in American history,” Glick warned. “And it’s much worse than [what] we saw in the 1950s under the McCarthy House un-American Activities Committee that blacklisted communists and communist sympathizers.” When you have “a fusion of operations and interests and positions being put forward by corporate giants in a political party in the United States — and that particular political party also controls all elected arms of the federal government — this… does look a lot more like classical fascism in Italy in the 1930s than… what we’re used to in the United States.” Democrats and their megaphones in the media and Big Tech don’t just want to silence conservatives — they want to repress, ruin, and criminalize them. That isn’t capitalism, Caroline argued. It’s not the free market system. It’s a ruling oligarchy bent on replacing American democracy. “The kind of power that’s being brought to bear today against half of the country — we’ve never seen it before. It’s disturbing. And it’s very important to talk about it, because people have to be aware. They’re [going to have to fight to] to protect their right to freedom of speech and the right to [call out] what’s happening.” We can’t put blinders on, Caroline warned, or we’ll be “silenced, shunned, and canceled.” The Great Purge, as she calls it, “isn’t about one side seizing the levers of power for itself. It is about one side denying the other side the right to even vie for power.” Ironically, Bob Unanue wasn’t “vying for power” when he visited the White House last July. He was fighting to give the Hispanic community more scholarships, jobs, and opportunities. If his board had bothered to check, they might have realized that the man who was leading that coalition, Donald Trump — the same Republican they want to oust their CEO for supporting — has done more for the minority populations Goya serves than any president in recent memory. “He was really able to break the [grip of] identity politics that Americans have been under since the time of Obama,” Caroline pointed out. Before the pandemic set in, there had never been “low[er] unemployment among African Americans, among Hispanic Americans, and among women in the Trump economy. He raise[d] up all Americans across the board.” Today, Democrats are bringing those divisive politics back in a way that’s truly incredible. The last thing any corporation should do is punish leaders who think Americans deserve better. Encourage Goya’s board of directors to back off Bob Unanue and start listening to consumers — not cancel culture. Call company headquarters at 201-348-4900 or email them here. Tags: Goya Board, Threatens, Can-Sell Culture, Tony Perkins, Family Research CouncilTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Why We Must Feed the Better Angels of Joe Biden’s Nature
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 09:16 PM PST
by Ralph Benko: Most conservatives are eager to commence hostilities with President Biden. Big mistake. Charles Koch, by contrast, in an interview with The Washington Post’s James Hohmann to promote his new book ”Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions for a Top-Down World,” stated, ”We’re going to be looking for common ground [with Biden] and things that we can work together on for as many issues as possible,” among which are repealing ”President Trump’s tariffs, restore protections for ‘Dreamers’ and enact police reform that addresses systemic racism.” Amen. President Biden has already proposed some policies that archconservatives like me find problematic. One is a federally mandated minimum wage of $15 per hour. Nobly intentioned, letting people earn a living wage. Yet wages, like all prices, are determined by supply and demand. Raising the minimum wage by statute is akin to purporting to repeal the speed of light by statute. This violates the Ten Commandments of humanitarian capitalism. Thus, it will hurt those it intends to help. And, in an order designed to help destigmatize those identifying as transgender, President Biden allows biological males to compete in Title IX women’s sports. This, I submit, is inequitable to women. Additionally, shutting down the Keystone XL pipeline is already drawing protests from Biden’s own organized labor base. As a dues-paying member of the AFL-CIO, I concur in those protests. Yet these policy errors aren’t existential threats to America. They are Biden’s ”sop to Cerberus” that I had previously predicted at Newsmax. Per The Free Dictionary: ”In the Aeneid Virgil describes how the Sibyl guiding Aeneas to the underworld threw a drugged cake to Cerberus, thus enabling the hero to pass the monster in safety.” These disputed policies are politically expedient by the shrewd Biden. They do not betray him as a sleeper Communist agent. Conservatives will be making a mistake if we obsess over our (perfectly legitimate) disagreements with President Biden. Few other than Judge Judy groupies relish a scold. If we become policy shrews, always carping and criticizing, we will erode our public support. Let’s not cast ourselves as Grumpy Cats. As Peter Drucker wrote in his ur-supply-side classic, ”The Effective Executive” (p.98), ”In every area of effectiveness, one feeds the opportunities and starves the problem.” (Original emphasis.) If we make Biden’s policy missteps our focus we court the fate of the peg-legged Captain Ahab. At the climax of Ahab’s vendetta against the great white whale that had bitten off his leg in a previous expedition, “Moby Dick” rams and sinks the Pequod. Ahab precipitated his own doom, losing his ship and all hands except Ishmael. Bad policy, bad politics. We needn’t weaponize every issue. In addition to the areas of common ground enumerated by Charles Koch there are other areas where true conservatives can, fully consistent with our principles, cooperate with Biden. Three marquee Biden initiatives immediately come to mind. These promote values that, while not betraying the Democrats’ progressive faction, are highly appealing to many conservatives. Paramount is Biden’s shifting the discourse from ”equality” to ”equity.” Second is his offering to add 11 million new conservative voters, the trapped undocumented, to America’s voting roles. Third is getting serious about restoring America’s world technological leadership. I will address these more extensively in a future column. For now, the most subtle and, therefore, powerful of these is Biden’s shifting of the discourse. Astoundingly, Biden instantaneously, without fanfare, redefined goodness from ”equality” — long a Democratic Party darling — to ”equity.” I have been protesting the progressives’ misguided focus on ”inequality” for many years. ”Equality” is a grotesque caricature of the legitimate value of equity. Protesting ”inequality” overlooks the legitimacy of merit-based differentiated outcomes based on qualities such as, among others, those identified by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King. Jr. (on Aug. 28, 1963 in his “I Have a Dream” speech) on ”the content of their character.” “Equity” is legitimate and consistent with the American sense of fair play. Joe Biden is singing from our hymnal. I have been preaching in vain the doctrine of ”equitable prosperity” for a generation or two. To be clear, ”equitable” means that nobody gets special privileges and nobody gets prejudiced by the ground rules. The call for a level playing field is something most conservatives give lip service to, albeit only sometimes. Biden effortlessly shifted the discourse from the progressive shibboleth of equality to conservative-compatible equity. This achievement is, to quote then-Vice President Biden, a ”big f*****g deal.” Bravo! My fellow conservatives? ”And I only am escaped alone to tell thee.” It would be self-defeating to engage in a dreary vendetta making Joe Biden our very own “Moby Dick.” Let us experiment with laying aside our rhetorical harpoons and, instead, feeding the better angels of President Biden’s nature. Tags: Ralph Benko, The Capitalist League, Why We Must, Feed the Better Angels, of Joe Biden’s Nature To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
President Biden’s Flimsy Coalition and the Left’s Piñata Party
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 09:02 PM PST by Newt Gingrich: There seems to be a continued, deep split between the message of unity the President Joe Biden administration would like us to hear – and what its actions are communicating. Again, President Biden’s inaugural address was great. It hit the right themes of bringing people together as Americans. But but he promptly walked up to the White House and created dissonance with his first volley of clearly partisan left-wing executive orders. Much of his first week has been filled with the consequences of these divisive orders. More and more people are realizing that President Biden’s order to disallow discrimination based on gender or gender identity in Title IX essentially eliminates women’s sports. Keep in mind: One of the main features of Title IX when it was passed in 1972 ensured that colleges and universities that receive federal funding offered sporting programs in which women could compete. Without Title IX, women – most of whom cannot physically compete with male athletes due to differences in musculature and hormones – didn’t have the same athletic opportunities their male cohorts had. Biden’s order on Title IX undoes this. If biological males can compete in women’s collegiate sports – and receive scholarships and grants for women’s sports – because they identify as female, their biologically female competitors are immediately at a disadvantage. One of my Inner Circle members on Tuesday raised the question: What’s next? How long before biological males who identify as women are entitled to women-owned business grants or other programs for uplifting women? To be clear: I don’t support discriminating against Americans who are simply living their lives, exercising their liberties, and pursuing their happiness – but I also don’t support measures that grant unfair advantages over other Americans trying to do the same. Divisions are also beginning to show over President Biden’s decision to kill the Keystone XL oil pipeline, which was meant to carry oil from Canada to the US. These divisions aren’t strictly partisan. President Biden is quickly learning it will be tough to balance the wants of the radical left and those of more traditional working-class Democrats. Of course, Biden campaigned on killing Keystone XL (when he was talking to his environmentalist constituents) and was less aggressive in attacking fossil fuels (when he was talking to people in oil and natural gas states). Now, ironically, some of the biggest unions which supported Biden in the election are going to lose the biggest number of jobs from him killing Keystone XL. The North American Building Trades Unions, the Laborers’ International Union of North America, and the United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipefitters have all come out criticizing President Biden’s move, because it will render thousands of Americans unemployed – during a pandemic to boot. As one last example, I must again point out the knee-jerk reaction to abolish the 1776 Commission. This was purely an effort of partisan cultural warfare. That’s because President Biden is beholden to a radical, elite culture which consistently wants to erase American history and rewrite it to better serve a left-wing agenda. The 1776 Commission was an answer to The New York Times’ 1619 Project, which initially proclaimed America’s “true founding” occurred when the first British slave ship docked in New England. The project has been so thoroughly debunked by serious historians that The New York Times has been quietly editing out its most egregious statements. I have written at length about this historic propaganda effort – and produced a podcast episode offering a historic response. The 1776 Commission, on the other hand, was an effort to study and teach real history (CNN promptly called it “racist” without any cause). One of the lead advisors was my friend, College of the Ozarks President Jerry Davis. If you aren’t familiar with College of the Ozarks, it is one of the most remarkable institutions of higher learning I have ever seen. Students attend for free, and they work on campus in exchange for their education. In addition to top-tier traditional curricula, the college offers students an unabashedly patriotic education. It is a model for the whole country. On the very first day, the Left realized what a danger the 1776 Commission was and pushed President Biden to kill it. So, in his first week, President Biden continued to talk about unity but delivered purely partisan actions. This is because when he says “unity” he really means “conformity.” The left-wing is not interested in listening to or compromising with the more than 74 million people who voted for President Donald Trump. The left just wants them to step in line or be ignored. If President Biden really wanted unity, he could call on the US Senate to drop impeachment proceedings against President Trump. But he knows he can’t do that. It would break his flimsy coalition. The single unifying element of the current Democratic Party is hatred of Trump. The Democrats know they must keep Trump as a central issue if they are going to keep their grip on the government. Two or three years focused on Trump instead of solving problems is exactly what America doesn’t need. But the Democrats know as long as they can keep Trump as a piñata, they can keep their members happy. Once the piñata goes away, they will all be staring at each other – still holding sticks. |
||||||||||||
Fanning The Flames, Attacking Our Founding, Never Again
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 07:52 PM PST
