Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Tuesday April 13, 2021
1.) THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
2.) THE EPOCH TIMES
Red Rock Secured—China’s Plotting to Kill the Dollar (and your Retirement Savings) Help Protect Your Money with Gold & Silver. Delivered right to your doorstep. You don’t have to worry anymore. SPRING INTO ACTION You can help keep the truth coming in a city that desperately needs it! The more The Epoch Times reports the truth to the citizens of Hong Kong, the more the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tries to shut us down. It hasn’t worked on previous attempt to stop us, and it won’t work now. On April 12, four black-clad masked intruders broke into our facility and used hammers to smash our printing presses and a computer. Of course, we’ll rebuild as soon as we can, and we’ll find ways to keep the news coming. But we can’t do it alone. Your support will get the presses rolling that much quicker. Just as the people of Hong Kong are counting on us, we’re counting on you!
WORDS OF WISDOM “Start by doing what’s necessary; then do what’s possible; and suddenly you are doing the impossible.” SAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI MORNING BRIEF TOP NEWS POSITIVE NEWS EPOCH OPINION A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR China is poised to strike the dollar and other foreign currencies while the rest of the world is still on its heels from the pandemic. This would cause a global market collapse that could destroy your retirement. A Gold IRA can help protect from inflation, increased taxes, and economic uncertainty caused by anti-Dollar currency manipulation. How Could This Affect Your Retirement?
EPOCH PREMIUM VIDEOS PUZZLE CENTER Feedback: Let us know what you think by taking this survey. If this email has been forwarded to you and you would like to sign up, please click here. Dear readers, share with us the photos you’ve taken that reflect American greatness. If we end up publishing anything of yours in the magazine, we will compensate for use of the photos. They must be original, and please specify if they are also exclusive. Please send the photos in a link or attach only low-res images so our inboxes can handle it. Looking forward to seeing your perspective of America. mageditor@epochtimes.com Copyright © 2021 The Epoch Times, All rights reserved. The Epoch Times, 229 W 28th St, Fl.5, New York, NY 10001
With social media censorship sidelining many important headlines, our Morning Brief email is how we make sure you get the latest developments that our reporters have curated from around the world. It’s our way of keeping you truly informed so that you can make the decisions that align with your values. We hope you enjoy our coverage. Manage your email preferences here.
|
3.) DAYBREAK
|
4.) THE SUNBURN
5.) MORNING BREW
|
BECOME SMARTER IN JUST 5 MINUTES
Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
6.) THE FACTUAL
|
7.) LIBERTY NATION
|
|
|
8.) FOX NEWS
9.) UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL
|
APRIL 13, 2021 | |||||||
|
U.S. NEWS | |||||||||||
|
HEALTH NEWS | |||||||||||||||
|
WORLD NEWS | |||||||||||
|
ENTERTAINMENT NEWS | |||||||||||
|
ON THIS DAY | |||||||||||||||
|
PHOTOS | ||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
10.) JUST THE NEWS
11.) AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
|
12.) THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
13.) AXIOS
Axios AM
☕ Good Tuesday morning. Smart Brevity™ count: 886 words … 3½ minutes.
💻 Please join Axios’ Kim Hart and Aja Whitaker-Moore tomorrow at 12:30 p.m. ET for a virtual event on the flexible workplace future, with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Twitch chief people officer Lenke Taylor. Sign up here.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Democrats hope to add a huge array of health spending to upcoming legislation, including ACA subsidies and allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription prices, Axios Vitals author Caitlin Owens reports.
- Why it matters: The next few months may give Democrats the opportunity to walk the walk after campaigning extensively on health care for years, and to plug some of the glaring holes in the system that were exposed by the pandemic.
President Biden is preparing a giant package of family-related policies, including health care.
- Speaker Pelosi is pushing the White House to prioritize a permanent expansion of the ACA’s premium subsidies, the WashPost reports. The last coronavirus package expanded them through 2022.
- Some Democrats want to find a way to provide health insurance to poor adults in states that haven’t expanded Medicaid, per Politico.
More controversial moves are on the table, including lowering the Medicare eligibility age — which Sen. Bernie Sanders is pushing for, The Post reports. Hospitals strongly oppose that change.
- Sanders is also pressing to expand Medicare benefits to include dental, vision and hearing care.
The bottom line: Passing any combination of these policies would be a big deal.
Minnesota’s raw rage played out on the world’s TV screens last night, as cable-news reporters choked on tear gas and furious demonstrators used the f-word live on both CNN and MSNBC.
- Police clashed with protesters in Brooklyn Center — about 10 miles from the Derek Chauvin trial — after a Black man, Daunte Wright, 20, was killed by an officer who, authorities say, intended to fire a Taser.
“Authorities fired multiple rounds of tear gas, along with rubber bullets and flash grenades,” the Star Tribune reports. “Protesters dispersed from areas hit by tear gas were regrouping and retaliating by throwing water bottles and launching fireworks.”
- Earlier, 300 people attended a peaceful vigil for Wright at the site of the traffic stop, the Star Tribune adds: “Several pastors prayed for the Wright family, and trumpet player Butchy Austin, who lives near George Floyd Square, ended the vigil with ‘Amazing Grace.’ … Wright’s mother, his brother and grandfather addressed the crowd.”
Tragically, gun confusion is a known issue, as Axios Twin Cities notes:
The ad industry, plagued last year by pandemic-driven budget cuts, is poised to return stronger than ever in 2021 and beyond, Axios Media Trends author Sara Fischer writes.
- The quick turnaround means that the ad market is recovering faster than it did following the 2008 recession.
What’s next: Analysts are optimistic that in-person activities — sporting events, live entertainment and travel — will return faster than expected, driving marketing opportunities.
- The Summer Olympics is expected to fuel $800 million in ad spending, ad agency Magna estimates.
- The strongest ad growth is expected from the travel, automotive, beverages, and movie categories.
📡 Sign up for Sara Fischer’s weekly Axios Media Trends, out later today.
Photo: Mohd Rasfan/AFP via Getty Images
As the holy month of Ramadan began, Muslims practiced social distancing while reciting evening prayers yesterday at the Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin Mosque in Putrajaya, Malaysia.
President Joe Biden holds up a silicon wafer during a CEO Summit on Semiconductor and Supply Chain Resilience in the Roosevelt Room yesterday. Photo: Patrick Semansky/AP
In an interview with Ina Fried and me, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger called for the U.S. to spend billions of dollars over the next few years as part of a “moonshot” to regain lost ground in semiconductor manufacturing.
- The goal is for the U.S. to account for a third of global output, up from 12%.
Why it matters: Investments made now will take several years to bear fruit, so they won’t do much to ease the current semiconductor shortage. But they’re vital to America’s long-term economic and national security.
- “The most important building block for our economic livelihood — and every aspect of human life — is now increasingly not in our control,” Gelsinger told us after a White House meeting.
Microsoft announced yesterday that it’ll buy Nuance Communications, a software company that focuses on speech recognition through AI, for $19.7 billion, Axios’ Sara Fischer reports.
- It’s Microsoft’s second-largest acquisition after the $26.2 billion deal for LinkedIn in 2016.
Why it matters: Microsoft is trying to leapfrog competitors — Google, Amazon — as they face record antitrust scrutiny.
73 far-right incidents (threats, burnings, bombings, etc.) recorded in the U.S. in 2020 marked an annual high in at least 25 years, The Washington Post reports from a CSIS database that goes back to 1994.
- The attacks were “driven chiefly by white-supremacist, anti-Muslim and anti-government extremists.”
The U.S. budget deficit in the first half of the fiscal year (Oct.-March) more than doubled from the same period a year ago, The Wall Street Journal’s John McCormick reports (subscription).
- The budget gap — $1.7 trillion for six months — was driven by pandemic shutdowns and a third round of stimulus checks.
Fans made pilgrimages to the Cinerama Dome in L.A. yesterday. Photo: Chris Pizzello/AP
Pacific Theaters — which operates some 300 screens in California, including the beloved ArcLight theaters and the historic Cinerama Dome in Hollywood — said yesterday that it won’t reopen.
- The ArcLight theaters were a favorite of entertainment industry professionals and celebrities, AP reports.
- The Cinerama, a concrete geodesic dome on Sunset Boulevard, is a monument and tourist attraction — featured in Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” and decorated for premieres.
Photo: Domino’s
Domino’s, the world’s largest pizza company based on global retail sales, this week begins autonomous pizza delivery in Houston.
- Some customers who place a prepaid order from Domino’s in Woodland Heights will be able to choose to have their pies delivered by an R2 robot from Nuro, the self-driving delivery company.
Nuro says it’s the first fully autonomous, occupant-less on-road delivery vehicle approved by the Department of Transportation.
💡 Axios AM is written in Smart Brevity®. Learn how your team can communicate in the same smart, clear style with Axios HQ.
14.) THE WASHINGTON FREE BEACON
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15.) THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16.) THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.) THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2021 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
18.) ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 13, 2021 View in browser AP Morning Wire
Good morning from The Hague. Police in Minneapolis have clashed with protesters for a second night after authorities said an officer intended to fire a Taser, not a handgun, in the fatal shooting of a Black man during a traffic stop. Meanwhile, the defense for a former Minneapolis police officer charged in George Floyd’s shooting is set to start presenting its case. India is battling against a surge in coronavirus infections, and in Tokyo things are starting to stir around Olympic venues.
Also this morning:
MIKE CORDER The Associated Press The Hague, Netherlands
The Rundown BROOKLYN CENTER, Minn. (AP) — Police clashed with protesters for a second night in the Minneapolis suburb where a police officer fatally shot a Black man in a traffic stop over the weekend. The……Read More MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The defense for a former Minneapolis police officer charged in George Floyd’s death was set to start presenting its case Tuesday, following 11 days of a prosecution narrative……Read More NEW DELHI (AP) — The Indian city of Pune is running out of ventilators as gasping coronavirus patients crowd its hospitals. Social media is full of people searching for beds, while relatives… …Read More WASHINGTON (AP) — The attack on Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility is casting a major shadow over the resumption of indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran over resurrection of the international… …Read More WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden has begun publicly courting Republicans to back his sweeping infrastructure plan, but his reach across the aisle is intended just as much to keep Democrats in…Read More
OTHER TOP STORIES JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) — Muslims in Indonesia began marking Ramadan with communal prayers Tuesday in a socially distanced contrast to the empty mosques of a year ago when…Read More TOKYO (AP) — Japan’s government said Tuesday it has decided to start releasing massive amounts of radioactive water stored in tanks at the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant …Read More TOKYO (AP) — The Tokyo Olympics are getting closer and things are starting to stir around the venues, though not as much as you might expect. Many preparations are still u…Read More PUERTO RICO DE GRAN CANARIA, Spain (AP) — When hotel director Calvin Lucock and restaurant owner Unn Tove Saetran said goodbye to one of the last groups of migrants stayin…Read More
“There are only two forces that can carry light to all the corners of the globe … the sun in the heavens and The Associated Press down here.” Mark Twain
GET THE APP Download the AP News app to get breaking news alerts from AP on your phone, tablet or watch.
Unsubscribe | About us © 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. 200 Liberty St., New York, NY 10128 |
19.) FORT MYERS (FLORIDA) NEWS-PRESS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20.) CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
21.) CHICAGO SUNTIMES
CPS ‘firmly committed’ to reopening high schools next week despite CTU’s threat to stay remote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.) THE HILL MORNING REPORT
|
23.) THE HILL 12:30 REPORT
|
24.) ROLL CALL
|
Morning Headlines
The new White House commission to study potential changes to the Supreme Court will also have to grapple with how to change the Senate, where confirmation clashes have exposed just how much power the senators have to shape the high court. Read more…
Most of us are familiar with Kübler-Ross’ five stages of grief. Rep. Andy Barr knows them entirely too well — his wife, Carol, died last June, weeks shy of her 40th birthday. In the past few months, Barr’s worked through denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance, but there’s still one more step to go: lawmaking. Read more…
Presidential ‘fast starts’ come with electoral risk
OPINION — The combination of President Joe Biden’s “fast start” and historic midterm trends makes it difficult to see Democrats retaining the House next year. But there are enough reasons why 2022 could be different from 2010 and 2018 to keep both parties fixated on the midterms. Read more…
Click here to subscribe to Fintech Beat for the latest market and regulatory developmentsin finance and financial technology.
Clyde says he will take magnetometer fine matter to federal court
Rep. Andrew Clyde says he will go to federal court to fight $15,000 in fines he incurred for dodging security screening at the entrance to the House floor. On Monday, the House Ethics Committee announced it upheld both fines the Georgia Republican was assessed for eluding the magnetometers. Read more…
Is broadband infrastructure? Republicans used to think so
The debate in Congress over President Joe Biden’s $2 trillion-plus infrastructure plan has featured a clean, simple attack line from Republicans: Most of the money wouldn’t really go to infrastructure. Of course, that depends entirely on how you define infrastructure. Read more…
&pizza closes early in Rayburn after staffers eat all the pizza
Bubbling cheese had just returned to Congress, but &pizza quickly became “no pizza” on Monday after a run on the restaurant. So great was the pent-up pizza demand inside the Rayburn House Office Building that the newly reopened shop was forced to close three hours early when ingredients got low. Read more…
Obama alums, police chief named to lead immigration agencies
President Biden has tapped a number of Obama administration alumni to lead key immigration agencies within the Department of Homeland Security, the White House announced Monday. Biden will nominate Ur Jaddou to lead U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Chris Magnus to lead U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Read more…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2021 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
25.) POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: Dem pollsters admit they blew it in 2020
Presented by Facebook
DRIVING THE DAY
After 2016, when just about every poll heading into Election Day had HILLARY CLINTON winning, Democratic pollsters vowed they could never allow themselves to be that wrong again.
Now, a group of five leading Democratic polling firms is trying to explain, once and for all, why they blew it again in 2020, predicting victories for the party up and down the ballot that never materialized. As our polling guru Steve Shepard reports today, the competing firms — ALG Research, GBAO Strategies, Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group, Global Strategy Group and Normington Petts — banded together in an unusual collaboration after the election to conduct a self-autopsy of sorts. It acknowledged “major errors” and a failure “to live up to our own expectations” — yet, frustratingly, no easy solution to the problem of consistently overestimating how major Democratic candidates, including JOE BIDEN, would perform.
Among the culprits:
- Deteriorating public trust in institutions, government, the news media and, yes, the polling industry — driven by DONALD TRUMP’S bashing of those very institutions. Essentially, Trump voters were less willing to participate in polls.
- Pollsters again underestimated turnout among rural and white non-college-educated voters, who overwhelmingly backed Trump.
- Failure to detect late movement toward Trump and Republican candidates in the run-up to the election.
- Not accurately accounting for the fact that Democrats stayed home and answered their phones in greater numbers last year than Republicans who did not follow Covid-19 restrictions as closely.
But IDing the problems was easier than agreeing on fixes for next time. Even before Trump, the polling industry had been struggling to adapt to the evaporation of home landlines and the relative reliability they provided to survey takers. Trump has only exacerbated the challenge of measuring public sentiment when few people want to answer the phone and many actively distrust pollsters.
“While there is evidence some of these theories played a part, no consensus on a solution has emerged. What we have settled on is the idea there is something systematically different about the people we reached, and the people we did not,” the memo reads.
Put differently, as one of the participating pollsters told Steve, who got the scoop on the autopsy: “2020 was an ‘Oh, s—‘ moment for all of us.”
Read the full story here. And read the memo here.
SENATE REPUBLICANS CALL FOR TRUMP-MCCONNELL TRUCE — Two days after Trump derided Minority Leader MITCH MCCONNELL as a “dumb son of a bitch,” Senate Republicans are calling on the two to make peace, as our Burgess Everett and Marianne LeVine report. Even Sen. JOHN THUNE of South Dakota, McConnell’s No. 2 and no fan of Trump, says the duo needs to come to some sort of understanding if they want a shot at taking back the majority — and if Trump wants to remain relevant in the party.
Trump, of course, isn’t having it. In a statement late Monday night, he hit McConnell again, accusing him of being too weak to fight what he called the left’s court-packing effort. “He didn’t fight for the presidency, and he won’t fight for the court,” the statement read. (Everyone knows McConnell cares more about the courts than pretty much any Republican in Washington — probably why Trump chose to make that particular dig.)
Here’s the problem for McConnell and a potential “truce”: Trump demands loyalty and doesn’t give it in return. So even though it’s Trump taking potshots — not McConnell — peace would require McConnell to do what House Minority Leader KEVIN MCCARTHY and NRSC Chair RICK SCOTT (R-Fla.) have done in recent days: grovel. Scott over the weekend awarded Trump some sort of “NRSC Champion for Freedom Award” to butter him up. But can McConnell really stomach doing something like that after Jan. 6?
So far, the answer is no. On Monday, McConnell refused to respond to Trump’s weekend putdown. At the same time, if there’s one thing that motivates McConnell more than anything, it’s being majority leader. So perhaps a little ring-kissing will seem worth it if it’s the price of taking back the Senate. Or not.
In the meantime, the drama between the two isn’t going away.
Good Tuesday morning. Thanks for reading Playbook, where we’re happy to grovel for the support of our readers. Got a tip or document to share? Drop us a line: Rachael Bade, Eugene Daniels, Ryan Lizza, Tara Palmeri. We’ll keep you anonymous.
BIDEN’S TUESDAY — The president will receive the President’s Daily Brief at 9:30 a.m. Biden will visit the Capitol Rotunda to pay his respects to Capitol Police Officer WILLIAM EVANS at 11 a.m. Biden and VP KAMALA HARRIS will meet with members of the Congressional Black Caucus at 2 p.m. in the Oval Office.
— Harris will hold a roundtable on Black maternal health alongside domestic policy adviser SUSAN RICE at 12:30 p.m. At 4 p.m., Harris will visit the Capitol Rotunda to pay respects to Evans.
— Press secretary JEN PSAKI will brief at 12:30 p.m.
THE SENATE will meet at noon to consider the nomination of POLLY TROTTENBERG to be deputy Transportation secretary before recessing and returning for a vote at 2:15 p.m. IRS Commissioner CHARLES RETTIG will testify before the Finance Committee at 10 a.m.
THE HOUSE will meet at 7 p.m., with first votes as early as 7:15 p.m.
PLAYBOOK READS
CONGRESS
ABOUT THAT W.H. INFRASTRUCTURE MEETING — Hill Republicans left an infrastructure meeting with Biden on Monday saying the president struck all the right notes on being open to compromise. But Rep. DAVID PRICE (D-N.C.) told us afterward that the main obstacle for a bipartisan deal — and it’s a gigantic one — remains: how to pay for it all.
During the meeting, Sen. ROGER WICKER of Mississippi, the ranking Republican on the Commerce Committee, told Biden that raising the corporate tax rate is a non-starter for many Republicans who view their support for the 2017 Trump tax cuts as a legacy-defining vote. More on the meeting here from Sam Mintz
DOUBLE DARE YOU — “Democrats dare GOP to filibuster Asian American hate crimes bill,” by Nicholas Wu, Marianne LeVine and Burgess Everett: “Democrats, for their part, are daring the 50-vote minority to block the modest legislation amid a spike in hate incidents against Asian Americans during the pandemic. While the GOP has yet to make a conference-wide decision, Wednesday’s vote could serve as a data point for Democratic senators seeking to persuade more of their colleagues to scrap the 60-vote threshold that has left some of President Joe Biden’s most progressive priorities to languish in the upper chamber.
“Senate Minority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) said that Republicans are considering voting to open debate and offering amendments on the hate crimes measure. Some in the GOP may want ‘an opportunity to engage in a discussion about how to make it better, how to improve it,’ Thune said of the bill.”
BEWARE HANGRY HILL AIDES — “&pizza closes early in Rayburn after staffers eat all the pizza,” Roll Call: “Bubbling cheese had just returned to Congress, but &pizza quickly became ‘no pizza’ on Monday after a run on the restaurant. So great was the pent-up pizza demand inside the Rayburn House Office Building that the newly reopened shop was forced to close three hours early when ingredients got low.”
POLITICS ROUNDUP
DO NOT WHAT MCCONNELL SAYS — A week after the Senate leader warned the business community to “stay out of politics,” it appears to be doing anything but. Major League Baseball took heat over its decision to pull the All-Star Game out of Atlanta, yet criticism of Republican efforts to enact stricter voting laws from business leaders is spreading, according to the NYT: “With Republicans in Texas and other states continuing to advance restrictive election legislation, corporate chieftains around the country have stepped up their efforts in recent days to oppose such laws and defend voting rights.
“Two prominent Black executives are enlisting major corporations to sign a new statement opposing ‘discriminatory legislation,’ and PayPal and Twilio said Monday that they had agreed to add their names. BlackRock, the investment firm, was likely to sign the statement but had not yet committed, according to a person familiar with the situation. Other companies were also in discussion to sign on, two people familiar with the deliberations said.”
DEFIANT DESANTIS — “After YouTube pulls DeSantis video for mask fallacies, governor holds another COVID-19 talk with same docs,” South Florida Sun Sentinel: “After YouTube took down a video last week of Gov. Ron DeSantis’ coronavirus roundtable because of misinformation about mask-wearing, DeSantis doubled down Monday and invited those same panelists back to the state Capitol for more discussion.
“The move plays into DeSantis’ recent push to punish ‘big tech’ for censorship of conservatives, as well as continuing to cement DeSantis’ status as the top Republican advocate against anti-COVID-19 measures and a potential GOP nominee for president in 2024.”
TRUMP CARDS
WHY THE ROAD TO MAR-A-LAGO STILL MATTERS: because Trump can pull in serious cash for candidates. Sen. RAND PAUL (R-Ky.) raked in a cool half-million dollars at a fundraiser hosted by Trump at Mar-a-Lago on Friday. Last month, South Dakota Gov. KRISTI NOEM raised $300,000 at a fundraiser at the resort. Each haul was a personal record for a single event, according to their aides. “No matter what some in the party might say, President Trump remains key to any candidate’s success,” said Paul adviser SERGIO GOR.
DEPT. OF REALITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT — “Haley says she’ll back Trump, stand down if he runs in 2024,” AP: “Former U.N. Ambassador and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, often mentioned as a possible 2024 GOP presidential contender, said Monday that she would not seek her party’s nomination if former President Donald Trump opts to run a second time. ‘Yes,’ Haley said, when asked if she would support a second bid by Trump, in whose Cabinet she served for the first half of his administration.”
WOOD TAKES HIS CONSPIRACY THEORIES ON THE ROAD — “Pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood makes chaotic appearance in Charleston ahead of SC GOP chair bid,” Post and Courier: “Chaos erupted at the Charleston County GOP meeting when attorney Lin Wood pushed conspiracy theories that Donald Trump won the 2020 election. It was part of Wood’s pitch to replace S.C. Republican Party Chairman Drew McKissick next month.”
DESSERT from The Daily Beast’s MOLLY JONG-FAST: “What Mika Brzezinski Did When She Read Trump’s ‘Bleeding Facelift’ Tweet”
BEYOND THE BELTWAY
LATEST FROM MINNESOTA — “7 P.M. Curfews Go Into Effect For 2.5M In Twin Cities Metro Area After Daunte Wright Shooting Death,” CBS Minnesota … “Minnesota killing adds to the anger, and the stakes, as Chauvin trial nears its end,” WaPo
TOXIC TOWN — “‘Bond Girl’ Talk and Groping: Albany’s Toxic Culture for Women,” NYT: “The senator, Julia Salazar, who declined to identify her colleague, also recalled attending a fund-raiser just outside the Capitol in 2019 where another legislator’s staff member began commenting on her appearance. ‘He said, “You should be on a calendar,”’ recalled Ms. Salazar, who was 28 at the time. ‘I was so embarrassed that I left.’
“If encounters like these are unacceptable and potentially career-ending, especially in the #MeToo era, they are also a defining part of the culture of government in Albany, N.Y., and so endemic that they have continued even after sex scandals took down a governor (Eliot Spitzer) and several members of the State Assembly. Sexual misconduct in Albany has been thrown into sharp relief by allegations against Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo from multiple current and former aides who have accused him of sexual harassment and, in one case, groping during an encounter in the Executive Mansion.”
VOTING VETO — “How a Very Weird Quirk Might Let Michigan Republicans Limit Voting Rights,” NYT: “But unlike in other states with divided governments, Michigan’s Constitution offers Republicans a rarely used option for circumventing [Gov. Gretchen] Whitmer’s veto. Last month, the state’s Republican chairman told activists that he aimed to do just that — usher new voting restrictions into law using a voter-driven petition process that would bypass the governor’s veto pen.”
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION
A RARE TRUMP HOLDOVER — “Biden keeping Trump’s pick for Moscow ambassador in place,” CNN: “The Biden administration recently decided to keep the Trump-appointed US ambassador on the job in Moscow for the foreseeable future, two senior administration officials told CNN, demonstrating a willingness to nurture areas of stability in the US-Russia relationship after it got off to a tumultuous start.
“John Sullivan has been on the job for almost a year and a half. He is viewed by administration officials as a steady hand as the administration ramps up the pressure on Russia for taking actions to undermine the US and democratic values broadly.”
ALSO … “Biden picks former New Jersey attorney general to lead DEA,” WaPo
AMERICA AND THE WORLD
BLOWING UP THE IRAN NUCLEAR TALKS? — “After Nuclear Site Blackout, Thunder From Iran, and Silence From U.S.,” NYT: “The operation raised the question of whether Israel was acting on its own to strike Iran and undermine American diplomacy as the Biden administration seeks to reconstitute a nuclear agreement. Or, alternatively, whether Israel was operating in concert with American interests, carrying out dirty work that would weaken Iran’s negotiating position in the talks.
