Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Wednesday September 30, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
THE RESURGENT
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
DAYBREAK
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORNING BREW
|
---|
|
---|
Cory Doctorow / Flickr
|
---|
Pool/Getty Images
|
---|
Francis Scialabba
|
---|
|
---|
“Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase” (CC BY 2.0) by jurvetson
|
---|
|
---|
AppHarvest
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
Written by Eliza Carter, Alex Hickey, and Neal Freyman
Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here. |
ADVERTISE // CAREERS // SHOP
Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here. Copyright ©2020 Morning Brew. All rights reserved. |
JUDICIAL WATCH
FOX NEWS
JUST THE NEWS
Just The News: Daily Newsletter
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
AXIOS
☕ Good Wednesday morning. Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,481 words … 5½ minutes.
💻 Join Margaret Talev and me tomorrow at 3:30 p.m. ET for an Axios virtual event, with post-debate reaction from Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and more. Register here.
One of the few groups in America with anything to celebrate after last night’s loud, ugly, rowdy presidential “debate” was the violent, far-right Proud Boys, after President Trump pointedly refused to condemn white supremacist groups.
- Why it matters: This was a for-the-history-books moment in a debate that was mostly headache-inducing noise. Trump failed to condemn racist groups after four months when millions marched for racial justice in the country’s largest wave of activism in half a century.
Trump also telegraphed with clarity that there’s unlikely to be a clean outcome to the Nov. 3 election: “We might not know for months, because these ballots are going to be all over. … It’s a fraud and it’s a shame. … It’s a rigged election.”
- On the Supreme Court, Trump said: “I think I’m counting on them to look at the ballots, definitely. I hope we don’t need them, in terms of the election itself. But for the ballots, I think so, because what’s happening is incredible.”
- That could mean weeks or months of delay, even in a blowout.
Here’s what happened: Toward the end of the opening presidential debate, Trump was asked: “Are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups, and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence … we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland?”
- “Sure. I’m willing to do that,” Trump told the moderator, Fox News’ Chris Wallace, who was so frustrated by the president’s disregard for the rules that at one point he offered to switch places.
- But then Trump never did. “I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing — not from the right wing,” Trump said. “I’m willing to do anything — I want to see peace.”
- “Then do it, sir,” Wallace repeated.
“What do you want to call them?” Trump said. “Give me a name. Who would you like me to condemn?”
- Joe Biden, who called Trump a “clown” during the debate, stepped in and prompted “Proud Boys,” one of the country’s best known hate groups. The Anti-Defamation League describes the group as: “Misogynistic, Islamophobic, transphobic and anti-immigration.”
- Then, the line that will echo. “The Proud Boys — stand back and stand by,” Trump said. “But I’ll tell you what … somebody’s gotta do something about Antifa and the left. This is not a right-wing problem. This is a left-wing problem.”
The Proud Boys account on the secure messaging platform Telegram turned “Stand back … stand by” into a logo right after the debate, Axios’ Ina Fried reports.
- “President Trump told the proud boys to stand by because someone needs to deal with ANTIFA … well sir! we’re ready!!” Proud Boys organizer Joe Biggs wrote on Parler, a conservative social-media platform. “Trump basically said to go [eff] them up! this makes me so happy.”
- “STAND BACK … STAND BY” was also emblazoned on a Proud Boys T-shirt.
- The N.Y. Times reported that when asked what the president meant by “stand by,” Trump campaign senior adviser Jason Miller said it was “very clear he wants them to knock it off.”
As Trump tried to run away with the debate, Biden rarely looked at him and mostly addressed Wallace or spoke directly tot he camera. Biden’s strategy, Axios’ Hans Nichols reports: Ignore Trump and speak straight to the American public.
- By contrast, Trump spent most of the night speaking directly at Biden, who either looked down or looked perplexed at Trump’s charges and claims.
- Trump was Trump: indomitable, indiscriminate, incandescent.
The bottom line: Neither Democrats nor Republicans were convinced that their guy won. And it’s hard to believe many Americans are eager to tune in to the next two debates.
- Biden’s campaign told Axios’ Alexi McCammond that he’ll show up for the remaining debates — on Oct. 15 and Oct. 22, after next week’s vice presidential debate — so he can continue to spotlight contrasts with Trump.
Last night’s debate in Cleveland was like a 90-minute spin through the hellhole of modern social media, Axios CEO Jim VandeHei writes:
- You can’t help but log in — or turn on. You laugh, yell, cringe — then comment and share.
- It instantly teases out the worst of us — in this case, Trump’s wild, childish taunts and Biden calling him a liar, a clown and telling him to shut up.
Ninety minutes later, your anxiety is through the roof — and you realize you are exponentially dumber than when you turned the damned TV on.
Illustration: Eniola Odetunde/Axios
Scientists are racing to learn more about the damage that coronavirus can do to the heart, lungs and brain, Axios’ Caitlin Owens writes.
- Why it matters: It’s becoming increasingly clear that some patients struggle with its health consequences — and costs — far longer than a few weeks.
The virus can have a severe impact on the lungs, as you might expect. Pneumonia associated with the disease can damage air sacs in the lungs, and the resulting scar tissue can cause long-term breathing problems.
- But researchers conducting autopsies have also found evidence of the virus in parts of the brain, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract and in the cells that line blood vessels, the Washington Post has reported. They’ve also found clotting in many organs.
- And problems with the vascular system — the body’s network of blood vessels — ”could unleash a global surge in vascular diseases, from stroke and atherosclerosis to myocarditis and heart attack,” experts wrote in a recent WashPost op-ed.
The bottom line: Even if we manage to get the coronavirus under control, whether that’s through a vaccine or behavior modification, we’re going to be dealing with its effects for a long time.
Photo illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios. Photos: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP and Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket, both via Getty Images
If President Trump wins, it will largely be because Americans see him as the force rallying the economy. But the man behind booming U.S. asset prices is really Fed chair Jerome Powell, Axios Markets editor Dion Rabouin writes.
Reality check: It is Powell, not Trump, that Wall Street credits for the stock market’s return to all-time highs, even in the face of the worst economic collapse in U.S. history last quarter.
- That’s got many voters feeling the “wealth effect” — a greater belief in economic strength and confidence when the value of homes and investment portfolios rise — despite the fact that only half of Americans own stocks and more than 80% of equities are held by the top 10% of households.
The intrigue: Powell has gone above and beyond the actions of previous Fed chairs to boost markets. His course correction in 2019 to lower U.S. interest rates and restart the Fed’s massive bond-buying program in the midst of a strong U.S. economy was controversial, but helped power the S&P 500 higher by 30%.
- This year, Powell’s decision to roll interest rates back to zero and provide markets with $3 trillion in liquidity has kept stock indexes hitting record highs even as close to 30 million Americans collect unemployment benefits.
- And the promise of unlimited asset purchases, including buying bonds from trillion-dollar companies like Apple and even companies with “junk” credit ratings in March, has been described as “unprecedented.”
- The Fed and other central banks effectively “nationalized” the market for government and corporate bonds, strategists at Bank of America said in a note to clients in mid-July, helping lead to “irrationally” high stock prices.
The big picture: The Fed’s impact has helped keep eyes trained on record-high equity indexes and away from spiking job losses, rising food insecurity, a growing trade deficit with China, a national debt nearing $27 trillion and a debt-to-GDP ratio on pace to be the worst in history.
- Share this story. … Sign up for Dion Rabouin’s daily newsletter, Axios Markets.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Americans reported drinking alcohol more frequently and in higher quantities in the first half of this year compared to 2019, Axios’ Marisa Fernandez writes from a study published in JAMA.
- Why it matters: Experts have warned the stress of the pandemic has fomented alcohol and drug abuse.
The greatest changes were among women and people ages 30 to 59.
- On average, alcohol was consumed one day more per month by three of four adults.
Amazon has introduced palm-recognition technology in a pair of cashier-free Amazon Go stores in Seattle, and sees a broader potential audience in stadiums, offices and other gated or secured locations, AP reports.
- The company chose palm recognition, according to Dilip Kumar, vice president of Physical Retail & Technology, because it’s more private than other biometric technology.
- “And it’s contactless, which we think customers will appreciate, especially in current times,” Kumar wrote in a blog post.
The company expects to roll it out as an option in other Amazon stores in the coming months, which could mean Whole Foods grocery stores.
📱 Thanks for starting the day with AM! Invite your friends to sign up for Axios AM/PM.
THE WASHINGTON FREE BEACON
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Sep 30, 2020 View in Browser AP MORNING WIRE Good morning. In today’s AP Morning Wire:
TAMER FAKAHANY
The Rundown AP PHOTO/PATRICK SEMANSKY Haunts and acrimony overshadow Trump, Biden visions in time of crises as chaos reigns in first debate
It will likely go down as one of the most chaotic, acrimonious and rancorous U.S. presidential debates in the television era since they began with the sepia-tinted Kennedy-Nixon debate in 1960.
There was no love lost, nor was there any lighthearted repartee, nor respectful jabs to be sure. And there are two more debates to come in this most polarized of American general elections.
Trump in particular repeatedly interrupted his opponent with angry — and personal — comments that sometimes overshadowed the sharply different visions each man has of a nation facing historic crises, report Jonathan Lemire, Darlene Superville, Will Weissert and Michelle L. Price.
There were heated clashes over the president’s handling of the pandemic, the integrity of the election results, deeply personal attacks about Biden’s family and how the Supreme Court will shape the future of the nation’s health care.
But it was the belligerent tone that was pervasive, somehow fitting for what has been an extraordinarily ugly and brutish campaign.
VIDEO: In fiery debate Biden tells Trump, ‘Shut up, man.’
VIDEO: Trump, Biden trade attacks on pandemic response.
Key Debate Takeaways: An acrid tone from the opening minute.
Far-Right Extremists: Trump didn’t clearly condemn white supremacist groups and their role in violence in some American cities this summer when given the opportunity by the debate moderator Chris Wallace. Instead, he said the violence is a “left-wing” problem and he told one far-right extremist group to “stand back and stand by.”
Trump’s exchange with Biden left the extremist group Proud Boys celebrating what some of its members saw as tacit approval from the president. A channel on Telegram with more than 5,000 of the group’s members posted “Stand Back” and “Stand By” above and below the group’s logo, Kathleen Ronayne and Michael Kunzelman report.
VIDEO: Trump tells Proud Boys: ‘Stand back and stand by.’
Analysis: Trump stepped onto the debate stage needing to urgently make up ground in his race against Biden and shift the attention away from himself and onto his rival. Instead, Trump was the centerpiece of the night, dictating the tone and tenor of the debate with repeated interruptions, and insults flew back and forth. Biden alternated between trying to ignore the president and growing visibly irritated. By the end of the 90-minute debate, it was unclear whether Trump did anything at all to shift the trajectory of the race. AP Washington Bureau Chief Julie Pace writes.
Scene: Debate veers from ‘How you doing?’ to ‘Will you shut up?’
Global Reaction: The first U.S. debate was not a highlight of political oratory in the eyes of many overseas who took a dim view of the chaos and open rancor. Yet interest ran high for its potential impact on what may be the most consequential U.S. election for the world at large in years.
Debate Moments Past: Ashley Thomas looks back at very different previous eras and what memorably stood out then. AP Fact Check
Falsehoods were flying in the contentious debate.
That’s according to an AP Fact Check.
Trump made a series of incorrect claims about the coronavirus. Biden wrongly asserted that Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, believes the Affordable Care Act is “not constitutional.”
Trump also continued his assault on the integrity of the U.S. elections during the debate, spreading falsehoods about the security of voting and misrepresenting issues with mail ballots.
In the final segment, Trump launched into an extended argument against mail voting, claiming it’s ripe for fraud and suggesting mail ballots may be “manipulated.” Trump’s riff was laden with misstatements and inaccuracies, Nicholas Riccardi reports. AP PHOTO/ANTONIO CALANNI At global virus milestone, an Italian priest reflects on loss, love, lessons; UN meeting began with unity, ends with divisions
As the world somberly counts more than 1 million coronavirus victims, the quiet of everyday life and hum of industry has returned to Italy’s Bergamo province, which along with the surrounding Lombardy region was the onetime epicenter of the outbreak in Europe.
But the memory of those dark winter days, and the monumental toll of dead they left behind, has remained with those who survived only to see the rest of the world fall victim, too.
For one Bergamasco, the Rev. Mario Carminati, parish priest in hard-hit Seriate, the milestone offers a moment to reflect on loss, love and lessons that should be learned.
“We need to understand we are not immortal, none of us is immortal,” he said after visiting the cemetery where some victims of COVID-19 lie. “The virus ultimately returns to us this dimension of fragility.”
Maria Grazia Murru and Nicole Winfield have that story.
U.N. Cooperation vs Division: The virtual General Assembly meeting began with a declaration that the urgency for all countries to unite “has rarely been greater.” It concluded with a parade of divisive grievances that echoed when the final gavel fell. Leader after leader in days of speeches they delivered had stressed the importance of working together to navigate the challenges presented by the pandemic, but divisions loomed large, reports Edith M. Lederer.
US Children: After preying heavily on the elderly in the spring, the coronavirus is infecting a rising number of American children and teens in a trend authorities say appears driven by school reopenings and the resumption of sports, playdates and other activities, Lindsay Tanner reports.
How can I volunteer for a COVID-19 vaccine study? The AP is answering Viral Questions in this series. AP PHOTO/JOHN MINCHILLO Kentucky court to release grand jury record in Breonna Taylor case following outrage
Kentucky’s attorney general acknowledged that he never recommended homicide charges against any of the police officers conducting the drug raid that led to Breonna Taylor’s death, and said he didn’t object to a public release of the grand jury’s deliberations.
Amid outrage over the jury’s decision last week to not charge any of the officers for Taylor’s fatal shooting, Attorney General Daniel Cameron said that he also didn’t object to members of the panel speaking publicly about their experience, Dylan Lovan reports.
None of the officers was indicted in the fatal shooting of Taylor after they knocked down her door to serve a narcotics warrant on March 13. A coroner’s report says Taylor was shot five times and died of multiple gunshot wounds. It says she was hit in the torso, her upper left arm and both legs. She tested negative for drugs and alcohol.
Racial Injustice Appalachia: Some Black Appalachians say their history and struggles are finally being recognized more widely in the wake of this year’s nationwide protests against institutional racism. Though the national reckoning on racism has raised awareness about the issue for many white Americans, that it is also echoing in the hills of Appalachia is particularly striking in a region that isn’t known for its diversity, Piper Hudspeth Blackburn reports.
Other Top Stories Leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia have brushed off the suggestion of peace talks, accusing each other of obstructing negotiations over the separatist territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Dozens of people have been killed and injured in three days of heavy fighting. The region lies within Azerbaijan, but has been under the control of ethnic Armenian forces backed by the Armenian government since 1994 at the end of a separatist war. President Trump reportedly must pay back more than $300 million in loans over the next four years, raising the possibility his lenders could face an unprecedented situation should he win a second term and not be able to raise the money: foreclosing on an American president. But financial experts say the notion of Trump going broke anytime soon is far-fetched. Even with a total debt load of more than $1 billion, they note he still has plenty of assets he could cash in on, starting with a portfolio that includes office towers and golf courses valued at $2.5 billion. Thousands of California’s weary wine country residents are confronting yet another devastating wildfire. The Glass Fire has scorched more than 66 square miles and destroyed about 95 structures. It’s the fourth major fire in three years in the Napa-Sonoma area. The region is nearing the third anniversary of a 2017 wildfire that killed 22 people. Dozens of Palestinian families from the Gaza Strip have found themselves stranded abroad because of a dispute between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel grants permits allowing Gazans to travel for humanitarian reasons, but requests must be submitted through the Palestinian Authority, which cut off all contacts with Israel in May over its planned annexation of parts of the West Bank. The only way to bypass Israel is to travel through Egypt, but that is an arduous journey and the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza only opens sporadically. GET THE APP
Download the AP News app to get breaking news alerts from the AP on your phone, tablet or watch.
Unsubscribe About us 2020 THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 200 Liberty St. New York, NY 10128 |
FORT MYERS (FLORIDA) NEWS-PRESS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
CHICAGO SUNTIMES
Lynn Sweet: Trump hijacked this debate, but it doesn’t mean he won it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO TRUMP NEWS
THE HILL
|
ROLL CALL
|
Morning Headlines
Amy Coney Barrett’s Capitol Hill path to the Supreme Court began on Tuesday with courtesy calls unlike any previous high court nominee’s — sans handshakes, amid the homestretch of a heated presidential campaign and without the traditional veteran politician who serves as a guide, or Sherpa, to the ways of the Senate. Read More…
House Democrats are holding out hope for a bipartisan coronavirus aid deal but are preparing for a quick vote as soon as Wednesday on the $2.2 trillion aid package they unveiled Monday if an expected White House counteroffer falls short. Read More…
Georgia election to fill Rep. John Lewis’ term goes to runoff
A short-term stint in Congress will be even shorter after a special election Tuesday in Georgia’s 5th District ended with none of the seven candidates getting the needed 50 percent of the vote to avoid a runoff. Read More…
Click here to subscribe to Fintech Beat for the latest market and regulatory developmentsin finance and financial technology.
