Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Wednesday February 4, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
Mar 04, 2020
|
Good morning from Washington, where President Trump appears more visible than ever as he seeks to reassure Americans that his administration is working to limit the spread of the coronavirus. Fred Lucas recaps. We’ve also got an account from our foreign correspondent, Nolan Peterson, on flying internationally as the global outbreak grows. On the podcast, two of the president’s strongest supporters in the House look back on Democrats’ impeachment drive. Plus: a judge isn’t done with Hillary Clinton, the threat of government-controlled medicine, and the young’s infatuation with socialism. On this date in 1789, Congress meets in New York for its first session under the Constitution, although attendance is poor among senators and representatives. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add morningbell@heritage.org to your address book to ensure that you receive emails from us.
You are subscribed to this newsletter as rickbulow1974@gmail.com. If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters, or opt out of this newsletter, please click here to update your subscription. |
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DAYBREAK
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TWITCHY
|
|
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
REDSTATE
Stop Gaslighting, Joe Biden Is Still Joe Biden and He’s Not Ok
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
REALCLEARPOLITICS
|
IJR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NBC
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray and Carrie Dann FIRST READ: Biden grabs the delegate lead, and it’s going to be hard for Sanders to catch him We mapped out yesterday morning what we THOUGHT might be a super Super Tuesday for Joe Biden. We just didn’t realize how great for him it would actually be.
Biden won nine states (AL, AR, MA, MN, NC, OK, TN, TX, VA) versus three for Bernie Sanders (CO, UT, VT), with two states still not called by NBC News (CA and ME). Mario Tama/Getty Images More significantly, Biden has won – so far – 87 more delegates than Sanders did last night, according to NBC’s Decision Desk.
And even when all of the California delegates eventually get allocated, we still believe Biden will emerge as the delegate winner from Super Tuesday.
And here’s why that’s a problem for Sanders: The future contests don’t get any easier for him.
On March 10, the Democratic presidential race moves to Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota and Washington state.
On March 17, it heads to Arizona, Florida, Illinois and Ohio.
And on March 24, Georgia holds its primary.
While Sanders could conceivably win Michigan, Washington, Arizona and Ohio that could help him cut into Biden’s delegate lead, Florida and Georgia – combined – could conservatively net Biden 100 delegates.
So any Sanders gains could be quickly erased – and more – by states in the South.
The Vermont senator’s best path to the nomination was building a 200- or 250-delegate lead on Super Tuesday and holding on.
Instead, it was Biden who got the delegate lead on Super Tuesday, and that’s a much tougher place for Sanders.
The good news for Sanders is that every time we seem to think we have the Democratic presidential race figured out – “Sanders is the frontrunner!” “Biden won South Carolina but might not have the organization or money to compete on Super Tuesday!” – we get quite the surprise.
TWEET OF THE DAY: Ten days that shook the political world
Sanders is (mostly) stuck in the 20s Bernie Sanders won New Hampshire last month with 26 percent of the vote.
He got 20 percent in South Carolina.
And last night, he took 26 percent in Massachusetts, 25 percent in Oklahoma and Tennessee, 24 percent in North Carolina, 23 percent in Virginia, 22 percent in Arkansas, and 16 percent in Alabama.
While Sanders did get 36 percent in Colorado, 33 percent (so far) in California, and 51 percent in his home state of Vermont, he isn’t growing his base.
In fact, it seems quite the contrary – see below.
DATA DOWNLOAD: And the number of the day is … 35 points.
That’s the difference between the share of the vote that Bernie Sanders got in his home state of Vermont in 2016 (86 percent) and what he got there last night (51 percent).
Yes, it’s a more crowded field, but it’s also a signal of how Sanders hasn’t expanded his base in the last four years.
Here’s how those vote shares from 2016 and 2020 stack up in the other states that voted last night. Alabama Arkansas California Colorado (Was a caucus in 2016, now a primary) Maine (Was a caucus in 2016, now a primary) Massachusetts Minnesota (Was a caucus in 2016, now a primary) North Carolina Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Utah (Was a caucus in 2016, now a primary) Vermont Virginia
2020 VISION: Bloomberg’s bust As we noted yesterday, Michael Bloomberg spent $198 million on TV and radio ads in the Super Tuesday states, per our ad trackers at Advertising Analytics.
And as of this morning, Bloomberg has picked up just 18 delegates from the Super Tuesday contests.
That’s $11 million per delegate.
On the campaign trail today: Biden is expected to deliver remarks in Los Angeles.
Dispatches from NBC’s campaign embeds: A fired-up Joe Biden celebrated a victorious Super Tuesday night in California, NBC’s Marianna Sotomayor reports: “’It’s a good night, and it seems to be getting even better. They don’t call it Super Tuesday for nothing,’ Biden immediately told the crowd of several hundred gathered at a Los Angeles recreational center. A boisterous Biden reminded the crowd that many predicted weeks ago that his campaign would end on this exact night. Instead, it appears that it will end in an upset for his opponents, which has surprised Biden campaign expectations. ‘Well, it may be over for the other guy,’ Biden said in an apparent jab to his opponents. ‘I’m here to report, we are very much alive.’”
And the haul for Biden last night may have Mike Bloomberg reassessing, NBC’s Josh Lederman, Maura Barrett and Julia Jester report from last night: “Publicly, the Bloomberg campaign is projecting confidence tonight, with campaign manager Kevin Sheekey saying on Tuesday night that they are “’absolutely not”’ worried about Bloomberg being a spoiler and that their internal polling showed Bloomberg being viable in most, if not all, the states at play. But privately, Bloomberg campaign officials are far less optimistic. They are acknowledging that Joe Biden is poised to do extremely well and their data showed that a large number of voters made up their minds last-minute, which almost surely helps Biden. Bloomberg officials are acknowledging that Bloomberg will re-assess on Wednesday whether to stay in the race.”
THE LID: Known Unknowns Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we noted that some of the delegate allocations from Super Tuesday might take a lot longer than you think.
SHAMELESS PLUG: Late night ToddCast! The First Read Team stayed up late parsing everything we learned from the Super Tuesday returns. Check out a special edition of the Chuck ToddCast here.
ICYMI: News clips you shouldn’t miss Joe Biden sure found his mojo last night, writes Jonathan Allen.
Mike Bloomberg is meeting with advisers to “reassess” his candidacy.
What was going on with those long lines in California and Texas?
Team Trump may not be saying it publicly, but they’re privately concerned about what Joementum might mean for their candidate.
It’s a runoff between Jeff Sessions and Tommy Tuberville in AL-SEN (which means: No Roy Moore.)
Here’s the latest on the Cuellar/Cisneros race in Texas, according to the Texas Tribune. |
ROLL CALL
Morning Headlines
After winning big Tuesday night, Joe Biden said Democrats need a nominee who can help the party keep the House and win the Senate this fall. But several of those down-ballot contests in states that voted Tuesday night remain in flux. Read More…
Texas Rep. Kay Granger, the most senior Republican woman in the House, fended off a competitive primary challenge Tuesday, defeating former tech executive Chris Putnam. Read More…
Sessions heads to Alabama Senate runoff against Tuberville
Alabama Democratic Sen. Doug Jones is one step closer to learning who he will face in November after Tuesday’s primary narrowed the Republican field to two candidates: former Sen. Jeff Sessions and former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville. Read More…
Smooth sailing: No partisan Super Tuesday battles for these candidates
More than a dozen House and Senate incumbents sailed through Super Tuesday without a primary challenger and will be almost guaranteed to keep their seats in the next Congress. Read More…
Democrat Cunningham wins Senate primary to take on Tillis in North Carolina
Army veteran and former state Sen. Cal Cunningham sailed through the North Carolina Democratic Senate primary Tuesday, setting up what is certain to be a closely watched race in November against vulnerable Republican incumbent Thom Tillis. Read More…
2019 vote studies: Pelosi sets record holding caucus in line
House Democrats set a record in 2019 for party unity, a testament to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s ability to manage a caucus marked by a large progressive wing alongside 31 Democrats in districts won by President Donald Trump in 2016. Read More…
They’re doctors. They’re politicians. They were using hand sanitizer before it was cool
Personal space is hard to come by on the campaign trail. Throw in meet-and-greets and close-talkers and elbow-bumping starts to look pretty appealing. Read More…
States turn to unenforced federal law to slow medical marijuana legalization
Medical marijuana’s unique legal status involves a little-known provision called the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment that Congress renews every year in spending laws Read More…
Capitol Ink | The COVID-19 Scream
The post Capitol Ink | The COVID-19 Scream appeared first on Roll Call. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2020 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
|
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.
Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive. We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy |
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 20 new items) |
- Globalization Bleeding . . .
- Democratic Establishment Tries To Bail Out Biden
- It Was Biden All Along
- Governor Signs ‘Born Alive’ Bill Into Law in West Virginia
- Another African Tragedy
- The Delusional Left, What About Fox, Getting Tough On China
- Nikki Haley – Simply Irresistible?
- “Remain-in-Mexico” Policy Is Needed to Reduce Illegal Immigration
- The Establishment’s Ultimatum: Scuttle Bernie!
- Mass Transit Is Making Gridlock Worse
- Trump’s Remain in Mexico Policy, Wall Construction Credited With Halting Illegal Immigration . . .
- Best Laid Plans . . .
- 1000 Deaths & Months Later, Obama Declared H1N! Emergency
- Boy Crisis
- Zoned Out
- The Coronavirus, God, and a World out of Our Control
- An Imam at a Bernie Rally Had Defended Sex Slavery, Chopping Off Hands, Called for Destruction of Israel
- 4 Keys to Understanding History of Super Tuesday
- Trump Nominates Nation’s 1st African American Military Service Chief
- McConnell Addresses American Energy Innovation Act
Globalization Bleeding . . .
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 06:23 PM PST . . . The recurring dream — or nightmare — of being a ‘citizen of the world’
by Dr. Victor Davis Hanson: By the early 21st century, cosmopolitans were gushing that high-tech, instant communications, transnational agencies and agreements, free-flowing capital, international corporations, and a new eerily uniform global elite had, finally, made nationalism, borders, and even the nation-state itself all irrelevant. Nationalism was apparently relegated to dustbin of history, as we hit peak Socratic citizen-of-the-worldism. There were always two flaws to these adolescent giddy reports from world-bestriding New York Times op-ed journalists about win-win globalization, with their praise of gleaming airports and superior high-speed rail in what was otherwise Communist China, or accounts of flying first-class on Qatar Airlines was heavenly compared with backward United or American Airlines. Nothing New under the Sun By a.d. 200, there was a globalized Roman world of 2 million square miles, stretching from Hadrian’s Wall to the Persian Gulf, and from the Rhine to the Atlas Mountains. Like frogs around the pond of Mare Nostrum, all official business was conducted in Latin or, increasingly in the East, Greek. A Roman citizen could enjoy habeas corpus from Bithynia to the Atlantic. Thousands of small towns were marked by fora and agorae, colonnades, and basilicas. While multiracial and non-Italian, otherwise uniformly equipped and trained legions secured the vast borders. It was quite an achievement of providing aqueducts, security, and property rights to 70 million disparate peoples, but it was no longer really the earlier Roman Republic of the Scipios, either. Yet by a.d. 500, the vast sameness was eroding. Most of the Empire in the West and the old borders in East had been picked apart by Vandals, Visigoths, Osogoths, Huns, Sasanians, and a host of other tribes and migrant and aggressive peoples. History’s succession of subsequent would-be imperial globalists — the Byzantines, the Caliphates, the Ottomans, Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler — for a while collapsed national borders and spread uniform language, architecture, customs, and culture until their dreams eventually imploded, usually from overreach, military defeat, corruption, bankrupt ideology, demographic calcification, rampant inflation, or sheer inefficiency and bloated bureaucracy. It was never set in stone that the European Union could forever abolish national borders and invent something permanent called Europeanism. Or that the new Chinese Silk Road would tie the world together under Chinese hegemony. Or that the World Health Organization’s international protocols would make something like the coronavirus virtually impossible. Or that the world would shrink as tens of millions flew on identical Boeing 737 Maxes. History does not end in something, it continues on with everything. Tribalism, nations, empires, and globalizations all grow and collapse, not unlike natural long-term changes in climate. Or, as the Greeks believed, societies are like the endless cycles of natural birth, aging, and decline of humans themselves. One World, One Bigger Problem The premise of Orwell’s dystopian 1984 is that the nations of the postwar world have been absorbed by just three transcontinental feuding empires, Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia; and with such nightmarish aggregation comes the death of free expression and individualism itself. Globalization’s supposed selling points — worldwide markets, shared popular tastes, a common commercial language and currency, a nationless elite culture, ease of travel, dissemination of information, and communications — were never so simple. Was the easy transoceanic networking that linked Christopher Steele, John Brennan, Stefan Harper, Joseph Mifsud, and various Russian oligarchical gossip-mongers proof of the attractions of a common global culture? After all, do we really feel comfortable with Westernized virology labs under the control of the Chinese Communist Party that might have the ability to spread a mistake throughout the world in a matter of hours? Is it really a great thing that imported toxic Chinese drywall or tainted Chinese dog food undercuts American suppliers, and thereby makes us more “competitive,” and creatively destroys those businesses that “need” to be destroyed? Do we think it is good business to have everything from our heart medicines to chemotherapy produced in China? Trump got elected in part because voters were wary of asymmetrical globalization. He campaigned on secure borders, legal-only immigration, and an end to the outsourcing of key industries (defense, strategic industries, and manufacturing) to a totalitarian and hostile China, and he promoted general American independence in fuel, food, and key components of everyday life. Is the antithesis of his agenda — open borders, the free flow of all foreign nationals, more production of key U.S. consumption in China — the way to combat the coronavirus? Is diversity actually our strength when over a million illegal immigrants over the past three years from impoverished Central America and southern Mexico — without legal sanction, without criminal background checks, mostly without high-school diplomas and skills, without health audits, and without any knowledge of or familiarity with America — simply en masse crashed the U.S. border and declared themselves permanent residents if not de facto citizens? In my neighborhood, we see nearby roads now littered with abandoned couches, cast-off refrigerators, and worn-out tires; the occasional shoot-outs between rival gangs; shade-tree illegal barber shops, illicit day-care centers, and unlicensed, unvaccinated packs of dogs — are these all teaching me to celebrate diversity and to get with the culture of most of the world? Do we really know which particular Chinese technology students in Silicon Valley — with shades, Levi’s, and flip-flops — are in the sometime employment of the Chinese military? Does it matter? Are those who jet into Davos the sort that we trust to guide our political, commercial, corporate, and entertainment future, to protect the American Bill of Rights? Is it so neat that the NBA players now tailor their political expression to fit the wishes of their financial enablers in China? Has Angela Merkel’s globalized visions of immigration come down to earth at the fetid refugee camps of Turkey and Lesbos and Chios? I can understand why brilliant or powerful or at least well-connected grandees — Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, George Soros, Barack Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Emmanuel Macron, the geniuses of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the European Union — applaud the globalization of the world. But I am not reassured that their money, titles, influence, degrees, or connections mean that they are either wise or even always well-intentioned. Mike Bloomberg’s description of supposed know-nothing farming, ancient and modern, reminds one of how global commercial brilliance and practical stupidity are often symbiotic. Did we really think that fundamentalist Islam would simply accept Western encroachment on its Dark Age culture and allow the disruption of its fervent reach and influence, simply because we called it “globalization” — without seeing such growing uniformity as a threat to its eighth-century view of the world and to the sway of imams and mullahs? Was it really unforeseen that Bin Laden or the Taliban or the creepy al-Baghdadi might find Westernized social media and the Internet useful in expediting anti-Western terror? The fact that Bin Laden was once a playboy in Beirut or in his dotage supposedly sat glued to Westernized porn on his computer did not suggest he felt anything but hatred for the Westernized modern world and wished to use its own protocols to destroy it. How strange that most of the worst Islamists were creatures of globalization, without which no one would have cared much about their usual local hell-raising and thuggery in the streets of Baghdad, Damascus, or Cairo. Or were they virtual creatures of the Western strip mall: hooked on consumerism while despising the forces that created it, like veteran old bass at the bottom of the pond that still cannot resist biting on the shiny lures that will reel them in. If our globalized future is what is regurgitated nightly on the standard homogenized CNN or BBC international news, the political orthodoxy of Davos, the platitudes of Brussels and Strasbourg, or the globalized ethos that sent Bill Clinton to Moscow for a quid pro quo $500,000 honorarium or Hunter Biden to Burisma, or Google to data-mine and massage the international Internet searches of over a 3 billion people, then I would prefer to live under the customs and culture of a flyover nation. Yes, unfettered globalization gave the impoverished people of sub-Saharan Africa a shot at lifesaving pharmaceuticals, and it spread market capitalism that lifted billions out of poverty. The irony is that the most reliable and trustworthy custodians of dangerous globalized and internationalized science — or volatile harmonized culture, commerce, and politics — were not Orwellian international and stateless technocrats but viable nation-states that still might regulate and filter out globalism’s excesses and dangers. In the end, we have no control over Wuhan, China, but it apparently has a lot of control over us. There also used to be old-fashioned, honored Western concepts such as autonomia and autarkeia — independence and self-sufficiency — that have now been demonized as chauvinism and protectionism. But it once was a reassuring fact to Americans that most of their lifesaving drugs and pharmaceuticals were produced in North America and Europe under Western auspices rather than in China and India, as it is now reassuring that most Americans consume oil and natural gas that are extracted at home and not imported from the Middle East, Russia, or North Africa. One of the reasons that maximum pressure is working on Iran, and that the theocracy is desperate, is that the Great Satan doesn’t need Iranian oil — and that the Little Satan doesn’t need it, either. We should be relieved that the U.S. is still self-sufficient in grains, fruits, meats, and vegetables — and can export its fuels and foods to others rather than solely vice versa, given that it produces them according to standards that are far superior to China’s, Russia’s, or what is found in Africa and Latin America. When we become citizens of the world, that is, citizens of everyplace, then we end up citizens of utopia. That is, as citizens of οὐ τόπος — of “no place.” Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, Globalization Bleeding, recurring dream, or nightmare, being a ‘citizen of the world’ To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Democratic Establishment Tries To Bail Out Biden