by Gary Bauer: Fanning The Flames Biden again lamented, “We have never fully lived up to the founding principles of this nation,” and declared, “our soul will be troubled as long as systemic racism is allowed to persist.” While attempting to unite us around the far-left concept of “racial equity” (very different from equal opportunity), Biden proceeded to divide us into the usual left-wing blocs of “people of color, Americans with disabilities, LGBTQ Americans, religious minorities,” etc., etc. By the way, while Biden was once again bashing America for its systemic racism, another police officer was shot in New York. Last week, a police officer in Toledo, Ohio, was shot and killed. Biden could have used his remarks to denounce violence against law enforcement officers, many of whom are minorities putting their lives at risk to keep our streets safe. But he was too busy denouncing America and pushing critical race theory into every federal agency. It has already infected our universities and many local public schools, with teachers telling our kids that they (and by extension their parents) are racists and too “blind” to see it. We are now far removed from Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream of a society where we do not judge people on the color of their skin but the content of their character. Now the left asserts that race is the only thing that matters. Remember Kamala Harris’s much-maligned video where she declared, “Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place”? That’s Marxism. America is about equality of opportunity, not equality of results. This “systemically racist” nation has elected a black president and a black vice president. We have had a black attorney general and black Supreme Court justices. Many of our major cities, including our nation’s capital, are led by black mayors, police chiefs and city councils. Yet to the left, this progress is never seen as evidence that America is a good and decent country. It is continually doubling down on the idea that America is racist to its core. Attacking Our Founding The 1776 Commission was created to defend America and our history. Apparently, Joe Biden finds that offensive. And if he’s concerned about “counter-factual” history, he should condemn the 1619 Project. (Here, here and here.) If Biden thinks he can unify the country around the lies of the 1619 Project, he’s sorely mistaken. I want to be absolutely clear: No one is suggesting that racism is not a problem or that we should ignore America’s history of slavery. Racism is a sin, and slavery was America’s “original sin.” But we must also understand that throughout the history of mankind slavery was, sadly, the universal norm. Thankfully, it was the vision and values of our founding fathers that signaled the death knell of slavery. Reasonable people should be able to appreciate the virtues of our founders while acknowledging their shortcomings and also celebrating their contributions to this exceptional nation, which has guaranteed more freedom and prosperity to more people than any nation in the history of the world. But the radical left isn’t reasonable. In his brief remarks, Biden made it absolutely clear that he and the left are all in on the idea that America was a hopelessly flawed and racist nation from the beginning and remains so today. And he implied that the left gets to define what is true, and that unity will only come when everyone else bows to his truth. That is the very definition of totalitarianism. Are You In The “Unholy Alliance”? During a recent interview, he commented on the fighting that broke out on Capitol Hill and said that members of the Biden Administration were “moving in laser-like fashion to uncover” alleged domestic “insurgency movements” composed of “an unholy alliance.” Who’s in this “unholy alliance”? According to Mr. Brennan, it’s made up of “religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians.” Whether you realize it or not, you’re part of Brennan’s “unholy alliance” or Hillary’s “basket of deplorables.” The left routinely smears conservatives as “religious extremists,” “authoritarians,” “fascists,” “bigots,” “racists” and “nativists.” But what’s his beef with libertarians? Brennan’s demagoguery was too much for former Democrat Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard. In a Twitter post, Gabbard condemned the people who breached the Capitol, but she also blasted Brennan and the Big Tech/Big Brother tyrants, saying: “Let’s be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol.” Impeachment Update Why? Pittman admitted that her department “did not do enough” to prepare for January 6th, even though they knew days before that there was “a strong potential for violence and that Congress was the target.” This apology is critically important because Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are attempting to impeach President Trump on the absurd claim that his speech that day incited the riot. Well, that’s clearly not the case as Chief Pittman just acknowledged. Meanwhile, polling shows that the American people overwhelmingly believe that the Democrat Senate is wasting its time with this vindictive impeachment trial. Never Again In 2005, as then-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was threatening a second Holocaust by vowing to “wipe Israel off the map,” the United Nations voted to recognize January 27th as International Holocaust Remembrance Day. As the world pauses to remember the atrocities of the Holocaust, it must also learn from the mistakes of the past. Unfortunately, it’s not clear that we are. In a Fox News opinion piece, Gilad Erdan, Israel’s new ambassador to the United States, warns that the world is failing to take the threats of Iran’s fascist and anti-Semitic regime seriously. Sadly, he’s right. The Biden Administration, with the full support of congressional Democrats, is rushing to rejoin Obama’s fatally flawed nuclear deal with the tyrants of Tehran. Why? Iran hasn’t done a single thing to warrant sanctions relief or any deal of any kind. Meanwhile, as a presidential appointee to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, I have made efforts to combat anti-Semitism a key priority of my work on the Commission. And I have put a particular emphasis on exposing Iran’s role in promoting global anti-Semitism. Tags: Gary Bauer, Fanning The Flames, Attacking Our Founding, Never AgainTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Media May Ignore It, but Biden Presidency Is Already Radical
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 07:03 PM PST by Ben Shapiro: For four years, we were informed by our establishment media that President Donald Trump’s behavior was “not normal.” The abnormality of Trump’s behavior became a near rallying cry for the self-appointed heroes of journalism, who spent every waking hour poring over his bizarre tweets and his bloviating self-absorption. The media dedicated themselves to preventing Trump’s supposed normalization. Now, the media inform us, we have been graced by the most normal normal person to have ever normalled: President Joe Biden. Biden, they proclaim, is utterly boring, nondescript, barely worthy of coverage. His administration, too, is paradigmatically normal. Yascha Mounk of The Atlantic tweets, “It is so nice to have a boring President.” Alleged media watchdog Brian Stelter asked this week whether Biden is “making the news boring again,” adding, “The Biden White House is clearly a break from the chaos and incompetence of Trump world.” For his part, Biden obviously revels in this sort of coverage. This week, his favorite ice cream flavor (chocolate chip) was tweeted out as well as a retweet of first lady Jill Biden’s announcement that Champ and Major, the new first pets, had entered the White House. On a personal level, Biden is clearly more “normal” than Trump—although treating Biden, a career politician worth nearly $10 million, as the height of normality is rather stunning. The goal for the establishment media isn’t to point out merely that Biden is a sort of American Everyman. It’s to use that supposed normalcy to disguise the fact that his agenda is absolutely abnormal. The dirty little secret of the Trump administration is that despite Trump’s personal abnormality, his agenda was well in line with past precedent, and with mainstream American opinions on everything from taxes to military policy. Trump did not radically shift American policy. Biden will. Within the first five days of his presidency, he issued 30 executive orders, compared with four for Trump, five for Barack Obama, and zero for George W. Bush. Those executive orders included endorsement of radical reinterpretation of American history; killing the Keystone XL pipeline, along with its attendant estimated 11,000 American jobs; forcing the military to allow troops to undergo gender reassignment surgery; and forcing federally funded institutions to allow biological men who identify as transgender to compete alongside biological women, among others. He is reportedly pursuing an immigration plan directed toward reopening America’s borders. He has staffed his Cabinet by intersectional box-checking. Biden’s policy is indeed radical. But because Biden is presented as a normal person, we’re supposed to ignore all of that. We’re supposed to simply be grateful for the “return to normalcy”—complete with caving to the teachers unions that seek to keep schools closed indeterminately, reentering a long-dead deal with the Iranian theocracy, firing government staffers with whom he disagrees, and lying openly about the vaccine distribution plan he inherited. Meanwhile, our media pat themselves on the back. It’s rare to see a profession declare itself irrelevant, but that’s what many in the media are doing these days. According to Stelter, it’s “refreshing” that Biden’s team promises accountability and transparency. According to Margaret Sullivan of The Washington Post, the media must learn their lesson from the Trump era and cover Democrats more sycophantically. Joe Biden may be a relatively normal guy. But none of this is normal. And pretending it is represents just another way for the media to reject legitimate criticisms of an administration seeking radicalism right off the bat. Tags: Ben Shapiro, Media May Ignore It, Biden Presidency, Is Already RadicalTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Maoist Roots Of Deprogramming
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 06:43 PM PST by Bill Donohue: The Catholic League, like all advocacy organizations, makes maximum use of its First Amendment right to freedom of speech. To this extent, the increasing calls for censorship of organizations that espouse traditional moral views is worrisome. We live in a time of unparalleled attacks on free speech, emanating from establishment sources, including the media. One might think that the media, which does not exist without freedom of speech, would be reflexively opposed to censorship, but not anymore. In many cases, those who work in the media are leading the charge to silence what it sees as its opposition. This is much more dangerous than the McCarthyism of the 1950s: the variety of tactics being advocated today extends far beyond anything the senator from Wisconsin had in mind. For example, calls to deprogram Trump supporters is now one of the most popular strategies for silencing any organization that has praised Trump’s record. The Catholic League has lauded Trump’s policies on religious liberty. We will continue to do so. But we know that our critics are not content to disagree—they would like to deprogram us, if they could. Though calls for deprogramming are now routine, they began last summer. Last summer, failed White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci said those on the left should view Trump supporters, and especially those who worked in the administration, as candidates for deprogramming. A few days later, CNN’s Don Lemon targeted all of those who voted for Trump in 2016. “And I think a lot of people need to be deprogrammed, right now, before they cast their next ballots.” Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich showed his fondness for Stalinist tactics a few weeks before the election. “When this nightmare is over,” he tweeted, “we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It would erase Trump’s lies, comfort those who have been harmed by his hatefulness, and name every official, politician, executive, and media mogul whose greed and cowardice enabled this catastrophe.” After the election, the totalitarians went into high gear, zeroing in on Trump voters. David Atkins, a prominent California Democratic operative, said he knew exactly what he wanted to do, but was unsure how to do it. “No seriously…how ‘do’ you deprogram 75 million people?” He asked, “We have to start thinking in terms of post-WWII Germany or Japan.” Harvard students, who would never consider themselves to be the unwitting dupes of brainwashing, called for reeducation and moral rehabilitation camps. A Bernie Sanders employee was caught in a Project Veritas sting saying, “we need to send all the Republicans to the reeducation camps.” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she wanted to “deradicalize” those who were “radicalized” by Trump. One of the most clarion calls to deprogram Trump supporters came when Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson said, “there are millions of Americans, almost all white, almost all Republicans, who somehow need to be deprogrammed”; he added that they are members of a ”Trumpist cult.” Former “Today Show” host Katie Couric also voiced her support for deprogramming, arguing the need to deal with those “who have signed up for the cult of Trump.” An attorney for Public Broadcasting Services (PBS) went too far even for his left-wing employer when he set his sights on the kids. Caught by Project Veritas, Michael Beller announced, “We go for all the Republican voters, and Homeland Security will take their children away. And we’ll put them [Trump supporters’ children] in re-education camps.” He was subsequently fired. He should move to North Korea. The roots of deprogramming are found in Maoism. Once Mao Zedong seized power in 1949, he moved quickly to launch the first of his “thought control” campaigns. Everyone from intellectuals to housewives were chosen for “self-education and ideological remoulding of the liberated people.” Under Mao, “thought reform” reached a level the world had never seen before. It was a U.S. foreign correspondent, Edward Hunter, who in 1951 wrote a book, “Brainwashing in Red China,” that detailed the workings of “thought reform.” Ten years later, American professor of psychiatry Robert Jay Lifton wrote, “Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism.” It became a classic. Lifton fingered two key elements of “thought reform.” The first was “confession, the exposure and renunciation of the past and present ‘evil.’” The second was “re-education,” or the “remaking of a man in the Communist image.” To cite one example, young Chinese students had to confess how wrong they were to respect their parents—they were forced to denounce them. That set the stage for their re-education. Do people like Katie Couric have any idea what they are promoting when they call for deprogramming? Do they know that there is nothing more totalitarian than having government send in agents to police our minds? The Catholic League will never yield in its fight for freedom of speech. We need all the allies we can get. Tags: Bill Donohue, Catholic League, Maoist Roots, DeprogrammingTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
The Great School Reset
