The Morning Dispatch: January 6 Committee Gets Rolling

Nancy Pelosi and Kevin McCarthy clash over the inclusion of GOP members who voted not to certify Joe Biden’s 2020 win.

(Photo by Stefani Reynolds/Getty Images.)

Happy Monday! We may not have gotten the Kanye West album we were promised on Friday, but we did get Ted Lasso Season 2 and the Olympics. Two out of three ain’t bad.

Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories

  • The Department of Justice wrote a letter to GOP Rep. Lee Zeldin over the weekend announcing it will not be conducting a civil investigation into the handling of nursing home coronavirus cases by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The department also will not investigate fellow Democratic Govs. Gretchen Whitmer and Tom Wolf for similar policies.
  • In response to the Biden administration’s recent warning to companies about doing business in Hong Kong, the Chinese Communist Party sanctioned seven people, including former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Carolyn Bartholomew, chair of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
  • At least 113 people in western India are dead following landslides and flooding sparked by heavy monsoon rains. Officials say about 100 people remain missing.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Sunday she was appointing GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger to serve on the January 6 Select Committee, a position Kinzinger said he would accept. The committee is now made up of seven Democrats and two Republicans after Pelosi blocked two of Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s five appointees, leading McCarthy to withdraw the remaining three.
  • The Tokyo Olympics kicked off in earnest over the weekend, with China jumping out to an early lead in the overall medal count—15 total so far—while the U.S. paces the field in gold medals with seven. Nearly 30 sports are in action today.

Partisanship Roils January 6 Select Committee

It’s been a few weeks since we last provided an update on the status of the January 6 select committee. But in anticipation of the new committee’s first hearing tomorrow, we figured it was worth checking back in.

When Senate Republicans used the legislative filibuster to block legislation establishing a truly bipartisan January 6 commission back in May, it appeared to scupper the already tenuous path toward an investigation both Republicans and Democrats could get behind. Following that vote, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved forward with her Plan B: establishing a 13-member select committee that she argued was necessary to “investigate and report on the facts and the causes of the attack.”

While the membership of the select committee was guaranteed to be more partisan than the proposed commission—the former would split power equally between Republicans and Democrats, the latter would ensure a 60 percent Democratic majority—Pelosi nevertheless offered House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy the opportunity to select five Republicans for the panel. After a few weeks of deliberations, McCarthy decided to play ball, announcing his picks on July 19: Reps. Jim Banks of Indiana, Rodney Davis of Illinois, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, Troy Nehls of Texas, and Jim Jordan of Ohio.

Of these Republicans, three—Nehls, Jordan, and Banks—supported objections to the election results in January, and two—Jordan and Banks—backed Texas’ lawsuit contesting the election results in four battleground states.

McCarthy claimed his picks were intended to “make sure you get the best people on the committee.”

“You’ve got a mix from the entire conference, from people who objected, people who didn’t object,” he told reporters. “You’ve got people who authored the commission. … So, you’ve got a microcosm of the conference.”

On some level, McCarthy had a point. If the goal of the committee was to reach a consensus about the events leading up to the attack on the Capitol, it would require a degree of buy-in from representatives across the political spectrum. But Banks quickly gave away the game in a statement last week, making clear he had his own motives for accepting the position.

“We need leaders [on the committee] who will force Democrats and the media to answer questions so far ignored. Among them, why was the Capitol unprepared and vulnerable to attack on January 6?” he wrote. “If Democrats were serious about investigating political violence, this committee would be studying not only the January 6 riot at the Capitol, but also the hundreds of violent political riots last summer when many more innocent Americans and law enforcement officers were attacked.”

“Make no mistake, Nancy Pelosi created this committee solely to malign conservatives and to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda,” the statement continued.

Pelosi showed less enthusiasm about expanding the scope of the investigation in this manner, issuing a press release announcing that she would block Banks and Jordan from serving on the committee. “With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject [these] recommendations,” she said.

Worth Your Time

  • In a piece for National Review, friend of The Dispatch Thomas Koenig argues that political tribalism goes against the principles of the American Founding. “Binding ourselves so tightly to our in-group and growing so hate-filled toward the ‘other side’ necessarily runs counter to our Founding principles—to what made us exceptional,” he writes. “Why? Because to some significant degree, tribalism is necessarily anti-reason, anti-intellectual. Our in-group is so just and the out-group so despicable that only knee-jerk condemnation of ‘them’ and support for ‘us’ will suffice. That sort of thinking walls us off from independently reasoning our way through political issues, and it is part and parcel of the intolerance, warring, and group loyalties and antagonisms that dominated the pages of human history prior to the Revolution.”
  • For its Inheritance Project, The Atlantic got Mississippi-born sportswriter Wright Thompson to pen a retrospective on the murder of Emmett Till—and everything we still don’t know about it—just days before Till would have turned 80 years old. Thompson’s piece centers on the barn where a band of white men tortured and killed the 14-year-old Till—a barn that an unsuspecting Jeff Andrews bought in 1992. “The barn’s existence conjures a complex set of reactions: It is a mourning bench for Black Americans, an unwelcome mirror for white Americans. It both repels and demands attention,” Thompson writes. “I called Jeff Andrews a month or two after my first visit to the barn and asked if I could come back and talk. I explained that I felt compelled to do this story because one of the central conflicts for white Mississippians is whether to shine a bright light on the past or—‘—move on?’ he said, finishing my thought. That remains a fraught and divisive question for white Mississippians. Should you dig deep enough that you might come to hate a place you also love?”
  • In the New York Times, American Enterprise Institute fellow Michael Strain argues against $4 trillion in new federal spending. “Economists can’t say for sure whether the inflationary pressures caused by this spending would push the economy into a damaging inflationary period,” he writes. “Regardless, it would increase the risk of a policy mistake by the Federal Reserve. In the face of another multi-trillion-dollar spending package and consistently disquieting monthly inflation numbers, the Fed might feel it had fallen behind the curve and attempt to withdraw some support for the economy, decreasing or eliminating asset purchases or raising interest rates. But the Fed may not have the necessary precision to slow the economy without putting it into reverse. Prematurely ending the expansion would hurt low-wage workers and low-income households the most, threatening to leave them out of the recovery.”

Presented Without Comment

Toeing the Company Line

  • In Friday’s Uphill, Harvest spoke with Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger about her moderate streak and willingness to buck party leadership, as well as the direction she hopes the party moves leading into 2022. “We are now the majority party. We now have the responsibility of actually governing,” she told The Dispatch. “I find it just so surprising that instead of saying, this is what we’re doing, and these are the policies we’re for—that it’s sometimes easier to just be reductive down to a slogan.”
  • Echelon Insights co-founder Patrick Ruffini dropped by Friday’s Dispatch Podcast to chat with Sarah and Chris about his firm’s efforts to find the political center of gravity in the United States. Could either party run the table for years with a few tweaks to their platform? Why are moderate Democrats outperforming progressives? And why are educated voters drifting left while less educated ones are drifting right?
  • David’s Sunday French Press focuses on a dispute within McLean Bible Church, where a group of congregants are upset with what they see as Pastor David Blatt’s embrace of wokeness. But “on the core issues of American racism,” David argues, “Platt is biblically and historically right, and it’s his detractors who are biblically and historically wrong.”

Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Ryan Brown (@RyanP_Brown), Harvest Prude (@HarvestPrude), Tripp Grebe (@tripper_grebe), Emma Rogers (@emw_96), Price St. Clair (@PriceStClair1), Jonathan Chew (@JonathanChew19), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).