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 05:59 PM PST
by Star Parker: South Carolina Democratic voters have revived Joe Biden’s candidacy. Maybe I should say that South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn has. According to exit polls, 61% said Clyburn’s endorsement of Biden was an “important factor” in their decision, and 27% said it was “the most important factor.” Clyburn explained Biden is his friend and has been a reliable vote for government programs that blacks like. He also argued that with Biden on the ticket, reelection prospects for congressmen and congresswomen running for election down ticket would be better. “We need to keep the House speakership under Nancy Pelosi,” said Clyburn. Now, the whole Democratic establishment is piling on to endorse Biden and push out Bernie Sanders. But are they being straight with us? It goes back to my column of a few weeks ago: “It doesn’t matter which Democrat wins.” Despite Sanders’ socialist declarations, the realities that would result under him or under Biden are barely distinguishable. The country is already well down the path to socialism. And without major reforms to take things in a different direction, it will only become more so. The saying popularized by Karl Marx, summing up the ethos of communism, was, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” That is, those with political power get the final say regarding who has what. In our own country, we call these transfer payments. Government takes from one set of taxpayers and redistributes through government programs to others. According to American Enterprise Institute economist Mark Perry, in 1950, transfer payments made up of less than 20% of the federal budget. By 2012, they were 70%. Former Senate Banking Committee chairman Phil Gramm and former Bureau of Labor Statistics assistant commissioner John Early summarized the extent to which government now redistributes our economic resources (that is, how much socialism we already have) in a recent Wall Street Journal opinion column. Per Gramm and Early, “More than 80% of all taxes” are paid by households with incomes in the top 40% and “more than 70% of government transfer payments” go to households with incomes in the bottom 40%. We’re talking about programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps — all told, around 95 federal programs. The average household income in the bottom 20% is $4,908, say Gramm and Early. That household, they say, receives $45,389 in government transfers. Without reforms, American socialism will just expand. Unfunded liabilities — the projection of shortfall in current taxes to meet future requirements — of Social Security and Medicare are around $50 trillion, per trustees of the programs. That’s more than twice our annual GDP. Government needs to take more taxes to keep these programs going. That is, more socialism. What are the chances that President Biden would introduce reforms to bring more market forces into the picture? Did you say zero? So a President Sanders or Biden, in the end, wouldn’t be much different. At least Sanders is honest. However, for a sitting senior congressman like Jim Clyburn, voting for Biden means his buddy of some 30 years would be sitting in the White House. Any question of whom he would prefer? You might ask, “Doesn’t all this government make us a more moral society?” Consider that when the War on Poverty began in 1967, 70% of those in households in the bottom 20% were working. Now it is 36% — about half. The difference between socialism and charity is that the latter is voluntary, individualized and motivated by personal caring. Charity aims to lift up the unfortunate and usually originates with people of faith. Socialism is an atheistic institutionalized system that pretends to solve human challenges through politics. It’s why, in the end, it destroys the human spirit. This is the real problem in our poor communities. So Bernie or Joe? There’s little difference. Tags: Star Parker, Center for Urban Renewal and Education, CURE, Democratic Establishment, Tries To, Bail Out Biden To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
It Was Biden All Along
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 05:46 PM PST by Mario Murillo Ministries: Super Tuesday means nothing. Bernie will be sidelined by the juggernaut of Democrat elites, the media, and moguls who simply need to stay in power. All you young lefties need to realize that they have turned your Woke into a joke. Even if Bernie does great today he will not be allowed to win. But Christians and conservatives need to get this: Lost in all the rhetorical dust is this chilling fact: Biden is Obama’s third term. He is—pure and simple—a return to Obama misery. Joe is a shill for Barack. He is a carnival barker for the return of the most failed political sideshow ever. His campaign slogan should be “REFILL THE SWAMP.” Okay, before you read anymore, let me tell you, I take no joy in writing blogs like this. As I have often said, someone else, far more qualified, was supposed to take this mantle, but they didn’t. I just want to win souls, see the sick healed, and bring revival to churches. But, it is what it is so here goes… This whole thing has been a masterful use of misdirection. The Democrat Party unleashed its screaming Left-wing fringe for a season. Presidential candidates Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Beto O’Rourke, and Mayor Pete, are utterly unelectable. They are there to make even a mediocre choice a relief. Representatives Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Maxine Waters, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were there to gross out the Liberals, and to make them yearn for adult supervision. They are all players in a stunt to rebrand and sanitize Uncle Joe. But no matter what, he remains that unwanted snuggler, and a servant of Obama most high. That is why you see him rising in the polls and why he will be made to look like the front runner. Democrats are supposed to think: JOE BIDEN!−WHAT A RELIEF! In Obama’s mind he never left. He simply put his sleeper cells in place. He put them in the FBI to get warrants and spy on Donald Trump. He worked the adoring media to make life hell for Trump. He did everything within his power to create chaos and mischief for the new President. Why is he so callous and bitter? One reason is that he is watching his ‘legacy’ (and, I’m being kind there) being dismantled. Why is he so bent on staying in power? He hates America, Israel, and the Faith that makes us great. Am I being harsh? NO! His malice is well documented. Judge for yourself the number of times Obama acted in direct hostility to the Bible. He takes credit for the Trump economy, even though his policies: failed healthcare, immigration, foreign policy, and Leftist court appointments nearly drove us under. He refers to himself gratuitously in every speech he gives. He is the first President in our history who bashed his successor in the White House. The single reason they are pushing for impeachment is that they are convinced President Trump will be reelected. They see no other way to stop him. If there was nothing else but the economy, Trump would have the upper hand, but there is so much more. Biden is the only other thing they can think of. Obama wants power. He wants Israel brought down. He wants to punish the American church. I pray God helps you see what is really happening here. Joe Biden will bring back all the convoluted and tangled ideas of Obama. He will operate at the behest of his true boss. He will have zero ideas on how to protect us, bring prosperity, or fix anything. He will be the most powerful hand puppet in the history of the world. Why should you reject this man? A million reasons flood my mind, but let’s focus on just one: Obama is the architect of the most hare-brained lie in recent history: That Trump colluded with Russia. Two years after the most expensive investigation ever, he still pumps the lie to his lackeys. But, as this investigation by the newly appointed special counsel gets to the source of the FISA Warrant, Obama’s prints will be all over it. But there is one final mind-numbing lie you must swallow, if you are to believe Donald Trump colluded with Russia. You must then believe that Russia conspired to rebuild the American economy, the military, and our energy companies—all things that make Russia weaker. Why would Putin put Trump in office knowing it would jeopardize Russia’s hold on the Middle East, strengthen Israel, and make Europe wake up to their NATO responsibilities? If you believe all that, then Biden is the candidate for you. Tags: 2020 Presidential election, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, barack obama, Beto O’ Rourke, Beto O’Rourke, CNN, Cory Booker, Democrat Party, Donald Trump, Mario Murillo, Mario Murillo’s blog, Robert Mueller, Russia collusion To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Governor Signs ‘Born Alive’ Bill Into Law in West Virginia
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 05:24 PM PST by Mary Margaret Olohan: The governor of Governor Signs ‘Born Alive’ Bill Into Law in West Virginia signed a bill into law that protects babies born alive in botched abortions and penalizes doctors for allowing these babies to die. West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice, a Republican, on Monday signed House Bill 4007 into law to require medical practitioners to use “the same degree of reasonable medical judgment to preserve the life of a fetus which is born alive as would be used in a live non-abortion birth of the same gestational age.” The bill also criminalizes the “failure to exercise such judgment” and makes such a failure of judgement a “violation of medical licensure standards.” “I truly believe that every human life, born or unborn, is a gift from God,” the governor tweeted Monday:
Women who wish to obtain an abortion in West Virginia must first receive state-directed counseling and then wait 24 hours before obtaining the abortion. State law also requires that the parent of a minor be notified before a minor obtains an abortion. Justice said at the bill signing that it is “unbelievable, to tell you the truth, that we have to do such a thing.” “So today we’re going to put a stake in the sand that says for us, for us at least, we stand for life and we stand for the right stuff,” Justice said, ABC News reported. The governor’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Caller News Foundation. Democratic lawmakers in West Virginia insist that murder already is illegal in the state, drawing on arguments made by Democratic lawmakers in both the U.S. House and Senate regarding the federal Born-Alive Survivors Protection Act votes last week. “A child born alive who would somehow be killed, that would be murder. It would clearly be murder, there’s nobody doing that and if they do do it, they’re in jail,” said state Sen. Mike Romano of Harrison County when the West Virginia Senate passed the bill in February, ABC News reported. U.S. Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., made a similar argument Feb. 25 when he noted that infanticide in the United States is illegal, and suggested Republicans, and in particular Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., were highlighting an issue that did not need attention. Sasse pointed out that active infanticide is indeed illegal in the United States, but that politicians such as Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, have suggested that passive infanticide be legalized. “What’s actually happening is the senator from Illinois is wanting to obscure the debate because he wants to use euphemisms about choice so that you don’t have to admit to the American public that what’s actually happening on the floor today is probably that like last year, 44 Democrats are gonna filibuster an anti-infanticide bill,” Sasse said of Durbin. “There’s nothing in the bill that’s about abortion,” he added. “Nothing. It’s about infanticide.” “That’s the actual legislation. And you’ve got 44 people over there [on the Democrats’ side] that want to hide from it, and talk in euphemisms about abortion, because they don’t want to defend the indefensible.” Tags: Mary Margaret Olohan, West Virginia,Governor Signs, ‘Born Alive’ Bill To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Another African Tragedy
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 04:54 PM PST
by Dr. Walter E. Williams: Here are a few headlines about an African tragedy: “Africa’s Worst Locust Plague in Decades Threatens Millions” (The Wall Street Journal), “‘Unprecedented’ Locust Invasion Approaches Full-Blown Crisis” (Scientific American), “Somalia Declares Locust Outbreak a ‘National Emergency’” (The National) and “UN Calls for International Action on East Africa Locust Outbreak” (Bloomberg Green). This ongoing tragedy is mostly man-made, according to an analysis by Paul Driessen, who is a senior policy adviser with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) and the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen says that billions of desert locusts have attacked the eastern Africa nations of Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti and Somalia. According to the U.N., the locust attack in Kenya is the worst in 70 years and the worst in 25 years for other east African nations. Locusts are destroying crops and threatening tens of millions of Africans with lost livelihoods and starvation. These locust swarms can blanket 460 square miles at a time and consume more than 400 million pounds of vegetation daily. They reproduce fast, too, meaning locust swarms could be 500 times bigger in six months. Africa’s locust plague is man-made. Economic development organizations and activist nongovernmental organizations have foisted “agroecology” on the poorest nations — an organic-style agriculture. They promote the virtues of peasant farming. So how do these poor farmers fight the locust plague? Driessen says: “Desperate Africans are responding with ‘time-tested’ methods: whistling and shouting loudly, banging on metal buckets, waving blankets and sticks, crushing the bugs perhaps even roasting and eating them, under UN-approved nutrition programs. In Eritrea, they are using ‘more advanced’ methods: hand-held and truck-mounted sprayers. In Kenya, police are firing machine guns and tear gas into the swarms!” Antonio Guterres of Portugal, the U.N. secretary-general, claimed global warming as a cause of the problem. He said there is a link between climate change and the unprecedented locust crisis plaguing Ethiopia and East Africa. Guterres said: “Warmer seas mean more cyclones generating the perfect breeding ground for locusts. Today the swarms are as big as major cities and it is getting worse by the day.” Guterres’ suggestion that global warming is the cause of today’s plague is sheer nonsense. Locust infestations have been feared and revered throughout mankind’s history. Devastating locust attacks in Egypt around 1446 B.C. were mentioned in the Book of Exodus in the Bible. “The Iliad” describes locusts taking flight to escape fire. Plagues of locusts are also mentioned in the Quran. Driessen concludes: “A primary reason this plague of locusts has overwhelmed East Africa — indeed, perhaps THE primary reason — is that the UN Food and Agricultural Organization, other UN agencies and multiple environmentalist NGOs have been extolling and imposing ‘agroecology’ on Africa. This highly politicized ‘movement’ rabidly opposes hybrid seeds, synthetic insecticides and fertilizers, biotechnology, and even mechanized equipment like tractors! Acceptance of its tenets and restrictions has become a condition for poor farmers getting seeds and other assistance, and their countries and local communities getting development loans and food aid.” By the way, locusts are not only a threat to crops; they threaten people in another way. In early January, a Boeing 737 on final landing approach to Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, found itself in the midst of a massive cloud of locusts swarming above the airport. The insects were sucked into the plane’s engines. Their bodies were splattered across the windshield blinding the pilots to the runway ahead. The Boeing 737 climbed above the swarm. The pilot depressurized the cabin so he could open the side window and reach around to clear the windshield by hand. Diverting to Addis Ababa Bole International Airport, the pilot was able to land the plane safely. Tags: Walter Williams, commentary, Another African Tragedy To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Delusional Left, What About Fox, Getting Tough On China
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 03:00 PM PST
by Gary Bauer, Contributing Author: The Delusional Left But just so you know, the yearly flu has already infected at least 32 million Americans, caused 310,000 hospitalizations and 18,000 deaths. The left’s delusional reaction to the coronavirus is more of a public threat than the virus itself. Seriously, friends, let’s just look at how the left has responded to this crisis.
Once again, it’s obvious that the left views everything — yes, even a virus — through a warped, ideological lens. Just think about that for a moment. If there’s a potentially dangerous virus spreading around the world, the left would refuse to secure the borders. It would demand that experience and expertise take a back seat to racial quotas. It would lie about basic facts, and mock people for seeking God’s wisdom and mercy. Is that really the kind of government we want? Just something to remember in November. By the way, a recent Gallup survey found that 77% of Americans are confident in the government’s ability to address the coronavirus situation. That confidence level is significantly higher than previous outbreaks involving the bird flu, the swine flu and Ebola. Assaulting Your Rights Bloomberg is known for bankrolling radical anti-Second Amendment efforts around the country. Those efforts have elected hundreds of far-left Democrats. Yet, the former mayor travels with an armed security detail. The questioner pointedly asked Bloomberg, “Does your life matter more than mine or my family’s?” Bloomberg’s response was dripping with condescension and entitlement. He made it clear that he was worth far more than the questioner, and as a former politician he does get death threats. But he claimed that the only restrictions he supports are laws to prevent the sale of firearms “to people with psychiatric problems, criminals or people [who] are minors.” Well, there are already laws on the books to address all those things. But stopping kids from buying guns has nothing to do with the radical left-wing agenda he’s funding and enabling. Michael Bloomberg is no “moderate.” He’s just another lying left-wing politician. What About Fox? I heard it last night as Fox covered Biden’s Texas rally with Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rouke. As I have noted before, but it evidently bears repeating, there’s NOTHING moderate about any of these Democrats. All of them support Obamacare or some form of government-run healthcare. All of them support abortion on demand. All of them support the demands of the radical homosexual/transgender movement. All of them support open borders. Even free healthcare for illegal aliens. All of them support the radical Green New Deal. None of them are “moderate.” And you don’t have to take my word for it.
Speaking of Fox News, I assume the network will be canceling Donna Brazile‘s contract after her outrageous outbursts today. During a segment on Super Tuesday, Brazile repeatedly told RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel to “go to hell.” Fox would never tolerate any conservative commentator talking to Brazile that way. Speaking Of Elections. . . A spokesman for Netanyahu’s Likud Party told reporters, “The country had its say. The people want a nationalist government under Netanyahu.” At the moment, the conservative-religious bloc appears to control 58 seats in the Knesset, just shy of the 61 votes needed to form a government. Getting Tough On China Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said, “As we have done in other areas of the U.S.-China relationship, we seek to establish a long-overdue level playing field. . . We urge the Chinese government to immediately uphold its international commitments to respect freedom of expression, including for members of the press.” As Secretary Pompeo noted, the Trump Administration is aggressively rebalancing our relationship with China. And the American people are noticing. For the first time in decades, more Americans now see the United States, not China, as the world’s leading economic power. President Trump is making America great again! Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, The Delusional Left, What About Fox, Getting Tough On China To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Nikki Haley – Simply Irresistible?
