Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Thursday July 23, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
THE RESURGENT
THE EPOCH TIMES
“What you see and what you hear depends a great deal on where you are standing. It also depends on what sort of person you are.”
C.S. LEWIS
International Group of Lawmakers Condemns Chinese Regime’s Campaign of Religious Persecution
Over 600 Lawmakers From 30 Countries Ask Beijing to ‘Immediately Stop’ Falun Gong Persecution
Trump Signs Order Excluding Illegal Aliens From Census Numbers Used for Congressional Districts
You may have read our articles on our website, but did you know we have a print edition as well?
Each week our team of reporters, editors, and designers produce a beautifully designed broadsheet newspaper with the best of our in-depth content. It includes news and opinion, as well as inspiring content in our Life & Tradition section, advice on healthy living in our Mind & Body section, our amazing Food section, and puzzles—a reader favorite. It’s a reading experience you don’t want to miss!
Try the paper yourself for just $1 and get a free gift. Cancel anytime
As floods continue in southern and central China, in the north, China is facing droughts. And this, combined with locusts, is furthering the risk of food shortages.
Copyright © 2020 The Epoch Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive newsletter communications from The Epoch Times.
Our mailing address is: The Epoch Times 229 W. 28 St. Fl. 5 Click here to unsubscribe. |
DAYBREAK
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOX NEWS
JUST THE NEWS
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
AXIOS
Happy Thursday!
There’s been a popular notion — even among some Black people — that the wealth difference between white and Black Americans could be closed if Black people collectively “got it together,” Axios Markets editor Dion Rabouin writes as part of our What Matters 2020 series.
- Reality check: The wealth gap — which could more accurately be described as a wealth chasm because of just how large it is —would not be closed by Black Americans doing any (or all) of the things that have been proposed.
Why it matters: The argument goes that Black Americans should focus more on education, family structure and home ownership, put money in Black-owned banks, start more Black-owned businesses, increase savings and investment and generally take personal responsibility the way other “model minorities” have.
- The fact of the matter — evidenced by decades of reporting from the Federal Reserve System, Department of Labor, Department of Commerce, and academic and professional studies — is that the wealth gap is the product of centuries of inequality and racism that has grown too large to be impacted significantly by individual actions, achievements or choices.
Here are some of the most popular myths about the racial wealth gap’s causes and solutions — and why each falls apart with a closer look:
1. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through education
On average, Black households in the U.S. with heads who have completed a college degree have lower net worth than white households headed by someone with less than a high school education.
- Why it matters: It is only after completing advanced post-college work that the median Black household surpasses the median white household’s net worth for a head with only a high school degree.
- Read more.
2. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through personal responsibility
As noted in a report last year by the Cleveland Fed, the income gap between Black and white Americans is the result of “persistent systemic differences in economic opportunity,” rather than a lack of responsibility.
3. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through home ownership
Many have suggested that a key to closing the racial wealth gap between Black and white Americans is to encourage more Black families to own homes.
- But data shows that would be woefully insufficient.
- Read more.
4. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap with individual accomplishment
The increasing number of Black millionaires and billionaires and the success of people like former President Obama have led many to speculate that the racial wealth gap in the U.S. is closing.
- In fact, the opposite is happening.
- Read more.
5. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through increased savings
An oft-suggested reason for the massive wealth gap between Black and white families in the U.S. is that Black Americans simply don’t save or invest enough.
- Data shows that is untrue.
- Read more.
6. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap by investing in Black-owned banks
Politicians and others have long suggested that if more Black families and businesses used Black-owned banks, it would help Black people overcome the racial wealth gap.
- However, a Brookings Institution report shows Black-owned firms with paid employees generated just over $103 billion in revenue annually.
- Read more.
7. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through entrepreneurship
Black Americans’ attempts at entrepreneurship are often foiled by an initial lack of capital and an inability to obtain financing, especially through government programs.
8. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through financial literacy
The focus on financial literacy points to disproportionate use of services like payday lending and check cashing stores, with fees and interest payments much higher than traditional lending or banking options by Black Americans.
- However, a 2017 report from the St. Louis Fed finds: “[M]eager economic circumstances — not poor decision making or deficient knowledge — constrain choices and leave asset-poor borrowers with little to no other option but to use predatory and abusive alternative financial services.”
- Read more.
9. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap by emulating “model minorities”
A prevailing myth about the wealth gap between white and Black Americans is that it could be closed if Black people valued hard work and education like so-called model minorities, typically Asians and other recent U.S. immigrants.
- Reality check: Data shows that to be untrue.
- Read more.
10. The myth of closing the racial wealth gap through “stronger families”
Often the increased rate of Black single motherhood or “Black family disorganization” is referenced as a reason for the gap in wealth accumulation between Black and white Americans.
- Reality check: “[W]ealth differences among white and Black women persist despite type of family structure, marriage, age, or education,”a 2018 study from the Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity finds.
- Read more.
💰Sign up for Dion Rabouin’s daily newsletter, Axios Markets.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
The legal and legislative fight over how much insurance companies must pay for coronavirus-related losses is just starting, and it’s likely to get uglier, Axios managing editor Jennifer Kingson writes.
- Why it matters: COVID is, as one insurance industry executive puts it, “the biggest insured loss event in history.”
- For many companies, a successful insurance claim will make the difference between staying in business or going bust.
Where it stands: Insurance lawyers keeping tabs on the litigation say that hundreds of lawsuits have been filed against insurers over virus-related claims — from In-N-Out Burger to the Houston Rockets to the nonprofit Simon Wiesenthal Center — with scant success so far.
What’s at stake, according to an insurance industry trade group:
- COVID could generate $40 to $80 billion in insurance payouts in the U.S., and over $100 billion internationally.
- By contrast, 9/11 cost insurers $47 billion, while Hurricane Katrina cost them $54 billion.
The fight: Insurers argue that business interruption policies cover only physical damage — like the kind incurred during floods and fires — and that virus contamination doesn’t count.
- “When the end of the world is coming and we’re being asked to pay for it, clearly that’s not something you can responsibly do,” Robert Gordon, SVP of policy, research and international at the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, tells Axios.
So far, the handful of decisions that have been handed down in relevant cases have gone against the policyholders — who typically don’t have enough money or time to pursue endless litigation against their insurers.
After weeks of explosive growth, the number of new infections in the U.S. is still climbing — but not quite as fast as it has been, Axios’ Sam Baker and Andrew Witherspoon report.
- The number of new coronavirus cases in the U.S. shot up by over 20% per week for the past month.
- This week, it rose by a comparatively modest 7%.
- That doesn’t mean we’re getting better. The U.S. may be leveling off, but it’s leveling off at a very high rate of infection. The country is averaging roughly 66,000 new cases per day.
Portland’s mayor was tear gassed by the U.S. government as he stood at a fence guarding the federal courthouse, during another night of protests against the presence of federal agents, AP’s Gillian Flaccus reports.
- Mayor Ted Wheeler, a Democrat, said it was the first time he’d been gassed.
- Wheeler, 57, appeared slightly dazed, and coughed as he put on a pair of goggles someone handed him and drank water.
Why it matters: President Trump is also sending federal agents to Chicago and Albuquerque, N.M., a move that’s deepening the country’s political divide.
- “You have radical-left Democrats running cities like Chicago,” Trump said at his coronavirus briefing. “There’ll be a time when they’re going to want us to go in full blast, but right now we’re sending extra people to help. We’re arresting a lot of people that have been very bad.”
The Sierra Club said John Muir (1838-1914), the group’s first president, “was not immune to the racism peddled by many in the early conservation movement”:
- “He made derogatory comments about Black people and Indigenous peoples that drew on deeply harmful racist stereotypes, though his views evolved later in his life,” executive director Michael Brune wrote.
- “In … early years, the Sierra Club was basically a mountaineering club for middle- and upper-class white people who worked to preserve the wilderness they hiked through.”
Doug Sosnik, who was the White House political director during President Clinton’s successful re-election race, is out with one of his famous political decks, six weeks out from the start of early voting for president:
Trump is starring in a rerun of his 2016 campaign in a different country than the one that elected him president. Trump changed our politics, but the coronavirus changed our country. Both of these accelerated a new era in American politics.
Doug says these three slides tell the story of the election:
Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, one of the Republican Party’s top future presidential prospects, has a book out Tuesday, “Still Standing,” that describes how seriously he considered challenging President Trump for re-election:
- “I’m not just wandering around the states hitchhiking,” Hogan recalls joking to reporters in New Hampshire after a trip to Iowa.
- Hogan writes that he told them he had no interest in launching “a suicide mission” if he didn’t think he had a prayer to win: “But a short, energetic campaign might be right up my alley. ‘I’m pretty good at retail politics,’ I said.”
Hogan says he waited for Trump to unleash a nickname:
- “I assumed he would go with ‘Fat Larry,’ an obvious choice as I had admittedly put on some weight since my cancer battle. Or maybe ‘Cancer Boy.’ That would be a good one. But it didn’t happen.”
“I never attack the president personally,” Hogan continues:
Never call him a name. I’d really prefer not to talk about him at all. I stay focused on my job as governor. But when something rises to the level that I really disagree with, something that’s just so offensive or that directly hurts the people of Maryland, I stand up and say something. …
I’m respectful of President Trump. But unlike a lot of Republicans, I won’t just stay silent, swear allegiance, and blindly toe the line.
Photo: Emma McIntyre/Getty Images
Meredith Kopit Levien, the incoming CEO of the New York Times, tells Axios’ Sara Fischer that her vision for the future includes establishing the Times as a world-class digital and tech company.
- Why she matters: Kopit Levien helped drive the company’s digital turnaround. Her focus on data and technology will be a big thing to watch.
The Times announced yesterday that Kopit Levien, the paper’s current COO, will become its president and CEO, succeeding Mark Thompson.
- At 49, she’ll be the youngest CEO the company has had.
As part of Kopit Levien’s goal to make the Times a digital powerhouse, she says she wants to “reimagine the way we do our work to look and feel and operate the way transformational tech companies do.”
- “There are more engineers at the Times than any other department other than journalists,” she said.
Citi Field during Mets practice yesterday. Photo: Kathy Willens/AP
Opening Day — delayed for 119 days — brings ballparks without fans, cardboard cutouts for spectators and personal rosin bags for pitchers, AP’s Ben Walker writes.
- MLB players can put a patch with “Black Lives Matter” or “United For Change” on a jersey sleeve during opening day.
No high-fives? No problem, Phillies slugger Bryce Harper said:
- “I think the air high-five is going to come back and be the coolest thing in baseball this year and be the coolest thing in sports.”
📱 Thanks for reading Axios AM. Please invite your friends to sign up here.
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
CHICAGO SUNTIMES
Trump calls Lightfoot to discuss sending more than 200 federal agents to Chicago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO TRUMP NEWS
THE HILL
|
ROLL CALL
Morning Headlines
A bank where Rep. Harold Rogers once served as a director provided millions to business owners as the economy cratered under coronavirus, according to a CQ Roll Call review of Paycheck Protection Program loans. Read More…
A split that erupted last year within the Democratic Party inspired Cooper Teboe, a political operative who serves as campaign manager and finance director for Rep. Ro Khanna, to launch his own firm. Teboe officially opened his Silicon Valley-based shop, CDT Strategies, in January. Read More…
To remember John Lewis, remember the real John Lewis — and his righteous fight
OPINION — Some of the tributes to the late John Lewis emphasized his generosity of spirit, evident in his ability to forgive and embrace those who beat him into unconsciousness. But the picture is incomplete without acknowledging the impatience, the fury to make it right, that saw him through more than three dozen arrests. Read More…
Click here to subscribe to Fintech Beat for the latest market and regulatory developmentsin finance and financial technology.
Senate Republicans, White House near agreement on coronavirus relief package
Senate Republicans and the Trump administration expect to unveil their COVID-19 relief plan Thursday after reaching agreement on key pieces late Wednesday. That package will no longer be one bill but a series of bills addressing the ongoing health care and economic crisis, according to Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. Read More…
Jamaal Bowman: ‘The police literally beat the crap out of me’
When Jamaal Bowman says he wants to end police brutality and overhaul law enforcement procedures in America, it’s not just an abstract policy position. The 44-year-old New York Democrat has a long history with police officers treating him roughly. He was just 11 years old the first time it happened. Read More…
House passes bill to remove Confederate, racist statues and busts
A measure seeking to remove the bust of former Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who wrote the majority opinion in the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision that said Black people were not U.S. citizens, along with racist and Confederate statues in the Capitol passed the House 305-113 on Wednesday. Read More…
House passes bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban
The House passed a measure Wednesday that would repeal the Trump administration’s ban restricting travel from targeted nations and prohibit future presidents from implementing bans based on race or religion. The measure passed 233-183, mainly along party lines. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2020 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: Are the W.H. and Senate Rs on the same page?
DRIVING THE DAY
NEW … JOE BIDEN’S campaign is going up with a new ad — part of a $15 million buy — called “Crossroads” that seeks to draw a contrast between Biden and President DONALD TRUMP. The new ad focuses on three key issues: the economy, health care and beating Covid-19. It includes imagery of a priest saying a prayer next to a bed in a hospital, and a Black Lives Matter protest — with predominantly white people. It will run in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
— THE SCRIPT: “Right now, we’re at a crossroads. We’ve seen what can happen when we elect a leader determined to divide us. As president, Joe Biden will forge a new path — by growing an economy that works for working families, getting small businesses back on their feet and expanding access to affordable health care. Joe Biden will lead us on a path forward, paved with opportunity for us all.” The 30-second spot
— THE AD COMES as Biden and former President BARACK OBAMA are also joining forces. More from WAPO’S ANNIE LINSKEY and MATT VISER: “Obama and Biden, together again to troll Trump”: “Joe Biden’s presidential campaign on Wednesday deployed a new tactic to reach voters when bunting-strewn stages and boisterous rallies have been set aside: using cinematic flourish to tease a major appearance with Barack Obama intended to excite Democrats and troll President Trump with the presence of his popular predecessor.
“Biden faces an urgent need to expand his digital presence in a campaign now likely to be defined to a great degree online, and will use the event — to be fully released on social media Thursday morning — as a way to reach Obama’s nearly 121 million Twitter followers. It leans on the former president’s stature and signature coolness — in the view of many voters Biden needs — to add sparkle as the campaign slogs through summer.
“The video is also a sign of how much Biden and his team will focus on his partnership with Obama even as he goes through the process of searching for his own running mate.”
PLAYBOOK OUIJA BOARD, COVID RELIEF EDITION: As of this writing — before sunrise in Washington — Senate Majority Leader MITCH MCCONNELL plans to unveil his coronavirus relief bill first thing this morning, and the Senate GOP leadership anticipates it will have the White House’s support. REMEMBER: MCCONNELL views this bill as a GOP marker for negotiations.
BUT WE’VE BEEN AROUND THIS CAROUSEL enough times — congressional leaders counting on the White House’s support — to know that until MCCONNELL is on the floor announcing this bill, and the White House says “we back this bill,” there is no deal.
YES, Treasury Secretary STEVEN MNUCHIN and MARK MEADOWS announced an agreement in principle alongside senators Wednesday evening. But color us a tad bit skeptical that everything is locked up. Doubt us? Let’s see where we are by the publication of Playbook PM. If we’re wrong, we’ll say it. If we’re right — buckle up.
THERE’S REAL IMPACT if Democrats catch a whiff of any disagreement among Republicans. If the White House and Senate Republicans aren’t on the same page, it strengthens the Dems’ hands. And we’ve seen the administration roll Republicans a few times already.
HERE’S THE LIKELY ROAD MAP FOR THE NEXT WEEK — assuming MCCONNELL puts out his bill at some point soon:
— STEP ONE: MCCONNELL will speak about CARES 2 — the name of the bill — on the floor, and then each Republican author of the bill will talk about it. The payroll tax cut the president wanted appears to be out of this bill, but again — until we see the final version, we can’t say for sure what is in or out.
— STEP TWO: Much of the middle of the GOP conference — the leadership, chairs and allies of MCCONNELL — will be for the bill, yet they will likely complain. The outer ring may be against it because, in their view, it spends too much or too little or doesn’t include some policy POTUS wanted.
— STEP THREE: Democrats will call the bill woefully inadequate. Why? Because it’s the beginning of a negotiation between political opponents, not a dispassionate analysis of the policies. You shouldn’t take Senate Minority Leader CHUCK SCHUMER and Speaker NANCY PELOSI’S initial analysis of this bill as a sign of what may or may not get done at the end of the day. Both sides are trying to get the most they can. MCCONNELL has an incentive to go as far as he can to the right on the first draft, and Democrats are incentivized to trash it.
— STEP FOUR: The Senate usually leaves Thursdays, so this issue will die out for the week after today — save the Sunday shows, maybe.
— STEP FIVE: The funeral and remembrance ceremonies for JOHN LEWIS could likely be next week, so that’ll break up the action.
— STEP SIX: Then — and only then — will the real negotiating happen.
Good Thursday morning. TODAY is opening day. The world champion WASHINGTON NATIONALS will play the NEW YORK YANKEES tonight at Nats Park. First pitch is 7:08 p.m.
TRUTH TALK … ON INTERNAL GOP DIVISIONS: “Republican feuding this week represents broader reckoning over party’s future as Trump sinks in the polls,” by WaPo’s Seung Min Kim and Rachael Bade: “Trump came from nowhere five years ago to effectively take over the Republican Party, remaking it into a seeming cult of personality that has repeatedly violated the party’s supposed orthodoxies. But this week’s dust-ups are bringing into relief the fault lines and competing personalities that will define the coming war over the soul of the post-Trump GOP, whether that is after a single term or in another four years, with some appearing already to be jockeying for position in the 2024 presidential contest.”
CORONAVIRUS RAGING …
— NYT: “Spike in U.S. Cases Far Outpaces Testing Expansion”
— LAT: “California shatters another record for new coronavirus cases, hospitalizations,” by Luke Money: “Gov. Gavin Newsom said Wednesday that 12,807 new coronavirus infections had been reported statewide in the past 24 hours — a record high — bringing California’s total to 413,576. ‘It’s just another reminder … of the magnitude of impact that this virus continues to have,’ he said during a press briefing.
“The sustained surge in cases comes as coronavirus-related hospitalizations have continued to hit or approach record-breaking levels in the state. Approximately 7,170 confirmed COVID-19 patients were hospitalized statewide as of Tuesday, with 2,058 in intensive care, according to the state Department of Public Health.”
— NBC: “White House executive office cafeteria closed after positive coronavirus test,” by Josh Lederman: “The White House is conducting contact tracing after a cafeteria worker tested positive for coronavirus, three Trump administration officials tell NBC News. The cafeteria and an eatery in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, or EEOB, were both closed this week after the case was discovered, officials said. It was unclear how long the facility will remain closed, although some staffers were told it could remain shuttered for two weeks.
“‘There is no reason for panic or alarm,’ the White House said in an email sent to officials Wednesday night and obtained by NBC News. ‘The White House Medical Unit has already conducted contact tracing and based off of their interviews, they have determined that no EOP staff should self-quarantine due to exposure.’” NBC
AP: “Trump deploys more federal agents under ‘law and order’ push,” by Colleen Long and Jill Colvin: “President Donald Trump announced he will send federal agents to Chicago and Albuquerque, New Mexico, to help combat rising crime, expanding the administration’s intervention into local enforcement as he runs for reelection under a ‘law and order’ mantle.
“Using the same alarmist language he has employed to describe illegal immigration, Trump painted Democrat-led cities as out of control and lashed out at the ‘radical left,’ which he blamed for rising violence in some cities, even though criminal justice experts say it defies easy explanation.”
— IN OREGON: “At Portland protests, feds gas demonstrators, Mayor Ted Wheeler,” by The Oregonian’s Shane Dixon Kavanaugh: “Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler stood Wednesday among the front lines of downtown protests, where he and hundreds of other people were tear gassed repeatedly by federal officers.
“Demonstrators have converged every night for eight weeks in downtown Portland to call for systemic reforms to the police bureau Wheeler oversees. The mayor’s appearance on Day 56 attracted attention and jeers from the crowd of more than 2,000 people.” Oregonian
WHY DOES THE PRESIDENT KEEP TALKING ABOUT THIS COGNITIVE TEST?! … WAPO’S ASHLEY PARKER and WILLIAM WAN: “Trump said he was first asked to repeat a set of words — ‘person,’ ‘woman,’ ‘man,’ ‘camera,’ ‘TV,’ he said, offering a hypothetical example — and then, later in the assessment after some time had elapsed, he was again asked whether he remembered those same words, in order.
“‘And they say … “Go back to that question, and repeat them. Can you do it?”’ Trump said, mimicking the doctors administering the exam. ‘And you go, “Person, woman, man, camera, TV.” They say, “That’s amazing. How did you do that?” I do it because I have, like, a good memory, because I’m cognitively there.’
“But medical and public health experts stress that the cognitive exam is not what Trump seems to think it is — an indicator of IQ or a cudgel to be wielded against a political opponent like a debate challenge. Experts say the president’s fixation on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment — or MoCA, as it is sometimes called — is particularly puzzling because the test is normally administered only if someone is concerned that they or their loved ones may be experiencing dementia or other cognitive decline.
“Getting a perfect score — as Trump has repeatedly claimed he did — merely signifies that the test-taker probably does not have a cognitive impairment as measured by the exam. …
“‘It’s not meant to measure IQ or intellectual skill in anyway,’ said Ziad Nasreddine, the neurologist who created the test. “If someone performs well, what it means is they can be ruled out for cognitive impairment that comes with diseases like Alzheimer’s, stroke or multiple sclerosis. That’s it.’” WaPo
ELENA SCHNEIDER: “Georgia Democrats think this is their year — and Biden’s VP pick could help”: “Georgia Democrats are close to tipping the state their way for the first time in years this November, and they want Joe Biden to give it a nudge with a home-grown running mate.
“Retirements, resignations, the political calendar and the coronavirus pandemic have all conspired to load up Georgia’s ballot with key races this fall, including two Senate seats that could decide control of the chamber, a state House that could flip just before the legislature kicks off redistricting, competitive House races and 16 Electoral College votes that are up for grabs for the first time since the ‘90s. And two of Georgia Democrats’ highest-profile leaders — Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms and 2018 gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams — have been a part of the monthslong conversation about Biden’s vice presidential pick.
“A half-dozen Georgia Democrats granted anonymity to discuss the issue candidly conceded that both women’s lack of prior federal experience could make them long shots for the vice presidency. Some noted that Abrams has noticeably faded from public VP speculation in recent weeks, while Bottoms has enjoyed an elevated profile as she battles Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp over the response to the coronavirus. But they also said that Biden has a rare chance to tip a long-coveted state into the Democratic column with a surge of attention, investment and enthusiasm that would come with picking a running mate from Georgia.”
TRUMP’S THURSDAY — The president has nothing on his official public schedule.
