Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Tuesday July 28, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
THE RESURGENT
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may have read our articles on our website, but did you know we have a print edition as well?
Each week our team of reporters, editors, and designers produce a beautifully designed broadsheet newspaper with the best of our in-depth content. It includes news and opinion, as well as inspiring content in our Life & Tradition section, advice on healthy living in our Mind & Body section, our amazing Food section, and puzzles—a reader favorite.
It’s a reading experience you don’t want to miss!
Try the paper yourself for just $1 and get a free gift.
Cancel anytime
|
To an increasing number of people, America’s policy of “engagement” with China’s communist dictatorship has proven to be a deadly mistake.
|
Copyright © 2020 The Epoch Times, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive newsletter communications from The Epoch Times.
Our mailing address is:
The Epoch Times
229 W. 28 St. Fl. 5
New York, NY 10001
Click here to unsubscribe.
DAYBREAK
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUDICIAL WATCH
FOX NEWS
JUST THE NEWS
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
AXIOS
Good Tuesday morning! Today’s Smart Brevity™ count … 1,165 words … 4½ minutes.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
The coronavirus recession is creating two parallel economic realities, growing further apart by the day, Axios Markets editor Dion Rabouin reports.
- Many people with financial assets and white-collar jobs have actually benefited from the downturn, while the rest of the country is doing its best to stay afloat.
Evidence of a “K-shaped recovery” — in which some Americans’ fortunes rise while others’ fall — is already visible, Peter Atwater, an adjunct lecturer at William & Mary, tells Axios.
- Wealthy and middle-class asset holders have retained or resumed their jobs. And the value of their assets, like stock portfolios and homes, has risen to all-time highs.
- Blue-collar workers and small business owners, and the half of the U.S. population not invested in the stock market, are enduring unprecedented job losses and business closures.
- Starting Saturday, more than 20 million no longer will receive $600 a week in unemployment benefits.
How it happened: A massive $3 trillion bond buying spree by the Fed and more than $2 trillion in relief spending from Congress have underpinned asset prices.
Nearly half of Americans say they’ve established social “bubbles” of people they can trust amid the virus, managing editor David Nather writes from the new Axios-Ipsos Coronavirus Index.
- Between the lines: The trend isn’t particularly partisan. It’s most common in the suburbs and among women, older adults and people who went to college.
Why it matters: This week’s poll findings suggest that Americans are grappling with the reality that the virus isn’t going away anytime soon.
- 46% of Americans say they know someone who has tested positive.
- 18% say they know someone who has died.
47% of Americans said they’ve established social bubbles, including:
- 51% of women.
- 50% of suburban residents.
- 54% aged 65 and older.
- 51% with a bachelor’s degree or higher.
Between the lines: This is one of the rare movements that isn’t hopelessly split along party lines. 50% of Democrats and 49% of Republicans say they’ve established bubbles, as have 42% of independents.
- 49% of Black Americans, 47% of white Americans, and 41% of Hispanics had established bubbles.
The mayors of Portland and five other major U.S. cities appealed to Congress to make it illegal for the federal government to deploy militarized agents to cities that don’t want them, AP reports.
- The mayors of Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Kansas City, Albuquerque and D.C. wrote: “This administration’s egregious use of federal force on cities over the objections of local authorities should never happen.”
📺 Protest violence is now a prime-time staple on Fox News.
- Tucker Carlson’s show, which can draw 4 million viewers, led last night with: “POLITICAL VIOLENCE IS AN ATTACK ON AMERICA ITSELF … MORE CHAOS & VIOLENCE IN CITIES ACROSS AMERICA.”
🗞️ Local coverage from The Oregonian … People chanted: “Feds go home!”
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus say farewell as the late Rep. John Lewis, a pioneer in the civil rights movement and a 17-term congressman from Georgia, lies in state in the Capitol Rotunda.
- During the memorial service, Speaker Nancy Pelosi turned the microphone over to Lewis himself, playing audio from his address at Emory’s 2014 commencement, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution writes.
- “You must find a way to get in the way,” Lewis’ voice bellowed from loudspeakers. “You must find a way to get in trouble. Good trouble. Necessary trouble.”
All three broadcast networks broke in for hours of live coverage, including the hearse’s journey through Black Lives Matter Plaza in D.C.
Reporters trail Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin after weekly policy luncheons on Capitol Hill yesterday. Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other Republican leaders rolled out a roughly $1 trillion proposal for the next round of coronavirus relief funding, which has the White House’s seal of approval, Axios’ Alayna Treene reports.
- Leaders hope they can pass a final bill by mid-August.
- That’ll be extremely difficult, given stark party differences.
Some key provisions of the Republicans’ HEALS Act:
- Unemployment benefits will be extended, but at 70% of an individual’s lost wages rather than the $600 weekly benefit Americans were receiving under the CARES Act. They will begin as a $200 weekly benefit until states, many of which have outdated systems, are able to calculate the new target.
- The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) will be extended. Small businesses with 300 or fewer employees that show a revenue loss of 50% will be able to apply for a second loan.
- Stimulus checks will be doled out under the same guidelines as in the CARES Act. Direct payments of $1,200 will be available to individuals with a yearly income of up to $75,000.
- Back-to-work child care grants are a key White House priority.
- Schools will get $105 billion. Roughly $70 billion will go toward K-12; schools that reopen will get more immediate access to the money.
- Liability protection, which covers claims against a defendant caused by “an actual, alleged, feared or potential exposure to coronavirus.”
- Share this story.
⚡ New this morning … House Judiciary Committee Democrats plan to press Attorney General Bill Barr at a hearing today on the politicization of the Justice Department. Keep reading.
Moderna’s stock soared 9% on Monday following a new federal grant and the official start of a late-stage trial for the company’s coronavirus vaccine, Axios health care business reporter Bob Herman writes.
- It now has received almost $1 billion in taxpayer funds to help develop a vaccine that is tied to the work of federal scientists.
The company, with no FDA-approved drug on the market, is valued at $31 billion.
Dan Senor — who advised Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, served President George W. Bush and now works in finance — writes in the Financial Times (subscription), “It is too soon to write off Donald Trump’s election chances”:
[Trump should] drop his offensive tributes to symbols and leaders of the Confederacy and instead focus attention on … “cancel culture.” This cause was launched by young progressives who call out or boycott public figures for objectionable behavior. But many other Americans worry that the movement is getting out of hand.
Why it matters: This is Senor’s effort to calm the GOP donor world, which is currently in panic mode.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Virus cases are skyrocketing in states frequently slammed by hurricanes — Texas, Florida and Louisiana, Axios’ Caitlin Owens writes.
- Hurricane Hanna hit the Texas coast over the weekend, testing the response effort in a state that hasn’t been able to get its outbreak under control.
Why it matters: Encouraging people to travel to other cities or states to stay with family, or housing them in crowded gymnasiums and convention centers, isn’t exactly in line with pandemic mitigation practices.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
China has long used its U.S. embassy and consulates to exert control over student groups and collect information on Uighurs and dissidents, reports Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian, author of the weekly Axios China.
The Houston consulate, which the U.S. ordered closed last week, wasn’t even China’s most important espionage hub.
- “San Francisco is the real gem but the U.S. won’t close it,” a former U.S. intelligence official told Axios.
Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios
NASA’s Perseverance rover, heading to Mars on Thursday, aims to pave the way for humans, writes Miriam Kramer, author of the weekly Axios Space newsletter.
NASA has methodically “followed the water” on Mars for 20 years, and progressively found evidence that the planet was once habitable and pinpointed areas where life may have been preserved.
- MOXIE, one of the experiments flying into space this week, is designed to figure out how to draw oxygen from the thin Martian atmosphere.
📱 Thanks for reading Axios AM. Please invite your friends to sign up here.
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
CHICAGO SUNTIMES
15 Chicago schools vote to keep cops so far, but more than 50 yet to vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO TRUMP NEWS
THE HILL
|
ROLL CALL
Morning Headlines
Congress is racing to finish negotiations on another coronavirus relief package as jobless benefits are set to expire this week, but lawmakers are carving out time to honor John Lewis as he lies in state at the Capitol. Read More…
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have wanted to question Attorney General William Barr at an oversight hearing for more than a year, so they have a dizzying list of controversial topics for what promises to be a highly watched showdown Tuesday. Read More…
House GOP candidates join Trump in preaching hysteria
ANALYSIS — Fundraising emails from New York Rep. Lee Zeldin and former Georgia Rep. Karen Handel, who is trying to take back her House seat, provide a window into Republican strategy and demonstrate how far the party will go in making unsubstantiated claims. Read More…
Click here to subscribe to Fintech Beat for the latest market and regulatory developmentsin finance and financial technology.
Stop saving businesses and start saving schools
OPINION — Washington’s priorities always show up in the money it spends. So far, it’s bailed out country clubs, hedge funds, law firms, private schools and even Kanye West’s fashion brand, Yeezy. It’s time to save schools before businesses. Doing that will save both in the end. Read More…
Guard officer: Lafayette Square police tactics ‘disturbing’
A National Guard officer present at the June 1 clearing of protesters from Lafayette Square will testify Tuesday that he found what he saw that day to be “deeply disturbing” and that law enforcement officials were heavy-handed in their tactics, engaging in an “unnecessary escalation” of force. Read More…
Big Tech antitrust hearing could be colossal — or mere theater
The virtual appearance by four of the world’s most powerful technology executives before the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee on Wednesday could be a defining moment for bipartisan efforts to rein in Silicon Valley. Or it could be a political circus. Read More…
Watch: Pelosi yields the floor to Lewis one last time
In a speech eulogizing the late civil rights leader Rep. John Lewis, Speaker Nancy Pelosi yielded the floor for the last time to the Georgia Democrat. A recording of Lewis’ voice echoed in the Rotunda, urging others to get into “good trouble” once again. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2020 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: A trillion-dollar staring contest. Who will blink first?
DRIVING THE DAY
HIGH-STAKES LEGISLATIVE DEBATES aren’t always battles of ideas. They don’t necessarily test the power of persuasion. They’re staring contests between powerful political leaders who are trying to humiliate their opponents, and squeeze as much out of them as possible while seeking to achieve a political and policy victory that’s palatable to the majority of their internal constituency — their colleagues — and their external constituency, the voters.
NO ONE EXCELS at these affairs like Senate Majority Leader MITCH MCCONNELL and Speaker NANCY PELOSI — the respective party leaders. And no one has watched from the sidelines and admired the negotiating game — and longed to get in it — like MARK MEADOWS, the former House Republican from North Carolina and current White House chief of staff.
WASHINGTON IS NOW KICKING OFF what’s shaping up to be a real cliffhanger over another round of coronavirus relief 98 DAYS before Election Day.
A FEW IMPORTANT THINGS HAPPENED MONDAY, and they set the stage for what’s to come. After much haggling over the weekend between the White House and Senate Republicans — and plenty of bruised feelings — MCCONNELL released his negotiation marker Monday.
THE DETAILS matter less at this point because the real talks began Monday evening between PELOSI, MEADOWS, Treasury Secretary STEVEN MNUCHIN and Senate Minority Leader CHUCK SCHUMER. (MCCONNELL didn’t join in, but in order for a bill to become a law, it has to go through him.) MEADOWS is seen by Republicans as a counterbalance to MNUCHIN, who has earned a reputation of working well with Democrats and backchanneling with SCHUMER.
THE GENERAL CONSENSUS of aides in both parties, on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, is that Democrats have a healthy negotiating edge.
REPUBLICAN senators have already conceded that half of their conference is going to be against this bill. Sen. TED CRUZ (R-Texas) helpfully reminded reporters that “there is significant resistance to yet another trillion dollars.” So to get anything done, Democrats will be absolutely crucial.
MONDAY NIGHT’S PELOSI-MEADOWS-SCHUMER-MNUCHIN MEETING was illustrative in laying out the hurdles. PELOSI said she isn’t interested in a short-term package. She said new money for mail-in voting needs to be in this bill for it to have a chance to get through the House. (PELOSI also has demands on SNAP and OSHA regulations, but those are probably easier to find consensus on.)
BTW … CLASSIC PELOSI: SCHUMER had to use the restroom during the meeting, which was held in the speaker’s office suite on the House side of the Capitol, and he asked PELOSI where it was. PELOSI asked MEADOWS to show him the way, but then quickly said, “Is it wrong for me to assume you still remember? You know, from the Boehner years.”
ANYWAY … REPUBLICANS are pushing for a liability overhaul (their red line); a bonus for workers who retain or hire employees; and money for schools. They seem open to giving on rent forbearance, but they haven’t signaled a ton of wiggle room on unemployment insurance.
A QUICK DEAL would probably benefit PELOSI AND DEMOCRATS BECAUSE …
… ENHANCED FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS run out Friday. That is the deadline driving this. MEADOWS and MCCONNELL are at 70% of lost wages, and PELOSI and SCHUMER call that woefully inadequate. Dems are resisting extending unemployment while negotiations continue.
THEORETICALLY, this deadline can be the Achilles’ heel for both parties. Senate Republicans are going to want to keep this money flowing because their majority is at risk. Senate Republicans say House Democratic front-liners are in the same tough spot, so they’ll be eager for a deal.
THE COMMON DENOMINATOR that can get through both chambers is the current policy — $600 extra — but it’s Tuesday. We’re far from there at this point. That would also cause a massive split in the Senate GOP.
— STATE AND LOCAL CASH might be a bigger problem than currently envisioned. Republicans want to give states flexibility with money already appropriated, and Dems want new dollars.
WITH ALL THAT IN MIND, here are three scenarios for what could happen next:
1) RUSH TO GET A DEAL: The two sides scramble to reach agreement this week. That’s not going to be easy at all. One side would have to cave.
2) GO OVER THE CLIFF: Frankly, it seems likelier than not that Congress will be unable to do anything by Friday. If so, enhanced unemployment benefits will run out, which will scramble all sorts of considerations.
3) SOMETHING SHORT-TERM?: Could both sides agree to a short-term patch — an enhanced unemployment extension to avoid the Friday deadline — and then restart the wider negotiations in September? Remember: there’s another action-forcing event in September — government funding runs dry at the end of the month. A short-term deal would require acrobatics — PELOSI easing on her opposition to it, consent from Republicans and Democrats in the Senate — and that kind of maneuvering may be hard to come by.
NOTABLE QUOTABLES: Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) on why the Trump administration is insisting on money for a new FBI headquarters in this coronavirus stimulus bill: “Good question.” (h/t Hill pool) … PELOSI: “[Republicans] didn’t have money for food stamps, but they had money for an FBI building just so that they can diminish competition for the president’s hotel.”
— “New Senate GOP coronavirus bill includes unrelated White House demand for FBI headquarters money,” by WaPo’s Jonathan O’Connell, Seung Min Kim and Erica Werner
Good Tuesday morning.
REMEMBERING JOHN LEWIS … ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION: “Rep. John Lewis honored as ‘the conscience of the Congress’ in Capitol ceremony”
DRIVING TODAY: MEADOWS and MNUCHIN will be back in the Capitol today. … MCCONNELL will sit down with CNBC’s KAYLA TAUSCHE for his first interview on the subject today at 3 p.m. … A.G. BILL BARR testifies before House Judiciary. … SENATE GOP LUNCH is, as usual, today. …
JOHN BRESNAHAN and ANDREW DESIDERIO: “‘It’s a tough hand’: Brutal year gets even worse for McConnell”: “Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is trying to pull off something of a miracle.
“With less than 100 days until voters head to the polls, Senate Republicans are in trouble. More than 30 million Americans are out of work, tens of thousands of businesses are shuttered, and parents across the country are wondering whether they will be able to send their children back to school in the coming weeks.
“Now McConnell has to help negotiate another massively complicated coronavirus relief package through a bitterly divided Senate to help address these huge problems. And this time, he faces flak from both his left and right, as Democrats are seeking trillions of dollars more in funding than the Kentucky Republican wants to approve, while a large group of GOP hard-liners opposes new spending altogether. ‘I’ve said to him, “You’ve got the worst job,”’ Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) quipped. ‘I wouldn’t want his job for anything.’”
OUT TODAY … ROBERT DRAPER’S new book: “To Start a War: How the Bush Administration Took America into Iraq”
— NUGGET FROM THE BOOK (page 113, Oval Office conversation on Aug. 1, 2002, between President GEORGE W. BUSH and KING ABDULLAH of Jordan, who had expressed strong opposition to the war): “‘Saddam is a bad guy,’ Bush snapped. ‘My opinion of him hasn’t changed. We need to take him down.’ With exasperation he continued: ‘What will people say thirty years from now? I don’t want them to say that the king and I backed away from a showdown— using whatever excuse we could find not to move forward.’
“Sitting beside the Jordanian ruler, leaning into his face, Bush’s voice rose: ‘History has called us. We will affect how the world looks tomorrow!’ Composing himself, the president half apologized: ‘I’m passionate on the subject. I’ve dealt with the Europeans on this. All the excuses in the book. They don’t get it.’ An unwillingness to act would send a disastrous message to adversaries around the world, he added, such as North Korea. ‘When I said “axis of evil,”’ said Bush, ‘I meant it.’”
MEMO TO WASHINGTON: TIM ALBERTA goes to Scranton, Pa.: “Trump’s Biggest Problem Isn’t Wealthy Suburbanites. It’s the White Working Class.”
NAHAL TOOSI: “‘It’s absolutely serious’: Susan Rice vaults to the top of the VP heap”: “The chatter is loud enough that allies of others being eyed for the vice presidency are increasingly worried about Rice … Privately, some in California Sen. Kamala Harris’ world have indicated that Rice could be Harris’ most formidable rival for the vice presidential slot.”
NYT, A1 … ALEX BURNS: “Susan Rice Wants to Run for Office. Will Her First Campaign Be for V.P.?”: “Before ruling out [challenging Sen. Susan Collins in Maine], Ms. Rice had quietly explored the idea of battling Ms. Collins for weeks, seeking advice from seasoned politicians in Maine, friendly operatives in Washington and top advisers to former President Barack Obama, including Valerie Jarrett and the pollster Joel Benenson. Within her political circle, the sincerity of her interest was clear.
“In the end, Ms. Rice did not run. But her exploration of the race represented an emphatic declaration of new political aspirations. It was Ms. Rice’s first and only examination of what it would mean to become a candidate, and test the appeal of her formidable credentials not to her fellow experts but to voters for whom the National Security Council is a distant and obscure institution. … Ms. Rice, 55, is now among a handful of women under consideration to become Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s running mate. …
“The questions that faced Ms. Rice in 2018 presaged, in some respects, those that now surround her as a vice-presidential contender: How much do voters prize government experience, or care about the international stage? Is the country ready, just years after seeming to reject elite expertise with the election of President Trump, to embrace a candidate defined chiefly as an analytical policy mind?”
CORONAVIRUS RAGING … More than 4.2 MILLION Americans have contracted Covid-19. … More than 148,000 Americans have died.