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 02:14 PM PST
by Tom Balek, Contributing Author: Nikki Haley entered the conference hall of the Gateway Center in Richburg, SC and immediately sucked all of the oxygen out of the huge room. The overflow crowd at Congressman Ralph Norman’s campaign kickoff Monday night could not contain their enthusiasm – no, it was love – for the petite powerhouse who has been out of the spotlight since she stepped down as President Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations. Introducing Haley, Norman’s son, Warren, asked her, “How should I address you? Ambassador Haley? Governor Haley? Next President of the United States Haley?” I have not seen a gathering so overpowered by a woman since I attended a Hillary Clinton event promoting HillaryCare back in the 1980s. But while I found the Hillary encounter completely frightening, Haley’s warm connection to her audience was a sharp contrast. She pointed out that she and her husband decided to stay in New York City to allow their son to graduate from his high school, but next year they will be moving back to South Carolina and he will attend Clemson, like his mom. So what has Nikki Haley been doing lately? I mean, besides preparing to run for president in the 2024 election? She wrote her second book, “With All Due Respect”, describing her experiences working in the Trump administration as ambassador to the United Nations. A sometimes-critic of Trump, Haley quit her governor post and accepted Trump’s invitation to the highly-visible ambassadorship, winning acclaim among conservatives for her fire-breathing speeches defending the USA and the Trump agenda before the UN delegates. During her tenure as ambassador there were latent questions about her loyalty to the president, but Monday night she made clear to Norman’s supporters that she joins the congressman in full support of Trump. Last year Haley founded a conservative policy group “Stand for America” and cherry-picked Heritage Action president Tim Chapman for the lead role in that organization, an indication of her intention to run for president. Similarly, Marco Rubio snatched two Heritage Action top officials, Mike Needham and Dan Holler to anchor his 2024 campaign team. As a South Carolina resident, I have followed Haley’s career with interest. I still see her as a very ambitious career politician and have lined up on the opposite side of her on some specific issues. Still, as a state representative and governor she was an outstanding administrator, a budget hawk, and her state government ran like a clock, famously answering every phone call with the chirpy greeting, “It’s a great day in South Carolina!” My family band played for Norman’s Monday kickoff event, and we got to meet Haley for a brief visit backstage. I was surprised at how warm and down-to-earth she is. Especially after watching her bring a couple thousand very discerning conservatives to their knees. Nikki Haley is a force to be reckoned with in American politics. Maybe irresistible. Tags: Tom Balek, Rockin’ On The Right Side, Nikki Haley, Simply Irresistible? To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
“Remain-in-Mexico” Policy Is Needed to Reduce Illegal Immigration
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 01:57 PM PST
by Hans von Spakovsky: In a torturous, twisted interpretation of federal immigration law, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary court order Friday to block the Trump administration from continuing to implement its Migrant Protection Protocols, known informally as the Remain-in-Mexico policy. But shortly after issuing the ruling, the three-judge panel voted 2-1 to put a hold on it, preventing it from going into force until the federal government can file written arguments by the end of Monday in favor of the Remain-in-Mexico policy and plaintiffs can respond by the end of Tuesday arguing in favor of stopping the policy from being carried out. Implemented last year by the Trump administration, the policy has proven effective in stemming the flood of illegal crossings at our southern border. One of the biggest drivers of the crisis at the southern border was the “catch and release” policy of President Barack Obama’s administration. Because the number of illegal immigrants apprehended at the border far exceeded the capacity of federal detention facilities, most of those arrested were simply processed, scheduled for an immigration hearing and then released. The majority then disappeared into the vast interior of our country and never showed up for their immigration hearings. Naturally, this only encouraged more illegal immigration. Fighting back, the Trump administration issued a new rule last year that took advantage of the authority granted under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1225(b)(2). That provision specifies that in the case of immigrants who arrive “on land (whether or not at a designated port of arrival) from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States,” they can be returned “to that territory” while their claims for asylum are pending. The Migration Protection Protocols (MPP) required that asylum seekers who crossed the southern border had to return to Mexico until immigration officials determined the validity of their claims. Moreover, the asylum claims of those who failed to cross through an official port of entry would not be considered credible. This is simply common sense. After all, why would someone with a valid asylum claim sneak across the border instead of coming in legally at a port of entry? The administration provided exceptions to the MPP for unaccompanied children as well as those with a credible fear of persecution in Mexico. Once word got out about this new policy, the number of illegal crossings plummeted. With the cooperation of the Mexican government, more than 60,000 illegal immigrants were returned to Mexico over a 13-month period. New immigration courts at key crossing points like Laredo, Texas, drastically reduced the time needed to process asylum claims, so that refugees with legitimate asylum claims had their cases heard much faster. Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said the MPP “allowed us to take control of the crisis” at the border that was overwhelming the Border Patrol and our immigration capabilities. So naturally, those who want open borders and no enforcement of our immigration laws sued and found a friendly audience in federal court in San Francisco and in the 9th Circuit. Given how clear the statute is, one might wonder how a court could say that the MPP is somehow invalid. But that is what the 9th Circuit did in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump. It began by ignoring several provisions of federal immigration law that deprive courts of having any say over this issue to begin with. One of those, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252(e)(3), specifically says that regardless of “the nature of the action or claim and without regard to the identity of the party or parties bringing the action, no court may enter declaratory, injunctive, or other equitable relief in any action pertaining to an order to exclude an alien.” Of course, this is exactly what the lower court and 9th Circuit did in issuing an injunction against the order excluding immigrants from entry into the U.S. while their asylum claim is being evaluated. The court then held that the MPP is an “arbitrary and capricious” interpretation of the law, even though federal immigration law unambiguously and without any limitation gives the federal government the ability to exclude immigrants who have crossed one of our land borders while their asylum claims are being evaluated. How can applying the clear text of a federal law be arbitrary and capricious? The court further held that it was also arbitrary and capricious for the executive branch to consider as not credible the asylum claims of those who cross illegally rather than through an official port of entry. This was despite acknowledging that the courts have long recognized that the method someone uses to enter the country is a discretionary factor that the government can consider in deciding whether an immigrant should be granted relief. Finally, the court substituted its own foreign policy judgment for that of the president by ruling that enforcing these provisions of federal immigration law was “unreasonable” in light of our treaty obligations under the 1951 U.N. Convention Relating to Status of Refugees and the 1967 U.N. protocols Relating to the Status of Refugees. In fact, the court seems to be substituting its foreign policy judgment not just for that of the president, but also for Congress. That’s because the president in this case is acting not only under his constitutional authority to conduct foreign policy and secure our border, but under the specific authority delegated to him by Congress to determine which immigrants will be allowed into the United States. There is no doubt that the Trump administration will appeal the court’s unwise decision. The White House issued a news release saying that if this “hugely successful” policy is stopped, it will “flood the Nation’s immigration system, present unchecked coronavirus entry risk, deeply damage our positive relationship with the Government of Mexico and other regional partners, and reignite the humanitarian and security crisis at the border.” News releases are often filled with hyperbole. But in this case, that is an accurate assessment of what will happen if this latest nationwide injunction is not lifted. Tags: Hans von Spakovsky, “Remain-in-Mexico” Policy, Is Needed, to Reduce, Illegal Immigration To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Establishment’s Ultimatum: Scuttle Bernie!
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 01:38 PM PST by Patrick Buchanan: Of what is the establishment terrified? That if Sanders is nominated, Donald Trump will crush him in November. And not only will the White House be lost, all hopes of winning the Senate and blocking Trump’s second-term Supreme Court nominees would also be lost. After Joe Biden’s blowout victory in South Carolina Saturday and the swift withdrawal of Tom Steyer, “Mayor Pete” Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the decisive day of the race for the Democratic nomination, Super Tuesday, is at hand. Fourteen states — including California and Texas and delegate-rich Colorado, North Carolina and Virginia — hold primaries today, where 40% of the delegates to the Democratic convention will be chosen. Yet consider where the Democratic Party, the party of diversity, America’s “progressive” party, the all-inclusive party of persons of color, African Americans, Asians and Hispanics, the party of women and LGBT, will close out this day. Of the 24 candidates who sought the nomination in 2019, all the black candidates such as Sens. Cory Booker and Kamala Harris and Gov. Deval Patrick, have been eliminated. The sole Asian American, Andrew Yang, is gone. The Hispanic candidate, Julian Castro, is long gone. Winning just 2% of the black vote in South Carolina, 38-year-old gay candidate Pete Buttigieg is gone. After South Carolina, the last two women in the race, Elizabeth Warren and Klobuchar, were put under pressure from the Democratic establishment in its hair-on-fire panic. To do what? These female senators were to sacrifice their hopes and dreams to advance the establishment’s plot to derail the nomination of the unapologetic progressive who has run the best and boldest campaign of this election year — Bernie Sanders. Klobuchar packed it in Monday. Warren is barely hanging on. And where does that leave the party of diversity this first week in March? With three potential nominees. All three are aging white men — Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Mike Bloomberg. All three, if nominated and elected, would soon celebrate their 80th birthday in the White House. The establishment’s ultimatum: Everyone, get with the program of breaking Bernie and “Go with Joe!” or face retribution. Of what is the establishment terrified? That if Sanders is nominated, Donald Trump will crush him in November. And not only will the White House be lost, all hopes of winning the Senate and blocking Trump’s second-term Supreme Court nominees would also be lost. And not only the Senate but Nancy Pelosi’s House could also be lost. And not only the House but hundreds of down-ballot candidates could also lose, leaving the GOP with the whip hand in redistricting congressional seats through the decade. For Democrats, the fear is of the Harding-Coolidge Roaring ’20s revisited. And if Trumpists rule the roost in the Republican Party and the populist-left of “Crazy Bernie” dominates the Democratic Party, what happens to the agenda of the establishment? Today promises to a fateful one in the history of the Democratic Party, and it will answer many questions: Will Sanders win enough delegates to give him an insurmountable lead for the nomination? Or will he have a good, but not a great, night, winning most of the states, but not a large enough pile of delegates to reach 50% before the convention in Milwaukee? As for Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who was being urged to drop out and back Biden before he got the first returns on his $500 million investment in his campaign, what did he buy with that half billion? We shall find out today. If his performance is disappointing, will he yield to the establishment and do what it demands to advance the killing of Sanders’ candidacy? As for Biden, the questions are clear and crucial: Will the momentum from Saturday’s victory be sustained and replicated in Alabama and other Southern and border states where the African American share of the Democratic electorate is similar to South Carolina’s? Will today provide the clarity the establishment and Biden want, and make this a Biden-Sanders race, with those two coming into the convention with large blocs of delegates but neither with a majority? What the establishment wants is for the first ballot to end without a nominee — if that nominee would be Sanders — and the pledged delegates to be freed of their commitments, and for the superdelegates to vote on the second ballot, and for the party thus to be spared falling into the custody of an angry septuagenarian socialist. For the Democratic establishment, the stakes could not be higher and thus that establishment, after Biden’s landslide in South Carolina, is not disguising its interests or demands: Sanders must be denied the nomination, and Biden is the only one who can accomplish that. Biden might have won South Carolina without the endorsement of veteran African American Congressman Jim Clyburn. But it was Clyburn’s blessing that gave Biden his landslide. And if Biden wins Alabama and other states today, the major factors of his victory will be his South Carolina landslide and his support from African Americans. Should Biden win the nomination, still a long shot, he will be in deep political debt. Look for Biden to put an African American woman on his ticket. Tags: Patrick Buchanan, conservative, commentary, The Establishment’s Ultimatum, Scuttle Bernie, Should Biden win, Look for Biden, to put, African American woman, on the ticket To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Mass Transit Is Making Gridlock Worse
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 01:29 PM PST
by Stephen Moore: Why in the world is the federal government, 20 years into the 21st century, continuing to pour tens of billions of tax dollars into little-used mass transit rail projects? In a digital age with increasingly popular and affordable door-to-door ride-sharing apps such as Uber and Lyft, universal use of cars by all income groups and the revolution of smart driverless vehicles around the corner, subway systems and light rail are as old-fashioned as the rotary phone. The federal government and urban planners in at least 25 cities are frantically spending money to lay down tracks that, in 10 or 20 years, they will have to rip right out of the ground. The scandal here is that mass transit is adding to traffic congestion problems across America. It is also blocking mobility as we divert billions of gas tax dollars, which are supposed to get spent on road repairs and expansions, to white elephant transit projects with minuscule ridership that, in most cities, is shrinking. Meanwhile, the public is increasingly infuriated by traffic gridlock. In 2018, the average driver lost $1,348 by sitting in traffic. Traffic congestion is now nearly a $100 billion annual tax on the economy. In cities such as Boston, Chicago and Los Angeles, drivers lose the equivalent of three to four weeks a year sitting in traffic. By the way, every one of those cities has new or expanded transit systems that were designed to ease traffic congestion. The latest transportation data underscores the futility of transit as a solution to inner-city gridlock. Today, fewer than 1 in 20 commuters take transit to work. Yes, there are some densely populated cities where transit works and may even be indispensable — New York being by far the leader in transit use, with Washington and San Francisco not far behind. Almost everywhere else, transit numbers are so trivial they have virtually no impact on traffic congestion. For every one person using transit, 18 are in cars. About as many people walk, scooter or bike to work as use transit. Yet urban planners arrogantly refuse to listen to what commuters want, as they pour money into fashionable light rail systems that people use the least. Transportation expert Wendell Cox has noted that for the exorbitant cost of transit subsidies in many cities, “It would be less expensive for taxpayers to purchase every transit rider a brand-new Prius.” But the subsidies keep rolling in. In Seattle, the urban transit enthusiasts have come forward with a grandiose plan called Sound Transit. It’s a plan to spend $100 billion on new bus and rail projects over the next 25 years with car and gas taxes, tolls and fees. But its analysis shows it will lead to almost no reduction in traffic congestion in that sprawling and gridlocked city. For tens of billions of dollars less spent on new, smart road technologies, average commute times would fall, even with the increase in population. Even the urban myth that billions of dollars of big-city transit subsidies are needed to help the poor and minorities is fatuous. The percentage of Hispanics using transit has fallen 21% since 2000. Over the last two decades, almost 1 in 5 black commuters has stopped riding transit. The percentage of people with incomes below $30,000 who use mass transit fell over the last 20 years, while those with incomes above $75,000 has risen. Ironically, the most significant change in transportation over the past several decades is that millions more poor people and minorities can afford to own a car and drive where they want and when they want. For low-income households, transit is something not to aspire to but to be liberated from. Studies show conclusively that owning a car is literally and figuratively a road to higher incomes for those at the bottom. If the goal of American transportation policy is greater mobility and speed at ever-lower costs, the first step is to not lay down another inch of rail. Investing in mass transit makes as much sense in 2020 as building telephone poles. So, just stop at this red light. Tags: Stephen Moore, Steve Moore, Rasmussen Reports, Mass Transit, Is Making, Gridlock Worse To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Trump’s Remain in Mexico Policy, Wall Construction Credited With Halting Illegal Immigration . . .
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 01:21 PM PST . . . as left-wing groups continue suing!
by Richard McCarty: During the 2016 campaign, President Trump ran on cracking down on illegal immigration. After years of border security being largely ignored, Trump made it a central issue. After three years in office, it is clear that he is getting results. So far, over 120 miles of border wall have been built, and hundreds of more miles of wall are expected to be built this year. Just last week, Mark Morgan, who leads US Customs and Border Protection, told Congress that one section of border wall had reduced the number of illegal border crossings there by more than 80 percent. In addition, the administration’s Remain in Mexico policy that keeps asylum claimants in Mexico pending hearings is credited with slowing down migration as illegal border crossings continue to drop. This policy requires asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their immigration court dates; previously, asylum seekers were allowed to wait in the U.S., but many simply disappeared and never reappeared for their court dates. Thanks to the new policy, in January, the most recent month for which we have official numbers, the number of people apprehended or found to be inadmissible on the Southern border fell to 36,679. In May of last year, that number peaked at 144,116, but it has been declining ever since. Americans for Limited Government’s Frank McCaffrey has reported from respite centers, bus stops and businesses along migrant routes on both the U.S. and Mexican sides of the border attesting that migrant traffic has slowed as the Remain in Mexico policy took effect. The two policies, the wall and Remain in Mexico, are the heart of the administration’s success in combating illegal immigration but remain in constant legal wrangling thanks to lawsuits by left-wing organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and others who are suing to stop the wall and the successful Remain in Mexico policy. Late last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals put a hold on the Remain in Mexico policy before staying the injunction allowing enforcement to continue. But should the Ninth Circuit overturn the policy, the Supreme Court will likely end up ruling on this case, too. Previously, it has reversed rulings preventing the wall from being constructed using reprogrammed military construction funds, another case sure to come up again. In the meantime, the Trump administration not only is Trump working to discourage illegal immigration, he is also hiring more immigration judges to deal with the backlog of immigration cases. Immigration judges matter because they decide issues such as whether immigrants should be deported and whether asylum seekers are granted asylum. At last report, there were 466 immigration judges, which is the most since at least 2010. By comparison, there were 289 immigration judges in FY 2016. Nor do Trump’s efforts to fight illegal immigration stop at our borders. He has also struck deals with El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico to reduce the number of people arriving at our border. Mexico has been particularly helpful deploying troops to its border to halt the massive caravans of migrants that have strained our immigration system in recent years. As the old saying goes, charity begins at home. No doubt many of the people seeking asylum do have rough lives in their home countries, but asylum should be limited to those fleeing repressive regimes, not extended to those just looking for a better job or a better neighborhood. As it is, in many parts of our country, we do not have an adequate supply of housing for American citizens; our public schools, too often, struggle to turn out graduates who are functionally literate; and our national debt continues to grow. So we cannot afford to just roll out the welcome mat for anyone who shows up at the border. Every year, we give billions of dollars in foreign aid, but we must not forget that the primary job of the American government is to look out for the interests of the American people. And finally we have a President who is doing just that. It’s about time. Tags: Trump’s Remain in Mexico Policy, Wall Construction Credited, With Halting Illegal Immigration, left-wing groups, continue suing To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Best Laid Plans . . .
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 01:05 PM PST . . . Trump called a Racist for implementing his travel ban but what do Democrats have to offer? Open borders?
