Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Wednesday September 23, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
THE RESURGENT
THE EPOCH TIMES
Protect Your Retirement from COVID-19 with a Home Delivery Gold IRA. Delivered right to your doorstep. You don’t have to worry anymore.
“As long as you live, keep learning how to live.”
SENECA
Oregon Deputies Make 21 Arrests in Areas Under Evacuation From Wildfires
Pentagon Planning for Possibility of Total Withdrawal From Afghanistan by May 2021
COVID-19, Economy, Violence in Cities Among Topics for First Trump-Biden Debate
Bloomberg Effort Raises $20 Million to Pay Fines for Florida Felons So They Can Vote
|
|
|
|
|
You can rollover Your IRA/401K into Physical Gold and have it delivered to your doorstep. Find out how 1,000s of American retirees are protecting their future with a TAX FREE Home Delivery transfer… The only way to personally control your Gold IRA yourself. For a limited time only Red Rock Secured is offering up to $3,500 in free gold or silver on new qualifying accounts. Click here for your free guide and find out if you qualify.
|
In the United States, following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, democrats are threatening that if the Trump administration fills her vacant seat ahead of the November elections, they will expand the Supreme Court and pack it with their own judges.
|
Copyright © 2020 The Epoch Times, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive newsletter communications from The Epoch Times.
Our mailing address is:
The Epoch Times
229 W. 28 St. Fl. 5
New York, NY 10001
Click here to unsubscribe.
DAYBREAK
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUDICIAL WATCH
FOX NEWS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
JUST THE NEWS
Just The News: Daily Newsletter
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
AXIOS
🌞 Good Wednesday morning. Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,170 words … 4½ minutes.
💣 “Editorials published by several Chinese state media groups signaled Beijing may not sign off on a deal that could put control of [TikTok] in the hands of Americans,” the Financial Times reports (subscription).
- State media denounced ByteDance’s deal with Oracle and Walmart as “dirty and unfair,” saying Beijing had “no reason” to approve the agreement backed by President Trump.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, and the fight over her replacement, are amplifying Wall Street worries about major volatility and market losses ahead of — or even after — the election, Axios Markets editor Dion Rabouin writes.
- The 2020 election is the most expensive event risk on record, per Bloomberg — with insurance bets on implied volatility six times their normal level, according to JPMorgan analysts.
- “Not getting the election results in a timely manner will be destabilizing,” Lou Brien, rates strategist at DRW Trading, tells Axios.
The Supreme Court fight will compound partisanship and division in the event of a contested election, analysts at TD Securities say in a note to clients.
- “[W]e should be putting in a greater probability of a blue wave,” which would leave Democrats with control of the presidency and both chambers of Congress, Priya Misra, TD’s head of global rates strategy, tells Axios.
Wall Street is also closely watching the Senate.
- “[T]he tilt of the Senate, especially if [Joe] Biden wins, will allow him to make much bigger changes in policy than we’ve seen in the past,” says Stephen Dover, head of equities for Franklin Templeton.
A repeal of President Trump’s tax cut could have immediate stock market implications.
- With a Democratic Congress, Biden would be expected to increase spending on health care, new jobs programs and renewable energy.
- 💰 Sign up for Dion Rabouin’s weekday newsletter, Axios Markets.
Flags near the Washington Monument memorialize the 200,000+ Americans who have lost their lives to COVID-19.
- That’s equivalent to a 9/11 attack every day for 67 days. It is roughly equal to the population of Salt Lake City or Huntsville, Ala.
U.S. deaths are averaging 770 a day, AP reports.
- See our graphic, which led Axios PM.
The FBI warned that “[f]oreign actors and cybercriminals” could try to take advantage of a delay in election results, and urged Americans to depend on authorities for results, and to verify social-media posts before sharing them.
- Why it matters: As President Trump calls for a quick result and says the election is “rigged,” his own experts are saying we may need patience.
“State and local officials typically require several days to weeks to certify elections’ final results in order to ensure every legally cast vote is accurately counted,” the bulletin says.
- “The increased use of mail-in ballots due to COVID-19 protocols could leave officials with incomplete results on election night.”
- “Foreign actors and cybercriminals could exploit the time required to certify and announce elections’ results by disseminating disinformation that includes reports of voter suppression, cyberattacks targeting election infrastructure, voter or ballot fraud, and other problems intended to convince the public of the elections’ illegitimacy.”
- Read the bulletin.
🇷🇺 A top-secret CIA assessment dated Aug. 31 concludes that Vladimir Putin is “probably directing” a Russian foreign influence operation to hurt Joe Biden, WashPost columnist Josh Rogin scoops.
- The document’s hard-hitting lead: “We assess that President Vladimir Putin and the senior most Russian officials are aware of and probably directing Russia’s influence operations aimed at denigrating the former U.S. Vice President, supporting the U.S. president and fueling public discord ahead of the U.S. election in November.”
Elon Musk takes a piece of paper from a Tesla fan in Berlin on Sept. 2. Photo: Fabian Sommer/picture alliance via Getty Images
“Elon Musk laid out a plan for Tesla Inc. to build a cheap electric car using drastically lower-cost batteries to make a $25,000 vehicle and potentially turn the company into the world’s largest auto maker,” The Wall Street Journal reports (subscription).
- Musk said he’s “targeting eventual annual production of 20 million vehicles, or almost twice as many as Volkswagen sold last year as the world’s bestselling individual auto company.”
Why it matters: “Battery technology is the secret sauce behind today’s electric vehicle revolution,” The Journal reports in a separate story.
- “As more car makers compete in the market and try to persuade customers to abandon their gas guzzlers, companies are pushing to overcome two hurdles to the mass appeal of electric vehicles — price and performance.”
Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham “is looking at scheduling a confirmation hearing for the week of Oct. 12 and a committee vote near the end of the following week, with a vote on the floor before Halloween,” the WashPost reports.
- Read The New Yorker’s “Cover Story.”
Ipsos and U.Va.’s Center for Politics are out with an interactive U.S. map that goes down to the county level to track changes in public sentiment that could decide the presidential election, Axios’ Hans Nichols reports.
How it works: The 2020 Political Atlas tracks President Trump’s approval ratings, interest around the coronavirus, what’s dominating social media and other measures, with polling updated daily — enhancing UVA’s “Crystal Ball.”
- Larry Sabato, director of U.Va.’s Center for Politics, says understanding swing states means knowing “what’s being discussed in their local papers and nightly news, and how much the candidates are spending there.”
The TIME 100, the magazine’s annual list of the 100 most influential people, is unveiled with eight worldwide covers:
- Top row from left: Dr. Anthony Fauci … Black Lives Matter founders Alicia Garza, Opal Tometi and Patrisse Cullors … COVID frontline nurse Amy O’Sullivan … Megan Thee Stallion.
- Bottom row from left: Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai … The Weeknd … Dwyane Wade and Gabrielle Union … Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen.
This exclusive photo shows Philippe Reines playing Donald Trump during Hillary Clinton’s debate prep.
- Senior-will-style, Reines has bequeathed the costume to Ron Klain, Joe Biden’s debate prep guru.
- The package included a blue suit, red tie, dress shoes with 3.25-inch lifts, Trump-branded watch and cuff links sourced from eBay, and flag lapel pin.
Philippe tells Axios’ Alexi McCammond he won’t be wearing the suit again:
- “[T]he 42 pounds I’ve lost in 2020 took it from an authentically tailored, too-baggy Trump fit to what would be wearing a Trump tent big enough for two.”
As film and TV production resumes in earnest after the coronavirus lockdown, “uncertainty about industrywide safety protocols has led to chaos,” The Hollywood Reporter’s Bryn Elise Sandberg writes.
- “There’s the film that told its cast and crew they couldn’t leave the Motel 6 where they were staying, only to realize there that there was no restaurant on the property — a logistical ‘nightmare,’ according to one source.”
The state of play … “All the major studios are said to have projects in various stages of production, and it’s beginning to add up: Los Angeles has seen a 40 percent increase in film permit requests from July to August”:
To protect against an outbreak, sets are now often divided into specific ‘zones’ that correspond to the level of protection they require, depending on their proximity to the mask-less actors. Many refer to them as the A, B and C zones, though Netflix calls them the red, yellow and green zones. …
The A/red zone is the strictest area on set because it’s wherever the mask-less actors are, so the greatest amount of personal protective equipment is required.
📱 Thanks for joining the Axios AM breakfast table. Invite your friends to sign up here!
THE WASHINGTON FREE BEACON
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Sep 23, 2020 View in Browser AP MORNING WIRE Good morning. In today’s AP Morning Wire:
TAMER FAKAHANY
The Rundown AP PHOTO/MARK LENNIHAN US hits 200,000 virus dead, Trump says it’s ”a shame”; Britain faces pandemic winter of discontent
The staggering number of ccronavirus dead in the United States — 200,000 — is equivalent to a 9/11 attack every day for 67 days or around 600 fatal jetliner crashes. It is roughly equal to the population of Salt Lake City, Utah or Huntsville, Alabama.
“It is completely unfathomable that we’ve reached this point,” a Johns Hopkins University public health researcher said, eight months after the scourge first reached the world’s richest nation.
And while virus deaths in the U.S. continue at close to 770 a day on average, a widely cited model from the University of Washington predicts the U.S. toll will double to 400,000 by the end of the year as schools and colleges reopen and cold weather sets in, reports Carla K. Johnson. A vaccine is unlikely to become widely available until 2021.
The once-unimaginable grim milestone came six weeks before an election that is certain to be in part a referendum on President Donald Trump’s handling of the crisis.
Trump said it was “a shame” the U.S. reached 200,000 deaths but claimed the toll could have been much worse. “I think if we didn’t do it properly and do it right, you’d have 2.5 million deaths,” the president said.
VIDEO: Trump says 200,000 virus deaths milestone ”a shame.”
Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden said, “It didn’t have to be this bad. There’s a devastating human toll to this pandemic — and we can’t forget that.”
Milestone Politics: The Trump administration has prioritized politics over science at key moments over the past six months, refusing to follow expert advice that might have contained the spread of the novel coronavirus. Trump and his people routinely dismissed experts’ assessments of the gravity of the pandemic and of the measures needed to bring it under control. They have tried to muzzle scientists who dispute the administration’s rosy spin, Jason Dearen reports.
U.K.’s Winter of Discontent: British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has appealed for a “spirit of togetherness” through the winter as he unveiled a series of new restrictions on everyday life to get on top of a dramatic spike in coronavirus cases. Warning that the new restrictions could last for six months, Johnson said that pubs, restaurants and other entertainment venues in England will have to close at 10 p.m. It was a speech with deliberate echoes of World War II communal spirit, Jill Lawless and Pan Pylas report from London.
Sierra Leone Doctor’s Mission: Dr. Mamadu Baldeh is one of only four physicians managing the COVID-19 unit at Sierra Leone’s Connaught Hospital, and the only one doing so while still overseeing the infectious diseases unit. Despite the loss of colleagues, Baldeh is fighting not only to save his coronavirus patients but also to provide quality care for those afflicted with other infectious diseases as he and other health care workers fight for a better system in the West African nation, Carley Petesch reports. AP PHOTO/STEVEN SENNE Senate GOP plans vote on Trump’s court pick before election; Thousands expected to honor Ginsburg at Supreme Court
Senate Republicans, with the votes in hand, are racing ahead with plans to confirm President Trump’s pick to quickly fill the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Supreme Court.
Trump is set to announce his nominee Saturday. Appeals court judge Amy Coney Barret, a favorite of the right-wing, is considered the favorite.
Conservatives are pushing for action before Election Day, Nov. 3. Democrats say it’s too close to the election and that whoever wins the presidency should pick the court nominee.
Confirmation proceedings will spark a heated debate even as early voting for president is underway in several states,
On the campaign trail this week with Joe Biden, the generational fight to fill a suddenly vacant Supreme Court seat has become an afterthought. On the other side, President Donald Trump has found a new rallying cry.
The conflicting messages from the Republican president and his Democratic challenger reflect a broader fight to define the lens through which voters view the 2020 contest, report Steve Peoples, Zeke Miller and Alexandra Jaffe.
Supreme Court Changes: The prospect that Trump and Senate Republicans will try to fill Ginsburg’s Supreme Court seat before the year is out has ignited a call for major changes on the court, including expanding the number of justices. Some Senate Democrats previously averse to a larger court said in the wake of Ginsburg’s death Friday at age 87 that the Republican push to quickly fill the high court vacancy could be a breaking point. But Joe Biden is not yet on board, Mark Sherman reports.
Picking a Justice: Barack Obama spent hours reading legal briefings as he mulled candidates for the Supreme Court. Bill Clinton savored building a personal connection with Ruth Bader Ginsburg before selecting her. And Ronald Reagan offered a personal touch in making his case for Anthony Kennedy after his first two picks for a vacancy went sideways. By contrast, Donald Trump is flying by the seat-of-his-pants with his frequent public deliberations on replacing Ginsburg, a process that’s moving at warp speed.
Ginsburg Memorial: Thousands of people are expected to pay their respects at the Supreme Court to the late women’s rights champion, leader of the court’s liberal bloc and feminist icon who died last week. The court is closed to the public because of the pandemic. But the justice’s former colleagues, family, close friends and the public will have the chance today and Thursday to pass by the casket of the second woman on the Supreme Court. UNTV VIA AP World leaders who skipped past UN meetings get their moment; Global powers clash, virus stirs anger at virtual debate
For some world leaders, the pandemic brings an opportunity of sorts on the global stage.
This year’s virtual U.N. gathering means those who generally wouldn’t appear have a chance to address the world. Take Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, who missed last year’s event. Today, Maduro will speak from the comfort of the presidential palace in Caracas without having to worry about getting arrested if he comes to New York, Christine Armario reports.
Others who will speak at the General Assembly for the first time include Saudi Arabia’s 84-year-old King Salman and Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who has defended his drug crackdown that left more than 5,700 mostly poor people dead.
On the first day of leader speeches, the head of the global body exhorted nations to unite and tackle the era’s towering problems: the coronavirus, the “economic calamity” it unleashed and the risk of a new Cold War between the United States and China.
As Secretary-General Antonio Guterres opened the first virtual “general debate” of the General Assembly, the yawning gaps of politics and anger became evident. China and Iran clashed with the U.S., and leaders expressed frustration and outrage at the handling of the pandemic, Edith M. Lederer reports.
They said it: Leaders at the virtual UN, in their own words.
VIDEO: UN chief says poverty rising for first time in 30 years.
Telling COVID’s Story: World leaders participating this week are presenting their own visions of the fight against the pandemic, both in their respective countries and around the world while sometimes criticizing other nations and arguing the U.N. itself needs reform. While some heads of state may present a rosy picture of their handling of the crisis, as their political futures at home depend on it, there will also likely be calls to arms around the development of a coronavirus vaccine, mitigating inequality and cooperation between nations to stop the spread of a virus that has killed nearly 1 million people, Peter Prengaman reports.
Lebanon Blast Aftermath An image captured by an AP photographer showing a dust-covered girl carried against a man’s shoulder, a gash bleeding from her forehead, has come to symbolize the devastation of the Aug. 4 blast at the Beirut port. The explosion took 193 lives and wounded 6,500.
Among the dead are at least 43 Syrians, plunging a war-weary community into further misery. Zeina Karam and Hassan Ammar have this moving exclusive story behind the photo which captures the particular pain of Syrian refugee families in Lebanon, which is now home to about a million who fled the horrors of war in their own neighboring country.
Other Top Stories Louisville is preparing for more protests and possible unrest in advance of the state attorney general’s announcement about whether he will charge officers in Breonna Taylor’s shooting death. The Metro Police Department said that authorities were placing barricades around Jefferson Square Park, where many of the demonstrations have been held, and the perimeter of the downtown area. Taylor, a Black emergency medical worker, was shot multiple times March 13 by officers who entered her home using a no-knock warrant during a narcotics investigation. No drugs were found inside. A lack of firefighting resources in the hours after a wildfire was sparked allowed the fast-moving blaze to make an unprecedented run through Southern California mountains and eventually find fuel in old-growth trees to become one of Los Angeles County’s largest fires ever. The Bobcat Fire has burned for more than two weeks and was still threatening more than 1,000 homes after scorching its way through brush and timber down into the Mojave Desert. It’s one of dozens of major blazes across the West. The German hospital in Berlin treating Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny for poisoning says his condition improved enough for him to be released from the facility. Navalny, the most visible opponent of President Vladimir Putin, was flown to Germany two days after falling ill in August on a domestic flight in Russia. German chemical weapons experts have determined he was poisoned with a Soviet-era nerve agent. Navalny was kept in an induced coma for more than two weeks. Members of his team accused the Kremlin of involvement in the poisoning, charges that Russian officials have vehemently denied. Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim says he has secured a majority in Parliament to form a new government in Malaysia that is “strong, stable and formidable.” If he succeeds, it will mark a dramatic comeback for Anwar after his roller-coaster political journey. Once a high flyer in the ruling party, Anwar was convicted of homosexual sodomy and corruption after a power struggle with then- Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad in 1998. He was imprisoned for a second time for sodomy in 2014. Anwar and his supporters have long denied the allegations. GET THE APP
Download the AP News app to get breaking news alerts from AP on your phone, tablet or watch. |
FORT MYERS (FLORIDA) NEWS-PRESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
CHICAGO SUNTIMES
In debate over where cops should patrol in Chicago, ‘no one wants to lose’
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO TRUMP NEWS
THE HILL
|
ROLL CALL
|
Morning Headlines
Only one House Democrat in the caucus’s 14-member elected leadership team is exiting the chamber next year, but that opening has created a competitive race for assistant speaker and cleared opportunities for other ambitious Democrats to run for the lower-ranking positions those candidates are vacating. Read More…
Some Democrats are fretting over polls suggesting that Joe Biden’s presidential campaign isn’t reaching Latino voters, missing an opportunity to connect over the response to the coronavirus pandemic that the group identifies as its biggest campaign issue. Or just to connect. Others are telling the worriers to relax. Read More…
House passes stopgap funding bill shortly after bipartisan deal
The House on Tuesday swiftly passed a stopgap funding measure needed to avert a partial government shutdown in eight days after top congressional leaders reached a deal resolving a fight over farm payments. Read More…
Click here to subscribe to Fintech Beat for the latest market and regulatory developmentsin finance and financial technology.
There is nothing civil about intimidation
OPINION — With the U.S. now an ideological tinderbox, the last thing we need are leaders adding fuel to fire with intemperate words and their apparent decision to inflame the streets. We need leaders who will turn down the temperature, reject the calls of Twitter celebrities and resist the temptation to exploit an already explosive environment. Read More…
The cooling saucer and other Senate hooey
OPINION — Despite its reputation for being locked in amber and quaint fustiness, the Senate is an institution that has changed quite a bit in the history of the republic. But that doesn’t stop the pearl-clutching when the prospect of change comes along. The latest debate about the future of the filibuster revolves around the role of the Senate. Read More…
Supreme Court fight underscores campaign trail focus on health care
The upcoming Senate battle over a Supreme Court nomination is sharpening the focus on the 2010 health care law on the campaign trail before a high-stakes oral arguments hearing to determine the law’s future, which will be held just a week after the election. Read More…
She was selling RBG greeting cards. Then she heard from RBG
At first Janie Velencia thought she was in trouble. The former journalist, who was running her own greeting card company, had just received a message from an assistant to Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “I panicked,” says Velencia, who’d been making greeting cards with Ginsburg’s likeness for a couple years. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2020 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: Just like that, the drama on Capitol Hill recedes
Presented by Amazon
DRIVING THE DAY
THIS IS KIND OF RARE.
AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS WEEK, it seemed like the drama in Washington had ratcheted up to code-red levels: The government was on the brink of shutdown, RUTH BADER GINSBURG had recently died, and Congress was facing the prospect of a brutal election-season confirmation fight.
BUT ALL OF A SUDDEN …
— IN ONE DAY, CONGRESS and the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION struck a deal to fund the government until Dec. 11, removing the threat of a shutdown. THE HOUSE cleared the bill Tuesday night. Sarah Ferris, Caitlin Emma and Heather Caygle with the details
— SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL corralled the support of 50 of his colleagues to leave Republicans on the brink of a floor vote to confirm a Supreme Court justice just weeks before an election. SEUNG MIN KIM — who owns the judges beat for the WaPo — says Judiciary Chair LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-S.C.) is looking at holding hearings the week of Oct. 12. Anne Gearan, SMK, Josh Dawsey and Bob Costa’s WaPo piece
— CONGRESS HAS BASICALLY ABANDONED Covid relief talks, with 200,000 people dead, thousands sick and the economy teetering. No back and forth between the White House. No shuttle negotiations. Mostly a recognition that it probably won’t get done.
THE DRAMA, for the moment, at least, has faded to black. … But just wait until the confirmation hearings.
Good Wednesday morning. SPOTTED: Rep. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D-N.Y.) and boyfriend Riley Roberts eating outside at Joselito Casa de Comidas on Tuesday evening.
41 DAYS until Election Day. #41, by the Dave Matthews Band with Warren Haynes, for Jake Tapper and Sopan Deb
THE CORONAVIRUS CONTINUES TO RAGE … AP: “200,000 dead as Trump vilifies science, prioritizes politics,” by Jason Dearen … WSJ: “Thousands of American Troops to Take Part in Covid-19 Early-Detection Study”
SUPREME COURT CORNER …
— ALEX ISENSTADT and MARC CAPUTO: “Trump-world clashes over Barrett vs. Lagoa”: “Donald Trump’s looming Supreme Court decision is dividing the president’s political orbit between the pragmatists and the purists.
“One camp is dominated by the GOP operative class overseeing the party’s electoral efforts, including the president’s own campaign advisers and donors. The imperative is to do anything possible to win the election, and Barbara Lagoa would be an undeniable boon, they say: a Florida-based, Cuban-American jurist from a must-win state, who might also help the president in Hispanic-heavy Arizona and Nevada.”
“The other, led by White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, consists of religious and movement conservatives. They want a can’t-miss pick — someone who carries the lowest possible risk of becoming the next John Roberts or, worse, David Souter. The obvious choice to them is Amy Coney Barrett, an acolyte of former Justice Antonin Scalia who’s been groomed for decades to ascend to the high court and is seen as having the inside track.
“The two sides aren’t openly warring; instead, disagreements are surfacing in their attempts to bend the president’s ear and generate favorable media coverage for their preference. But the discord reflects the GOP’s conflicting priorities six weeks out from an election that Trump could well lose.”
ONE THING WE KEEP HEARING is that LAGOA can’t be too good for conservatives, since she was confirmed by the Senate in a bipartisan 80-15 vote in 2019. BARRETT was confirmed 55-43 in 2017 — a party-line vote.
— BURGESS EVERETT and ANDREW DESIDERIO: “Senate Republicans bet it all on the Supreme Court — again”: “With their majority increasingly in peril and Joe Biden demonstrating a durable lead over President Donald Trump, GOP senators are trying to make 2020 a sequel to their surprising win four years ago. In 2016, Republicans credited Mitch McConnell’s decision to block Merrick Garland’s appointment with delivering Trump the presidency — as well as saving the Senate GOP majority. …
“‘A Supreme Court debate right before an election is good for us,’ said Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who is facing a surprisingly strong challenge from Democrat Jaime Harrison. ‘It’s a right-of-center nation, certainly in South Carolina it is. It’s an event that will matter in these races.’”
— NYT, NEWS ANALYSIS, A19, by PETER BAKER: “With Nothing Else Working, Trump Races to Make a New Supreme Court Justice the Issue”: “To a president lagging in the polls, the chance to fill a Supreme Court vacancy has become a political lifeline, a chance to mobilize supporters and talk about something, anything, other than the coronavirus that has killed 200,000 Americans. …
“With the future of Roe v. Wade presumably on the line, the confirmation fight will certainly inject abortion into a race that had not focused on it until now. Anti-abortion voters have long been a bedrock of the Republican coalition and often more devoted to casting ballots on that issue than their counterparts. But polls show the broader electorate supports retaining Roe v. Wade, and Democrats hope that if the ruling appears to be threatened it will activate voters who support abortion rights.”
— CNN’S MANU RAJU: “Democrats weigh how to handle Trump’s potential Supreme Court pick after past flap over Barrett’s faith”
— HEATHER CAYGLE, MEL ZANONA and SARAH FERRIS: “Pelosi wrestles with House factions ahead of Supreme Court confirmation fight”: “The California Democrat is under pressure to placate an animated liberal base eager to battle Republicans over filling the seat of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the waning weeks before the election.
“Pelosi also must attempt to appease a coalition of vulnerable moderate Democrats, desperate for a coronavirus relief deal they see as key to their reelection. These centrist Democrats are worried the Supreme Court fight could overshadow any negotiations, not to mention make the party seem extreme.
“Both factions see their priorities as key to delivering Democrats sweeping power in the House, Senate and White House next year. Whether Pelosi can keep her sprawling caucus from splintering in the month before the election will be critical.”
— JOHN HARRIS column: “McConnell Is On The Losing Side of History — And He Knows It”
FASCINATING READ … NYT’S MAGGIE HABERMAN, DANNY HAKIM and NICK CORASANITI: “The Green Party’s Biggest Fan? In Some States, It’s the G.O.P.”: “In Wisconsin, a G.O.P. elections commissioner and lawyers with ties to Republicans tried to aid attempts by Howie Hawkins, the current Green Party presidential candidate, to get on the ballot there, which were ultimately unsuccessful. In Montana, state regulators found that the Republican Party violated campaign finance laws as part of an effort to boost the Greens in five down-ballot races, including for senator and governor.
“And in Western Pennsylvania, petitioners from Florida and California were brought in to gather signatures for Mr. Hawkins by an outside firm whose actions Mr. Hawkins and the party said they could not account for. Mr. Hawkins also did not make the ballot there. …
“Republican efforts to aid the Green Party are not new. In 2016, a billionaire backer of President Trump, Bernie Marcus, the co-founder of Home Depot, provided support to Jill Stein, the Green candidate, according to people with knowledge of the strategy, who said the effort was done with the knowledge of some officials at the Trump campaign and its chairman at the time, Paul Manafort. (Mr. Manafort was subsequently convicted of eight counts in an unrelated financial fraud trial.)”
THE NEW HANGING CHAD … HOLLY OTTERBEIN in Philadelphia: “Pennsylvania election officials warn of 2000 Florida redux”: “‘Naked ballots’ are fast shaping up as 2020’s equivalent of hanging chads. After the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that mail-in ballots sent without a proper envelope — known as naked ballots — cannot be counted, Pennsylvania election officials are sounding the alarm that upwards of 100,000 votes could be tossed out in November in this key battleground state.
“In 2016, Pennsylvania saw one of the closest finishes in the nation: Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton here by only 44,000 votes. Now, the prospect that more than twice that number of ballots might be disqualified is sending shudders through the Democratic establishment in a state where recent polls show Joe Biden’s lead is within single digits.” POLITICO
ESSENTIAL DAVE WEIGEL READING … WAPO: “The 50 political states of America”
WSJ: “Cindy McCain Formally Endorses Biden,” by Tarini Parti: “Cindy McCain, the wife of the late GOP Sen. John McCain of Arizona who was a frequent critic of President Trump, officially endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden Tuesday night.
“‘My husband John lived by a code: country first,’ Mrs. McCain said in a statement and in a series of tweets. ‘We are Republicans, yes, but Americans foremost. There’s only one candidate in this race who stands up for our values as a nation, and that is Joe Biden.’ Mrs. McCain added that although she and Mr. Biden didn’t always agree on issues, ‘he is a good and honest man. He will lead us with dignity.’”
NYT’S JONATHAN MARTIN interviewed MCCAIN: “Asked whether she had considered Mr. Trump’s reaction to her endorsement of Mr. Biden, Ms. McCain said she would just ‘laugh it off’ if the president attacked her in one of his ‘5 in the morning’ tweets. … Ms. McCain, asked whether she would support Ms. McSally, who has consistently trailed in the polls behind Mark Kelly, the Democratic challenger, flatly said no. ‘I have no interest in it,’ she said.”
— @jmartNYT: “The lineup of prominent Ariz Repubs poised to stand w @JoeBiden in the state: @cindymccain, @JeffFlake, Jim Kolbe, @GrantWoods. No other state has such big-name current and former Rs for Biden.”
AP’S WILL WEISSERT in Wilmington, Del.: “‘Bidin’ his time’: Joe Biden battles being chronically late”: “Joe Biden was running late. Again.
“On a recent Friday, he’d already apologized for the delayed start to a speech, then taken more questions than expected at a subsequent press conference. When it was finally over, Biden’s motorcade sped away quickly enough to leave behind one of the journalists traveling with it.
“But as the line of armored, black SUVs reached Biden’s home in suburban Wilmington, it suddenly reversed course and headed back out — this time to a nearby M&T bank branch. Biden’s next event was already supposed to be underway, a virtual fundraiser with National Democratic Finance Chair Chris Korge. Instead, he lingered at an ATM. The former vice president later told the donors gathered online that he was sorry to have been waylaid by a ‘significant press conference.’ He omitted the stop to withdraw pocket money.”
DEPT. OF MEASURING THE DRAPES? — “Left wing organizes to stop Biden from being Obama 2.0,” by Alex Thompson: “In 2008, the left wing of the Democratic Party felt shut out of the Obama transition effort. Amid an historic financial crisis, Barack Obama filled key jobs with holdovers of the moderate Clinton economic team like Larry Summers and Tim Geithner, who liberals felt were more focused on rescuing big banks than the people losing their homes.
“‘The progressive approach to the transition in 2008 was not organized,’ said Jeff Hauser, the director of The Revolving Door Project, which he founded in 2015 to dig deep on executive branch appointees in anticipation of the next Democratic administration. ‘It was a defeat.’ So for the last decade, Hauser and a small group of liberal activists have been quietly organizing in the wonky world of transition politics to prevent a repeat of 2008.
“Their goal in 2020: make a prospective Biden administration look more like a Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren administration. And they see an opportunity to get some of their agenda enacted through the 4,000-plus appointees Biden would need to pick should he win.” POLITICO
— ELENA SCHNEIDER: “The RNC is wiring cash to Texas. Is it a 2020 battleground?”
TRUMP’S WEDNESDAY — The president will deliver remarks to honor veterans of the Bay of Pigs at 11 a.m. in the East Room. Trump will participate in a discussion with state attorneys general about protecting consumers from social media abuses at 3 p.m. in the Cabinet Room.
ON THE TRAIL … BIDEN will travel to Charlotte, N.C. He will attend a Black economic summit in the afternoon.
PLAYBOOK READS
RUSSIA WATCH … NATASHA BERTRAND and DANIEL LIPPMAN: “CIA clamps down on flow of Russia intelligence to White House”: “The CIA has made it harder for intelligence about Russia to reach the White House, stoking fears among current and former officials that information is being suppressed to please a president known to erupt in anger whenever he is confronted with bad news about Moscow.
“Nine current and former officials said in interviews that CIA Director Gina Haspel has become extremely cautious about which, if any, Russia-related intelligence products make their way to President Donald Trump’s desk. Haspel also has been keeping a close eye on the agency’s fabled ‘Russia House,’ whose analysts she often disagrees with and sometimes accuses of purposefully misleading her.
“Last year, three of the people said, Haspel tasked the CIA’s general counsel, Courtney Elwood, with reviewing virtually every product that comes out of Russia House, which is home to analysts and targeters who are experts in Russia and the post-Soviet space, before it ‘goes downtown’ to the White House. One former CIA lawyer called it ‘unprecedented that a general counsel would be involved to this extent.’” POLITICO
AP/BERLIN: “Alexei Navalny released from German hospital after 32 days”
POLITICO’S THE FIFTY … BEYOND THE BELTWAY — “7 reasons Gavin Newsom has the worst job in politics,” by Jeremy White, Debra Kahn, and Alexander Nieves in Sacramento
FASCINATING FED READ … NYT’S JEANNA SMIALEK in Fredericksburg, Va., and EMILY COCHRANE: “Embattled Fed Nominee Celebrates Free Markets, but Not in Her Backyard”: “Judy Shelton has spent her career pushing for free markets and criticizing the far-reaching power of the Federal Reserve — an institution she may join as a governor and could one day lead, given the right chain of events.
“Yet Ms. Shelton’s track record is packed with incongruities, ones that have raised eyebrows among Senate Republicans, imperiling her nomination to take one of seven seats on the Fed’s board in Washington. … Those inconsistencies extend to her private life, where she has failed to apply her public view that markets and businesses should operate unencumbered and free of government interference to her own backyard.
“Over the past several years, Ms. Shelton and her husband have gone to court to block mining projects near their home — a manor on a former plantation outside Fredericksburg, Va., that once served as the Confederate general Stonewall Jackson’s winter camp. While the would-be miners argued that their operations would be good for the local economy, the Sheltons and their neighbors seized on zoning rules to try to block them, arguing they would provide too little benefit to outweigh added truck traffic, lost property value, environmental damage and disruptions to the local peace.”
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
TRANSITION — Harold Fox is joining Honigman as managing partner for the firm’s D.C. office. He previously was a partner at Steptoe & Johnson.
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Julia Ainsley, NBC News correspondent. How she got started in journalism: “One summer in college, I wrote for the newsletter of a nonprofit that repairs homes for people in Appalachia. My job was simply to sit on the porch with these families, hear their stories and write about how they’d been helped by this organization. I’ll never forget that summer or the people I met. But I soon realized I wanted the bigger picture. I wanted to know about their education system, health care access, local economy, politics, not just about their leaky roof. That realization ultimately led me to interning at the Charlotte Observer my last year of college and then to Medill from there.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Rep. Al Lawson (D-Fla.) is 72 … Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-N.J.) is 55 … Kristen Silverberg (h/t Dina Powell McCormick) … Elise Jordan (h/ts Ben Chang) … Todd Ricketts is 51 (h/t Brian Baker) … Helen Tolar, principal at Mehlman Castagnetti (h/t husband Mac) … Nick Everhart of Content Creative Media and Medium Buying … NYT’s Mike Schmidt … Richard Viguerie is 87 … POLITICO’s Bernie Becker and Emily Martin … Sean Spicer is 49 (h/t Katie Armstrong) … WaPo’s Meredith Kirsch … Ana Marie Cox … PwC’s Todd Metcalf … Amanda Cox … Tom Martin, president and CEO of the American Forest Foundation (h/t Jon Haber) … Abbey Watson … Darryl Nirenberg, partner at Steptoe (h/t Kathy King) … Ralph Hellmann is 59 … CNN producer Greg Wallace … Joshua Foer is 38 … David Harris, CEO of the American Jewish Committee, is 71 … Kelly Sackley … Kyle Wiley, senior adviser at DOE … Saunji Fyffe … Karen Czarnecki, VP of outreach for the Mercatus Center at George Mason … Serenety Hanley, social media director for 43 Alumni for Biden (h/t Kris Purcell) …
… former Rep. Jason Lewis (R-Minn.), who’s running for Senate, is 65 … Siraj Hashmi, commentary video editor and writer at the Washington Examiner … Brooke Brogan is 32 … Annie Hsu, senior producer for “Face the Nation” (h/t Hugo Rojo) … Naomi Seligman (h/t Tim Burger) … POLITICO Europe’s Santa Silapētere … Kyle Cotner … Jonathan Peled, acting director for the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs … SoRelle Wyckoff Gaynor … Mike Davis … Izabela Teixeira … Armaan Pai … Gabriella Schwarz … Kyle Inan … Julius Niyonsaba … Victoria Zarella … Lincoln Ferguson … James Howard Fitzgerald … Maura O’Brien … former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay is 79 … Maria Karl … John Tamny is 51 (h/t Juleanna Glover) … Dan Conley … Ryan Shucard, VP of media relations at 720 Strategies … Ken Rynne … Blair Fowler … Dustee Tucker Jenkins … Matt McAlvanah … Corey Tellez … Loretta Solon Greene … Matt Hirsch … Neil Schoolnik is 49 … Thomas Daley … Katrina Mendiola … Stan Davis … Dale Leibach (h/ts Teresa Vilmain) … Cherie Blair
Follow us on Twitter
AMERICAN MINUTE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Kamala Harris Will Remind Everyone How Awful She Is During Confirmation Hearing
Democrats May Regret Harris Being Back in the Confirmation Hearing Spotlight
Hump Day is here and we plod on into the end of the week as best we can. I’ll be plodding with a bit of whiskey. I hope you’re all having a wonderful start to your day, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends.
One big plot twist to this David Lynch movie that we’re calling 2020 is that the Democrats’ nominee for vice-president also sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kamala Harris will have to take some time off of the strange, mostly virtual campaign trail that she and Grandpa Gropes have been on so she can attend to her day job. It’s not like Biden will be able to pick up the slack with Harris in Washington for several days.
We’re in campaign crunch time and the stakes have been raised since the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg last Friday. This is when candidates are wearing themselves out to make their cases. On Tuesday, Biden officially called it a day before noon for the second time in four days.
He’s gassed and there is more than a month to go. If Harris is pulled away from covering for this drooling idiot there’s a chance that the water-carrying press may not be able to gloss over his extended nap time.
Some on the Left think that the confirmation hearing could be a golden campaign opportunity for Kamala Harris.
President Trump’s Supreme Court plans have created a major opportunity for Sen. Kamala Harris to go on offense, Axios’ Alexi McCammond reports.
Why it matters: A confirmation fight puts Harris back in the spotlight thanks to her role on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- Allies still point to her grilling Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 (clips of which have racked up millions of views on YouTube) and they laugh at her “suggested … hinted … inferred?” exchange with Attorney General William Barr in May regarding the Mueller report.
- These exchanges with Harris often go viral and they usually showcase a moment where she’s riffing or offering a snap reaction to the person she’s questioning.
- Those are the electric moments that you can’t always learn during debate prep, and allies say they show that Harris is meticulous and skilled at the clapback — arguing both will serve her well in the Oct. 7 debate against VP Mike Pence.
I think there’s a lot of mental revisionist history going on there, unless what they are hoping for is that Harris gets another opportunity to remind everyone what shrill shrew she is.
As we have noted many times before, Kamala Harris is so off-putting that her own party decided that she was the first of the “top tier” candidates in the Democratic primary race who needed to go. Increased exposure to the public doesn’t really go well for Harris.
Since it’s a given that President Trump is going to nominate a woman, Harris’s Kavanaugh antics almost certainly won’t play as favorably as the Axios writer thinks.
If, as noted in yesterday’s Morning Briefing, Amy Coney Barrett or Barbara Lagoa are nominated, Harris may be exposed for the anti-Catholic bigot that she is:
In 2018, Kamala Harris suggested that Judge Brian Buescher was unfit to serve on the bench because he is a member of the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization and charitable group with millions of members.