— “Experimental COVID-19 vaccine is put to its biggest test,” by AP’s Lauran Neergard, Michael Hill and Joycelyn Noveck: “The biggest test yet of an experimental COVID-19 vaccine got underway Monday with the first of some 30,000 Americans rolling up their sleeves to receive shots created by the U.S. government as part of the all-out global race to stop the pandemic. …
“Final-stage testing of the vaccine, developed by the National Institutes of Health and Moderna Inc., began with volunteers at numerous sites around the U.S. given either a real dose or a dummy without being told which.” AP
THE LATEST IN PORTLAND … WAPO: “More federal agents dispatched to Portland as protests rise in other cities,” by Devlin Barrett, Nick Miroff, Marissa Lang and David Fahrenthold: “The Trump administration is sending more federal agents to Portland, Ore., already the site of aggressive policing tactics that activists and city officials across the country say are inspiring more-violent clashes and re-energizing protests.
“The U.S. Marshals Service decided last week to send more deputies to Portland, according to an internal email reviewed by The Washington Post, with personnel beginning to arrive last Thursday night. The Department of Homeland Security is also considering a plan to send an additional 50 U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel to the city, according to senior administration officials involved in the federal response who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations.
“Such moves would mark a significant expansion of the federal force operating at the Portland federal courthouse — there were 114 federal agents there in mid-July — though it is unclear how many existing personnel could be sent home after the arrival of at least 100 reinforcements, according to internal Marshals emails.” WaPo
CNN’S MANU RAJU and ALEX ROGERS: “Senate GOP candidates attacked Obama over Ebola but defend Trump on coronavirus pandemic”: “In the run-up to the 2014 midterm elections, Republican David Perdue excoriated President Barack Obama over his handling of the Ebola outbreak — contending that Obama had ‘failed to lead’ and ‘took a serious threat far too lightly.’
“Six years later, Perdue, a first-term senator, is on the ballot again in Georgia — and now is running on the same ticket as a president struggling to get control of a virus far more deadly to the country.
“But Perdue has praised Donald Trump, even as the president has repeatedly downplayed the coronavirus, contended it would disappear, called on states to be ‘liberated’ as they were trying to isolate from the virus, was late to embrace mask wearing and has falsely claimed that more testing is the lone reason for more cases. ‘It’s a totally different situation,’ Perdue told CNN last week when asked about his criticism of Obama in 2014.”
— THE FORWARD: “Republican senator deletes ad that made Jewish opponent’s nose bigger”
HOUSE NEWS … THE DCCC’S independent expenditure arm is reserving another roughly $3 million in TV ads in New York and Texas. The bulk of the buy is $2.2 million on Dallas broadcast. The Democrats are trying to grab retiring Rep. Kenny Marchant’s (R-Texas) seat in the northwest Dallas suburbs, but they also have Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) in the area. The rest of the buy is New York TV: $476,425 on New York City TV on Long island, which is aimed at the seat being vacated by longtime GOP Rep. Pete King (WLNY and cable), and $310,000 on New York cable aimed at southern Jersey, the tough seat Rep. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) represents.
THE NRCC’S chairman — Rep. TOM EMMER of Minnesota — will send out this memo this morning about how Republicans are gaining on Democrats in online fundraising.
NEW … DOUG COLLINS is going up with his first TV ad attacking Sen. KELLY LOEFFLER. The ad, featuring a Monopoly board and questioning Loeffler’s trustworthiness, is running statewide in Georgia on Fox News. The ad
BRUTAL FOR MARKEY … BOSTON GLOBE: “Markey spends less time in Mass. than the rest of the delegation,” by Victoria McGrane and Liz Goodwin
— ALSO THE GLOBE: “Send Ed Markey back to the Senate”
VEEPSTAKES DISPATCH, via NATASHA KORECKI: “Joe Biden was at the Capitol Monday to pay respects to John Lewis, who was lying in state, but he turned heads when he was later spotted chatting with CBC Chair and VP short-lister KAREN BASS. Biden then exited the Capitol flanked by Bass and Rep. CEDRIC RICHMOND (D-La.). In a call shortly afterward, RICHMOND told me, ‘What you all think came up, I can promise you, didn’t come up at all,’ he said, referencing the vice presidential search.”
WSJ: “Notre Dame Withdraws as Host of Planned Trump-Biden Debate,” by Ken Thomas: “The University of Notre Dame on Monday withdrew as host of the first planned presidential debate in late September, citing the need for public-health precautions because of the coronavirus pandemic.
“The Commission on Presidential Debates announced that the Sept. 29 debate, expected to feature President Trump and presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden, will instead be co-sponsored by Case Western Reserve University and the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio. The debate will be held at the Health Education Campus, a joint project between the university and clinic, which is serving as a health security adviser to the nonpartisan debate commission.”
TRUMP’S TUESDAY — The president has nothing on his schedule.
PLAYBOOK READS
DAN SENOR in the FT: “It is too soon to write off Donald Trump’s election chances”
AMAZING ANECDOTE, via NYT’S KATIE ROGERS and NOAH WEILAND: “‘Randy Levine is a great friend of mine from the Yankees,’ Mr. Trump, referring to the president of the baseball team, told reporters on Thursday as Dr. Fauci was preparing to take the mound. ‘And he asked me to throw out the first pitch, and I think I’m doing that on Aug. 15 at Yankee Stadium.’
“There was one problem: Mr. Trump had not actually been invited on that day by the Yankees, according to one person with knowledge of Mr. Trump’s schedule. His announcement surprised both Yankees officials and the White House staff.
“But Mr. Trump had been so annoyed by Dr. Fauci’s turn in the limelight, an official familiar with his reaction said, that he had directed his aides to call Yankees officials and make good on a longtime standing offer from Mr. Levine to throw out an opening pitch. No date was ever finalized.
“After the president’s announcement, White House aides scrambled to let the team know that he was actually booked on Aug. 15, although they have not said what he plans to do. Over the weekend, Mr. Trump officially canceled.”
POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics
HAPPENING TODAY — “Barr faces the Democratic barrage,” by Kyle Cheney and Betsy Woodruff Swan: “It took 14 months, but the House Judiciary Committee finally got its man. And after myriad controversies, Attorney General William Barr’s long awaited — and repeatedly delayed — testimony to the panel arrives Tuesday at the nadir of trust between Capitol Hill Democrats and the Justice Department. In fact, committee Democrats say they intend to distill their lengthy list of urgent issues down to one theme: that Barr has reoriented DOJ to serve Trump, rather than the nation. …
“It’s a hearing whose importance has been magnified not least because it’s taken more than a year to arrange. Democrats first sought Barr’s testimony in May 2019, on the heels of the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia. But Barr called it off after Chairman Jerry Nadler unveiled plans to allow staff counsel to question him. A subsequent effort for his testimony fell apart in March, after the Covid-19 pandemic overtook the agenda. Finally, Nadler threatened to subpoena Barr last month before the two sides at last agreed to the Tuesday hearing.” Barr’s opening statement
TROUBLE IN FOGGY BOTTOM — “Dems torch Pompeo in report ahead of hearing,” by Nahal Toosi: “Two days before Secretary of State Mike Pompeo makes a long-awaited appearance on Capitol Hill, Senate Democrats plan to release a report that is highly critical of his management of the State Department.
“The analysis, shared first with POLITICO, finds that vacancies, turnover and a fear of political retaliation plague the department well into President Donald Trump’s first term. At least one key State Department division has seen a significant rise in its staffers considering quitting, while others report myriad morale issues.
“The report, titled ‘Diplomacy in Crisis: The Trump Administration’s Decimation of the State Department,’ is produced by the Democratic staff on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. It runs more than 40 pages and is a synthesis of surveys, anecdotes, news articles and other data dealing with U.S. diplomacy stretching back to just before Trump took office. The report argues that the coronavirus pandemic has further exposed the dangers of having a weak and strained State Department.” POLITICO
MEDIAWATCH — National Review is launching Capital Matters, a new section of its website focused on defending free markets. The initiative will include events and forums in addition to a range of commentary and articles. It’s headed by Andrew Stuttaford, National Review’s newest fellow, and Kevin Hassett, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers.
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
STAFFING UP — The Trump campaign is adding Steve Cortes as senior adviser for strategy and Greg Manz as comms adviser for strategy. Cortes previously was a spokesman for the America First Action PAC and a talk radio host. Manz previously worked for Steve Bannon’s “War Room” show and the Pennsylvania GOP. Both are Trump 2016 alums.
TRANSITION — Aaron Cooke is now chief economist for macroeconomic policy at the Council of Economic Advisers. He most recently was an economist at OMB.
ENGAGED — Freddi Goldstein, who was until recently press secretary for NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio, and Alex Cohen-Smith, president of Mitchell Martin Healthcare, got engaged Thursday — “low key, at our house after dinner.” They met in 2017, but things didn’t click until the fourth time they met, when they struck up a conversation at a fundraiser hosted by a mutual friend. Pic … Another pic
WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Jeff Le, U.S. state and local public policy lead at VMware, and Kelly Gravuer, a biologist at the EPA’s Office of Water, welcomed Jacinda Donna Le on Wednesday. She came in at 7 lbs, 7 oz and 20 1/4 inches. Pic … Another pic
— Evan Philipson, AIPAC Florida political director, and Gabriella Philipson, a pediatric clinical pharmacist at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, welcomed Aviva Maisie Philipson on Friday evening. Pic
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Kirsten Fedewa, president of Kirsten Fedewa & Associates. A fun fact people might not know about her: “I am passionate about horses — especially Arabian horses. I parachuted while at Oxford University — and decided that horses are the better hobby!” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: White House chief of staff Mark Meadows is 61 … Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) is 54 … WaPo’s Beth Reinhard … Scott Pelley is 63 … CNN’s Kate Bolduan … Courtney Kube, national security and Pentagon correspondent for NBC … Huma Abedin … Theresa Kehoe … Satish Narayanan (h/ts Teresa Vilmain) … former Sen. Bill Bradley (D-N.J.) is 77 … Patrick Boland … BuzzFeed’s Ruby Cramer … Torrie Miller Matous … Kathy Dedrick … Betsy Werronen … former A.G. Michael Mukasey is 79 … POLITICO’s Tanya Snyder and Mandy Fogarty … Kidron Lewis … N.Y. Daily News’ Laura Nahmias … Lauren Kaplan … Steve Deace … Chandler Thornton, national chair of the College Republican National Committee …
… Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, is 69 (h/t David Andelman) … Juan Guaidó is 37 … Lacey White … Susan Berghoef … Abigail Alger … Sophie White … Shannon Salk … Brad Crowell … Grant Allen … Bill Cheney … Kelly Landis … Kevin Smith of New Hampshire … Ann Tumolo … Susanne Fleek-Green … Jay Zeidman, managing partner at Altitude Ventures … Becky Able … John Lease … Scott Pearson, outgoing executive director of the D.C. Public Charter School Board (h/t Jon Haber) … Sarah Jackson … Sam Mondry-Cohen of the Nats … Colin Hart, senior director of corporate comms at WeWork … George Cook … former Greek PM Alexis Tsipras is 46 … Anne Wojcicki, co-founder and CEO of 23andMe
Follow us on Twitter
AMERICAN MINUTE
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: COVID Is Going To Kill Sports Before Woke Hell Will
Face It, Sports Are Toast This for the Rest of the Year
A wonderful Tuesday to you, discerning readers of the Kruiser Morning Briefing.
We can file this under “Stories I Didn’t Want to Write but We All Knew I Would Have To.” In my role as Resident COVID Curmudgeon I have been throwing cold water on my sports fans friends and colleagues whenever they began looking forward to their favorite sport getting off to its weird COVID start. Sure, I’m kind of the jerk in most situations like that but I felt this one in my gut all along.
Actually, I was surprised that baseball got going at all, given what a dysfunctional mess the owners and the MLB players union are. Once they did come to an agreement I felt an hour or two of elation, then I began to be honest with myself about sports in the time of COVID.
Just about two weeks ago I wrote that the year is dead. Here was my boilerplate take on the MLB situation (and all sports) from that Briefing:
I watched my first baseball game of the year yesterday so you’d think I’d be more upbeat. Sure, it was just an intrasquad Dodgers game, but it was baseball. What I think will probably happen is that they’ll start playing, a few guys will test positive, and then MLB pulls the plug on the season. Same with the other sports.
I do love quoting myself.
What I had been telling my friends was that I thought they would play for a week or so before some players tested positive.
It took four days before they canceled a game.
Two MLB games have been postponed due to an outbreak of COVID-19 from the Miami Marlins.
Monday night’s game between the Marlins and the Baltimore Orioles has been canceled due to at least due to 12 Marlins players and two coaches testing positive.
Following that news MLB announced the New York Yankees and Philadelphia Phillies game would also be canceled. The Marlins had spent the past weekend playing the Phillies at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia.
As the kids like to say, that escalated quickly. ESPN went so far as to question some of their in-house experts about whether this threatens the whole season:
We’ll only be able to answer this accurately with hindsight — though it looms as a possibility that Monday’s news is an inflection point with ramifications not only across the rest of this season, but across all the major team sports endeavoring to attempt what MLB already is trying to pull off. For now, this is baseball’s first big test of its ability to stage the 2020 season, and it is more than a little disheartening that it came with just 92 games in the books. Baseball couldn’t get through its first weekend without a possible nightmare scenario emerging.
You don’t need to be an epidemiologist to figure out where this is going. The ESPN report hits the nail on the head: if things spiral out of control with baseball then the other pro sports are pretty well screwed. We have already seen some of the NCAA’s smaller conferences cancel all fall sports rather than figure out how to manage COVID protocols and keep the players and coaches safe.
The bigger conferences that are more dependent on sports revenue from football and basketball are still torturing themselves trying to find a way to make their seasons happen. Money does talk loudly.
The NFL is the most problematic of the pro sports. There are more players on the field at a given time and it’s a contact sport. You can’t tackle a running back and maintain proper social distance, after all. I wouldn’t be surprised if they made it illegal to touch quarterbacks this season. The NFL has been moving in that direction for years.
I hate to be the most negative sports fan in the room again, but as I mentioned last week, there is no guarantee that any of this madness is going to be constrained by a calendar. If most NCAA and pro sports just give up for the rest of 2020 that means that they aren’t really going to figure out a way to work around the virus. We sports junkies may find ourselves in even greater withdrawal in 2021 if the COVID monster decides to be even more persnickety.
Most hardcore sports fans have spent our time in COVID limbo worrying about what the woke kneeling plague would do to ruin our enjoyment. Now facing the prospect of not having any sports at all to watch we might just wish we had some wokeness to grumble about.
Heartbreaking and It Was All Unnecessary
Which Is Why So Many of Them Won’t Be
PJM Linktank
COVID Kills Early Black Friday Kickoff as Walmart and Target To Close on Thanksgiving
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D, Crazytown) Believes Antifa Are Mythical Creatures Like Unicorns
Amid Lawless Riots, Leftists Compare Melania Trump to Marie Antoinette
Ten Coronavirus Charts and Graphs You Need To See
VodkaPundit: #DefundThePolice: Murder Rate Spikes 10-50% in Major Cities
Portland Football Coach Fired Because He’s a Cop
How to Turn a Seattle Soyboy CHAZ Supporter into a Gun-Toting Conservative in One Easy Step
Demagoguery: ‘Conservative’ Warns Us That Trump Wants to Be a Dictator
Bombs and Ammo Found Near Where Man Was Shot at ‘Mostly Peaceful’ Portland Riot
Most Americans Back Trump Sending Federal Law Enforcement to Fight Violent Crime
A Few of the Democrats Biden Missed When He Called Trump Our First Racist President
NAACP Leader Confused About Why Woke White People Have Co-opted the George Floyd Riots
A Response to ‘Dead Wrong: The Anti-Muslim Myth’
VodkaPundit, Part Deux: Insanity Wrap #14: Another Day in Antifa Paradise, Plus Pelosi’s Failed Meme
Treacher: Joe Biden Says Women Need His Help to Succeed in America
On ‘Life, Liberty, and Levin,’ Stanley Kurtz Confirms Joe Biden Will Destroy the Suburbs
Wait, the Word ‘Chief’ Is Racist, Now?!
VIP
John Roberts Is the Most Dangerous Man in America
VodkaPundit, Part Trois: The Burning of USS Bonhomme Richard and Our Shockingly Brittle Navy
The Real Tragedy of Removing Chicago’s Columbus Statue
VIP Gold
‘Unredacted with Kurt Schlichter’: Donald Trump Is an Agent of Change
It’s Undeniable That Black Lives Matter Is Just a Marxist Plot at This Point
From the Mothership and Beyond
#LetItBurn Chicago Mayor Blames Everyone Else For Her Violent Crime Problem
I’m available. Do Americans Need A “Gun Rights Champion?”
The Unraveling States of America: Violence At Protests Up Sharply
I have a safe bet guess…Police Investigate Political Motive Behind Murder Of Black Trump Backer
Oh. UN Issues Warning Over Law Enforcement Response To Riots
Shooting At Dallas Bar Stopped By Armed Patrons
The One Issue Bernie Delegates Want on the Party Platform… Or Else
Buy guns and ammo, people. Caller Threatens Trump Supporters on a CSPAN Show… and the Host Is Silent
ICYMI: Seattle Police Chief Notes Who Should be Blamed for Allowing Seattle to be Engulfed in Chaos
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL <breathe> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL: Kaepernick, Fauci Receive Human Rights Award
Here’s What’s in the Senate GOP’s New COVID Relief Plan
Sen. Hawley: Future SCOTUS Nominees Must Believe Roe v. Wade Was ‘Wrongfully Decided’
Michigan Focus Group Shows Polling Could Be Wildly Wrong
Turley Wonders: Why Are Media Outlets Uninterested In A Modern Watergate?
Sen. Rand Paul’s Neighbor Gets An Additional 13 Months For Assault
That’s how you get Trump 2.0: Poll: 77% Concerned That Crime Is Rising In Major Cities
Roger Goodell ‘Mails’ NFL Fans Letter on Wuhan Flu; Mark It ‘Return to Sender’
Focus Group Shows Trump Attacks on Biden Working in Michigan.
Democrats Rush to Change the Narrative as the Rioting They Encouraged Backfires
Push for racial justice could be an ‘awakening’ on abortion, prolife advocates say
A devout Catholic, Barr able to put his stamp on executive power as Trump’s AG
First US Phase III trial for COVID-19 vaccine begins
How a Viral Tweet Brought Back a Boozy Root Beer Called Cronk
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
Last Saturday was the 40th anniversary of the release of Caddyshack, which is one of the greatest achievements in film history.
I like you Betty.
I’m organizing a beer chess league for anyone who’s just over it all.
___
Kruiser Twitter
Kruiser Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.
WHITE HOUSE DOSSIER
|
White House Dossier
http://www.whitehousedossier.com
P.O. Box 27211,
Washington, DC 20038Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: Senate Republicans Unveil the HEALS Act
Plus, what college might look like this fall.
The Dispatch Staff | 1 hr | 4 |
Happy Tuesday! We hate to say we told you so, but wasn’t Sarah’s new newsletter great? Sign up for The Sweep by clicking here if you haven’t already.