TikTok ‘not a great look’ for lawmakers, security experts say
Despite official warnings for nearly a year about the security risks of the Chinese-owned TikTok video-sharing app, several politicians who might be ideal targets for Beijing’s spies still have accounts. These include two former presidential candidates, plus members of Congress who oversee military, intelligence and digital security programs. Read More…
A true sneakerhead wants to bring a ‘fresh’ style to Congress
Kamala Harris broke the internet when she stepped off a jet sporting a pair of Chuck Taylors. Ed Markey wore vintage Nikes during his Senate primary. But campaign watchers haven’t seen anything yet. Cameron Webb is a true sneakerhead, and this is his shoe story. Read More…
States push for more funds and guidance on vaccine distribution
With just a month before a Nov. 1 Trump administration deadline for states to be ready to potentially distribute any upcoming COVID-19 vaccines, public health officials cite relatively low funding and the tight time frame as examples of the challenges they face. Read More…
Senate ends debate on stopgap funding bill, final vote Wednesday
The Senate on Tuesday voted to limit debate on short-term agency spending through Dec. 11, clearing the way for a final vote Wednesday that could bump up fairly close to a midnight deadline to avoid a partial government shutdown. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2020 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: Do we have to do that two more times?
Presented by Facebook
DRIVING THE DAY
DID WE JUST ALL WATCH THE LAST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE OF 2020? Was that even a debate? A boxing match? One of those preschool learning pods we keep reading about?
TUESDAY NIGHT’S … AFFAIR between President DONALD TRUMP and JOE BIDEN was an absolute mess of crosstalk, insults, exasperation and jeers.
TRUMP refused to condemn white supremacy, launched a broadside against Hunter Biden when the former VP was asked about Beau and repeatedly interrupted the proceedings, showing absolutely no deference to the moderator, Fox News’ CHRIS WALLACE, or the agreed-upon format. He was wild in every way, and impossible to control.
— NYT’S MATT FLEGENHEIMER and MAGGIE HABERMAN: “President Trump did for the Tuesday debate what he has done for the political life of the country in his four years: supply as much rampaging volume, custom-busting obtrusion and outright fiction as necessary to impose his will on the proceedings.”
BIDEN called the president a clown, derisively called him “Donald” and asked him to “shut up.” Neither man had an ounce of respect for the other. BIDEN cleared the very low bar TRUMP set for him: He was cogent, and not the mental mess the president has been suggesting for months.
DANA BASH on CNN: “I’m just going to say it like it is: That was a shitshow. And we’re on cable, we can say that. Apologies for being maybe a little bit crude but that is really the phrase that I’m getting from people on both sides of the aisle on text and it’s the only phrase that I can think of to really describe it.”
THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES might consider some new guidelines, like penalizing a candidate for interrupting, or turning off their mic when they interject. Perhaps a fact check here or there. Otherwise, these debates are a waste of everyone’s time.
THE TRUTH IS MOST PUBLIC POLLING SUGGESTS that voters were pretty well set before this debate. Because if you were looking for any clarity Tuesday night on the major public policy debates shaping America today, you would’ve been disappointed.
HOW IT PLAYED … NYT: “With Cross Talk, Lies and Mockery, Trump Tramples Decorum in Debate With Biden” … WAPO: “Trump incessantly interrupts and insults Biden as they spar in acrimonious first debate” … AP: “Chaotic first debate: Taunts overpower Trump, Biden visions”
BIG PICTURE … JOHN HARRIS column: “An Epic Moment of National Shame: The Debate Was an Embarrassment for the Ages”
— WAPO’S DAN BALZ: “Trump sets the tone for the worst presidential debate in living memory”: “No one alive has ever seen a presidential debate like Tuesday night’s unseemly shout fest between President Trump and former vice president Joe Biden — 90 minutes of invective, interruptions and personal insults. It was an insult to the public as well, and a sad example of the state of American democracy five weeks before the election.
“On the margins, the debate probably did more to help Biden than the president, at a moment when Trump needed to change the shape and trajectory of the campaign. But that’s not what people will remember. Even partisans locked into their choices were probably dispirited at what they were witnessing. One can only imagine what the next two debates between the two men will look like.”
THE AFTERMATH … RYAN LIZZA: “Tuesday was different for three reasons. First, Trump, the king of powerfully simplistic political branding, no longer seems to have a message. … In 2016, Trump had a clear and concise line of attack against Hillary Clinton: she was a corrupt member of the Washington establishment and he was going to send her to jail if he became president. He discussed the alleged perfidy of her deleting personal emails with impressive discipline. But Biden has proven to be a more elusive target. …
“Finally, and most important, Trump in 2020 is burdened with a record, one that has sunk him into chronic unpopularity for several years now, even during the height of his economic boom. Trump was not the first American politician to successfully win an election by casting himself as a populist outsider taking on the corrupt establishment. That playbook is as old as the republic.”
— LAURA BARRÓN-LÓPEZ: “Undecided voters call Trump ‘unhinged’ and ‘un-American’ — but unswayed by debate”
— NYT’S MICHAEL GRYNBAUM: “Chris Wallace Struggled to Rein In an Unruly Trump at First Debate”
ROB FLAHERTY, BIDEN’S digital director, said the campaign had their “best online fundraising hour of all time” Tuesday night between 10 p.m. and 11 p.m.
Good Wednesday morning.
BIDEN will travel to MIAMI on Monday for a town hall with NBC’s LESTER HOLT.
COVID KLATCH: Treasury Secretary STEVEN MNUCHIN is expected to come to Speaker NANCY PELOSI with a counter to her $2.2 trillion Covid relief bill today. Everything we hear out of MNUCHIN’S world is that the offer will be somewhere in the $1.5 trillion to $1.6 trillion neighborhood. That will leave the two sides roughly $700 billion to $1 trillion apart. The larger question becomes: Does PELOSI see a way forward, and furthermore, is there a way to fudge the numbers enough to bring them close together on their top line?
— DEMS ARE MOVING: THE HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE, which sets the parameters for floor debate, is meeting this morning to lay the groundwork for a floor vote on PELOSI’S $2.2 trillion plan. She wants to give MNUCHIN a chance, but she also wants to prep the caucus for floor action should the negotiations go south, as many expect they will.
— HOW HIGH/LOW CAN THEY GO: Can PELOSI accept an offer under $2 trillion? How close can MNUCHIN get to that threshold? What will the Senate GOP do? They hardly want $1 trillion.
— IF WE DON’T SEE MAJOR movement today, this is probably done for the time being, since the House is leaving this week until after the election. It’s far from guaranteed a Covid bill could come together in the lame duck.
LOWERING THE PRESSURE … TREASURY ANNOUNCED Tuesday that it would extend loans to seven airlines: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Frontier Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Hawaiian Airlines, SkyWest Airlines and United Airlines.
— THIS COMES as airlines were threatening to lay off tens of thousands of workers.
MEANWHILE … WSJ: “Disney to Lay Off 28,000 Employees as Disneyland’s Reopening Unclear”
BIG JOB MOVE … DAVID URBAN is now EVP for North American corporate affairs at ByteDance. Urban, a TRUMP 2016 campaign alum and big-time TRUMP world insider, most recently was president of the American Continental Group, which has represented TikTok parent company ByteDance since the beginning of the year. He also has represented Oracle. TRUMP also named URBAN to the board of visitors of West Point, from which he graduated in the same class as Secretary of State MIKE POMPEO.
SCOTUS WATCH — “Republicans plot out Barrett confirmation blitz,” by Burgess Everett, Gabby Orr and John Bresnahan: “Senate Republicans say they can get Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court by Election Day, no problem. But to do so will require essentially a perfect confirmation process featuring almost no errors from Barrett and no slip-ups in the Senate.
“Though Supreme Court vacancies have been filled more quickly, Barrett’s would be both rapid by historical standards and the closest ever to a presidential election. Add to that a president that’s on the ropes in his reelection campaign and a close race for Senate control and it’s easy to see why the White House and Senate GOP are taking every precaution necessary. On Tuesday, in between quick meetings with Barrett, Senate Republicans said they were on track to install her before the Nov. 3 election — and they had few, if any, qualms about doing so.” POLITICO
— “In Senate questionnaire, Barrett won’t pledge to recuse herself from 2020 election cases,” by Andrew Desiderio and Marianne LeVine.
— ON THE GROUND: JAMES ARKIN in Grimes, Iowa: “SCOTUS battle crashes into decisive Senate race in Iowa”: “Republican Sen. Joni Ernst joined the GOP blockade of Merrick Garland in 2016, and two years later she reiterated that the Senate shouldn’t take up a Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year. But with Senate Republicans now forging ahead with confirmation proceedings for Amy Coney Barrett, the first-term senator is right there with them.
“‘In my mind, I’ve been consistent because we had divided government then between the Senate and a Republican majority versus the president,’ Ernst, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said in an interview here last week, arguing that Garland wouldn’t have been approved, anyway. ‘But we have consolidated power between the branches now, and I think it’s appropriate. So I’ll do my duty.’
“Yet Ernst — locked in one of the most competitive Senate races in the country — isn’t taking much heat from her Democratic opponent over her change. In an interview, Theresa Greenfield brushed off a question about Ernst’s consistency by saying voters would make that judgment, and even criticized claims from Democrats that the entire confirmation process is illegitimate, calling them ‘divisive.’
“Greenfield said that a vote on Barrett should wait until after the election so voters can have their say and criticized the rush to confirm the lifetime appointee. But with the confirmation moving forward, she also called on senators in her party to meet with Barrett and carefully review her nomination.”
NEW … CONNIE CHUNG has produced three videos encouraging women and Asian voters to support BIDEN and urging Asians to get out the vote. “I searched for the facts and I told you the truth,” she says. “I covered a lot of men who ran for president and the men who made it to the White House. I saw their pimples and their blemishes and their foibles up close. I never really told you what I thought of them. But this year, I can’t sit on the sidelines.” The three ads
TRUMP’S WEDNESDAY — The president will leave the White House at 2:30 p.m. and travel to Minneapolis. He will arrive at 4:15 p.m. CDT and travel to Shorewood, Minn. Trump will attend a fundraiser at a private residence at 5:30 p.m. He will depart at 6:25 p.m. and travel to Duluth, Minn. He will hold a campaign rally at 8 p.m. Afterward, he will travel back to Washington, arriving at the White House at 1 a.m.
ON THE TRAIL … BIDEN and his wife JILL BIDEN will launch a train tour across Ohio and Pennsylvania. They will stop in Alliance, Ohio, Pittsburgh and Greensburg, Pa. Biden will hold an event in New Alexandria, Pa. Jill Biden will meet with small business owners in Greensburg, Pa. The two will also make a stop in Latrobe, Pa. In the evening, they will campaign at a drive-in event in Johnstown, Pa.
PLAYBOOK READS
TOP-ED … BEN GINSBURG in the WAPO: “How Trump’s evidence-free attacks on elections damage the Republican Party”
ACROSS THE POND … RYM MOMTAZ in Rukla, Lithuania: “Macron calls on Europe to quit dependency on U.S. arms”: “French President Emmanuel Macron called for Europe to end its dependency on American weapons systems as he made a renewed pitch for the Continent to take control of its destiny.
“In a debate with students at the University of Vilnius in Lithuania Tuesday, he made a plea for Europe to take on a more independent and assertive role in the world — subservient to neither Washington nor Beijing.
“‘We, some countries more than others, gave up on our strategic independence by depending too much on American weapons systems,’ Macron said at the debate. ‘We cannot accept to live in a bipolar world made up of the U.S. and China.’”
EARLY VOTING LATEST — “Early surge of Democratic mail voting sparks worry inside GOP,” by WaPo’s Amy Gardner and Josh Dawsey: “Democratic voters who have requested mail ballots — and returned them — greatly outnumber Republicans so far in key battleground states, causing alarm among GOP party leaders and strategists that President Trump’s attacks on mail voting could be hurting the party’s prospects to retain the White House and the Senate this year.
“Of the more than 9 million voters who requested mail ballots through Monday in Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maine and Iowa, the five battleground states where such data is publicly available, 52 percent were Democrats. Twenty-eight percent were Republicans, and 20 percent were unaffiliated.
“Additional internal Democratic and Republican Party data obtained by The Washington Post shows a similar trend in Ohio, Minnesota, New Hampshire and Wisconsin. Even more alarming to some Republicans, Democrats are also returning their ballots at higher rates than GOP voters in two of those states where that information is available: Florida and North Carolina.” WaPo
CALIFORNIA BURNING — “How wine country became the epicenter for fires in California,” by LAT’s Joseph Serna and Paige St. John in Santa Rosa: “Perhaps no part of California has felt more threatened by fire in recent years than the vast expanse of wine country and the Redwood Empire north of San Francisco.
“More than 9,000 structures were lost and dozens of people were killed in 2017, when fires swept through Santa Rosa and surrounding communities. Last year, the Kincade fire menaced the region for weeks, putting nearly 100,000 people under evacuation orders. More than 50% of Lake County to the north of Santa Rosa has burned in the last decade.
“You could be forgiven for thinking the region is due for a break. But on Sunday night, a fiery chain of events returned like a nightmare: a dry winter followed by a hot summer, which leads to a small grass fire on a windy autumn day spreading to an overgrown forest, where it feeds and transforms into a monster that races toward civilization.”
BUSINESS BURST — “Boeing to Move All 787 Dreamliner Production to South Carolina,” by WSJ’s Andrew Tangel and Doug Cameron: “Boeing Co. will set plans this week to consolidate 787 Dreamliner assembly in South Carolina, people familiar with the matter said, ending production of that jetliner in Washington state as the coronavirus pandemic saps demand for aircraft.
“The decision carries significant implications for the Seattle-area economy and Boeing’s unionized workforce around Puget Sound. It wasn’t clear over what period of time the consolidation would play out, or how many employees might be affected by the move. Boeing could announce the plans as soon as this week, some of the people familiar with the matter said.” WSJ
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
SPOTTED at an ASPR pre-debate virtual book event Tuesday night for the late Rep. Elijah Cummings’ “We’re Better Than This: My Fight for the Future of Our Democracy” ($20.49 on Amazon): Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, co-author James Dale, Adam Shapiro, Sara Sneed, Melissa McIntosh, Thomas Sanchez, Anthony Shop and Nicolle Grayson.
TRANSITIONS — Kristen Hawn is joining ROKK Solutions as a partner. She most recently has been an outside senior adviser there, and is a longtime Democratic strategist. … Steve Hartell has been promoted to VP of U.S. public policy at Amazon, becoming the company’s top lobbyist. He previously was a director on the public policy team.
WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Josh Weisz, comms director for the House Education and Labor Committee, and Morgan Nelligan, a family nurse practitioner, welcomed Gavin Lewis Weisz on Sunday evening. Pic
BIRTHWEEK (was Tuesday): Former Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) turned 65 (h/t John Barrow)
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Craig Minassian, chief comms and marketing officer at the Clinton Foundation and founder of Minassian Media, is 5-0. A fun fact people might not know about him: “In college, I was cast as a villain in some TV shows. The casting director for the Fox show ‘Sightings,’ which re-created unsolved crimes with the help of a psychic, said I didn’t look like the murderer … but I did look like the murderer’s best friend. For another show I was cast as car thief. I also was a walk-on for the track team at the University of Miami.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) is 44 … Harrison Fields, White House assistant press secretary (h/t Karoline Leavitt) … Ari Shapiro, host of NPR’s “All Things Considered” … Nate Tibbits, SVP of global government affairs and public affairs at Qualcomm (h/ts Ben Chang) … FiveThirtyEight’s Perry Bacon Jr. … Greg Mecher … Conor Maguire … POLITICO’s Sally Goldenberg and Brendan MacArthur … Ben Voelkel, comms director for Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) … AP legal affairs writer Curt Anderson … Grant Young, political director for David Young’s Iowa congressional campaign … WSJ’s Steve Russolillo … Edelman’s Emily Lippard … Mike Henry, COS to Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) … Aaron Pickrell … Mary Triick (h/ts Teresa Vilmain) … Bobby Donachie … Maggie Rousseau, deputy COS and comms director for Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) … Bradley Akubuiro, chief spokesperson at Boeing (h/t Gordon Johndroe) … POLITICO Europe’s David Herszenhorn … former Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) is 6-0 …
… Kodiak Hill-Davis, founder/political director of Republican Women for Progress and director of government affairs at the Niskanen Center, is 3-0 … Tom Johnson (h/t Ashley Chang) … Alyssa Cass, principal at New Deal Strategies … Rachel Trello of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation … Felix Schein is 44 … Michael O’Connor, senior director of state government affairs at Eli Lilly … Hildy Kuryk, founder of Artemis Strategies … Stefanie Mohler … Sue Andres … LaRhonda Burley (h/t Ed Cash) … Jake Yunker … Anastasia Goodstein, SVP at the Ad Council … Caroline Cirillo … Arthi Yerramilli … Cynthia McCabe … Sam Lozier … Nathan Thornburgh, CEO/co-founder of Roads and Kingdoms … JJ Mitchell … Courtney Sanders Felts, VP of executive comms at the U.S. Chamber … Gerardo Interiano … Maria Cereghino … Mark Drapeau … Phillip Martin … Alan Eason … Adam Hudson … ABC News’ Joshua Hoyos … Brandon Farbstein … Kitty Eisele … Carolina Hewell … Mike Milligan
Follow us on Twitter
AMERICAN MINUTE
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Please God Let the Next 2 Debates Die In a Fire and Spare Us All
Defund Debates
A joyous Hump Day to you all, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends.
Well that happened.
The first of what we are calling presidential debates finally happened and I’m still not sure what in the hell I watched. I’m also surprised I didn’t hit the whiskey harder.
In case you didn’t watch it, Tyler has a full recap of the dysfunctional mess here.