Tags: Editorial Cartoon, AF “Tony” Branco, Best Laid Plans, Trump called a Racist. for implementing his travel ban, but what do Democrats have to offer, Open borders? To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
1000 Deaths & Months Later, Obama Declared H1N! Emergency
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 12:56 PM PST
by Free Press International News Service: The swine flu, or H1N1, was first reported to have been detected in the United States in April 2009. At the end of April 2009, President Barack Obama addressed Americans briefly, saying that U.S. health officials were monitoring the situation. Obama said he had requested $1.5 billion from Congress to support the government’s efforts. In October 2009, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told CNN, “millions of people in the United States have been infected, at least 20,000 have been hospitalized and more than 1,000 have died.” Obama declared H1N1 a public health emergency on Oct. 24, 2009. Few if any Democrats complained about Obama’s handling of the outbreak. China first reported the Wuhan coronavirus to the World Health Organization on Dec. 31, 2019. President Donald Trump declared coronavirus a public health emergency On Jan. 31, 2020. Among the steps the Trump administration took upon the Jan. 31 declaration:
Democrats and their allies in the corporate media have criticized Trump’s every move on the coronavirus, from complaining that no minorities were on the task force the president set up in late January to saying Trump didn’t ask for enough funds from Congress to combat the virus. In a Feb. 5 tweet, which has since been deleted, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wrote: “The premature travel ban to and from China by the current administration is just an excuse to further his ongoing war against immigrants. There must be a check and Balance on these restrictions.” Trump tweeted on March 2: “I was criticized by the Democrats when I closed the Country down to China many weeks ahead of what almost everyone recommended. Saved many lives. Dems were working the Impeachment Hoax. They didn’t have a clue! Now they are fear mongering. Be calm & vigilant!” Donald Trump Jr. lashed out Friday at his father’s critics, saying, “Anything that they can use to try to hurt Trump, they will.” “For them to try to take a pandemic and seemingly hope that it comes here and kills millions of people, so that they could end Donald Trump’s streak of winning, is a new level of sickness,” Trump Jr. said on “Fox & Friends.” His comment prompted CNN’s Jake Tapper to ask Vice President Mike Pence: “I don’t expect you to criticize the president’s son, but you don’t think that Democrats want people to contract this disease, do you?” Pence replied, “I think that was Don Jr.’s point, that there has been some very strong rhetoric directed at the president by some members of Congress and political commentators.” Pressed by NBC’s Chuck Todd to provide an example, the vice president cited Wednesday’s op-ed by New York Times columnist Gail Collins headlined, “Let’s call it Trumpvirus.” “When you see voices on our side pushing back on outrageous and irresponsible rhetoric on the other side, I think that’s important, and I think it’s justified,” Pence said. Republican Senator Tom Cotton said on Friday that “The single most consequential and valuable thing done to stop this virus from already spreading throughout the United States was when President Trump decided to shut down travel to China last month.” He also acknowledged that “the so-called experts who opposed the decision at the time” eventually admitted that it “bought valuable time to prevent the spread of this virus in the United States.” The World Health Organization noted: “Air-traffic data shows that flights from China to the United States dropped much more than they did to Europe. As of this writing, a single case not connected to any known transmission has turned up in California, but there are no indications of large outbreaks like those in Italy and Iran.” PJ Media’s Matt Margolis wrote on Feb. 29: “But we’re not seeing Trump get any credit for this in the media, or from Democrats, are we? Nope. They’ve politicized the coronavirus epidemic, using lies to attack Trump in the hopes it will help defeat him in November.” In a March 1 op-ed for RedState, Elizabeth Vaughn noted: “The Trump administration took decisive action to minimize the impact of the coronavirus in the first month. The disease had been declared a public health emergency one month before the first U.S. death. Despite the unwarranted criticism coming from the left, the government appears to be focused on protecting Americans. “When asked what more the Trump administration could be doing, Democrats have no real answers. But that doesn’t stop them.” Meanwhile, security correspondent Bill Gertz had a different blame thought: “Trade deal with China for President Trump to pursue: Make Beijing pay for the damage caused by the Wuhan virus. They have trillions in cash reserves and China’s Communist Party should be held accountable for China making the world sick with new microbes.” Tags: Free Press International, News Service, Free Pressers, 1000 Deaths, & Months Later, Obama Declared, H1N Emergency To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Boy Crisis
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 12:33 PM PST by Kerby Anderson: Boys are in crisis. That should be obvious, but Dr. Warren Farrell still has to spend his first six chapters documenting it. He was on my radio program to talk about the book, The Boy Crisis, that he wrote with Dr. John Gray. First, there is the crisis of our sons’ mental health. For example, the increase in the suicide rate among white males led to as many white male deaths as were lost to AIDS. The rate of mass shootings has increased significantly, and they are done by boys. Our daughters live in the same homes, have the same access to guns, video games, and the media. They are not killing. Our sons are. Second is the crisis of our sons’ economic health. They are entering an economy different from their grandparents that has moved from muscle to mental, or to put it another way, from muscle to microchip. The median annual earnings of boys have dropped significantly. Third is the crisis of our sons’ education. Over the last fifty years, the percentage of college degrees received by gender completely reversed. Females rose from 39 percent to 61 percent. Males dropped from 61 percent to 39 percent. Less educated boys are more likely to be unemployed. But this reversal in education also affects marriage. As our sons become less educated, our daughters increasingly desire partners who are more educated. Finally, there is a crisis of fathering. Boys growing up with less involved or non-involved fathers are more likely to face more social problems. These include dropping out of school, drinking, doing drugs, becoming delinquent, and perhaps even ending up in prison. Pastors and Christian leaders need to focus attention on this boy crisis. We have church programs and faith-based solutions that build strong marriages and instruct in biblical parenting. The first step is to realize we are facing a boy crisis. Tags: Kerby Anderson, Viewpoints, Point of View, Boy Crisis To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Zoned Out
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 12:25 PM PST by Paul Jacob, Contributing Author: There are ways of cultivating community standards without resorting to zoning and similar regulatory regimens by state and local governments. They have been studied, written about, and they can be found here and there around the country, though most famously in Houston, Texas. But zoning’s the norm in urban and suburban communities. Ask Marietta Grundlehner. She had been running an online clothing boutique from her home in Fairfax County, Virginia, and has been forced to shut it down. Well, a court has ruled that she must remove all her inventory from her home. You can have a home business in Fairfax, but not inventory of goods for sale. Ms. Grundlehner had been earning, she said, about $30,000 a year as a “LulaRoe Fashion Retailer” in an industry billed by its online organizer as “social retail.” The ecommerce hub, lularoe.com, makes an enticing pitch for its business model: “Find your joy and fulfillment by creating a positive impact in your community.” But it was a neighbor who turned her in and sicced the local government on her. That Fairfax resident sure did not think she was having a “positive impact” in their community. Grundlehner hopes for a regulatory change to save her business, but Christian Britschgi of Reason has a word for that battle: “uphill.” Still, online businesses are on the ascendency. Too many run afoul of zoning laws. And online entrepreneurship being the wave of the future, local governments might want to forget their old gentrification utopianism and meet the real world, the place where people actually live. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Zoned Out To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Coronavirus, God, and a World out of Our Control
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 12:12 PM PST
by John Stonestreet: The coronavirus has now spread to over 60 countries, with major outbreaks in China, South Korea, Northern Italy, and Iran. The global numbers are staggering: nearly 90,000 reported cases and over 3,000 deaths. As of Monday afternoon, there were over 90 confirmed cases of the virus in the United States, with six deaths. Of course, given the current pace of developments, these numbers are already out of date. Naturally, people are alarmed, even frightened. Despite our recent bouts with Swine Flu and even Ebola, this one just feels different, partly because it’s obvious that scientists, reporters, and national leaders are learning on the fly with this one, partly because, at least in America, media pundits and presidential candidates are seizing the opportunity to point fingers and gain political advantage, and partly because social media is very, very good at spreading panic. Panic, however, is almost always the wrong response. Though we know that the COVID-19 virus has spread to every inhabited continent and will soon earn the title “pandemic,” that word, as one public health expert told Bloomberg News, is too often used in movies as “a proxy for a deadly apocalyptic virus.” So, it can be misleading. Is COVID-19 serious? Absolutely. Unprecedented? Maybe. Apocalyptic? No. According to the best numbers so far, the lethality of COVID-19 is about two percent. If that rate holds, the coronavirus would be about ten times as lethal as the seasonal flu, but we have reason to doubt it will. For example, we just don’t know how many people have the disease. So far, hte overwhelming majority of reported deaths from the coronavirus have come from the early stages of the outbreak in China, when very little was known about it, and have occurred among those already vulnerable to respiratory ailments, such as the elderly. Most who have the virus experience symptoms akin to a severe cold. So, it could be that the lethality rate of COVID-19 will drop. Whether or not it does, the world, especially the Western world, has been given a sobering reminder. One of the most embedded traits of our culture, shaped as it is by what we can call “post-enlightenment modernity,” is the wrong-headed belief that we are in control of our own destiny, via a technological and medical prowess that will, in the end, save the day. It’s a hubris rooted in a remarkable amount of scientific and technological achievement, one in which we forget that not only is the world in which we live fallen, but that we live in it courtesy of a whole host of forces completely outside of our control. Whereas previous generations were constantly reminded of their many vulnerabilities to the various forces of nature, we control so much of the natural world that we forget, as Christian philosopher Blaise Pascal noted, that “Man is only a reed, the weakest in nature . . . There is no need for the whole universe to take up arms to crush him: a vapour . . . is enough to kill him.” We exist by the grace of God. Were He to withhold His breath of life and His creation-sustaining Word—well, that’d be it, folks. Such a reminder of the truth about the human condition, especially coming as it has during this time of Lent when, above all, we are to remember that we are “but dust and to dust we shall return,” is a call for inward reflection. During my “BreakPoint This Week” conversation with Shane Morris, I was reminded of a challenging book by historian Steven Keillor, entitled “God’s Judgments: Interpreting History and the Christian Faith.” In the wake of tragedies, such as 9-11 and Hurricane Katrina, some Christian pundits embarrassingly claimed to know not only that God was judging by allowing these calamities, but why and who He was judging. That’s a different but just as unhelpful kind of hubris. At the same time, the normative way the Old Testament understands calamity is as judgment, though we are rarely given a full glimpse behind the curtain of God’s intentions and reasonings. Rather than look outwards, Shane Morris suggested in our conversation, we’d do well to heed the words of Jesus in Luke 13, when He was asked who God was judging in the collapse of the tower of Siloam: “Do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others living in Jerusalem? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all perish just as they did.” God is working in history, even allowing calamities, to accomplish His purposes. Even those of us who believe that will be tempted to bemoan the loss of control this epidemic reveals, a control we never really had in the first place. At times like this, Christians shouldn’t be caught in the panic or the blame or the political footballing. When times are at their worst, Christians should be at their best. Already we’ve seen glimpses of this in China, where Christians who face state-sponsored persecution are taking care of their non-believing neighbors in the midst of the coronavirus outbreak. That sort of behavior only comes from knowing this world belongs to God, and that He, in the end, will wipe away every tear from our eyes. Tags: John Stonestreet, BreakPoint, The Coronavirus, God, World out of Our Control To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
An Imam at a Bernie Rally Had Defended Sex Slavery, Chopping Off Hands, Called for Destruction of Israel
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 11:54 AM PST
by Daniel Greenfield: When Imam Omar Suleiman appeared at a Bernie rally in Mesquite, TX, the hateful Islamist cleric spoke in front of a backdrop of giant American flags and signs urging donations to Sanders. Before Bernie took the stage, he called for an, “America where we uplift our most vulnerable, celebrate our diversity.” The Imam did not mention, as he has before, that he believes that, “Zionists are the enemies of God.” By “god”, the Imam meant Allah. The occasion for that hateful outburst was Operation Protective Edge which began after Hamas kidnapped and murdered three Jewish teenagers. One of them American. Earlier in the conflict, Omar had tweeted, “God willing on this blessed night as the 3rd Intifada begins, the beginning of the end of Zionism is here. May Allah help us overcome this monster, protect the innocent of the world, and accept the murdered as martyrs. ameen #48kMarch #3rdIntifada.” He later tweeted, “The people of #Gaza made us proud. You refused to let terror break you and we refuse to let Zionist media silence you.” When Sanders announced that he was boycotting AIPAC, Imam Omar Suleiman rejoiced. While Senator Bernie Sanders has insisted that he couldn’t go to AIPAC because of, “the platform AIPAC provides for leaders who express bigotry and oppose basic Palestinian rights”, he was fine with Omar. Not only did the Imam speak at his Texas rally, but was repeatedly photographed with Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders was providing a platform for a monster who had called for the destruction of Israel, described Jews as the enemies of Allah, and championed another intifada being waged against Israel. The Hamas charter had already described what the intifada’s outcome would look like in the infamous Islamic hadith. “The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!” Omar has appeared at American Muslims for Palestine events. AMP was founded by Hatem Bazian, the godfather of campus anti-Semitism, and founder of SJP, who had allegedly read that same hadith calling for another Holocaust. AMP has also been linked to a variety of Hamas front groups. AMP’s national director, Osama Abu-Irshaid, had celebrated, “Hamas, whose youth have been renewed by its commitment to its precise principles for liberation” during Operation Protective Edge. Suleiman had attended MAYA conferences, a hate group that the FBI had described as, “a conduit for money to Hamas . . . and… a forum where Hamas could promote its ideology and recruit new members.” At one MAYA conference, a Hamas leader had told the audience, “Finish off the Israelis. Kill them all. Exterminate them. No peace ever.” But Imam Omar Suleiman’s hatred went beyond calling for the destruction of Israel. A year before his Hamas outrage, Imam Suleiman had claimed in a YouTube video that, “If it was not for Bani Israel, meat would not decay.” The hateful cleric was quoting an Islamic hadith which blamed meat going bad on the Jewish people. The Jews had not only beaten Hamas, but had also invented bacteria. While it’s understandable that Bernie Sanders would be okay with Imam Suleiman’s calls for the destruction of Israel, his campaign has multiple anti-Semitic allies and surrogates, including Linda Sarsour, John Cusack, Amer Zahr, and Rep. Ilhan Omar, but it doesn’t end with the Jews. It never does. “When Allah describes homosexuality as a repugnant shameless sin and details his punishment of a people that practiced sodomy, how can anyone who believes in Allah not find it immoral?” Imam Omar Suleiman had also said. Had those same remarks been made by a Christian preacher, he would have been swiftly banished. But Suleiman’s comments about gays and women, have gotten the same pass as his anti-Semitism. And his other politically incorrect fidelity to the brutalities of Islamic custom and law. “Sisters, you know what happens with a really jealous Dad? He kills you and he kills the guy,” a smiling Imam Suleiman told Muslim female college students at an Islamist youth event. “Even if they don’t have a man who’s going to be a real man, Allah has more than any man.” A willingness to honor kill your own daughter is the Islamic measure of a “real man”. “Society’s welfare always takes precedence over the individual’s welfare,” Imam Suleiman had said, when discussing concubines and sex slaves. “It supersedes the outrage of a woman – the very real possibility that a woman in that situation had that option not been there – would have most likely been put in a situation of prostitution.” And then, making it clear that he was talking about sex slavery of the ISIS variety, he discussed a situation where “a prisoner of war was to come in, if a woman was to come in that situation”. In Islam, girls and women are captured as “prisoners of war” and raped by Muslim men. As the many Yazidi girls and women raped by ISIS were. As were American women like Kayla Mueller. Bernie Sanders had campaigned on criminal justice reform. Imam Omar Suleiman has another take. “The punishment for theft,” Imam Omar Suleiman said at a Sharia Council Panel, “which would be the cutting off of the hand, that’s not just any theft, Allah wants to protect the life of the one who had stolen… but a skilled thief.” Before defending the Sharia punishment of cutting off the hands of thieves, he had defended stoning men and women for immorality. But, no one in the media will ask Bernie Sander whether he agrees with Imam Omar Suleiman. Suleiman has developed a slick routine for American audiences, filled with jokes and pop culture references, even when he’s discussing honor killings and mutilations, but his mentors and theological influences are clerics who defended female genital mutilation and killing Muslims who leave Islam. Suleiman had called Aid al-Qarni, “one of the greatest scholars and thinkers in the world”. The Saudi hateful cleric had preached that, “Fighting the Jews and not making peace with them is a religious Islamic duty” and that, “the Jews and the Christians are the enemies of the Muslims and the enemies of Islam.” He claimed that the Jews had killed Lincoln, and called them “apes and pigs”. “Throats must be slit and skulls must be shattered. This is the path to victory, to shahada, and to sacrifice,” he had ranted. Bernie Sanders was against the Iraq War. So was Suleiman’s inspiring scholar and thinker. “I praise the Jihad, the sacrifice and the resistance against the occupiers in Iraq. We curse them every night and pray that Allah will annihilate them, tear them apart, and grant us victory over them,” he had stormed. “The Jihad in Fallujah is a source of pride.” The Jihadists in Fallujah were the terrorist group that would eventually turn into ISIS. Good thing Bernie skipped AIPAC. While Bernie wouldn’t go to AIPAC, he did go to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) convention alongside Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the World Trade Center bombing, who had declared, “You know what the punishment is, if a man is found with another man? The Prophet Mohammad said the one who does it and the one to whom it is done to, kill them both.” Imam Omar Suleiman is also a big fan of Wahhaj, calling him, “my beloved Imam” and gushing, “every time I meet him I feel like a little child meeting his hero.” While Bernie couldn’t go to AIPAC because he falsely accused the liberal group of providing a platform “for leaders who express bigotry”, he’s okay with ISNA’s platform for killing gay people. And everyone. Bernie’s ISNA presidential forum was moderated by Salam Al-Marayati, who had defended Hamas and Hezbollah, and justified Hezbollah’s mass murder of Marines in Lebanon. Water finds its own level. So did Bernie. Bernie would not be comfortable in a room full of Jewish pro-Israel liberals. He is quite comfortable with progressives like Imam Omar Suleiman, Linda Sarsour, Amer Zahr, and Rep. Ilhan Omar, and their ilk. The Vermont socialist, who celebrated Castro and the Soviet Union, is not comfortable among Jews. He is very happy being surrounded by bigots and haters who believe in killing Jews, destroying Israel, and then going on to stone gay people, kill women, chop the hands of thieves, and murder Americans. There’s no room for Bernie at AIPAC. Or at any Jewish forum. And, if he’s the nominee, there will be no room for Jews in the Democrat Party unless they’re willing to act as accomplices to the murder of Jews. Just like Bernie. Tags: Daniel Greenfield, Sultan Knish, An Imam, at a Bernie Rally, Had Defended, Sex Slavery, Chopping Off Hands, Destruction of Israel To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
4 Keys to Understanding History of Super Tuesday
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 11:44 AM PST