A reminder: This is the version of TMD available to non-paying readers. We’re happy you’ve made The Dispatch part of your morning routine, and we hope you’re enjoying The Morning Dispatch and the rest of our free editorial offerings. If you do, we hope you’ll consider joining us as a paying member. In addition to the full version of TMD each day, you’ll get extra editions of French Press, the G-File, Vital Interests, and our other paid products. And members can engage with the authors and with one another in the discussion threads at the end of each of our articles and newsletters. If this appeals to you, we hope you’ll please join now.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- The United States confirmed 54,187 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday, with 7.1 percent of the 760,840 tests reported coming back positive. An additional 1,075 deaths were attributed to the virus on Monday—631 of which are the result of Texas catching up on earlier fatalities—bringing the pandemic’s American death toll to 148,009.
- The White House and Senate Republicans unveiled their $1 trillion coronavirus relief package Monday afternoon. With support from Democrats in the House and Senate required for final passage, the HEALS Act should be viewed more as a starting point for bipartisan negotiations.
- The first presidential debate of the general election will be moved to Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland after the University of Notre Dame withdrew due to coronavirus concerns.
- The Trump administration is dispatching an additional 100 federal agents to quell protests and riots in Portland, Oregon, according to an internal email reviewed by the Washington Post. The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly debating sending 50 more U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers to Portland as well.
- National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien has tested positive for the coronavirus, which he believes he contracted from his daughter. A White House statement says O’Brien “has mild symptoms and has been self-isolating and working from a secure location off site.”
- Google extended work-from-home status for its nearly 200,000 employees to July 2021 citing coronavirus concerns and uncertainty over school reopenings across the country.
- Two Major League Baseball games were canceled yesterday, just four days into the fledgling season, after at least 13 players and staff members on the Miami Marlins tested positive for COVID-19. MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred said the league believes it “can keep people safe and continue to play.”
- Texas Gov. Greg Abbott extended the state’s early voting period by six days, citing the challenges of conducting an election during a pandemic. Texans will now be able to begin early voting on October 13.
- A week after the White House hoped to signal a new tone in combating the coronavirus, President Trump went on a late-night Twitter spree, retweeting postsclaiming Dr. Anthony Fauci and Democrats are suppressing the cure to COVID-19 “to perpetuate Covid deaths to hurt Trump.”
Republicans Unveil the HEALS Act
After weeks of frenetic and fiery deliberations, we’ve finally got our GOP coronavirus proposal on Monday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell unveiled the $1 trillion package, which now must run the gauntlet against House Democrats determined to spend triple that. Before the haggling starts, here’s a quick look at what’s in it.
Dubbed the Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools (HEALS) Act, the Republican package in large part functions as an extension of the three major coronavirus relief bills that have already been made law this year. It refuels the Paycheck Protection Program and the CARES Act’s fund for forgivable loans to small businesses that continue to make payroll. It includes another round of direct cash payments to individual Americans. And it extends the CARES Act’s federal supplement to state unemployment insurance for people out of work, but at a reduced rate of $200 a week, down from $600.
What Will College Look Like in the Fall? It Depends.
As Democrats and Republicans increasingly cling to K-12 school reopenings as ammunition in their political offensives, colleges and universities have largely been left to their own devices as they formulate a way forward this fall. The recent surge in new coronavirus cases around the country has institutions of higher education trying to implement creative solutions for reopening with the help of experts, community leaders, and their own student bodies.
The Chronicle of Higher Educationis tracking more than 1,260 colleges as they form plans to offer coursework to students. As of Monday evening, slightly less than 50 percent of schools included in the study are preparing to open for in-person education come fall. The data also show that 35 percent will operate on a hybrid model, 13 percent will go entirely virtual, and about 3.5 percent have yet to reach a final decision.
Worth Your Time
- A natural instinct in today’s political environment is to deal entirely in absolutes, leaving little room for nuance. Recent events in Portland, Oregon, are no exception. All the protesters in the city are either valiant martyrs or violent anarchists hell-bent on overthrowing the existing social order. All the law enforcement agents deployed to protect the federal courthouse are either authoritarian goons or heroic civil servants saving the City of Roses from destruction. But the best reporting works to tease out the contradictions in a story, and this saga features plenty of gray areas. “We are not here being violent or being destructive. We have a positive message — there is nothing to quell here,” a protester told Mike Balsamo and Gillian Flaccus in their on-the-ground reported piece for the Associated Press. “Thirty minutes later, someone fired a commercial-grade firework inside the fence. Next came a flare and then protesters began using an angle grinder to eat away at the fence. A barrage of items came whizzing into the courthouse: rocks, cans of beans, water bottles, potatoes and rubber bouncy balls that cause the agents to slip and fall. Within minutes, the federal agents at the fence perimeter fired the first tear gas of the night.” Read the whole piece—and Balsamo’s accompanying Twitter thread—for an unparalleled look at what is actually happening in a city that both “sides” are hoping to exploit for political purposes.
- Writing in the New YorkDaily News, former national security adviser John Bolton argues that contrary to conventional wisdom, Donald Trump has been weak on China. In pursuit of his much-cherished trade deal, “Trump sneered at concerns about Beijing’s belligerence in the South China Sea; its intentions to subjugate Taiwan; repression of the Uighurs; the shredding of China’s pledge to maintain Hong Kong’s separate status after the ‘handover’ from Great Britain; and more.” On COVID-19, “at first, Trump simply ignored Beijing’s culpability. China’s disinformation, concealment and willful misrepresentation went unanswered… On Jan. 24, for example, Trump tweeted cravenly: ‘China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!’” While Trump has toughened his approach to China as he seems to cast Joe Biden as weak, the real concern, Bolton says, is what Trump would do in a second term.
- Two pieces published yesterday highlight the scientific uncertainty and rapidly evolving research surrounding the coronavirus. First, Katherine Wu in the New York Times details an upcoming study from UCSF and Johns Hopkins researchers that finds not only does an individual wearing a mask protect others, it might protect the wearer itself—either by preventing infection entirely or lessening the severity of the symptoms by reducing the viral load ingested. Next, The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson dug into what he deems “hygiene theater,” our newfound obsession with deep cleaning and disinfecting ourselves and our surroundings despite pretty convincing evidence that COVID-19 spreads primarily through the air, not surfaces (though surface transmission is not impossible, wash your hands!). “Money that could be spent on distributing masks, or on PSA campaigns about distancing, or actual subway service, is being poured into antiseptic experiments that might be entirely unnecessary,” Thompson writes.
- CNN legal analyst and Supreme Court biographer Joan Biskupic is out with an exhaustive piece on John Roberts’s tumultuous year as chief justice. Roberts’ recent rulings on a wide range of cases have surprised liberals and conservatives alike—and CNN’s reporting provides a host of interesting inside details and previously unknown background information about the conditions that led to those decisions.
Presented Without Comment
“You don’t even look, you just press retweet, you just fire from the hip!” — @stoolpresidente “Well, you see something that looks good and you don’t investigate it.” — @realDonaldTrump
Toeing the Company Line
- Chief Justice John Roberts joined the four liberal justices on Friday in denying a Nevada church’s application for injunctive relief over coronavirus restrictions. Sarah and David have some thoughts. Catch the latest episode of Advisory Opinions to get their insights on all things SCOTUS, including some revisionist history on a hypothetical Merrick Garland Supreme Court tenure and Sen. Josh Hawley’s crusade to save legal conservatism.
- On the site today, Samuel J. Abrams shares some data that shows we shouldn’t fall back on regional cultural tropes to claim that some areas are more responsible in their pandemic response. In reality most Americans are wearing masks, social distancing, and trying to get through this pandemic thing together
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons), Charlotte Lawson (@charlotteUVA), Audrey Fahlberg (@FahlOutBerg), Nate Hochman (@njhochman), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Photograph by J. Scott Applewhite/Pool/Getty Images.
4 |
LEGAL INSURRECTION
|
THE DAILY WIRE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DESERET NEWS
|
BRIGHT
|
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
THE BLAZE
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … On the heels of the Seattle City Council’s vehement support for cutting the police department by 50%, the council’s next plan is to abolish prisons, municipal courts, and ultimately the entire criminal justice system, according to several documents leaked from the King County Executive’s Office in Seattle. The documents, which read like a cri … Read more
You might like …
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA |
THE FEDERALIST
|
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Facebook, Twitter censor Breitbart video of physicians telling the truth about COVID-19
- Bradley Hopp is fighting human trafficking with Teshua Tea Company
- Infection Fatality Rate Estimates: The numbers they don’t want you to know
- Austin driver who shot BLM protester armed with AK-47 released by authorities
- Democratic-Socialist leader: ‘If Joe Biden wins, the progressive movement dies’
Facebook, Twitter censor Breitbart video of physicians telling the truth about COVID-19
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 09:50 PM PDT Update: Add YouTube to the censorship list. We found the video on BitChute, though: Original Story: Many of us, particularly conservatives, have had our perspectives censored by Big Tech, especially as it pertains to contentious issues like the coronavirus. Here at NOQ Report, we’ve had three posts taken down by Facebook, one on YouTube, and we’ve seen our status in Google’s search engine drop dramatically. But the truth is the truth so no matter how hard they try to bully us, we won’t back down. Breitbart and several front-line doctors experienced the censorship today. As of now, Facebook, Twitter, and Periscope have all taken down the video. Here’s a version from YouTube that is still up… for now. Dr. Stella Immanuel said, “I’m upset. Why I’m upset is that I see people that cannot breathe. I see parents walk in, I see diabetic sit in my office knowing that this is a death sentence and they can’t breathe. And I hug them and I tell them, ‘It’s going to be okay. You’re going to live.’ “And we treat them and they leave. None has died. So if some fake science, some person sponsored by all these fake pharma companies comes out say, ‘We’ve done studies and they found out that it doesn’t work.’ I can tell you categorically it’s fixed science. I want to know who is sponsoring that study. I want to know who is behind it because there is no way I can treat 350 patients and counting and nobody is dead and they all did better.” Our EIC Tweeted a response to the take down and linked to a study we posted today regarding the limited risks to people under the age of 50 associated with the coronavirus. It was a comprehensive study done by a reputable organization, yet it received little fanfare and no media attention until now.
Big Tech is taking a calculated risk. They know more people, especially skeptical patriots, will now be more interested in seeing Breitbart’s Hydroxychloroquine conference with these doctors. But if the left can keep the sheep blind, that’s all that matters to them. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Facebook, Twitter censor Breitbart video of physicians telling the truth about COVID-19 appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Bradley Hopp is fighting human trafficking with Teshua Tea Company
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 09:01 PM PDT Instead of going down the route of a straight up non-profit organization seeking donations, Bradley is using his business to fund his goal of saving girls out of sex trafficking, and then create opportunities for them to support themselves financially by creating products that his company sells. By setting up his company in this fashion, it allows for sustainability and being able to do more than just put a roof over these girls’ heads and food in their stomachs. What many don’t realize is that human trafficking is much more commonplace than what is reported in the news. Bradley works closely with people on the ground in Asia working to free girls enslaved by these horrific people. But we also have to remember that this is also happening in the United States of America. In fact, here in the USA, they are using many of the same strategies as they do in Asia, often times using karaoke bars as a cover for their illegal activity. Bradley explains how his teams literally go into these bars to breaks these girls out, and then gives them a fresh jump start on life, giving them opportunities that they probably wouldn’t have without this company. For more information on Teshua Tea Company, please visit https://teshuahtea.com/ For more shows from Freedom First Network, please visit http://freedomfirstnetwork.com Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Bradley Hopp is fighting human trafficking with Teshua Tea Company appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Infection Fatality Rate Estimates: The numbers they don’t want you to know
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 09:00 PM PDT Update 2: The video is being systematically removed from YouTube as well, so here it is on BitChute: Update: A video by Breitbart featuring doctors who support the truth documented below has been censored on Facebook and Twitter. Here’s a YouTube version… until it’s censored too.
Original Story: When COVID-19 first hit the scene in the United States, most Americans were rightfully concerned. It was an unknown in so many ways. How deadly is it? How infectious is it? What precautions should we take? Is this pandemic going to be a major killer? That was in February and into March. But by April, the picture started becoming much more clear. In May, even people like New York Governor Andrew Cuomo had to admit that despite their best efforts, the disease had likely infected tens of millions of New Yorkers. By June and now into July, we have a very clear understanding of what the disease is capable of, who is most vulnerable, and what the real risks are to most Americans. The disease has exceeded expectations in the number of people it infects while being completely underwhelming as a life-threatening pandemic for people under the age of 45. Unfortunately, that truth has yet to make the light of day despite the facts being well documented in June, if not earlier. Instead, we’ve been fed heavy doses of pandemic panic theater. Why? How have the American people been so duped by politicians, mainstream media, and a public health system that all seem to have different reasons for achieving the same goal of prolonging the panic and therefore the lockdowns for as long as possible? Before we get into “why,” let’s look at the numbers. There was a comprehensive study of all the numbers that took place once the United States passed the 100,000 coronavirus death mark in June. It was handled by the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), an advocacy group that is generally neutral if not slightly left-leaning in its politics. Their study should have been the basis for affirmation that the lockdowns didn’t work but opening up the economy was a safe practice as long as we protect the vulnerable, namely the elderly and those who have immunocompromised conditions. Instead, the study was largely ignored and even suppressed because it ran completely counter to the persistent lockdown narrative. Nobody questioned the results. They simply pretended like they didn’t exist and continued promoting panic. The key to this study is that it focused on the most important numbers in any major outbreak like this: Infection Fatality Rate Estimates. It’s a quotient from two numbers, one an estimate and the other a known quantity. The estimate is the number of people who have been infected. That’s different from known cases as it extrapolates based on all available data the likely number of people who have contracted COVID-19. As we knew for certain back in May with some studies giving matching results as early as April, the number of actual infections are magnitudes higher than known cases. Many simply never get tested either because their symptoms are too mild or because they were completely asymptomatic. The second number is known—deaths attributed to COVID-19. As we’ve learned in recent weeks, those numbers are exaggerated as many medical professionals have overstated them by falsely claiming coronavirus in cases where coronavirus had nothing to do with the death. It is also telling that the provisional death rates, which most use in place of known deaths, include those who are “suspected” of having COVID-19 even if a test was not administered before or after death. When you divide the number of deaths by the estimated number of cases, you get the Infection Fatality Rate Estimate. That tells us the likelihood of death from contracting COVID-19 broken down by age groups. The results were stunning. For those over the age of 65, the rates were very high at 5.6%. In other words, one out of every 20 people over the age of 65 who contract COVID-19 will likely die. That’s not quite up there with previous viruses like SARS-CoV at 9.8%, but it’s still clearly very dangerous for the elderly. Those age 50-64 were better but still not great. At 0.14% Infection Fatality Rate Estimate, that’s 14 deaths for every 10,000 infections. For people in this age group, it’s about 14 times more dangerous than influenza. But from there, the Infection Fatality Rate Estimate drops dramatically. Those age 20-49 have a 0.0092%, or nine deaths per 100,000 infections. As for children age 10-19, the rate drops to 0.00032%, or three deaths per 1 MILLION infections. It’s understandable that mainstream media and Democrats do not want this information known because it would eliminate the need for locking down the nation, at least for those under 50-years-old. But why isn’t the White House addressing it? This study is tailor-made for the reopening narrative. Here are five possible reasons ranked from least to most likely by my reckoning.
According to the study, “While coronavirus is obviously concerning and a very real threat to some people (namely, the elderly and immunocompromised), the data also shows that the risk for the rest of the population is quite low.” Why do mainstream media and Dr Fauci never discuss Infection Fatality Rate Estimates, the most important figure for determining true risk? Because at nine deaths per 100,000 infections for people 20-49 and far less for children, it doesn’t fit their lockdown narrative. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Infection Fatality Rate Estimates: The numbers they don’t want you to know appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Austin driver who shot BLM protester armed with AK-47 released by authorities
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 06:55 AM PDT A driver in Austin, Texas, who called police after shooting a Black Lives Matter protester who approached his vehicle with an AK-47 allegedly pointed at him has been released by authorities after being taken into custody for about a day. The shooting, which happened over the weekend during one of many protests and riots happening across the country, left Garrett Foster dead. According to The Gateway Pundit, police do not believe Foster discharged his weapon. The driver shot at him five times based on audio from multiple videos reviewed, then a different firearm was discharged three times. Police believe the other firearm was from another armed protester shooting at the vehicle as it drove off. Police have released the driver who allegedly killed an armed protester Saturday night in downtown Austin, while they investigate what led to the fatal shooting. Austin Police Chief Brian Manley identified the man who was shot as Garrett Foster. Foster was attending the protest against police violence and had been pushing the wheelchair of his fiancée, Whitney Mitchell, 28, who is a quadruple amputee. The couple, who met in North Texas as teenagers, moved to Austin a couple of years ago and had attended protests in recent weeks, their mothers told The Dallas Morning News. Austin police are investigating what occurred between Foster, who they said was carrying an AK-47-style rifle during the protest, and the driver, who called police to report that he’d shot someone… … Witnesses reported that just before 10 p.m. Saturday, a car turned down the street toward the protesters and the driver started honking its horn. The vehicle stopped in the roadway, police said, and Foster approached the driver’s side window as others began striking the car. The driver then opened fire, striking Foster. Manley said at a news conference Sunday that the driver reported Foster pointed his weapon at them before the shooting. KVUE-TV reported that police have said Foster did not discharge his weapon, but the chief did say someone else in the crowd did return fire as the car left the scene. If Garrett Foster aimed his firearm at the driver who shot him, and at least one image is circulating around social media supporting this premise, then the driver should be considered as having acted in self-defense. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Austin driver who shot BLM protester armed with AK-47 released by authorities appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Democratic-Socialist leader: ‘If Joe Biden wins, the progressive movement dies’
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 06:21 AM PDT Far-left radical progressives, also known as hyper-leftists, also known as Neo-Marxists, also known as anti-capitalists, are currently fighting two major foes. There are the Republicans/conservatives who are their long-term political rivals, but for the far-left to have a realistic chance of ever taking them on directly, they need to overcome their more immediate threat. Establishment Democrats like Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden will do more to keep the radical progressives, who I’ll refer to going forward as the Democratic-Socialists, from ever achieving real power. Upon reading this, the instant response from supporters of the organizations like the Sunrise Movement and Justice Democrats would be to get angry or even chuckle in amusement. This could easily appear to be a ploy to make them secretly cheer for President Trump to win reelection. As a news outlet, we’re considered part of the vast right-wing conspiracy and are labeled as “very far right” by some of the fact-checkers. That theory could have merit if it weren’t for the fact that every indicator—including a conversation I had with an anonymous source in leadership of one of the most prominent radical progressive political action committees in the nation—supports the notion that the far-left has halted attacks on President Trump and have not offered support to Joe Biden. But don’t take my word for it. After all, I’m not naming the source or even the organization he/she belongs to, so this could still all be a ploy, right? Let’s look at the narratives coming out of a pair of the most powerful far-left groups in America today. It’s telling that in the month of July, the 140 Tweets posted by the Justice Democrats have only mentioned Biden three times, and all three were references to their need for Biden to take policy advice from Democratic-Socialists.
