Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Wednesday October 14, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
THE RESURGENT
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
DAYBREAK
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORNING BREW
|
---|
|
---|
Apple
|
---|
Giphy
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
Francis Scialabba
|
---|
Google Finance
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
Written by Eliza Carter, Alex Hickey, and Neal Freyman
Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here. |
ADVERTISE // CAREERS // SHOP
Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here. Copyright ©2020 Morning Brew. All rights reserved. |
JUDICIAL WATCH
FOX NEWS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
JUST THE NEWS
Just The News: Daily Newsletter
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
AXIOS
Axios AM
🐪 Good Wednesday morning. Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,192 words … 4½ minutes.
Photo illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios. Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty Images
Eight months ago, Joe Biden was in danger of losing the Democratic nomination. Now he’s a prohibitive favorite for president — who got there with lots of luck and shockingly little scrutiny, Axios’ Hans Nichols reports.
- Why it matters: The media’s obsession with President Trump — and Trump’s compulsion to dominate the news — allowed Biden to purposely and persistently minimize public appearances and tough questions.
Since Aug. 31, Biden has answered less than half as many questions from the press as Trump — 365 compared with 753 — according to a tally by the Trump campaign, which the Biden campaign didn’t dispute.
- In that time, Biden has done approximately 35 local TV interviews, three national interviews and two town halls.
- Biden went almost three months without taking questions from beat reporters.
- Biden aides say one reason there’s less scrutiny of Biden in the general election is that he already was examined thoroughly in the primary election and over decades in public life.
- Andrew Bates, a Biden spokesperson, said: “Who’s ‘scrutinizing’ Trump more, Maria Bartiromo or Sean Hannity?”
Biden has yet to be pinned down on an array of legitimate questions, including:
- His blunt view of adding new justices to the Supreme Court, Medicare for All, police funding, Pentagon spending, fracking, reparations for African Americans, the Green New Deal and his support for the 1994 crime bill.
- 🎧 Hear it here: Hans Nichols takes you inside the Biden campaign on the “Axios Today” podcast.
After promising for 10 years to get rid of the Affordable Care Act, and with a lawsuit pending at the Supreme Court that could do exactly that, Republicans are making a new argument: C’mon! Nobody’s getting rid of the ACA.
- That new message blared as the Senate Judiciary Committee held the opening round of questions for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, with health care as the dominant topic, Axios’ Sam Baker writes.
- Barrett has criticized the Supreme Court’s previous decisions upholding the ACA, but was quick to emphasize the difference between those cases and the one she might hear. She refused to discuss how she might rule.
Reality check: Republican attorneys general and the Trump administration are asking the Supreme Court to strike down the entire law, and will make that case in oral arguments on Nov. 10.
🗞️ How it’s playing …
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
China is already test-driving the future of finance while the rest of the world is stuck trying to get its learner’s permit, Dion Rabouin writes in Axios Markets.
- Why it matters: The pandemic has accelerated the world’s move away from paper money. Producing the world’s first central bank digital currency could put China in the driver’s seat to steer the future of payments and currency.
China’s central bank has distributed the currency to “lottery” winners who are reportedly spending it at thousands of retailers, including local supermarkets and pharmacies and even Walmart.
- 💰 Sign up for Dion Rabouin’s daily Axios Markets newsletter.
Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
This is President Trump’s packed-in, largely maskless rally last night in Johnstown, Pa., which even Fox News and C-SPAN decided against airing live. (C-SPAN 3 went with a Wendell Willkie event from 1940.)
- Trump said: “Suburban women: Will you please like me? [Cheers.] Please. Please. I saved your damn neighborhood, OK. … We saved suburbia in the U.S.”
Delivering his “Vision for Older Americans” in Pembroke Pines, Fla., Joe Biden holds up a notecard showing metrics that are included on his daily schedule.
- The “only senior Donald Trump seems to care about” is himself, Biden said.
- See Biden’s plan.
The new iPhones. Photo: Apple via AP
With the iPhone 12 unveiled yesterday, Apple made some big tech bets that should boost demand for 5G networks, as well as help spur developers looking to create more advanced augmented reality applications, Axios chief technology correspondent Ina Fried writes from S.F.
- Why it matters: Many tech advances start out as chicken-and-egg problems, with developers waiting for a market to emerge while consumers don’t yet see the value. Apple has the rare ability to push past that block.
Apple introduced four models of the iPhone 12 that support for a wide range of 5G networks. The two Pro models add not only a zoom lens, but also a LiDAR sensor for depth sensing and advanced augmented reality capabilities.
- That could be a large enough market to start attracting app developers to take advantage of the technology — by offering more complex image layers or more precise map locations for AR apps, which place digital information over real-world images.
Go deeper: Details of the announcements.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote yesterday in favor of narrowing the longstanding — but now hotly contested — law that keeps online platforms from being held liable for what users post, Axios’ Ashley Gold reports.
- Why it matters: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a growing target of bipartisan ire.
- Thomas, arguably the court’s most conservative justice, is laying down a marker, as the likely confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett looks set to tip the court further right.
Illustration: Axios
Continuing to grow profitably amid the pandemic, Axios will take Smart Brevity local next year and launch experiments in Denver, Des Moines, Minneapolis-St. Paul and Tampa-St. Petersburg.
- Axios CEO Jim VandeHei told The Wall Street Journal that the focus will be on topics of consequence like local business, tech and education.
- “This is a big bet — a bet that you can hook local readers on a daily basis with a morning newsletter and build up from there,” VandeHei said. “It’s a risk worth taking because if we are right, it’s superscalable.”
Why it matters: VandeHei said in a Digiday Podcast interview that local journalism “is maybe the hardest puzzle to solve.”
- “Let’s try to be essential overnight,” he said.
- Jim added on a Recode Media interview with Peter Kafka that Axios Local will try to bolster existing local outlets: “We’re going to point people to other sources of information, encourage them to subscribe.”
The Journal’s article is headlined, “Axios Is Growing and Profitable Despite Bleak News Landscape.”
- “The hope with Axios,” Jim told Digiday, “is that we can get people to pay attention to what matters. Climate change matters. China as a competitor or a threat matters. A.I., the robot revolution, this idea that technology is moving faster than the human mind — it matters.”
🎧 Listen to Jim’s Recode Media interview.
- Listen to Jim’s Digiday Podcast interview.
Sign up here for any of the four inaugural Axios Local areas.
Via Fox News
CNN, Fox News and MSNBC collectively averaged just under 10 million viewers in prime time last week (V.P. debate week), or 72% more than the same week in 2019, AP’s David Bauder writes from Nielsen data.
- Fox News’ average of 4.42 million last week was up 63% … MSNBC’s 2.75 million was up 38% … CNN’s 2.59 million was an eye-popping 172% increase.
V.P. debate: Fox News, 11.94 million … CNN, 7.75 million … MSNBC, 6.94 million.
- NBC’s Biden town hall drew 6.7 million.
The NBA just completed a historic season that required the league to shutter its arenas. Now, it will help execute a historic election by reopening them to voters, Kendall “Axios Sports” Baker writes.
Voting was an important issue for players inside the bubble, with PSAs airing during playoff games and teams wearing warm-up shirts with “VOTE” written across the chest.
- Following a three-day strike in August in response to the shooting of Jacob Blake, play resumed only after the league committed to converting arenas into voting locations for the 2020 election.
Why it matters: The momentum created by the NBA has extended to other leagues, culminating in the largest political effort the sports world has ever seen.
- Over 40 sports venues in 20 states will function as polling centers for the upcoming election.
Go deeper: Stadium voting center details (ESPN)
- ⚾ Sign up here for Kendall Baker’s daily Axios Sports.
Walmart says it’ll spread out its traditional one-day Black Friday deals over three weekends in November in an effort to reduce crowds in its stores during a pandemic, AP retail writer Anne D’Innocenzio reports.
- The nation’s largest retailer said more of its doorbuster deals will be reserved for online, as a way to steer shoppers away from its stores.
Many stores are starting their holiday deals this month.
- Amazon, which usually holds its annual Prime Day event in mid-July, delayed it to this week.
📱 Thanks for starting your day with us. Invite your friends to sign up for Axios AM/PM.
THE WASHINGTON FREE BEACON
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Oct 14, 2020 View in Browser AP MORNING WIRE Good morning. In today’s AP Morning Wire:
TAMER FAKAHANY
The Rundown POOL VIA AP /STEFANI REYNOLDS Supreme Court nominee Barrett deflects tough questions from Democrats, back on Capitol Hill for final session
Amy Coney Barrett returns to Capitol Hill today for a third day of U.S. Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Senators are digging deeper into the conservative judge’s outlook on abortion, health care and a potentially disputed presidential election.
Barret gave hours of testimony but very few specifics, AP’s Lisa Mascaro, Mark Sherman and Laurie Kellman report.
President Donald Trump has said he wants a justice seated for any disputes arising from his heated campaign against Democratic rival Joe Biden, but Barrett testified she has not spoken to Trump or his team about election cases. Pressed by Democrats, she declined to commit to recusing herself from any post-election cases without first consulting the other justices.
Democrats are running out of time to stop Republicans from ensuring that Trump’s nominee is quickly confirmed.
Today’s session is set to be Barrett’s last. Underscoring the Republicans’ confidence, an initial committee vote on the nomination has been set for Thursday.
Day 2 Takeaways: Barrett is reticent as Democrats focus on health care.
VIDEO: Barrett sidesteps questions on abortion ruling.
VIDEO: Sen, Klobuchar says Barrett is ‘polar opposite’ of Ginsburg.
VIDEO: Barrett says nobody wants ‘Law of Amy.’
AP FACT CHECK: Sen. Graham and Biden on Obamacare, Barrett.
Hearing turns to discussion of notable high court cases.
Barrett cites ‘Ginsburg rule’ that Ginsburg didn’t follow.
AP Explains: Originalism, Barrett’s judicial philosophy.
AP PHOTO/CAROLYN KASTER Battling Biden in swing states, Trump is forced to play defense; Court halts U.S. census in latest twist of 2020 count
Donald Trump is being forced on the Electoral College defensive with a trip to Iowa later today, a state he won handily in 2016 but where Joe Biden is making serious inroads.
Trump’s heavy travel this week, including his rally in Des Moines, reflects his uphill climb three weeks before the election, report Jonathan Lemire, Will Weissert, Kevin Freking and Bill Barrow.
He has already visited Pennsylvania and Florida and will head to another battleground state, North Carolina, that he likely needs to win. Also on his schedule is Georgia, another state he once thought was in his grasp but where recent polling shows Biden improving.
Both candidates tailored Tuesday’s campaigning to strongly motivate voters who could cast potentially decisive ballots. Biden went to Florida to court older voters, looking to deliver a knockout blow in a state Trump needs to win while trying to woo a group whose support for the president has slipped.
And Trump visited Pennsylvania, arguably the most important state on the electoral map, unleashing fierce attacks on Biden’s fitness for office in his opponent’s backyard.
VIDEO: Trump pleas with suburban women: ‘Please like me’.
VIDEO: Biden targets Fla. seniors, slams Trump on COVID.
AP FACT CHECK: Trump’s distortions on WHO and lockdowns.
Voting Misinformation: Popular and verified social media accounts are helping spread online misinformation around the U.S. vote that’s casting doubt on this year’s election. The false claims around voter fraud, misleading photos of ballots being dumped in the trash and tweets stoking fears of violence on Election Day are coming from social media users, partisan news outlets and even Trump’s son. That’s according to new research from the Election Integrity Partnership, some of the world’s top misinformation researchers, Amanda Seitz reports.
2020 Census: The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can end census field operations early, a blow to efforts to make sure minorities are properly counted in the crucial once-a-decade tally. The decision is not a total loss for plaintiffs as they managed to get nearly two extra weeks of counting people. However, it increased the chances of the Trump administration retaining control of the process that decides how many congressional seats each state gets — and how much voting power each state has, Mike Schneider reports.
Race On The Ballot: The Black Lives Matter movement isn’t named in any of the 120 statewide ballot measures up for a vote on Nov. 3. But the nationwide protests over police brutality and racial injustice are major factors in several states for measures with racial themes, David Crary reports. AP PHOTO/FRANK AUGSTEIN Europe tightens rules with more masks, less play as virus surges; Lockdown 2.0 deepens divisions in Israel
The World Health Organization says Europe reported more than 700,000 new COVID-19 cases last week, a record number and a jump of 34% compared to the previous week. Britain, France, Russia and Spain accounted for more than half of the new infections.
Governments across Europe are ratcheting up restrictions in an effort to contain the spread of the resurgent virus, report Jamey Keaten and Frank Jordans.
But wary of hurting already fragile economies, European governments have tried to walk a fine line between keeping the virus under control and stifling businesses that are struggling to survive.
Divided Israel: The country had one of the largest income gaps and poverty rates among developed economies even before the pandemic struck. It has a few high earners concentrated in the lucrative high-tech sector, but many Israelis barely get by as civil servants, in service industries or as small business owners. Those gaps have widened as the second nationwide virus lockdown was imposed last month. The fallout has also deepened long-simmering divisions among Israeli Jews, pitting a largely secular majority against a powerful ultra-Orthodox minority. Joseph Federman reports from Jerusalem.
Antibody Drug: Independent monitors have paused enrollment in a study testing the COVID-19 antiviral drug remdesivir plus an experimental antibody therapy being developed by Eli Lilly. The antibody drug is similar to a treatment Trump recently received. Lilly confirmed that the study had been paused out of caution and said safety is its top concern. The move comes a day after a coronavirus vaccine study was paused to allow investigation of a possible safety issue, Marilynn Marchione and Linda A. Johnson report.
Vaccine Ads: Facebook says it will ban ads that discourage vaccinations and will run an information campaign to encourage people to get flu shots. Unpaid posts by people or groups that discourage vaccinations will still be allowed — the new policy only includes paid ads. Facebook also said ads that push for or against legislation or government policies around vaccines — including a COVID-19 vaccine — are still allowed, Barbara Ortutay reports.
Looking for America
In Vienna, Illinois, almost no one talks openly about the violence that drove out Black residents nearly 70 years ago, or about how it became one of hundreds — perhaps thousands — of so-called ‘sundown towns.’
These towns were places where Black people were allowed in during the day to work or shop but had to be gone by nightfall. Today, some sundown towns still exist in various forms, enforced by tradition and fear rather than by rules, report Tim Sullivan and Noreen Nasir.
“We don’t have any trouble with racism,” said a twice-widowed white woman with a meticulously-kept yard and a white picket fence.
But one of only a handful of Black residents, a stay-at-home father, said, “It’s real strange and weird out here sometimes. Every time I walk around, eyes are on me.”
VIDEO: Racism lingers in Illinois ‘sundown town.’ This part of southern Illinois in the Midwest had at least a half-dozen sundown towns. A three-person AP team went there on the second stop of a reporting road trip across America, a journey they are taking to look at how the U.S. has been shaken and shaped by months of protests over racial injustice, the pandemic, an economic crisis and the looming November election.
They wanted to take a close look at systemic racism, trying to understand how something that is so crushingly obvious to some people can be utterly invisible to others. Other Top Stories A Russian attempt to broker a cease-fire amid the worst outbreak of hostilities over Nagorno-Karabakh in more than a quarter-century has failed to gain any traction, with Azerbaijan and Armenia trading blame for new attacks. The failure of the truce that was supposed to start on Saturday reflects the uncompromising positions of the two South Caucasus rivals. The escalation of fighting since late September raises the threat of an even wider conflict that could draw in Russia and Turkey, as well as threaten Caspian Sea energy exports.
An FBI agent has testified that members of anti-government paramilitary groups who plotted to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer also discussed abducting Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam. The agent said both governors were mentioned during a June meeting in Ohio of extremists from several states. No one has been charged with plotting against Northam. A federal judge in Grand Rapids, Michigan, ordered three Michigan defendants held without bond before trial in the Whitmer plot. The judge delayed a decision on two other Michigan men. Another was ordered transferred to Michigan from his home state of Delaware. Kim Jong Un visited a typhoon-ravaged rural town and lambasted government agencies for defeatism. The Korean Central News Agency cited Kim as saying typhoon-related damage in the northeast was more severe than he thought and praised soldiers in rehabilitation projects for their devotion. In the past, when natural disasters hit North Korea, state media have often dispatched photos, sometimes doctored, of vivid scenes of damage, in an apparent effort to win foreign aid. But Kim said in August he won’t accept any outside assistance this year to maintain stringent border closures to prevent the spread of the virus. Dry, windy weather is posing an extreme wildfire risk in Northern California, where massive blazes already have torched hundreds of homes and killed or injured dozens of people. The National Weather Service issued a red-flag warning from 5 a.m. through Friday morning. With bone-dry humidity and wind gusts up to 55 mph, Pacific Gas & Electric warned that it may begin cutting power this evening to as many as 54,000 customers in 24 counties. GET THE APP
Download the AP News app to get breaking news alerts from AP on your phone, tablet or watch.
Unsubscribe About us 2020 THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 200 Liberty St. New York, NY 10128 |
FORT MYERS (FLORIDA) NEWS-PRESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
CHICAGO SUNTIMES
Lightfoot’s worry: how Amy Coney Barrett on Supreme Court will impact gay marriage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO TRUMP NEWS
THE HILL
|
ROLL CALL
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: ‘Will you please like me?’
Presented by Facebook
DRIVING THE DAY
WITH 20 DAYS until Election Day, it seems like someone might be reading polls … QUOTE OF THE DAY: President DONALD TRUMP, Tuesday night in Johnstown, Pa.: “So can I ask you to do me a favor, suburban women, will you please like me? Please. Please. I saved your damn neighborhood, OK?” Meridith McGraw in Johnstown on Trump pinning his hopes on a “hectic comeback tour”
WHAT THE RIGHT WILL BE TALKING ABOUT TODAY … N.Y. POST: “Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad,” by Emma-Jo Morris and Gabrielle Fonrouge: “Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to e-mails obtained by The Post. …
“The computer was dropped off at a repair shop in Biden’s home state of Delaware in April 2019, according to the store’s owner. Other material extracted from the computer includes a raunchy, 12-minute video that appears to show Hunter, who’s admitted struggling with addiction problems, smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman, as well as numerous other sexually explicit images.
“The customer who brought in the water-damaged MacBook Pro for repair never paid for the service or retrieved it or a hard drive on which its contents were stored, according to the shop owner, who said he tried repeatedly to contact the client. Photos of a Delaware federal court subpoena given to The Post show that both the computer and hard drive were seized by the FBI in December, after the shop’s owner says he alerted the feds to their existence.
“But before turning over the gear, the shop owner says he made a copy of the hard drive and later gave it to former Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, Robert Costello. Steve Bannon, former adviser to President Trump, told The Post about the existence of the hard drive in late September and Giuliani provided The Post with a copy of it on Sunday.”
HOW SCOTUS PLAYED … DAVID MUIR on ABC’s “WORLD NEWS TONIGHT”: “Judge Amy Coney Barrett grilled by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee for hours, defended by Republicans on the committee. Judge Barrett answering without referring to any notes, at one point, holding up her notepad there to show it was blank. She has said that Justice Antonin Scalia, who she clerked for, that she shares his judicial philosophy, today saying she will be her own person on that court if confirmed.
“Repeatedly pushed on the Affordable Care Act, with a case before the court just days after the election — Judge Barrett insisting it is not her ‘mission to destroy the act.’ And forcefully pushing back when asked if she would recuse herself if the results of the election are to come before the court, saying she hopes the committee would ‘have more confidence in my integrity.’ And the very personal moment today when she described talking to her own children about the video of George Floyd.”
— JOSH GERSTEIN: “Senate Republicans had this to say Tuesday about the man who tapped Amy Coney Barrett for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, in essence: Donald who?”
— NYT, A1, two columns: “Barrett Declines to Say She’ll Sit Out if Election Is Thrown to the Court … Sticking to Playbook of Deflection … Insists She Won’t Be ‘Pawn’ of Trump”
— WAPO: “Barrett pledges to be apolitical justice” … Seung Min Kim and Anne Marimow’s ledeall
— N.Y. POST: “Held hostage: Dems lecture Barrett in bizarre hearing: Marcus”
NEW … POLITICO/MORNING CONSULT POLL: BARRETT is getting more popular: 48% of registered voters believe she should be confirmed. Democrats who think she should be confirmed have jumped 13 points. … A WARNING ON WHACKING FAUCI … 64% of those polled say ANTHONY FAUCI has been excellent or good in his handling of the coronavirus. 39% say the same of TRUMP.
THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE begins another round of questioning at 9 a.m.
Good Wednesday morning.
SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI had a heated conversation with WOLF BLITZER on Tuesday night on CNN about her Covid relief efforts. Watch the 1:32 clip
— THE UPSHOT: PELOSI doesn’t appreciate people questioning her approach, which is that she should continue to hold out for a better Covid relief deal because her negotiating position vis-a-vis the administration is strong. There are oodles of people who are quietly saying it’s a wrongheaded stance, but Rep. RO KHANNA (D-Calif.) is the only person suggesting publicly she should take the $1.8 trillion offer proffered by the administration. BLITZER, of course, was not defending the administration here.
ANYONE STILL THINK there’s going to be a deal? Ping us and make the argument!
FIRST DURHAM IS WAITING UNTIL POST-ELECTION, NOW THIS! … WAPO: “‘Unmasking’ probe commissioned by Barr concludes without charges or any public report,” by Matt Zapotosky and Shane Harris: “The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing, according to people familiar with the matter.
“The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department. The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the ‘unmasking’ of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.”
NEW: “Eugene Scalia’s wife tests positive for coronavirus,” by Colby Bermel: “The wife of Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia tested positive for coronavirus on Tuesday afternoon, the department told its employees in a Tuesday night email. Trish Scalia ‘is experiencing mild symptoms but doing well,’the Labor Department wrote, adding that Secretary Scalia had tested negative and experienced no symptoms of the virus. The agency didn’t specify whether Trish Scalia would self-isolate, but did say, ‘The Secretary and Mrs. Scalia will follow the advice of health professionals for Trish’s recovery and the health of those around them.’”
SOME CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE SABER RATTLING … THE NRCC is giddy with excitement. They have a poll that has Rep. CHERI BUSTOS (D-Ill.), the chair of the DCCC, up just 5 percentage points over ESTHER JOY KING, the Republican running against her, with another 7 percent undecided. BUSTOS is from a TRUMP district — which was part of her calling card when she ran. Democrats don’t put much stock in the poll, and think BUSTOS is going to wallop KING. BUT … BUSTOS did just go negative on KING, knocking her from being from Chicago and looking to cut health care. The ad
— THE DCCC RESPONDS: “The rumors are true — Chairwoman Bustos represents a district that swung 17 points toward Republicans in 2016 to vote for Donald Trump, and her constant focus on the needs of the communities she serves is why she’s continued to win her district handily year after year. What’s unclear is who the NRCC troll factory thinks they’re surprising with this poll when they have much bigger problems to deal with on every front.
“The fact that Cheri Bustos has won big in a Trump district is exactly the reason she is the right person to ensure the 30 Democrats in this caucus who also represent Trump won districts come back in three weeks.”
SCOTUS WATCH — “Supreme Court allows Trump administration to end census count,” by Zach Montellaro and Josh Gerstein
— NPR’s @hansilowang: “The Census Bureau says it will keep accepting online #2020Census responses at http://My2020Census.gov through Oct. 15 until 11:59 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time.” Census statement
BIG READ … NYT’S ASTEAD HERNDON with a ‘Long Run’ story: “What Kamala Harris Learned About Power at Howard”
DAVID SIDERS: “Minnesota shows few signs of flipping — despite Trump’s best efforts”: “Donald Trump has fixated on Minnesota since his narrow loss to Hillary Clinton there four years ago. But with less than a month until the election, his prospects there are dimming. Joe Biden’s polling lead remains solid. Even after heavy campaign spending and recent visits to the state by the president and top surrogates, Biden was running ahead of Trump by more than 9 percentage points, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average.
“‘I haven’t heard from anyone on the Republican side who’s to some degree confident,’ said Michael Brodkorb, a former deputy chair of the Minnesota Republican Party. ‘I think the best you’ll hear from a Republican in Minnesota is they think that the race is close.’ Four years ago, it was close. Trump lost the state by fewer than 45,000 votes, and immediately after the election began signaling his infatuation with Minnesota. It was one of his few offensive opportunities on the 2020 battleground map.
“If he could limit his losses in the Twin Cities and their suburbs and run up turnout in more rural, conservative reaches of the state, Republicans and Democrats alike believed he had a credible chance of winning — something no Republican has done since Richard Nixon in 1972.
“The president has traveled to Northern Minnesota twice in recent weeks in an effort to juice his base in a region culturally distant from the Democratic-heavy cities Minneapolis and St. Paul. Before largely white crowds in Bemidji in mid-September and Duluth two weeks ago, Trump mocked Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Somali-American and former refugee who represents a Minneapolis-based district. At both events, he said Biden would ‘turn Minnesota into a refugee camp.’”
IN THE BATTLEGROUND STATES — “Covid crisis colors Wisconsin race,” by Natasha Korecki … “Trump campaign stalls in Pennsylvania,” by Holly Otterbein … “Democrats dominate early voting in Florida,” by Marc Caputo
TRUMP’S WEDNESDAY — The president will deliver remarks to the Economic Clubs of New York, Florida, Washington, Chicago, Florida and Sheboygan in the Rose Garden at 11 a.m. He will leave the White House at 4:05 p.m. for Des Moines. Trump will arrive at Des Moines International Airport at 5:50 p.m. CDT. He will deliver a campaign speech and then return to Washington at 7:30 p.m. He will arrive at the White House at 10:45 p.m.
ON THE TRAIL … JOE BIDEN will attend a virtual fundraiser.
PLAYBOOK READS
TIM ALBERTA in Lansing, Mich.: “‘He’s just so angry all the time’: Trump hemorrhaging support among suburban women”: “Michigan is looking less competitive by the day, and there’s a growing likelihood of Joe Biden blowing out Donald Trump here come November 3. All three Rust Belt states that Trump improbably won in 2016 — Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — are problematic for the president this year. But Michigan is where things look bleakest.
“His support has diminished among the white working-class. Black turnout appears certain to rebound after a dismal showing in 2016. New laws that allow for early voting and no-excuse absentee balloting are expected to push voter participation to historic levels, with Democrats the expected beneficiary of low-propensity Michiganders flooding the ballot box. But the simplest explanation for the president’s trouble here is that he’s continuing to hemorrhage support from white, college-educated women in the suburbs of Detroit.
“It’s hard to overstate just how badly Trump is performing with this crucial demographic. Over the past several weeks, a raft of internal polls have produced numbers that political professionals here are struggling to comprehend. In Oakland County, the second-biggest voting area in the state, Gongwer reported that Democratic polling shows Biden leading Trump by 27 points; Republicans pushed back with a survey showing Trump down only 18 points. (For reference, Trump lost Oakland County by 8 points in 2016.)”
ACROSS THE POND — “Netherlands to return to ‘partial lockdown’ amid rising coronavirus cases,” by Eline Schaart: “The Dutch government ordered a partial lockdown Tuesday and changed tack on masks by mandating them in public spaces in a bid to control one of the worst coronavirus infection rates in the EU.
“‘We are going to a partial lockdown,’ Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said during a press conference. ‘That hurts, but it’s the only way.’
“The Netherlands had long held out on mandating masks in public, unlike many of its European neighbors, but will now require them in places such as stores and museums. The government ordered all restaurants and bars to temporarily close.”
— “EU’s top diplomat Borrell, crisis boss Lenarčič to self-isolate,” by Zoya Sheftalovich
DOWN BALLOT … WAPO: “Health care dominates final Virginia Senate debate, as Gade denies wanting to gut ACA,” by Meagan Flynn
MARKETWATCH — “JPMorgan, Citigroup Signal That Economy Isn’t Out of the Woods,” by WSJ’s David Benoit: “A curious thing happened in the middle of the coronavirus crisis: America’s biggest bank posted a higher profit than it did a year ago, before the pandemic ravaged the economy. JPMorgan Chase & Co. said Tuesday that third-quarter profit rose 4% from a year ago, beating Wall Street estimates. Citigroup Inc., too, delivered better-than-expected results.
“Taken together, the two banks’ third-quarter results show that businesses and consumers held up surprisingly well in the months since the pandemic plunged the U.S. into recession. But the leaders of both banks warned that the economy isn’t out of the woods. The results were boosted because the banks didn’t have to put aside as much money to cover future loan losses. But executives said they haven’t yet changed their views that significant losses are looming in the future.
“They continue to hold large reserves for potential losses and predicted that next year unemployment would remain high and more customers could start defaulting on their loans. JPMorgan Chief Executive James Dimon warned that without more public assistance for the economy, it could grow worse.” WSJ
MEDIAWATCH — The NYT is shuttering its At War blog this week. Announcement from Lauren Katzenberg
— “Pod Save America” will have former President Barack Obama on a special bonus episode about the election, airing this afternoon
— Alexis Johnson is joining Vice News as a correspondent in their D.C. bureau. She previously was a digital reporter at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, where her sidelining this summer made headlines.
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
TRANSITIONS — Paula Glover will be president of the Alliance to Save Energy. She currently is president and CEO of the American Association of Blacks in Energy. … Amelia Chassé Alcivar will return to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan’s administration as chief of staff. She most recently has been comms director for the Republican Governors Association.
WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Jason Rezaian, WaPo columnist and former Tehran bureau chief, and Yeganeh “Yegi” Rezaian, advocacy associate at the Committee to Protect Journalists, welcomed Justus Raha Rezaian on Saturday in D.C. Raha means “free one” in Persian.
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Tucker Foote, SVP and head of government and corporate affairs for North America at Mastercard. How he’s celebrating: “Takeout at home with my wife, kiddos and an obstinate bulldog. And maybe an IPA or two. Sure, the pandemic is putting a damper on our options, but it also doesn’t get much better than that.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: WaPo’s Bob Costa is 35 … Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) is 66 … Mike Feldman is 52 … Eli Lehrer, president of R Street … Peter Osnos (h/t son Evan) … former Nixon White House counsel John Dean is 82 … Cody Keenan … POLITICO’s Bianca Quilantan and Erin Aulov … Isabel Milán … Norm Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute … Emily Atkin … Leigh Farris, managing director at the Carlyle Group … The Boston Globe’s Victoria McGrane … Ira Shapiro … Melissa Maxfield … Lorie Slass (h/ts Jon Haber) … J.C. Derrick … Jacqui Gifford, editor-in-chief of Travel and Leisure (h/t husband Robert) … Jack Fitzpatrick, reporter at Bloomberg Government … Alan Blinder … Robbie Myers, digital director at HUD, is 34 …
… CNN’s Annie Grayer … Lucy Gardner (h/t Margaret Pritchard) … Brian Hart … Stephen Ohlemacher … Daniel Castro, ITIF VP and director of the Center for Data Innovation (h/t Sintia Radu) … David Lehrer … Zeenat Rahman … Collin Burton … Chris May, CEO and founder of Quadrant Advisory … Warren Hendriks is 79 (h/t wife Kathleen) … Dave Leichtman, director of program strategy for Microsoft’s Defending Democracy Program, is 42 … Tucker Coburn is 23 … Dukes Wooters … Catherine Loper … Marco Acevedo … Eve Lieberman, chief policy adviser and legislative counsel for Colorado Gov. Jared Polis … Bee Bononcini is 69 (h/t husband Dave) … Jason Epstein … Brian Bond … Richard Skinner … Anang Mittal … Saul Pink … Jerry Ceppos (h/t daughter Robin)
Follow us on Twitter
AMERICAN MINUTE
Supreme Court – America a “Christian Nation” – Bill Federer
The U.S. Supreme Court stated in the 1892 case of Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, written by Justice David Josiah Brewer (143 U.S. 457-458, 465-471, 36 L ed 226):
“This is a religious people. This is historically true. From the discovery of this continent to the present hour, there is a single voice making this affirmation …”
Read as PDF …
Get the book America’s God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations
The Supreme Court continued:
“The commission to Christopher Columbus … (recited) that
‘it is hoped that by God’s assistance some of the continents and islands in the ocean will be discovered’ …
The first colonial grant made to Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584 … and the grant authorizing him to enact statutes for the government of the proposed colony provided
‘that they be not against the true Christian faith’ …
The first charter of Virginia, granted by King James I in 1606 … commenced the grant in these words:
‘… in propagating of Christian Religion to such People as yet live in Darkness …’
Language of similar import may be found in the subsequent charters of that colony … in 1609 and 1611; and the same is true of the various charters granted to the other colonies.
In language more or less emphatic is the establishment of the Christian religion declared to be one of the purposes of the grant.
The celebrated compact made by the Pilgrims in the Mayflower, 1620, recites:
‘Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith … a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia’ …
The fundamental orders of Connecticut, under which a provisional government was instituted in 1638-1639, commence with this declaration:
‘… And well knowing where a people are gathered together the word of God requires that to maintain the peace and union … there should be an orderly and decent government established according to God … to maintain and preserve the liberty and purity of the gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess … of the said gospel is now practiced amongst us.’
In the charter of privileges granted by William Penn to the province of Pennsylvania, in 1701, it is recited:
‘… no people can be truly happy, though under the greatest enjoyment of civil liberties, if abridged of … their religious profession and worship …’
Coming nearer to the present time, the Declaration of Independence recognizes the presence of the Divine in human affairs in these words:
‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights …
appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions …
And for the support of this Declaration, with firm reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor’ …
These declarations … reaffirm that this is a religious nation.”
Justice Brewer continued in Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States:
“While because of a general recognition of this truth the question has seldom been presented to the courts, yet we find that in Updegraph v. The Commonwealth, it was decided that,
‘Christianity, general Christianity, is, and always has been, a part of the common law … not Christianity with an established church … but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all men.’
And in The People v. Ruggles, Chancellor Kent, the great commentator on American law, speaking as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New York, said:
‘The people of this State, in common with the people of this country, profess the general doctrines of Christianity, as the rule of their faith and practice …
We are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply engrafted upon Christianity, and not upon the doctrines or worship of those impostors.’
And in the famous case of Vidal v. Girard’s Executors (1844) this Court … observed:
‘It is also said, and truly, that the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania’ …
If we pass beyond these matters to a view of American life as expressed by its laws, its business, its customs and its society, we find everywhere a clear recognition of the same truth.
Among other matters note the following:
The form of oath universally prevailing, concluding with an appeal to the Almighty;
the custom of opening sessions of all deliberative bodies and most conventions with prayer;
the prefatory words of all wills, ‘In the name of God, amen’;
the laws respecting the observance of the Sabbath, with the general cessation of all secular business, and the closing of courts, legislatures, and other similar public assemblies on that day;
the churches and church organizations which abound in every city, town and hamlet;
the multitude of charitable organizations existing everywhere under Christian auspices;
the gigantic missionary associations, with general support, and aiming to establish Christian missions in every quarter of the globe.
These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation …”
Justice Brewer continued:
“Or like that in articles 2 and 3 of part 1 of the constitution of Massachusetts, (1780)
… ‘It is the right as well as the duty of all men in society publicly, and at stated seasons, to worship the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe …
As the happiness of a people and the good order and preservation of civil government essentially depend upon piety, religion, and morality, and as these cannot be generally diffused through a community but by the institution of the public worship of God and of public instructions in piety, religion, and morality:
Therefore, to promote their happiness, and to secure the good order and preservation of their government, the people of this commonwealth …
authorize … the several towns, parishes, precincts … to make suitable provision … for the institution of the public worship of God and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion, and morality …'”
Justice Brewer added:
“Or, as in sections 5 and 14 of article 7 of the Constitution of Mississippi, (1832:)
‘No person who denies the being of a God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state …
Religion morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government, the preservation of liberty, and the happiness of mankind, schools, and the means of education, shall forever be encouraged in this state.’
Or by article 22 of the Constitution of Delaware, (1776) which required all officers, besides an oath of allegiance, to make and subscribe the following declaration:
‘I, A.B., do profess faith in God the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy Ghost, one God, blessed for evermore; and I do acknowledge the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration.'”
Justice David Josiah Brewer had served on the Kansas Supreme Court, 1870-1884.
President Chester A. Arthur appointed him a Circuit Court Judge in 1884, then a Supreme Court Justice in 1889.
Justice David Josiah Brewer was a nephew of Supreme Court Justice Stephen J. Field, with whom he serve 9 years on the bench.
Justice David Josiah Brewer died on March 28, 1910.
In his work, The United States-A Christian Nation, published in Philadelphia by the John C. Winston Company, 1905, Justice David Josiah Brewer wrote:
“We classify nations in various ways. As, for instance, by their form of government.
One is a kingdom, another an empire, and still another a republic.
Also by race. Great Britain is an Anglo-Saxon nation, France a Gallic, Germany a Teutonic, Russia a Slav.
And still again by religion. One is a Mohammedan nation, others are heathen, and still others are Christian nations.
This republic is classified among the Christian nations of the World. It was so formally declared by the Supreme Court of the United States …”
Brewer continued:
“We constantly speak of this republic as a Christian nation in fact, as the leading Christian nation of the world.
This popular use of the term certainly has significance …
In no charter or constitution is there anything to even suggest that any other than the Christian is the religion of this country.
In none of them is Mohammed or Confucius or Buddha in any manner noticed.
In none of them is Judaism recognized other than by way of toleration of its special creed …”
Justice Brewer concluded:
“While the separation of church and state is often affirmed, there is nowhere a repudiation of Christianity as one of the institutions as well as benedictions of society.
In short, there is no charter or constitution that is either infidel, agnostic, or anti-Christian.
Wherever there is a declaration in favor of any religion it is of the Christian …
I could show how largely our laws and customs are based upon the laws of Moses and the teachings of Christ;
how constantly the Bible is appealed to as the guide of life and the authority in question of morals.”
On August 28, 1947, President Harry S Truman wrote of America to Pope Pius XII:
“Your Holiness, this is a Christian Nation. More than a half century ago that declaration was written into the decrees of the highest court in this land.
It is not without significance that the valiant pioneers who left Europe to establish settlements here, at the very beginning of their colonial enterprises, declared their faith in the Christian religion and made ample provision for its practice and for its support.
The story of the Christian missionaries who in earliest days endured perils, hardship — even death itself in carrying the message of Jesus Christ to untutored savages is one that still moves the hearts of men …”
He added:
“As a Christian Nation our earnest desire is to work with men of good will everywhere to banish war and the causes of war from the world whose Creator desired that men of every race and in every clime (region) should live together in peace, good will and mutual trust …
that mankind shall live in freedom, not in the chains of untruth nor in the chains of a collectivist organization.”
Get the book SOCIALISM-The Real History from Plato to the Present: How the Deep State Capitalizes on Crises to Consolidate Control
Chief Justice John Jay wrote to John Murray, a Pennsylvania State Representative, October 12, 1816:
“Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest, of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.”
When President William Henry Harrison died in office, the next President, John Tyler declared a National Day of Fasting, stating April 13, 1841:
“When a Christian people feel themselves to be overtaken by a great public calamity, it becomes them to humble themselves under the dispensation of Divine Providence.”
In 1838, the New York State Legislature wrote:
“With us it is wisely ordered that no one religion shall be established by law, but that all persons shall be left free in their choice and in their mode of worship.
Still, this is a Christian nation. Ninety-nine hundredths, if not a larger proportion, of our whole population, believe in the general doctrines of the Christian religion.
Our Government depends for its being on the virtue of the people, – on that virtue that has its foundation in the morality of the Christian religion.”
During a cholera epidemic in which 150,000 Americans died, President Zachary Taylor declared a National Day of Fasting.
New Jersey Governor Daniel Haines issued supportive proclamation, published in the Paterson Intelligencer, August 1, 1849:
“Whereas the President … inconsideration of the prevailing pestilence, has set … a Day of Fasting … and whereas I believe that the people of this State recognize the obligations of a Christian nation publicly to acknowledge their dependence upon Almighty God …
… that … they assemble … with humble confession of sin … and … implore the Almighty Ruler of the Universe, to remove us from the scourge … and … restore to us the inestimable blessing of health.”
Francis Scott Key addressed the Washington Society of Alexandria, March 22, 1814:
“The patriot who feels himself in the service of God … will therefore seek to establish for his country in the eyes of the world, such a character as shall make her not unworthy of the name of a Christian nation.”
Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, who Lincoln later appointed Chief Justice, assigned Director of the U.S. Mint James Pollock, former Governor of Pennsylvania, with the task of adding “In God We Trust” to the two cent coin.
James Pollock’s Report was printed by U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1863, page 190-191:
“We claim to be a Christian nation — why should we not vindicate our character by honoring the God of Nations …
Our national coinage should do this. Its legends and devices should declare our trust in God – in Him who is ‘King of Kings and Lord of Lords’ …
The motto suggested, ‘God our Trust,’ is taken from our National Hymn, the ‘Star-Spangled Banner.'”
President William Taft stated December 6, 1912:
“We are a world power …
Our responsibilities in the Pacific and the Atlantic … require us … to clothe ourselves with sufficient naval power … to give weight to our influence in those directions of progress that a powerful Christian nation should advocate.”
Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, who did not support President Truman dropping the atomic bomb, had stated August 10, 1945:
“If we, as a professedly Christian nation, feel morally free to use atomic energy in that way, men elsewhere will accept that verdict.
