Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Tuesday March 3, 2020.
THE DAILY SIGNAL
|
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DAYBREAK
|
LARRY J. SABATO’S CRYSTAL BALL
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE— Texas, a traditionally Republican state that is becoming more competitive, is a vital prize on Super Tuesday. — While much of the vote has been cast, much remains, and the narrowed field adds further uncertainty to an already-close race. — The big urban areas may tell the tale. — Down the ballot, the Democratic Senate field lacks Beto O’Rourke’s sizzle as a runoff looms. — Two veteran House incumbents face ideological challengers, while several other primaries will set up competitive general election races in emerging battlegrounds. Breaking down the Texas primaryThe Texas primary is the day after Texas Independence Day. To the rest of the country, Super Tuesday may be a random amalgamation of delegate-rich states. Yet, let’s be honest, any true Texan would never lump themselves into a group where they have to share the limelight with California. The Lone Star State appears to be something of a Toss-up between Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. The total number of registered Texas voters recently surpassed 16 million, and turnout is expected to exceed that of the 2016 Democratic primary turnout (more than 1.4 million votes) and perhaps even approach the 2016 Republican primary turnout — almost 3 million ballots cast. At the end of early voting, about 1 million votes have already been cast on each side of the aisle. Still, California has nearly double the delegates. Why, then, is Texas important? Unlike California’s more liberal Democratic electorate, Texas is a bellwether for its potential as a swing state. Beyond the state’s vast racial diversity, its diversity of geography, industry, and lifestyle makes Texas a fascinating conglomeration of booming suburbs, rich but sparsely populated farm and ranch land, oil country, border towns, urban centers, college towns, etc. Even in a Democratic primary, Texas voters are not ideologically monolithic, and many may lean more towards the center. Texas’ formidable delegate haul might be splintered now that it is a fractured field compounded by Michael Bloomberg’s massive media buys — although the state got less fractured by the exit of several Democratic candidates since South Carolina (but that massive number of early votes means that some voters are probably wishing for a do-over). Texas’ importance is enhanced on Election Night because it may the biggest state that actually gets called Tuesday night. Because of a complicated voter registration and absentee balloting process, California may be hard to call initially, and the vote count will take weeks. The Texas outcome could provide powerful momentum to whomever emerges as the victor going into the rest of the primary calendar. Bernie Sanders has demonstrated that he is the national front-runner by expanding his original coalition of mostly white younger voters to now include Latinos and other minority groups. However, on Saturday in South Carolina, one of the most important voices in the Democratic base, African Americans, delivered a harsh rebuke to Sanders’ candidacy, 61%-17% according to the exit poll, in favor of Joe Biden. The results of South Carolina only have 72 hours to make their impact on Super Tuesday, yet Biden’s eye-popping 29-point margin — and subsequent endorsements from departed candidates Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg delivered in Dallas Monday night — could persuade moderate or undecided voters who did not vote early. Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D, TX-16), who came close to beating Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) in 2018 and later ran for president, also endorsed Biden on Monday. According to an NBC News/Marist poll, 33% of Texas’ early voters have cast their vote for Sanders, while 25% and 16% have voted for Biden and Bloomberg, respectively. Of Election Day voters, the poll reflects 11% are undecided and 35% back Sanders, while Biden had 16% and Bloomberg had 14%, potentially making it very difficult for Biden to close the gap despite “Joementum” from South Carolina, although more recent polls have been much better for Biden. Given most polls were conducted before or just during Biden’s excellent series of events in South Carolina, some support may have already melted away from Bloomberg and the departed candidates. In a Public Policy Polling survey asking about the race in Texas without Bloomberg, Biden led the field with 31% to Sanders’ 25%. Since Biden substantially proved his viability in South Carolina, and since Bloomberg’s disastrous initial debate performance was followed by an underwhelming second, Bloomberg’s Election Day voters (and those who backed departed candidates) may flock to Biden as the only realistic alternative to Bernie and his perceived unelectability. Examining the early vote in Texas, it appeared that early turnout exponentially increased in Houston and Dallas, which some surveys indicate may be good areas for Biden, as well as critical suburban swing counties like Collin, Williamson, Denton, and Fort Bend. However, turnout in Sanders’ core of Travis County (home of liberal Austin and the University of Texas) seemed to increase exponentially on pace with Harris (Houston). Figure 1: Pace of Texas early voting in major counties![]() Examining post-New Hampshire polls parsed out by Texas metro areas, Sanders could replicate this success in Austin and draw votes from other communities where Clinton dominated in 2016. In Austin, Sanders earns 21% of the vote in the Austin Metro area (YouGov/University of Houston), with his favorability at 71% (PPP). Still, fellow progressive Elizabeth Warren outperforms him in both polls in this stronghold of young liberal voters, at 27% and 80%. After Sanders’ significant loss in South Carolina and Buttigieg and Klobuchar’s exit, Warren could siphon off some millennial votes and suburban voters. (It’s worth noting that these primary polling subgroups have large margins of error, so take this all with a grain of salt.) More than half (52.7%) of the vote is in Texas’ largest metro areas. Map 1 shows the various concentrations in the state. Map 1: Share of 2016 Democratic primary vote by county![]() Biden’s strong victory in South Carolina could also motivate African-American voters, amongst whom Biden enjoys a slew of Texas endorsements. As Texas’ second-largest minority group at 12% — trailing Hispanics who make up 39% of the state’s population — African Americans comprise a reliable and large voting bloc. Dallas and Houston are substantially more diverse than Austin, while San Antonio, Harlingen (South Texas), and El Paso are majority Hispanic media markets. There are a lot of moving pieces, and even more recent polls cannot account for the changes in the race that we’ve seen in the past few days. Making Texas even more interesting on Tuesday is that the nation’s second-largest state is also holding its down-ballot primaries. Let’s take a look at those races as well. TX-SEN: May runoff very likely for DemocratsUnlike the galvanizing Beto O’Rourke movement in the 2018 campaign, the 12 candidates vying to challenge Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) have extremely low polling numbers. At this point, there is little interest and energy in the race — a harsh reality that very well may prove fatal to the eventual challenger in November absent a Texas landslide against Trump. With the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee’s backing, M.J. Hegar, who nearly defeated Rep. John Carter (R, TX-31) in 2018, seems like a sure shot at making the May runoff. However, the polling has shown a tight race for second between Dallas-area state Sen. Royce West and labor organizer Cristina Tzintzun Ramirez, with former U.S. Rep Chris Bell also a possibility to advance. West may consolidate the African-American vote; he shared the endorsement of the Dallas Morning News with African-American Houston Councilwoman Amanda Edwards. In 2006, West masterminded flipping Dallas County blue and currently has the primary’s most congressional endorsements, notably almost all from representatives who have backed Biden. The more liberal candidates in the race are two Latinas: Ramirez and Sema Hernandez, who lost to O’Rourke in the 2018 primary but won about a quarter of the vote and many counties in heavily Hispanic South Texas. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D, NY-14) endorsement of Ramirez has drawn ire from the Hernandez’s camp, who views their candidate as the true progressive in the race. Given Ramirez’s close ties with both Warren and Sanders, her performance could greatly depend on how each candidate performs in the state. Here, it may be the case that these two progressives split their potential vote share and neither moves onto the inevitable runoff. Congressional racesPrimary infighting An incumbent from each party is facing an ideological challenger that exposes larger divisions in their respective parties. In Fort Worth-based TX-12, former Fort Worth Mayor Kay Granger was the first Republican woman to represent Texas in the U.S. House, endorsed Mitt Romney in 2007, vehemently opposed Trump in 2016, and identified as pro-choice in the past. Granger is now anti-abortion and has run embracing Trump and his policies. Granger has drawn an extremely well-funded challenger, Chris Putman, who has run ads attacking Granger’s fealty to and love for the president. A Super PAC created by allies of Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has already spent $1.1 million to topple Granger, tarring her as a 12-term establishment insider. In three recent weeks alone, $2.3 million was spent on TV ads, according to the Dallas Morning News. Along the border in TX-28, there is almost zero polling on an intergenerational matchup between the incumbent conservative Rep. Henry Cueller (D) and liberal 26-year-old Jessica Cisneros, who was recruited by Justice Democrats and backed by EMILY’s List and presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. No doubt these are valuable endorsements, but in a relatively patriarchal community in South Texas known for its moderates thanks to the highly Catholic Hispanic population of the area, these might not carry much weight and may even hurt Cisneros. While the constituents of the district may be restless of Cuellar’s conservative positions, this primary begs the question — are voters there ready for a considerably more left-wing alternative? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, meanwhile, backs Cueller. If I had to bet on one of these districts, I would suspect Granger is likelier to lose her seat than Cuellar. Other Safe hotspots In TX-11, 10 Republicans are vying to replace retiring Rep. Mike Conaway (R), while in TX-13, 15 Republicans are fighting to inherit Rep. Mac Thornberry’s (R) seat, including former White House doctor Ronny Jackson. Trump has endorsed August Pfluger for TX-11. Targeted seats Of the six seats that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is targeting and the two that they are defending, most of the matchups are set. However, some open primaries have led to uncertainty and large fields that may lead to expensive runoffs. Democrats are targeting Reps. Michael McCaul (R, TX-10), Chip Roy (R, TX-21), John Carter (R, TX-31), and open seats TX-22, TX-23, and TX-24. Of the six seats, TX-23 was the only one carried by Hillary Clinton in 2016, although the others have trended Democratic in recent years and were reasonably close in 2018. Democrats will be defending Reps. Lizzie Fletcher (D, TX-7) and Collin Allred (D, TX-32), who defeated long-serving Republican incumbents in districts that flipped from voting for Mitt Romney in 2012 to Clinton in 2016. Keep an eye on the Texas HouseThe Democrats only need nine seats to gain a majority in the Texas House for the first time in 19 years. They have the potential to do this, as they came close in many others that O’Rourke carried in his 2018 Senate bid. This would be pivotal, particularly given Texas’s emergence as a swing state and 2021 redistricting. However, the Democrats also will be playing defense on the 12 seats they picked up in the midterms. Welcome to the RodeoSouth Carolina established that there may be a long road to the convention. Depending on the trajectory of these primaries, many of these seats — and the biggest prize of 38 electoral votes — may be up for grabs come November. As much as Texans like to think of themselves as divorced from their cowboy roots, the vicious attack ads and ideological warfare in both parties reflect a kind of rough and tumble breeding ground for fresh ideas and potential upsets up and down the ballot.
|
|||||||
Super Tuesday Down the Ballot: AL-SEN & CA-25 | |||||||
By Niles Francis Guest Columnist, Sabato’s Crystal Ball |
|||||||
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE— In Alabama, the three-way Republican primary for Senate will be one of Super Tuesday’s marquee primaries; former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former Auburn football coach Tommy Tuberville are polling competitively, though Rep Bradley Byrne (R, AL-1) is also a serious candidate. — Regardless of the primary outcome, Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL) faces an uphill reelection race — aside from the other Republicans, his flawed 2017 opponent, Roy Moore (R), is running again, but is unlikely to get the nomination. — We continue to see the special election in the Los Angeles-area CA-25 as Leans Democratic. It’s unlikely a single candidate wins outright on Tuesday, so a runoff will likely ensure on May 12. Trump Looms Large in Alabama GOP Senate PrimarySen. Doug Jones (D-AL), who shocked the nation by defeating beleaguered Republican Roy Moore in a 2017 special election, hopes to defy the odds once again by winning a full six-year term in deep red Alabama. Jones is no newbie in Washington. He used to work as a staff counsel for Sen. Howell Heflin (D-AL), whose Senate seat he now occupies. Working as a federal prosecutor in the 1990s, Jones’ two most prominent cases secured the convictions of two Ku Klux Klan members who bombed a Birmingham church in the 1960s, which resulted in the deaths of four young girls. A special election was triggered when then-Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) was confirmed as Attorney General, but the timeframe of the election was a critical point of contention. Then-Gov. Robert Bentley (R-AL) appointed Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange (R) to the seat. Bentley also made the controversial decision to schedule the special election for the seat to coincide with the 2018 midterm elections. Following Bentley’s April 2017 resignation, Republican Lt. Gov. Kay Ivey ascended to the governorship and, perhaps in a symbolic break with her scandal-tarred predecessor, rescheduled the election for later in 2017. Strange ran in the special election but faced a tough Republican primary (Map 1). Rep. Mo Brooks (R, AL-5) and former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore were his top competitors. Map 1: 2017 Alabama Republican Senate primary![]() Trump is certainly looming large in the race for the Republican nomination to challenge Jones. Jeff Sessions, who was ousted from his role as Attorney General after a public falling-out with the president, made something of a last-minute decision to enter the race for his old Senate seat. He quickly rolled out endorsements from nearly a dozen GOP senators, including his former Alabama colleague, Richard Shelby (R-AL). Despite his universal name recognition in the state and generally good rapport with local Republicans, Sessions does not have the field all to himself. Former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville is also running for the seat, as well as Rep. Bradley Byrne (R, AL-1). Roy Moore is again in a race for the seat, but in the wake of his high-profile 2017 loss, his candidacy seems like an afterthought — he has rarely made public appearances since kicking off his campaign and his fundraising has nearly dried up. Polling has suggested that this is a three-way race with Sessions, Byrne, and Tuberville, with Sessions usually leading and Tuberville generally in second. A runoff is all but certain given that no candidate has polled close to or above 50% in public polls. In a runoff campaign, Sessions will get hit hard over his falling out with President Trump, who said in a June 2019 interview that his “biggest mistake” was appointing Sessions as Attorney General. Tuberville has tried to wrest the “outsider” mantle in this race, promising to donate his Senate salary to Alabama’s veterans if elected. Byrne has promised to “fight for Alabama” and has made overtures to the more business-oriented wing of the GOP electorate. On the campaign trail, Sessions will often highlight his early relationship with Trump, frequently mentioning in ads that he was the first Republican Senator to endorse Trump — which is true. A runoff would be held on March 31 if no candidate clears 50% of the vote next Tuesday. Because of lower turnout, partisan runoffs can be more volatile and harder to handicap than general elections. But the fact that Sessions, a former U.S. senator who had a high public profile as Attorney General, is polling in the mid to low-30s in next week’s primary may be an ominous sign for his prospects in a runoff. Looking to the fall, there is little question that Trump will dominate the top of the ticket in Alabama — since 2004, every Republican presidential nominee has cleared 60% there. For Jones’ part, he has taken some tough votes since being elected. He voted against Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court in 2018 and, more recently, he voted to convict President Trump on both impeachment charges. As he often does, Trump took to Twitter and derided Jones as a “Do Nothing Stiff.” On Election Day in November, Jones could outperform the Democratic nominee by 20 percentage points and still come up short — the Crystal Ball rates that race as Likely Republican. For now, as we have seen over the last election cycles, Trump wields enormous power in Republican primaries and may play a big role in determining who the Republican nominee will be in this race. The race to replace Katie HillWhen Katie Hill, a first-time candidate from the northern Los Angeles area, ousted sophomore Rep. Steve Knight (R, CA-25) in 2018, she was immediately seen as a rising star in the Democratic Party. At 31 years old, she was one of the youngest members of the 2018 freshmen class and was California’s first openly bisexual member of Congress. Upon her election, she ascended to a leadership position in the House. In October 2019, though, her congressional career came to an early conclusion, as she resigned after explicit photos of her were leaked online and as she faced allegations of inappropriate relationships with staffers. Hill’s resignation set up a special election, which California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) set for March 3, coinciding with Super Tuesday. Most of the Democratic Party establishment is rallying behind Assemblywoman Christy Smith, who represents over 60% of CA-25 in the California Assembly. Cenk Uygur, who founded the popular commentary show The Young Turks, is running as a progressive alternative to Smith. However, local Democrats have criticized his weak connections to the district — primarily, that he doesn’t live there. Knight is running to reclaim his seat in Congress, but it appears that local Republicans have soured on him since his defeat. The Los Angeles County Republican Party is supporting Mike Garcia, a former naval officer from Santa Clarita. Politico‘s Ally Mutnick pointed out that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the House Democratic campaign arm, has hit the airwaves attacking Garcia as a way to boost Knight’s chances of making the runoff, which would be held in May if no candidate gets over 50% of the vote. Map 2: Hill and Newsom’s performances in CA-25![]() Democrats have a reason to be optimistic about their chances of holding this seat. It has been lurching to the left in the Trump area — after it voted for every statewide Republican candidate in the 2014 midterms, it backed Democrats almost entirely (Table 1). Table 1: Recent statewide races in CA-25![]()
Read the fine printLearn more about the Crystal Ball and find out how to contact us here. Sign up to receive Crystal Ball e-mails like this one delivered straight to your inbox. Use caution with Sabato’s Crystal Ball, and remember: “He who lives by the Crystal Ball ends up eating ground glass!” |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
© Copyright by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia |
TOWNHALL
![]() |
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
ROLL CALL

Morning Headlines
Before they put on their robes, dozens of judges appointed during the Trump and Obama administrations made major campaign contributions to Senate Judiciary members and their home-state senators — the very people who could make or break their nominations. Read More…
OPINION — The future of Barack Obama’s legacy is at stake this year. An endorsement now from the former president, whether for Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders, could give voters clarity on where he thinks the country should be going and who would be best equipped to get us there. Read More…
Coronavirus funding talks held up over drug price language
Disagreement over provisions intended to ensure affordability of vaccines and other medications is holding up agreement on an emergency funding package to fight the novel coronavirus-caused illness that has killed more than 3,000 people worldwide, sources with knowledge of the talks said. Read More…
Jayapal warns against mixing coronavirus aid and surveillance extension
How difficult could the vote counting be for an emergency spending bill to respond to the coronavirus if leadership tries to attach an extension of expiring surveillance powers? Just ask one of the lawmakers whose constituents have been near the epicenter of a coronavirus outbreak in Washington state. Read More…
Bloomberg thrills fintech world with cryptocurrency shoutout
It’s just three sentences and five bullet points, but Mike Bloomberg’s platform for cryptocurrencies has the nascent technology’s boosters cheering and champing at the bit for more. “We really like it. We think it’s great that he’s thinking about these issues,” said Kristin Smith, executive director of the Blockchain Association. Read More…
7 things to watch on Super Tuesday in the battle for Congress
Super Tuesday contests will be critical in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. But there are also plenty of primaries further down the ballot that will provide clues about the battle for Congress in 2020. Read More…
Klobuchar ends presidential campaign, plans to endorse Biden
Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar pitched herself as a moderate who could win in red states and earned praise from pundits. But after a third-place finish in New Hampshire gave her a brief turn in the spotlight, she decided to end her campaign a day before the spate of Super Tuesday primaries that included her home state’s. Read More…
VA Committee Republicans eye top spot as Roe heads for exit
At least three House Republicans are considering bids to succeed Phil Roe as the top Republican on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee when he retires at the end of the year. Party rules don’t require the steering committee to make chairman and ranking member appointments based on seniority, which widens the field for Roe’s replacement. Read More…
Getting to the bottom of the missing youth vote
In their new book “Making Young Voters: Converting Civic Attitudes into Civic Actions,” University of Virginia professor John B. Holbein and Duke University professor D. Sunshine Hillygus examine both the reasons for low youth turnout and the changes that may make them more likely to vote. Read More…
…
[Message clipped] View entire message
BRIGHT
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE SUNBURN
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
THE BLAZE
More from TheBlaze
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … Democratic presidential candidate and gun control advocate Michael Bloomberg was asked by a voter on Monday how he can “justify” his agenda aimed at restricting his fellow Americans’ right to defend themselves while he himself enjoys the security of having armed guards protect him. What are the details? During a Fox News town … Read more
You might like … Got friends?