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 06:24 PM PST by Paul Jacob: A reset is going to happen; the status quo is not an option. The major institutions of the modern welfare state were unsustainable before COVID-19, which is why Klaus Schwab had been talking up The Great Reset for years. He and his Davos crowd — convening right now, virtually, at the 2021 annual meeting of the World Economic Forum — want to fix everything with a huge heaping helping of intrusive government. The pandemic panics have merely forced the technocrats to speed up their timeline. Which may be one reason why Deep State aficionados in the Biden administration and in the media have set their eyes upon squelching the populist movements that increasingly want to chuck them along with their globalist policies. But populism isn’t their only problem. For a real education, look at “education.” “We are witnessing an exodus from public schools that’s unprecedented in modern U.S. history,” writes Corey A. DeAngelis in the December Reason. “Families are fleeing the traditional system and turning to homeschooling, virtual charters, microschools, and — more controversially — ‘pandemic pods,’ in which families band together to help small groups of kids learn at home.” All these new ways around the failed centralized institutions of government schooling that DeAngelis discusses are increasingly seen as liberatory. Will a people accustomed to increasing freedom and excellence in one realm easily succumb to a pitch to decrease freedom and increase government in all others? Seems a tough sell. Which suggests a small sliver of hope that we might get a Freedom Reset instead of a technocratic one. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Great School ResetTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Sen. Susan Collins: ‘Extraordinarily unlikely that the president will be convicted… just do the math’
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 05:52 PM PST by Robert Romano: “I think it’s pretty obvious from the vote today that it is extraordinary unlikely that the president will be convicted… Just do the math.” That was Sen. Susan Collins’ (R-Maine) statement to the New York Times after a Senate vote with 45 Senate Republicans including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) moving to dismiss the impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump on the point of order that it was unconstitutional to convict and “remove” a president who is no longer in office. The point of order was originally raised by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) moved to table the point of order, prompting the Senate voting 55 to 45 to table the motion. Sen. Collins was one of five Republicans to vote against the Paul motion, which also included Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.). In arguing for the point of order, Sen. Paul stated, “we’re basically wasting our time” with the impeachment trial now that Trump’s out of office. Sen. Paul explained, “I think there will be enough support on it to show there’s no chance they can impeach the president. If 34 people support my resolution that this is an unconstitutional proceeding, it shows they don’t have the votes.” And after the vote, Sen. Collins agreed, citing the vote as making it “extraordinarily unlikely” for the Senate to obtain a conviction. Of which, there is little wonder. Almost 9 out of 10 Republican voters oppose convicting former President Trump in recent polling by Reuters-Ipsos. Plus, it is not even constitutional to hold a trial for “removal” after President Trump’s term has already expired. Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution states “The President… shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” And Article I, Section 3 states “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States…” Those constitutional provisions are all inclusive and must be read consistently. Only a sitting president can be removed and since conviction must include removal, there cannot be an impeachment trial of a former president. Moreover, on the merits of the charge, “incitement of insurrection” for the speech Trump gave on Jan. 6 at the Save America Rally, Trump explicitly urged those protesting the certification of the election results by Congress to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.” That is protected speech under the First Amendment and cannot be made into a crime by Congress. In addition, evidence is emerging that planning for the riot at the Capitol that followed the speech began days and weeks prior to the rally and was done on social media outlets like Facebook, according to Justice Department court filings. If the riot and attacking Capitol Police was premeditated and pre-planned, then it was not a spontaneous outcome of Trump’s speech. Finally, one has to ask what interest President Joe Biden has in wasting valuable Senate floor time in his first 100 days with his own party prosecuting his former opponent from the 2020 election in a trial that has practically a zero percent chance of conviction. Biden just spent his Inaugural Address saying, “To restore the soul and secure the future of America, requires so much more than words. It requires the most elusive of all things in a democracy: unity… We can see each other not as adversaries but as neighbors.” Now, with the divisive impeachment trial upon us beginning Feb. 8, risking further stoking the partisan divide, Biden’s call for national unity has gone unheeded in less than a week, with a trial almost certain to fail. As Sen. Collins urged, just do the math, Mr. President. Robert Romano is the Vice President of Public Policy at Americans for Limited Government. Tags: Robert Romano, Americans for Limited Government, Sen. Susan Collins, ‘Extraordinarily unlikely, that the president, will be convicted, just do the math’To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Out With the New
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 05:34 PM PST Biden rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and ending the XL pipeline puts China 1st over America.
Editorial Cartoon by AF “Tony” Branco Tags: AF Branco, Out With the NewTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Impeach Obama for Inciting Black Lives Matter Riots
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 05:17 PM PST by Daniel Greenfield: On May 31st, a violent Black Lives Matter mob burned American flags, threw bottles at police officers, and started a fire in the historic ‘Church of Presidents’ which had been visited by almost every president. Another building was set on fire, and windows across the area were smashed by the rampaging BLM mob wielding baseball bats, bricks, and even more lethal weapons. Helicopter footage showed the Washington Monument wreathed in smoke from the fires set by the massive BLM assault on the center of our government. But while the BLMers assaulted numerous buildings, including the Department of Veterans Affairs, and had vandalized historical landmarks, including the Lincoln Memorial, the real target of the radicals was the White House. 60 members of the Secret Service and 150 law enforcement officers in total were eventually injured. As the BLM mob assailed the White House, the Secret Service took President Trump and his family to a bunker: an eventuality meant to deal with terrorist or nuclear attacks. Black Lives Matter mobs didn’t break through to the White House, but they managed to set the White House guardhouse on fire. Instead of condemning this extremist assault on our nation, Democrats supported the rioters and falsely claimed that law enforcement had assaulted “peaceful protesters” for a “photo op”, and demanded the removal of the National Guard. Democrats and their media allies sneered at President Trump for retreating to a bunker. Barack Obama, as the first black man to sit in the White House, a D.C. resident, and the politician who had done the most to bolster the racist and radical BLM movement burning American cities, had the opportunity to put out the fires. Instead he poured on more gasoline. After the White House attack, Obama delivered a speech at his own foundation’s event which made no mention of the assault on the house he had formerly occupied or the threat of violence to his successor. Obama then spoke to Brittany Packnett Cunningham, described as, “one of the most prominent activists behind the Black Lives Matter movement” whom he had appointed to serve on his Task Force on 21st Century Policing after the Ferguson riots. Obama began his speech by once again accusing America of racism, which he described as an “original sin”, and praised the mobs terrorizing the country. Instead of condemning the violent attack on the White House, he falsely claimed that the violence was the work of a “tiny minority”. Then, putting the lie to his false claim, he chatted with Brittany Packnett Cunningham who had previously urged attendees to repeat a chant by domestic terrorist Assata Shakur still wanted by the FBI for her role in the murder of a police officer. Shakur is the icon of BLM and while Democrats accuse Republicans of being domestic terrorists, the movement they embraced is built around one of the FBI’s top ten most wanted terrorists from a violent racist hate group. The month before, she had tweeted Martin Luther King’s quote about a riot being the “language of the unheard” while appending her own text, “Property damage at protests, 101”. Not only wasn’t the violence coming from a tiny minority, but Obama’s own event was complicit. Obama’s speech described the turmoil as “profound as anything that I’ve seen in my lifetime”, and urged that, “at some point, protests start to dwindle in size. And it’s very important for us to take the momentum that has been created… and say, let’s use this to finally have an impact.” Every American man and woman who had been assaulted, robbed, and threatened by Obama’s mobs felt the impact. The police officers in the hospital, the shopkeepers sifting through the rubble, and the dead in the BLM riots felt the impact. Obama could have stopped the violence, instead his political support for the violent racist BLM terrorists helped keep the riots going. While in the White House, Obama had helped incite the racist BLM movement. When the Ferguson riots broke out after Michael Brown robbed a convenience store and assaulted a police officer, Obama and his administration incited violence by spreading false claims without evidence that Brown had been an innocent victim of police racism. The DOJ attempted to suppress the surveillance video showing Brown’s attack on a minority store clerk, and Democrats refused to stop spreading false claims that he had been murdered. Recently, Senator Kamala Harris doubled down on the lie, inciting violence by falsely claiming that “Michael Brown’s murder forever changed Ferguson and America.” Obama claimed that “the anger and the emotion that followed his death awakened our nation”. The BLM racial terrorist movement, backed monetarily by left-wing foundations and corporations, timed its riots to coincidence with election years. These were not mere race riots: they were and are election riots that exploit the shooting of a criminal to help the Democrats. The biggest years of BLM and proto-BLM riots in 2014, 2016, and 2020 were election years. When Obama and the Democrats fed the racial supremacist agenda of BLM, they were engaging in a campaign of political terror to turn out votes and tilt elections in their favor. In 2016, the BLM riots surged again. On July 7, 2016, Obama delivered a speech from the Marriott in Warsaw falsely accusing the police of racism against black people. That same day, Micah X. Johnson, who had attended BLM rallies, set out to murder as many white Dallas police officers as he could. He killed 5. Obama spoke at the funeral of the police officers in defense of the racist hate group that killed them, and continued to incite violence by falsely accusing police officers of “the killing of Alton Sterling of Baton Rouge and Philando Castile of Minnesota” at a funeral for police officers. Sterling had raped a 14-year-old girl and was shot by police officers after reaching for a gun. “Even those who dislike the phrase ‘Black Lives Matter,’ surely we should be able to hear the pain of Alton Sterling’s family,” Obama had urged. Earlier that year, Obama had invited BLM organizers, including Brittany Packnett Cunningham and DeRay Mckesson, as well as Al Sharpton, to the White House. Mckesson had been sued that year by a Baton Rouge police officer who suffered brain trauma and lost teeth after being assaulted by a McKesson organized mob at a BLM protest for child rapist Alton Sterling. Obama had invited a man accused of having “incited the violence” that crippled a police officer. The Supreme Court case of Mckesson v. Doe, in which the racist movement was represented by Covington & Burling attorneys, was tossed by the Supreme Court with Justice Thomas, the court’s only black justice dissenting, but it’s already playing a role in the attempt to impeach President Trump over false allegations that he had somehow incited the Capitol riot. The Democrats would like to continue impeaching President Trump even after he leaves office. But if a president can be impeached even after he leaves office for supporting protests that turn violent, then Obama’s impeachment should be next. Obama’s long history of supporting Black Lives Matter is a matter of public record. Obama’s defenders will argue that he urged peaceful protests. So did President Trump. It hasn’t stopped Obama’s cronies from impeaching Trump. The Democrat case against President Trump hinges on using the word, “fight” in his speech. At Obama’s BLM event at the White House, Brittany Packnett Cunningham had urged, “we have to take the fight everywhere.” On the campaign trail for Biden in Philadelphia Obama had ranted, “We can’t abandon those protesters who inspired us. We’ve got to channel their activism into action, we can’t just imagine a better future. We’ve got to fight for it.” A week later, massive riots broke out in Philly that brought out the Pennsylvania National Guard. A curfew was imposed across multiple districts as mobs of thousands rampaged through the streets. Thirty police officers were injured: including a female officer who was hit by a car. That’s how the “protesters” were fighting for that better future. The case for impeaching Barack Obama is simple enough. He backed a violent racist hate group. He delivered multiple speeches in support of its extremist cause while falsely claiming that America was racist and that the racist protests were justified. After he used the word “fight” in a speech, devastating riots followed that brought a great American city to its knees. That’s the same case that the Democrats have made for impeaching President Trump. If it’s good enough to impeach President Trump, it’s good enough to impeach Obama. Obama abused his office to support a racist hate group. He invited members of the racist hate group to the White House. Including those accused of inciting violence. He used his office to undermine law enforcement efforts to stop the extremist violence. And the end result has been thousands of injuries, numerous deaths, and billions of dollars in damages across America. Impeaching Obama won’t fix all of that. But it will offer justice to some of BLM’s victims. Tags: Daniel Greenfield, Impeach Obama, for Inciting, Black Lives Matter, RiotsTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Why Biden’s Immigration Policy Will Harm Americans and Migrants Alike