Atomic weapons will be looked upon as a normal part of the arsenal of war and the stage will be set for the sudden and final destruction of mankind.”
In a backward sense, President Obama inadvertently acknowledged that America had been a Christian nation in his 2007 contested comment “Whatever we once were, we’re no longer a Christian nation.”
Award-winning actor Pat Boone replied in the article “The President Without a Country” (June 6, 2009, WND.com):
“You surely can’t be referring to the United States of America, can you? America is emphatically a Christian nation, and has been from its inception! Seventy percent of her citizens identify themselves as Christian.”
In 2014, Pew Forum reported that 70.4 percent of Americans identified themselves as Christian.
President John F. Kennedy was inaugurated in 1961.
The same year, he sent a greeting to President Quadros of Brazil, January 31, 1961:
“Once in every twenty years presidential inaugurations in your country and mine occur within days of each other …
To each of us is entrusted the heavy responsibility of guiding the affairs of a democratic nation founded on Christian ideals.”
Read as PDF – Supreme Court – America a “Christian Nation”
Get the book Who is the King in America? And Who are the Counselors to the King? An Overview of 6,000 Years of History and Why America is Unique
Schedule Bill Federer for informative interviews & presentations: 314-502-8924 wjfederer@gmail.com
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission is granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate, with acknowledgment.
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: So Much for Hoping That Democrats Wouldn’t Be Awful Filth During the ACB Hearings
This Is Who the Democrats Are Now
I hope you are all having a wild, wonderful, and happy Wednesday, my Kruiser Morning Briefing friends.
Well, we had hopes, didn’t we?
There had been a lot of talk in the mainstream media recently that the Democrats were privately worrying about a repeat of their awfulness during the Kavanaugh confirmation while grilling Amy Coney Barrett to join him on the court. They weren’t worrying about being awful people, of course, they just thought that the optics of it might have negative repercussions for them this close to the election.
After the way they treated ACB on Tuesday it’s safe to say that they’ve gotten over those worries.
The display put on by the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee on Tuesday ranged from just sad to a most perfect display of what demented partisan hatred can do to a person.
Kamala Harris finally peeled off that campaign aura of calm that she had and reminded us all just how off-putting she is. Harris remained in her office to question Barrett, just to keep the COVID panic porn ratcheted up.
Rather than be thoughtful — which she’s probably incapable of anyway — Harris opted for ad hominem:
By the way, Kennedy’s turn at the mic was beyond epic. Made an Animal House reference and referred to Boston University’s Ibram X. Kendi as “some butt head professor” for calling Barrett a “white colonizer” because she adopted children of color. The GOP could use ten more of him.
Amy Klobuchar was fairly pathetic, admitting that she’d kind of hoped it would be her who was nominated for the Supreme Court one day rather than Barrett.
Gotcha, Sen. Sour Grapes.
Klobuchar flailed about while questioning ACB about Roe v Wade and precedent. ACB got her so twisted around at one point that Klobuchar was unable to get out a coherent sentence. That prompted this from me:
Here’s hoping that none of Klobuchar’s staffers got a clipboard concussion after that.
The most vile display of partisan hatred came from the pinched, bitter, and probably evil Mazie Hirono, the senator from Hawaii.
Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), however, will be remembered for asking something no one else asked. During her time to question Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Hirono asked, “Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?”
Barrett had children in the room when Hirono asked that, by the way.
There was nothing in Barrett’s record to prompt the question, it was asked out of pure spite. Hirono is garbage for asking it and so are the Democrats for not condemning her.
Look at the anger on their faces. The all-consuming hatred as a result of their Trump Derangement Syndrome has made them ugly inside and out.
Yet these are the people who say they’re going to heal the country from the president who has mean tweets.
The best part of the spectacle is the utter poise, grace, and class that Amy Coney Barrett is providing as a contrast to the emotional and intellectual pig sty-wallowing of the Democrats on the committee. It’s terrible that she has to go through this but, like Brett Kavanaugh, she’s made of better stuff than they are so she’ll weather it.
Sadly, this vindictive, hateful turn the Democrats have committed to have probably taken them to a place from which they won’t be able to return.
As I sad at the top: this is who they are now.
PJM Linktank
Me: The Great Leftist Voter Suppression Fallacy: Transgender Edition
[WATCH] The Iconic Moment ACB Demonstrated Her Brilliance Without Saying a Word
Treacher: Check Out the Biden Campaign’s Latest Innovation: Rap Battles
FLASHBACK: Joe Biden Used the ‘Offensive’ Phrase ‘Sexual Preference’ Back in May
ACB Hearing Actually Makes Some News: Judge Amy’s Got a Gun
Democrat Cites False SPLC Talking Points in Demonizing Amy Coney Barrett
Nevada Man First Known Case of COVID Reinfection in U.S.
Ted Cruz Eviscerates Sheldon Whitehouse on ‘Citizens United’ and Dark Money
#Lulz. [WATCH] Weaksauce Biden ‘Drive-In’ Drowned Out by MAGAs Chanting ‘FOUR MORE YEARS!’
The Left’s Latest ‘Handmaid’s Tale’ Attack on Amy Coney Barrett Reeks of Desperation
Amy Coney Barrett Is Following the Ginsburg Rule on Abortion and Obamacare. Dems Can’t Stand It
ICONIC: Amy Coney Barrett Sends a Strong Message to Young Conservative Women of Faith
What’s the Angle? Kim Jong-un Cries as He Apologizes to N. Koreans for Poor Living Standards
Was America Discovered by an ‘Islamophobe’?
VodkaPundit: Insanity Wrap #69: ‘Antifa Is Just an Idea’ Myth, Obliterated
It’s Begun: Media Start Predicting a Biden ‘Landslide’ — Just Like Four Years Ago
Oh. California Radicals Believe Their State Is Too ‘Moderate’
[VIDEO] Republican Challenger Joe Collins Wallops ‘Mansion’ Maxine Waters in Hard-Hitting Ad
‘Powerful’ President Trump Is Back and Triggering Everyone with Dancing and Kisses
Did Joe Biden Just Take Court-Packing Off the Table?
Biden Caught in Another Lie in Desperate Bid for Black Votes
[WATCH] Joe Biden Just Made Another Trump Ad
Slate Wants You to Think Columbus Was ‘Driven by Islamophobia’
VIP
The Kruiser Kabana Episode 73: ACB’s Flaming Archangel Sword of Roe-Killing Fury
Where We’re Going, We Won’t Need Roads—or Collectivists
VIP Gold
WEDNESDAY AT 3:30PM EASTERN: VIP Gold Live Chat with VodkaPundit, Kruiser, and Preston
Here’s How One Grassroots Group Is Saving the Electoral College
“Gatekeeping” Gets a Bad Rap but It’s Necessary to Keep Out Those Who Would Destroy a Subculture
From the Mothership and Beyond
As Taiwan’s profile rises, so does risk of conflict with China
Judge Barrett Wrecks Kamala Harris Under SCOTUS Questioning
‘It’s a Hypothetical’: Hickenlooper Dodges Question on Court Packing During Debate With Sen. Gardner
Sen. Blackburn Exposes Democrats’ Agenda-Based Attacks on Judge Barrett
BREAKING: SCOTUS Shuts Down 2020 Census…For Now
Joe Biden’s Anti-Segregation Crusade From Black Church Story Just Took a Punch to the Mouth
Keith Olbermann Illustrates Why We Won’t Give Up Our Guns
Dems can’t even define honesty anymore. The Dishonest Attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s 2A Views
Will Gun Buying Surge End Anti-Gun Lawmaker’s Career?
CALL HER AND TELL HER THIS. How McSally Should Frame The Gun Debate In AZ Senate Race
5-Year-Old Badass Stops Home Invasion
Conchata Ferrell Dies: Former ‘Two and a Half Men’ Co-Star Was 77
Early Absentee Ballot Voting in Some States Has Some Concerns for Democrats
CA Dem Rep. T.J. Cox’s Campaign Mgr Admits Faking Tweet From Opponent, Gives Typical Dem Excuse
Here Are the Metrics That Show Trump Has a Lock on the Election
Oh My: Biden Has No Idea How Long Trump Has Been President
CNN Reporter Tries a Nobel Prize Dunk on Trump, It Goes Hilariously Wrong
Would You Trust Biden to Fix Your Plumbing?
Nov. 4th, if Biden wins. The COVID-19 Pandemic Will End “Far Sooner Than Expected,” Says … The NYT
See also: no one in Phoenix takes taxis. Driverless Taxis Are About To Be A Thing In Phoenix
Netflix CEO Defends “Cuties” After Indictment
Tara Reade Has Written A Memoir Which Will Be Published One Week Before The Election
Democrats’ Emoluments Clause Lawsuit Against President Trump Is Dead
CO seniors protest outside their nursing home: “Rather die from COVID than loneliness”
Guy Fieri cooks for first responders battling CA blaze
California officials ask citizens not to microwave their mail-in ballots to kill the coronavirus
We don’t see any masks or social distancing in this huddle of Democratic senators
Planned Parenthood gets mad at Amy Coney Barrett for…quoting John Adams
GAME OVER: CNN panel, Andrea Mitchell gush over SCOTUS nominee Amy Coney Barrett
The Spectacular Science of the Great Lakes’ Glowing Rocks
Smells Like Onion
The Kruiser Kabana
This is fantastic.
After a couple of lengthy conversations it has been decided that whimsy has been canceled for the remainder of 2020. Namaste, mis amigos.
___
Kruiser Twitter
Kruiser Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.
WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
White House Dossier
http://www.whitehousedossier.com
P.O. Box 27211,
Washington, DC 20038Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: Sheldon and THE SCHEME
Plus: Some concerning COVID data and the Trump administration’s incomprehensible Obamacare position.
The Dispatch Staff | 1 hr | 3 |
Happy Wednesday! Isn’t it nice that when Sen. Mitt Romney talks about a “vile, vituperative, hate-filled morass that is unbecoming of any free nation” he is referencing our national political culture at large and not The Dispatch comment section?
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- The United States confirmed 51,658 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday per the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard, with 5.6 percent of the 929,567 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 810 deaths were attributed to the virus on Tuesday, bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 215,861.
- Days after Eli Lilly urged the FDA to approve emergency use of its antibody treatment, the government-sponsored clinical trial testing it has been put on hold due to safety concerns.
- Two of the six men charged with conspiring to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer reportedly also discussed plans to abduct Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, according to testimony from an FBI Special Agent.
- The Supreme Court reversed a lower court order that extended counting for the 2020 Census due to pandemic-related delays to October 31 from an original deadline of July 31, allowing the count to be halted immediately. All states but Mississippi (99.4 percent), Louisiana (98.3 percent), and South Dakota (99.8 percent) have now enumerated 99.9 percent or more of housing units. The Trump administration argued the count had to end now in order to meet a year-end deadline.
- A 25-year-old Nevada man has become the first American to become re-infected with COVID-19, scientists said yesterday. Also this week, an elderly and immunocompromised woman in the Netherlands reportedly became the first person in the world to die of a second COVID infection.
- Russia, China, and Cuba won spots on the United Nations’ Human Rights Council on Tuesday, but Saudi Arabia failed to cross the needed vote threshold. “These elections only further validate the U.S. decision to withdraw and use other venues and opportunities to protect and promote universal human rights,” said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, referencing the Trump administration’s 2018 departure from the Council. (More background from Danielle Pletka and Brett D. Schaefer, here.)
- A civil rights organization filed a lawsuit to extend the voter registration deadline in Virginia by 48 hours after a cut fiber optic cable resulted in the state’s online voter registration portal being down for several hours on Tuesday.
Day Two of ACB Hearings: Grandstanding Galore
Democratic Senate Judiciary Committee members spent day two of the confirmation hearings trying to pick Amy Coney Barrett’s brain on the constitutionality of Roe v. Wade, Obergefell v. Hodges, and the Affordable Care Act.
But Judge Barrett consistently adhered to the Ginsburg rule, saying she would provide “no hints, no forecasts, no previews” of her future legal positions during their hearings. (This has become a bog-standard nominee technique at SCOTUS hearings: In her 2010 confirmation hearing, for example, now-Justice Elena Kagan said “it would be inappropriate for a nominee to talk about how she will rule on pending cases or on cases beyond that might come before the Court in the future.”)
Republicans were pleased with Barrett’s performance on Tuesday, praising her temperament throughout the hearings and remarking on her ability to speak at length about every question launched her way without notes. Here are some of the highlights.
ACB Doesn’t Take the Bait
After a thinly veiled reelection pitch to South Carolina voters, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham asked Barrett if it would be accurate to call her a “female Scalia.” “I want to be careful to say if I am confirmed, you would not be getting Justice Scalia,” Judge Barrett replied. “You would be getting Justice Barrett, and that is because not all originalists agree.”
Barrett did, however, proudly embrace the originalist label to defend her deferential approach to constitutional interpretation. “Judges cannot just wake up one day and say, ‘I have an agenda—I like guns, I hate guns, I like abortion, I hate abortion,’ and walk in like a royal queen and impose their will on the world,” she said.
Sheldon Whitehouse’s Dark Money Diatribe
After hours of Q&A, Barrett was able to rest her voice for a thirty minute stretch when Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) took the floor. Whitehouse did not ask Barrett a single question on Tuesday, instead using his allotted time to speak about the conservative legal movement’s alleged “dark money operation” to influence the makeup of the Supreme Court. Whitehouse said Barrett’s confirmation hearings were nothing but “puppet theater,” whereby “outside forces” in the conservative legal network were “pulling strings” behind the scenes to advance her nomination. He railed against Republicans’ decision to block Merrick Garland in 2016: “When you find hypocrisy in the daylight, look for power in the shadows.”
Whitehouse made sure to cater to visual learners as well, tearing through a series of flowcharts and placards—including one that read “THE SCHEME”—to connect the dots between conservative groups’ lobbying efforts, amicus briefs, and alleged attempts to control the judicial selection process of Supreme Court judges. He claimed that this dark money conspiracy is responsible for the rulings in 80 Supreme Court cases that were decided by a 5-4 conservative majority, which he dubbed the “Roberts Five.”
Have We Entered COVID’s Third Wave?
It’s hard to escape the feeling we’re entering the final act of the coronavirus pandemic. Escape is on the horizon: Therapeutic treatments are constantly improving, and a vaccine is seemingly only a few months away. But in the meantime, the virus is accelerating again, once more raising the prospect of a crunch of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths before we’re home free at last.
Until now, the pandemic has taken place largely in regional phases: The spring stage was dominated by the virus pounding the Northeast, particularly New York and New Jersey, while over the summer the damage spread more diffusely across the South. But while the South remains responsible for the bulk of new infections, since the beginning of September, every U.S. region has been trending in the wrong direction. Six states, including Michigan and Ohio, saw their greatest single-day spike in new cases since the spring within the past week.
Daily COVID deaths have not yet seen a major bump, still averaging the same 700 or so per day that we’ve seen in recent weeks. Hospitalizations, however, are rising significantly: The 35,000 Americans currently hospitalized across the country this week represents a 16 percent increase over last week, according to the Covid Tracking Project.
Donald Trump, ACB, & the ACA
Obamacare has been in the news a lot lately. Democrats have made protecting it a hallmark of their campaigns this fall, the Supreme Court is set to hear a case on it next month, and President Trump is always two weeks away from rolling out his plan that will keep all the good parts of the ACA and get rid of all the bad parts.
In a piece for the site today, James cut through the noise to lay out where exactly things stand with regard to Trump and Obamacare, particularly as it relates to preexisting conditions.
Oral arguments in Texas v. California—a lawsuit filed by more than a dozen Republican state attorneys general that seeks to overturn the ACA—are set to begin on November 10, just days after both the election and Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s likely elevation to Justice. Democrats have been hammering the case during Barrett’s confirmation hearings this week.
“The suit is widely considered to be a dead end,” James writes, “but Democrats’ political instincts to focus on a threat to Obamacare are correct. For example, the legislation’s provision forbidding insurance companies to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions is immensely popular: 72 percent of the public believes that keeping the provision is ‘very important,’ including 62 percent of Republicans.”
Worth Your Time
- Juliet Bartz of Axios has put together an incredible analysis visualizing just how tightly Republican elected officials have stuck by President Trump’s side these past four years, even through “crises that would have crushed most politicians.” The “Trump Loyalty Index” takes into account not only how often lawmakers have voted in line with the president’s priorities, but assesses their response to some of the highest-profile Trump controversies—Access Hollywood, Charlottesville, the Lafayette Plaza Bible photo op—of the past four years. The index underscores Trump’s tightening grip on the Republican rank and file. In 2016, 42 percent of GOP officials criticized Trump’s “grab them by the p****” remarks. A year later, 19 percent criticized him for his handling of Charlottesville. This summer, just 12 percent spoke up about his clearing of peaceful protesters for a photo op. You’ll never guess who the most and least loyal Trump Republicans have been (you’ll probably be able to guess).
Presented Without Comment: Welcome to D.C. Edition
Also Presented Without Comment
Toeing the Company Line
- Democrats in recent days have made Amy Coney Barrett’s purported threat to the Affordable Care Act their number one issue in her confirmation hearings. But is the ACA in any danger, even if Barrett is seated on the Supreme Court? In his latest French Press (🔒), David argues no. “Yes, there’s an Obamacare oral argument—and yes once again conservatives are seeking to strike down the entire law—but this time the vast majority of informed legal observers recognize the lawsuit is an exercise in legal futility,” he writes. “There’s virtually no chance SCOTUS will end Obamacare.”
- Slate’s Will Saletan joined Jonah on Tuesday’s episode of The Remnant for some SCOTUS punditry, Hegel talk, and a discussion of post-liberalism and post-conservatism.
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), James P. Sutton (@jamespsuttonsf), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Photograph by Greg Nash – Pool/Getty Images.
3 |
LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
THE DAILY WIRE
|
DESERET NEWS
|
BRIGHT
|
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
|
||||||||
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE— Politicians increasingly, and deliberately, seek to make voters angry. — Eliciting voters’ anger comes at a cost. When voters are angry, they are more likely to express distrust in the national government. This distrust is problematic because trust in government can facilitate bipartisan cooperation and maintain support for social welfare programs. — Nevertheless, incentives to elicit anger remain strong for political elites because voter anger helps politicians win elections. Absent a shift in the incentive structure that politicians face, expect voter anger to continue to rise. American RageContemporary American politics is, above all else, rage-inducing. This is due in large part to our politicians, those architects of anger who benefit from the public’s ire. Donald Trump, in particular, is quite adept at stoking anger among his base. From his claims that immigrants from Mexico are “drug dealers, criminals, and rapists,” to his references of COVID-19 as the “Chinese virus,” to his disparaging comments about Democratic-run cities, the president seeks to keep his base perpetually outraged. These messages are amplified by other Republican politicians and affiliated groups, some of whom have claimed that Democrats “don’t love” America and seek to silence those with whom they disagree. Joe Biden, too, traffics in anger. Despite his claims about wanting to “restore the soul of the nation,” Biden has sought to arouse anger among his base by claiming that Trump’s handling of the coronavirus crisis was all about “making sure … his rich friends didn’t lose money,” and that the president “didn’t do a damn thing” to keep Americans safe. And, much like Republicans have buttressed Trump’s anger-inducing claims, prominent Democrats have echoed Biden’s remarks about Trump by calling the president “a threat to our democracy” and a would-be autocrat. Why do politicians — both Democrats and Republicans — seek to make their voters angry? Research from my book, American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics, suggests that politicians seek to make their supporters angry because angry voters are loyal voters. Put simply, when a voter is angry, she is most likely to vote for her own party’s candidates at all levels of the federal electoral system. Crucially, anger can bind a voter to her party’s presidential candidate even when that candidate is not well liked. Anger, and not bonds of affection, is what drives political behavior in the United States. This anger takes many forms. Americans are angry at the opposing party’s politicians and supporters. They are also angry with the opposing party’s policy ideas. Yet, while the specific nature of a voter’s anger may vary, anger often leads to a predictable outcome. When voters are angry, they seek to take an action — or set of actions — that alleviates their anger. This action is usually aimed at the source of one’s anger. Because Americans’ political anger is often due to the opposing political party, they most typically channel their frustration into pursuing outcomes that benefit their own party — or, perhaps more accurately, harm the opposing party. Most commonly, this action is casting a vote for one’s party’s candidates up and down the ballot. And, unlike many things in today’s political climate, anger is a bipartisan emotion. Both Democrats and Republicans are capable of experiencing anger, and both are increasingly outraged. According to data from the American National Election Studies (ANES), there has been a dramatic increase in the percentage of both Democrats and Republicans who reported feeling angry with the opposing party’s presidential candidate. In 2008, 43% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans reported that they experienced anger with the other party’s standard bearer. By 2012, 56% of Democrats and 75% of Republicans indicated that they felt angry with the opposing party’s presidential candidate. In 2016, these numbers soared. Among Democrats, 90% of respondents to the ANES reported feeling angry with Donald Trump; 89% of Republicans reported feeling angry with Hillary Clinton. Not coincidentally, the 2016 election saw high rates of partisan loyalty at the ballot box. Using data from the 2016 ANES, I calculated whether a voter felt positively or negatively toward their own party’s presidential candidate by examining their ratings of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on a measure known as a “feeling thermometer” scale. This measure, which ranges from 0-100, asks respondents to give their affective evaluations of candidates and parties on this 101-point scale, where higher values indicate a more positive feeling. Individuals who rated their own party’s candidate at 50 or below were classified as having a negative evaluation. Among those with negative views of their own party’s candidate, more frequently being angry with the other party’s candidate was strongly associated with partisan loyalty. In fact, among those who did not like their own party’s candidate and reported “never” feeling angry at the opposing party’s candidate, only 22% remained loyal to their own party in the 2016 presidential election. Among those individuals who did not like their own party’s nominee but reported feeling angry at the other party’s candidate “some of the time,” nearly 48% voted loyally for their own party. Most drastically, 95.8% of Americans who did not like their own party’s candidate in 2016 but reported “always” feeling angry with the other party’s presidential candidate voted loyally. Anger, then, can lead to behavior that is more characteristic of dedicated partisans. Though politicians have incentives to stoke voters’ anger, these actions are not without cost. In fact, voter anger has a host of negative consequences. In particular, anger serves to reduce Americans’ trust in the national government. In an era of heightened nationalization, the national government serves as the focal point for Americans’ views about politics. Because anger causes us to evaluate people, places, and institutions in a negative fashion, politicians’ stoking of voter anger specifically about politics has the unfortunate consequence of lowering Americans’ trust in their governing institutions. This decline in trust is marked. In 1958, 73% of Americans said they trusted the federal government “always” or “most of the time.” By 2019, this figure had dropped to 17%. This diminished level of trust is problematic for effective governance. Trust in government has been shown to be essential for facilitating bipartisan cooperation and maintaining support for social welfare programs. Thus, should trust in government continue to decline, we are likely to see less bipartisanship and a further erosion of Americans’ support for programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Because politicians have an overarching concern with being reelected, and because anger aids in this pursuit, the outlook for the health of American democracy looks bleak. The challenge is great if we are to make progress and hold together as a nation. Anger management is a good start.