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA |
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
DRIVING THE DAY
G’MORNING from MINNEAPOLIS and happy Super Tuesday.
“THIS ISN’T AN ELECTION to spend all our time in the battle for the soul of the Democratic Party,” JOE BIDEN said Monday in HOUSTON. “We’re in the battle for the soul of this country.” It’s one of his usual lines, but it’s now wrong. FOR THIS is exactly what this race has become: an existential battle between two competing forces in the Democratic Party.
AND IN THAT, BIDEN and BERNIE SANDERS now both have the race they wanted.
BIDEN is consolidating establishment Democratic support with speed and precision as he makes the case that he — and only he — can steer the party through an election with President DONALD TRUMP atop the ballot. He’s rounding up prominent supporters — like PETE BUTTIGIEG, AMY KLOBUCHAR and BETO O’ROURKE in Dallas on Monday night — and finally beginning to raise the millions he needs to continue deep into March and April. BIDEN is so eager for unity that he told a local reporter in Houston on Monday that he would ask BUTTIGIEG to be in his administration.
SANDERS, on the other hand, seems to relish the fight as Democratic potentates line up against him. As the party poobahs pooh-pooh his candidacy, he’s packing public parks, large event spaces and, here in the Twin Cities on Monday night, an auditorium with more than 8,000, where he managed to both whack the establishment and court establishment Democratic support. He invited KLOBUCHAR’S and BUTTIGIEG’S supporters to side with him, while saying the establishment was nervous, and out to get him. This is Bernie’s sweet spot: Rail against the establishment, and use that to rally his base.
HERE’S SANDERS’ UNITY PLEA: “All of the Democratic candidates — and Amy and Pete, everybody who has run — we all share the understanding that together we are going to beat Donald Trump. But let us be clear, there are obvious differences of opinion, that’s true. But all of us understand that our differences of opinion pale in comparison to the differences that we have with Trump.”
… AND THEN, RIGHT INTO THE ESTABLISHMENT BROADSIDE: “Now, as you all know, you can’t miss it. If you turn on the TV, the establishment in this country, the economic establishment and the political establishment, are becoming very nervous.”
BERNIE ended his stump speech with this: “With great joy together, we will defeat Donald Trump.”
THIS PRIMARY IS GOING TO GO CLEAR through the month of March. It will take time for California to post full results, and the next two Tuesdays have critical primaries for both candidates. March 10 has Michigan, where SANDERS is hoping to do well, and Mississippi and Missouri, where BIDEN thinks he has a good chance.
ARIZONA — where SANDERS heads Thursday — votes March 17, as does Florida. There, the central question will be: When does MIKE BLOOMBERG get out, and does he throw his weight behind BIDEN? BLOOMBERG has about 25% of the vote in Florida, and his endorsement could bolster BIDEN, who leads in some polling we’ve seen.
OF COURSE, THOUGH, a big night tonight could put SANDERS on the precipice of the nomination. BIDEN will be in California today, with stops in Oakland and an election night event in Los Angeles. SANDERS will be in Burlington, Vt. ELIZABETH WARREN will vote in Massachusetts this morning. BLOOMBERG is in Florida, and will spend election night in Palm Beach.
FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — THE BIDEN CAMPAIGN is feeling so good about its status in the race that it’s starting a $1.5 million television campaign in Michigan, Missouri and Mississippi today. All three states vote March 10. They’ll run this ad — entitled “Service” — which has former President BARACK OBAMA heaping praise on BIDEN. The spots will run in the following TV markets: Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids and Lansing in Michigan; St. Louis, Kansas City, Springfield, Columbia, Quincy and Paducah in Missouri; and Jackson, Greenwood, Columbus/Tupelo, Meridian and Hattiesburg, in Mississippi.
THE CAMPAIGN is also launching a slate of GOTV ads and mail, one aimed at black voters.
Good Tuesday morning. TRUMP will sit down for an interview with SEAN HANNITY at 9 p.m. on Fox News.
HAPPENING TODAY — “How to watch Super Tuesday like a pro”: CHARLIE MAHTESIAN & the gang break down what to expect in each state today … Live highlights and updates
BIG PICTURE … NYT, A1: JONATHAN MARTIN and ALEX BURNS: “How the Democratic Establishment Stumbled as Sanders Surged”
MARC CAPUTO: “‘Rocket fuel’: How black voters could deliver a Super Tuesday windfall to Biden”
IN THE SUPER TUESDAY STATES: CHRIS CADELAGO and HOLLY OTTERBEIN in San Jose, Calif.: “Inside Bernie’s ‘secret strategy’ to win huge in California” … LAURA BARRÓN-LÓPEZ and MARC CAPUTO: “Biden campaign predicts Texas upset over Sanders”
OUCH … NYT’S SHANE GOLDMACHER on WARREN: “Now, as voters head to the polls on Super Tuesday, Ms. Warren’s campaign has all but admitted her pathway to winning the Democratic nomination outright has vanished. She enters March seeking to accumulate delegates for a potential contested convention and is most realistically hunting for them in more educated enclaves, like Seattle and Denver, where she recently held rallies and is investing heavily in advertising.
“In many ways, the arc of the Warren candidacy is the story of her cornering an upscale demographic early, only to become confined to it, and then lose her grip on it.” NYT
#BEBEST … NYT’S MAGGIE HABERMAN in Charlotte and PETER BAKER: “Trump Targets Biden Again as Democratic Race Hits Critical Stage”: “He gleefully repeated recent misstatements by Mr. Biden, including his confusion over names and states, his statement that he was a candidate for the Senate, his reference to Tuesday’s primaries as ‘Super Thursday’ and his head-spinning comment that 150 million Americans have been killed by guns since 2007.
“‘That means 50 percent of our country!’ Mr. Trump said of the gun comment. ‘That’s a big story!’ ‘Sleepy Joe,’ Mr. Trump continued, ‘he doesn’t even know where he is or what he’s doing or what office he’s running for. Honestly, I don’t think he knows what office he’s running for.’
“If Mr. Biden won the presidency, Mr. Trump said, his staff would actually do the governing. ‘They’re going to put him into a home, and other people are going to be running the country,’ the president said, ‘and they’re going to be super-left, radical crazies. And Joe’s going to be in a home and he’ll be watching television.’” NYT
WAPO’S HOLLY BAILEY in Memphis: “Ahead of Super Tuesday, many black voters wonder whether Biden can go the distance”: “The ability to mobilize black voters across the South has long been considered the foundation of Biden’s third bid for the presidency — an advantage that he has argued would add to his ability to assemble a diverse coalition to take on Trump in November.
“But even after South Carolina, there are signs that his support among black voters is not a sure thing — especially this Tuesday, when Democrats across 14 states and one territory will cast their ballots in what will be the biggest and most important day of the nomination race so far and one that is likely to be a test for whether Biden has resurrected his candidacy. …
“Memphis is the seat of Shelby County, the state’s most-populous county with about 940,000 people, more than half of them African American. In Memphis proper, about two-thirds of the population is black, and on the eve of Super Tuesday, many in the community remained divided over Biden’s candidacy, viewing him as a beloved party figure but questioning his ability to win.”
KNOWING TONY FAUCI — “‘You don’t want to go to war with a president,’” by Sarah Owermohle: “Anthony Fauci might be the one person everyone in Washington trusts right now. But at 79, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases is in the thick of one of the biggest battles of 35 years in the role: The race to contain coronavirus when the nation is deeply polarized and misinformation can spread with one tweet — sometimes, from the president himself.
“‘You should never destroy your own credibility. And you don’t want to go to war with a president,’ Fauci, who has been the country’s top infectious diseases expert through a dozen outbreaks and six presidents, told POLITICO in an interview Friday. ‘But you got to walk the fine balance of making sure you continue to tell the truth.’
“And the truth about coronavirus? ‘I don’t think that we are going to get out of this completely unscathed,’ he said. ‘I think that this is going to be one of those things we look back on and say boy, that was bad.’” POLITICO
CORONAVIRUS LATEST — “Virus alarms sound worldwide, but China sees crisis ebbing,” by AP’s Ken Moritsugu and Matt Sedensky in Beijing: “Iranians hoarded medical supplies, Italians urged doctors out of retirement and South Koreans prepared to pump billions into relief efforts Tuesday as the virus epidemic firmed its hold around the globe.
“Mushrooming outbreaks in the Mideast, Europe and South Korea contrasted with optimism in China, where thousands of recovered patients were going home. A growing outbreak in the United States led schools and subways to sanitize, quickened a search for a vaccine, and spread fears of vulnerability for nursing home residents.
“‘We have moved to a new stage in the fight,’ said Dow Constantine, the political leader in King County, Washington, which is home to Seattle. All six U.S. fatalities from COVID-19 have been in Washington state and Constantine said his county is buying a hotel to become a hospital for isolated patients.
“World Health Organization leader Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said outbreaks in South Korea, Italy, Iran and Japan were the agency’s greatest concern. He said the virus was uniquely capable of community transmission but could be contained with the right measures. ‘We are in unchartered territory,’ Tedros said.” AP
— “Major airlines, U.S. officials clash over passenger tracking related to coronavirus cases,” by WaPo’s Jeff Stein, Lena Sun and Lori Aratani
— ICYMI … DAN DIAMOND and ADAM CANCRYN: “Azar in the crosshairs for delays in virus tests” … Watch Lou Dobbs take Azar to the woodshed
SARAH FERRIS and CAITLIN EMMA: “Hill leaders close to striking emergency coronavirus funding deal”: “Negotiators for Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell say they expect to unveil the bipartisan package — which is expected to be between $7 billion and $8 billion — as soon as Tuesday, according to people familiar with the process. The legislation is intended to shore up U.S. public health preparedness, with six deaths reported in Washington State and the number of people infected in the U.S. now exceeding 100. …
“Negotiators are still haggling over several key details, including language that would make sure vaccines are affordable for all populations, according to people familiar with the talks. The bill is also likely to include a requirement that the Trump administration replace $136 million that it’s shifting from various health accounts in order to pad out its response to the outbreak.”
MARKETWATCH — “Global Stocks Claw Back More Ground,” by WSJ’s Xie Yu and Anna Isaac
TRUMP’S TUESDAY — The president will leave the White House en route to the Washington Hilton at 10:45 a.m., where he’ll speak at the National Association of Counties legislative conference at 11 a.m. Afterward, he’ll return to the White House, then depart at 2 p.m. for the National Institutes of Health’s vaccine research center in Bethesda, Md. At NIH, he’ll participate in a roundtable briefing at 2:30 p.m., followed by a tour of the viral pathogenesis laboratory at 3:15 p.m. He’s scheduled to be back at the White House by 4 p.m.
MEMBERS of the coronavirus task force will hold a press briefing at 5:30 p.m. in the James S. Brady briefing room.
PLAYBOOK READS

WAR REPORT — “Secret documents on Trump Afghanistan peace deal shared with Congress,” by John Bresnahan: “The Trump administration is making available to Congress two secret documents related to the United States’ peace agreement with the Taliban, part of the White House’s effort to build support for ending the longest military conflict in American history.
“Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has reached out to senior lawmakers on the House and Senate panels that oversee foreign relations to discuss the accord – signed by the U.S. officials and the Taliban in Doha on Saturday – and inform them that the administration will share the ‘military implementation documents’ as early as Tuesday.
“‘I think we’re taking a big chance, but I think it’s something we have to explore because this war is never-ending, and I don’t really want us to go into perpetual war,’ said House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), who spoke to Pompeo on Friday. ‘Like everything else, there are mixed feelings. You don’t want our enemies to feel like they drove us out. On the other hand, you don’t want to never leave. I’m glad we’re working on it at least.’” POLITICO
POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics
ANOTHER ONE — “White House withdraws nomination of Defense official who questioned Ukraine aid freeze,” by Connor O’Brien
WELCOME BACK, JOE! — “Ron Johnson threatens subpoena over Hunter Biden’s Ukraine work,” by Andrew Desiderio: “A key senator is threatening to issue a subpoena for records related to former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter and his work for a Ukrainian energy firm — the most significant escalation yet in an investigation that has divided Senate Republicans.
“In a letter obtained by POLITICO, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) told members of the panel that he will soon schedule a business meeting to vote on a subpoena for the documents, which are purportedly related to Hunter Biden’s role on the board of the Ukrainian firm, Burisma.
“The subpoena seeks records from Blue Star, a Democratic public affairs firm. In his letter to committee members, Johnson cited government documents indicating that the firm ‘sought to leverage Hunter Biden’s role as a board member of Burisma to gain access to, and potentially influence matters at, the State Department.’” POLITICO
ISRAELI ELECTION LATEST … HAARETZ: “Netanyahu Two Seats Away From Majority With 90 Percent of Votes Counted”
VALLEY TALK — “Tim Cook and Apple Bet Everything on China. Then Coronavirus Hit,” by WSJ’s Tripp Mickle and Yoko Kubota: “Long before the coronavirus struck, Apple Inc.’s operations team began raising concerns about the technology giant’s dependency on China.
“Some operations executives suggested as early as 2015 that the company relocate assembly of at least one product to Vietnam. That would allow Apple to begin the multiyear process of training workers and creating a new cluster of component providers outside the world’s most populous nation, people familiar with the discussions said.
“Senior managers rebuffed the idea. For Apple, weaning itself off China, its second-largest consumer market and the place where most of its products are assembled, has been too challenging to undertake.” WSJ
MEDIAWATCH — “Chris Matthews Out at MSNBC,” by NYT’s Michael Grynbaum: “Chris Matthews, the veteran political anchor and voluble host of the long-running MSNBC talk show ‘Hardball,’ resigned on Monday night, an abrupt departure from a television perch that made him a fixture of politics and the news media over the past quarter-century.
“Mr. Matthews, 74, had faced mounting criticism in recent days over a spate of embarrassing on-air moments, including a comparison of Senator Bernie Sanders’s campaign to the Nazi invasion of France and an interview with Senator Elizabeth Warren in which the anchor was criticized for a condescending and disbelieving tone.” NYT … NBC headline, w/ video: “Chris Matthews announces retirement, mutually parts ways with MSNBC”
— WATCH THE HOMETOWN CROWD … The L.A. TIMES is airing a live, three-hour online broadcast called “California Decides,” from 8-11 p.m. Pacific time tonight. Eli Stokols is anchoring from the L.A. studio.
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
TRANSITIONS — Kate Meissner is now an SVP of new business at Edelman. She previously was SVP of operations and business development at ICX Media. … Andy Eichar is now press secretary for Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.). He previously was press secretary for the late Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.). …
… Daniel Barash, James Conway and Julia Sherman have joined SKDKnickerbocker. Barash is VP of the political division and previously was campaign manager for Sen. Michael Bennet’s (D-Colo.) presidential campaign. Conway is now a senior associate and previously was campaign manager for Virginia state Sen. Joshua Cole. Sherman is now a political writer and previously worked on Sen. Cory Booker’s (D-N.J.) presidential campaign in Iowa.
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: George Little, partner at the Brunswick Group. A trend he thinks doesn’t get enough attention: “We are likely to see growing tensions in the coming years over resources in the Arctic region. America is an Arctic power and it is unclear that we are prepared for such tensions.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), NRCC chairman, is 59 … DCCC COS Alex Smith … Jesse Hunt, communications director at NRSC … Dan Conston is 3-5 … Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) is 36 … Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) is 58 … Rep. Paul Cook (R-Calif.) is 77 … Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) is 39 … Marc Short is 5-0 … CBS News president Susan Zirinsky … Tim Morrison … Andrew Olmem, deputy assistant to the president and deputy director of the National Economic Council … NYT’s Elaina Plott … Alexa Henning, WH director of broadcast booking (h/t Judd Deere) … Ron Chernow is 71 … Peter Mirijanian, president of Peter Mirijanian Public Affairs, is 57 … Tedros Adhanom, director-general of the World Health Organization … John Roscoe … Steve Smith, associate director of the WH Office of American Innovation … POLITICO’s Lily Mihalik, Mark McQuillan and Cecilie Combs … Allie Carroll, RNC assistant press secretary (h/ts Maddison Stone and Cassie Smedile) … Carlton Carroll, VP of communications at the Climate Leadership Council … Freddi Goldstein …
… Ira Glass, host and producer of “This American Life,” is 61 … Cameron French, VP of public affairs at SKDKnickerbocker … Michael Remez, editorial officer at the Pew Charitable Trusts … Marathon Communications founder Richard Lichtenstein (h/ts Jon Haber) … Spencer Hurwitz (h/t Sarah Mills) … Hadar Arazi, Rep. Josh Gottheimer’s (D-N.J.) director of scheduling and operations (h/t James Adams) … Ben Goldstein … Luxembourg PM Xavier Bettel is 47 … Mongolian President Khaltmaagiin Battulga is 57 … Katie Marshall … Caitlin Gallagher, director of media and communications at the Federation of American Hospitals … David Yassky is 56 … Tyler Ann McGuffee … Carly Walsh … David Steinhardt is 51 … Amanda Crane … Adam Sachs … Jason Gerson … Patrick Gavin … Scott Pollard … Hannah Blatt … Ghada Alkiek … Jason Dick, deputy editor at Roll Call … Lauren Shay Lavin … Tariq Khan … Kristin Lawton … Charles Cote … Anne Gordon … Jasen Castillo … Geneva Overholser … Edward Lewine … Janeen Lawlor … David Pringle … Carolyn Stanford Taylor … Mike Yelovich
Follow us on Twitter
DESERET NEWS
|
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: The Coronavirus Continues to Spread
Plus, a Super Tuesday preview, and what went down at a trio of conservative conferences.
The Dispatch Staff | 1 hr | 1 |
Happy Tuesday! To quote both President Trump talking about Mike Bloomberg’s campaign advisers and Declan’s friends watching him indulge his newfound addiction to The Bachelor: “They led you down a very dark and lonely path! Your reputation will never be the same!”
A reminder: You’re getting this version of TMD as a non-paying member. To get the full version—and the rest of our editorial offerings—join now.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- Amy Klobuchar suspended her campaign for president and joined Pete Buttigieg, Beto O’Rourke, and Harry Reid in endorsing Joe Biden’s candidacy, as the Democratic establishment consolidated around the former vice president in an effort to stop Bernie Sanders from becoming the party’s standard bearer.
- A day after Biden’s victory in South Carolina, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson sent a letter to his Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee colleagues letting them know he planned to force a vote on subpoenaing a witness in their Burisma probe. Johnson denied the timing of his decision was related to Biden’s resurgence in the Democratic race.
- The Supreme Court agreed to hear a legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate next term.
- The Trump administration announced new restrictions on Chinese journalists in the United States following the Chinese government’s expulsion of three Wall Street Journal reporters last month.
- Stocks rebounded from their worst week since the fiscal crisis on Monday with their best day since 2009. The Dow surged 5.1 percent and the S&P 500 rose 4.6 percent.
- Several government agencies—including the Department of Justice and FBI—issued a joint statement ahead of Super Tuesday voting saying, “foreign actors continue to try to influence public sentiment and shape voter perceptions.”
The Latest on COVID-19
The last few days have marked a period of contrasts for the novel coronavirus, as the press has begun to call it. From a financial standpoint, the news has been reassuring: markets saw a remarkable rebound Monday from last week from last week’s steep slump, offering at least a temporary reassurance that the disease would not precipitate a worldwide economic meltdown.
But the medical news keeps growing more alarming, with more cases in more places around the world each day, as authorities struggle to contain a virus whose distinguishing characteristic is stealth: a long incubation period and, in many patients, symptoms suggesting nothing worse is afoot than a cold. Four more Americans died of the virus Monday, bringing the total number of fatalities to six.
The Biggest Day of the Democratic Race Thus Far
More than 1,300 delegates are up for grabs today in 14 states and American Samoa. That’s more than a third of the total pledged delegates for the entire primary season. Just California, for example, has 415 pledged delegates in a race where the winner—at least to win on the first ballot—needs 1,991.
All eyes will be on Joe Biden, as it became clear that the Democratic establishment is rallying around the former vice president and trying to fend off Bernie Sadners. Pete Buttigieg dropped out Sunday night, and Amy Klobuchar yesterday. Both endorsed Biden, and Klobuchar spoke enthusiastically at a Biden rally in Dallas on Monday night. “”We do not in our party want to just eek by a victory,” she said. “We want to win big. And Joe Biden can do that.”
The State of Conservatism Is…Weird
Over the weekend, three separate gatherings here in D.C. attempted to lay claim to the mantle of True Conservatism™ and the best path forward. The more mainstream—dare we say “establishment?”—Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) was far and away the largest and most successful, but two smaller renegades (which could be in more stark disagreement)—the America First Political Action Conference and the Summit on Principled Conservatism—attempted to carve out their own right-wing niches. Your Morning Dispatchers attended (or streamed) all three forums, and have pieces up on the site detailing what we found.
After spending a few days soaking in the Trump-happy sights at CPAC, Andrew turned his attention to a gathering of extremely online young white nationalists who gathered across the river in Arlington Friday night for an anti-CPAC conference, in which the participants spent much of their time insisting that the larger gathering wasn’t true Trumpism at all. (Link)
Each of the America First PAC organizers were former CPAC attendees who had become, for one reason or another, too toxic to associate with, even for others on the right. For Fuentes, it was his long history of half-ironic xenophobic agitation, including sneering jokes about the Holocaust and the El Paso mass shooting. For former Daily Caller writer Scott Greer, it was his history of writing pseudonymously for the alt-right website Radix. For Patrick Casey, it was his leadership of out-and-out white nationalist group Identity Evropa.
In their speeches, which were streamed by tens of thousands of others online, they sneered at what they described as the cooptation of Trump’s movement by the same conservatives Trump defeated.
“When Donald Trump came down the escalator five years ago, his core message wasn’t that America needed a child tax credit or a better industrial policy subsidy. It was immigration,” Greer said.
“But you would never know this if you listen to the people who call themselves Trumpists today. Depending on the source, you will hear that Trump just wanted to focus on jobs, regulations, tax cuts, or on some petty social issue. Their imagined Trumpism looks nothing like the agenda Trump won on.”
And Declan filed a dispatch from the Summit on Principled Conservatism, a comparatively anti-Trump bunch gathered at the National Press Club, hosted by Evan McMullin’s Stand Up Republic and Heath Mayo’s Principles First organizations. (Link)
The crowd of nearly 300 was a self-selected group. Plenty hailed from D.C., Virginia, or Maryland, but Mayo said nearly half traveled from across the country to join the conversation—South Carolina, Oregon, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, California, and Utah were all represented. Attendees were largely politically engaged (McMullin’s running mate in 2016—Mindy Finn—was brought to the stage as “needing no introduction”), and they were largely white (Shermichael Singleton—the day’s lone black panelist—said “I’m looking in this room, I’ve only counted three African Americans. I’m just being very honest.”). Some said they recognized each other from Twitter profile pictures. Joseph Reynolds—a Marine engineer challenging Sen. Lindsey Graham for the Republican nomination in South Carolina—went table to table introducing himself and giving anyone who’d listen a pitch for his candidacy.
…
Bubbling beneath the surface of the high-mindedness and magnanimity was a slew of deep-seated resentments and personal grievances. The day’s speakers—at one time vice presidential chiefs of staff, acting attorneys general of the United States, high-level campaign operatives, and some of the most influential writers in the country—have been all but cast aside in Donald Trump’s GOP. And on several occasions, those frustrations came to the fore.
…
When Will Chamberlain—the pro-Trump agitator and editor-in-chief of Human Events—reached the front of the question line to ask a panel if they agreed with Wilson’s past remarks referring Donald Trump’s supporters as the president’s “credulous rube, ten-toothed base,” Tim Miller, who used to work for Jeb Bush, said he didn’t, referencing his old boss’ views on the dignity, meaning, and purpose of all human life. But Wilson took the bait anyways, giving Chamberlain exactly the soundbite he wanted. “I’m sorry that the f***-your-feelings crowd can’t take the fact that I’m a pirate, and that I talk the way I do. And I’m sorry their delicate little feels are hurt when they get called out.”
Stuart Gerson—assistant attorney general for the Civil Division in the George H.W. Bush administration and acting attorney general under Bill Clinton—introduced the discussion he was a part of as “the Human Scum panel,” proudly owning President Trump’s moniker for Never Trump conservatives the way the president’s own supporters embraced Hillary Clinton’s “deplorable” label. “As much as any of you, I’d like to see [Trump] extricated from American politics and put on the new NASA one-way trip space program,” he said.
Worth Your Time
- Critics of the president often lament his attacks on “our institutions,” but what does that really mean? George Packer attempts to answer that question in his latest essay for The Atlantic, arguing Trump is “destroying the civil service and bending the government to his will.” He concludes: “Four years is an emergency. Eight years is a permanent condition.”
- When Rep. Mark Meadows announced he’d be retiring from Congress in December, it set off a scramble in North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District over who would succeed him. National Review’s John McCormack tells the story of Dan Driscoll, a young Iraq War veteran and Yale Law School grad looking to fill the seat.
- “We’re eating at street-corner stalls and food trucks, in front of the TV and at the grocery—everywhere but restaurants,” Karen Stabiner writes. Her excellent essay in The Counter details how changes in technology and venture capital are warping the food industry.
Presented Without Comment
Toeing the Company Line
- The latest Advisory Opinions podcast is filled to the brim. Sarah and David break down the likelihood of a contested convention on the Democratic side, the Court of Appeals’ Don McGahn decision, the Supreme Court and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Katie Porter’s place at the intersection of #MeToo and revenge porn. Be sure to subscribe and give it a listen here!
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
1 |
Top posts
AXIOS
🗳️ Happy Super Tuesday. Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,483 words … 5 minutes.
- Live coverage all day and night in the Smart Screen atop Axios.com.
🇮🇱 Situational awareness: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu led today but was short of a governing majority in the third national election in less than a year. (Reuters)

Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo: Paras Griffin/WireImage
The Bernie Sanders diehards packing his rallies would love to live in a world with Medicare for All, free college and higher taxes on the rich — but they mostly know that’s a distant dream, Axios’ Alexi McCammond and Stef Kight report.
- Instead, they’re fueled by the movement he’s promising to build.
Why it matters: Sanders, on a delegate roll heading into today’s 14-state Super Tuesday voting, is looking more and more like a liberal incarnation of Donald Trump circa 2016 — a cultural force who transcends party or policies.