I should mention upfront that I hate the presidential debates no matter who the candidates are and I wouldn’t mind seeing them abolished altogether. They aren’t really debates anymore, they haven’t been since the Lincoln-Douglas days. Television has really perverted the process, turning these things into little more than poorly produced, dueling campaign commercials.
And then there was whatever happened last night.
It was such a you-know-what show that I even found myself agreeing with CNN.
As I suspected he would be, moderator Chris Wallace was spectacularly hacky and awful. The questions he chose sounded at times as if he had coordinated with the Democratic National Committee beforehand.
That’s an ongoing problem of mine with modern presidential debates — the questions are always on topics that the Democrats want to make important whether they are or not. Last night it was Trump’s taxes and climate change, for example. There was nothing about the Hillary bombshell from earlier in the day yet Wallace let Biden babble on unchallenged about Trump and Russia.
As we’ve discussed, the bar was so low for Biden that all he had to do was avoid soiling himself and still be standing at the end of the debate to have it be considered a good night for him. He did manage to do that. Well, the standing part anyway, I can’t verify whether he soiled himself or not.
The mainstream media all think Grandpa Gropes won the debate. They were gleefully tweeting seemingly every line of Biden’s as if it was brilliant, never mind that none of those lines were in direct response to a question. After the first thirty-five minutes I had Biden responding to only one question directly on my scorecard.
My conservative colleagues, on the other hand, all thought the debate went well for Trump. Megan chronicled her favorite Trump moments here.
Back to Wallace…he certainly earned his Democratic lapdog status. Here is a quote on that from our own VodkaPundit Stephen Green’s Drunkblog last night:
From the comments: “I figured Wallace would ask tough questions of both candidates, and, in fairness, he’s asked some of Biden, but his performance incredibly unbalanced. Quite disappointed.”
I can count two tough questions Biden got, but tons of framing and fact-checking against Trump.
This isn’t a loser’s lament — I think Trump is doing fine. But Wallace has gone from “weak” to “propping up his favorite candidate.”
One is excusable. The other isn’t.
There are two things to consider for the next two debates: how Trump actually does and what the mainstream says he does. Last night, all they could do was caterwaul about him interrupting Wallace or Biden. Given that Wallace and Biden were working in cahoots against him, that could be viewed as taking the initiative against stacked odds.
If this debate moved anyone’s vote I can’t put my finger on what did it. I think we should just acquiesce to the plague year weirdness and cancel the next two debates, I don’t think I can listen to two more nights of Trump and Biden talking over each other while the moderator keeps saying, “Don’t make me stop this car!”
However, if the moderator for the next debate does press Biden to answer a question rather than spend the night checking his notes and going forward with an unrelated talking point I might find new hope for the universe.
PJM Linktank
FACT CHECK: Did Hunter Biden Get Kicked Out of the Military for Drugs? (Spoiler: Yes)
AND…SCENE. BOMBSHELL: Hillary Clinton May Have Cooked Up a Trump-Russia Hoax Back in July 2016
#PettyTyrantUpdate: COVID Kills More Jobs: Disney to Lay Off 28,000 Park Employees
Hackers Release Children’s School Records Online After District Refuses to Pay Ransom
Color Us Shocked, New York City Is Screwing Up Mail-In Ballots… Again
Dem Tulsi Gabbard Raises the Alarm: ‘Ballot Harvesting Has Allowed for Fraud and Abuse’
BUSTED On Hot Mic: PA Gov. Wolf and Elected Crony Laughing About Masks As ‘Political Theater’
Mnuchin, Pelosi Meet as Democrats Release Details of $2.2 Trillion Stim Bill
New York State Parents File Lawsuit Against Cuomo for Forced Masking and COVID Restrictions
Dianne Feinstein: Masks for Thee but Not for Me!
Trump Administration Will Ship 150 Million Rapid COVID Tests to States
Trump Blasts Media For Anti-Catholic Bigotry
Sorry, ‘Atlantic,’ the Only Candidate with a Record of Protecting People of Faith Is President Trump
VIP
The Kruiser Kabana Episode 71: What the *%#*, Kruiser?
The Legacy Media Still Doesn’t Understand Christianity
VIP Gold
Analysis: Why I Don’t Fear a 6-3 Conservative SCOTUS Majority Overturning Same-Sex Marriage
The Left’s Unacknowledged Problem With Gun Control
From the Mothership and Beyond
I want a swearing parrot. Lincolnshire Wildlife Park: Swearing parrots removed from view
Yeah, run on that. Biden Doubles Down on Promise to Raise Taxes on Middle-Class Earners
WATCH: Kamala Harris Attempts to Do Damage Control Following the First Presidential Debate
Joe Biden Denies Antifa Organizations Exist
President Trump Tells Biden Why He ‘Never’ Could Have Handled COVID
A Political Shift In Cleveland
BREAKING: Appellate Courts Makes a Big Decision on a Swing State’s Mail-In Ballots
‘Elections Have Consequences’: President Trump Obliterates Biden on Supreme Court Nomination
McConnell Bulldozes Democrat Attacks on Judge Barrett
Bankrupt academia: 2020 College Free Speech Rankings Reveal Crisis on Campus
Anti-Gun Meltdown Over Barrett Continues
Remington To Be Broken Up, Sold
This PA Court Decision Could Gut The 2A
Dems: We’ll Get Back To You About Packing The Court After The Election
Jonathan Turley: Judge Sullivan Should Dismiss The Flynn Case
Cruz After Meeting With Barrett: We Can’t Afford To Have The Court Deadlocked 4-4 On Election Cases
History Professor’s Take On The ‘Model Minority Myth’ Seems A Bit Self-Contradictory
Whose Streets? Portland Police Try New Tactics, 24 Arrested
Well, it’s on…Seriously? Two NFL Teams Shut Down After COVID Outbreak
Biden projects weakness — a tough sell to Americans
More Details on Biden’s Desperate Debate Moves: Turns out It’s Even Worse Than First Reported
Nipping Sexism in the BUD/S: Navy SEAL Ethos Goes Gender-Neutral, Drops Toxically Masculine Terms
Democratic Senate Nominee Gets the Mocking He Deserves After Photo He Posted Goes 50 Shades of Wrong
The Food Stylist Who Creates Hollywood’s Unreal Dishes and Drinks
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
#RIP Mac Davis
___
Kruiser Twitter
Kruiser Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.
WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
White House Dossier
http://www.whitehousedossier.com
P.O. Box 27211,
Washington, DC 20038Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: One Bad Debate
Plus, explaining the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
The Dispatch Staff | 1 hr | 5 |
Happy Wednesday! Well, that was … something. Thanks to the 4,000 of you who joined our bonus, post-debate Dispatch Live last night. We’ll get through these next 34 days together!
If you missed the fun, never fear: You can watch a replay of the event here.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- The United States confirmed 42,795 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday per the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard, with 5.3 percent of the 812,773 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 943 deaths were attributed to the virus on Tuesday, bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 205,974.
- Researchers at MIT and Commonwealth Fusion Systems produced papers outlining the theoretical basis for a compact nuclear fusion reactor, named Sparc, that could, if successful, begin producing clean energy within the next decade. Construction of a reactor is expected to take three to four years, and begin next spring.
- Joe Biden and Kamala Harris released their 2019 tax returns on Tuesday, just hours before last night’s debate. On the $944,737 Joe and Jill Biden made last year, the couple paid $299,346 in federal income taxes (a 31 percent tax rate). Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, reported joint income of $3,018,127 in 2019 and paid $1,185,628 in federal income taxes (a 39 percent tax rate).
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals released promising new data on Tuesday showing the biotechnology company’s antibody cocktail REGN-COV2—a monoclonal antibody treatment—reduced the viral load and improved recovery time in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
- Two NFL teams—the Tennessee Titans and Minnesota Vikings—announced on Tuesday they “will suspend in-person club activities” this week after three Titans players and five Titans staffers tested positive for COVID-19, the first known outbreak of the young season. The announcement came two days after the Titans played host against the Minnesota Vikings, who have yet to announce any positive cases. The league is still planning for the Titans to play their next game on Sunday.
The First Debate: Can’t-Unsee TV
Joe Biden and Donald Trump met for the first time on the debate stage last night, and man, was it hard to watch. The 90-minute event felt like it lasted several years, with both candidates yelling over one another incomprehensibly for large swaths of it as Fox News moderator Chris Wallace tried to keep control. Despite his gamely efforts, the whole thing was a sorry spectacle, another low point in an exhausting year during which low points have become the norm.
“Watching that debate,” one Democratic strategist told us after, “was like watching the Angel of Death unfurl its glorious infinitely black wings before me, my eyes being taken ever deeper into the absolute void where no color can exist, and seeing in that moment nothing but death and the end of all things shouted at me through the guttural Queens accent of a madman.”
Okay, a little dramatic. One unaligned Wisconsin voter likely spoke for much of the country when he put it this way halfway through the affair: “Can’t even watch this. We can do so much better than these two. Just an embarrassment.”
President Trump seemingly came into the debate with two tasks: to rattle Biden and make him look like the doddering old man the Trump campaign has been trying to cast him as for months; and to do some damage to Biden’s have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too policy agenda, a strongly progressive set of policies cast in gauzy, moderate terms.
On the former, it looked at first like he might see some results. Particularly in the early going, Biden wasn’t as sharp with his delivery as Trump, who has always had a preternatural ability to talk for minutes on end without missing a beat. And the president’s constant interruptions made sure he was the one in control of the ball. He was frequently able to heckle Biden away from a point he was trying to make, which got on the former vice president’s nerves enough that at one point, Biden snapped, “Will you shut up, man? This is so unpresidential.”
Conflict in the Caucasus
Elsewhere in the world, the battles were less metaphorical. Long simmering tensions reignited over the weekend in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh area of the Caucasus, resulting in the deaths of more than 100 service members and civilians. As Armenia and Azerbaijan—the two countries that claim political authority over the territory—mobilize their forces, surrounding powers with vested interests in the conflict’s outcome have begun to exert their influence.
Fighting in the mountainous region, sometimes referred to as the Republic of Artsakh by local separatists and Armenians, erupted on Sunday after Armenia and Azerbaijan failed to reach a diplomatic agreement. Neither side claims responsibility for escalating the conflict, which has largely been contained to low-grade border skirmishes. Armenian officials allege that Azerbaijan attacked civilians within Nagorno-Karabakh, while Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry has moved troops, tanks, drones, and planes into the region as part of a “counteroffensive to suppress Armenia’s combat activity and ensure the safety of the population.”
“The settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue is our historical mission,” Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev told his security council on Sunday. “We must resolve this so that historical justice can be restored. We must do so to restore the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.”
The decades-old dispute over the region began in the late 1980s, when Nagorno-Karabakh first sought to join with Armenia. After the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union, former Soviet republics claimed neighboring territories largely based on ethnic makeup. When the Republic of Artsakh declared independence from Azerbaijan in 1991, fighting began in earnest and continued until the establishment of an unstable ceasefire in 1994.
Worth Your Time
- Ever since Trump took office in 2017, super PACs have sprung up in opposition to his presidency. The Lincoln Project has carried the torch for anti-Trump campaign ads in the social media and cable news spheres, boasting 2.2 million followers on Twitter and 487,000 on Instagram. But do these anti-Trump attack ads—Lincoln Project or otherwise—actually persuade undecided voters? A group of Democratic operatives called Fellow Americans launched a data-driven testing methodology earlier this year to answer this question. “Ads that directly attack Trump, using his voice, news clips, or even just his face, have the effect of turning off not only persuadable voters, but also the Democratic-base voters whom Joe Biden needs in November,” writes Peter Hamby in Vanity Fair. Those overly negative anti-Trump ads may be backfiring.
- The Atlantic released its new project, “The Firsts,” on Tuesday in honor of the children who desegregated America. “We couldn’t sit at the counter or go to restaurants,” recalls Jo Ann Allen Boyce of her first day attending a newly desegregated public high school in Clinton, Tennessee. “We went to the back of the bus; we had our own bathrooms—our own water fountains clearly marked colored only.” This collection of essays provide insight into the brave young activists who fought to make the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. Board of Education a reality.
- In a piece for the New Statesman, Ido Vock explores the deteriorating relationship between the Czech Republic and China, and how it could serve as a model for other countries looking to decouple from the Chinese Communist Party. In 2015, Czech President Milos Zeman attended a People’s Liberation Army parade in Beijing; this month, Czech Senate President Nukis Vystrcil visited Taipei and declared “I am Taiwanese” in solidarity. Chinese President Xi Jinping had promised lavish investment in the Czech economy, with the private Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC expected to make most of the investment. But after the initial wave of positive media, the investments largely failed to materialize, and CEFC became embroiled in corruption in the Czech Republic and elsewhere. One CEFC representative offered the president of Chad two million dollars concealed in gift boxes. The Czechs responded with outrage. The episode, Vock writes, is a “useful corrective to the idea that statecraft in a one-party state is ruthlessly effective and can be used to bend small countries to its will.”
Presented Without Comment
SandraDiazNJ @SandraDiazNJ1
I have the proof. It is the official document from Trumps company how much I paid. Many others too. The Washington Post and others know the truth. https://t.co/zLq1hekgI0
Toeing the Company Line
- In the latest issue of Capitolism, Scott Lincicome takes a comprehensive look at the Trump administration’s tariff policy. “Most American manufacturers, as well as the economy more broadly, are worse off; almost every country—allies and adversaries—has retaliated; K Street and the Administrative State are doing what they do best; our farmers may be on a new and permanent dole; and Beijing seems emboldened, not chastened.” But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
- CBS News’ John Dickerson joined Jonah on the latest episode of The Remnant to discuss his latest book about the American presidency, The Hardest Job in the World. Don’t worry, they squeeze in some rank punditry—and Woodrow Wilson bashing—as well.
- On the site today, Danielle Pletka and Brett D. Schaefer argue that the U.N. Human Rights Council offers seats to too many authoritarian countries and obsesses on Israel. They lay out needed reforms that could bring the U.S., which left the council in 2018, back into the fold.
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), James P. Sutton (@jamespsuttonsf), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Photograph by Morry Gash/Getty Images.
5 |
LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
THE DAILY WIRE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DESERET NEWS
|
BRIGHT
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AMERICAN THINKER
LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
THE BLAZE
THE FEDERALIST
|
The Federalist, 611 Pennsylvania Ave SE, #247, Washington, DC 20003, United States
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- 4 reasons Ilhan Omar MUST be investigated immediately
- Bob and Eric Save America with Dr. Karlyn Borysenko and Mike Yoder
- 9/11 families, experts appeal federal agency fecision on Building 7 report
- The Left isn’t trying to win the election. They’re desperately trying to foment revolution.
- Two Mikes give debate appetizer, discuss immigration
4 reasons Ilhan Omar MUST be investigated immediately
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 05:05 PM PDT Following the second in a series of videos from Project Veritas exposing ballot harvesting and voter fraud in Minneapolis, the crew was able to collect strong circumstantial evidence that Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and her campaign were directly involved in the scheme. She must be investigated by the Department of Justice immediately. In the latest episode of NOQ Report, I described four reasons why this must be the case. Faith in justiceThere has never been a time in my memory when faith in justice prevailing in America was ever lower. Millions of Americans seem to no longer believe the justice system does its job properly. That’s not even counting the leftist morons who believe police are too harsh. I’m talking specifically about the people who have seen Hillary Clinton get away with everything, Jeffrey Epstein never receiving the sentencing or questions he deserved, or those involved with Obamagate on the verge of being arrested. We need this. We need the Congresswoman to be investigated at the very least and if she’s found to have been involved, she needs to be charged. Dissuade other ballot harvestingThis close to the election, there seems to be rampant ballot harvesting and non-stop voter fraud popping up everywhere. As I noted yesterday, there have been three known cases just in the last few days. How much of it is happening that we don’t know about? By going after those involved in this crime, it sends a message to not only others involved in voter fraud but also those who may be willing to otherwise take the payoff in exchange for their votes. Find terroristsSo many have pointed to Omar as being connected to terrorist organizations. I have never talked much about it, not because I don’t believe it’s true but because there wasn’t enough evidence to pursue. Now, there is. Because she deserves itShe rivals the Clintons in her ability to face scrutiny without facing criminal prosecution. From marrying her brother to campaign finance indiscretions, she has skated the law multiple times in her short political career. This time, she cannot be allowed to skate. America needs to see the good guys win some of these battles. Investigating Ilhan Omar will send a very clear message that those who want to destroy America and fraudulently influence the vote are not above the law.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post 4 reasons Ilhan Omar MUST be investigated immediately appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Bob and Eric Save America with Dr. Karlyn Borysenko and Mike Yoder
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 04:32 PM PDT Special guests include #WalkAway superstar and political commentator Dr. Karlyn Borysenko, and noted Constitutional attorney Mike Yoder. They discuss the well-organized, well-funded riots taking place coast-to-coast; the #WalkAway campaign and the impact it will have in reelected President Donald J. Trump; the trouble with Critical Race Theory; the upcoming Supreme Court confirmation process; and more!