Read the fine printLearn more about the Crystal Ball and find out how to contact us here. Sign up to receive Crystal Ball e-mails like this one delivered straight to your inbox. Use caution with Sabato’s Crystal Ball, and remember: “He who lives by the Crystal Ball ends up eating ground glass!” |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
© Copyright by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia |
THE BLAZE
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had a full blown melt down on CNN after anchor Wolf Blitzer pressured her on securing a deal for coronavirus relief for the American people. Blitzer asked Pelosi to respond to a tweet from her Democratic colleague, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), about the failed negotiations … Read more
You might like …
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA
|
THE FEDERALIST
|
The Federalist, 611 Pennsylvania Ave SE, #247, Washington, DC 20003, United States
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Bombshell Hunter Biden emails show him leveraging relationship with father for financial gain
- Ashamed? Senator Mark Warner photoshopped police logo out of campaign image
- Andrew Cuomo in leaked audio: School lockdowns are a ‘fear based response’
- False flag? October surprise? Attorneys for Whitmer-kidnapping plotter claims FBI informant PUSHED others to act
- Even CNN fact-checked Biden’s ‘not constitutional’ claim on Amy Coney Barrett confirmation
- Lee Smith warns America about ‘The Permanent Coup’
- Election truth bombs from Dinesh D’Souza and Ryan Fournier
Bombshell Hunter Biden emails show him leveraging relationship with father for financial gain
Posted: 14 Oct 2020 04:39 AM PDT Hunter Biden, son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, used his connections to his father to attempt to secure higher pay and longer terms on his contract with Ukrainian energy company Burisma, leaked emails show. A story by the NY Post highlights the important parts of the emails between Hunter Biden and his long-time business partner, Devon Archer. The emails were recovered from a computer that held a trove of messages, documents, photos and videos purportedly recovered from a MacBook Pro laptop that a Delaware computer-shop owner told The Post was brought in for repair in April 2019 and never picked up afterward. Mainstream media will not cover this. Why? Because it’s THAT big. It’s the type of story that has tanked politicians throughout history. But since the subjects of the story are Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Burisma, and Ukraine, it will be completely buried and even debunked by our illustrious Democrat-friendly press. According to the report: In a lengthy memo to his then-business partner, Devon Archer, who already sat on the Burisma board, Biden repeatedly mentioned “my guy” while apparently referring to then-Vice President Joe Biden. Under President Barack Obama, the elder Biden was the point person for US policy toward Ukraine, and he held a press conference there with Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk on April 22, 2014. Hunter Biden’s e-mail to Archer is dated a little more than a week earlier. “The announcement of my guys [sic] upcoming travels should be characterized as part of our advice and thinking- but what he will say and do is out of our hands,” Hunter Biden wrote on April 13, 2014. “In other words it could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit.” In essence, Hunter Biden was playing on his relationship with his father to demonstrate that he could leverage him against the Ukrainian government. At the time, Burisma was under investigation by new Prosecutor General of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin, for corruption charges. It has been widely speculated that Burisma hired Hunter Biden to their board in an effort to cease multiple investigations. Vice President Biden famously pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Shokin. While visiting Kiev in December 2015, Vice President Biden warned Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that if he did not fire Shokin, the Obama administration was prepared to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. This effectively removed pressure from Burisma and justified the large sums of money they were paying for Hunter Biden to be on their board. He left the board in April, 2019, the same month that his father announced his candidacy for president. The surfaced emails seem to demonstrate that Hunter Biden and Archer were using the former’s relationship with the Vice President of the United States to secure ongoing funds for an extended period of time. In the e-mail, Hunter Biden wrote to Archer, “We need to ask for long term agreement and across the board participation. This is a huge step for us that could easily become very complicated. And if we are not protected financially regardless of the outcome we could find ourselves frozen out of a lot of current and future opportunities. “The contract should begin now- not after the upcoming visit of my guy,” the email read. “That should include a retainer in the range of 25k p/m w/ additional fees where appropriate for more in depth work to go to BSF for our protection. Complete separate from our respective deals re board participation.” It’s unclear if Hunter Biden or Archer got any of the $25,000 a month mentioned. Hunter Biden was reportedly paid as much as $50,000 a month by Burisma before his lawyer has said he “stepped off” the board in April 2019. Joe Biden has used rage to stifle attempts to question him about Hunter Biden, and the press has obliged. But this smoking gun should be enough to force the issue. At least it would if we had real press instead of the Democrats’ Pravda. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Bombshell Hunter Biden emails show him leveraging relationship with father for financial gain appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Ashamed? Senator Mark Warner photoshopped police logo out of campaign image
Posted: 14 Oct 2020 02:51 AM PDT Senator Mark Warner has been a staple in Virginia politics for two decades. He has built a long career in the purple state by claiming to be a “common sense” Democrat. But the party is leaving him, lurching to the left and forcing so-called moderates to decide if they want to be “woke” like their voter base. Apparently, Warner has chosen to embrace the anti-police stance of his party. His campaign website shows two versions of the same image. At the top of the website, it’s a background. Further down, it’s a primary image. It’s clear he’s wearing a leather jacket that does not have a badge on it in the image at the bottom, but in the top version a Virginia State Police badge can be seen when the image is enlarged. On desktop view, the top image cuts off, which is likely why the campaign missed it. Why would he have an association with law enforcement digitally removed from a campaign image?
“It’s sad that Mark is so ashamed of the police,” Republican Senate candidate Daniel Gade told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “First he defunded them by $50 million dollars as Governor and now he is photoshopping them out of his campaign. Mark says he wants police reform, but voted against it because it was ‘token legislation.’ He clearly just wants to airbrush the police away.” Democrats have been pushing to defund police ever since the mantra of Black Lives Matter became a driving force behind the left’s policies. While many Democrats like Warner and presidential candidate Joe Biden have attempted to distance themselves from such concepts, they are still cognizant of their base’s desires. They want no association with law enforcement out of fear that they will be “canceled” by the radical progressives controlling the party today. It is unconscionable for a United States Senator like Mark Warner to be so against law enforcement that he would have a police emblem photoshopped out of a campaign image. But that’s the state of the Democratic Party today. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Ashamed? Senator Mark Warner photoshopped police logo out of campaign image appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Andrew Cuomo in leaked audio: School lockdowns are a ‘fear based response’
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 10:25 PM PDT New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is one of the leaders of the self-proclaimed “party of science.” They often say we need to listen to doctors without taking into account that doctors are naturally going to err on the side of caution even if doing so does little good against the pandemic and tremendous bad to the welfare of the people. But don’t think for a moment that Democrats like Cuomo are simply unaware of the stupidity of their lockdowns. They’re fully aware and banking solely on the stupidity of the populace. A perfect example of this was acknowledged by Cuomo himself in a recently leaked phone conversation he had. In it, he declared, “This is not a highly nuanced, sophisticated response. This is a fear driven response. This is not a policy being written by a scalpel. This is a policy being cut by a hatchet.” He then went on to blame Mayor Bill de Blasio for the closing of all schools, including preschools, and claimed that he was trying to “sharpen” the policy to better suit the Jewish leaders he was talking to on the phone at the time.
According to Emes: Hamodia recently published an article which contains a half-hour long audio clip of a private phone conversation recently held between NY State Governor Cuomo and various Rabbonim in the community. The audio (full clip below) as well as the article are very telling. But perhaps one of the most shocking parts is where Cuomo tells Rabbi Yaakov Bender that the government initiatives are not based on science, but simply out of fear. Notice at the end of the clip how Howard Zucker, Commissioner of Health for New York State agrees with the governor. Let’s dispel this fiction that Andrew Cuomo doesn’t know what he’s doing with the lockdowns. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s using fear to promote authoritarian control to keep the people beholden to big government. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Andrew Cuomo in leaked audio: School lockdowns are a ‘fear based response’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
False flag? October surprise? Attorneys for Whitmer-kidnapping plotter claims FBI informant PUSHED others to act
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 02:28 PM PDT Early court proceedings have begun in the cases against the six men accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Mainstream media is covering every nuance as best they can since this is being spun by Democrats as a way to blame President Trump for extremism. But one important detail from the bond hearings has been buried or altogether omitted from reporting. It’s the type of detail that has conspiracy theorists asking more questions. Deep within a story from the Detroit Free Press is a potential bombshell if it pans out as true.
Defense lawyers contend that there was no probable cause to arrest and charge the suspect, arguing, among other things, that the suspects had no operational plan to do anything, were engaged in all legal activities — including talking in encrypted group chats and practicing military exercises with lawfully owned guns — and that it was the informants and undercover agents who “pushed” others to do illegal things. “One of the most active leaders was your informant,” Graham said. As defense attorney Scott Graham points out, the FBI informant who wore wires to meetings with the militia may have been more than an undercover observer. He was one of the most active leaders of the group pushing the rest of them to follow through with their criminal plans. Clearly, Graham is promoting a narrative of entrapment, but the underlying sentiment here is much more important to all Americans. Was the FBI trying to egg on a domestic terrorist attack as a false flag maneuver? If so, what could be their motivation? The FBI has lost credibility from top to bottom over the last four years. While most FBI agents are honorable men and women serving their nation and defending it against crime, there have been multiple cabals exposed and countless others that are still in the Deep State shadows. One common theme seems to tie these cabals together: They hate President Trump. If it’s true that the FBI informant was trying to manufacturer a criminal situation, it could have been an attempt to facilitate an “October surprise” to influence the upcoming presidential elections. That takes this news to an extreme conspiracy theory level, but considering everything we’ve learned about the Deep State’s attempts to subvert and even overthrow this administration, it’s not out their in left field with flat earth theory or lizard people. It’s actually quite feasible. A plot to kidnap a Democratic governor has had a negative impact on sentiment towards President Trump. Many mainstream media op-eds have blamed the President’s anti-lockdown and pro-militia rhetoric for the plot despite the fact that leaders of the groups opposed the President. Democrats, including Whitmer and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, have echoed this sentiment. Was this an October surprise launched a bit prematurely? Will more plots surface before the election? We know the Deep State has gone to the most extreme measures possible in their quiet coup against this administration. That’s why we should not discount the possibility that a cabal within the FBI was pushing the plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post False flag? October surprise? Attorneys for Whitmer-kidnapping plotter claims FBI informant PUSHED others to act appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Even CNN fact-checked Biden’s ‘not constitutional’ claim on Amy Coney Barrett confirmation
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 01:59 PM PDT CNN loves Joe Biden. Perhaps they don’t “love” him as their preferred person to be carrying the anti-Trump mantle, but they must publicly act like they adore him. In the eyes of their viewers and scant readers of their website, it’s important to the heads at CNN that the Democratic nominee must be painted as perpetually walking on water. That’s why their latest fact-check on him is so startling. According to their fact-check: In the lead up to Monday’s confirmation hearings to install Judge Amy Coney Barrett on the US Supreme Court, Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden raised concerns that the efforts to put Barrett on the court are unconstitutional and exemplify court packing. “The only court packing going on right now, is going on with Republicans packing the court now,” Biden told reporters on Saturday. “It is not constitutional what they are doing.” Facts First: This is false. Legal experts say there is nothing strictly unconstitutional about Barrett’s confirmation process. When asked by CNN, the Biden campaign argued that the Senate’s push to confirm Barrett ahead of the election doesn’t violate a specific clause of the Constitution, but people’s constitutional right to have a say in who makes the nomination. According to his campaign, Biden’s comments refer to the principles and spirit of the Constitution, which they insist the effort to confirm Barrett before the election violates. Article II, section 2 of the Constitution states that the President “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint … Judges of the supreme Court.” “President Trump has the constitutional power to ‘nominate’ Judge Barrett to be a Supreme Court Justice, and the Senate has the constitutional power to ‘consent’ to that,” Eugene Volokh, a professor at UCLA School of Law, told CNN. “That’s all the Constitution says on the subject, and no precedents have added any extra requirements to that.” Josh Blackman, a South Texas College of Law professor who specializes in constitutional law, told CNN, “I have no idea what VP Biden meant.” You know it had to hurt for CNN to report on Joe Biden’s lies. But when the lie is THAT big regarding Amy Coney Barrett and the constitutionality of her confirmation, even CNN had to acknowledge it as fake news. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Even CNN fact-checked Biden’s ‘not constitutional’ claim on Amy Coney Barrett confirmation appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Lee Smith warns America about ‘The Permanent Coup’
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 12:58 PM PDT They failed. The Deep State. The Democrats. The Clintons. The Bidens. The Obamas. They all thought they could stop a Trump presidency. When that failed, they thought they could prevent him from reaching his reelection. Barring something crazy happening in the next three weeks (don’t count that out), they will have failed at that as well. Now, the only question is whether or not they’ll be able to win in November. President Trump is fighting, as are his tens of millions of supporters. Author Lee Smith is fighting with his new book, The Permanent Coup. He joined Two Mikes last week to discuss the current state of affairs in America. The left, the Deep State, mainstream media, and other forces behind the scenes are trying to keep this President down and steal the election. Author Lee Smith understands this and is spreading the truth to the world.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Lee Smith warns America about ‘The Permanent Coup’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Election truth bombs from Dinesh D’Souza and Ryan Fournier
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 10:09 AM PDT Bob and Eric talk the ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic as well as the recent VP Debate! Special guests for this episode are Ryan Fournier and conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. Ryan and Eric talk the upcoming election, the riots breaking out coast-to-coast as well as a host of other hard-hitting topics. Dinesh D’Souza drops by to discuss his new film, Trump Card, available now on-demand by visiting www.dineshdsouza.com. Dinesh does what he does best – sounds the alarm on the socialism slowly making its way to mainstream politics. Is this the most consequential election in American history? We discuss. Thanks for tuning in!
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Election truth bombs from Dinesh D’Souza and Ryan Fournier appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 14 new items) |
- Is War With China Becoming Inevitable?
- Day Of Rage, Who Loves America, You Don’t Deserve To Know
- Trump Is Now One With Countless Essential Workers
- Why Won’t Joe Just Say ‘No’ To Court Packing
- Sue the Governors!
- 9 Takeaways From Day 1 of Barrett Confirmation Hearings
- The Biden-Harris Orwellian Redefining of “Court-Packing”
- Lord of the Flies
- Can the Fed End Racism?
- On the Law, Oaths, and the Truth
- Court Packing Kamala: VP Candidate an Existential Threat to U.S. Supreme Court and Second Amendment
- Yes, Hillary Clinton Orchestrated the Russia-Collusion Farce
- Government 5G? The Deep State Military-Industrial-Complex Looks to Expand Its ‘Unwarranted Influence’
- Judiciary Committee’s Schedule For A Vote On Judge Barrett’s Nomination Keeps With Precedent
Is War With China Becoming Inevitable?