- His followers have extreme enthusiasm — and modest expectations.

We interviewed more than two dozen Sanders rally-goers over the past week in Virginia, which votes today, and in South Carolina.
- “If he doesn’t get it done, it’s not because he won’t try,” said Colton Fagundes, a supporter who said he expects student loan forgiveness under a Sanders presidency.
- Luke Waldrop, 23, said it’s “really just about changing the zeitgeist and American politics.”
The bottom line: Many Sanders voters see Trump as having paved the way for a President Sanders.
- Sanders supporter Jamal Jilao said: “I hope the time of being fearful of using executive orders has been laid to rest.”
Mike Bloomberg, who has already poured more than $500 million into his campaign, faces his big Super Tuesday test today after Joe Biden’s South Carolina sweep and triple crown of big endorsements yesterday (Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, Harry Reid, Susan Rice).
- Bloomberg is spending Super Tuesday in Florida, which votes March 17.
Axios’ Alayna Treene will be with Bloomberg today as he travels through Miami, Orlando and West Palm Beach, where he’ll watch tonight’s returns.
- Later this week, he’s supposed to hit the swing states of Michigan (which votes March 10), Pennsylvania (which votes April 28), and back to Florida.
At a small event yesterday in Manassas, Va., the former New York mayor told the crowd that he has “won three elections so far, and I don’t plan to start losing now.”
- He added that he talked with Buttigieg and Klobuchar shortly after they dropped out of the race and thought “they behaved themselves well,” and that he “felt sorry for them. But I’m in it to win it.”
- During his last Monday stop, a Fox News town hall in Virginia before flying to Miami, he predicted “the most likely scenario for the Democratic party is that nobody has the majority,” and it ends in a contested convention: “It doesn’t even have to be one of the two leading candidates.”
🥊 Joe Biden, 77, accepting the endorsement of Pete Buttigieg, 38, in Dallas last night:
- “He reminds me of my son Beau. … I’m sorry to talk about my son Beau so much, but he was my soul. … I just hope he’s proud of me.”
- “And I look over at Pete during the debates, and I think: You know, that’s a Beau. Because he has such enormous character, such intellectual capacity and such a commitment to other people.”
Scientists say half of the world’s sandy beaches could disappear by the end of the century if climate change continues unchecked, AP reports.
- Why it matters: “The projected shoreline changes will substantially impact the shape of the world’s coastline,” more than a third of which is sandy beach, the authors wrote.
Researchers at the European Union’s Joint Research Center in Ispra, Italy, used satellite images to track the way beaches have changed over the past 30 years and simulated how global warming might affect them in the future.
- By 2100, around half of the beaches in the world are expected to experience erosion of more than 100 meters.
The superstar cities that already claim high shares of the U.S. digital services economy are only getting stronger, according to a new analysis by the Brookings Institution, writes Axios’ Kim Hart.
- Why it matters: The tech industry’s success along the coasts is not dispersing to other regions that have been passed over in terms of job creation, deepening America’s already stark geographic divides.
- 🏙️ Sign up for Kim Hart’s weekly newsletter, Axios Cities.
In a memo to teams, the NBA told players to avoid high-fiving fans or strangers, and avoid taking items for autographs, in response to the coronavirus crisis that has spread to most corners of the planet.
- “Corona,” the New York Knicks’ Bobby Portis said as he offered some fist-bump greetings last night. (AP)
Illustration: Axios Visuals
As part of our What Matters 2020 series on the critical trends that will outlive this moment, Axios CEO Jim VandeHei and I taped seven short videos discussing topics of consequence to society.
- Today’s conversation is centered on the rise of robotics and AI and what it means for work.
- Why it matters: The What Matters 2020 topics are our way of breaking with the rest of media to focus not on daily shiny objects, but the topics that will shape the next decade.
MSNBC’s Steve Kornacki, pinch-hitting on “Hardball” last night after Chris Matthews announced his forced resignation at the top of the hour, remembered Matthews’ “boundless energy and curiosity [when] I first watched Chris when I was a teenager in the mid-1990s.”
- Chris Hayes, host of the next hour, started his show by saying he had watched Matthews in his dorm room at Brown, covering President Bill Clinton’s impeachment.
- Matthews published “Hardball,” the book about the crude dynamics of politics that was the show’s namesake, in 1988 — 32 years ago.
- Here’s how long Matthews was in the game: Open the book of historic L.A. Times front pages to the day President Ronald Reagan was shot in 1981, and there’s a UPI story quoting Chris Matthews, spokesman for House Speaker Tip O’Neill.
Matthews, 74, stayed at the punch bowl of live TV too long. He quit after new attention to a string of leering comments about women over the years, including colleagues, public officials and guests. He began the show:
Let me start with my headline tonight: I’m retiring. This is the last “Hardball” on MSNBC. And obviously, this isn’t for lack of interest in politics. As you can tell, I have loved every minute of my 2o years of host as “Hardball.” Every morning I read the papers, and I’m gung-ho to get to work. Not many people have had this privilege. …
The younger generations out there are ready to take the reins. We see them in politics, and the media … They are improving the workplace. We’re talking here about better standards than we grew up with — fair standards.
A lot of it has to do with how we talk to each other. Compliments on a woman’s appearance that some men, including me, might have once incorrectly thought were OK were never OK — not then, and certainly not today. And for making such comments in the past, I’m sorry. …
So let’s not say goodbye but: ’til we meet again.
David Plouffe, President Obama’s campaign manager in 2008, is out today with a pair of books — one for adults and one for young people — with the common theme: You can do this.
- “A Citizen’s Guide to Beating Donald Trump” is rawer: “Lord knows what [Trump will] do on Twitter heading up to Election Day.”
- “Ripples of Hope,” aimed at 10- to 15-year-olds, is more aspirational: Election night “will be a lifetime memory, win or lose.”
Plouffe told me the books are out on the same day because he’s “hoping families will talk about what they can do to defeat Trump — and if parents and kids are both reading the respective books they can make the best plan together for the general election.”
Charlie Kirk, 26, a favorite of President Trump’s, is out today with “The MAGA Doctrine,” a manifesto for the young “Make America Great Again” crowd.
- Kirk is founder and president of Turning Point USA, a conservative youth activist group on over 2,000 high school and college campuses.
- The book became an Amazon #1 bestseller after Trump tweeted Sunday night that a Kirk interview on Fox News was “Amazing!!! … This is a really GREAT book. Support Charlie Kirk!”
Kirk told me his favorite page is Page 8: “Trump has swept aside an astonishing number of conservative taboos, once-dominant institutions, and once-unbreakable rules …”
- “[T]he Republican Party is in some sense no longer a conservative party, no longer the party of Reagan, but instead a Trump-remade populist party.”
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
One of the world’s biggest esports leagues is working with Nielsen to develop the first-ever comprehensive measurement system for viewership of esports broadcasts, Axios’ Sara Fischer writes.
- Tournaments are often watched both live and after-the-fact, since audiences are global and span different timezones. Aspiring players also like to rewatch games to learn from other gamers’ techniques.
Why it matters: Esports audiences are growing so big that they are beginning to outpace traditional sports viewers globally.
📬 Thanks for starting Super Tuesday with us! Please tell a friend about AM/PM.
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Dems Circle the Wagons for Crazy Joe the Wonder Veep
PROTECT THIS LUNATIC AT ALL COSTS!
The prevailing wisdom of the past few months is that this hot mess of a Democratic primary would finally start to clear up a lot after Super Tuesday. With Bernie Sanders stealing almost all of the thunder for weeks as votes finally began to be cast, it looks like the higher-ups in the party decided to get some contingency plans rolling a bit early.
Hot on the heels of Mayor Pete exiting the race, Amy Klobuchar bailed as well, and immediately threw her endorsement to der Bidengaffer.
Both candidates saw the writing on the wall after Biden’s overwhelmingly decisive victory in South Carolina last Saturday. His thumping of Sanders proved that the battle for the soul of the Democratic party was well and truly on.
Rumors began spreading late yesterday that Biden would receive Beto O’Rourke’s endorsement at a rally in Texas. Just as he did in the primaries, Mayor Pete decided to steal Beto’s spotlight and throw his nod to Biden as well.
It no doubt took several hours for his handlers to explain to Biden who Beto O’Rourke was, but it all ended up being a big group hug kind of night:
The message is clear: establishment Democrats are still buying the “Biden electability” argument, despite his increasingly erratic and mistake-prone behavior on the campaign trail. That they’re willing to throw in with a candidate who can’t go an hour without making an incredibly stupid mistake rather than rally behind Bernie indicates that they think socialism is a losing issue.
At least it is if the candidate admits that he’s a socialist. Biden, of course, will be promoting the stealthier socialism that the Democratic party prefers in order to stay on brand.
At the rate Biden has been declining, the Democrats’ best hope may be to just have him stand in the background at campaign events, drooling on a bib and smiling that “Mommy that man scares me!” smile of his while his former rivals speak for him.
Getting help from the vanquished can bring some baggage along with it, however:
Bringing that unabashed gun-grabbing attitude back front and center could be the kind of thing that drives away the very heartland voters the Dems lost in 2016 and desperately need to win back this year.
Anyway, it’s obviously “Biden or Bust” for the Democratic old money, which could turn out even better for the Republicans. The Bernie Bros will not take the Biden nomination well. The party will hemorrhage younger voters who feel that the fix was in again to get an “electable” candidate nominated over Sanders.
This should be fun.
Bernie Still Has Establishment Friends (Sort Of)
PROGRAMMING NOTES
1: My friend and colleague Stephen Green will be doing one of his signature VodkaPundit drunkblogs for all of the Super Tuesday results. The link will be on the homepage as soon as it goes live.
2: Thanks to PJ Media Managing Edito
r Paula Bolyard for filling in for me on the Briefing yesterday. I needed a rest day after four nights of hosting the triumphant return of the Kruiser Kabana at CPAC 2020 and celebrating my birthday on Sunday following a day of air travel.
PJM Linktank
VodkaPundit: Afghanistan: It Was a Nice Peace While It Lasted
BREAKING: Federal Judge Orders Hillary Clinton Deposition Over Private Emails; ‘Still More to Learn’
Watch What Happens When BLM Protesters Bang on L.A. DA’s Front Door at 5:30 a.m.—and a Gun Answers
Trump Hugs and Kisses American Flag at CPAC: ‘I Love You Baby!’
Media Darling Katie Hill’s Glam Media Rehab Tour Continues
[WATCH] Protestors Interrupt Mike Bloomberg Town Hall on Fox News, Forcing a Commercial Break
[WATCH] Exclusive Interview with Ricky Rebel on Non-Binary Trend: ‘I Don’t Buy Into Your Psychosis’
VIP
The Kruiser Kabana Episode 21: CPAC 2020 Wrap-Up
Exclusive Interview With Laura Loomer: Will Twitter Reinstate Her if She Wins Congressional Race?
Early Voting Disenfranchises Voters and It Should Be Abolished
VodkaPundit, Part Deux: The Road to ’68? Wargaming Super Tuesday
Joe Biden Is NOT a ‘Return to Normalcy’ Candidate
VIP Gold
Trump: I Bet Biden Offered Buttigieg A Job. Biden: I Told Buttigieg I’d Offer Him A Job.
Biden Gaffe: Former Vice President Claims Tomorrow Is ‘Super Thursday’
Me+Schlichter=Hot Mess: ‘Unredacted with Kurt Schlichter’: Keeping It Hot at CPAC
‘We like to troll’: President Trump explains holding rallies opposite Democratic primaries
From the Mothership and Beyond
The employment blood bath continues: California’s AB 5 kills off 40-year Lake Tahoe Music Festival
Schlichter: Conservatives Think They Have This Election Won
WATCH: Bloomberg Confronted Over Having a Security Detail While Pushing for Gun Control
Playboy Writer Failed to Disclose He Was Dating Katie Hill in Emails to RedState
Kira Davis: Trump Could Flip California…Here’s How
New Mexico Sheriffs Preparing To Sue Over Red Flag Law
This Interview Is What’s Scaring Anti-Gun Leftists
Biden’s Latest Explanation Of His South Africa “Arrest” Story Is Worse Than The Previous Ones
Teachers’ unions are evil: AFT President Goes Rogue, Endorses Warren Ahead Of Super Tuesday
Suspense Mounts: Is Biden Going To Surprise Bernie In California Tomorrow?
‘Rocket fuel’: How black voters could deliver a Super Tuesday windfall to Biden
Bloomberg’s online tactics test the boundary of disinformation
Washington state is buying a motel to isolate coronavirus patients
“Be Prepared”—Boy Scouts of America file for Chapter 11
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
Thanks to Townhall Media, CPAC 2020 saw the Kruiser Kabana make a comeback after a seven-year hiatus. “Epic” seems an inadequate word to describe the event. No, I didn’t sleep. Paula posted one pic yesterday. I thought I’d give you a before and after look today. I posted these on social media and a bunch of idiots chimed in with reminders to tip the housekeeping staff. I’ve been on the road for thirty years people, I know how to treat hotel employees.
Before
After
In honor of the Kabana:
My liver has left the building.
___
PJ Media Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.”
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
THE FEDERALIST
|
THE HILL
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
NBC
![]()
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray and Carrie Dann FIRST READ: Who’ll dominate Super Tuesday? Here are three scenarios to watch. After the moderate wing of the Democratic Party banded together Monday like superheroes in an Avengers movie, the true voting battle now begins on this Super Tuesday.
And given that the Democratic contest is now a delegate and math race, with a total of 1,344 pledged delegates up for grabs on Super Tuesday, we think tonight could go one of three different ways.
Samuel Corum/Getty Images Scenario #1: Joe Biden’s super night. This back-of-envelope delegate math assumes Biden gets Hillary Clinton-like margins in the South, gets Elizabeth Warren and/or Michael Bloomberg to split up the delegates in California and Texas, and sees Bloomberg failing to hit the 15 percent threshold for delegates in several states, especially in the South:
Sanders 557 Biden 500 Bloomberg 146 Warren 115 Klobuchar 26
So even on a great night for Biden, Sanders edges Biden by 50 to 60 delegates.
Scenario #2: Bernie Sanders’ super night: This rough delegate math assumes Sanders grabbing more than half of the delegates out of California and Texas; Warren failing to hit 15 percent in many of the Sanders-friendly states; and Bloomberg picking up delegates in the South (thus denying Biden those delegates):
Sanders 691 Biden 445 Bloomberg 142 Warren 36 Klobuchar 30
Under that scenario, Sanders comes out of Super Tuesday with nearly 250 more delegates than Biden.
Scenario #3: Somewhere in the middle: Or you have something right down the middle, with Sanders emerging from Super Tuesday +150 over Biden.
For us, Sanders’ magic number tonight is 600 delegates. If he’s above it, it means he got close to (or surpassed) a majority of all 1,344 delegates.
Below it, however, means a solid majority of delegates went elsewhere.
And the upcoming primaries – in Mississippi (March 10), Florida (March 17) and Georgia (March 24) – don’t get easier for Sanders.
Allocating all of the delegates could take a couple of weeks But also remember that it could take a couple of weeks to count all of the votes and sort out all of the delegate math, especially when it comes to California.
“Went back and looked… At 2 am eastern time on primary night in 16, Clinton led Sanders by 21.5 in California…. She won by 7. Patience is VERY much needed with this count,” CNN’s Harry Enten tweets.