by Fred Lucas: Super Tuesday is typically the closest thing to a national primary election in the United States. It got the “super” name with as many as 24 state contests and as few as three in a single day. On March 3 this year, it falls somewhere in between as 14 states and American Samoa hold presidential contests. Over the years, the states holding primaries on Super Tuesday have varied. The 14 states holding primaries this Tuesday are Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia. Here are four keys to understanding the legacy of this single day in picking a president. 1. Casual References The New York Times first used the term during the 1976 presidential contests as a hyphenated “super-Tuesday.” That first Super Tuesday came when six primaries were held May 25, according to the National Constitution Center. It was the day that President Gerald Ford and his challenger, former California Gov. Ronald Reagan, each won three states as they fought it out for the Republican nomination. The Democrats had a crowded field that year. Eventually, Ford and former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter won their parties’ nominations. “When three southern states banded together in 1980, that helped Jimmy Carter beat [Sen.] Ted Kennedy,” said presidential historian Craig Shirley, whose most recent book is “Mary Ball Washington: The Untold Story of George Washington’s Mother.” In 1980, one Super Tuesday occurred as Alabama, Florida, and Georgia held primaries March 11. The term Super Tuesday also was used to describe the final Tuesday in June, with voting in eight states that Kennedy unsuccessfully targeted for wins. That year, Reagan beat a crowded Republican field to win the GOP nomination to take on Carter, who staved off a challenge from Kennedy for the Democratic nomination. In 1984, the term “frontloading” was used when nine states—Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Washington—held primaries in the Democratic nomination race. Former Vice President Walter Mondale eventually won the Democrats’ nomination that year before losing 49 states to Reagan in November. 2. Super Tuesday Formalized “Southern Democrats did not want another George McGovern, so to try to ensure a more centrist candidate, they pooled together to have southern primaries on the same day,” Shirley said. The Republican incumbent, Richard Nixon, trounced Democratic nominee McGovern in the 1972 election. In 1988, then-Sen. Chuck Robb, D-Va., said Super Tuesday was designed to reduce the “Iowa syndrome,” regarding too much emphasis from candidates on the Iowa caucuses. A total of 20 states—12 in the South—held their primary on March 8, 1988: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington state. “The 1988 primaries were designed to help Al Gore,” Shirley said, referring to the Tennessee Democrat, who was then in the Senate. “But Jesse Jackson and Al Gore ended up splitting the southern vote, and [eventual Democratic nominee] Michael Dukakis came through the middle.” 3. When Super Tuesday Was Decisive “Now it’s just a big mess, with California and Minnesota and no ideological harmony or regional character,” Shirley said. That first Super Tuesday in 1988 was key in helping Vice President George H.W. Bush stop whatever momentum Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas had gained from winning the Iowa caucuses. Bush went on to thump Dukakis, the Massachusetts governor, in November. “In 1988, Super Tuesday was definitive for both Republicans and Democrats,” Shirley said. It took four years, but Democrats on Super Tuesday, March 11, 1992, realized their intent of nominating a more moderate southern Democrat, when Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton swept the southern Super Tuesday states. Clinton went on to defeat Bush, the incumbent, in November. This occurred after Clinton became a rare candidate to be nominated after losing contests in the earliest two states, Iowa and New Hampshire. Only 11 states were part of Super Tuesday in 1992, including some outside the South: Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas. Dole, facing a crowded Republican primary field in 1996, swept all seven Super Tuesday states in 1996, forcing most of the other Republican candidates to drop out, though Pat Buchanan held on a little longer. The seven states voting that March 12 were Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Oregon, Tennessee, and Texas. Dole went on to lose to Clinton that November. In 2000, Texas Gov. George W. Bush stopped any remaining hope Sen. John McCain of Arizona had of winning the GOP nomination. Bush swept primaries in 16 states, including the mega-delegate states of California and New York along with Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Gore, the eventual Democratic nominee, also won those states, and former Sen. Bill Bradley of New Jersey dropped out after not winning a single contest. The year 2004 saw a mini-Super Tuesday with five states on Feb. 3 followed by a March 2 Super Tuesday II with 10 states. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts won all but Oklahoma on Feb. 3 and all but Vermont on March 2 to secure the Democrats’ nomination. He lost to the incumbent Bush in November. 4. Split Super Tuesday Decisions In 2008, McCain essentially wrapped up the Republican nomination, winning nine of 21 states Feb. 5. However, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won seven states that night and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee won five. So the Republican primaries continued. The Democrats were in for a much longer contest between Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York and Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois when Democrats had 23 contests Feb. 5, resulting in a delegate deadlock when Clinton won 10 states and Obama won 13. Obama defeated McCain in the general election. In 2012, Romney entered the GOP contest as the frontrunner, but couldn’t close the deal even on Super Tuesday. He won six of the 10 contests March 6, losing three to former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and one to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia. In 2016, Republicans and Democrats both continued their primaries after Super Tuesday when no candidate won a majority of convention delegates. But, each contest gave a picture of where the nomination battle was going. On March 1, New York businessman Donald Trump won seven states, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas won three, and Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida won one. That day, Hillary Clinton won eight states, while Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., won four. Tags: 4 Keys, to Understanding, History of Super Tuesday, Fred Lucas, The Daily Signal To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Trump Nominates Nation’s 1st African American Military Service Chief
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 08:57 AM PST
by Oriana Pawlyk: President Trump has nominated Gen. Charles “CQ” Brown to be the next top general to lead the U.S. Air Force. The nomination, announced by the Defense Department Monday afternoon, would make him the first African American officer to serve as the top uniformed officer for any of the military branches. The Wall Street Journal first reported Monday that Brown, currently the head of Pacific Air Forces, would be tapped for 22nd Air Force chief of staff, following Gen. David Goldfein, who is set to retire this summer after four years in the position. Brown would also be the first black officer to sit on the Joint Chiefs of Staff since then-Army Gen. Colin Powell served as chairman between 1989 and 1993. “The [Air Force] will be well served by the formidable talents of CQ Brown,” Air Force Secretary Barbara Barrett said in a tweet following the announcement. “He has unmatched strategic vision and operational expertise. His leadership will be instrumental as the service continues to focus on the capabilities and talent we need to implement the [National Defense Strategy].” Before his post at PACAF, Brown was the deputy commander of U.S. Central Command at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. He also served as the head of Air Forces Central Command (AFCENT) between 2015 and 2016, during the height of the air campaign against Islamic State fighters in Iraq and Syria. The highly decorated commander, an F-16 Fighting Falcon pilot by training, commissioned in 1984 and has accumulated more than 2,900 flight hours, including 130 combat hours in various aircraft. With posts that have taken him across Europe, the Pacific and the Middle East, Brown has also “commanded a fighter squadron, the U.S. Air Force Weapons School, and two fighter wings” throughout his career, his bio states. Despite publicly stated efforts across the military services to attract and retain minority troops, the most senior ranks remain largely homogenous. A 2015 report from USA Today found that, of 280 Air Force generals at the time, just 18 belonged to minority groups, and just 13 — or 4% of the total — were African American. Between 2014 and 2015, Brown was the director of operations, strategic deterrence and nuclear integration at U.S. Air Forces in Europe. During that time, the general told Air Force Times he had been focused on watching Russia’s activities unfold in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, but quickly had to switch gears during his tour to focus on deterring ISIS forces from making gains in Iraq and Syria. “When you ask me what my biggest accomplishment was during this time of my [AFCENT] command, [strategic] targeting. That was it,” Brown told this reporter during an interview in 2016. Brown’s goal at the command was to streamline processes between the Air Force, coalition air components and the intelligence community to create better dynamic and deliberate targeting operations for battlefield success. “In the last 15 years or so, we’ve done a lot of close-air support for troops in contact and overwatch, and the deliberate targeting process — we lost a little muscle memory from what we had in the past,” he said, referencing operations in Afghanistan. “So I think this is something that’s going to help us in the [Central Command area of operations] and in other contingencies later on that we as a nation or we as the coalition team may face in the future.” Like his PACAF predecessor, Air Force Gen. Terrence O’Shaughnessy, Brown has worked to improve collaboration with partner forces, with an emphasis on integrating fifth-generation combat capabilities, such as those within the F-35A Joint Strike Fighter, into theater. “Our allies and partners are on the front lines of fifth-generation integration in the Indo-Pacific,” Brown said in 2018, referencing how the U.S., Australia, Japan and South Korea will all operate the F-35 in coming years. Tags: Oriana Pawlyk, Military.com, Trump Nominates, Nation’s 1st, African American Military Service Chief To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
McConnell Addresses American Energy Innovation Act
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 08:24 AM PST U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell: This week, the Senate has a good opportunity to update the laws governing the way we harness and deploy America’s tremendous domestic energy resources. It’s been well over a decade since the last time comprehensive energy legislation was signed into federal law. But following our overwhelming vote yesterday to proceed to consideration of the American Energy Innovation Act, the Senate is on track to change that very soon. The American Energy Innovation Act, put forward by Chairman Murkowski and Ranking Member Manchin, is thoroughly bipartisan. It contains provisions sponsored or cosponsored by more than 60 of our colleagues. It’s come to include 50 individual pieces of legislation that the Energy and Natural Resources Committee considered last year. Over the past three years, the Trump administration and this Congress have worked together to secure historic advances for both the producers and consumers of affordable domestic energy. We’ve opened access to new energy reserves. Streamlined the regulation of liquid natural gas exports. Halted or reversed the most egregious Obama-era regulatory burdens. The growing record is clear. We’ve helped to usher in a prosperous new era of U.S. energy independence. The legislation we’re considering this week is designed to build on these successes. It takes proactive steps to ensure the security, efficiency, and affordability of American energy for years to come. First, it puts a strong tailwind behind programs, grants, and research efforts that are focused on energy innovation. That means significant investments in improving energy efficiency and grid storage technologies. New resources for the development of renewable geothermal, nuclear, and other energy sources to help sustain domestic energy independence. Reauthorization for the Department of Energy’s cutting-edge research at the Advanced Research Projects Agency. And a renewed commitment to carbon capture, utilization and storage at coal production facilities. In addition to energy innovation, the legislation also focuses on energy security. Since the last comprehensive update to federal energy laws in 2007, our nation’s critical infrastructure including the electric grid has changed significantly. And so have the threats it faces. Our colleagues’ legislation tackles this head-on. It introduces incentives for electrical grid modernization and cybersecurity projects. It encourages utility providers to take proactive measures to protect ratepayers from the devastating effects of potential cyberattacks. It makes new technical cybersecurity assistance available to municipalities and rural utilities and authorizes grant funding for on-the-job workforce retraining. Perhaps most importantly, the legislation before us is not only designed for continued advances in areas where the U.S. energy sector has seen success. It’s also meant to take a sober assessment of where we’re falling short. As my colleague, Chairman Murkowski noted yesterday, the United States currently relies on foreign imports to meet our demand for dozens of mineral commodities. We’re talking about rare substances with critical applications in manufacturing, energy production and national security. These are critical products. But at present, domestic production does not satisfy domestic demand. That’s why this legislation provides for new survey and cataloging efforts to identify new domestic supplies of important materials. And it invests in extraction technologies that would harness existing mining infrastructure in places like Appalachian coal country to help meet the demand. As the senior senator from Kentucky, I know the importance of these investments firsthand. The working families and job creators in my state know that clean coal technologies and longstanding mining operations can continue to add tremendous value to the security and prosperity of our nation. There’s a reason why this legislation has earned widespread praise from the researchers and energy industry leaders who would be affected the most. It is the product of serious, good-faith, bipartisan work. That’s why organizations from the National Mining Association to the Environmental Defense Fund have found common ground in endorsing it. I’ll have more to say about this legislation in the coming days. But right now, I’m grateful to our colleagues on the Energy Committee for their work bringing it to the floor. I look forward to considering their important legislation in the days ahead and I encourage all members to join me in supporting this excellent work. Tags: Mitch McConnell, American Energy Innovation Act, U.S. Senators, Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Joe Manchin, D-W.Va To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Cenk Uygur beats expectations by getting more than zilch
- After years of questioning President Trump’s mental acuity, media goes silent on slow-brained Joe
- President Trump bashes Jeff Sessions, seems to endorse Tommy Tuberville
- 9-seat flip: Results of congressional races in California are terrifying for Democrats
- Money can’t buy Bloomberg love on Super Tuesday… except in American Samoa
- Will Bernie Sanders supporters revolt against the Democratic Party?
- CBP nabs illegal alien Luis Gustavo Sanchez Arenales on suspicion of murdering social worker
- Deep State endorses Joe Biden
- James Comey endorsed Joe Biden. The Biden campaign rejected his endorsement.
- Polyamory isn’t pursued for noble reasons
Cenk Uygur beats expectations by getting more than zilch
Posted: 04 Mar 2020 06:23 AM PST Marxist Cenk Uygur has quite a resume. He created both The Young Turks and the Justice Democrats. He has debated many conservatives. He’s been helping Bernie Sanders finish 2nd in Democratic nomination races since 2016. Now, he can add something else to his resume: candidate for Congress who received votes. Official numbers are not finalized yet but it appears that he not only received votes, but may or may not have hit the 5% mark in a race to replace Katie Hill, the former Congresswoman who resigned last year. His fourth place finish means he won’t be in the runoff to see who will fill the seat for the next few months, but considering he was never actually serious about winning the seat, it can be marked as a victory in his own mind. Now, his focus turns to the national election as his new stated goal in life is to make sure Joe Biden is not the Democratic nominee. On his show last night, he said that Biden is incapable of defeating President Trump, stating Biden is either “near-senile” or fully senile already. He compared Biden to Hillary Clinton, only less capable with a worse record and a lot more lies under his belt. Considered a long-shot in the crowded field, Uygur endeared himself to voters by saying things they wouldn’t like. It was a strategy similar to his denial of the Armenian Genocide and odd fixation with bestiality: Give people an unpopular opinion, then debate the issue until they realize arguing with him is pointless. His real focus is on helping Sanders win the nomination and the presidency. To accomplish these goals, he went into meltdown mode, a tried and true way to get him into news reports and therefore at the top of mind.
The naysayers said he had no chance of getting actual people to vote for him, but Cenk Uygur proved them all wrong. Some people did, indeed, vote for him. It wasn’t much when seen through a mathematical lens, but who needs math when we have feelings? American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Cenk Uygur beats expectations by getting more than zilch appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After years of questioning President Trump’s mental acuity, media goes silent on slow-brained Joe
Posted: 04 Mar 2020 05:04 AM PST If you’re one of the few who watches CNN or MSNBC, you’ve probably seen psychologists brought on to dissect something President Trump said. The “analyses” have always ended the same way with the master shrinks declaring in their expert, “totally non-partisan” opinion that President Trump is slipping. Some have accused him of early signs of dementia. Most compared his current actions or words to President Reagan’s second term when he allegedly quietly battled Alzheimer’s Disease. In every case, the “analyses” in question required mental gymnastics and complete suspension of disbelief for anyone to hear the President’s words and come to the conclusion he has lost a step or two upstairs. The reality is this: President Trump is just as mentally fit as he’s been his entire adult life. He is showing no signs of dementia. None. His occasional misspoken words are no different today than they were 20 years ago. Not drinking, smoking, or doing drugs tends to save the necessary brain cells for life at age 70 and beyond. But I’m not here to take my amateur psychological skills and analyze the President’s speech patterns. I’m wondering how in the world these “journalists” at CNN, MSNBC, and progressive mainstream media rags can claim an inkling of integrity as they completely ignore former Vice President Joe Biden’s unambiguous mental challenges. They’ve been on display almost daily for months. There is absolutely no doubt he isn’t as sharp as he was just a few years ago. But how many experts and psychologists have mainstream media “journalists” rolled out to “analyze” the Democratic frontrunner? Zero. It hasn’t happened. It won’t happen. They can’t find a shrink on this planet who would be willing to go on camera and claim Biden has nothing bad going on in his head. They’d become the laughing stock of their profession. Many Democrats and their mainstream media proxies aren’t even concerned about whether Joe Biden is mentally fit to be president. They’re only concerned about whether he can hold together an illusion of lucidity through November. Whatever comes after that is secondary; they’ll pick him a nice Vice President to take over when his mental acuity completely collapses while in the White House. As long as someone, anyone, can defeat President Trump, they’re all-in. And unless his intellectual degradation worsens, the person they have in mind is Joe Biden. Unfortunately for them, there’s this…
Mainstream media has spent the last four years trying to convince Americans President Trump’s mind is slowing down. Now that Joe Biden is their new white knight, television shrinks aren’t appearing on CNN or MSNBC anymore. Coincidence? American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post After years of questioning President Trump’s mental acuity, media goes silent on slow-brained Joe appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President Trump bashes Jeff Sessions, seems to endorse Tommy Tuberville
Posted: 04 Mar 2020 04:47 AM PST The Alabama primary race for Senate was close. Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former Auburn football coach Tommy Tuberville (who we’ve endorsed) were neck and neck throughout the night with Tuberville edging ahead, 33.4% to 31.6%, after 90% of the vote was counted. Both claim loyalty to President Trump. Both are staunch conservatives with agendas that match the Trump agenda. But Sessions was fired by President Trump two years after recusing himself from the Russia probe, essentially allowing the entire Russia hoax and Mueller investigation to go forward. The President hasn’t forgotten. First, he Tweeted an AP story noting Tuberville had advanced. Then, he went after Sessions.
The winner of the March 31st runoff will face Democrat Doug Jones in the general election. Jones won the seat that Sessions previously held, defeating Judge Roy Moore in a deep red state after the Washington Post reported Moore dated teen girls while he was in his 30s. Moore ran again this year but came in fourth. This attack on Sessions, something the President did regularly when he was Attorney General, will likely reverberate. It also comes despite reports that Tuberville attacked the President based on a truncated clip that excluded the part about Tuberville wanting to go to Washington DC to help fight for the President and his agenda.
There has not been an official endorsement of Tuberville yet, but the writing on the wall is crystal clear. President Trump does not want Sessions back in DC. The course has been set by the President. Will Alabama listen? American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post President Trump bashes Jeff Sessions, seems to endorse Tommy Tuberville appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9-seat flip: Results of congressional races in California are terrifying for Democrats
Posted: 04 Mar 2020 03:08 AM PST Beneath the cover of a contentious presidential primary race that gave Establishment Democrats hope, the arguably biggest takeaway of the night is going to be buried. But Democrats took note and the implications are terrifying for them. While Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden did battle on the national stage from coast to coast, several states were also holding primary elections for lower offices. There were some good storylines in high-profile Senate races that will supplement Biden vs. Sanders talk in the news cycle, but the part you likely won’t hear much about was California’s primary for all 54 congressional seats. Why won’t you hear about it elsewhere? Because nine Democratic seats can clearly be flipped and the one Republican seat in jeopardy seems poised to stay red. This wasn’t the news the DNC wanted to hear. It’s definitely not the news Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi wanted to hear as it’s the first real indicator that her gavel is at risk. Keep two things in mind. First, these aren’t nine seats that are deemed “in play” through some election miracle. These are nine seats currently held by Democrats where Republicans have the upper hand based on analysis of Tuesday’s primary votes. Second—and this is very important to understand—with only one statewide ballot measure, the main draw was the Democratic presidential primary in which Republicans may not vote. That means that even without the draw of a presidential primary choice, nine seats showed Republicans either within striking distance or outright beating Democrats. The “jungle primary” system for congressional seats means everyone gets the same ballot choices. The top two finishers in the primary will go head-to-head in the general election. Based on these criteria, a shocking number of Democratic seats are now in jeopardy in November. Let’s break them down one-by-one. District 798% of precincts reporting
Incumbent Democrat Ami Bera had no trouble beating the other Democrat nor the Green Party candidate, but Republicans Buzz Patterson and Jon Ivy combined to beat him. Though they combine for 46.7% of the vote, the presidential primary boost Bera received did not give him the significant lead he would have hoped for as a Sacramento incumbent. Patterson, a former carrier of the “nuclear football” for President Clinton, is an outspoken conservative and former Air Force Lt. Colonel. If he can get some wind on his back, he has a strong chance of flipping the seat and beating the incumbent.
District 1058% of precincts reporting
At the time of this article there was only 58% reported, but incumbent Democrat Josh Harder is only at 38.9%, barely edging ahead of Republican Ted Howze. Republicans combined for 56.3% of the vote.
District 1692% of precincts reporting
This was an unusual primary in which only one Republican ran. But that Republican, Kevin Cookingham, is in the lead. Granted, Democrats have the lion’s share of the total votes, but incumbent Democrat Jim Costa is clearly in trouble with his own base; this is the first time he’s faced other Democrats for his 16th district seat. It’s also the only time he’s come in second in the primary. District 2186% of precincts reporting
Republican David Valadao narrowly lost his seat in 2018 to Democrat TJ Cox. He wants his seat back, and if the primary is any indicator he’s poised to do just that. He easily defeated the field of Cox plus a Republican and Democrat (oddly both named De La Fuente). In a strange twist, Ricardo De La Fuente also won a primary… in Texas. He was running for congressional seats in two states. That’s something to unpack in the future. For now, Valadao is the story as he is in good shape going into the general election. District 2487% of precincts reporting
The last two elections, Democrat Salud Carbajal has easily won CA-24, defeating his opponent by over 17-points in 2018. But he wasn’t facing Republican Andy Caldwell before and this primary shows that Caldwell is within striking distance. Had there been a Republican presidential primary, he may have even overtaken the incumbent. Now, he has until November to prove to voters that he should win the seat. District 2555% of precincts reporting
Ah, the 25th district. This is a mess. Vacated by disgraced Congresswoman Katie Hill, the former red seat flipped in 2018. Now, a dozen candidates, including high-profile names like George Papadopoulos and Cenk Uygur, are trying to grab it. But it was Democrat Christy Smith and Republican Mike Garcia who popped in at #1 and #2. With 55% of the vote in, Republicans combine for 53%. It’s looking strong to be flipped back to red in November. District 3983% of precincts reporting
This one should be a no-brainer, a correction from a horrible 2018 flip that turned the seat blue. It’s also a rematch of 2018, only this time Republican Young Kim is in the driver’s seat.