“Since 1993, you have been a member of the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men,” Harris began. “In 2016, Carl Anderson, leader of the Knights of Columbus, described abortion as ‘a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.’ Mr. Anderson went on to say that ‘abortion is the killing of the innocent on a massive scale.’ Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman’s right to choose when you joined the organization?”
A Catholic organization opposing abortion? Who knew?
The optics of Harris teeing off on a Roman Catholic mother with a shrieking progressive “Gender traitor” rant won’t really help Team Harris-Biden win over any hearts and minds in swing states where the polls are tight.
It really doesn’t matter that the people who were already going to vote for the Democrat Trojan Horse ticket will be thrilled with whatever Harris does during the hearing. The people she needs to reach will see her for what she is.
And that’s terribly unpleasant.
Enjoy Your New Insurance Premium, Psycho
Oh No, Burn It Down Boy Is Back
If They’re So Desperate for $$$ Maybe They Should Start Serving Alcohol In the Main Cabin Again
PJM Linktank
CNN: Yeah, McConnell Is About to Go 3-0 With Trump SCOTUS Picks
Trump’s Middle East Peace Deals Continue to Pay Dividends
And I will. Chuck Schumer Gets Heckled and Doesn’t Enjoy It. But You Can.
LA County Rushes to Slap Hefty Fines on John MacArthur for Going to Church Amid Lockdown
War for the White House #11: War for the Supreme Court Edition
A Mob Hunts Down Judiciary Chair Senator Lindsey Graham Over RBG. He Deftly Flips It On Them
Treacher: Alyssa ‘#DefundThePolice’ Milano Calls the Cops
The New York Times Just Gave Definitive Proof the ‘1619 Project’ Is a Fraud
This should go swimmingly…Seattle to Pay Ex-Pimp $150,000 to Come Up With ‘Alternatives to Policing’
Oh. Don Lemon: Democrats Should ‘Blow Up the Entire System’ if Trump Confirms a Justice
Chicago Postal Workers Threaten Strike After Several Mail Carriers Shot
Here’s Why Justice Ginsburg Is Being Laid to Rest at a Military Cemetery
Democrat Senate Candidate Called Police Gangsters, Thugs, Bullies, a ‘Danger’ to Children
Here’s What You Need to Understand About That Amish Trump Parade in Ohio
This Obama-Biden Administration Failure Killed More Americans (and Veterans!) Than COVID-19
Support For Trump Among Rank-and-File Union Members Remains Strong
Wisconsin Judge Rules Absentee Ballots Can Be Counted Up to Six Days After Election
Trump Introduced Pro-Masking GOP Gov. Mike DeWine at His Ohio Rally and It Did Not Go Well. At All.
Harry Potter and the Transphobic Author
VIP
The Kruiser Kabana Episode 69: I Hate the Fall and Granny Boxwine Is Drunk
No, Rush Limbaugh, We Do Need a Hearing for Trump’s Supreme Court Pick. Here’s Why.
VIP Gold
Schlichter: Democrats Need Practice Making Threats
Even In D.C. More Residents Are Embracing Their 2A Rights
Shove It, Democrats. Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Seat Is Ours…And There’s Nothing You Can Do About It
From the Mothership and Beyond
The ‘Trump train’: ‘I’m tired of people putting down our president’
Two Co-Hosts from ‘The View’ Admit Political Defeat
Why CPAC Chair Matt Schlapp Says ‘Being a Republican Is Going to Be Illegal Soon’
WATCH: Even Michigan Teamsters Are Showing Up to Support the President
Pence Says Trump Is Planning Executive Action to Protect Pre-Existing Conditions
BREAKING: House Passes a Bipartisan Stopgap Bill to Prevent a Government Shutdown
Exclusive: Sen. Loeffler Introduces Legislation Further Protecting Women’s Sports Under Title IX
Ellen Addresses Toxic Work Environment in First Monologue of New Season
Musk: Cheaper Tesla ready ‘in about three years’
Albuquerque City Council Shoots Down Gun Control Bills
Employee Of Philly Violence Prevention Program Busted For Carrying Gun
Dem Lawmaker Smears Bar Owner Who Committed Suicide
The medieval carpentry techniques used in Notre Dame cathedral rebuild
April Ryan Fangirls Kamala Over Her Spot On Ticket: “It Sends Chills Through Me”
Polls: Biden Still Underperforming With Hispanic Voters Nationally And In Miami-Dade County
Old TV set interfered with village’s DSL Internet each day for 18 months
Company Gives Up Its NBA Suite, Fires Off Letter to Franchise Owner Over the Ruining of Sports
Look At How Democratic Officials Are Misusing Federal Coronavirus Aid
Shocking: Hollywood’s Elite Revolt Against an Aristocratic School’s Woke Revolution
American Sign Language Bible now complete after 39 years
Florida sheriff breaks out photos to educate the press on peaceful protests vs. riots and looting
As Joe Rogan’s Platform Grows, So Does the Media and Liberal Backlash. Why?
BINGO. Feehery: Trump landslide is only way to save the republic as we know it
The Newest Addition to Denmark’s Happiness Museum: Tomato Seeds
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
OK, this clip from Bad Lip Reading really isn’t that different from reality when it comes to Biden.
I’ve been asked to be a body double on Dancing With the Stars.
___
Kruiser Twitter
Kruiser Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.
WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
White House Dossier
http://www.whitehousedossier.com
P.O. Box 27211,
Washington, DC 20038Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: How Democrats Could Shake Up the Senate If They Win
A brief history of court packing and the filibuster.
The Dispatch Staff | 2 hr | 1 |
Happy Wednesday! We’ve got a special bonus Dispatch Live on tap tonight. Our Advisory Opinions team will be answering your questions about the coming Supreme Court confirmation battle, and Sarah Isgur will talk to David French about his new book. The only catch? You have to be a Dispatch member. But check out details about the event here, and check out our 30-day free trial on annual memberships here.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- The United States confirmed 60,864 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday per the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard, with 7.8 percent of the 771,155 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 912 deaths were attributed to the virus on Tuesday, bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 200,724.
- Sen. Mitt Romney announced yesterday he intends to “follow the Constitution and precedent” and vote on President Trump’s coming Supreme Court nominee “based upon their qualifications.” His support for moving forward with the process increases the likelihood that President Trump’s nominee—set to be announced Saturday evening—will be confirmed to the court.
- Slightly more than a week away from a potential government shutdown, the House approved a bipartisan short-term spending bill negotiated by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin that will fund the government through December 11. President Trump is expected to sign the bill into law once it passes the Senate.
- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered state election officials on Thursday to throw out “naked ballots” received by the election deadline, meaning any ballot not encased by the requisite “secrecy envelope” will automatically be invalidated. Lisa Deeley, the Democratic chair of the Philadelphia city commissioners, warned that the court’s ruling may require election officials to throw out more than 100,000 ballots, causing “significant postelection legal controversy, the likes of which we have not seen since Florida in 2000.”
- The GOP plans to challenge the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s September 17 extension of the state’s mail in voting deadline, marking the first case the Supreme Court will likely hear in a post-Ruth Bader Ginsburg court. The Republican party of Pennsylvania filed court documents Monday night and Tuesday morning, setting the stage for a bitter election fight in the battleground state that Trump won by 44,000 votes in 2016.
The Norms, They Are A Changin’
When Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made clear on Friday Republicans would be moving ahead with filling the Supreme Court vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, Democrats were—predictably—furious. “McConnell is cementing a shameful legacy of brazen hypocrisy,” Sen. Bernie Sanders said. Sen. Martin Heinrich called Republicans confirming a new justice “hypocrisy at its worst” and “a grave injustice to the American people.”
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer escalated the rhetoric on a Democratic caucus call the following day. “Let me be clear,” he said. “If Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year.”
Well, by all accounts, Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans are moving forward with this, so it’s worth taking a look at the procedural maneuvers Schumer says are now on the table if Democrats reclaim the Senate in November. Neither are entirely without precedent, but both would usher in dramatic—and perhaps irreversible—change to our political system.
Packing them in.
The most direct path to vengeance for Democrats would be to pack the Supreme Court. Proposals that would do so have thus far taken two basic tacks: Ostensibly nonpartisan reform or straightforward score-settling in response to “stolen” seats of Justice Gorsuch and whoever replaces Justice Ginsberg. The plan Pete Buttigieg ran on in the Democratic primary, for example, falls into the former camp. He would expand the court from nine members to 15, with five associated with the Republican Party, five associated with the Democratic Party, and the remaining five having to be chosen unanimously by the first 10. New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie, by contrast, has argued for a more straightforward, “eye-for-an-eye” approach. “Add two additional seats to account for the extraordinary circumstances surrounding the Gorsuch and Kavanaugh nominations,” he wrote in 2019.
“Court packing,” the colloquialism for Congress using its (yes, entirely constitutional) power to add seats to the Supreme Court, isn’t new to U.S. politics. Congress has intervened to add—and subtract—justices under partisan conditions several times in American history. But the Supreme Court has stood at nine justices since 1870.
Worth Your Time
- Does the debt matter? According to Peter Wehner and Ian Tufts, neither party seems to think so. For decades, both Republicans and Democrats have piled trillions of dollars onto our national debt with little regard for how such fiscal irresponsibility will affect future generations. In National Affairs this week, Wehner and Tufts endeavor a solution out of this fiscal crisis we’ve found ourselves in: “Everything needs to be on the table — entitlement reforms, a restructuring of the tax code (including tax increases), changes to the federal budget process, etc. — to ensure that the United States can gradually bring the public debt down to more sustainable and safer levels.”
- The U.S. coronavirus death toll officially surpassed 200,000 people this week, and the elderly accounted for the vast majority of those deaths. Research shows that “globally, people don’t value elderly lives as much as they do young people’s,” Olga Khazan writes in a piece for The Atlantic, citing a giant trolley problem-esque psychology study called the Moral Machine game. “When it comes to deciding who lives or dies, there’s a disregard for the elderly, even among the elderly.” This trend, Khazan argues, has made it far easier for the public to grow numb to the staggering loss of life we as a society have experienced these past six months.
- Joe Rogan has one of the largest political followings in the country, with Spotify reportedly paying $100 million in May for the exclusive rights to broadcast his show. Rogan brands himself as a moderate liberal, but earlier this year he faced a tidal wave of backlash from Democratic elites after Bernie Sanders publicly acknowledged Rogan’s quasi-endorsement of his candidacy. “The argument was that Rogan’s views are so repellent, bigoted, and anathema to liberalism that no Democratic candidate should be associated with him,” explains Glenn Greenwald in The Intercept, citing Rogan’s history of questioning the modern trans-activist movement on his show. “If the standard is that anyone who even entertains debates over the maximalist and most controversial questions in this very new and evolving social movement is to be cast out as radioactive, liberalism and the Democratic Party will be a very small group.”
Presented Without Comment
Toeing the Company Line
- It’s become trendy on the American populist left and the nationalist right to blame the country’s problems on the alleged domination of libertarian elites in Washington. In his latest Capitolismnewsletter, Scott Lincicome argues this claim is utter nonsense—and he has a zillion charts to prove it. From trade policy to the administrative state, “our current, mishmash system reflects the divided and often frustrating mix of views and procedures that is the United States.” This reality, Lincicome argues “is far more complicated (and boring) than the populist caricature, and it certainly doesn’t lend itself to easy solutions like purging Friedmanesque ideologues from the government.”
- Over at the site today, Andrew has a piece breaking down the CDC’s recent head-scratching decision to publish new guidance calling the coronavirus an “airborne disease” spread via aerosols—and then to walk that guidance back, claiming it was published in error.
- Also on the site today, Gregg T. Nunziata provides a brief history lesson and tutorial on the Senate confirmation process for Supreme Court justices. Did you know that on a few occasions in the past, the Senate confirmed the president’s nominee in an afternoon?
- The SCOTUS wars are back in session and hypocrisy abounds on the political left and right. In yesterday’s French Press (🔒),David walks readers through the history and political norms surrounding election year Supreme Court nominations. “The decision to turn on a dime and reject clearly stated political principles when a presidential election is so close that voting is actually underway represents an escalation of the SCOTUS wars,” he writes. To save our country from irreparable political enmity, David argues Trump should make his pick and the Senate should wait to confirm until after the election. “If Trump wins, they confirm the pick. If Trump loses, they also confirm the pick unless key Democrats (including Joe Biden) pledge not to pack the court.”
- David is back on The Remnant again, but this time as a guest, not a guest host! He and Jonah discuss his new book, Divided We Fall, and how we can knit together our social fabric back again. Don’t worry, they talk Tenet, The Boys, and Dune, too.
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), James P. Sutton (@jamespsuttonsf), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Photograph by Alex Wong/Getty Images.
1 |
LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
THE DAILY WIRE
|
DESERET NEWS
|
THE FEDERALIST
|
The Federalist, 611 Pennsylvania Ave SE, #247, Washington, DC 20003, United States
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
THE BLAZE
More from TheBlaze One last thing … A Louisville Metropolitan Police Department officer sent an email to about 1,000 fellow officers at 2 a.m. Tuesday criticizing protesters, city officials, department leadership, and the FBI as he awaits a decision on whether he will be charged in Breonna Taylor’s death, Vice News reported.The email, written by Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and … Read more
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. Privacy Policy | Manage your preferences | Unsubscribe 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA
|
BRIGHT
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Danielle D’Souza Gill fights for the pre-born by discussing ‘The Choice’
- Supreme Court myths and absurdities from Democrats
- Shut up, they explained: The left now wants to ban free speech because of the COVID crisis
- George Soros is verboten on Fox News. Tucker Carlson doesn’t care.
- Don’t bank on Mitt Romney just yet
- When is the mask madness going to end?
- Run on accomplishments, not promises. Fill the seat.
Danielle D’Souza Gill fights for the pre-born by discussing ‘The Choice’
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 06:15 PM PDT Young women in America are arguably the most under-served portion of the population by the Trump campaign. It’s not for lack of trying, but the demographic is one that isn’t easily reached through the channels the Trump campaign works the most. Thankfully, they’re taking advice from certain young women, including Danielle D’Souza Gill, who are recommending better ways to reach young female voters. Gill isn’t just a member of the Women for Trump advisory board. She’s also a published author whose new book, “The Choice: The Abortion Divide in America,” is currently available for pre-order with a release date of October 6. In it, she takes on the talking points of the pro-abortion left by addressing it through a lens they claim to understand: Choice. Gill believes it does come down to choice and she’s hopeful that people will make the right one for pre-born babies. In this interview on NOQ Report with our EIC, JD Rucker, Gill breaks down what’s happening in the world of Women for Trump as well as how her fight against abortion is a universal one for men and women across America. She positions the debate as one that’s empowering for those who choose life. It’s a different angle that should be considered by all pro-life activists in America today.
One of the things that makes America great is our right to choose. Danielle D’Souza Gill understands that choice is important, which is why she named her pro-life book “The Choice.” More Americans need to make the right one. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Danielle D’Souza Gill fights for the pre-born by discussing ‘The Choice’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Supreme Court myths and absurdities from Democrats
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 05:09 PM PDT With Pavlovian predictability, leftist Democrats have gone into full lunacy mode in the immediate aftermath of the announcement of Ruth Ginsburg’s passing. And just as predictable is the universally fraudulent nature of absolutely everything they are proclaiming. Their goal is singular: Prevent President Trump at all costs from nominating a pro-Constitution jurist to the High Court. But they’re Democrats. So of course they cannot afford to be honest about it. Still, in all of their lies and posturing, they inadvertently reveal who they are, and what their despicable agenda portends for the nation if they ever get into power. So the ugliness lurking behind all of their grandstanding needs to be exposed and considered in its true light. Perhaps the most ghoulish fraud (so far) has been the purported letter from Ginsburg, in which she ostensibly claimed that she wanted her successor to be named by someone other than President Trump. This transparent effort to “tug at the heartstrings of America” has already been endorsed by none other than the embodiment of phony moralizing himself, Barack Obama. Even if this scam were real, it would only serve to spotlight the abhorrence of Ginsburg’s actual “legacy.” It is wholly without merit, or any basis in the Constitution, and in fact would represent a gross departure from that founding Charter of our nation if anyone were so unprincipled and foolish as to actually abide by it. But more significantly, it represents the exact manner in which Ginsburg actually conducted herself (and in the process disgraced her oath of office) during her time on the Court. From the moment of her confirmation in 1993, Ginsburg showed flagrant and continual contempt for the Constitution of the United States, and instead was the most reliable leftist activist on the Court. Her decisions, based not on any constitutional principle but solely on political ideology, were virtually 100% predictable before even a single oral argument was heard. Clearly she saw her station not as a guardian of the American ideal, but as an autocratic post with zero accountability, much more akin to “royalty” than to the preservation of the principles of our Republic. So it stands to reason that as her last effort in this life, she might try to manipulate the system in order to determine her successor. Concurrent with that sad parody, the panic and hysterics of the leftist Democrats and their dutiful minions in the Fake News has been just as unsurprising, and just as transparently pathetic. In textbook leftist Alinksy fashion, every Democrat with access to a microphone has been attempting to make the claim, with effusive self-aggrandizing “virtue,” that preventing President Trump from picking the nominee is somehow in the best interests of our great nation. It isn’t! Such a course would only benefit the abhorrent and dangerous leftist agenda. Leftist Democrats tout the supposed need for a mythical “balance” on the Court. But they never truly reveal the nature of that “balance,” or between which contrasting governing ideologies it should bridge. If the Court were to function as intended by the Founders, there would be no “balance” in it whatsoever. It would stand above anything political, as the arbiter and protector of the integrity of the Constitution as ratified and amended. The nominees from both parties should rightly be devoted to this end above any other motivation. Sadly, reality paints a far less noble picture, particularly among the Democrats. While a pro-Constitution Court is intended to be the guarantor of the rights and freedoms of all Americans, on that basis alone it is an obstacle to the leftist Democrat agenda. In recent years, the Court has degenerated into a Democrat weapon (when dominated by leftist activist “justices”) by which to circumvent the law, and trample the rights and freedoms of decent Americans. So when the Democrats speak of “balance,” they actually seek to establish sufficient political clout from the Court, in order to bypass the rest of the legislative process. And that presents the gravest of dangers to our Nation’s future. Ultimately, all of the hysterics and grandstanding of the leftist Democrats do not reflect positively on them, and can actually be a huge liability if Republicans respond properly to all of it. Those on the right should, as loudly as possible, make the case that their intent is to uphold the Constitution as written and ratified, and to oppose any leftist Democrat effort to undermine that defining principle of our nation. From that point forward, every Democrat rant against the effort to install a new, pro-Constitution jurist on the Court should be just as loudly characterized as an attack on that effort to preserve, protect, and defend our Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Certain Democrat players are already wary of the liability this poses to them. Public recognition of where they actually stand would be hugely detrimental to their efforts to paint themselves as paragons of patriotism and virtue. It is precisely for this reason that the Biden puppet-masters have no intention of releasing any list of prospective nominees. Doing so would instantly unmask their leftist activist objectives for the Court. Thankfully, President Trump is already framing the debate in just such terms. In response the rancor and venom of leftist Democrats is increasing. And that can ultimately be used for the good of our nation. Let the Democrats hurl their accusations that upholding the Constitution is “divisive” and “partisan.” Given the flagrant animosity of the leftist Democrats towards the greatness of our America in recent years, fighting for America is indeed a “partisan” mission. And they are on the wrong side of it. Bio Christopher G. Adamo is a lifelong conservative from the American Heartland. He has been involved in grassroots and state-level politics for years. His recently released book “Rules for Defeating Radicals,” subtitled “Countering the Alinsky Strategy in Politics and Culture,” is the “Go To” guide to effectively overcoming the dirty tricks of the political left. It is available at Amazon. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Supreme Court myths and absurdities from Democrats appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Shut up, they explained: The left now wants to ban free speech because of the COVID crisis
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 02:46 PM PDT
Along the way, whole swaths of the bill of rights were being infringed upon as never before in the history of the nation. Now that they have that under their hobnail boots, they are going for another: Free speech. Actual video title: Can Shutting Up Stop the Spread of Covid-19?That title from Bloomberg should grab everyone’s attention. The whole mask mandate scam is wearing thin, given that states with these mandates are now seeing an uptick in cases. Sweden showed the way by protecting the vulnerable and allowing the rest of the population to develop herd immunity, as is taking place where there are no mask mandates and Farr’s law shows a decline at a mathematically predictable rate. The left isn’t satisfied with merely destroying the economy and micromanaging everyone’s life down to the most basic of details. They have their eyes set on goals that are more ambitious than forcing us to wear face placebos. They’ve already talked about how they can parlay this ‘serious crisis’ into a discussion of climate change. Now they want to use it to literally shut people up. The bottom line: The left has only one priority, and that’s the attainment of powerThose of us who have studied the socialist left for decades foresaw how they would again use another crisis to enhance their power. It’s never about the crisis itself, but how they can assert more control over everyone else. Many on the left are ‘LARPing’ [Live Action Role-Playing] as socialist revolutionaries, thinking that all of this will lead to them being installed as the ruling elite of their new socialist Utopia. The problem for the tyrannical ten percent is that the rest of us want to be left alone. We know where they are going with this, that is why everyone is arming up and ammo is nowhere to be found. You can guess this won’t be the last draconian demand based on the COVID crisis. They’ve exploited the crisis to suppress most of the 1st amendment. As soon as they figure out how to connect guns with germs, that will be their next priority. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Shut up, they explained: The left now wants to ban free speech because of the COVID crisis appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
George Soros is verboten on Fox News. Tucker Carlson doesn’t care.