And while tonight is a math race, there are some symbolic bellwethers:
Who wins Texas?
Who wins North Carolina?
Who hits more 15 percent thresholds – Michael Bloomberg or Elizabeth Warren?
And whose delegate total is bigger – Sanders’ or Biden + Bloomberg?
TWEET OF THE DAY: When Beto took Biden to Whataburger
2020 VISION: Everything you need to know about Super Tuesday Fourteen states, plus American Samoa, will be holding contests today, awarding a total of 1,344 pledged delegates. (Americans Abroad also begins its voting process, but it lasts until March 10, so NBC News isn’t including its 13 delegates with the other Super Tuesday races.).
These 1,344 delegates represent 34 percent of all pledged delegates up for grabs in the entire Democratic contest. By the end of the March 17 primaries, nearly 62 percent of all pledged delegates will have been awarded.
The states by final poll-closing times:
7:00 pm ET: Virginia (99 pledged delegates) 7:00 pm ET: Vermont (16 pledged delegates) 7:30 pm ET: North Carolina (110) 8:00 pm ET: Alabama (52) 8:00 pm ET: Maine (24) 8:00 pm ET: Massachusetts (91) 8:00 pm ET: Oklahoma (37) 8:00 pm ET: Tennessee (64) 8:30 pm ET: Arkansas (31) 9:00 pm ET: Colorado (67) 9:00 pm ET: Minnesota (75) 9:00 pm ET: Texas (228) 10:00 pm ET: Utah (29) 11:00 pm ET: California (415)
Also, five Super Tuesday states – Alabama, Arkansas, California, North Carolina and Texas – will be holding their House and Senate primaries today.
Among the races we’re watching: The GOP’s AL-SEN primary, the Dem NC-SEN primary, the Dem TX-SEN primary, and the CA-25 primary to fill the seat vacated by former Rep. Katie Hill, D-Calif.
On the campaign trail today: Bernie Sanders votes in Vermont and then also holds his election-night rally in Burlington, Vt., with members of the band Phish… Elizabeth Warren casts her ballot in Massachusetts before campaigning in Detroit later this evening… Joe Biden holds his Super Tuesday night event in Los Angeles… Michael Bloomberg spends his day in Florida… And Tulsi Gabbard, who remains in the Dem race, holds a town hall in Detroit.
Dispatches from NBC’s campaign embeds: In Dallas, Joe Biden received Amy Klobuchar, Pete Buttigieg and Beto O’Rourke’s endorsements. NBC’s Marianna Sotomayor and Amanda Golden report: “Buttigieg spoke first, saying that the most important part of his campaign was to ‘defeat Donald Trump and to win the era for the values that we share.’ In exchange, Biden offered what he described as ‘the highest compliment’ he could ever give to any human being. ‘I don’t think I’ve ever done this before, but he reminds me of my son Beau,’ Biden said, causing Buttigieg’s face to grow heavy. ‘I look over at Pete during the debates and I think, I think, you know, “that’s a Beau” because he has such enormous character, such intellectual capacity, and such a commitment to other people.’”
Amy Klobuchar used her campaign message to lure her supporters into Biden’s camp: “I believe this now standing with the vice president, if you feel tired of the noise and the nonsense in our politics, and if you are tired of the extremes, you have a home with me,” she said. “And I think you know you have a home with Joe Biden.”
NBC’s Gary Grumbach reports on Bernie Sanders’ campaign event in Minnesota: “Tonight, I want to open the door to Amy’s supporters, to Pete’s supporters. I know that there are political differences but I also know that virtually all of Amy’s support and Pete’s support understand that we have got to move towards a government which believes in justice, not greed,’ Sanders said. ‘So to all of Amy and Pete’s millions of supporters, the door is open, come on in.”
DATA DOWNLOAD: And the number of the day is … $198,404,168. $198,404,168
That’s how much Mike Bloomberg has spent on TV and radio advertising in Super Tuesday states as of today, per Advertising Analytics.
Here’s the state-by-state breakdown.
THE LID: Known Unknowns Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we mused on how there’s a LOT we don’t know about how the electorate will react to the news of the last few days.
ICYMI: News clips you shouldn’t miss Sahil Kapur has your guide for what to watch tonight.
Barack Obama hasn’t publicly endorsed a candidate. But that doesn’t mean he’s totally uninvolved.
Biden says he’s raised $33 million in the last month.
Biden’s former rivals are quickly coalescing behind him. Will it be enough?
One important group to watch tonight: Latinos.
EMILY’s List endorsed Elizabeth Warren.
Timing is everything: Senate Republicans are planning their first subpoena in a probe of Burisma. |
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
![]() |
- Joe Biden’s embrace of Beto O’Rourke’s gun confiscation plan is more concerning than most realize
- Denver Councilwoman Candi CdeBaca Tweets ‘solidarity’ for spreading coronavirus at Trump rallies
- San Francisco, where crime is rampant and politicians make police sit on their hands
- DNC fires all weapons to prop up a man who doesn’t know where he is half the time
- Chris Matthews retires on-air after Laura Bassett sexual harassment accusations
- Husband of LA DA Jackie Lacey points gun at Black Lives Matter trespassers
- 1294 point Wall Street surge the largest in history
- Because of Google, let’s not boost Bernie on Super Tuesday
- Conservative bloc wins in Israel, making it possible for Benjamin Netanyahu to form a government
- Amy Klobuchar dropped out the day before her home state. Yep, the fix is in.
Joe Biden’s embrace of Beto O’Rourke’s gun confiscation plan is more concerning than most realize
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 03:14 AM PST For months, many have questioned whether former Vice President Joe Biden really wanted to be president. Some argued he wanted to be in play as a candidate to shield himself and his son from scrutiny regarding Ukraine. Judging by how poorly he performed from November until last weekend, that conspiracy theory seemed to hold some weight. But now he appears to be all-in and the DNC is fully behind him. Did something change? Actually, yes. Three things have changed over the last couple of weeks that forced everyone watching this nomination race to adjust our calculus. The first thing that happened was billionaire Mike Bloomberg bombed. It wasn’t just his abysmal debate performances, unearthed videos of past indiscretions, or Senator Elizabeth Warren turning into his worst nightmare. It was a realization by powerful Democrats that putting him up against President Trump is the same mistake the GOP made when they put Mitt Romney up against President Obama. The biggest weakness of President Obama was Obamacare, so the worst candidate to hit him was the architect of Romneycare. President Trump’s biggest weakness (other than the fake news media) is he’s a rich New Yorker who rubs certain people the wrong way. Bloomberg is richer, more New Yorkish, and rubs people worse because his personality is so elitist. The second thing that changed was South Carolina. Biden’s huge win didn’t just rejuvenate his campaign. It seemed to rejuvenate him as well. He’s been campaigning like a lost puppy for months, one who growls feebly all the time but had no real bite to him. That changed with the South Carolina primary. Now, for the first time in months, he’s acting like he actually wants to be President of the United States. When the Democratic Establishment in the DNC and beyond saw his big win and realized he was their only hope of defeating Senator Bernie Sanders for the nomination, they went into overdrive. Powerful Democrats called on other powerful Democrats to call on everyone they knew to back Biden. They applied pressure to Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar to get out of the race. They probably even pressured Senator Elizabeth Warren to stay in the race so she could pull from voters from the far-left lane who would likely switch support to Sanders when Warren bows out. What does all of this have to do with Beto O’Rourke? The former Congressman has failed in his last two elections, but he’s still fairly popular in Texas. Biden needs Texas to go his way today. Without it, this race may be over. The fact that Biden, who has been relatively moderate when it comes to gun control (at least compared to Sanders, Bloomberg, and especially O’Rourke), gave a full-throated verbal embrace of man who wants to take away all AR-15s and AK-47s in America, just as a starting point. As The Blaze reported:
That may all sound like standard primary pandering to a fellow partisan, the type of rhetoric we’ve grown accustomed to hearing every four years or so. And that’s a problem. Biden’s sudden willingness to pander so hard for votes means he is, for the first time since announcing is candidacy, as all-in for his campaign as his campaign is. On the surface and for any other current candidate, this wouldn’t be an issue. But for Biden, it’s a huge one. This is where we get a bit controversial. I’m neither a neurologist nor a psychologist, but in my amateur opinion, Biden would be a figurehead president at best. He simply no longer has the mental capacity to do anything other than fake it, and he doesn’t do a very good job at that. Unfortunately, he has set up the nation to dismiss at least some of his lapses in cognitive ability because of his history with stuttering. That excuse has been coming up more and more lately because he’s saying stranger and stranger things. But even when he’s not stuttering, he’s still saying strange things that demonstrate a lack of mental stamina. If he’s falling apart on the campaign trail, the stress of being President of the United States going into his 80s is utterly terrifying. To get there, he’s pandering to people like Beto O’Rourke. That means if, by some very foul spirit, he gets the nomination and defeats President Trump, then people like Beto O’Rourke will be running the executive branch from their little fiefdoms. This is, of course, how the White House is supposed to run to some extent. Nobody expects a president to do everything. Otherwise, they’d all be like President Carter. But the president needs to have the final word on important issues and I sincerely doubt Biden is capable of handling it all. In other words, all of these favors he’s promising in exchange for endorsements will end up putting the wrong people in the wrong places in the White House. These people will have more control than under a normal presidency. The results of an executive branch run almost entirely by cabinet members and department heads will be a complete and total mess. Joe Biden is writing out an awfully long favors list. That should scare people considering where he stands mentally. If he somehow wins the presidency, people like Beto O’Rourke will get their wishes, and that should terrify us all. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Joe Biden’s embrace of Beto O’Rourke’s gun confiscation plan is more concerning than most realize appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Denver Councilwoman Candi CdeBaca Tweets ‘solidarity’ for spreading coronavirus at Trump rallies
Posted: 03 Mar 2020 02:00 AM PST The coronavirus is in the process of paralyzing much of the world as tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people have already been infected. The death toll continues to rise daily and Americans are getting very antsy as it dominates much of the news cycle. But a recent hideous trend on social media has leftists claiming if they are infected, they will be going to campaign rallies for President Trump, presumably with the intention of spreading the deadly disease to his supporters. One such person is Denver City Councilwoman Candi CdeBaca, who Tweeted “#solidarity Yaaaas!!” while Tweet-quoting “For the record, if I get the coronavirus I’m attending every MAGA rally I can.”
This isn’t the first time the Councilwoman, who was elected last year, has stirred up controversy for her unhinged views. A video of her calling for “community ownership of land, labor, resources, and distribution of those resources,” came to the public eye last year, but only after she had won her election. “And whatever that morphs into is, I think, what will serve community the best, and I’m excited to usher it in by any means necessary,” she concluded. She has since claimed she is not a communist, but it clearly sounds like she’s advocating for communism with this detailed explanation of her economic ideology. NOQ Report reached out for comment but has not received a reply. We will update this story with her response. Some on Twitter have started reacting to her Tweet which only began receiving attention early Tuesday morning despite it sitting on her public timeline since last Friday. The Daily Wire’s Ryan Saavedra pointed it out on Twitter and reactions started coming in shortly afterwards.
Even in this polarized political atmosphere, under no circumstances should anyone wish the coronavirus to spread among opposition supporters. There is no justification for this whatsoever. Democrats should disavow her completely. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Denver Councilwoman Candi CdeBaca Tweets ‘solidarity’ for spreading coronavirus at Trump rallies appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
San Francisco, where crime is rampant and politicians make police sit on their hands
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 10:09 PM PST What happens when a major city’s government puts more value in protecting criminal illegal aliens or virtue signaling about climate change than serving their citizens? Street crime goes up. Human feces covers the street. Open air drug use becomes rampant. And stores get robbed in broad daylight. Casually.
This video, being widely shared on social media, demonstrates the nonchalant attitude criminals have in San Francisco. They know the police won’t come because they’re too busy ticketing people for plastic straws. The know the store owners can’t defend their property because of draconian gun control laws. They know bystanders or employees won’t try to stop them because they risk being sued. In San Francisco, criminals rule the streets. But something strange is happening. Rather, something not strange is not happening. One would think that the residence of San Francisco would have had enough. They should be mad as hell over the lack of action from city government that is too busy with their latest radical progressive pet project like climate change or pretending to help the homeless. Except, they’re not. This is a lost city, one with a majority of residence who are indoctrinated into a leftist mindset in which victimhood is a virtue to be sought and authoritarianism is a dream that may someday be completely realized. They have given as much control over their lives to government as possible under the Constitution and they’re confused by why collectivism hasn’t produced utopia yet. The worst part about this video is how there’s absolutely no fear or sense of urgency among the thieves. They have numbers, bags, and progressive politicians preventing law enforcement from enforcing the law. It’s hard not to generalize regarding a city like San Francisco that utterly refuses to consider any of those evil politicians with the letter (R) next to their name. This city is a Democrat stronghold and the people will go down with the leftist policies. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post San Francisco, where crime is rampant and politicians make police sit on their hands appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
DNC fires all weapons to prop up a man who doesn’t know where he is half the time
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 05:41 PM PST In all of my years covering presidential election politics, I have never seen a more concerted effort by national party representatives to prop up a bad-but-acceptable candidate. Even the RNC in 2016, much of which wasn’t convinced then-candidate Donald Trump could win in the general election, did far less to get in his way. Some tried and NeverTrump was born, but for the most part they recognized his bombast and flair were benefits to their overarching cause, so they ran with it. The DNC isn’t running with Bernie Sanders. They’re running away from him as fast as they possibly can. They’re running back to the guy they were originally propping up before his gaffe-filled existence and pitiful fundraising efforts scared them away temporarily. They looked at Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg for a short time before finding both were wanting. They played with Elizabeth Warren and had her try on moderate clothes, but in doing so they only drove much of her progressive support towards Sanders. Then, they flirted with Michael Bloomberg as their savior, but made the wise decision to force him into a debate to see how he tasted to the electorate. That failed miserably. So, they’re back to Quid Pro Joe. And, like any relatively organized and intellectual bunch, they’ve decided to go all-in as they derail the Sanders campaign and replace him as frontrunner with Biden. By going all-in, they’ve called on every favor they had in their Rolodex. First, they got his moderate lane competitors out of the way by cutting some sort of deal with Buttigieg and Klobuchar. Then, they hit up every prominent, semi-prominent, and somewhat known Democrat to tell them to get on whatever channels they had available to them to announce support for Biden. Beto O’Rourke, Harry Reid, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and everyone they could find with a Twitter account swore their undying loyalty to the guy today. It was awkward watching the blatantly manufactured show of support flooding in for someone who, earlier today, promoted “the thing.”
I do not support Bernie Sanders, but I haven’t hidden the fact that I’d love for him to be the nominee. The reason isn’t like other Trump supporters who think Sanders would be easier to beat or that he would damage the down-ballot races for Democrats. The reason we need to see a Trump-Sanders general election is because this country needs to have the debate about freedom versus authoritarianism. Socialism will continue to rear its ugly head until we have that conversation on the national stage. I’d rather have that conversation between now and November instead of letting it fester for another four years. And it will. The DNC’s message to Bernie Sanders and his supporters is this: We’re just not that into you. Meanwhile, they’re rallying behind a man who remembers more about his days as a Senator than what he had for breakfast this morning. The party is imploding. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post DNC fires all weapons to prop up a man who doesn’t know where he is half the time appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Chris Matthews retires on-air after Laura Bassett sexual harassment accusations
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 04:52 PM PST Former MSNBC show host Chris Matthews announced his abrupt retirement during his show, “Hardball,” Monday night. It will be effective immediately, according to the long-time staple of progressive journalism. Matthews has hosted “Hardball” for more than two decades. The announcement followed a pair of controversies that have arisen this week. First, he came under fire for attacking Democratic presidential nomination frontrunner Bernie Sanders by comparing his win in Nevada just over a week ago to the Nazi invasion of France. On Friday, he was accused of sexual harassment by GQ columnist Laura Bassett. Matthews was not seen during MSNBC’s coverage of the South Carolina primary on Saturday.