“The White House was saying almost nothing in public on Monday about the apparent explosion inside Iran’s Natanz facility, below more than 20 feet of reinforced concrete, which destroyed the power supply that keeps the centrifuges spinning at supersonic speeds, enriching uranium. … White House and State Department officials said they had no idea whether the Iranians would show up in Vienna again on Wednesday, when the talks were scheduled to resume.”
PLAYBOOKERS
NOW HERE’S A TRANSITION FOR YOU — “Redfield Joins Big Ass Fans, Promoter of Controversial COVID-Killing Technology,” Daily Beast: “Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has joined Big Ass Fans, lending his scientific credibility to a company division that says its ion-generating technology kills the coronavirus. The company charges $9,450 for a fan with technology that academic air quality experts question.
“Academic indoor air quality experts who criticize certain claims about COVID-killing technology say the industry-funded studies often focus on results of tests run in a space ranging in size from a shoebox to a cabinet that do not reflect the conditions in a large room. Studies backed by the industry rarely make it clear whether the touted ‘virus-killing’ ions or molecules are doing the work, experts say, or if improvements come from a fan or filter on a device.”
MEDIAWATCH — “Reuters names Alessandra Galloni as its next editor-in-chief,” Reuters
— Allison Harris is joining NewsNation as a correspondent in D.C. focused on the White House. She previously was a reporter for KDFW-TV FOX 4 Dallas-Fort Worth.
STANDING BY TUCKER — “Fox has no problem with Tucker Carlson’s ‘replacement theory’ remarks, says Lachlan Murdoch,” CNN: “Fox Corporation chief executive Lachlan Murdoch dismissed the Anti-Defamation League’s demand that the company fire host Tucker Carlson, telling the organization in a letter that his company saw no problem with comments Carlson made about the racist ‘great replacement’ theory. …
“‘Concerning the segment of “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on April 8th, however, we respectfully disagree,’ Murdoch continued in the letter, which the ADL provided CNN. ‘A full review of the guest interview indicates that Mr. Carlson decried and rejected replacement theory. As Mr. Carlson himself stated during the guest interview: “White replacement theory? No, no, this is a voting rights question.”’ In a letter of its own, the ADL responded Monday to Murdoch.”
STAFFING UP — The Interior Department announced a slate of new members of its leadership: Heather Barmore will be director of digital strategy, Liz Klein will be senior counselor to the secretary, Giovanni Rocco will be deputy press secretary, Felicia Salazar will be speechwriter, and Raina Thiele will be senior adviser for Alaska affairs and strategic priorities. Announcement
TRANSITIONS — Jeff Lowenstein will be staff director for the House Intelligence Committee. He previously was chief of staff for Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). Patrick Boland will take over as COS for Schiff and previously was comms director for the House Intelligence Committee. … Lauren Evette Williams is now comms director for the House Oversight Coronavirus Crisis Subcommittee. She most recently was an SVP at Burson Cohn and Wolfe and is a Marcia Fudge alum. …
… Chris Mewett is now legislative director for Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). He previously was national security adviser for Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and is a Defense Department alum. … Michael Frazier is now EVP and chief business officer at FARE. He previously was EVP and deputy director for external affairs at the 9/11 Memorial & Museum. … Taylor Sholler is now senior director of government affairs at Lam Research. He most recently was director of government affairs at Applied Materials and is a U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Judd Gregg alum.
REBRAND: Lobby shop Peck Madigan Jones has changed its name to Tiber Creek Group in a nod to its growing, bipartisan team and the Tiber Creek that stretches from Capitol Hill to the Washington Monument.
ENGAGED — Corey McCray, of Chevron government affairs, proposed to Kristyn Royster, U.S. Chamber of Commerce PAC director, over the weekend at their favorite spot on Fripp Island, S.C. They met through a mutual friend in 2017. Pic
HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) … Reps. Jim Costa (D-Calif.) and Marie Newman (D-Ill.) … Celinda Lake … Will Davis of the OECD Washington Center … Doug Coutts … Brian Bartlett of Rational 360 … Taylor Gross of the Herald Group … POLITICO’s Jack Smith … CNN’s Nathaniel Meyersohn … Edelman’s Sujata Mitra and Kate Meissner … Maggie Feldman-Piltch … Amazon’s Justin Snow … C-SPAN’s Jeremy Art, a huge Nationals fan … Alex Yost … E&E News’ Amy Carlile, Colleen Luccioli and Jeff Tomich … John Barsa … former Reps. Susan Davis (D-Calif.) and Ted Yoho (R-Fla.) … Engage’s Nick Schaper … Sally Larson … Ford’s Brad Carroll and Rachel McCleery … Kasey O’Brien of Middle Seat Digital … NBC’s Justice Gilpin-Green … Jonah Cunningham … Amy Goodman … WaPo’s Lateshia Beachum … Morning Consult’s Jeff Cartwright … SKDKnickerbocker’s Mia Motley … Steve Ayscue … Dean Hingson … Emily Loeb … Deena Tauster … Erin Dunne … Bloomberg’s Ayanna Alexander … Janet Ritz … Mercury’s John Gallagher … Karriem Holman of kPolitics … former Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colo.) … Geoff Embler … Kevin Warsh
Send Playbookers tips to playbook@politico.com. Playbook couldn’t happen without our editor Mike Zapler and producers Allie Bice, Eli Okun and Garrett Ross.
Follow us on Twitter
26.) AMERICAN MINUTE
27.) CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
28.) CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
29.) PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: U.S.May Want to Look Into Getting Rid of Minnesota
Top O’ the Briefing
What Has Minnesota Done for Us Lately?
Happy Tuesday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Jack LaLanne may have been from the future.
Early in my stand-up career, I drove to all of my gigs. The average opening act in comedy club isn’t flying all over the place. I got to see a lot of this great land and became quite enamored of it. Most of it, anyway. I never did get San Francisco.
That was a long time ago, however. People change. Countries change.
The Democrats go off the socialist deep end and turn the states and cities that they run into fetid cesspools of civil unrest.
I’m kind over those places now.
Hear me out. I know that we have all gotten used to the way the American flag looks and that change is difficult but, let’s be honest here, we could all probably get used to having fewer stars on it. Maybe start by removing one after we rid ourselves of, say, Minnesota. I’m done with it. Minnesota and its 10,000 lakes need to go somewhere that isn’t here.
Off the top of my head, Prince is the only worthwhile thing I can think of to ever come out of Minnesota. OK, our own Ed Morrissey lives there, but he’s not a native and we can rescue him and move him to a free state.
In recent years, all the state has given us is Keith Ellison, Ilhan Omar, and race riots since last summer.
We can do better, America.
Night Two of Riot Boogaloo got underway in Minneapolis last night. Our Townhall colleague Julio Rosas is doing his glutton for punishment thing again and covering it for the Mothership. Bryan highlighted some of the action that Julio shared:
This is what the back and forth between the rioters and police looks like in Brooklyn Center, MN. pic.twitter.com/yb6e5TMG4m
— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) April 13, 2021
These people really need hobbies. Ones they can do as Canadians, preferably. Or Greenlanders. Progressives are obsessed with Russia, maybe Vlad can take this miserable place off of our hands. This is a breakup that’s been a longtime in the making.
If we have any luck getting rid of the thorn that is Minnesota, maybe we can find a taker for Oregon and its ne’er-do-well hellhole Portland, which has been in a state of permanent unrest since last summer doesn’t show any signs of letting up.
The only goal for these leftist enclaves is to have all of this rioting lead to the de-Americanization of America. Why keep them around? If they were acting out under another country’s flag it might make them just a bit easier to ignore.
If it doesn’t, at least somebody else would be picking up the bill for all of this nonsense.
We’ll always have Prince.
Everything Isn’t Awful
This young boy is winning hearts at local baseball game by dressing up like his idol — the umpire. ⚾️ https://t.co/i9rZzYNwW0 pic.twitter.com/PkgL7wwpJe
— Good Morning America (@GMA) April 12, 2021
PJ Media
VIDEO: If Antifa’s ‘All Cops Are Bastards’ Chant Was Right, Would They Be Marching or Chanting?
CA Governor Gavin Newsom Finally Admits He’s Not Bigger Than Jesus
Treacher: ‘The Columnist’ Depicts Every Journo’s Fondest Dream: Murdering Online Trolls
The Latest Police Statement on Daunte Wright Shooting Isn’t Likely to Cool Tensions…
VodkaPundit: Insanity Wrap #185: One of Our Vice Presidents Is Missing!
Austin Police Officer Shot On Duty; Just One City Council Member Gives Him Backup
Does Rep. Steve Cohen Want to Start a War Over the Capitol Riot?
I hate it when the fight. Oh wait…Nate Silver Accuses Dr. Fauci of Gaslighting on COVID Transmission
COVID-19 Cases Are Surging in Michigan and the CDC Director Says Shut It Down to ‘Flatten the Curve’
Christian Colleges Demand a Say in Lawsuit Aiming to Gut Religious Exemption
Coca-Cola is poison and Delta has always been awful. The Victims of Woke Capitalism: Georgia Business Owners Speak Out After MLB Snub
Muslim Leaders Enraged, Demand Apology as Jay-Z Wears T-Shirt with Image of Mosque on It
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Intel Veteran Exposes China’s Spy Ops and Paramilitary Training in Canada
Hamas-Linked CAIR Enraged by Minneapolis Curfew, Demands Ramadan Exemption
Former Child Victim Speaks Out About St. Louis Family Court Trauma: ‘No One Would Help Me’
Amid Renewed Rioting in Minneapolis, a Lesson on the Second Amendment
Townhall Mothership
BREAKING: Second Night of Riots Erupt in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
The UK COVID Variant Hysteria Just Got Silenced in New Study
Nikki Haley Makes an Announcement About Her Presidential Prospects
Whaddya know. New Polling Shows Opposition to Democrats’ Hefty ‘Infrastructure’ Package
CNN Actually Fact Checks (Some Of) Biden’s 2A Lies
Thanks, Joe! Jacksonville Gun Show Attracts Thousands After Biden Executive Orders
Nevada Op-Ed On Racial Equality And The Second Amendment
Feelings Get Hurt After Chris Christie Drops Inconvenient Truths About Biden’s Infrastructure Plan
Georgetown Students Support Georgia’s New Voting Law (They Just Didn’t Realize It)
Jim Acosta Asks the Execrable Harry Reid About Court Packing, Doesn’t Get the Answer He Expected
Bodycam Footage Proves BLM Wrong on Daunte Wright Shooting (VIDEO)
#Popcorn. Black Lives Matter activists want investigation of leader after real-estate binge
Number of migrant kids in cages drops 45% (now they’re in convention centers)
“Kiss of death”: Dems’ voting-reform bill could torpedo immigrants’ hopes of citizenship
VIP
Kruiser’s (Almost) Daily Distraction: The Pfizer Vaccine Pairs Well With Craft Beer
Here Are 100 Companies That Don’t Want Your Money if You Want Secure Elections. Spend Accordingly.
VodkaPundit, Part Deux: Irony Alert: Dr. Fauci Is the Most Effective Anti-Vaxxer Ever
60 Minutes Tries to Pull DeSantis Hit Piece Story Out of the Crapper and It Backfires Spectacularly
Government-Mandated Climate Confessions Are Coming to a Company Near You
GOLD ‘Unredacted with Kurt Schlichter’: Is Matt Gaetz Being Blackmailed?
GOLD IN MY ORBIT: A Conversation With Marc Ang on Anti-Asian Hate, Race, and True Diversity
Around the Interwebz
When to See This Month’s ‘Pink Super Moon’ at Peak Brilliance
Archaeologists find “lost golden city” buried under sand for 3,400 years
Reporter locked out of Twitter after sharing story about BLM founder buying $1.4 million L.A. home
11 Strange Stories From the National UFO Reporting Center
Bee Me
‘It Is Still Not Safe To Go Outside,’ Says Fauci’s Head In A Jar In Year 2739https://t.co/xiTVz4iS1B
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) April 12, 2021
The Kruiser Kabana
Kabana Gallery
The Parnassus: Mars and Venus, 1497 #mantegna #andreamantegna pic.twitter.com/ukYRt7jkc6
— Andrea Mantegna (@artistmantegna) April 12, 2021
Kabana Tunes
Pocket watches and dungarees will get America back on track.
30.) WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
Editor
8409 Lee Hwy
#3984
Merrifield VA 22116-9998
USA
Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options
31.) THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: China Provokes Taiwan With Airspace Incursion
Plus: Protests in the Twin Cities over the shooting death of Daunte Wright.
The Dispatch Staff | 13 min ago | 1 |
Happy Tuesday! Let’s dive right in.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon said Monday that the police officer who fatally shot Daunte Wright, a 20-year-old black man, meant to fire her taser, citing police camera footage and calling it “an accidental discharge that resulted in the tragic death of Mr. Wright.”
- A police officer was injured at a high school shooting in Knoxville, Tennessee, on Monday. The high school student who shot the officer died at the scene.
- President Joe Biden will nominate Christine Wormuth to be the secretary of the army and Tucson Police Chief Chris Magnus to head U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
- Senior national security officials from the U.S. and Israel will hold virtual strategic talks on Iran on Tuesday, Axios reported on Monday. The talks come one day before the U.S. will resume indirect negotiations with Iran on the 2015 nuclear deal and two days after an explosion at a top Iranian nuclear facility.
- Following a series of explosions beginning on April 9, La Soufrière volcano on the Caribbean island of St. Vincent had its largest eruption this week on Monday, sending “deadly clouds of hot gas, ash and stones down the mountainsides.”
Ellen Nakashima @nakashimae
SCOOP: Former senior NSA officials named to White House cyber position and head of DHS cyber agency https://t.co/i7F1967Ke1
- The United States confirmed 72,545 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday per the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard, with 6.6 percent of the 1,101,031 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 472 deaths were attributed to the virus on Monday, bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 562,533. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 27,952 Americans are currently hospitalized with COVID-19. Meanwhile, 2,644,914 COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered yesterday, with 120,848,490 Americans having now received at least one dose.
From Our Partners At Reason
In a media environment cluttered with voices that play to the crowd, Reason magazine stands out as a clear and unapologetic voice for free minds and free markets. In a political moment in which leaders of both political parties seem comfortable growing the power of the government, Reason offers a welcome contrarian view, with reporting and commentary that provides daily reminders of the threat to freedom posed by the power of the state.
China Provokes Taiwan in South China Sea
One day after U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken took to Meet the Press to express concerns over Beijing’s recent “aggressive actions” in the South China Sea, the Chinese Air Force deployed 25 fighter jets and nuclear-capable bombers to Taiwanese airspace in its largest recorded incursion to date. Monday’s saber-rattling—combined with increasingly hostile rhetoric from Chinese officials—raises alarm bells of an impending invasion by Beijing to retake the island nation.
Astute observers and regional experts attribute the military exercises, at least in part, to American movement toward China’s “insurmountable red line”: support for Taipei’s sovereignty. The State Department released new guidelines Friday to “encourage the U.S. government engagement with Taiwan that reflects our deepening unofficial relationship.” Symbolically, “the guidance underscores Taiwan is a vibrant democracy and an important security and economic partner that is also a force for good in the international community.” In practice, it permits U.S. officials greater access to their diplomatic counterparts.
The shifting State Department protocol builds on that of its predecessor, which in its final days dismantled the “complex internal restrictions” inhibiting “our diplomats, servicemembers, and other officials’ interactions with their Taiwanese counterparts.” The Trump administration also authorized more than $15 billion in defense sales in a strategic effort to deter a Chinese invasion.
While it’s uncertain what support theAmerican military will provide in such an event, arming Taiwan has been a critical component of the U.S.’s Indo-Pacific policy since the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act. The legislation “doesn’t require us to defend Taiwan, but does mandate that we sell them equipment and make sure that they can defend themselves,” Gary Schmitt, a resident scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, told The Dispatch. “To the Trump team’s credit they made a very big effort to try to close that gap and the Taiwanese have been willing to buy a lot of equipment that they need.”
“We stand behind those commitments,” Blinken said of the legislation on Meet the Press. “And all I can tell you is it would be a serious mistake for anyone to try to change the existing status quo by force.”
Daunte Wright’s Death Sparks Protests in the Twin Cities
Last year, Minnesota’s Twin Cities were rocked by protests and riots following the killing of George Floyd, a black man who died face-down in the street with a police officer’s knee on his neck. This week, with that officer’s trial ongoing, another incident took place just miles away in Brooklyn Center, when another young black man, 20-year-old Daunte Wright, was shot and killed during a traffic stop.
According to police, the altercation began as a routine stop on Sunday afternoon: Officers pulled Wright over because his vehicle had expired tags. When they ran his name, however, they discovered he had an outstanding warrant—police said only that it was a gross misdemeanor—and moved to arrest him.
What happened next was caught on the body camera of the officer who fired the weapon, footage of which was released by the department on Monday. Wright exits the car without incident and turns to be cuffed by the officer at his window, a black man. Another white officer was standing at the passenger window; the third, a white woman—who was wearing the body camera—approached to assist with the restraining.
Worth Your Time
- After years spent bullying his political adversaries and publicly displaying his ego,, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is one of the most unpopular Democratic lawmakers of the 21st century. He faces ongoing investigations into his nursing home death cover-up, as well as multiple, detailed allegations of sexual harassment levied against him. “At the same time,” writes National Review’s Michael Brendan Dougherty, “this absolutely power-mad, arrogant, sleaze bucket of a governor is the only thing preventing New York from becoming the next California.” Per Dougherty: “Cuomo began his reign in New York by immediately closing the state’s massive budget deficit, taming an unruly legislature, and then going on the offensive against big public-sector unions,” and later took under his wing a group of Democrats in the state legislature who split from the more prog
ressive flanks of his party. “I guess it’s a tribute to this bizarre state to think, That son of a bitch was intolerable and deserved to be at Rikers; I’ll miss him when he’s gone.”
Presented Without Comment
Toeing the Company Line
- Is Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer likely to retire anytime soon? David Lat joined Monday’s episode of Advisory Opinions to give us his thoughts. Stick around to hear Lat and our hosts chat about Biden’s 36-person Supreme Court commission, a new opinion involving California pandemic law, Google v. Oracle, and lawful orders from police officers.
- President Biden unveiled his commission to look into possible reforms to the Supreme Court. Ilya Shapiro warns that there are no quick fixes.
- Thomas Koenig reviews Fears of a Setting Sun: The Disillusionment of America’s Founders, a book that details how the Founding Fathers lost faith in the American experiment.
- Peter Hedger compares recent comments by J.D. Vance about reining in Big Tech companies who benefit from infrastructure and government privileges to Barack Obama’s infamous “You didn’t build that” comment.
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Haley Byrd Wilt (@byrdinator), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Ryan Brown (@RyanP_Brown), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
1 |
32.) LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
33.) THE DAILY WIRE
|
34.) DESERET NEWS
35.) BRIGHT
|
36.) AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
37.) LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
38.) THE BLAZE
View this email in your browser One last thing … Iconic action movie actor Sylvester Stallone reportedly joined the Mar-a-Lago private club owned by former President Donald Trump and liberals online wasted no time in lashing out at him over it. Page Six reported that a source at the club told them Stallone had joined and was seen taking photos with others at the club. The 74-year-old actor … Read more On Monday’s episode of “The Glenn Beck Radio Program,” Glenn opened up about the tragic death of his brother-in-law, Vincent Colonna Jr., who passed away unexpectedly on April 5. He also shared some of the important thoughts and insights he’s learned thr … Read more
More stories for you
You might like …
© 2021 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. Privacy Policy | Manage your preferences | Unsubscribe 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA
|
39.) THE FEDERALIST
40.) REUTERS
|
|
41.) NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Shocking video reveals cell tower transmissions interfering with xylitol crystal formation, showing disruption of ‘morphic resonance’
- Will one powerful RINO keep chemical castration of teens legal in Texas?
- The last bastion of ‘conservatism’ in SoCal, Orange County, pushes vaccine passports
- The free world died of COVID-19
- The harms of lockdowns, the dangers of censorship, and a path forward
- Night two of the Daunte Wright riots accelerate, spread to other cities. And it’s going to get worse.
- America, formerly the home of the free… but at least there’s still a few brave
- Vandana Shiva on the taking down of Bill Gates’ empires
- Ron Paul: Global Taxes – Global Stagnation
- Minneapolis riots were just a warm-up for the post-Chauvin-trial anarchy
Shocking video reveals cell tower transmissions interfering with xylitol crystal formation, showing disruption of ‘morphic resonance’
Posted: 13 Apr 2021 03:40 AM PDT Scientists have long known that crystals form into patterns which are instantaneously communicated to other molecules around the world, as if invoking a kind of “cosmic internet” that remains unseen. Article by Mike Adams at Natural News. As Woodard and McCrone wrote in their article, ‘Unusual crystallization behavior,’ published in the Journal of Applied Crystallography (Vol. 8, 1975, p. 342.) Xylitol, first prepared in 1891, was considered a liquid until 1941 or 1942, when a form melting at 61 °C crystallized (Wolfrom & Kohn, 1942). These experiments were successfully repeated by Carson, Waisbrot & Jones (1943) and in the course of further recrystallizations a new form, melting at 94°C, crystallized. Subsequent attempts to prepare the lower melting form were unsuccessful (KiT & Jeffrey, 1969). There are many instances, some reported in the literature, and many others not, of crystalline compounds behaving respectably for many months or years until nucleation of a more stable form. After this occurs, the previously obtained crystal form cannot be made to crystallize often even in laboratories many miles away. We have recently encountered such an event and became interested in the prevalence of such behaviour. The results were so interesting to us we felt your readers might be equally interested. Morphic resonance and the cosmic database of knowledgeWhat McCrone had stumbled across is the shocking reality that molecules communicate morphic structure “knowledge” to other molecules, and this communication requires no technology and isn’t limited by distance. Pioneering science thinker Rupert Sheldrake calls this phenomenon, “Morphic resonance,” and describes morphic fields as “habits of nature” that are used by molecules and living systems to remember and communicate knowledge, structure and organizational information. Sheldrake’s books include, “Morphic Resonance,” “A New Science of Life” and “The Presence of the Past.” I encourage you to read them. Just as molecules “remember” how to form new configurations — and instantly communicate that knowledge to other molecules around the world — living things such as insects, animals and human beings also rely on morphic fields. Morphic resonance information allows spiders to repair broken spider webs and salamanders to regrow lost limbs. Morphic fields are used by human embryos to grow into a fully-formed human beings, and the healing of wounds relies on morphic fields to instruct individual cells on how to repair the structures they need to repair. (Human genes describe almost nothing about the human being, as genes are mostly focused on protein synthesis, not the structure of the whole human body.) Although xylitol was previously known as a liquid at room temperature in the 19th century, xylitol learned to coalesce into new morphology as explained by McCrone, above. Now, xylitol “freezes” into crystals at room temperature. Testing morphic resonance in the labIntrigued by this theory of morphic resonance, I decided to film the crystallization of xylitol using a video microscope in my lab. After melting small piles of xylitol into a ceramic container, I filmed crystals growing both with and without 4G cell phone interference. The difference in the formation of the crystals is remarkable. When 4G cell phone energy is not present (I do not have a 5G phone so couldn’t test that), the resulting crystals were quite beautiful, symmetrical and resembled flowers (you can see the video of this forming by watching my podcast video below): When 4G cell phone energy was present, the crystals tended to form dirty, chaotic, structures that lacked symmetry and appeared to be “fractured.” In one instance, a xylitol crystal structure formed — and you can see this “growing” in the video below — that resembled some sort of vicious claw or mouth of a beast. Notice that lack of symmetry and the strange straight lines that characterize this crystal, formed in the presence of 4G cell phone interference: A closer look at the “beast” image above, reveals strange lines and dots, arranged almost in a kind of “script” — like an alien Morse Code or something similar: The matrix of straight lines appears at a specific frequency / distance / wavelength. With better measurement tools, we could measure the nanometer width between these lines and perhaps deduce something about the frequencies used by cell phones. Notice how they are fractured by “lightning strikes” that are woven into the pattern of lines. Also remember as you see this: What you are seeing it nothing by xylitol, which is nothing but carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms. There is nothing else in this solution. We also see the formation of crystal “tumors” that would adhere to the edges of other crystals, forming chaotic, cancer tumor-like shapes that lacked symmetry or a clear nucleus. Learn about morphic resonance and The Contagious MindMy live presentation coming up this Friday — streamed live, for free, at Brighteon.com — covers this topic in more detail. I am also about to release a free, downloadable audiobook entitled, “The Contagious Mind” which provides over 7 hours of audio (and a downloadable, printable transcript) which explores this topic in great detail, providing how-to information on how you can become a more effective receiver and transmitter into the morphic resonance database of knowledge which I call “God’s cloud storage system.” Register now to be alerted to the free audiobook download at TheContagiousMind.com. I also strongly recommend you purchase and read all the books by Rupert Sheldrake — or read his website at Sheldrake.org — who will no doubt be fascinated to see these microscopy photos and videos. As of this writing, he is not aware I have been working on this subject, but I look forward to sharing more video microscopy results with him. Sheldrake is giving a live online talk about morphic resonance on April 30th, at 7pm UK time. See the details of that talk at this link. Much more research is coming soon. I have a number of experiments lined up that will be publicly shared once complete. Watch the full video below to see these xylitol crystals growing on camera. You will be astonished: Brighteon.com/15397aee-f1ee-4c7b-94fe-691f77f4e8d9
Be sure to watch my live presentation this Friday at the Thrive Time Show conference, streaming for free on Brighteon.com. My talk is schedule for 5pm central but will likely slip to later in the evening, as such events are difficult to keep on schedule. Also be sure to sign up for The Contagious Mind audio book (free), which is a game-changer for human liberty, knowledge and the defeat of evil. Register now at TheContagiousMind.com ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Shocking video reveals cell tower transmissions interfering with xylitol crystal formation, showing disruption of ‘morphic resonance’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Will one powerful RINO keep chemical castration of teens legal in Texas?