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 09:24 AM PDT Fox News doesn’t like people talking about George Soros on their network. They even stifled former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich from truthfully reporting on Soros during an episode of Outnumbered. Rumors have circulated that even the name “George Soros” is verboten on the network, never to be uttered by anyone who ever wants to be on the air again. Host Tucker Carlson apparently doesn’t care. During last night’s interview of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, the popular conservative host immediately mentioned Soros without flinching. Following a few clips from crime-ridden cities, Carlson spoke out against Soros. “Most living Americans have never seen scenes like that,” he said. “Now they’re common all over the country. What happened? Well they tell us it’s about police brutality, but police brutality has not increased. In fact, federal statistics show it’s down. “What’s changed in many places is the nature of the prosecutors, the people whose job it is to keep you safe are instead making it easier for criminals to terrorize your family. That’s not an accident. Left-wing mega-donors like George Soros realized it’s easier to install radical DA’s than it is to convince the public to let their own cities burn. “Soros has worked hard to elect district attorneys who will nullify laws against rioting and violence by failing to enforce them. In Portland, Oregon, where violence has become a way of life, a Soros-funded political action committee funneled $20,000 to Mike Schmidt’s campaign this year. Schmidt in turn has announced he won’t prosecute any of the rioters who’ve turned Portland into a war zone. He’s already dismissed charges against rioting suspects, hundreds of them. In fact, at one point Schmidt said the unrest in Portland was ‘beautiful.’ “But it’s not just Portland. Entities bankrolled by George Soros have spent more than $13 million in district attorney races in a total of 17 states. Over the past few years, this unfolded in Florida, California, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia. In 2017, Soros spent roughly $1.7 million getting a single man elected, Larry Krasner in Philadelphia. He’s the district attorney, and as expected Krasner presided over a dramatic rise in crime. Soros is now trying to do the same in Los Angeles. There’s a DA race underway there now.” It is demonstrable that George Soros has funded radical leftist district attorneys despite many Fox News claims to the contrary. It’s good to know Tucker Carlson is willing to speak the truth instead of quashing it as verboten. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post George Soros is verboten on Fox News. Tucker Carlson doesn’t care. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Don’t bank on Mitt Romney just yet
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 08:44 AM PDT I don’t trust Mitt Romney. Nobody should. The left doesn’t trust him now that he has said he will vote for a Supreme Court nominee. The right seems to temporarily trust him as a result, but this could be a mistake. We should consider the strong possibility that he will, indeed, vote on the nominee but will side with Democrats in opposition. The key is in the way he worded it. According to Newsmax (with the key line highlighted): Utah Republican Sen. Mitt Romney said Tuesday he supports voting to fill the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Supreme Court, all but ensuring President Donald Trump has the backing needed to push the nomination over Democrats’ objections that it’s too close to the November election. Romney issued a statement saying he would support moving forward. “If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications,” Romney said. Trump , meanwhile, said he would announce his choice to replace the late Ginsburg on Saturday, setting off a Senate battle with Democrats. The Senate Judiciary chairman who will shepherd the nomination through the chamber said Republicans have the votes they need for confirmation — even hough no nominee has been announced. From anyone else, the line would be an innocent, politically correct way of saying they will be fair and give every opportunity to the Supreme Court nominee to win his vote. But this isn’t anyone else. It’s Mitt Romney. I can picture him using this opportunity as a way to further embarrass the President just as he did during the impeachment hearings in the Senate when he voted to remove President Trump from office. Until Mitt Romney votes in favor of confirming the Supreme Court nominee, we shouldn’t count him as being on the right side of the debate. Saying that he will “vote based on their qualifications” could mean he’s planning the ultimate snake-like move. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Don’t bank on Mitt Romney just yet appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
When is the mask madness going to end?
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 08:14 AM PDT Note something on the opinion screed that once was the Associated Press. In the middle of dragging out the plaudits of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and making her irreplaceable, along with other leftist hobby horses, the pandemic panic has gone by the wayside. Oh sure, they still push the ever-popular ‘grim milestone’ stories while ignoring the fact that Beijing Biden thinks that 61% of Americans will be dead when he’s done misreading his teleprompter. Other sites still try to maintain the panic, but now they are down to talking about how tiring it all is. The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (CRC) is showing that places that have achieved herd immunity aren’t seeing an increase in cases while those that insist on maintaining the COVID tyranny are on the increase. Even the media has to admit to Sweden’s success in avoiding a surge in virus cases but they can’t bring themselves to change course in giving up control – especially on the subject of face placebos. CDC chief says masks better at stopping coronavirus than a vaccine – seriously?It doesn’t help that the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dr. Robert Redfield made the bizarre claim that face masks may ultimately be better than a much-hoped-for vaccine:
So now they are moving the goalposts once again, even though states that avoided draconian mask mandates are approaching herd immunity. John Ziegler made a very good point in Mediaite in an article entitled: The Conservative Argument Against Mask Mandates is Stronger than the Media Pretends on the substantive reasons for our resistance to wearing masks that have little to do with wanting to deal with the hassle of wearing one:
The first point being very important – it’s up to those wanting to force us to wear these placebos to prove that it’s worth the risk and the damage to liberty. So far, the burden has been falsely transferred to those who object to this intrusion on our liberty. When is this going to end?Time was, the left at least tried to sugar-coat its tyrannical dictates. The ongoing lock-down was at least put forward as ’15 days to slow the spread’ 6 months ago. They at least tried to sell the rest of it with appeals to the collective good. The face placebo mandates were different, it was ‘you are going to wear them and you’re going to like it –even if we can’t tell if you’re smiling’. That was it, even worse, they didn’t even bother with talking about the metrics for determining when it would all end. The bottom line: It’s going end because we say it’s endingOf course, many embraced this idea because they were all on board with prolonging the panic. These are the folks walking around with the black face masks, just to make sure you notice. These are also the people who wear them outdoors even when it’s not necessary. This has become a political issue with the implication from the press that placebo pundits advocates care about science and others while resisters are anti-science and selfish. As time goes on, more and more people will care less and less about being afraid and pretending to be virtuous. Even now, we’re seeing less than 100% masking up. There will of course be those still want to make a political statement, but for the rest of us, we’re going to gradually go about our lives, getting back to a mask-less normal, and there is nothing the mask Nazis will be able to do about it. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post When is the mask madness going to end? appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Run on accomplishments, not promises. Fill the seat.
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 07:45 AM PDT The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg presents the opportunity of a lifetime to shift the balance of the Supreme Court. Despite what the media will almost always insist, there are not five conservatives on the Supreme Court. In fact, I would only count Alito and Thomas as conservatives. Gorsuch has proven not to be a conservative on the bench in his first three years, and Kavanaugh is perhaps an improvement from Kennedy but nowhere near Alito. And if John Roberts betrays us on every issue of significance, how can it be said he is one of us. Previously, the court was four Leftists, three swing votes, and two solid conservatives. Now the communists on the Supreme Court are reduced to three with their intellectual heavyweight gone. President Trump is left with a predicament. He must choose between political expedience or political decorum. And with the nation in the midst of a cold civil war, the choice could not be clearer. Fill the seat. And do so before the election. This election could go down a number of ways and shenanigans and Tomfoolery are to be expected with the chaos of mail-in ballots. This election, like 2000, could be decided by the Supreme Court and a gridlocked decision would leave the appellate ruling in place. The next president is not something to gamble on an appellate court ruling should it come to that. But, as I stated before, this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to shift the balance of the Supreme Court, one we have not had in several decades. Not only is it imperative to replace the intellectual heavyweight of our adversaries, but it is most necessary and beneficial to do so prior to the election. We are losing the fight for the soul of our country and fake conservatives like David “Vichy” French and Jonah Goldberg argue that we should take a knee on 1st and goal instead of driving the ball in for a touchdown. This idea of negotiating against yourself could be a generational blunder. In 2016, Republicans were stupid in claiming we should not confirm Merrick Garland in an election year, when the reality is that we should not be allowing Antonin Scalia be replaced with a Marxist. But Lindsay Graham, I suppose, needed to appeal to some nonsense to cover up the fact he would have voted to confirm Merrick Garland just as he had Obama’s other two Justices. But Republicans should confirm Trump’s nominee before the election precisely because of the election. The consultant class of Republicans will argue that we need to dangle the nominee like a carrot to drive turnout. But this is obvious manipulation. It’s clear Trump’s base wants the replacement confirmed ASAP. 2016, like 2012 and 2008 were base election. Trump turned out his base and Hillary Clinton did not. If Trump wants to turn out his base, score big by replacing their idol with a conservative. I should not have to remind anyone that Trump is an incumbent. He cannot simply run on promises. He must run on accomplishments. And to date, there have been too few for my liking. The wall is in progress, but Obamacare remains. The swamp needs massive draining, which includes handcuffs. And I am not enamored with Trump’s two SCOTUS appointees; neutering John Robert’s ability to be the swing vote on the highest court in the land will solidify Trump’s legacy and service to our cause. Many conservatives reluctantly voted for Trump to ensure Scalia and any other justice would be replaced with someone who revered the Constitution. We knew the possibility of Trump being able to appoint three or four to the Supreme Court in his first term. Now, we finally have an open slot to shift the balance of the court in our favor. This is more imperative than the election. The Prime Directive of our cause is to save our country. And so with Vulcan shrewdness we must fill this vacancy. And the irony is this will not come at a great cost, Trump can campaign on his SCOTUS appointees and Americans his base will turn out ecstatic on election day. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Run on accomplishments, not promises. Fill the seat. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 14 new items) |
- Pelosi Panics, Coming Together, Washington Prayer March
- Democrats Would Pack Court Regardless, Given The Chance
- Biden Anti-Business Agenda Would Wreck the Economy
- Last Best Chance to Capture Supreme Court
- Short List
- Worms for Early Bird Voting?
- Judge Barrett is the Answer to Ginsburg’s Legacy of Death
- Do Democrats Really Believe Biden Is Winning?
- Some Reasons I Support Donald Trump
- Debunking Demo Objections to President Trump’s Third SCOTUS Nominee
- The Cancellation of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
- Protecting Senior Votes
- Will Biden Propose A Mask Mandate Penalty Tax, Too?
- What You Need to Know About Supreme Court Confirmation Process, and Trump’s Top Picks
Pelosi Panics, Coming Together, Washington Prayer March
Posted: 23 Sep 2020 12:46 AM PDT
by Gary Bauer: Pelosi Panics During an interview on MSNBC yesterday, Pelosi preemptively attacked the president’s nominee, declaring what “horrible” things will happen with another conservative justice on the Supreme Court. She said: “They are on a path to undo the Affordable Care Act. They’re on a path to undo a woman’s right to choose. And there are many more issues that relate to the LBGTQ community, clean air, clean water, pollution. They’re coming after your children. Protect your children from what they are trying to do in this Court. “They’re coming after your children”?! That’s rich coming from her, one of America’s leading advocates of abortion. Pelosi and her party are sitting on the corpses of unborn children who have been sacrificed to the god of abortion on demand! Everyone knows abortion is THE issue driving the left. Yet she says conservatives are the ones coming for children! But that’s not all. Pelosi is also raising the specter of impeachment yet again, telling a New York Times reporter yesterday, “Well, we can impeach him every day of the week for anything he does.” Not to be outdone, socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants to impeach Attorney General William Barr too! Meanwhile, CNN’s Don Lemon is calling on leftists to “blow up the entire system.” He is telling Democrats that if Joe Biden wins, they must “[pack] the Supreme Court” and “get rid of the Electoral College.” My friends, the left is serious about “fundamentally transforming” America. It’s not just a talking point. It’s not an empty threat. They mean it. This isn’t just another election. The constitutional republic our Founding Fathers created is at risk this November. Please stand with me as we stand with President Trump! Coming Together Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been clear that the president’s nominee will get a floor vote. Here’s some additional history bolstering the case for why this president and this Senate should fill this vacancy:
Meanwhile, Sen. McConnell has been working to ensure that his caucus is committed to getting this vacancy filled, and his efforts are paying off. Senators Grassley and Ernst of Iowa support moving forward with the nomination process. Other senators in tough reelection battles, including Senators Gardner (CO), McSally (AZ) and Tillis (NC) are all on record in favor of President Trump and the Senate filling this appointment sooner rather than later. Even Senator Mitt Romney is on board to proceed. And last night, Sen. Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told Sean Hannity, “We’ve got the votes to confirm the justice on the floor of the Senate before the election. And that’s what’s coming.” While I appreciate Senator Graham’s enthusiasm, we remember what happened with the Kavanaugh confirmation battle. We know the left will do anything it can to smear this nominee in order to drag out and delay the process. We must be ready. But this fight won’t be over once the nominee is confirmed. We must finish this fight at the ballot box this November by reelecting President Trump, maintaining the GOP Senate majority and electing a conservative House majority! To Pack Or Not To Pack? Incredibly, Joe Biden refuses to give the American people a list of his Supreme Court nominees. He also refuses to stand up to the left-wing flank of his party by clearly stating whether he supports packing the Supreme Court. Biden said yesterday that addressing those issues “will shift all the focus.” Well, guess what, Joe? There’s an open seat on the Supreme Court. This isn’t a trick question or some minor distraction. This is the huge issue right now. The Democrat chairman of the House Judiciary Committee wants to increase the size the Supreme Court by adding four or five more seats to the court and then filling every new position with far-left, pro-abortion, anti-religious liberty and anti-Second Amendment justices. By refusing to say whether he supports that, Biden is in fact answering the question. He will support it. My friends, here’s what you need to understand about the left’s threats to pack the court. This has nothing to do with Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death. They were promising to pack the court before she died. Last year, the Washington Post identified 11 Democrat presidential candidates who favored packing the court with additional left-wing justices. Kamala Harris was one of them. Remember the threats to impeach Justice Brett Kavanaugh? Some radicals even want to impeach Justice Gorsuch because he’s occupying a “stolen seat.” They will try to do it if they can, which is why every single one of these Senate races is so critically important. National Voter Registration Day Today is National Voter Registration Day. If you aren’t registered to vote yet, now is a good time as voter registration deadlines start closing in the days ahead. Everything is at stake in this election – the White House, the Congress, the Supreme Court – and every vote matters. But you can’t vote if you aren’t registered to vote. Please register now at Vote.gov. And make sure all your friends and family members are registered to vote too. Washington Prayer March That’s why I am honored to join Reverend Franklin Graham this weekend for his Washington Prayer March on the National Mall. The march will take place this Saturday at 12:00 PM and will begin at the Lincoln Memorial. If you are interested in attending the Prayer March, click here for additional information. And if you cannot join us physically, I encourage you to make a special effort to join us in prayer this weekend. Values Voter Summit The 2020 Values Voter Summit begins today! American Values, my non-profit public policy organization, is a proud co-sponsor of the Values Voters Summit. I am pleased to announce that President Donald Trump has joined the lineup of all-star speakers! And the first of my two appearances at the Summit airs tonight. Register now and join us online tonight at 8:00 PM ET. Tags: Gary Bauer, Pelosi Panics, Coming Together, Washington Prayer MarchTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Democrats Would Pack Court Regardless, Given The Chance
Posted: 23 Sep 2020 12:07 AM PDT