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 04:57 PM PST
by Virginia Allen: A migrant caravan began moving toward America’s southern border after the Biden administration announced a pause in deportations for 100 days. A federal judge in Texas on Tuesday temporarily blocked President Joe Biden’s decision to suspend deportations, pending arguments. The president’s immigration policies, such as the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, pose a grave threat to America, according to Ana Quintana, a Heritage Foundation senior policy analyst in Latin America and the Western Hemisphere. Quintana joins the podcast to explain the likely impact of Biden’s changes to immigration policy. We also cover these stories:
Virginia Allen: It is such a pleasure to welcome Ana Quintana to the show. Ana is a Heritage Foundation senior policy analyst in Latin America and the Western Hemisphere. Ana, welcome back to the podcast. Ana Quintana: Thanks for having me, guys. Allen: There is a migrant caravan traveling toward America’s southern border as we speak. So let’s start there. Tell us what we need to know about this caravan. Quintana: Sure. Yeah, so, I think the key thing to know is the timing of this. They set off a few days before the inauguration. The curious thing about it is it happened a few days after [Vice President] Kamala Harris went on Univision, one of the largest Spanish-language channels, and essentially outlined the Biden administration’s amnesty plan. That they would be suspending deportations for 100 days, they would be granting green cards to TPS holders, outlining their pathway to citizenship for the 11-plus million [illegal immigrants] in the United States, etc. And within three days, that’s when the 7,000-plus from Honduras started making their way to the United States. Allen: A part of me has to think that the Biden administration knew that this would happen. If they’re out there touting, “We’re not going to be deporting individuals for 100 days,” I have to believe that they would have expected the natural response to be a lot of individuals thinking, “Now’s my shot to get to the states.” Quintana: I think you and I have common sense and others have common sense in thinking, “Well, you outline an amnesty plan, clearly it’s going to lead to a border surge.” And clearly about a month ago, their senior advisers even went on a major Spanish-language wire service and stated that they will not immediately, which, contradicting Kamala, they would not begin undoing [former] President [Donald] Trump’s immigration policies because they were getting word that there were going to be masses of people coming to the United States. But then Kamala, a few weeks later, completely undid the mitigation efforts that they put in place. Allen: We’re going to dive a little deeper into the Biden administration’s policies on immigration, but let’s just chat a little bit more about how these caravans operate and how they work. I know back in 2018, you traveled down to Mexico City as there was a caravan moving north toward the border. These were individuals mainly from the countries of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. You sat with them, you talked with them, you saw the situation on the ground. So can you just explain a little bit about what you learned on that trip back in 2018, regarding how these caravans form, how they operate, who’s driving them, who’s leading them? Quintana: Sure. I think one thing to note is the caravans then are different than what’s happening now. So the method of transportation is essentially the same because it’s just been learned that it’s cheaper and it’s safer to travel in large groups, and it’s also just far easier to get through border controls. If you are in a group of 1,000 something-plus people, you can easily just push past the National Guard and just push past the border control police. So back then what was going on was it was largely these leftist political groups that were organizing these caravans, and essentially telling these people—and these are incredibly desperate people. I think that’s the one thing to keep in mind. So it’s really easy and unfortunate how easy it is to manipulate them. They’re telling them that, “Well, once you guys got to the United States, the United Nations is going to be at the border to help adjudicate your case on your behalf.” And I’m sorry, but anybody who tells me otherwise, I’m going to tell them to your face, “You’re lying,” because that’s specifically what the caravan organizers told me to my face and what some of the migrants told me to my face—that the U.N. would be there because, according to the migration protection, the global convention on immigration protection, something to that effect, … the United Nations would have to be there. There were also various, like, leftist U.S.-based groups who were there essentially guiding people on the U.S. asylum process because it’s quite difficult to actually qualify for U.S. asylum. You’ve always had this issue of so many meritless cases of people just floating around in the United States who claim asylum, but essentially, at the end, never qualify for asylum. And so there are people who guide and coach them there. And so we were there in Mexico City for a few days. It was about 5,000-plus something people. And it was just very unfortunate to see all of these leftist organizers, leftist agitators who have a political objective. They want to undermine and destabilize the United States, and they want to agitate relations. This time it was these groups from Honduras, these leftist political organizations from Honduras, and they would tell us how they would go from city to city and they would call the next city that they would go to. And they would say, “Hey, we’re on the way with 5,000 whatever people. So have an area set up for us.” In this case it was a stadium. “Have food, have clothes, have whatever.” And the city would have to do that because otherwise they would get a lot of negative attention on them if they didn’t. Allen: Wow. So it’s really strategic. This doesn’t really happen by accident. It sounds like it’s very well orchestrated. Quintana: I mean, it has to be right, because how else do you move so many people from one point to [another?] These are countries. People are going from Honduras to El Salvador to Guatemala to Mexico. These are mass movements of people. And so this requires resources, this requires logistics. This requires a lot of methodical planning here. And this is before there were stricter border control measures between Guatemala and Mexico, for example. And between, like, Honduras [and] between Guatemala’s border further, their southern border. Allen: And what role do drug traffickers, human traffickers play within these caravans, or taking advantage of potential opportunities within a caravan like this? Quintana: Oh, God, it’s so awful. … One of the groups that we met had told us about, I think it was 100 of the people who were traveling with them had hitched a ride on some trucks, on like some 18-wheelers. And they went through—I forgot which drug cartel’s territory—and they were extorted by this one organization, and they didn’t have the sufficient amount of money on them. And they ended up [being] kidnapped and killed. Right? So that’s incredibly common. And just a few days ago, when one particular part of Mexico called Tamaulipas, the Central Americas—I think there were specifically from Guatemala—they were killed. I think they were burned alive. These sorts of things are common because, essentially, cartels and various other criminal organizations control the transportation networks. They control a lot of human smuggling as well. So if people don’t have the money to pay to transit, that’s what’s going to happen to them. Allen: Wow. So, so sad. So, we’re seeing that as President [Joe] Biden, he announced, “OK, we’re putting pause on deportations for a 100 days,” that promise, as we chatted about, seems to have brought on this flood of individuals who are now traveling toward the border. Just talk a little bit more on your thoughts about this decision to pause deportations for a 100 days. What are the effects of that decision? Not only regarding the caravan, but then also for those individuals who are already in the states. Quintana: Sure. So, think about this, this absolutely incentivizes people to make this incredibly dangerous journey. And I think we all should be incredibly livid with the Biden administration for their radical immigration policies and their lack of attention to border security. But I think, also, at the end of the day, we should also have humanity toward the individuals who are putting themselves on this dangerous journey. I think it’s awful that the Biden administration is dangling this carrot and saying, “Hey, by the way, we’re not deporting people for the next 100 days,” because they’re creating this false incentive to people to come to the United States. They should never do that. At the end of the day, America is a country of laws. We’re a country who needs to maintain the integrity of our immigration system. And we cannot do that if we have a president who’s saying, “Well, we’re not going to deport anybody for 100 days, guys, so, by the way, just come on over. Who cares?” Because we have people who are literally going to risk their lives and are going to risk their children’s lives and their wives … are potentially going to get raped and sexually assaulted on the way over here. And then for the people who are inside of the country, if you’re already at the point where you are going to be deported, why give this impression that America is no longer going to uphold its commitment to keep the sanctity of its immigration system? It absolutely makes no sense. At this point, it’s like, “Why are you going to selectively choose and selectively politicize which part of our criminal justice system you want to apply the laws to, just because it’s politically convenient for a domestic constituency that you are trying to appease?” It’s illogical and it just shows that, again, the Biden administration is, one, they’re not focused on unity. They’re just completely focused on this hyper-radical perspective of just applying the law or whatever suits them politically. Allen: I was reading today that before Trump left office, the Department of Homeland Security signed the Sanctuary for Americans First Enactment, or it’s also called SAFE. So this agreement says that Arizona, Indiana, Louisiana, and Texas must be given an 180 days notice before the executive branch can actually make changes to immigration policy. So could you just walk us through a little bit more of understanding this action by the Department of Homeland Security before Trump left office? And then the impact that that might have on what Biden is saying regarding pausing these deportations for 100 days? Quintana: … Yeah, I think before Trump left office I think they put a host of these measures in place in order to prevent the federal government from coming in to adjust them so the states can have more of an active role in place. A few days ago, for example, we saw El Paso issue an alert that they were anticipating a massive influx of migrants, and that would essentially give the state of Texas, again, more of an ability to exert the state’s powers. Again, under SAFE. But what we’ve now seen from the Biden administration is that they are going to overrule that. So I think, again, while the Trump administration may have put the safeguards in place for border states and for states that are particularly more vulnerable to influxes of migration, I’m not necessarily convinced—and I think, also, we’re seeing the evidence—that the Biden administration is going to uphold them. Frankly, they’re absolutely not. So, frankly, I don’t think many Americans should have confidence in that. Allen: So then what can we expect to see when these caravans do reach the border? What’s going to happen to these people? Quintana: OK. So, what’s happened right now is, the caravan, the vast majority of it has been broken up inside of Guatemala. And I think a lot of credit needs to go to the Guatemalan government for breaking it up because the transit route has been from Honduras into Guatemala, and then after Guatemala [it] would have gone through Mexico and then into the United States. The Guatemalan government, again, to their credit, really did a lot because it’s completely unfair that Guatemala’s health protocols have been broken and Guatemala’s immigration protocols have been broken. This is a country who has been under, just like us, a very strict lockdown, and as a consequence, they’ve also experienced a massive economic downturn. So why is it that just because the Honduran government did not stop their people from fleeing, that the Guatemalans should have to suffer from that as well? And so I think it’s pretty great that the Guatemalans stopped them. But again, I think this is only for now. I think we should anticipate to see more individuals coming because this immigration bill will be put forth. I think they’re now saying that they want to put it forth in piecemeals, and I think we should dive a bit more deeper into this because it’s not just the temporary pause on deportations. It’s so many more things. It’s green cards for TPS holders, it’s the pathway to citizenship, rather, for 11 million. … It’s the most radical immigration bill that I think I’ve seen in my seven-plus years at Heritage, and there’s a significant amount of Democratic support for it that is quite concerning. Allen: Let’s go ahead and dive into that. So, it’s called the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021. Tell us what we need to know about this proposed legislation, Ana. Quintana: Sure. Imagine, 11 million people who are here in this country illegally, … and frankly, I think that number is … not an accurate number. That number should be far higher, probably closer to 15 something million. A significant chunk of these probably have already either been convicted of a crime, convicted of a felony. So in a normal situation if, let’s say they were here legally, they would not even qualify for citizenship. The Biden administration is proposing that if they have been here for eight years, they can now apply for a green card. And then after they have a green card for five years, they can apply for citizenship. So imagine, you come into this country illegally, you are now on a fast track for U.S. citizenship, when in comparison, so many people who I know who’ve gone through the process legally, it’s been far for them. My parents, it took them far longer than that to become U.S. citizens, and they came to this country as political refugees. My friends who are living in Mexico, whose families have opened up businesses in the United States, who have visas, their process is far more costly and far slower. And these are people who, again, did things the legitimate, the right way, and who are still going to have to wait far further behind in the line than individuals who