Also noteworthy is the conspicuous lack of attacks on President Trump with only two retweets mentioning him. One was a swipe at House Democrats for not getting his tax returns and the other was a call for New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to tax the rich more in New York.
The Sunrise Movement’s Twitter account is more of the same with even fewer attacks on President Trump and less support for Biden. As for the candidates they support, it’s conspicuous that they are also in a similar bubble in which they support Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren while rarely if ever mentioning Biden or Trump. If one were to look at the average congressional candidate’s Twitter feed, they mention the top of both tickets often. Not so for Democratic-Socialists. They keep their narratives very tight, attacking only their direct primary or general election opponents and avoiding discussions of Biden and President Trump. Here’s the sad reality of the Democratic-Socialist movement. Hillary Clinton’s embarrassing loss to President Trump in 2016 forced many Democrats to rethink their strategies about elections. The “moderate” failed miserably. Then, 2018’s midterm election demonstrated strength within the Democratic-Socialist movement as they picked up an impressive number of congressional seat. Fast forward to 2020 and the only thing that prevented their presidential candidate, Sanders, from getting the nomination was an all-out intervention by the DNC. Following the South Carolina primary that Biden handily won, as expected, the DNC pressured other “moderates” to drop out before Super Tuesday. This opened the path for him to beat Sanders who polls had winning big against with Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, Tom Steyer, and Michael Bloomberg splitting the centrist vote. This series of events have led the Democratic-Socialists to two possible conclusions. The first is that a Biden victory would undercut all of the momentum they’ve built up over the last four years. The Democratic Party will be able to say, “See, we can win without being radical.” The result will be a wave of Biden-backed candidates being able to suspend disbelief in their moderate ways, making it nearly impossible for Democratic-Socialists to make gains or even keep what they already have in 2022 and 2024. In this scenario, it behooves Democratic-Socialists for Biden to lose. The other possible conclusion is all contingent on who the DNC picks as Biden’s Vice President. We already know it will be a Black woman. But if that person is not a Democratic-Socialist and especially if it’s a former law-and-order politician like Senator Kamala Harris (former prosecutor) or Congresswoman Val Demings (former police chief), there is very little chance the Democratic-Socialists will change their tune. The same goes for Obama administration alums Susan Rice or Michelle Obama, both of whom represent a return to the Obama-era lukewarm progressivism the Democratic-Socialists also despise. The most likely VP candidate who could garner support from Democratic-Socialist is Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms. She is NOT a radical progressive despite attempts to label her as such, but she could be persuaded to act like (and even govern like) one if enough pressure comes from the far-left. It’s a long shot from multiple angles, but unless Biden comes out with someone from left-field who isn’t on the radar, Bottoms may be the only VP choice malleable enough to entice Democratic-Socialists to support and groom her. One can even argue if Biden DOES come out with a pick from left field, it is because of pressure from the Democratic-Socialists. The schism in the Democratic Party has been downplayed by mainstream media and ignored by the public, mostly due to coronavirus fears and recent rioting. But it’s there. Republicans must take advantage of this. I detail how in the latest episode of Conservative Playbook. Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Democratic-Socialist leader: ‘If Joe Biden wins, the progressive movement dies’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 17 new items) |
- China
- Time to Crush the New Rebellion Against Constitution
- Faith Under Siege, Pastors Take A Stand, Trump Takes Action
- Fedcoin: A New Scheme for Tyranny and Poverty
- Where Are the New Heroes of the Revolution?
- Michelle Malkin vs. Leftist Fascist Mob
- How Progressive Policies Wreck Everything
- This is What Keeps America Free
- Pawn Stars . . .
- Another 930,000 Leave Unemployment In A Week – Trump Economy Continues Rapid Recovery
- Democracy Thrives in Out-of-Court Settlement
- Not Your Parents’ Revolution How Today’s Anarchists Differ From 60s Protesters
- Eliot Ness and President Donald Trump
- New Jersey’s All-Mail Vote Debacle Is a Warning for November
- Trump’s Reactive Engagement
- ‘Fascist’: What Top Democrats Say About Federal Law Enforcement Help for Their Cities
- The Dogma Of Our Times
China
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 09:38 PM PDT by Kerby Anderson: China has been in the news lately, and not just because of their mishandling of the coronavirus. A number of government officials have been warning of the danger China poses. And before we go any further, we are talking about the Chinese Communist Party and not the good people of China who have little control over what these communist leaders do. FBI Director Christopher Wray gave a shocking presentation earlier this month in which he mentioned that nearly half of all the FBI’s current counterintelligence cases are focused just on China. He described China’s frequent counterattacks, predatory practices, and economic espionage that has resulted in “one of the largest transfers of wealth in human history.” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned the Chinese leaders to back down in their military actions in the South China Sea. “The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire. America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources.” Attorney General William Barr was not only critical of the Chinese government but of Hollywood and Big Tech for their cooperation with China. “I suspect Walt Disney would be disheartened to see how the company he founded deals with foreign dictatorships of our day.” Of course, he could also have added how the NBA came down on one general manager who posted a tweet supporting Hong Kong. Daniel Blumenthal and Nicholas Eberstadt in a recent column argue that the Communist Chinese Party “is far more powerful today than it was in Mao’s time.” That’s quite a statement, and a reminder that we should ask political candidates if they believe China poses a danger to the US. Already, President Donald Trump and former Vice-President Joe Biden have given vastly different answers to that question. This is an important foreign policy issue for our time. Tags: Kerby Anderson, Point of View, China To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Time to Crush the New Rebellion Against Constitution
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 09:27 PM PDT by Frank Miele: Jonathan Karl of ABC News asked an interesting question of White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany at last Tuesday’s press briefing: “Where in the Constitution does the president derive the authority to send federal law enforcement officers to the streets of American cities against the will of the elected officials in those cities?” McEnany, as it turned out, was prepared. Section 1315 of Title 40 of the U.S. Code, she explained, “gives DHS the ability to deputize officers in any department or agency like ICE, Custom and Border Patrol and Secret Service … for the duties in connection with the protection of property owned or occupied by the federal government.” She added, “When a federal courthouse is being lit on fire, commercial fireworks being shot at it [and] being shot at the officers, I think that falls pretty well within the limits of 40 U.S. Code 1315.” Since violent thugs have targeted the federal courthouse in Portland, Ore., it was an appropriate response, but it didn’t directly answer Karl’s question, which asked about constitutional authority for the use of federal force. It is a question worth asking, in part because there are many urban areas in the United States currently under similar attack but where no federal property is involved. I’m not sure if Karl thinks President Lincoln’s use of federal force was justified when it was used to put down the rebellion in not just a few riotous cities, but across the entire South, but I do know for a fact that the United States Army was there “against the will of the elected officials” in those cities and states. Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, appearing on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” last Thursday, claimed that the current insurrection is not an aberration, but an echo of that earlier Civil War begun by earlier Democrats who rejected the power of the federal government. “The Democratic Party for a long time historically has been the party of secession,” Miller said. “What you’re seeing today is the Democratic Party returning to its roots. These are mayors and governors that are saying the federal law — the U.S. Constitution — doesn’t apply within the confines of our cities, and our citizens will be held at the mercy of the mob, and the administration of justice, the federal courthouse will be allowed to fall under siege, and that’s what’s happening right now in Portland.” Taking a cue from Miller’s historical analogy, President Trump could learn from the example of our 16th president. Abraham Lincoln had a reputation for taking bold action to preserve the Union, sometimes skirting the Constitution, but there was never any doubt where his allegiance lay. He was dedicated to his oath of office, which had him declare publicly that he would “to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” In the face of secession by the Southern states, Lincoln decided that preserving the Constitution was worth bending it a little. Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus is still debated, and it provides some insight into the use of federal police powers today to quell unrest. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution provides that “The Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of Rebellion or Invasion, the public Safety may require it.” That provision protects against unlawful imprisonment, but it also makes a specific exemption involving rebellion and public safety. The mayor of Atlanta in 1864 objected passionately to Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman’s invasion just as Mayor Ted Wheeler has strenuously objected to the federal officers trying to restore law and order in Portland. But in both cases they would have been wrong to say the Constitution does not provide authority for the president to act. And although the provision to suspend habeas corpus is found in Article I, which is dedicated to legislative powers, there is no reference to the legislature in this specific provision. Insofar as the president is designated as the commander in chief, it is therefore reasonable to assume that he — not Congress — shall be expected to act during a crisis of “rebellion or invasion” to restore public safety. Nor is Article I the only provision that empowers the president to act. The Constitution guarantees citizens of the United States certain civil rights, including the right of free speech and the right to peaceably assemble. Those rights are being impeded by the far-left mobs rioting in Portland, Seattle and other cities, as well as by the lawlessness that has been spawned in many urban areas by defunding or decommissioning police. Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona spoke forcefully on this issue last week when appearing on “Lou Dobbs Tonight”: “This is not peaceful protesting. … This is rioting, this is looting, this is criminal behavior, and in some instances … [it] is being done for purposes of undermining civil order. It is almost treasonous if you look at it that way. … This is gonna cascade. Rights are being abrogated and it’s basically all being done not for enhancement of rights, but actually to take away rights and burn down the system of government that we have built, the economic system and the societal system that makes us Americans.” Biggs said President Trump was entirely justified in sending in federal law enforcement to protect the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, summing it up this way: “In order to fully implement and enjoy liberty, you have to be able to exercise your rights. These people who live in these cities are not able to exercise their rights.” Bingo — and depriving people of their civil rights has been a federal crime for well over a century, at least since the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868. Moreover, Section 241 of U.S. Code Title 18, Chapter 13, makes it a crime for “two or more persons [to] conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It is about time for the Justice Department to recognize that the coordination of thousands of antifa and BLM rioters across multiple cities is indeed just such a conspiracy. One could also make the case that city councils and mayors who refuse to put down violence for any reason are conspiring to “oppress” citizens who wish to enjoy their right to conduct lawful business, to assemble and to speak freely. If Chicago’s leadership permits gun violence to take the lives of dozens of people every month, for instance, then the president has an obligation to step in to protect civil rights. He is authorized to do so by the Insurrection Act of 1807, and more specifically by Title 10, Chapter 13, Section 252 of the current U.S. Code: “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.” This provision is based on Article IV of the Constitution, which says in Section 4 that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” The “republican form of government” referred to means government of the people, by the people and for the people — not the mob, but all the people, making decisions for themselves in a democratic way where everyone’s rights are respected. Article IV anticipates that the leadership of the states will be working for “the people,” not for the mob, and will ask the federal government for help in restoring order, but that raises the question of what happens when the governor, the legislature, or perhaps the mayor and city council have joined forces with the mob. What recourse then do the people have? Should they submit themselves to lawlessness? And what aid can the federal government provide to those who have the misfortune to be citizens of such a rogue state? It seems that the primary purpose of Article IV, Section 4, is the guarantee of a free government that protects the rights of the people. Should the people be held hostage by a secessionist legislature, such as occurred during the Civil War, or by an insurrectionist city council such as we find in Seattle and Portland, then is the president really supposed to wait for the outlaw legislature to call for help? I think not. It is time for President Trump to reassert federal power in the runaway cities that have rejected the Constitution. It is time to put an end to lawlessness. It is time to “insure domestic tranquility … promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty,” as the authors of the Constitution promised. It is time to act. Tags: Frank Miele, RealClear politics, Time to Crush, the New Rebellion, Against, Constitution To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Faith Under Siege, Pastors Take A Stand, Trump Takes Action
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 09:10 PM PDT
by Gary Bauer, Contributing Author: Faith Under Siege It’s an obvious double standard by the state, and an outrageous decision by the Supreme Court. The four left-wing justices voted exactly as expected. Sadly, Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by President George W. Bush, joined them and continues to become more unreliable. In many respects, Friday’s decision essentially ignores the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty. State governments are now treating churches as if they have fewer constitutional protections than other institutions. As a commissioner on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, I would not be surprised at all to hear that communist China was restricting church attendance. But as an American citizen, I am shocked to hear it is happening in this country. This issue proves yet again just how important the courts are and why the upcoming elections are so critical to the future of this country. Thankfully, four justices were willing to overturn Nevada’s discriminatory order. In a brilliant dissent, Justice Neil Gorsuch declared: “In Nevada, it seems, it is better to be in entertainment than religion. Maybe that is nothing new. But the First Amendment prohibits such obvious discrimination against the exercise of religion. The world we inhabit today, with a pandemic upon us, poses unusual challenges. But there is no world in which the Constitution permits Nevada to favor Caesars Palace over Calvary Chapel.” Pastors Take A Stand I want to commend these pastors for taking such a bold stand. But I’m sure Pastor MacArthur probably realizes the irony here. Historically, he has not been known for advocating Christian activism in elections or public policy. Perhaps if more pastors in California had stood up in recent years, they would not have to petition a governor who couldn’t care less about religious liberty. Some have suggested, as even Pastor MacArthur did in his statement, that “the Lord may be using these pressures as a means of purging to reveal the true church.” Well, if you’re looking for God’s hand in something, you can’t come up with a better scenario than the Supreme Court deciding that Caesars Palace has more protection than Calvary Chapel. But as men and women of faith we know that Calvary overcame Caesar many centuries ago, and it will do so again. Trump Takes Action
As the president also said, “Some very rich people are not going to like me very much today.” Trump blasted the unfair system that has made middlemen very rich while “U.S. taxpayers are effectively subsidizing the socialist healthcare systems of foreign welfare states.” By the way, kudos to President Trump for also ordering the Census Bureau to exclude illegal immigrants from the congressional reapportionment process. This too is just common sense, but no president until now has had the courage to take on the open borders lobby and defend our sovereignty. The Left Insults Law Enforcement Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf said on Fox News over the weekend that he has been called up to the Hill by multiple left-wing critics. In all those meetings, only once did a liberal member of Congress inquire about the health and safety of his officers. Meanwhile, Joe Biden accused federal authorities of “brutally attacking peaceful protesters” in Portland. Do you remember when there were protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, a few years ago and President Trump said there were fine people on both sides? Trump specifically said that he wasn’t referring to the neo-Nazis or white supremacists who showed up later, but to the people defending and protesting a historic monument. Well, Joe Biden just called the people trying to burn down a federal courthouse “peaceful protesters” while vilifying the people defending it. Just think about how differently the “mainstream” media have treated these two statements. More Lies It again shows just how flimsy the entire FBI investigation of the Trump campaign truly was. Steele’s primary source wasn’t feeding him first-hand information from Moscow, as the FBI and the media have alleged. The Brookings Institution is a left-leaning think tank that until 2017 was led by Strobe Talbott, a close ally of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Rep. Devin Nunez believes there is evidence that Talbott was instrumental in disseminating the dossier around Washington, D.C. Again, this has all the markings of a political hit job, not a serious national security matter. So, the obvious question is why the FBI continued to pursue it, even once it was clear the dossier was junk and that Trump’s political opponents were behind it. Sen. Lindsey Graham said yesterday that more is going to be revealed in the days ahead. “Here is what I think I’m going to be able to show to the public,” Graham said. “Not only did the FBI lie to the [FISA] court about the reliability about the Steele dossier, they also lied to Congress. And that is a separate crime.” Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Fedcoin: A New Scheme for Tyranny and Poverty
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 08:46 PM PDT
by Dr. Ron Paul: If some Congress members get their way, the Federal Reserve may soon be able to track many of your purchases in real time and share that information with government agencies. This is just one of the problems with the proposed “digital dollar” or “fedcoin.” Fedcoin was initially included in the first coronavirus spending bill. While the proposal was dropped from the final version of the bill, there is still great interest in fedcoin on Capitol Hill. Some progressives have embraced fedcoin as a way to provide Americans with a “universal basic income.” Both the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee held hearings on fedcoin in June. This is the first step toward making fedcoin a reality. Fedcoin would not be an actual coin. Instead, it would be a special account created and maintained for each American by the Federal Reserve. Each month, Fed employees could tap a few keys on a computer and — bingo — each American would have dollars added to his Federal Reserve account. This is the 21st century equivalent of throwing money from helicopters. Fedcoin could effect private cryptocurrencies. Also, it would limit the ability of private citizens to protect themselves from the Federal Reserve-caused decline in the dollar’s value. Fedcoin would not magically increase the number of available goods and services. What it would do is drive up prices. The damage this would do to middle- and lower-income Americans would dwarf any benefit they receive from their monthly “gift” from the Fed. The rise in prices could lead to Congress regularly increasing fedcoin payments to Americans. These increases would cause prices to keep rising even more until we face hyperinflation and a dollar crisis. Of course, we are already on the path to an economic crisis thanks to the Fed. Fedcoin will hasten and worsen the crisis. Fedcoin poses a great threat to privacy. The Federal Reserve could know when fedcoin is used, who is using it, and what they use it for. This information could be shared with government agencies, such as the FBI or IRS. The government could use the ability to know how Americans are spending fedcoin to limit our ability to purchase goods and services disfavored by politicians and bureaucrats. Anyone who doubts this should recall the Obama administration’s Operation Choke Point. Operation Choke Point involved financial regulators “alerting” banks that dealing with certain businesses, such as gun stores, would put the banks at “reputational risk” and could subject them to greater regulation. Is it so hard to believe that the ability to track purchases would be used in the future to “discourage” individuals from buying guns, fatty foods, or tobacco, or from being customers of corporations whose CEOs are not considered “woke” by the thought police? Fedcoin could also be used to “encourage” individuals to patronize “green” business, thus fulfilling Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s goal of involving the Fed in the fight against climate change. Fedcoin could threaten private cryptocurrencies, increase inflation, and give government new powers over our financial transactions. Fedcoin will also speed up destruction of the fiat money system. Whatever gain fedcoin may bring to average Americans will come at terrible cost to liberty and prosperity. Tags: Ron Paul, Fedcoin, new scheme, tyranny, poverty To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Where Are the New Heroes of the Revolution?