PLAYBOOK READS
POLITICO MAGAZINE: “Susan Pompeo Is Just Trying to Help. Some Don’t See It That Way,” by Daniel Lippman and Nahal Toosi: “From speaking to roughly two dozen people and examining emails and audio recordings, a portrait emerges of a couple experiencing a rude introduction to the major leagues. In a vast Cabinet department with extensive resources, tightly bound by protocol and with close oversight, Mike and Susan Pompeo have imported a model more familiar to smaller, less scrutinized congressional offices on Capitol Hill: a blurry line between the appointed secretary and unappointed spouse, and among official, political and personal agendas.” … Mike Pompeo’s 732-word statement
SURREAL ESTATE … WSJ: “CNN Chief Jeff Zucker is Selling His Manhattan Home,” by Katherine Clark: “CNN chief Jeff Zucker has inked a deal to sell his Manhattan apartment. While the sale price wasn’t clear, the Upper East Side apartment had been on the market asking $17.5 million.
“If the deal closes for close to that price, the apartment would be among the priciest to have sold in New York City since the coronavirus pandemic stalled the city’s luxury housing market. Luxury home sales in Manhattan fell by about 54% in the second quarter compared to the same period last year, according to a recent report by Douglas Elliman.”
BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN: “Blocked gun sales skyrocket amid coronavirus pandemic”: “Internal FBI data reveal a jarring new stat: The number of people trying to buy guns who can’t legally own them has skyrocketed. That came as part of a surge in gun purchases in the first three months of 2020, compared to the same time period in 2019. And the change has raised concerns about gun safety.
“In March 2019, the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) ran background checks on 823,273 attempted gun buys (the system immediately greenlights the vast majority of transactions). This past March, however, NICS processed more than 1.4 million background checks––a massive spike. The most dramatic shift, though, might be in how many people the system blocked from buying guns.
“In March 2019 and February 2020, the NICS system blocked about 9,500 and 9,700, respectively. But in March 2020, it blocked more than double that amount: a whopping 23,692 gun sales. Everytown for Gun Safety — a group that advocates for tighter gun laws — obtained the numbers through a Freedom of Information Act request and shared them with POLITICO.”
POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics
BUSINESS BURST — “Tesla Posts Fourth-Consecutive Quarterly Profit, Defying Pandemic Shutdown,” by WSJ’s Tim Higgins: “Tesla Inc., for the first time in its 17-year history, reported a fourth-consecutive profitable quarter, a milestone that is sure to bolster Chief Executive Elon Musk’s pitch that he can usher in the age of fully electric cars. Defying the global coronavirus pandemic, threat of extended economic recession and Wall Street analysts who expected a loss, the Silicon Valley auto maker found a way, helped by the sale of regulatory tax credits, to eke out a $104 million profit in the second quarter.” WSJ
MEDIAWATCH — SAM DOLNICK’S AUDIO EMPIRE: “The [New York] Times will acquire Serial Productions, a group of audio’s best and most successful longform journalists, and formed a creative and strategic alliance with ‘This American Life,’ the unrivaled and iconic show that transformed audio journalism.” More details
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
SPOTTED at a Zoom fundraiser for Senate Majority PAC hosted by Jeffrey Katzenberg on Wednesday: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Marilyn Katzenberg, Katie McGrath and J.J. Abrams, Andrew and Ellen Bronfman Hauptman and Cindy and Alan Horn.
TRANSITIONS — WestExec Advisors has added former NASA Administrator Charles Frank Bolden Jr., former acting DNI Joseph Maguire and former White House CEA member Jay Shambaugh as principals. … Kiara Pesante Haughton is joining BerlinRosen as SVP of issue advocacy. She currently is comms director at Civil Rights Corps.
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Mary Crane, public affairs manager at Targeted Victory. A trend she thinks doesn’t get enough attention: “I’ve been growing fruits and vegetables for a couple years now, but it’s been fun to see gardening start to trend with more people during the pandemic. I have a lot growing in my garden this year, but I’m most excited about the handful of watermelons on the vine that should be ready to enjoy in the coming days.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Stephanie Grisham, COS and spokesperson for first lady Melania Trump … Fritz Brogan, co-founder and managing partner of Mission Group and national chair of Maverick PAC … former Justice Anthony Kennedy is 84 … Monica Lewinsky … CNN PR manager Liza Pluto … The Economist’s Lane Greene … John Mihalec … Dean Aguillen of Ogilvy Government Relations … Eric Werwa … David Brock, author and founder of Media Matters for America and American Bridge 21st Century … Kat Borgerding … Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey … Carolyn Vadino, head of comms for Gemini … Sujata Thomas, booker for MSNBC (h/ts Ben Chang) … Jennifer Darling, tax partner at PwC and the pride of Evanston, Ill., is 4-0 (h/t husband Eben) … Matt Jeanneret, EVP and COO at the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, is 53 … WaPo’s Perry Stein …
… Alex Pareene … DOT’s Aaron Moore … Melissa Brown, deputy digital director at Interior (h/t Sarah Westwood) … Tod Moore … Lithuanian PM Saulius Skvernelis is 5-0 … Stephani Englund, client strategy manager at Targeted Victory … Melinda Wittstock … NYT’s Sam Barnes … Judy Lichtman (h/t Jon Haber) … Josh Gross, SVP at Glover Park Group … former Rep. John Hall (D-N.Y.) is 72 … Alexandra Booze … Edelman’s Courtney Gray Haupt … Georgetown Law professor Itai Grinberg … Marshall Schraibman … Sarah Obenour … Joey Rault … Tracie Pough … Bridget Mary McCormack, chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court (h/t Mitchell Rivard) … Michael Bruce Hill … David Dewit … Mariane Pearl … Fay Hartog-Levin … Joel Stein … Jeremy D. Goodwin … Jim Thompson … Dan Pink (h/t Teresa Vilmain) … Brooks Emanuel … Zack Bliss
Follow us on Twitter
AMERICAN MINUTE
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Which American Pro Sports League Will Suffer Most From Being Woke?
Sports Should Be a Distraction
A happy, wonderful Thursday to all of you, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing readers.
Major League Baseball is back today and anyone who has been reading the Briefing during the plague knows what that means to me. Baseball is far and away my favorite of all the sports, and I want to be ecstatic today. Unfortunately, tedious wokeness has invaded MLB just as it has every other sport.
The anthem kneeling that’s been infecting the NFL for a few years has spread like a cultural cancer to other sports and is threatening to permanently ruin what was once a relaxing escape for millions of Americans.
Perhaps sports fans should feel lucky simply because it took politics and the wokescolds longer to start bothering us than it did Hollywood. Movies and television have been full of cringe-worthy wokeness seemingly forever now. For the most part, we fan types have still had our favorite sports to retreat to when we wanted to avoid the madness of turning all entertainment into a political statement.
It was super fun while it lasted.
I have always despised the mixing of politics and sports. In the early Twitter days, I would spend Sundays blissfully tweeting about football, commiserating with other Steelers fans when they’d have a Mike Tomlin day, and trash talking with other fans. On the then rare occasions when someone would make something political I would launch into my “no politics and sports” rant, then usually block the person.
The peril those days came from fans politicizing sports. We didn’t have to worry about the players much then.
Good times.
While it’s true that athletes have made political statements in the past, it was never this rampant. The huge difference this year, obviously, is that the leagues are now involving themselves. That, my friends, is very, very problematic for any number of reasons.
Just as with movies or television shows, once one political side is endorsed at least half of the audience is offended. In entertainment, the split is probably around 50/50. In sports, however, that may be even more weighted to one side, and its not the side that’s getting all of the political love from the leagues. The politics that the pro sports leagues are cheering on right now may be alienating more than half of their audiences, especially in the NFL.
Of the four major pro sports leagues in America, the NHL has been the least affected by the current drama. MLB — both players and the league itself — had been relatively benign until recently. The ChiCom favorite NBA has been the worst league thus far, opting to paint “Black Lives Matter” on its courts. The fear of many NFL fans is that the league is about to have a “hold my beer” woke moment.
The NFL recently announced that it would allow social justice decals on players’ helmets this season. This is the league that just a few years ago fined a player for wearing different colored shoes to honor his recently deceased mother.
Of all the major American sports, the NFL is probably taking the most risk with the league-sanctioned wokeness. There was quite a lot of backlash from fans in 2017 when the kneeling fever ran through the league like wildfire. Many, like me, just stopped watching games. I belong to a demographic that the NFL has just recently begun to win back.
Football Fans Voice Displeasure But NFL Isn’t Listening
They obviously don’t care.
Sports fans who just want to watch sports are obviously going to have to suffer through this season. I’m actually glad that the baseball season is going to be shorter now. The best we can hope for is that this is a phase. If it isn’t, it will be RIP sports and the COVID cancel riot plague year will have claimed another victim.
But I Still Have Moments of Sports Fan Optimism
PJM Linktank
The elf needs to go on the shelf. Need More Reasons Not to Trust Dr. Fauci? Here You Go
De Blasio Finally Broke Up the Month-Long BLM ‘Occupation’ in NYC. Is Trump Responsible?
Well, well…Gun Sales Spike in 2020, Driven by New Purchases by Black Men and Women
This Black Lives Matter Activist Thought KNEELING on a White Baby’s Neck Was a Good Idea…
Not a chance. Will Joe Biden Ever Face Difficult Questions From the Media? Mark Levin Says No
YES. YES. YES. Trump Dispatches Federal Law Enforcement to Combat Crime Waves in U.S. Cities
Federal Judge May Release Muslim Who Pleaded Guilty in Plot to Behead Pamela Geller
Basement Boy wants a pony. Biden Spending Plan Will Hit $10 Trillion Over the Next Decade
Russian Defense Ministry Says New Coronavirus Vaccine Is Ready and Safe
Nancy Pelosi Calls the Wuhan Coronavirus ‘the Trump Virus’
Minneapolis Is About to Replace Police With…What? We Have Serious Questions.
‘We Thought It Was a War Out There’ — 15 Shot at Funeral for Chicago Shooting Victim
GOP, Dems Still Far Apart on Next Round of Coronavirus Aid
VDH: Why This Revolution Isn’t Like the ’60s
The King Stallion Helicopter: A Relic from the Past That We Can No Longer Afford
VodkaPundit: Insanity Wrap #11: California’s Lunatic Booze Rules, Plus Biden Can’t Hack It
Worst Mayors in America Demand Congress Stop Trump From Ruining Their Riots
YAHTZEE! Is St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner Framing the McCloskeys?
WHAT?! Joe Biden’s Gobsmackingly Absurd Claim About Trump’s ‘Racism’
Black Votes Matter. Watch Out Biden: Black Voters Are Moving Toward Donald Trump
VIP
The Real Reason Democrats Won’t Condemn the Deadly George Floyd Riots
My Advice for Antonio Sabato Jr. on His Plans for a ‘Conservative Movie Studio’
VIP Gold
VIP Gold Live Chat with VodkaPundit, Kruiser, and Preston – Replay Available
Socialists Make Gains In NY Elections. Could That Actually Help The 2A?
The Most Compelling Case for Trump 2020 Was Just Made by Someone Who Despises Him
From the Mothership and Beyond
A Second Wave 2A Sanctuary Movement Is Hitting Virginia
THIS Is How You Stop Gun Thefts: 42 Year Sentence for Gun Thief
PA DA Sees His First “Ghost Gun” Case
42 Percent Of Crimes Against Truckers Are Violent
‘Merica. Virginia Sheriff Takes First Steps To Deputize Thousands Of Armed Citizens
Schlichter: Enough Whining About Trump’s Mean Tweets
Der Bidengaffer is a Klansman. Joe Biden Just Said Something That’s Pretty Racist About Asians
A little tardy…Alas, Cities Finally Confirm What We Already Knew Regarding the Spike in COVID Cases
Conservative Publication Scalps ‘The Atlantic’ For Peddling Fake Story About a Police Shooting
Barr Drops a Reality Check About Black Homicide, Violent Crime
Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s Home Vandalized, Hours Later She Votes To Protect Police Funding
Media Hails Wall Of Moms As Portland Heroes. Here’s Why They Are Not.
Yeesh, these idiots. Is Minneapolis Now Defunding The Policing Alternatives, Too?
Good luck with that…Oregon AG Seeks Restraining Order Against Federal Officers In Portland
Hmm: Did A Google Glitch Expose A Blacklist Of Conservative Sites?
Yelps says more than half of restaurants temporarily closed are now permanently shuttered
ESPN’s Sage Steele Delivers a Fierce Reply to Allegedly Being Excluded for Not Being ‘Black Enough’
Is A Cure Finally Here? U.S. Deal for 100 Million Doses of Potential Vaccine Inspires Optimism
Los Angeles County Officials Rush to Judgement in “Reimagining” De-Funding Priorities
You’ve Heard the ‘Hairy Legs’ Video? Prepare for Creepy Joe Biden, Part Two, What the Nurses Did
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Responds to Trump Moving Agents Into Her City by Victimizing Herself
Sean Hannity apologizes to Fox viewers for ‘misunderstanding’ with Tucker Carlson
Un-cancel culture. Baltimore’s Italian American community plans new statue to honor Columbus
‘Will they stop at burning an empty church?’: Anti-Christian attacks rise in Europe
Tesla picks Texas, will redesign Model Y for European production
Keyless entry is key to stealing other people’s cars for European crime ring
SCIENCE! Cutting screen time lowers risk of death, study finds
Not the Bee: Armed 10-year-old kids are committing carjackings in Chicago, police warn
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
This is a fantastic Rickles interview. One of my favorites.
Don’t tell the trolls who only read the headlines that we have fun at the end.
___
Kruiser Twitter
Kruiser Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.
WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
White House Dossier
http://www.whitehousedossier.com
P.O. Box 27211,
Washington, DC 20038Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: Is the Economy on the Brink?
Plus, Democrats renew push for voting rights reform.
The Dispatch Staff | 2 hr | 4 |
Happy Thursday! Don’t forget: Sarah, Jonah, Steve, and David doing a Dispatch Live tonight at 8:30 p.m. ET/5:30 p.m. PT. These semi-regular livestream events feature a lively discussion of current events where viewers can ask questions and participate in a Live Chat—but they are open only to our paid members.
Upgrade today and look for our Dispatch Live emails in your inbox for instructions on how to join us tonight and at future engagements.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- The United States confirmed 70,778 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday, with 8.9 percent of the 796,395 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 1,192 deaths were attributed to the virus on Wednesday, bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 143,184.
- The Department of Health and Human Services announced a $1.95 billion agreement with Pfizer to purchase 100 million doses of its experimental coronavirus vaccine, pending its approval and manufacture, with the ability to buy an additional 500 million doses if needed. This agreement comes two weeks after the Trump administration’s $1.6 billion agreement with Novavax for 100 million doses of its vaccine.
- The State Department ordered Chinese officials to close and vacate their consulate in Houston, Texas, accusing China of engaging “for years in massive illegal spying and influence operations throughout the United States against U.S. government officials and American citizens.”
- A funeral for a Chicago man who was killed in a drive-by shooting last week was disrupted by another drive-by shooting, which left 15 injured. At least one of the shooting victims is in “extremely critical condition.”
- Following on the heels of an executive order directing law enforcement agencies to protect federal property last month, President Trump announced he will be sending a “surge” of hundreds of federal officers to Chicago, Albuquerque, and Kansas City. “Under no circumstances will I allow Donald Trump’s troops to come to Chicago and terrorize our residents,” Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot tweeted earlier this week.
- The governors of Ohio, Indiana, and Minnesota each announced on Wednesday mask mandates that will take effect in the coming days. More than half of the 50 states now have some form of mask mandate in place.
- Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced a bill that would update the Voting Rights Act of 1965—in the name of the late Rep. John Lewis—to restore voter rights protections overturned in a 2013 Supreme Court case.
- The House of Representatives voted on a bipartisan basis—305-113—to remove statues and busts of Confederate figures and leaders from the U.S. Capitol. The bill, which is unlikely to advance in the Senate, would require states—who are each allowed to send two monuments to the Capitol—to replace “all statues of individuals who voluntarily served” the Confederacy.
- A new Cato Institute/YouGov poll found that 62 percent of Americans—including 52 percent of Democrats and 77 percent of Republicans—believe today’s political climate prevents them from saying things they believe because others might find those beliefs offensive.
Is the Economy About to Get a Lot Worse?
After days of fervent and at times hostile discussion, the Senate Republican proposal for a new infusion of federal spending to keep the economy limping along is beginning to take shape. The White House and Sen. Richard Shelby, who chairs the powerful Appropriations Committee, announced Wednesday night they had hashed out a deal on the appropriate levels of spending, which they said will be announced later today. (Though this morning’s Politico Playbook offers reasons to be skeptical.)
The proposal is expected to refuel several key measures from the March CARES Act, including the Paycheck Protection Program small business funding, another round of direct payments to many Americans, and money to extend unemployment insurance, according to a Politico report from Wednesday. It would also provide billions for schools and to buttress state-level coronavirus testing efforts.
The fight over the next COVID relief package is taking place against an economic backdrop that increasingly feels like a calm before the storm. Looking back over the last few months, some economic indicators would suggest a slow but steady resurgence from our near economic full-stop back in March. After soaring from 4.4 percent to nearly 15 percent in April, the unemployment rate ticked down encouragingly in May and June to around 11 percent. Stocks have largely recovered from their wild springtime plunge. The housing market remains surprisingly strong.
Democrats Renew Voting Rights Push
Tributes to civil rights icon Rep. John Lewis have bubbled up from far and wide since his passing on Friday, but the one Lewis himself might appreciate most came on Wednesday, and it came from Sen. Pat Leahy of Vermont.
As Audrey writes in an explainer for the site, Leahy’s legislation “seeks to restore and expand provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) that were struck down in 2013 by the Supreme Court’s ruling in a case called Shelby v. Holder.” The legalese is a little tricky here, so let’s try and break it down.
Does the Voting Rights Act still prohibit any “standard, practice, or procedure” that “results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen … to vote on account of race or color?”
Yes. Those protections as outlined in the 1965 VRA are still intact, even after Shelby.
So what is the purpose of Leahy’s legislation?
It has to do with Section 4 of the VRA, and something called “preclearance.” From Audrey:
Democrats are keen on reinstating the “coverage formula” of the VRA, which dictated which states and voting precincts needed to obtain federal “preclearance” before changing their election laws. When the law was initially passed, this coverage formula included states and local voting precincts that had a history of “literacy and knowledge tests, good moral character requirements, [and] the need for vouchers from registered voters,” and had “less than 50 percent voter registration or turnout in the 1964 Presidential election.” Included in Section 4(b) of the VRA, the formula was originally set to expire after five years but was reauthorized several times by Congress until the Supreme Court struck it down in 2013.
Worth Your Time
- As we seek to root out anti-Semitism, the life and legacy of John Lewis serve as helpful guidance. In Tablet Magazine, James Kirchick pays tribute to Lewis’s lifelong fight against hatred in all of its many forms, even when it isolated him from his colleagues and allies in Congress. “Along with the rest of the country, Jews have been called upon these past two months to recognize the pain and suffering of their black fellow citizens. That is right and just,” he writes. “But if the extraordinary life of John Lewis teaches us anything, it’s that empathy should not be a one-way street—just like hatred is not a one-way street.”
- After a lifelong career studying education policy, Thomas Sowell published his latest book—Charter Schools and Their Enemies—last month on his 90th birthday. Jason L. Riley’s op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, aptly titled “Thomas Sowell Has Been Right From the Start,” outlines the various ways in which charter schools level the playing field for black students. “In many cases, inner-city charter-school students are outperforming their peers in the wealthiest and whitest suburban school districts in the country,” he writes. “In New York City, for example, the Success Academy charter schools have effectively closed the academic achievement gap between black and white students.”
Presented Without Comment
Toeing the Company Line
- Check out the most recent episode of The Remnant for Jonah’s latest bout of conservative egg-headery—and a healthy dose of rank punditry to boot—with Matthew Continetti of the American Enterprise Institute.
- Vladimir Putin’s interference with Western liberal democracies isn’t limited to the United States. Be sure to read Tom Joscelyn’s latest Vital Interests( 🔒)for a deep dive into Russia’s meddling in the United Kingdom.
- Jonah’s Wednesday G-File (🔒) is on the difference between a Republican and a conservative—and why that distinction matters now more than ever. “There’s nothing in the Constitution or conservatism that says a duly elected member of Congress, the first branch of government, is obliged to agree with the president just because he or she’s a member of the same party,” Jonah writes. “If you think surrendering in Afghanistan or withdrawing from Germany or defenestrating Anthony Fauci are the right positions, make the argument. If you think they’re not, make the argument. Don’t blather at me that they’re the right policies because they’re Trump’s.”
- On the site day, Brad Polumbo looks at an idea being kicked around for the new COVID relief package, and that’s a “back-to-work” bonus that would reward those who went back to work with extra cash. Right-of-center economists aren’t so sure the plan is a good idea.