by Mike Huckabee: “Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time…I’ve heard that there are some people on the Democratic side who would like to increase the number of judges. I think that was a bad idea when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to pack the Court.” So said Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in an NPR interview on July 24, 2019. Democrats are now threatening to pack the Court with as many as four more justices; it seems they have no problem going against RBG on this, while using her name as a pretext for doing it. As reported by NPR, she also dictated a statement to her granddaughter in her last days saying it was her “most fervent wish” that she “not be replaced until a new President is installed.” Ah, but this time, Democrats consider RBG’s wishes sacrosanct. And they ignore something she’d previously said: “…the President is elected for four years, not three. So the powers that he has in year three continue into year four…and that’s how it should be.” Never mind the confusion created by these very different versions of what she said she wanted, let alone the idea that someone’s deathbed wish should override the Constitution. And what did she mean by “new President”? “New,” as in “different”? Did she mean that if Trump is re-elected, we should hold her seat open till the “new” President takes office in 2025? That sure is a long time to struggle on with a tie-prone 8-member court. Just getting through the next few months that way would be a nightmare, given the inevitable election challenges. Times sure have changed. As I said on Sean Hannity’s TV show Monday night, it was Sen. Harry Reid who “threw the match in the gas can” in 2013, when he killed the filibuster for judicial appointments. He was told at the time that it would come back to bite, and now it has. Thank God we have a President who won’t be intimidated and will do his duty, and I pray the Senate will do the same. I also wish we had some real journalism going on; then people would know that proceeding with nomination and confirmation of a new justice under these circumstances is constitutional and customary. Andrew C. McCarthy, writing in NATIONAL REVIEW, makes the same point I did over the weekend — that what happens now really all comes down to politics. One party will do what it calculates it has the power to do, given the anticipated political fallout. As McCarthy points out, there was nothing wrong with President Obama nominating Merrick Garland for Supreme Court Justice, just as there was nothing wrong with Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Senate majority blocking that nomination. It’s all constitutional. The rest –- all the “outrage” –- is pure politics. McCarthy worries, though, that Republicans’ push to confirm before the election may make it harder for Trump to win against enraged Democrats, as it motivates them even more. I don’t know about that. At the risk of sounding like Chandler Bing from FRIENDS, could Democrats BE more enraged? Republicans could smile and nod and confess to deep-seated racism and capitalist greed and cave to everything the left wanted, no matter how insane and unconstitutional, and they’d still move the goalposts and find more reasons to be enraged. It would never end. Republicans have the opportunity to make this appointment, it’s perfectly constitutional, and they must take advantage of it, just as the Democrats absolutely would. Case closed. Sen. Lindsay Graham said on Hannity’s show that “we’re gonna move forward in the [Judiciary] committee, we’re gonna report the nomination out of the committee to the floor of the United States Senate, so we can vote before the election. That’s the constitutional process.” Why so determined? “After Kavanaugh, everything changed with me,” he said. “They’re not gonna intimidate me, Mitch McConnell or anybody else…We’re gonna have a process that you’ll be proud of, a nominee who’s gonna be supported by every Republican in the Judiciary Committee, and WE’VE GOT THE VOTES TO CONFIRM THE JUDGE [emphasis mine] on the floor of the Senate before the election. And that’s what’s coming.” Trump says he’ll announce his choice on Friday or Saturday. Senators know it’ll be Judge Amy Coney Barrett, who reportedly met with the President on Monday, or one of several other women on his shortlist (which he, unlike Biden, has revealed). So this is apparently happening. Get ready to hear a lot more threats about packing the Court as “payback” for doing what the Senate absolutely has the constitutional right and, arguably, obligation to do. REASON has a must-read (cautionary) article that outlines the various power-grabs the Democrats intend to make as soon as they are able. What everyone needs to understand is this: IF THEY GAIN POWER, THEY WILL DO THESE THINGS WHETHER TRUMP WAS ABLE TO GET HIS NOMINEE CONFIRMED OR NOT. For this reason, no matter what else happens, Biden and the Democrat ticket absolutely must not win. I cannot say this strongly enough. If they do, the America we love will be largely over. Republicans have to win in such a landslide that there’s nothing Democrats can do after November 3 to upset the process and the will of the electorate. Author Josh Blackman agrees with Jeffrey Toobin in the NEW YORKER that these changes are not only good payback but “good policy as well.” He’s all for 1) the complete elimination of the filibuster, 2) statehood for DC and Puerto Rico, with two new senators for each (“an appropriate rejoinder”), 3) adding to the number of lower-court judges, and 4) adding to the number of SCOTUS justices (“the greatest and most appropriate form of retribution”). “If Republicans succeed in stealing two seats,” he writes (note his choice of the word “stealing”), “the Scalia and Ginsburg vacancies, the Democrats could simply pass a law that creates two or three more seats on the Supreme Court. He likens this to playing a game of hardball. See how the “game” is rationalized? (Again, they really don’t care what RBG would think of adding seats.) I brought up this article to get you into leftists’ heads and show you what they have planned. Clearly, they intend to do these things whether Trump gets his way on a new justice or not. Tags: Nike Huckabee, Democrats Would Pack Court, Regardless, Given The ChanceTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Biden Anti-Business Agenda Would Wreck the Economy
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 11:39 PM PDT
by Stephen Moore: The Democrats are rewriting history, celebrating the Obama record on the economy as if these were the salad days for America. In Washington parlance, that is called “misremembering.” The reality is that the Obama tax-and-regulate agenda led to the weakest economic recovery from a recession since the Great Depression. In President Donald Trump’s first three years in office, real median family income for Americans rose by more than $6,400. In Obama’s EIGHT years in office, the increase in incomes was closer to $4,000. Black Americans made more income gains in three years under Trump than eight years under Obama. But Biden’s agenda is to return to a regulation binge — in banking, finance, environment, consumer affairs and health care. The rumors are swirling that Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a leading Biden economic policy adviser and confidant, could be Treasury secretary or regulatory czar. For example, Warren and many Biden economists are advocating adding to the Fed’s current dual mandate of promoting stable prices and maximum employment. Now they want a mandate that will use the Fed monetary policy to equalize incomes. How? By printing money? Forcing companies to pay a superminimum wage? Retirement savings of American mom-and-pop investors and financial traders of all shapes and sizes could be at risk if independent analyses of credit rating agencies are compromised by government mandates. The Biden Democrats want the feds to intervene in these bond ratings to promote social justice, environmentalism and other goals that may be worthy but that steer retirement and other investment funds away from the highest returns. Trump wants health care freedom that gives patients and doctors more say of what kind of insurance they can buy and what kind of procedures are best for them. Biden wants to double down on the Affordable Care Act, which has driven up health costs and prohibited Americans from purchasing more affordable health plans. The costs of all these “consumer protections” fall hardest on the lowest-income families. Casey Mulligan of the University of Chicago estimates that the Biden regulatory stranglehold and his ban on fracking would reduce the incomes of the poorest households by about 15%. The average household would see losses of about 4% by going back to the Obama regulatory regime. Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders has suggested that the Biden administration would be the most progressive and radical in history if it takes office. He may be called “Lunch Bucket Joe,” but for blue-collar America, the Biden agenda would be a real blow to the wallet. Tags: Stephen Moore, Steve Moore, Rasmussen Reports, Biden Anti-Business Agenda, Would Wreck the EconomyTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Last Best Chance to Capture Supreme Court
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 11:20 PM PDT
by Patrick Buchanan: Are there Republicans who would really walk away from this last, best chance to secure the court, simply because the process offends their sense of proper procedure? This may be a hard vote for Murkowski, Collins and a few other Republicans. But to vote down a qualified conservative nominee, on the eve of a presidential election, would amount to a crippling blow to their party and to their reputations within that party. President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are on the cusp of making history. With Trump having named two justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, they have an opening to elevate a third justice to fill the seat of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, thereby securing the constitutionalism of the court for a generation. Trump and McConnell need only persuade 50 of the 53 Senate Republicans to vote to confirm the nominee Trump says he will send up at week’s end, following the days of mourning for Ginsburg. Two Republican senators, however, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, have said that they will not vote to confirm a justice nominated this close to a presidential election. Yet, if Trump appoints a qualified female jurist, as he has pledged to do, and she passes muster in the Judiciary Committee, would four GOP senators really collude with Chuck Schumer’s Democratic Caucus to kill that Republican nominee and risk having President Joe Biden fill the seat? A Senate vote to reject a Republican nominee, in which Republican senators cast the decisive votes, would demoralize and divide the party on election eve and betray a cause for which some have fought for 50 years. It is hard to conceive of a greater act of political treason. Many Republican presidents made strides toward recapturing the court after the radical rampage of the Earl Warren era. None achieved it. Three of Richard Nixon’s four picks went south on Roe v. Wade, and Justice Harry Blackmun authored the abominable decision. Gerald Ford’s lone nominee, Justice John Paul Stevens, went left as soon as he went up. While Ronald Reagan nominated Antonin Scalia, his other choices, Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy, became “swing votes.” George H. W. Bush picked David Souter and Clarence Thomas, with the latter’s constitutionalism canceled out by the former’s liberalism. But today, the hour of Trump’s triumph may be at hand, and the stark panic on the left testifies to it. Mobs are forming outside McConnell’s home in Kentucky. Former Attorney General Eric Holder threatens that if Republicans confirm a justice this year, a Democratic Senate will cancel out its victory by “packing” the courts. Rep. Joe Kennedy III says that if McConnell prevails in 2020, “We pack the court in 2021.” Radicals are threatening to take to the streets and burn the country down if a Trump nominee is elevated. Let them try. When FDR, after his landslide reelection, sought to pack the court by increasing the number of justices in 1937, the result was a national recoil and a political rout that cost him 72 House seats in 1938. Republican senators have to bite the bullet on this one and vote on whomever Trump nominates before this session of Congress ends. And, in this battle, there is no room for conscientious objectors. Even “Never Trumpers” and Republicans for Biden have to take a stand. For if they play a role in killing Trump’s nominee, and Biden wins in November, they will have helped to turn the Supreme Court over to leftist Democrats who will fill both the Ginsburg seat and that of Justice Stephen Breyer, 82, and hold the court for years. Consider the issues that the new nominee will decide. The cause of right to life. Affirmative action. Religious freedom. Immigration. Gun rights. All could be lost if the opportunity to fill the Ginsburg seat is forfeited by Republican defectors. The 50-year struggle to recapture the Supreme Court would be over. Are there Republicans who would really walk away from this last, best chance to secure the court, simply because the process offends their sense of proper procedure? This may be a hard vote for Murkowski, Collins and a few other Republicans. But to vote down a qualified conservative nominee, on the eve of a presidential election, would amount to a crippling blow to their party and to their reputations within that party. It is said there is not time enough to get the vote done responsibly. Nonsense. Gerald Ford’s choice of John Paul Stevens went through in 19 days. Only 49 days lapsed between the nomination of Ginsburg and her confirmation. Of the nominees to the Supreme Court, those who have been brutalized worst in the last 50 years were all Republican appointees: Clement Haynsworth in 1970, Robert Bork in 1987, Clarence Thomas in 1991 and Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. No Democratic nominee has been savaged like these four federal court judges. And for Biden to condone a relentless partisan attack on a qualified female judge would seem to be risking the women’s vote in 2020. Assume that Amy Coney Barrett, Catholic jurist and mother of seven, is nominated. Would fellow Catholic Joe Biden demand that his Democratic colleagues reject Barrett because she might be a vote against Roe v. Wade, which Joe now enthusiastically champions? Tags: Patrick Buchanan, conservative, commentary Last Best Chance, to Capture, Supreme CourtTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Short List
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 11:06 PM PDT
Tags: Editorial Cartoon, AF “Tony” Branco, Short ListTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Worms for Early Bird Voting?
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 10:45 PM PDT by Paul Jacob, Contributing Author Election Day is six weeks away. Yet, in my home state of Virginia, voting began last week. Is it responsible to cast a ballot so early? You may know with metaphysical certainty how you’re voting for president — even in the event of some major cataclysm — but have all the state rep and city council and ballot measure campaigns also played out fully enough for you? Here in Virginia, we get few candidate races in our split-up state and federal elections, much less ballot issues to decide. I could have made all my (very few) choices months ago. But I trust that in a more competitive and healthy representative democracy we would more want to hear out the candidates. A lot can happen in six weeks. And you cannot change your vote once it’s cast.* The new Democratic-controlled Legislature — in reaction to the pandemic, to prevent crowding at the polls — expanded the early voting period this year. It started September 18 and ends October 31.** There are costs to expanding early voting — including making campaigns more expensive to run and win. Disabled from marshaling advertising into a two-or-three-week period before the vote, campaigns are forced to sustain publicity for a month. Or longer. While better-funded incumbents have little difficulty with the added cost, it cripples challengers. It especially handicaps grassroots ballot initiative proponents battling public employee unions or the Chamber of Commerce. Make the voting process comfortable and easy for citizens. But let’s be certain not to make it comfortable and easy for incumbents and special interests. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. * In Sweden, you can change your early vote, informs my friend Bruno Kaufmann, a journalist and direct democracy advocate. They call it “second voting.” ** Though several other states routinely allow more than six weeks of early voting. ———————-
Paul Jacob (@Common_Sense_PJ) is author of Common Sense which provides daily commentary about the issues impacting America and about the citizens who are doing something about them. He is also President of the Liberty Initiative Fund (LIFe) as well as Citizens in Charge Foundation. Jacob is a contributing author on the ARRA News Service. Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Worms for Early Bird VotingTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Judge Barrett is the Answer to Ginsburg’s Legacy of Death
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 10:00 PM PDT
“Today, we fight for her legacy,” says Democratic Party Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris. By any objective assessment, a big part of Ginsberg’s legacy was continuing abortion on demand, which has now taken 60 million unborn lives since the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973. “RIP to the more than 30 million innocent babies that have been murdered during the decades that Ruth Bader Ginsburg defended pro-abortion laws,” said Rep. Doug Collins, who is also a military chaplain. But only three Republican Senators voted to oppose the confirmation of this pro-abortion radical back in 1993. The three Senators, in that 96-3 vote, were Senators Jesse Helms (R-NC), Don Nickles (R-OK), and Bob Smith (R-NH). Helms called her “a pleasant, intellectual liberal” but denounced her “outrageously simplistic and callous position” in favor of abortion and against the sanctity of human life. He said she spoke of “no qualification whatsoever” in support of abortion, saying it was a matter of “personal autonomy” and “the right to be let alone and to make basic decisions about one’s life’s course.” Helms went on, “Why…in the name of God did someone not ask, ‘But Mrs. Ginsburg, what about the unborn innocent and helpless child’s right to be left alone, that child who is about to be destroyed because of specious reasoning by people like Ruth Bader Ginsburg?’” Her service to the abortion industry has been ignored by many commentators, including some on Fox News, who want to honor her personal career choices as a feminist. It’s truly terrible that she went through many difficult health struggles. But she lived a long life and it’s also apparent that she tried to hang on to her seat on the Court for political reasons. She despised Trump. Her long career stands in contrast to the unborn lives, mostly female, that were snuffed out by abortionists in a painful procedure that she personally sanctioned. Worldwide, thanks to Ginsburg and others, the U.S. is third in abortions, behind Russia with 218 million and China with 401 million. Abortion was the leading cause of death in the world in 2019, killing 42 million. The late Phyllis Schlafly noted that Ginsburg was so extreme that she even wanted to write taxpayer funding of abortion into the Constitution. Ginsburg also found another “right” that was in reality nowhere in the Constitution – gay marriage. Helms saw this coming, too, when he said that Ginsburg during her confirmation hearing that she was “likely to uphold the homosexual agenda.” But it was mostly left to conservative leaders like Howard Phillips and Phyllis Schlafly – not Senate Republicans – to raise these concerns. Looking at Ginsberg’s confirmation hearing, Phyllis Schlafly asked, “How does it happen that a Supreme Court nominee whose only experience in private law practice was seven years as general counsel to the ACLU came to be praised by almost everyone as a ‘moderate’ and a ‘centrist’”? She answered, “My theory is: This just proves how easily men are fooled by a skirt. They deduced that Ruth Bader Ginsburg is ‘moderate’ because she isn’t a loud-mouthed, frizzy-haired, bra-burning street demonstrator.” The failure to recognize the danger of her nomination and legacy is relevant to what the Senate will do as President Trump nominates a successor. The propaganda barrage against the Republicans for moving ahead with Ginsburg’s replacement has already begun. Phillips and Schlafly have passed away, to be replaced by establishment conservative organizations like the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation to recommend judicial nominations. Will they endorse a strong pick like Judge Barrett? Or will go for some “moderate” nomination, arguing this is the only way to get someone confirmed? But Amy Coney Barrett was already confirmed by the Senate in a 55-43 vote to be a United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit. That means the vetting process can be shortened considerably. What’s more, Republican Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski voted for her. So did Democrats Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Tim Kaine of Virginia, and Joe Manchin of West Virginia. It’s true that Barrett came under attack by Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein because she is a faithful Catholic. But this is the kind of fight Republicans should welcome. It would be interesting to watch the “Catholic” Democratic Party presidential candidate Joe Biden oppose Barrett’s nomination. For conservatives, Barrett is a woman who could serve as a real role model, in direct contrast to the radical feminism and ACLU activism that Ruth Bader Ginsburg will always be remembered for. This fight will offer the public an alternative to the notion that Ginsburg represents American women. The oldest of seven children, Barrett and her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor, have seven children, including two adopted Haitian children. In a story about her life in Louisiana, a local paper noted that “her former New Orleans high school, St. Mary’s Dominican High School, named her their alumna of the year, recognizing Barrett ‘as a woman who instills Christian moral values while urging the practice of ethical behaviors as demonstrated through her dedication to family, public service or career.’” One can anticipate Barrett being attacked by bigots opposed to her Christianity. For example, she will be attacked for her affiliation with People of Praise, described as a “tight-knit group” of conservative Christians. Fox News, which was recently caught censoring a discussion of the role of billionaire George Soros in violent crime, ran a >story about how Barrett had been “criticized” for her ties to the group when she was nominated by Trump for the Seventh Circuit. But it was the New York Times that led the criticism of Barrett based on her Christianity. In terms of liberal and left-wing advocacy groups, the so-called Alliance for Justice will lead the opposition. the AFJ has received funding from the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation associated with billionaire investor Warren Buffett and his family, and the Open Society Foundations associated with atheist George Soros. Intervening in the unfolding contest, as if he’s the real presidential nominee, former president Barack Hussein Obama says Ginsburg “was a warrior for gender equality – someone who believed that equal justice under law only had meaning if it applied to every single American.” But as Howard Phillips testified, Ginsberg’s belief in “the extinguishment of innocent unborn human lives, without due process of law,” was not only inconsistent with “the plain language of the Constitution” but with “the revulsion toward abortion which prevailed at the time when our Constitution was drafted and ratified.” The issue is straightforward and simple: does the Constitution protect our God-given right to life? Ginsburg was on the wrong side of this fundamental question. She did not in fact, believe the Constitution applied to “every single American.” After 60 million abortions, it’s time to put human life in perspective in contemplating the legacy of “the legendary RBG.” In terms of killing, abortion makes coronavirus look mild by comparison. The abortion industry has spawned serial killers such as abortionist Kermit Gosnell and is so powerful that pro-life citizen journalists like David Daleiden have been investigated and prosecuted by politicians such as Kamala Harris for exposing the sale of aborted baby parts. Perhaps in the afterlife, Ginsburg will be held accountable for the pain and suffering she inflicted on the innocent unborn. In the meantime, the Court needs a Christian judge willing to be guided by moral values. The choice is clear. Tags: Cliff Kincaid, Judge Barrett, is the Answer, to Ginsburg, Legacy of DeathTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Do Democrats Really Believe Biden Is Winning?