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post Bob and Eric Save America with Dr. Karlyn Borysenko and Mike Yoder appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
9/11 families, experts appeal federal agency fecision on Building 7 report
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 04:23 PM PDT NEW YORK CITY, NY, September 29, 2020 – Families of victims killed in the September 11th attacks and the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth filed an administrative appeal late yesterday condemning the decision of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to deny the group’s “request for correction” regarding NIST’s 2008 report on the controversial collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, which was famously reported by the BBC 23 minutes before it actually happened. The 47-story office building, not hit by an airplane, fell straight into its footprint roughly seven hours after the Twin Towers came down on September 11, 2001. NIST concluded in its 2008 report that Building 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire. The request for correction asks NIST to throw out that conclusion on the grounds that it violates NIST’s information quality standards under the Data Quality Act. “The explanations given by NIST for its decision to deny our request are preposterous and totally avoid addressing our arguments,” said Ted Walter, spokesperson for the 9/11 families and AE911Truth. “Our hope now is that NIST’s associate director for laboratory programs, James Olthoff, will reverse this egregious decision and have the report revised.” The appeal submitted late yesterday alleges that NIST’s decision to deny the request is “demonstrably in error and fails to provide a response to most of the relevant data quality arguments contained in the request.” Among other things, the appeal takes aim at NIST’s refusal to study a melted piece of steel from Building 7 on the flimsy grounds that the steel cannot be confirmed as coming from Building 7 — an excuse the appeal calls “brazenly unscientific.” The appeal also targets NIST’s refusal to perform new computer simulations that would include a structural feature NIST admits was excluded from the modeling. AE911Truth argues that including this structural feature would prevent the failure that allegedly initiated the collapse. “They are refusing to conduct new analyses they know they should, and their justifications are beyond absurd,” said Richard Gage, who is an architect and the founder of AE911Truth. The procedure governing requests submitted to NIST says that the associate director’s decision is communicated “usually within 60 calendar days after receipt of the appeal” and will constitute a final decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce, of which NIST is a part. The procedure also dictates that “No individuals who were involved in the initial denial will be involved in the review of or response to the appeal.” “Dr. Olthoff will have the final opportunity to restore NIST’s integrity and deliver some truth to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11,” said Walter. “If he doesn’t, NIST can expect we will take legal action.” The appeal, NIST’s initial decision, and the original request for correction can all be found at AE911Truth.org/nist. COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.The post 9/11 families, experts appeal federal agency fecision on Building 7 report appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
The Left isn’t trying to win the election. They’re desperately trying to foment revolution.
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 03:29 PM PDT There are times when a video sets forth an almost perfect explanation of what is taking place in our nation. Consider several seemingly disparate events that fit together when considered in terms of the ‘The Seven Pillars of a color revolution’:
Look at how these pillars fit into what the left is doing now:
Pillars 1 & 2: No matter what happens, the propaganda drumbeat is that President Trump is set to loseNormal electoral seasons will see wide swings in the polls as events take place. That isn’t the case this time around, the media has made up their mind that President Trump is losing, so don’t confuse them with the facts. No matter what happens, the numbers in some polls mysteriously stay the same. The national socialist media has gone for having an obvious bias to becoming the de facto propaganda organ of the left. Part of the problem is that this has become normalized, it’s expected of them. Somehow, the perception is that it doesn’t carry over into the polls run by the same organisations. It doesn’t help that the national socialist media started their ‘October surprise’ strategy early breathlessly reporting on some supposed ‘bombshell’ that turns out to be a dud. They start with a deep analysis of a ‘bombshell’, then there is the reaction to the ‘bombshell’. Then there is a reaction to the deep analysis followed by a reaction to the reaction. The echoes reverberating of several days, until the next ‘bombshell’ followed by the more reactions and analysis for a news cycle or two, and then it starts all over again. Pillars 3 & 6: The left was for rioting before it was against it – for a united and organised oppositionIf there is one hard and fast rule for the left, it’s their tendency for overreach. They are at their rotten core a collectivised mob, so that explains some of it. But, while the scenes of ‘mostly peaceful but fiery’ rioting and looting did wonders in bolstering support for President Trump. It took them weeks to realise that the Marxist mobs aren’t helping them. So in one instance, they finally started condemning that which they encouraged mere weeks ago, while Kamala Harris is doing the opposite. Not to mention high-level threats of ‘peaceful’ violence if Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed. So, while they spent weeks scary ordinary folks into supporting President Trump and maxed out ammo and gun sales along with PVC and food supplies. All of this did nothing for their cause, except as a form of riot rehearsal and future intimidation. Pillars 4 & 5: The left was for the cheat by mail scam before it was against it – to imply a falsified voteWhile some vestiges of the nation’s socialist left are still flogging this subject, some have backed off. All of their machinations put an unwelcome spotlight on cheat by mail, with many reports coming forth that they can no longer pretend it doesn’t exist. All of this does call into question the legitimacy of making drastic changes to a system that works in the middle of an election. But it was supposed to call into question the whole process itself, not the cheat by mail scam favoured by the left. However, this aspect of their scheme does play into ‘pillars 4 and 5’ in trying to ‘drive home the point that voting results were falsified’. It strains credulity beyond the breaking point that with all the rancour of the most important election in the history of our nation, that some would ‘forget to vote’ until the very last second, dropping that precious cheat by mail ballot into the dropbox at 11:59:59 on November 3rd. Presumably, the pony express mail system taking an interminable 3, 9, 17 days to get its destination. Joe Biden doesn’t seem to be striving to win the electionThis has been the case for months, with many wondering what is going on. It’s not just the COVID crisis, the left chose one of the worst candidates possible. Despite the nation’s socialist media working day and night to prop him up, Biden is floundering. It’s become so bad that even the media is taking notice, wondering when he will get out and run a real campaign instead of hiding. Granted, this year has been odd all along, but at some point, he should be doing something other than pathetically small events that are less than even going through the motions. What is going on here? The only explanation that fits the facts is that Biden and the rest of the party know he can’t win so they have something else in mind. Consider the evidence in the context of the left ‘LARPing’ a color revolutionNone of the above items make sense in the normal context of a campaign. The left’s propaganda organs have to know they are destroying their credibility with woefully one-sided coverage, but they don’t seem to care. Leftists have to know that all of the rioting and intimidation tactics won’t garner support for them. It’s become so bad that USA Today actually had a piece on how many cars have hit ‘demonstrators’ since the George Floyd protests began. Forgetting about the fact that these BLM ‘demonstrators’ tend to be out in the street blocking traffic. They also have to know that people will tend to agree with the contention that Mail-in voting is rife for fraud. Or that it’s become obvious that Biden isn’t trying to win. None of this makes sense in terms of a political campaign but makes perfect sense when considered in the light of a half-baked LARP revolution. The bottom line: The left wants a half-baked revolution instead of a winDespite the polls and the propaganda drumbeat, most people realise that Biden is on the losing end of this battle in a normal political context. But that isn’t the point, they know he can’t win so they aren’t trying. Their Hail Mary play is to try this half-backed LARP revolution to try and take over the country by that means. If they fail to do that they have a ready-made excuse for delegitimise President Trump’s second term. This explanation puts their actions into a proper perspective. They aren’t going to win by trying to intimidate people or block traffic. They certainly aren’t going to do so by ‘peacefully’ rioting at the drop of a hat. Neither are they going to win pushing their cheat by mail scheme, especially when all this focus on the topic has brought forth so many news stories that shows that it is broken. But all of these are part of their ‘The Seven Pillars of a color revolution’ even though that kind of extreme action has no place in our society. These events also highlight another fact, the nation’s socialist left is a victim of its own echo chamber. They have several bizarre beliefs that do not coincide with reality, causing them to plan based on those beliefs. Let’s hope that reality soon throws some cold water on their plans.
The post The Left isn’t trying to win the election. They’re desperately trying to foment revolution. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Two Mikes give debate appetizer, discuss immigration
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 02:57 PM PDT The debate Tuesday night was already won by Joe Biden in the eyes of mainstream media before it even began. But the reality is President Trump is very likely going to win tonight. Our intrepid hosts discussed the debate as well as the challenges we face with immigration and foreign policy in general.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outletNobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it. When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that. Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated. The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Two Mikes give debate appetizer, discuss immigration appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 17 new items) |
- McConnell on Judge Amy Coney Barrett: “This Nominee Could Not be More Fully Qualified to Serve on the Supreme Court”
- Debate Night, The Smears Begin, Pelosi’s Post-Election Plot
- Sane Party Regulars Say to Progressive Democrats: ‘Feeling Lucky, Punk?’
- A Reminder to American Jews: Civilization Is Fragile
- No, the United States Is Not Systemically Racist
- Will Justice Amy Star in ‘The Five’?
- It Is Political Groundhog Day & Food for Thought
- A Biden Debate Primer
- Harvest Season
- Stimulating Debate
- Pelosi Holds Millions Of Small Businesses Hostage While Working Families Struggle—Again
- The Real Threat Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Poses to Democrats
- CNBC Hires Former Fox Anchor To Bash Trump
- FBI Agent on Flynn Case Didn’t See Predicate For Russia Probe, Says Mueller Team Was Out to ‘Get Trump’
- Minneapolis Plan To Defund The Police Collapses, City Council Members ‘Regret’ Making Pledge
- Why House Republicans, and Maybe Some Democrats, Want to Remove Speaker Nancy Pelosi
- DOJ Warns San Francisco Officials They Can’t Limit Church To One Congregant At A Time
McConnell on Judge Amy Coney Barrett: “This Nominee Could Not be More Fully Qualified to Serve on the Supreme Court”
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 11:11 PM PDT ‘I had the opportunity to meet with Judge Barrett earlier today. I left our discussion even more convinced that President Trump has nominated exactly the kind of outstanding person whom the American people deserve to have on their highest Court.’ WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) delivered the following remarks today on the Senate floor regarding the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court: “On Saturday evening, President Trump announced his nominee for the Supreme Court: Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. “I had the opportunity to meet with Judge Barrett earlier today. I left our discussion even more convinced that President Trump has nominated exactly the kind of outstanding person whom the American people deserve to have on their highest Court. “Americans deserve brilliant judges with first-rate legal minds. Judge Barrett is that and then some. She attended Notre Dame Law School on full scholarship, graduated number one in her class, and was executive editor of the Law Review. “She secured top-flight clerkships on the D.C. Circuit and the Supreme Court. And after a few years in private practice, she returned to academia and built a national reputation as an award-winning professor and legal scholar. “Judge Barrett is brilliant. “Americans also deserve judges who are committed to fairness and impartiality, to following the facts in every case. They deserve judges who understand that their job is to interpret the text of our laws and Constitution as they are written, not as the judge might personally wish they’d been written differently. “Again, Judge Barrett passes with flying colors. Her three years of rulings on the Seventh Circuit are the record of a judge who sets out to do impartial justice under law — nothing more and nothing less. “This nominee could not be more fully qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. “Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman is a fierce critic of President Trump. He was one of House Democrats’ star witnesses in their impeachment. He has known Judge Barrett professionally for more than 20 years. Despite some philosophical differences, he went out of his way this past weekend to write that she is, quote, ‘highly qualified to serve on the Supreme Court.’ “Here’s what Professor Feldman wrote: ‘I know her to be a brilliant and conscientious lawyer who will analyze and decide cases in good faith, applying the jurisprudential principles to which she is committed. Those are the basic criteria for being a good justice. Barrett meets and exceeds them.’ “And if you ‘believe in an ideal judicial temperament,’ Professor Feldman went on, then ‘rest assured that Barrett has it.’ “It is the same story from everyone who knows Judge Barrett well. “One of her faculty colleagues says, quote, ‘she is a principled, careful judge, admired legal scholar, and amazing teacher.’ “Six young women who all studied under now-Judge Barrett say she drilled into them ‘the necessity of setting personal beliefs aside when evaluating the answer to a legal question.’ “These objective qualifications and credentials are what matter most. Judge Barrett deserves to be judged by her record. “But a few more things bear notice. “As our nation continues to honor the trail-blazing life of the late Justice Ginsburg, it seems fitting that President Trump has nominated another brilliant woman who has climbed to the very top of the legal field. Young women who know Judge Barrett well describe her as not just an excellent teacher but a gracious mentor and an inspiring example of female leadership. “And, as the only congressional leader not from New York or California, I applaud the President’s decision to look to the heartland. “If confirmed, Judge Barrett would be the only current Supreme Court Justice with a law degree from anywhere besides Harvard or Yale. “I’d say this nominee would bring welcome diversity on multiple fronts.” Tags: Mitch McConnell, Judge Amy Coney Barrett To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Debate Night, The Smears Begin, Pelosi’s Post-Election Plot
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 10:46 PM PDT by Gary Bauer: Countdown to Victory: 35 Days until Election Day! Debate Night The debate will be moderated by Chris Wallace of Fox News, and will feature a small live audience. It will be broadcast by the major networks, and streamed by ABC, CBSN and C-SPAN. Presumably there will be a debate. As of a few hours ago, the campaigns were reportedly unable to agree on some ground rules. br> If the debate takes place, I fully expect the media will declare Joe Biden the victor. It is essential for the left-wing media to prop up Biden and present him as the winner. I suspect they have already written their reviews: “Debate Shocker, Biden Wins” and “Trump Forced On His Heels, Hammered Over COVID, Healthcare and Taxes.” They are desperate to create a sense of inevitability, and desperate to demoralize conservative voters. The media will react exactly the way they reacted to the last person who “defeated” Trump in a debate and went on to not be president. Her name was Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, check out the Trump campaign’s latest ad, hitting Biden’s weakness on the economy, against the radical mobs and against communist China. The Smears Begin The “sinister” group referenced by the Post is the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which was founded by Dr. James Dobson, D. James Kennedy, Bill Bright, Larry Burkett and others. It was created to push back against the radical agenda of the ACLU and to defend religious liberty and traditional values in the courts. ADF is an outstanding group, and we are proud to be on the same team with them! I also know of another major meeting where Christian views were touted and Barrett actually has embraced this other group too. They were much more selective – only 41 people attended the meeting, which took place in Philadelphia. It was called the Constitutional Convention. I guarantee you that the delegates assembled at Independence Hall also believed in a Christian worldview. While they were familiar with Greek and Roman political philosophy from which they found support for the separation of powers, the most profound ideas that influenced their thinking were found in the Torah and the New Testament. Their brilliance and dedication to those values made America possible. But there will be no future for America if this Washington Post headline becomes the prevailing worldview, one where Christians have no place in public life or public office. Targeting Her Children Too Yesterday, we told you that Boston University Professor Ibram Kendi compared Barrett to “white colonizers” for having adopted two black children from Haiti. It’s now being reported that the director of Tom Steyer’s superPAC, NextGen America, is attacking the legitimacy of the adoptions. John Lee Brougher tweeted: “As an adoptee, I need to know more about the circumstances of how Amy Coney Barrett came to adopt her children, and the treatment of them since. Transracial adoption is fraught with trauma and potential for harm, and everything I see here is deeply concerning.” Brougher has no right to demand anything from Judge Barrett. And the accusation that her children are being abused in some way, suffering trauma and harm, is beyond disgusting. This is a new low for the left. About the only thing the Democrats didn’t do was accuse Judge Kavanaugh of abusing his children. But that’s where the left is starting with Judge Barrett. Pelosi’s Post-Election Plot If that happens, and it last happened in 1876, the election would be decided by the House of Representatives. Under this unusual scenario, each state gets one vote, which is determined by a majority vote of the state’s House delegation. For example, Florida has 27 seats in the House of Representatives. Its delegation is currently split 13 Democrats to 14 Republicans. If all members vote based on their party affiliation, then the state of Florida would cast one vote for Donald Trump. Here’s the kicker: Even though Democrats currently control the majority in the House, they DO NOT control a majority of state delegations. Republicans currently control 26 state delegations, while Democrats control 22. (Two states are tied, and tied delegations are not counted.) But it is not THIS House majority that would vote. It is the next House majority – the one determined by the November elections and seated in January – that would decide a contested presidential election. Suddenly, this year’s political calculus is far more complicated. br> But any House race that could potentially flip a state delegation’s majority is much, much more important given that the result could determine the next president of the United States. Two races getting the most attention in this scenario are the at-large House seats in Alaska and Montana, currently held by Republicans. If Republicans can retake seats lost in 2018 in Michigan and Pennsylvania, they could flip those state delegations. Likewise, Democrats are hoping to defeat a vulnerable Florida Republican. If Republicans can capture contested seats in Maine and New Hampshire, they could deadlock those state delegations and take their votes out of the Democrat column. Rest assured, my friends, we have been looking at this possible scenario for some time too, and CWF is strategically investing your resources in the most critical House races! Trump’s Third Nomination As you know, President Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to negotiate the Abraham Accords between Israel and the United Arab Emirates. But you may not know that the president received a second Nobel Peace Prize nomination for his efforts to normalize relations between Kosovo and Serbia. Well, the accolades just keep coming. President Trump has now received his third Nobel Peace Prize nomination for his efforts to get America out of “endless wars.” To be fair, Joe Biden also received a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, and it’s a lot like Barack Obama’s. He got it just for talking and for his “calming influence.” And I suspect his chances of winning are pretty good. Of course, he hasn’t actually done anything, like make peace between multiple nations. But Obama proved that real results weren’t necessary to win. Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, Debate Night, The Smears Begin, Pelosi’s Post-Election PlotTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Sane Party Regulars Say to Progressive Democrats: ‘Feeling Lucky, Punk?’