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 08:37 PM PDT Cultural revolutions are suicidal, nihilistic, and incoherent. Those who survive such cannibalism do so by arbitrarily exempting their leaders from their own rules of mandated purity and no statute of limitations.
by Victor Davis Hanson: Since late May, the United States has been convulsed by a cultural revolution unlike any seen in its recent history. Statues have been toppled, often without any logic or consistent grievance. Institutions have been renamed, again without coherent consistency. Christian iconography has been a common target. Television shows have been taken off the air; particular corporations boycotted; professional sports recalibrated into social activist spectacles. If there is any common denominator to this madness, it is apparently that the past was toxic, and erasing it in the present will make for a more just and united future. For example, because of the glorification of the imperialist and spoiler of native paradise Christopher Columbus, his statue in Chicago must be removed nocturnally by the order of the mayor—in order to restore peace of mind, social justice, and calm. That act of iconoclasm will rectify things in the present, and thus there will not be another 500 annual homicides in Chicago. But once names are replaced and commemoration destroyed, what exactly follows the erased? Anarchy Is the Replacement Will the founders of Black Lives Matter demand such statues for themselves? In truth, the iconoclasts and revolutionaries are guided by an informal set of chaotic rules that ensures their movement must remain anarchical and nihilist. They cannot really replace what they have destroyed—at least according to their own ad hoc rules of political correctness. And after over two months of constant protests, we know what those protocols are. One, we do not judge famous people by weighing their bad and good deeds. One sin—with or without confession—condemns you to politically incorrect Hell. One bad characteristic—especially supposed racism—cancels whatever good one otherwise accomplished. Liberals idolize President Woodrow Wilson for his progressive politics and one-world utopian foreign policy. But because Wilson was also by our standards an inveterate racist, he is now canceled. Global pacifist Mahatma Gandhi is also out, because in his earlier incarnation as a South African barrister he said and wrote things that now are deemed racist. George Washington may have been unique in terms of his superior morality and achievements, especially in comparison with other slave-holders. But as a slave-holder, his virtue does not matter; and so Washington is relegated to the toxic column, lumped together with any otherwise criminal-minded person who also owned slaves. Two, the revolutionaries are morally censorious but selective in their outrage. They despise Christopher Columbus but are more than happy to live in a Westernized America. They do not eschew it for other indigenous areas that are less contaminated by supposedly toxic Western capitalism and constitutional government. They claim they despise the corporate state, but can’t leave home without their corporate mass-produced smartphones. The selfie, not the clenched fist, is the new emblem of the revolution. In truth, the iconoclasts and revolutionaries are guided by an informal set of chaotic rules that ensures their movement must remain anarchical and nihilist. They cannot really replace what they have destroyed—at least according to their own ad hoc rules of political correctness. And after over two months of constant protests, we know what those protocols are. One, we do not judge famous people by weighing their bad and good deeds. One sin—with or without confession—condemns you to politically incorrect Hell. One bad characteristic—especially supposed racism—cancels whatever good one otherwise accomplished. Liberals idolize President Woodrow Wilson for his progressive politics and one-world utopian foreign policy. But because Wilson was also by our standards an inveterate racist, he is now canceled. Global pacifist Mahatma Gandhi is also out, because in his earlier incarnation as a South African barrister he said and wrote things that now are deemed racist. George Washington may have been unique in terms of his superior morality and achievements, especially in comparison with other slave-holders. But as a slave-holder, his virtue does not matter; and so Washington is relegated to the toxic column, lumped together with any otherwise criminal-minded person who also owned slaves. Two, the revolutionaries are morally censorious but selective in their outrage. They despise Christopher Columbus but are more than happy to live in a Westernized America. They do not eschew it for other indigenous areas that are less contaminated by supposedly toxic Western capitalism and constitutional government. They claim they despise the corporate state, but can’t leave home without their corporate mass-produced smartphones. The selfie, not the clenched fist, is the new emblem of the revolution. Three, there are no statutes of limitations. One insensitive remark in one’s youth, one errant and regrettable deed in the past, will be ferreted out by the social media and internet lynch mob to cancel present lives and livelihoods. The #MeToo movement reached back to then high-schooler Brett Kavanaugh’s late teens to claim falsely that he was a sexual assaulter in efforts to stop a conservative trending Supreme Court. Such is the new standard. These informal rules explain perhaps why when statues go down, none go back up. No Heroes Are Good Heroes Get rid of Columbus to put on a pedestal Martin Luther King, Jr.? Not according to present revolutionary standards: the great civil rights leader’s great good is canceled by his plagiarism, his callous womanizing, and, according to a recent biographer, his serial demeaning of women. Maybe we could replace statues with more progressive heroes like Franklin D. Roosevelt? Not so fast. He green-lighted the amoral and forced internment of Japanese-Americans and Japanese resident aliens during World War II. He voiced anti-Semitic tropes and did little to allow Jews to reach America as a sanctuary. Against that and under the new rules, what does the New Deal or leading the United States in World War II against fascism matter? Perhaps we should look to more contemporary new heroes that could replace now toppled statues of old Stonewall Jackson the racist or the late 18th-century Father Junipero Serra the severe Catholic disciplinarian? Why not someone of the squad, like Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)? Aside from the fact that so far young Omar has had few if any legislative accomplishments, her rhetoric and personal life, by the rules of the revolutionary council, would also cancel her. She has tweeted and uttered statements that are clearly anti-Semitic. There is some evidence, so far not rebutted, that she married her own brother to skirt U.S. immigration law. And she is currently under investigation for campaign finance and income tax irregularities. Not the stuff of a crusading hero. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger? She’s fading fast, given her eugenics-inspired racism. The icon of the Sierra Club, John Muir, might as well have been an armed robber, given he said things now deemed racist that cancel out his other pathbreaking work as the father of Sierra Nevada mountain preservation. Safe Zones for Cosplay Revolutionaries There are plenty of safe zones in the world where the “system” operates on more pre-Columbian assumptions and has over time cleansed itself from much of past Western racism, colonialism, and imperialism—to the point that such places can now brag of being non-Western. Southern and rural Mexico might be an ideal place for protestors to emigrate. There are few toxic white people there. Indigenous pre-Columbian customs and language still survive, and it is nominally under the jurisdiction of an often anti-American Mexican government. Ditto the mountains of Peru. Cuba has restructured itself as the antitheses of the West and could be an ideal home with accessible healthcare for the Antifa youth of Seattle and Portland. The strange reluctance to flee from a hated system, while enjoying its affluence and leisure to attack the source, suggests that most protestors, alas, are Western to the core. They apparently secretly know why they have the freedom, the money, the time, the health, and the security — all dividends of America—to cosplay as Che Guevara without having to delve into the mud and humidity of the Bolivian jungle. Then we come to the revolutionaries themselves and their insistence that any past racist or illiberal utterance condemns one to the cancel-culture guillotine. How about the godhead of the New York Times’ “1619 Project,” Nikole Hannah-Jones? Nope—a quarter-century ago, according to the revolution’s own rules, she remains still guilty for expressing youthful and vile racism. As a college student, she stereotyped an entire race as murderous, prone to rape, theft, and innately savage in their role as “bloodsuckers.” Maybe ascendant progressive pathbreaker Joy Reid of MSNBC is worthy of a pedestal in place of the now toppled Miguel de Cervantes or Frederick Douglass? Nope. She has a now decade-old history of unhinged homophobic and gay-bashing rants, and she compounded her sins by lying that she never wrote them. Perhaps then we can rename the Woodrow Wilson School either the Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, or Jeremiah Wright school of diplomacy? All, unfortunately, have a long history of anti-Semitic slurs. No One Measures Up How about we at least consider the legendary founder of the revered Southern Poverty Law Center, Morris Dees? Again nope. No statue or named university wing there either. Dees once worked for the racist George Wallace. And the now dethroned Dees seems to have run his center like a cultish Synanon, in the sense that the money-making enterprise made him quite wealthy, and according to some of this own employees was a hotbed of “mistreatment, sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and racism.” The anti-racist SPLC racist? The iconic center of the Civil Rights movement might be the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture on the Washington Mall. Alas, it just took down a display that by any standard was utterly vile and racist. It claimed “whites” (that is all 240 million apparently herd-like whites) typically demand toxic values like being on time, the Protestant work ethic and good grammar—as if millions of blacks do not find such values key to their success, without considering them “white” at all, but innate to their own history and values. No statues are going up, because there can be no heroes by the revolution’s own 360-degree rules. No leaders emerge, because the moment they do—“warlord” (and capitalist landlord) Raz Simone, “trained Marxist” and BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors, or iconic moneyman for the revolution George Soros—they would be found guilty of the same crimes of having a past that is often quite less than honorable. The Unspoken Hypocrisy and Arbitrariness of the Revolution Some people must be above revolutionary law and deserve exemption from violating the values of tolerance and diversity that they espouse. So LeBron James cannot be anti-Semitic even though his past tweets and statements might suggest just that. Tara Reade has to be a liar to dare to accuse Joe Biden of a long-ago rather creepy, violent, and ugly sexual assault. Joy Reid, to continue her good work, simply has to make up an imaginary hacker who magically put all those ugly homophobic remarks into her own social media accounts. Cultural revolutions are suicidal, nihilistic, and incoherent. Those who survive such cannibalism do so by arbitrarily exempting their leaders from their own rules of mandated purity, anti-Western cant, and no statute of limitations. Otherwise, in truth, Che becomes a middle-class spoiled brat homicidal thug, Mao’s China would still be a country of genocide and starving peasants pounding out non-Western pot-iron in their ovens, and Colin Kaepernick would be erased from the Nike brand for once smearing another NFL player with the N-word. If there is any coherent message in this otherwise incoherent summer, it is that a few thousand wannabees have launched a revolution with the full expectation that their own careers in the universities, media, sports, and politics will be thereby enhanced — and enhanced in the most remuneratively Western and capitalist fashion possible. Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, Where Are the New Heroes, of the Revolution? To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Michelle Malkin vs. Leftist Fascist Mob
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 08:37 PM PDT . . . A leading conservative warrior sends “LAW & ORDER!!! S.O.S!” message to Trump. by Joseph Klein: It was supposed to be a peaceful expression of support for Denver’s beleaguered local police. The sixth annual Law Enforcement Appreciation Day event was scheduled to be held on July 19th in its normal location at the amphitheater in Denver’s Civic Center Park. Conservative writer and speaker Michelle Malkin, who has dealt before with radical leftists trying to prevent her from speaking on college campuses, was to be a featured speaker at this event. But an assortment of anti-police militants, including members of the Marxist Party for Socialism and Liberation and other Black Lives Matter supporters, violently shut the event down before Malkin had a chance to speak. “No parties for the pigs! Shut down Pro-Police Rally,” they advertised on Facebook. The Denver police should have been prepared for what was coming. But instead of being grateful for the public show of support, Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen wanted the Law Enforcement Appreciation Day event rescheduled or moved to another location because he feared a Black Lives Matter counter-protest. Pazen’s duty is to protect people’s exercise of their constitutional right to peacefully assemble for whatever cause. But Pazen, who had marched together with Black Lives Matter demonstrators the month before, was willing to effectively give Black Lives Matter and their radical left wing supporters veto power over free speech. The organizers of the pro-police event did not back down. They began, as scheduled, with the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. But the peaceful participants were vastly outnumbered by the police-hating militants who showed up as promised to shut down the pro-police rally. They used fascist-style tactics to accomplish their mission. A number of women attending the peaceful event were assaulted by the rioters, in some cases with hard objects such as batons. Michelle Malkin herself was one of the victims of the mob’s assault on the Law Enforcement Appreciation Day rally as she tried to protect one of the participants. She caught what transpired on video and tweeted a portion showing “the moment one of our people was beaten on stage by invading BLM/Antifa.” One of the rally organizers was bloodied in the face and head right near Malkin. Lillian House, an organizer for the Party of Socialism and Liberation that co-sponsored the militants’ shutdown action, said that any celebration in support of police is “unacceptable” and “just all around out of touch with the struggles people are facing.” Are we now at the point in Denver and other major cities across the country where mobs decide what speech is acceptable or unacceptable and are permitted to enforce their dictates with violence? It seems so. “I’m ok. America is not,” Michelle Malkin tweeted following the mob’s shutdown of the rally at which Malkin was supposed to speak. “Outrageous violence,” tweeted Acting Deputy Secretary Ken Cuccinelli. “These tyrannical, left-wing anarchists hate free speech. If you do not agree with them, they believe you must be beaten down – literally. @michellemalkin” The Denver police were reportedly told to stand down initially, allowing the angry mob to first drown out and then violently attack the people who had come out in support of the police. The police said that it was only after some of the rioters “made aggressive moves” toward police officers themselves that they used pepper balls and a can of pepper spray to disperse some of the rioters. Malkin summed up the mayhem in her July 22nd column for the Jewish World Review. “Unprovoked, the cop-haters blared airhorns, sprayed our faces (mine included), burned an American flag, punched, shoved and menaced and took over our stage,” she wrote, adding that the police did not intervene in time. “Freedom of speech? Association? Peaceable assembly? Ha. Ha. Ha,” Malkin sneered. Instead of supporting those exercising their constitutional rights, many in the privileged “Fourth Estate” media view the violent lawbreakers as mere “counter-protesters” who deserve respect. On July 23rd, four days after members of the Party for Socialism and Liberation and their comrades disrupted the peaceful assembly in honor of Law Enforcement Appreciation Day, the Denver Post published an editorial entitled “Trump and the federal agents he can deploy need to stay away from Colorado’s protests.” The Denver post editors pompously declared that “Trump — or any president for that matter — does not get to decide whether or not protests occur.” True, if the protests are peaceful. But militant mobs do not get to decide either what speech is “unacceptable” and back their edicts with force. Yet that is exactly what happened in Denver last week. If the local police fail to protect their residents’ civil liberties, it is time for federal agents to step in. Not to fight run-of-the-mill street crimes but to protect law-abiding individuals’ fundamental constitutional freedoms from extremist group violence. President Trump has focused on mob violence that local law enforcement agencies have proven unwilling or unable to contain. The mayhem in Portland, including unprovoked nightly attacks against federal officers and property, is the leading example today. Seattle and Denver are not far behind. If people peacefully assembling to celebrate law enforcement, as they have done annually in Denver for years, can no longer rely on law enforcement for protection against violent mobs, something is very rotten in America. We are no longer living in the same country where we were brought up to believe in a nation of freedom under the rule of law. To add insult to injury, the Denver Post editorial referred to the rioters as “counter-protesters calling for police reform.” No, they are violent revolutionaries whose expressed intent was, in their own words, to “shut down” the pro-police rally. A forcible shutdown of a peaceful assembly is not a peaceful “counter-protest” protected as an inviolable right under the Constitution. Intimidation and beatings are a criminal infringement of the rights of others to peacefully assemble, which require a firm law enforcement response. The Denver Post editorial refused to blame either side. “Videos taken at the event by a Denver Post reporter capture fights erupting occasionally but don’t make it clear who is to blame for the skirmishes,” the editors asserted. “Denver police handled the situation admirably by allowing both groups to assemble, but also attempting to protect people from harm by breaking up fights. Pulling police from the event after things had settled down and one group left was the right call. Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen should be applauded for how his officers handled the volatile situation.” Reality check: One group assembled peacefully. The other “group” – a mob – attacked the already assembled peaceful group who had begun their pro-police rally onstage. The police failed to amass enough officers to stand between the pro-police rally participants and the much larger mob, allowing thugs from the mob to storm the stage and beat up members of the peaceful group. The police only responded to the mob violence when some of their own officers were being threatened. The mob succeeded in shutting down the Law Enforcement Appreciation Day event, which forced the participants to leave for their own safety. Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen should be condemned for his actions before and during the riot, not applauded. The Denver Post concluded its editorial this way: “Adding another agency to the mix — one with questionable accountability for their actions and directives from the president that one side of the dispute ‘hates America’– could have been disastrous.” Wrong again. The violent mob could have been dispersed before they launched their attack on a peaceful assembly of people exercising their constitutional rights. The Denver Post editorial board, like so many in the mainstream media, refuse to accept that militants attacking peaceful demonstrators they do not agree with, law enforcement officers and public property do truly hate America’s capitalist constitutional republic. The militants clamor for revolution to bring down the present system and replace it with a socialist state. Consider what the Party of Socialism and Liberation, an organizer of the shutdown of the peaceful pro-police rally in Denver, proclaimed in its party program: ———————– Joseph Klein writes for FrontPage Mag. Tags: Joseph Klein, FrontPage Mag, Michelle Malkin, Leftist Fascist Mob To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
How Progressive Policies Wreck Everything
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 07:00 PM PDT
by John Stossel: I laughed when I saw The Washington Post headline: “Minneapolis had progressive policies, but its economy still left black families behind.” The media are so clueless. Instead of “but,” the headline should have said, “therefore,” or “so, obviously.” Of course, progressive policies failed. They almost always do. “If you wanted a poster child for the progressive movement, it would be Minneapolis,” says former Rep. Jason Lewis, R-Minn. in my new video. “This is the same City Council that voted to abolish the police department.” The council, which has no Republicans, spends taxpayer money on most every progressive idea. Council members brag that they recycle most everything. They have a plan to stop climate change. They tell landlords to whom they must rent. They will force employers to pay every worker $15 an hour. They even tell supermarkets what cereal they must sell. Despite such policies, meant to improve life for minorities and the poor, the Minneapolis income gap between whites and blacks is the second-highest in the country. While that surprises the media, it’s no surprise to Lewis, who points out, “When you take away the incentive for work and savings and investment, you get less of it.” Exactly. When government sends checks to people who don’t work, more people don’t work. Guarantees like a high minimum wage raise the cost of potential workers, so some never get hired. High taxes to fund progressives’ programs make it difficult for businesses to open in the first place. “I’ve been touring businesses that were burned. They did not mention global warming, recycling, or the environment one single time,” Lewis said. “You know what they say? Give me low taxes and give me public order.” Lewis says Minnesota is now a “command-and-control economy. … They’re not even shy about it. [Congresswoman] Ilhan Omar said we need to abolish capitalism!” Not exactly. But Omar did call for “dismantling the whole system of oppression,” including America’s economic systems that “prioritize profit.” Lewis says she wants to create “equal poverty for everybody.” No, I push back: “She thinks her ideas will lift everybody up.” “Show us, Ilhan,” he responds. “Where has it worked? Everything that you’re proposing hasn’t worked!” He’s right. But Cam Gordon, a current Minneapolis councilman, tells me the city’s economic “disparities were caused by a long trail of historic racism.” He tweeted: “Time to end capitalism as we know it.” That would be good, he said, because “[w]e could have more democratic control of our resources.” Gordon is the kind of guy who gets elected in Minneapolis. “Every alternative to capitalism brings stagnation and poverty,” I say to him. Gordon answers, “I think we can take care of each other better.” Lewis points out that before COVID-19, “the people gaining the most were at the bottom end of the wage scale. Women, Hispanics, African Americans were gaining the most. A rising tide truly lifts all boats.” He’s right again. In the past 50 years, while progressives attacked profits, capitalism—the pursuit of profit—lifted more than 1 billion people out of extreme poverty. When I point that out to Gordon, he simply ignores my point about fabulous progress around the world and says: “The problem with capitalism as we know it is this idea that we have to have constant growth. … Capitalism got us the housing crisis right now and … climate change. It’s actually going to destroy the planet.” Sigh. His Green Party’s “community-based economics” would give the community control over private property. It seems to me like community-based economics is just another way to say socialism. That’s brought poverty and tyranny every time it’s been tried. “When socialism fails,” says Lewis, “the apologists always say, ‘We just didn’t do it enough, just didn’t do it the right way.’ [But] it’s always failed.” Sadly, today in America, the progressives are winning. Tags: John Stossel, How Progressive Policies, Wreck Everything To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
This is What Keeps America Free
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 05:55 PM PDT by NRA-ILA: In response to a public expression of lawful political speech, “safety officers” come to the person’s home at midnight to interrogate him. He is accused of intimidation, making threats, hate crimes, and disorderly conduct. He is found guilty and his punishment includes exclusion from the community, suspension of his academic privileges, a ban on taking leadership roles in campus organizations, mandatory meetings with appropriate officials to learn about correct ways of thinking and speaking, and the presentation of a formal written apology, to be submitted in draft form “for approval.” Readers would be excused for assuming that this occurred in some backward, repressive dictatorship or totalitarian regime, but these troubling events took place at an American University. Austin Tong, a senior at Fordham University in New York State, posted two messages on his Instagram account. The first, on June 3, was a comment about the “nonchalant societal reaction” to the killing of David Dorn, a black, retired St. Louis Police officer. His second post, a day later, was a photo of himself holding his lawfully owned AR-15 rifle at his off-campus home. This was captioned, “Don’t tread on me,” followed by the emojis of the American and Communist Chinese flags and a hashtag “commonly used by Chinese citizens to avoid censorship of online discussion of the Tiananmen Square massacre.” Mr. Tong is a Chinese-American who arrived in the United States as a six-year-old immigrant. He explained that his second post was made to commemorate the 31st anniversary of the suppressed 1989 Chinese Democracy Movement. According to Mr. Tong, the university “sent safety officers at midnight to interrogate me all over a simple picture of a lawfully owned gun.” Keith Eldredge, Fordham University’s Dean of Students and Assistant Vice President, followed up by advising that he was initiating an investigation for bias/hate crimes, threats/intimidation, and disorderly conduct, based on these “posts on social media related to the current racial issues in the country and political issues in China, including one in which you were holding an automatic weapon.” Fordham University – a private educational institution that is not bound by the First Amendment – nonetheless professes its commitment to free speech and expressive rights. For example, its mission statement “guarantees the freedom of inquiry required by rigorous thinking and the quest for truth.” The university’s Demonstration Policy opens with the following: “By its very nature, the University is a place where ideas and opinions are formulated and exchanged. Each member of the University has a right to freely express their positions and to work for their acceptance whether they assent to or dissent from existing situations in the University or society.” Similarly, Fordham’s policy on “Bias-Related Incidents and/or Hate Crimes” claims the University: A July 14 letter from Keith Eldredge (copied to the “Department of Public Safety”) outlined the sanctions. Mr. Tong would be barred from the campus for the duration of his degree program. He was banned from representing the university or running for any student office or position. He would be required to attend instruction and complete activities on “implicit bias,” including a meeting with staff of the “multicultural affairs” office. He would have to submit a mandatory “apology letter,” to be approved by the university and a failure to comply would result in the university suspending or expelling him. Perversely, the social media backlash to these innocuous posts has itself resulted in threats, intimidation, and potential bias/hate crimes against Austin Tong. It will be interesting to see whether Fordham University will enforce the same rules and policies against the activists from the university that “flooded the comments section” of his posts. In the same way that the “quest for truth” supported characterizing his firearm indiscriminately as an “automatic weapon,” the university’s commitments to “freedom of expression and the open exchange of ideas” protected Austin Tong, who was “forcibly silenced, faced verbal and assaulting harassment from mobs, and subjected to Soviet-style interrogation and punishment.” Despite this, and the possibility that his academic career will be marred indefinitely due to these disciplinary actions, he has been steadfast in his defense of his constitutional rights. In a video for the NRA, Austin Tong describes his decision to purchase a gun, adding that “[h]ere in America, we have our right to keep and bear arms. This is what keeps America free.” Actually, Austin, it is patriots like you – who fight to protect our constitutional freedoms – that keep America free. Tags: NRA-ILA, This is What Keeps America Free To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Pawn Stars . . .