came into this country illegally. So now people with temporary protected status—this is a designation that’s given to individuals from a country that’s in the middle of a major catastrophe, a major political situation where they cannot go back for fear of their lives. So that’s for Nicaraguans, Salvadorans, there [are] a few countries for where these individuals have temporary protected status. The problem is Democrats have always used TPS, as conservatives have alleged, as a backdoor amnesty. Because, for example, Nicaraguans have had TPS for about 20 years. Same thing with Salvadorans. There’s nothing temporary about a program that’s a 20-year-old program. Now the Biden administration is saying, “Hey, you know what? You’ve been here so long, let me just give you a green card. After you have a green card, you can apply for citizenship a few years later.” Again, what’s the purpose of anything called temporary if you can eventually become a citizen? There’s literally nothing about it. Then there’s like what we were talking about, the pause in deportations, they want to add additional immigration judges because they say they want to relieve the backlog on the U.S. immigration system right now, which there’s about a million-plus cases held up in immigration courts. Oh, and also they want to dramatically expand the U.S. refugee program, create [a] new Refugee Resettlement Program. When [President Barack] Obama left office, for example, the U.S. was admitting about 118,000 refugees into the United States. And that’s essentially the highest point in U.S. history. And the United States is still processing refugee applications from the Obama administration era. Biden wants to lift it to 125,000. So imagine, we’re still processing Obama-era refugee admission applications. Biden wants to expand it dramatically. So every which way you look at this immigration proposal plan, it’s broad amnesties, it’s essentially not looking out for the American people or the American worker, and it’s appeasing a domestic constituency that he should not be looking out for. Allen: It seems, in so many ways, going back to this fast track for citizenship, it just removes the incentive for individuals of, “Why would I go through the legal process? Why would I do it correctly when it’s going to be so much harder and take so much longer than if I just do it illegally?” Quintana: This is the thing, though. People of integrity are still going to do it the legitimate way because it’s a matter of pride. People [who] have pride will never want to be known as, “No, I didn’t … ” It’s a matter of, like, “I’m not going to accept Biden’s handout.” Allen: Yeah. Quintana: But then again, it’s also a matter of, I think, of Americans who legitimately care about the integrity of just their country and the integrity of their immigration system should take a look and examine, “OK, do I want my schools right now to have … “ Right now, our schools are completely shut down. Our teachers are working from home because our teachers unions have just completely hijacked this entire system, and imagine the impact on our schools that this is going to have. Imagine the impact that this is going to have on our local communities. And this isn’t a xenophobic argument. But this is an argument that we actually need to sit back and think about. We have about 11 million Americans that are unemployed, and yet the priority for this administration in the first two weeks is to shut down the Keystone Pipeline and to push forward this massive amnesty bill that’s going to encourage a massive influx of people into this country. Allen: Yeah. It doesn’t make any sense. You’re shutting down jobs and then you’re bringing in all these individuals that need jobs. Quintana: Exactly. Allen: Yeah. Just absolutely crazy. Talk a little bit about Biden’s … policy decisions around “Dreamers,” or [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals] recipients. Quintana: … For them as well, it’s green cards as well. He wants to expand for DACA recipients. … That’s tied up with Texas right now is fighting the U.S. government, rather, they’re going to expand the fight with the Biden administration, kind of like Texas has been. They essentially [are] the major bulwark against the broadening of DACA. But the Biden administration essentially wants to broaden the “Dreamers” who qualify for DACA. So, “Dreamers” are essentially individuals who came into this country as youths, and who came into this country legally. And so, essentially, to qualify for DACA benefits, they would need to officially be enrolled, quote-unquote, within the DACA program. … The Biden administration wants to make it easier for individuals who are “Dreamers” to enroll for DACA benefits. And again, this begs the question, well, who is the priority here for the Biden administration? Allen: And then on top of all this, we also know that Biden is stopping funding to the border wall, correct? Quintana: Yes. Yeah. … He has shut that down. The border wall construction is no longer. I’ve heard tangentially that sound like … it’s being phased out, just to phase out certain contracts. But yes, border wall construction is no longer. And again, this is just him making political decisions, because if you speak to border agents, these are nonpolitical individuals, these are the men and women who are at the border every single day, and they just want it to be easier for them to stop anything that’s coming into the border—whether it’s individuals, whether it’s drugs, whether it’s even, honestly, diseased cows. … That’s something that happens. You have diseased cows coming in from Mexico, going onto U.S. ranchers’ properties. And then imagine what happens to the herds onto American ranchers. That will then infect their entire herd, and there goes their livestock. And so it just makes it a lot easier for them to do their jobs. Allen: So is there anything among President Biden’s immigration policies that we’ve seen so far that we can say is positive or that will benefit Americans in any way? Quintana: I think it’s encouraging that he wants to add more judges to help relieve the backlog, but then you look at why these judges are being added. Why is the backlog being relieved? And it’s only to expedite the entry and expedite the processing of people who essentially are already here illegally, and to legalize their status in the United States. So … essentially the objective of why he’s trying to do it is wrong. It’s just their philosophical outlook on what the U.S. immigration system is there for is unencouraging, to be frank. Allen: Ana, we so appreciate all of your research and your work on this topic. Can you tell us how our listeners can follow your work? Quintana: Sure. Our colleagues and I were just always on Twitter, we’re always commenting on this. … Also, you can find our work on Heritage.org. You just search our names. And yeah, we’re out there. And I think trying to combat the Biden administration’s immigration policies and shine a light as to why this is not good for America, why this isn’t good for the border states, that’s going to be a top priority of ours this year. Allen: Ana, thank you so much for your time. We so appreciate it. Tags: Virginia Allen, Why Biden’s Immigration Policy, Will Harm Americans, and Migrants AlikeTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
Gun Rights are Equal Rights
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 02:56 PM PST
by Nicholas Johnson: When looking at the struggle of Black people in the United States for their natural rights—those of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness—the right to bear arms, and particularly those arms employing multi-shot technology, has been vital. Opponents of the AR-15, America’s most-popular rifle, argue that its repeating capability is exceptional and that such a thing was not contemplated by the framers and ratifiers of the constitutional right to arms. This is false. Many versions of repeating firearms were available at the time of the framing. But the most-vivid demonstration that the right to arms was embraced with full appreciation for the capabilities of repeating firearms is the transformative post-civil war extension of federal constitutional rights as limitations on states through the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. The views of the drafters and advocates of the Fourteenth Amendment are plain. Sen. Jacob Howard of Michigan introduced the proposal by explaining that “the great object” of the amendment is to “restrain the power of the states and compel them in all times to respect these great fundamental guarantees … secured by the first eight amendments of the Constitution; such as the right to keep and bear arms.” The same congress that advanced the Fourteenth Amendment also abolished southern state militias, demonstrating a vision of the right to arms as an individual right, and not merely some federal protection of state prerogatives.
By 1868, the capabilities of repeating rifles were widely understood. In 1861, B. Tyler Henry’s 16-shot, lever-action rifle already had powerful advocates in the Union Army. The Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton; Secretary of Navy, Gideon Welles; and President Abraham Lincoln all received gifts of presentation-grade Henry rifles. In May of 1862, the Henry was tested at the Washington Navy Yard, where one 15-shot magazine was fired in 10.8 seconds. A total of 1,040 shots were fired with hits made out to 348 feet on an 18-inch square target. This was done with .44-caliber cartridges firing 216-grain bullets. Commentary from the period highlights the acknowledged utility of the lever-action repeater in the context of civil unrest. In July 1862, George Prentice, editor of the Louisville Journal, said, “In these days when rebel outlaws and raids are becoming common in Kentucky. … Certainly the most effective weapon that could be used with the most tremendous results is the one that we have mentioned recently on two or three occasions, the newly invented rifle of Henry.” Prentice ultimately bought several hundred Henry rifles and resold them to loyal Union men. After the war, the utility of the repeating rifle was abundantly clear to Black people who plainly needed more than the parchment barriers of the Fourteenth Amendment to protect them against both private terrorism and the overtly hostile state and local governments. The Black Codes of this era (local and state laws that aimed to reinstitute slavery in a different
form) reflected the age-old wisdom that subjugation requires disarmament. The Freedmen appreciated instinctively that arms were vital to their survival. They defied local and state disarmament efforts and defended their neighbors, friends and selves. We know from newspapers of the day, petitions to Congress, and reporting of Freedman’s Bureau agents that the right to arms was a paramount concern for those newly freed in the territory where they were recently enslaved. By the end of the 19th century, the importance of repeating rifles to Black people was so well-established that storied anti-lynching advocate, Ida B. Wells, would declare, “A Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every Black home.” Wells’ praise of the Winchester was not empty rhetoric, and her perspective was not just historical. She was referencing two recent episodes, one in Jacksonville, Fla., and one in Paducah, Ky., where well-armed Black people thwarted lynch mobs. Wells drew similar lessons from Black people using repeating technology in self-defense in Oklahoma. Seven months before she arrived, Black men wielding Winchester rifles defied a mob to rescue Edwin McCabe, the Black founder of Langston, Okla., who had the grand vision of becoming governor. After mobs in Memphis had lynched her best friend and sacked her newspaper, Wells traveled there in search of a more hospitable environment where she might recommend Black people to migrate. Wells’ exhortation was heeded by countless men and women who faced petty tyranny and mobs during the first century of Black citizenship in America. And hers was not an isolated voice. The commitment to armed self-defense and the deployment of multi-shot and multi-projectile firearms was common from the leadership to the grassroots. After the 1906 Atlanta race riot, W.E.B. Du Bois
described buying a Winchester shotgun “and two dozen rounds of shells filled with buckshot,” as defense against roving mobs. Du Bois’ future compatriot at the National Association of Colored People (NAACP), Walter White, was only a boy at the time of the Atlanta riot, but he vividly recounted crouching with his father in a darkened parlor, clutching a rifle as a mob descended on his Atlanta neighborhood. Du Bois and White pulled heavy oars at the burgeoning NAACP. Du Bois was the intellectual force behind the organization’s flagship Crisis magazine. White would lead the NAACP for more than two decades, into the 1950s. So, it is not surprising that the NAACP cut its teeth as an organization defending Black people who had used guns to defend themselves against mobs and majoritarian tyranny. The first major litigation supported by the NAACP was the 1910 self-defense case of Pink Franklin. Franklin’s troubles stemmed from his quest for better wages. He had agreed to work for a planter, but then quit to take a better job. This sort of thing is common practice today and was equally common then, at least for white people. But in 1910, for Black sharecroppers like Pink Franklin, the pursuit of better pay was restricted by a special category of agricultural contract governed by the South Carolina Criminal Code. The law was basically a renewed version of the Black Codes that the defeated Confederates attempted to enforce against freedmen immediately after the Civil War. The law said that sharecroppers who broke labor agreements with planters could be fined and jailed. Black contract-breakers who could not pay their fines, or their growing fees from incarceration, could then be sold off into the convict labor system, virtually slaves again. After Franklin left his first boss for better pay at another farm, the jilted employer swore out a warrant for his arrest. One dark morning around 3 a.m., government men descended on Franklin’s shanty. Stories disagree on the details, but, basically, Franklin said he was surprised in the dark by strange men in his bedroom. Franklin said when one of them fired at him, he rolled to the repeating rifle he kept in the corner and came up shooting. A surviving constable, however, claimed that the doors to Franklin’s house and bedroom were ajar; that they entered and were attacked by Franklin. There was agreement on the fact that Franklin shot two constables, one of them fatally. Pink Franklin was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. The NAACP supported Franklin’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court and lobbied the governor to commute his sentence. The advocacy and lobbying continued for nearly a decade, and Franklin was finally released in 1919.