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 09:25 PM PDT by William L. Gensert: Once it was the “big lie.” Now it is many little lies — riots are peaceful; he is she is they; Biden is not doddering; Trump will steal 2020. Told often enough and given enough time, little lies become truth. Today we live in the “age of lies” told to steal an election in November and control a populace who refuses to do as they are told. All Americans should stop at least once before Election Day and take a hard look at the Democrat candidate, “King of Aphasia” Joe Biden. When they do, they will understand what the left is planning. Ignore his 47 years in elected office without accomplishment, save for the 1994 Crime Bill, which he has since disavowed. Ignore that, as Robert Gates, former defense secretary under Obama, said, he has been wrong on every foreign policy issue facing the United States in the last 40 years. Dismiss the serial corruption of his family as they traded on his political office to become wealthy. Ignore the gaffes and the serial plagiarism. Ignore his long association with politicians associated with the Ku Klux Klan. Ignore his penchant for the unwanted touching of women and children and his creepy fondness for the smell of their hair. Concentrate on the man and who he is today. Look at the comparison of the Joe Biden who debated Paul Ryan in 2012 with the Biden of today, hoping to trade his basement for the White House cellar. His mumbling and the many times he seems lost even when reading prepared answers off a teleprompter to prearranged questions from reporters pre-picked by his staff should force even the casual observer to admit he has lost much more than a step. His mental decline from even just a few years ago is pronounced. He did, after all, undergo not one, but two brain surgeries in his life. The blank stares and when he loses his train of thought halfway through sentences along with the bouts of anger and his spontaneous streams of logorrheic gibberish show he is losing the battle to maintain his mental acuity. What serious voter would pick this man for the most important job on Earth? Who sincerely believes that a man who is losing his faculties should be put in a position where he might control the fate of humanity? No, in a normal world, the media would have already dispensed with moldering Joe. Yet today, the left controls the Democratic Party, corporate media, social media, Big Tech, and the bureaucracy — and Biden is their candidate. A candidate like Joe, who in a fair and free election would lose by a landslide regardless, of his opponent, combined with the fact that they genuinely believe they deserve the reins of power and thus Trump is illegitimate, makes their coming coup not only predictable, but also inevitable. The Democrat-media claque have soiled themselves with the soul-staining perfidy of their onanistic pursuit of total and everlasting control of everything in a “fundamentally transformed” United States of America. Constructing a nationwide virtual echo chamber, they have convinced themselves that the “tired old man they elected [their] king” is not only worthy of the presidency, but also actually in the lead in the two-way race for America’s executive office. They seek to create a belief in people that Biden is not only winning, but way ahead because when Trump wins by a landslide on the evening of November 3, they will be justified in deploying their 1,000-lawyer legal team to prevent his win through lawfare while party hacks work in the days and weeks following Election Day to create or find enough ballots to steal Trump’s victory. All this while, Antifa and Black Lives Matter soldiers take to the streets as the “voice of the people” in “organic” riots as they strive to impose the “will of the people” to overthrow a duly re-elected Trump. Those on the left have convinced themselves that if not for Trump, we would be living in a nation they would diligently be making perfect. Yet Trump is incidental. Leftists have been walking down this path for a long time, and the Obama presidency was the ego boost they needed to progress from theory to action, allowing them to believe that any victory not won by the left must be outright theft and therefore should justifiably be fought and reversed. They need people to think Biden was robbed. They must convince voters that Trump stole the election. It is the same strategy they used with Hillary but failed. With the benefit of hindsight and almost four years of planning, they have marshaled their forces and are determined to succeed this time. There is no more honest polling. Biden will always be winning, no matter how bad he is really losing. There are no more unbiased media figures. Talking heads between now and November will constantly explain to people just how much of a guaranteed bet Biden is to win the presidency. When he loses, they will call for, and help organize, the “rebellion.” Google will skew search results, and Twitter, always willing to censor conservatives, will suspend Trump’s account because that is how he bypasses the left and talks directly to Americans. Facebook will follow suit. Trump must not be allowed to speak to the people, lest he speak the truth. Democrats are all in on stealing this election. For them to succeed, they need to make people believe that Trump, when he wins, has stolen it first. Americans do not have to allow this. People need to organize and confront the Democrat-Antifa-BLM tough guys trying to suppress Republican voters at the polls and give Trump a resounding victory. He must win the majority vote and the Electoral College by margins that make the election impossible for the left to steal and give the president a mandate to confront the rioters who will surely surge to violence and destruction to depose the president in the aftermath. America is the greatest, most successful nation ever to have existed. It is a republic, and only Americans can do what needs to be done to keep it. Tags: William L. Genser, American Thinker, Do Democrats Really Believe, Biden Is WinningTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Some Reasons I Support Donald Trump
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 09:10 PM PDT Received this from a local fishing and hunting buddy who spent considerable time putting the list together, but I think it covers the bases nicely, and thought you would enjoy perusing it. 1. Legal immigration only – the wall to stop drugs and illegal immigrants,
2. Making NATO countries pay their fair share,
3. Negotiating trade deals with Canada and Mexico and China,
4. Moving the Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem,
5. Supporting Israel,
6. Reducing government regulations,
7. Reducing government bureaucracy,
8. Bringing back jobs and industry to the USA with tax incentives,
9. Signing a new prison bill for minor offenses reducing incarcerations,
10. Signing a bill against Jewish discrimination in schools,
11. Policies that reduce black unemployment,
12. Policies that increase women in the workforce,
13. Fighting for law and order in the cities,
14. Having ICE round up criminals for deportation,
15. Promoting charter schools and school choice,
16. Reducing taxes,
17. Supporting states’ rights during the pandemic,
18. Extending benefits during the pandemic when Congress failed to act,
19. Signing of evection extensions during the pandemic,
20. Committing billions to pandemic research,
21. Supporting the Second Amendment,
22. Supporting religious freedom and God in America,
23. Supporting the right for life and to live,
24. For balancing the trade deficit with policies and tariffs,
25. Reducing government tax burden,
26. Working on reducing the cost of prescription medicines,
27. Court appointments that follow the founding principles not revisionist, progressive policies,
28. Protecting the Constitution,
29. Promoting capitalism not socialism,
30. Spending billions on state parks and stopping the Alaskan mining,
31. Promoting American values,
32. Putting America first,
33. Fighting liberal progressives every day,
34. For getting troops out of the Middle East Wars and elsewhere – Germany, Korea etc.,
35. Working to heal the racial divide by not excepting the liberal derelict solutions,
36. Fighting off Dems attacks to overthrow the legitimate government,
37. Confronting the lying and distorting liberal press,
38. Working to stop liberal control of information by censorship in social media,
39. A populist president for the people not for the elite Globalists at the expense of American technology and jobs,
40. Working harder and getting more done than anyone before him for middle America,
41. Equalizing tariffs that promote fair trade,
42. To stop Biden taxes on income on the wealthy on dividends and capital gains,
43. Putting a stop to racial identity Democrats are dividing us,
44. Stop the war on Christianity,
45. Stop the oppressor and the oppressed democratic syndrome,
46. Put nationalism over tribalism,
47. Promote the Protestant work ethic,
48. Promote American culture stop non-English documents, ballads, signs etc.,
49. Stop socialized medicine,
50. Stop tax subsidies to illegal aliens,
51. Making American energy independent,
52. End hiring diversity- hire by talent and not promoting groups,
53. Stop race-based privileges,
54. Promote American culture and sovereignty,
55. Stop Sharia law,
56. Do not allow international legal authorities to dictate American law at the United Nations,
57. Recognize and except that the black culture is a failed culture, no other race or color has these failed morals and cultural values so a solution can be forged,
58. Combat liberal intolerance,
59. Outlaw sanctuary cities and prosecute city officials,
60. Deport illegal aliens who cannot support themselves rather than putting them on Government substance,
61. Stop Dems from fanning the flames of cultural class warfare,
62. Promote the values and virtues of capitalism,
63. Oppose Dems collectivism and destroying individual liberties,
64. Reducing government debt during prosperous years not now,
65. Reconstruct welfare policies with proper incentives and training with mandatory government- work programs,
66. Combat Dems racist rants,
67. Oppose the progressive Multi-Culturalism,
68. End sedition of sanctuary cities and civil disobedience prosecute officials,
69. Defund Planned Parenthood – not something the government should be doing,
70. Reduce US corporate tax,
71. Fund infrastructure spending along with the wall at our southern border,
72. A pragmatist not an ideologue,
73. Willing to fight for what he believes in even at his political expense,
74. Takes power away from technocrats,
75. Reduce the unelected bureaucrats who want to run the country,
76. Streamline government agencies,
77. Believes in natural, unalienable, rights of mankind,
78. Trump’s fast-paced style,
79. Talks frequently to the ordinary people in the country,
80. Quick to change positions if he sees it that it is not getting the results desired,
81. Always pushing ahead and personally involved,
82. Works on 10 things at once,
83. Prefers areas of commission rather than errors of omission,
84. Strong leader tireless energy,
85. Deals with highly educated individual intellectuals who have no practical experience, never worked in the industry, and don’t have a lick of common-sense and favors people with practical knowledge over academic knowledge,
86. Takes on China’s intellectual theft,
87. Fighting the left that oppose assimilation and promotes race baiting,
88. Fighting the media that portray racial violence and LGBT over Law and order and over real concern of the working workers
89. Stop the out of touch elites from running the agencies —Trump says out loud what normal Americans are thinking,
90. The left rejects American ideals and has abandoned the principal of liberalism that is in opposition to the Judeo -Christian Foundations of this country,
91. Trump is committed to stopping the liberal indoctrination in our schools,
92. The Dems are amoral stealing from one to give to another and to spend others’ money and to teach dependence is better than the Protestant work ethic,
93. Stopping Dems attempt to overthrow the government and the level of contempt displayed,
94. The primary role of the federal government is to keep America safe from all threats both domestic and foreign and Trump does that,
95. Renegotiate trade agreements to benefit America,
96. Giving incentives for reparations of US money in foreign countries,
97. His focus on jobs – jobs and job creation,
98. Trumps works to streamline government,
99. Healthcare reform not addressed yet,
100. To stop Dems race baiting and class division and identity divisive policies,
101. Make Sharia law illegal,
102.He restored military funding and might,
103. He improved veterans’ healthcare,
104. He has total focus on economy improvement as a businessman knows how to do it,
105. Promotes the moral religious values and convictions fights atheist dogma that undermines capitalism,
106. Trump rejects nations building,
107. Trump fight censorship by Apple – Google – Amazon – Facebook and other social media,
108. Fights the insurrection – impeachment and resistance,
109. Believes liberalism is a war with Christianity and Judaic-Christian morality is the heart of America’s the first amendment,
110. Liberalism believes that rights come from government and can be taken away if in conflict with progressive agenda,
111. State is stealing the culture upon which America was founded,
112. He wants to put on an end to class warfare,
113. He substantially changed the Republican Party to represent the American middle-income American worker not the money and power interests of multinational corporate interests,
114. Presented an alternative economic view that benefits the workers at the expense of big corporate America to those who believed they were not being told the truth,
115. Labeled the media the opposition party against nationalism and for globalism,
116. Trump is disarming – directness – unafraid – down to earth – without pretense – courage of convictions – a happy warrior – genuine – a person who ignores the political Washington class advice,
117. Has faith in the American people, not afraid to offend the status quo, a man of vision and believes that the workingman is crucial to a strong America,
118. Spoke about important issues that were not politically popular and never discussed before,
119. An expert in mass communication and controlling the dialogue or narrative and refocusing to the important issues,
120. An agent of change with a populist message,
121. Electrifying charisma like that of Clinton and Reagan,
122. Trump was not a polished Political man and not part of the establishment number,
123. Willing to be a disruptor of the status quo,
124. Trump’s an optimist,
125. His wish is to end catch and release,
126. Wants to enforce the nation’s laws,
127. Trump wants safe streets, good schools, and great jobs,
128. He Follows the 10th amendment regarding states’ rights over the national government intervention,
129. He works at stopping the diminishing liberty and growing central government,
130. He is fighting the threat to undermine our values erase the bonds of culture, faith, and tradition,
131. He has the vision and clarity to put into understandable words the cause of western civilization,
———————————-
HT McIntosh Enterprises. Tags: Some Reasons, I Support, Donald Trump/b>To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks!
|
||
Debunking Demo Objections to President Trump’s Third SCOTUS Nominee
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 08:57 PM PDT “It will be a woman — a very talented, very brilliant woman.” Calling Amy Coney Barrett…
by Mark Alexander: “There is not a syllable in the plan under consideration which directly empowers the national courts to construe the laws according to the spirit of the Constitution.” —Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers No. 81 (1787)
Apparently, all the Democrat Party operatives and their legions of useful idiots got the Demo memo and are singing the same chorus line: “Let the people decide!” They insist that, so close to a presidential election, only the candidate who wins that election should put forth the next nominee to the Supreme Court, filling the seat vacated by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death.
That is their layup for opposition to a nomination by President Donald Trump to fill RBG’s seat.
First, a couple questions.
In regard to SCOTUS nominations in the fourth year of a presidential term, who said: “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year”?
That was Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2016, after then-lame duck Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland to fill the vacancy after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court’s most articulate and faithful advocate of Liberty and Rule of Law. (This despite a Leftmedia claim that Ginsburg told her granddaughter just before her death, “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”)
And regarding SCOTUS nominations before an election, who said: “I made it absolutely clear that I would go forward with the confirmation process as chairman even a few months before a presidential election”?
That was then-Vice President Joe Biden in 2016, objecting to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s refusal to take up Obama’s Garland nomination.
So, what would Senator Chuck Schumer have done with Obama’s nominee if he was majority leader in 2016? Obviously, he would have done exactly what McConnell is doing now.
Senator McConnell has been clear regarding his consistent standard for election-year nominations and votes.
In a statement on the passing of Associate Justice Ginsburg, McConnell affirmed he will call for a vote on a SCOTUS nominee: “In the last midterm election before Justice Scalia’s death in 2016, Americans elected a Republican Senate majority because we pledged to check and balance the last days of a lame-duck president’s second term. We kept our promise. Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year. By contrast, Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 because we pledged to work with President Trump and support his agenda, particularly his outstanding appointments to the federal judiciary. Once again, we will keep our promise. President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate.”
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), responding to Demo objections, provided them a quick lesson on the history of SCOTUS nominations: “Twenty-nine times there has been a vacancy in a presidential election year. Presidents have made nominations all 29 times.” Cruz added that a significant factor in Trump’s election was the Scalia vacancy, to ensure the appointment of “a principled constitutionalist on the court.” Cruz noted, “And it’s a big part of the reason why we have a Republican majority elected in 2014, reelected in 2016, grown even larger in 2018. A major issue in each of those elections is the American people voted and said we want constitutionalist judges.”
Indeed, as President Thomas Jefferson noted in 1804, “The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.” And it is that tyrannical despotism that will completely undermine the principles upon which our Republic was founded.
The SCOTUS appointment is not about Right v. Left. It’s about Liberty v. Tyranny. Furthermore, as for McConnell’s actions in 2016, better obstruction than destruction of Rule of Law regarding “the advice and consent of the Senate” on nominations. The Constitution’s mandate for the nomination process is straightforward.
Again, Trump is not a lame-duck president as was Obama in 2016, and he does not have a Senate controlled by the opposition party, as did Obama in 2016.
President Trump’s response to first hearing about the death of RBG was very humble, as was his Presidential Proclamation.
He then made clear: “We were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us, the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court Justices. We have this obligation, without delay!”
He noted that his nominee would “be a woman — a very talented, very brilliant woman,” whom we believe will be Louisiana native Amy Coney Barrett, now serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Indiana. Judge Barrett has been on Trump’s short list for two years. In fact, he reportedly told numerous people, “I’m saving her for Ginsburg.”
Trump has nominated and the Senate approved 205 federal judges over the course of his first term. His appointments of Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the latter being confirmed after a disgraceful obstructionist effort by Democrats, have moved SCOTUS back to center.
This nomination will help ensure the majority of SCOTUS judges will abide by their solemn oaths “to support and defend” our Constitution, which is precisely why the Democrats object. They prefer “despotic” jurists who will do their bidding by judicial diktat.
Of course, whether Trump’s nomination will get through the Senate is another matter, given opposition from Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME). The nominee may face opposition from Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) but he indicates he would support the vote.
Then there is the question of whether Republicans can break through all the Democrat obstacles between now and election day. If not, and in Arizona, Mark Kelly defeats incumbent Republican Martha McSally in that special election, that would take away her vote before the end of November.
Of course, in a tie, Vice President Mike Pence will step in.
As for the amount of time required to consider a nomination, Justice Ginsburg, despite her clear leftist leanings, was confirmed by the Senate on 22 June 1993, just 42 days after her nomination by Bill Clinton, and with a 96-3 vote. There are 43 days until the presidential election.
That rapid approval is because Republicans uphold their constitutional duty, unlike Democrats who, two years earlier, made a spectacle out of George H.W. Bush’s nomination of Clarence Thomas, which resulted in a 52-48 affirmation. Those hearings were the Democrat model for the Kavanaugh debacle, during which one of the most vociferous of his opponents was Kamala Harris.
Some further observations:
Democrats spent three years using deep-state operatives to, in effect, attempt a coup d’état to take down Trump’s presidency. That charade was based on a fake dossier funded by Trump’s 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton. (As it turns out, there are Obama and Biden fingerprints all over the coup crime scene.)
After that direct assault on our Constitution, Democrats now believe they have the moral authority to insist that President Trump not nominate an RBG replacement in an election year?
When their coup attempt failed, Demos attempted to take Trump’s presidency down with an impeachment farce — in a presidential election year.
Again, after that direct assault on our Constitution, they believe they have the moral authority to insist that President Trump not nominate an RBG replacement in an election year?
As RBG said correctly, “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”
And on the subject of frivolous impeachments, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) hinted that the House might impeach Trump again to distract from the nomination, saying, “Well, we have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now.” And in a bizarre response to leftist George Stephanopoulos, who asked, “But to be clear, you’re not taking any arrows out of your quiver? You’re not ruling anything out?” Pelosi responded with an answer that only Joe Biden could understand: “Good morning. Sunday morning. The, uh, we have a responsibility, we take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people, uh, that, uh, is, uh, when the, we weigh the equities of protecting our democracy requires us to use every arrow in our quiver.”
For the record, whenever Pelosi mentions the Democrats’ “oath to protect and defend the Constitution,” you have permission to laugh out loud!
Pelosi added, “They’re coming after your children.” The irony of that statement is rich.
Of course, one of her “quivers” is the plan Democrats revived last February – FDR’s court-packing agenda. Now they are threatening to act on it. Mitch McConnell declared: “The American people are about to witness an astonishing parade of misrepresentation about the past, misstatements about the present [from] the same people who have already been saying for months they want to pack the court.”
The Constitution stipulates that Congress has the responsibility to set the number of justices on the court. Article III provides Congress the discretion to “determine the shape and structure of the federal judiciary.”Historically, there have been as few as six Justices, but since 1869, the Chief Justice has served with eight associate Justices.
When Chuck Schumer was asked about how he would respond, including adding the number of Justices so Democrats could move the court back to the Left, he said, “Let me be clear: if Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year. Nothing is off the table.”
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) was more direct, saying if Democrats take the Senate and presidency, congress “should immediately move to expand the Supreme Court,” adding, “Congress would have to act and expanding the court would be the right place to start.” And then: “If Leader McConnell presses forward, the Republican majority will have stolen two Supreme Court seats four years apart. … We can’t have business as usual when Republicans are destroying the institution as they have done.”
That’s “stolen two Supreme Court seats.”
Recall that 11 of the Democrat primary presidential candidates favored packing the court with leftist judges, including Kamala Harris.
As for Biden, who has thus far refused to release a list of his prospective SCOTUS nominees, also refused to answer the court-packing question: “I’m not going to answer that question.”
Regardless of the Trump nomination, I believe the Democrats, if they take control of the Senate and Executive Branch, are going to pack the courts. One of the Demos’ most vociferous Leftmedia propagandists, CNN’s Don Lemon, summed up the Left’s objective, noting Democrats should “blow up the entire system.” He insists they must “[pack] the Supreme Court” and “get rid of the Electoral College.”
Now, leftists are threatening more violence on the streets when Trump advances a nomination. I would add, now is the time when Republican senators should ALL have additional security, given the history of Democrat supporters attempting to murder Republicans. The Marxists will start targeting senators.
Finally, allow me to end this column with a few words of praise for Justice Ginsburg.
When asked about the Democrat efforts to “pack the court” by adding justices under a future Democrat president, RBG chastised them, calling it a “bad idea” and “partisan.” She said: “Nine seems to be a good number. … I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried. … I am not at all in favor of that.”