District 45100% of precincts reporting
The 45th district is another casualty of the so-called “blue wave” of 2018 with Elizabeth Warren acolyte Katie Porter narrowly winning the seat. She faced six Republicans in the primary, and while she won handily, she didn’t get to 50% with Republicans combining for 51.9%. Now, Greg Raths will face her in the general election. If Republicans unite behind him, Congresswoman Porter will have just one term in DC. District 48100% of precincts reporting
Like the 45th district, the 48th featured a single-term incumbent Democrat who took a ride on the 2018 “blue wave” to win a traditionally red seat. But he’ll be facing Michelle Steel in the general election with more than 10-points to make up against Republicans.
District 5062% of precincts reporting
This was the race to watch in California, the one Democrats are hoping to flip following the resignation of Duncan Hunter in January. Two strong, local Republicans were competing for the second slot to face Ammar Campa-Najjar. At the time of this article, it’s unclear whether Darrell Issa or Carl DeMaio will make it to the general election. Whichever one does will have the upper hand as Democrats could not combine for 40% of the primary vote. It’s official. The House is up for grabs. There are nine seats held by Democrats in trouble in radical progressive California while all of the Republican seats are safe. Nancy Pelosi’s days with the gavel appear to be limited. Again. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post 9-seat flip: Results of congressional races in California are terrifying for Democrats appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money can’t buy Bloomberg love on Super Tuesday… except in American Samoa
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 07:31 PM PST Billionaire Mike Bloomberg had a shockingly bad day. It wasn’t shocking that he didn’t do well on Super Tuesday. The shock came in the realization of just how badly he performed despite spending over half-a-billion dollars for today alone. As it turns out, money can’t buy as many votes as some people thought. That’s a good thing. On the bright side, he won in American Samoa. Bloomberg’s woes didn’t start on Super Tuesday. It was his first horrible and second slightly-less-horrible debate performances that really did him in. Viewers who were considering him were left with more questions than answers, and those who had all the answers they needed decided he just wasn’t equipped to go head-to-head against President Trump. If Senator Elizabeth Warren could dismantle him so easily after failing to do so against her previous targets, Senator Bernie Sanders and Vice President Joe Biden, it meant Bloomberg’s wealth was his only redeeming quality. With votes mostly tabulated from nine of the Super Tuesday states, Bloomberg was only qualified for delegates in three of them. NY Times is projecting him at 153 delegates when all is said and done, which wouldn’t (shouldn’t) get him in on the conversation during a contested convention. Nevertheless, it may be too early to count out the 8th richest man in America even if he’s spending enough to drop to the 9th spot on the list very soon. Biden isn’t exactly a solid candidate mentally and Sanders had his weaknesses put on full display today. And yet, we can still return to this silver lining in his bad night, first from our EIC, then from our President:
Considering the rate at which Mike Bloomberg is hemorrhaging his personal money to get such abysmal results, one might think he’s ready to drop out. But he still has plenty in the bank. It’ll come down to how much of a beating his ego can take. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Money can’t buy Bloomberg love on Super Tuesday… except in American Samoa appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Will Bernie Sanders supporters revolt against the Democratic Party?
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 06:18 PM PST Super Tuesday results are still coming in as of the writing of this article, but former Vice President Joe Biden has already had a great night. He handily won three of the four early states and is showing ahead in some of the others. Even if he loses Texas and California, it’s still a strong showing for someone who was political dead just a couple of weeks ago. This is a direct result of his strong showing in South Carolina and the subsequent onslaught of support by both Establishment Democrats and the Deep State. Meanwhile, the frontrunner until just this week, Senator Bernie Sanders, has lost a strong likelihood of getting a plurality going into the convention. He did this without losing much if any support going into Super Tuesday. Biden simply gained a ton of momentum. This was by design. The question going forward is how Sanders supporters will respond. They’re definitely going to be mad and believe the nomination of their guy is in the process of being stolen because, essentially, it is. The Democratic Establishment has taken great pains to avoid letting it all play out, opting instead to eject Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar while keeping Senator Elizabeth Warren in the race. It wasn’t illegal. It wasn’t even “dirty” politics. It was just politics, period. And Sanders is getting hit by it. The DNC is taking a great risk by pushing Biden towards the finish line. They assume Sanders supporters will pinch their noses and vote for Biden despite not liking him when the other option is President Trump. But that’s not necessarily the case. There’s another factor to consider, a factor that may fall into the shadows and get under-reported but it will be there nonetheless. Radical progressive groups like the Justice Democrats are not going to support Joe Biden. In fact, they will quietly hope Biden loses, just as many Sanders supporters (a good chunk of whom are also card-bearing members of the Justice Democrats) do. Here’s why. The goal of the Justice Democrats is NOT to ensure more Democratic victories. Not yet. Their goal is to upend the Democratic Party and take it over. They don’t want moderates or “sensible” Democrats controlling the party or representing them in office. They only want the radicals. They want people like Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib to control Congress. They want Sanders-acolytes to take over the Senate. They want to win local and state elections with people like Candi CdeBaca. The biggest roadblock to achieving their goal is not the GOP. It’s the DNC. The Justice Democrats will NOT support Joe Biden. They will NOT encourage Sanders supporters to do so, either. They will attack Biden all the way until the convention and if he anyone other than Sanders emerges from a contested convention with a victory, they may stew about it for a week before getting to work. From the convention until election day, 100% of their effort will be focused on winning down-ballot race with their radicals. And though they probably won’t directly attack Biden, they won’t support him, either. They will NEED Biden to lose for their long-term goals to be achieved. Any major win by the Democratic Establishment solidifies its stake in controlling the Democratic Party. Only another embarrassing loss by the Democrats in November will help the Justice Democrats achieve their goal of political, cultural, and economic revolution. A Biden win in November would in no way help the Justice Democrats take America to the Marxist utopia they envision. This is why if Biden is the nominee, they will turn their efforts down-ballot and hope for a huge win by President Trump. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Will Bernie Sanders supporters revolt against the Democratic Party? appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBP nabs illegal alien Luis Gustavo Sanchez Arenales on suspicion of murdering social worker
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 05:13 PM PST Social workers handle a lot of abuse. Between the people they’re trying to help and those who get in their way, it’s challenging work that can, at times, be dangerous. New York City social worker Purcell Gowie was walking near his home in East Harlem when he was gunned down. The suspect is an illegal alien. Luis Gustavo Sanchez Arenales, 19, tried to flee by going to Dulles International Airport in Washington DC. His evasion technique may have worked if Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) had not cooperated with NYPD to apprehend the fleeing suspect outside of their jurisdiction. According to CBP:
The irony, of course, is that New York sanctuary jurisdiction policy would not allow the favor to be returned. If federal law enforcement such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) requested assistance holding an apprehended criminal immigrant, NYPD would be forced to not comply based on the radical progressive ideology of local and state politicians. But this isn’t a game of fairness. Despite knowing cooperation only works in one direction, CBP officers put the safety and security of Americans over petty political battles. Of course they wouldn’t allow a New York City murderer to escape. They are patriots. In the reverse situation, NYPD officers would be forced to release dangerous criminals if federal law enforcement filed a detainer. If anything, a detainer is a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card for criminal illegal immigrants because Democrats hold their safety and security in the highest regard. A criminal illegal immigrant will always be released much faster than an criminal who is an American citizen captured in a sanctuary jurisdiction. Another bad guy is behind bars thanks to CBP helping the NYPD. It’s sad that sanctuary policies prohibit local law enforcement from reciprocating. As long as Democrats put freedom of illegal immigrants over safety for Americans, law enforcement’s hands are tied. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post CBP nabs illegal alien Luis Gustavo Sanchez Arenales on suspicion of murdering social worker appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deep State endorses Joe Biden
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 02:36 PM PST Following Joe Biden’s big win in the South Carolina primary, the Democratic Establishment has gone all-in for the for former Vice President. They are pulling out all stops to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the nomination. But they’re not the only ones who think Biden is the guy they want in the White House. The Deep State—the cabal of lifetime intelligence bureaucrats who exert control over U.S. foreign policy—has also put their best people on getting Biden the nomination. Publicly, Biden received endorsements from former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, former FBI Director James Comey, and former CIA Director John Brennan. This Deep State trifecta tells us everything we need to know about who they believe would serve their interests the best.
This is, of course, bad. But it’s probably much worse behind the scenes because the Deep State’s influence is not focused solely on foreign affairs. They have a tremendous network of powerful figures working on their behalf domestically with assets in the media, political party offices, and even Hollywood. Their reach is vast and they’re using as much of it as they can comfortably expose in order to get Biden the nomination. Their motives are very different from the Democratic Establishment’s, though. Sanders isn’t a candidate they fear will lose to President Trump or harm down-ballot races, as the DNC has asserted. Sanders is similar to President Trump in that he’s averse to military and intelligence intervention around the world. Biden is not. In many ways, Biden is more like President Clinton and President Obama than Hillary Clinton was. He prides himself on being a “man of action” which is exactly who the Deep State wants in the White House. But unlike President Trump, Biden represents someone who can be easily manipulated into pursuing their interventionist agenda. Biden has often been compared to former Vice President Dick Cheney in that he believes in exerting pressure by any means necessary all across the world. It’s no shock that Cheney, a neoconservative warmonger, would exchange praises with Biden instead of endorsing the America First edicts of President Trump. The Deep State is as big of a threat to America’s future as the Democrats. When the two get together to back a single candidate, every alarm bell should ring out like klaxons ahead of an imminent attack. Stay frosty, folks. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Deep State endorses Joe Biden appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James Comey endorsed Joe Biden. The Biden campaign rejected his endorsement.
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 02:04 PM PST Poor James Comey. The former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations has no friends. Republicans hate him as a Deep State ringleader who let Hillary Clinton slide over her unambiguously illegal email debacle. Democrats hate him because they blame his opening of an investigation into Clinton as a factor in her 2016 election loss. Since then, he’s tried to get back into the Democrats’ good graces by constantly bashing President Trump, but some wounds run too deep. In an effort to stay relevant in a world that wants to forget him, Comey decided to chime in and throw his support behind Joe Biden. It was received and subsequently rejected by a senior Biden staffer.
Biden campaign rapid response director Andrew Bates hilariously said what many Democrats feel. Not only is Comey considered a traitor to their cause, but he’s also a very strange man whose opinion is often ridiculed by both sides of the political aisle. Mind you, this is a man who has entertained running for public office. Considering he’s a politician without a political home, chances are slim he’d ever be able to mount a serious effort. But Bates wasn’t the only one with thoughts about Comey’s endorsement. Twitter chimed in as Twitter always does:
While many are lampooning James Comey for his rejected endorsement, we have to ask ourselves what it takes to get the endorsement of both Comey and John Brennan, which Joe Biden has received. The Deep State loves Quid Pro Joe. Update: A previous version of this story said Biden received a nomination from James Clapper, not John Brennan. It’s hard to keep up with the Deep State ringleaders. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post James Comey endorsed Joe Biden. The Biden campaign rejected his endorsement. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Polyamory isn’t pursued for noble reasons
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 01:11 PM PST It has been said, that polyamory is the next frontier for Biblical sexuality to confront. Though, currently transgenderism and its best friend, pedophilia, are a more omnipresent fight, at least in America, it would not be unwise for pastors to equip themselves to fight the rise of orgy relationship known by the flowery title polyamory. However in an article that garnered much attention highlighting the issue, we saw how Christians should not approach the sexual preference. Last week, I responded briefly to Preston Sprinkles article on the topic. However, the next frontier of the sexual deconstruction of society merits deeper discussion. The paragraph in the article that drew the most scrutiny was as follows
There are several theological errors present in this concession to sin. At this point, it is important to note that Preston Sprinkle was an adviser to the homosexual Revoice Conference, that sought to legitimize homosexuality as an acceptable identity for Christians. So the author has a history of trying to subvert Biblical sexuality. Moreover, it should come as no surprise he is published in Christianity Today. Problem 1: Why we sinSprinkle’s assumption is that we sin because we seek that which is good however misguided we are. But this is not why Adam and Eve first sinned. They first sinned because they wanted to be like God. Their motives were not good, they were rebellious. We could use example after example in Scripture. David didn’t pursue Bathsheba because he was lonely and without a helper. He desired her when he saw her naked one day. The Bible says in Jeremiah 17: 9“The heart is more deceitful than all else And is desperately sick; Who can understand it? The heart will come up with many motives for the sins we commit but this cannot escape the truth or the righteousness of God. Polyamory is no different. There was a viral story about a polyamory relationship meant to glorify it that received due ridicule. In this video, if you do not recall the story, there is one girl with four boyfriends, and she’s pregnant. It’s certainly an ego boost to have four guys want you, so we can plainly see the sexual perversion of the girl in this situation. But the four guys on the otherhand. There is no nice way to say this: there isn’t an ounce of testosterone in that entire household. She found four masculine boys who can shave so desperate for fortification they would sacrifice every shred of dignity for affection when they’re not playing Fortnite. There is no noble pursuit here. This is a desperate and lazy attempt to achieve orgasm and companionship. The Bible tells us “It is not good for man to be alone” but just because we sinners attempt to solve a problem that God acknowledges, does not mean that we are seeking good things when we attempt to solve these problems with sin. We saw what happened when modernist movements sought to solve the earth’s problems throughout the 20th Century. It was evil regardless of good intentions, by which their hearts were deceived. Problem 2: The false accusation of idolatryIt can be agreed that the Church has not always done well standing for marriage an biblical sexuality. However, to say that the church idolizes marriage and the nuclear family is a false charge in almost every instance, similar to how theological liberals (heretics) accuse those believing in inerrancy of bibliolatry. Marriage is a topic on which the Bible speaks so clearly. In fact, much of the issues within the church with confronting sexuality largely surround dating for which the Bible does not set a whole lot of parameters. The dogma surrounding dating within “purity culture” was far more detrimental than the positive affirmation of God’s design for marriage. Sprinkle’s logic would suggest that the church’s view on marriage would make homosexual “marriage” an appealing alternative, but since these are all sinful lifestyles, Sprinkle is essentially attributes an individual’s rejection of biblical sexuality to their own sinful choices. Is the father responsible for the Prodigal Son’s decent into a sinful stupor because of his wise instruction? How does this make sense? It’s understandable that contrarians resist trends and so the church’s emphasis on marriage may make them susceptible to temptation in a different area, but now we enter a territory where no claim can really be proven without God’s omniscience at hand. After all, the heart is deceitful, in that, it will convince you of good motives that do not exist. Problem 3: Cycle of abuse, addictionThough I am married, I remember what it was like to be single, to be thirsty. At no point would I have sunken as low as to join three other dudes in a neverending cuckhold, but I would pursue hopeless causes, against God’s plan for my life because I knew it was not good for man to be alone. My heart would deceive me into thinking I found “the one”, an unbiblical notion but I digress, so that I would go headfirst into a bad relationship, unequally yoked. Loneliness is dreadful. And that’s why four guys would settle for a cucked relationship with a rather unattractive woman. I cannot speak for if four woman were in a relationship with one guy, but I’d imagine there is abuse there. Preston Sprinkle, strategically in my opinion, whitewashes the sin of these orgy relationships. In this point, it needs to be made clear that Jesus died so that we may be set free from our sins. The power of the Holy Spirit enables us to repent of our sins so that we may find peace with God and have everlasting life. With God’s free gift, there is no need to settle for the deceptive allure of sin. Interested in learning more? Join the Evangelical Dark Web. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Polyamory isn’t pursued for noble reasons appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
THE HILL
|
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
DESERET NEWS
|
AXIOS
🗳️ Good Wednesday morning. Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,399 words … 4½ minutes.
Never in American history has a presidential candidate spent more to get less than Mike Bloomberg, making his buy-a-nomination bid a big bust, Axios CEO Jim VandeHei writes.
- Why it matters: Bloomberg spent $600 million to win as many states as every American who chose not to run: zero. (He has American Samoa to show for it.)
- Fellow billionaire Tom Steyer got off — and out — cheap by spending less than half that much to tie Bloomberg in states won.
What’s next: Look for Bloomberg to drop out as soon as this morning, and try to save face by promising to spend a helluva lot more to defeat President Trump with someone other than him.
- Bloomberg returned to New York after speaking in West Palm Beach last night. Sources expect him to address staff at his headquarters today.
- He doesn’t want history to remember him as the spoiler who helps Sanders win the nomination, or hands re-election to Trump.
What happened:
- Bloomberg bet Joe Biden was toast. He was wrong.
- Bloomberg bet Democrats would rally around him as the Electable One. He was wrong.
- Bloomberg bet he could buy support with TV ads, while avoiding tough media interviews. He was wrong.
- Bloomberg bet on a brokered convention. This could still happen. But he appears dead wrong that Democrats would turn to him as their savior.
A nighttime Twitter thread by Bloomberg campaign manager Kevin Sheekey gives the candidate an exit strategy if he wants one, and space to redefine success:
- Sheekey said that in just 100 days Bloomberg had gone from 1% in polls to being “a contender,” and built a national coalition that can defeat Trump.
Super Tuesday made Joe Biden the 77-year-old Comeback Kid, clipping Bernie Sanders’ wings and transforming the Democratic primary into a two-man race.
- Why it matters: Biden’s campaign was broke and all but dead until he won South Carolina on Saturday. The revival that unfolded across 14 states last night was built on strong support from African Americans but also a consolidation of white, establishment Democrats around the former vice president.
- “They don’t call it Super Tuesday for nothing,” Biden declared at his victory rally in L.A.
The big picture, from Axios politics editor Margaret Talev: This may not be over for a while. Sanders’ enduring appeal to younger voters, Latinos and progressives foreshadows a long fight.
- Biden appeared to get significant boosts from the endorsements of former rivals Amy Klobuchar, Pete Buttigieg and Beto O’Rourke.
- Voters were splitting geographically, with Sanders performing better in western states.
- Elizabeth Warren’s relentless attacks on Bloomberg in recent weeks hit their mark. But her big losses last night — including coming in third in her home state of Massachusetts — only ramped up the pressure on her to drop out and help Sanders.
Details: Biden was the projected winner in Alabama, Arkansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.