During the civil-rights movement of the 1960s, repeating firearms helped Black activists survive. In Carroll County, Miss., activist Leola Blackmon repelled Klansmen who set a cross on fire in her yard. “That night when they set that cross afire at my house … I thought to cut them down, but I didn’t. I just let some bullets through behind them. I had a rifle. It would shoot 16 times. And I just lit out up there and starting shooting.” One county over from Blackmon, activist Hartman Turnbow staunched a firebomb attack on his home by deploying his 16-shot semi-automatic rifle. The next morning, the license plate of the local sheriff was found in Turnbow’s driveway. Turnbow also appreciated that the capabilities of his semi-automatic rifle were rivaled, and maybe exceeded, by another common firearm, the shotgun. Turnbow described his calculation this way: “The next year when they shot over here, I had got an automatic shotgun, Remington 12-gauge, and them high-velocity buckshot. So I jumped up and run out and turned it loose.” (In 1997, the U.S. Joint Service Combat Shotgun Report confirmed that, within 40 yards, a shotgun loaded with buckshot can be superior to many repeating rifles, a conclusion that clearly would have been no surprise to Turnbow.) In Bogalusa, La., in 1965, Robert Hicks, one of the early leaders of the Deacons for Defense, repelled terrorists who attacked his home using a modern copy of the Winchester rifle Wells had extolled nearly a century earlier. In Birmingham, Ala., legendary activist the Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth was protected by armed “Civil Rights Guards” after suffering several violent attacks. Shuttlesworth’s colleague, The Rev. Ed Gardner would later describe how they survived those times with the aid of his “non-violent Winchester.” When Thurgood Marshall and his young assistant, future federal court judge, Constance Baker Motley, were litigating school desegregation cases for the NAACP, they, too, were guarded by armed men. Judge Motley described one episode this way: “While in Birmingham … we stayed in Arthur Shores’ spacious new home on the city’s outskirts. This house had been bombed on several occasions, but because we could not stay in a hotel or motel in Birmingham, we had to take up Shores’ offer of his bomb-prone abode. … When Thurgood and I arrived, the garage door was wide open. Inside were six or eight Black men with shotguns and machine guns who had been guarding the house since the last bombing. … When we went to court the next day, the driver of our car and one other man in the front passenger seat carried guns in their pockets.” Daisy Bates, who shepherded the Little Rock Nine through the turmoil of desegregation efforts in Arkansas, wrote about taking her turn in the armed watch of her home, wielding a venerable semi-automatic .45-caliber 1911 pistol. One night she shot multiple rounds to repel a man who had thrown a flaming missile at her home and was about to launch another. He had the good sense to retreat, and Bates survived to carry on the fight.
Throughout the South, the Deacons for Defense and Justice would protect activists in a variety of contexts. In 1966, Martin Luther King, Jr. and others gathered to support a wounded James Meredith and to continue his “Mississippi March Against Fear.” The discussion about whether to use the Deacons as security illuminates the worry within the leadership that legitimate self-defense might spill over into political violence, which the non-violent movement dearly hoped to avoid. As movement leaders gathered in Memphis, a vanload of Deacons pulled up and got out. Some of them were carrying semi-automatic M-1 Garand rifles (the WWII infantry rifle that Gen. George Patton called “the greatest battle implement ever devised” and which the United States government has sold to the public for decades through the Civilian Marksmanship Program). Representatives of the NAACP and the Urban League thought it was too much of a risk to have the Deacons at the March. King ultimately sided with the leaders of the Congress of Racial Equality and the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee to welcome the Deacons. Although they would not take a visible role in the march, armed Deacons remained close, surveying the route and guarding campsites. A subsequent interview with Deacon Charles Sims indicates that, in addition to M1 Garands, Deacons also were armed with M1 carbines. Sims said, “I was carrying two snub-nosed .38s … and had three men riding down the highway with semiautomatic carbines with 30 rounds apiece.” In this case, resistance to tyranny did not mean fighting and winning a war. There were no tea-tax vandals, salty minutemen or pamphleteers urging a breakaway from the mother country. But this fight was against tyranny in its ultimate and most-vicious iteration, against imminent threats to life and limb from forces small and large. This story of resistance is filled with authentic American heroes, using the tools of self-defense wisely incorporated into the framing documents of this country, and with lessons we should never forget. Tags: Nicholas Johnson, Negroes and the Gun, The Black Tradition of ArmsTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
The Roots of Our Partisan Divide
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 02:01 PM PST Time to note a former article that addresses today’s concern!
by Christopher Caldwell: American society today is divided by party and by ideology in a way it has perhaps not been since the Civil War. I have just published a book that, among other things, suggests why this is. It is called The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties. It runs from the assassination of John F. Kennedy to the election of Donald J. Trump. You can get a good idea of the drift of the narrative from its chapter titles: 1963, Race, Sex, War, Debt, Diversity, Winners, and Losers. I can end part of the suspense right now—Democrats are the winners. Their party won the 1960s—they gained money, power, and prestige. The GOP is the party of the people who lost those things. One of the strands of this story involves the Vietnam War. The antiquated way the Army was mustered in the 1960s wound up creating a class system. What I’m referring to here is the so-called student deferment. In the old days, university-level education was rare. At the start of the First World War, only one in 30 American men was in a college or university, so student deferments were not culturally significant. By the time of Vietnam, almost half of American men were in a college or university, and student deferment remained in effect until well into the war. So if you were rich enough to study art history, you went to Woodstock and made love. If you worked in a garage, you went to Da Nang and made war. This produced a class division that many of the college-educated mistook for a moral division, particularly once we lost the war. The rich saw themselves as having avoided service in Vietnam not because they were more privileged or—heaven forbid—less brave, but because they were more decent. Another strand of the story involves women. Today, there are two cultures of American womanhood—the culture of married women and the culture of single women. If you poll them on political issues, they tend to differ diametrically. It was feminism that produced this rupture. For women during the Kennedy administration, by contrast, there was one culture of femininity, and it united women from cradle to grave: Ninety percent of married women and 87 percent of unmarried women believed there was such a thing as “women’s intuition.” Only 16 percent of married women and only 15 percent of unmarried women thought it was excusable in some circumstances to have an extramarital affair. Ninety-nine percent of women, when asked the ideal age for marriage, said it was sometime before age 27. None answered “never.” But it is a third strand of the story, running all the way down to our day, that is most important for explaining our partisan polarization. It concerns how the civil rights laws of the 1960s, and particularly the Civil Rights Act of 1964, divided the country. They did so by giving birth to what was, in effect, a second constitution, which would eventually cause Americans to peel off into two different and incompatible constitutional cultures. This became obvious only over time. It happened so slowly that many people did not notice. Because conventional wisdom today holds that the Civil Rights Act brought the country together, my book’s suggestion that it pulled the country apart has been met with outrage. The outrage has been especially pronounced among those who have not read the book. So for their benefit I should make crystal clear that my book is not a defense of segregation or Jim Crow, and that when I criticize the long-term effects of the civil rights laws of the 1960s, I do not criticize the principle of equality in general, or the movement for black equality in particular. What I am talking about are the emergency mechanisms that, in the name of ending segregation, were established under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These gave Washington the authority to override what Americans had traditionally thought of as their ordinary democratic institutions. It was widely assumed that the emergency mechanisms would be temporary and narrowly focused. But they soon escaped democratic control altogether, and they have now become the most powerful part of our governing system. How Civil Rights Legislation Worked The first was its unprecedented concentration of power. It gave Washington tools it had never before had in peacetime. It created new crimes, outlawing discrimination in almost every walk of public and private life. It revoked—or repealed—the prevailing understanding of freedom of association as protected by the First Amendment. It established agencies to hunt down these new crimes—an expanded Civil Rights Commission, an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and various offices of civil rights in the different cabinet agencies. It gave government new prerogatives, such as laying out hiring practices for all companies with more than 15 employees, filing lawsuits, conducting investigations, and ordering redress. Above all, it exposed every corner of American social, economic, and political life to direction from bureaucrats and judges. To put it bluntly, the effect of these civil rights laws was to take a lot of decisions that had been made in the democratic parts of American government and relocate them to the bureaucracy or the judiciary. Only with that kind of arsenal, Lyndon Johnson and the drafters thought, would it be possible to root out insidious racism. The second noteworthy thing about the civil rights legislation of the 1960s is that it was kind of a fudge. It sat uneasily not only with the First Amendment, but with the Constitution as a whole. The Voting Rights Act of 1965, passed largely to give teeth to the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal rights for all citizens, did so by creating different levels of rights for citizens of southern states like Alabama and citizens of northern states like Michigan when it came to election laws. The goal of the civil rights laws was to bring the sham democracies of the American South into conformity with the Constitution. But nobody’s democracy is perfect, and it turned out to be much harder than anticipated to distinguish between democracy in the South and democracy elsewhere in the country. If the spirit of the law was to humiliate Southern bigots, the letter of the law put the entire country—all its institutions—under the threat of lawsuits and prosecutions for discrimination. Still, no one was too worried about that. It is clear in retrospect that Americans outside the South understood segregation as a regional problem. As far as we can tell from polls, 70-90 percent of Americans outside the South thought that blacks in their part of the country were treated just fine, the same as anyone else. In practice, non-Southerners did not expect the new laws to be turned back on themselves. The Broadening of Civil Rights Affirmative action was a vague notion in the Civil Rights Act. But by the time of the Supreme Court’s 1978 Bakke decision, it was an outright system of racial preference for non-whites. In that case, the plaintiff, Alan Bakke, who had been a U.S. Marine captain in Vietnam, saw his application for medical school rejected, even though his test scores were in the 96th, 94th, 97th, and 72nd percentiles. Minority applicants, meanwhile, were admitted with, on average, scores in the 34th, 30th, 37th, and 18th percentiles. And although the Court decided that Bakke himself deserved admission, it did not do away with the affirmative action programs that kept him out. In fact, it institutionalized them, mandating “diversity”—a new concept at the time—as the law of the land. Meanwhile other groups, many of them not even envisioned in the original legislation, got the hang of using civil rights law. Immigrant advocates, for instance: Americans never voted for bilingual education, but when the Supreme Court upheld the idea in 1974, rule writers in the offices of civil rights simply established it, and it exists to this day. Women, too: the EEOC battled Sears, Roebuck & Co. from 1973 to 1986 with every weapon at its disposal, trying to prove it guilty of sexism—ultimately failing to prove even a single instance of it. Finally, civil rights came to dominate—and even overrule—legislation that had nothing to do with it. The most traumatic example of this was the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. This legislation was supposed to be the grand compromise on which our modern immigration policy would be built. On the one hand, about three million illegal immigrants who had mostly come north from Mexico would be given citizenship. On the other hand, draconian laws would ensure that the amnesty would not be an incentive to future migrants, and that illegal immigration would never get out of control again. So there were harsh “employer sanctions” for anyone who hired a non-citizen. But once the law passed, what happened? Illegal immigrants got their amnesty. But the penalties on illegal hiring turned out to be fake—because, to simplify just a bit, asking an employee who “looks Mexican” where he was born or about his citizenship status was held to be a violation of his civil rights. Civil rights law had made it impossible for Americans to get what they’d voted for through their representatives, leading to decades of political strife over immigration policy that continues to this day. A more recent manifestation of the broadening of civil rights laws is the “Dear Colleague” letter sent by the Obama Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights in 2011, which sought to dictate sexual harassment policy to every college and university in the country. Another is the overturning by judges of a temporary ban on entry from certain countries linked to terrorism in the first months of the Trump administration in 2017. These policies, qua policies, have their defenders and their detractors. The important thing for our purposes is how they were established and enforced. More and more areas of American life have been withdrawn from voters’ democratic control and delivered up to the bureaucratic and judicial emergency mechanisms of civil rights law. Civil rights law has become a second constitution, with powers that can be used to override the Constitution of 1787. The New Constitution First, it has a moral element, almost a metaphysical element, that is usually more typical of theocracies than of secular republics. As we’ve discussed, civil rights law gave bureaucrats and judges emergency powers to override the normal constitutional