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 10:09 PM PDT by Ralph Benko: The Democrats may or may not win the presidency and majority control of the U.S. Senate. If they do, left wing hotheads are proposing some extremist rule changes. Progressives lust to dominate the federal government and are proposing to rewrite some venerable political rules. Democratic Party militants are agitating to eliminate the filibuster, pack or term limit the U.S. Supreme Court, abolish the electoral college, and add D.C., Puerto Rico and maybe Samoa to spangle Old Glory to pad their Senate majority. Armageddon? I say, game on! There are plenty of countermoves by the regulars in both parties to make these advocates of mob rule rue the day they decided to start playing with fire. To paraphrase Dirty Harry, “Feeling lucky, Punk?” … Plus the GOP owns the real .44 Magnum here: Texas. Texas has the unalloyed right, without congressional approval, to create four new states. Texans haven’t split Texas up because Texans are big galoots. They’ve assumed Texas would have to break up into 5 Tennessee-size states. Texans like Texas big. But hold on, pardner. This overlooks a key fact. The Texas annexation joint resolution of 1845 allows Texas to split into 5 states of “convenient” size and having “sufficient” population. Anything bigger than Rhode Island is ipso facto of convenient size and anything with a population greater than Wyoming’s 586,107 is of sufficient population. (Republican) Texas Governor Greg Abbott in concert with the (Republican) Texas legislature could deftly carve out four “Tiny Texases” – coincidentally, all Republican! – sacrificing only maybe 3% of the Lone Star State’s territory and less than 10% of its population. Big Texas stays Big while lifting Texas’s presence in the Senate from two to 10. Bonus: four new governors and four new congresspeople, all Republican, 16 new statewide offices. Texas could gift wrap and give each of President Trump’s kids a high office with plenty left over, swamping any possible gains from feckless Democratic maneuvering. (Governor Abbott? What’s stopping you?) So. Should we fear progressive hooligans rigging the game if the Dems run the table next month? Go ahead punk. Make my day. Tags: Ralph Benko, Make My day, Sane Party Regulars, Say to Progressive Democrats, ‘Feeling Lucky, Punk? To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
A Reminder to American Jews: Civilization Is Fragile
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 09:33 PM PDT by Dennis Prager: Yesterday was Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. It is meant to be a time of intense self-examination. In light of that, I offer this column. The question I receive more than any other from non-Jews is: Why are so many Jews on the left? Before addressing it, I should note that the same question could be asked of Christians and other non-Jews. Why have so many mainstream Protestants and Catholics (up to and including the pope) embraced the left? Why have nearly all blacks, the majority of Hispanics and Asian Americans, the most successful ethnic group in America, embraced the left? And, outside of the United States, why have most Germans, French, Canadians, Australians and others in the West embraced the left? This question could be asked about almost every group in the world. Nevertheless, it is valid to ask it about Jews because, if any group should be wary of dismantling a society, especially a decent one, it is the Jews. The moment civilization begins to disintegrate, the Jews are the first victims — never the only, but always the first. That’s why Jews have so often been likened to the proverbial canary in the mine. Miners take canaries down with them because when there are noxious fumes, canaries die, and when the miners see the dead canaries, they know there are toxic fumes they must fight, or they, too, will die. That’s why decent non-Jews who don’t fight anti-Semitism are fools. They don’t understand that anti-Semitism represents a mortal threat to them. Tens of millions of non-Jews were killed because decent non-Jews ignored Hitler early on, dismissing him and Nazism as a Jewish problem. It is often asked how the most culturally advanced country in Europe, perhaps in the world, could produce Nazism and the Holocaust. Or, as it is often put, “How did the country that gave us Bach, Beethoven, Heine and Schiller give us Auschwitz?” One answer is that advanced culture and advanced morality are not the same. The Nazis loved classical music. The other, more important, answer is that civilization is fragile. It is fragile because civilization consists of human beings, and human nature is profoundly flawed. Exceptional evil is as common as exceptional good. It takes a great deal of effort and a great deal of time to make a decent society. But it takes little effort and little time to destroy a society. That most American Jews do not appreciate how extraordinarily decent America is — compared with other countries, not compared with some childish utopian vision — only proves the lack of relationship between education and wisdom and between intelligence and wisdom. The left is tearing down America because the left in America is what the left has been everywhere: a purely destructive force. Conservatives and liberals build everything, and leftists destroy everything: music, art, universities, high schools, elementary schools, economies, late-night comedy (for that matter, all comedy), journalism, sports and, now, the sciences. In addition, everywhere the left gains power it suppresses personal freedom, beginning with the most important freedom, freedom of speech. Every violent demonstration (also known as “riots”) over the past six months has been a left-wing riot. Why, then, does this left-wing destruction not frighten America’s Jews? Do they not know the more power the left has, the less freedom they and all other Americans will have? Do they not know how much Black Lives Matter, antifa and the rest of the left loathe Israel? Or do they not care? (The answer is that, increasingly, many American Jews do not care — especially young Jews, who have been raised by left-wing teachers and left-wing media.) How do they not recoil when statues of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln are violently removed? Do American Jews not know that the unique esteem in which they (and Israel since 1948) have been held in American society has been entirely due to the Judeo-Christian roots of America’s values and its Judeo-Christian identity? Do they not know that in a post-Christian America, they will be just another minority and that, as the left gains influence, nonleft Jews (specifically religious and pro-Israel Jews) will be singled out for opprobrium? (Just look at how Jewish students who publicly identify as Jews, let alone as pro-Israel Jews, are treated on many American campuses.) We conservatives know the answer to the question, “How did the country that gave the world Beethoven give the world Nazism?” The answer: Civilization is fragile. That was true in Germany, and it is true in America. Tags: Dennis Prager, Yom Kippur, Holiest day, Jewish calendar, American Jews,Civilization Is FragileTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
No, the United States Is Not Systemically Racist
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 08:52 PM PDT by Stephen Moore: In the second half of the 20th century, from 1950 to 2000, Black people in the United States experienced much larger income gains than whites did. The group that had the largest income gains, by far, was Black women. Their incomes nearly doubled over that period (after inflation). The race gap persists, but it is much lower today than it was in 1950. Does this sound like the financial result from a systemically racist country? We are told by Black Lives Matter, about 80% of the college professors and their pals in the media, that President Donald Trump is a racist. CNN says it almost every night. It’s always wise to judge a man by his deeds, not his words or promises. The Census Bureau report released earlier this month finds that, from 2016 to 2019, Black incomes rose more than in any three years in the history of the United States. The median household income for Blacks is now $45,438. I don’t have the latest data in front of me, but data from several years ago would indicate few, if any, other nations on Earth with a higher average Black income than the United States. Black poverty rates fell to their lowest level ever recorded. Black poverty is still much higher than white poverty, but Black people’s economic advancement under Trump (precoronavirus) has been nearly miraculous. Does this sound like the result of a racist president? One of the more fantastic claims by the BLM crowd is that America discriminates against all minorities, or “people of color.” By that, they mean people who are Black, Hispanic or any other race that is not white. But the latest census data on incomes squarely contradict this conclusion — at least when it comes to family finances and economic opportunity. The highest-income group in America today is not white-skinned workers. It is Asians. Astonishingly, the median household income of Asian Americans reached just shy of $100,000 a year. (The number is $98,174 to be exact.) In other words, the average Asian family is upper-income. One of America’s wonders as a land of opportunity is that an immigrant can come to America dirt-poor from China or India and, within 20 years, move into the middle class or even become wealthy. How did Asians, many of whom are first- or second-generation immigrants from Japan, Korea, India, China, Pakistan, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, etc., race ahead of whites? Perhaps they have a stronger work ethic. Maybe they are more likely to go into occupations in the sciences, engineering or medicine, where salaries are high. Perhaps it is the “tiger moms” effect. Who knows? But what is indisputable from this evidence is this: This couldn’t have happened in America if this were a nation that hates ethnic minorities. It could not have occurred in a xenophobic country. What about Hispanics? Trump has indeed said some very nasty things about Mexicans coming to the U.S. illegally and committing crimes. But Hispanics are doing very well in America. The average Hispanic household makes more than $56,000 a year today. That’s not rich — but it is a massive leap forward from what Hispanics earn in Mexico, El Salvador or Cuba. The gains of Latinos in just the last three years have been extraordinary. Hispanics have also been invaluable in keeping our hospitals, nursing homes, stores and delivery systems functioning during this pandemic thanks to their incredibly strong and admirable work ethic. I would submit from all this that America isn’t the most but rather the least racist nation on Earth when it comes to upward economic mobility. Tags: Stephen Moore, Steve Moore, Rasmussen Reports, No, the United States, Is Not Systemically RacistTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Will Justice Amy Star in ‘The Five’?
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 08:28 PM PDT by Patrick Buchanan: America’s court wars, in which the coming battle over Barrett’s nomination may prove decisive, go back half a century. By nominating Federal Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, Donald Trump kept his word, and more than that. Should she be confirmed, he will have made history. Even his enemies would have to concede that Trump triumphed where his Republican predecessors — even Ronald Reagan, who filled three court vacancies — fell short. Trump’s achievement — victory in the Supreme Court wars that have lasted for half a century — is a triumph that will affect the nation and the law for years, perhaps decades. Trump’s remaking of the Supreme Court for constitutionalism may well be the crown jewel of his presidency. Consider. If Judge Barrett becomes Justice Barrett, she will join Justices Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to create a constitutionalist core of five justices, a controlling majority. On the other side would sit the three liberals: 82-year-old Stephen Breyer and Barack Obama appointees Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. If Chief Justice John Roberts envisioned a Roberts Court where he would be the swing vote for 4-4 deadlocks, deciding every such case himself, his dream could be about to vanish. If Barrett is confirmed, the new court becomes “The Five,” with its youngest, newest and most charismatic member, a 48-year-old protege of Justice Antonin Scalia, its brightest and rising star. Consider the credentials of the jurist Trump just named. Barrett was summa cum laude at Notre Dame Law School, graduating first in her class. She clerked for Scalia, taught law at South Bend for 15 years and has served for three years on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. She is a non-Ivy League, Middle American and a devout Catholic and mother of seven, including a special needs child and two adopted children from Haiti. Almost universally, former classmates and colleagues, liberals among them, praise her temperament, brilliance and scholarship. America’s court wars, in which the coming battle over Barrett’s nomination may prove decisive, go back half a century. It was begun in June 1968, as Richard Nixon, victorious in his party’s primaries, was moving inexorably to the GOP nomination in Miami Beach and very possibly on to the presidency of the United States. Chief Justice Earl Warren, an old adversary of Nixon’s from California days, was not happy with this. A report in the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that Warren “is said to feel that Richard Nixon — regarded as the GOP’s likely presidential nominee — would be bound to appoint a new Chief Justice pledged to overturn recent court decisions guaranteeing constitutional rights of criminals.” Nixon sent the clipping to me with a note: “Buchanan: Why doesn’t (Strom) Thurmond send this to Southern papers — opinion leaders.” The Inquirer article proved to be on point. In collusion with Chief Justice Warren, President Lyndon Johnson had hatched a plot. Warren would announce his resignation as chief justice and would make acceptance contingent upon Johnson’s nominee to succeed him being confirmed. And that nominee would be Justice Abe Fortas, a court ally of Warren and longtime crony of LBJ. All three were in on it. When Fortas was confirmed, his vacant seat as associate justice would then be filled by Federal Judge Homer Thornberry, also an ally of Johnson’s going back to his Texas days. Thus would Nixon be preempted, the liberalism of the high court guaranteed, and the Warren Court succeeded for another decade by the Fortas Court. When LBJ named Fortas, Nixon went silent. But GOP Senators Robert Griffin, John Tower and Howard Baker moved to block Fortas’ ascent. They used an argument familiar to us today. The new president chosen in November, not the president retiring in January, should choose Warren’s replacement as chief justice. The attack from Senate Republicans soon zeroed in on Fortas’ social liberalism on pornography as manifest in his having voted alone on the court to approve for public viewing films depicting acts of homosexual sex. Fortas not only failed to win the support of the two-thirds of the Senate he needed to overcome a Republican filibuster, he also failed to win a simple majority, receiving only 45 votes for confirmation. On Oct. 1, 1968, Fortas asked Johnson to withdraw his nomination, and in the spring of 1969, he was forced to resign from the court in a financial scandal. Warren would have to swear in Nixon as the nation’s 37th president on Jan. 20, 1969, and then watch Nixon replace him as chief justice with Judge Warren Burger in the spring of that same year. Came then Nixon’s losing battles to put Southern judges Clement Haynsworth and G. Harrold Carswell on the court, Reagan’s failure to elevate Bob Bork, and the brutal but failed assaults on Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh. Now comes Amy Coney Barrett’s turn. If Senate Republicans stay united, then they can realize a victory that generations of their GOP predecessors had hoped to see. Tags: Patrick Buchanan, conservative, commentary, Will Justice Amy, Star in ‘The Five’?To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
It Is Political Groundhog Day & Food for Thought
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 08:10 PM PDT by Mike Huckabee: This is the day we’ve all been waiting for on pins and needles! It’s Political Groundhog Day, when Joe Biden will finally emerge from his burrow and we’ll find out if he sees his Teleprompter, which will mean five more weeks of campaigning. The debate will air on multiple broadcast and streaming sources. And if the debate itself doesn’t provide enough excitement and entertainment for you, the crew at http://www.PJMedia.com will be live-blogging it in real-time. I imagine that one of Biden’s big attacks on Trump will be to again accuse him of botching the COVID-19 (Chinese) coronavirus response and being personally responsible for all 200,000+ deaths from it. A few things to bear in mind: * When Trump shut down travel from China very early on, Biden called him hysterical and xenophobic. That later turned out to be one of the most important moves at slowing infections in the US until we could better prepare. * Yes, Trump and his team made mistakes early on, but everyone did. It was a brand new disease and it took time to learn what works (Mask? No mask? Mask again?) But Trump quickly assembled one of the most effective public-private partnerships in history to fight it. Early predictions were for deadly shortages of ventilators and hospital beds and 2.2 million deaths in the US. None of those things happened. * While Biden claims he would have handled the pandemic much better, his own campaign health advisor admitted that with Obama/Biden’s limp response to H1N1/swine flu, it was only due to sheer dumb luck that it wasn’t more contagious and millions didn’t die. * Comparisons of Trump’s response to those in other nations are apples and oranges because Trump doesn’t have the power to force states to do what he wants. Maybe that’s why the deaths largely occurred in a handful of Democrat-run states. * Biden blames Trump both for the economic damage caused by the lockdowns and for not locking down even more of the economy for even longer. Can’t have it both ways. * Biden has proposed more draconian economic lockdowns which would inflict more pain on Americans than the virus. Don’t believe that last one? Last week, the CDC released the latest numbers on COVID-19 survival rates. If you’re under age 70, you have a 0.5% chance or less of dying from the coronavirus, and that’s among the small subset of people who’ve actually caught it. Even if you’re 70 or older and catch it, you have a 94.6% chance of surviving it. Also, for Democrats insisting that schools must stay closed, Florida reopened its schools and there has been no surge among kids age 5-to-17. In fact, cases declined through late September. FOOD FOR THOUGHT To help keep you from getting too worried about these threats, you should know that this is mostly a combination of childish lashing out in frustration because they know they botched the SCOTUS transition and are going to lose (they should’ve leaned on RBG to retire under Obama, but they were all so certain Hillary would win that their own arrogance tripped them up) plus a lot of election year screeching to fire up their base. But here’s some cold reality: If they try to change the makeup of the SCOTUS, Republicans will filibuster it. The far leftists say they’ll do away with the filibuster entirely, but chances are that some of their own Senators would be smart enough to oppose that. Remember how Harry Reid did away with the filibuster on judges? That’s precisely why they can’t stop Judge Barrett’s confirmation. Mitch McConnell warned Reid that he would live to regret it, maybe sooner than later, but he didn’t listen. Many of today’s Democrat leaders are like five-year-olds having a tantrum in Walmart because they want a candy bar and they want it RIGHT NOW! They’re really into instant gratification and don’t think far enough ahead to consider the spanking it will bring them later. But some of their members surely will, especially those who were elected from red or purple states and would like to keep their seats. Those four new seats from DC and Puerto Rico might be canceled out and then some. Imagine what would happen if those Senators from less liberal states were replaced by Republicans who had both a majority and no filibuster roadblocks to deal with. As for all the other rewrites to the Constitution they want to make, like doing away with the Electoral College: amending the Constitution takes a 2/3rds majority vote of both Houses of Congress (which they will not have) and ratification by three-fourths of the states. Do you really think that many states would vote to give away their say over who becomes President to New York, California, Florida and Texas? So I urge you not to take their threats to radically remake America too seriously. But take them just seriously enough to spur you to go to the polls and vote (in person) in overwhelming numbers to insure they never have the power even to try it. Although I do kind of like their “term limits” idea. Only let’s apply it to Congress first and see how it works out. Tags: Mike Huckabee, Morning Edition, Political Groundhog Day, Food for ThoughtTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
A Biden Debate Primer
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 07:46 PM PDT If you think tonight’s first debate will be a cakewalk for Donald Trump, think again.