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 05:35 PM PDT . . . Science says that kids (students) are better off in school but the teachers union prefer to play politics and use the kids as pawns.
Tags: editorial cartoon, AF Branco, Pawn Stars, teachers, unions, students To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Another 930,000 Leave Unemployment In A Week – Trump Economy Continues Rapid Recovery
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 05:28 PM PDT — but will the virus get in the way? by Robert Romano: Another net 930,000 Americans left continued unemployment claims the week of July 11, according to the latest unadjusted data from the U.S. Department of Labor as momentum continues to bring millions of Americans back into the labor force. In the same week, initial unemployment claims came in at about 1.5 million, but with the overall drop in the number of people collection by almost 1 million, that means even more Americans are returning to work. The number translates into 2.4 million who got their jobs back. There is still a lot of volatility, but the trajectory is clearly on its way down. Continued claims had jumped up the week of July 4 as many Americans came off of extended pandemic unemployment assistance, but then continued on their weeks long downward trajectory a week later. The states with the biggest returns to the labor force were California, Florida and Pennsylvania, with 217,000, 223,000 and 141,000 leaving unemployment claims the week of July 11, respectively. Michigan and Georgia also contributed to the drop in unemployment, falling 99,000 and 97,000 respectively. Since the week ending May 9, unadjusted continuing unemployment claims have dropped from 22.8 million to 16.4 million the week ending July 11, an overall drop of 6.4 million. Overall, in May and June, from 7.8 million to 8.8 million Americans got their jobs back the past two months after labor markets bottomed in April, with millions more expected for the month of July, even as COVID-19 cases are seeing a temporary spike. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) estimates about 117,000 new COVID-19 cases a day at the moment, still down 53 percent from it late March peak of 253,000 new cases a day. IHME puts daily deaths are at about 851 today, down 63 percent from its April 17 peak of 2,301. Two weeks ago, though, IHME was only estimating about 80,000 new cases, and so the rate of reopening could see a pause the second half of July into August, when daily new cases are expected to stabilize and begin dropping through the end of September. A slowdown of reopening may similarly slowdown any economic recovery. Another headwind could be Congress as it considers another extension of unemployment benefits. But President Donald Trump said on July 21 at a White House press briefing that this time, workers won’t be making more on unemployment assistance than they were making when they were working: “We want to have people go back and want to go back to work as opposed to be, sort of, forced into a position where they’re making more money than they expected to make. And the employers are having a hard time getting them back to work… The amount would be the same, but doing it in a little bit smaller initial amounts so that people are going to want to go back to work, as opposed to making so much money that they really don’t have to.” The biggest adjustment in labor markets could be coming in September as many but not all schools begin some form of reopening, giving working families a major boost. Still, the speed of recovery seems to be surprising almost everyone except for President Trump. On March 25, the President predicted, “I don’t think it’s going to end up being such a rough patch. I think it’s going to, when we open — especially, if we can open it — the sooner, the better — it’s going to open up like a rocket ship. I think it’s going to go very good and very quickly.” Now, the numbers are proving he was right. But to be sustained will require states finding a way to safely reopen, especially if everyone’s hopes for a vaccine don’t pan out the way we want. The truth is there’s never been an effective vaccine for a coronavirus developed. If we get one this time, it’ll be the first time. Meaning, the President, Congress and state governors need to be preparing the American people for a reopening scenario where there might not be an effective vaccine in place. The truth is we cannot stay locked up forever, no matter who wins the election in November. We still need to make certain that as we find a way to mitigate the risk of the virus, the cure is not worse than the disease itself. Tags: Robert Romano, Americans for Limited Government, Another 930,000, Leave Unemployment, In A Week, Trump Econom, Continues Rapid Recovery To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Democracy Thrives in Out-of-Court Settlement
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 05:28 PM PDT by Paul Jacob: Nick Sandmann has won again. The Washington Post “Where Democracy Dies in Darkness” has agreed to settle out of court with young Mr. Sandmann — for an undisclosed amount. We learned this from Sandmann himself, on Twitter: CNN settled in January. Suits against ABC, CBS, The Guardian, The Hill and NBC are still pending. At issue? “The Washington Post falsely reported in 2019 that a group of Covington Catholic High School students, including Sandmann, harassed a man named Nathan Phillips with taunts and racial slurs,” explains Beckett Adams in The Washington Examiner. “The students did no such thing, as video evidence available at the time made clear. In fact, footage of the incident shows the teens were accosted not only by Phillips, who clearly sought out a confrontation, but they were also being harassed by a nearby gathering of members of the racist, anti-Semitic Black Hebrew Israelites. The Washington Post chose to give glossy, glowing news coverage to the Black Hebrew Israelites, a known hate group, all while portraying the Covington Catholic students (some of whom were black) as racists.” Inflamed by the Post and CNN and other outlets, a self-righteously woke online mob jumped on Sandmann and other students — included were many calls for violence, and much harping on the fact the kids wore MAGA hats. If ever a lawsuit of this kind made sense, this one did. But will these media outfits learn their lesson? This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Democracy Thrives, in Out-of-Court Settlement To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Not Your Parents’ Revolution How Today’s Anarchists Differ From 60s Protesters
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 03:02 PM PDT Today, if there is a silent mass of traditionalists and conservatives, they remain in hiding.
by Victor Davis Hanson: In the 1960s and early ’70s, the U.S. was convulsed by massive protests calling for radical changes in the country’s attitudes on race, class, gender and sexual orientation. The Vietnam War and widespread college deferments were likely the fuel that ignited prior peaceful civil disobedience. Sometimes the demonstrations became violent, as with the Watts riots of 1965 and the protests at the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago. Terrorists from the Weathermen (later called the Weather Underground) bombed dozens of government buildings. The ’60s revolution introduced to the country everything from hippies, communes, free love, mass tattooing, commonplace profanity, rampant drug use, rock music and high divorce rates to the war on poverty, massive government growth, feminism, affirmative action and race/gender/ethnic college curricula. The enemies of the ’60s counterculture were the “establishment” — politicians, corporations, the military and the “square generation” in general. Leftists targeted their parents, who had grown up in the Great Depression. That generation had won World War II and returned to create a booming postwar economy. After growing up with economic and military hardship, they sought a return to comfortable conformity in the 1950s. A half-century after the earlier revolution, today’s cultural revolution is vastly different — and far more dangerous. Government and debt have grown. Social activism is already institutionalized in hundreds of newer federal programs. The “Great Society” inaugurated a multi-trillion-dollar investment in the welfare state. Divorce rates soared. The nuclear family waned. Immigration, both legal and illegal, skyrocketed. Thus, America is far less resilient, and a far more divided, indebted and vulnerable target than it was in 1965. Today, radicals are not protesting against 1950s conservatism but rather against the radicals of the 1960s, who as old liberals now hold power. Now, many of the current enforcers — blue-state governors, mayors and police chiefs — are from the left. Unlike Democratic Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley in the ’60s, today’s progressive civic leaders often sympathize with the protesters. The ’60s protests were for racial assimilation and integration to reify Martin Luther King Jr.’s agenda of making race incidental, not essential, to the American mindset. Not so with today’s cultural revolution. It seeks to ensure that racial difference is the foundation of American life, dividing the country between supposed non-white victims and purported white victimizers, past and present. In the ’60s, radicals rebelled against their teachers and professors, who were often highly competent and the products of fact-based and inductive education. Not so in 2020. Today’s radicals were taught not by traditionalists but by less-educated older radicals. Another chief difference is debt. Most public education in the 1960s was bare-bones and relatively inexpensive. Because there were no plush dorms, latte bars, rock-climbing walls, diversity coordinators and provosts of inclusion, college tuition in real dollars was far cheaper. The result was that 1960s student radicals graduated without much debt and for all their hipness could enter a booming economy with marketable skills. Today’s angry graduates owe a collective $1.6 trillion in student loan debt — much of it borrowed for mediocre, therapeutic and politicized training that does not impress employers. College debt impedes maturity, marriage, child-raising, home ownership and the saving of money. In other words, today’s radical is far more desperate and angry that his college gambit never paid off. Today’s divide is also geographical in the fashion of 1861, not just generational as in the 1960s. The two blue coasts seem to despise the vast red interior, and vice versa. Yet the scariest trait of the current revolution is that many of its sympathizers haven’t changed much since the 1960s. They may be rich, powerful, influential and older, but they are just as reckless and see the current chaos as the final victory in their own long march from the ’60s. Corporations are no longer seen as evil, but as woke contributors to the revolution. The military is no longer smeared as warmongering, but praised as a government employment service where race, class and gender agendas can be green-lighted without messy legislative debate. Unlike the 1960s, there are essentially no conservatives in Hollywood, on campuses or in government bureaucracies. So the war no longer pits radicals against conservatives, but often socialists and anarchists against both liberals and conservatives. In the ’60s, a huge “silent majority” finally had enough, elected Richard Nixon and slowed down the revolution by jailing its criminals, absorbing and moderating it. Today, if there is a silent mass of traditionalists and conservatives, they remain in hiding. If they stay quiet in their veritable mental monasteries and deplore the violence in silence, the revolution will steamroll on. But as in the past, if they finally snap, decide enough is enough and reclaim their country, then even this cultural revolution will sputter out, too. Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, McIntosh Enterprises, Not Your Parents’ Revolution, How Today’s Anarchists, Differ From 60s Protesters To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Eliot Ness and President Donald Trump
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 02:52 PM PDT
by Newt Gingrich: When President Trump announced Operation LeGend to stop growing urban violence, many left-wing Democrats and propaganda media members criticized it as inappropriate federal intervention. Speaker Nancy Pelosi tweeted “Trump & his stormtroopers must be stopped.” As I noted in the chapter “Loving Criminals, Hating the Law” in my new best-selling book Trump and the American Future, there is a deep passion on the left to give criminals every possible break (no bail and automatic release in New York City, for example) while slandering, attacking, and attempting to defund the police. The Pelosi tweet is in this anti-police tradition. Far from being so-called stormtroopers, federal law enforcement officials involved in Operation LeGend are in a tradition that everyone who has seen the Kevin Costner movie, The Untouchables, will recognize. In 1930, Al Capone’s criminal organization was so big and profitable it had corrupted law enforcement and elected officials in Chicago. The United States government established a small team which methodically began destroying Capone’s illegal empire. An earlier federal intervention was, in many ways, the first big national story which led to the Federal Bureau of Investigation being established. Faced with a wave of murders of Native Americans of the Osage Nation, who were killed for their oil royalties and unable to get local law enforcement to do anything in 1925, the elders of the Osage tribe asked the then-Bureau of Investigation and its young director, J. Edgar Hoover to investigate the murders and find the killers. The heavily publicized success of a small number of federal agents in ending the killings helped launch Hoover’s career – and what became the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1935. My granddaughter Maggie got me to read David Grann’s book Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI. It is an amazing and little-known story of local corruption and the value of an active federal law enforcement system. A more recent example of federal law enforcement intervening when local police and local politicians fail to protect American lives was the 1964 killing of three civil rights workers in Mississippi, the so-called Mississippi Burning Murders. It was clear that local law enforcement and local politicians would do nothing to find the murderers. President Lyndon B. Johnson sent in the FBI. Agents found the hidden bodies of the three young Americans (buried in an earthen dam on a farm) and tracked down the killers, who were brought to trial on civil rights violations. In this same tradition of intervening when local politicians and law enforcement fail to do their jobs, President Trump outlined the case for decisive federal involvement in saving lives. President Trump started by reminding everyone on Wednesday that protecting the American people was his “sacred obligation.” The President outlined realistically the current disastrous situation: “Perhaps no citizens have suffered more from the menace of violent crime than the wonderful people of Chicago — a city I know very well. At least 414 people have been murdered in the city this year, a roughly 50 percent increase over last year. More than 1,900 people have been shot. These are numbers that aren’t even to be believed. “Yesterday alone, 23 people were shot in Chicago, including at least 15 who were shot in a merciless onslaught of gunfire outside of a funeral home. Sixty-three people were shot in the city this past weekend, and at least twelve people were killed. Over the Fourth of July weekend, nearly 80 people were shot, and 17 were killed. Over Father’s Day weekend, 104 people were shot, and 15 were killed, including 5 young children. And the last weekend in May saw the city’s deadliest day on record: 18 murders in 24 hours.””In a stunning moment of tragic irony, the day before Trump’s speech, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot criticized President Trump’s plan saying he was trying to deploy “unnamed special secret agents” and strip civil liberties form people. She said it “is not going to happen in Chicago.” It was the same day the 15 people were shot and killed at a funeral home – where they were grieving for someone who had been killed by criminal violence. What about their civil liberties, Mayor Lightfoot? It amazes me that none of these Democratic mayors in New York City, Chicago, St Louis, Minneapolis, Portland, and Seattle – none of them – seem to understand that an anti-police bias creates a vacuum which attracts violent predators. In an upcoming podcast at Gingrich 360, former New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, the man whose policies radically reduced murders in New York City, talks with me about the madness of the current policies and the degree to which they are directly responsible for the explosion of violent deaths. In this environment, President Trump is exactly right to take steps to protect innocent Americans who are being sacrificed to the ideology of their local Democratic officials. |
||
New Jersey’s All-Mail Vote Debacle Is a Warning for November
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 02:50 PM PDT by Jason Snead: Even as New Jersey voters look to the general election, many are still coping with the aftermath of the state’s first all-mail vote. Paterson, the Garden State’s third-largest city, is mired in a burgeoning election scandal. One in 5 ballots have been rejected. The local NAACP has cried foul. And now, four men—including a councilman and councilman-elect—have been charged by the state’s attorney general with criminal election fraud. The state’s May 12 election was conducted entirely by mail on Gov. Phil Murphy’s order. Ballots were automatically sent to every registration. That makes Paterson an early test of the vote-by-mail model now being pushed in unison by the political left. The fact that it immediately went off the rails is a warning to the nation that we would be foolish to ignore. WATCH >>> Exposing the dangers of mass mail-in voting! Concerns began mounting before voting had even ended. Undeliverable ballots piled up in trash cans and apartment lobbies. Even though state law forbids anyone from collecting more than three ballots, roughly 800 ballots were found bundled together — 400 were stuffed into one mailbox, and 360 more were found in another in a completely different town. That evidence of illegal vote harvesting led officials to reject them all. An additional 1,214 votes were disqualified because the voters’ signatures did not match official records, and 1,000 more because the “bearer”—the person who collected and delivered the vote—didn’t properly report doing so. Voters reported never receiving ballots even though they are listed as having voted. In other words, someone else purportedly cast their votes. Ultimately, nearly 20% of ballots cast on May 12 were invalidated. Paterson NAACP leader the Rev. Kenneth Clayton summed it up best: “These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore.” Unsurprisingly, the four people recently indicted face charges that they illegally possessed or tampered with ballots. Fresh accusations are coming to light that one of the defendant’s campaigns hired workers to churn out fraudulent votes in bulk. The simple fact is, mail voting is more susceptible to error and fraud than voting in person. Bad actors can get their hands on mail ballots and alter, forge, or destroy them. Anytime voting takes place away from the controlled and observed confines of a polling place, it is less secure. Fifteen years ago, a commission co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter warned that mail-in voting is “likely to increase the risks of fraud and of contested elections.” That’s as true today as it was then. Jury-rigging a vote-by-mail system doesn’t just risk fraud. The New Jersey Spotlight reported that 1 in 10 ballots cast statewide were rejected for various reasons. Many arrived too late to be counted, a stark reminder that mail ballots can be lost or delayed. Roughly a third of rejected ballots had something wrong with the ballot itself: The ballot was not enclosed, for instance, or was missing information necessary to be processed. These sorts of mistakes—to say nothing of innocent errors like voting for too many candidates in a single race—are easily fixed at polling places. Not so when those votes are mailed in. Studies show that first-time absentee voters are more likely to make mistakes that force officials to disqualify their ballots. Let’s not forget, an unprecedented portion of the electorate this fall will be first-time mail voters. Imagine the nightmare of a November election decided by a hair, but with a sizable percentage of ballots thrown out. Vote-by-mail proponents retort that the obvious solution to the problem of rejected ballots is to discard the rules and safeguards that lead to ballots being invalidated. Liberal groups and their allies have filed dozens of partisan lawsuits across the nation to force this plan on states. Its core pillars: Automatically mail ballots even to voters who are likely deceased or have moved away, allow vote harvesting, and dismantle the systems that states use to stop vote tampering and ensure each vote is cast by a lawful voter. In other words, the aim of the vote-by-mail crowd is to create all the conditions that made the Paterson election ripe for fraud, but remove the tools that allowed that fraud to be detected, stopped, and prosecuted. Do they really believe no one will take advantage of that free-for-all? Most voters understand that in fair elections, it must be both easy to vote and hard to cheat. Fraud, both real and perceived, turns people off. States are down to the wire to finalize their plans for voting this fall. Vulnerable voters need to be able to request absentee ballots, but that is a far cry from the all-mail election that activists are pining for. Their plan is a recipe for disaster. If we implement it, we may soon be asking ourselves how we could have ignored Paterson’s warning. Tags: Jason Snead, The Daily Signal, New Jersey, All-Mail Vote Debacle, Is a Warning, for November To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Trump’s Reactive Engagement
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 01:59 PM PDT . . . Examining the president’s foreign policy.