Posted: 13 Apr 2021 03:05 AM PDT The big question on the minds of American social conservatives is: “is Texas next?” After frustrating vetoes of pro-family legislation by the Republican governors of South Dakota and Arkansas, social conservatives feel fed up. They ask themselves, “Has our side really been stringing us along?” In the long run, betrayals by Kristi Noem and Asa Hutchinson might even help the pro-family cause. These two governors forced pro-family conservatives to acknowledge that we have been played for fools for a very long time. It is about time we stop pretending that the “pro-life” label suffices to qualify someone as a fighter for family values. Go on the Offense or Stop Pretending to PlayUntil now, the national media cycle has not spotlighted the raucous civil war among Texas conservatives. But it’s already in full swing. As reported in earlier articles, social conservatives have besieged Austin trying to force the Republican-led legislature in Austin to act on dozens of pro-family causes. These common sense bills range from holding liable reckless LGBT counselors to reclassifying “cancel culture” as workplace harassment. The approach taken recently by Mass Resistance comes from painful experience. The left has succeeded largely because they push aggressive legislation on every front and don’t back down. The right, by contrast, plays defense, when it doesn’t simply forfeit. They Flood the Zone, While We StumbleWhen conservatives do push back against the left, they often do so based on narrowly defined issues shorn of context. (Like coaches leading prayers before football games.) Leftists press-gang activists from nearly every profession to advocate for them, including educators, artists, and programmers. And they attack on every front at once. Conservatives tend to pour resources into constitutional lawyers and the lawmakers whom they advise. Grassroots traditionalists donate copious funds to activists who focus on a tiny number of high-profile court cases. Ultimately even those court cases are almost all lost. The ingredients exist in Texas for another family-values nothingburger. The establishment GOP feels snug and entitled. Their party controls all branches of state government. Ambitious lawmakers have learned how to look conservative even while dodging the pushback (from Coke, from the NCAA, etc.) entailed in actually serving conserving anything. The state’s size attracts grifters, swindlers, hustlers, and prospectors of every stripe. Here is where Elmer Gantry goes corporate. The Mating Habits of Texas RINOsTexas’s unique system only allows for the legislature to meet for 140 days every two years. This year’s session began in January but the deadline for introducing bills fell on March 12. For much of the time prior to March 12 the politicians were on vacation. A heck of a way to run a state.
And pretty much every session, the mass of establishment RINOs sink all pro-family bills using feints and sleights. They cite time constraints, rules of order, fear of the courts overturning it, or random objections raised in committee. They buck constituents and refuse to introduce bills, or send them to committees to die. In any other year, these games would work. Texas lawmakers could keep their liberal corporate interests happy, avoid trouble for themselves, and look decent for their conservative constituents. Not this year. 2020 changed everything. There is no such thing as business as usual. Just ask Rep. Stephanie Klick. Loudly Christian RINOs Take Discreet Phone Calls from LGBT Thugs and … ObeyStephanie Klick used to be chairwoman of the Tarrant County Republican Party. Famed for her deep Christian faith, her grandmother status, and career in nursing, she chairs the Public Health committee for the Texas House of Representatives. She has the power to give bills hearings and can decide whether to vote on them. Normally the Republican apparatchiks in Texas would place a discreet call to someone in her position and tell her to make pro-family boondoggles go away. Kill the bill with a smile. According to Texas Scorecard, Ms. Klick was up to precisely such games in this session. She was helping to bury a law banning chemical castration and other “trans” abuse of teens in Texas:
Pro-Family Texans Push BackKlick came under massive fire on Twitter. “Stephanie Klick is afraid if we speak of this abuse often ushered in by parents that trans people will be #traumatized,” posted Mass Resistance Texas. Tracy Forester tweeted, “Stephanie Klick needs to schedule these anti-child abuse bills for a hearing: HB 68, 1399, 2693, and 4014.” A reply to Forester’s tweet quickly stated that Klick was now planning on scheduling HB 1399. She announced this only on Friday, April 9, after weeks of brushing aside constituents demanding action on the pro-family agenda. The late announcement left only two working days and a weekend before the actual hearings scheduled on Wednesday, April 14. Mass Resistance Texas had to scramble to put together an informational session in Klick’s district in sixteen hours, to let her voters know what was at stake. Other tweeters pointed out that the proposal Klick chose to schedule — HB 1399 — did not match the bill being considered by State Sen. Bryan Hughes’s State Affairs Committee. The Senate bill would ban social transitioning of minors under the age of fourteen, but would leave high schoolers with no restrictions on gender transitioning. Should Texas Schools Pressure Kids into Transgender Transition?The House bill would ban puberty blocking drugs and surgery for minors under the age of eighteen, but would not ban “social transitioning.” Social transitioning is the knot of counseling pressure, demand for pronoun discipline, cross-dressing, opposite-sex identification, and social contagion that often leads young people to decide in haste that they are the opposite sex. Such social transitioning is often enforced by schools, counselors, and courts. Sen. Hughes assigned meetings to pro-family bills first, and then pressure mounted on Rep. Klick. A source on the State Republican Executive Committee stated that public campaign pressures are still necessary despite Klick’s scheduling of the haring for HB 1399. This source stated, “if the hearing takes place on April 14 but Klick’s committee does not hold a vote, then chances are, this is a smokescreen and it’s not going to the House floor for a vote.” The Texas RINO Machine Does the Bidding of Transgender ExtremistsThe SREC source said, “this is usually how bills get killed. If there’s a delay in voting in committee, the calendar committee will then claim there is not enough time for the House to vote on it.” Everything depends, it seems, on Stephanie Klick not only conducting the hearing but also calling for a committee vote and then aggressively pushing for the legislation to go through. The GOP weasels who do not want to be exposed for sinking the pro-family bill will ideally want Klick to make HB 1399 go away. That way everyone can claim he tried to oppose the LGBT agenda, but pro-LGBT donors will be satisfied. And pediatric gender transitioning will continue to grow across the state. As Tracy Shannon and Jeff Younger both point out in this teach-in, we are still not in the clear even if Klick calls for a committee vote and her committee sends the bill to the House floor. The calendar committee can simply stonewall it by not entering a time for it to be heard on the floor. If it passes the House, it must then go to the Senate, where it might be thrown back into a Senate committee. If the Senate passes it, the bill has to reach Governor Abbott’s desk. Will Abbott Sell Us Out Again?Given Governor Greg Abbott’s courtship of big business, nobody in Austin is optimistic that he will sign the bill. One insider said, “the ideal scenario for the governor is it never reaches his desk at all.” And remember – HB 1399 is merely the banning of puberty-blocking drugs or surgery on children under the age of 18. An enormous array of other interventions necessary to protect family values are not even in play at all. Nobody has introduced bills for them, despite heroic lobbying. Or committee chairs like Klick are refusing to give them hearings. Such is the fate of HB 68, introduced by Rep. Steve Toth, which would have classified pediatric sex reassignment as child abuse. That bill was lucky enough to be introduced but Klick wouldn’t even give it a hearing. A Case Study in GOP Betrayal of Pro-Family CausesHailing from the cities wedged between Fort Worth and Dallas, Klick represents House District 91. Her world is a typical battlefield for the GOP’s electoral future. One could classify District 91 as either mildly urban or exurban. When people talk about the suburban mom vote, this is it. Fifty-two percent of the district is female. Women there are about 10% more likely to be mothers than the national average. The median home value is $168,000. Trump’s America is a restless place too. Texas would be an ideal locale for grassroots revolts to primary RINOs in 2022. The per capita income sits at $30,818, which is ten percent lower than the U.S. But the average household income is $69,541, which is ten percent higher than the national average. The divergence between per capita and household income statuses reflects the social fabric of this community. Whether because of immigrant traditions (the district has higher Latino and Asian populations than the national average) or because of white Christian family values (several thoroughfares in District 91 are essentially church districts), people tend to form families and live as family units. The voters in Klick’s district are 58% white, while 26% are Latino. Only 27% of them hold college degrees. Humble but stable, hardworking, prayerful, family-focused, and struggling to attain the American dream, this is Trump’s America in its purest essence. Time to Hunt Down RINOs in the PrimariesIn 2020, Klick won re-election against her Democratic challenger by a breezy margin of 28 points. The largest city in her district, North Richland Hills, still abounds in “Back the Blue” signs and Trump flags. But Trump’s America is a restless place too. This would be an ideal locale for a grassroots revolt to primary Klick in 2022. It could be a theater for Democrats to stage a comeback with a charismatic candidate who can reconnect with his party’s working-class roots. Jeff Younger’s son is the child at the center of the “Save James” movement. Younger has been fighting his ex-wife who wants to transition their son James into a girl called Luna. He feels the battle in Texas stands in for a larger social crisis. “I think Stephanie Klick is part of the Texas establishment. Whatever her personal beliefs are, she wants to stay there,” Jeff Younger said. “Our leaders are on the verge of showing the electorate that they will allow the sexual mutilation of children … When Republican voters see that, they will absolutely understand that their leaders will not protect their children from child abuse. When the people realize that it will be the end of the Republican Party.” Currently activists like Jeff Younger are asking people to contact Texas officials and push for support of the Save James bills. They also request prayerfully that conservatives ask Texas Republicans to extend the filing deadlines of the present session so more issues can be addressed, or to hold a special session focusing on pro-family bills. See Mass Resistance’s site for more. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Will one powerful RINO keep chemical castration of teens legal in Texas? appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
The last bastion of ‘conservatism’ in SoCal, Orange County, pushes vaccine passports
Posted: 13 Apr 2021 01:33 AM PDT One of the hallmarks of freedom is travel and engagement. As Americans, we have wide access to modes of transportation and venues through which to engage on a daily basis. At least we did. When Covid-19 struck and governments around the world reacted poorly against the science, we entered a new phase of human existence. Even in America, our freedoms are being ripped away one by one. California, known for its penchant for radical leftism, has a few rural areas spread across the state that are conservative. But there has been on metro area that has maintained “moderate” status, if not mildly conservative. Orange County, between Los Angeles and San Diego counties, has been the reddest metro area in the state until recently. And while the shift towards political conservatism has begun again with Republican wins in the 2020 election, the bureaucracy is still quite blue. Case-in-point: The current push to force vaccine passports onto the residents. According to ABC7: As Orange County moves toward fewer restrictions and more openings, the OC Health Care Agency is hoping to help make it safer and give people peace of mind with a digital passport that will prove vaccination status and test results. The agency briefly made the announcement last week, saying it will launch the pilot program this month. The county says it can be used for travel, attractions, conferences or meetings, concerts, sports, school and more. The digital passport is already visible on the Othena app, which is Orange County’s official home for scheduling vaccine appointments. It’s a tool that will likely start appearing more and more through a platform called CommonPass, currently in the trial stage. It can be accessed through other apps and services, which will potentially allow people to show it to get into a concert or to get on a plane. The push for authoritarian rule is happening in various places around the country, but Orange County was supposed to be more freedom-oriented. Apparently, that’s no longer the case. And while it benefits the travel industry, some leaders are already speaking out. “It sounds good, but the bottom line, logistically – a nightmare, it’s discriminatory and many people, like I’ve had COVID, I’ve got antibodies, and my doctor tells me the chances of me getting COVID is like zero,” said U.S. Travel Association President and CEO Roger Dow. “So I think there’s many other things that people have to look at and be sure – not just vaccine, that’s not the only answer,” Dow said. “But we’re glad to see people getting the vaccine, cause it’s giving people the confidence to travel.” Orange County and other areas across the country are pushing towards vaccine passports that will allow people access to what they need, all the while saying the experimental drugs aren’t effective enough for us to even take off our masks. This is lunacy. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post The last bastion of ‘conservatism’ in SoCal, Orange County, pushes vaccine passports appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
The free world died of COVID-19
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 11:50 PM PDT As someone with a background in foreign policy and international affairs, I am often asked to discuss the ramifications of having Joe Biden as the so-called leader of the Free World. Article by Jordan Schachtel from The Dossier. While it is easy to get carried away debating the merits of a heavily compromised man being the physical representation of the Free World, and how cringeworthy and depressing that is, I can’t help but get stuck on the possibility that the term itself is no longer viable. “What Free World?” The Free World is a term that was originally used to describe the Allied powers during WWII, but it is most applicable here when discussing what united the anti-Soviet bloc to the United States during the Cold War. It was these “Western world” values of free speech, free media, the freedom of assembly, and freedom of association that united our sovereign states against the evils of Communism. COVID Mania has turned the world’s sovereign states into one tyranny after another. And the authoritarian forces of the world won this second “Cold War” against its citizens without firing a shot. Some appear to be under the impression that the ruling class, which just finished the fastest roll up of power in human history, will simply return these stolen liberties when the “national emergency” comes to an end. I’m not particularly convinced that this is the case. As John Adams once said, “But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.” In the United States, our federalist system allows for pockets of freedom in places like Florida, Texas, South Dakota and the like. But dare to protest in the Nation’s Capital today and you’ll quickly find yourself on an FBI watchlist, and almost certainly, with a future date in our nation’s kangaroo court system. We continue to see authoritarian states implementing “vaccine passports” and other discriminatory measures in the name of a virus. Throughout most population centers in the United States, there are still heavy “COVID restrictions” on society and the economy. Our nation is no longer united behind these “Free World” concepts, and they are now only considered virtuous ideas in the aforementioned pockets of freedom in America. In the rest of the country, it has been made crystal-clear that your rights do not supersede a disease with a 99.8% recovery rate. Now observe the devastation in the rest of the Anglosphere: The United Kingdom has placed its citizens under indefinite confinement. Their “COVID restrictions” have lasted well over a year, and there is no end in sight.
Canada, which has also been under a strict lockdown for over a year, has mutilated the free press while simultaneously transforming into a Chinese state colony. Under the “leadership” of Justin Trudeau, Canada has essentially outlawed freedom of movement, free speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly in the name of a virus.
New Zealand, another nation that is cozying up to Beijing, is committed to a “Zero COVID” self-siege that has blockaded the island nation from the world for over a year. Citizens who test positive for COVID-19 are forcibly sent to quarantine camps. The government has recently considered legislation punishing people for the act of acquiring COVID-19.
States in Australia have implemented some of the most intrusive lockdowns in the world. In Victoria, lockdowns meant citizens were only allowed to leave their homes for one hour a day, and they were not allowed to travel outside of a certain radius from their homes. The act of protesting is illegal, and it will be met by riot police.
As for other NATO members, and other bumper sticker labeled liberal democracies in the “Free World,” actual freedoms remain difficult to identify. Germany, France, and Italy just entered another round of rights restricting lockdowns, and countless more “Free World” nations continue chipping away at personal freedoms.
Making things all the more confusing (and eye opening), people living in countries long considered adversarial, authoritarian nations (like Russia, China, Belarus, etc) are enjoying more freedoms than your average citizen in the West. Belarus never implemented lockdowns. Russians have treated their restrictions in a very lax manner. China has been open for well over a year.
The Western values that some of us hold near and dear to our hearts are not shared by our ruling class. The Free World, as a united force, was indeed very sick for the better part of the 21st century, but it has finally died from COVID-19. The concept only lives on in our imaginations and memories. The COVID era has exposed that these values that supposedly united the West are nothing more than a facade. However, there are reasons for optimism. There are millions and millions of us who have witnessed the atrocities committed by governments over the course of the past year, and have become “red-pilled” to the threat posed by these authoritarian forces. Like-minded people can and will build a new coalition that stands behind our unalienable rights. Whether that comes in the form of an alliance of nation states or a more independent movement of citizens around the world remains to be seen. The demand for the recognition of basic human freedoms will soon become too obvious to ignore. There are many paths for a new Free World to emerge, but for now, the old Free World as a uniting force for Western values is a relic of history. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post The free world died of COVID-19 appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
The harms of lockdowns, the dangers of censorship, and a path forward
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 11:40 PM PDT Below is the video and the full transcript of Concerned Ontario Doctors’ Covid-19 Summit, April 11, 2021. It features detailed discussion of public health, Covid-19, and various lockdown policies deployed around the world. Courtesy of AIER. •Opening/Closing Address: Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill, MD, FRCPC President and Co-Founder of Concerned Ontario Doctors, Frontline Physician •Moderator: Dr. Richard Schabas, MD, MSHC, FRCPC Former Chief Medical Officer of Health for Province of Ontario, Retired Physician •Panelists: -Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PHD Professor of Medicine at Stanford University, Physician, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist -Dr. Sunetra Gupta, PHD Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology at University of Oxford -Dr. Martin Kulldorff, PHD Professor of Medicine at Harvard University, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist, Biostatistician Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Welcome. And thank you for joining us today for Concerned Ontario Doctors COVID-19 Panel. My name is Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill. I’m the president and co-founder of Concerned Ontario Doctors and a frontline physician in the greater Toronto area. I am honored to be joined by world eminent scientists and physicians today to discuss the harms of the lockdowns, the dangers of censorship and a path forward. Joining us today are three esteemed panelists who are giants in their field and who are the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which has garnered nearly one million signatures from physicians, scientists, public health experts, and concerned citizens globally. First, we have Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who is a professor of medicine at Stanford University, and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He directs Stanford’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging. Dr. Bhattacharya’s recent research focuses on the epidemiology of COVID, including the fatality of COVID infection and the effects of the lockdown policies. Before COVID, Dr. Bhattacharya studied the health and the wellbeing of the vulnerable populations with an emphasis on the role of government programs, biomedical innovation and health policy. He has published many articles in top peer reviewed scientific journals in medicine, economics, health policy, epidemiology, stats, law, and public health amongst other fields. He holds both an MD and a PhD in economics, both earned at the Stanford University. Thank you so much for joining us today. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Thank you. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: We also have on the panel, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who is an epidemiologist, a bio statistician and a professor of medicine at the Harvard Medical School. His research centers on developing and applying new disease surveillance methods for the early detection and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and for post-market drug and vaccine safety surveillance. The methods are used by most federal state and provincial public health agencies around the world and by many local public health departments and hospital epidemiologists. Thank you so much for joining us. And we have last on the panel, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, who is a professor of theoretical epidemiology at the University of Oxford with an interest in infectious disease agents that are responsible for malaria, HIV, influenza, and bacterial meningitis. Dr. Gupta has consolidated a large body of work on the evolution of pathogen population structure, which establishes a novel pipeline for developing a universal influenza vaccine. In tandem with her studies of pathogen diversity, Dr. Gupta has made fundamental contributions to the evolution of diversity in host genes that protect against infectious disease. Thank you so much for our esteemed panelists for joining us today. And moderating today is Dr. Richard Schabas, who is a retired Ontario physician with specialty training in public health and internal medicine. He was Ontario’s former chief medical officer of health for 10 years, spanning from 1987 to 1997. He actually trained our current chief public health officer here in Ontario, Dr. Williams, and many other medical officers of health. Dr. Schabas was also the former chief of staff at the York Central Hospital during SARS. He was critical of the mass quarantine during the SARS outbreak and the alarmist prediction surrounding H5N1 bird flu. He has been outspoken against the lockdown since the beginning of the COVID pandemic highlighting the tremendous harms to society. Thank you all for joining us today. And the floor is yours, Dr. Schabas. Dr. Richard Schabas: Well, thank you. And thank you, Kulvinder, for organizing this. I’m delighted to be here today. And as I mentioned before, you’ve faced efforts at censorship by our medical licensing body in Ontario. And it’s wonderful to see that you’re not being intimidated by that. One of the great casualties of COVID has been the loss of collegial constructive discussion. And that’s why I think this panel is so important. So to our distinguished guests, first of all, welcome to Canada, at least virtually. As I said, I’m delighted to be included in this. I will say that I have found the last year to be a very, from an intellectual and professional standpoint, isolating experience. I’ve had a handful of supportive colleagues, but I have felt very much cut off from the mainstream of discussion in professional and scientific world and from the media where I’ve been effectively canceled. And it’s been great whenever I have seen one of the three of you give an interview or read something you’ve written, because it tells me that I’m actually not crazy, that my idea is well. I may not be right about everything or anything. It’s not crazy and that these are legitimate perspectives. These are legitimate questions. And so I’d like to thank the panelists for their ongoing insights, for their willingness to speak out and for their courage, because I’m sure whatever animosity I have faced, you have faced orders of magnitude higher. So anyway, we have lots to talk about. We have about an hour and a half, so let’s get right to it. I’m hoping that most of the people who see this video will be familiar with the Great Barrington Declaration, which I signed way back in October, and many of us have signed, and that’s great. But wonder if we could begin just by asking the panelists to go over what they see as the fundamental principles of the Great Barrington Declaration and in particular, it’s six months later, and there have been important developments in COVID. I would particularly highlight the vaccines and the variants. So what are the principles and where does it sit at the end of March 2021? Maybe if we could start with you, Jay. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Sure. So there’s two key scientific ideas to my mind that underlie the Greater Barrington Declaration. The first is that there’s an enormous risk difference by age in mortality from COVID. The oldest population, people who are the oldest, face the highest risk by far. So just to give some sense from several prevalence studies around the world, the survival probability for someone over 70 is 95% from infection, which is, I mean, that’s a really high death rate from a disease. Whereas for people under 70, it’s much higher, 99.95%. And for children, the flu poses a greater threat than COVID. There’s this enormous age stratification in the risk of severe outcomes from COVID. The second idea, the second scientific idea is that the lockdowns themselves by causing disruptions in the normal functioning society pose great harm directly to the population. Not just in terms of economics, which I think sort of unfortunately emphasize to some extent, it’s really mainly in terms of the health and psychological wellbeing of the population at large. The lockdowns are not a human way to live. They separate people. They disrupt our ability to interact with one another in ways that are harmful to human wellbeing. So if you combine those ideas for the oldest populations, we have to do an enormous amount to protect them from COVID. So that’s the first idea of the Great Barrington Declaration, focused protection of the vulnerable, the older population. For the rest of the population, the lockdowns are more harmful than COVID. So the argument from the Great Barrington Declaration side is to lift the lockdowns and instead focus on and think about creative ways to protect the vulnerable. And we, in the Great Barrington Declaration laid out a whole bunch of ideas for how we might do that. But of course, we invited the public health community to join with us in thinking of ways to better protect the vulnerable without the lockdowns. I suppose we’ll talk a lot about how the lockdowns have failed. So I’ll leave that aside for now, but I’ll just say that the vaccines provide a perfect way to, I mean, a great way to protect the vulnerable. By prioritizing older people for the vaccines, you effectively defang the epidemic, take away the possibility of the epidemic harming the people that it’s most likely to affect by effectively vaccinating them first. Dr. Richard Schabas: Thank you. Sunetra, would you like to add to that? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: So indeed. So Jay’s laid out the basic precepts and vaccination indeed actually allows us to get away from the argument. Actually, it might be useful at this stage to revisit the arguments that were raised at the time, and to see how well they’ve weathered or what has happened in the last six months with regard to the arguments that were raised against this idea. One was that there may be no immunity at all to SARS-CoV-2. I was positive it was premature to pursue that. Now I would argue that anything is possible. But in terms of likelihood of there being acquired immunity, first of all, there were already studies, very, very elegant and very well conducted studies around showing that you made the type, an array of responses, antibody, and T cell that you would expect of COVID, of coronavirus. I mean, the truth is we weren’t completely in the dark about this virus. We had ample knowledge of what other coronaviruses did by way of eliciting a natural immunity. So six months down the line later, I think we can say now with confidence that that was not a very good way to attack the idea. I mean, why you’d want to attack it in the first place is another whole story. Then the second line of attack, which was a little bit more reasonable, was that natural immunity was unlikely to be lifelong as it is the measles. And that actually was sensible reasonable hypothesis in that that is true of many of the other coronaviruses. But what was wrong there in the thinking was that because natural immunity was not lifelong, we would never get to a kind state of endemic equilibrium whereby herd immunity reduce the risk of infection to tolerable levels in the population. Now, once again, with reference to other coronaviruses, that is exactly what happens that you reach a state, an endemic state in which sufficient numbers of people are immune to keep infection levels at something we can manage. And that is bound to be true for SARS-CoV-2 because while we do not become immune forever, in the sense of we don’t develop lifelong infection blocking immunity, you can maintain herd immunity. In fact, it’s maintained exactly the same level for any other pathogen with the same or not through a slightly different mechanism, whereby immunity is lost, but regained. So you just have this much more dynamical flow, but actually the levels of immunity that you achieve in that way are identical to a system where immunity is lifelong. So loss of immunity does not actually impact on the proposition that our destination is one of endemic equilibrium, and that’s a fundamental epidemiological fallacy that I’m surprised that many people made. And the third point criticism was that you cannot deliver focused protection. As Dr. Bhattacharya just said that it’s unfortunate that this was just treated as dogma because what we wanted at the very least was just a conversation with other public health practitioners. But anyway, that debate was never had, which is sad. But the truth is the vaccine now provides us a way of shelving that debate. Although perhaps we should keep it somewhere and shouldn’t shelve it too far back because it might come up again if we are to have a robust strategy for how we deal with these situations. But so delivering focused protection has got a whole lot easier. And as far as I’m concerned, we in the UK have just done that. We’ve got there. Mission accomplished on that one. So what is a mystery is why we are now not opening up. Dr. Richard Schabas: Martin. Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Yeah. So there has been a very naive belief from one politician, journalists and some scientists that somehow we can suppress this disease with lockdowns and contact tracing and so on and protect the old and vulnerable that way. And as soon as we had the outbreaks a year ago in Italy and Iran, it was very clear this pandemic would be a worldwide. And once it’s in the country, that is an impossible thing to do. And we saw that there were those who believe that when their cases went down in the summer, but that was because of successful lockdown measures. And that’s why in October, we decided to write this declaration because we knew that things were going to come back this coming winter. We didn’t know exactly to the extent of it, but we knew it was going to come back. And at the time we were criticized for doing a straw man, because nobody wanted lockdowns, but it only took a few weeks when people were starting to argue for lockdowns again. And the problem is there are two bad ways to deal with the pandemic, and there’s one good way to do it. But one bad way is to let it rip and not do anything and just let everybody get infected, old and young and so on. And if you do that, a lot of old will be affected. And since they are high risk of dying from this disease, a lot of people will have high mortality and everybody can get infected. So it’s not the difference in risk of getting infected, it’s the difference risk of dying or having a serious hospitalization. So, let it rip is a very bad strategy, but lockdown is also very best strategy because it just sort of slows things down. And there are some arguments of doing that in the very beginning to not overwhelm the hospital systems where everybody doesn’t get sick at the same time, but to do it for a long period of time is very misguided and actually increases the deaths from COVID. Because the more you drag it out, the more difficult it is for all the people to protect themselves. So basically locked down is let it rip strategy that’s dragged out a little bit more over time. So if we look at basic principles of public health and all the pandemic preparedness plans that most countries had done before the pandemic, it is to protect the most vulnerable, the high-risk risk people. And in this case is the older people. So that’s what the Great Barrington Declaration put forward. We have to do a much, much better job protecting older people because of lockdowns do not protect them at all. And we have seen that. We have enormous mortality from this pandemic that because lockdown is a very bad strategy. And there are standard ways to protect older people. For example, in nursing homes, you should have less staff rotation and more testing of the personnel, etc. So your standard ways that we outlined the declaration itself or in the FAQ that goes with it, that should have been implemented and that weren’t implemented and that has led to tragic results with far too many people dying from this disease then had to be the case. And then of course, for the younger people, they are not at high risk of COVID. As Jay said, for children, the risk is less than from dying from influenza and we don’t close schools for influenza and so on. So we have done the misguided things or trying to protect people who don’t need protection. We’re not protecting the ones who do need protection. Children and young adults, they have suffered a lot of the collateral damage from this, from these lockdowns, with school closings and plummeting vaccination rates, cancer screenings not being done, worse cardiovascular disease outcomes, people not getting their diabetes treatments, more overdoses, opioid overdoses, and deteriorating mental health. So this has been an absolutely catastrophic public health disaster and fiasco of how we have responded to this pandemic. And I hope it will never ever be done again. And we need to now end the lockdowns. And what’s happening now is we had the new surge in the winter. So we have a lot more immunity now. So the reason that things are going down is mostly now because we have immunity in large sections of the population, which has helped by more and more people getting vaccinated also. And eventually as we’d all a bit further, the seasonal pattern is going to kick in, so that will also help us to lower the, the mortality during the spring and the summer. Dr. Richard Schabas: Well, thank you. And just to give that a little bit of a Canadian perspective, in the province of Ontario, for example, in the outbreak last spring, about 75% of all the deaths in the province were in longterm care residents. In the outbreak in the winter, that was down to about 50%. So there wasn’t far from perfect, but the measures were somewhat effective. And we, of course, I think quite reasonably immunized long-term care residents as a priority. And when I looked at the numbers yesterday, we’re still getting an average of 24 deaths a day in the province of Ontario. There were no deaths in long-term care. So yeah, and the reported case fatality rate in the province, which you could estimate from the general numbers, was running about 2% at the peak of the winter break, the middle of January, it’s now running at about 1%. So you take away the 50% of the deaths in long-term care, which we appear to have done, and that’s the result you get. On the other hand, Canada in general has had relatively low rates of infection and certainly low rate of death compared, for example, to the United States and compared to Western Europe. I’m not quite sure why we can talk and speculate about that. I’m a little loathed to attributed to our lockdown measures because they really haven’t been very different than anywhere else. In fact, maybe even a little less severe than in many places, and we’ve had a huge variation within the country. So we’ve had much higher rates in the province of Quebec, particularly the Island of Montreal, which are at Western European levels, and lower rates in Ontario, about half the rate in Ontario, and half again or less in British Columbia without any real indication that anybody has done anything particularly different. But the result of that is that we probably have fairly low levels of natural immunity in Canada. And we’re starting to see the kind of uptick in cases that is being seen in a lot of other places in the world now, which presumably is due to the spread of what the next thing I want you to talk about, which is the impact of the variants. What do you think the impact of the variants is and how does that change or does it change the Great Barrington perspective? Can I start again with you, Jay? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Sure. So the variants, actually might want to tap Dr. Gupta because she is the world’s expert in this. But just to give you my view, much of which I’ve learned from her, the variants are sort of what you would expect when the disease has reached a sort of endemic equilibrium, close to an endemic equilibrium, the variants, this disease mutates all the time. There’s tens of thousands of more variants and most of them do nothing to the infectivity of the disease or lethality of the disease. The variants that have emerged, the empirical evidence that I’ve read to date suggest that they may be slightly more infectious than the wild type variant, the wild-type virus. But and very, very mildly, more lethal with a very small, but with no change in the fundamental thing, which is the age grading and more lethality. Both the variants and the wild-type both share that same thing, which is that it’s much more deadly in the old than in the young. The other key feature for policy for the variant is that infection with the wild-type variant virus, and also vaccination seems to provide protection against serious outcomes from the variants. That is while you might get reinfected with the variants, it’s possible, so just like you might get reinfected with the wild-type. When you’re reinfected, the outcome is very likely to be milder than the initial infection and certainly much less likely to produce a death or hospitalization. So in that sense, the variants don’t change the policy calculus at all. The lockdowns, if you thought that the lockdowns were going to be effective against the less infectious wild-type virus, I don’t see why you would expect it to be more effective against a more infectious variant. So I think the use of the variant to raise fear in the population is just a mistake, both from the scientific perspective and the public health perspective. The variants are not cause for renewing the lockdown or shut because what’s the end point again. The end point is not the elimination of a virus that’s even more infectious. And the lockdowns, if we continue to do them will continue to wreak enormous harm on society. The right strategy is still focused protection. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra. Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Yes, indeed. I don’t think it materially alters anything, any of the recommendations that were made at all. I suppose it’s not as if we, I mean, we would alter recommendation. We’re not sticking necessarily to a set of recommendations, but the general principle that you protect the vulnerable and that’s really all you need to do remains under what Jay just described, which is exactly as I believe is the right interpretation of the situation. Which is that within any kind of standard evolutionary theory, any model would indicate that the likelihood is that these variants, and I mean, it’s interesting that the same mutations have cropped up in different parts of the world. So here’s a pathogen population that is trying to optimize its ability to infect people, optimize its virulence, which doesn’t mean that it becomes more or less virulent, but just finds just the right level that allows it to compete successfully against other variants. So the prevailing, the main principle here is that these systems evolve towards a state in which the optimal variant dominates and the optimal variant is one which may be slightly more transmittable, but there is no reason to believe that it is hugely more transmittable. The reason why people are coming up with these ideas goes back to something you said, which is the level of herd immunity. So when there is no herd immunity, the lower the level of previous exposure, the bigger the pool of susceptible individuals the pathogen population has to play with. And so the lower, so it faces less competition in a totally susceptible population. As people become immune, the pool available of resources available to the pathogen becomes smaller and smaller at which point the competition intensifies. And this is probably what’s happened leading in many parts of the world to the emergence of variants, which are remarkably similar in lots of ways and likely to be at least a little bit more transmittable, but crucially having the same age distribution of risk. The other thing they might be, they are very likely to be, is it to have to possess is some level of immunization. So there have been very nice studies showing that the South African variant, for example, is not neutralized to the same extent as the wild-type by people who’ve previously been exposed to the wild type. But that doesn’t mean that the vaccines won’t work against them, or indeed the natural immunity to the previous variant won’t protect you against severe disease. So what all of this does is it refocuses our attention or it underscores the fact that we need to separate out the process of infection and the observations relating to that, that infections are growing, with the process of severe disease and death, because that’s what we want to prevent. Severe disease and death, because that’s what we want to prevent. So if we start reacting every time we see infections grow, if we start imposing restrictions to stop infection in attempt to stop disease and death, then we’re always going to end up in a muddle. What we need to do is be very clear that what we want to stop is disease and death. And it’s a very naive attitude to assume that the only way to do that is by curbing infection. And so we need to get that right in our heads. If we decouple those and the variant situation kind of highlights or, as I said, underscores the need to do that. Then I think we’ll be in a better position to prevent the deaths from this virus. Dr. Richard Schabas: Okay, Martin. Dr. Martin Kulldorff: The only one small thing I have to add is that the key thing, with this variance, if right now they have the same age distribution in that anybody can be infected, but the risk for mortality for death is still the same, much higher for the old versus the young. And the only type of variant that will sort of change that is if suddenly we get a variant that starting killing the young people instead of the old. Then we have to fundamentally change the strategy, but that’s not the case. All these variants still have a situation where they are much more dangerous for the old and not at all dangerous for the young and therefore the focus protection of all the high risk people is still the right strategy. Dr. Richard Schabas: Thank you. And just again, a couple of comments. I want to come back to something Jay said, it’s kind of a pet peeve of mine, but I react negatively to the general use of the word mutation to describe what’s going on. As Jay said, this virus mutates all the time. In fact, all living organisms, including all of us are sitting here, merrily mutating away like mad. This is not about mutation. It’s about evolution and the virus is evolving and more or less in the way that we would expect the virus to evolve. And I think Sunetra’s point about it’s a reflection of the fact that it’s feeling evolutionary pressure, which is coming from population immunity. So not to be unexpected. I should also comment that a couple of days ago the provincial health officer in British Columbia, Bonnie Henry, who, I’m not going to say she’s been more sensible than the others, but has been less unsensible perhaps than some of the others, made a comment that she was concerned about the increase in cases with the variants, because they were happening mainly in young people. And I just found that a complete head-scratcher, maybe she would have been happier if we were seeing more cases in the elderly who are going to die rather than the young, who, as we know, are by and large going to brush this off. So, anyway, moving on to a related subject, I think it was Martin who suggested a few minutes ago that we’ve never controlled respiratory viruses in this manner before. They can show a few pictures of people in 1918 wearing masks, and they shut the schools in some places in the United States for a couple of weeks in 1957, but lockdown as a strategy to control a respiratory virus is something we’ve never done before. It was never part of our pandemic planning. And if we reflect back to about a year ago, we went in the matter of a couple of weeks from being fairly relaxed about COVID, I’d say in hindsight, probably too relaxed about COVID, certainly I was, to a state of absolute panic, which is when we started instituting lockdowns based on the fact that China locked down and then Italy locked down. So it must be the thing to do. And there were some compelling internet memes that encouraged people to think that lockdown was going to be effective. And then in kind of a pandemic of its own and matter of a couple of weeks, just about everybody rushed and locked down, including Canada. And I think there is, as we know, the evidentiary basis for this was very, very thin on the ground, but we’ve had experience with it for a year. And without dwelling at the moment, we can come back to it on the harms of lockdown. There is still a general perception, I think, out there in the world, that number one, we are faced with this sort of microbiological apocalypse that the models predicted a year ago with tens of millions of dead. Even though I think very clearly that was a gross exaggeration, but there’s still a widespread perception that lockdowns are doing the job of preventing it. They’re doing the job of controlling the infection. And in Canada, we’ve gone through a whole series of places that were supposed to be the model for us. Back in the spring, the models were supposed to be Germany that was controlling the disease with contact tracing and the Czech Republic, which was controlling the disease by wearing masks. And then we were supposed to follow the lead of Michigan with their lockdown. And then we were told no, no, France is the place that’s controlled things with lockdowns. So my question is for our audience, do lockdowns actually play … are they really effective at controlling the spread of the disease? And if so, how effective are they and what sort of the long-term, if any, advantage of lockdown down in terms of disease control? Who’d like to jump in on that? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: I can start. So a year ago, when we started with the lockdown, that was a huge experiment for which there was no precedent and no studies. So it was a huge experiment. So there was no evidence that they would work. Now a year later, we do have the evidence and the evidence is that they do not work. They can sort of push things forward a little bit, but with the pandemic, it can never be kept out. So, this belief that they would work, that the lockdowns and a masks and contact tracing would work, that has created this big disaster. And a lot of people have died because of it, because it didn’t protect the old. We didn’t put in the measures to protect the old. And even before vaccines, there were many measures that we could have put in that was never used at the same time as we’re getting this collateral damage on public health that we’re going to live with and die with for many years to come. Dr. Richard Schabas: Okay. Anyone else? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: The other thing, and this I’ve learned from Dr. Kulldorff. So I’m stealing directly from him, but he’s here. So he can take credit. Lockdowns are focus protection of the rich. That’s the way to think about them. They’re a form of trickle down epidemiology. If they protected anybody, they protected the rich. And you can see this in the evidence from Toronto, that rich neighborhoods of Toronto have been relatively hit less than the poor neighbors of Toronto. If you think about what lockdowns actually do, it’s not universal. People still need to have food delivered, grown. People still need to have all kinds of services provided, but who can afford to stay at home and have all those services provided for them. It’s the relatively well off. Whereas, the working class has been exposed to the virus. Exposed and so you see this in places where there is a lockdown, you see this gross inequality in outcomes where it’s the poor and working class that have borne the brunt of the disease and borne the epidemiological sort of the cost for achieving herd immunity in some sense. In LA County, in California, where I live in California, we’ve been locked down essentially for a full year with the schools closed, churches closed, businesses at half capacity or less through much of the epidemic. And in LA County, the death rates are three times higher for Hispanics than for whites. And for people living in places like Beverly Hills, high income neighborhoods versus people living in poor neighborhoods. Again, the death rates three times higher from the disease in the poor neighborhoods, whereas in Florida, for instance, which has not been locked down for most of the epidemic, the results are much more equal. And in terms of the level, actually, Florida has achieved better results in terms of COVID mortality than California after you adjust for the older population there. The lockdowns have not worked. And in many ways it’s the most regressive economic and public health policy I have ever seen in my lifetime. Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Yeah. Thinking of the United States, I think the lockdowns is the worst assault on workers and the working class since segregation on the Vietnam war. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Sunetra do you want to weigh in on this? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Yes. Well, I’m going to quote myself. Some time ago I found myself saying lockdowns are a luxury of the affluent. And I was essentially echoing all the things that have been already said by Martin and Jay, but also thinking very much of other countries where lockdowns are simply not an option. So I guess my bottom line is I don’t even care whether they work or not. I do, of course, but even if there was now very good proof that they worked and we should actually qualify that word worked. What does worked mean? Suppressing infection. Okay. So what if they suppress infection? I mean, again, actually go back and drill down to that a bit further. What are lockdowns for? Lockdowns could either keep the infection in, which is what they used to do in medieval times during the plague is okay, the villagers would agree we’re not going to let anyone out. And that was a noble use of lockdown. And you could argue that, that’s what Wuhan, actually, that was their purpose, at least declared purpose at the time. And indeed even Bergamo. It was all about keeping it in, which one can understand as a strategy, even if it’s not realistic. Then of course there are countries who have used lockdown to keep it out. And you could argue there’ve been successful, New Zealand, in certain circumstances you can keep it out. It’s an entirely selfish strategy, but it can work. But we’re talking about lockdown suppressing infection, and you have to ask, even if it does work, first of all, to what end. And I guess the only answer to that, that might be reasonable is, until we get a vaccine, but that’s a big gamble. That’s a debate that needs to be had. But then the real issue is even if they do work, can we afford them? And the answer I think is no, not in the UK, maybe there are some very rich, very affluent countries where the wealth is distributed evenly, who have money in the bank. Maybe Norway can say, well, we’ll stay in lockdown until we have a vaccine. But as such, I don’t think lockdowns are an option. They’re only an option for the affluent within most settings. And for most countries, they’re simply not an option at all. And the sad truth is that in focus protection is not an option for many countries on this planet. And we should be aware of that when we think about this problem. Dr. Richard Schabas: So those are all great points. Certainly one of the criticisms I’ve had from the lockdowns from the beginning. And I think Sunetra’s really touched on this is it’s never really been clear what the lockdowns were trying to accomplish. I think when Canada went into lockdown in the latter part of March almost exactly a year ago, nobody was quite sure why. There was an atmosphere of panic, but I think the prevailing perception was we were doing this so we could get our healthcare system in order so we did not face the problems that they had in Northern Italy. Now, there were all kinds of reasons why Bergamo and Northern Italy had the problems they had, and there were lessons to be learned and they were learned very quickly. And it was pretty obvious by, within a two or three weeks that our healthcare system was actually empty. It wasn’t being overwhelmed by COVID, but the goals and objectives of lockdown, which had never [inaudible 00:42:36] had never been clearly stated here, or I don’t think anywhere else sort of morphed. There was this sense of mission creep and it then went, well, we’re going to do this because we’re going to prevent deaths. And of course, it didn’t work terribly well with that, but by the fall, it had morphed even further. And it continues to morph into now we’re going to prevent cases. We’re going to not zero COVID or very little COVID or stop the waves of some people have called it in Canada. So the objectives of lockdown keep changing. And there’s a great public health, Dr. Yogi Berra, who once said, “If you don’t know where you’re going, you won’t know when you get there.” And we certainly don’t know when we’re getting there in terms of lockdowns. So underlying, the principle of lockdown is another hugely controversial area. And I think an area of significant scientific uncertainty with regard to COVID, and that is the issue of asymptomatic and presymptomatic transmission. And so much of the rationale for the lockdown measures is based on the presumption that these are important engines of transmission that we can’t simply avoid the symptomatic people. We can’t use what would be more typical means of controlling the disease because of the importance of asymptomatic and presymptomatic transmission, which I think undoubtedly happened. But that’s not really the point. The point is how important are they in the overall transmission of the virus? Would any of you like to weigh in on that? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Sure. There was a fantastic study published in the Journal of American Medical Association earlier this year, that was essentially a meta analysis of transmission within a household setting. Your kid gets the disease or your wife gets the disease. What’s the likelihood that the infection then spreads to other members of the household. So it’s a kind of a controlled setting. Generally with no social distancing, no mask, nothing like that. And it was a large meta analysis of, I think like 54, some studies. They compared presymptomatic and asymptomatic transmission on the one hand versus symptomatic transmission on the other hand. And what they found was that if you have a household member who is asymptomatic or presymptomatic, the disease is spread to other household members in seven out of 1000 cases, seven out of 1000, versus if you have a symptomatic patient, the disease is spread in 200 out of a thousand cases on that order. The likelihood of transmission, asymptomatic transmission relative to symptomatic transmission is orders of magnitude lower. It, as you say, it can happen, but it is not the primary mech … It primarily is very unlikely to happen. Any given interaction between a asymptomatic individual and a immune naive individual is much, much, much less likely to result in a transmission then a interaction between a asymptomatic individual and another individual. So if that’s the case then, I mean, in household settings, it seems like it’s going to be much more likely even more so in outside settings, because in outside settings, people are social distancing. Even in places that don’t mandate it, you’ve seen social distancing. This spreads by droplets. It spreads by aerosol, but aerosolization events are more likely for someone that’s symptomatic. Infected droplets are more likely to someone that’s symptomatic. So I think both from a sort of physiological point of view, as well as the sort of the evidence on the ground, asymptomatic spread can happen, but should not be the primary driver for our thinking about how to control this disease. Dr. Richard Schabas: Anyone else? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Well, for people who Are aiming for a zero COVID of course, whether it’s asymptomatic or symptomatic, transmission matters, but zero COVID is impossible. So the question is, what strategies do we use? And it doesn’t really matter whether there’s the matter of asymptomatic versus symptomatic spread in either case focus protection is the right approach where we protect those who are at high risk for mortality. And to try to prevent it from spreading among asymptomatic people who have no symptoms or anything is not useful for public health, is more likely to be as harmful. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra. Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Yeah. So I would say overall, and one of the, I think, strengths of the solution of focus protection is that some of these questions, I mean, it’s robust to the answer that we might have obtained with regard to what we should actually do. But in terms of public health recommendations, obviously this shows the importance of staying at home when you’re sick, how much more important that is to altering the course of the disease or whatever it is that you’re again, trying to actually do. If you want to stop it from spreading, or if you want to stop it from spreading to somebody in particular, vulnerable person, for example, it’s particularly important to, for a symptomatic person not to engage in activities that would promote that. So I think what it does is it just shifts your perspective from what would you focus on in terms of preventing the spread in situations where you need to prevent the spread? Now, overall, I would say we don’t really need to prevent the spread. We need to protect the vulnerable while spread is naturally occurring. So in some ways it’s not a very critical question in terms of how we protect the vulnerable, but I think it obviously has other epidemiological relevances and which we’ve already talked about. Dr. Richard Schabas: Yeah, it certainly is important for the issue of quarantine. We call that self isolation now. Isolation, of course, is what you do to cases, not what you do to contacts, but we call it self isolation, but it’s really quarantine. And it’s been very widely applied around the world for contacts, for travelers, for whatever. And of course, it’s based on the notion, presumably, that you are some risk to others when you are asymptomatic. It’s, I’m sure, been immensely inefficient. I haven’t seen any good data on the proportion of different kinds of contacts who ended up eventually developing the disease. But one of the knocks on quarantine of course, is that it’s immensely, immensely inefficient. And in fact, if presymptomatic and asymptomatic spreader are not a major feature, they’re not a major risk, then it’s also in fact, entirely unnecessary. What you should do is observe people and if they become symptomatic, then you should isolate them. There’s a very good reason why successful respiratory viruses make us cough and sneeze. It’s not because they want to make us miserable. It’s because that’s how they spread efficiently, I think. Well, coming back to something I alluded to a few minutes ago, which is the models. One of the points that I made with SARS some 18 years ago, and at the time was that we spent all of our time worrying about what SARS might do, rather than actually looking at what it was doing. And with the first SARS, we missed the boat entirely because it, in fact, was not a highly infectious disease and it was only spread and people who were critically ill and primarily in hospitals, and the minute we started taking proper care of people in hospitals and proper infection control, SARS essentially disappeared. And in spite of the fact that there were models at the time that were predicting 120 million deaths from SARS, we ended up with, I think about 800. But models in fact have played a huge role in our response to COVID. And for reasons that I still scratch my head, because a model is like the guy who predicts the football game or pick stocks. And when they start getting the answers right, you start paying attention to them, but they have to get a few right before you pay attention to them. And when they’re always wrong, after a while, you just tune out and go somewhere else, but they have taken on a role of their own. So I wonder if maybe you could reflect on why you think we have become so enamored with the models and why you think so many of the models have been so consistently wrong. Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Should I start? Dr. Richard Schabas: Please, please. Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Okay. Well, I think, and I’ve been trying to quietly say this and I actually kind of gave up after a bit, for the last 20 years or more, that models are fantastic conceptual tools, almost all of my thinking for this pandemic and everything else that I’ve done in my career has been by models, mathematical models. And they give wonderful insights. For example, actually the fact that the rapid loss of immunity doesn’t actually impact on the maintenance of herd immunity. It’s something that I would certainly have found hard to understand without the aid of a model. I’ve used a mathematical model to generate a flu vaccine. So I have huge trust and faith in models, not just in advancing conceptual understanding, but in the ability of these concepts to be translated directly into public health outcomes. So what is my problem with predictive models? Predictive models require us to make assumptions about the parameters and the processes within the models, but particularly let’s dwell on the parameters, which are very difficult to nail. So the reason, I mean, there was no difference between Neil Ferguson’s model really. It was big, large computer simulation and a paper that we put on Med Archive around the same time last year about this time, which the difference was that our conceptual model just gave you an idea of what the various extreme, I mean, what the scenarios were that were compatible with the data that we had and pointed to what data needed to be collected in order to discriminate between the different possibilities. What the other form, predictive modeling, does by contrast, is you take a model, often a complicated one, and you try and use statistical methods to fit it to such data as are available at that time. And that means you come up with your best guess and each time what you’re doing is making some sort of guess, which you use statistical methods to try and dignify, but at the end of the day, they’re not very accurate. They’re not very reliable by [inaudible 00:55:07] because they rely on inaccurate measurement really, an inaccurate guess even a basic one at what the parameter is. And often the outcome is so sensitive to that parameter, for example, how many people are going to die when they’re infected, that it just becomes a nonsensical exercise. And then you end up doing things to the model that should never be done. So you make an assumption about how much transmissibility will be reduced by closing schools. And then you run the model and you say, this how much infections will drop, because you’ve made an assumption that transmissibility will be altered by closing schools. So, I mean, at that point, it just becomes not a very useful tool, should we say? And I think that’s … But as I started to see 20, 25 years ago, there was this problem, which is that there’s a seduction to numbers and equations, or they can frighten people. They intimidate people. So once you see some equations and graphs, it’s very easy to believe that this is the truth. And I think that it’s our responsibility as modelers to make sure that people are aware that that’s not the truth. That is a projection. And of course you can make an educated guess or have your favorite projection or say, this is what I think is going to happen, but it is unfortunate that those projections and predictions have in some ways taken the place of mathematical modeling. Dr. Richard Schabas: [crosstalk 00:57:10] I apologize … Sorry, go ahead, Martin. Dr. Martin Kulldorff: I agree with that wholeheartedly. And just as an example, if we take the Imperial college model that Neil Ferguson has worked on, they assume that the infection fatality ratio would be, I think, it was around 1%. So that’s the percent of people who are getting infected that will actually die. That was one of the input parameters. And at the time it was not known what that infection fatality was. So that was one plausible thing, but it could be something else. So they developed this very fancy, computational simulation models to then get out how many people would die. But I could have done this with that 1%, and then a few other assumptions that were made, I could have made the same conclusions from some hand calculations. … You could have made the same conclusions from some hand calculation on the back of an envelope. But because it’s sort of a complex sophisticated system that becomes like a black box, then people have more confidence in it. As me, as somebody who worked a lot with models, I have less confidence in it in that case. Now if instead you have assumed the 2% effect, so the 1% affects your federal arrangement that the estimate for the US was I thinking about 2 million deaths. And if we, instead of putting 2%, they would have been twice that approximately, so 4 million deaths. But if we put in a chance of a percent it would be much less. So these system is very, very, as Dr. Gupta said, it’s very, very dependent on the input parameters that we don’t really know. And that makes these complex sophisticated computer models useless for public health purposes. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Can I address that for just very briefly just to give a sense of the, I mean I completely agree with both of my colleagues. I mean I think they can be useful in helping you think about things, trade-offs, but they should not be used as gospel truth because they rely on so many assumptions. But what I want to address is things that we end up missing because we’re beguiled by the complexity of the model we have, because the reality is much more complex than any model we can ever devised. And just let me give you a concrete manifestation of that in the context of lockdown. So in the United States the hospitals are staffed by people that are in the labor force, that you’d expect. When schools got closed in the United States a large number of women stopped working to care for their kids at home and oversee the instruction for online instruction, they withdrew from the labor force. At this point actually, the female labor force supply in the United States is at the lowest level it’s been since, in 40 years. That had a knock on effect of making staffing at hospitals more difficult. And it actually made the likelihood of hospitals being overrun by COVID patients or other patients more likely, because it reduced the staffing levels of hospitals. I didn’t see that in any of the models, because no one had thought about the knock on effects of the lockdowns of closing schools on the labor force supply. It’s not in the Ferguson model, it’s not in any of these models that we see on the internet but it’s a fact that has happened in the real world. If you act on models without a broader wisdom about how these interventions will play out in the world, you’re going to get these sort of unintended consequences that make the goals you’re trying to achieve, whatever they are, more difficult as well as causing all kinds of other harm. Dr. Richard Schabas: Okay, thank you. And Sunetra, I apologize. I wasn’t dissing models and modelers, I was simply- Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Of course not, no. Dr. Richard Schabas: Reflecting on the role they’re playing in public policy, and I think we all agree that they should not be the drivers of public policy that they have so uncritically become. So let me pivot and turn to another issue, and I don’t know if anybody wants to talk about this, but I want to talk a little bit about masks. I was struck when you did your interview with Unheard when you announced the great [inaudible 01:01:43] declaration that the three of you were sitting side by side at a table, and none of you were wearing masks. And I wondered if that was a statement or whether it just never occurred to anybody that that was the politically correct thing to do. But just as lockdowns kind of swept the globe in a matter of a couple of weeks, we went from being generally very skeptical about the public use of masks in casual social situations, based on I think many years of experience, and a not inconsiderable body of evidence. And then in the course of about a month, in April and into May of last year, the world pivoted 180 degrees and became very enthusiastic about mask use, and masks have become kind of the emblem of COVID control. And people I think sometimes wear them as much to show where their minds are at and whose side they’re on as opposed to just to prevent disease. But what are your feelings about masks? Do you think masks play a role in COVID control? What do you think that role is? What do you think about mandatory mask laws? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Well one concern is that with the public health messages that had been sent out that masks are critical. And even the former CDC Director of the US claimed that masks were more important than vaccines, which is of course nonsense. But that means that a lot of older people think that as long as everybody wears masks they are protected being outside, going to the supermarket and so on. And the concern there is that because they think they are protected when they are not, they need to physically distance to protect themselves, they will take risks that they probably shouldn’t have taken. So that’s the concern that if you make people think that these masks are going to protect you but they don’t, that’s a problem with older people who need to be protected. Dr. Richard Schabas: Jay or Sunetra, do you want to weigh in on this delicate subject? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: I mean I agree with Martin obviously on that, but what it points to is a failure in public health messaging around masks. I think with any intervention we should think about both the costs and the benefits, and try to think broadly about what the effects are likely to be. So my problem with the masks, I mean I don’t think that they’re useless. I mean I think like in hospital settings they’re quite useful. In crowded situations where it’s very difficult to social distance they might be useful. The empirical evidence in my reading is very, very weak on the subject, so I don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other in that sense because it’s just hard to evaluate. So I don’t, I’m puzzled by the latching onto it as if it were a strong thing. I mean like as Martin said, the idea that the CDC Director would say that they’re more effective than vaccines just still boggles my mind. I think that what’s the other problem with masks, at least the messaging around them, is that it’s created this moralization of behavior that I think public health should seek to avoid. You know, if I wear a mask I’m a good person, if I don’t wear a mask I’m a bad person. I think that that has created social division where public health should seek to create unity in. In a sense it’s a cousin of how we’ve moralized, public health messaging has moralized COVID. The first question someone asks when someone gets COVID is, well who gave it to you? Where’d you get it from? Why weren’t you protecting yourself? We’ve stigmatized COVID as if it were, you’re now a pariah because you had it. Again, a failure of public health. I think that the major problem in public health messaging it’s, every single pathology you could imagine in public health messaging has happened with COVID, and masks are just sort of the tip of the spear of this. Where we’ve created something that could be useful in some settings if we were to convey the information properly and treat the public like adults and say, here’s where the evidence is wrong, here’s where the evidence is weak. Instead we’ve turned this into this moral thing you can do to signal virtue about yourself. I think that was just an enormous mistake. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Yes, I mean once again it’s all down to the framework of cost and benefit. I mean I have largely been indifferent to masks because you think there is very little cost mostly, so in which case it should be up to the individual. But the truth is, as my colleagues have just outlined, that that’s not correct, there are some costs. First of all, the idea of masking children, I think it is to me, makes me feel slightly sick. Because I just think that masking individuals, I mean it must have some quite serious mental health consequences. The idea of putting a mask on a child is really problematic for me. Masks of course create the illusion of protection, which can be difficult and dangerous actually, as has been mentioned. And also masks have been used to buttress the idea that all of this prevention of infection is a communitarian activity, which is problematic because it’s not actually. The lockdowns and all these measures are in fact at some level, highly individualistic and people should at least be aware of that. I mean to believe that you’re performing or participating in something that’s communitarian, when in fact you are individualistically protecting your own affluent community, is to me a bit of a problem. So as such while masks may seem to have no cost, and where they don’t I think they could and should be used if it in fact gives the wearer a sense of security. Or maybe if you’re visiting a vulnerable person, why not take that extra precaution just in case. So I think it shouldn’t be taken for granted that there are no costs associated with this intervention. Dr. Richard Schabas: You know just reflect on that as a public health doctor, in public health we often make recommendations to the public that are in contrast to medical type interventions. They seem sort of small, they exercise more or eat more fruits and vegetables. It’s not like cutting off someone’s leg or putting them on a toxic drug. And we tend to be a little casual about them. And the strategy is if you can make a small change in the lives of lots of people you can actually have a significant, beneficial public health impact. But the flip side applies too. I mean masks are not without their harms. They are an imposition on the lives of people, they’re uncomfortable, they reduce our social interactions, I think spread fear among children. And although you may say, well that’s a pretty small harm, when you multiply that across billions of people the cumulative harm is not so small. And particularly since it’s not clear what the end point is going to be. Again, it’s like with every aspect of lockdown, it’s not clear to me, once we start wearing masks, it’s not clear when we stop. Because if we wait until there’s no more COVID then people are going to be wearing masks, or at least some people are going to be wearing masks for a very long time, and I think we pay a price for that. Turning to public health messaging, one of the things that has shocked me from very early on has been public health willingness to resort to fear as a legitimate tool to promote public health policy. And I know I’ve heard Martin and Jay both speak on this and how this is contrary, and I completely agree, contrary to the basic principles of public health, which are much more about giving people common and objective information to assist them in making rational decisions. But fear has become a big element. I think there are many, many people who are deeply fearful, often irrationally and unrealistically fearful of COVID. I want to know if you agree with those statements and if maybe you can talk about how we can move forward, because people who are fearful don’t make rational decisions. So who’d like to weigh in there? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: I can take a stab at this. I mean I think it helps to try to understand why it’s a bad idea to induce fear as a public health strategy. I think there’s lots of reasons, but for one and you said [inaudible 01:11:29] completely needed. It’s very difficult to unring the bell once you’ve triggered fear as a response to assuage someone. To tell people really here’s what the data actually saying is not enough because they won’t believe you. People’s fear takes over, their willingness to listen, and it creates this division that lasts. When the fear ultimately dissipates, I think it creates distrust that’s very, very long lasting. It’ll be much more difficult to give people good public health messages about a whole host of other things that are even more threatening to their health then COVID. Advice about diabetes management, advice about cancer screening. Advice about a whole host of public health priorities are going to be much more difficult going forward, vaccinations, because of the use of fear as a tactic to control people’s behavior by public health. It undermines trust in public health. I think, I mean I could go on at length about this but I think that the public health community is going to need to think very carefully about this, about how to undo the damage. And maybe it’ll take quite a long time to do that when we’re finally through COVID. I mean this is one of these things where I thought was a basic principle of public health that everyone agreed with, and yet we almost immediately resorted to this fear tactic. And even for COVID it hasn’t worked. The idea is we have to get people to understand and take it seriously, but what’s happened then is that we’ve conveyed this idea that COVID has this flat age profile and risk. And so to some extent people who are older have underestimated their risk, whereas people younger have overestimated the risk and have undertaken activities, actions that have actually harmed them out of that excessive fear of COVID. It’s not possible to engineer the population to do exactly what you want them to do. It’s better to treat people like adults, as public health we have to treat people like adults, give people facts in a clear, meaningful way, and give them tools so that they can flourish. I mean that’s the purpose of public health, not to induce panic and fear, which is the way we sort of address this epidemic. Dr. Richard Schabas: Martin? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: I agree with that, so I don’t really have anything to add. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra, do you want to weigh in on that? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Well again, I’m not a public health person. So yeah, it just does seem to me that using fear as a tactic is, it’s a real insult to the general public that we should even consider such a means. I mean I’ve often been told, well you shouldn’t be talking about more optimistic projections because then people won’t take it seriously. And my answer has always been the general public are able to, they are equipped to understand this problem. It’s not quantum physics. The fact that infection spreads, and as it spreads people become immune, which impedes the progress of the pathogens through the population, these are not concepts that the general public wouldn’t understand, wouldn’t be able to take on board. I mean this discussion, what have we discussed here that someone won’t, a member of the general public would not comprehend? So why this disdain for the general public? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: If public health officials, it’s a two-way street. So if public health officials do not trust the public then automatically the public is never going to trust public health officials. So that trust has to be in both directions for it to work. Dr. Richard Schabas: Reflecting on my own career as a public health physician, when I retired I was often asked to reflect back on what the big battles had been. And without hesitation I would identify the fight against tobacco addiction as the dominant issue of my 30 years in public health. And I think we all understand that although we’ve made a lot of progress, particularly in North America, tobacco addiction as a public health problem still dwarfs anything that COVID-19 has come close to doing. And in Canada we have an estimated 40,000 deaths a year as a consequence of tobacco addiction. And those deaths, each one represents about 20 years of potential life loss. So as an impact on premature mortality, it’s six, eight times greater than what we’ve seen. Even in Britain tobacco addiction has caused a much bigger impact on premature mortality than COVID has in the last year. And of course, tobacco addiction deaths go on year, after year, after year. But the point is that many years ago we learned that promoting fear was not a very useful tactic in controlling people’s tobacco use, that that was not a very effective strategy. And we moved away from that to things that were, as I say, much more balanced, much more rational. We didn’t try to scare people, we tried to give them the facts. And I think also when we use public policy, we did use public policy and have used public policy, but it’s not been coercive public policy. I mean people said, why don’t you just make tobacco illegal? Well you don’t do it because it’s a free and open society and because that won’t work. When you start using coercive measures, sooner or later people will push back as they pushed back with alcohol prohibition. So I completely agree that it’s contrary to the principles, and in fact the experience of public health. Kind of a spinoff of that though, and I think it’s a spinoff of that, is we’re hearing now a lot about vaccine hesitancy when it comes to COVID. And there seems to be significant reluctance, particularly among some segments of society to get the vaccine. And just to give you a little background on vaccine hesitancy in Ontario, in Ontario for 35 years we’ve had something called the Immunization School Pupils Act, which is often characterized as a mandatory school immunization law. In fact, it’s not that, what it does is it gives parents options. They can either present a record of immunization or they can get an exemption. And there’s something, there are medical exemptions if you’re allergic to a component or if you previously had the disease, and then there’s what’s called a philosophical exemption, where all you have to do actually is you sign a piece of paper saying I’m philosophically opposed to immunization. The point is that since the law was put in place 35 years ago, the percentage of children who have been exempted has been about the same, it’s been about 2%. It’s been very small and it’s varied a little bit between philosophical and medical exemption. But as of the last time I checked, which is admittedly is three or four years ago, it was still running at where it had always run, at about 2%. So the reality is in spite of all of the talk about people in general being hesitant about immunization, that really wasn’t reflected in the numbers. And parents with a little nudge we’re by and large very willing to get their children immunized. So I don’t see vaccine hesitancy as sort of a fundamental problem in our society, and yet we seem to be seeing a lot of it with COVID-19 vaccines. Would anyone like to talk about why that’s happening? And again, what we can do to overcome that? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: I think it has to do with the trust. Because of the mismanagement of the pandemic there’s much less trust in public health officials in the CDC, in the United States and so on. So then when these same people say we need to have a vaccine and it’s going to be mandated, then people don’t trust it. And if you try to coerce people into that with, for example vaccine passports, that backfires. It increases hesitancy and reduces willingness to get vaccinated. And the problem is it’s not just because of the COVID-19, it also spills over to other vaccines, incredibly important vaccines like missiles vaccines in children, for example polio vaccines. So in my view, I mean there’s a small group of people who don’t want, who don’t believe in vaccines often called anti-vaxxers, but that’s a very small group. And as you say, I don’t think they have been very influential. But these people who are now pushing for vaccine passports for COVID, they are doing a lot more damage to vaccinations than these anti-vaccine people have ever been able to do. And one example is people want to mandate those who have had the disease to also get the vaccines, but people who have had the infection naturally do not need the vaccines. So when public health officials are saying those things, which are obviously nonsense, then obviously people are going to say, well I can’t trust you, why should I get the vaccine at all? So I think these people who think that they are promoting vaccines by arguing for a vaccine passport and mandatory vaccinations of COVID, they are doing huge public health damage, both to the willingness to get the COVID vaccines but also other vaccines. And they are the, at this point of time, they are the big anti-vaxxers because of what they are doing. Dr. Richard Schabas: Anyone else? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: I mean that’s completely right. I mean the vaccine passport idea or the idea that you have to require the vaccine to participate in normal life, in a sense it’s like in the United States in the south we had this segregation between blacks and whites for generations called the Jim Crow Laws. So this is like a re-imposition of Jim Crow with the vaccine as the division in society. The vaccine hesitancy, the public research suggests that it actually is quite divided along socioeconomic lines, where it’s like minorities that are more hesitant, the poor are the more hesitant. People who have reason to distress public health are more hesitant. And if we then say, you can’t participate in normal life unless you’ve done this, we’ve essentially reimposed a sort of vaccine Jim Crow. I think it’s a deadly public health disaster. Instead, tell people about how effective the vaccines are, especially for older people it’s a godsend as we said at the beginning of this. I mean it really does reduce the risk of being exposed to a deadly disease. For someone older we should be conveying this as a, just show people the data, convey it to them and inform them that they can understand, tell the people the truth and people will respond I think. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra, do you have a weigh in on this? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Yeah, just to say that I think that vaccines are distorting perception of risk. So if we were straight up and just said, look again, if we followed the focused protection sort of framework we would say, these are people who are really at risk, they really need the vaccine, and once we’ve given it to them we can relax some level. Then that would be a nice message. It would be truthful and it would make people more positive about the vaccine. But instead if we’re being told that, in particular in the UK, that nothing is going to change until we vaccinate everybody, this creates, I think a perception of risk which will be somewhat at odds to what… Well either first it will either heighten the sense of fear, heightened the fear, or it will seem wrong to someone who goes and we… Now Oxford, I can’t remember which group at Oxford University, has produced this nice little app that you can use to calculate your own risk. And mostly you look at that risk and then you think, why are they telling me I have to be vaccinated? I think you can set up all sorts of conflicts and questions in the minds of the thinking public, and I consider most of the public to be thinking, or people are thinking. And so I think it’s really unfortunate that we haven’t just said, this is a fantastic tool for focused protection, this is going to liberate everybody, let’s use it to that capacity. And then yeah, sure, if you’re worried about getting long COVID and you want the vaccine go for it, that’s fine. But it’s the way it’s being presented or the plans for its use don’t align with the science. And I think it will cause more confusion and hesitancy. Dr. Richard Schabas: You know there are some interesting parallels with the influenza immunization, and actually that’s particularly relevant to the province of Ontario, which for the last 20 years has very enthusiastically embraced the policy of universal influenza immunization. It’s been really a major government policy. And it’s one that I actually initially supported, I wrote the editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal almost 20 years ago saying what a good idea. And then about five years ago I kind of changed my mind. And it’s interesting because even within Canada, the two other large provinces, so Quebec and British Columbia, don’t have universal programs, and in fact have been very resistant. Quebec has actually increased its recommended age from 65 to 75. And the issues are very similar. I mean influenza vaccine has the additional problem that it’s not as good a vaccine, but the issues are very similar. And the real issue with COVID is what are you trying to accomplish? If you’re trying to limit death, well then you promote vaccine in the vulnerable. And if a vulnerable person doesn’t want to take the vaccine and they die, well it’s- If a vulnerable person doesn’t want to take the vaccine and they die, well, it’s a free and open society, and that’s your decision. And young people, well yeah they are not at zero risk, so if they wish to do it, or if they think it’s socially responsible to do it, but obviously the urgency or the importance of getting immunization in younger people is not as strong. I think that’s what the Cole Vendor got in trouble with the college for expressing sediments pretty much exactly along those lines. But again, if you don’t know where you’re going, you’re not going to be sure when you get there and if we keep changing the goalposts, and if I can mix my metaphors, keep changing the goalposts, then, in fact, we will never get there. So that’s let me ask, the next question is, where do you think we are headed with all of this? And by way of background, I’m an incorrigible optimist. Last spring, when people were saying, “This is terrible.” I said, “No, wait. Once people realized that the outbreaks in Western Europe have peaked at about an order of magnitude less mortality than the models predicted, people will come to their senses.” Well, that didn’t happen. They didn’t come to their senses. And then they said, “Oh, we’re going to contact trace.” I said, “Don’t worry. As soon as those strategies collapse…” And they lasted about 15 minutes in Canada before they collapse… “People will realize that that’s not an option.” And then [inaudible 01:28:29] And then I said, “Don’t worry. As soon as they realized that lockdown is not a short-term phenomenon, they’ll realize it’s unsupportable. That’s not going to change.” Didn’t happen. And then I said, “Don’t worry when the vaccines come along, it will all change. And this will all go away.” Well, clearly that’s not happening. The vaccines are here and the rhetoric is getting triller. And I know I have some colleagues who think this is actually getting darker and darker in terms of the infringement on individual rights, on the stigmatization. And I keep trying to be an optimist, but ironically, I find it harder and harder to be optimistic. What do you think? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: I am an optimist. I don’t think there are a lot of people who have dug their heels in know they’re not going to change their views, but within the population, they are more and more people who are understanding what’s going on, who are learning about infectious disease technology, and who are seeing that it’s obvious, that lockdowns and contact tracing and not working. So I think that’s the gradual process, but that makes me optimistic, because I think during the [inaudible 01:29:41] people where a year ago, people didn’t know anything about these things, but as people learn more and more, there are more and more people who are realizing that the path we have taken has been a huge mistake. And I think that’s going to increase the number of people who come to that realization. So I’m optimistic for that reason. I am pessimistic in some ways. For example, I’m pessimistic it’s going to take a long time, as Dr. Bhattacharya was saying, to regain the trust between public and public health. That’s a huge undertaking that we have to take to regain that trust and it’s going to take many, many years to regain that. We have all the collateral damage from public health, from the lockdowns that we have to deal with for many, many years. So in that sense, I’m not very optimistic. And also in terms of the scientific community, where we have seen so much trying to limit scientific discourse, either by ignoring people or by slander and so on, and a lot of people who don’t dare to speak up. I don’t know if the scientific community is going to survive that. I hope it will be able to regain because if not, then the 300 years of enlightenment has ended now, and that would be very unfortunate I think. In the short term, in just what I think is the priority to do next is to make sure that all children get back in school for in-person teaching. If there’s one thing I could change is that all children are back with in-person teaching by Monday. It’s so important for children. No school districts should… There’s no public health reasons to keep children away from schools, and there’s enormous damage, both short-term and long-term. And those school districts should prevent children from going to school and no parents should try to keep the children away from school. And there is a change there, at least in the United States, where there are parents, as well as some teachers, are really rising up to demand that schools reopen. So it’s gradually happening, but it’s way too slow. Dr. Richard Schabas: Okay. Anybody else grounds for optimism? Pessimism? What do you think? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: I think salvation, when it comes, will come from the people. I mean, if you look at Germany as a good example of this, right? So Angela Merkel had a renouncement that she was going to close the country entirely, grocery stores, a very sharp, sharp lockdown from April 1st to April 6th. And an enormous number of people protested because it’s an inhuman thing to do to prevent people from the [inaudible 01:32:44] would not be effective on stopping COVID. Because if you tell me a week from now, I’m not going to be able to shop for food for my family for a week, we’re going to crowd the grocery stores from now until then, right? Spreading the disease. I think I agree with Martin, the people who have been arguing, who stake their professional reputations on lockdowns, the scientists and so forth will be the very last people to change their mind. And I don’t think that that’s really where the change will come. In the United States, the lifting of lockdowns has happened because of political pressure on governors. And I think in Canada as well, that’s what it’s going to take. It’s not going to come from experts. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: So, I haven’t lost my optimism, but I have become disillusioned in certain regards. I mean, I would say the biggest point of surprise and horror for me is how we’ve treated school children. I just didn’t think that was possible. I really did not imagine that the general public would permit such a thing to happen as to prevent school children from being in school. And also the blindness displayed towards the collateral damage I found very, very surprising. I mean, there are many points… Then of course, the censure of my colleagues and the ways in which the mainstream media have behaved, all of these things have come as huge surprises to me. But I still remain optimistic that eventually there will be a sufficient kind of wash of opinion. People will return to their senses I hope. And at least the space for public debate will again be open. Dr. Richard Schabas: Well, and that leads nicely into my next question, which is why has there been such vitriol, so much rancor? I think back to debates to previous years, and I think back to SARS, which was a big deal in Toronto. We had in hindsight, we thought it was a major outbreak. It was not a major outbreak, but it seemed like at the time, and there was a great deal of concern and a great deal of worry. And there were divided opinions and my views were outliers. I think they eventually turned out to be correct, but they were outliers. But I was still able to meet and discuss and exchange ideas in a collegial fashion with my colleagues, even though we were polls apart on this, we can still laugh and joke and make side bets and do the usual things that that colleagues do. And that free and open exchange of ideas was important. With COVID, from the very beginning it seemed to be different on the very beginning, back in March, when one of our local modelers, who I’d always regarded as a friend and a colleague, went to the media with the results of his models. And I sent him an email just saying, “Hey, heads up, don’t you remember we had this discussion 10 years ago with your model on H1N1 that was wrong by three orders of magnitude. Don’t you think you should be a little cautious with these numbers?” And instead of engaging me in discussion, he fired back an email accusing me of being in the pay of the capitalists. And I thought, “Whoa, we’re where did that come from?” And do it’s the ranker, it’s the political divide. I don’t think I’m, I’m reading too much into it. In fact, I think some of you have commented on them. The three of you cover a broad political spectrum. I think Sunetra has been quoted as describing herself as left of labor, which is probably more or less where I’d put myself. And I know Jay has worked for the Hoover Institute, which I doubt is named after the vacuum cleaner company. So you’ve managed to overcome this, but in the world, both the scientific world and the political world, you’re either on the side of the Orthodox or you’re some kind of libertarian conspiracy theorist, anti-vaxxer, climate change denier, why has this happened? Where did we lose the collegiality? How can we get it back? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Well, you didn’t mention my politics, but in my native Sweden, because I support the socialist government’s policies of keeping schools open. So there I’m a left-wing fanatic, and in the US, I support focus protection of the Florida government, et cetera. So here I’m a right-winger. So I guess I’m a schizophrenic in my politics, because I have two countries where the different sides in Sweden, it’s the left, who is in favor of trying to keep the society open and against the lockdowns and the right is sort of want to have more lockdowns, but in the US is sort of the flipped the other way around. So I guess that makes it sort of very schizophrenic for me having two countries like that. Dr. Richard Schabas: So how have you dealt with that as a group? I mean, is that an issue? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: If Sunetra is left of center, count me as left of center, left to labor. I also am endorsing. I, I think that, that, what I discovered is that there are values that are more fundamental than partisan politics that divide us. I mean, I find much more in common with my colleagues here, all the folks here. And I honestly I didn’t know about your politics Richard before you just mentioned [inaudible 01:39:01] I think there’s this commitment to small L liberalism of sort of a vision of society that sees the purpose of public health as promoting human flourishing, protection of life, but consistent with democratic values. I mean, I think all of those things are things we all share, that are much more fundamental than any, whatever partisan issues that divide us. I think if we can make a comment on, I mean, I’ve been trying to think about what the answer to your question is, why we have this divide? And I don’t know if I have a full answer, but I will say I know that there’s two norms and two very, very different norms in scientific discussion versus public health discussion. And scientific discussion, I view science as a dialectical process, right? You have an idea. I have an idea. They make different predictions. We do the experiment, the experiment favors you. I say, “Yeah, you’re right, Richard.” And we make a side bet, you won the side bet, I take you to dinner, right? And then we have another disagreement, we keep going, it’s a fun process of disagreement resolved by data that we look at together and argue over. And the one thing that can’t happen in a process is you can’t stop me from having an idea that disagrees with you. That discussion, that open discussion is absolutely fundamental. That’s the part of the norm of scientific discussion, right? When Martin says”, That the Age of Enlightenment is ended,” That’s what I take him to mean, right? That discussion, that openness discussion ending is the end of science. On the other hand, in public health, there actually does have to be some consistency in messaging, right? So you can’t really have a lot, a ton of, deep disagreements played out in front of the public because you’ll confuse the public, right? So there’s this norm of like, “Let’s agree on what we’re going to say.” And then when we communicate with the public, we communicate as close to a consensus as we can get so as to not sort of get conflicting messages. So there’s a little less of that norm of completely open discussion, there’s a norm of like consensus building before communication. The problem here is that we have this situation that’s really novel, right? We have a virus, we don’t know what the infection, fatality rate is. We don’t know a whole lot of basic facts about it in March of last year or February of last year. And strangely, instead of letting the scientific process and debate get carried out before we arrive at a consensus, we decided we knew the consensus, we knew all the results and anyone that would argue against the consensus in doing normal science is dangerous. I think if the conflation of these two norms, especially with the premature application of the sort of public health norm for consensus, that has led to the problem that we’re seeing here. I have a full answer to your question as to why maybe people thought that this is too important, or maybe it’s just fear took over even in the minds of public health and scientists, but in any case, I think that that’s what’s going on. Dr. Richard Schabas: Sunetra? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: So I see this as a collapse in the space in which people think. It’s a collapse in dimensions, everything suddenly collapsed down. It must have been fear and uncertainty that collapsed everything down to a single axis. So normally you think, “Oh, well so-and-so has these views. I really agree with those. But then that particular idea, I don’t believe in free markets as much as I think markets should be regulated.” But it’s never a sort of, “Hey, this person is evil because I think markets should be regulated, but he or she doesn’t.” So I think that’s led to what I call a very big middle term, non distributed fallacy. So that people are looking to take all these different ideas. And usually you were able to think of an individual as having this idea, that idea, some of which aligned with you, a big sort of space in which their ideas existed and sometimes contradict each other, sometimes complemented each other and that’s all gone. So now it’s sort of like, “Well, you believe in focus protection, Trump believes in focus protection. So you must be you believe in Trump.” So that’s sort of a fundamental sort of syllogistic problem, I think, has flourished and become accepted. So I think that’s what the enlightenment militated against is let’s not think that’s not to commit those fallacies. And somehow we’ve gone back to thinking in those fallacies and that’s what’s led to this kind of tribalism. Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Now when that happened, what Sunetra describes, that means science becomes more religion than science because you belonging to a certain groups that had to sort of believe in a set of beliefs and you can’t have that attitude in science. So I think that’s why, if that continues, then we don’t have a bright future for science. Dr. Richard Schabas: Well, there’s so much more I would like to talk about, but I promised Kulvinder 10 minutes at the end. I think she wants to ask us a question and to sum up. So I’m going to take this opportunity to thank the three of you. It’s been wonderful, just been a delight for me, and it’s great to meet you. And again, thank you for all the great work you’ve done. Kulvinder? Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you, Dr.Schabas- Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Kulvinder, I have a hard stop in three minutes, but- Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Yes. Thank you all tremendously for sharing your insightful and informed opinions, and for sharing your wisdom and for your expertise. Ontario and Canada’s response over the past year has been tremendously myopic, very misguided and fear-based as we have discussed. And most frontline physicians here in Canada are hopeful that your discussion will bring the data and the science back to the forefront to allow for our policy decision-makers to start making ethical, evidence-based decisions. Now going forward. What is one thing that all of you think should be done to ensure that we’re never in this situation, in this predicament again in the future? Dr. Sunetra Gupta: Can I quickly answer, and then I’m going to have to go, I’m afraid. I think we need to take full stock of the collateral effects of the mitigation strategies that have been put in place. So at the very least, at a very fundamental level, we can do a cost benefit analysis, right at the outset. It seems to have been left for the end, like, “Okay, well, we’ll figure this out when we get to the end of this process.” And that is simply wrong and we’re going to be paying for that for decades. So that’s one thing that I would like, and in fact, many of us are actively engaged in promoting that particular activity, which is to have a very clear look and a clear tabulation of what these lockdown strategies have cost us. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you. Dr. Kulldorff? Dr. Martin Kulldorff: So in the immediate thing, the most important thing is to get our schools and school children and students back in school, with in-person teaching immediately. We can’t afford to have any more suffering and treating those children and students the way we have done for no good reason. But in terms of the long-term, we have to go back to the basic principles of public health that was thrown out the window a year ago. It’s not one disease public health is about all the diseases, so all the collateral damage. We can’t just think short-term. We have to think long-term. Public health is about everybody in society. We can’t protect the laptop class or the Zoom class and throw the working class under the bus. Whether the issue of fear, we can’t use fear and shaming as a public health tool. It has to be trust between public health officials and the public and so on, where there are many of these other principles that we have to also [inaudible 01:48:04]. Also, for example, somebody who is sick, if somebody has symptoms, somebody has a case, or somebody has symptoms. Somebody is asymptomatic; it’s not a case of the disease. We, as public health officials, we can’t assume that everybody’s like we are, we have to listen very closely to the public. And also one basic principle of public health is that we have to reach everybody. So I’ve been criticized for being on certain media, which is either left or right, because I’ve been on both, but we have to empower health, we have to reach everybody. You can sort only decide, “I’m only going to reach Democrats. I’m only going to reach Republicans,” you have to reach everybody in public health. So there are many of these principles that are fundamental to a good public health strategy and the public health of the population that we have ignored during this last year. We have to get back into those basic principles of public health. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you. Dr. Bhattacharya? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: I mean, I’ll really just endorse what both Dr. Gupta and Dr. Kulldorff just said. I just, maybe I’ve had one thing to add is when these decisions got made in March, a very, very narrow set of experts raised the alarm and were incredibly influential. We have to set up processes where if we’re going to consider something like this again, a much broader set of experts need to be at the table, right? It just can’t be mathematical modelers or whoever it was. It has to be people who understand the breadth, the full breadth of public health at the table when these decisions get made. And voices that urge for caution should not be sat aside and ignored, even demonized, but rather welcomed so that we can have an open discussion in the full eye of the public so that they can make up their own minds, as well as to the wisdom of these kinds of actions. What we’ve done now is, is essentially override that debate, force the public with the policies if there were no other choice and then withhold from the public, the fact that a very large number of experts disagree with what’s going on. It’s anti-democratic and it’s likely to lead to an enormous harm in the intermediate and long-term. So I think what I would like to work toward that vision of expanding the debate at the highest levels to include more people and more viewpoints before we ever do anything like this again. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you. Oh, Dr. Schabas? Dr. Richard Schabas: Oh, of course. Like the other panelists. I could talk about this for several hours, but I think probably the biggest mistake, and we need to change at something that actually comes out of the intelligence committee. When you read about failures of intelligence, probably the most spectacular being the weapons of mass destruction fiasco, the lesson that they were supposed to learn from that, and maybe have learned, is that you need to encourage cognitive dissonance. You need to encourage critical thinking. You need to have people who are looking at things differently than your mainstream view, because it will help to prevent you from making catastrophic errors. It will help to keep you honest. And we’ve done exactly the opposite instead of encouraging critical thinking, different ideas, we’ve stifled it. That’s what makes the actions of the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons towards you so shocking because it’s absolute the opposite of what we need to do. And it’s been that absence of critical thinking of incorporating critical thinking in our decision-making that has led to one mistake after another in handling COVID-19. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you all for being on a Concerned Ontario Doctor’s panel, and Dr. Schabas for moderating. This has been tremendous. And I really hope that this will be a pivotal point within Canada’s response to COVID-19. And I would ask all those that are watching to continue to follow Concerned Ontario Doctor’s advocacy closely. You can follow us on our website carenotcuts.ca, which has links to all of our social media. And thank you once again for your tremendous insights. And I truly hope that science and ethics and evidence-based decision-making is back to the forefront very soon. Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: Thank you. Dr. Richard Schabas: Thank you Kulvinder. Thank you Jay. Thank you, Martin. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: Pleasure to meet you both. Dr. Martin Kulldorff: Thank you. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post The harms of lockdowns, the dangers of censorship, and a path forward appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Night two of the Daunte Wright riots accelerate, spread to other cities. And it’s going to get worse.
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 10:22 PM PDT The police killing of Daunte Wright, a Black man with an arrest warrant who ran from police and endangered bystanders, prompted riots in Minneapolis and surrounding towns on Sunday night. Monday, the riots spread to other cities and got worse in Minnesota following the revelation that the police officer who shot him thought she was firing a taser. First, let’s look at some of the reporting from Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, where the shooting occurred. Julio Rosas reports, “This is what the back and forth between the rioters and police looks like in Brooklyn Center, MN.”
Rebecca Brannon reported outside of a Dollar Tree, “Chaos breaking out. Police pushing back protesters as people continued to loot nearby businesses. Nearly 3 hours past curfew.”
Andy Ngo reported earlier that Brooklyn Center attempted to mitigate damage by putting up barriers ahead of time. “The city of Brooklyn Center (near Minneapolis) is putting up concrete barricades at the police station following mass #BLM rioting and looting overnight over the shooting death of wanted criminal suspect.”
Jack Posobiec noted Black Bloc in Minneapolis area chanting “You can’t stop the revolution.”
Ian Miles Cheong posted a video of a store casually being looted.
Brendan Gutenschwager said the “Dollar Tree has been looted and set on fire here in Brooklyn Center.” It is unclear if this is the same store from the previous video or a different one.
Rebecca Brannon reported that rioters were still coming in half-an-hour after the mandated curfew. “30 minutes past curfew, large group of protesters dressed in black continue to arrive outside the Brooklyn Center Police Station. There is heavy rain now, hundreds still parked all along 67th Ave N.”
She then showed the aftermath at night when police started to get a handle on the situation. “Heavy police presence at Target Express off Lake Street where reports earlier indicated individuals with bats were attempting to loot the store.”
Julio Rosas said arrests were finally being made after much of the chaos had already engulfed the city. “MN State Troopers are pushing the rioters away from the Brooklyn Center police building. Arrests are being made.”
Then, Rosas reported gunfire in the area. “Multiple gunshots nearby in Brooklyn Center, MN.”
Gabriel Hébert-Røuillier reported on a major confrontation between rioters and police. “Protesters and police in riot gear are clashing tonight in #BrooklynCenter, Minnesota after officials say officers shot and killed a man during a traffic stop.”
Brooklyn Center and the Minneapolis areas were not the only places hit by riots. Reports are coming in from multiple cities coast-to-coast that protests are starting on behalf of accused criminal Daunte Wright. Anecdotal indications of violence are coming in as well, though no video has been seen at this time. Marie Oakes posted a video of protests starting in the nation’s capital. “Protesters in Washington, DC chant ‘burn it down,’”
The same is being reported in Portland, Oregon. “Protests have now begun in Portland, Oregon after a vigil for Daunte Wright, who was killed by a Minnesota police officer.”
Did Brooklyn Center prepare for tonight’s riots by strengthening their law enforcement position? No. According to a resolution they passed earlier, they weakened their police officers. “Brooklyn Center approves resolution banning crowd control tactics during protests. Includes use of rubber bullets, tear gas, “kettling” and chokeholds. This can apply only to BCPD officers. ”
Last year, the George Floyd riots had spread to dozens of U.S. cities by night three following the initial release of the bodycam footage showing Derek Chauvin with his knee in Floyd’s neck area. The same thing is likely to happen this time with weather conditions improving and professional rioters being deployed across the country. It’s important to understand two things. First, Daunte Wright’s death is not grounds for looting businesses of people who had nothing to do with it. This is why it’s so difficult for most Americans to understand the anarchy that arises from these events. They don’t make sense until we understand the second important aspect. These acts of domestic terrorism are coordinated by groups who only need a predicate behind which to rally the anarchists and opportunists. They incite these riots with precision and cunning, planting well-trained operatives in positions across the nation. They appeal to the sense of anger amongst the anarchists and the willingness of some to take advantage of the situation to steal. Democrat-run cities are always the target because they know their efforts will not be quashed. In fact, they are often supported by local politicians. We appear to be in for another summer of anarchy. It will likely be even worse than last summer with the Derek Chauvin verdict coming. As Jack Posobiec often says, “Get Out of Cities” now. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Night two of the Daunte Wright riots accelerate, spread to other cities. And it’s going to get worse. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
America, formerly the home of the free… but at least there’s still a few brave
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 07:28 PM PDT
For years, when other governments persecuted their own citizens for violating the rights that Americans believed are given to us by God, such as our freedom of speech, religion or to peaceably assembly, we would point out the contrast because our Constitutional Rights and their tyrannical oppression. It was an easy point to make: America is the greatest nation on the face of the planet because of the simply fact that we protect more freedom than any other country in the world. The beauty of America is that what unites us is not race, culture or religion. The unifying factor of our great country is the value of the individual due to the belief that we are created in God’s image. Because of this belief in the intrinsic value of human life that is given to us by God, we hold high individual liberty. We’ve done so since the founding of America. Unfortunately today, that has all gone out the window. Practically speaking, Americans no longer have Constitutional Rights. In theory we do, but in reality, they’ve been stripped away from us in the name of safety. Social Media has taken away our right to free speech and freedom of expression through censorship and deplatforming. Our government has stripped us of our right to peaceably assemble and worship God as we see fit by shutting down and limiting our churches. Joe Biden’s administration is taking away our right to bear arms through his recent Executive Actions enforcing gun control. Despite what is written in the Constitution of the United States of America, we have no more rights. The government has stripped us of our liberty in the name of safety. And you know what the scary thing is? Millions upon millions of Americans are perfectly content giving it all away. The only way we are going to get our rights back is for the American people to rise up and take them back. We must refuse to submit to unConstitutional mandates or laws. By definition, if a law is unconstitutional, it is illegal. Why would you submit to illegal behavior? We need more pastors like Pastor Coates at GraceLife Church in Canada, who is refusing to shutdown his church, despite the government sending in 200 armed police officers to keep them from worshipping God. Or like Pastor Greg Locke in Tennessee who has refused to shutdown services since Day 1. Or like the owners of Tinhorn Flats in Burbank, CA who have refused to close their saloon throughout the “pandemic.” There are plenty of examples of men and women standing up to the authoritarians that could care less about you or your family, but are simply on power trips. However, we need more to rise up. We need more businesses to refuse to enforce face masks or capacity limitations. We need more business owners to commit to not requiring a vaccine passport. We need more churches to fully open their services without restriction. This is the only way that we can take back our country. We must resist tyranny.
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post America, formerly the home of the free… but at least there’s still a few brave appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Vandana Shiva on the taking down of Bill Gates’ empires
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 06:59 PM PDT STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In this interview, Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., discusses the importance and benefits of regenerative agriculture and a future Regeneration International project that we’ll be collaborating on. We’re currently facing enormously powerful technocrats who are hell-bent on ushering in the Great Reset, which will complete the ongoing transfer of wealth and resource ownership from the poor and middle classes to the ultra-rich. Perhaps the most well-known of the individuals pushing for this is Bill Gates who, like John Rockefeller a century before him, rehabilitated his sorely tarnished image by turning to philanthropy. However, Gates’ brand of philanthropy, so far, has helped few and harmed many. While his PR machine has managed to turn public opinion about him such that many now view him as a global savior who donates his wealth for the good of the planet, nothing could be further from the truth. Gates’ Stranglehold on Global HealthThe magnitude of Gates’ role over global health recently dawned on me. I believe the COVID-19 catastrophe would not have been possible had it not been for the World Health Organization, which Gates appears to exert shadow-control over. Remember, it was primarily the WHO that facilitated this global shutdown and adoption of freedom-robbing, economy-destroying measures by virtually every government on the planet. When then-President Trump halted U.S. funding of the WHO in 2020, Gates became the biggest funder of the WHO. As explained in “WHO Insider Blows Whistle on Gates and GAVI,” the WHO has turned global health security into a dictatorship, where the director general has assumed sole power to make decisions that member states must abide by, but according to a long-term WHO insider, Gates’ vaccine alliance GAVI actually appears to be the directing power behind the WHO. The two — Gates and the WHO — have been working hand in hand pushing for a global vaccination campaign, and Gates has a great deal of money invested in these vaccines. We’ve also seen extraordinary efforts to censor natural alternatives and inexpensive, readily available and clearly effective drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and it appears the reason for this is probably because they’re competitors to the vaccine. Emergency use authorization for pandemic vaccines are only given when there are no other treatments, so vilifying alternatives has been a key strategy to protect vaccine profits. The Parallels Between Rockefeller and GatesAs noted by Shiva, the comparisons between Rockefeller and Gates are quite apt. Rockefeller created not just Big Oil but also Big Finance and Big Pharma. He had intimate connections with IG Farben.1 There was a Standard Oil IG Farben company. Without the fossil fuels of Standard Oil, IG Farben couldn’t have made synthetic fertilizers or fuels. In 1910, Rockefeller and Carnegie produced The Flexner Report,2 which was the beginning of the end for natural medicine in the conventional medical school curriculum. They eliminated it because it saw natural medicine as a hugely competitive threat to the new pharmaceuticals that were primarily derived from the oil industry. Much of Rockefeller’s history has been captured by Lily Kay,3 who sifted through Molecular Vision of Life’s archives. There, she discovered that the Nazi regime, which was a eugenics regime that thought some people were inferior and needed to be exterminated to keep the superior race pure, didn’t vanish when Germany lost the war. Eugenics simply migrated to the U.S., and was taken up by Rockefeller under the term of “social psychology as biological determinants.” The word gene did not exist at that time. Instead, they called it “atoms of determinism.” Rockefeller paid for much of the eugenics research, which ultimately resulted in the silencing and suppression of true health. To be healthy means to be whole, and wholeness refers to the “self-organized brilliance of your integrated body as a complex system,” Shiva says. That’s what Ayurveda is based on, and even this ancient system of medicine has been attacked in recent times. The notion of genetic determination ignores this foundational wholeness, seeking instead to divide the human body into mechanical components controlled by your genes. “Coming back to the parallels, Rockefeller was behind it because he was driving the chemical industry. When the wars were over, they said, ‘Oh my gosh, we have all these chemicals to sell.’ And they invented the Green Revolution and pushed the Green Revolution on India. Rockefeller, the World Bank, the USA all worked together, and if the farmers of India are protesting today, it’s a result of Rockefeller’s initiative, the Green Revolution in India. Most people don’t realize what high cost India has borne; what high cost the state of Panjon has born. Then you have Gates joining up with Rockefeller and creating the Alliance for the Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) … which pretends to be his solution to climate change. I say, ‘My god, what kind of stage has the world reached that absolute nonsense can pass the science?’ I’ll give you just three examples from his chapter on agriculture, in which he talks about how we grow things. First of all, plants are not things. Plants are sentient beings. Our culture knows it. We have the sacred tulsi. We have the sacred neem. We have the sacred banyan. They are sentient beings. So many people are awake to animal rights. I think we need more people awake to plant rights and really tell Mr. Gates, ‘No, plants are not things.’ He goes on to celebrate Norman Borlaug, who was in the DuPont defense lab, whose job it was to push these four chemicals by adapting the plants [to them]. So, he created the dwarf variety, because the tall varieties are free varieties … [Gates] says we’re eating food because of Borlaug. No, people are starving because of Borlaug. The farmers are dying because of Borlaug.” Gates Offers Problems as SolutionsGates hails synthetic fertilizer is the greatest agricultural invention. “Doesn’t he realize synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are creating desertification, dead zones in the ocean, and nitrous oxide, which is a greenhouse gas?” Shiva says. In short, he’s offering the problem as the solution. Gates also, apparently, does not understand that nitrogen-fixing plants can fix nitrogen. He incorrectly claims that plants cannot fix nitrogen. Gates is equally wrong about methane production from livestock. “Have you smelt methane behind nomadic tribes?” Shiva asks. “Have you ever smelt methane behind our sacred cow in India? No, they don’t emit methane.” The reason cows in concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) emit methane that stinks to high heaven is because they’re fed an unnatural diet of grains and placed in crowded quarters. It’s not a natural phenomenon. It’s a man-made one. “You know what Mr. Gates wants to teach us? He says cows make methane because of their poor stomachs,” Shiva says. “They call them containers. I think we should sue him for undoing basic biology 101. You’ve talked about how he controls the WHO. He’s also trying to take control of the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). [FAO] has recognized ecological agriculture is the way to go and supported [regenerative] agriculture up until last year, when Gates started to take charge. Now he’s moving the food summit to New York. Five hundred organizations have said, ‘This is no longer a food summit, it’s a poison summit. The poison cartel and Bill Gates are running it to push more poisons, now under new names. So, we have a lot of work to do.’” The answer to the environmental problems we face is not more of the very things that created the problems in the first place, which is what Gates proposes. The answer is regenerative agriculture and real food. “When people are eating healthy food, there is no problem,” Shiva says. “[Gates] wants to commit a crime against our gut microbiome, pushing more fake food through Impossible Food. And he wants to create conditions so that real food will disappear. That’s why we all have to organize together and the scientists have to start being protected. There’s an extinction taking place. They call it the sixth mass extinction. Most people think the sixth mass extinction is about other species. They don’t realize large parts of humanity are being pushed to extinction. Food is health, as Hippocrates said, [and that requires] indigenous systems of learning, ecological agriculture, small farmers. In Bill Gates’ design, all this that makes life, life, that makes society, society, that makes community, community, that makes healthy beings, he would like to push this to extinction because he’s afraid of independence, freedom, health and our beingness. He wants us to be ‘thingness,’ but we are beings … The worst crime against the Earth and against humanity is using gene editing technologies for gene drives, which is a collaboration of Gates with DARPA, the defense research system. Gene drives are deliberately driving [us] to extinction. Now he does it in the name of ending malaria. No. It’s about driving to extinction. Amaranth is a sacred food for us. It’s a very, very important source of nutrition … There’s an application in that DARPA-Gates report of driving the amaranth to extinction through gene rights. And when this was raised at the Convention on Biological Diversity, do you know what he did? He actually hired a public relations agency and bribed government representatives to not say no. Can you imagine?” Gates’ Long-Term PlayGates clearly had a long-term vision in mind from the start. His growing control of the WHO began over a decade ago. Over this span of time, he also started transitioning into Big Pharma and the fake food industry, which would allow his influence over the WHO’s global health recommendations to really pay off. While fake foods have many potential problems, one in particular is elevated levels of the omega-6 fat linoleic acid (LA). If you eat real food, you’re going to get more than enough LA. Our industrial Western diet, however, provides far more than is needed for optimal health already, and engineered meats are particularly loaded with LA, as they’re made with genetically modified soy oil and canola oil. This massive excess of LA will encourage and promote virtually all degenerative diseases, thereby accelerating the destruction of human health. In addition to that, Gates is also investing in pharmaceuticals, which of course are touted as the answer to degenerative disease. Again, his solutions to ill health are actually the problem. Shiva says: “Gates … [is] entering every field that has to do with life. Our work in Navdanya, which means nine seeds, is basically work on biodiversity in agriculture. We started to bring together all the work that he’s doing in taking over. I mentioned the Rockefeller Green Revolution, now the Gates-Rockefeller Green Revolution in Africa. The next step he wants to push is … digital agriculture. He calls it Gates Ag One,4 and the headquarters of this is exactly where the Monsanto headquarters are, in St. Louis, Missouri. Gates Ag One is one [type of] agriculture for the whole world, organized top down. He’s written about it. We have a whole section on it in our new report,5 ‘Gates to a Global Empire.’” Stolen Farmer Data Is Repackaged and Sold Back to ThemWhat does digital agriculture entail? For starters, it entails the introduction of a digital surveillance system. So far, Shiva’s organization has managed to prevent Gates from introducing a seed surveillance startup, where farmers would not be allowed to grow seeds unless approved by Gates surveillance system. The data mining, Shiva says, is needed because they don’t actually know agriculture. This is why Gates finances the policing of farmers. He needs to mine their data to learn how farming is actually done. This knowledge is then repackaged and sold back to the farmers. It’s evil genius at its finest. Through his funding, Gates now also controls the world’s seed supply, and his financing of gene editing research has undercut biosafety laws across the world. As explained by Shiva, the only country that doesn’t have biosafety laws is the U.S. “The rest of the world does because we have a treaty called the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,” she says. “While he created the appearance of philanthropy, what he’s doing is giving tiny bits of money to very vital institutions. But with those bits of money, they attract government money, which was running those institutions. Now, because of his clout, he is taking control of the agenda of these institutions. In the meantime, he’s pushing patenting, be it on drugs, vaccines or on seeds.” Taken together, Gates ends up wielding enormous control over global agriculture and food production, and there’s virtually no evidence to suggest he has good intentions. The Anatomy of MonopolizationThe company that collects patents on gene-edited organisms, both in health and agriculture, is Editas, founded by a main financial investor for the Gates Foundation. Gates is also a big investor in Editas. “So, here’s a company called Editas to edit the world as if it is a Word program. The two scientists who got the Nobel Prize this year have both been funded in their research by Gates. My mind went back to how Rockefeller financed the research, got the Nobel Prize, and then made the money. So, you finance the research. Then you finance the public institutions, whether they be national or international. You invest and force them down the path where they can only use what is your patented intellectual property. And, as he has said in an interview, his smartest investment was vaccines, because it is a 1-to-20 return. Put $1 in and make $20. How many billions of dollars have been put in? You can imagine how many trillions will be made. At the end of it, where does food come from? It comes from seed. He wants to control it. It comes from land. He’s controlling that. He’s became the biggest farmland owner [in the U.S.]. But you need weather [control]. You need a stable climate. So, what could be a weapon of control of agriculture? Weather modification. He calls it geoengineering. This is engineering of the climate. Again, making it look like he’s going to solve global warming by creating global cooling.” As explained by Shiva, Gates is also heavily invested in climate modification technologies that not only will destabilize the earth’s climate systems more, but also can be weaponized against the people by controlling rainfall and drought. In India, they’ve been having massive hail during harvest time, which destroys the harvest. Is the UN Subservient to Gates?According to Shiva, Gates is also corrupting the United Nations system, just like he’s corrupted world governments and the WHO, and in so doing, he’s destroying the efforts built over the last three decades to protect the global environment. “Whether it be the climate treaty, the biodiversity treaty or the atmospheric treaties, he is absolutely behaving as if the UN is his subservient institution,” Shiva says. “[He thinks] governments and regulatory bodies should not exist … and that people in democracy have no business to speak. [If they do], they’re conspiracy theorists.” Taking Down Gates’ EmpiresAs it stands right now, ordinary people are forced to fight battles that are in actuality rooted in institutional, structural and societal crimes. These crimes really need to be addressed the way Rockefeller’s Standard Oil empire was addressed. In the case of Gates, his empire is actually multiple empires, and they all need to be dismantled. To that end, I will be collaborating with Shiva and Regeneration International, which she co-founded, on a project to boycott Gates’ empires. “I’ve noticed that no matter what the movement, they’re using the word regeneration now. It could be a health movement, a democracy movement, a peace movement, a women’s movement — everyone has realized that regeneration is what we have to shift to,” Shiva says. “So, what do we need to be doing in the next decade? For me, the next decade is the determining decade, because these petty minds’ insatiable greed want to go so fast that if, in the next decade, we don’t protect what has to be protected, build resilient alternatives and take away the sainthood from this criminal, they will leave nothing much to be saved. The poison cartel is also big pharma. People think agriculture is here, medicine is there. No. The same criminal corporations gave us agrichemicals. They gave us bad medicine that creates more disease than it solves. So, Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Poison — it’s all one. And Bill Gates is holding it all together even more, and trying to make them bigger because he has investments in all of them … I think [seeds] is where we have to begin … I’m hoping that we will be able, together, to launch a global movement soon to take back our seeds from the international seed banks. The strategy is we need to remind the world that these are public institutions [and] that they’re accountable to the farmers whose collections these [seeds] are … On the food question, I think that’s the big one because food and health go [together]. In Ayurveda, it says food is the best medicine, and if you don’t eat good food, then no medicine can cure whatever disease you have. The best medicine is good eating. And Hippocrates said ‘Let food be thy medicine.’ So, I think this is the time to really grow a very big global campaign for food freedom. Food freedom means you cannot destroy our right to grow food. Secondly, you cannot destroy our governments’ obligations to us to support regenerative agriculture rather than support degenerative agriculture and subsidize it. And third, I think we should call for a worldwide boycott of lab foods … Another part of this should be, don’t let big tech enter our bodies. Let big tech not enter life sciences … These guys will make life illegal. Living will be illegal except as a little piece in their machine through their permission.” Each year, Navdanya holds a two-week campaign on food freedom starting October 2, which is nonviolence day. We now need to take that campaign to the global stage, and I will do my part to aid this effort. So, mark your calendar and prepare to join us in a global boycott of food that makes you sick — processed food, GMO foods, lab-created foods, fake meats, all of it. More InformationYou can learn more about Shiva’s work and her many projects on Navdanya.org. During the first week of April every year, Navdanya gives a five-day course called Annam, Food as Health, via Zoom. In this course, you’ll learn about soil and plant biodiversity and healthy eating for optimal health. You can also learn more by reading the report “Earth Rising, Women Rising: Regenerating the Earth, Seeding the Future,” written by female farmers. And, again, mark your calendars and plan your participation in the food freedom campaign, starting October 2, 2021. “When all the spiritual forces, all of nature’s forces and most of people’s forces are aligned together, what can [a few] billionaires, technocrats — who want to be richer than they are, greedier than they are, more violent than they are — do?” Shiva says. “They don’t count in the long run, really. It’s just that we cannot afford to not do the things that we can do.”