by Douglas Andrews: We don’t mean to ruin anyone’s day, but Joe Biden has a lot going for him heading into tonight’s first presidential debate. Seriously.First, even though President Donald Trump has tightened things up in recent weeks, Biden still leads in the polls. We know, we know: The polling is shamefully biased and meant to depress those malleable middle-of-the-roaders still open to the idea of voting for Trump. We get it. And for that reason, we call it “pollaganda,” and we take all of it with a shovelful of salt. Still, Scranton Joe has some margin for error.Second, Biden has been debating other politicians for nearly half a century, and he’s gotten pretty good at it. A lot of this is muscle memory — key terms, simple phrases, and affective mannerisms he can summon up even in a state of cognitive decline. So even if — ahem — the words mouth of out his come that all sense at no make, he’ll be able to act as though they do. And for soft Democrats and Trump-averse indies inclined to watch the debate with the volume on mute, that’s all it’ll take. What’s more, while the president has been barnstorming the nation, Biden has been prepping in his basement. Third, the debate bar for Biden has been set preposterously low. The bar is so low, in fact, that if the mysterious pick-me-up his handlers have been giving him in recent weeks can keep him somewhere north of catatonia for 90 minutes, Wednesday’s headlines will say that he mopped the floor with Trump. If Biden doesn’t drool, he “wins” in a rout. This is the danger of mismanaged expectations, and the president’s supporters have no one to blame for it but themselves. Fourth, and finally, the mainstream media serves Biden like a Praetorian Guard with a poop-scooper. Whenever he says something false, foolish, or straight-up contradictory — and he will — they’ll be right there for him, just like that Harvey Keitel character in “Pulp Fiction,” to clean up the mess. “Fracking cleanup on Aisle 6,” he’ll shout, and his media fixers will come a-runnin’. And it’s this last point that’s the most galling. We know that The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Associated Press desperately want Biden to win. We know that CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, NPR, and countless other media organs are all-in behind Barack Obama’s bumbling backslapper. And we know that President Trump has singlehandedly made mincemeat out of the media’s reputation for four years running. But can’t they play this game with honest dice just once out of respect for the American people? Of course not. Conservative columnist Ramesh Ponnuru recently pondered this very issue. “All political candidates make mistakes,” he wrote. “For a lucky few candidates, the embarrassment is mitigated by the assistance of journalists who accept the explanations or, even better, don’t ask for them in the first place. … This protective impulse toward Biden on the part of the press is sure to express itself in all kinds of ways as the campaign goes on.” And it has expressed itself, as when he flip-flopped on fracking, when he shamefully walked away from the Hyde Amendment, and when he (laughably) vowed to “take your AR-14s away.” “When people want to dismiss the importance of Trump’s inaccuracies,” Ponnuru concludes, “they sometimes say he should be taken seriously but not literally. But part of the press’s job is to report when candidates are departing from the literal truth. It should not be to protect a candidate from the voters, or from himself.” This, though, is the priceless in-kind contribution that the Biden campaign is getting from the mainstream media: protection from the voters and from himself. We hope we’re wrong about tonight’s debate. We hope Trump cleans Biden’s clock. But if he doesn’t, it’ll be in large part because, in addition to debating Biden, he was also debating a deeply dishonest media. Tags: Douglas Andrews, A Biden Debate Primer To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Harvest Season
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 07:05 PM PDT
The Minnesota story is juicy; the Project Veritas video speaks for itself. But in Texas? “Two private investigators, including a former FBI agent and former police officer, testify under oath that they have video evidence, documentation and witnesses to prove that Biden’s Texas Political Director Dallas Jones and his cohorts are currently hoarding mail-in and absentee ballots and ordering operatives to fill the ballots out for people illegally, including for dead people, homeless people, and nursing home residents in the 2020 presidential election.” That, courtesy of the industrious Patrick Howley, in the thick of the investigation. “Witnesses have shown me,” the former FBI agent testifies, “how the ballot harvesters take absentee ballots from the elderly in nursing homes, from the homeless, and from unsuspecting residences’ mailboxes. The ballot harvesters then complete the ballots for their preferred candidate and forge the signature of the ‘voter.’” Several Biden campaign workers and two Harris County bureaucrats are implicated. It will be interesting to see if these accusations lead to charges. And how many similar stories will emerge elsewhere. Folks can argue about how much voter fraud happens, but when we find it, let’s act. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Harvest Season To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Stimulating Debate
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 06:31 PM PDT . . . Some are speculating that Biden may be using Drugs to get to appear vibrant during debates. Trump asks for a drug test.
Editorial Cartoon by AF “Tony” Branco Tags: Stimulating Debate, Some are speculating, Biden, may be using, Drugs, to get to appear vibrant, during debates, Trump asks for a drug testTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Pelosi Holds Millions Of Small Businesses Hostage While Working Families Struggle—Again
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 06:11 PM PDT by Robert Romano: At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when a lot less was known about the virus and how to counter it, and while the nation was still ramping up production of testing and hospital resources including ventilators needed, 25 million jobs were lost across the country, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Since labor markets bottomed in April, 13.8 million jobs have been recovered, as states have begun steadily reopening in the months since. But it could have been much worse. Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning is crediting the foresight of the payroll protection plan from President Donald Trump and Congress, a bipartisan measure that was put in the original CARES Act, with leading the rapid recovery. “One of the biggest reasons was because the Trump administration and Congress worked together on the CARES Act, that provided $525 billion to 5.2 million small businesses, which may have saved as many as 50 million jobs,” Manning said. In other words, if President Trump had not led on the issue of protecting small businesses during the pandemic, tens of millions more jobs would have been most certainly been lost. Now the country is experience a rapid, V-shaped rebound in labor markets. But that could be in jeopardy now. Unfortunately, payroll protection program, administered by the Small Business Administration, ran out of money on Aug. 8, and with 11 million jobs still on the sidelines, in order to maintain the momentum of the economic recovery, Congress needs to act to renew the program. But for months, Pelosi has insisted on a House-proposed unworkable $3 trillion package — while the White House and the Senate have looked toward a $1 trillion extension of existing measures that were working with some tweaks — leaving her own constituents out in the dust. Manning stated, “The only way the remainder of the jobs lost in the state-led pandemic lockdowns will be recovered is by providing support to safely reopen the economy and schools, something Nancy Pelosi will not allow to happen so long as she remains Speaker and those who elected her Speaker are directly responsible for this reckless course.” Now a deal is said to be close to hand, but not before Manning and Americans for Limited Government focused on recently elected, vulnerable Democrats in targeted press statements across the country for not doing more to push Pelosi to make a deal sooner — especially in blue states where unemployment is much, much higher. Here follows a list of these members, and the release took note of the state-level unemployment rates reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics each member’s constituents back home are suffering from: Virginia’s 10th: U.S. Rep. Jennifer Wexton, state unemployment rate 6.1% Florida’s 26th: U.S. Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, state unemployment rate 7.4% Florida’s 27th: U.S. Rep. Donna Shalala, state unemployment rate 7.4% New Jersey’s 2nd: U.S. Rep. Jeff Van Drew, state unemployment rate 10.9% New Jersey’s 3rd: U.S. Rep. Andy Kim, state unemployment rate 10.9% New Jersey’s 7th: U.S. Rep. Tom Malinowski, state unemployment rate 10.9% New Jersey’s 11th: U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill, state unemployment rate 10.9% New York’s 11th: U.S. Rep. Max Rose, state unemployment rate 12.5% New York’s 22nd: U.S. Rep. Anthony Brindisi, state unemployment rate 12.5% New York’s 19th: U.S. Rep. Antonio Delgado, state unemployment rate 12.5% Pennsylvania’s 5th: U.S. Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, state unemployment rate 10.3% Pennsylvania’s 6th: U.S. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, state unemployment rate 10.3% Pennsylvania’s 7th: U.S. Rep. Susan Wild, state unemployment rate 10.3% Pennsylvania’s 17th: U.S. Rep. Conor Lamb, state unemployment rate 10.3% Minnesota’s 2nd: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, state unemployment rate 7.4% Minnesota’s 3rd: U.S. Rep. Dean Phillips, state unemployment rate 7.4% Kansas’ 3rd: U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids, state unemployment rate 6.9% Colorado’s 6th: U.S. Rep. Jason Crow, state unemployment rate 6.7% Texas’ 32nd: U.S. Rep. Colin Allred, state unemployment rate 6.8% Oklahoma’s 5th: U.S. Rep. Kendra Horn, state unemployment rate 5.7% Arizona’s 2nd: U.S. Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, state unemployment rate 5.9% Iowa’s 1st: U.S. Rep. Abby Finkenauer, state unemployment rate 6.0% Iowa’s 3rd: U.S. Rep. Cindy Axne, state unemployment rate 6.0% Illinois’ 14th: U.S. Rep. Lauren Underwood, state unemployment rate 11.0% Illinois’ 6th: U.S. Rep. Sean Casten, state unemployment rate 11.0% Georgia’s 6th: U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath, state unemployment rate 5.6% Maine’s 2nd: U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, state unemployment rate 6.9% South Carolina’s 1st: U.S. Rep. Joe Cunningham, state unemployment rate 6.3% Michigan’s 8th: U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin, state unemployment rate 8.7% Michigan’s 11th: U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens, state unemployment rate 8.7% New Mexico’s 2nd: U.S. Rep. Xochitl Torres Small, state unemployment rate 11.3% California’s 10th: U.S. Rep. Josh Harder, state unemployment rate 11.4% California’s 39th: U.S. Rep. Gil Cisneros, state unemployment rate 11.4% California’s 45th: U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, state unemployment rate 11.4% California’s 49th: U.S. Rep. Mike Levin, state unemployment rate 11.4% California’s 48th: U.S. Rep. Harley Rouda, state unemployment rate 11.4% Washington’s 8th: U.S. Rep. Kim Schrier, state unemployment rate 8.5% Utah’s 4th: U.S. Rep. Ben McAdams, state unemployment rate 4.1% In other words, Pelosi’s refusal to deal with Senate Republicans on phase four legislation — putting millions of small business at risk once again — has hurt Democratic-run states and Democrats the most. Pelosi and House Democrats are punishing their own constituents with the consequences of some of the most restrictive pandemic lockdowns — with no relief in sight with the election right around the corner. What is Pelosi thinking? Manning concluded, “House Democrats clearly oppose reopening the economy in this vital time, and they own Pelosi’s policy of leaving the country shut down forever destroying the hopes and dreams of millions of working families.” This could come back to bite in November. No President has flipped the House in a reelection bid since Harry Truman in 1948, but with working families who are suffering the most, expect President Trump and House Republicans to make their case that they’ve been ready to get the small business and other relief extended for months. Pelosi and Democrats might find themselves wishing they had made a deal when they had a chance. Tags: Robert Romano, Americans for Limited Government, Pelosi Holds, Millions Of Small Businesses Hostage, While Working Families, Struggle—AgainTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
The Real Threat Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Poses to Democrats
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 05:34 PM PDT by Don Purdum: On Saturday, September 26, President Donald Trump selected his third Supreme Court nominee to fill the vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death. This nomination has all the trappings of a major meltdown by Democrats. The media is portraying the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett as life and death. If confirmed by the Senate, and that’s almost a certainty, she will change the court from leaning conservative to fully conservative for decades to come. That could ruin the hopes and dreams of liberals and the far left who won’t have the court to protect them. However, that may not be the real reason Democrats are in an uproar. Despite claims of fairness and waiting until after the election, that’s not the real issue. Yes, some in the media and on the left want to make a case against her foundation of Catholicism for overturning Roe v. Wade. That’s just a part of it. There’s one major issue that’s driving her nomination that has them in a stir. Judge Barrett’s feminism. Ginsburg’s Feminism Paths the TrailRuth Bader Ginsburg was a feminist trailblazer who pushed America to reevaluate the roles men and women played in society. She challenged discrimination in the workplace. Ginsburg helped make it possible for women like Amy Coney Barrett to find avenues of professional success. However, in Ginsburg’s form of 1970’s feminism, she also equated abortion as a central issue regarding gender equality. Much of that has purveyed to this day. What the feminist movement did, according to some, was distort the shared responsibilities for children between men and women and promoted a perspective that pregnancy was a consumer choice. Some argue that abortion wouldn’t need to be so readily available if society were more favorable to workplace accommodations and the government was financially supportive of families. Ginsburg often argued that abortion was necessary because of these inequalities. New Type of Feminism Could Replace the OldBarrett changes that perception and reality. She’s a happily married 48-year-old mother of 7 children, 2 of whom are adopted. She has managed a full-time job as a busy appeals court judge who ascended to be a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States. Her life is the epitome of the one that the pro-choice movement said isn’t possible, yet claimed to be fighting for. Instead of fighting against her, perhaps they should be evaluating her success and ask how she did what they said for so long wasn’t possible. Her Husband Is the KeyThe nuclear family is widely given credit for the rise in America’s strength. For decades, left-wing feminists and politicians have tried to destroy that reality. Yet, Barrett is the living example that can’t be ignored or denied. On Saturday, the Supreme Court nominee credited her husband and their family for her success. She talked about how he helps take care of their children, and that they work together to establish family responsibilities. As they did so together, their family and professional lives thrived. The Barrett’s demonstrate, not talk about in theory, how their shared responsibilities empower their family life and careers. The Barrett’s Life Exposes Feminism and AbortionThe message the Barrett’s are sending is a direct threat to liberalism. Yet, without Ginsburg’s idea of feminism, it would not have led to Judge Barrett’s. Her story proves that society can move beyond the old conversation of abortion. In the future, America may no longer even be talking about abortion. It won’t be relevant. Instead, America may be evaluating how to reconsider the way we work, structure family, and raise children in a shared environment between moms and dads. Liberals will fight to preserve their political power even though the outcome is the one they have desired for decades. It’s sad but true. The hearings will likely be contentious. In the end, this could be the beginning of the end for today’s brand of liberalism. Listen closely to what’s said and not said in Judge Barrett’s hearings, and it may become self-evident. Tags: Don Purdum, RightWing.org, The Real Threat, Supreme Court Nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, Poses to Democrats To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
CNBC Hires Former Fox Anchor To Bash Trump
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 04:01 PM PDT by Cliff Kincaid: CNBC has been a good source for stock market updates and “Shark Tank” programs about new products. Its daytime schedule is best known for the antics of Jim Cramer, a booster of pot stocks who also provides analysis of financial markets. On Wednesday, however, former Fox News gay anchor Shepard Smith begins hosting his own Trump-bashing program on CNBC. This marks a definite turn to the left for the business channel. Dozens of ads have been appearing, trying to convince the CNBC audience that Smith will provide just the “facts,” even the “truth.” CNBC describes the program as the channel’s nightly newscast “providing deep, non-partisan coverage and perspective on the day’s most important stories.” But the commentator is best known for his disgust for those who reject his liberal opinions masquerading as news. The one-hour show, “The News with Shepard Smith” premiers on September 30 at 7:00 pm EST. One of the major homosexual power players in the media, Smith was a closeted gay early in his career but then began to talk openly about his lifestyle choices and attended a National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association event in 2014 with other Fox News employees. It later became the Association of LGBTQ Journalists. But he left Fox News in a controversy as the audience rejected his heavy-handed approach and his ratings lagged far behind the conservative news channel anchors. Described as “often” critical of President Donald Trump, he had completely dropped any pretense of objectivity on his show. When the far-left Huffington Post in 2016 proclaimed Smith “the future” of Fox News, many conservatives started looking elsewhere for news and information. However, Smith left Fox News in 2019, having achieved notoriety as the only gay anchor at the channel. His poor ratings took their toll. Later, he emerged from obscurity and donated $500,000 to the Committee to Protect Journalists, in order to protest criticism of the media. “Intimidation and vilification of the press is now a global phenomenon,” Smith said. “We don’t have to look far for evidence of that.” Hence, Smith apparently believes it is improper for Trump to defend his administration against unfair press criticism by activists posing as journalists. His decision to join CNBC, a sister network of Trump-hating MSNBC, is regarded as an attempt to inject more bias into a channel the normal CNBC business-oriented audience might not expect or anticipate. It’s comparable to making ESPN, once known for sports, into an arm of Black Lives Matter. Indeed, the debut of the Shepard Smith show, just weeks before the election, is apparently designed to add one more anti-Trump commentator to the cacophony of anti-Trump voices already in the media, and therefore sway some votes against the president on November 3. The danger for CNBC is that it will lose its edge as a business channel giving objective analysis of the financial markets, driving members of its business audience away. “Haters are going to hate” is how Shepard Smith, then with Fox News, referred to supporters of Christian clerk Kim Davis when she opposed gay marriage. It was perhaps the most notorious example of his displeasure with those rejecting his lifestyle choices. In fact, Fox News, CNBC, and scores of media organizations have served as sponsors of the Association of LGBTQ Journalists. This is the group that dictates, through an actual “stylebook,” how to use “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender & queer terminology.” Sponsors of the group’s upcoming convention include AARP, CNN, CBS News, Bloomberg, Fox, the Google News Lab, the Democracy Fund, McClatchy, the Facebook Journalism Project, and NBCUniversal, parent of CNBC. But in addition to attacking Christians as “haters,” Smith complained on the air on Fox News that those turning out in support of Christian clerk Kim Davis and her stand against gay marriage were being “divisive.” He said Davis was surrounded by “grandstanders,” such as the “ridiculous” Mike Huckabee, a presidential candidate and former governor of Arkansas who served as a host of a talk show on the Fox News Channel. His daughter later served as Trump’s press secretary. On his show about Davis, Smith mocked her for having been married several times and having kids out of wedlock, not mentioning her religious conversion to Christianity that turned her life around and led her to take a stand against signing gay marriage licenses. Smith said, “Ms. Davis apparently believes in the sanctity of marriage to the degree that she’s been married a total of four times. In fact, she got pregnant with her third husband’s children while married to her first husband. But fear not: her second husband adopted them.” Davis was the target of this venom because she had objected on religious liberty grounds to putting her name and government title on licenses for homosexual marriages. She spent six days in jail. Later, she met with Pope Francis during his trip to the United States, a visit arranged by his ambassador to the United States, Archbishop Carlo Vigano. Francis removed Vigano, a traditionalist, from his post and Vigano has emerged as a fierce critic of Francis, declaring in letters that a Deep State with secular and demonic spiritual elements and a “Deep Church” are trying to destroy the Donald J. Trump presidency. He says, “Presidential elections in November represent an epochal challenge, a biblical challenge, the outcome of which will be decisive not only for the United States of America but for the whole world.” CNBC enters into this conflict with a noted proponent of the gay lifestyle who also wants to take down Trump. CNBC has taken sides. This can only hurt ratings. Tags: Cliff Kincaid, Renew America, CNBC Hires, Former Fox Anchor, To Bash TrumpTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
FBI Agent on Flynn Case Didn’t See Predicate For Russia Probe, Says Mueller Team Was Out to ‘Get Trump’
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 03:45 PM PDT by Debra Heine: An FBI agent who was assigned to the bureau’s investigation into Michael Flynn in 2016 told the Justice Department that he believes there was never a valid predicate for the Russia probe, and that the prosecution of Flynn was just a means to “get Trump.” The agent also claims in the explosive new interview transcripts that he overheard members of the Special Counsel team joking about “wiping” their phones.