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), Nate Hochman (@njhochman), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
4 |
LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
THE DAILY WIRE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DESERET NEWS
|
BRIGHT
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE— Recently-released fundraising reports indicate a mismatch between the best-funded GOP candidates and the districts in which they are competing. — At this point, Democrats are more likely to net House seats than Republicans, although we’re still not expecting much net change overall. — There are eight rating changes this week: seven in favor of Democrats, one in favor of Republicans. Table 1: House rating changes
Big GOP fundraisers not matched to best district targetsRecently-finalized House fundraising reports covering April through June reinforced an emerging theme of this year’s House elections: The Republicans have a number of well-funded challengers, but those challengers are not necessarily matched to the seats that the GOP has the best chances of winning. Some of the top GOP fundraisers, for instance, included 2018 nominee Young Kim (R) against Rep. Gil Cisneros (D, CA-39); businesswoman Genevieve Collins (R) against Rep. Colin Allred (D, TX-32); and veteran Wesley Hunt (R) against Rep. Lizzie Fletcher (D, TX-7). But these challengers are all trying to win seats that Hillary Clinton carried in 2016 and that these now-incumbent Democrats flipped in 2018. All of these districts profile as places where Joe Biden seems likely to run ahead of Clinton’s 2016 showing. Historically, it’s difficult to beat an incumbent House member while that incumbent’s party is carrying the district for president. There are typically a few instances each cycle when that happens, but only a few. For instance, this happened in only two districts in 2016 and two districts in 2012, per a count by National Journal’s Alex Clearfield. The incumbents who lose these races sometimes have considerable problems specific to them: The two who lost in 2016 were Reps. Scott Garrett (R, NJ-5), an ideologue out of step with his suburban district who attracted negative headlines for refusing to pay dues to the National Republican Congressional Committee over the NRCC’s support of gay candidates, and Frank Guinta (R, NH-1), who had major campaign finance problems. Both of those districts were won by Donald Trump in 2016, but only narrowly. In other words, the Republicans may be able to win one or a couple of these targeted seats if their candidates perform really well and the Democrat makes mistakes, but they probably won’t win many. Meanwhile, Republican outside groups are going to have to carry a good deal of weight in some of the redder districts where Democrats are playing defense. For instance, Rep. Kendra Horn (D, OK-5) may be the most vulnerable House Democratic incumbent, but she is sitting on a $2.6 million warchest while her two potential GOP opponents, state Sen. Stephanie Bice and businesswoman Terry Neese, each have only about $100,000 cash on hand as they head to an Aug. 25 runoff for the right to challenge Horn in November. That won’t necessarily prevent the ultimate nominee from beating Horn, but this race is no slam dunk for the GOP. That speaks to a larger observation about the House map: In all likelihood, some Democratic incumbents will lose, but no Democratic incumbent is an outright underdog as of now — even members who hold seats that Trump won by double digits in 2018, like Horn or Reps. Joe Cunningham (D, SC-1), Collin Peterson (D, MN-7), Max Rose (D, NY-11), and Xochitl Torres Small (D, NM-2). In fact, some of these members have a decent chance to win. One of them, Torres Small, moves from Toss-up to Leans Democratic in this update. Part of the reason why Torres Small is in the House to begin with is that she faced an opponent who did not distinguish herself in 2018: former state legislator Yvette Herrell (R). Herrell is once again the GOP nominee in NM-2 after winning a nasty primary over businesswoman Claire Chase (R), who some Republicans thought could offer the party a fresh start in the district. Torres Small more than tripled Herrell’s campaign spending in 2018; that edge could get even more pronounced in 2020, as Torres Small holds a $3.9 million to $379,000 cash on hand edge over Herrell as of the most recent reporting. This is definitely a GOP-leaning district: Trump won it 50%-40%, with another 8% going to home state Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson. In all likelihood, Trump will carry the district again, although perhaps with a reduced margin. The race is arguably very close right now — a Republican internal poll released recently had it tied 46%-46% (the poll did not include presidential numbers for the district) — and probably will be close in the end. But we suspect Torres Small will be able to generate enough crossover support to hang on to her seat. We are also moving a Trump-won open seat, IA-2, from Toss-up to Leans Democratic. This southeast Iowa seat has been held for the past decade and a half by Rep. Dave Loebsack (D), a surprise winner in 2006 who became an impressive electoral performer, winning by close but clear margins even in the bad Iowa Democratic years of 2010, 2014, and 2016. Donald Trump won IA-2 by four points — four years after Mitt Romney lost the district by 13. Still, if Joe Biden runs better in Iowa than Hillary Clinton did — polls in the state are roughly tied after Trump won statewide by 10 points — Biden may carry this district, and Democrats have the better-funded candidate, former state Sen. Rita Hart (D), against state Sen. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R), who lost to Loebsack in 2008, 2010, and 2014. Just like NM-2, this is a very competitive race, but it’s one where we see a little bit of a Democratic edge. The Republicans’ best target in Iowa is probably Rep. Abby Finkenauer (D, IA-1) in northeast Iowa. IA-1 is a Trump-won district where the GOP does have a very well-funded candidate, state Rep. Ashley Hinson (R), although Hinson suffered bad headlines this week when reports emerged that some of her campaign materials contained plagiarized material. Hinson apologized, and — rightly or wrongly — we don’t think plagiarism accusations carry quite the sting that they once did in politics. Meanwhile, a number of Republican seats appear to be getting more vulnerable, both because of Biden’s current lead in the presidential race and the emergence of well-funded Democratic challengers. We took a close look at Texas a few weeks ago and noted what a close presidential race might mean in that state. Even though Trump won first-term Rep. Chip Roy’s (R, TX-21) Austin-to-San Antonio district by 10 points, Roy had a close race in 2018 and the district has demographic characteristics (highly-educated and diverse) that suggest it is rapidly approaching swing seat territory. Roy’s challenger, former state Sen. Wendy Davis (D), will be familiar to readers: She lost to now-Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) in a landslide in 2014. But Texas was a much different and much more Republican state just six years ago. Davis has a substantial cash-on-hand advantage over Roy. Neither candidate is particularly moderate: Davis became best known for a filibuster of an anti-abortion bill, while Roy was criticized by members of both parties for holding up unanimous consent of a disaster relief bill in 2019. Roy’s saving grace may be that even if Texas is becoming less red at the presidential level, realignment sometimes stalls down the ballot, which could allow him to run ahead of Trump in the district. But this race is real enough that we are moving it from Leans Republican to Toss-up. Also moving to more competitive categories are Reps. French Hill (R, AR-2) and Richard Hudson (R, NC-8), who represent right-of-center districts and will face Black candidates who outraised the incumbents this quarter: state Sen. Joyce Elliott (D) in the former, and former North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Pat Timmons-Goodson (D) in the latter. Both districts have sizable Black voting blocs and some suburban swaths. Spirited Democratic campaigns in each could put the districts in play, particularly if the presidential race in each narrows from 2016 (Trump won both districts by roughly 10 points). In North Carolina, Gov. Roy Cooper (D-NC) is favored for reelection, and Democrats are making a serious play to flip the state House out of Republican hands. NC-8 overlaps with several key legislative districts, so both parties should be watching the area closely. Two very longshot Republican districts move from Safe Republican to Likely Republican this week: Reps. Mike Turner (R, OH-10) and Joe Wilson (R, SC-2). This is mostly out of an abundance of caution, although both were outraised in the second quarter. OH-10 is a right-leaning but swingy district covering the Dayton area that is more competitive on paper than Turner’s typically outstanding performance would suggest. SC-2, meanwhile, covers parts of west-central South Carolina, and is somewhat diverse and somewhat highly educated. Trump won it by 19 points, down from Romney’s 25 in 2016, and in 2018 the district voted almost exactly the same as the state in the gubernatorial race, suggesting it may be becoming a better reflection of the state as a whole. Ultimately, if Democrats put South Carolina in play for president and Senate — we are skeptical and rate both statewide races Likely Republican — this is the kind of place where they’d have to perform well. It makes some sense, then, to also call this district Likely Republican. Wilson won by 13 points in 2018 against a financially overmatched opponent. He remains best known for shouting “You lie” at then-President Obama during Obama’s address to Congress on health care in 2009. These are very much dark horse Democratic targets. One dark horse Republican target comes back onto our ratings board this week: Rep. Ron Kind (D, WI-3). Kind has won easy victories even as his western Wisconsin district has trended Republican: Trump carried it by five points. Republicans appear to have a real challenger this time, veteran Derrick Van Orden (R), who raised a surprising amount in the second quarter (about $550,000). Kind still has a huge cash-on-hand edge, and if Biden carries Wisconsin, he likely will do better in WI-3 than Clinton did (and may flip it from Trump). But a Trump rally and a real challenge from Van Orden could mean more work for Kind — his district is vulnerable enough that it belongs in our ratings, if only as Likely Democratic. Van Orden was one of a handful of Republicans with military backgrounds who turned in unexpectedly impressive fundraising quarters, outraising Democratic incumbents who hold swing seats we rate as Likely Democratic; others are Alek Skarlatos (R), challenging Rep. Peter DeFazio (D, OR-4); Tyler Kistner (R), challenging Rep. Angie Craig (D, MN-2); and Sean Parnell (R), challenging Rep. Conor Lamb (D, PA-17). Our general sense is that these candidates are all running in the wrong year for their party, but they’ve also forced observers to take notice of their campaigns. ConclusionThis week’s rating changes mean we now have 229 House seats at least leaning Democratic, 193 at least leaning Republican, and 13 Toss-ups. Splitting the Toss-ups seven to six Democratic would yield a one-seat Democratic gain from 2018, when Democrats won a 235-200 majority. At this point, a modest Democratic gain seems to be the likeliest House outcome. For Republicans to make a significant dent in the Democratic House majority, they need at least one of two big-picture things to happen: The president’s numbers need to improve markedly, or the Democratic lead in the House generic ballot (currently in the high single digits in polling averages) needs to shrink. The former might suggest overall improvement in the electoral environment for Republicans at all levels. The latter might suggest that even while Biden may be retaining his lead in the presidential race, voters would be more open to splitting their tickets to put a check on a hypothetical Biden administration. If neither of these things happen, Republicans may be heading for a redux of 2008: losses at the presidential, Senate, and House levels in the midst of national crisis. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Pandemic’s Potential to Create a Lost Generation of Voters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By Steven R. Okun and Thurgood Marshall, Jr Guest Columnists, Sabato’s Crystal Ball |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE— College students are a key voting bloc whose participation in this year’s election may be blunted by the public health crisis. — Major efforts are needed to ensure that students know how to vote, take the steps to vote, and make sure their vote is counted. Time is now to address student voting this fallThe United States’ 20 million college students are a significant voting bloc and have the capability of deciding elections. For that to occur, first they must register to vote. The best way to do this, and then to get these college students to actually vote, requires direct outreach. Traditionally, that occurs on-campus — something that COVID-19 has made particularly challenging this year. “Dorm Storms” of registering student voters in their residence halls will not be happening. For this year’s coronavirus campaign, new ways must be undertaken to find, register and educate these voters, and then to make sure their vote counts when they do so. Given a recent survey finding that Joe Biden holds a 34-point advantage over Donald Trump with 18-29 year olds, if the 2020 presidential race is just as close in key states as the one in 2016, fewer students voting could keep the former vice president from winning a race he otherwise would have. In 2016, over 50 colleges had more students than the presidential margins in their states. Certainly, fewer college students voting could create the potential for dozens of down-ballot races to be influenced. Not enough resources are being allocated to find ways to ensure students are registered to vote, and follow through on voting. There is a danger that we might not even reach the previous 48% threshold of college students who voted in 2016. The impact of a lack of students voting this November does not end in 2020. Many college students register and vote during the one presidential election while they are at school. As voting in college leads to the habit of a person continuing to vote onwards, this will impact our civics for years to come. Much needs to be done, and the window closes soon. Expat voting provides a roadmapOne group of U.S. citizens always faces the challenges that this year’s college students face when it comes to registering and voting — Americans living abroad. Expatriates always have to register remotely, get an absentee ballot, and ensure the ballot is received by Election Day. This year, college students face the same challenges in needing to learn how to register remotely and then properly vote away from (or at) their family residence. How do they register? In which state do they even register? Then, how do they vote? What do they need to do to request an absentee ballot, receive it, and return it so it arrives before the deadline? Many 18-22 year olds, in college or not, have no clue. When the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) at Tufts University asked youth if they could register to vote online in their state, one-third said they did not know, and one-quarter who said yes were incorrect. In addition, only 24% reported having voted by mail before. A 2018 Fairfax County (Virginia) focus group found many college students who went so far as to take the initiative to register and get an absentee ballot simply failed to send it back because they did not know where to get stamps. The Federal Voting Assistance Program provides voting assistance for U.S. service members, their families and overseas citizens. Vote From Abroad, a non-partisan platform, helps U.S. expatriates by providing the information necessary for filling out federal forms related to voting overseas. In fact, many U.S. citizens living overseas can even go to the U.S. embassies and consulates in their country and use the diplomatic pouch for free mail service from embassies and consulates to a U.S. sorting facility. In their own way, colleges and universities, political parties, and NGOs such as the non-partisan Campus Election Engagement Project need to help college students do just the same — and they need to be adequately funded to do so. Obstacles exist for students after they register to voteThe United States Postal Service has been a hallmark of American society. Now we face a pair of unpredictable challenges to the postal system: a pandemic that brings operational and financial challenges coupled with presidential threats to the wellbeing of the Postal Service. The understandable delays in the delivery of ballots due to COVID-19 could trigger a higher than normal incidence of mishandled or misplaced ballots. Voters will need to send in their ballots earlier this year than usual. They need to know that. An NPR analysis found at least 65,000 absentee or mail-in ballots have been rejected this primary season because they arrived past the deadline. Imagine how many ballots will arrive late when all 50 states and the District of Columbia vote on the same day, especially with some college students needing to mail their ballots from out of state. Even when these ballots are received in a timely manner, mail-in ballots can be thrown out by a challenge from election officials with relative ease if they are marked incorrectly or if the signatures do not match — tactics used for a century in parts of the country to keep Blacks from voting in the face of federal civil rights laws guaranteeing the vote. Local election officials can be biased against college students as well. As former Ohio Gov. Dick Celeste (D) explains, these administrators sometimes sought to put obstacles in the students’ way when it came to registering and then voting. The attitude was, “We don’t want kids who don’t pay taxes and won’t stay here once they graduate voting in our town.” The same discrimination can occur with mail-in ballots that look like they are from a young person — especially one voting out of state. These ballots could be disproportionately discarded at higher rates for perceived discrepancies in their signatures without proper oversight. The parties need to be prepared to deal with these specific challenges come Election Day. And it’s not just the presidency that could be impacted. The Crystal Ball downgraded the reelection chances of Rep. Peter DeFazio, a 17-term Democratic congressman in Oregon whose district contains Eugene (University of Oregon) and Corvallis (Oregon State University), because if those students don’t vote, his chances for reelection drop. With fewer student voters, swing districts across the country might end up being red instead of blue. The time is nowThe integrity of the American electoral process requires ensuring the newest generation of voters register and then vote — and have their votes counted. These vitally important voters have already been tested more than they could have possibly bargained for in the pandemic era and their inability to vote, or a mishandling of their votes when they do so, could easily alienate them for years to come. We already know most schools will not allow the same type of interaction as in the past in terms of registering students to vote, if they are open at all. What are we waiting for? Joe Biden recently said that thinking about access to voting keeps him up most at night: “Making sure everyone who wants to vote can vote. Making sure that the vote is counted, making sure we’re all trusting in the integrity of the results of the election.” We need a focused effort to tackle these challenges. That starts with a comprehensive plan to identify and address each and every potential pressure point in our system. And it must also include a focused educational effort to fully inform students, election administrators, and the general population to support those undertaking these initiatives. And it needs to start now.
Read the fine printLearn more about the Crystal Ball and find out how to contact us here. Sign up to receive Crystal Ball e-mails like this one delivered straight to your inbox. Use caution with Sabato’s Crystal Ball, and remember: “He who lives by the Crystal Ball ends up eating ground glass!” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Copyright by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia |
THE BLAZE
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … An 18-year-old self-proclaimed “freedom fighter” wants a Chicago police officer fired for allegedly knocking out her teeth amid a riot in Grant Park on Friday, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.Miracle Boyd claimed an officer swatted a cellphone from her hand, WMAQ-TV reported, adding that she said the phone struck her face and knocked out some of her … Read more
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA |
THE FEDERALIST
|
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Leftists keep saying ‘secret police.’ I do not think it means what they think it means.
- ‘Nurses breathing in my nostrils’ is up there among strangest Joe Biden sound bites
- Should Christians consider Kanye West for President?
- Graphic video of ‘unarmed’ man killed by cops yields zero riots because of his skin color
- Yale professor explains how the left is killing people by panning Hydroxychloroquine
- DeAnna Lorraine exposes just how low the COVID-19 numbers really are
- A phony ‘pandemic’ of stats and symbolism
- Twitter’s QAnon purge should motivate every patriot, Q-supporter or not
- White Fragility rebuttal introduction
Leftists keep saying ‘secret police.’ I do not think it means what they think it means.
Posted: 23 Jul 2020 05:42 AM PDT For the past couple of days, Democrats and their mainstream media puppets have been invoking the phrase “secret police” when talking about the Homeland Security officers deployed to various leftist cities across the nation. This is an attempt to make this seem like some totalitarian regime cracking down on political dissidents through mass abductions and draconian enforcement on law-abiding citizens. This is worse than propaganda. It’s an outright lie. It doesn’t even make sense when we consider the transparency the administration has engaged in when discussing these “secret police” officers. Not only are they announcing when, where, and how many officers will be deployed, they’re even stating their individual missions and areas of operations. That’s not how “secret police” work. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. But the narrative lives on. In the latest episode of the NOQ Report Podcast, I dove into this topic and explained why it’s so important for the left to try to push out this narrative. They’re failing miserably in cities like Seattle, Portland, and Chicago as neutered local law enforcement can’t get a handle or establish real deescalation of violent rioters posing as protesters. Buildings are being burned. Statues are still coming down. People are being beaten because they’re out on the streets at the wrong time. This isn’t how America should operate. It’s important to note that I am against the use of federal law enforcement for local matters 99.99% of the time. The bar to reach for such things to happen is very high. Unfortunately, we’ve reached it. There are American citizens losing everything right in front of our eyes and feckless radical progressive “leaders” in these cities and states are pandering to the mob. The only way this ends is for law and order to be restored. If local and state law enforcement is prevented from doing it, then the White House is forced to act. And they are. I also discussed a funny quip by Joe Biden as he discussed how nurses used to breath into his nostrils to stir him. That was the fun one. The not-so-fun segment came at the end when I discussed the reality that Joe Biden’s peaceful protesters are destroying America. Yes, it’s very similar to the first segment, but it takes it from an election-year angle. This is a longer podcast than normal but definitely worth a listen. These must be the worst-kept secret police ever assembled. There’s literally nothing secret about them. They’re being deployed to do what weak Democratic leadership refuses to allow local law enforcement to do. What choice does President Trump have? Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Leftists keep saying ‘secret police.’ I do not think it means what they think it means. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
‘Nurses breathing in my nostrils’ is up there among strangest Joe Biden sound bites
Posted: 23 Jul 2020 01:26 AM PDT Joe Biden’s tenuous connection with the real world seems to be slipping even further into the abyss. His mental acuity issues are well documented, but it’s the times when he seems semi-lucid that should really concern people. The anecdotes he tells and the information he chooses to put out there on the campaign trail are telling. The latest version is 12 seconds of pure silliness.
In the latest episode of Conservative News Briefs, JD examines not only the way Joe Biden’s mind is working today, but also the lukewarm defense his “supporters” are putting up for him. They aren’t trying to prove that he’s mentally capable. They’re simply saying, “Ya, but Trump…” The DNC is hoping Joe Biden never sets foot on a debate stage before the election. In fact, they’re doing everything they can to prevent it. Clips like this are all the reason anyone needs in order to understand why. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post ‘Nurses breathing in my nostrils’ is up there among strangest Joe Biden sound bites appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Should Christians consider Kanye West for President?
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 09:47 PM PDT America has been craving someone to break the political duopoly for decades. Furthermore America has not had a Christian President in decades. Enter Kanye West for President. He launched himself into the fray by calling the nation back to God. I do believe that politics is a legitimate realm for Christian influence to take hold and spread the Gospel, just as athletics and education are. If we are to believe that Kanye West is a genuinely born again believer, then the question of supporting our brother in Christ is worth asking. For the sake of this question, let us assume that he is. On abortion, Kanye West would be poised to be the most pro-abolition President in the modern abortion era. From my perspective Kanye seems traumatized by the possibility he would have been aborted as well as his daughter. He adds a level of humanity to the issue that not even Trump does, and Trump is the President that has set the highest mark on this issue however low this bar may be. But it is dubious how much Kanye can feasibly accomplish on this issue. Will he appoint justices that will overturn Roe V Wade? Trump hasn’t. Will he unilaterally defund Planned Parenthood? This I think he could do, but his success will be determined by his willingness to defy the courts, like Abraham Lincoln. On other issues, Kanye is shaky. I don’t agree with him on “criminal justice reform” and there doesn’t seem to be much of a platform. Furthermore, with Elon Musk on his team and some obscure pastor, it is foreseeable that celebrity culture will hold sway as it does presently. Ultimately, what I want and what I believe you should seek as a Christian in politics is a return on investment. When our kingdom is not of this world, then we should treat the politics of this world as transactional, not transcendent. In politics we should aim to advance the interest of the Heavenly Realm. Two criticisms of Kanye need addressing. First, I cannot take his campaign more seriously than he does. He has not done a good job of persuading me of his seriousness. Secondly, I have a hard time seeing someone who does not have himself or his family in order getting the country in order. This is not to judge a man who converted after much of these critiques were already in motion. In conclusion, I do think there is a compelling case, on the basis of Christian liberty, to make in voting Kanye West for President. This does not mean he is the only candidate a case can be made for or that a case can be made for every candidate. But such are the times when Kanye West is a legitimate consideration for such a high office. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Should Christians consider Kanye West for President? appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Graphic video of ‘unarmed’ man killed by cops yields zero riots because of his skin color
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:52 PM PDT What is the left rioting about right now? Is it police brutality or excessive use of force? If so, does that only apply to Black suspects getting killed? Does it matter if they’re armed or unarmed? Seriously, what is the radical left rioting about right now? If you really thought the answer had anything to do with race, you’ve been conned. This has to do with a revolution that has no agenda other than revolution itself. “Non-violent protesters” in Seattle, Portland, Chicago, Albuquerque, New York, Minneapolis, and in Democratic cities throughout the nation are selective with their optics and ambiguous with their narrative, and this is all for one reason. They believe they are using anarcho-communism as a pathway to Neo-Marxism, but in reality they’re just being used to destroy this nation. The latest example of rife hypocrisy came with responses or lack thereof regarding a Caucasian man who stole a car, cash, and supplies from the convenience store where he worked. He was pulled over, and when the police realized the car was reported stolen, they tried to peacefully arrest him. But he wasn’t having that, first aggressively trying to escape and take the police officers down with his car at the same time. When he crashed, he charged the cops, then started to run away, the charged them again, getting shot along the way. If this exact scenario happened with a Black suspect, there would be buildings burning to the ground today as an “unarmed” assailant was killed “in cold blood” over “stolen property.” That’s how the left spins narratives. But since he was Caucasian, he doesn’t quite fit the optics they need, nor does he fulfill requirements for the narrative they’re trying to build.