And reflective of the national sentiments of even the most leftist SCOTUS judge, regarding the anti-American antics of celebrity athlete Colin Kaepernick and his refusal to stand for the national anthem, RBG said: “I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”
Footnote: Reflective of threats being posted by emotionally incontinent leftist adolescents regarding the upcoming court nomination… “If they even TRY to replace RBG we burn the entire f—–g thing down.” “If McConnell jams someone through, which he will, there will be riots.” “If McConnell gets another justice, we need to burn down the f—–g Senate.” “We’re shutting this country down if Trump and McConnell try to ram through an appointment before the election.” And…
—————————
Mark Alexander writes for The Patriot Post.
Tags: Mark Alexander, Patriot Post, Debunking Demo Objections, to President Trump’s, Third SCOTUS NomineeTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Cancellation of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 07:17 PM PDT
by Pem Schaeffer: You may think the words of this title are harsh, and they are for an America rapidly disappearing. But I submit that the cancellation has already happened; hear me out. I work at staying informed by a variety of means in this period of existential crisis for the country I grew up in; it is incredibly discouraging. I read from many sources, including those friendly to the primary provocateurs and terrorists of our time. Like many these days, I also sit in on Zoom based webinars from a variety of sources. This week I’ve been following one in which learned academics are discussing the fallacies and distortions of the 1619 Project created by the New York Times. This unproven, widely challenged narrative has spread like wildfire into the curriculum of public schools nationwide without so much as a public airing. It is a startling policy departure from the norms of American History. In one of the sessions, reference was made to Dr. Martin Luther King, perhaps the best known and most revered leader in America’s reformation in civil rights. I realized that while I’ve always been moved by the brief video clips from his “I Have A Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial in 1963, I had never actually read the entire speech. So I looked it up and read it all, and I shall do it over and over in the next few days. I was stunned by the majesty of his words; the human dignity; the eloquence; and the glorious way in which he expounded on why and how “black (Negro) lives must matter” if the American dream is to fulfill its glorious promise. I implore you to read it too in its entirety. In the chaos of today’s violence and rioting and shouted demands of all sorts, it takes on a new and profound energy and relevance. Reading it reminded me that I have lived believing that “a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character” was the essence of civil rights. Letting the words sink in will make it clear that the Black Lives Matter movement, only seven years old, but seeking overthrow of the American system and culture and replacement with a Marxist regime, sneer at that essential MLK conception. BLM, and its leaders and followers, and their words, demands, behavior, and actions, have intentionally shredded every word, non-violent impulse, inspiration, and hope of Dr. King. They defile every thought he so sonorously echoed across the Mall to the throngs there in person, and those hearing it live on radio and TV. Today’s crumbling societal fabric makes that moment all the more powerful. The simple, unavoidable truth is that BLM has completely inverted the thoughts and sentiments that Dr. King embodied that day. To use today’s vernacular, BLM has summarily canceled not only his speech, but Dr. King himself. Simply put, BLM and Dr. King are polar opposites. How long will it be before BLM “activists” tear down the signs on every street, avenue, boulevard, hospital, school, Church, and other entities named in MLK’s honor? When will his statues and other tributes to his legacy be covered with graffiti and other shameless acts of profane dishonor? Even worse, when will the leaders of BLM, who clearly despise the very principles and civility on which Dr. King founded his life, and surrendered it to a hater’s rifle, issue formal declarations of their hatred and disagreement for everything King and his followers stood for and worked for so diligently? How long will it take before the progress made since that historic day is reversed and permanently erased from the “woke history” that fills our classrooms from this day forward? When will they publicly confess this is what they stand for, and unleash waves of sorrow like we’ve never seen? Sadly, as I pondered these thoughts, a disturbing image came to mind. Mount Rushmore stands defaced, shelled, and left in ruins. A huge “Black Lives Matter” banner has been strung across its huge face. At the base of this historic and symbolic shrine, in the resulting rubble, three crosses have been erected. On the tallest one, in the center, a tattered and burned vestige of Old Glory is nailed. On another, set lower, frayed and charred copies of The Declaration of Independence and Constitution are nailed. The third has Dr. King’s image and the text of The “I Have a Dream Speech” nailed haphazardly to it, each showing signs of abuse and burning. Spanning the three crosses is a banner of frayed and tattered cloth, bearing the mournful words “It Is Finished. Tags: Pen Schaeffer, blogger, The Cancellation of, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther KingTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Protecting Senior Votes
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 06:41 PM PDT by Penna Dexter: Here’s good advice for everyone to remember as we enter election season: “Never trust a stranger with your ballot.” This comes from Ken Blackwell, the former Mayor of Cincinnati. It’s particularly timely because, this November, universal Vote By Mail will take place in more than the few states where it’s already practiced. This differs from absentee voting in which a voter requests a ballot to mail back by election day. Universal Vote by Mail means ballots are sent to addresses without being requested. Countless ballots will land at addresses where residents have moved or passed away. Of the risks posed by such a system, the worst distortions can occur in institutional settings, like nursing homes and assisted living facilities. The average stay for a resident of senior housing is just 24 months. In an article for The American Spectator, Ken Blackwell points out that “It would be easy for dishonest staff or party-affiliated vote harvesters to fill out and return ballots of former residents with their own preferred candidate marked.” He says, “There are many documented cases of such fraud.” Ballot harvesters collect ballots and deliver them to polling stations or mail them in. Even where ballot harvesting is legal, the opportunities for its abuse are obvious. The American Constitutional Rights Union has launched a needed initiative: www.protectelderlyvotes.org The organization has sent letters to nursing home directors in seven key states and another 1000 facilities across the country explaining the need to ensure that the votes of their residents should not be suppressed or stolen. These directors will receive follow-up phone calls. This is urgent. Currently, the ACRU is acting on a tip that the League of Women Voters and the ACLU are attempting to ballot harvest at assisted living facilities across the state of Florida. To protect your loved ones and the facilities they live in there’s a voter fraud hotline at 877-730-ACRU. Check out protectelderlyvotes.org. Tags: Penna Dexter, Viewpoints, Point of View, Protecting Senior VotesTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Will Biden Propose A Mask Mandate Penalty Tax, Too?
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 06:22 PM PDT
by I & I Editorial Board: Joe Biden can’t seem to make up his mind about whether he supports a national mask mandate. First, he was for it. Then he said it was unconstitutional. Now he’s saying he thinks he could do it through an executive order. Well, here’s an idea. If Biden is so determined to impose a national mask mandate, he should just follow the path laid out by Obamacare, that “big f–-ing deal” which, for the first time ever, forced Americans to buy something millions didn’t want or need – government-approved insurance. The justification for the Obamacare insurance mandate was that it was good for society as a whole to have everyone insured because it would improve the nation’s health and save money. That’s why Democrats officially labeled the Obamacare mandate penalty on the uninsured – we are not kidding about this – the “shared responsibility payment.” When that flagrant violation of the Constitution’s limits on federal intrusion into our lives went before the Supreme Court, Justice John Roberts defended the Obamacare mandate by saying that, because of the way it was structured, it fell under the government’s taxing authority. In other words, the government wasn’t mandating that you buy insurance, just taxing those who couldn’t prove to the IRS that they had “qualifying coverage.” Thankfully, the Obamacare mandate penalty went away when Republicans set the amount at zero, but the mandate to buy insurance is technically still on the books. So why doesn’t Biden, while he’s busy reviving the Obamacare mandate penalty, simply add another requirement: that every American buy and wear a government-approved mask or pay a penalty. Sorry, make a “shared responsibility payment.” He can use the same argument as he and Barack Obama did for the individual mandate – that it will improve public health and save money. Now, we know what you are going to say: “What about those who can’t afford a mask?” Fear not. Obamacare shows us the way. All that’s required is the creation of Mask Exchanges, either run by states or the federal government, and a Mask.gov site. There you will be able to choose from several government-approved masks. After selecting the mask, you enter your projected income for the year, your marital status, and the number of children you have. Depending on your answers to those questions, a mask subsidy would kick in. For a married couple with two children making $50,000 a year, for example, a $2 mask might cost something like $1.25. Then the government would pay the mask manufacturer the difference. There would, of course, have to be a new regulatory agency to make sure that mask manufacturers weren’t taking advantage of the subsidies to jack up mask prices. And we’d need a new federal department to certify that the masks being sold meet the government’s standards. Maybe Biden can have his “Board of Scientists” do that while they are approving a coronavirus vaccine. To be fair, there would have to be exemptions to the mask mandate for those who meet a specified set of criteria which, like the Obamacare mandate exemptions, would include spousal abuse. All they’d have to do to qualify for the exemption is go to their local Mask Exchange and fill out the necessary paperwork. At tax time, you’d simply need to provide proof that you purchased a mask, and wore it per the Biden mask mandate guidelines. Those who can’t show they met the mandate would make a “shared responsibility payment,” with the penalty amount based on their adjusted gross income. As to what proof would be required to show compliance, surely the IRS could come up with a set of instructions that are simple and easy to follow. Oh, and one more thing. If your income was higher or lower than you predicted when you enrolled in the Affordable Mask Program, you’d have to either pay back the excess subsidy money (if you made more money) when you file your taxes, or get a larger tax refund (if your income was lower). Now, what could be simpler and more effective than that? Image Note: Joe Biden violates his own mask mandate.(C-SPAN) Tags: I & I Editorial Board, Will Biden Propose, Mask Mandate Penalty TaxTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
What You Need to Know About Supreme Court Confirmation Process, and Trump’s Top Picks
Posted: 22 Sep 2020 05:55 PM PDT by Katrina Trinko: What steps are involved in a Supreme Court confirmation process and are any optional? What do we know about Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa, reportedly two of the top contenders to be nominated? Can Democrats pack the Supreme Court? And what lessons did the left and right learn from the Kavanaugh hearings? John Malcolm, who heads the Meese Legal Center at The Heritage Foundation, joins the podcast to discuss all this and more.
We also cover these stories:
Kate Trinko: Joining me is John Malcolm, vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government and head of the Meese Legal Center at The Heritage Foundation. John, thanks for joining us. John Malcolm: No, it’s my pleasure, Kate. Good to be with you. Trinko: So, I do want to discuss the legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but this being Washington, D.C., people did move very quickly away from mourning the late justice to discussing what’s next. First off, we’re obviously close to the next election. Is there anything in the Constitution or in precedent that makes it problematic for the president and the Senate to confirm a new Supreme Court justice before the election? Malcolm: No, there’s nothing in the Constitution about that. The Constitution basically says that the president nominates, the Senate gives its advice and consent, although they can decide to withhold their advice and consent. And then once somebody is confirmed, the president appoints them. It’s a three-step process and that’s all it says. Now, people are citing precedent of what we did in 2016 and what we’re doing now and in other confirmation fights. And there are an awful lot of senators on both sides of the political aisle that I believe are eating the words that they said in 2016, but there was certainly no constitutional impediment or Senate rule or precedent that would prevent the president from getting his nominee confirmed if the Senate decides to conform that nominee. Trinko: OK. So, on a practical level, you’ve watched a lot of Supreme Court confirmations. What actually needs to be part of the process and how short could this process actually be? Malcolm: Well, the process has lengthened over time in part because there are courtesy calls that the nominees make on senators and the FBI does more extensive background checks and provides reports to the senators, but the process can go very quickly. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, when she was confirmed, I think it was something like 96 to 3. These were very different times. Antonin Scalia was confirmed, I think it was 98 or 99 to nothing. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed in six weeks. Sandra Day O’Connor, I looked this up, was confirmed in 33 days. Franklin Delano Roosevelt nominated one justice, James Byrne, who was confirmed the day he was nominated. His next nominee, Harold Burton, he struggled. I mean, it took a whole day from the time he was nominated until he was confirmed. So that was a different time and things are more contentious, but it can happen very quickly. Trinko: So really it sounds like the only thing that’s absolutely essential is the Senate vote. It sounds like the courtesy calls and all that maybe it would be unwise to skip them, but it sounds like that could be done. Malcolm: Yes, that’s right. I mean, the president could nominate somebody this week and the Senate Judiciary Committee could hold the hearing next week. I think the only procedural rule that I am aware of is, and I suppose this could even be waived, the Senate Judiciary Committee typically schedules a meeting for a vote a weekend after having its hearing. As a matter of course, if the minority party requests an additional week before a vote, that is just granted. So there should be a vote within two weeks after the hearing concludes for the nominee. And then it goes to the Senate floor where it could be fast-tracked. Trinko: President [Donald] Trump has said he intends to pick a female justice. He’s mentioned two women contenders by name, Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa. So let’s start with Barrett. What do we know about her? What do we know about her judicial philosophy? Malcolm: Well, we know a lot more about Amy Coney Barrett than we know about Barbara Lagoa. So Amy Coney Barrett, an exceptionally bright woman, not that Barbara Lagoa isn’t, graduated from Notre Dame Law School, clerk for Judge Laurence Silberman of the D.C. Circuit, and then Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. [She] spent a brief time in private practice, worked for the Republicans in the Bush v. Gore dispute, and then spent most of her time in academia and most of that time at University of Notre Dame Law School. I mentioned that because she wrote, she published in many prestigious law reviews around the country on a whole host of issues that judges deal with and that the conservative legal community cares about. She wrote a lot about originalism. She wrote about a lot about textualism. She wrote a lot about how judges ought to approach precedent and when they should adhere or depart from precedent. She was quizzed on all of those things and of course her Catholic faith during her confirmation hearing. Most memorably, Sen. Dianne Feinstein from California, talking to her about Roe v. Wade, said that the dogma lived loudly in her. And she held up with tremendous grace and poise under fire. I think that Sen. Feinstein probably regretted at the end of that hearing having asked her that question. And since she’s been on the court, which was in 2017, she’s written over a hundred opinions, both majority opinions, dissents, and concurrences, and has shown that she is a committed textualist and a committed originalist. She said during her confirmation hearings, for instance, that she would set aside her personal beliefs and her faith to rule according to the law. Certainly as a devout Catholic, which I believe she is, I don’t know this for a fact, but I would suspect that maybe she does not like the death penalty on a personal basis, yet she has joined opinions that have upheld capital sentences. As far as I know, she hasn’t ruled in any cases involving abortion. And my guess is the nominee, whoever she is, since we know it’s going to be a she, will follow what Ruth Bader Ginsburg did during her confirmation hearing and just say that it would be inappropriate for her to offer any hints or suggestions about how she might rule in a case that would be likely to come before the court. As to Barbara Lagoa, people I know who know her like her a lot. She’s Cuban American. She went to Columbia, Columbia Law School, in private practice for a little while. She did pro bono work for the Miami family of Elian Gonzalez. She was an assistant US attorney, federal prosecutor in Miami for a few years. She has been a judge for quite a long period of time. She was appointed to an intermediate appellate court in Florida by Gov. Jeb Bush in 2006. She served on that intermediate appellate court until January 2019 when Gov. Ron DeSantis named her as the first Cuban American to the Florida Supreme Court. She did not stay long on the Florida Supreme Court because President Trump plucked her off of that court and nominated her to the 11th Circuit where she actually was confirmed quite handily. I think the vote was 82 to 15, but she’s only been on that court since December of 2019. She hasn’t issued rulings in these significant number of cases. Although recently she did join an en banc majority. It was a 6 to 4 ruling upholding Florida’s felon voting law, which required felons to serve their entire sentence, including paying all fines and restitution before they’re eligible to have their voting rights restored. She joined the majority opinion that was written by Chief Judge Bill Pryor of the 11th Circuit and one thing, which I took great part in—so, Judge Pryor not only wrote the majority opinion, he wrote a one-page concurring opinion that was quite bold in which he said: Trinko: Interesting. So of course the most recent confirmation hearing was Brett Kavanaugh’s and that was, to put it mildly, very ugly and divisive. Do you think conservatives learned lessons from the confirmation of Kavanaugh? Do you think the left learned lessons? And how do you think that the Kavanaugh hearing or its shadow could affect this upcoming confirmation process? Malcolm: I have a variety of answers to that. I’m not sure the right learned much because these were lessons they had already learned through the Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings, which also involved, certainly in the case of Thomas and Kavanaugh, the politics of character destruction. So, these vacancies don’t come up very often. There were only nine of these justices. The Supreme Court considers all sorts of issues, statutory cases, important constitutional cases that define our rights, separation of powers, etc. Indeed, the court takes on a lot of issues that I personally think they shouldn’t take on and should leave to the democratic process, but because they take on these hot-button issues, senators want to know the personal beliefs of these. They want to get guarantees as to how these judges or nominees are going to rule in individual cases and they get frustrated when they don’t get answers that they want to hear. And sometimes they reach out for more personal attacks in order to try to damage or defeat a nominee. This is going to be tough. I don’t think that it will be very credible to accuse either Barbara Lagoa or Amy Coney Barrett if one of them is the nominee of having attempted to rape somebody in college, which was the allegation against Brett Kavanaugh. I think that both of these women, they’re charming and quite poised, who have been through a confirmation process recently. I think the Democrats are going to have to think very long and hard about how they attack these nominees because if they’re viewed as having overplayed their hand, that could have an effect on how the electorate and how undecided voters view them. It will be particularly interesting, I believe, to watch how vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris, who is on the Senate Judiciary Committee, approaches this hearing. Trinko: You brought up the nine justices, which in most of our lifetimes that’s been the status quo, but what is the history of how many justices there have been in the Supreme Court? Have there been court-packing attempts? The reason I asked this, of course, is because Reps. Joe Kennedy and Jerry Nadler, who’s chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, both tweeted over the weekend comments that indicated that they think the Democrats should add more Supreme Court justices if a Trump nominee gets through. So is this a viable proposition and how does it fit into the larger picture? Malcolm: Let] me go over the history of that and then I’ll tell you whether I think it’s a viable proposition. There is nothing in the Constitution. It just says that there shall be a Supreme Court and such inferior courts as Congress may establish. The number of Supreme Court justices is established by statute and it has changed over time. Although there have been nine justices for a long time, there was one serious attempt in our nation’s history to try to pack the court. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was very frustrated that a majority on the Supreme Court were issuing rulings striking down large portions of his New Deal. He didn’t like this. So he proposed a plan to basically pack the court—a number of the justices were elderly—that basically said that he would get to name another justice for every justice who was over 70. That did not happen. It did not happen for a couple of reasons. One is he could not get enough democratic support. They controlled the Senate at that time, fairly substantial majority. He couldn’t get enough of the democratic senators to go along with that plan. One of the reasons why he couldn’t garner that kind of support—and this has been referred to historically as “the switch in time that saved nine”—is that after Franklin Delano Roosevelt put forth his court-packing plan, one of the justices, I think it was Justice Owen Roberts, started changing his votes and started voting with what had been the four dissenters to uphold large portions of the New Deal. And once Justice Roberts changed his vote and the New Deal was being upheld and not being struck down, I think some of the air went out of that balloon in terms of that effort to pack the court. Now, I think it is likely that if the Democrats keep the House and take control of the Senate and win the presidency, that they will pack court, not just the Supreme Court, by the way. They’ll probably add additional slots to the lower federal courts of appeals and additional district court judges too. The last time that happened on any kind of a broad basis, not the Supreme Court, but lower courts, was under Jimmy Carter. So I think it’s highly likely that they may do it anyway. But certainly if President Trump pushes through a nominee and he loses and the Senate is retaken by the Democrats, I think it’s a virtual certainty that they will pack the court. The biggest impediment to them at the moment is that while the filibuster has been done away with—nuke is the phrase that was used, the nuclear option was used to do away with the filibuster or nominations—the filibuster still lives for legislation. And again, you’d have to pass a statute to change the number of justices on the court. But I think the Senate has Democrats that have already made it quite clear that they are fully prepared to go nuclear on the legislative filibuster, too. And if they do that, all they need is for the House to pass something, 51 senators to pass it, and for a president to sign it. Trinko: To change tack, many conservatives have been frustrated with the recent decisions by Chief Justice John Roberts. Justice Neil Gorsuch also disappointed some conservatives with his decision in a recent ruling on Title VII and gender identity. We also have Republican Sen. Josh Hawley proposing that it’s time for a litmus test on abortion for judicial candidates. So, do you think conservatives need to vet Supreme Court nominees any differently than they did in the past or how should conservatives approach this? Malcolm: Well, it is certainly true that there have been rulings, obviously, the Bostock case, which you alluded to that was written by Neil Gorsuch, several cases, the two Obamacare cases, the DACA case, the citizenship question on the census, the June Medical, the abortion where Chief Justice Roberts — Trinko: John, you’re just putting me in a bad mood at this point. Malcolm: Well, I’ll say this, look, even your friends, even people who you like and admire who will rule the way you like 90-plus percent of the time are occasionally going to disappoint you. I mean, even Antonin Scalia—and no conservative would say that Antonin Scalia was anything other than a fantastic justice—joined in an opinion that held that burning an American flag was protected speech under the First Amendment. And he wrote an opinion called Employment Division v. Smith that people of faith believed really watered down the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution. So, even great justices whom you like and admire will occasionally disappoint you. These are independent-minded men and women, and you look to see whether they are issuing opinions with fidelity, even if you think they got it wrong, or whether they are really tacking to the left, which many Republican appointees—John Paul Stevens, David Souter, certainly Earl Warren and William Brennan—have done. Now, I understand that frustration. And I understand the desire of some to say, “The vetting process has not worked well. We need to have a litmus test.” I am not a fan of litmus tests for a variety of reasons. One is I think that judges take an oath that they are not going to pre-judge cases until they are presented with a case and consider the arguments of the lawyers in any amicus curiae that weigh in on an issue. And I think that that is something that judges should take very, very seriously. The other thing is that Josh Hawley said, “Well, I want to have a litmus test on Roe v. Wade. And … anybody has to have said before they were nominated what their views were.” Well, if you went with that, then there are some justices like David Souter who probably get through. And there are other justices like Clarence Thomas—who was asked about this in his confirmation hearing, he said, “Look, I focused on other issues. I haven’t spent a lot of time thinking about Roe v. Wade”—who do not get through. And far as I’m concerned, any rule that would keep Clarence Thomas off of the Supreme Court is a bad rule. Trinko: Let’s switch to Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s legacy. She served nearly 30 years on the Supreme Court and before that obviously had a long career as a lawyer. How will she be remembered in the legal world? Malcolm: Well, she was a giant in the legal world in a way that actually very, very few lawyers can reach. She is the equivalent for women’s rights that Thurgood Marshall was in terms of the rights for African Americans. She graduated from Columbia Law School. She was at Harvard for three years and then she transferred to Columbia because her husband had gotten a job in New York, finished, tied for first in her class when she was at Harvard. I think she was the first woman on the Harvard Law Review. She struggled to get a job because she was a woman. Then she became a professor. And then she started in 1972 the American Civil Liberties Union’s Women’s Rights Project. And she mapped out a strategy, a very successful one, to advance women’s rights. She argued six seminal cases, winning five of them before the U.S. Supreme Court and lots of cases in the lower court. So in terms of advancing women’s rights, she is clearly a legend and deservedly. She then served with distinction for a number of years in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and 27 years on the Supreme Court where she was certainly a liberal icon. So while she certainly left her mark as a judge on the D.C. Circuit and a justice on the Supreme Court, where she really left her mark was as the lawyer. To show how much respect she had in the legal community and how different times were, even though she had started this ACLU women’s project where a lot of Republicans did not like the positions that she advocated for, I think she was confirmed something like 96 to 3. And on the flip side, Antonin Scalia was confirmed … either 98 or 99 to nothing. But those times are long gone now. Trinko: Speaking of those times in your op-ed for The Daily Signal with Elizabeth Slattery, you guys talked a lot about what great friends she and Scalia were. And it really does seem to be the sort of friendship that is a little baffling in 2020. And also, sadly, it seems to be going out of vogue in Washington, D.C. So why were these two such pals? Malcolm: I think they knew … the importance and impact that they had had on the law. They served together on the D.C. Circuit before they were justices on the Supreme Court. I think they admired each other’s writing abilities and legal acumen, and they shared a lot of common interests. Mos>t prominently, I suppose, that everyone knows about is they both loved the opera. And actually I love the opera too. And I would see them at the opera together. They were in operas, the Washington National Opera, on occasions. And they obviously enjoyed each other’s time. I remember speaking and not with Justice Scalia, but with Mrs. Scalia, Maureen Scalia, and she would just wax rhapsodic about what wonderful people Ruth and Marty Ginsburg were. At one point I remember the two of them were being interviewed and were asked about the friendship—which many, many people consider very bizarre—and Justice Scalia looked at her and said, “Other than her legal opinions, what’s not to like?” And they fortunately were able to have respect and admiration for each other. Clearly they disagree without being disagreeable and could put aside their political and legal differences to forge this great friendship. And you are right, those sorts of relationships are now going the way of the dinosaur. Trinko: Last question. We are seeing a ton of interest in the Supreme Court nomination. And in recent years, interest seems to have only grown. A lot of donations flow into both sides. And while that’s great for you, you’re head of the Legal Center, do you think it’s good for America that we care this much about who’s on the Supreme Court? Is this what the Founders had in mind? Malcolm: Well, I think the reason it’s not great for America is also the reason why the Founders would have been befuddled, which is the Supreme Court, by expanding areas of the Constitution—so just in my opinion—finding a right of privacy, expanding the Commerce Clause so that they not only consider commerce that happens in-between states, but they get into a lot of issues about things that happen totally within one state that had the most minor of economic impact. They’ve expanded things like the General Welfare Clause. Instead of saying that a law has to apply to the general welfare, it now applies to bridges to nowhere in Alaska. That’s good enough to pass the general welfare test. Because the Supreme Court has expanded the Constitution in this sort of way through living constitutionalism, the Supreme Court now gets involved in so many issues that the Founders would have believed should have been left to the democratic process. And because the court gets involved in all of those issues, the public comes to view them as super legislators. And if you view them as super legislators, then they kind of care about how they vote on the issue that you care about. And that’s why these things become blood feuds. Trinko: Well, John, thank you so much for making the time to talk to us today. Malcolm: Good to be with you. ———————–
Katrina Trinko is editor-in-chief of The Daily Signal. Tags: What You Need to Know, About Supreme Court, Confirmation Process, Trump’s Top PicksSTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REDSTATE
Company Gives Up Its NBA Suite, Fires Off Letter to Franchise Owner Over the Ruining of Sports
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
AMERICAN SPECTATOR
BIZPAC REVIEW
|
|
ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Wednesday, September 23, 2020
|
Good morning, NBC News readers.
President Donald Trump appears to have secured enough Senate support to push a vote on his Supreme Court nominee. “Zombie” storm Paulette has come back to life and Covid-19 claims another victim: Halloween.
Here’s what we’re watching this Wednesday morning.
|
White House gets behind idea of pushing Supreme Court nominee vote before the election
A consensus has formed within the West Wing to push for a vote on President Donald Trump’s coming Supreme Court nominee before the election, with aides and advisers saying they are increasingly optimistic that they will be able to pull off the speedy confirmation, three NBC News White House correspondents report.
Some outside advisers had initially argued that waiting to hold a vote until after Election Day could be the most politically advantageous strategy, said a person familiar with the thinking. Having the seat vacant could motivate conservatives to turn out for Trump to ensure that it got filled and save senators in tight races from having to make a controversial vote so close to the election.
But the momentum in the past 48 hours has swung toward getting a vote done as soon as possible, with those inside and outside the White House arguing that the quicker the process, the more likely they are to fill the seat, senior administration officials said.
Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, added to GOP confidence Tuesday when he threw his support behind Trump’s push to fill the seat vacated by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg quickly.
All eyes had been on Romney, often a Trump critic who voted to convict the president during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, as someone who could join Democrats to block the confirmation vote.
Trump even expressed appreciation toward his frequent foe during a rally in Pennsylvania Tuesday, saying: “Thank you, Mitt.”
To date, only two Republican senators have said it is too close to the presidential election to consider a court nomination, not enough to block it.
The president promised to “reveal” his nominee at the White House at 5 p.m. on Saturday.
Meantime, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden punted on the hypothetical question of how Democrats should retaliate if Republicans manage to secure their nominee. Asked if he’d be open to expanding on the number of Supreme Court seats if given the opportunity, he demurred.
“It’s a legitimate question. But let me tell you why I’m not going to answer that question. Because it will shift the focus,” Biden said.
The former vice president also won an interesting endorsement Tuesday: Cindy McCain threw her support behind Biden in a stinging rebuke of Trump by the widow of the GOP’s 2008 presidential nominee.
Trump has had a fraught relationship with members of John McCain’s family since he disparaged the Arizona senator during his 2016 campaign. But the McCains have stopped short of endorsing Trump’s rivals until now.
Cindy McCain’s backing could help Biden appeal to Republicans disaffected with Trump and give him a boost the crucial swing state that McCain represented in Congress for 35 years.
|
‘No way in hell’: Wary parents won’t vaccinate kids, setting up future school showdowns
As pharmaceutical companies race to manufacture a Covid-19 vaccine, many people are wary of a shot that is working its way through the approval process at record speed during a highly politicized pandemic.
While some professions could require employees to get the vaccine, experts say schools almost certainly will require students to — potentially setting the stage for a showdown between reluctant parents and education officials.
“This is going to be a huge issue, and I don’t think most people understand that yet,” said one education law attorney.
Meantime, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued new warnings about Covid-19 that will make Halloween more frightful and may dash any would-be trick-or-treaters dreams.
|
DHS gave millions in contracts to firm where acting chief’s wife works
The consulting firm where the wife of acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf is an executive has been awarded more than $6 million in contracts from the Department of Homeland Security since September 2018, according to records on the federal government website USA Spending.
Wolf became chief of staff at the Transportation Security Administration, a DHS agency, in 2017 and chief of staff to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen in 2018.
He took over as acting secretary in November and has been nominated to become secretary. His confirmation hearing before the Senate is scheduled for 10 a.m. Wednesday.
Wolf’s wife, Hope Wolf, is vice president of professional staff operations at Berkeley Research Group, a consulting firm. Although the company has a long history of federal contracts, it did not do work for DHS until after Wolf became the TSA’s chief of staff in 2017.
Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf’s confirmation hearing before the Senate is scheduled to begin this morning.
(Photo: Oliver Contreras / Sipa USA via AP file)
|
Four issues that must be resolved for Afghan peace talks to succeed
Taliban militants and delegates appointed by the Afghan government are meeting in Qatar in an attempt to end decades of war that have torn Afghanistan apart and left it reliant on foreign aid.
And as the sheen of the opening ceremony begins to fade, the huge task remains of resolving one of the world’s deadliest conflicts.
NBC News has spoken to Taliban commanders, an Afghan government negotiator and a former high-level diplomat to find out what barriers could prevent the cycle of conflict being broken.
Afghan Taliban militants and villagers attend a gathering in March 2020. (Photo: Noorullah Shirzada / AFP – Getty Images file)
|
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
|
Plus
- The House passed a funding bill with GOP support to avert another government shutdown.
- “Zombie” tropical storm Paulette has regained some strength, adding to 2020’s weird weather.
- A officer wounded during the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor sent an email to more than 1,000 colleagues saying: “I know we did the legal, moral and ethical thing.”
- A Canadian woman has been charged with sending a letter laced with the deadly poison ricin to the White House.
- Wells Fargo’s CEO exasperated some employees when he blamed a “limited pool of black talent” for not reaching diversity goals.
|
THINK about it
Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump’s “Top Secret” clearance raised red flags. Here’s why it didn’t matter, Washington correspondent for The New York Times Michael S. Schmidt writes in an excerpt from his new book “Donald Trump v. the United States.”
|
Live BETTER
Where are the healthiest places to live in the U.S.? The 2020 rankings revealed.
|
Shopping
The exercise bike brand Echelon developed its latest exercise bike alongside Amazon to hit the right mix of tech, style and price. Here’s what to know about the Prime Bike.
|
One fun thing
From book reports to Halloween costumes to law school inspiration, young women are speaking out about how Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg impacted and motivated them.
|
NBC FIRST READ
|
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Carrie Dann and Melissa Holzberg
FIRST READ: Here’s how Biden passed Trump last month in the 2020 money race
Augusts often have played pivotal roles in our modern presidential contests.
Think 2004 (when John Kerry’s disastrous August put him in hole from which he never climbed out) or 2008 (hello, Sarah Palin).
Well, three weeks after it ended, we know Joe Biden clearly won August – at least on the financial front.
Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Not only did Team Biden (campaign + DNC + joint fundraising accounts) emerge with $141 million more in the bank per last month’s filing than Team Trump did (campaign + RNC + JFAs), $466 million to $325 million.
They did it after starting in a nearly $200 million cash-on-hand hole when Biden essentially wrapped up the Democratic nomination at the end of the March – that’s when the pandemic was beginning in this country.
Here’s a cash on hand comparison by month that NBC’s Ben Kamisar put together for us, per FEC filings and campaign releases:
As of March 31
Team Trump: $244 million
Team Biden: $62 million
Difference: Trump +$182 million
SOURCE: FEC reports
As of June 30
Team Trump: $296 million
Team Biden: $238 million
Difference: Trump +$58 million
SOURCE: FEC reports
As of July 31
Team Trump: $300 million
Team Biden: $294 million
Difference: Trump +$6 million
SOURCE: Campaign statements
As of Aug. 31
Team Biden: $466 million
Team Trump: $325 million
Difference: Biden +$141 million
SOURCE: Campaign statements
So Biden and the Democrats went from a cash-on-hand deficit of $182 million after March, to an advantage of $141 million after August.
That’s some kind of swing.
|
Biden improves his standing with younger voters
Biden passing Trump in the money race isn’t the only notable change for the Democrat since the summer.
He’s also improved his numbers among young voters, per the latest NBC News and Quibi analysis of young voters from the NBC News/WSJ polls.
“Voters under 40 now view Joe Biden more favorably than they did earlier this year, and they’re now even more likely to choose him over Trump,” one of us writes.
“The September data [from the NBC/WSJ poll] show that 38 percent of voters who are either members of Generation Z (ages 18-23) or millennials (ages 24-39) have positive views of Biden, compared with 40 percent who have negative views.”
“The numbers come one week after NBC News and Quibi released a comprehensive analysis of about 2,000 younger voters reached by pollsters at Hart Research and Public Opinion Strategies from January to August. In that group, just 28 percent of young voters had positive views of Biden, while 41 percent had negative views.”
|
Trump’s best state poll numbers in weeks
Two new WaPo/ABC polls of Florida and Arizona represent President Trump’s best state numbers in weeks.
In Arizona, Trump is up among likely voters, 49 percent to 48 percent, though that’s well within the poll’s margin of error. (Among registered voters, it’s Biden 49 percent, Trump 47 percent.)
And in Florida, it’s Trump 51 percent among likely voters to Biden’s 47 percent. (Among registered voters, it’s Biden 48 percent to Trump 47 percent.)
But caveat: This notable difference between LVs and RVs isn’t what we’re seeing in other surveys this presidential season – with turnout expected to be sky-high.
Another caveat: This is the first Arizona poll in quite a while that’s had Trump ahead. So take that into consideration.
As CNN’s Harry Enten tweets, “Honestly think these are the best polls Trump has had in 6 months? Of course, we’ve had a lot of polls in these states & these are… well they’re unique.”
|
DATA DOWNLOAD: The numbers you need to know today
6,927,827: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 36,527 more than yesterday morning.)
202,063: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 945 more than yesterday morning.)
96.61 million: The number of coronavirus tests that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.
More than 36,500: The number of Latinos who have died of the virus, according to CDC data analyzed by the Washington Post.
10 points: The jump in younger voters’ positive ratings for Joe Biden in our September poll, according to a new analysis from NBC and Quibi comparing the latest results to merged data from January-August.
359 to 57: The House vote last night on a spending bill that will fund the government through December 11.
$6 million: The amount in contracts that DHS has awarded since September 2018 to a consulting firm where acting secretary Chad Wolf’s wife is an executive.
As many as 100,000: The number of ballots that could be rejected in Pennsylvania due to the state’s requirement that all mail ballots arrive with a “secrecy envelope,” according to one official’s projections.
|
TWEET OF THE DAY: What has changed since March (and what hasn’t)
|
2020 VISION: Did someone say “Shenanigans”?
President Trump continued attacking the integrity of mail in ballots during his rally in Pennsylvania last night:
“They have these fake ballots. Millions and millions of ballots. By the way when you — when, not if, when you see shenanigans please report it to your authorities, okay? The real authorities. They’re watching. And the authorities are watching. But please report it.”
But in Pennsylvania, there are concerns over hundreds of thousands of mail-in votes being counted.
Based on the state Supreme Court’s ruling last week, “naked ballots” in Pennsylvania – ballots sent in without a secrecy envelope – can be rejected.
And Philadelphia city commissioner Lisa Deely said that based on the error rate in prior elections, she believes this ruling can lead to more than 100,000 mail-in ballots being rejected.
President Trump won Pennsylvania by just over 44,000 votes in 2016.
On the campaign trail today: Joe Biden stumps in Charlotte, N.C… And one of us moderates a VA-SEN debate between incumbent Mark Warner and GOP challenger Daniel Gade.
|
Ad Watch from Ben Kamisar
Today’s Ad Watch take a look at some rough new GOP ads in Georgia that hem tight to the crime/rioting message Republicans are pushing in the hopes to win back suburban voters.
This recent spot from Republican Sen. David Perdue uses footage of the recent ambush of Los Angeles police officers before tying Democrat Jon Ossoff to the “Defund the Police” movement.
And this one from the NRCC in Georgia’s 6th District hits Democratic Rep. Lucy McBath on a part of the House Democrats’ coronavirus aid plan. The ad says the bill would “release criminals from prison — murderers, rapists” and that her support for it proves McBath can’t “protect our neighborhoods.”
Meanwhile, recent ads from the Democrats in those races center on health care, the issue that helped Democrats flip the House in 2018. That year, Republicans leaned heavily on the security argument down the stretch, warning that the Democrats’ immigration policies would make the nation unsafe. But ultimately, the health care message won out. It looks like we’ll see if anything’s changed in November.
|
THE LID: Are you ready for some football?
Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we looked at how Americans are viewing the return of college football during a pandemic.
|
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world?
United States of Care (USofCare) has released its 2020 Voter Action Guide ahead of the election.
Cindy McCain has endorsed Joe Biden.
A consensus is growing in the White House to hold a Supreme Court confirmation vote before the November election.
Would Biden expand the Supreme Court if Republicans jam through the new nominee? He’s punting on the question for now.
Activists are taking aim at Trump’s TPS policies, which could affect hundreds of thousands of immigrants.
The UK is facing a new round of coronavirus restrictions.
The New York Times does a deep dive into how the 2020 race is playing out in Milwaukee’s suburbs.
|
CBS
|
|
|
|
IJR
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
LOUDER WITH CROWDER
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
|
|||||||||||
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
|
SARA A. CARTER
|
TWITCHY
|
|
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
ZEROHEDGE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
HOOVER INSTITUTE
|