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 11:00 PM PDT by Patrick J. Buchanan: Tensions are rising between the U.S. and China, as the list of ideological, political and economic clashes continues to lengthen. And there is a transparent new reality: China seems in no mood to back down. “The Indians are seeing 60,000 Chinese soldiers on their northern border,” Secretary of State Michael Pompeo ominously warned on Friday. He spelled out what he meant to commentator Larry O’Connor: “The Chinese have now begun to amass huge forces against India in the north. … They absolutely need the United States to be their ally and partner in this fight.” Pompeo had just returned from a Tokyo gathering of foreign ministers from the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or “Quad,” the group of four democracies — U.S., Japan, Australia, India — whose purpose is to discuss major Indo-Pacific geostrategic issues. Exactly what kind of “ally and partner” the U.S. is to be “in the fight” between India and China over disputed terrain in the Himalayan Mountains was left unexplained. We have no vital interest in where the Line of Control between the most populous nations on earth should lie that would justify U.S. military involvement with a world power like China. And the idea that Japan, whose territorial quarrel with China is over the tiny Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, thousands of miles away, would take sides in a Himalayan India-China conflict also seems ludicrous. Yet, tensions are rising between the U.S. and China, as the list of ideological, political and economic clashes continues to lengthen. And there is a transparent new reality: China seems in no mood to back down. When, after a year of demonstrations for greater democracy, the Hong Kong government failed to quell the uprising, Beijing stepped in and took control. The U.S.-led democracies that had been cheering on the Hong Kong marchers and protesters did nothing, and they have done nothing since to reverse Xi Jinping’s political coup but prattle on about “values.” Lately, the democracies have been protesting, and rightly so, the inhumane treatment of the Uighur peoples in Xinjiang in China’s west. Han Chinese have been moved into the region to swamp the local population of Turkic and Muslim Uighurs and Kazakhs and bring about the demographic change Beijing desires. “Reeducation camps” have been established to cleanse Uighurs of their ethnic and religious identities and convert them into loyal and reliable Chinese Communists. In a speech in late September, Xi declared that Beijing’s policy of eradicating the ethnic and religious identity of the minorities of Xinjiang through state-driven education has proven “totally correct.” He vowed to imprint a Chinese identity “deep in the soul” of the peoples living there. “Our national minority work has been a success,” said Xi, “It must be held to for the long term.” Xi makes no apology for — indeed, he is proud of — using state power to impose the state ideology upon the peoples he rules, and he openly repudiates our democratic values as inapplicable in his country. Our rejection of China’s claims to virtually all of the reefs and atolls in the South China Sea is also being ignored. Beijing’s warnings grow louder and more pointed as the U.S. continues to send warships, the latest being the USS John McCain, close to islets claimed by China. What is our strategy here? Are we prepared for a naval and air clash in these waters? What would be the U.S. strategic goal? The Chinese are now responding angrily and defiantly to what they see as the provocations of sending high-level U.S. officials, and selling new weapons, to Taiwan, which China regards as its lost province. Again, what is our purpose in playing the Taiwan card now? If it is to provoke a fight, then are we prepared for a war in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea? Do we think the Chinese will capitulate? Is this being done to “stand up to China” before Nov. 3? Which is the party here that is engaged in bluster and bluff and which is the party that seems deadly serious as it views its vital interests and territorial rights as challenged? There has been talk of the Quad evolving into an Asian NATO that embraces the major democracies in the Indo-Pacific Theater. But the essence of NATO is Article V, where the U.S. commits itself to treat an attack on any one of some 30 nations as an attack on us. Is there anything like this in the cards? Australia, Japan and the U.S. are not going to war with China over its border with India, or its ethnic concentration camps in Xinjiang, or its seizing Hong Kong and atolls in the South China Sea. When this election is over, this country has to think through what we are and are not willing to fight China for. Xi Jinping dismisses our concerns over Hong Kong and the Uighurs, and he appears willing to fight for Taiwan and for what Beijing holds in the South China Sea, rather than see it permanently lost. Are we? Tags: Patrick Buchanan, conservative, commentary, Is War With China, Becoming Inevitable?To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Day Of Rage, Who Loves America, You Don’t Deserve To Know
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 10:36 PM PDT by Gary Bauer: “Day Of Rage”
It’s hard to express how angry I am over the latest outburst of leftist violence in Portland. Statues of Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln, two of the greatest Republican presidents, were torn down and the Oregon Historical Society was ransacked in a “day of rage” on Sunday.The destruction of those statues is all the proof you need that this violence has nothing to do with black lives or racism. This nihilism has nothing to do with making America a better country.The riot itself was billed as a demonstration for “Indigenous People’s Day.” The Biden campaign put out a statement for Indigenous People’s Day and ignored Columbus Day, the actual federal holiday.I can say with certainty that none of the thugs participating in Sunday’s violence are Trump/Pence voters, but a significant percentage are undoubtedly Biden/Harris voters. This is not a fringe movement, but the heart of the Democrat Party. Why do I say this? Because, among other things, one of the rioters was a former Democrat candidate. Democrat staffers and officials have been arrested at other riots. I have no doubt that the Portland rioters were inspired by what they have been taught at our “institutions of higher learning.” They are immersed in a campus culture that mocks patriotism. They have been taught “anti-American history,” taught that America was evil from its “founding in 1619” and that the American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery, a disgusting lie. They have been inspired by Nancy Pelosi, who condemned law enforcement officers as “Stormtroopers” and by other leftists who have denounced America as “systemically racist.” The left’s rhetoric and its radicalism created this violent mob, and the Biden/Harris ticket is empowering this mob. Just yesterday the guy we’re told is a “moderate” stoked the left’s hatred of America once again. See below. Who Loves America? Joe Biden quickly embraced Rivers’s statement and has repeated it during recent campaign events. Yesterday in Ohio, Biden said, “Think about what it takes for a black person to love America. . . ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men,’ we’ve never met that standard.” What an outrageous statement for Biden to make! He served as the vice president to the first black man ever elected and reelected as our president. And Biden has the audacity to say, “We’ve never met that standard.” Biden’s statement mocks every black man and woman who wore the uniform of our all-volunteer military. It mocks every grave of a patriotic black veteran. It is a poisonous message to every young American. Once again, we see just how desperate the left is to gain power, even if it has to tear down America in the process. You Don’t Deserve To Know First, let’s set the record the straight on the question of legitimacy. A Supreme Court vacancy has occurred 15 times during a presidential election year. In all 15 times, the president made a nomination, as is his constitutional right. In seven of those times, the Senate was controlled by the opposition party and there were only two confirmations. That’s a confirmation rate of just 29% when the White House and the Senate are controlled by different parties. In eight of those times, the Senate was controlled by the same party as the president. Seven of those nominations were confirmed. That’s a confirmation rate of 88% when the White House and the Senate are controlled by the same parties. And that is the situation we have today. There was nothing unusual with the Senate refusing to confirm Merrick Garland in 2016. It would have been highly unusual if Garland had been confirmed. And there is nothing unusual about the Senate proceeding with Judge Barrett’s confirmation now. It would be highly unusual if Judge Barrett were not confirmed. Moreover, in the course of their remarks, one Democrat after another has revealed their true intentions as they label Barrett a threat to abortion, a threat to Obamacare, a threat to LGBTQ rights. In other words, they aren’t interested in the Constitution, but their policy agenda. They want activists making policy from the bench. Thankfully, Judge Barrett rejects that philosophy. In her opening remarks yesterday, Barrett declared, “Courts are not designed to solve every problem. . . The policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political branches elected by and accountable to the People.” But Joe Biden has no interest in being accountable to the people. When asked recently about his views on packing the Supreme Court with more left-wing judges, Biden said, “You’ll know my position on court-packing the day after the election.” Pressed later by a reporter as to whether voters deserved an answer, Biden doubled down, saying, “No, they don’t.” Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer isn’t being coy. He told MSNBC that Democrats would be “right” to pack the Supreme Court with left-wing judges. Schumer also said he was plotting ways to block Barrett’s confirmation. An Absurd Analysis Biden used to be pro-life. We know what his position is today. The Joe Biden of decades ago would have no chance of being nominated by today’s Democrat Party. That’s why he has moved so far to the left on every issue. Meanwhile, the left is claiming that Trump and Senate Republicans are attempting to pack the court with Judge Barrett. That’s not court packing. That’s fulfilling a constitutional obligation to fill a judicial vacancy. Court packing is not liking the make-up of the court, not waiting for a vacancy and increasing the number of justices by legislation so you can install activist judges who will rubber stamp your radical agenda. That is the only definition of court packing that has ever existed. It is foolish for analysts at Fox News to defend Biden over some decades-old statement. The most telling point here is that the left is attempting to redefine court packing in order to justify their efforts to do real court packing in the future, just as Chuck Schumer did. “President Harris” Yesterday, Joe Biden made several statements that raise serious questions about his mental faculties.
Unfortunately, these kinds of memory lapses are not unusual for Biden, and the people who love him the most have to know what is happening to him. The fact that they are not protecting him, and quite frankly the country, from this deterioration is beyond sad. It almost leads one to conclude that the powers controlling the Democrat Party are convinced Kamala Harris is the real power behind this ticket. And the American people seem convinced as well, as most don’t expect Biden to finish his first term. Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Trump Is Now One With Countless Essential Workers
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 09:55 PM PDT
President Trump has no reason to apologize for getting sick. He took risks to meet the obligations of his office and is now one with the millions who do the same thing, every day. by Dr. Victor Davis Hanson: Joe Biden has redefined mask wearing. It is now the thinking man’s patriotism, what every “scientific” and “refined” mind naturally does. Biden, the media, and the progressive party all blame the now ill Trump for becoming infected. They accuse the president of becoming sick because he was selfish. You see, he was not always wearing a mask, or not always isolating in social-distancing fashion, or not always staying inside except for essential expeditionary trips. Upon reading these condemnations, one could be forgiven for thinking Trump was the mayor of Fresno, not the president of the most powerful and necessary nation in history. The subtext is that Trump is no Biden. Joe follows “science.” He “gets it.” He “listens” to “experts.” Like Trump his rival septuagenarian has health issues, but very much unlike Trump, Biden, until lately, seldom was seen or heard. For Biden, the way to run a presidency is the way he wishes to conduct the second debate—by Zoom. Who Is the Real “Patriot”? Class differences, considerations, and interests are the real themes of this election. They are on the side of the president who took the same calculated risks that millions do to meet the requirements of their jobs that simply cannot be done from basements and safe zones or over computers and smartphones. Recently, Joe Biden, in his usual clumsy racialist fashion, at last confessed that his own half-year sequestration kept him safe only because, “some black woman was able to stack the grocery shelf.” Aside from the reality that Biden usually stereotypes black people as either stock people, or clueless (“you ain’t black”), or defenseless (“put ‘y’all back in chains” ) or addicted to drugs ( “you taking cocaine or not? What do you think, huh? Are you a junkie?”), he accidently stumbled upon a truth here. Biden really doesn’t take risks, because he assumes that others less privileged will take them on his behalf. And in doing so, hundreds of thousands of Americans, with masks, with hand sanitizer on their palms, and with careful distancing whenever possible, have been infected, some severely and others mortally so. So COVID, the quarantine, and the president’s illness alike have now become class issues. On the one hand, are the elite and entitled “Karens.” They scream and rant when they see a slipped mask. They worship Lord Zoom and His Highness Skype. They brag about their near-perfect quarantine, and become insufferable when talking of “the science” and “Dr. Fauci.” In truth, the telecommunicating, distance-working and remote profiting classes are all part of the pyramidal capstone of American society, the tiny tip that does not totter or blow off because it rests on a vast, indomitable base below that has no such options. Who exactly makes or brings House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ’s (D-Calif.) designer ice cream to her palazzo? Who cooks the food delivered via DoorDash to the right zip codes? Who slaughters, cleans and packages the steak cooked by the quarantined class, or meets the sick at the ER door? Those of perfect weight, with correct vitamin D levels, who eat the proper vegetables, and keep their blood sugar and cholesterol low, and the fat off with a daily hour at the gym? Not always. Yes, they should and they do wear protective gear. But they are also busy, often exhausted, short of breath by their eighth hour on their feet, and so human rather than Karen-perfect. A mask is not a matter of an hour’s walk break from quarantine, or a trip to the grocery store, but of impairing breathing for 9-10 hours, day after day, to keep a grocery store open or cut the tree limbs back from sidewalks. Not long ago during the quarantine, four of our old appliances, like clockwork, failed. I ordered replacements from Home Depot. They were delivered by sweaty movers, who did 10-15 such deliveries a day. Most usually fit the weight, age, and ethnic categories of those at risk. As two scooted the refrigerator into the kitchen narrows, one had taken off his mask. He apologized with, “Sorry, but I can’t get enough air after about the 10th delivery.” I told him “We beggars can’t be choosers—and without you I would have no food.” It was not as if he slung his mask off to board his private jet, or roamed around the Hamptons while actively infected, as a prelude to lecture the nation on the sacred and deified mask. We Don’t Deserve or Choose to Get COVID If our supermarkets ran on the logic of Yale, or our hospitals on the hours of Stanford, or our assembly plants worked on the rationale of the grad seminar, then most of us would starve, die, or revert to a pre-civilizational existence. The track record of our elite policymakers, like many of our epidemiologists, and our modelers and our media, is not nearly as good as those who deliver refrigerators or slaughter steers. There is a now mini-internet industry of exposing our hectoring political and media grandees—take Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), or CNN’s Chris Cuomo—shouting about the need to wear masks, while themselves stealthily not wearing them. And they do so often in the context of sneaking into upscale salons for beauty treatments, or scurrying around a private jet port, or inspecting an “East Hampton property under construction.” Their message is unambiguous: “I do exemptions so I can ensure you don’t.” Most Americans who don’t work from home try to wear masks. They use hand cleansers. They distance when they go out each day. But most also under no circumstance say anything to correct anyone pouring cement, changing tires, cooking food, or fighting fires if their protocols seem like they don’t meet Joe Biden’s standards. Not only do these people help to keep us alive another day, but we know those who set such standards for others have often failed them—and predictably in a landscape of privileged hypocrisy. In this context, Trump is not the reckless one. He no more deserved to get the virus than did the 210,000 who have died—died with and without masks, distancing and not so much, and meticulously clean and sometimes not. Trump is president. He’s not a professor, not a journalist, not a stockbroker, not an actor. The Left has it upside-down. It is narcissistic for a president to hibernate on the theory that he can’t be replaced, even as he does the nation psychological damage. It is leadership to go out and, with proper caution, to brave the contagion, on the theory Trump is indeed replaceable while cowering is inexcusable. His job description is to be one with the people, and to take measured risks, when necessary. That’s what leaders must do. General George Patton certainly did not have to fly above his 3rd Army in a fragile Piper-Cub in foul weather and near enemy skies. But he did it to hone his knowledge of the battlespace, and to remind his men that like them, he was as expendable. Churchill had no business making 25 trips outside wartime Britain. Yet he had all the business in the world to do so if he was going to encourage men that not all was lost, and that the Wehrmacht was not so powerful. Teddy Roosevelt was not “reckless” when he finished a speech after being shot, with the bullet lodged near his heart. Rather he determined that his Stoicism reminded his audience that he was one with them, and stronger unarmed than the assassin armed. In our true sickness, we have come to equate COVID-19 infection with some sort of moral or patriotic failing, as though it is due to lack of prior exercise or weight control, or whatever writ is used to fault the infected. No doubt, there are beach boys and sorority girls who do dumb things in their drinking and kissing without masks, as they get and pass the virus to the vulnerable. But most of the sick and dead were not so reckless. Trump got infected because his duties entailed meeting guests, talking and jousting with the media, greeting foreign leaders, crisscrossing the country in times of fire, riot, recession, and crises abroad, hosting receptions, huddling nonstop with advisors, and yes, addressing thousands at rallies if need be. We are told this was foolhardy and exposed others. Perhaps, but more likely at 74, too heavy, and with the knowledge that he was vulnerable, Trump took hazards to conduct a normal presidency in times of abnormality. We are told he was rash, impulsive, poorly served, foolish—fill in blanks— in taking off-label and experimental drugs, or that the combination of his unproven medicines ensured side effects that will impair his work and endanger his own more sober and judicious citizens. But in reality, Trump was willing to risk his health again to get back to work. Yes, it is not especially a safe thing simultaneously to take off-label and experimental drugs like Regeneron’s REGN-COV2 and Remdesiver, whose side effects, interactions, and long term risks are not really yet known. The conservative regime, as media hounds bark nonstop, is not taking new medicines and combining them with the steroid dexamethasone at 74 and while being overweight. Again, perhaps. But it most certainly is necessary if you are president and were elected to guide the nation in times such as these. Only a lost generation such as our own could transform a president who is willing to take risks to his person to get back on the job, to run the country, and to try to restore a normal campaign in a horrific year into some kind of unpatriotic monster. Politically Correct and Incorrect “Science” Americans have nothing but respect for public health officials. But the latter has been the most unscientific bunch we’ve seen in decades. The head of the World Health Organization is not a medical doctor. For weeks, he recycled trite Chinese communist lies about viral transmission, quarantines, and travel bans. Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a Biden COVID advisor on a disease that targets septuagenarians, has previously written that life really is, and should be, over at 75. Emanuel’s timing on how to protect those vulnerable at 75 and over could not have been worse. Dr. Fauci may be a saint. But take any key issue of the last six months—from wearing masks, to quarantining, to taking cruises, to blind dating, to projecting viral loads and likely lethality—and he has not just been mistaken, but predictably self-contradictory. So herky-jerky are Fauci’s edicts that he finally was reduced to explaining that he had told a “noble” lie about the irrelevancies of mask-wearing to ensure supplies for medical professionals. Later, he was caught without a mask at a sporting event, while also in violation of his own commands about social distancing. The truth is that “science” is still ambiguous about long-term quarantines and the cost-benefit efficacy of non-stop wearing of masks. Science may well soon teach us that far more died from missed surgeries, tests, and examinations, or domestic violence, or drug and alcohol abuse, or billions of hours of lost schooling for an entire generation of youth. Facts and data may soon reveal far more Americans in our lose/lose year perished as a result of consequences stemming from the reaction to the virus than from the virus itself. Recently hundreds of medical professionals signed a declaration urging governments to reconsider the scientific costs of the continued quarantines and the damage they are doing to the nation, given that COVID-19 is a selectively chronological killer. By quarantining everyone, when the majority of age cohorts are as vulnerable to COVID-19 as to a bad flu—we are consuming limited resources that might well have been better focused on the sick, the vulnerable, and the aged. The reasoning of these professionals was scientific. What was not scientific were earlier petitions by other professionals saying that those who violated mask-wearing and social distancing to protest in the streets were not contravening any laws of lockdowns. Or, as they put it, it was more hazardous for your health not to protest than to violate a national quarantine. Throughout this long quarantine those who have screamed the loudest about science, about patriotism, and about fairness—according to their accustomed habit of projection—have been the least scientific. They are the most insensitive to class and the most ignorant about true patriotism. A patriot struggles to keep the world’s greatest nation fed, safe, and viable in a dangerous world that watches America hourly for signs of vulnerability, fear, and mass hysteria. So this election had always been about class. It has been about reminding minorities that they deserve good jobs and dignity rather than “you ain’t black” condescension, and that the rich who profit from China worry little about those who don’t. That’s why suddenly Joe Biden, after spending a lifetime as a globalist and a parasite who feeds on the ideas of others, is now scrambling to Xerox the Trump agenda with the zealotry of a late convert. He is suddenly blabbering about “buy American” and “hire Americans” and “stand up to China”—words never uttered in the past five decades of Biden’s so often self-referenced career. President. Trump has no reason to apologize for getting sick. He took risks to meet the obligations of his office. And he took more risks to be healthy enough to continue at it. In other words, Trump is now one with the millions who do the same thing, every day and thereby keep the country functioning—so often for others who haven’t got a clue about how or why they do so at all. Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, Trump Is Now, One With Countless, Essential WorkersTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Why Won’t Joe Just Say ‘No’ To Court Packing
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 08:51 PM PDT by Catherine Mortensen: As Joe Biden continues to duck, dodge, and weave on the question of packing the Supreme Court, an elected official in his own party is calling court packing a “dangerous proposal.” Biden said the American people will have to wait until after the election to know what he thinks of court packing. He’s already getting pushback from within his own party. Democratic Congressman Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) has introduced a bi-partisan resolution to permanently set the number of U.S. Supreme Court Justices at nine. Peterson’s resolution is the first step toward protecting the highest court in the land from political corruption that Biden’s far-left base is calling for. The resolution to amend the Constitution simply states: “The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine justices.” “The Supreme Court is an important part of our country’s system of checks and balances, and it is vital that we preserve its independence,” said Peterson. “I worry that partisan attempts to change the size of the court will set off a judicial arms race which will further divide our country. If one party succeeds in packing the court, the next party to hold a majority may choose to do the same in retaliation. My amendment will preserve the integrity of the court and permanently protect Americans from these dangerous proposals.” Congressman Denver Riggleman (R-Va.) co-sponsored the resolution, noting that “the independence and non-partisan nature of the Supreme Court of the United States is a core aspect of American government.” Currently, the number of supreme court justices is set by congress through statute. Lawmakers have changed the number of justices several times throughout the nation’s history, and last modified the size of the court in 1869 when congress raised the number of justices from seven to nine. “Packing the court” was coined by president franklin D. Roosevelt, and was a slang term for the judicial procedures reform bill of 1937. Roosevelt sought to reform the number of Supreme Court Justices in an effort to obtain a favorable ruling for the New Deal legislation. The central provision of the bill would have granted the president power to appoint an additional justice to the supreme court — up to a maximum of six — for every member of the court over the age of 70 years and six months. Roosevelt’s bill went nowhere. The public and Congress rejected it, seeing it for what it was, a power grab. No president has ever tried it since. Or even threatened it. Until now. According to Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network, Biden wants to “replace our current Supreme Court with a liberal super-legislature, stacked with politicians-turned-judges in the mold of AOC, Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. All with lifetime appointments, rewriting the law and Constitution.” Roman Buehler, director of Keep Nine, a coalition of legal scholars dedicated to protecting the Supreme Court from politicization says Biden’s failure to reject court packing is troublesome. “It’s clear that court packing is a direct assault on the constitutional checks and balances that this county has depended on for more than 150 year,” he said. Buehler explained that for the first 80 years of the court’s history, there was “political manipulation of the court by both parties.” After the Civil War, he said a tradition grew up that the court ought to be independent and serve as a “critical check on the abuse of federal power. “Today some very short-sided people are trying to do what Roosevelt tried and failed to do. If they succeed in packing the court, they will undermine the independence of the court by the rule of law.” Curiously, and contrary to the facts, Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.)is claiming that confirming Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court “constitutes court-packing.” President Trump exercising his power to fill the Ginsburg vacancy on the Supreme Court with Judge Barrett is not court-packing, it is fulfilling constitutional duty. Under Article II, Section 2, the president is to “nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint … judges of the Supreme Court…” Court-packing, as every American history student in high school should learn, is an illegitimate attempt to increase the number of Supreme Court justices in order to have those justices rule in favor of unconstitutional laws, regulations and actions. “Republicans won the Senate election in 2014, and the White House in 2016, and elections have consequences,” said Rick Manning, president of Americans for Limited Government. ”Presidents don’t serve for three years. They serve for four years. In 2016, when the Scalia seat became vacant, former President Barack Obama wasted no time in exercising his constitutional authority to attempt to fill it with Merrick Garland even though it was his last year in office, just as the Republican Senate exercised its right to just say no. Now the Senate is considering the Barrett nomination, as is their prerogative under the Constitution. It cannot be emphasized enough that filling a vacancy is legitimate, while creating vacancies for political purposes would do violence to the independence of federal courts.” Biden won’t just say “no” to court packing because he fears it will alienate his far-left base. But his dance around the issue has already alienated at least one Democratic Member of Congress. We’ll have to “wait until after the election” to find out how many independent voters he’s alienated. ——————- Tags: Catherine Mortensen, Rick Manning, Americans for Limited Government, Why Won’t Joe Just Say, ‘No’ To Court PackingTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Sue the Governors!