This event happened last year, but the bodycam footage was released today. Here’s how it all went down according to a statement from law enforcement: On Monday, August 19, 2019, early in the morning, David Patrick Sullivan arrived at the Shell gas station where he worked. At approximately 5:20 a.m., Sullivan stole about $1,000 in cash and loaded more than one thousand dollars-worth of store merchandise (cigarettes, pastries, lighters, energy shots, water and a gas can) into the back seat of a customer’s 2011, black, Range Rover (“Range Rover”). Sullivan then put gas in the Range Rover and left. The vehicle was reported stolen a few hours later. At approximately 11:35 a.m., BPPD Officers Colon and Tran were on patrol in a marked patrol car, traveling eastbound on Artesia Street, when Officer Colon noticed the registration tag on the Range Rover Sullivan was driving was expired. Officer Colon, who was riding in the passenger seat of the marked patrol car, directed Officer Tran to conduct a traffic stop. Officer Tran began following the Range Rover as Sullivan travelled eastbound on Artesia Street, then northbound on N. Gilbert Street. Officer Tran activated the overhead lights and ran the license plate. The license plate inquiry showed the registration expired in June of 2018. Officer Colon activated his Body Worn Camera (“BWC”), exited the patrol car with an electronic ticket book in his right hand, and approached on the driver’s side of the Range Rover. Sullivan remained in the driver’s seat and lowered the driver’s side front window as Officer Colon approached. Through the open window, Officer Colon contacted Sullivan and asked for Sullivan’s driver’s license, registration and proof of insurance. Sullivan told Officer Colon that he did not have a driver’s license and that the car belonged to his cousin. Sullivan then handed Officer Colon his California Identification Card. Sullivan was calm and cooperative. At approximately 11:37 a.m., while standing outside of the Range Rover, Officer Colon notified BPPD dispatch of the car stop and reported the Range Rover’s license plate number. After confirming that the registration was expired, Officer Colon told Sullivan to “Hang on” and then returned to the patrol car. Officer Colon informed Officer Tran that Sullivan told him the vehicle belonged to his cousin. BPPD dispatch then advised that the vehicle was stolen and that two (2) additional patrol units were dispatched to assist. Officers Colon and Tran approached on the driver’s side of the vehicle with their weapons holstered. Officer Colon opened the driver’s door and instructed Sullivan to exit the vehicle. Without warning, Sullivan suddenly grabbed the steering wheel with his left hand and started the engine with his right hand. Colon ordered Sullivan three (3) times to exit the vehicle. Sullivan, ignoring each of the exit commands, pulled his left arm free, put the Range Rover into reverse and, with the driver’s door wide open, reversed at a high rate of speed forcing Officer Colon to jump back in order to avoid being hit by the open car door. Sullivan quickly exited the Range Rover and angrily yelled back, “F*** you!”. Officer Colon backed up as Sullivan continued to charge at him, quickly closing the distance. Officer Colon fired one round at Sullivan, who was within about six (6) feet of Officer Colon at that time. Sullivan veered slightly to his right, took two (2) to three (3) more strides, and continued to angrily yell profanities at Officer Colon. Officer Colon fired a second shot while Sullivan was still within five(5) to seven (7) feet of him. Sullivan, who did not physically react to any of the shots, changed his direction, and continued running. Seeing no physical reaction from Sullivan, Officer Colon fired a third shot. Sullivan changed direction and began running toward the back of the parking lot . Sullivan abruptly stopped, turned around and began charging at Officers Colon and Tran a second time. Officer Tran was now only a couple of feet away from Officer Colon. Officer Colon continued to fire and Officer Tran fired two (2) shots at this time. Sullivan then let out a loud scream and dropped to his knees as the officers yelled at Sullivan to “Get on the ground!”Witness John Doe #1, who was standing across the street and witnessed the incident, described Sullivan’s action: “He had full intention of doing some form of physical harm or damage to the officers by his attack.” Officer Tran requested paramedics respond to their location and both officers approached Sullivan and placed him in handcuffs. By the time paramedics arrived, Sullivan was deceased. The radical left is far beyond using double-standards in their narratives and manufactured outrage. They’ve gone with chaos and selective moral values to promote Cultural Marxism. This video will be lost to history. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Graphic video of ‘unarmed’ man killed by cops yields zero riots because of his skin color appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Yale professor explains how the left is killing people by panning Hydroxychloroquine
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:18 PM PDT I’m not going to go into a long diatribe or offer study after study that demonstrates the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine as part of COVID-19 treatments. You either believe it or you don’t, and that’s likely determined by where you get your news. If you watch Fox News, Laura Ingraham had an excellent guest in Dr. Harvey Risch, Professor of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health. On the latest episode of the Rucker Report, JD examines the doctor’s claims and speculates about why the left is so bent on stopping use of a 65-year-old drug. Hint: It’s #TDS. The left says to listen to doctors. They say listen to scientists. They say listen to academics. Well, Dr. Harvey Risch qualifies on all counts. Listen to him. Hydroxychloroquine saves lives. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Yale professor explains how the left is killing people by panning Hydroxychloroquine appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
DeAnna Lorraine exposes just how low the COVID-19 numbers really are
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 06:29 PM PDT Subscribe to Let’s Talk Right Now with Jeff Dornik on Apple Podcasts. Let’s Talk Right Now is a show hosted by Jeff Dornik breaking down the day’s headlines from a Conservative perspective. Today’s stories include: Gavin Newsom closes churchesIn California, Governor Gavin Newsom took things to a whole new level when he not only re-closed indoor church services, but also completely banned in-home Bible Studies in response to the rising number of cases of COVID-19 in California. However, at the same time, he’s also allowing Black Lives Matter “protests”… I mean riots… to continue legally. This is utter hypocrisy and is simply showing Governor Newsom’s tyrannical authoritarian streak. It’s clear that he is targeting religious institutions, specifically those within the Christian faith. At some point the people of California needs to say, “Enough is enough!” I’m already at that point. Are you? Twitter cancels QanonThis is an interesting story, because the real story isn’t really the story itself. As many of you might know, Qanon is a conspiracy theory that states that President Donald Trump or someone close to him is releasing private information exposing his fight against the Deep State. Twitter has now made the call to completely censor the Qanon topic from gaining any traction on their platform. You might think: Who cares? Here’s the real problem: This is simply an attempt by Twitter to ensure that President Trump does not win the next election. While they are censoring Qanon in the name of Fake News, what’s really at play is that the Q crowd is extremely pro-Trump. If they can get them off of their platform and force them over to an echo-chamber like Parler, they’re voice will be rendered silent in the main public discourse. This is a serious problem. The Constitution provides us with the right to the freedom of speech, expression and opinion. But now Twitter is showing us that they don’t hold those same standards. While they may be going for Qanon right now, they’ll be coming for you, the Trump supporter, next. DeAnna Lorraine exposes just how low the COVID-19 numbers really areI think we all agree that the COVID-19 numbers are heavily inflated. But to what degree? DeAnna Lorraine recently posted on her twitter feed some surprisingly shocking numbers showing just how wide the disparity truly is. You will be shocked at just how much the numbers are inflated! What’s really going on here is that the medical community and the government are trying to find every possible way to inflate the numbers. One aspect of this is a public policy standpoint, where they are trying to justify the shutdowns, mail-in ballots and the impending vaccine. Another aspect of this is financial, since the hospitals get additional funding if they treat a COVID-19 patient. Is anybody shocked that the COVID-19 numbers are heavily inflated? No. Now if only we could get the mainstream media to report on this… Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post DeAnna Lorraine exposes just how low the COVID-19 numbers really are appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
A phony ‘pandemic’ of stats and symbolism
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 05:17 PM PDT From the moment America first heard the alarms of the Wuhan Flu, the nation divided into two starkly different responses to it, based not on disease awareness or any other biological trait, but on politics. Those on the right sought to take appropriate actions to mitigate the risk and save lives, while maintaining as much normalcy across the land as possible. For leftists however, the prospect of a horrific crisis was instantly met with jubilation, as they perceived the opportunity to exploit all of the fear and suffering to great political advantage. In the process, it became inescapably evident that leftist Democrats were perfectly willing to let innocent people get sick and die needlessly, if that horror and death would translate into political advantage for them. Such an assessment may sound harsh, but it is quantifiably provable and true. The pattern has been clear from the moment word of the virus reached the American people. The despicable and criminal abuses of seniors in New York will stand among the darkest episodes in American history, once the truth is told. Leftist Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo engaged in nothing short of their premeditated slaughter, by forcing Covid positive patients into nursing homes, where they could readily spread the disease among the most vulnerable and helpless. Death rates there actually did skyrocket, yet leftist Democrats and their Fake News minions merely deflected Cuomo’s criminal culpability by making their standard accusations that the carnage was all somehow President Trump’s fault. Next came the indefensible leftist Democrat war on Hydroxycloroquine (HCQ), a decades old medication with a great track record of extremely low risk use. When statistical research showed that Covid deaths were markedly lower in regions of the world where the drug was widely used for Malaria, doctors quickly put “two and two” together and began administering HCQ to severe Covid patients, with stunningly positive results. But rather than celebrating the hope and promise such an effective treatment (leftists reflexively abhor any hope and promise that doesn’t entirely focus on them), Democrat politicians and their media parakeets loudly condemned the use of the drug, in an obviously coordinated and malignant effort to fan flames of fear and mistrust over its use. Even more abhorrently and transparently, leftist Democrat governors began issuing edicts threatening legal action against doctors and pharmacists who prescribed HCQ. After months of still more needless deaths, the “genie” could no longer be kept in the bottle, and it was finally conceded that the drug works. Lives could have been saved enmasse. But that would have severely deflated the leftist Democrat campaign of fear. It is infuriatingly obvious that the last thing leftist Democrats want is for America to return to normalcy until after November, when they hope all of their abominable actions will have the desired effect of scaring Americans back into their camp, so they can win the presidential election and complete their intended takeover of the nation. The “problem,” from their sick, twisted perspective, is that not nearly enough people are suffering and dying. So they are compelled to create as much of an illusion of continuing disaster as possible. And that is the real goal of all their clamoring about the “need” for masks. Even as states are opening back up and attempting to return to normal, death rates are below what they were as far back as April. Meanwhile, we have all heard those reports of the thoroughly contrived “spikes” in “reported” Florida Covid cases, intended to create the image that Governor Ron DeSantis is somehow culpable for the supposed spread of the disease. With more than three hundred “medical” facilities (so far) having been caught in blatant fraud, as they report up to 100% of those tested as “positive,” it is undeniable that the real statistics are drastically lower, and hence not as politically beneficial to the party of fear and lies. Issuing such phony claims is tantamount to shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theater. Every perpetrator and collaborator (including those peddling the Fake News), should be held accountable for the real damage they are inflicting on a panicked population. Here in the heartland, the reality of the virus is what those on our side suspected from the beginning. It is hardly the Twenty-First Century “Black Plague,” aside from all of the superstition being peddled in its name, almost exclusively from leftists of course. Still, their need to wield it as a political weapon thoroughly supplants any consideration for the plight of fellow citizens, so the fear mongering continues unabated. Leftist Democrats are now staking the entirety of their political futures over the subject of masks. Once again, they are in a dangerously weak position, and can only succeed if those on the right retreat from the battle and allow a leftist victory. The masks are not about health or safety, but are only ineffectual symbols of leftist “virtue.” It is no coincidence that those who vehemently demand that Americans wear them just happen to be the same ones who were belligerent in their opposition to HCQ. It will be a tragedy for the nation if they prevail. Even the medical experts invoked by the left have had to admit that the paper masks are only intended to filter out pollen and dust. They are at most, 30% effective at preventing the spread of the virus, which of course equates to being 70% ineffective. Cloth masks are even worse, at 10% effective (90% ineffective, obviously). But both are 100% effective in the real mission for which the left intends them, which is to create the visual impression for Americans, every time they go out in public, that a looming and deadly enemy lurks, and may strike them dead if they don’t cede their rights and freedoms to the state and silently comply. This environment of fear has real, quantifiable consequences which are being deliberately ignored, because they “complicate” the leftist Democrat narrative. Despite the lack of bodies in the streets, Americans are being made to feel they are in a fearful “lockdown” every time they go into any public venue where masks are required. Rates of depression, drug abuse, and suicide have spiked severely, and in many locales are exceeding death rates from the virus (even including all of the fraudulent “cooked” numbers). Americans must decide whether they intend to break out of this mire of hopelessness and fear that leftist Democrats have created for them, or if they are willing to accept the ugliness of it as their future. Victory over the left starts with standing up to all of the lies and fraud. Most importantly, it requires holding every purveyor of fear accountable, from the highest office holders in the land, to local municipalities with their pint-sized tinhorn wannabes who issue unconscionable edicts, intended to cow and subjugate the American people. Bio Christopher G. Adamo is a lifelong conservative from the American Heartland. He has been involved in grassroots and state-level politics for years. His recently released book “Rules for Defeating Radicals,” subtitled “Countering the Alinsky Strategy in Politics and Culture,” is the “Go To” guide to effectively overcoming the dirty tricks of the political left. It is available at Amazon. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post A phony ‘pandemic’ of stats and symbolism appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Twitter’s QAnon purge should motivate every patriot, Q-supporter or not
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:15 AM PDT 7,000 Twitter accounts associated with QAnon have been permanently banned. 150,000 accounts are currently being suppressed, essentially made invisible. Anything associated with QAnon will be prevented from having an impact on Twitter, whether it’s hashtags or websites known to be supportive of them. What makes this worse is that QAnon is the first classification of Tweets and users ever to be singled out. Meanwhile, Antifa accounts carry on unabated. Twitter made the announcement yesterday, noting they were doing this because of “offline harm” coming from the loose group of Trump supporters and conspiracy theorists. They did not cite any examples, nor are there news stories telling of past indiscretions. Meanwhile, Antifa and Black Lives Matter use Twitter regularly to plan out riots, lootings, statues being taken down, and police stations getting torched. One does not have to be a Pizzagate-believer to be affected by this in the long run. The way Twitter has positioned this is conspicuously designed to give them easy targets among conservatives while keeping progressives safe from virtual harm. They’re attributing “multiple accounts” as something they will be cracking down on now and in the future. Many conservatives keep backup accounts based on past purges that have them concerned about Twitter’s iron fist against the right coming down on them. Thus, a much larger number than 7,000 Trump-supporting accounts are at risk. Meanwhile, the #Resist movement continues to harass conservatives without risk of getting banned. On the latest episode of the NOQ Report Podcast, JD discusses this event and what patriots must do to move forward. Should they hop on Parler or other social networking sites? Yes, but that doesn’t mean they should abandon their Twitter accounts just yet. There is still a great need to get the truth out there and until there is platform that has anywhere close to Twitter’s reach, it’s not the time to bail out on Twitter unless forced. He also discussed Aubrey Huff’s epic rant against social justice warriors in professional sports as well as the left’s willingness to keep Hydroxychloroquine positioned in a negative light despite clear evidence it’s an effective part of COVID-19 treatments. They will literally allow people to die in order to keep an upper hand against President Trump going into the November elections. Antifa plans attacks through Twitter, but QAnons are considered threats through “offline harm.” Twitter is doubling- and tripling-down on their attacks against supporters of President Trump. Conservatives must stand tall and take action. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Twitter’s QAnon purge should motivate every patriot, Q-supporter or not appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
White Fragility rebuttal introduction
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 06:31 AM PDT In the second installment of the White Fragility Rebuttal Series, we move through the introduction where Robin DiAngelo throws a lot of new terms at us, like racial stamina. There will be a pop quiz on these! In this video we talk about the author’s backstory and the book’s scope. In the first installment, I introduced the series. I explain that this book needs to be confronted because it is being used to infiltrate the church and society as a hole. In this video, the Robin DiAngelo’s introduction is explored. In the introduction she explains her background as a corporate diversity trainer who has encountered resistance among white people for her proselytizing. She deems this defensiveness white fragility. But this is far from the only term conjured. She concocts a whole new vocabulary that non-woke people are unfamiliar with. And several of these new terms do not have context clues, let alone explicit defining. For instance, do you know what racial stamina is? Neither did I until I got to page 125. Buckle up. It’s time to get on the crazy train. And don’t forget to subscribe so you don’t miss the next installments. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post White Fragility rebuttal introduction appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 19 new items) |
- Pelosi And Schumer’s Opening COVID Bid Is Actually Just An Unserious Liberal Wish List
- One Nation Under Anarcho-Tyranny
- Cheating the Children or Empowering the Parents
- The Left Comes for Religious Hospitals
- Disavowed Study
- Trump’s Coronavirus Update, The Battle Over Columbus, More Chinese Infiltration . . . .Biden Stays Silent As Churches Attacked, Biden Courts Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour
- The Faustian Bargains of the Woke NBA
- God Survey Reveals Status Divide
- The FBI’s Eternal Shame
- The Rush to Destroy the Past
- Rising Diversity Is Joe Biden’s Worry, Too
- Are You Lonesome Tonight?
- Cops vs. Mobs, Tyranny vs. Law?
- Why Does Nancy Care about Portland?
- Every Sports Team Must Change Its Name
- Ted Cruz: It’s ‘Racist’ to Defund the Police
- Opus To Defund Police
- President Trump Is Ending The Obama-Biden Regulation To Rezone Neighborhoods Along Income And Racial Guidelines
- “Never Give In”
Pelosi And Schumer’s Opening COVID Bid Is Actually Just An Unserious Liberal Wish List
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 08:55 PM PDT SENATE MINORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “We think this–we think the HEROES bill is the right place to be, and that’s our position. … Democrats are united, House and Senate, behind the HEROES bill. It has overwhelmingly broad support.” (Sen. Schumer, Press Conference, 7/21/2020) HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI (D-CA): “We, two months ago and one week, we passed The Heroes Act, which is a robust but necessary package… So, what we said today, Leader Schumer and I, said today, ‘We have our offer on the table, it’s called The Heroes Act…’” (CNN, 7/21/2020) “SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI’S HOUSE is not officially coming back yet. They are waiting for the release of a new coronavirus bill, which will cost trillions of dollars. Neither this bill nor anything resembling it will ever become law — it’s a Democratic wish list filled up with all the party’s favored policies.” (Politico’s Playbook, 5/11/2020)
“Privately, several House Democrats concede their latest bill feels like little more than an effort to appease the most liberal members of the caucus, many of whom were chafed that their most important priorities were minimized or ignored entirely in previous coronavirus negotiations.” (“McConnell Brushes Off Pelosi As She Finalizes Relief Package,” Politico, 5/11/2020) “A divided House narrowly passed a $3 trillion pandemic relief package … advancing a proposal with no chance of becoming law over near-unanimous Republican opposition…. Even though the bill was more a messaging document than a viable piece of legislation, its fate was in doubt in the final hours before its passage.” (“House Passes $3 Trillion Aid Bill Over Republican Opposition,” The New York Times, 5/15/2020)
“… House Democratic leadership was engaged in what a few senior aides and lawmakers described as the most difficult arm-twisting of the entire congress: convincing their rank and file to vote for a $3 trillion stimulus bill that will never become law…. The bill was released earlier [the same] week. It’s not been through a single congressional committee. And it’s caught flak from both moderates and liberals in the caucus. It’s a messaging bill.” (Politico Playbook, 5/15/2020) “It also includes a host of favored liberal provisions which have come under attack by Republicans and have little chance of surviving the coming negotiations.” (“House Passes Massive $3T Coronavirus Relief Package,” The Hill, 5/15/2020) Speaker Pelosi’s partisan bill would … Roll back the cap on state and local tax deductions for two years … PAGE 228: “SEC. 20161. ELIMINATION FOR 2020 AND 2021 OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL TAXES.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress)
Retroactively grant CARES Act recovery checks to illegal immigrants and allow illegal immigrants to receive the new rebates proposed in this bill … PAGES 165-167: “SEC. 20111. ADDITIONAL RECOVERY REBATES TO INDIVIDUALS. (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter B of chapter 65 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after section 6428 the following new section: ‘SEC. 6428A. ADDITIONAL RECOVERY REBATES TO INDIVIDUALS. ‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an eligible individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by subtitle A for the first taxable year beginning in 2020 an amount equal to the additional rebate amount determined for such taxable year…. (4) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER REQUIREMENT.— ‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The $1,200 amount in subsection (b)(1) shall be treated as being zero unless the taxpayer includes the TIN of the taxpayer on the return of tax for the taxable year.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress)
Permanently undermine state voter ID requirements … PAGE 1482: “(2) ADMINISTRATION OF VOTING BY MAIL.—‘‘(A) PROHIBITING IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING BALLOT. — A State may not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prevent a State from requiring a signature of the individual or similar affirmation as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) PAGES 1499-1500: “SEC. 325. PERMITTING USE OF SWORN WRITTEN STATEMENT TO MEET IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. (a) USE OF STATEMENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), if a State has in effect a requirement that an individual present identification as a condition of casting a ballot in an election for Federal office, the State shall permit the individual to meet the requirement— (A) in the case of an individual who desires to vote in person, by presenting the appropriate State or local election official with a sworn written statement, signed by the individual under penalty of perjury, attesting to the individual’s identity and attesting that the individual is eligible to vote in the election; or (B) in the case of an individual who desires to vote by mail, by submitting with the ballot the statement described in subparagraph (A).” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) Legalize ballot harvesting nationwide … PAGES 1492-1493: “(2) PERMITTING VOTERS TO DESIGNATE OTHER PERSON TO RETURN BALLOT.—The State— (A) shall permit a voter to designate any person to return a voted and sealed absentee ballot to the post office, a ballot drop-off location, tribally designated building, or election office so long as the person designated to return the ballot does not receive any form of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person has returned and no individual, group, or organization provides compensation on this basis; and (B) may not put any limit on how many voted and sealed absentee ballots any designated person can return to the post office, a ballot drop off location, tribally designated building, or election office.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) Require a review of the immigration files of all individuals in ICE custody to assess the need for continued detention … PAGE 1786: “SEC. 191205. ICE DETENTION. … [T]he Secretary of Homeland Security shall review the immigration files of all individuals in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to assess the need for continued detention.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) Require banking regulators and the GAO to issue diversity reports for cannabis-related businesses … PAGE 1100: “(h) ANNUAL DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION REPORT.— The Federal banking regulators shall issue an annual report to Congress containing— (1) information and data on the availability of access to financial services for minority-owned and women-owned cannabis-related legitimate businesses…” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) PAGE 1100: “(i) GAO STUDY ON DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION.—(1) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study on the barriers to marketplace entry, including in the licensing process, and the access to financial services for potential and existing minority-owned and women-owned cannabis-related legitimate businesses.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) Allow cannabis businesses to work with federally backed banks and insurers … Create a new ‘soil health’ pilot program at USDA which would pay farmers to NOT farm and to plant grass on 5 million acres of productive farmland …
Establish a ‘facility’ within the Federal Reserve to make ‘long-term, low-cost loans to debt collectors’ to ‘temporarily compensate’ them until consumers’ payments resume … PAGES 1064-1065: “(4) CREDIT FACILITY.—The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall— (A) establish a facility, using amounts made available under section 4003(b)(4) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9042(b)(4)), to make long-term, low-cost loans to debt collectors to temporarily compensate such debt collectors for documented financial losses caused by forbearance of debt payments under this subsection; and (B) defer debt collectors’ required payments on such loans until after consumers’ debt payments resume.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress) And give special treatment to the New York State Medicaid program. PAGES 1851-1852: “SEC. 200015. MODIFICATION TO MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENT FOR TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MEDICAID FMAP. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6008(b)(1) of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d note) is amended by inserting ‘, or as signed into State law on April 15, 2020, and taking effect in State law on April 3, 2020’ after ‘January 1, 2020’. (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act.” (H.R. 6800, 116th Congress)
Tags: Senate Republican Communication Center, Speaker Pelosi, Schumer, Opening COVID Bid, Is Actually, Unserious, A Liberal Wish List To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
One Nation Under Anarcho-Tyranny
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:42 PM PDT