“After my conversation with MSNBC, I decided tonight will be my last ‘Hardball.’ So let me tell you why. The younger generations out there are ready to take the reigns. We see them in politics, in the media, in fighting for their causes, they are improving the workplace. We’re talking here about better standards than we grew up with—fair standards.” The important part followed as he mentioned, without noting specifics, the challenges that popped up last week regarding his sexual harassment claims. Still, he noted that he made “compliments on a woman’s appearance,” blunting the allegations and dismissing them as not negative in nature. “A lot of it has to do with how we talk to each other. Compliments on a woman’s appearance that some men, including me, might have once incorrectly thought were okay, were never okay. Not then and certainly not today, and for making such comments in the past, I’m sorry.” Whether he’s another old, powerful man who fell to #MeToo sins of his past, the pressure of being an anti-Sanders “journalist,” or a combination of his various scandals, Matthews has nobody to blame but himself for his abrupt career disintegration. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Chris Matthews retires on-air after Laura Bassett sexual harassment accusations appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Husband of LA DA Jackie Lacey points gun at Black Lives Matter trespassers
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 04:29 PM PST The Los Angeles chapter of Black Lives Matter wanted to make a statement by visiting the home of Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey for a “community meeting.” Instead, they were met by the DA’s husband at the door with a semi-automatic pistol in hand. The black rights group proudly released the video in hopes of drawing sympathy to their cause. It worked to some extent as many, particularly those who are not fans of Lacey (I’m not a fan), cheered them on. But most reactions on social media indicate people were more upset by the invasion of privacy and refusal to acknowledge property rights of an American citizen.
According to Black Lives Matter, they have been trying to secure a meeting with the District Attorney since 2016. They claim to have held weekly protests outside of her office. Meanwhile, Lacey claims the group continuously harasses her and that this isn’t the first time they’ve attempted to engage her on her private property. This appears to be the case of two wrongs making nothing right. Lacey has not denied avoiding the group intentionally, as Black Lives Matter claims. Conversely, BLM has not denied harassing the District Attorney. Unfortunately, having a meeting after this event would only encourage other groups to form mobs outside of politician’s homes and going on their private property. That must not be the case. The saddest part is BLMLA’s team probably believe this endears their cause to the people. But the inherent racism of the group’s desire to make their lives supersede the lives of other races was overshadowed by their disregard for property rights. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Husband of LA DA Jackie Lacey points gun at Black Lives Matter trespassers appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
1294 point Wall Street surge the largest in history
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 03:11 PM PST The coronavirus may be raging around the nation and across the globe, but stocks in the United States are soaring with the Dow Jones having its highest percentage gain in history. All domestic markets were up with impressive gains as the market correction forced by the coronavirus outbreak seems to have eased for now. Prospects of interest rate drops helped global markets make gains as well going into Monday. But it is believed this is a temporary, albeit dramatic, boost in stocks as there are still fears the coronavirus will disrupt worldwide trade. According to The Daily Wire:
Investors have been waiting for indications the market correction had hit bottom and today’s news seems to mark that moment. That’s not to say the market won’t fluctuate swiftly over the next few weeks or longer depending on news of the coronavirus, but today’s surge showed it’s possible to find economic strength even in the face of real-world disaster. Stock markets tend to rely on the news to determine direction up or down. As investors get antsy, they sell. As they get confident, they buy. Today’s surge shows the general sentiment is that economic prospects seem good despite the virus, thanks in large part to the degree of last week’s selloff. The news will harm the Democrats’ talking point that the economy is too fragile with President Trump and Vice President Pence in charge of fighting the coronavirus. It seems many, at least in Wall Street, aren’t convinced by the left’s narrative. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post 1294 point Wall Street surge the largest in history appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Because of Google, let’s not boost Bernie on Super Tuesday
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 02:21 PM PST What if I told you Google and the other tech companies could shift 15 million votes in the 2020 election? Then I added that at least one former professor believes this explains Joe Biden’s big win in South Carolina. Being that both Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar ended their campaigns following those results, would it raise an eyebrow? It should. Tomorrow is Super Tuesday and some Republicans are talking about voting for Bernie Sanders. Time to rethink that strategy. Bots Don’t Have this Much PowerDr. Robert Epstein voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Despite his own political preferences he is both alarmed and determined to warn about the dangers the technology companies pose to our elections. He has been studying the techniques companies like Google have been using since at least 2013. This has been augmented by whistleblowers and former employees as well as leaks of company meetings which provide context and details about their specific activities related to elections. Today on Glenn Beck’s podcast when asked how he wanted to frame the interview, Dr. Epstein said clearly:
And according to Dr. Epstein, these activities could have devastating effects for Republicans. The tech companies donate to Democrats and shift votes in their direction. From his recent article:
And he has the research to back up his claim adding he may be underestimating the the impact. In rigorous study of the techniques that monitors the online experience of 10’s of thousands of participants from around the world the potential to shift votes is astounding. Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME)This is related to the search algorithm, which prioritizes results. Most users are likely to click in the first several results to learn more about the topic they are looking for. By prioritizing these results, Google could easily shift 20% of undecided voters according to Dr. Epstein. As an example, a Ukrainian court ordered an investigation into Joe Biden’s role in the firing of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. Google’s algorithm could arrange the results of a search about Joe Biden and Ukraine to put information about this down the page. This would decrease the likelihood an undecided voter sees it. Instead they could prioritize articles about the ‘conspiracy theory’ about Biden and Ukraine. With this type of manipulation there is no record. It is also completely controlled internal to the organization and can’t be counteracted or corrected according to Dr. Epstein. Go Vote Reminderin 2018 Google replaced their logo with a “Go Vote” reminder. This received praise as a public service. Yet according to Dr. Epstein it is anything but. Google knows the demographics of their users and according to the research it could have shifted 800,000 votes if everyone saw it. In case you forgot, President Donald Trump won by a margin of about 70,000 votes in three states. Stay Out of the Democrat PrimaryEconomist Keith Boulding once said, “A world of unseen dictatorship is conceivable, still using the forms of democratic government.” Dr. Epstein says this is exactly what Republicans are up against. A technological elite that actually have the ability to take over public policy by means that are difficult to identify. While it is likely that these companies will work with the mainstream Democrats to stop Bernie. If the nomination is stolen from Sanders, the Bernie Bros will stay home and it will create a sharp fracture in the party. This effect could be magnified if the revolutionaries make good on their threat to wreak havoc in Milwaukee and other urban cities to vent their juvenile rage. Lower turnout from the Democrat base can only help to reelect the President. In the event Sanders wins the nomination, it is likely the tech companies would work to his benefit. Google leadership’s leaked group therapy session guarantees they won’t work to the benefit of President Trump. In that case I am not sure you want to be the person who pulled the lever for a communist thinking that insanity would be easier to beat. Dr. Epstein’s research shows the game could be rigged in ways we are only beginning to understand. Just let it ride. *If you would like to support Dr. Epstein’s work to hold the technology companies responsible you can visit mygoogleresearch.com. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Because of Google, let’s not boost Bernie on Super Tuesday appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Conservative bloc wins in Israel, making it possible for Benjamin Netanyahu to form a government
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 01:32 PM PST The most shocking part about Israel’s unprecedented third election in a year isn’t that Likud won the most seats or that their embattled leader pulled off a seeming miracle ahead of appearing in court on corruption charges later this month. The most shocking part is that Israel may finally be able to form a government. Likud and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are showing a strong victory in the Israel elections, according to exit polls. The conservative bloc appears to have 58-61 seats won with votes from soldiers still waiting to be processed. Members of Israel’s military generally vote conservative, leaving little hope for the center-left bloc led by Blue and White of pulling out a last minute upset.
The positive results for Netanyahu can be attributed to higher-than-expected turnout, though Blue and White’s Benny Gantz says they did not get the turnout they needed in critical areas. This contentious race drew in over 70% of voters, up from up from 68.46% in April and 69.83% in September. That seems to be the difference after the last election in which Blue and White won the most seats individually but could not form a government. From here, Netanyahu must form a coalition of at least 61 Members of the Knesset in order to put together a new government. Exit polls show Likud will have 36-37 seats. Its allies in Shas won 9, followed by UTJ with 7-8 and Yamina with 6-7. Once the soldiers’ voters are counted, a 61-seat majority is likely. Yisrael Beytenu, the party of Avigdor Lieberman that started this election mess by leaving the conservative bloc, appears to no longer be needed to form a coalition government. They are expected to finish with 6-8 seats. Meanwhile, Blue and White is sitting in second place with 33 seats. Of note is the Arab List with around 14 seats, a strong showing for the pro-Palestinian group of parties. Israel’s nightmare election season appears to be over with President Trump’s ally, Benjamin Netanyahu, still sitting in the Prime Minister’s seat. It’s a great day for Israel and America’s interests in the Middle East. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Conservative bloc wins in Israel, making it possible for Benjamin Netanyahu to form a government appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Amy Klobuchar dropped out the day before her home state. Yep, the fix is in.
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 12:35 PM PST When Pete Buttigieg dropped out of the Democratic nomination race Sunday, many speculated he had cut a deal with someone. Maybe it was the DNC. Maybe it was Joe Biden. Maybe it was Mike Bloomberg. Our EIC determined it was likely a combination of all three. Now that Amy Klobuchar has dropped out the following day, it is crystal clear Establishment Democrats are pulling out all stops to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the nomination. Though Buttigieg was ahead of Klobuchar in all indicators, the Minnesota Senator’s early exit is the most perplexing. She was set to win one primary—her home state—which would have capped off an impressive run and likely solidified her as a potential VP pick for the eventual nominee. But she pulled up short. She couldn’t wait one day to find out if there was a miracle in store for her in the future or a bittersweet finale to this particular campaign in the friendly territory of Minneapolis. Instead, she ended early and endorsed Biden. It only makes sense if we assume powerful Democrats cut a deal of some sorts with her. And Sanders is getting pushed out once again. The large mountain the frontrunner had to climb has now gotten quite a bit taller. Super Tuesday could have been a landslide victory for Sanders in the way of delegates as a crowded moderate field had the potential of locking out all of the other candidates from reaching the 15% threshold. Now, Biden’s and Bloomberg’s prospects are much brighter, especially in California where nobody but Sanders was projected to receive a significant number of delegates. The calculus has changed dramatically. Is it unfair? Perhaps. But this is just politics. If the DNC is helping Biden consolidate the moderate lane, and that certainly seems to be the current plan, then Sanders supporters are going to balk. This isn’t exactly what happened in 2016 as Hillary Clinton already had the moderate lane locked up at this point with no major challengers, but the wide range of candidates this election cycle had favored Sanders before. Now, he’s the one facing the split vote conundrum thanks to Elizabeth Warren staying in for Super Tuesday. Biden lost two of his challengers dragging him down, but Sanders has retained the one person pulling from the far-left lane. The nomination is still up for grabs and it’s unlikely this will be resolved without a contested convention. But the chances of Bernie Sanders having a clear plurality of delegates going in are now slim. We can expect it to get much uglier from here. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Amy Klobuchar dropped out the day before her home state. Yep, the fix is in. appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REALCLEARPOLITICS
|
REDSTATE
![]() |
![]() |
Kira Davis: CNN’s Complaints About Redstate Require a Response
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
TWITCHY
|
|
HOTAIR
![]() |
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
CBS
|
|
|
|
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
NATIONAL REVIEW
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
AMERICAN MINUTE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 18 new items) |
![]() |
- BREAKING: Federal Judge Orders Hillary Clinton Deposition Over Private Emails; ‘Still More to Learn’
- Europeans Undervalue Religious Liberty
- What to Do About Our ‘Tech Cold War’ With China
- A Coronavirus Reality Check
- Taking On China, Another Left-Wing Hoax, Biden’s Back
- New Impeachment Rules Would Snare Obama
- The King of Gaffes Retains His Crown
- Five Reasons You Don’t Need to Panic About the COVID-19 Coronavirus
- Can the Fed Save Us from Climate Change?
- Nothing But Fear Itself . . .