by Dr. Victor Davis Hanson: The United States and indeed the Western world face four quite different challenges on the horizon: China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea. All these threats were analyzed at length in the 68-page U.S. National Security Strategy assessment of December 2017, written by then–national-security adviser H. R. McMaster and his staff. The encompassing theme of that blueprint was dubbed “strategic realism.” In popular parlance it may have been better known as a new “Jacksonianism” — defined loosely as something like the self-composed epitaph of the Roman strongman Sulla found in Plutarch’s life of the general (“No friend had ever surpassed him in doing kindness, and no enemy in doing harm”), or perhaps the reactive principle enshrined in the motto of the Stuart dynasty of Scotland, “No one provokes me with impunity.” One overarching goal of the NSS white paper was to synthesize U.S. and allied interests while isolating enemies and winning over neutrals — and all in the context of a new domestic paradigm of enhancing the economy of the American interior while securing the nation’s borders. That assessment of continued, though recalibrated, engagement abroad explains the considerable increases in U.S. defense spending, the preservation of some 800 military bases and installations, the steady deployment of 170,000 active military personnel overseas, and the assignment of 30,000 State Department officials outside the U.S. Isolationist powers simply do not commit such massive resources outside their borders; declining nations “in retreat” do not allot such forces to protect the interests of so many allies. The aims of restoring economic vitality in the U.S. interior, pressuring China for reciprocal trade, and establishing a secure southern border and energy independence are not just campaign props, but foreign-policy assets that allow America to extend its strategic reach, if need be, well beyond its borders and on its own terms. There is nothing radical in the American idea that NATO allies must meet their promises of military investment if the alliance is to survive in the 21st century. Who would disagree that our military, after 19 years in a stalemated Afghanistan, should rethink its strategic agenda and indeed the utility of its presence? What is controversial in concluding that policies that led to interventions in Libya did not enhance U.S. interests or regional stability? The Iraq War is now mostly seen, in a cost-to-benefit analysis, fairly or not, as not having been worth the price in blood and treasure. And if isolationism is defined by taking out General Qasem Soleimani, or bombing ISIS into retreat, or taking unprecedented action in moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, or reestablishing good relations with Egypt and the Gulf monarchies, then such isolationism is a strange sort of blinkered standoffishness. In truth, the U.S. is in a far better position to deal with its strategic challenges than it was in 2016. The old Western consensus concerning Chinese globalized mercantilism and imperial aspirations could be summed up only as an uncertainty about when — not whether — China would assume world dominance. For all the upheavals of the coronavirus pandemic, the prior trade standoff with China had prepped the world for the unacceptable Chinese reaction to the Wuhan outbreak. After America’s pushback to Beijing in 2017 — leveling tariffs on key Chinese industries and warning China to cease copyright and patent infringement — exposed Chinese mercantilism to the world, few were surprised in 2020 by China’s chronic lying, subversion of transnational organizations, and laxity in allowing its Wuhan virus to infect the world. Certainly, once China calibrates the full damage done to the U.S. economy by the coronavirus and the baleful effects of the subsequent lockdown on American social equilibrium, we should prepare for the chance of episodic appearances of more SARS-CoV-2-like viral “accidents.” Beijing may soon not so subtly warn the U.S. that in a matter of weeks it could suffer more economic and social devastation from an “inadvertent” release of a “new” virus from a Wuhan wet market, lab, or wayward pig or bat. When the contagion reached the U.S. in early 2020, Americans were already aware that China was on notice that it could not continue routinely violating almost all post-war commercial protocols. Its disdain for global commercial norms was quite stunning. It offered no apologies when it stole technologies, violated copyrights and patents, dumped subsidized goods on the export market, manipulated its currency, ran up artificially huge trade surpluses, and sought to siphon off key domestic industries. No one knows what the balance of power will look like after the end of the COVID-19 epidemic. Yet at least now the world recognizes that Beijing’s systematic deceit and corruption of transnational organizations were exactly what the U.S., alone since 2017, had been warning about. The lessons of 2020 were not that America had unduly taken on China, but that America had ripped off the veneer of Chinese intentions, which now were revealed as unapologetically imperialist and bellicose, without the prior dissimulating claims of furthering world harmony. One reason that the Middle East has ceased being the world’s hotspot is current U.S. foreign policy. The decision to accelerate fracking and horizontal drilling has crashed oil prices, robbing the Middle East of billions of dollars in U.S. importation revenue and making its oil optional, not essential, in American strategic thinking. The Obama policy of championing Iran over both Israel and moderate Arab states — and by extension Iranian terrorist surrogates, such as Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian government, Hezbollah, and Hamas — is deservedly in shambles. It was destroyed by the Trump administration’s departure from the flawed Iran deal, its leveling of tough “snapback” trade sanctions on Tehran, and the forging of a new de facto tripartite alliance of America, Israel, and moderate Arab states against Iran. The effort to bleed Iran economically through sanctions and boycotts, and the retaliatory strikes on its military aggression abroad — most notably the killing of Soleimani, the arch-terrorist-architect — put Iran in an especially vulnerable position. Its position became even worse when oil prices crashed in February 2020 and Tehran clumsily tried to hide the fact that its Chinese patron’s imported coronavirus had reached epidemic proportions throughout Iranian territory. Obama’s failed multiyear effort at a reset with Russia (2009–2014) only whetted the appetite of Vladimir Putin to absorb eastern Ukraine and Crimea and to carve out an imperial zone of operations in Syria — given that the Putin regime has often seen American outreach not as magnanimity to be repaid in kind but as timidity to be leveraged. John Kerry, the Obama administration’s secretary of state, invited the Russians back into the Middle East after a 40-year hiatus, ostensibly to become a stabilizing influence in controlling Syrian weapons of mass destruction. They have never left, although the cost of their presence suggests it may ultimately prove as unwise as other such Mideast interventions have been for a long array of Western nations. For all the false talk of its “collusion” with Russia, the Trump administration has repeatedly opposed the surreal German–Russian natural-gas deal. It upped sanctions on Russian oligarchs, jawboned NATO to beef up its expenditures and defenses, especially in the context of Russian bullying of Eastern Europe, and sold lethal weapons to Ukraine after the Obama administration had refused to do so. The U.S. pulled out of an asymmetrical 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty that was continually violated by Moscow, and it increased defense spending — also the exact opposite of Obama-era appeasement of Russia. Yet one casualty of the Russian-“collusion” myth was the end of traditional Kissingerian realist triangulation, or the old American policy that neither a nuclear China nor a nuclear Russia should become a better friend to the other than each was to the U.S. One of the reasons China has so brazenly moved on its Indian border, threatened Taiwan, cracked down on Hong Kong, and carved out bases in the South China Sea is that the U.S. has not worked with Russia in areas of mutual advantage to curb Chinese aggression. The Trump administration inherited a North Korean menace that boasted it had the ballistic-missile capability and the unhinged will to hit the cities of the U.S. West Coast. Past administrations had tried all sorts of multilateral agendas to denuclearize North Korea. All had not merely failed, but in their appeasement had further encouraged Pyongyang to accelerate its nuclear proliferation and become more bellicose. Ultimately there are only four ways of dealing with North Korea’s nuclear capability. One is to increase missile-defense efforts to neutralize any sudden attack, allowing the U.S. to remain safe while providing good cause for a devastating response on North Korea’s entire missile-launching infrastructure. A second, of course, is to pressure China to rein in its useful client. In the past, appeasing Chinese trade violations conveyed the same sort of weakness to Beijing as the Agreed Framework (1994), the Six-Party Talks (2003), and other assorted U.S. outreach had shown to Pyongyang. Beijing wondered why it should corral North Korea when the latter’s studied recklessness and feigned rogue independence from China had proved so valuable in consuming U.S. attention and resources. Third, South Korea and North Korea could denuclearize the peninsula, each pledging to dismantle existing weapons or disband nuclear-weapons programs. This is unlikely because an impoverished failure such as North Korea feels it now enjoys diplomatic parity with a rich, democratic, and successful Seoul — but only because it boasts as a failed state that it has the spoiler power to destroy its rival. Fourth, America can easily impose sanctions, and not relax them on reports of near starvation in North Korea, but rather tighten them on the rationale that, in such lose–lose arithmetic, short-term callousness is preferable to a nuclear exchange. Yet efforts to denuclearize North Korea in these ways always seemed to fail, for obvious reasons. North Koreans understand that denuclearization, either voluntary or coerced, is tantamount to regime change or emasculation of the kind that occurred in Iraq, Libya, and Syria — as John Bolton at one point seemed to hint. Beijing finds a nuclear North Korea a useful pit bull to let off its leash occasionally as a way to remind China’s neighbors of its own clout and warn the United States that it is not responsible for a rogue missile launcher. And South Korea’s sometimes left-wing governments naïvely cling to the idea that spillover prosperity might liberalize the North, or that advantageous unification could follow from mutual nonproliferation agreements, or that warming up to China might entice Beijing to pressure the North to work with the South. The Trump administration has mostly rejected these nostrums. In reductionist fashion, it assumed that the only method the U.S. possessed to deter North Korea, aside from imposing far tougher sanctions or encouraging Seoul to become a nuclear power, was a frightening message of Armageddon to Kim Jong-un that any use of North Korean nuclear assets against the U.S. or its Asian allies would be synonymous with the nation’s utter destruction. Why, then, is all of the above written off as rank isolationism? Donald Trump was the first president without either elective office or military service in his past. He was elected to the chagrin of the bipartisan foreign-policy establishment and most of the permanent administrative class of the State Department and the Pentagon. Trump also was the first president to question the 75-year-old post–World War II status quo, by asking whether there was a shelf life on America’s role in subsidizing the defense of affluent Europeans and Asian allies, many of whom ran up huge trade surpluses with America and were not always so friendly to the U.S. Trump was the first president to reject the standard view that granting trade concessions to dictatorial nations such as China is a necessary cost to ensure their good behavior — on the dubious theory that globalized wealth inevitably leads to political liberalization and consensual government. He was instead elected on the argument that a hollowed-out American interior, an open border, millions of foreign nationals living illegally in the U.S., a stagnant economy and middle-class wages, and an inability to win often-optional wars in the Middle East were all unsustainable and weakened the economy — and eventually would erode U.S. stature abroad. And he doubted the notion that military forces could achieve strategic results in the Middle East by fighting on behalf of dubious allies or coerced democratization, and in ways that limited or neutered conventional American military strength and advantage. Effective criticism of the Trump foreign policy not only would entail rejecting all these premises, but also would address why almost half the country believed in 2016 that many of their domestic problems arose from a foreign policy that had not yet adjusted to a world far different from what their grandparents had created in 1945. Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, Trump’s Reactive Engagement, National Review To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
‘Fascist’: What Top Democrats Say About Federal Law Enforcement Help for Their Cities
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 01:44 PM PDT
by Fred Lucas: Democratic mayors and other leaders of some large cities have grown edgier in opposing President Donald Trump’s push to use federal agents to quell violence, using terms such as “resist” and “fascist.” Some elected Democrats in affected cities have vowed to sue and even arrest federal agents as they criticize federal action to protect government property in Portland, Oregon. For “Operation Legend,” the White House has announced plans to send federal law enforcement officials to Chicago; Kansas City, Missouri; and Albuquerque, New Mexico. Over the next three weeks, the Justice Department intends to expand the effort into Cleveland, Detroit, and Milwaukee. Democratic mayors and other leaders in these and other cities mostly object, according to news reports. Trying to meet with demonstrators Wednesday night in Portland, Mayor Ted Wheeler was booed and told to resign by the crowd and overcome by tear gas deployed by federal agents to control the situation. Wheeler said he was “pissed off” and called the situation “flat-out urban warfare” wrought by the president. Cities across the nation have seen various levels of unrest and violence since the May 25 death of a black man, George Floyd, in police custody in Minneapolis. Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who heads one of America’s most violent cities, previously opposed intervention by federal officials. However, after Trump’s announcement Wednesday of “Operation Legend,” Lightfoot offered a more diplomatic comment. “I’ve been very clear that we welcome actual partnership,” Lightfoot said. “But we do not welcome dictatorship. We do not welcome authoritarianism, and we do not welcome unconstitutional arrest and detainment of our residents. That is something I will not tolerate.” Leo Schmitz, chief of public safety at the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, attended the White House event Wednesday announcing “Operation Legend.” His jurisdiction includes Chicago. Before his announcement on putting down violent crime in cities, Trump had mentioned the possibility of sending federal law enforcement to New York, Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore, and Oakland, California, which are among U.S. cities with the highest crime rates. “I’m going to do something—that I can tell you,” Trump told reporters Monday in the Oval Office. “Because we’re not going to let New York and Chicago and Philadelphia and Detroit and Baltimore and all of these—Oakland is a mess. We’re not going to let this happen in our country. All run by liberal Democrats.” That same day, Philadelphia officials provided some of the most aggressive rhetoric, even threatening to arrest federal officials in the city, making fascist comparisons, and vowing to “resist.” Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner said: “My dad volunteered and served in World War II to fight fascism, like most of my uncles, so we would not have an American president brutalizing and kidnapping Americans for exercising their constitutional rights and trying to make America a better place, which is what patriots do.” “Anyone, including federal law enforcement, who unlawfully assaults and kidnaps people will face criminal charges from my office. At trial, they will face a Philadelphia jury,” added Krasner, who was elected in 2018 with the help of a super PAC funded by liberal billionaire George Soros. “It’s the least we can do to honor those who fought fascism, including those who are fighting it even now.” In another interview with Democracy Now, Krasner said: “The president’s threat is wrong on many levels,” Kenney said. “To send federal agents to police U.S. cities that have not requested such aid can only impede the work of local governments and exacerbate already heightened tensions in these cities. And to target cities that are led by Democratic mayors is clearly a politicization of federal resources that should outrage all taxpayers.” “While the city of Philadelphia has not received any formal notification that federal agents will be sent here,” the mayor said, “we would use all available means to resist such a wrongheaded effort and abuse of power.” New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said Wednesday that the city would sue to keep federal law enforcement out, Fox News reported. “I want to be very, very clear that we will not allow this to happen,” de Blasio said, adding: “We are New Yorkers and we won’t take lightly if we see federal officers in New York City. If we do, we’ll be in court.” Trump said “Operation Legend” is named for 4-year-old LeGend Taliferro of Kansas City, who was shot and killed in late June. His killer hasn’t been found. Kansas City Police Chief Rick Smith was among those attending the White House event Wednesday where Trump announced the operation. Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas, however, called the law enforcement initiative “dog-whistling.” “What we don’t support is an expanded and broadened mission, which is what we’ve seen in Portland and what we’ve seen hinted at in interviews from the president that look like a federal takeover of policing in Kansas City,” Lucas said, according to The Kansas City Star. Sheriff Manuel Gonzales of Bernalillo County, New Mexico, a top law enforcement official in the Albuquerque area, also attended the White House event. Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller, however, told CNN that the law enforcement operation is “about inciting violence.” “You almost know that something is up because one, the president is talking about Albuquerque, which doesn’t usually happen,” Keller said, “but two, we’ve been told nothing and usually we get formal MOUs [memos of understanding], we get details, there’s task forces that are put in place. We have received no formal documentation on this at all.” Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett said a federal presence would be divisive, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported. “With few exceptions, protests in Milwaukee have been peaceful,” Barrett said in a statement. “It is preposterous to suggest Milwaukee needs federal agents to quell unrest or manage peaceful protests. Their presence at this time could be counterproductive.” After Trump named Cleveland as one city that would get assistance from federal law enforcement, Mayor Frank Jackson’s administration told the Plain Dealer newspaper that it “has not been made aware of any additional federal law enforcement resources coming to the city.” “The Cleveland Division of Police has in the past and will continue to partner with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to combat violent crime in our neighborhoods,” the statement reads. “In [December], the Division of Police announced the Relentless Pursuit initiative, which is designed to combat violent crimes in our neighborhoods with our federal, state and local partners.” Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan told local media: “Early on, we made the decision [that] the bond between the Detroit Police Department and the community was strong enough we could handle the protests ourselves.” Separately, Duggan issued a joint statement with Detroit Police Chief James Craig opposing federal assistance, which said: Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf accused Trump of trying to distract Americans from COVID-19. “I don’t need law enforcement in Oakland; I need testing, I need personal protective equipment,” Schaaf said. “We need direct income support for people who are out of work, that’s what we need. This president seems to confuse a political bent.” Tags: Fred Lucas, Daily Signal, ‘Fascist,’ What Top Democrats, Say About, Federal Law Enforcement, Help for, Their Cities To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Dogma Of Our Times