by Michelle Malkin: The America you grew up in is not the America we live in now. One nation under God? Ha. Land of the free? Ha. Domestic tranquility? Ha. Equal protection under the law? Ha. The right to bear arms? Ha. Freedom of speech? Association? Peaceable assembly? Ha. Ha. Ha. It’s not “socialism” or “communism” under which we suffer. Our dangerously chaotic, selectively oppressive predicament is more accurately described as “anarcho-tyranny.” The late conservative columnist Sam Francis first coined the term in 1992 to diagnose a condition of “both anarchy (the failure of the state to enforce the laws) and, at the same time, tyranny — the enforcement of laws by the state for oppressive purposes.” The “criminalization of the law-abiding and innocent,” Francis expounded, is achieved in such a state through: “exorbitant taxation, bureaucratic regulation; the invasion of privacy, and the engineering of social institutions, such as the family and local schools; the imposition of thought control through ‘sensitivity training’ and multiculturalist curricula; ‘hate crime’ laws; gun-control laws that punish or disarm otherwise law-abiding citizens but have no impact on violent criminals who get guns illegally; and a vast labyrinth of other measures.” The toxic combination of “pandemic panic” and “George Floyd derangement syndrome” has thoroughly destroyed the home of the brave. It is a paradise for the depraved and dictatorial. Anarcho-tyranny is how hoodlums can toss statues into rivers with impunity, while citizens disgusted by Black Lives Matter street graffiti are charged with “hate crimes” — as David Nelson and Nicole Anderson in Martinez, California, were by a George Soros-funded district attorney two weeks ago. Anarcho-tyranny is how rioters can shut down highways and byways on a whim without fear of arrest, while commuters trying to escape the window-smashing barbarians obstructing traffic are charged with “assault” — as poor Jennifer Watson of Denver, Colorado, was this week. Anarcho-tyranny is how hordes of gay pride activists marching shoulder to shoulder can defy social distancing guidelines with gushing approbation from radical left-wing medical “experts,” while anti-lockdown and anti-mask mandate protesters are deemed public health menaces who now face snitch hotlines, fines, house arrest or jail time. Anarcho-tyranny is how 1,000 black militia members can take over the streets in Georgia and point their guns at motorists as they demand reparations, while white citizen militia members in Idaho, Utah and New Mexico have been smeared publicly as racists and face injunctions for peacefully defending their neighborhoods. Where do the police stand in this regime? It pains me to say it, but those of us who have backed the blue so loyally and vocally can no longer do so under the assumption that the blue will back us. It’s rank-and-file cops who are issuing citations to citizens who want to breathe freely. It’s rank-and-file cops who are standing by while our monuments and courthouses and landmarks are burned and obliterated. It was rank-and-file cops in Denver who watched as my patriotic friends and I tried to hold a Law Enforcement Appreciation Day this past Sunday and were besieged by Black Lives Matter and antifa thugs who had declared that their sole intent in invading our permitted celebration was to “shut us down.” I livestreamed the chaos as pro-police attendees were beaten, including the organizer Ron MacLachlan, who was bloodied in the face and head just a few feet from me by black-masked animals. One antifa actor wielded her collapsible baton just inches from me. The cop-haters had obstructed traffic on their five-minute march from their unpermitted event at the Colorado State Capitol to our permitted space. No cops intervened. Unprovoked, the cop-haters blared airhorns, sprayed our faces (mine included), burned an American flag, punched, shoved and menaced and took over our stage. No cops intervened. The Denver police chief, Black Lives Matter champion Paul Pazen, has repeatedly and publicly blamed us — the law-abiding — for not having enough private security in place, even as he admitted that 76 officers have been injured by the “peaceful” agitators who have turned our capitol into a heathen hellhole (and perpetrated more than $1 million in property damage so far). If we had brandished or used our weapons in self-defense, we’d be facing felony assault charges — as armed citizen Steven Baca is in Albuquerque, New Mexico, at the hands of another Soros-subsidized district attorney. If any of our men had tried to peel the female antifa thugs off of MAGA ladies who were assaulted, they’d be charged with battery, too — just like Baca. On Tuesday morning, a Denver police union official called me to apologize for the department’s failure to protect those of us who tried to speak on their behalf. The “backlash” for defending our constitutional rights was too high a price to pay, he told me. Sorry. So the message is loud and clear. When push comes to bloody shove in end-stage America, under the rule of the anarcho-tyrants, we, the law-abiding, are the enemy. Those in uniform sworn to protect and serve will turn their backs on us because their bosses don’t answer to the public. They protect and serve the mob. Tags: Michelle Malkin, One Nation, Under Anarcho-Tyranny, Rasmussen Reports To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Cheating the Children or Empowering the Parents
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:32 PM PDT by Newt Gingrich: The United States is gradually grinding to an educational collapse as the giant bureaucracies and extraordinarily powerful teachers’ unions ignore children and education in pursuit of power. Many of the wealthiest school systems have decided that they simply will not go back to school this fall. They will offer virtual classes even though the evidence is overwhelming that for younger children virtual classes are dramatically less effective than in person instruction. Nearly every organization of pediatricians and children-oriented specialists have said it is vital for children to be back in school. However, to the teachers’ unions, the children don’t matter. Power matters. Children have been getting cheated at least since the 1983 “A Nation at Risk” report, which pointed out that if a foreign power damaged our children as much as our schools were, we would consider it an act of war. Yet, since then, reform effort after reform effort has been defeated by the power of the teachers’ unions, the education bureaucracies, and the educational theorists of the left. For 37 years, children have come last, and the bureaucrats and unions have come first. Now, we are seeing this anti-student, anti-learning power structure in its full aggressiveness as big, well-funded school systems simply refuse to go back to school. Notice of course that they are not refusing to accept money. All the teachers and bureaucrats want full pay without having to actually deal with students. They don’t mind sending their so-called instruction through Zoom, Gotomeeting, or some other service (despite that most of these systems and teachers have no particular training in the effective use of online learning). The Chinese Communist Party must love the collapse of American education. Its members know there is no way we can compete with them in a high-tech world if our children can’t go to school. The Chinese virus is paying big dividends for the Chinese Communist dictatorship. There are also three enormous human costs to the bureaucracy-union stranglehold over education and the refusal to put the children’s interests first: First, virtually every serious study shows that poor children in impoverished neighborhoods have the greatest need for face-to-face education. They have the least ability to learn by video, and all the reports this spring have reinforced this fact. The children who were already being cheated by the expensive unionized bureaucracies in cities such as Baltimore (the fourth most expensive bureaucracy per child in the country) will now simply have their lives crippled by the absence of courage and commitment on the part of those recruited and paid to teach them. Second, children with disabilities especially need real human interaction, in-person sympathy, and a commitment by mentors to help them overcome the challenges they face. Leaving them at home to cope with online learning is simply cruel – and undoes a generation of hard work at helping children with disabilities experience full lives. Third, there are a host of practical services, especially for low-income students, such as school breakfast and lunch, seeing the school nurse, having a safe place to go while your parents work, and seeing the school guidance counselor that all come from the school system. When these are cut off, the lives of the poorest children become much more difficult. It is tragically ironic that at the time people are pledging to help overcome racism and seeking to help the African American community, the teachers unions in our biggest cities (where much of our African American community lives) are following a strategy of blackmail and cowardice. They shift between being afraid to do their jobs (in which case they could resign and let other people do them) and using the situation to exploit the larger society. Here are two examples of this unconscionable, despicable blackmail: The Los Angeles Teachers’ Union demands more money through defunding the police and capping charter schools as part of any reopening plan; and the North Carolina Teachers’ Union members demand universal health care and welfare for people in the country illegally before they will reopen the schools. There are three things we can do to return the focus to the children and their education despite the bureaucracy and the teachers’ union: No. 1, as the US Department of Education has explained, 10 percent of America’s K-12 students attend non-public schools – this includes millions of students who are from lower- and middle-income families. In Florida alone, 20,000 of these students could lose their scholarships due to the impact of the coronavirus. The pandemic has impacted all American students. The parents of students in non-public K-12 schools need relief, too. Any further federal relief must include these families. We should be funding students – not school system bureaucracies. Further, as parents lose income from furloughs and lay-offs, the students of lower-income families are most likely to have their educational options cut short – either through loss of scholarships or school closings. We need direct aid to families for education expenses (including career, technical, and special education). This could prevent the closure of hundreds of faith-based and independent schools which millions of low- and middle-income students attend across the country. No. 2, the new recovery bill should include a provision that any school district that refuses to open its schools for in-school learning should lose its federal aid – which would then be converted into a tax credit for the students in that district if their parents want to home school, establish a small community school with others, or go to a private school. No. 3, the tax cuts in the new recovery bill should include a permanent tax credit for those families who want to provide an education outside the bureaucratic, government-run, unionized system. If we debated education by putting the students and learning first, these are the kind of policies we would develop in response to bureaucratic, unionized self-centeredness. Every day we fail to act, our children fall further behind their Chinese counterparts – and our survival as a free country becomes a little more endangered. Every day we fail to act, poor children are further trapped in a self-serving bureaucratic cycle and are further kept from a prosperous future. If teachers don’t want to teach our children, we should fire them and hire ones who will. Tags: Newt Gingrich, Cheating the Children, or Empowering, the Parents To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Left Comes for Religious Hospitals
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:23 PM PDT by Tony Perkins: The justices predicted a war—and almost one month to the day of their Bostock ruling, they got one.The first shot was fired last Thursday, when the ACLU decided to sue Maryland’s St. Joseph Medical Center for refusing to take out a woman’s perfectly healthy uterus just because she wanted to live as a man. It goes against the hospital’s religious beliefs, St. Joseph argued. But now, thanks to the Supreme Court, it might go against six justices’ ridiculous definition of “sex” too.The last thing anyone should want right now is fewer hospitals. And yet, that may very well be the outcome of lawsuits like this one.If people are worried about the health care system being overwhelmed today, just wait until liberals force the religiously affiliated groups entirely out of business. Because that’s what’ll happen if the left insists on forcing religious facilities to embrace its radical views. Catholic nonprofits have told the country before—in adoption and abortion debates—that choosing between their faith and ministry is no choice at all. They’d rather shut their doors than bend an inch on biblical teachings. The ACLU, on the other hand, is more than willing to blow a gaping hole in America’s medical care just to advance its political goals. And that’s all this is about. It’s certainly not about justice for Jesse Hammons—she already got her surgery somewhere else. It’s about making the nonconformists pay. St. Joseph’s refusal, the liberal attorneys insist, was a “discriminatory and unconstitutional application of Catholic religious doctrine.” Worse, Hammons said, “I felt like this hospital didn’t see any worth in my life and the care that I needed.” On the contrary, St. Joseph’s might have been the only one who did see the worth in Hammons—because it, unlike the attorneys exploiting her story—refused to mistake bodily harm for medical “care.” Either way, a spokesman insisted, the hospital’s decision has nothing to do with Hammons or animus toward people struggling with their gender. It has to do with the hospital’s religious code. St. Joseph’s has been under the umbrella of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops since it became a hospital in 1864. And those directives are clear: There are limits on the “removal of healthy organs.” At the end of the day, Wesley Smith argues at National Review, the denial actually has nothing to do with Hammons identifying as transgender. If she’d had a cancerous uterus, surgery wouldn’t have been a problem. But this procedure would have sterilized her, Smith explains, and the church has very strong feelings about that. It’s their right to say they won’t destroy a womb. Just as it was Hammons’ right to go elsewhere—which she did, nine days after the Bostock ruling—and have her body changed. By all accounts, everyone should have been satisfied. Hammons got the surgery she wanted, and the hospital didn’t have to violate its conscience. But the ACLU sued anyway—proving, once again, that this debate has never been about coexistence or compromise. Maybe those are possible in a civil society where everyone is adult enough to put aside their hostility and see the value in respecting different viewpoints. If instead of suing people like Aaron and Melissa Klein out of business, couples simply found another bakery. If instead of jeopardizing care for everyone else, Hammons was content with an alternate location and moved on. If instead of preaching tolerance, activists practiced it. But unfortunately, all of that became even more of a pipe dream once the Supreme Court stepped in to redefine the word “sex,” deciding for everyone that millennia of biology, history, and morality no longer applied. Justice Samuel Alito tried to warn where this would lead, but six of his colleagues were too busy legislating to listen. “Healthcare,” he wrote in his Bostock dissent, “ … may emerge as an intense battleground under the Court’s holding.” Workers are already suing for sex reassignment surgery under their insurance, Alito pointed out. This sets up another major conflict, since, as he points out, “requiring them to pay for or to perform these procedures will have a severe impact on their ability to honor their deeply held religious beliefs.” The battle that Alito worried about is here. “It is open season on Catholic hospitals,” Smith writes, and anyone else with a biblical view of gender. “Medicine is becoming a major front in the accelerating attacks on religious liberty in this country. The assault against medical conscience can only exacerbate our bitter cultural divisions already at the ripping point.” Six activists on the Supreme Court think they’ve done Hammons a favor by ordering America to help her live as a man. But what about the hospitals that want to live as Christians? We need justices who will stand up and protect them. Tags: Tony Perkins, Family Research Center, FRC, Family Research Council, The Left Comes, for Religious Hospitals To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Disavowed Study
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 07:00 PM PDT by Kerby Anderson: How should the academic world respond when a research study published in a peer-reviewed journal comes to a conclusion you wouldn’t expect? In the past, some might have challenged the methodology or even considered doing a second study to see if the conclusions could be replicated. The latest tactic is to bring pressure on the researchers and their universities so they will disavow their own study. That is what happened to professors at Michigan State University and the University of Maryland who studied police shootings. They analyzed 917 fatal police shootings of civilians to test whether the race of the officer or the civilian predicted fatal police shootings. Neither did. Their study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that once “race specific rates of violent crime” were taken in the account, they found no disparities based on race. Heather MacDonald is a fellow with the Manhattan Institute, and has been a guest on my radio program. She has cited this study in her congressional testimony and also referred to their article in some of her writings. She even added that other professors also challenged the study design. The two professors in the original study concluded that even under the proposed study design, there was “no significant evidence of anti-black disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police.” Given the current climate, you can imagine the amount of pressure they have been under. Earlier this month, the authors decided to retract their paper under the excuse that its conclusion had been misused. They specifically mentioned op-eds by Heather MacDonald. This retraction illustrates what’s wrong with the academic world. No longer is the focus on finding the truth. Political consensus is already driving much of the research done in this country. Researchers will likely suppress any results that challenge the latest liberal, progressive narrative. Truth will be set aside. Tags: Kerby Anderson, Viewpoints, Point of View, Disavowed Study, Heather MacDonald, Manhattan Institute is a fellow with the Manhattan Institute To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Trump’s Coronavirus Update, The Battle Over Columbus, More Chinese Infiltration . . . .Biden Stays Silent As Churches Attacked, Biden Courts Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 06:28 PM PDT . . . Biden Stays Silent As Churches Attacked, Biden Courts Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour (Note: Update for July 21-22, 2020)
by Gary Bauer: Trump’s Coronavirus Update Trump avoided being drawn into debates with reporters who attend the briefings with the goal of making news and advancing their careers by getting into heated exchanges with the president. Instead, Trump reviewed the challenges we still face as a nation, predicting that the virus may get worse before it gets better. But he also talked about the progress that’s been made — and it’s been extraordinary. Trump corrected some misperceptions about the virus that, like the virus itself, never seem to go away. He emphasized that 90 percent of those hospitalized with the virus had underlying medical conditions. He also stressed that the chances of children succumbing to Covid-19 are vanishingly small. He further mentioned that, despite what the media would have us believe, coronavirus fatalities nationwide have not been surging. In fact, they’ve fallen 75 percent since mid-April. That’s partly because testing capacity has increased 400 percent since mid-May. Trump also noted that his administration currently has zero unfilled requests for medical equipment, including ventilators. The administration is working with Congress to advance the next economic relief package. It is also providing major investments in companies that are developing a vaccine so that, once a breakthrough occurs, it can be manufactured and dispersed quickly. The president touted the tremendous progress being made toward developing a vaccine for the virus, noting that two vaccine candidates are entering their final stage of clinical trials this month. It’s plausible that a vaccine could be announced before Election Day. The reason I mention Election Day should be obvious. The media and Trump’s political opponents believe they can defeat him over a virus that originated in China even though they’ve offered nothing specific about what they would have done differently. In fact, they opposed Trump when he cut off travel from China in January, a decision that saved countless lives. How political are they making it? When the president called it the “Chinese virus,” Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and the media were furious. They accused him of smearing China. Yesterday, Pelosi referred to it as the “Trump virus.” Predictably, that smear was met with silence by the media. If only America’s political leaders were as united in fighting this virus as they are in destroying the president and protecting communist China. The Battle Over Columbus That’s because the left is increasingly willing to take up arms against anything they oppose — the police, monuments to America’s founding, Donald Trump, etc. Here’s the latest example. Chicago police on Monday showed footage of an organized riot at a monument to Christopher Columbus near Grant Park. The video shows rioters armed with weapons attacking police. But these weren’t anarchists randomly attacking whoever they could get their hands on. This was an extremely well-organized riot that had the hallmarks of a military operation. The video shows hundreds of protestors proceeding behind banners held up by metal piping with slogans such as “Black Lives Matter” and “Defund the Police.” Once the protestors got to Grant Park, the banners were held up to shield the group behind them, who opened umbrellas, changed into all-black clothing and began handing out rocks, frozen cans and frozen water bottles among the mob. The rioters then moved toward the statue in what the police superintendent later described as “a platoon-like fashion.” The rioters attacked the cops for 30 minutes with the metal piping and the projectiles. They restocked the rioters from shopping carts throughout the attack. Some 49 officers suffered injuries, including one who suffered an eye injury when he was hit by an incendiary device. This was, in effect, a military operation. The tragedy here is that most Americans will never learn about this incident. They wouldn’t have heard about it in any of the mainstream national media outlets. Kudos to Breitbart for bringing it to the public’s attention. This is one more indication that the forces rioting in cities across the nation are much more dangerous than they are being portrayed. More Chinese Infiltration Later in the day, the Trump Administration ordered the Chinese government to close its consulate in Houston, Texas, because we have evidence that for years they have been involved in the theft of intellectual property and other nefarious activity against the U.S. government and American citizens. Within hours of this announcement, the Houston Fire Department was called to the consulate, where smoke was seen rising from an outdoor courtyard. Footage broadcast on local TV stations showed people hurriedly burning documents on the consulate’s premises. There are likely hundreds or thousands of Chinese doing this type of espionage within our borders. The two indicted Chinese nationals had been hacking into our networks since early in the Obama administration. The Obama-Biden Administration didn’t take this seriously. Finally, we have an administration that is. Biden Stays Silent As Churches Attacked Omar has made a name for herself for hating on America, the country that took her in as a refugee from war-torn Somalia and allowed her to ascend to the halls of Congress. Biden told the groups that he intends to end what he called “the vile Muslim ban” on day one of his presidency. Fact check: There is no Muslim ban. President Trump instituted a temporary ban on people entering the United States from countries known to be hotbeds of terrorism. Some of those countries are majority Muslim, but others, including Venezuela and North Korea, are not. The Supreme Court upheld the president’s travel ban in 2018. The majority wrote that the ban was “squarely within the scope of Presidential authority.” But Joe Biden has never let the facts get in the way of a good talking point. Meanwhile, I’m struck by the silence of many on the left, including Biden and much of the mainstream media, amid a rash of attacks against Catholic churches over the last 10 days. Catholic churches across the country have been targets of arson, vandalism and destruction of religious statues. Most recently, a satanic symbol was painted on the door of a historic church in New Haven, Connecticut. Earlier in San Gabriel, California, a fire gutted the interior of the centuries-old San Gabriel Mission Church. And in Ocala, Florida, a man crashed a minivan through the front door of a conservative Catholic church, then lit the interior ablaze while parishioners prepared for morning Mass. With each attack, it’s becoming clearer that the verbal threats of far-left protestors in recent weeks against churches were more than empty words. They were a call to destructive action. As a commissioner on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), I have tried to draw attention to the danger that attacks on places of worship pose to the future of the society where such attacks take place. Now, sadly, we are experiencing them here. Attacks on places of worship are often precursors to attacks on worshippers themselves. It’s revealing that Biden, who touts his Catholic faith at nearly every opportunity, hasn’t said a thing as Catholic churches have been attacked across the country. Shame on him for remaining silent. Evangelical churches don’t appear to have been targeted, at least not yet. But they have been in the past. So have synagogues. So, don’t be deceived. The radical forces that have been unleashed will come after all of us unless they are stopped. Men and women of faith must remember the wise words of Ben Franklin, who said that if we don’t hang together, most assuredly, we will all hang separately. How Radical Are Today’s Dems? A recent Washington Post poll on police, U.S. history and related issues was revealing. Among other things, it found: 3.Similar large majorities of the public opposed racial reparations and taking down statues of U.S. presidents/Founding Fathers who owned slaves. The Democrats were on the wrong side of these issues too, but the Post did not provide the exact numbers.Biden Courts Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour In spite of her extremism and history of hate, Sarsour was one of several Muslim political activists on a recent phone call with Biden when he promised to end the “Muslim ban.” Sarsour reportedly said during the call that the upcoming election is “about whether you want to defeat fascism in America.” She and the other leaders said they “promise to turn out one million Muslim votes for Biden.” I know you don’t want to let Biden and these radicals take the White House! We’re doing everything we can to expose Biden’s extremism, support the Trump/Pence team and help elect more conservatives to Congress. Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, Trump’s Coronavirus Update, The Battle Over Columbus, More Chinese Infiltration, Biden Stays Silent, As Churches Attacked, Biden Courts, Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Faustian Bargains of the Woke NBA