Agent William Barnett, who played a lead role in the Flynn investigation (codenamed Operation Razor), was interviewed by Justice Department prosecutors earlier this month. Last year, Attorney General Bill Barr asked Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen to review the case against Flynn. Barnett told Jensen’s investigators that he thought the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe was “opaque” and “with little detail concerning specific evidence of criminal events.” “Barnett thought the case theory was ‘supposition on supposition,’” the investigators wrote in the 302, adding that he believed the “predication” of Operation Hurricane was “not great,” and “a dead end. He said that it “was not clear” what the “persons opening the case wanted to ‘look for or at’” and that various theories were “groping.” After six weeks of investigating, Barnett said he was “still unsure of the basis of the investigation concerning Russia and the Trump campaign without a specific criminal allegation.” After the 2016 election, Barnett said he asked other agents on the Flynn case what they thought “the end game” was, and suggested that they interview the general and close the case “unless derogatory information was obtained.” Remarkably, he said he was “cautioned against” an interview of Flynn, because the other agents were afraid it would “alert Flynn as to the investigation.” Barnett said he argued that Flynn’s position as White House national security adviser in the incoming Trump administration “offered an opportunity for the FBI to conduct the interview without alerting any suspicion and Flynn would see such an interview as being standard procedure.” The agent saw the interview with Flynn as a “last step taken prior to closing the case,” which he believed to be a dead end. Barnett’s request for an interview with Flynn went “up the chain,” according to the 302, but his request was denied. Barnett said that between Christmas and New years of 2016, he was told to close the Razor investigation, and so he began working on a document to close the case. He said he wanted to include in the report non-derogatory information that had turned up during the investigation, and his request for an interview, but those requests were denied. On January 4, Barnett says an analyst on the case emailed him with additional information for his closing document. Later that day, Barnett received a message from another agent, asking him to not close the file because then-special agent Peter Strzok had new information regarding Flynn, presumably the transcript between Trump’s incoming national security advisor and the Russian ambassador. Barnett said that after reading the [REDACTED] two times, that he did not see the significance of the new information, or what “the rub” was. He said that he was told it was a potential Logan Act violation, which he didn’t view as a “serious, stand alone charge.” arnett says he had no part of the eventual FBI interview (ambush) of Flynn at the White House on January 25, and was not even told about it ahead of time. When he heard about it, he said he assumed that it was just a “check the box” interview to close the case (rather than to set Flynn up.) In hindsight, he said that he believes that he was “cut out” of the interview. In early February 2017, Barnett requested that he be taken off the case, which he believed by this time was “problematic and could result in an inspector general investigation.” “Barnett still did not see any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government,” the 302 states. “Barnett was willing to follow any instructions being given by the deputy director as long as it was not a violation of the law.” Barnett described the FBI’s investigation into Flynn as “top down” as “direction concerning the investigation was coming from senior officials,” naming specifically then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. Barnett, in the spring of 2017, was asked to give a briefing on the Flynn investigation to a group of attorneys from the Special Counsel’s Office, including Jeanne Rhee. “Barnett said he briefly went over the investigation, including the assessment that there was no evidence of a crime, and then discussed [REDACTED], which he thought was the more significant investigation,” the 302 stated. Barnett told investigators that he thought “Rhee was obsessed with Flynn and Russia and she had an agenda.” A day following the briefing, Barnett said he was contacted by former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who said “he really wanted Barnett to work with the special counsel’s office.” Barnett said he told Strzok that he “did not wish to pursue the collusion investigation as it was ‘not there,’” Ultimately, however, Barnett decided to work with Mueller’s team, “hoping his perspective would keep them from ‘group think.’” According to the 302, Barnett said that he believed the appointment of Mueller in May 2017 “changed everything.” He described the Mueller probe as “‘upside down’ with attorneys drafting search warrants and getting agents to simply act as affiants,” the 302 stated. “Barnett thought there was a ‘get Trump’ attitude by some at the SCO,” the 302 continued. One example Barnett shared was comments made by the president, saying investigators “needed to ‘get to the bottom’ of a matter. One of the SCO attorneys said Trump wanted to ‘cover it up.’” Barnett “corrected it saying, ‘no, he said get to the bottom of it.’” Another example Barnett recalled ”was when the president fired FBI Director James Comey, which he said was interpreted as “obstruction when it could just as easily have been done because Trump did not like Comey and wanted him replaced.” Barnett went on to tell investigators that it seemed that the attorneys on Mueller’s team “wanted to be part of something ‘big,’ a successful prosecution.” “There was a lack of letting the evidence lead the investigation and more the attitude of ‘the evidence is there we just have to find it,’” Barnett’s 302 stated. McFarland said in a radio interview last February that Mueller’s team pressured her through hell to either cop a plea or implicate other Trump associates in crimes, even though she didn’t think she or they did anything wrong. She said the contentious interrogation actually left her “traumatized.” “They gave me the distinct impression after … 20, 30, 40 hours of hell that they wanted me to either plead guilty to a crime I didn’t feel I committed, or to talk about other people having done things that I didn’t think they had done,” she explained at the time. “Barnett said it seems there was always someone at SCO who claimed to have a lead on information that would prove collusion, only to have the information be a dead end,” the 302 stated. According to the 302, Barnett said the SCO issued him a cellular phone, which he said he did not “wipe.” Barnett said he did overhear other agents “comically” talking about wiping their SCO-issued cellular phones. After months of being hounded and threatened by Mueller’s deputies, Flynn in December of 2017, finally pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the FBI regarding his communications with the Russian ambassador. Barnett said “some individuals” in Mueller’s office “assumed Flynn was lying to cover up collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” Federal prosecutors, earlier this year, moved to dismiss Flynn’s case — in which he had previously pleaded guilty to providing false statements to the FBI — after FBI records called into question the circumstances surrounding Flynn’s interview with investigators. The Justice Department maintained that the FBI’s interview of Flynn was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.” Tags: American Greatness, Debra Heine, FBI Agent. on Flynn Case. Didn’t See Predicate. For Russia Probe, Says Mueller Team. Was Out to, ‘Get Trump’To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Minneapolis Plan To Defund The Police Collapses, City Council Members ‘Regret’ Making Pledge
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 03:35 PM PDT by Emily Zanotti: Minneapolis, Minnesota’s plan to defund and then disband their local police force has “collapsed” according to a New York Times report from over the weekend. Some of the Minneapolis City Council members who pledged to abolish the city’s law enforcement — including the City Council president — now say they regret making that promise. The Times headline blares that the “pledge to dismantle the police department has collapsed,” and notes that “a majority of City Council members promised to ‘end policing as we know it’” after George Floyd died while in the custody of the Minneapolis police department. Instead, though “they became a case study in how idealistic calls for structural change can falter.” Back in June, the Minneapolis City Council was clear that the Minneapolis Police Department was on borrowed time. The City Council president, Lisa Bender — a self-described progressive — told residents that she had a vision of a “transformative new model of public safety” and now-famously added that anyone worried that a lack of law enforcement would result in a spike in crime was speaking from a place of “privilege.” At the time, Bender even challenged her fellow councilmembers to stick with the plan to dismantle the MPD, lest they be complicit in “white supremacy.” “If you are a comfortable white person asking to dismantle the police I invite you to reflect: are you willing to stick with it? Will you be calling in three months to ask about garage break-ins? Are you willing to dismantle white supremacy in all systems, including a new system?” she mused. She got the timeline nearly right — for herself. Bender is now among those who say abolishing the police is not the right approach. “Councilor Andrew Johnson, one of the nine members who supported the pledge in June, said in an interview that he meant the words ‘in spirit,’ not by the letter,” according to the NY Times. “Another councilor, Phillipe Cunningham, said that the language in the pledge was “up for interpretation” and that even among council members soon after the promise was made, ‘it was very clear that most of us had interpreted that language differently.”’ “Lisa Bender, the council president, paused for 16 seconds when asked if the council’s statement had led to uncertainty at a pivotal moment for the city,” the NY Times adds. “’I think our pledge created confusion in the community and in our wards,’ she said.” Over the last month, Minneapolis officials have moved to “formalize a retreat that has quietly played out in Minneapolis in the months since George Floyd was killed by the police and the ensuing national uproar over the treatment of Black Americans by law enforcement and the country at large. After a summer that challenged society’s commitment to racial equality and raised the prospect of sweeping political change, a cool autumn reality is settling in,” the NY Times reports. “National polls show decreasing support for Black Lives Matter since a sea change of goodwill in June. In Minneapolis, the most far-reaching policy efforts meant to address police violence have all but collapsed,” the outlet adds. That’s partly because Minneapolis has experienced an unprecedented spike in violent crime, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, and partly because the City Council had no plans beyond defunding and dismantling the police department — something the city’s charter explicitly disallows. Tags: Minneapolis, Plan To, Defund The Police, Collapses, City Council Members ‘Regret,’ Making PledgeTo share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
Why House Republicans, and Maybe Some Democrats, Want to Remove Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 01:48 PM PDT by Rachel del Guidice: Conservatives who make up the House Freedom Caucus last week forced a meeting of the House’s entire Republican conference to discuss a motion “to vacate the chair,” which is a push to force Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to step down. The Freedom Caucus has worked on this effort to remove Pelosi since July. What was the deciding factor in going ahead now? How does the motion to vacate work, especially given the House’s Democrat majority? Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., chairman of the Freedom Caucus, joins “The Daily Signal Podcast” to discuss. Rachel del Guidice: I’m joined today on “The Daily Signal Podcast” by Congressman Andy Biggs of Arizona, who is also the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus. Congressman Biggs, it’s always great to have you on “The Daily Signal Podcast.” Rep. Andy Biggs: Thanks, Rachel. Good to be with you. Del Guidice: Thanks for making the time to be with us. Well, on Wednesday, the House Freedom Caucus forced a meeting of the entire House Republican Conference to discuss the motion to vacate the chair, which is a push to get House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to step down. Can you tell us about what’s going on here? Biggs: Yes. When Nancy Pelosi became speaker, because she had the majority, she changed the rules to make it very, very difficult to remove the speaker. Wonder why? This is not a coincidence. One of the things that we have to do is we have to get our minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, to make the motion. In order for him to make the motion, we have to go through the rules of our body, and so we were able to, the House Freedom Caucus, get enough signatures on board of people who want to see a change in the speaker to force the debate. So, we had the debate last Wednesday that Speaker Pelosi should be removed. We know that. We all know that. The question is, was the timing appropriate? And we had a very good discussion within conference. Del Guidice: The House Freedom Caucus has been working on this effort since July. Can you talk about what was the deciding factor to go ahead with this right now? Biggs: Well, we’ve been pushing it, as you say, for months, even with a draft of a resolution to remove her done, but what really pushed everybody over the limit is this notion that she would even allow the suggestion of impeachment of the president for engaging in his constitutional prerogative, not just prerogative, but his obligation. I mean, the American people elected him to be the president of the United States for a full four years, and part of his duty is to fill Supreme Court vacancies. And so, this notion that you would impeach him for doing a constitutionally required duty, which is just a step too far, and then her rhetoric in the recent couple of weeks has just been absolutely abysmal and demeaning to the institution. So, that was the last straw. Del Guidice: Well, Congressman, that was actually one of my next questions, just talking about how Pelosi is threatening to, again, impeach the president for the second time this year for doing his job, as you highlighted, which is nominating a justice to fill the vacancy that was created by Justice [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg. So, what is her motivation here when he is just trying to fulfill the dictates of his role? Biggs: Well, what she said is that they want to do anything, and the Democrats in the Senate have said the same thing. They will do anything to stop this nomination. That’s an outrageous statement in and of itself. I mean, you have a really, really qualified individual, but what she’s wanting to do is even though the House has, virtually, nothing to do with the advice and consent, we just are observers, … she said it, basically, that she wanted to create a distraction, a distraction for this administration. So, while they’re in a very contentious confirmation process, she wanted to tie down everybody that she possibly could in the White House by impeaching the president. Then secondarily, she’s also said she wants to impeach the attorney general, Bill Barr. So, when you hear that type of thing, you say, “This is a raw abuse of power, and it can’t stand.” We’re a majoritarian country, but the rights of the minority, which in this case would be Republicans in the House, need to be protected. And so, that was one of our goals, is to say, “Look, she needs to be removed.” … In fact, I would tell you that there’s largely consensus in the body that she needs to be removed. And if she actually does try to go through with any of this, the minority leader has said that he will make that motion posthaste, which is a privileged motion. So, it would get immediate attention. It’s despicable that they would attempt to use impeachment. I mean, what they did last time was impeachment because they don’t like the president. This time, they would use it as a distraction, because they don’t like the fact that he got to appoint [Judge] Amy Coney Barrett. Del Guidice: Can you talk a little bit about how the motion to vacate works, especially given the Democrat majority in the House? Biggs: The way it works is the minority leader would file the motion with the clerk and bring it up immediately when we were on the floor and they would have to recognize they cannot not recognize him, they must recognize him, and he would make a privileged motion to vacate, which means to remove the speaker. What would happen at that point is that we anticipate any ways that the Democrats would move to table or to set that motion to vacate aside, and we would then have a motion on that. That would be the telling motion. That would be effectively saying you support Pelosi or you don’t support Pelosi, you support the removal or you don’t support the removal, all in that motion to table. We anticipate that there could be as many as 15 or 20 Democrats that would cross over and vote with the Republicans. If that were the case, then you would have a good chance of actually removing Nancy Pelosi. Del Guidice: I was actually going to ask you too, are there any in her own party, and you did allude to this in your answer, mentioning that you think 10 or 15 Democrats might cross over and vote to remove her, but do you think there are those in her own party who are frustrated by her leadership? Biggs: Oh, absolutely. Absolutely, they are. They’re quiet publicly about it. I know that they’ve had some very contentious conference meetings, but moreover, some of my colleagues who are friends from the other side have expressed to me their frustration with her. Some believe that she’s not far enough left, others believe that the more Marxist side of the Democrats have co-opted her speakership. But what she has, Rachel, and this is important for everyone to understand, is she raises just bucket loads of money. And so, she’s so effective at keeping her conference together because she does raise an awful lot of money. Del Guidice: A we look at the situation, and potentially … the House removing her, who would you all want to replace Pelosi with? Biggs: Well, there’s so many people that I think would probably do a job of being fair, but it wouldn’t surprise me if somebody like a [Rep. James] Clyburn would come into play because I think that he would have the support of a fairly broad number of the Democratic Conference. I think that he would also be a fair broker. I don’t think that he would ram this stuff down our throats. I think that he would also encourage his chairman instead of to violate the rules, to follow the rules. … I mean, to violate the rules when you’re the majority is silly because you always have the votes, you know you always have the votes. And so, when you try to prevent the members of at least one of the committees I sit on from actually raising a point of order or discussing issues, what you’re doing is you’re saying, “You know what, not only do we have the majority, but we’re not going to follow the rules. We’re not going to have decorum here. We’re not going to allow you to even have your say and represent your district here.” That’s what’s happened here, and that’s how this whole body has been denigrated, because the speaker has allowed that to go on. Del Guidice: Switching gears just a bit here, last week, you had a special order on the House to find out about who’s been funding the recent riots we’ve seen all across this country. Can you tell us a little bit about that? Biggs: Yeah. We’re able to control the floor for an hour and bring in people, many from the Freedom Caucus, but others from around the body as well, to come in and talk about a couple of things. No. 1, the police have been mercilessly attacked. No. 2, even Democrats who run some of these cities have acknowledged that these riots are coordinated. And so, if you have coordination, then you know you’ve got organization. The RICO Statutes, for instance, are very, very broad and allow for prosecution of a RICO, a civil RICO case, just on a conspiracy type of issue. And so, we wanted to forward the questions about the organizations, who’s out there? Who is coordinating these riots? Who is coordinating and giving material? Over the last week, you’ve seen U-Hauls coming to some of these locations, filled with tools of rioting and causing mayhem. Somebody is organizing, and with somebody organizing, we need some people to come in and investigate, make arrests, and prosecute. And the best place to do that, and which we’re all very frustrated about, is not necessarily Congress, which has some authority and some power to investigate, but is the Federal Bureau of Investigation. That’s who should be conducting these investigations. We’re not seeing that, and it’s been very, very frustrating to us. And so, that’s why we did the special order last week. Del Guidice: On that note, Heritage Foundation and senior fellow Mike Gonzalez recently did some investigative reporting himself, and in an exclusive commentary he did last week for The Daily Signal, he wrote that Alicia Garza, who’s one of the three founders of the Black Lives Matter organization, had partnered with the left-wing San Francisco group that’s known to carry water for China, which is the Chinese Progressive Association. I’m just curious, did you happen to see this? And what is