order, bypassing democracy. But the key question is: Under what conditions is the government authorized to activate these emergency powers? It is a question that has been much studied by political thinkers in Europe. Usually when European governments of the past bypassed their constitutions by declaring emergencies, it was on the grounds of a military threat or a threat to public order. But in America, as our way of governing has evolved since 1964, emergencies are declared on a moral basis: people are suffering; their newly discovered rights are being denied. America can’t wait anymore for the ordinary democratic process to take its course. A moral ground for invoking emergencies sounds more humane than a military one. It is not. That is because, in order to justify its special powers, the government must create a class of officially designated malefactors. With the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the justification of this strong medicine was that there was a collection of Southern politicians who were so wily and devious, and a collection of Southern sheriffs so ruthless and depraved, that one could not, and was not morally obliged to, fight fair with them. That pattern has perpetuated itself, even as the focus of civil rights has moved to American institutions less obviously objectionable than segregation. Every intervention in the name of rights requires the identification of a malefactor. So very early on in the gay marriage debate, those who believed in traditional marriage were likened to segregationists or to those who had opposed interracial marriage. Joe Biden recently said: “Let’s be clear: Transgender equality is the civil rights issue of our time. There is no room for compromise when it comes to basic human rights.” Now, most Americans, probably including Joe Biden, know very little about transgenderism. But this is an assertion that Americans are not going to be permitted to advance their knowledge by discussing the issue in public or to work out their differences at the ballot box. As civil rights laws have been extended by analogy into other areas of American life, the imputation of moral non-personhood has been aimed at a growing number of people who have committed no sin more grievous than believing the same things they did two years ago, and therefore standing in the way of the progressive juggernaut. The second characteristic of the new civil rights constitution is what we can call intersectionality. This is a sociological development. As long as civil rights law was limited to protecting the rights of Southern blacks, it was a stable system. It had the logic of history behind it, which both justified and focused its application. But if other groups could be given the privilege of advancing their causes by bureaucratic fiat and judicial decree, there was the possibility of a gradual building up of vast new coalitions, maybe even electoral majorities. This was made possible because almost anyone who was not a white heterosexual male could benefit from civil rights law in some way. Seventy years ago, India produced the first modern minority-rights based constitution with a long, enumerated list of so-called “scheduled tribes and castes.” Eventually, inter-group horse trading took up so much of the country’s attention that there emerged a grumbling group of “everyone else,” of “ordinary Indians.” These account for many of the people behind the present prime minister, Narendra Modi. Indians who like Modi say he’s the candidate of average citizens. Those who don’t like him, as most of the international media do not, call him a “Hindu nationalist.” We have a version of the same thing happening in America. By the mid-1980s, the “intersectional” coalition of civil rights activists started using the term “people of color” to describe itself. Now, logically, if there really is such a thing as “people of color,” and if they are demanding a larger share of society’s rewards, they are ipso facto demanding that “non–people of color” get a smaller share. In the same way that the Indian constitution called forth the idea of a generic “Hindu,” the new civil rights constitution created a group of “non–people of color.” It made white people a political reality in the United States in a way they had never been. Now we can apply this insight to parties. So overpowering is the hegemony of the civil rights constitution of 1964 over the Constitution of 1787, that the country naturally sorts itself into a party of those who have benefitted by it and a party of those who have been harmed by it. A Party of Bigots and a Party of Totalitarians But say you’re a conservative person who goes to church, and your seven-year-old son is being taught about “gender fluidity” in first grade. There is no avenue for you to complain about this. You’ll be called a bigot at the very least. In fact, although you’re not a lawyer, you have a vague sense that you might get fired from your job, or fined, or that something else bad will happen. You also feel that this business has something to do with gay rights. “Sorry,” you ask, “when did I vote for this?” You begin to suspect that taking your voice away from you and taking your vote away from you is the main goal of these rights movements. To you, the other party is a party of totalitarians. And that’s our current party system: the bigots versus the totalitarians. If either of these constitutions were totally devoid of merit, we wouldn’t have a problem. We could be confident that the wiser of the two would win out in the end. But each of our two constitutions contains, for its adherents, a great deal worth defending to the bitter end. And unfortunately, each constitution must increasingly defend itself against the other. When gay marriage was being advanced over the past 20 years, one of the common sayings of activists was: “The sky didn’t fall.” People would say: “Look, we’ve had gay marriage in Massachusetts for three weeks, and I’ve got news for you! The sky didn’t fall!” They were right in the short term. But I think they forgot how delicate a system a democratic constitutional republic is, how difficult it is to get the formula right, and how hard it is to see when a government begins—slowly, very slowly—to veer off course in a way that can take decades to become evident. Then one day we discover that, although we still deny the sky is falling, we do so with a lot less confidence. Tags: Imprimis, Christopher Caldwell, The Roots, Our Partisan DivideTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||||||||||||
A Stolen Country – Part 1
Posted: 27 Jan 2021 01:54 PM PST
by John Velisek: The media is now continually talking about the stolen 2020 election as being free and fair. From the high perches they claim as their own, they badger the riff-raff to agree with their pronouncements and ask no questions. The progressive socialist Democrats and media (but I repeat myself) call all the evidence of election irregularities lies and expect more than half the country just to shut up and believe them. I, for one, will not. There are too many irregularities to ignore. First, leftists claimed there were NO irregularities, then they claimed there weren’t enough to make a difference, and now they call it all lies, and you are a fascist if you question them. Here are the FACTS as known so far:
It is interesting how things had changed since 2005 when senile hypocrite San Fran Nan called the progressive socialist opposition to the presidential electors from Ohio “democracy at work.” She claimed that the opposition was fundamental to our democracy. She spouted that the opposition was to protect their aggrieved constituents who had been disenfranchised. Claiming that it was appropriate to debate while the American people were listening and at the same time excoriated the integrity of our elections. In Pelosi’s words, “It is imperative that the American people have confidence that every legal vote is counted and be accurate.” The change that has befallen our election was calculated to destroy any semblance of legality. So, where do we go from here? What does this country have to look forward to? Social cleansing has already begun. Conservative sites and voices are being de-platformed. Freedom of speech is no longer valid on social media. Parler has been shut down, Twitter followers were moving to Parler by the thousands, and Twitter itself is closing down individuals who do not toe the progressive socialist party line. People are noticing and need to understand that this is how the Nazis started. Closing down the press, including FOX, OAN, and NEWSMAX, will be next, as the progressive socialists are demanding that the citizenry not be allowed to see anything not approved through the new politburo the AOC’s and violent agitators living in mommy’s basement. They will continue to push until all thoughts of freedom and individual thought have been purged. Twitter permanently suspended the Presidents personal account and his government and campaign accounts as well. Facebook blocked the President until his term expires and will decide when to reopen his account after that. They have been adding bogus information to the base of every input from Trump. They also gave a contribution-in- kind to China Joe’s campaign by blocking information about China Joe and his son Hunter to keep it from the American public. For the sycophantic progressive organization, the ACLU, it was too much. Kate Ruane, the senior legislative counsel, said that this unchecked power should be concerning when used to remove people from platforms just for the political reality of disagreeing with that party line. They do not want the range of ideas that this country embraces. These large social media companies have absolute immunity from being taken to court and sued because of Section 230, protection given to them by Congress upon the companies’ formation. With the progressive socialist Democrats being in charge, I expect the situation to worsen, and they will further constrain the citizens of our country from stating positions held by millions of people but shutting down individuals and groups that find solace that they are not alone in their opinions. ABC, that paragon of even-handedness, following in the tradition of such as Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot, has already had their Political Director Rick Klein call for a cleansing of the Trump movement across the country. It called for a process in the weeks and years to come to make not only those who created chaos in the Capitol, but we must police Americans evenly and make a commitment to fix it. Not mentioned were the summer riots of BLM/Antifa and the over $2 billion of damage done, the lives and businesses lost, or the fear of all colors and types of people in the country. That was called a peaceful protest. The Capitol riots were, of course, insurrection. The Progressive socialists mentioned during the impeachment all the violence and that law enforcement’s safety was paramount in importance. Where was that type of speech when police were being hurt and killed during the summer? All these same politicians could whine about was “peaceful protests” and “defund the police. The Capitol riots were wrong; all of us can agree with that. The leftists say the summer protests and the Capitol are not the same, and they are correct. The Capitol was not looted and burned down like the business in many of our large cities under Democrat control. If they want to call this an insurrection, they can. If this was an insurrection, it was poorly run, even though the word is now coming out that it was all pre-planned by Antifa and BLM. It is disturbing that there were some radical right extremists as well. The leftists want to blame it on the Proud Boys. I have met some of that group, an organization of all colors who believe in the constitutional rights the country is based on. There is no proof that any Proud Boys took part, and no one in the Capitol was armed. Our bartender from Brooklyn claims half of the Congress could have died with no proof. Just another lie to advance the garbage they need for a further crackdown. The only person shot and killed by the Capitol police. was a veteran woman The media is complicit in our slide into socialism. Cnn has compared the BLM/Antifa riots this summer to our brave soldiers going ashore in Normandy. They consistently and continuously lie about the Russia Hoax. CNN and MSNBC have both denigrated our President in a way never seen before. Along with academia, they have pushed socialist/communist lies on the citizens. Children have been indoctrinated for the past twenty years on the glories of the socialist doctrine. Today, most millennials firmly believe that socialism would be better for our country without taking a look at the founding principles of socialism or how many people have died by their hands since it was coming on the scene in 1917. The students do not realize that there is monstrous evil within every person and are being told that our country is the root of all evil. The United States is not perfect, but our history has shown that the nation strives to improve. As has been stated many times in the past, President Trump is not the problem; we are. The American people have stood for freedom and our country. All the leftists in media, academia, and even globalist corporations have given themselves the right to destroy our culture, religion, and a way of life that gives the opportunity to all its people to move forward. Along with China and their puppet, China Joe, the next step in their plan is to destroy our economy and make everyone dependent on the government. That would make the citizenry easier to control and expects the populace to accept anything that the government will do meekly. As the Great Reset calls for, making the people fear for their lives and property will make the police state inevitable. Too many patriots remain to just meekly lay down for the socialist agenda. President Trump forced the progressive socialists to put their agenda of making the United States on hold. Both Democrats and Republicans are globalists and have no concern about the vast majority of working-class citizens’ opinions. It was the protection that President Trump gave to the working class that has made him a threat to the elitist globalists who feel that they are so superior to the “little man” that they should be in charge of running everyone’s life. The leftists controlled by the United Nations and the billionaire class can not allow the President to be seen as the one who had made our country safer or stronger. One step in their agenda is to declare all those who oppose them as “domestic terrorists.” These are the same people who locked down the entire country and will continue to keep it that way to destroy the economic independence that President Trump brought to everyone. Dick Durbin, a senator from Illinois, has put forth the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act to fight “White supremacy” and “white nationalism.” Durbin, along with Elissa Slotkin from Michigan, intend to use the legislation to stop civil and constitutional liberties for all who disagree with the socialist vision they have for the country. This is not the country that we deserve, nor the one that patriotic citizens of our country voted for. Antifa and BLM will continue to damage our cities with impunity. Do they really expect the citizens of this country to sit by as they destroy our country? Tags: John C. Velisek, Stolen Country, Part 1To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
43.) REDSTATE
What Happened With GameStop, Reddit, and Some Wall Street Hedge Funds — and What Might It Mean?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions |
44.) AMERICAN SPECTATOR
45.) CONSERVATIVE REVIEW
Copyright © 2021 Conservative Review. All rights reserved.