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 05:48 PM PDT . . . The massive Chinese audience may guarantee short-term profits, but at what price down the road? by Dr. Victor Davis Hanson: The NBA should be delighted. Its once American sport is now globalized. Its talented players, who have redefined the very game itself, are the best by far in the world. Many have become cultural icons, and a few are now billionaires. Indeed, the players are very rich, the owners far richer. The league’s geniuses weigh in with lectures on culture and politics. And the NBA’s public relations are Machiavellian in their ability to make corporatism seem hip. That said, a number of proverbial NBA chickens are coming home to roost. No one quite knows how much money the National Basketball Association, its individual teams, and the players all make off playing, and merchandising their multifarious brands, in China. Some estimates suggest that the NBA’s various Chinese markets reach $6 billion in profits and more — not surprising, given 1.4 billion new potential consumers. No wonder the league is touchy about its huge China investment. When last year Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey mildly objected to Beijing’s crackdown on democratic Hong Kong, he was pilloried by widespread criticism from the league, the players, and other coaches — on the prompt of the Communist Chinese themselves. The Americans all seemed terrified about losing their newfound lucrative markets. Shortly after, San Francisco Warriors coach Steve Kerr offered a pathetic, Walter Duranty–like defense of China, ludicrously suggesting that its terrible human-rights record was no worse than America’s episodic tragedies of deranged shooters: “People in China didn’t ask me about, you know, people owning AR-15s and mowing each other down in a mall. I wasn’t asked that question. . . . There’s this and that issue. The world is a complex place, and there’s more gray than black and white.” In mentioning AR-15s, Kerr was perhaps referring to the 2019 record of mass shootings in the U.S., the worst in history — at 211 deaths attributed to private individuals troubled by mental-health issues, family disputes, drug deals, gang violence, or school rampages. Again, Kerr and the profit-minded NBA should get woke to the Chinese Communist government’s official state policy, which has put more than 1 million Uighur Muslims in reeducation camps. It is destroying democracy in Hong Kong in violation of its past international agreements. Beijing has all but eradicated the indigenous culture of Tibet. China violates almost every canon of international commercial law and trade. It has bullied all of its Asian neighbors and insidiously expanded its intrusions into their air and sea space. More than 140,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 — a virus that mysteriously originated in China and spread globally, killing well over 500,000, entirely due to Chinese laxity and deceit. Beijing’s “Belt and Road Initiative” is a throwback to the 19th century’s colonialism and imperialism. Dissidents don’t go off Twitter in China; they more often just disappear. This growing NBA–China nexus couldn’t come at a more embarrassing time for the league. During the COVID-19 epidemic, the national quarantine, and the demonstrations, violence, and cultural revolution that has followed the death of George Floyd, the NBA has not been shy about political activism. Players, coaches, ex-players, and obsequious sports writers have all virtue-signaled the nation about America’s supposed sins. Indeed, part of the NBA woke/hip/cool/edgy brand is to trash the “establishment” that has ensured the foundations of its multibillion-dollar-empire. In scary marketing fashion, NBA players, current and retired, and their acolytes in popular culture have veneered their 1950s-style corporate fealty with woke talk about BLM, the “Jews,” eugenics, Farrakhan, and the usual totems of “resistance.” Their basic message for young consumers is that you can hate the man and still wear $400 sneakers — the same way that you can wear a jersey with an edgy logo during the game and then retire at night into your Malibu compound. In the spirit of medieval indulgences, paid to help the sinner enter heaven, the more that the players become corporate cut-out pitchmen, the more they voice left-wing boilerplate to square the circle of being privileged rich people who nonetheless cling to street cred for the sake of advertising. No one knows how long this 30-year disingenuousness can continue. It may come to a head this fall, when the league will soon deal with some players’ plans to kneel during the national anthem next season. The NBA has approved of individual players wearing politicized slogans on their jerseys — politicized in the sense of trashing the U.S., but not offering an ill word about Chinese Communist atrocities. The message is, “Ridicule your own democracy all you want, but censor your incorrect thoughts about racist and totalitarian China.” Joe Fan at home is supposed to watch all this and say, “That’s right! We sure do need more multimillionaires to trash of our flag, anthem, and country! Sign me up for more cable ESPN.” In other words, the NBA and lots of its players are both athletes and social activists — but with very selective agendas, given that the league is as critical of America as it is silent about China’s monstrous behavior. During the COVID-19 epidemic, few NBA players noted that Chinese businesses were turning away African students and workers, as the government singled them out for forced COVID-19 testing. The hypocrisy over China has become a touchstone for lots of long-known but taboo subjects in the NBA. Despite all the virtue-signaling about diversity, the league, like the NFL, is one of the most nondiverse institutions in America. Of its 30 owners, only three are nonwhite. Yet over 75 percent of the players are black, raising the quandary of who are the most non-diverse — the athletes or the owners? In fact, both. Those from 65 percent of the population own 90 percent of the franchises, while athletes from just 12 percent of the population make up 75 percent of the players. Excuse the silly reductionist number crunching, but this is 2020 America, and we are all supposed to follow the rules of those who made the rules. After all, we have been lectured by the woke nonstop for decades on the need for proportional representation — if we are to prevent insidious microaggressions that are de facto exclusionary. And one reason that a once-staid NBA developed a national audience over the past 70 years, and radically widened its appeal and fan interest, was that it belatedly integrated an all-white league in the early 1950s, became diverse, and won over millions of new fans. The progressive theories of disparate impact require no proof of overt bias to ascertain systematic prejudice, and they allow no mitigating circumstances such as the fossilized construct of “meritocracy.” A postmodern university diversity coordinator might speak of it all this way: “Who is to say that the “standards” that the NBA “constructs” to adjudicate so-called talent are not themselves “socially embedded within a discriminatory and nondiverse system that is predicated on perpetuating the asymmetrical dominance of white owners and black players?” Nonsense? Of course, but it’s the sort of nonsense that now governs diversity in America. Latino players make up just 1.8 percent of the league athletes, while Asian players less than 1 percent; the two groups are now near 20 percent of the U.S. population. Under our campus and government guidelines, for example, something is terribly wrong, and someone needs to do something about these volatile asymmetries. The average NBA player makes nearly $8 million a year. Star LeBron James is worth over $450 million. The NBA is one of the most elite, exclusive, and coveted professions in America, where players de facto become multimillionaire celebrities — on the theory that pure merit, not race, determines who wins these most-sought-after billets. Again, that is nearly the opposite mindset from that of an Asian-American straight-A, 800-SAT student assuming that by merit she should get into Yale, and thereby “overrepresent” her race in the Ivy League, at the “expense” of other “excluded” groups. So add up all these divergent facts, and there emerges an inconvenient NBA modus operandi. The hyper-rich players occasionally moan that a mostly white ownership controls mostly black players, while their supporters often invoke plantation imagery, channeling Bryant Gumbel’s now decade-old jibe that, during a player lockdown, former NBA commissioner David Stern acted as if he was a “modern plantation overseer.” A few years later, former Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling’s overt racism, at least in one case, bore out Gumbel’s rant. The mostly white owners nod that they must do something someday about this owner imbalance. No one dares to say that the progressive players themselves do not care much for the progressive admonition of “looking like America.” And then everyone lives and lets live, to make lots of money. Money is certainly at the center of these contradictions. For the NBA brand, it seems to make much better business sense to routinely damn democratic, diverse, and free America, but not the racialist, Communist, and outlaw China. The former’s audience is changing, touchy, and shrinking; the latter’s is uniform, predictable, and growing. Wokeness has lost some market share inside the U.S., but such perceived anti-Americanism helps to win it back — and more — in China. Beijing, of course, sees anti-American-sounding American athletes as high-profile useful idiots — a fact no doubt known to the receptive players and coaches of the NBA who willingly and sincerely play their parts. No wonder the NBA is so secretive and defensive about its China hypocrisies. The league’s domestic attendance and viewership are now flat. Its various affiliated TV audiences last year dived. TNT’s NBA viewership dropped 22 percent; ESPN, 19 percent. Last year game attendance was off as well. The league claims all sorts of reasons for its inert viewership, except the fact that its hard-left social activism and players’ pop philosophizing did not always play well with many of its traditional fans. The demography of NBA fans has also radically shifted. It is now nearing 50 percent African-American. That is encouraging on the one hand but on the other reveals a reliance on a demographic that makes up only 12–13 percent of the U.S. population. In other words, for corporate accountants, there will soon not be enough American fans, viewers, and consumers to sustain the astronomical growth in salaries and expenses in the NBA. The NBA has become the only major professional sports league with less than 50 percent white viewership, an often poorly defined demographic that still may make up nearly 60–70 percent of the population. Latino and Asian NBA audiences are likewise not expanding much. Someone from Mars might suggest that the African-American audience is increasing because 75 percent of the players are African-American, and the overall audience is shrinking because other ethnic groups are vastly underrepresented in the league — and on occasion some may feel excluded by the league’s messaging. Translated, that means that some groups are occasionally the targets of jibes from the players, as we have seen from their periodic anti-Semitic and anti-Asian slurs. Former NBA stars Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Charles Barkley recently deplored the anti-Semitism among black athletes, and the league once worried about the racism directed at then NBA player Jeremy Lin. Two years ago, superstar LeBron James posted some rap lyrics on his Instagram account (which had 45.9 million followers): “We been getting that Jewish money, Everything is Kosher” — followed by his sort of defiant apology, “Apologies, for sure, if I offended anyone.” When it comes to diversity, the NBA then is facing some of the same challenges hitting much smaller non-diverse sports, such as golf, hockey, and swimming — but with important exceptions. None of these mostly white sports earns so much money for so many; none were ever as mainstream as basketball, football, and baseball; and few of their athletes lecture America on its sins, in fear of turning attention to their own non-diverse sins and foibles. There are now two solutions for the NBA to expand its audience to meet the enormous overhead of the multi-million-dollar yearly salaries of their players and keep churning out mega profits for the owners. The league could both diversify and depoliticize. The NBA might recruit more minority-owned franchises. And it certainly might try mentoring and bringing in more Latino and Asian-American players, to make the league look more like America — in alignment with popular doctrines of diversity, which the NBA is oddly not shy of showcasing despite its own errant status. With less political hectoring and virtue-signaling, the NBA could also win back more traditional viewers of all backgrounds. What a strange country in 2020 when the Oscar awards come under fire for not proportionally representing all Americans, but the NBA remains exempt from the same logic of diversity and inclusion. Or, alternatively, if the league wishes to remain politicized, with a leftish message at odds with half of America, and if both the ownership and the players hardly wish to reflect the rich diversity of America, it can seek to find greater audience share — in fact, much greater — elsewhere in China. Presto — and so it has. No wonder that coach Steve Kerr, or superstar Lebron James, or gossip sports writer like Adrian Wojnarowski (who in hip street fashion recently tweeted to Senator Josh Hawley “F*** You” for daring to point out hypocrisies in the NBA’s stance toward China) are so hair-triggered about any mention of a racist, imperialistic, colonialist, and genocidal China. The NBA corporate-media borg collectively believes that China can sustain a business that, at least under its current business plan and operating assumptions, may not be sustainable in its present incarnation in America. But the NBA should be careful. The Chinese, unlike Americans, don’t like dissent. You can’t write a snarky “F*** You” to a provincial Communist minister. And the pro-Chinese, anti-American boilerplate is not negotiable — ever, given that it is one reason why the Chinese so like the NBA itself. The Chinese themselves are invested in racial chauvinism, not the cultural tapestry of diversity. But most of all, they are harsh belt-and-road paymasters who demand a Faustian bargain from all they make rich in the short term. The story of Chinese courting of American industries over the last half-century is that China lures them in with promises of big money, partners with them, rigs the arrangement, xeroxes their expertise, dumps their partners, and then absorbs their markets. In other words, NBA China may make the league money now. But we are in a new COVID-19 world, where no one believes that China will democratize once it gets rich enough, and China itself has mostly given up on hiding its own agendas. So, given the known Chinese blueprint of foreign investment, assume that once China masters the mechanics and public relations of the sport, the contours of its franchising, and the intricacies of its branding and merchandising, its 1.4 billion people may prefer their own Chinese players, Chinese coaches, Chinese owners — and all of their own newfound Chinese profits. Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, McIntosh Enterprises, The Faustian Bargains of the Woke NBA To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
God Survey Reveals Status Divide
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 05:27 PM PDT by Bill Donohue: The Pew Research Center’s latest survey on religion worldwide reveals some interesting socio-economic patterns. In general, the developing nations are more likely to believe that it is necessary to believe in God in order to be moral and have good values than is true in the developed nations. Within each nation, the same phenomena exists: the wealthy are less likely to agree that God is central to morality than is true of those at the bottom of the class strata. In the United States, 54% say it is not necessary to believe in God in order to be moral and have good values; 44% say it is necessary. Education drives the outcome: the most highly educated are the least likely to acknowledge the seminal place of God in shaping moral outcomes. Education, of course, is linked to income. Interestingly, the gap on this scale between those with higher income and those with lower income is greatest in the United States. Political leanings matter as well. Those of a more conservative bent are the most likely to affirm the role of God in moral decisions; those who lean left are the least likely. This is true in all 15 nations surveyed. When the question is personalized, i.e., when respondents are asked about the role of religion in their own lives, 72% of Americans say it is important. It is clear from this survey, as well as many others, that socio-economic status helps to explain religiosity: there is an inverse relationship between the two, meaning that the more educated and affluent a person is, the less likely he is to say religion plays an important role in his life. From a Catholic perspective, the sin of pride is operative. To be exact, the highly educated believe that they have no need for God; they believe they are morally self-sufficient and prefer to follow their own moral compass. Sociologically, this matters (after all, we all interact with each other). Ergo, we need to explore the content of their moral compass. In the United States, those who say religion is critical to morality are essentially saying that their vision is shaped by the Judeo-Christian ethos, which is rooted in the Ten Commandments. Those who say God is not important are more likely to have their vision shaped by moral relativism; it defines their moral compass. Which brings us back to the survey. It is one thing for someone, including a person of faith, to say that it is possible for an individual to be moral without also being religious. Indeed, examples abound. However, it is quite another to say that a society can be moral if most people entertain a secular vision. This is not to say that the European nations, most of which have adopted a secular vision, are morally corrupt. They are not. But this is no tribute to them. Every western nation is still benefiting from the residue of the Judeo-Christian culture which has long shaped their society. History has shown, however, that in the long run, a culture that embraces moral relativism is inviting nothing but trouble. Tags: Bill Donohue, Catholic League, God Survey, Reveals Status Divide To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The FBI’s Eternal Shame
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 04:03 PM PDT . . . Newly released notes confirm the deep-state corruption that we’d long suspected. by Douglas Andrews: We take no pleasure in printing that headline. But it has to be done. And we suspect the overwhelming number of good people at the FBI are relieved and even grateful for it. What we now know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that the FBI knew by January 2017 that Christopher Steele’s Hillary Clinton-financed “dossier,” its primary piece of evidence for securing FISA warrants with which to spy on a major party candidate for president of the United States, was total rubbish. And yet the FBI continued to use this manufactured piece of political pablum as a means to continue spying on Donald Trump and his presidential campaign — even after Trump took office. Let that sink in. As Friday’s article from The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board puts it, “The Justice Department’s release of documents from the Obama Administration’s 2016-17 Trump-Russia investigation is beginning to paint a picture, and the more we learn the worse the FBI looks.” The title of the WSJ editorial is “The FBI’s Dossier Deceit,” and that’s exactly — though not exclusively — what it was. Just five years ago, it would’ve been near impossible to name a federal government organization with a better brand name, a more sterling reputation, than that of the FBI. The U.S. military? Maybe. Today, however, the bureau’s reputation is in tatters, thanks to the actions of a lawless few Trump-haters whose names have become household bywords: Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page. (To that disgraceful group we should add a name that’s less well-known — that of FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who’s somehow flown under the radar despite having intentionally altered evidence that was exculpatory toward Trump campaign associate Carter Page.) Credit for the declassification and release of the FBI notes goes to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, who said last week, “The dossier was a critical document to justify a FISA warrant against Mr. Page and this DOJ memo clearly indicates that the reliability of the dossier was completely destroyed after the interview with the primary sub-source in January 2017.” Graham continued, “Most importantly after this interview of the sub-source and the subsequent memo detailing the contents of the interview, it was a miscarriage of justice for the FBI and the Department of Justice to continue to seek a FISA warrant against Carter Page in April and June of 2017.” Got that? Graham is a lawyer himself, and he doesn’t lightly throw around terms like “miscarriage of justice.” And yet here he’s using it to describe the actions of Barack Obama’s Department of Justice. The FBI notes also put the lie to a much-ballyhooed New York Times story claiming that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russians. “The comments of Peter Strzok regarding the February 14 [2017] New York Times article,” said Graham, “are devastating in that they are an admission that there was no reliable evidence that anyone from the Trump Campaign was working with Russian Intelligence Agencies in any form.” As the Journal sums things up, “Democrats and the press corps that touted the phony Steele dossier will say this is a pursuit of a conspiracy theory, but it’s not a theory. The more evidence that is made public, the clearer it becomes that the Steele dossier and collusion narrative were dirty political tricks that became abuses of power.” Will justice ever be served? And without justice, will the FBI ever be able to rebuild its reputation? U.S. Attorney John Durham is doggedly building his case, but the clock is ticking — perhaps toward a Democrat administration that would love nothing more than to dismiss this matter entirely. Fidelity, bravery, integrity. Those three words, the FBI’s motto, are written on a white ribbon that stretches across the bottom of the bureau’s iconic logo — a logo that was designed in 1940 by Special Agent Leo Gauthier. How different the meaning of those words must be to the overwhelming majority of FBI personnel, whose commitment to their motto never wavered, compared to those contemptible few on the 7th floor of the J. Edgar Hoover Building, who dishonored their bureau and their motto in the lawless pursuit of our nation’s 45th president. Tags: Douglas Andrews, The Patriot Post, The FBI’s Eternal Shame To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Rush to Destroy the Past
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 03:48 PM PDT by Gary M. Collier: I read the other day that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, apparently is in favor of renaming military bases named for Confederates. Having spent the first three years — and the very last year — of my military career as a paratrooper at Fort Bragg, NC, I have a bit of a problem with that. Gen. Milley may be intimately familiar with the history behind the names of all military posts in all of the branches of the services, and in the case of those named for people, their individual histories. That would put him into a pretty exclusive category: most civilians in the states where such bases are located don’t know much about the people for whom bases are named, even those who work on them. The same can probably be said for many, if not most, of the military members stationed there, though they have a much higher likelihood of knowing at least the person a base was named after. I’m pretty sure that most members of Congress don’t know who the bases in their districts were named for, though they no doubt have staffers who do, or can find out quickly if needed. Even among people who might know full names, they probably couldn’t tell you much about them, what war(s) they served in, or whose side they were on if they even guessed “Civil War” correctly. Until a few weeks ago, nobody cared a whole lot. History is what happened. It isn’t judgment, it is a statement of fact (one hopes) about events that took place at a time and place, and participants in those events. People decide, often later and in a different context, how to interpret those facts, if need be, and if they so desire, to judge for themselves what the facts “mean.” Denying them doesn’t change the events; trying to erase or bury them doesn’t either. It simply means that other people no longer have access to the facts about those people, places, and things that shaped the history that is examined by others at a later time (because once an event has occurred, every examination of it happens later, and is colored by the perceptions of those who do the studying). Whatever might be learned — good, bad or indifferent — is lost once references to the past are erased, and as Santayana wrote, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” (often quoted in different forms, which is quite ironic). The most repressive regimes in history like to destroy the past, so that people have no basis to refer back to in order to see if history is repeating itself, for better or for worse. If you don’t know any better — because there isn’t anything to remind you — then you are pretty much forced to play along with whatever the current regime tells you. Orwell’s 1984 was nearly prophetic in our modern era, as the past is erased or constantly rewritten, and the only thing we have is the present. Anyone who thinks differently is guilty of wrongthink, and thoughtcrimes are to be punished as severely as possible. It seems as if this is happening widely, swiftly, and alarmingly. If we are going to get rid of all symbolism that doesn’t conform to the current dogma and judge all past actions of everybody by the feelings of the moment, we will destroy society. Statues are being torn down; flags banned; alternatives to the National Anthem actively sought; institutions shuttered or defunded, and critical voices effectively silenced. A generation ago — a decade ago, even less — this would have been unthinkable. Now, it is wrong not to agree with such thinking, and one criticizes it at one’s own peril. If we are going to engage in the rename game to cleanse society of any reference to anything the thought police find objectionable, military bases will be joined by almost anything else that has a name. I went to Jump School at Fort Benning, outside Columbus, GA — and Columbus is now persona non grata, so what shall become of the city? (Ohio must reckon with this also.) Watch out, Jefferson City, MO! How about Lincoln, NE, or Jackson, MS? And let’s not forget the most egregious of all: Washington, D.C. (for District of Columbia!), which is a double whammy. The list is not endless, but it is extensive. What should be done with our nation’s capital? Rename it Floydsville, District of BLM? How about renaming all offensively named cities for martyrs of whatever the popular movement of the day is? And doing it every few years as certain movements fall out of favor and new ones arise? We probably need to rename anything that smacks of cultural appropriation, so anything that carries a Native American or other indigenous people’s name must be renamed. If people can no longer buy a house with a “master bedroom” or “master bathroom,” what new terms will people have to learn for most things that could possibly have any sort of objectionable connotation? Finally, what shall our country be called, because “America” cannot be allowed to remain? I don’t know when, or if, any wisdom will prevail, and the insane rush to destroy the past in favor of an ever-shifting present will subside, but I fear what the aftermath will be in either case. Franklin responded to a question about the newly formed American government by saying “…a Republic, if we can keep it.” Either “if” should have been immortalized in capital letters, perhaps underlined and in bold print as a quotation, or should have been spoken as “for however long” instead. I fear for the future, because a future with no foundation in the past, however sordid or insufficient it was, is not a future where I will have a place. Tags: Gary M. Collier, American Thinker, the Rush, to destroy, the past To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Rising Diversity Is Joe Biden’s Worry, Too
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 03:07 PM PDT by Patrick J. Buchanan: Today, Democrats are pushing for amnesty and a path to citizenship not only for the DACA “Dreamers” but also the 11 million to 22 million other immigrants here illegally. Democrats may be found enlarging the electorate anywhere they can, even if it means allowing convicted felons and prison inmates to vote. Is her racial diversity America’s greatest strength? So we are told. Yet, even before America becomes a majority-minority nation, 25 years from now, recent changes in the composition of the country are going to impact both parties in 2020. According to Brookings Institution demographer William Frey, between 2010 and 2020, while America’s population grew by 20 million, our white population fell for the first time since the 1790 census. White Americans fell as a share of the population in all 50 states, in 358 of 364 metropolitan areas, in 3,012 of 3,141 counties. During that same decade, our Black population grew by 3 million, our Asian population by 4 million and our Hispanic population by 10 million. What’s the significance of those numbers? In presidential elections, Hispanics and Asians vote 70% Democratic and African Americans vote 90%. White folks, who made up 69% of the U.S. population in 2000 when George W. Bush was elected, have fallen today to 60%. For children under 16, the white share has fallen to less than half. Minority kids are now the majority in California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Mississippi and Maryland. Whites are also the oldest Americans, with a median age of 44. For Asian Americans, it is 37, for Black Americans, it is 35, and for Latinos, it is 30. Bottom line: The pool of Democratic voters is growing inexorably while the largest pool of potential GOP voters is aging, stagnating and shrinking. For the GOP, this is an existential crisis. If demography is destiny, and the party does not either increase its share of the white vote or attract millions more Black, Asian or Hispanic voters, then its national fate and future are sealed. All one need do is look to California. There, Democrats occupy every statewide office and two-thirds of both houses of the legislature. Both senators are Democrats as are 45 of the 52 members of the U.S. House. Nor are Democrats unaware of the opportunity demography offers. As persons of color in America — Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans and people of mixed race — grow in number, the Democrats’ job is a simple one. Get more people of color registered and voting. So, today, Democrats are pushing for amnesty and a path to citizenship not only for the DACA “Dreamers” but also the 11 million to 22 million other immigrants here illegally. Democrats may be found enlarging the electorate anywhere they can, even if it means allowing convicted felons and prison inmates to vote. If Democrats capture the White House and Senate, the “Muslim ban” on immigration is history, and America’s doors will be opened anew. But Joe Biden and his generation of Democrats have their own problem. Even as people of color make up a growing share of the nation, around 40%, they are an even larger, and still growing, share of the Democratic base. Without the huge majorities Asians, Blacks and Hispanics give them, Democrats could not win the White House. Yet, in this year’s primaries, the six top finishers in delegates were Biden, Bernie Sanders, Mike Bloomberg, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar. All are white, as are the two top Democratic leaders in the House, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer; the two top Democratic leaders in the Senate, Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin; and the overwhelming majority of the 47 Democratic senators and 24 Democratic governors. Democrats may prattle on about their glorious “diversity,” but a closer look reveals a predominantly white senior officer corps, atop an army of minorities, whose shock troops are the Black Caucus, Black Lives Matter, antifa and The Squad, the latter consisting of four women of color. There is something else of interest here. While the statues being torn down in the revolution of the Democratic left are a variety of explorers, conquerors, colonists, missionaries, Confederates and presidents, all appear to have one thing in common. All are white men. The Democratic left wants to terminate the succession of white folks making the history of the country. Thus the Democrats’ problem that comes with Biden’s choice of a running mate. Though demands are being made that minorities, who deliver half of all Democratic votes, be represented on the ticket, Biden is said to be leaning toward a white woman, Elizabeth Warren. Choosing Warren would make this Democratic ticket like every other one in 220 years, save for Barack Obama’s — an all-white ticket. It would pass over half a dozen women of color and put a white woman first in the line of succession to the presidency. And the 77-year-old Biden is promising to be a transition president. If Biden overlooks the women of color being considered as running mates and picks a white woman, the rumbling of the coming rebellion of the minorities inside the Democratic Party will be heard loud and clear. Tags: Patrick Buchanan, conservative, commentary, Rising Diversity, Is Joe Biden’s Worry, Too To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Are You Lonesome Tonight?