your perspective? I mean, we just talked about the FBI. Should Congress get involved? Who should investigate this? What should happen? Biggs: Yes, Rachel, I did see the piece, and I saw several other what I would call more attenuated discussions of something similar, but the point is it was a great piece, but it also begs the question of, when will we see the Federal Bureau of Investigation? Again, I used that term. That’s what they’re supposed to be doing, investigating these people and bringing them to bear. We leave that there. That’s the executive branch arm that’s supposed to be doing that. But Congress also has a duty and an ability to conduct investigations. The problem that we have, Rachel, without getting political, I’ll just say that the other side controls and the other side doesn’t want to have investigations. You have to understand that my colleagues across the aisle, they don’t even want to acknowledge that these are not peaceful protests. A lot of reporters just stand in front of burning buildings and say these are peaceful protests, or mostly peaceful protests, and that they’d been co-opted. Well, who’s co-opting them? They don’t want to find out who’s co-opting these ostensible peaceful protests, and Congress does have committees. That Judiciary Committee is uniquely set up to conduct some of these investigations. Homeless Security could, Government Reform could, even Intelligence could, if those chairmen were willing and interested in getting to the bottom of this and bringing order and stability and security and safety back into our country, but they’re not interested in that. They’re very comfortable with the discord that’s going on because they have a political agenda. And it’s a shame to me, that’s a shame to me, because Congress should be doing that, we should be bringing these people in, we should be helping get to the bottom of this and forwarding what information we obtained through our investigations to the Department of Justice. And that’s simply not going to happen under a Pelosi regime. Del Guidice: I know we talked a little bit about this at the beginning, but I did want to circle back to this at the end, I realize all the action in the Senate, but I wanted to get your thoughts on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett and how you hope the Senate proceeds as we ramp up to confirmation hearings. Biggs: Well, first thing I’ll tell you is I hope the Senate proceeds with alacrity. They need to move swiftly on this. I think they’ve committed to doing that. The good news is a lot of the Democrats don’t want to even meet with Amy Coney Barrett. That’s fantastic. That’ll make the process go a lot swifter, and a quick confirmation would be good for the country and be good for Amy Coney Barrett personally. That’d be good for the United States Supreme Court. She is a marvelous pick. … Before [Brett Kavanaugh] was appointed and she was on the list, I looked very carefully to her opinions, at her writings or speeches. I looked at her character. She is a person with an unassailable personal character. She is a person of integrity and compassion, and she is a great human being, … the left can attack her on that, but she’s also unbelievably qualified. They can attack her on her qualifications. She graduated summa cum laude, she’s a graduate, she’s No. 1 in her class, she is published, she gives speeches, she’s consistent, her opinions are well-reasoned, she’s applying the law, she is an originalist, she is an exceptional person and jurist, and she worked at a highly rated law firm. She’s an excellent lawyer, she’s been a top rated law professor type. This is a uniquely, highly qualified individual. And so, by golly, if you’re going to be objective about it, you would say, “We need to vote for her. … Advice and consent of the Senate would be to confirm.” I don’t think you’ll see that. I think already we’ve seen that they’ve attacked her Catholic faith last week. Rep. [Steve] Cohen from Tennessee basically intimated that President [Donald] Trump’s appointed too many Catholics. That’s despicable. How despicable is that? There is no religious test, constitutionally, either. So, that bigotry is awful. They’ve attacked her for that. They’ve attacked her for adopting children of color from Haiti, for Pete’s sake. How despicable is that? I mean, it’s just outrageous. Then when they find anything with her legal background to attack or her character to attack, then you have Bill Maher that just basically throws ad hominem attacks filled with expletives in it. Really what it boils down to, the question really is more, is Bill Maher capable of expressing himself without expletives and without ad hominem attacks on somebody who is an excellent pick for justice? That is where we are today, Rachel. I’m sad to say, we’ve reached a point where somebody who is incredibly well-qualified is going to be attacked personally for simply not having any personal defects that would prohibit her from being confirmed. It’s going to be a real hellacious battle, but I think it will be swift. Then I think she’ll be confirmed, and then she’ll go on to have a stellar career for many, many years, hopefully several decades, as a Supreme Court justice. Del Guidice: Well, Congressman Biggs, thank you so much for joining us today on “The Daily Signal Podcast.” It’s great to have you. Biggs: Thank you very much. Thanks for having me. Tags: Rachel del Guidice, The Daily Signal, Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz.To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
DOJ Warns San Francisco Officials They Can’t Limit Church To One Congregant At A Time
Posted: 29 Sep 2020 01:25 PM PDT by Mark Tapscott: Department of Justice officials have warned San Francisco authorities that their decree limiting church attendance in the “City by the Bay” to one person at a time is unconstitutional and a violation of every San Franciscan’s right to freedom of religious practice. In a September 25 letter to Mayor London Breed, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Eric Drieband and U.S. Attorney for Northern California David Anderson wrote: “San Francisco’s treatment of places of worship raises serious concerns about religious freedom. In particular, the limitation of indoor worship to one congregant without regard to the size of the place of worship is draconian, out of step with the treatment afforded other similar indoor activities in San Francisco, wholly at odds with this Nation’s traditional understanding of religious liberty, and may violate the First Amendment to the Constitution. “Of course, as mayor, you have a duty to protect the health and safety of the people of San Francisco in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. In exigent circumstances, the Constitution allows some temporary restriction on our liberties that would not be tolerated in normal circumstances. But, there is no pandemic exception to the Constitution. “Individual rights, including the protections in the Bill of Rights, are always operative and restrain government action. Thus, even in times of emergency, when reasonable, narrowly-tailored, and temporary restrictions may lawfully limit our liberty, the First Amendment and federal statutory law continue to prohibit discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers. “These principles are legally binding, and the Constitution’s unyielding protections for religious worshipers distinguish the United States of America from places dominated by tyranny and despotism.” Dreiband and Anderson thus provide a succinct context for assessing all local, state and federal regulations aimed at places of worship in the context of protection of public health. With California and multiple other states and local jurisdictions issuing a flood of such regulations in response to the coronavirus pandemic, Congress is already hearing protests from around the country. Even with federal courts addressing these various protests in litigation, odds are Congress will have to take action at some point in the near future, so congressional aides should find the full text of the Dreiband/Anderson letter to Mayor Breed extremely informative and useful. Tags: Mark Tapscott, Hill Faith, DOJ, Warns, San Francisco, Can’t Limit Chuch,to one Congregant, at a time To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REDSTATE
Hilarious and Great Moments When Trump Laid Biden Low in the First Debate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
AMERICAN SPECTATOR
BIZPAC REVIEW
|
|
ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Wednesday, September 30, 2020
|
Good morning, NBC News readers.
Well, we’ve never seen a presidential debate like that before.
Americans were sideshow spectators last night to a political spectacle that NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell, who has been covering presidential debates since 1976, labelled “a disgrace.”
Here’s what everyone is talking about this Wednesday morning.
|
Trump derails debate as first Biden clash turns into unruly slugfest
The first presidential debate Tuesday quickly devolved into name-calling, shouting and insults as President Donald Trump steamrolled the debate rules and Democratic nominee Joe Biden fired back.
Trump talked constantly through the 90-minute debate, while moderator Chris Wallace tried, without much success, to rein him in.
“I think the country would be better served if we allowed both people to speak with fewer interruptions. I’m appealing to you, sir, to do that,” Wallace told Trump.
But his entreaty was largely ignored and the slugfest of mocking taunts and interruptions continued.
Biden called Trump a “racist,” a “clown” and “the worst president we’ve ever had,” at one point saying, “Will you shut up, man?”
The tone of the debate was unlike that of any televised presidential matchup before, a shift that commentators described as “embarrassing” and a “dumpster fire” fueled by Trump’s disregard for the rules negotiated by his own campaign.
One of the most significant moments of the evening came when Wallace asked the president whether he was willing to condemn white supremacists and “militia” groups that have inflamed violence at nationwide protests.
Trump appeared irritated and demanded to know whom he was being asked to condemn. When the far-right group called the Proud Boys was mentioned, Trump said: “Proud Boys, stand back and stand by,” and then pivoted into an attack on “antifa and the left.”
The extremist group with ties to white nationalism were energized by the shout out and immediately adopted it as a rallying cry on social media.
- Check out some of the other key take-aways from the primetime showdown.
- “Dumped in rivers … creeks … wastepaper baskets”: Trump again pushed debunked claims that mail-in voting is rife with fraud.
- Biden might have embellished a few facts, too: What was true and what was false from the first debate.
- Looking for more on the blow by blow? Read more of our in-depth analysis of the debate as it unfolded last night.
|
Breonna Taylor grand jury records will offer a rare glimpse into secret system
On Wednesday, Kentucky authorities will give the public a rare glimpse at a secret aspect of the criminal justice system when they release recordings of the grand jury that weighed the case of three police officers who opened fire in the raid in Louisville, Kentucky, that killed Breonna Taylor.
The unusual move comes a week after the grand jury indicted one of the officers, Brett Hankison, for wanton endangerment, but did not charge any of the three officers in Taylor’s death.
The lack of other charges set off protests in Louisville and around the country and prompted a motion in court by one of the 12 Jefferson County grand jury members to release records of the panel’s work “so that truth may prevail.”
NBC News’ Jon Schuppe takes an in-depth look at how grand juries became an integral — and divisive — piece of the criminal justice system.
|
‘Fire fatigue’: Evacuations hit wine country as blazes continue to overwhelm California
Napa County residents are being evacuated with more preparing to leave as the Glass Fire scorches through wine country amid a horrific fire season for the West Coast.
Evacuation orders were issued Tuesday as the wildfire expanded to 42,500 acres and zero percent containment over Napa and Sonoma counties, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire.
Authorities said the Glass Fire, which began overnight Sunday, has already destroyed 80 residences.
Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick warned Tuesday that many might be experiencing “fire fatigue”— especially as the three-year mark of the devastating Tubbs fire looms.
“This is our fourth major fire in our community since 2017,” Essick said. “Many people are feeling the effects. Many people are evacuating who have evacuated multiple times.”
|
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
|
Plus
- In a rare public statement, special counsel Robert Mueller defended the Russia probe amid criticism from one his former top prosecutors.
- Disney announced it plans to lay off 28,000 workers amid continued strain from the coronavirus pandemic.
- ‘I Am Woman’ singer Helen Reddy has died. She was 78.
|
THINK about it
Here’s the scariest detail form Trump’s tax return revelations, former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence and NBC News/MSNBC analyst Frank Figliuzzi writes in an opinion piece.
|
Live BETTER
How to deal when you and your partner are political opposites.
|
Shopping
Amazon’s fourth generation Echo and Echo Dot have a whole new look. Here’s what you need to know.
|
Quote of the day
“I hate to raise my voice, but why should I be different than the two of you?”
— Exasperated debate moderator Chris Wallace trying to maintain order on Tuesday night.
|
One funny thing, but not if you’re a ‘Potterhead’
Oh no! Time for a vanishing spell!
Some Harry Potter enthusiasts had waited for hours at a train station in Scotland for a chance to glimpse the “Hogwarts Express” as it passed by.
But a local train got in the way and blocked their view as the famous locomotive chugged by.
Darn! Maybe they’ll have to head to platform Nine and Three-Quarters and try to catch the next one…
|
NBC FIRST READ
|
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Carrie Dann and Melissa Holzberg
FIRST READ: Trump’s last best tactic: Burn it all down
Trailing in the polls with five weeks to go, President Trump didn’t use last night’s debate to disqualify his opponent or outline his vision for the next four years.
Instead, he decided to burn down the debate – by constantly interrupting, not engaging on the substance, offering falsehood after falsehood, and questioning the legitimacy of the upcoming election.
Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images
Joe Biden responded with a few insults of his own (“Will you shut up, man?” “You’re the worst president America has ever had”).
Biden didn’t put away the race with his debate performance last night, but Trump certainly bailed him out:
- by ensuring that the spectacle of last night’s train wreck would be the top takeaway.
- by not even trying to change this race from a referendum on him into a choice versus Biden.
- by refusing to denounce white supremacists when he was given the opportunity.
- and by attempting to delegitimize the entire debate.
(And the president couldn’t have asked for friendlier issue terrain last night, with more time and questions spent on the Supreme Court and law and order/protests than on the coronavirus.)
We get Trump’s goal from last night: He wanted to demoralize the other side, essentially saying: “You’re stuck with me the next four years.”
But is that going to work – with turnout expected to be sky-high, as well as the huge turnout we saw in the 2018 midterms?
They say presidential debates can offer revealing moments about the candidates.
Well, last night was revealing in this respect: Trump is who he is. And he’s never going to change.
|
So which candidate painted the more accurate picture?
Here’s another way to look at last night’s debate:
The portrait of Trump that Biden and Democrats were trying to paint is that the president is a bully, a fraud and has no plan – either when it comes to the coronavirus or the next four years,
What did the public see last night?
And the portrait of Biden that Trump and Republicans were trying to paint is that Biden is captive to the Democratic left and that he’s senile.
What did the public see last night?
|
TWEET OF THE DAY: Pretty clear who fared better with this focus group
|
DATA DOWNLOAD: The numbers you need to know today
7,227,598: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 44,412 more than yesterday morning.)
207,232: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 937 more than yesterday morning.)
103.16 million: The number of coronavirus tests that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.
48 percent to 41 percent: The share of debate watchers who said that Biden won last night’s debate versus those who thought Trump won, per a CBS snap poll.
More than 9 million: The number of mail ballots that had been requested through Monday in Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maine and Iowa.
52 percent: The share of those 9 million ballots that were requested by Democrats. (Just 28 percent were requested by Republicans; the rest were unaffiliated.)
28,000: The number of workers being laid off by Disney due to strain from Covid limitations.
|
2020 VISION: The day after the debate
On the campaign trail today: Joe and Jill Biden embark on a train tour, departing in Cleveland, then visiting Pittsburgh, Latrobe, Pa., and Johnstown, Pa… And Donald Trump holds a rally in Duluth, Minn., at 9:00 pm ET.
|
You spin me right round
After the debate came to an end, Team Trump quickly tried to spin the president’s words to far-right extremist group, Proud Boys, to “stand back and stand by,” NBC’s Hallie Jackson, Monica Alba and Shannon Pettypiece report:
“Allies are trying to create confusion: Donald Trump Jr. appeared on CBS and said the president said ‘stand down.’ When corrected, Don Jr. said he didn’t know if it was a ‘misspeak’ and said ‘he’s talking about having them stand down.’ Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh also tried to tell us it was “stand down,” and in the president’s defense claimed that he just last week named the KKK a terror organization (he did not – the president, at an event focused on Black economic empowerment, pledged to prosecute the KKK as a terror org if he’s reelected.)”
And from Team Biden, deputy campaign director and communications director Kate Bedingfield committed that Biden will continue to show up to the debates:
“Yes, we are going to the debate. You know, in terms of discuss ongoing discussions with the commission about, you know, formats and rules in those conversations are always ongoing that’s a continuing process as we move through these debates. So I would imagine there will be some additional conversations but yes, we are, we are committing to attending the debates.”
|
Ad Watch from Liz Brown-Kaiser
Today’s spotlight is a new ad push across five battleground states from the main Super PAC backing President Trump’s re-election.
America First Action announced Tuesday that it’s spending $40 million on TV, digital, and mail advertisements between this week and Election Day in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. (Note where they’re NOT running: Michigan and Minnesota, where Trump travels today.)
The first spot out Wednesday is airing in the Philadelphia market, and warns that Joe Biden will raise taxes on day one of his presidency and shut the country down again to combat Covid-19.
“Joe Biden. The times are tough. The man is too weak,” the narrator says.
The Super PAC’s coming ads will also focus on the economy and argue that Biden would hurt America’s comeback as president.
|
THE LID: “LOL nothing matters”? Or something else?
Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we looked at the voters who are up for grabs and asked whether anything about the debates could move them.
|
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world?
The Washington Post’s debate lede: “The presidential campaign devolved into chaos and acrimony here Tuesday night as President Trump incessantly interrupted and insulted Democratic nominee Joe Biden while the two sparred over the economy, the coronavirus pandemic, the Supreme Court and race relations in their first debate.”
The New York Times’ lede: “The first presidential debate between President Trump and Joseph R. Biden Jr. unraveled into an ugly melee Tuesday, as Mr. Trump hectored and interrupted Mr. Biden nearly every time he spoke and the former vice president denounced the president as a “clown” and told him to “shut up.”
The AP’s lede:“The first debate between President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden deteriorated into bitter taunts and near chaos Tuesday night as Trump repeatedly interrupted his opponent with angry — and personal — jabs that sometimes overshadowed the sharply different visions each man has for a nation facing historic crises.”
What was true and what was false in the debate? Our fact check team has you covered.
Sahil Kapur offers four takeaways from the chaotic night.
Members of the Proud Boys are thrilled with Trump’s comments about and to them during the debate.
Biden says he’ll participate in the next two debates, but many Democrats say he should demand changes to the rules.
NBC will host a town hall with Joe Biden in Miami on Monday.
New documents show that President Trump offered Amy Coney Barrett the Supreme Court slot the same day he met with her.
Barrett is not committing to recusing herself from 2020 election cases.
|
CBS
|
|
|
|
IJR
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
LOUDER WITH CROWDER
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
|
|||||||||||
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
|
SARA A. CARTER
TWITCHY
|
|
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
ZEROHEDGE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
HOOVER INSTITUTE
|