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 08:08 PM PDT
by Paul Jacob, Contributing Author: Expect a tsunami of lawsuits against state and local governments. The lockdowns, mask mandates, and other putative ‘mitigation efforts’ to combat the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 demand a deluge. The latest is Burfitt v. Newsom, filed in Kern County’s Superior Court of the State of California. “The legal complaint,” explains Matthew Vadum in The Epoch Times, “seeks declaratory and injunctive relief for the constitutional violations it alleges have been committed by [Governor Gavin] Newsom and his officials, stating that the ‘lockdown was originally supposed to be only a temporary emergency measure. However, nearly seven months later it appears that, absent judicial intervention, there will never be a “reopening” to normal, pre-COVID activity, despite incontestable facts — including California’s own data . . . showing that the lockdown is no longer warranted and is causing far more harm than good.’” The plaintiff is Father Trevor Burfitt, who simply seeks to carry on the established rites of the Roman Catholic Church. Though churchgoers and other observant religious people are increasingly defiant, politicians are generally following New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s lead. Cuomo says* his edicts apply regardless of religious affiliation: “the community must agree to the rules. If you do not agree to enforce the rules, then we will close the institutions down.” But Cuomo’s “must” is actually iffy:
The biggest If, though, is what would happen were the litigation to fail. Citizen political action must join the litigation wave. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Sue the Governors!To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
9 Takeaways From Day 1 of Barrett Confirmation Hearings
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 07:42 PM PDT
by Fred Lucas: The opening day of Senate confirmation hearings for federal Judge Amy Coney Barrett was filled with speechifying, with Democrats on the Judiciary Committee previewing their line of attack on the Supreme Court nominee. In her opening remarks, Barrett, currently a judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stressed that the role of a judge is not to make policy, while Democrats focused almost entirely on policymaking. President Donald Trump nominated Barrett on Sept. 26 to fill the seat of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had died eight days earlier. Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., predicted Barrett’s confirmation would likely pass the Senate on a party-line vote. Here are the biggest takeaways from the first of four days of hearings. 1. Barrett View of Judges’ Role “Courts have a vital responsibility to the rule of law, which is critical to a free society. But courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life,” Barrett said. “The policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political branches, elected by and accountable to the people.” She went on to explain: “I am confident that Notre Dame could hold its own, and maybe I could even teach them a thing or two about football,” she joked. As some Democrats have attacked her Catholicism, she was open about her prayer life. “I would like to thank the many Americans from all walks of life who have reached out with messages of support over the course of my nomination,” she said. “I believe in the power of prayer. And it has been uplifting to hear that so many people were praying for me.” Barrett praised now-deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she clerked earlier in her career. “Like many law students, I felt like I knew the justice before I ever met him, because I had read so many of his colorful, accessible opinions,” Barrett said. “More than the style of his writing, though, it was the content of Justice Scalia’s reasoning that shaped me.” “His judicial philosophy was straightforward: A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were,” she added. 2. Election-Year Nominations “We are confirming a judge in an election year after the voting has occurred,” Graham said, later adding, “The bottom line is, Justice Ginsburg, when asked about this several years ago, said that a president serves for four years, not three. There’s nothing unconstitutional about this process.” Graham said, “The bottom line here is that the Senate is doing its duty constitutionally.” “As to Judge Garland, the opening that occurred after the passing of Justice Scalia is in the early part of an election year. The primary process had just started,” Graham said. “We can talk about history. Here is the history as I understand it: There has never been a situation where you have a president of one party and the Senate of another where the nominee was made as a replacement in an election year.” He continued: “The speed at which Republicans are moving to fill this seat stands in sharp contrast to the approach taken by the same Senate Republicans the last time there was a vacancy in an election year in 2016,” he said. He pointed to a poster behind him of the so-called “McConnell rule,” quoting McConnell saying in 2016: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their Supreme Court justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” “This rock-solid statement of principle was made 269 days before the 2016 election,” Durbin said. “Republican members of this committee fell obediently in line behind Sen. McConnell’s statement of principle. … It comes down to this, either the American people do get an election year voice regarding a vacancy on the Supreme Court or they don’t. “In 2016, Sen. McConnell said, ‘Give them a voice.’ Now he says, ‘Don’t give them a voice.’ It’s a shameless, self-serving, venal reversal.” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, noted there were just 22 days before the election. “Voting is underway in 40 states. Senate Republicans are pressing forward full-speed ahead to consolidate a court that will carry their policies forward with, I hope, some review for the will of the American people,” she said, later adding, “I believe we should not be moving forward on this nomination. Not until the election has ended and the next president has taken office.” 3. Future of Roe v. Wade “Without Roe v. Wade, our country looks like people being denied the ability to make decisions about their own bodies, not just while they are pregnant, but being stripped of the right to plan for their futures,” he said. Booker went on to claim that women who have miscarriages would be interrogated by law enforcement. “It looks like women of color, low-income women, women living in rural areas who can’t just pack up and leave if abortion is restricted or criminalized where they live,” Booker said. “It looks like them being left with no options. It looks like state laws proliferating throughout our country that seek to control and criminalize women. “It looks like the government interfering and making personal medical decisions. It looks like a country in which states may write laws that could subject women who have miscarriages to investigations to ensure they didn’t have abortions. In America today, people are scared.” Early in the hearing, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who is pro-life, noted how many times Democrats have made that same kind of claim. “Democrats and their allies shouldn’t claim to know how any judge would rule in any particular case. Just look at history. The left slammed [John Paul] Stevens for his consistent opposition to women’s rights,” Grassley said. “They called Anthony Kennedy ‘sexist’ and ‘a disaster for women.’ They said David Souter would ‘end freedom of women in this country.’” “Ultimately, the left praised these very justices that they attacked. Their doomsday prediction failed to pan out,” Grassley said. “Democrats and their leftist allies have also shown that there is no low that they won’t stoop to in their crusade to tarnish a nominee.” 4. Protecting Obamacare Most displayed large cardboard posters of constituents they said had health problems who would allegedly lose their insurance coverage if Barrett is confirmed. “Look at this person, soon after enrolling in the expanded Medicaid program, she began experiencing debilitating pain in her ear, behind her eye,” Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said of one of his constituents. “It led to a series of expensive medical tests and MRIs that would cost $6,000 each. She shudders at the thought of what would have happened without the Medicaid expansion.” Leahy said it weighs heavily on the minds of Vermonters. “They’re scared, Judge Barrett. They’re scared that your confirmation would rip from them the very health care protections that millions of Americans have fought to maintain,” he said. “They are scared that the clock would be turned back to a time when women had no right to control their own bodies and when it was acceptable to discriminate against women in the workplace.” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., called Barrett a “judicial torpedo.” “This Supreme Court nominee has signaled in the judicial equivalent of all caps that she believes the Affordable Care Act must go and that the precedent protecting the ACA doesn’t matter,” Whitehouse said. “The big, secretive influences behind this unseemly rush see this nominee as a judicial torpedo they are firing at the ACA.” Grassley countered that it’s “outrageous” to presume to know how she would vote in a pending Obamacare case simply because of an academic paper she wrote criticizing a 2012 Supreme Court opinion upholding the law. “Let’s set the record straight. … Democrats say her view was radical and a preview of how she might vote on the court,” Grassley said. “First, her comment dealt with a provision of the law that is no longer in effect. So, the legal issues before the court this fall are entirely separate. “Moreover, her criticism of [Chief Justice John] Roberts’ reasoning are mainstream, not only in the conservative legal community, but well beyond.” 5. What Trump Had to Say He was even critical of the amount of time Graham allotted to Democrats on the committee. “The Republicans are giving the Democrats a great deal of time, which is not mandated, to make their self-serving statements relative to our great new, future Supreme Court justice,” Trump tweeted. “Personally, I would pull back, approve, and go for STIMULUS for the people!!!”
Although Republicans on the committee barely responded to the Democrats’ Obamacare attacks, Trump did.
He also took a verbal shot at Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who touted Obamacare, abortion rights, and gun control.
6. ‘Religious Bigotry’ Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., cited the importance of preserving the high court’s 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut decision that upheld the right of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction. “When you tell somebody that they’re too Catholic to be on the bench, when you tell them they’ll be a Catholic judge, not an American judge, that’s bigotry,” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., countered. “The pattern and practice of bigotry from members of this committee must stop. I would expect that it would be renounced.” He specifically referenced what Coons had said. “I can only assume it is another hit at Judge Barrett’s religious faith, referring to Catholic doctrinal beliefs,” he said. “I don’t know what else it can be, since no one has challenged [the Griswold decision]. It is not a live issue, and hasn’t been for decades. This is the kind of thing I’m talking about. And this is the sort of attack that must stop.” 7. Sasse’s Civics lessonSen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., said it’s important to distinguish between civics and politics. He mused on what had happened in going from the unanimous Senate confirmation of Scalia, 98-0 in 1986, and the nearly unanimous confirmation of Ginsburg, 96-3 in 1993, to what is happening in today’s hyperpoliticized climate of judicial confirmations. “Some of what happened between then and now is we have allowed politics to swallow everything,” he said. “Civics is the stuff we are all supposed to agree on, regardless of our policy views. Civics is another way we talk about the rules of the road. Civics 101 is stuff like ‘Congress writes laws.’” Sasse continued: “We ourselves within the legislative branch have got to do a better job by focusing on the fact that the Constitution is not just a judicial thing. It is also a legislative thing. It’s also an executive thing. It’s an American thing,” Lee said, telling Barrett: “It’s one of the many reasons I will object when anyone, anytime tries to attribute to you a policy position and hold you to that. You are not a policymaker. You are a judge. That’s what we’re here to discuss.” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, had a similar view. “The framers of the Constitution deliberately set up a system of checks and balances so that nobody can become a Supreme Court [justice] without both the president and the Senate,” Cruz said. “Each was designed to check the other. That system of checks and balances limits power and protects the voters. Indeed, voters made a clear choice.” Cruz added: Yet, Senate Democrats blocked passage of a COVID-19 relief package last month. Last week, Trump announced negotiations with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had broken down and would resume after the election. “Americans are worried about one thing above all else right now, our health,” Whitehouse said. “This hearing itself is a microcosm of Trump’s dangerous ineptitude in dealing with the COVID pandemic. Trump can’t even keep the White House safe. Here, it is the chairman’s job to see to the committee’s safety. Though his words were reassuring, I don’t know who has been tested, who should be tested, who is a danger. What contact tracing has been done on infected and exposed senators and staff?” Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, fired back. “I’ve heard several of my colleagues basically say the Republicans are refusing to work on helping to address the COVID crisis,” Crapo said. “This coming from colleagues who just a month or so ago voted unanimously to filibuster a $500 [billion] to $600 billion COVID relief package in the Senate.” He continued: Fred Lucas is chief national affairs correspondent for The Daily Signal. Tags: Fred Lucas, 9 Takeaways, From Day 1, Barrett Confirmation HearingsTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Biden-Harris Orwellian Redefining of “Court-Packing”
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 06:37 PM PDT by Ken Blackwell: Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are redefining the words “court packing” in a manner worthy of George Orwell’s 1984, ironically previewing how a packed (i.e., expanded) Supreme Court would redefine the Constitution’s words, abolishing our democratic republic as it has existed for over 200 years. Perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of our Constitution is that it is a written document. America’s Constitution is the first and oldest written constitution in the world. Like any document, it consists of words on paper, so its meaning rests entirely on the meaning of those words. Every American have vital interests in those words, including me. I serve on the board of a religious-liberty law firm, concerned that the First Amendment words “free speech,” and “establishment” and “free exercise” of religion must have a clear and fixed meanings. I serve on the NRA board, so am concerned about the Second Amendment’s “right to keep and bear arms.” I serve on the board of the Club for Growth, and so focus on the words in the Constitution’s Tax Clause, Spending Clause, and Commerce Clause. As a black man, I care about the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantees of “due process” and the “equal protection of the laws.” These fundamental rights survive only when those words have unchangeable meanings. “A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were,” Amy Coney Barrett said today, speaking of Justice Scalia. “Sometimes that meant reaching results he did not like. But as he put it in one of his best known opinions, that is what it means to say we have a government of laws, not of men.” This is why court-packing would destroy our form of government. As Justice Antonin Scalia famously explained, it is our Constitution’s structural protections of separation of powers and checks and balances that actually holds tyranny at bay to protect the people. The greatest check the Supreme Court has over Congress and a president is an independent judiciary with the power to strike down government actions that violate the fixed meaning of the Constitution’s words. “Court-packing” refers to a president and Congress controlled by the same party to pass a law increasing the number of Supreme Court seats, then packing those seats with justices that will rubber-stamp whatever the government does. They redefine the Constitution’s words to give a pass to whatever the ruling party wants. That would destroy a check that is essential to our very form of government, which is why it is the single greatest issue facing the voters in this election. Biden and Harris must not be allowed to continue refusing to answer whether they will pack the Supreme Court should they gain power—a refusal that implies they will do precisely that. Instead, they redefine “court-packing.” In Orwell’s frightening book, the all-powerful government brainwashed the people with the slogans: War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength. Words had no meaning. The Harris-Biden ticket (their term, not mine) is instead redefining “court-packing.” Article II of the Constitution specifies that Supreme Court justices are appointed through two-party agreement, with the president choosing whom to nominate and the Senate choosing whether to advise and consent (which we call “confirmation”). All 29 times when there have been election-year Supreme Court vacancies, presidents have offered nominees to fill them. Twenty-two of our 45 presidents have done so. When held by the same party, the Senate almost always confirms. When held by the opposition party, the Senate almost never confirms. This is the normal constitutional order. Yet Biden and Harris are redefining “court-packing” to refer to that ordinary process, inverting the meaning of a term that threatens our constitutional system of government. Americans must reject Biden and Harris’s bid to eradicate the Constitution’s separation of powers and checks and balances, condemning America to the dystopian one-party rule Orwell warned could be in our future. Tags: Ken Blackwell, Biden-Harris, Orwellian Redefining, of “Court-Packing”To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Lord of the Flies
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 06:19 PM PDT . . . The media made a big deal over a fly on VP Mike Pence’s head during the Debate but what if Flies were lies.
Editorial Cartoon by AF “Tony” Branco Tags: Editorial Cartoon, AF Branco, Lord of the FliesTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Can the Fed End Racism?
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 05:48 PM PDT by Dr. Ron Paul: House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters and Senator Elizabeth Warren have introduced the Federal Reserve Racial and Economic Equity Act. This legislation directs the Federal Reserve to eliminate racial disparities in income, employment, wealth, and access to credit. Eliminating racial disparities in access to credit is code for forcing banks and other financial institutions to approve loans based on the applicants’ race, instead of based on their income and credit history. Overlooking poor credit history or income below what would normally be required to qualify for a loan results in individuals ending up with ruinous debt. These individuals will end up losing their homes, cars, or businesses because banks disregarded sound lending practices in an effort to show they are meeting race-based requirements. Forcing banks to make loans based on political considerations damages the economy by misallocating resources. This reduces economic growth and inflicts more pain on lower-income Americans. The Carter-era Community Reinvestment Act has already shown what happens when the government forces banks to give loans to unqualified borrowers. This law played a significant role in the housing boom and subsequent economic meltdown. The Federal Reserve Racial and Economic Equity Act will be the Community Reinvestment Act on steroids. This legislation also requires the Fed to shape monetary policy with an eye toward eliminating racial disparities. This adds a third mandate to the Fed’s current “dual mandate” of promoting a stable dollar and full employment. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has already publicly committed to using racial disparities as an excuse to continue the Fed’s current policy of perpetual money creation. Since inflation occurs whenever the Fed creates new money, Powell and his supporters want a policy of never-ending inflation. Supporters of this scheme say that inflation raises wages and creates new job opportunities for those at the bottom of the economic ladder. However, these wage gains are illusory, as wages rarely, if ever, increase as much as prices. So, workers’ real standard of living declines even as their nominal income increases. By contrast, those at the top of the income ladder tend to benefit from inflation as they receive the new money — and thus an increase in purchasing power — before the Fed’s actions cause a general rise in the price level. The damage done by inflation is hidden and regressive, which is part of why the inflation tax is the most insidious of all taxes. When the Fed creates new money, it distorts the market signals sent by interest rates, which are the price of money. This leads to a bubble. Many people who find well-paying jobs in bubble industries will lose those jobs when the bubble inevitably bursts. Many of these workers, and others, will struggle because of debt they incurred because they listened to “experts” who said the boom would never end. The Federal Reserve’s manipulation of the money supply lowers the dollar’s value, creates a boom-and-bust business cycle, facilitates the rise of the welfare-warfare state, and enriches the elites, while impoverishing people in the middle and lower classes. Progressives who want to advance the wellbeing of people in the middle and lower classes should stop attacking free markets and join libertarians in seeking to restore a sound monetary policy, The first step is to let the people know the full truth about the central bank by passing the Audit the Fed bill. Once the truth about the Fed is exposed, a critical mass of people will join the liberty movement and force Congress to end the Fed’s money monopoly. Tags: Ron Paul, Can the Fed, End Racism?To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
On the Law, Oaths, and the Truth