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 02:57 PM PDT
by Stephen Moore: “Are you lonesome tonight? / Do you miss me tonight? / Are you sorry we drifted apart? / Does your memory stray to a brighter, sunny day?” — Elvis Presley Loneliness is such a sad affair, as the saying goes, and our politicians have succeeded in turning America into a lonely nation by decree. We are going on four months now of lock-ins, business shutdowns and few, if any, social gatherings. What this is doing to the nation’s psyche has been devastating. A good friend of mine, Wayne, is 80 years old. He’s sociable, always upbeat and a great storyteller. He likes nothing more than to have a whiskey sour and a long dinner with friends. He’s single and loves to visit the ladies — especially the younger ones in their 60s and 70s! I spoke to him last week, and he was more forlorn than any time I’ve ever known him. He lives in an upscale assisted living facility, but he hasn’t been able to visit with friends for three months. He’s been isolated. A delivery man brings his meals; he isn’t allowed to go out during the daytime, when there are a lot of people out on the streets of Chicago. I offered to come visit him, and he was excited but called back the next day to say, never mind, the folks at the living center won’t allow outsiders to come in because of the virus. Everyone reading this probably knows more than one person suffering from the agony of moderate to severe depression resulting from this continuing, god-awful economic lockdown that is supposed to be saving lives. The negative effects on Americans’ health is getting more worrisome with every passing week. The good folks at Foundation for Economic Education recently reported on “alarming spikes in drug overdoses,” which The Washington Post calls “a hidden epidemic within the coronavirus pandemic.” By examining the national drug abuse data, they found that overdoses in March rose by 18% from the previous year nationally. In April, that figure ticked up to 29%. In May, the increase was 42%. Mental health experts find a strong link between loneliness/depression and drug overdoses. Social distancing may be good for us, but it is bad for us, too — especially after many months. Other research confirms that isolation can lead to physical health problems ranging from loss of sleep to heart failure to stress to injured immune systems to obesity. I’ve gained many pounds since the lockdowns began, as I constantly raid the refrigerator when I get bored staying at home. Children are especially negatively affected, and research indicates the cognitive effects can be long-lasting. Get the schools, the parks, the playgrounds and the sports programs opened, for goodness’ sake. These negative effects on children from isolation and indoor lockdowns are especially enraging because we know that children have a very low risk of getting sick from the coronavirus. Unless they have some severe preexisting health problems, they are about as likely to die from the coronavirus as they are to die from the normal flu. There is another negative sociological effect of the fear of the virus that is disrupting normal human connection. People are suspicious; they walk rapidly away from you if they see you coming toward them. They scowl and get agitated. I am told by some of my friends who lived through the horrible polio epidemic of the 1940s and early 1950s that it was never like that. Even though polio was a much more crippling and dangerous disease than the coronavirus, people didn’t walk around suspicious that the person next to them was carrying the disease. Commerce continued to flow, and businesses didn’t shut down, though swimming pools were often closed. This was the “greatest generation.” They lived through the Great Depression and World War II. They weren’t going to let a disease shut down our society. Polls show today that young people in their 20s and 30s are the most worried about COVID-19 and most in favor of lockdowns. They are the age group least likely to get sick from it. This is the snowflake and “safe spaces” generation that lives in mortal peril that someone might say something that offends them. It would be hard to imagine these worrywarts storming the beaches of Normandy. Americans have to be braver. We need to interact. Solitary confinement is a form of punishment. The political class in America is punishing us all for their own arrogance and incompetence. Tags: Stephen Moore, Are You Lonesome Tonight, Rasmussen Reports To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Cops vs. Mobs, Tyranny vs. Law?
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 02:47 PM PDT by Paul Jacob: “He was stuffed into what may have been a rental van operated by unmarked federal agents,” explained Cato Institute’s Patrick Eddington, “and taken to the federal courthouse, where he was interrogated without counsel. He wisely refused to answer questions and was then subsequently released without any kind of charges being filed.” Eddington concluded: “I think most people would call that kidnapping.” The “he” — detained and questioned by federal agents* in Portland, Oregon — is Mark Pettibone. Whether the van was rented is irrelevant, nor do these agents or their vehicles require any marking. And criminal suspects can lawfully be held for questioning. “So that we understand how police may remove someone from the streets,” Cato Daily Podcast host Caleb Brown adroitly offered, “we understand that they need to identify themselves. . . . that people who are placed under arrest retain certain rights to communicate with the outside world, to assert their ability to have a lawyer present for questioning. “It seems that perhaps,” added Brown, “asking for a lawyer was the trigger here” resulting in Mr. Pettibone’s release. Eddington agreed, but then announced that it “really does have the feel of Argentina or Chile in the 1970s, with the disappearances that took place. The only thing lacking was Mr. Pettibone being murdered by those agents.” That is one big “only”! “This is being done essentially to try to suppress protests in this country,” argued Eddington. “It has nothing to actually do with protecting monuments.” “We’re talking only about violent rioters,” Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Ken Cuccinelli told NPR. “We’re not talking about actual protesters. We’re not seeking to interfere at all with anyone peacefully expressing themselves — period, full stop.” Following the rule of law means protecting peaceful protests. And welcoming an investigation into the federal role in Portland. More concerning than Mr. Pettibone’s detention is the continued use of so-called non-lethal weapons, which seriously injured a protester weeks ago. But the rule of law also means protecting Portlanders and their property against violence and destruction. And welcoming an investigation into the state and local dereliction of duty in Portland. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. * The Department of Homeland Security acknowledged that agents with the CBP (Customs and Border Protection) were “cross designated to support FPS” (the Federal Protection Service) in Portland “because of the demand for more manpower in light of the violence.” Note: Walter Olson, a senior fellow at The Cato Institute’s Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies and founder of the blog, Overlawyered.com, details what we know about the Portland controversy. Tags: Paul Jacob, Cops vs. Mobs, Tyranny vs. Law To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Why Does Nancy Care about Portland?
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 02:33 PM PDT by Christopher Chantrill: In poker they call it a “tell” when someone inadvertently signals their hand. So what do you call it when all the usual Democratic suspects pile on when Trump’s G-men take on the Antifa regime thugs in Portland? And why Nancy Pelosi? Why is she so concerned? And now even “moms” are peacefully protesting for the right of their children to riot. Hey Midge Decter! That you would have lived to see a rerun of your Sixties reportage, Liberal Parents, Radical Children! The question is, do Democratic leaders believe that the riots help them win in November? Or are they afraid of losing control of the party if they don’t go along with the crazies? I’ve decided that it’s the latter. The Democratic party is being taken over by the woke left and the old generation of leaders is desperately trying to stay in control for one last cycle. Probably they will fail and be thrown out after the 2020 election, especially if Trump wins. Remember back in 2018 when Genius Pelosi got a whole class of moderate Democrats elected to the House? Wasn’t she smart? All those suburban women electing moderates to Congress, and Nancy got to be Speaker again. Only, it is now clear, Nancy Pelosi isn’t really in charge. She is running desperately after the woke mob trying not to lose control of the Democratic caucus completely. Oh sure, she’s good at the Women in White thingy for the State of the Union speech. But the wokeys are in the saddle, and they are canceling all and sundry, whether it’s Bari Weiss at the New York Times or Andrew Sullivan at New York / Vox. The Left has always been a lie, a cunning plan for the educated to get power in an over/under coalition. At least in the old days the bourgeoisie was a minority of the population so the over/under coalition plundered the minority bourgeoisie to deal out free stuff to the majority workers Not anymore. Today the educated Gentry, aided by corporate America and the Tech Lords, is plundering the majority, the middle-class Commoners, so it can lord it over Creation and toss a few bennies to its underclass clients and Victims. It is a monstrous injustice. Well-born street thugs in Antifa and BLM are beating on ordinary middle-class Commoner policemen who are the poor suckers that have to deal every day with drugged-out miscreants, the detritus of a century of lefty politics who, if they are the right race, are automatically victims of police brutality. Privilege? Systemic Systemism? If you are a white Commoner working for a big organization you can be canceled in a minute: fired, prosecuted, demolished. You have no rights, no defense, no respect, no recourse. All the privilege in America adheres to the upper-class educated Gentry that occupies the commanding heights of everything and makes the rules, and their helpless-victim clients that are exempt from the rules. The rules only apply to ordinary Commoners. And yet they are telling us that we, the Commoners of America, are the ones with unearned privilege. As Curtis Yarvin writes in his new Gray Mirror under “race laws,” our legal code since 1965 is all about race. It first distinguished between “humans of European and West African descent.” But then women became a race, and then gays. What do you get if you’re an official race? It means you can’t be bullied. People aren’t allowed to be mean to you, individually or collectively… The purpose of the race laws is to grant extra legal protection to races, such as humans of West African descent, whom the other, raceless people are bullying, or were bullying, or would bully if they could get away with it. What should we call our race laws? Not Nuremberg, obviously. Maybe “literally Hitler?” Even as recently as five years ago a guy like Yuval Hoah Harari could write Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind to the delight of the globalist elite and talk about the three modern religions being liberal humanism, socialist humanism, and evolutionary humanism. And yet here we are in an all-out religious war between normals getting canceled all over, because racism, and frenzied cultists in the media and the academy that believe in Critical Race Theory and all the other detritus of cultural Marxism (that the New York Times in 2018 called “a crude slander, referring to something that does not exist”). You know what? I feel sorry for Our Nance. No one, no one at the meeting of everyone-who-is-anyone to plan the defenestration of Donald Trump could have imagined the facts on the ground today, with regime thugs torching cities because Black Lives Matter and government teachers refusing to show up for work in September because WuFlu. Got any good ideas, Nance? Or is it time to ride your palfrey back to your glorious San Francisco castle? Tags: Christopher Chantrill, Why Does Nancy Care, about Portland? To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Every Sports Team Must Change Its Name
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 02:07 PM PDT by Daniel Greenfield: The Washington Redskins agreed to change a name that offended no one except white leftists, but the media, which always speaks with forked tongue, is demanding more sports scalps. The Cleveland Indians have issued a statement whining that “the recent social unrest… has only underscored the need for us to keep improving as an organization on issues of social justice.” Remember when the Indians were just known for being cursed with the second-longest championship drought in sports, now they can be cursed for their commitment to social justice. The curse used to be known as the Curse of Chief Wahoo, but he’s already been purged for political incorrectness. And now the Indians announced that they’re “committed to engaging our community and appropriate stakeholders to determine the best path forward with regard to our team name.” Those stakeholders won’t be their fans or anyone who knows what baseball is. But the purge of Indian names from sports is just getting started. The Kansas City Star ran a piece declaring that, “It’s time for the Chiefs to defuse the cultural offenses they enable and reflect”. The editorial though quickly goes beyond blasting the Chiefs, to declaring that America is genocidal and that the Declaration of Independence is racist. Spoiler alert. They’re not just coming for the Kansas City Chiefs, they’re coming for America. Remember when American newspapers didn’t entirely consist of headlines that looked like they were badly translated from Chinese Marxist rants? Maybe it would be easier to rename the Chiefs, the Kansas City Marxists. We could call them the Reds, but that name is taken. The Atlanta Braves have said that they aren’t changing the name, but will consider getting rid of the tomahawk chop. But the only thing appeasement half-measures accomplish is putting blood in the water. And once social media piranhas smell blood, they’ll never stop until they drink it. The Black Hawks are currently refusing to change their name, but are promising to, “expand awareness of Black Hawk and the important contributions of all Native American people.” As if that will protect them from a mob of angry white leftists who couldn’t care less. The culture war isn’t hitting sports because white lefties, some of whom claim to be Native American activists even though they have the blood quantum level of Elizabeth Warren, care about the feelings of American Indians, but because it gives them the power to terrorize people. The movement has already moved north of the border to Canadian football where the Edmonton Eskimos announced that, after “an extensive year-long formal research and engagement program with Inuit leaders”, they’re currently keeping the name. Boston Pizza, among other sponsors, is pulling out because a Canadian pizza chain founded by a Greek immigrant named after something it’s not, doesn’t want to be associated with Eskimos. The lefty media has already moved beyond Indian names, sensing that well might soon run dry. The Washington Post’s Karen Attiah, best known for helping turn Osama bin Laden’s old pal, Jamal Khashoggi, into a martyr, quickly put out a piece demanding that the Texas Rangers change their name because they’re symbols of white supremacy and law enforcement. They’re “not so far off from being called the Texas Klansmen”, Attiah huffed. That’s big coming from a Jeff Bezos employee who had tweeted that, “White women are lucky that we are just calling them ‘Karen’s’ and not calling for revenge.” Maybe the team can move to D.C. and change its name to the Washington Post Racists. “While we may have originally taken our name from the law enforcement agency, since 1971 the Texas Rangers Baseball Club has forged its own, independent identity,” the Texas Rangers responded. As if anyone had confused the team with the law enforcement agency. Not that it’s going to stop there. Statues of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Columbus are under attack. CNN is denouncing Mount Rushmore as a symbol of white supremacy. It’s only a matter of time until the Patriots, the Cowboys, the 76ers, 49ers, the Trailblazers, Nuggets, Spurs, and any names that reference American history, settlement and westward expansion, will also be banned. That includes the Yankees and the Knicks, whose names are already forgotten national slurs. The two New York City teams got their names from the slurs that the English settlers used to hurl at the Dutch settlers who wore short pants, or knickerbockers, and the slur John Cheese or Yan Kees, that the Dutch hurled back at the English usurpers. That won’t be the issue for the culture war mob, which doesn’t care about the slurs that different groups of white people called each other, but they both ‘problematically’ reference the European settlement of New York. Both teams could change their names to those of local Indian tribes, but that’s already off limits. Some media editorialist will, eventually, link the Cleveland Cavaliers to the Southern cavalier mythos and accuse them of white supremacy. The English Civil War would seem to have little to do with a Cleveland team, but King Charles I was involved in the African slave trade. “The name Cleveland Cavaliers represents a group of daring fearless men, whose life’s pact was never surrender, no matter what the odds,” the fan who won a contest to name the team wrote. We’ll see how long that lasts. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers will come under fire once someone realizes that their namesakes were involved in the slave trade in ways that were far more brutal than anything in Virginia. And if you’re going to get rid of them, the Pittsburgh Pirates will probably have to go too. The Minnesota Vikings might seem safe, since the Vikings largely focused on European slaves, but they did deal in at least some African slaves, which would also put them off limits. What names would still be safe? Birds, animals, colors, and the climate. Just avoid history. And the safest names will be corporate brands. The Washington Redskins are trying to figure out what to rename their team because FedEx gave the Redskins an ultimatum. They might as well just call them the Washington FedExes to celebrate the new politically correct corporate oligarchy which enforces political discipline through firings, indoctrination, and ad campaigns. A nation with no history, no mythos, and nothing to take pride in except for the million dollar losers at the local stadium is a lot easier for all sorts of people and organizations to rule over. The simplest solution might be for every team to change its name to Black Lives Matter. And when the Pittsburgh Heinz Black Lives Matters play the New York MetLife Black Lives Matters, it’ll be a little bit confusing, but that’s okay because no one will be watching. Tags: Daniel Greenfield, Sultanknish, every sports team, must change its name To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Ted Cruz: It’s ‘Racist’ to Defund the Police
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 01:48 PM PDT
by Rachel del Guidice: As municipalities around the country ponder defunding their police forces, Sen. Ted Cruz is pushing back. The Texas Republican argues that more black lives will be lost and more black women will be sexually assaulted if law enforcement is cut or abolished in some communities. Cruz joins The Daily Signal Podcast to discuss. The senator also talks about how and why he was sanctioned July 13 by the communist government of China for “interfering in China’s internal affairs.” Read a lightly edited transcript below. We also cover these stories:
Rachel del Guidice: I’m very honored to be joined on The Daily Signal Podcast by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. Sen. Cruz, it’s great to have you back on with us. Ted Cruz: Rachel, it’s great to be with you. Thank you for having me. Del Guidice: Well, it’s great to have you with us. So, to start off, China announced earlier this week sanctions against you and several other officials in the country for “interfering in China’s internal affairs.” Sen. Cruz, can you tell us what’s going on here? Cruz: Well, sure. Earlier this week, I went to bed, went to sleep, and when I woke up, I used my cellphone as my alarm clock. And so, I picked up the phone and looked at it. And first thing I had was four or five texts. All of which told me that while I was sleeping, that the communist government of China had formally sanctioned me, and had banned me from traveling to China. And I have to admit, I laughed out loud when I read that. I view that as a badge of honor. When it comes to China, the Chinese communist government, they are murderers, they are liars, they are torturers, they have over 1 million Uighurs right now in concentration camps in China, where they are being oppressed. They have brutal and inhuman policy such as the one-child policy that they enforced through forced sterilization and forced abortions. They engage in massive human rights cover-ups, including their censorship and cover-up of the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. … The cover-up of the Chinese communist government is a direct cause of the [deaths] of over 500,000 people who have died worldwide from this pandemic. And let me say also, we’re now at a point in time when a lot of politicians in Washington are suddenly discovering that the communist government in China is bad. I got to say, I had been a leading China hawk for the entire eight years I served in the Senate, laying out the danger that I believe China poses—the single greatest geopolitical threats to the United States for the next century. And there were an awful lot of politicians in Washington, both Democrats, but also a lot of Republicans, who argued on the other side, who said there wasn’t a threat from China, said the Chinese leadership was bragging, we should embrace them and become even more dependent on them. I’m glad that a lot of those are opening their eyes and coming over. There’s a reason why China singled me out for these sanctions, because they’re scared of American leadership standing up to their threat, but that only underscores the need to do so even more. Del Guidice: Well, given that, how do you think the United States can hold China accountable? Cruz: Well, I think it needs to be a multipronged strategy. I’ve introduced about a dozen different pieces of legislation focusing on different aspects of it. No. 1, let’s focus on the coronavirus pandemic. China bears enormous responsibility. It bears enormous responsibility for the [cover-up], and even potentially before that, potentially for the origination of this virus. There were two different virology labs in Wuhan, China, both of which we now know were studying coronaviruses. They were studying coronaviruses derived from bats. The particular bats they were studying, the closest natural population is over 900 miles away in China. And we also know that the State Department, last year, there were multiple wires raising serious concerns about the security protocols in those Chinese government labs, and in particular, raising the threat, the risk, that because their security was so shoddy, there was a risk of them triggering a global pandemic of a coronavirus that could escape. I think we need absolutely clear accountability. We need to go in with a forensic effort to, No. 1, determine every single step of China’s culpability of their responsibility. We also know, in December, when heroic Chinese whistleblowers and physicians tried to blow the whistle, tried to point out this outbreak was occurring, the Chinese government went and arrested those whistleblowers, they silenced them, they punished them, and they made a deliberate decision not to act as a responsible government, not to send in public health officials and quarantine those who were affected. If they’d had done that, there’s a very real possibility this could have remained as a limited regional outbreak instead of a global pandemic. But instead, they cynically risked the lives of millions across the globe. We need a careful accounting of that, and we need real consequences and responsibility. On a totally different aspect of the problem, economically, our vulnerability to the supply chain, to critical infrastructure that’s been drawn into China. Let’s take, for example, medical equipment, [personal protective equipment], pharmaceuticals. The Chinese communist government systematically targeted that vital industry in the United States, engaged in economic warfare, drove out of business much of our domestic production. We’re now incredibly dependent on communist China for antibiotics, for cancer drugs, for Alzheimer’s drugs, for all sorts of vital medical equipment. And right in the midst of this pandemic, one Chinese government-controlled state newspaper explicitly threatened to cut off pharmaceuticals to the United States as a tool of economic warfare. Now, if they would do that, that’s actually not economic warfare, that’s actual warfare, that is literally threatening the lives of millions of Americans who depend upon these medicines. And it gets completely unacceptable that we are dependent upon the whims of the Chinese communist leadership. So I’m fighting for legislation to create strong tax incentives, to move that manufacturing back to the United States, the critical infrastructure, the pharmaceutical [manufacturing], so that we don’t have the lives of Americans subject to the whim of communist dictators who are trying to defeat the United States of America. Del Guidice: What about your colleagues in the Senate? Are you happy with how they’ve responded to these votes from China or do you see that there is more needed to be done, and how would you encourage them to go about that? Cruz: I think there’s a great deal more that needs to be done. I do think people’s eyes are opening up more significantly. But the comprehensiveness of the threat is still something we’re just beginning to grapple with. I think the most far-reaching consequence of this global pandemic is going to be a fundamental reassessment of the United States’ relationship with China. That includes things like rare earth minerals and materials. I have another bill I’ve introduced, the ORE, because a great many minerals—China did the same thing they did the pharmaceuticals, they targeted U.S. production of it, they bankrupted it, drove it out of business, and we depend upon it for national security, for critical defense tools, for technology. We need to be bringing that back. Chinese censorship, which is an enormous problem, both in China, but also here—Hollywood willingly censors American movies because they want access to the Chinese market. So for example, the new sequel to “Top Gun,” that was supposed to be coming out later this year, the back of Mavericks jacket—in the original movie, there was a Taiwanese flag and a Japanese flag on the back of his jacket. Hollywood happily edited them out because the Chinese overlords demanded them. I’ve introduced legislation called the SCRIPT Act, that what it does is restricts access to federal government assets. A whole lot of movies use things like military ships, military jets, military tanks, or equipment to film their movies. And what the SCRIPT Act says is, listen, if you want access to federal government hard assets then you have to agree not to let the Chinese government censor your film. And so, I think fighting these issues across the board is important. And Rachel, I’ll note, last fall in October, I traveled to Asia and I went to Pearl Harbor, and Japan, and Taiwan, and India, and Hong Kong. And it was very much designed as really a friends and allies tour, of major allies of America surrounding China … The entire focus of the trip was dealing with the threat of communist China. In Hong Kong, I met with the protesters, some 2 million protesters came to the streets of Hong Kong fighting for liberty. And I met with them, many of them young teenagers risking their lives to stand up for freedom. I did one of the Sunday shows by satellite back in the United States, and I dressed in all black in solidarity with the protest … the protesters dressed in all black when they protested. I think highlighting this and understanding the scope, and breadth, and depth of it, the Chinese government is waging a 1,000-year war. That’s what they’re trying to do. We need to be serious and level-headed, and clear-eyed in defending ourselves against that threat. Del Guidice: Well, switching gears just a little bit here, something that you have been vocal about is your concerns about the “defund police” movement. What is your perspective on this movement and how would you characterize it? Cruz: Well, I think today’s Democratic Party has really released the angriest, and craziest, and most extreme left-wing voices in their party. And I got to say, once you’ve opened Pandora’s box, it’s very hard to close it again. If I would have suggested to you a month ago that Democrats would be advocating for abolishing the police, people would have laughed and ridiculed that: “Come now, that can’t possibly be serious. Nobody would propose that.” And yet, sadly, we’re seeing more and more elected officials embracing that radical, extreme ideology. We’ve got Bill de Blasio, the mayor of New York City, who’s advocating for cutting $1 billion from the New York Police Department, even while their crime rate is skyrocketing and their murder rate is skyrocketing. I think that defunding the police or abolishing the police is profoundly dangerous, I think it is foolish, I think it is a radical idea. I also think it is racist. Because those who are advocating this, their mantra is “black lives matter.” And listen, as a statement of values, that is absolutely correct. Yes, absolutely, black lives matter. And if you abolish the police, if you defund the police, you know to an absolute certainty that more black lives will be lost, more African American women, and children, and innocents living in high-crime neighborhoods, more of them will be murdered, more of them will be assaulted, more of them will be subject to sexual assault. And it is dangerous, and they get an approach to say, “These vulnerable communities, we’re going to pull the cops out of there and leave you to be victims of violent crime.” I think that’s a terrible, terrible idea. Del Guidice: What is your perspective as well on this, on how lawmakers and other state and local leaders have responded to all these pushes across the country? What can and … what needs to be done? Cruz: Well, unfortunately, there are too many elected politicians who are standing with and facilitating and encouraging the angry mob. We have seen, tragically, mobs burning our cities, we’ve seen violent rioters attacking innocent citizens, firebombing police cars, looting and destroying small businesses, many of which are owned by African Americans or Hispanics in the inner city, murdering police officers. And this is wrong. I have been calling upon and working with state and local law enforcement to stop it. To make clear, everyone has a right to protest, everyone has a right to speak and to speak freely, but you don’t have a right to engage in violence, you don’t have a right to hurt anybody else, you don’t have a right to murder anybody else, you don’t have a right to destroy anybody else’s home or anybody else’s business. And if you do that, law enforcement needs to put you in jail for a very long time. Sadly though, we see politicians on the left who have determined it is in their political interest to stand with the rioters, and the looters, and the murderers. And it is wrong. You look at Minneapolis in the wake of the horrific killing of George Floyd; the riots there destroyed over 700 buildings in the city of Minneapolis. Much of that violence was spearheaded by Antifa, [the] terrorist organization that infiltrated what were peaceful protests and turned them into violent riots instead. I’ve introduced in the Senate legislation that allows any individual American, if you have elected officials that have ordered the police to withdraw, that have allowed a lawless zone or a lawless territory to be created that results in the destruction of property or the harming of individual Americans, that allows you to sue those elected officials who made the decision to wrongfully deprive you of your civil rights, and for political reasons, remove police protections from vulnerable neighborhoods. Del Guidice: Lastly, Sen. Cruz, you’re very passionate [in] speaking about clean energy initiatives that would, in the long run, harm the economy. … People say these things are good, but then there are very serious implications down the road. Cruz: Well, much like the Democratic Party has unleashed the extreme, abolish the police forces, it’s also unleash[ed] the extreme environmental left, where the Green New Deal that was initially proposed by [Rep.] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would cost $93 trillion. Now, it’s hard sometimes for people to put numbers in scope and relative scale. So here’s one way of thinking about it: $93 trillion is more money than the United States government has spent in the entire history of our country. Going back to the days of George Washington, if you add up every government expenditure, including the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, and World War II, that all adds up to less than $93 trillion. And the proposal of AOC, that’s now being embraced by many mainstream Democrats or supposedly mainstream Democrats, is a staggering expense that would result in dramatic taxes that would just cripple working families, destroying manufacturing jobs across this country, destroying blue-collar jobs across this country, destroying energy jobs across this country. The last several years, we have seen an energy renaissance in the United States, and it’s driven by the technological advances that have allowed us to develop far more resources, fracking, the shale revolution, oil and gas resources that’s driven down the cost of energy and has produced millions of high-paying jobs. And what is now being proposed is to destroy those jobs. And I got to say, I just think that is fundamentally wrong. I recognize that that would please the billionaire donors in New York City and San Francisco. But I think we ought to be standing with the working men and women, with the steelworkers in Ohio, with the truck drivers, with the waiters and waitresses, and single moms, and the men and women with calluses on their hands. The proposal of the Democrats on energy is just to bankrupt those blue-collar jobs, to put them out of business. And also to put out of business a lot of manufacturing jobs, because the low cost energy that American innovation has produced in the last few years has enabled us to bring manufacturing jobs back from China, back from Mexico, back from countries across the world, back to the United States. But yet, the current proposal being debated would result in those blue-collar jobs being eliminated. I think that’s wrong. And my view on energy is we should pursue all of the above. I’m for every energy source, whether oil, gas, or coal, or nuclear, or solar, or wind, or biofuels, you name it, we should have all of them, but it shouldn’t be Washington bureaucrats taking winners and losers, it shouldn’t be the corrupt Washington process doing it. Instead, it should be the innovation and creativity of the market moving forward and driving more jobs, more opportunity, higher wages, driving our economy forward. Del Guidice: Sen. Cruz, thank you so much for joining us today on The Daily Signal Podcast. It’s been great to have you back on. Cruz: It’s been a lot of fun. Thanks for having me. Tags: Ted Cruz, It’s ‘Racist’, to Defund the Police. Rachel del Guidice, The Daily Signal To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Opus To Defund Police
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 01:23 PM PDT
Tags: Opus, To Defund Police, Editorial Cartoon, Michael Ramirez, Issues & Insights To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
President Trump Is Ending The Obama-Biden Regulation To Rezone Neighborhoods Along Income And Racial Guidelines
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 01:08 PM PDT by Robert Romano: President Donald Trump is ending the 2015 Obama-Biden era regulation Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) regulation, and has removed requirements that more than 1,200 cities and counties make changes to local zoning in order to qualify for $3 billion of annual community development block grants. Appearing at the White House Rose Garden on July 14, President Trump called enforcement of this regulation was a “key element” of former Vice President Joe Biden’s platform for president, saying it would “abolish the suburbs…” According to Biden’s campaign website, “Biden will implement the Obama-Biden Administration’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule requiring communities receiving certain federal funding to proactively examine housing patterns and identify and address policies that have a discriminatory effect.” Trump explained, “Enforce Obama-Biden’s radical AFFH — that’s the AFFH regulation that threatens to strip localities of federal affordable housing funds unless they change their zoning laws to fit the federal government’s demands. So what you have — I mean, I’ve been watching this for years in Westchester, coming from New York. They want low-income housing built in a neighborhood.” But with changes to the rule released in January, the zoning mandates have been repealed. Trump said, “I’m ending that rule. I’m taking it out, so — I spoke with Ben Carson the other day. We’re going to be taking it out. I’ve watched that whole thing go, and now they want to make it twice as bad in the suburbs — in the suburbs. Mothers aren’t happy about that. Fathers aren’t happy about that. They worked hard to buy a house, and now they’re going to watch the housing values drop like a rock, and that has happened. It dropped like a rock. So we’re not going to do that; we’re going to do the exact opposite.” Under the new rule that was proposed by the Trump administration on Jan. 14 with comments that ended on March 16, “Jurisdictions are free to choose to undertake changes to zoning or land-use policies as one method of complying with the AFFH obligation; however, no jurisdiction may have their certification questioned because they do not choose to undertake zoning changes.” This differed drastically from the original 2015 regulation had included an explicit requirement calling for changes to local zoning, stating, “This final rule, and Assessment Tools and guidance to be issued, will assist recipients of Federal funding to use that funding and, if necessary, adjust their land use and zoning laws in accordance with their existing legal obligation to affirmatively further fair housing.” At the time, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives adopted an amendment by U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) to defund implementation of the regulation. Later, a more moderate provision by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) passed the Senate easily 87 to 9 in 2016 that barred the regulation from being used to affect local zoning. The Collins amendment was eventually included in the 2017 omnibus, the 2018 omnibus, the 2019 omnibus, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020, stating: “None of the funds made available by this Act may be used by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to direct a grantee to undertake specific changes to existing zoning laws as part of carrying out the final rule entitled ‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing’ … or the notice entitled ‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Assessment Tool’…” Now, there are plenty of non-discriminatory reasons why cities wouldn’t want the federal government to interfere with local zoning. For example, it might result in property values declining. Or, conversely, because demand for property would remain high in densely populated areas, changes to zoning might still result in high prices, thereby mitigating the effects of reform to make housing more affordable. In 2018, I personally submitted comments to the Department of Housing and Urban Development noting Congress had explicitly barred implementation of AFFH as written and that, to comply, the regulation would have to be rewritten to remove the zoning requirements and making any changes voluntary. The Department found further legal justification for revising the AFFH rule to remove zoning mandates under 42 U.S. Code § 12705(c)(1), which states, “the adoption or continuation of a public policy identified pursuant to subsection (b)(4) [which includes local zoning ordinances as a potential barrier to affordable housing] shall not be a basis for the Secretary’s disapproval of a housing strategy…” This provision, per HUD, “prohibits HUD from disapproving consolidated plans because a jurisdiction adopts or continues zoning ordinances or land-use policies.” Meaning funds cannot be denied on the basis of a city or county’s lack of a plan to change zoning. Now, President Trump may be taking the additional step of scrapping the rule altogether. Of course, a future Biden administration might not see things the same way. Therefore, the President ought to press Congress to continue including the Collins amendment in future appropriations bills to prevent the federal government from dictating local zoning policy. In the meantime, President Trump on his own is ending federal dictates and restoring local government control over zoning — the way it should be. Tags: Robert Romano, Americans for Limited Government, President Trump, Is Ending, The Obama-Biden Regulation, To Rezone Neighborhoods, Along Income And Racial Guidelines To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
“Never Give In”
Posted: 22 Jul 2020 12:39 PM PDT “Then out spake brave Horatius We are watching firsthand governors of some states enacting ridiculous and unconstitutional executive orders rooted not in science but in the language of despots and tyrants. Consider the following: 1. People, citizens are being arrested and fined for going to Church! Pastors and Preachers arrested for giving sermons. How has this helped stem the tide of the Coronavirus? Whatever happened to Freedom of Religion? 2. Whatever happened to our basic civil liberties inherent in our Constitution and Bill of Rights? Why have they been suspended? From whence did the authority to do this come? 3. Police are literally dragging people off public transportation and arresting grandparents for walking in public parks with their four and five-year-old grandchildren. 4. You can be fined and jailed for violating “social distancing guidelines” 5. Today you can go to the beach, but you cannot lay in the sun on a towel; you must walk on the beach! Did some of our governors forget that human beings require sunlight, and why is it not safe to lay on the beach? 6. Forgive me but I cannot understand how releasing convicted violent criminals…rapists, gang-bangers, murderers and thieves from prisons for fear they might contract COVID-19 and then, enact executive orders to fine and jail law abiding citizens for opening their businesses so they can put food on the table and pay their bills. How is this helping with the Coronavirus? How it is in the best interests of the community? Are hardened criminals suddenly going to stop committing crimes because they were freed from prison. 7. How is spending millions of dollars on illegal aliens before helping American citizens and homeless veterans justified? How is it even right? 8. One governor announced that “Boating is OK, but you can only have two people to a boat” Three or more and you are in violation of the law. What law? Where? 9. Abortion Clinics specializing in the killing of infants are considered “essential businesses” but restaurants, hardware stores and gyms are not. Fascinating isn’t it? Many years ago, Saul Alinsky, a communist living in Chicago, and a favorite of Hillary Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama and John Brennan wrote: “A revolutionary organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of people’s lives….agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with current values and mores…to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive affirmative non challenging climate for it.” In other more simplistic terms, pit good against evil, with a clear path leaning towards evil. If you think about it, this is precisely what has been happening in our nation over the last decade, intensified when Trump won the Presidency in 2016. That wasn’t supposed to happen. It upset the applecart. The Great Alinsky Plan was in danger and something had to be done. Enter the fake Russia investigations, the Ukraine investigations, the vile and despicable attempt to discredit now Justice Kavanaugh with disgusting falsehoods and lies, the unlawful investigations of General Michael Flynn, the not so subtle pushing aside of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Sham Failed Impeachment of President Trump that was really a failed bloodless Coups d’etat, the overthrow of our elected government. In other words, treason. And now we have the shutting down of our nation over the Coronavirus. I am well within the mark when I say that these are all intentional plans to seize control of our government by democrats and liberal/socialists whose ultimate aim is to force the US into the New World Order. If they succeed, it will mean the destruction of our nation and the last bastion of freedom in the world. November 2020 is a pivotal time for America. We must let our voices and our votes be heard. We cannot and must not countenance democrats regaining power. And above all we must remember what democrats like Nancy Pelosi, Gerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders have tried to do to our nation and how they failed to step up and act in the interests of the citizens they represent! Do I believe the COVID-19 is a real issue? Of course, I do. But it is not the crisis we have been led to believe. It is a serious virus, but it has a 99% recovery rate and that is a fact. And we have the tools to deal with it. You do not shut down a nation as a response to such a “threat”. My strong belief is that COVID-19 is nothing more than a tool to push our nation towards the concept espoused by miscreants like Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, Jim Comey, Eric Holder and many others of a New World Order, a new un-constitutional kingdom ruled by them. Sir Winston Churchill often used the poem translated by Babbington McCaulley and cited above to inspire his nation in the dark days of World War II when Britain was under assault by the Nazis. He succeeded. I use it in this piece as a reminder to “Never Give in” but in this case the message is do not sacrifice our freedom and our nation at the altar of convenience or false security. I implore you….do not let it happen. Tags: E.P. Unum, Never Give In, McIntosh Enterprises To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REDSTATE
Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler Leads Protests in Portland Wed. Night — Feds Didn’t Change Tactics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
AMERICAN SPECTATOR
ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Thursday, July 23, 2020
|
Good morning, NBC News readers.
Republican leaders may have finally struck a deal on the next coronavirus aid package as the number of confirmed cases in the U.S. approaches 4 million.
Here’s what we’re watching this Thursday morning.
|
Senate GOP, White House reach tentative $1 trillion pact to break coronavirus aid logjam
Senate Republicans announced Wednesday evening that they have “reached a fundamental agreement” with White House negotiators on how to move forward with a coronavirus relief bill.
The tentative framework comes amid tension in the party over how to respond to the coronavirus pandemic.
The proposal includes $16 billion for testing, money so schools can “safely reopen” and another round of direct payments to Americans.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has indicated that he wants to keep the price tag to $1 trillion. But some Republicans have denounced the cost amid a soaring national debt.
The new proposal would just be the starting point for negotiations with Democrats who have been pressuring the GOP to move quickly on new aid as COVID-19 cases and deaths rise in the United States.
Here are some other developments:
- Coronavirus test results are taking weeks. A rapid test could take minutes — but there’s a catch.
- California now has more confirmed coronavirus cases than New York.
- “It’s better that they stay home”: Puerto Rico backtracks on welcoming tourists after coronavirus cases spike.
- Track U.S. hot spots where COVID-19 infection rates are rising.
- The U.S. death toll from coronavirus has surpassed 143,000 according to NBC News’ tally.
|
Chicago activists worry as federal troops head their way
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he would send federal law enforcement officers to Chicago to address the city’s recent increase in violence, his latest deployment of federal agents to Democratic-run cities that the president has claimed are out of control.
“I am announcing that the Department of Justice will immediately surge federal law enforcement to the city of Chicago. The FBI, ATF, DEA, U.S. Marshals Service and Homeland Security will together be sending hundreds of skilled law enforcement officers to Chicago to help drive down violent crime,” Trump said at a White House event addressing crime in cities.
Trump said he would also be sending law enforcement to other cities “soon,” including Kansas City, Missouri and Albuquerque, New Mexico.
But community activists and criminologists in Chicago say they are concerned that the tensions, reinvigorated protests and questionable arrests involving federal agents in Portland, Oregon, in recent days could flare in Chicago, America’s third-largest city.
“Sending in federal agents without any real specificity and clarity for their presence is a very slippery slope,” said David Stovall, a professor of African American studies and criminology at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
|
Chinese consulate in Houston was hot spot for spying, say U.S. officials
The Trump administration’s decision to close China’s consulate in Houston on Wednesday came after years of FBI intelligence-gathering showed it was a hot spot of Chinese spying in America, U.S. officials told NBC News.
Multiple U.S. officials said that the Houston consulate has long been used by the Chinese government to steal valuable medical research and that it was involved in attempts to infiltrate the oil and natural gas industries. President Trump had been well briefed about the concerns, they said.
Current and former U.S. law enforcement officials say the consulate is well-fortified, was hardened to prevent U.S. surveillance, and was a high-tech communications hub to coordinate and execute various spying operations.
On Wednesday the U.S. government ordered China to “cease all operations and events” at the consulate.
|
Who’s behind Trump’s big polling deficit? Two key groups defecting to Biden.
In the wake of a pandemic and the protests following George Floyd’s death, voters’ support for President Donald Trump has tanked.
His average deficit against Joe Biden in national polls has ballooned from 6 percentage points in March to 9 points in July. In the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, published just last week, former Vice President Joe Biden leads Trump 51 percent to 40 percent.
A closer look at the recent surveys shows two key groups are fueling Biden’s polling surge: seniors and white voters with college degrees, writes NBC News’ contributor David Wasserman.
Click here to see the charts that show the trends.
|
|
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
|
Plus
- He guarded Nazi gas chambers at age 17. Now, at 93, he has been found guilty by a German court.
- The House voted overwhelmingly to remove Confederate statues from the U.S. Capitol. But it’s unclear whether Republicans will take the bill up in the Senate or if it will reach the president’s desk.
- More Wells Fargo customers say the bank paused their mortgage payments without asking.
- What’s up with the new “COVID fee?” Consumers are split on whether to pay more for drinks, dinner, or a haircut.
- Kim Kardashian West opened up about her husband Kayne West’s bipolar disorder.
|
THINK about it
Solitary confinement is a national disgrace. My sister’s death proves why, activist Melanie Brown writes in an opinion piece.
|
Live BETTER
Wellness is all about self-care, but with $100 yoga pants, imagery of slender — mostly white — women and “positive vibes only,” self-care sometimes seems to be only for a select few. Meet the women working to change that.
|
Shopping
The best dog treats, according to veterinarians.
|
One fun thing
At 94 years old, Mae Krier, a former “Rosie the Riveter,” is serving her country once again — by sewing face masks.
For about eight hours a day, she’s at her sewing machine making masks in the iconic polka-dot print.
“It’s very rewarding. That little piece of red and white polka-dot stands for something,” she said.
While she started out making them for family and friends, she now has over 1,000 pending orders from strangers across the country saluting women’s service.
|
NBC FIRST READ
|
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Carrie Dann and Melissa Holzberg
FIRST READ: The Republican silence on what’s happening in Portland is jarring
If you’ve followed American politics over the last 10 years, you might be surprised that Republicans are more outraged at Liz Cheney than they are at federal armed agents who just tear-gassed a city’s mayor.
What happened to “Don’t tread on me”?
What happened to states’ rights?
What happened to freedom of speech and assembly?
Photo by Nathan Howard/Getty Images
It’s easy to understand in our current politics why elected Republicans aren’t speaking out against the Department of Homeland Security forces in liberal, urban Portland. (Sen. Rand Paul is one exception.)
But if you lived through the Obama Era, this Republican silence is jarring.
And the next time they’re out of power from the White House, it will only undercut future efforts by them to decry federal overreach.
|
America’s partisan divide over race stands out in NBC News/WSJ poll
The nation’s two political parties couldn’t be more divided over the issue of race after George Floyd’s death and the protests that followed it, according to the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll numbers we released earlier this week.
One party believes that discrimination of Blacks and Latinos exists (between 80 and 90 percent of Democrats say this); the other party doesn’t (just 15 to 26 percent of Republicans).
One party believes that America is a racist society (82 percent of Democrats); the other party doesn’t (30 percent of Republicans).
One party believes President Trump has made it more acceptable for people to be racist (79 percent of Dems); the other party doesn’t (18 percent of GOPers).
One party has a positive view of Black Lives Matter (83 percent of Dems); the other party doesn’t (11 percent of GOPers).
And one party’s members want to remove Confederate monuments either by being destroyed or put in a museum (81 percent of Dems); the other party doesn’t (16 percent of Republicans).
|
White Democrats vs. white Republicans on race
And if you think this partisan divide over race is due to Democrats having more Blacks and Latinos in their ranks, just see below.
The differences between white Democrats and white Republicans couldn’t be starker.
|
DATA DOWNLOAD: The numbers that you need to know today
3,989,346: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 79,832 more cases than yesterday morning.)
144,183: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 1,224 more than yesterday morning.)
48.02 million: The number of coronavirus TESTS that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.
$1 trillion: The price tag on the tentative agreement Senate Republicans and the White House have reached to address the next round of coronavirus relief
$3.4 trillion: The cost of the recovery bill Democrats have already passed in the House
More than half: The number of states that now have mask-wearing mandates
At least 76 percent: The share of voters who are eligible to cast a ballot by the mail in the fall, according to a study by the Washington Post.
72: The number of House Republicans who joined with Democrats to vote to remove statues of Confederate leaders from the Capitol.
45 percent to 44 percent: The head-to-head between Biden and Trump in Texas, according to a new Quinnipiac poll.
|
TWEET OF THE DAY: Let’s play ball
|
2020 VISION: Obama, Biden discuss health care
In the latest release of the Biden campaign’s conversation between Barack Obama and Joe Biden, the two men discuss health care and Biden’s son, Beau, per NBC’s Mike Memoli and Marianna Sotomayor.
BIDEN: “I remember when Beau was toward the end, and the only person I told the detail all the time as you, because you had a right to know exactly what my, and he only had months left to go. And I used to sit there and watch him in the bed and in pain and dying and glioblastoma, I thought to myself, what would happen if his insurance company was able to come in, which they could have done before we passed Obamacare and said, you have out run your insurance. You’re about to suffer the last five months of your life in peace. You’re on your own. All the things that it did, that it was so profound, an impact on people. It was like, it took them a while until they started to take it away to realize what was happening.”
OBAMA: “I mean, you and I both know what it’s like to have somebody you love get really sick. And in some cases to lose somebody, but that loss is compounded when you see the stress on their faces, because they’re worried that they’re being a burden on their families. They’re worried about whether the insurance is gonna cover the treatments that they need. I couldn’t be prouder of what we got done. 20 million people have health insurance that didn’t have it because of what we did.”
|
Where Senate Republicans agree and disagree on the relief bill
Senate Republicans announced Wednesday night that they “reached a fundamental agreement” with the White House on the next phase of coronavirus relief, per NBC’s Hill team.
While the particulars of the bill remain fluid, Republicans still are not totally in sync on it, and Democrats haven’t begun to weigh in.
Here’s what our Hill team can report will be in the proposal:
- $25 billion for testing total ($9 billion from earlier packages plus $16 billion in this package)
- $70 billion for K-12 schools: Half of that will go to all schools on a per capita basis, and the other half will go to costs for schools that have re-opened.
- $30 billion for colleges/universities which is not tied to reopening
- $5 billion for governors to use at their own discretion
And what are we waiting to know?
- There is an agreement to provide more direct stimulus payments to Americans, but what that amount looks like and what income levels that will cover is still not public
- There is no agreement on additional unemployment insurance benefits at this point
- Whether or not a payroll tax cut will be in this bill.
|
THE LID: We are never ever getting back together
Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we looked at a big schism in the GOP and what it might mean for the party.
|
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world?
Joe Biden says that Trump is the first racist president.
Mike Bloomberg’s gun control group is pouring millions into races in eight states.
The White House cafeteria is closed after a worker tested positive for coronavirus.
The Biden campaign is going on the offensive on the Senate GOP’s probe of Burisma.
The Trump administration is sending more federal agents to Chicago and Albuquerque.
Mike Pompeo’s wife is coming under scrutiny from some State Department insiders.
|
CBS
|
|
|
|
IJR
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
LOUDER WITH CROWDER
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
|
||||||||||
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
TWITCHY
|
|
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
HOOVER INSTITUTE