- The Texas win was Biden’s biggest victory. With 228 delegates at stake, it was once thought to be leaning toward Sanders and was one of the last states to be called.
- Sanders was winning Colorado, Utah and his home state of Vermont — and is projected to win California.
- Maine is still too close to call.
At Sanders’ rally in Vermont, Axios’ Alexi McCammond heard sneers and anger about “the establishment.”
- The bottom line … A veteran strategist said of the late but swift rally around Biden: “Bernie terror finally took hold in a big way.”
How it’s playing …
“At least 24 people are dead after a powerful and fast-moving storm cut across Middle Tennessee in the early hours of Tuesday morning, dropping tornadoes that roared up to 165 miles per hour,” reports Nashville’s The Tennessean.
- “[A]t least 40 structures collapsed around Nashville.”
- “Windows were blown out, cars overturned, gas lines leaked and power lines torn down in a path that stretched from North Nashville and Germantown into East Nashville, where two people died.”
An advocacy group for college athletes urged the NCAA to consider holding March Madness with no fans as a way to protect against the coronavirus, and the NCAA didn’t dismiss the idea out of hand, AP reports.
- The games — which begin on St. Patrick’s Day, two weeks from yesterday — still would be televised.
- The NCAA said: “Today we are planning to conduct our championships as planned; however, we are evaluating the COVID-19 situation daily and will make decisions accordingly.”
Total attendance for the 2019 men’s tournament was 688,753, an average of 19,132 per game.
- Attendance for the 2019 women’s tournament was 274,873, an average of 6,545 per game.
- The men’s Final Four will be played the first weekend in April at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, and the women’s Final Four is set for Smoothie King Center in New Orleans.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Our expensive, inaccessible health care system could easily make it harder to control the coronavirus’ spread, failing individual patients and endangering more people, Axios’ Caitlin Owens writes.
- “You could see uninsured or underinsured patients, just like they do for other conditions, skipping necessary treatment because they believe they can’t afford it,” said Chris Sloan of the consulting firm Avalere Health.
Between the lines: A public health issue like the coronavirus isn’t just another health care problem to add to the list. Rather, all of those other issues directly complicate the response to the virus.
- If we end up with a widespread outbreak, these big issues will “not even bubble up — they would really explode out into much more plain view,” said Jen Kates of the Kaiser Family Foundation.
The uninsured: Nearly 28 million Americans remain uninsured, despite the insurance gains made under the Affordable Care Act.
- Uninsured people are more likely to rely on the emergency room. During a pandemic, that can overburden ERs and increase the risk of exposure for uninfected patients waiting to receive care, Kates said.
Costs: Even for patients who have insurance, deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs have been steadily rising.
- A hospital stay often comes with the risk of a big bill no matter what, and emergency rooms are also some of the biggest sources of surprise bills — often for thousands of dollars.
- This happened to a family that evacuated from China to San Diego, and got a bill for $4,000 following a mandatory quarantine. (N.Y. Times)
What’s next: The Trump administration appears to be taking these concerns seriously. It’s considering using a national disaster program to pay providers for coronavirus care of uninsured people, the Wall Street Journal reported.
“Iran’s growing stockpile of nuclear fuel recently crossed a critical threshold, according to a report issued [yesterday] by international inspectors,” the N.Y. Times’ David E. Sanger and William J. Broad write:
- “For the first time since President Trump abandoned the 2015 nuclear deal, Tehran appears to have enough enriched uranium to produce a single nuclear weapon, though it would take months or years to manufacture a warhead and deliver it over long distances.”
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
The growing online trade in copycat goods is a new target in D.C.’s war on Big Tech, as policymakers pressure companies to take more responsibility for what happens on their platforms, Axios’ Margaret Harding McGill writes.
- The big picture: The spotlight on counterfeit goods is part of a broader push by lawmakers to use policy levers to hold tech companies accountable for real-world damage from users’ online actions.
Driving the news: Lawmakers want to crack down on the sales of fake products online, with two House committees raising the issue this week.
- House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on Monday introduced the “SHOP SAFE” Act, which would hold online marketplaces responsible for trademark infringement if they don’t take steps to stop third parties from using their platforms to sell counterfeit goods with a health or safety risk.
- The House Energy and Commerce consumer protection subcommittee today will hear from Amazon, eBay, Apple and others in a hearing focused on fake and unsafe products sold online.
“Hundreds of thousands of single-family homes are now in the hands of giant companies — squeezing renters for revenue,” Francesca Mari writes for the N.Y. Times Magazine.
- Why it matters: “[I]t has fundamentally altered housing ecosystems in ways we’re only now beginning to understand, fueling a housing recovery without a homeowner recovery.”
2020 coverage has taken over our televisions, with politics dominating prime time for the second week in a row, AP’s David Bauder writes:
- CBS News’ Democratic debate in South Carolina was easily last week’s most-watched show, with 15.34 million viewers.
- “60 Minutes,” with Scott Pelley interviewing Mike Bloomberg, was second.
- The Nevada Democratic debate, which reached just under 20 million people on NBC and MSNBC, dominated ratings the previous week.
The three news networks were the most popular networks on cable.
- Fox News averaged 3.03 million viewers in prime time, with MSNBC second with 1.8 million.
- CNN had 1.161 million, ESPN had 1.158 million and HGTV had 1.08 million.
📬 Thanks for starting your day with us! Please tell a friend about AM/PM.
THE BLAZE
More from TheBlaze
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … Cenk Uygur, a combative progressive YouTube personality, was visibly angered by the lackluster performance of his favored presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), in the Super Tuesday primary elections. His co-hosts also appeared stunned when the disastrous poll results rolled in for his campaign for California’s seat in the US Hous … Read more
Got friends?
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA |
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
DRIVING THE DAY
G’MORNING from BURLINGTON, Vt.
JOE BIDEN’S earned media-fueled, expectation-defying, momentous and wide-ranging romp through Super Tuesday gives him legitimate claim to the frontrunner mantle 244 DAYS before Election Day. BIDEN won in Massachusetts, where Sen. BERNIE SANDERS (I-Vt.) drew 13,000 on Saturday; he won in Minnesota, a state SANDERS won handily in 2016; he won in Virginia and North Carolina, Southern states with a diverse set of suburbs, cities and rural pockets; he even won in Texas. Full results
THE POLITICAL UNIVERSE is waking up to the reality of a resurgent BIDEN this morning, and with that comes a set of fresh and urgent questions about his campaign, and the Democratic field at large.
SANDERS did get good news Tuesday night. He won California, Colorado and Utah, and he sent an unambiguous signal to the crowd gathered here in nearby Essex Junction that he is in this contest for the long haul, and the us-versus-them, base-versus-establishment Democratic primary election will continue for weeks, if not months.
“IF IT COMES OUT TO BE A CAMPAIGN in which we have one candidate who is standing up for the working class and middle class, we’re going to win that election. Then if we have another candidate who has received contributions from at least 60 billionaires — and if there is another candidate in the race who is spending hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars — we’re going to tell him in America, you cannot buy elections,” Sanders said. “I am excited about where we are. We have come a long, long way.”
THE STATE OF THE RACE IS THIS: DEMOCRATS seem exceedingly eager to beat President DONALD TRUMP, but are split about the best way to accomplish that. Moderates and institutional Democrats are going to trumpet Tuesday night as a romp for BIDEN — and fairly so. It probably will give the former VP a lead in the delegate count, and will certainly allow him to begin to raise the money he needs to build an operation that can win.
BUT ALL THAT MASKS some issues with BIDEN’S campaign.
TO BE BLUNT, BIDEN has been an uneven candidate, and that’s one of the principal hurdles he has to clear over the next few weeks and months. Nearly every single day, BIDEN gives Republicans fodder, and Democrats reason to doubt his political discipline and stamina. Tuesday’s wins should allay some of these concerns — for now. But some Democrats fear he has surrounded himself with advisers who cannot tell him the hard truths he needs to hear.
BIDEN has framed himself as a healer for a post-TRUMP America. But more urgently, if he’s going to be the nominee, and he wants to avoid the deep divides that plagued Democrats in 2016, BIDEN will need to find a way to bring the SANDERS wing of the party into the fold.
HOW DOES BIDEN reverse months of SANDERS conditioning his supporters to think he’s a weak-kneed, wrong-headed pol who represents all that’s sick about the Democratic Party? Case in point: The crowd in Vermont last night filled the expo center with boos when BIDEN came on-screen. SANDERS also intimated that BIDEN is not equipped to beat TRUMP — “you cannot beat Trump with the same kind of old politics,” he thundered.
RIGHT NOW, BIDEN FACES A MORE IMMEDIATE CHALLENGE: keeping up his white-hot momentum. In the last few heady days, he won big in South Carolina, drove two rivals out of the Democratic field and got them to endorse him. He plans to roll out endorsements from upcoming primary states as soon as this morning. But matching this week’s drama will be a tall order.
THERE ARE TWO MORE BIG TUESDAYS COMING UP. Voters will cast their ballots next week in Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota and Washington state. Then, on March 17, it’s Arizona, Florida, Illinois and Ohio. There’s a smidgen of early news in BIDEN’S favor: He’s ahead in Michigan, where SANDERS was expected to cruise, according to a new Detroit News poll.
MIKE BLOOMBERG and ELIZABETH WARREN are now facing what the NYT’s JONATHAN MARTIN and ALEX BURNS call an “uncertain path forward.”
BLOOMBERG is considering dropping out as soon as today, according to SALLY GOLDENBERG and CHRIS CADELAGO, reporting from West Palm Beach, Fla. WAPO sums it up with this brutal headline: “Bloomberg, finally on the ballot, gets little for his millions.”
ALEX THOMPSON is reporting that WARREN is facing intense pressure to step aside.
Good Wednesday morning. BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN is joining POLITICO as a national correspondent focused on federal law enforcement. Most recently, she spent nearly five years at The Daily Beast, where she broke story after story on a wide range of topics.
HOW IT PLAYED … NYT, banner: “BIG NIGHT FOR BIDEN SERVES NOTICE TO SANDERS” … RYAN LIZZA: “Biden makes a mockery of Sanders’ main argument for his campaign”
WHAT’S NEXT … WAPO’S DAN BALZ: “For the foreseeable future, the calendar will not get easier for Sanders. In coming weeks, the states holding contests, with some exceptions, were ones that he lost to Hillary Clinton four years ago. In some of the states he won in 2016, the shift from caucuses to primaries could hold down his delegate totals even if he were to win again.”
WHERE THEY ARE … BIDEN will speak and attend a fundraiser in LA.
DOWN-BALLOT — THE ESTABLISHMENT STRIKES BACK: Reps. KAY GRANGER (R) and HENRY CUELLAR (D) both appeared victorious against primary challenges in Texas. Each faced an insurgent competitor who said they were not sufficiently conservative or liberal. CUELLAR’S challenger, Jessica Cisneros, had backing from Rep. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D-N.Y.). Texas Tribune
— “Sessions forced into runoff for Alabama Senate seat,” by James Arkin: “Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions will face former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville in a runoff for the Alabama GOP Senate nomination after they finished in the top two spots in Tuesday’s primary.
“Tuberville had 33 percent of the vote and Sessions had 31 percent with 75 percent of precincts reporting when The Associated Press called the race. They defeated a handful of other candidates, including Rep. Bradley Byrne, who came in third place, and Roy Moore, the controversial judge who lost a 2017 special election and finished a distant fourth Tuesday.
“The March 31 runoff will decide which Republican takes on Democratic Sen. Doug Jones in Republicans’ top offensive target on the Senate map this cycle.” POLITICO
TRUMPWORLD ALREADY RECALIBRATING — “Republicans stoke dissension in Dem primary as Biden gains steam,” by Alex Isenstadt: “President Donald Trump’s political operation is shifting its focus to apparent Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden — and ramping up its efforts to convince Bernie Sanders’ supporters he’s being robbed of the nomination.
“With Biden suddenly vaulting to the front of the Democratic pack with his array of Super Tuesday wins, Republicans are intensifying their attacks on the 77-year-old former vice president. It represents a dramatic reversal: As late as last week, many in Trump’s circle were certain that Sanders would be their general election opponent and had all but written off Biden.
“The turnabout could have profound implications for Trump’s political fortunes. Many of the president’s top advisers had been relishing the idea of a match-up against Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist who threatens to alienate the affluent suburbanites who decisively swung to Democrats in 2018.” POLITICO
SIREN — “Trump tells lawmakers in private meeting he won’t support extending current surveillance laws,” by Marianne LeVine, John Bresnahan and Kyle Cheney: “President Donald Trump told top House and Senate Republicans on Tuesday evening that he would not support a clean extension of federal surveillance powers and called for them to work out a deal with Democrats on how to move forward.
“GOP leaders are already talking about a potential 30-day extension of provisions in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act while they try to hammer out a deal with Democrats.”
NEW … ANITA KUMAR tells us DEMOCRATS are looking to hit TRUMP where it hurts: Fox News. Democratic super PAC American Bridge will air a new five-figure TV buy in D.C. and Pennsylvania markets just before and after the president’s Fox News town hall in Scranton on Thursday night.
— THE AD features a Pennsylvania veteran who explains why he voted for Trump in 2016 but doesn’t plan to vote for him this year. “I don’t think President Trump is a Republican,” he says in the 30-second spot shared with POLITICO. “I think he only cares about getting reelected. For him, it’s Trump before everything else.”
— THE GROUP also will launch new banner ads highlighting Trump’s proposed cuts to Social Security and Medicare and attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act as part of a daylong homepage takeover of the Scranton Times-Tribune’s website. It’s part of a $10 million ad campaign aimed at Trump in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — three Rust Belt states he narrowly flipped in 2016.
MARKETWATCH — “Global Stocks Regain Stability After Period of Volatility,” by WSJ’s Xie Yu: “Global stocks edged higher Wednesday, regaining their footing after an emergency rate cut by the Federal Reserve a day earlier prompted some investors to question how much central banks can do to offset the economic impact of the novel coronavirus.” WSJ
— NANCY COOK and VICTORIA GUIDA on the White House’s scramble to prop up a suddenly wobbly economy: “Trump launches an urgent fight to save his ticket to reelection”
TRUMP’S WEDNESDAY — The president will speak at the Latino Coalition Legislative Summit at 1:50 p.m. at the JW Marriott here in Washington. At 3 p.m., he’ll participate in the Boy Scouts’ Report to the Nation. That event is closed to press.
PLAYBOOK READS
REALITY CHECK … NYT/KABUL: “The Taliban have carried out at least 76 attacks across 24 Afghan provinces since Saturday, when they finalized an agreement for a troop withdrawal by the United States, a spokesman for Afghanistan’s national security council said. And on Wednesday, the United States conducted its first airstrike against the insurgents after an 11-day lull. …
“The Kunduz attack came just hours after President Trump spoke on the phone with Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s deputy leader, who negotiated and signed the agreement with the Americans. ‘We’ve agreed there’s no violence. We don’t want violence,’ Mr. Trump said after the call. ‘We’ll see what happens.’” NYT … More on Trump’s call
THE GLOBAL PICTURE ON THE CORONAVIRUS … AP: “As the number of new cases drops precipitously in China, attention has shifted to South Korea, Italy and Iran, sites of major clusters of contagion that the World Health Organization says account for 80% of new cases outside China. … WHO said the death rate from COVID-19 was about 3.4%, making it more fatal than the common flu, though data suggest it’s not as easy to catch.”
— HAPPENING TODAY: a likely House vote on the emergency coronavirus funding bill, which hit a snag Tuesday. Sarah Ferris, Heather Caygle and Sarah Owermohle with more on that
BACKSTORY — “Coronavirus Deaths Tied to Nursing Center Came Earlier Than Anyone Knew,” by NYT’s Mike Baker and Karen Weise in Seattle: “The first public indication that something was wrong inside the Life Care nursing care center in Kirkland, Wash., came on Friday, prompting an alarming sign to go up on the front door: ‘WE ARE HAVING RESPIRATORY OUTBREAK.’
“Since then, officials have announced a series of coronavirus cases, some of them fatal, from the facility, which has become an ominous symbol of the dangers the virus poses. On Tuesday, the authorities made another jarring announcement: The first virus-related deaths tied to the nursing center occurred days earlier than previously known — and well before residents had been quarantined in their rooms.
“A man in his 50s, who was rushed from the facility in a Seattle suburb to a hospital on Feb. 24, died last Wednesday. On the same day, another patient from the center, a woman in her 80s, died at her family home. Both of their deaths have now been attributed to the coronavirus.” NYT
POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics
VALLEY TALK … CASEY NEWTON: “Were there not a deadly coronavirus spreading across the globe, I suspect more of us might be talking about a different disruption to life as we know it: the potential end of Jack Dorsey’s latest tenure as the CEO of Twitter. …
“The activist investor Elliott Management Corp. [a hedge fund led by GOP megadonor Paul Singer] has taken a roughly 4 percent stake in Twitter and has now put forth four nominees to the company’s board, with the goal of replacing Dorsey as CEO.” The Verge
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
SPOTTED at a welcome party at the Motion Picture Association on Tuesday night for Karyn Temple, the former register of copyrights who recently joined the MPA as senior EVP and global general counsel: Charles Rivkin, Reps. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.) and Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), Chris Dodd, Angie Gates, John Fithian, Emily Lenzner, Patrick Kilcur, Urmila Venugopalan, Vans Stevenson, Anissa Brennan, Alicia Leahy, Melissa Maxfield, Andrew Reinsdorf, Gina Adams, Bill Anaya, DeDe Lea, Andrea Iancu, Kenneth Giffords and John Burns.
FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — Kevin McAleenan will be a distinguished guest lecturer at West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center for the spring semester. He previously was acting DHS secretary and CBP commissioner.
TRANSITIONS — Tom Doheny is now director of strategic communications and media relations at Leidos. He previously was director of media and government relations at General Dynamics Information Technology and is a Deb Fischer alum. … Lora Lumpe will be the first CEO at the Quincy Institute. She currently is an advocacy director at the Open Society Foundations.