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 05:35 PM PDT by Pem Schaeffer: Prologue: I wrote this item nearly a year ago, and its distribution was local and limited. I thought of it again when I heard Senator Kamala Harris say words to this effect during the Vice-Presidential debate last week. “The death of George Floyd when a Minneapolis Police Officer knelt on his neck for eight minutes was horrific, and we’ve got to pass a law to make sure that can’t happen again.” Apparently, Senator Harris, even with her extensive “law enforcement experience,” doesn’t understand that passing a law doesn’t prevent a bad thing from happening. If it did, we wouldn’t have murders, rape, robberies, assaults, and all manner of other crimes that plague society. Laws do nothing to prevent crimes; they only establish penalties for them. In today’s partisan, impeachment-centric political climate, the following have become figurative lapel pins and brooches for the ruling class. As you read them, images of Jerry Nadler, Nancy Pelosi, and Adam Schiff may come to mind. My sincere apologies. “We are a nation of laws” (see Note 1 below) “No one is above the law” (see Note 2 below) “Equal justice before the law” (see Note 3 below) The majority of us embrace these as core truths of our unique American experiment, yet their regular flaunting, and at the same time abuse by those who should be their guardians, erodes their meaning and value. Most often, we find those who proclaim them most loudly are the very ones who least believe in them. A very obvious “loophole” in these foundational maxims is that “the law” does not treat of all situations in our civil and political existence. Note 1: Except when we aren’t, especially when “by any means necessary” is the golden rule. Not to mention those situations where there is no applicable law, or the law explicitly gives an exception to Congress. Note 2: Except for Members of Congress and those with whom they agree and/or seek favor. The law only means something when those charged with enforcing it actually do so. The mere existence of words on paper has no effect on behavior, anymore than a Highway speed limit sign constrains vehicle performance by limiting gas pedal travel. Note 3: Except when it is politically inconvenient to the anointed, and can interfere with social justice agendas and similarly sacred motivations. I suspect we all grew up hearing things like “it’s against the law to rob a bank;” or “it’s against the law to kill someone.” How many times have we heard someone say “there ought to be a law against that” ? Eventually I realized I had never seen words in criminal statute that said “thou shall not rob a bank.” Or “thou shall not kill someone.” Instead, what we find is language in statutes (state and/or federal) that defines criminal acts and specific penalties for committing them. The vast majority of our LEO’s (Law enforcement officials) spend most of their time pursuing perpetrators and seeing that appropriate penalties are meted out, rather than preventing the acts before they happen. Admittedly, the presence of a Police car parked along a highway tends to increase our attention to speed limits, and a Policeman walking a beat will likely discourage robbery and vandalism. What is law? In the simplest terms, it is Statutory language enacted by state and/or federal legislative action. We’re familiar with prosecutorial discretion, in which decisions are made based on available resources and the overall function of our system of justice. Now, however, we are seeing something far worse; abandonment of the law as it relates to behavior as wide ranging as illegal entry into our country to shooting up, pooping, and peeing on public ways. Candidates, some with highly troubling backgrounds, are even seeking and gaining office on platforms of ignoring laws that have existed for decades. Chaos has to follow; the first waves are already upon us. We are in a period of Congressional Inquiry hearings, where selected witnesses are called to testify under oath. These hearings are a once in a lifetime opportunity for those in charge, and they all too easily bend “the law” to suit their purposes. Why? The lust for political power, of course, and the belief that the unwritten code of the swamp is superior to the “laws of men.” The swamp, we all know, has books full or “rules,” and can make new ones at the drop of a hat. As best I can remember, Chairman Adam Schiff has been swearing in witnesses before the House Intelligence Committee with these words: “Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?” The thought occurred to me that if I was called as a witness and asked to take this oath, I would reply “Sir, I will take this oath if you will take the same oath with me, and every member of the committee, or any staff who will testify, takes it as well.” Can you imagine what the response would be? “The witness will suspend, and will be held in contempt,” I can hear Schiff say, his face gleaming with pomposity. Which raises the question of why Members of Congress are not held to the same standards as those who come before them. We read of various individuals indicted, convicted, and sentenced for “lying to Congress” and similar “crimes.” Yet we’ve also seen paragons of virtue like Senator Harry Reid lie through his teeth in public on the Senate floor about Mitt Romney’s failure to pay his income taxes. And Adam Schiff invent his own version of the transcript of the phone conversation between President Trump and the President of the Ukraine. Yet each is immune from any consequences for such barefaced public lying and/or fabrications. How can this be, when “no one is above the law?” I refer you to the three notes above and to the Speech and Debate Clause of the US Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1) which reads “….for any Speech or Debate in either House, [Senators and Representatives] shall not be questioned in any other Place.” The Supreme Court has upheld the Clause in multiple cases. In Doe v. McMillan (1973), “….the Court has held that the clause protects such acts as voting, the conduct of committee hearings, the issuance and distribution of committee reports, the subpoenaing of information required in the course of congressional investigations, and even the reading of stolen classified materials into a subcommittee’s public record.” (The Heritage Guide to the Constitution, page 81) Given that Congress is above the law, and has their own special exemption, how can we possibly trust anything they say in the conduct of official business “of the people?” The sad truth is that we cannot. In the gut wrenching language in said hearings, “how does that make you feel?” It makes me feel like we could use a new Amendment to the Constitution to repeal the Clause. Among other things. When you come right down to it, while there are exceptions for the masters of the swamp, there is little if any law that addresses honor, integrity, ethics, and accountability, to name a few main principles of personal conduct. Sure; Congress has “Ethics Committees” and rules, but these do not have the force of or the penalties of law mere mortals must live by. And don’t forget the hush money slush fund. Further complicating things is the concept of postmodernism, which among other things, holds that there is no such thing as “objective truth.” The simple example is in Orwell’s 1984 where 2 + 2 = 5 was the version of truth from Big Brother. In our era, it’s now asserted that we each have our own truth; you have yours, I have mine, and they have theirs. “The truth” no longer exists; all conceptions of truth are now entirely personal and individual. In other words, truth is no longer indisputable and commonly understood; it is as you like it. Remember the Kavanaugh hearings? Do you recall references to “her truth?” Pay attention, and you will more and more see such phraseology used in discussing the contentious events of our day. Congress wasn’t so much seeking truth as they were seeking “their truth.” That being the version of the truth that would allow them to reject the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh. Of necessity, this leads to the question of what these words in the referenced oath actually mean: “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” We should demand that Schiff tell us when he asks us to take the offered oath. “Which truth would you like Congressman? Mine, yours, or someone else’s?” We are at the point where oaths and truth no longer have meaning, because if my truth is subjective and personal and different than someone else’s truth, than the entire notion of conducting hearings, inquiries, and investigations to determine the truth “before the law” is hollow and irrelevant. Those of you steeped in STEM subjects may recall “the real and imaginary axes” used in complex variable analysis. Did you ever think we’d transition to conducting business on the j-axis? Therefore, all such exercises should be terminated immediately. Unless we can find enlightenment by the Board Members of the Ministry of Truth. Let me close with this advice. Buy up as many wool futures contracts as you can afford. Because the very public attempts to pull the wool over the eyes of millions and millions of Americans is sure to drive wool prices through the roof. You might as well benefit from the behavior of the free market while it still exists. And that’s the truth. Or, I should say, my truth. In closing, I leave you to ponder the concepts of tyranny, anarchy, and related abuses of the law, and how they are overwhelming our culture and our lives as we go about our daily lives. Have a Nice Day! Tags: Pem Schaeffer, On the Law, Oaths, TruthTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Court Packing Kamala: VP Candidate an Existential Threat to U.S. Supreme Court and Second Amendment
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 03:48 PM PDT by NRA-ILA: Another week, another Biden-Harris campaign refusal to level with the American voter on the issue of turning the federal judiciary into a second partisan legislative branch of government. At Wednesday’s vice presidential debate, Vice President Mike Pence asked Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) if a Biden-Harris administration would attempt to add seats to the U.S. Supreme Court. Just as Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden declined to answer this question during the first presidential debate, Harris did not answer this simple question. Pence posed the following question to Harris, “If Judge Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed to the Supreme Court of the United States, are you and Joe Biden, if somehow you win this election, going to pack the Supreme Court to get your way?” When Harris initially refused to answer, Pence reiterated, “People are voting right now. They’d like to know if you and Joe Biden are gonna pack the Supreme Court if you don’t get your way in this nomination.” Again, Harris did answer the question. After repeated non-answers from Harris, the debate moderator attempted to bail out the senator from California by moving on to another topic. In response, a polite but forceful Pence noted, “I just want the record to reflect, she never answered the question. Perhaps at the next debate Joe Biden will answer the question. And I think the American people know the answer.” The Vice President is right. The American people do know the answer. Given Biden and Harris’s steadfast refusal to state their position on such a monumental and unpopular policy measure, it is rational for concerned citizens to conclude the worst. Further, New York Times reporter Alexander Burns has stated that Harris told her that she was interested in packing the U.S. Supreme Court. Burns was recorded stating, “Senator Harris told me in an interview actually that she was absolutely open to doing that…” It was a narrow 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court decision that concluded in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. A similarly narrow 5-4 majority also incorporated that right to the states in McDonald v. Chicago. Even with a majority of justices that recognize the proper individual rights interpretation of the Second Amendment, the narrow majority has proven reluctant to vindicate this right when presented with the opportunity. Second Amendment supporters cannot afford to permit a Biden-Harris administration and Democrat-controlled Senate to pack the U.S. Supreme Court with anti-gun justices. Especially when both Biden and Harris have made clear that they do not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. During a September 2019 “townhall” event, Biden was asked, “Do you agree with the D.C. v. Heller decision in regards to protecting the individual right to bear arms that are in common use and which are utilized for lawful purposes?” Biden responded in part, “If I were on the court I wouldn’t have made the same ruling. OK, that’s number one.” As District Attorney of San Francisco, Harris signed an amicus curiae brief in Heller that argued the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. Advocating against the individual right to keep and bear arms, the brief argued, There is every reason to believe that any court packing scheme would involve installing a solid anti-Second Amendment majority to the U.S. Supreme Court that would work to eliminate recognition of the individual right to keep and bear arms. NRA members and gun rights activists must work to inform their family, friends, neighbors, and other freedom-minded individuals about the dangers a Biden-Harris administration poses to the U.S. Supreme Court and the Second Amendment. Tags: NRA, ILA, Court Packing Kamala, VP Candidate, an Existential Threat, U.S. Supreme Court, Second AmendmentTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Yes, Hillary Clinton Orchestrated the Russia-Collusion Farce
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 03:13 PM PDT by Andrew C. McCarthy: The Clinton campaign dreamed up, paid for, and peddled the Trump-Russia collusion farce. Did She Or Ddn’t She? Of course she did. In late July 2016, Hillary Clinton, in an effort to divert attention from the email scandal that was haunting her presidential bid, directed her campaign to peddle a political narrative that Russia’s suspected hacking and leaking of Democratic Party emails was in furtherance of a conspiracy between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump to swing the election to Trump. That is, as I argued in Ball of Collusion, the Clinton campaign dreamed up, paid for, and peddled the Trump–Russia collusion farce. And in promoting it, President Obama’s former secretary of state had a willing and able partner in the Obama administration — very much including its intelligence and law-enforcement apparatus. Democrats Change Their Tune As ever with the Clintonistas: when they’re moving their lips thye’re projecting. Ratcliffe’s initial revelation came with a caveat: While our spy agencies judged Moscow’s analysis about Clinton to be authentic (in the sense of truly being a Russian intel product), they could not vouch for its accuracy (i.e., it might reflect what the Russians really believed, but it might alternatively be exaggeration or fabrication). This was not a wobble. Intelligence agencies sweep up scads of information, and they must always grade its reliability with a skeptical eye to avoid deluding themselves. But this was all Democrats needed . . . at least at first. At a Judiciary Committee hearing, former FBI director James Comey and Senate Democrats scoffed at Ratcliffe’s frank, professional concession, claiming it discredited his disclosure in its entirety, and called his competence into question. He’d clearly been duped by Russian disinformation . . . said the people who seem to have made a habit of being duped by Russian disinformation. Did the Russians have a window into the Clinton campaign? It sure looks that way, between Secretary Clinton’s security practices (which even Comey has described as irresponsible) and her retention of Steele, with his stable of Russian oligarch clients and his dossier “primary subsource,” whom the FBI suspected (with copious reason) to be a Russian asset. But the point here is not whether Russian spies, thanks to Clinton’s own carelessness, had effectively infiltrated her campaign. The point is: Clinton was undeniably doing what, it turns out, the Russians were contemporaneously detecting. Want to play epistemological acrobatics? Okay, fine. We can spend hours pondering whether Russian spies generated an assessment about what Clinton was up to because they legitimately wanted to inform their Kremlin superiors, or whether they did it because they wanted our spies to see it and to wonder whether the Russians knew that we knew that the Russians knew . . . I’d prefer to keep my eye on the ball, which has precious little to do with spy games and Russian disinformation. The Russians were able to deduce what Hillary Clinton was up to because it was patently obvious. It did not take a super sleuth to figure this one out. Just eyes to see and ears to hear. That’s why you might have noticed a shift in Democratic tone when Ratcliffe released more documents. The second set of disclosures showed that the CIA had taken the Russian information seriously enough that (a) then-director John Brennan quickly briefed President Obama and his administration’s national-security team about it and (b) the agency included the Russian intel about Clinton in a memo to the FBI, which laid out information gleaned by the “Crossfire Hurricane fusion cell” that Brennan had assembled to promote the Trump–Russia storyline. After Ratcliffe published these documents, we were no longer hearing much about disinformation. Now the talking point became: Well, there was nothing criminal in what Clinton did; she was simply worried about a potentially corrupt conspiracy between Trump and Putin — and who wouldn’t be? Right . . . worried based on absolutely zero evidence. There was not a shred of proof that Donald Trump and his campaign had any foreknowledge of, much less complicity in, the suspected Russian hack of DNC emails. That, you may remember, was the sinkhole on which the collusion farce was constructed. Clinton Retains Steele to Craft Trump–Russia NarrativeAt this point, Democrats have no choice but to concede Clinton’s catalytic role in the collusion narrative because there is no other rational way to look at what happened — not for any sentient person, never mind Russian intelligence agents. Let’s look at the timeline. In spring 2016, the Clinton campaign, through their lawyers at Perkins Coie (an activist Democratic firm that also represents the DNC), retained Steele to compile opposition research connecting Trump and Russia. By June 20, Steele had produced the first of his dossier “reports.” It sets forth the infamous “pee tape” farce, at which any competent investigator would have rolled his eyes, especially if he knew anything about Steele’s self-professed Trump derangement. For Steele, the rumor that Putin has a video of Trump cavorting with prostitutes is not good enough; he figures the story is better if he adds that Trump went out of his way to stage the “golden shower” performance on a bed in which the Obamas — “whom he hated” — had slept. It’s melodrama, in the now familiar genre of Trump fever-dream. Beyond that, Steele’s “report” could have been written by Clinton or Brennan themselves. It frets over Trump’s by-then-well-documented skepticism about NATO, surmising that such thinking couldn’t possibly be explained by anything other than Trump’s being blackmailed by Putin. As usual, what’s actually interesting about a Steele “report” is what’s not in it. There’s nothing about emails. That this is a Steele pattern would also have been a red flag for the FBI if its top officials, like other devotees of the progressive international order, had not been as repulsed by Trump’s candidacy as Steele was. None of the seemingly important things Steele reports are verifiable (and some of them are plain false); by contrast, the actually important things that happen are never in Steele’s “intelligence reporting” until after they happen. He was not unearthing information as an intelligence professional; he was a paid political hack conveniently folding reported news into Clinton’s anti-Trump campaign narrative. Assange Issues a Threat as the Clinton Emails Scandal IntensifiesAs Steele might have noted had he been paying attention, over a week before his June 20 “report,” WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange had publicly said, “We have emails pending publication,” which were “in relation to Hillary Clinton.” Western intelligence services have long observed that WikiLeaks has a collaborative relationship with Russia. At the time, it was not common knowledge that the DNC had been hacked. Nor was it widely known that the FBI and the DNC had been slow to react to the hack, or that the DNC would deny the FBI access to its servers (with the support of the Obama Justice Department, which did not take action to seize them for forensic examination). Thus, anyone who was focused on Assange would have assumed that the emails he was talking about were Clinton’s personal emails — the 33,000 she had declined to surrender to the State Department even though they were rife with official business. The start of summer was a time of frenzied activity regarding Clinton’s email scandal. The FBI, driven by the political calendar and the Obama administration’s determination that the putative future Democratic president would not be charged with a crime, raced to close its probe-for-show before the Democratic national convention, scheduled to begin on July 25. In rapid succession: On June 27, Obama attorney general Loretta Lynch had her tarmac tête-à-tête with Mrs. Clinton’s husband (the former president who had first brought Lynch to prominence by appointing her U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of New York). On Saturday, July 2, the FBI and the Justice Department did their cursory close-out interview of Clinton (which was such a sham that she was permitted to have two other subjects of the investigation present and assisting her as “counsel”). And on July 5, FBI director James Comey held his infamous “exoneration” press conference, which illustrated that there was damning evidence of Clinton’s mishandling of classified information and destruction of government records, and of her promotion of a culture of national-security recklessness at the State Department; but, nevertheless, that the Obama administration would not charge her, even though her conduct violated the literal terms of the espionage statute. If Director Comey thought his press conference was going to put the email scandal behind the Bureau and the Clinton campaign, it had the opposite effect. Republicans were outraged that the fix was in. Democrats were outraged at the director’s misconduct in going public with the evidence against an uncharged person. At the congressional hearings that immediately ensued, Republicans questioned Comey in excruciating detail about all the disclosures he’d made concerning Clinton’s mishandling of classified information. It emerged that he’d begun preparing his exoneration speech months earlier, even though Clinton had not been questioned, other central witnesses had not been interviewed, and key evidence had not been obtained, let alone analyzed. Heading into the convention that she’d hoped would be a coronation, Clinton was reeling. Her email scandal was intensifying rather than dissipating. And Assange seemed to be threatening to leak the very emails she had taken pains not just to delete but to destroy — employing the BleachBit program so no one could ever read them. (Of course, as the Clinton campaign had to realize, if a foreign intelligence service had hacked into her non-secure homebrew system to copy the emails and slip them to WikiLeaks, an after-the-fact BleachBit treatment would not have helped.) The DNC Emails For Clinton, this was manna from heaven. Even though Assange had characteristically sought to drum up attention by promising emails “in relation to Clinton,” the Democrats’ nominee was not an active participant in the DNC emails. Nor could the hacking of the DNC be blamed on her reckless use of a non-government server system. Although Assange had implied that the emails he was about to release would damage Clinton, they did not damage her at all. To the contrary, they helped her. Clinton was able to pose as the victim, targeted by a WikiLeaks-Russia scheme; yet she suffered none of the harms of such a scheme, since her own emails were not at issue. In addition, the fact that emails were at the center of the controversy would enable her to conflate her email scandal with the hacking of the DNC. Now, if Trump or other Republicans referred to her destroyed emails, it would be spun as a reference to the DNC emails that Russia was suspected of hacking. When Trump foolishly chided that he hoped Russia found Clinton’s emails, it would be spun as a plea that Russia hack the DNC — even though he was obviously referring to the emails Clinton had purged, and doing so under circumstances where Clinton’s private servers had long been decommissioned and in the FBI’s possession. Steele and the Campaign Get On-Message
Naturally, publication of the hacked DNC emails was included, post facto, in the Trump-Russia narrative that Steele, at the Clinton campaign’s urging, had already been fabricating for weeks. The well-paid former spy got busy, writing a new “intelligence report.” He thundered about an “extensive conspiracy between TRUMP’s campaign team and Kremlin, sanctioned at the highest levels and involving Russian diplomatic staff based in the US,” which explained the Kremlin’s responsibility for the “recent appearance of DNC-emails on WikiLeaks.” This, of course, had been done “with the full knowledge and support of TRUMP and senior members of his campaign team” — a quid pro quo for Trump’s supposed agreement “to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue.”