Posted: 27 Jul 2020 01:08 PM PDT Historical Article by Frank Chodorov: What history will think of our times is something that only history will reveal. But it is a good guess that it will select collectivism as the identifying characteristic of the twentieth century. For even a quick survey of the developing pattern of thought during the past fifty years shows up the dominance of one central idea: that society is a transcendent entity, something apart and greater than the sum of its parts, possessing a suprahuman character and endowed with like capacities. It operates in a field of its own, ethically and philosophically, and is guided by stars unknown to mortals. Hence, the individual, the unit of society, cannot judge it by his own limitations or apply to it standards by which he measures his own thinking and behavior. He is necessary to it, of course, but only as a replaceable part of a machine. It follows, therefore, that society, which may concern itself paternalistically with individuals, is in no way dependent on them. In one way or another, this idea has insinuated itself into almost every branch of thought and, as ideas have a way of doing, has become institutionalized. Perhaps the most glaring example is the modern orientation of the philosophy of education. Many of the professionals in this field frankly assert that the primary purpose of education is not to develop the individual’s capacity for learning, as was held in the past, but to prepare him for a fruitful and “happy” place in society; his inclinations must be turned away from himself, so that he can adjust himself to the mores of his age group and beyond that to the social milieu in which he will live out his life. He is not an end in himself. Jurisprudence has come around to the same idea, holding more and more that human behavior is not a matter of personal responsibility as much as it is a reflection of the social forces working on the individual; the tendency is to shift onto society the blame for crimes committed by its members. This, too, is a tenet of sociology, the increasing popularity of which, and its elevation to a science, attest to the hold collectivism has on our times. The scientist is no longer honored as a bold adventurer into the unknown, in search of nature’s principles, but has become a servant of society, to which he owes his training and his keep. Heroes and heroic exploits are being demoted to accidental outcroppings of mass thought and movement. The superior person, the self-starting “captain of industry,” the inherent genius—these are fictions; all are but robots made by society. Economics is the study of how society makes a living, under its own techniques and prescriptions, not how individuals, in pursuit of happiness, go about the making of a living. And philosophy, or what goes by that name, has made truth itself an attribute of society. Collectivism is more than an idea. In itself, an idea is nothing but a toy of speculation, a mental idol. Since, as the myth holds, the suprapersonal society is replete with possibilities, the profitable thing to do is to put the myth to work, to energize its virtue. The instrument at hand is the state, throbbing with political energy and quite willing to expend it on this glorious adventure. Statism is not a modern invention. Even before Plato, political philosophy concerned itself with the nature, origin, and justification of the state. But, while the thinkers speculated on it, the general public accepted political authority as a fact to be lived with and let it go at that. It is only within recent times (except, perhaps, during periods when church and state were one, thus endowing political coercion with divine sanction) that the mass of people has consciously or implicitly accepted the Hegelian dictum that “the state is the general substance, whereof individuals are but the accidents.” It is this acceptance of the state as “substance,” as a suprapersonal reality, and its investment with a competence no individual can lay claim to, that is the special characteristic of the twentieth century. In times past, the disposition was to look upon the state as something one had to reckon with, but as a complete outsider. One got along with the state as best one could, feared or admired it, hoped to be taken in by it and to enjoy its perquisites, or held it at arm’s length as an untouchable thing; one hardly thought of the state as the integral of society. One had to support the state—there was no way of avoiding taxes— and one tolerated its interventions as interventions, not as the warp and woof of life. And the state itself was proud of its position apart from, and above, society. The present disposition is to liquidate any distinction between state and society, conceptually or institutionally. The state is society; the social order is indeed an appendage of the political establishment, depending on it for sustenance, health, education, communications, and all things coming under the head of “the pursuit of happiness.” In theory, taking college textbooks on economics and political science for authority, the integration is about as complete as words can make it. In the operation of human affairs, despite the fact that lip service is rendered to the concept of inherent personal rights, the tendency to call upon the state for the solution of all the problems of life shows how far we have abandoned the doctrine of rights, with its correlative of self-reliance, and have accepted the state as the reality of society. It is this actual integration, rather than the theory, that marks the twentieth century off from its predecessors. One indication of how far the integration has gone is the disappearance of any discussion of the state as state—a discussion that engaged the best minds of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The inadequacies of a particular regime, or its personnel, are under constant attack, but there is no fault-finding with the institution itself. The state is all right, by common agreement, and it would work perfectly if the “right” people were at its helm. It does not occur to most critics of the New Deal that all its deficiencies are inherent in any state, under anybody’s guidance, or that when the political establishment garners enough power a demagogue will sprout. The idea that this power apparatus is indeed the enemy of society, that the interests of these institutions are in opposition, is simply unthinkable. If it is brought up, it is dismissed as “old-fashioned,” which it is; until the modern era, it was an axiom that the state bears constant watching, that pernicious proclivities are built into it. A few illustrations of the temper of our times come to mind. The oft-used statement that “we owe it to ourselves,” in relation to the debts incurred in the name of the state, is indicative of the tendency to obliterate from our consciousness the line of demarcation between governed and governors. It not only is a stock phrase in economics textbooks, but is tacitly accepted in many financial circles as sound in principle. To many modern bankers a government bond is at least as sound as an obligation of a private citizen, since the bond is in fact an obligation of the citizen to pay taxes. Those bankers make no distinction between a debt backed by production or productive ability and a debt secured by political power; in the final analysis a government bond is a lien on production, so what’s the difference? By such reasoning, the interests of the public, which are always centered in the production of goods, are equated with the predatory interests of the state. In many economics textbooks, government borrowing from citizens, whether done openly or by pressure brought upon the banks to lend their depositors’ savings, is explained as a transaction equivalent to the transfer of money from one pocket to another, of the same pants; the citizen lends to himself what he lends to the government. The rationale of this absurdity is that the effect on the nation’s economy is the same whether the citizen spends his money or the government does it for him. He has simply given up his negligible right of choice. The fact that he has no desire for what the government spends his money on, that he would not of his own free will contribute to the buying of it, is blithely overlooked. The “same pants” notion rests on the identification of the amorphous “national economy” with the well-being of the individual; he is thus merged into the mass and loses his personality. Of a piece with this kind of thinking is a companion phrase, “We are the government.” Its use and acceptance are most illustrative of the hold collectivism has taken on the American mind in this century, to the exclusion of the basic American tradition. When the Union was founded, the overriding fear of Americans was that the new government might become a threat to their freedom, and the framers of the Constitution were hard put to allay this fear. Now it is held that freedom is a gift from government in return for subservience. The reversal has been accomplished by a neat trick in semantics. The word “democracy” is the key to this trick. When one looks for a definition of this word, one finds that it is not a clearly defined form of government but rather the rule by “social attitudes.” But what is a “social attitude”? Putting aside the wordy explanations of this slippery concept, it turns out to be in practice good old majoritarianism; what fifty-one percent of the people deem right is right, and the minority is perforce wrong. It is the general-will fiction under a new name. There is no place in this concept for the doctrine of inherent rights; the only right left to the minority, even the minority of one, is conformity with the dominant “social attitude.” If “we are the government,” then it follows that the man who finds himself in jail must blame himself for his plight, and the man who takes all the tax deduction the law allows is really cheating himself. . . . This is the fulfillment of statism. It is a state of mind that does not recognize any ego but that of the collective. For analogy one must go to the pagan practice of human sacrifice: when the gods called for it, when the medicine man so insisted, as a condition for prospering the clan, it was incumbent on the individual to throw himself into the sacrificial fire. In point of fact, statism is a form of paganism, for it is worship of an idol, something made by man. Its base is pure dogma. Like all dogmas this one is subject to interpretations and rationales, each with its coterie of devotees. But, whether one calls himself a communist, socialist, New Dealer, or just plain “democrat,” each begins with the premise that the individual is of consequence only as a servant of the mass-idol. Its will be done. There are stalwart souls, even in this twentieth century. There are some who in the privacy of their personality hold that collectivism is a denial of a higher order of things. There are nonconformists who reject the Hegelian notion that “the state incarnates the divine idea on earth.” There are some who firmly maintain that only man is made in the image of God. As this remnant—these individuals—gains understanding and improves its explanations, the myth that happiness is to be found under collective authority must fade away in the light of liberty. Tags: Frank Chodorov, Founder, Intercollegiate Studies Institute, The Dogma Of Our Times To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REDSTATE
The Left Is Trying to Create Their Own Horst Wessel But They Just Aren’t Good Enough
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
AMERICAN SPECTATOR
ABC
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NBC MORNING RUNDOWN
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
|
Good morning, NBC News readers.
The search for a COVID-19 vaccine enters a new chapter as a New York EMS worker reflects on the pandemic’s horrors amid concerns over a second wave.
Here’s what we’re looking at this Tuesday morning.
|
A leading drug just hit a key benchmark in the quest for a coronavirus vaccine
The quest for a COVID-19 vaccine reached an important juncture Monday as Moderna Therapeutics began the first phase 3 trial of a COVID-19 vaccine candidate in the U.S.
Phase 3 is the final stage for a vaccine, so it is meant to answer the big question: Does it work to prevent COVID-19?
“This is the main event, if you will, in drug development,” said Dr. Stephen Hoge, president of Moderna, a biotech company in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Moderna has partnered with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for its vaccine research.
As many as 30,000 volunteers will be recruited at nearly 100 research sites across the country in Moderna’s phase 3 trial. Half of the participants will receive the vaccine, and the other half will receive a placebo.
A new study released Monday reviewing 20 years of data found that U.S. vaccines are remarkably safe, thanks in large part to ongoing surveillance after they hit the market by the Food and Drug Administration.
“Most studies like this show a complicated picture, but here, we saw almost no complexity at all,” said the study’s lead author, Dr. Daniel Shepshelovich. “Vaccines are safe.”
Here are some other COVID-19 developments:
- Trump’s national security adviser, Robert O’Brien, has tested positive for the coronavirus.
- A coronavirus outbreak among players on the Miami Marlins has called Major League Baseball’s season into question just days into its long-delayed start.
- Notre Dame has withdrawn from hosting the first 2020 presidential debate, citing the coronavirus threat.
- Poll: Mask-wearing divisions remain even as coronavirus cases spike.
- Track U.S. hot spots where COVID-19 infection rates are rising.
- The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has surpassed 148,000 according to NBC News’ tally.
|
‘End of life as we know it’: EMS captain on pandemic’s horrors amid concerns of second wave
At the height of the coronavirus pandemic in New York, emergency medical services Capt. AJ Briones’ teams were fielding nearly 700 calls a day.
Before the pandemic swept through, Briones said their typical call volume was somewhere around 300 to 400 calls a day, but during the peak, calls doubled at times.
“We did a month’s worth of cardiac arrests in three days, three months worth of intubations in three days,” Briones said. “It was really a hard time for anybody. I don’t care how seasoned you were.”
Now with cases down in the state, his EMS teams can sometimes catch their breath for a moment. But with cases rising rapidly around the country, Briones reflected on the virus’ devastating toll, how far New York has come and his concerns about a possible second wave.
|
‘If this can happen here in Portland, it can happen anywhere.’
Video: As federal officers prepare to deploy to cities across the United States, NBC News looks at how the demonstrations in downtown Portland grew from a dwindling protest to a nationwide debate about federal authority.
|
‘We are the legacy’: John Lewis lives on in the generations of young activists he empowered
For all the achievements of his 67 years of service, Rep. John Lewis’ commitment to inspiring the next generation of leaders and activists may be his most significant and lasting contribution.
As an activist fighting for racial equality, Lewis, at 23, was the youngest speaker at the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Two years later, he put his body on the line for voting rights on “Bloody Sunday” on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, thinking he might be killed at 25.
Even before his work on the national stage, Lewis was a young preacher in his teens, and he led other students in anti-segregation work.
But as he grew into an elder statesman of the civil rights movement, Lewis actively looked to young people to continue his work.
“We are the legacy of Congressman Lewis,” said Rachelle O’Neil, who joined Lewis’ staff as a constituent services representative when she was 32 and worked with him for 18 years. “There are hundreds of us around the country who have been impacted by him.”
From Selma to the Capitol: See photos of John Lewis’ final journey.
Rep. John Lewis at the March for Our Lives at the National Center for Civil and Human Rights in Atlanta in 2018. (Photo: Prince Williams / WireImage file)
|
Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.
|
Plus
- “Jaws” in Maine? Authorities say a woman appears to have been killed in a rare shark attack in the state.
- Ivanka Trump has been accused of a “cheap media stunt” for her call to help solve Native American cold cases
- Will pencil skirts and blazers go the way of the typewriter? Retailers are adjusting to our new casual.
|
THINK about it
Attorney General William Barr will testify before the House Judiciary Committee this morning. It is a big opportunity for Democrats to show what a disaster Barr’s tenure has been for American democracy, Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, writes in an opinion piece.
|
Live BETTER
Dating during coronavirus? Some experts say pandemic dating may “lead to more stable relationships.”
|
Quote of the day
“This research study is something that I can do personally to benefit not only my family and my friends, but also humanity.”
— Jon Penman, a volunteer participating in Moderna’s final phase of its COVID-19 vaccine study.
|
One fun thing, sort of…
How much do you agree/disagree with your fellow Americans?
Take this interactive THINK quiz to see how much you disagree with your compatriots about the idea of suspending Congress, ignoring the Electoral College and more.
How do your feelings about authoritarianism stack up against other Americans? (Image: Chelsea Stahl / NBC News; Getty)
|
NBC FIRST READ
|
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Carrie Dann and Melissa Holzberg
FIRST READ: Here are six things that could change the 2020 race
With 98 days to go until the election, Joe Biden has a bigger and more durable lead over President Trump than Hillary Clinton ever had in 2016, particularly in the key battleground states.
But that doesn’t mean the race is guaranteed to remain stable over the next three months. Here are six upcoming events and potential storylines that COULD move numbers.
Photo by JIM WATSON, DOMINICK REUTER/AFP via Getty Images
1. Biden’s VP pick: With the Democratic convention approaching, so is Biden’s running-mate selection. Not since LBJ has a VP pick truly helped win a presidential race, but bad picks have backfired (see: Palin, Sarah). And as we’ve written, Biden’s fav/unfav numbers are soft with African Americans and younger voters.
2. The virtual conventions: Given the increased polarization in the country, the days of big post-convention bounces are probably over, and that’s probably especially true during a pandemic. Still, the conventions will consist of two weeks of speeches to sell each party’s ticket.
3. Will the economic and coronavirus numbers get better, worse, or stay the same? These might be the most important statistics to watch over the next three months. It’s the fundamentals, stupid.
4. The debates (or will they even take place?): That Notre Dame became the latest college campus to withdraw as a debate host siteduring the pandemic is an ominous sign. Ditto the fact that the Trump camp appears to be still negotiating over the debates.
5. Another October surprise? James Comey’s letter in the last two weeks of the 2016 election is proof that events at the end of a presidential race can move numbers.
6. How the 2020 vote gets counted: This might be the most important storyline of all, especially amid a deadly pandemic. Are there long lines? Disputes over mail-in ballots? Postal Service delays? Allegations of fraud and abuse? And just how long does it take to count the ballots?
|
Expect fireworks at today’s Barr hearing
Beginning at 10:00 am ET, Attorney General William Barr testifies before the House Judiciary Committee. And from Barr’s opening statement alone, it looks like it’s going to be a combative hearing.
“Ever since I made it clear that I was going to do everything I could to get to the bottom of the grave abuses involved in the bogus ‘Russiagate’ scandal, many of the Democrats on this Committee have attempted to discredit me by conjuring up a narrative that I am simply the President’s factotum who disposes of criminal cases according to his instructions,” Barr is expected to say, per his prepared remarks
(So Barr believes that Russia didn’t interfere in the 2016 election; that the Trump campaign didn’t expect it would benefit from the interference; and that Roger Stone didn’t communicate with Russian intelligence in ’16?)
He will say this about African Americans killed by police: “According to statistics compiled by the Washington Post, the number of unarmed black men killed by police so far this year is 8. The number of unarmed white men killed by police over the same time period is 11.”
(Thirteen percent of the U.S. population is Black; 60 percent is white.)
And Barr will say this about the protests in Portland: “What unfolds nightly around the courthouse cannot reasonably be called a protest; it is, by any objective measure, an assault on the Government of the United States.”
|
DATA DOWNLOAD: The numbers that you need to know today
4,317,028: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 59,724 more cases than yesterday morning.)
149,500: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 1,679 more than yesterday morning.)
52.25 million: The number of coronavirus TESTS that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.
68 percent: The share of Americans who say they always wear a protective mask when they leave home and may encounter other people, per a new NBC News|SurveyMonkey tracking poll.
$1 trillion: The amount of the coronavirus relief package unveiled yesterday by Republicans as benefits are set to expire within days.
Two: The number of Major League Baseball games postponed last night after members of the Miami Marlins team tested positive for the virus
|
Talking policy with Benjy
Even as there are a signs a vaccine may be in reach, some experts are worried about Americans getting complacent in the hopes a miracle drug will bail out our flagging coronavirus response, NBC’s Benjy Sarlin writes. Even in a best-case scenario in which a vaccine is approved by the end of the year, it may take months to distribute and plenty can go wrong along the way.
A new report from the Center for American Progress urges the federal government to prepare early for everything from manufacturing enough glass vials (to store the vaccine) to opening a network of community health clinics (to administer it), to running a PSA campaign (to convince people to receive it, which polls suggest many Americans may be reluctant to do).
“I think there ultimately will be a vaccine that at least partially works. That’s why it’s important to prepare for that eventuality,” Topher Spiro, VP of Health Policy at CAP and a co-author of the report, told NBC News. “It will take a while to stand up some of these things.”
The report, of course, assumes that we find an effective vaccine. But some experts, including a top pharmaceutical CEO, are warning we need a Plan B just in case the next phase of trials hit a snag or the first approved vaccines are only partially effective. .
|
AD WATCH from Ben Kamisar
Today’s Ad Watch takes a look at a new ad from Giffords PAC, which is wading into the Colorado Senate race with a $1.25 million television ad campaign against Cory Gardner.
The first ad in that Colorado campaign frames Gardner as more concerned about sticking by Trump than helping Colorado families confront gun violence, hitting the Republican in a state that’s seen tragic mass shootings in recent years and that’s given Trump low marks.
NBC has learned the ad (which will run today through the end of next month on broadcast and cable) is part of the at-least $7.5 million that Giffords PAC plans to spend this general election to play in races up and down the ballot and message on gun-violence prevention.
Read more on the MTP Blog later this morning about the push.
|
TWEET OF THE DAY
|
Here’s what’s in the Senate relief bill
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell released the GOP coronavirus relief package on Monday, and it includes a $400 cut in the weekly federal unemployment benefit.
If enacted, the $200 flat benefit would last for two months until states transition to a wage replacement system. Essentially, states would have two months to create a system that would give unemployed people 70 percent of their wages.
The bill also includes $105 billion for schools, liability protections, and another round of direct payments for Americans. You can read more about that here.
In a particularly awkward moment, though, McConnell seemed unaware of some of the bill’s components. When asked by our Hill team why new money for a new FBI headquarters is in the bill ($1.75 billion), McConnell responded, “I’m not sure that it is, is it?” After confirmation from a staffer McConnell said there were provisions in the bill as a starting place with the Trump administration.
But negotiations with Democrats probably won’t go as smoothly as throwing in construction provisions. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the bill was “a halfhearted, half-baked legislative proposal.”
|
ICYMI: What ELSE is happening in the world?
The Trump administration is sending more federal agents to Portland.
Trump’s announcement — and subsequent cancellation — of throwing a first pitch at Yankee stadium was a surprise to the team.
Susan Collins will vote against Trump’s pick for the Fed board.
Trump national security advisor Robert O’Brien has tested positive for coronavirus.
The New York Times looks at Trump’s history of leaving mourning to others.
Politico writes that Trump has a big problem with voters who are the core of his base: the white working class.
How real is the Susan Rice-for-veep buzz?
|
CBS
|
|
|
|
IJR
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
LOUDER WITH CROWDER
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
REALCLEARPOLITICS MORNING NOTE
|
||||||||||
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS TODAY
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
TWITCHY
|
|
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
|
|
|
A PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTERContact FPM Support Copyright 2016, frontpagemag.com |
HOOVER INSTITUTE
|
[Message clipped] View entire message