Image source: Wikimedia Commons ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Vandana Shiva on the taking down of Bill Gates’ empires appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Ron Paul: Global Taxes – Global Stagnation
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 09:03 AM PDT Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has proposed that governments around the world require payment of at least a uniform “global minimum corporate tax.” A motivation for Yellen’s push for a global minimum corporate tax is fear that the Biden administration’s proposed increase in the US corporate tax will cause some American corporations to flee the US for countries with lower corporate taxes. Article by Ron Paul. President Biden wants to increase corporate taxes to help pay for his so-called infrastructure plan. The plan actually spends more on “progressive” priorities, including a down payment on the Green New Deal, than on infrastructure. Much of the spending will benefit state-favored businesses. For example, the plan provides money to promote manufacturing and electric vehicles. So, the idea is to raise taxes on all corporations and then use some of the received tax payments to subsidize government-favored businesses and industries. The only way to know the highest valued use of resources is by seeing what goods and services consumers voluntary choose to spend their money on. A system where the allocation of resources is based on the preferences of politicians and bureaucrats — who use force to get their way — will be less efficient than a system where consumers control the allocation of resources. Thus, the greater role government plays in the economy the less prosperous the people will be — with the possible exception of the governing class and those who make their living currying favor with the rulers. Yellen’s global corporate tax proposal will no doubt be supported by governments of many European Union (EU) countries, as well as the globalist bureaucrats at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). For years, these governments and their power-hungry OECD allies have sought to create a global tax cartel. The goal of those supporting global minimum taxes enforced by a global tax agency is to prevent countries from lowering their taxes. Lowering corporate and other taxes is one way countries are able to attract new businesses and grow their economies. For example, after Ireland lowered its corporate taxes, it moved from being one of the poorest countries in the EU to having one of the EU’s strongest economies. Also, American workers and investors benefited from the 2017 tax reform’s reduction of corporate taxes from 35 percent to 21 percent. Yellen and her pro-global tax counterparts deride tax competition between countries as a “race to the bottom.” In fact, tax competition is a race to the top for the countries whose economies benefit from new investments, and for the workers and consumers who benefit from new job opportunities and new products. In contrast, a global minimum corporate tax will raise prices and lower wages, while incentivizing politicians to further increase the minimum. A global minimum corporate tax will also set a precedent for imposition of other global minimum taxes on individuals. This scheme may even advance the old Keynesian dream of a global currency. The Biden administration is already taking steps toward a global currency by asking the International Monetary Fund to issue more special drawing rights (SDRs). Global tax and fiat currency systems will only benefit the world’s political and financial elites. In contrast, regular people across the world benefit from limited government, free markets, sound money, and reduced or eliminated taxes. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Ron Paul: Global Taxes – Global Stagnation appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Minneapolis riots were just a warm-up for the post-Chauvin-trial anarchy
Posted: 12 Apr 2021 08:00 AM PDT Minneapolis stores were heavily looted last night following the police shooting death of Duante Wright, a Black man with arrest warrants who tried to run from police and allegedly put other people in danger in the process. But as bad as things were yesterday, they’re just a prelude to what’s going to happen in Minneapolis and other cities when the Derek Chauvin verdict is released. At this point, there is no way to avoid it. Even a conviction of second degree murder—the strongest charge against him—will result in rioting. Why? Because the narratives have already been set and the riots are already planned. Regardless of the verdict, the narrative will be declared by leaders of the various movements and rioting will begin. They will have nothing to do with Derek Chauvin or even George Floyd. This is 100% about pushing the Neo-Marxist agenda using Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and others to incite riots across the nation. Many have reported on the current riots, but journalist Andy Ngo has done a comprehensive job of posting them so we’ll turn to his Twitter account for examples. First, let’s look at the man whose death sparked this latest round of riots. Latest #BLM violence near Minneapolis sparked by police shooting of #DaunteWright. He was wanted on a warrant when he attempted to flee by car. He was shot & drove a distance before crashing into others. His FB is filled w/him flashing gang signs, using drugs & showing off cash. The claim from #DuanteWright’s mother & #BLM activists that he was killed by police over air fresheners is unsubstantiated. There was a warrant for his arrest. He resisted arrest & got back in the vehicle & tried to speed off. He nearly killed others during the failed escape.
#BLM protesters began rioting near Minneapolis in response to the police-involved shooting of a suspected gang member.
Brooklyn Center, Minn.: BLM rioter who was about to throw a large chunk of concrete at police was hit with an impact munition. He falls to the ground in pain.
The Brooklyn Center Walmart in Minnesota was broken into and looted in response to the BLM race rioting overnight after police shot dead a suspected gang member who was trying to escape a warrant arrest.
People looted a GameStop overnight in response to BLM inciting a riot & violence in Brooklyn Center (near Minneapolis) after police killed a criminal suspect evading arrest.
BLM looters break inside & steal from an O’Reilly’s auto store overnight in Brooklyn Center, Minn. Auto stores were infamously looted & burnt to the ground last year in Minneapolis.
A gas station convenience store was looted clean by #BLM rioters overnight in Brooklyn Center, Minn. Rioters & protesters are responding violently to the police killing of a wanted criminal suspect who tried fleeing by vehicle.
A Sally Beauty Supply store was smashed into and looted during the #BLM unrest & violence overnight in Brooklyn Center, Minn.
A liquor store in Brooklyn Center, Minn. was destroyed by BLM looters overnight.
A group of women sing and dance outside of stores that were looted by #BLM rioters in Brooklyn Center, Minn.
It’s important to see the devastation that’s happening now so we’ll know a little of what to expect following the Chauvin trial. The only silver lining in all this is that Minneapolis and other cities will be better prepared. National Guard will almost certainly be ready and law enforcement should be bolstered. But in cities the size of Minneapolis, it would take tens of thousands of troops to hope to truly keep the peace. As we learned in last summer’s riots, there is often heavy coordination that enables the rioters to divide and strike. Law enforcement cannot be spread too thin or they will be in danger, which means they can only move in large groups. Meanwhile, BLM and Antifa rioters are trained to split into smaller groups to cover more ground. Once law enforcement responds to one area, another area is left vulnerable. This all boils down to the demonstrable notion that the radical anti-American powers arrayed against us have proven their skill at controlling the narrative to drive the actions they desire. One of the reasons these movements, particularly Black Lives Matter, are able to flourish is because they create a false narrative of outrage based on illogical predicates. It makes it somehow acceptable to BLM activists to loot a local liquor store as a “protest” for a police shooting. They are often so brainwashed by the “cause” that they cannot see the logical fallacy in their actions, nor the consequences of the lives they destroy in the process. Again, we cannot reiterate enough that it doesn’t matter what the verdict is in the Chauvin trial. Every combination of guilty or innocent on the charges against him have been gamed out by the puppetmasters over BLM, Antifa, and other groups. They’re prepared to feed the press the narrative they want put forth, not in a press release or formal statement as much as with the tenor of editorials and slant on news reports. They don’t need to speak the narrative. They just need their operates in the press to pronounce it for them. Law abiding citizens may wonder what the recourse may be. Is it hopeless? First and foremost, we must pray through it. Just as villains emerge in times like these, so too can heroes emerge. It seems to be happening less and less, which is why we must be prayerful about this circumstance in hopes of a reprieve. Second, it’s most important for members of a community to defend their community. Law enforcement and National Guard will not be enough. We need to defend our lives and our property with whatever legal means are available to us. The best ally for the radicals in Antifa and BLM is the fearful citizen who is unwilling to act despite their capabilities. Some people cannot, but many who can have been unwilling to step up. Third, we need to back the blue now more than ever. I’ve seen rumblings from many, particularly on the right, who have abandoned their support for law enforcement because of Covid-lockdown-related incidents. It’s understandable; I get mad at any law enforcement officers I see participating in the unconstitutional aspects of lockdown. Last week’s incidents in Burbank surrounding Tinhorn Flats Saloon and Grill were despicable and many in law enforcement were involved. But generally speaking, law enforcement officers desperately need our support in times like these. Their numbers are dwindling, making it even harder to do their jobs. We have to help them keep their hopes high by letting them know we appreciate them. We can lambast them over Covid-tyranny when those incidents arise, but in the defense of our property against Neo-Marxists and anarcho-communists, we’re on their side. We must maintain our resolve despite the rage that’s mounting against us. BLM and Antifa want to burn down America and rebuild it in a Neo-Marxist image. We must stand strong against their threats. ‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including usJust when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 11,000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Minneapolis riots were just a warm-up for the post-Chauvin-trial anarchy appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
42.) ARRA NEWS SERVICE
43.) REDSTATE
Why Is Our Kneejerk Reaction to Blame Black Men With Guns?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions |
44.) WORLD NET DAILY
|
45.) CONSERVATIVE REVIEW
46.) BIZPAC REVIEW
|
|
47.) ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
48.) NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Tuesday, April 13, 2021
Good morning, NBC News readers.
We have the latest from the scene in Minnesota and the reaction to the killing of Daunte Wright, plus analysis on President Joe Biden’s gun reform plans and new moves to fight restrictions on voting.
Here is what we’re watching this Monday morning.
Reeling from the killing of Daunte Wright, Minnesota community is angry and desperate for change Protests continued overnight over the latest police killing of a young black man, with locals calling for change and President Joe Biden calling for calm.
Daunte Wright, 20, was killed Sunday after a traffic stop in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, about 10 miles from where George Floyd was killed by a Minneapolis officer last May.
“Daunte Wright was unjustly murdered, and change needs to happen,” Elise Goodwin told NBC News in this piece from the scene of a rally outside Brooklyn Police Department Monday night where hundreds defied a 7 p.m. curfew.
In other developments:
Tuesday’s top stories Biden’s gun actions could have a positive, if limited, impact, experts say By Rebecca Shabad | Read more Those pushing for tighter gun restrictions say President Biden’s proposals could lead to some reduction in gun violence but congressional action would be needed for substantial changes — a dim prospect in the closely divided Congress.
Top private law firms plan ‘SWAT teams’ to fight voting restrictions in court By Jane C. Timm | Read more More than a dozen top law firms have committed to join forces to challenge voting restrictions across the country, adding legal might to the corporate pressure campaign opposing Republican-led attempts to overhaul elections in the wake of former President Donald Trump’s loss.
Veterans face uphill battle to receive treatment for ‘burn pit’ exposure By Kenzi Abou-Sabe and Didi Martinez | Read more A growing number of U.S. veterans say they have developed serious health ailments after facing prolonged exposure to flaming trash piles at overseas bases. But the Department of Veterans Affairs has denied about 75 percent of veterans’ burn pit claims.
Khloe Kardashian missed chance at personal reflection over body image, critics say By Doha Madani | Read more A poolside photo of Khloe Kardashian began to circulate last week but quickly started to disappear after Kardashian expressed “unbearable” body image issues. Kardashian’s critics said she missed a chance for personal accountability.
OPINION ‘White Lives Matter’ protests are failing across America. Here’s one big reason why. By Nandini Jammi | Read more For tech activists who volunteer to track and get white supremacists removed from tech services, the failure of these rallies is the unsurprising result of lots of work.
BETTER Some stress is actually good for you. Here’s how to get better at dealing with it By Stephanie Thurrott | Read more You might think of stress as good or bad. Planning a wedding? Good stress, right? Losing your job? Bad stress. But that’s not exactly the right way to look at it.
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
Also in the news …
SHOPPING You don’t need to sport eyewear routinely during Covid-19, experts say. If you want to grab eye protection anyway, here’s what they recommend.
One fun thing Are you a fan of Spam, the processed canned pork developed in the 1930s? If you are, the chances are you’re from Hawaii.
According to the SPAM website, Hawaii residents consume 7 million pounds of Spam each year, putting it on restaurant and cafe menus across the state. “People say all of the same things,” food historian Rachel Laudan told TODAY. “About how they wouldn’t touch it, how it’s awful … But when it comes to hot dogs, which they could say many of the same things about, they don’t. So there’s a puzzle for you.”
Read the story here.
Thanks for reading the Morning Rundown.
I’m filling in for Petra Cahill while she has a week off. If you have any comments — likes, dislikes — send me an email at: patrick.smith@nbcuni.com. Thanks, Patrick Smith
|
49.) NBC FIRST READ
|
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray and Carrie Dann
FIRST READ: As GOP sticks with Trump, grassroots energy on the right has gone missing
Tax Day 2009 was the start of the Tea Party protests against Barack Obama’s agenda.
But as we approach April 15, 2021 – even with the tax-filing deadline extended to May 17 – it’s become noticeable just how quiet the conservative grassroots have been during President Biden’s first three months in office.
KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images
Part of it is due to the fact that Biden has never been the lightning rod for the right that Obama, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and even AOC are.
But another part is the 2020 defeated candidate who decided to stick around: Donald Trump.
In the 21st century, we’ve seen grassroots political movements – whether real, AstroTurf, or activated by cable news – replace defeated presidential candidates and unpopular presidents. (With the previous leadership either politically discredited by the results or voluntarily leaving day-to-day politics, new players rush to fill the vacuum and voters look for signals as to what they should be doing next and how their party can rebrand.)
The anti-war protests during George W. Bush’s presidency blossomed after John Kerry’s loss in 2004.
The Tea Party came alive after John McCain’s defeat in 2008, as well as Bush 43’s exit from the political stage.
And the Women’s March – the day after Trump’s inauguration – came after Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss.
Sure, conservatives like Marjorie Taylor Greene are raising lots of money.
Also to be sure, there’s always been lots of grassroots energy behind Trump (though that has dissipated after Jan. 6).
But when we’re talking about grassroots movement and energy to bolster a political party and stop the opposition’s agenda, the energy on the right has been largely MIA.
And it’s all taking place in a political environment where Nikki Haley says she won’t run in 2024 if Trump does, as well as where Sen. Rick Scott, the chair of the GOP’s Senate campaign arm, is presenting Trump with a trophy bowl.
|
TWEET OF THE DAY: Bad news on the vaccine front
|
Data Download: The numbers you need to know today
6: The number of women who developed rare blood clots after receiving the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, prompting federal health agencies to call for a pause on its use.
5: The number of Democratic pollsters who have signed on to a statement acknowledging “major errors” in 2020 polling.
31,401,163: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 70,733 more than yesterday morning.)
566,645: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far, per the most recent data from NBC News. (That’s 548 more than yesterday morning.)
189,692,045: Number of vaccine doses administered in the U.S.
20.3 percent: The share of Americans who are fully vaccinated
16: The number of days left for Biden to reach his 100-day vaccination goal.
|
Just asking…
Another school shooting. Another police officer killing a Black man during a traffic stop.
Why aren’t guns and police reform higher on the political agenda?
|
Remembering when Ron DeSantis’ own mail-in ballot got rejected
Here’s another angle to the continuing story of GOP-led state legislatures trying to place more restrictions on access to the ballot: There’s no guarantee that GOP skepticism of mail-in voting will be a permanent feature of every election in the future. After all, it wasn’t before 2020.
Case in point: Florida, where Republicans once dominated in mail voting, particularly with older voters — and where both former President Trump and now-Gov. Ron DeSantis made frequent use of the method.
In fact, as Noah Pransky of NBCLX reminds us, then-Rep. DeSantis had his own ballot rejected in 2016 due to a mismatched signature. (Pransky himself reported on the ballot’s rejection back in 2018.)
Pransky writes:
“When then-Congressman Ron DeSantis cast his mail ballot for Florida’s primary election in 2016, election workers in his hometown flagged the signature as a mismatch.
When DeSantis provided the canvassing board a new signature as a backup to the signatures already on-file, they determined that handwriting also had “no similarities” to the signature on DeSantis’ ballot and rejected the vote, according to Flagler County elections officials.
More:
“DeSantis’s public voting history – obtained through public records requests from the St. Johns and Flagler supervisors of elections – shows he regularly took advantage of Florida’s no-excuse absentee option, casting votes by mail in six out of seven elections between March 2016 and August 2020. The only time he voted in-person during that period was at a well-choreographed photo opportunity, when he appeared atop the ballot during his 2018 gubernatorial run.
Now, DeSantis is leading the charge in Florida to change how voters obtain a mail ballot, as well as how easily they can drop it off at their local elections offices.
….
[He] is also advocating a change to voter signature-matching that would order elections officials to use only a voter’s most-recent signature to determine authenticity.
|
McCrory expected to jump into NC-SEN race
Former North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory on Wednesday is expected to announce a bid for the state’s vacated Senate seat next year, and he’ll be joining a potentially crowded GOP field of candidates, NBC’s Leigh Ann Caldwell writes.
The field already includes Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., who took a shot at McCrory on Twitter, and it could also include Trump daughter-in-law Lara Trump, as well as Rep. Ted Budd, R-N.C.
|
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world?
Top private law firms are joining forces to form a “SWAT team”-style response to new voting restrictions, NBC’s Jane Timm writes.
The Biden administration is increasingly at odds with Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer over the coronavirus surge in her state.
The NCAA says it won’t hold championship events in states that restrict transgender athletes’ participation in sports.
Ohio Republican Senate candidate Bernie Moreno has cast himself as a big Trump fan. That wasn’t always the case, NBC’s Henry Gomez notes.
Speaking of Trump and GOP candidates, one Republican in Texas is taking an explicitly anti-Trump stance.
Progressive Democrat Charles Booker is mulling a race against Rand Paul.
How much difference would Biden’s proposed new actions on guns actually make?
The New York Times checks in on Andrew Cuomo’s continuing attempts to ride out his scandals.