- Don’t Panic, Prepare
- Heritage President Kay C. James Rallies the Troops at CPAC
- How the Left Seeks to Undermine America’s Elections
- Christian Leaders Are Saying Lies About You
- NWFA is Nothing More Than Open Borders
- Gaza, Elections and the Corbynization of the Democratic Party
- Marxist Dreams And Soviet Realities
- She is Young, Popular, has IQ of 157 & Fights Climate Activism
BREAKING: Federal Judge Orders Hillary Clinton Deposition Over Private Emails; ‘Still More to Learn’
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 07:55 PM PST
by Matt Margolis: A federal judge has ordered former Secretary of State and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to sit for a sworn deposition in order to answer more questions regarding her use of a private email server during her tenure at the State Department. D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, arguing that her past statements on the matter were insufficient, Fox News reports. “As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said. According to Lamberth, Clinton’s previous written responses to questions “were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Judge Lamberth specifically ordered an in-person deposition because using written questions now “will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.” Judicial Watch, which initiated this case in 2014, is looking for information regarding whether Clinton used her private email server to intentionally get around the Freedom of Information Act, whether the State Department acted in bad faith when they tried to settle the case years ago, and whether the department had adequately looked for records in response to Judicial Watch’s initial FOIA request. This story is developing. Tags: Matt Margolis, PJMedia, Federal Judge, Orders Hillary Clinton, Deposition Over Private Emails To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Europeans Undervalue Religious Liberty
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 07:43 PM PST
by Bill Donohue: The Pew Research Center recently released a survey of democratic rights in 34 countries. Countries represented in the survey were drawn from Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Canada, and the United States. Respondents were asked how important certain democratic values were to them, and how satisfied they were with the state of affairs on several variables. The following nine categories were chosen: Fair Judiciary; Gender Equality; Free Religion; Regular Elections; Free Speech; Free Media; Free Internet; Free Civil Society; and Free Opposition Parties. The data reported the “% who say it is very important to have ____ in their country.” The median score (the score where half the numbers are higher and half are lower) on Free Religion, as compared to the median score on the other eight categories, was relatively high for all parts of the world except for Europe. In other words, outside Europe, Free Religion garnered a relatively high percentage. The median score for Europe was 57%. That was the lowest median score across the board. In other words, the other eight categories were seen as more important to Europeans. “In over half the countries surveyed,” the report said, “those who say religion is very important in their lives are more likely to believe religious freedom is very important.” This makes sense, but it also means that those who are not themselves religious are not likely to support this foundational human right. The survey confirms the de-Christianization of Europe. Regrettably, secular societies are, by and large, more inclined to value individual autonomy and devalue freedom of religion. Those who are religious are not only in a minority, they live in countries where their religious rights are comparatively tenuous. Six nations stand out for their very high support for gender equality and their very low support for freedom of religion: Canada, Sweden, France, Netherlands, Spain, and Australia. For those who value freedom of religion, matters were better in the United States. Of the nine categories, the top three were Fair Judiciary (93%), Gender Equality (91%) and Free Religion (86%). The role that freedom of religion plays in the life of a free country is no longer understood by many in the West. It should be the focus of history textbooks and is deserving of a national conversation on how to preserve our freedoms. Instead, we are more interested in promoting the freedom of middle school kids to “transition” from one sex to the other. Tags: Bill Donohue, Catholic League, Europeans, Undervalue Religious Liberty To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
What to Do About Our ‘Tech Cold War’ With China
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 07:41 PM PST
by Kevin Mooney: China wants to use artificial intelligence and 5G technology to “control the world” and undermine human rights, a Heritage Foundation national security analyst said Friday during an annual gathering of conservative activists. U.S. policymakers and industry leaders “need to be honest” about the challenges posed by China and close off points of vulnerability that made it possible for the communist regime to steal American technology, James Carafano said. Carafano, the think tank’s director of international and foreign policy studies, spoke during a panel discussion at the Conservative Political Action Conference, known as CPAC. “The crux of the problem is there is a law in China that basically says if you are a Chinese company, then any data you have … we [the Chinese government] have free access to that data,” Carafano said. “If Chinese companies are global, then China has global access to data. … China wants to use data to control the world.” Carafano described 5G, an abbreviation for fifth generation, as a “transformative technology” that is just the “tip of the spear” of what should most concern U.S. leaders in and outside government who are working to safeguard intellectual property. Carafano was joined for the discussion by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and former acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker. Author and columnist Gordon Chang, who has written extensively on the Chinese threat, served as moderator. Chang asked Carafano to comment on the challenges American companies face in their relationship with China. “Those companies are going through a very painful learning curve,” Carafano said. “It would be a mistake to just look at Facebook or Apple; we also need to look at smaller companies. China forms joint ventures and they get a seat on the board.” “We shouldn’t think that if we win 5G, we win,” he added. “It would be like saying after D-Day, ‘We are done.’ We have to win across the board.” Chang expressed his view that the U.S. and China are in a “tech cold war” and that the “U.S. is behind in critical areas.” He said “a whole society mobilization” is needed across the nation to confront China in the arena of technology. Chang asked Rodgers to discuss the “dividing line” between the roles of government and the private sector in doing so. “We now have the left promoting the takeover of the economy with proposals like the Green New Deal,” Rodgers said. “We need the Trump approach that lays out the principles of freedom, individual rights, and liberties because this encourages innovation in the private sector.” To “win the future,” she said, policymakers should emulate President Ronald Reagan’s approach to the Soviet Union during the Cold War. “To be a military powerhouse, we also need to be an economic powerhouse,” Rodgers said. Whitaker also took up Chang’s question about the role of the public and private sectors in responding to China’s global ambitions. “The last trade dispute with China involved intellectual property and China stealing our intellectual property to use for their own ends,” Whitaker said. “They use facial recognition software and data analytics against their own people. We use this technology to expand our economy,” Whitaker said. “I’m pessimistic China will play by the rules we use in the free world. China is an authoritarian state. I see the U.S. being a beacon of freedom.” Rodgers credited President Donald Trump for making policy changes necessary to blunt China’s efforts to steal American technology. “The White House is on top of this,” she said. The Washington Republican also said lawmakers are working on legislation to set privacy standards across the globe. If Republicans take back the House majority, this could be accelerated, she suggested. CPAC, the largest annual national gathering of conservative activists, runs Thursday through Saturday at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland, just outside Washington. Tags: Kevin Mooney, The Daily Signal, What to Do About. Tech Cold War, With China To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
A Coronavirus Reality Check
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 07:07 PM PST by Mark Alexander: Starting the week off on the wrong foot, after the first reported U.S. coronavirus deaths, The Washington Times’s editorial page editor, Ethan Epstein, published a breathless hyperbolic warning about the COVID-19 flu variant — a case study of Beltway media groupthink that promotes pandemic panic. According to Epstein, “Americans have done so much screaming at each other to avoid panic over the novel coronavirus that they’ve arguably grown complacent.” He then goes on to affirm the actions being taken in other countries: “China … has locked down tens of millions of people and virtually shut down its economy, the world’s second-largest. Japan has closed schools for a month. In France, which has so far seen fairly minimal numbers, the Louvre was closed. Switzerland, also fairly minimally affected, won’t allow gatherings that draw more than 1,000 people. … Two decades after 9/11, many Americans once again seem to think ‘it can’t happen here.’ But as we’ve learned more than once, it can.” So, let’s shut the country down? Will COVID-19 be the next catastrophic attack on America, “The BIG One”? As I have noted previously, it might result in another bad year for U.S. influenza deaths, but nobody can actually project that right now. What is certain, however, is that the “pandemic fear and panic” are great political fodder for Democrats hoping to crash the U.S. economy … and thus President Donald Trump’s reelection. As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and their Leftmedia publicists continue to foment fear, it is having the desired dire consequences for the economy. By undermining consumer and business confidence, and thus the equities markets, Democrats are playing fast and loose with the job stability of all working Americans and their families. Pelosi said, “The market drop is disturbing,” but I can assure you that she and her Democrat ilk are high-fiving each other in private, knowing that what is bad for American workers is bad for Trump’s reelection prospects. The immediate effect of the disgraceful Pelosi/Schumer fear and panic tag team is that the net worth and retirement plans of all middle-income families is taking a big hit, and so is breadwinner job stability. To put the current viral flu threat into perspective, according to the latest 2020 CDC influenza report, in the U.S. the flu season we are now in has already resulted in 29 MILLION diagnosed cases, 280 THOUSAND hospitalizations, and more than 16 THOUSAND deaths. And this is a good year — in one year this past decade there were 63 THOUSAND flu deaths in the U.S. So, why haven’t Pelosi, Schumer, and Democrats across the country called press conferences to draw attention to each of the other 29 million cases and 16 thousand deaths — and the MSM dutifully reported each one? Because those deaths have no value as 2020 political fodder. Democrats are proficient at never letting “a good crisis … go to waste,” as they demonstrated back in 2014 with the Ebola pandemic threat. At that time I wrote, “Democrats thrive on manufactured crises, and the current endless loop of hyperbolic rhetoric about the ‘Ebola pandemic‘ from all corners of the 24-hour news recyclers” was a good example. Of course, Barack Obama was president then, so blaming him was not part of their politicization of the epidemic. But that was then. It’s a presidential election year and with nothing else to defeat Donald Trump, betting on a flu pandemic and blaming Trump for it seems like an easy sell. Over the weekend, acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney suggested that the best thing Americans can do to avoid the panic is turn off their televisions and tune out the Democrat and Leftmedia fearmongering. But that would undermine the Demo strategy. Thus Schumer declared, “For Mulvaney to suggest that Americans turn off their TVs and bury their heads in the sand when they’re worried about a global health pandemic is Orwellian, counterproductive, dangerous…” And then there were the Demo campaign-trail claims that Trump had cut the pandemic budget. Mike Bloomberg claimed, “[Trump] has defunded Centers for Disease Control.” Biden claimed, “[Trump] has cut the funding for the entire effort.” Those claims are patently false. According to an Associated Press fact check, Congress has actually increased funding: “The National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention aren’t suffering from budget cuts that never took effect.” Regarding Schumer’s claim that Trump has no plan, the AP notes, “The public health system has a playbook to follow for pandemic preparation — regardless of who’s president… Those plans were put into place in anticipation of another flu pandemic, and are designed to work for any respiratory-borne disease.” Adding to that nonsense was the erroneous claim that Trump had written off the coronavirus flu threat as a “hoax.” According to NBC: “Trump calls Coronavirus Democrats’ ‘new hoax.'” Politico repeated that lie: “Trump rallies his base to treat Coronavirus as a ‘hoax.'” In fact, what Trump called a “hoax” is that the Democrats have shamefully and grossly politicized the threat. And predictably, the most ardent of the Democrats’ Leftmedia propagandists are the talking heads at CNN. Fox Business Network host Trish Regan called that what it is: “Diagnosis: Positive. CNN is infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome. I’m calling out CNN for irresponsibly politicizing something that should be a unifying battle against a virus that doesn’t choose sides. Anti-Trump network CNN doing whatever it can to stoke a national coronavirus panic.” Of course, panic also keeps people tuned in — which is to say, it sells advertising! As I have previously noted, to be adequately informed and prepared for what may be a bad flu year, the most current information is on the CDC’s page, “What You Should Know,” which provides updates, preventive measures, travel advice, etc. You can review the CDC’s national pandemic-response plan and basic citizen flu-prevention measures. And if you are interested in country-by-country data on the COVID-19 flu virus, that is being tracked at the Johns Hopkins coronavirus interface. For personal and community preparedness, visit our preparation and response resource page. Tags: Mark Alexander, The Patriot Post, Coronavirus, Reality Check To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Taking On China, Another Left-Wing Hoax, Biden’s Back
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 06:33 PM PST by Gary Bauer, Contributing Author: Taking On China
Steve Bannon was on Fox News yesterday discussing the coronavirus and its impact on U.S.-China relations. Bannon noted that one of President Trump’s major goals has been to stop business as usual with China, specifically to “bring the supply chain back to the industrial democracies.”That goal flew in the face of the entire Washington, D.C., establishment. But President Trump has relentlessly hammered away at the issue. Over the course of the last three years, he’s transformed that relationship, forcing the Chinese to negotiate on trade, while holding Huawei at bay.Fox News host Maria Bartiromo noted that the president has “changed the conversation around China. Companies are wondering if they can trust China anymore.” Bannon rightly observed that the “China’s (cheap) price comes at a great cost,” and that there are huge risks to national security and health security due to supply chain dependency. But the president wanted our corporate leaders to recognize the dangers and difficulties of dealing with communist China. Beijing does not have our best interests in mind. Trump urged U.S. companies to think about getting out of China and bringing their factories back to America. Bannon suggested that the “silver lining” of the coronavirus is that it has exposed the danger of being so dependent on communist China. Trump was right to be tough on China, and if our corporate, media and political elites had listened to him from the beginning, we would be in a much better position today. Another Left-wing Hoax As we and others pointed out, the president specifically said that he was not referring to the neo-Nazis, whom he condemned. He was referring to the people demonstrating in support of Civil War memorials, and he said there were “very fine people” on both sides of that dispute. The latest example is just as absurd. Democrats now are claiming that the president called the coronavirus “a hoax.” That’s ludicrous! The president has appointed a special task force to deal with the virus, led by Vice President Mike Pence. He’s having regular meetings with top health officials, and urging executives of pharmaceutical companies to speed up efforts to find a vaccine. What the president labeled a “hoax” was not the coronavirus, but the left’s efforts to blame him for the outbreak. He compared their efforts to politicize the virus to the Russian collusion hoax and the Ukraine phone call hoax. But Joe Biden, Michael Bloomberg and major media outlets have repeated the lie that the president referred to the virus as a hoax. Thankfully, some fact checkers (here and here) are calling them out for this blatant distortion. Afghanistan Deal Some critics, including many Never Trumpers, blasted the deal. But none of them have offered an alternative other than staying in Afghanistan for another 20 years or sending hundreds of thousands of additional troops, neither of which is supported by the American people. President Trump ran on getting us out of these “no-win wars,” and he’s keeping his promise. Biden’s Back Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders finished second with 20%, followed by Tom Steyer at 11%. No other candidate received double-digit support. Biden’s South Carolina firewall held, largely due to the fact that more than half of the state’s primary voters were black and Biden won 61% of them. That level of support among black voters should be an advantage for Biden tomorrow in several states — Alabama, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee — with significant black populations. There’s something else those states share: They all voted for Donald Trump in 2016, and he will win them again in November by big margins. In other words, Biden is winning most of his delegates in states he will have no chance of winning in November. The Fallout Twenty-four hours later, former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg also dropped out of the Democrat presidential race. Buttigieg finished fourth in South Carolina with just 8% of the vote. It was a disappointing showing after a distant third-place finish in Nevada. In recent days, Buttigieg had been accused of plagiarizing Barack Obama’s speeches. Today, Sen. Amy Klobuchar dropped out and endorsed Biden. Elizabeth Warren is facing heavy pressure to bow out as well, so the party can unite around an alternative to the self-declared socialist frontrunner. Super Tuesday The big prizes up for grabs tomorrow are California and Texas. Polling shows Sanders is dominating California and narrowly leading in Texas. He’s also taking nothing for granted. Sanders is campaigning on Warren’s home turf, going for a “knockout” win in Massachusetts. The “wild card” in tomorrow’s voting is mega-billionaire Michael Bloomberg. We’ll see whether he gets a better reception from the voters than he did yesterday from some members at a historic black church in Selma, Alabama. Meanwhile, the odds of a brokered Democrat convention decided by the party’s “super delegates” have skyrocketed. Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, Taking On China, Another Left-Wing Hoax, Biden’s Back To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
New Impeachment Rules Would Snare Obama
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 06:08 PM PST