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: NRDC’s Stephanie Gidigbi. What she’s been reading: “‘My Grandmother’s Hands: Racialized Trauma and the Pathway to Mending Our Hearts and Bodies’ by Resmaa Menakem. It examines the impact of racial trauma and provides an alternative view of what we can do to grow beyond our entrenched racialized divide. As someone who works on issues related to race, climate, and health impacts — the book offered a new understanding of racial trauma, restorative practices and thought-provoking reflections.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) is 52 … Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) is 62 … Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) is 67 … Doug Hoelscher, WH director of intergovernmental affairs (h/t Ed Cash) … former Energy Secretary Rick Perry is 7-0 … CNN’s Kate Bennett (h/t Tim Burger) … James Norton … Cathy Russell … Deborah Turness, president of NBC News International … Shirley Henry … CNN’s Leigh Munsil … U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican Callista Gingrich is 54 … Maria Recio, Washington correspondent for the Austin American Statesman and a contributor to Texas Monthly … Jesse Solis, deputy communications director for the Ways and Means Republicans, is 25 (h/t Meredith Schellin) … Emily Bazelon, staff writer for the NYT Magazine, co-host of the “Slate Political Gabfest” and Truman Capote fellow at Yale Law School …
… Mike Haidet, director of WH scheduling, is 32 … Jennifer Loraine, deputy COS to Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) (h/t Erica Suares) … Deborah Ziskind … Nick Ryan … Scott Cunningham … Andrew Stein is 75 … Rosalie Morton … Valerie Jean-Charles, associate director of communications at the Hub Project (h/t Zack DiGregorio) … Rob Gould … Sarah Scott … Jesse Lewin … Sarah Millican … Allison Putala … Anna Otten … Abby Jagoda … Sean Simons, U.S./Canada press secretary at the ONE Campaign … Eric Jeng … Angela Zirkelbach … Henry Barrett … The New Yorker’s Melvin Backman … Ken Lovett, senior adviser to the MTA chairman and CEO and a NYDN alum … Zack Abrahamson … Andie Coller … Gary Whidby … Connie Fenner … WTOP’s Bruce Alan … Ian Goldin … Emma Sandoe … Steve Diminuco … Simone Ward
Follow us on Twitter
BRIGHT
|
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
THE FEDERALIST
|
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.
Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive. We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy |
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Super Tuesday—Fauxcahontas Farewell Edition
She’s Toast but She’ll Probably Burn a Little Longer
Super Tuesday was a super bust for the super unlikable Elizabeth Warren, the truth-challenged former Native American from Massachusetts. In her bid for the “Worst Candidate of This Cycle” title, Warren wasn’t even the favorite socialist in her home state, where she finished third.
As the kids like to say: that’s gonna leave a mark.
The question now is will this thoroughly awful, undeservedly proud stain on the American political landscape get the hint and leave the race? Or, as some have suspected, will Warren be this election year’s John Kasich, hanging around to serve no purpose whatsoever? With the right combination of hubris and dedicated donors, any candidate can stay in a race long past his or her shelf life. Warren gets a lot of money from academics who are always telling her that she’s the smartest girl in the room. That may very well be enough to let her linger like the odor of filthy socks in a teenage boy’s bedroom.
As of last night, Lizzy was still putting on a brave face:
Who knows? A few hours after this briefing is posted Warren’s donors may tell her that they’re done and therefore so is she. I’ve seen many say that the Biden people would want her around for a while to siphon off progressive votes from Sanders. That may have been a consideration yesterday, but Biden seems to be doing just fine now and Warren wasn’t really helping that much anyway.
This WaPo piece offers pre-excuses for Warren that are absolutely pathetic. The gist is that Warren has a wonky, intelligent appeal that’s only accessible by a select portion of the electorate and there just aren’t too many of them.
The reality is that the wonk was never able to adequately explain the math behind her signature policy issue because the math was nonsensical.
Despite the media narrative, Warren is largely running on pure identity politics:
Barton spoke approvingly of Warren’s wealth tax. Also, she said, “on principle I am voting for a woman.”
The litany of excuses for Warren’s failure will be tedious, of course. We will be lectured for weeks, if not months, that America still isn’t ready for a woman president, blah, blah, blah. Warren is so prone to lying that she may even come up with a few that Hillary Clinton never thought of.
I will be very glad, however, that I soon won’t have to listen to Warren’s psychotic tales of a dark America that doesn’t exist.
I like it here.
Your Frequent Reminder That the Democrats Are All-In on a Drooling Paste-Eater
Biden Opens Super Tuesday Victory Speech by Mixing Up His Sister and His Wife
(We’re a little light on links today because it was all Super Tuesday stuff. Every site had the same ten stories.)
PJM Linktank
SUPER TUESDAY-ISH STUFF
Mike Bloomberg Scores His Big Win… in American Samoa?!
[VIDEO] Scary Moment as Crazed Vegans Rush the Stage During Biden Speech
Jeff Sessions Faces a Runoff in the GOP Primary for His Old U.S. Senate Seat
Trump’s Tweet on Bloomberg’s Super Tuesday Results Has Sent Trolling to a Whole New Level
OTHER STUFF
Trump Just Donated His Latest Paycheck and the Media Can’t Call This a “Hoax”
Netanyahu Calls Likely Victory: ‘The Biggest Win of My Life’
Europe Braces for 130,000 Refugees on the Move from Turkey
She seems nice: Donna Brazile Tells GOP Chairwoman to ‘Go to Hell’ on Live TV
Centrists Flirt With Democrats, and the Party Rebuffs Them
#YOLO Iranians Lick Door of Holy Shrine to Show Coronavirus Who’s Boss
From the Mothership and Beyond
For the first time since July, there are no bushfires in New South Wales, Australia
Bill To Allow Church Carry In FL Still Alive
So What If Bloomberg Is “Wasting” Money On Presidential Bid?
Why Is Chris Matthews Out of a Job and Joy Reid Still Employed at NBC News?
What Juan Williams Just Called ‘the Biggest Surprise of the Night’
WSJ: Answers Needed Over Scrapped Federal Judges Meeting That Reportedly Centered on Rebuking Trump
Sanders Comes Out on Top In Utah After Historic Voter Turnout
New Solution To Homelessness In LA… Colorfully Painted Tents
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
OK then…
I have no idea why this felt appropriate but it did. Maybe it was the birthday.
Biden’s nanny/nurse is probably giving him extra Count Chocula this morning.
___
PJ Media Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.”
CBS
|
|
|
LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
THE DISPATCH
Joe Biden Had a Super Tuesday
Plus, a new report shows democracy in decline around the globe.
The Dispatch Staff | 5 hr | 18 | 23 |
At least you’re not Mike Bloomberg on this Wednesday morning! Poor guy spent half a billion dollars for the right to be embarrassed in two nationally televised debates, relitigate a bunch of sexual harassment allegations against him, and come out of Super Tuesday hitting the delegate threshold in only a handful of states. He did win in American Samoa, though.
(If you are Mike Bloomberg, thanks for reading, Mr. Mayor! You can become a full member of The Dispatch and enjoy a series of perks—including the ability to comment on stories, midweek G-Files and French Presses, and more—just by clicking here.)
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- U.S. coronavirus deaths now stand at nine, and the White House announced Tuesday that the CDC would lift all restrictions on testing for anyone who suspects they could have the virus.
- The Trump administration, spooked by the possibility of a coronavirus-sparked economic downturn in an election year, is mulling a number of economic stimulus proposals in a bid to keep markets shipshape. The Federal Reserve cut interest rates half a percentage point on Tuesday—the largest emergency cut since the financial crisis—but the Dow still fell almost 3 percent on the day.
- A United Nations watchdog said Tuesday that Iran has nearly tripled its stores of enriched uranium since November, putting it close to the amount it would need to produce a nuclear weapon.
- In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court widened states’ abilities to prosecute illegal immigrants for identity theft Tuesday.
Joe Biden Is Back
Less than a week ago, the 2020 Democratic presidential primary was beginning to look eerily like the GOP contest in 2016. Bernie Sanders, the race’s belligerent outsider, had built up a head of steam in early states and was consolidating his position with a plurality of voters. A sizable majority of voters preferred someone else, but the race lacked a standout for them to rally around, and the other major candidates seemed content to press their own chances rather than join forces to stop the frontrunner.
Then South Carolina changed everything. After months of telegraphing weakness and hemorrhaging support, Joe Biden finally put a big win on the board. That was all it took. Two other top-flight candidates, Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, bowed out at once and threw their weight behind the former vice president. As Super Tuesday dawned, a race that had previously featured a leftist standard-bearer and a fragmented center suddenly looked like a fair fight with two major candidates left in each camp: Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren way out left, Joe Biden and Mike Bloomberg somewhat less so.
The result: Biden mopped up, winning 10 states and surging into the delegate lead. (How substantial of a lead remains to be seen, and will depend largely on Sanders’ final victory margin in California, which is typically slow to report its results.) He crushed Sanders in states like North Carolina and Virginia—by 18 points and 30 points, respectively—and pulled out convincing surprise victories in states with ostensibly more progressive Democratic bases like Minnesota and Texas, where he no doubt benefitted from last-minute endorsements and home-state support from Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke, respectively.
The results show Team Biden that two issues that looked like substantial threats to his campaign in recent weeks have proved insubstantial.
The first is the threat of Mike Bloomberg. After the megabillionaire and former New York City mayor jumped into the race back in November, it looked as though he’d dealt Biden a death blow: Backed by an insane $500 million of his own money, he surged to nearly 20 percent in national polling just as primaries began in earnest last month. Most of that support seemed to come at Biden’s expense.
But after struggling mightily in a pair of debates, Bloomberg lost his brief and tenuous constituency: He failed to place in the top two in a single Super Tuesday state. His consolation prize: five delegates from American Samoa, which also awarded Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, who was born there, one. Tuesday shows Biden can still perform strongly with Bloomberg around; if Bloomberg drops out, presumably he only gets stronger.
The second danger was the question of how well the unification of the non-Sanders field would work. Although most observers saw Klobuchar and Buttigieg as competing for the same voters as Biden, there was actually some evidence to indicate that just as many of their supporters might defect to Sanders. A recent Morning Consult poll, for instance, suggested that a small plurality of Buttigieg’s supporters considered Sanders to be their second choice. That appears not to have mattered either.
The news wasn’t all bad for Bernie Sanders on Tuesday. Significant wins in California and Colorado cemented his position as the race’s only really viable leftist candidate and kept him within arm’s length of Biden in total delegates. And Biden’s sudden show of strength may play to Sanders’s advantage in another counterintuitive way: Gobsmacked leftists are increasingly out of patience with Elizabeth Warren’s continued presence in the race. Rep. Ilhan Omar, one of Congress’s most prominent young progressives, tweeted Tuesday night that a “united progressive movement” would have allowed Sanders to “win MN and other states we narrowly lost.”
But Tuesday also confirmed a deeper problem for Sanders: His theory of the race simply doesn’t seem to be working.
For years now, his philosophy has gone like this: The reason masses of working-class people don’t vote in America is because most politicians are backscratching, capital-serving establishmentarians who these voters don’t believe will materially improve their lives in any meaningful way. But those people could be reached and tapped into by a candidate with a trustworthy record, a powerful campaign machine, and an uncompromisingly pro-worker agenda—a role for which Bernie Sanders was uniquely suited. Alienating some moderates and independents in the general election wouldn’t matter, the theory ran, because the Bernie revolution would activate and mobilize previous nonvoters in such great numbers.
On Super Tuesday, turnout was indeed up—but not in the ways Sanders needed. Many of those casting their first Democratic primary ballots are the same type of voters Democrats tapped to win back the House last year: newly Dem-curious suburbanites who broke primarily for Biden. Turnout among young voters, meanwhile, remains low—below, in fact, 2016 in many states. That needs to change for Sanders to have a shot.
One more thing: There weren’t a lot of surprises down ballot last night. Jeff Sessions and Tommy Tuberville will head to a runoff for the Republican Senate nomination in Alabama to face Democratic incumbent Doug Jones in November—the most likely pickup seat for Republicans this fall. On the Democratic side, the establishment candidates prevailed in a number of primaries—Cal Cunningham, an Army veteran and former state legislator, won in North Carolina; MJ Hegar, another combat veteran, ran well ahead ahead of the AOC-endorsed candidate in a 12-person primary and will advance to the runoff to take on John Cornyn in Texas; and in California’s 25th Congressional District’s special election to replace Katie Hill, it looks like Democrat Christy Smith and Republican Mike Garcia appear headed for a runoff.
Speaking of Democracy…
Freedom House—the non-governmental organization founded in 1941 to research and promote democracy, political liberty, and civil rights around the globe—released the 2020 iteration of its annual “Freedom in the World” report today. The Dispatch received an advance copy.
The report, written by Sarah Repucci, finds that “democracy and pluralism are under assault,” with 2019 representing “the 14th consecutive year of decline in global freedom.”
“The unchecked brutality of autocratic regimes and the ethical decay of democratic powers are combining to make the world increasingly hostile to fresh demands for better governance.”
Repucci zeroes in on India and China as presenting particular cause for concern. “Almost since the turn of the century, the United States and its allies have courted India as a potential strategic partner and democratic counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific region,” the report states. But “the Indian government’s alarming departures from democratic norms under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) could blur the values-based distinction between Beijing and New Delhi.”
Under Modi, the Indian central government has cracked down on the semi-autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir—the only Muslim-majority state in the subcontinent—sending in troops and restricting internet service. It published a citizens’ register in the state of Assam and passed the Citizenship Amendment Law that “expedites citizenship for adherents of six non-Muslim religions from three neighboring Muslim-majority countries.”
China’s Communist Party has engaged in a “campaign of cultural annihilation” against Uighurs—an ethnic minority in northwestern China—and other Muslim minorities. “Mass violations of the basic freedoms of millions of Uighurs … continued in 2019,” the report says, “with hundreds of thousands of people sentenced to prison or detained for forced indoctrination. The crackdown also included forced labor, the confinement of detained Muslims’ children in state-run boarding schools, and draconian bans on ordinary religious expression.”
“Beijing claimed in December that the mass detentions had ended, but evidence from leaked government documents and victims’ relatives contradicted the assertion.”
The United States and other world leaders have made “some important diplomatic statements” against this repression, Repucci writes, but “in general the world’s democracies have taken few steps to rally international opposition or apply meaningful collective pressure to halt China’s rights abuses, and elected leaders in Europe and elsewhere have often been tepid in their public criticism.”
Which brings us to the United States. “Democracy advocates around the world have historically turned to the United States for inspiration and support, and Congress has continued to fund programs to that end in practice,” the report argues. “To date, however, the Trump administration has failed to exhibit consistent commitment to a foreign policy based on the principles of democracy and human rights.”
Repucci positively cites President Trump’s condemnations of authoritarianism in Venezuela, Iran, and Hong Kong, but says he “has excused clear violations by traditional security partners such as Turkey and Egypt” and “given a pass to tyrannical leaders whom he hopes to woo diplomatically, including Vladimir Putin of Russia and Kim Jong-un of North Korea.”
Domestically, “fierce rhetorical attacks on the press, the rule of law, and other pillars of democracy coming from American leaders, including the president himself, undermine the country’s ability to persuade other governments to defend core human rights and freedoms, and are actively exploited by dictators and demagogues.”
The report—which you can (and should) read in full here—concludes we are living in “a world without democratic leadership,” but offers a series of recommendations democracies can take to help fill this vacuum, including: investing in civic education, requiring social media companies to report foreign efforts to spread online disinformation, emphasizing democracy-strengthening programs in foreign assistance, and imposing targeted sanctions on individuals and entities involved in human rights abuses.
Worth Your Time
- When American conservatives largely made their peace with Donald Trump in the days leading up to the 2016 election, one huge reason was his pledge to nominate pro-life judges to the Supreme Court. Two SCOTUS appointments later, pro-life conservatives are waiting with bated breath to see what fruit that promise might yield. As the Supreme Court moves to consider a Louisiana abortion law this week, this Robert Barnes Washington Post piece is a good primer on the situation and an interesting look at some of the state legislators, including pro-life Democrats, who have brought things to this point.
- Fair warning: This one’s a little jargony, but fascinating nonetheless. In recent years, election journalism has gotten hooked on big data, with probabilistic model forecasting (election needles and the like) occupying a bigger and bigger place in how elections are presented to the news-consuming public. But does that presentation itself affect the public’s voting habits? A new study published last week in the Journal of Politics suggests indeed it does: probabilistic models, they find, chill voter turnout by “decreasing the impression that an election is competitive.”
Presented Without Comment: Super Tuesday Edition
Presented Without Comment: ‘Peace Deal’ Edition
“The relationship is very good that I have with the mullah,” President Trump said of Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s chief negotiator and one of its founding members
Toeing the Company Line
- In David’s latest French Press (🔒), he dissected just exactly what Bernie Sanders is proposing ($60 trillion in government spending over the next 10 years), and why it won’t happen, even if he does win the election. “Presidents alone cannot revolutionize our nation’s economy or its laws. They can often nudge, but they can rarely shove.” Be sure to check out the whole thing here!
- Jonah is joined by AEI’s Michael Strain on the latest episode of The Remnant to discuss the state of the American dream, the coronavirus, and Star Trek: Picard. Tune in here!
- Now that impeachment is well behind us, we can look at it with a little more circumspection. On the website today, Daniel Vaughan looks at where it went wrong for the Democrats.
Let Us Know
Shortly after former FBI director James Comey endorsed Joe Biden yesterday, Andrew Bates—the Biden campaign’s director of rapid response—made clear the former vice president wasn’t interested in Comey’s support.
James Comey@Comey
Voted in first Dem primary to support party dedicated to restoring values in WH. I agree with @amyklobuchar: We need candidate who cares about all Americans and will restore decency, dignity to the office. There is a reason Trump fears @joebiden and roots for Bernie. #Biden2020
Our question to you: Which would be the most damaging endorsement in the Democratic primary?
- Mike Bloomberg
- Rep. Dan Lipinski
- Omarosa
- Jonah Goldberg
- Hillary Clinton
- Anthony Scaramucci
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Corrections: Yesterday’s Morning Dispatch originally referred to Shermichael Singleton as the “lone black panelist” at the Principles First conference. He was one of two. Also, the newsletter originally referred to former California Rep. Katie Hill as California Rep. Katie Porter.
Photograph of Joe Biden by David McNew/Getty Images.
18 | 23 |
Top posts
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
|
AMERICAN MINUTE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
Great juxtaposition of the Trump/Taliban phone call tweet and the USFOR-A tweet. The last few days haven’t been looking good over there.
Really interested to see what happens next week — perhaps luckily for Biden, he doesn’t have to debate before the March 10th races, so he can ride some of this momentum into those contests.
I also am interested to see what happens with Warren’s candidacy. I think a lot of Bernie voters believe she’s pulling her supporters away from him, but based on the MA results and a lot of anecdotal evidence, my guess is that more of her supporters will go to Biden than anticipated. I think a lot of people underestimate the antipathy of young, liberal women (a group that I am a member of — probably not the target for this website!) toward Bernie after his treatment of Hillary / Warren, the Bernie Bros, etc. (and this is borne out in the pretty striking gender gap between him and Biden).