|
|
|
Download the NBC News Mobile App
|
50.) CBS
51.) REASON
|
|
|
|
|
52.) MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
53.) LOUDER WITH CROWDER
Brooklyn Center police held a press conference where they released the bodycam footage of Sunday’s officer-involved shooting of Daunte Wright. You can see police handcuffing Wright, Wright escaping … MORE
8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 USA
Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe | View in browser |
54.) TOWNHALL
|
||
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
55.) REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
|
||||||||||||
|
56.) REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
|
57.) CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
58.) BERNARD GOLDBERG
59.) SARA A. CARTER
60.) TWITCHY
61.) HOT AIR
62.) 1440 DAILY DIGEST
No images? Click here Good morning. It’s Tuesday, April 13, and we’re covering more details on a Minneapolis police shooting, loosened COVID-19 restrictions in England, and much more. Have feedback? Let us know at hello@join1440.com. First time reading? Sign up here. NEED TO KNOWDaunte WrightPolice officials in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, said yesterday an officer who fatally shot a motorist during a Sunday traffic stop mistakenly pulled their gun instead of their Taser. Twenty-year-old Duante Wright, a Black man, had been pulled over in the early afternoon for a traffic violation. Officers attempted to detain him after finding he had an outstanding warrant; Wright attempted to get back in the vehicle and flee. Body camera footage from the incident (view here, warning: sensitive content) shows an officer yelling “Taser” before discharging their firearm. Wright was pronounced dead a few blocks from the scene, where his vehicle crashed. The killing sparked protests across the Minneapolis region, with a reported 40 people arrested last night. Tensions in the area are already high in anticipation of a verdict in the Derek Chauvin murder trial. The prosecution is expected to rest its case today; George Floyd’s brother took the stand yesterday. Chauvin’s defense will make opening statements today. See a recap of the trial here. England ReopensRevelers in England returned to the pubs yesterday, albeit outdoors, as the country loosened a number of COVID-19 restrictions. Britain had been under one of the globe’s strictest lockdowns for months, but raced ahead in efforts to vaccinate its population—some experts believe the country reached herd immunity this week. The government aims to lift all restrictions by June 21. See photos from the first day back here. Separately, a top Chinese health official appeared to admit the country’s COVID-19 vaccines are not as effective as originally believed. China has released limited data on its main drug from SinoVac (how it works), but a preliminary trial in Brazil suggested just slightly over 50% efficacy when accounting for asymptomatic cases. The official later walked back his comments. In the US, new COVID-19 cases have risen nearly 30% over three weeks, with a seven-day average of about 70,000 new cases each day. However, five states—Michigan, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey—make up about 40% of new cases. Government officials called on Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) to reimpose restrictions, with the state having seen a 400% increase in cases since early March and many hospitals again reaching capacity. Whitmer has resisted more restrictions so far. The rise comes as the US faces a shortage of the one-shot Johnson & Johnson vaccine due to manufacturing problems at a Maryland facility. More than 46% of the adult US population has received at least one vaccine dose; see how your state is doing here. ‘The Jinx’ Trial to Resume Officials announced the trial of eccentric real estate heir and suspected serial killer Robert Durst will resume May 17, more than 14 months after it was suspended due to the then-emerging pandemic. The 78-year-old Durst is charged with the killing of friend Susan Berman two decades ago, allegedly to conceal his involvement in the 1982 disappearance of his wife Kathleen. The details of the case are incredibly strange ($$, LAT); Durst is also suspected of killing his friend Morris Black to hide his identity while living in Galveston, Texas, posing as a mute female botanist. Durst burst back into public consciousness following HBO’s 2015 documentary “The Jinx,” in which Durst appeared to inadvertently admit to the murders while speaking to himself in a bathroom after forgetting to turn off his microphone. He was taken into custody the day before the final episode aired. Watch the self-incriminating clip here. START INSIDEThe road to a longer, healthier life starts inside. And that’s what InsideTracker is all about. Founded by leading scientists in aging, genetics, and biometric data, InsideTracker is an ultra-personalized performance platform like no other. But how do they do it? First, InsideTracker uses its patented algorithm to analyze your body’s data to provide you with a clear picture of what’s going on inside of you. Then they offer you science-backed recommendations for positive diet and lifestyle changes. Finally, they’ll give you a concrete action plan and track your progress toward reaching your goals every day, every step of the way. Today, one lucky 1440 reader will win two of InsideTracker’s most popular and comprehensive Ultimate Plans and an additional two plans for InnerAge 2.0—their biological age tool. Enter today; good luck! Please support our sponsors! IN THE KNOWSports, Entertainment, & Culture> Harvey Weinstein, currently serving 23 years in New York, is indicted in Los Angeles on 11 counts of sexual assault (More) | Former Kansas City Chiefs assistant coach Britt Reid charged with felony DWI in February crash that left 5-year-old girl critically injured (More) > NCAA announces support for transgender athletes; won’t hold championships in states with discriminatory laws (More) | Federal judge approves settlement between US women’s national team and US Soccer Federation, allowing players to appeal court’s equal pay decision (More) > Will Smith and director Antoine Fuqua pull production of slavery drama “Emancipation” out of Georgia over the state’s new voting law (More) | See an overview of the law (More) Science & Technology> Intel in talks to produce computer chips for US automakers to help alleviate production slowdowns due to global chip shortage (More) | Explaining the chip shortage (More) > Archaeologists uncover a 3,400-year-old site believed to be the ancient city of Luxor, just north of the modern-day Luxor, Egypt; artifacts date to the 18th-dynasty pharaoh Amenhotep III (More) | See a timeline of Egyptian dynasties (More) > Amber fossil of a 98-million-year-old beetle provides a glimpse into the diet of one of the earliest known pollinators; discovery sheds light on the evolution of flowering plants (More) Business & Markets> US stock markets down (S&P 500 -0.02%, Dow -0.2%, Nasdaq -0.4%) as investors await this week’s earnings season kickoff (More) > Microsoft to acquire speech recognition software giant Nuance Communications for $19B, representing company’s second-largest acquisition after $26B LinkedIn deal in 2016 (More) > China imposes restructuring on Ant Group requiring transformation into a financial holding firm; fintech giant founded by Jack Ma saw its would-be record $37B initial public offering delayed last year by Chinese regulators (More) Politics & World AffairsBrought to you by Ground News > Iran vows revenge against Israel, blaming the country for an explosion that knocked out power at Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility; Iranian officials say incident threatens nuclear talks with the US (More) > St. Vincent volcano releases most powerful blast since eruptions began Friday; lava flows destroy farms and forests, while officials work to provide clean water as ash contaminates rivers (More) > The Food and Drug Administration lays out multiyear plan to establish limits and testing for heavy metals in baby food (More, $$, WashPo) | Move was spurred by a February report that sparked outrage (More) From our partners: Want to break free from your echo chamber? There’s an app for that. Ground News is the world’s first news source comparison platform that empowers you to compare how outlets from the left, center, and right are covering any story. Adopt a balanced news diet and download the Ground News App for free today. IN-DEPTHHow Austin Won the PandemicTexas Monthly | Michael Agresta. For years, Austin, Texas, has enchanted Bay Area techies with its hip atmosphere and the promise of cheaper and more available housing. With the pandemic as a tipping point, the city’s tech sector boomed over the past year, despite (or because of) the broader economic upheaval. (Read) The Sixth WaveMIT Press Reader | Per Espen Stoknes. The past three centuries have seen five waves of innovative disruption that not only created new industries, but reshaped the world’s social, political, and cultural boundaries. Are we on the verge of a sixth? (Read) MORE THAN ULTIMATEIn partnership with InsideTracker InsideTracker’s Ultimate Plan is your all-encompassing, comprehensive wellness solution. Designed to provide a perfect snapshot of your wellness, it covers everything from athletic performance to longevity and overall well-being. But InsideTracker doesn’t stop there. They also created InnerAge 2.0: It’s the new and improved ultra-personalized nutrition system, which uses advanced data to calculate your biological age and provide science-backed recommendations to improve the quantity and quality of your years ahead. Today, a lucky 1440 reader will win two Ultimate Plans and two InnerAge 2.0 plans. Enter to win now! Please support our sponsors! ETCETERAGo ahead, keep on daydreaming. Watch a butterfly construct and emerge from its cocoon. Kitten with rare two-toned face rescued from construction site. Prince Harry releases a eulogy for his grandfather. Future SpaceX spacecraft will have observation domes. Ugh millennials: You’re about to take over the housing market. Cadet smashes women’s record for West Point’s obstacle course. Domino’s Pizza to launch robot pizza delivery in Houston. Clickbait: Boston nurse rescued from mud. Historybook: President Thomas Jefferson born (1743); New York City’s Metropolitan Museum of Art founded (1870); Author Eudora Welty born (1909); Sidney Poitier becomes first Black male to win Best Actor at Oscars (1964). “I always wanted to be someone better the next day than I was the day before.” – Sidney Poitier Enjoy reading? Forward this email to a friend.Why 1440? The printing press was invented in the year 1440, spreading knowledge to the masses and changing the course of history. Guess what else? There are 1,440 minutes in a day and every one is precious. That’s why we scour hundreds of sources every day to provide a concise, comprehensive, and objective view of what’s happening in the world. Reader feedback is a gift—shoot us a note at hello@join1440.com. Interested in advertising to smart readers like you? Apply here! |
63.) AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
64.) NATIONAL REVIEW
TODAY’S MORNING JOLT WITH JIM GERAGHTY |
|
|
65.) POLITICAL WIRE
66.) RASMUSSEN REPORTS
67.) ZEROHEDGE
68.) GATEWAY PUNDIT
69.) FRONTPAGE MAG
70.) HOOVER INSTITUTE
71.) DAILY INTELLIGENCE BRIEF
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
72.) FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION
73.) POPULIST PRESS
74.) INDEPENDENT SENTINEL
75.) BLACKLISTED NEWS
BlackListed News Updates |
- FROM AMERICAN DREAM TO AMERICAN NIGHTMARE
- People on Volcano-Stricken Island Told They Won’t Be Rescued if They Haven’t Had the COVID Vaccine
- “That’s Not Orwellian, THIS Is Orwellian”: Aussies Mulling ID For Access To Facebook, Twitter, Tinder
- Video: DARPA Is Working On COVID Vaccine, Implantable Microchip To Detect Virus
- Fatal police shooting in traffic stop outside Minneapolis sparks protests, looting
- Connecting the DHS to the airline industry
- Houthi Rebels Strike Aramco Oil Facilities With Drones And Missiles
FROM AMERICAN DREAM TO AMERICAN NIGHTMARE
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT For most of the ninety years since James Truslow Adams coined the term American Dream, most Americans still believed the fairy tale of the American Dream, that no matter how humble your beginnings, everyone had a fair chance to become a success in America, based upon your individual talent, intelligence, work ethic and a society that rewarded those who exceled. Sadly, that dream is no longer achievable for most Americans. Our society has devolved into an oligarchy since The Epic of America was published in 1931, where a powerful few rule over a willfully ignorant many through propaganda, mistruth, fear, and an iron fist. |
People on Volcano-Stricken Island Told They Won’t Be Rescued if They Haven’t Had the COVID Vaccine
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT People on the volcano-stricken island of St. Vincent have been told by the country’s Prime Minister that they won’t be rescued if they haven’t taken the COVID vaccine. |
“That’s Not Orwellian, THIS Is Orwellian”: Aussies Mulling ID For Access To Facebook, Twitter, Tinder
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT The Australian government is mulling a proposal which would require citizens to provide at least two forms of identification if they want to use social media, under the guise of ‘battling online bullying’ and more easily report users to authorities. |
Video: DARPA Is Working On COVID Vaccine, Implantable Microchip To Detect Virus
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT The Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is working on a COVID vaccine that will work on all variants and has developed an implantable microchip that it says will continuously monitor the human body for signs of the virus |
Fatal police shooting in traffic stop outside Minneapolis sparks protests, looting
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT Apolice shooting in a Minneapolis suburb Sunday night sparked overnight protests and demonstrations, resulting in officers using teargas to disperse the crowds. |
Connecting the DHS to the airline industry
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT A Request For Information (RFI) posted on a website for Federal government contractors gives a glimpse into the degree to which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has embedded itself into the information technology infrastructure of the airline industry. |
Houthi Rebels Strike Aramco Oil Facilities With Drones And Missiles
Posted: 11 Apr 2021 09:00 PM PDT The Houthi rebels from Yemen today claimed yet another attack on Saudi Aramco facilities, involving 17 drones and two ballistic missiles. Reuters has reported the attack, according to the statement, targeted Aramco facilities in Jeddah and Jubail. |
You are subscribed to email updates from BlackListed News. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
76.) THE DAILY DOT
Welcome to the Tuesday edition of Internet Insider, where we dissect tech and politics unfolding online. Today:
- Over 100,000 people petition Biden to pick FCC commissioner without telecom ties
- Alex Jones called the cops on a Catholic charity because he thought they were human traffickers
- New York’s $15 broadband plan a ‘substantial step forward’ in closing the digital divide
|
BREAK THE INTERNET
Over 100,000 people petition Biden to pick FCC commissioner without telecom ties
More than 100,000 people have joined a push by numerous advocacy organizations urging President Joe Biden to fill out the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with someone who does not have ties to the telecom industry and would support reinstating net neutrality rules.
Last month, a coalition of more than 20 public interest and tech advocacy groups relaunched the Battle for the Net website, which has long been used in the past as a hub for net neutrality advocacy.
As of last week, the groups said more than 100,000 people have signed onto their petition and hundreds of tweets have been sent in support of the effort.
The FCC is currently deadlocked in a 2-2 partisan tie, with Biden having the ability to nominate a fifth commissioner who, once confirmed by the Senate, would give Democrats a majority at the agency. That majority would allow it to vote on what are likely partisan issues, like restoring net neutrality under Title II of the Communications Act.
Biden has faced increased pressure to nominate the fifth commissioner from advocacy groups and tech companies, but now, according to the advocacy groups, that pressure is also coming from more than 100,000 people online.
“Recent years have shown the public is prepared to engage in massive online activism to ensure a free and open internet. Activists are watching and have made clear they expect a public-interest minded nominee to the FCC,” Mark Stanley, director of operations at Demand Progress, said in a statement. “We urge the Biden administration to listen to these voices and quickly nominate a commissioner who will help restore Title II open internet protections and ensure affordable high-speed internet access for all.”
Deputy Tech Editor
|
SPONSORED
If your kids lose their masks all the time, this subscription will save your sanity
Keeping a mask on your kids’ faces is about as easy as teaching a cat to fetch. But if you stock disposable masks you don’t have to lose it when their cloth masks vanish for the 57th time. Armbrust’s child-sized mask subscription will keep your household stocked and save you 30% off the cost at the same time. And with blue, pink, and orange to choose from, you can be sure they’ll never be bored with this now-crucial daily accessory.
CONSPIRACY
Alex Jones called the cops on a Catholic charity because he thought they were human traffickers
Alex Jones’ latest video shows the extreme lengths he’ll go to to ensure that every immigrant child is properly buckled into their car seat.
The video shows Jones, Drew Hernandez, and their camera crew confronting a man loading children and a woman identified as their mother into a van in South Texas.
Shouting and screaming, they shove cameras in their faces and accuse the man of smuggling and trafficking the kids. They also try to get him to reveal where he’s taking the children, which isn’t creepy at all.
Like true traffic safety vigilantes, Jones and Hernandez absolutely lose their minds over the lack of seatbelts in the vehicle.
According to a clearly visible sign on the building, they’re outside Catholic Charities, which, among other things, provides clothing, relocation services, and other humanitarian relief to people seeking to immigrate to the United States.
In a statement, the charity categorically denied everything Jones said in the video, noting they were not smuggling children.
Contributing Writer
|
INTERNET RIGHTS
New York’s $15 broadband plan a ‘substantial step forward’ in closing the digital divide
New York will require internet service providers (ISPs) in the state to offer low-income residents a $15-a-month broadband plan.
The requirement is part of New York’s fiscal year budget plan. Specifically, the $15-a-month plan will be for internet with 25 megabits per second (Mbps) download speeds and 10 Mbps upload speeds. New York will also allow for ISPs to offer 200 Mbps service for no more than $20.
The plan will be available for New Yorkers who meet certain eligibility requirements, including being eligible for SNAP, Medicaid, and other programs. ISPs with more than 20,000 customers in the state—such as Verizon—would need to offer the $15-a-month plan.
Greg Guice, the government affairs director at tech advocacy group Public Knowledge called it a “substantial step forward.” Guice said that while the $15 per month plan is “fairly limited in terms of speed,” he noted that New Yorkers could also get more robust service for $20.
“New York’s new law marks a substantial step forward in addressing the challenge of broadband affordability that so many families around the country are confronting,” Guice told the Daily Dot.
Deputy Tech Editor
|
BTW
- Biden is determined to make broadband spending part of his infrastructure bill
- John Cornyn asks whether Biden is ‘in charge’ because he’s not tweeting
- Matt Gaetz mocked for calling himself a ‘canceled man’ who’s ‘wanted by the Deep State’
- Idaho Lt. Gov., previously accused of white supremacy, is ‘investigating’ critical race theory in schools
- Left-wing group ‘White Lies Matter’ says it’s holding Confederate monument that disappeared from cemetery for ransom
- Conservatives compare ‘vaccine passports’ to the Holocaust
Copyright © 2021 The Daily Dot, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up to get the inside scoop on internet culture from the Daily Dot.
Don’t want to hear from us anymore?
We understand, but it won’t be the same without you!
Click here to unsubscribe
77.) HEADLINE USA
78.) NATURAL NEWS
79.) POLITICHICKS
80.) ONE NEWS NOW
81.) THE WESTERN JOURNAL
82.) SEAN HANNITY
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
83.) THE DAILY CALLER
84.) AMERICAN CONSEQUENCES
85.) THE POLITICAL INSIDER – WAKE UP EDITION
|
Unsubscribe | ThePoliticalInsider.com | About | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of UseForward to a Friend The Political Insider, LLC | 1818 Library Street | Reston | VA | 20190
|
86.) THE PATRIOT POST
87.) DECISION DESK HQ
88.) DIGG
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twitter • Facebook • Tumblr • YouTube Advertise on Digg digg.com • Unsubscribe© 2020 Digg Holdings 18 Shipyard Drive, Hingham, MA 02043 |
89.) THE POLITICAL INSIDER – INSIDER’S EDITION
90.) CONSERVATIVE TRIBUNE
91.) USA TODAY
|
92.) DISRN
|
93.) ABSOLUTE NEWS
|
94.) JUDICIAL WATCH
95.) RIGHTWING.ORG
|
96.) JAMIE DUPREE
President Biden tries the bipartisan approach on infrastructure. Lawmakers pay tribute today to a fallen Capitol Police Officer. And the Battle of the Metal Detectors will go to court. This is “Regular Order” for April 13, 2021.
TUESDAY HILL HIGHLIGHTS:
+ Senate hearings begin on 2022 Defense Authorization. 9:30 am.
+ Senate Finance hearing on 2021 tax filing season. 10 am.
+ Congressional Black Caucus meets with President Biden. 2 pm.
+ Senate Banking hearing on student debt burden. 2:30 pm.
+ Senate panel holds hearing about COVID impact on travel, tourism. 3 pm.
INFRASTRUCTURE. In a bipartisan meeting on Monday with members of the House and Senate, President Biden pressed lawmakers to support his sweeping infrastructure plan. Rep. Donald Payne Jr. (D-NJ) told reporters the President brought up the issue of raising gas taxes to pay for new roads and bridges – though a plan like that wouldn’t come close to generating the funding needed.
- FUNDING. After the meeting, GOP lawmakers made clear they don’t like the President’s call for raising corporate taxes to fund new roads and bridges, as Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) called that an ‘almost impossible sell.’
- GAS TAX. Congress has not raised the federal gasoline tax of 18.4 cents per gallon since 1993. Along with cars getting better gas mileage, the lack of new revenue is why the Highway Trust Fund is short on funding for infrastructure.
SALES PITCH. The White House has issued two-page summaries for every state, rattling off a list of infrastructure needs which could be addressed by the President’s plans. Some examples: “Since 2011, commute times have increased by 10.8% in Georgia,” and “Since 2011, commute times have increased by 11.6% in Florida.” (Just change the two-letter abbreviation in the link to get your home state.)
- BACKERS. House and Senate Democrats returned from their Easter break even more ready to press ahead swiftly on infrastructure. “Let’s fix the damn roads,” said Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI). “Time for Congress to get to work and pass this plan,” said Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA).
POLICE SHOOTING. A day after denouncing police in Virginia for their treatment of a black U.S. Army officer in a traffic stop, Democrats in Congress condemned a police killing in Minnesota. “Daunte Wright should be alive today,” said Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI). “I am sick and tired of cops “accidentally” killing Black Americans,” said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL).
- BIDEN. President Biden bemoaned the shooting of Wright, but urged calm. “I want to make it clear again: There is absolutely no justification – none – for looting, no justification for violence,” the President told reporters.
- WHITE HOUSE. The subject could certainly come up at a White House meeting this afternoon involving President Biden, Vice President Harris, and members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
- GOP. Republicans viewed the latest unrest in Minnesota a bit differently. “BLM riots broke out (again)” tweeted Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA). “Where’s the outrage from Democrats and media commentators,” Hice asked – though the Georgia Republican never mentioned the police shooting which sparked the protests.
VIRGINIA. One police officer has already been fired over a traffic stop made against Army Lt. Caron Nazario, as the Governor of Virginia on Monday ordered a full investigation. Nazario wasn’t charged with anything, as the officers told him to stay quiet about what happened, or he might face repercussions.
- OLD DOMINION. “The incident captured on video was completely unacceptable,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA). “What has happened to Daunte Wright & Caron Nazario would never have happened to me or my daughters,” said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO).
CAPITOL TRIBUTE. President Biden will join lawmakers in the Rotunda today to honor Capitol Police Officer Billy Evans, who was killed when a man rammed his car into a security checkpoint on Good Friday. Evans is the third officer on the Capitol Police force to die this year. “His particular post often meant that he was the first line of defense for the Congress,” said Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell.
- CAPITOL SECURITY. The House and Senate are back in legislative session with no new answers on security for the Capitol Complex. The temporary fencing put up after the January 6 attack remains in place. It’s not clear how long it will stay up – or what other security changes will be made.
DOMESTIC TERROR. Armed with a new study from CSIS, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) says it’s time for Congressional hearings about the U.S. military and home-grown terrorism. “Recent data shows a deeply dangerous rise in participation by active duty military in terrorist plots & attacks,” Blumenthal said Monday.
- STUDY. The new review from the Center for Strategic and International Studies painted a straightforward picture. “The percentage of all domestic terrorist incidents linked to active-duty and reserve personnel rose in 2020 to 6.4 percent, up from 1.5 percent in 2019 and none in 2018,” CSIS reported.
CONGRESS TODAY. The IRS Commissioner testifies before a Senate committee today about the 2021 tax filing season. Don’t forget – while the April 15 tax deadline has been delayed, payments for estimated taxes are still due this week.
- HIGH TECH. The head of DARPA testifies before a Senate committee today. Not familiar with DARPA? They are the cool kids at the Pentagon – working on advanced research in a variety of fields, like crop-protecting insects.
- VEGAS BABY. The Senate Commerce Committee looks at how COVID-19 has hit the travel and tourism industry. Witnesses from Las Vegas, MGM Resorts, and Florida will tell their stories to Senators this afternoon.
COVID HATE. Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Schumer hold a news conference this morning on COVID-19 hate crimes – specifically targeting Asian-Americans over the Coronavirus. “This week the Senate will vote on Sen. Hirono’s Anti-Asian Hate Crimes bill,” Schumer said on the Senate floor.
- MAYBE NOT. But while Schumer was talking about a vote on the bill from Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI), it’s possible GOP Senators might not agree to allow the measure to move forward. Stay tuned.
HOUSE SECURITY. Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) announced on Monday that he will fight $15,000 in fines levied against him for not going through metal detectors around the House floor. “I will take my case to federal court where I am confident justice will be served,” Clyde said in a statement.
- ETHICS. A majority of the House Ethics Committee refused to accept Clyde’s appeal of his two fines. The ethics panel is divided evenly between the two parties. That means the decision against Clyde was a bipartisan one, as it was against Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX).
- METAL DETECTORS. The extra layer of security at the three main entrances to the House floor began after the January 6 attacks, to stop any lawmakers from bringing firearms onto the House floor (it’s against the law). A number of GOP lawmakers have complained the checks are unconstitutional.
HOUSE SCHEDULE. GOP protests led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) have stopped work on bipartisan non-controversial bills in the House. Greene and others had started forcing votes whenever possible in March, which used large amounts of time due to special COVID remote voting procedures.
- SUSPENSIONS. Suspension bills are rarely partisan in nature. They often include naming local post offices, and non-controversial bipartisan measures. Nothing like that is on the schedule this week. It means there’s a lot of bills sponsored by Republicans which won’t be getting a House vote.
ELECTIONS. The Senate returned to work Monday with a warning from Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell over objections by big companies to election law changes in Georgia. “It’s very different to try to short circuit the debate – to shut down the debate – through economic bullying of American citizens,” McConnell said.
- BASEBALL. GOP lawmakers are still seething over the decision of Major League Baseball to shift the All-Star Game out of Atlanta, in protest of the Georgia voting law changes.
BUDGET DEFICIT. With the feds sending billions of dollars in direct payments from the most recent COVID relief law, the budget deficit in March jumped dramatically. Uncle Sam ran a deficit last month of $660 billion – extremely large – but short of the $864 billion deficit in June 2020, also because of COVID relief.
- REVENUES. Money flowing into the U.S. Treasury was up in March when compared to a year ago, with $267.6 billion in revenues, versus $236.7 billion in March 2020. Monthly revenues in 2021 have been up in January, February and March compared to the same months a year earlier. But spending is up, too.
- FY 2021. Six months into the fiscal year, the federal deficit for 2021 is $1.7 trillion. That’s on pace to break last year’s record $3.13 trillion budget shortfall.
IN THE HOPPER. A group of House Democrats introduced H.R. 2395, a bill to ‘combat the spread of disinformation through restrictions on deep fake video alteration technology.’
- HIGH SPEED. Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-WA) introduced H.R. 2411, which would give people a tax credit to help offset the cost of getting broadband internet in areas with limited broadband availability.
- SCHOOLS. Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) introduced H.R. 2417, which would funnel unspent COVID relief funds to states, ‘on the basis of the number of school-aged children in each State.’
RAP SHEET. The Capitol Attack arrests continue. A Wisconsin man learns that when you fight with the cops, you get arrested. A Utah man tried to cover his face in the Capitol, but it didn’t stop a search warrant on his cell phone. And a Michigan man gets reminded that when you stay at a hotel near D.C., they have video of you.
MUSE OF HISTORY. April 13, 1830. On this date, the House of Representatives was nearing the end of a lengthy debate on a major infrastructure proposal for the United States – a national road which would stretch from Buffalo to Washington, D.C., and then on to New Orleans. It sparked familiar friction over the role of the federal government and the states on internal improvements for the growing nation. “I consider this bill as the most direct and daring attempt upon State jurisdiction and authority,” said Rep. Pryor Lea of Tennessee. The House on this date rejected several amendments to change the proposed route of the road – ‘by large majorities’ – and then voted down a plan to also provide a road from Boston to the Great Lakes. In the end, the Buffalo-New Orleans bill was defeated on a vote of 105-88.
LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM:
The House meets at 7 pm.
The Senate meets at 12 noon.
President Biden is in Washington. Schedule link.
Follow me on Twitter @jamiedupree. Email me at jamiedupree@substack.com
See the archive at http://jamiedupree.substack.com
97.) US NEWS & WORLD REPORT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
98.) NEWSMAX
|
This email is never sent unsolicited. You have received this Newsmax email because you subscribed to it or someone forwarded it to you. To opt out, see the links below.
Remove your email address from our list or modify your profile. We respect your right to privacy. View our policy. This email was sent by: DM208278 |
99.) WOLF DAILY
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
100.) MARK LEVIN
April 12, 2021
On Monday’s Mark Levin Show, The fatal shooting in Minnesota was a horrific tragedy. The incident was caught on tape and is nothing like the George Floyd case. It clearly had nothing to do with systemic racism and the looters should be jailed accordingly. The mayor has fired the City Manager, Curt Boganey, for asking for due process. The media have already drawn their conclusions and done away with any form of due process. When the Mayor fired Boganey he became part of the mob. Then, Tucker Carlson has been attacked by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for making ‘White supremacist’ comments. Yet, the truth is that Carlson’s comments were based on the facts of what’s happening at the border to change the voting demography of southern states. The ADL is led by a secular Jew and former Obama White House staffer that seemingly agreed with President Obama’s anti-Semitic views. The ADL should fire their CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt! Later, Joe Biden is ramming through trillions of dollars that ultimately benefit his base, not the people. Everything is being done in the name of infrastructure even if it isn’t. Congressional Republicans should reject any deals with the Democrats and play offense. Meanwhile, Democrats are seizing on the fecklessness of the GOP and working with large corporations to implement their leftist vision for voting laws.
THIS IS FROM:
Israel National News
ADL chief demands: Fox News host Tucker Carlson must resign or be fired
Wall St Journal
CEOs Plan New Push on Voting Legislation
Daily Wire
Buttigieg Claims Racism Is ‘Physically Built’ Into U.S. Interstate System
Twitter
Mayor fires Minnesota city manager who called for ‘due process’ after shooting
Just The News
Zuckerberg group gave Detroit $7.4 million to ‘dramatically’ expand vote in city key to Biden win
Thought Co
Why Did John Adams Defend Captain Preston After the Boston Massacre?
Post Millennial
FLASHBACK: Joe Biden calls court packing a corrupt ‘power grab’
NY Post
Inside BLM co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors’ million-dollar real estate buying binge
Right Scoop
Apple, Will Smith to move new film OUT of Georgia. Guess why?
The Blaze
Study: San Francisco lost the most residents of any major city in the United States
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Star Tribune
101.) BLACKPRESSUSA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
102.) CSN NEWS
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|