This email was sent by: Conservative Review 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 USA
Privacy Policy | Manage Your Preferences | Unsubscribe
To view this email as a webpage, go here. |
46.) BIZPAC REVIEW
|
|
47.) ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
48.) NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Thursday, January 28, 2021
Good morning, NBC News readers.
Today we’re taking a look at the alleged Medicaid minefield former President Donald Trump left behind for the Biden administration, a freshman GOP congresswoman who has come under pressure for her incendiary social media posts and the Wall Street head-scratcher GameStop.
Here is what’s happening this Thursday morning.
Trump tried to ‘booby trap’ Medicaid expansion. Biden now has a fight ahead. The Biden administration hopes to quickly help some of the millions of Americans without medical insurance by providing incentives to a dozen states to expand Medicaid.
The efforts won’t be easy though, NBC News’ Phil McCausland reports.
Some state leaders, like Georgia’s Gov. Brain Kemp last year, pursued a variation of Medicaid expansion pushed by the Trump administration — a version that undercuts the federal insurance program, implements work requirements and still leaves hundreds of thousands of people without access to coverage.
Critics say requiring people to work to get health care coverage during a pandemic that has sparked the worst employment crisis since the Great Depression completely misses the mark.
“The fact that during a pandemic, when Medicaid is a first responder, they were spending so much time trying to booby-trap the program and handcuff the Biden administration when they walked in the door is abhorrent,” said Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families.
It all adds up to a major policy and political headache for the Biden administration, as well as for the states that hope to hang on to the Trump deal they agreed to. “Everybody is born, everybody dies, and most people get sick in between,” said Dr. Karen Kinsell, the only doctor in Georgia’s rural Clay County, bemoaning the lack of health care coverage among her patients. (Photo: Mickey Welsh / Advertiser via USA Today Network)
GOP congresswoman under pressure for posts appearing to endorse violence against Democrats Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., is facing a backlash after a CNN review of her Facebook page showed she endorsed posts calling for violence against prominent Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Greene has served in Congress for only a few weeks but has already faced calls to resign over spreading false election misinformation in the run-up to the Capitol riot.
Now, some Republican leaders are suggesting House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy should strip Greene of her committee assignments, as he did following Rep. Steve King’s comments about white supremacy.
Meantime, the Department of Homeland Security issued a national terrorism advisory Wednesday warning that domestic extremists may be “emboldened” by the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. “She is not a Republican,” Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., tweeted about Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene in the wake of the report on her endorsing violence against Democratic lawmakers. (Photo: Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images file)
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
Plus
THINK about it Biden must remember that Trump followed Obama. He needs to avoid his old boss’s mistakes if he really wants to unite the country, W. James Antle III, politics editor at the Washington Examiner, writes in an opinion piece.
Live BETTER Check out the 3-step plan one woman used to build a Covid-19 emergency fund.
Shopping Not sure what to surprise your family and friends with this Valentine’s Day? Here are 15 Valentine’s Day gift ideas to help show your loved ones you care.
Quote of the day “The world is watching us intently right now. They want to know if we can heal our nation.” — Secretary of State Antony Blinken pledged to restore American leadership in the world on Wednesday, his first full day on the job as America’s top diplomat.
RIP: Cloris Leachman Cloris Leachman, who won an Academy Award for her portrayal of a lonely housewife in “The Last Picture Show,” died Wednesday. She was 94.
The incredibly versatile actress was probably most fondly remembered for getting laughs as the fearsome Transylvanian housekeeper Frau Blücher in “Young Frankenstein” and the neighbor Phyllis on “The Mary Tyler Moore Show.”
Leachman, who won eight Emmy Awards in her storied television career, insisted that she went into every awards night assuming she wasn’t going home with a statue.
“I never had a speech because I never thought I was going to win,” Leachman told the TV academy in a 2015 interview.
“But if you are good at what you do — and I always intend to be good at what I do — then the acclaim is just the follow-through. But it is a wonderful feeling,” she said.
View in browser 49.) NBC FIRST READ
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Carrie Dann and Melissa Holzberg FIRST READ: Three weeks after a deadly riot, one party turns a blind eye We are just 22 days removed from the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, and just look at what’s happening:
Photo by ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images Most Republicans – though not all – have done nothing significant to hold Trump accountable for Jan. 6.
They’ve also decided to stay silent on the subject of political violence, whether it was the insurrection three weeks ago or Marjorie Taylor Greene’s apparent past support for executing Dem politicians.
As a society, this country has concluded to never forget the Holocaust and what happened on 9/11.
But what happens when one political party suggests – by its actions — that it’s tried to forget what happened on 1/6? (If you don’t want to impeach and convict, fine. But what instead do you plan to do? Nothing?)
And when that same party hasn’t taken action against its own member who has apparently supported political violence in the past?
It certainly doesn’t have the high ground to demand bipartisanship and unity from a new administration.
A hard habit to break As we wrote yesterday, the GOP hasn’t tried to hold Trump accountable since he first criticized John McCain back in 2015, or after the “Access Hollywood” video. And every time, they’ve ended up having to defend more and more transgressions.
The longer they have put off dealing with Trump, it’s become harder and harder to detach themselves from the former president.
And if you’re McCarthy or another GOP leader, you might be thinking, “What choice do I have? This is a party that didn’t even espouse a party platform in 2020.”
But if you want the party to be defined by someone – or something – else, you’ve got to take SOME KIND OF ACTION.
Data Download: The numbers you need to know today 25,703,676: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 153,003 more than yesterday morning.)
430,760: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 4,174 more than yesterday morning.)
107,444: That’s the number of people currently hospitalized from Covid-19 in the United States.
300.08 million: The number of coronavirus tests that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.
At least 21.1 million: The number of Americans who have received one or both vaccine shots so far.
979,175: The average number of individual shots per day since January 20
92: The number of days left for Biden to reach his 100-day vaccination goals.
Up to 10,000: The number of U.S. servicemembers expected to be requested by FEMA to help administer Covid vaccines
3 months: How long the Biden administration will reopen Obamacare insurance marketplaces to address hardship from Covid
Around 8000 percent: How much GameStop stock prices have gone up over the last six months. (Confused? Here’s a great explainer of what’s happening on Wall Street.)
TWEET OF THE DAY: And just like that, they’re gone.
Rockier road All four of President Biden’s confirmed Cabinet picks so far have easily passed through the Senate. But Department of Homeland Security nominee Alejandro Mayorkas could be the first Cabinet nominee to require a more party-line vote.
Majority Leader Chuck Schumer filed cloture (meaning, place a time limit on the Senate considering the nomination) on Wednesday to bypass the Republican filibuster on Mayorkas’ nomination. It’s the first time Schumer has had to use cloture to circumvent Republicans on a Biden Cabinet pick vote. NBC’s Hill team reports that Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee requested for Mayorkas to have a second confirmation hearing – which committee Chair Dick Durbin declined. Mayorkas was confirmed by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Tuesday by a 7-4 vote.
The Senate will vote on the cloture motion today. If the motion passes – and it likely will since only 50 votes are needed – Mayorkas can be confirmed as early as Monday.
BIDEN CABINET WATCH State: Tony Blinken (confirmed) Treasury: Janet Yellen (confirmed) Defense: Ret. Gen. Lloyd Austin (confirmed) Attorney General: Merrick Garland Homeland Security: Alejandro Mayorkas HHS: Xavier Becerra Agriculture: Tom Vilsack Transportation: Pete Buttigieg Energy: Jennifer Granholm Interior: Deb Haaland Education: Miguel Cardona Commerce: Gina Raimondo Labor: Marty Walsh HUD: Marcia Fudge Veterans Affairs: Denis McDonough UN Ambassador: Linda Thomas-Greenfield Director of National Intelligence: Avril Haines (confirmed) EPA: Michael Regan SBA: Isabel Guzman OMB Director: Neera Tanden US Trade Representative: Katherine Tai
Biden’s day At 1:30pm ET, President Biden signs executive actions on health care, including one that reopens the Affordable Care Act’s markets for those who need coverage due to the pandemic… White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki briefs reporters at 2:30 pm ET.
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world? In a new report, DHS says that domestic extremists emboldened by the Capitol attack pose a growing threat.
It turns out that the leader of the Proud Boys cooperated with the FBI and even went undercover in Miami.
Biden wants to expand Medicaid. It could be a lot harder in the wake of policies encouraged by the Trump administration.
The Biden administration is likely to delay promised executive orders on immigration and family reunification for at least a few days.
Biden is phasing out federal contracts with private prisons. Here’s what that means — and why activists want more action.
A federal agency intended to prepare for health crises has been being used as a slush fund, the New York Times reports.
Here’s what new Secretary of State Tony Blinken promised on his first full day on the job.
Trump isn’t planning on appearing at his impeachment trial, but he may submit a written letter.
Here are some of the alternatives Democrats are considering as conviction of Trump fades into a longshot.
Can Democrats beat Marco Rubio in 2022? They’re not feeling optimistic, Politico writes.
Download the NBC News Mobile App
50.) CBS
51.) REASON
52.) MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
53.) LOUDER WITH CROWDER
54.) TOWNHALL
55.) REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
56.) REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
57.) CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
58.) BERNARD GOLDBERG 59.) SARA A. CARTER 60.) TWITCHY
61.) HOT AIR
62.) 1440 DAILY DIGEST
63.) AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
64.) NATIONAL REVIEW
|