After the lurid “pee tape” story, should we be surprised that Steele was just getting warmed up? He related that this “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between the Trump campaign and “the Russian leadership” was being coordinated on the Trump end “by the Republican candidate’s campaign manager, Paul MANAFORT, who was using foreign policy adviser, Carter PAGE, and others as intermediaries.”In fact, Manafort and Page do not know each other. Oh, and what about that “Russian diplomatic staff based in the US” that Steele touted? He pointed to the Russian consulate in Miami as a conspiratorial hub. Alas, there is no Russian consulate in Miami — as any competent FBI agent who was actually interested in assessing Steele’s credibility would have figured out in about five minutes (that’s about how long it took a State Department official to figure it out when Steele subsequently spun this yarn for her). While Steele was scrivening away, the Clinton campaign staff at the Democratic convention in Philadelphia was wasting no time. On July 24, with revelations from the hacked DNC emails still breaking and the convention about to begin, Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook told CNN: It was a great story for Clinton: She would be delighted to have Americans reading Democratic emails she was not party to, rather than speculating about her own emails. The DNC emails were basically a dud, making explicit the already manifest fact that the party was in the tank for Clinton against Bernie Sanders. More consequential was that they helped the media push the Clinton email scandal out of the limelight for a few days, between the embarrassment of a few top Democrats whose emails were published and the convention drama — speeches by the Obamas and Clintons, and Khizr Khan, the father of a heroic fallen Muslim American soldier, Captain Humayan Khan, blasting Trump’s proposed restrictions on Muslims entering the U.S. The Political Narrative Seamlessly Becomes an Investigation Getting her own email scandal out of the public eye was what Clinton wanted. And the Obama administration went right along for the ride. At exactly the time Clinton was rolling out the Trump-Russia narrative, based on the DNC email hacking, Alexander Downer — an Australian ambassador who once arranged a $25 million contribution to the Clinton Foundation, and who was closely tied to Steele’s British intelligence colleagues — suddenly remembered a conversation two months earlier with a nondescript Trump campaign adviser. That young fellow, George Papadopoulos, had made a vague remark about hearing that the Russians had some kind of compromising information about Mrs. Clinton. Eureka, Downer exclaimed to himself, Papadopoulos must have meant the DNC emails! Whereupon the diplomat sauntered over to the U.S. embassy to alert officials from the Obama State Department that Secretary Clinton used to run. Quite the leap of logic. Remember, the DNC emails did not involve Clinton. Plus, even Downer admits that Papadopoulos never mentioned the word emails in their barroom conversation. There is not a scintilla of indication that Papadopoulos knew anything about DNC emails or Russia’s suspected hacking of them. Months earlier, he says he had been told by the mysterious Maltese academic, Josef Mifsud, that the Kremlin might have Mrs. Clinton’s own emails from her non-secure homebrew server — which, if the conversation really happened, would have made Mifsud about the zillionth person to so hypothesize on that subject. (See, e.g., Director Comey’s July 5 remarks: “We assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”) No matter. At the same time that Hillary Clinton had her campaign proclaim that the DNC emails had been hacked by Russia as part of a corrupt Trump-Putin conspiracy to swing the election to Trump, and Steele dutifully reported that the DNC emails had been hacked by Russia as part of a corrupt Trump-Putin conspiracy to swing the election to Trump, the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on — you’ll never guess! — suspicion that the DNC emails had been hacked by Russia as part of a corrupt Trump–Putin conspiracy to swing the election to Trump. What a coincidence. Tags: Andrew C. McCarthy, Hillary Clinton, Orchestrated, the Russia-Collusion FarceTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Government 5G? The Deep State Military-Industrial-Complex Looks to Expand Its ‘Unwarranted Influence’
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 03:05 PM PDT
by Seton Motley: Dwight David Eisenhower was a supremely exceptional American. After serving as Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe in World War II, the Draft Eisenhower movement resulted in Ike serving two terms as a Republican President (1954-1960). On his way out the door in 1961, Eisenhower gave his famous Military-Industrial-Complex speech. In which (in part) he warned: “We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions…. “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence …by the Military-Industrial-Complex…. “Our military organization today bears little relation to that known of any of my predecessors in peacetime…. “We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes…. “The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists. And will persist. “Only an alert and knowledgable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals. So that security and liberty may prosper together.” This is Eisenhower – predicting the Deep State Swamp. Which is some serious Nostradamus-esque shot calling. Unfortunately, government schools led We the People to drop the ball. Rather than heed Eisenhower’s warning, we have instead spent the last half-century-plus in utter, Complex-expanding complacency. As a result, “the disastrous rise of misplaced power” has continued to “persist.” Times a billion. All the way up to now – during the presidency of Donald Trump. A man who ran in part on ending the endless wars for which the M-I-C is famous – and of which it is so fond. The Left has spent decades targeting for takedown the Defense Department (DoD). And that long march has borne much fruit. Liberal Generals Beclowning the Military When Leftist military leaders aren’t bad-mouthing Trump – they’re advancing terrible M-I-C policies against Trump’s expressed wishes. This is prototypical Deep State Swamp stuff – of which Eisenhower long ago warned. Please do not allow our affinity for the military rank-and-file to cloud our vision here. What these rogue officials are doing – is no different than the rogue officials of any other government department, agency, commission or board undermining the will of We the People expressed in our election of presidents. To wit: There have for many, many months now been rumblings beneath the surface of the fetid, festering Swamp – of yet another really terrible idea:… “The Pentagon’s recent Request for Information resurfaces a costly and unfeasible idea that the Trump administration has considered in the past: a government-built and operated 5G network. “Calls for a nationalized 5G network are motivated both by a national security and an economic component. “Besides the obvious and concerning fact that it would require billions of new tax dollars to deploy, there are some serious security implications that deserve further consideration.” The Deep State Swamp has kept this terrible idea alive. Via people Trump should have long ago fired. Trump Team Mulls Nationalized 5G Network to Counter China: “National security officials working for President Donald Trump are considering building a superfast 5G network….” Pentagon Awards $600 Million to Spearhead 5G Experiments Across Five Military Bases They even snuck it into Trump’s reelect platform. Trump Campaign Proposes ‘National’ 5G These Deep State clowns – are actually working against the actual “Trump Team.” Donald Trump Team Idea to Nationalize 5G Network to Counter China is Rejected “White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said….” Trump Says He Opposes Nationalizing U.S. 5G Network Trump Puts Kibosh on Nationalized 5G Network National 5G Network: FCC Chairman Ajit Pai Opposes Kudlow Says Trump Administration Opposes Government Intervention in 5G About two years ago, I personally saw National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow give a speech in which he said a government 5G attempt is stupid. About two years ago, I personally saw National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow give a speech in which he said a government 5G attempt is stupid. But this Walking Dead dumbness won’t die. How dumb is it? The opposition is……bipartisan. GOP to Trump: Please Don’t Nationalize 5G Democrats Launch Inquiry into Pentagon’s Moves on a National 5G Network Why a Nationalized 5G Network Is a Bad Idea: “It would harm America in the long run, not help Washington compete with Beijing…. “The Department of Defense appears to be making an unpopular move to develop a national 5G network, an idea that seemed dead on arrival following near-universal opposition in 2019. Among those opponents is President Donald Trump….” But the Deep State Swamp awfulness shambles on. Here’s the thing: We don’t need the government. The US private sector has already spent many years and tens of billions of dollars developing the US private sector 5G network. And we’re just about universally there. The government is S…L…O…W…. And inept. It is patently absurd to pretend government is capable of playing catch-up to the private sector’s many years and tens of billions of dollars’ head-start. Especially on something as technologically sophisticated as 5G. “The U.S. is maintaining its leadership in 5G, and the nation’s carriers are already far into their respective deployments of secure 5G networks. “The DOD’s recent request for information for a single, nationwide wholesale network will not lead to a tangible solution to the race to 5G, rather it will lead to a solution in search of a problem. “Driving a DOD-centric, or a DOD proxy-centric, solution is a fool’s errand. It is founded on a belief that the federal government can move faster and more effectively than the private sector. This has not been true for decades. “This assumption ignores the great strides that have been made by the existing American players on the 5G field already. These private sector companies are the repositories of the expertise and experience in the telecom field, not the government. “Thinking that the government or a jerry-rigged organization with political connections will somehow pull together the expertise out of thin air is nonsense.” Indeed it is nonsense. All of this is. But the Deep State Swamp remains steadfastly impervious to facts. The Deep State Swamp is a huge, multi-tentacled organism. And just like any other organism, its top two priorities are survival – and expansion. No matter how stupid its survival and expansion are. And the Swamp’s prospective national 5G network is really, REALLY stupid. Eisenhower was exactly right. I still like Ike. Tags: Seton Motley, Less Government, Government 5G?, The Deep State, Military-Industrial-Complex, Looks to Expand, Its ‘Unwarranted Influence’To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Judiciary Committee’s Schedule For A Vote On Judge Barrett’s Nomination Keeps With Precedent
Posted: 13 Oct 2020 03:19 PM PDT
6 DAYS: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s final hearing day was on July 23, 1993 and her Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on July 29, 1993. (“Supreme Court Nomination Hearings,” U.S. Senate Website, Accessed 9/26/2020; “Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees,” U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Website, Accessed 9/26/2020)
7 DAYS: Justice Clarence Thomas’ final hearing day was on September 20, 1991 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on September 27, 1991. (“Supreme Court Nomination Hearings,” U.S. Senate Website, Accessed 9/26/2020; “Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees,” U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Website, Accessed 9/26/2020)
Note: The Judiciary Committee voted to send Justice Thomas’ nomination to the floor on Sept. 27, 1991, but subsequently held 3 more days of hearings in October. 4 DAYS: Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s final hearing day was on September 11, 1981 and her Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on September 15, 1981. (“Supreme Court Nomination Hearings,” U.S. Senate Website, Accessed 9/26/2020; “Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees,” U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Website, Accessed 9/26/2020)
1 DAY: Justice John Paul Stevens’ final hearing day was on December 10, 1975 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on December 11, 1975. (“Supreme Court Nomination Hearings,” U.S. Senate Website, Accessed 9/26/2020; “Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees,” U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Website, Accessed 9/26/2020)
6 DAYS: Justice Harry Blackmun’s final hearing day was on April 29, 1970 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on May 5, 1970. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 4/29/1970; “Blackmun Backed By Senate Panel,” The New York Times, 5/06/1970)
SAME DAY: Chief Justice Warren Burger’s final hearing day was on June 3, 1969 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on June 3, 1969. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 6/03/1969; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 5 DAYS: Associate Justice Abe Fortas’ final hearing day was on August 5, 1965 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on August 10, 1965. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 8/05/1965; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) SAME DAY: Justice Byron White’s final hearing day was on April 11, 1962 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on April 11, 1962. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 4/11/1962; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 6 DAYS: Justice Potter Stewart’s final hearing day was on April 14, 1959 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on April 20, 1959. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 4/14/1959; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) SAME DAY: Justice Charles Whittaker’s final hearing day was on March 18, 1957 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on March 18, 1957. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 3/18/1957; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 5 DAYS: Justice William Brennan’s final hearing day was on February 27, 1957 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on March 4, 1957. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 2/27/1957; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) SAME DAY: Chief Justice Earl Warren’s final hearing day was on February 24, 1954 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on February 24, 1954. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 2/24/1954; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 6 DAYS: Justice Sherman Minton’s final hearing day was on September 27, 1949 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on October 3, 1949. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 9/27/1949; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 1 DAY: Justice Tom Clark’s final hearing day was on August 11, 1949 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on August 12, 1949. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 8/11/1949; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 5 DAYS: Chief Justice Fred Vinson’s final hearing day was on June 14, 1946 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on June 19, 1946. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 6/14/1946; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) SAME DAY: Justice Robert Jackson’s final hearing day was on June 30, 1941 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on June 30, 1941. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 6/30/1941; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 2 DAYS: Chief Justice Harlan Fisk Stone’s final hearing day was on June 21, 1941 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on June 23, 1941. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 6/21/1941; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 4 DAYS: Justice Frank Murphy’s final hearing day was on January 11, 1940 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on January 15, 1940. (“Murphy Appointment Approved,” The Boston Daily Globe, 1/12/1940; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 3 DAYS: Justice William O. Douglas’ final hearing day was on March 24, 1939 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on March 27, 1939. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 3/24/1939; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 4 DAYS: Justice Felix Frankfurter’s final hearing day was on January 12, 1939 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on January 16, 1939. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 1/12/1939; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 4 DAYS: Justice Stanley Reed’s final hearing day was on January 20, 1938 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on January 24, 1938. (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, 1/20/1938; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 4 DAYS: Justice Benjamin Cardozo’s final hearing day was on February 19, 1932 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on February 23, 1932. (“Cardozo Approved For Supreme Court,” The Associated Press, 2/20/1932; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 5 DAYS: Associate Justice Harlan Fisk Stone’s final hearing day was on January 28, 1925 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on February 2, 1925. (“Stone Tells Senate Committee He Assumes Full Responsibility For Pressing New Wheeler Case,” The Washington Post, 01/29/1925; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010) 5 DAYS: Justice Pierce Butler’s final hearing day was on December 13, 1922 and his Senate Judiciary Committee markup vote was on December 18, 1922. (“Confirmation of Butler Favored After Hearing,” The Baltimore Sun, 12/14/1922; “Speed of Presidential and Senate Actions on Supreme Court Nominations, 1900-2010,” Congressional Research Service, RL33118, 8/06/2010 Tags: Judicial Committee Schedule, Vote, Judge Barrett’s Nomination, keeps with precedent To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REDSTATE
Here Are the Metrics That Show Trump Has a Lock on the Election
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
AMERICAN SPECTATOR
|
BIZPAC REVIEW
|
|
ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Wednesday, October 14, 2020
|
Good morning, NBC News readers.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett is set to face another round of tough questions on Day 3 of her confirmation hearings for the U.S. Supreme Court. President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden spar over the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the campaign trail. And it’s the end of an era for the Soyuz rocket.
Here’s what we’re watching this Wednesday morning.
|
Trump’s words haunt Amy Coney Barrett as she vows not to be a ‘pawn’ on Supreme Court
Judge Amy Coney Barrett faced a barrage of questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee over more than 11 hours on Tuesday, the second day of her confirmation hearing for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Barrett was sharply questioned by Democratic lawmakers over her personal and judicial philosophies. She repeatedly insisted to senators that she has no “agenda” on issues like the Affordable Care Act, the future of abortion rights or same-sex marriage and that she would be nobody’s “pawn” if confirmed to the Supreme Court.
She has a particularly tough row to hoe given that the person who nominated her to the high court, President Donald Trump, has repeatedly told Americans that his judicial picks will faithfully advance his agenda.
For instance, she declined to commit to recusing herself from a potential lawsuit contesting the result of the 2020 election, even though Trump has clearly stated his desire to fill the Supreme Court vacancy in the event of such a scenario. But she said she would consider the questions surrounding recusal seriously.
“I certainly hope that all members of the committee have more confidence in my integrity than to think I would allow myself to be used as a pawn to decide this election for the American people,” she told Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.
News analysis: During Day 2 of her hearing, Barrett revealed a road map for reversing landmark abortion and desegregation rulings, NBC News Jonathan Allen writes.
The hearing will resume this morning at 9 a.m. ET. Watch coverage on NBC News, MSNBC and follow our live blog for updates and analysis.
|
Trump tells coronavirus victims: ‘I feel your pain’
A pumped-up President Trump told supporters Tuesday that he “felt like Superman” after he got his experimental drug treatment for Covid-19.
“To everyone fighting to recover from the virus, I feel your pain because I’ve felt your pain,” Trump told a largely maskless crowd of thousands packed onto an airport tarmac in Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
Trump, once again, insisted at the rally that the country is “rounding the corner” on the virus, which has infected over 7.8 million people in the U.S. and killed over 216,000.
In contrast, Democratic nominee Joe Biden delivered a scathing review of how Trump’s presidency has hurt senior citizens, taking particular aim at the president’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.
Biden, speaking to a socially distanced crowd at a senior citizen community center in southern Florida, hit Trump over his statements on possibly cutting Social Security and his record on lowering prescription drug costs, but saved his breath almost entirely for criticism of how the president’s response to Covid-19 has hurt older people in particular.
“While he throws superspreader parties at the White House, while Republicans hug each other, without concern of the consequences, how many of you have been unable to hug your grandkids the last seven months?” Biden said.
“To Donald Trump, it’s simple, not a joke, you’re expendable. You’re forgettable. You’re virtually nobody. That’s how he sees seniors. That’s how he sees you,” the former vice president told those gathered in the battleground state.
Polls in Florida show an exceptionally close race, and Biden has led Trump in five of the last six polls tracked by NBC News, since late September.
NBC News just announced this morning that it will host a town hall with Trump in Miami on Thursday.
|
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to end census count early
The Supreme Court on Tuesday effectively allowed the government to stop the census count immediately, blocking a lower court order that would have required the Trump administration to continue gathering census information in the field until the end of October.
The Census Bureau said it wanted to stop the count so that it could start processing the data to meet a Dec. 31 deadline, set in federal law, for reporting the results to the president.
But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the government to keep going with its field work until Oct. 31, concluding that a longer time in the field would increase accuracy.
In a brief unsigned order, the Supreme Court stayed the appeals court order.
The decision sets up a battle for how the data collected in the count mandated by the Constitution to be done every 10 years will be used to determine the distribution of $1.5 trillion in federal aid, as well as how many congressional seats and Electoral College votes each state gets.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, writing, “The harms caused by rushing this year’s census count are irreparable.” (Brian Snyder / Reuters file)
|
Gifted education has a race problem. The solution isn’t simple.
White children and those from wealthy families are more likely to be identified as “gifted” — despite decades of effort to make these programs more equal. In a new series, “Gifted Education’s Race Problem,” The Hechinger Report and NBC News examine how gifted classes are segregating schools and what districts can do about it.
Some cities have tried to diversify or grow their gifted programs, while others are eliminating them altogether and teaching students of all abilities together in one class. That’s what Rockville Centre, New York, aimed to do — but the district faced unforeseen challenges.
The series also looks at how advances in genetic testing could enable researchers to predict which students are most likely to succeed in school. That could boost — and complicate — efforts to make gifted programs fairer.
Around the country, gifted and talented programs have come under fire for exacerbating school systems’ already stark racial and economic segregation. (Image: Julius Constantine Motal / NBC News)
|
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
|
Plus
- The Justice Department has sued Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, the author of a book about her relationship with Melania Trump, saying she violated a binding promise of confidentiality.
- India Oxenberg broke her silence about her life and eventual escape from the “inhumane” NXIVM sex cult.
- The mayor of Anchorage, Alaska, announced his plans to resign after a TV anchor posted what she said was a partially nude photo of him on Facebook.
- End of an era: The Soyuz rocket departed for the international space station Wednesday on a historic final U.S.-Russian flight.
|
THINK about it
Cheap drones from China, Turkey and Israel are fueling conflicts like Armenia and Azerbaijan’s, military writer Sébastien Roblin argues in an opinion piece.
|
Live BETTER
Check out the best places to live in America (even during a pandemic), according to U.S. News & World Report’s annual listing.
Boulder, Colorado, is a perennial winner due to its beautiful landscape, a playground for outdoor enthusiasts. (Lightvision / Getty Images)
|
Shopping
Amazon Prime Day is on now, but other retailers such as Walmart and Best Buy are putting on their own big sales. Here’s what you should know.
|
Quote of the day
“I can’t really speak to what the president has said on Twitter.”
— Supreme Court Justice nominee Amy Coney Barrett during Day 2 of her Senate confirmation hearings.
|
One fun thing
All dog lovers know that their older pets aren’t the same as they were as puppies, but owners often can’t pinpoint the exact personality changes brought on by the passage of time.
A study published Wednesday in Scientific Reports attempts to map out those changes and finds that there are some personality traits — such as attraction to novel experiences, the desire to explore and the urge to run around — that seem to change for most dogs with age.
“A dog’s personality changes over time, and, on average, every dog becomes less active and less curious as they age,” said the study’s lead author.
The study participants included 37 border collies. (Photo: Kubinyi)
|
NBC FIRST READ
|
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Carrie Dann and Melissa Holzberg
FIRST READ: Losing the SCOTUS battle, Democrats focus on winning the messaging war
Two days into the hearings on Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, it’s become increasingly clear that Democrats don’t have the votes to stop her nomination.
Instead, they’ve decided to try to win the messaging war for November’s elections – when it comes to issues like health care and abortion.
Photo by Stefani Reynolds – Pool/Getty Image
Look no further than Sen. Lindsey Graham’s opening comments Tuesday on health care, which came after Democrats devoted their opening statements the day before to why they think that Barrett’s confirmation could endanger the Affordable Care Act and its protections for those with pre-existing conditions.
“All of my colleagues on the other side had very emotional pleas about Obamacare, charts of people with pre-existing conditions. I want to give you my side of the story: This is Lindsey Graham, senator from South Carolina talking. This is not a question directed at you. From my point of view, Obamacare has been a disaster for the state of South Carolina. All of you over there who want to impose Obamacare on South Carolina, we do not want it. We want something better. You know what we want? South Carolina Care.”
(Never mind that South Carolina, under the ACA, had the ability to set up its own insurance exchanges and declined. It also declined Medicaid expansion and all of the money that comes with it.)
When Graham, who’s facing the re-election fight of his political life, is starting his Q&A period with a discussion on Obamacare, you know that Democrats struck a political nerve.
All of this is a reversal from two years ago, when Democrats seized on allegations of sexual misconduct to try to stop Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination – which ultimately didn’t help Senate Democratic incumbents in North Dakota, Indiana and Missouri.
The lesson they learned from Kavanaugh is that they still couldn’t beat his nomination.
So they might as well talk about issues that will help them more in November.
|
TWEET OF THE DAY: Get ready for dueling town halls Thursday
|
DATA DOWNLOAD: The numbers you need to know today
7,900,973: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 55,635 more than yesterday morning.)
217,086: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 805 more than yesterday morning.)
117.36 million: The number of coronavirus tests that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.
$500 billion: The cost of a narrow coronavirus relief bill that Mitch McConnell plans to put on the floor after Senate Republicans balked at a $1.8 trillion measure offered to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi by lead administration negotiator Steve Mnuchin. (Pelosi has rejected that offer, too.)
|
2020 VISION: An Affair to (Not) Remember?
Earlier this month, we asked if the sexual-texting scandal dogging Democrat Cal Cunningham in North Carolina’s Senate race would hurt him in the polls.
The answer: Not yet.
A Monmouth poll released Tuesday showed Cunningham ahead of Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., by 5 points among likely voters, 49 percent to 44 percent, although the result is within the survey’s margin of error. (The same poll had Biden up by 4 points, 50 percent to 46 percent.)
Also on Tuesday came an online Reuters/Ipsos poll that found Cunningham ahead by 4 points among likely voters, 46 percent to 42 percent.
The numbers raise the question: Is political partisanship so powerful nowadays that these kinds of sex scandals don’t matter? (See Trump in 2016.)
Or do we need to wait for GOP paid advertising to see if it moves the needle?
Or – given the GOP’s virtual silence about Trump – are they flawed messengers when it comes to morality in office?
On the campaign trail today: President Trump holds a rally in Des Moines, Iowa… And VP Pence stumps in Michigan.
|
Florida, Florida, Florida
The Sunshine State is used to counting votes – including mail-in/absentee ballots – very quickly.
As a result, a Biden win in Florida COULD tell us how Election Night/Week/Month is going to play out, given that other states won’t be as fast in counting their ballots.
Last night during a campaign event in Florida, Biden said it a bit more clearly: “Here in Florida, you can determine the outcome of this election. We win Florida, and it’s all over.”
Recent polling shows a close race in Florida, though, and President Trump made his own appearance in Florida on Monday night and is expected to return to the state later this week.
|
Ad Watch from Ben Kamisar
In today’s Ad Watch, Joe Biden’s campaign goes right after the president on coronavirus, hitting him both on his policy response and his personal behavior leading to (and since) his diagnosis.
The spot begins by warning that Trump “ignored the evidence” about the virus, holding events and indoor campaign rallies before testing positive himself. Then it pushes back on Trump’s declaration that his illness helped him learn about Covid by arguing “he hasn’t learned a thing … meanwhile, America pays the price.”
It’s a harsh spot in a harsh race, yet another attempt to frame the race as a referendum on the president’s handling of the virus.
|
THE LID: All the way down the ballot
Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we looked at how state legislative races could end being a very big deal.
|
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world?
The Washington Post reports that the DOJ probe into the “unmasking” allegations against Obama administration officials has concluded without finding any significant wrongdoing.
Amy Coney Barrett laid out her view of precedents in her confirmation questioning yesterday.
She also apologized for using the phrase “sexual preference.”
Is the president still contagious? Here’s what experts say.
The wife of the Labor Secretary, who was also at that infamous Rose Garden event, has tested positive for coronavirus.
Here’s the latest on the court fight in Wisconsin over ballot deadlines.
Early voting has started in Texas.
The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can stop the Census count now.
Biden is telling Florida seniors that Trump thinks they’re “expendable.”
The mayor of Anchorage is resigning after admitting to an “inappropriate messaging relationship” with a local news anchor.
CBS
|
|
|
|
IJR
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
LOUDER WITH CROWDER
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
|
|||||||||||
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
|
SARA A. CARTER
TWITCHY
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
POLITICAL WIRE
|
RASMUSSEN REPORTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ZEROHEDGE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
HOOVER INSTITUTE
|