by Dr. Victor Davis Hanson: Barack Obama’s eight-year tenure was detrimental to the United States, but like most of his nonbelievers, I harbor no animosity for his person. Few critics that I know advocated that Obama be impeached, much less removed from office, before his reelection bid—even amid his worst scandals and dangerous policies. But we are now in a new age, whose protocols might have made it impossible for the Obama Administration to have finished two terms. Remember, his administration ran some 2,000 guns to Mexican cartels in some hare-brained scheme to monitor violence spilling into the United States. Under the new customs, he should have been impeached for instructing Attorney General Eric Holder to refuse to testify to Congress about Fast and Furious, or at least for not handing over subpoenaed documents. Imagine a Trump gun-walking scheme in Mexico. It was bad enough that Holder was the first attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress, well aside from the embarrassment of his unhinged outbursts about “my people” (hint: his “my” did not mean Americans of all races and creeds). We all remember Holder’s lunatic dismissals of his own country as “a nation of cowards.” (Imagine Bill Barr referring to “my people” or calling Americans cowards) Fine—politicians and bureaucrats misspeak. It is no surprise that radical progressives like Holder are both partisans and tribalists or that they don’t always have positive thoughts about America, past or present. But Obama won the election. So voters had ample warning from his past that he would likely put as many leftists as he wished into government. He had the legal right and political rationale to do so, without his opponents inventing crimes to remove them. At least he did before the Trump hysteria. Criminalizing Politics Again, fine, I thought at the time. Such is the way of all politics when another party takes the White House. I most certainly did not think Obama was creating a “climate of fear” or was “paranoid” in weeding out, even from nonpartisan, unpaid honorific posts, any non-supporters. Nor did I think it was so odd when Obama went much further, and fired dozens of U.S. attorney holdovers from the Bush Administration. Who knows? If I were president, I might well have fired myself from even such a nonpartisan commission. Who knows? Had Obama left in office a Bush holdover federal attorney, the partisan might have become a Viva la résistance “Resister”, or invoked the Logan Act to hound one of the president’s own liberal appointees, or impeded his administration, or refused to carry out a presidential executive order, or helped to surveil Obama appointees, or even leaked confidential presidential conversations to the media, or called up the New York Times and Washington Post to give a rendition of an Obama phone call to the president of Mexico, or might have written an anonymous op-ed for the New York Times? For that matter, I certainly did not join any “Resistance” in 2009—on the sick rationale that Obama might be a Nazi-like interloper who had occupied the United States as Hitler did France, and sent us true patriots into the Maquis to “resist.” Do not insult our collective intelligence by suggesting that Donald J. Trump abused the Constitution and the office of president in a way that would have been unthinkable to Barack Obama. Obama was elected for four years. We critics lost the 2008 election, and would have to wait four years to send him home, or, as it turned out in 2012, eight years to find relief. That is the American way. Obama’s clever campaign made both McCain’s and Romney’s amateurish in comparison, and so there was a logic in his victory over two inept candidates, even if both would have made better presidents. We don’t recall either the media or critics suggesting that Obama was crazy in his often repeated “elections matter” and “I won” hyper-partisanship, or that he should have been removed under the 25th Amendment for silly apologies tours or riffs on the Crusades or Americans not being exceptional or his adolescent furtive duck-outs to have a smoke. No mainstream pundit claimed Obama was a pathological liar for making up most of his “autobiography” or flat-out lying about Obamacare. When Reggie Love claimed he and a bored Obama played spades during the Bin Laden raid, few paid much attention. Nor did Obama do anything impeachable for stupidly and frequently weighing in during ongoing arrests and criminal proceedings—such as those of the Skip Gates Cambridge psychodrama or the Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin shootings. The Bowe Bergdahl disastrous swap was illegal, dangerous, and stupid, but not therein grounds for impeachment. Nor was impeachable the even worse Iran Deal that deliberately created an echo chamber among obsequious media to hide key elements of the “treaty”—hostage payoffs and nocturnal shipments of Danegeld. After all, presidents sometimes do stupid stuff. If we impeached every president for chicanery, we would have had no Lincoln, who suspended habeas corpus and rounded up Copperhead opponents, or FDR who put U.S. citizens of Japanese descent into detention camps. All presidents can get rough in their language. I noted and criticized Obama’s occasional potty mouth (e.g. “teabaggers”) and his puerile braggadocio about taking guns to knife fights, getting in their faces, and punishing enemies. All that was silly and nauseous, but certainly not proof that Obama should have been impeached or become the object of a FBI, CIA, or special counsel investigation. Scandal Upon Scandal When Lois Lerner invoked the Fifth Amendment and the subsequent testimonies of others established that the Obama IRS deliberately sabotaged conservative nonprofits to emasculate their criticism during the 2012 election, I thought the gambit was outrageous, even criminal. But I assumed that we still should let the voters in a few months, not a special prosecutor, decide to what degree Obama himself was directly responsible for such skullduggery. Ditto our former president’s outrageous quid pro quo deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin, when he was caught in a web of pre-election deceit and finagling, this time on a hot mic in Seoul. Even from inadvertent snippets, it was clear Obama was outlining how he would consider being flexible on missile defense in Europe (and later he was so elastic that he canceled the needed project) if “Vladimir” would just give him some space before his reelection bid. And Vladimir did just that by putting off his invasions of Crimea and Ukraine until after Obama was safely reelected. What is little noticed about Obama quid pro quo is that he and Putin actually went through with it—and to the clear detriment of Eastern Europe, Crimea, Ukraine, and U.S. security. Remember, the hot mic was an inadvertent public reminder, an encapsulation of what had likely been spoken earlier in private and at length. We did not need a special counsel to investigate the disastrous reset policy and years of Russian appeasement that had reversed George W. Bush’s sanctions after Putin’s 2008 invasion of Ossetia. I thought it outrageous, but not proof of impeachable “collusion,” that Obama refused to sell the hard-pressed Ukrainians Javelin anti-tank missiles, in fears of agitating “Vladimir.” We still rue that John Kerry foolishly invited Putin into the Middle East after a 40-year Russian hiatus. All that Obama could offer to Putin for years of election interference was a lame “cut it out.” But then again, he just knew Hillary was going to win and did not wish to give the sure loser Trump any grounds for whining about the election results. After the Benghazi hearings—another pre-reelection scandal—it was obvious that the Obama administration had been caught flat-out lying. It had systematically relaxed security in Libya after its disastrous regime-change bombing of Gaddafi (remember Hilary Clinton’s “We came, we saw . . . he died”? [Cackle! cackle!]), and then lied by denying such laxity had led to American deaths. Then it prevaricated yet again to cover up that lie by claiming it was impossible to send aid to our fighters trapped and in extremis. Then it lied still once more about the lies about the lies by claiming that a single obscure video maker had caused the mayhem. Therefore, Obama summarily had a pathetic resident alien fall guy Nakoula Basseley Nakoula jailed on a trumped-up charge of a minor parole violation. According to the new progressive standards, we were all wrong to simply snooze when Obama overreached. Speaking of civil liberties, was it an impeachable offense to monitor the communications of journalists like the Associated Press reporters and Fox News’s James Rosen? Why did Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan lie twice under oath to Congress and why did James Clapper, his director of national intelligence, also perjure himself? Weren’t those greater offenses than the campaign contribution violation of Dinesh D’Souza’s that sent him to jail? Why did the Obama Administration tap the communications of foreign leaders from Benjamin Netanyahu to Angela Merkel? And why did it collude, using U.S. taxpayer dollars no less, with the opposition in the Israeli election of 2015 in hopes of defeating Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? Are not, we are told, governments not to interfere in the free elections of other countries? Who set or tolerated such a corrupt culture? Still, excesses happen. I did not argue that Obama should be impeached for such flagrant sabotages of the rule of law—neither when James Comey interfered in the 2016 election with his schizophrenic press conferences and confused and contradictory public statements, nor when Attorney General Loretta Lynch met secretly with Bill Clinton on a tarmac at the Phoenix airport and hid such a meeting. I don’t remember anyone calling for mass firings, but then again Obama kept quiet how his FBI and Justice Department were warping the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance courts to spy on Carter Page in hopes of finding dirt on Donald Trump before the election. Comey, Brennan, and Clapper were all briefing Obama on their illegal activity—a fact that might explain why they are now so sure they will never be held to account. Perhaps without such Obama-appointed scoundrels, there would have followed no “Crossfire Hurricane” hit job that seeded a Clinton-bought phony dossier on Trump, her campaign rival, throughout the highest levels of the Obama Administration and the media, and thus ensured it bore fruit before the 2016 election. Insulting Our Collective Intelligence Under our just established current rules of presidential audit, Obama obstructed Congress by ignoring subpoenas and invoking executive privilege. He abused his power by making up immigration law and undermining the enforcement of existing statutes. Presidents are supposed to faithfully execute our laws, not undermine them or make them up. Obama allowed sanctuary cities to openly negate federal law and went after the state of Arizona when it dared to help to enforce federal law. Obama weaponized federal agencies like the IRS, and used his presidential leverage to go after the Trump campaign and transition, by using Hillary Clinton’s hired foreign national, Christopher Steele, to dump false information before an election. The Obama scandal-ridden Veterans Administration was a veritable wreck. People died in Benghazi, at VA hospitals, in Fast and Furious, and because of the Iran Deal and the Bergdahl swap. Obama cut quid pro quo deals with foreign leaders to assist his own reelection at the expense of the nation’s security. He paid one of the highest fines leveled in the history of federal financing of campaigns, for flagrant violations in 2008—a fact that was mysteriously not released to the public and voters by federal officials until four years later and only after Obama was safely reelected in 2012. Under Obama’s supervision, foreign money and foreign actors improperly played roles in the 2008, 2012, and 2016 elections. Meanwhile, Eric Holder ignored clear evidence of election interference at the polls by dropping charges against New Black Panther Party activists intimidating voters. In terms of the current pettiness in the context of the various complaints against Trump, we forget that Obama likewise never released his medical records (other than a boilerplate one-page “summary” from his doctor), played an excessive amount of golf, lied repeatedly with assurance that Americans would neither lose their doctors nor health plans under Obamacare, and in general presaged what is now considered alleged proof of Trump’s unfitness to be president. Neither Adam Schiff nor Nancy Pelosi offered a word of rebuke about Russia’s interest in Uranium One, Bill Clinton’s speaking in Moscow, huge donations to the Clinton Foundation from Russian-connected oligarchs, the cancellation of anti-Russian missile defense or the denial of Javelins to Ukraine—much less that a bought foreign national worked for Hillary Clinton in league with Russian actors to smear her opponent before the election—a fact known again to President Obama whose intelligence agencies worked hand-in-glove with the Steele dossier. OK and fine. But do not insult our collective intelligence by suggesting that Donald J. Trump abused the Constitution and the office of president in a way that would have been unthinkable to Barack Obama. Obama was not impeached not because he did not do things that are now defined as impeachable, but because his opposition in the House did not do what Democrats later most willingly did: attempt a coup to remove a president without cause. Tags: Victor Davis Hanson, New Impeachment Rules, Would Snare Obama, To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The King of Gaffes Retains His Crown
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 05:17 PM PST by NRA-ILA: After the Las Vegas, Nev. Democrat Presidential debate, where New York City billionaire Michael Bloomberg made his embarrassing debut on the stage, many expected the Charleston, S.C. debate to be another debacle. They were not disappointed. After a relatively quiet performance in Vegas, the undisputed, undefeated King of Gaffes, former Vice President Joe Biden, returned to form. Biden seemed to take a step back while Bloomberg was pummeled in Sin City. A solid strategy for a man prone to making mistakes whenever he speaks publicly. But Joe simply couldn’t go two debates without saying something that would leave most scratching their heads. While trying to show how much more anti-gun he is than all of his colleagues on the stage, Biden claimed that nearly half of all Americans had lost their lives due to firearms over the last 13 years. “150 million people have been killed since 2007,” Biden announced. Apparently, Biden watched Avengers: Infinity War as his debate prep, and thinks that gun manufacturers are owned by Marvel Comics villain Thanos. This character, of course, wiped out half of the life forms in the universe with the snap of his fingers, in spite of facing off against the mightiest superheroes in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Sorry, no spoiler alert. Maybe in Biden’s unique mind, he fancies himself the greatest power on earth. He does, after all, seem to take credit for nearly everything. This elevated sense of power might explain his awkward turn to the camera during the debate as he stated, “I’m coming for you, and gun manufacturers, I’m gonna take you on, and I’m gonna beat you.” Where Biden came up with the ludicrous number of 150 million is anybody’s guess, but it is simply not true. In fact, saying it is not true is putting it mildly. The claim is absolutely preposterous. Sadly, not a single person, either candidate or moderator, bothered to call into question such an absurd claim. While not everyone is well-versed in the actual numbers of fatalities related to firearms, more than half of which are suicides, someone might have done a quick calculation to figure out that firearms are clearly not involved in 11.5 million deaths each year. Had he actually made the claim jokingly attributed to him by the satire site The Babylon Bee, he likely would not have been challenged by anyone at the debate. But that is where we are today with the field of Democrat candidates who want to destroy the Second Amendment, along with their enablers in the media (the moderators); no lie is too big to make guns look bad. In fact, leading into the whole discussion on firearms at the debate, moderator Gayle King lamented over the fact that Congress had not passed “major gun legislation in a quarter of a century,” after running through a litany of tragic events she apparently blames on that notion. King and her fellow moderators did not fare very well in how they handled the debate. Biden didn’t make “150 million” his only gaffe, though. He also claimed he was able to get “magazines that could not hold more than ten rounds in them…eliminated.” What he was referring to, of course, was the 1994 ban on “assault weapons,” which also included a ban on the manufacture or importation of magazines that COULD hold more than ten rounds. And they were clearly not “eliminated,” as those already possessed, manufactured or imported when the law went into effect were completely legal. But at least he’s not still confused over the terms clips, magazines, and rounds. And the debate wasn’t the end of Biden’s gaffe-fest for the week. The very next night, during a CNN town hall event, the former VP said of the Second Amendment, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’” Really, Joe? That’s not just a misinterpretation of what the Founders said, it is patently false. Thomas Jefferson said quite a bit about armed citizens, but perhaps his best counter to Joe’s claim was when he wrote, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” Sounds like Jefferson meant everyone. Samuel Adams wrote, “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” Again, no equivocation about who can own what arms. Or maybe Joe has another government list in mind, where he gets to determine who is “peaceable,” and who is not. Of course, we do not object to those who are not “free” because they are in prison from having access to firearms. Perhaps that is also what is meant by “peaceable,” as in, persons not in jail are presumed to be “peaceable.” If that’s what Biden means, then that’s fine, but somehow we think that is not the case. But beyond the obvious distinction of actual convicted criminals, leaving it up to Biden to determine who can own what firearms is clearly not what the Founders had in mind. There are innumerable quotes from our Founding Fathers that support the correct view that the Second Amendment means what it says: “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” If Joe can point to any of them indicating they only meant some “people” (and how it is determined which ones) and some “Arms” (again, what is the criteria for determining which “Arms” are allowed), we’d be happy to look into whatever rewrite of history he has found. When the next debate rolls around, which is scheduled for March 15 in Phoenix, Ariz., we look forward to seeing him add to his ever-lengthening list of gaffes. Not to mention his public appearances between now and then. Joe has made it clear that, if you want to see someone say something absurd, laughable, or embarrassing, he is, as they say, Must Watch TV. Tags: NRA-ILA, Joe Biden, The King of Gaffes, Retains His Crown To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Five Reasons You Don’t Need to Panic About the COVID-19 Coronavirus
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 02:53 PM PST by Ross Pomeroy: The COVID-19 coronavirus that emerged in Wuhan, China back in December 2019 is now spreading globally and will undoubtedly be declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) very soon. Its ascendance has already rattled stock markets, disrupted the daily lives of millions, and resulted in the heartbreaking deaths of over 3,000 people, including the two in the United States as of March 2nd. With COVID-19’s spread now picking up steam outside of China – it has now arrived in at least 68 countries and new cases are rising almost every day – we can expect its outbreak to get worse before it gets better. Make no mistake, COVID-19 is a grave pathogenic threat which must be taken seriously. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC): 1. The number of cases in China is already falling significantly. Where once the graph of coronavirus cases in China showed an exponential climb, it has now leveled off substantially. Just three weeks ago, China was recording more than 3,000 new cases per day. Officials are now consistently reporting fewer than a thousand. Seeing much-improved conditions on the ground, big companies like Starbucks and Apple in China are resuming business activities. The latest (Mar. 1st) World Health Organization (WHO) situation report revealed 579 new cases in China in the previous 24 hours, all but nine of them in Hubei Province, where COVID-19 arose. 2. The vast majority of cases are mild, and the death rate is likely lower than reported. A large study of 72,000 confirmed COVID-19 patients in China found that 81% of cases were mild, another 14% were severe (characterized by difficulty breathing), and 5% were critical. Overall, the death rate was 2.3 percent. More recently, the WHO reported a death rate of 3.8% in China, but noted that it is rapidly falling as standards of care quickly improve. Early on, the city of Wuhan (where the disease originated) was inundated with patients and hospitals could not provide proper care due to overwhelming demand. For Chinese patients whose symptoms started after February 1st, the death rate is just 0.7 percent. (For comparison, the U.S. death rate from 2019-20’s annual flu oubtreak is between .06 percent to 0.1 percent. SARS a similar virus to COVID-19, had a death rate of 9.6 percent.) The death rate could be even lower, as very mild cases of COVID-19 that resemble a common cold likely go unreported. 3. Only one out of every 1,000 people in Hubei Province has contracted the coronavirus. There have been 66,907 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in China’s Hubei Province, where the outbreak began in December. That sounds like a lot, but keep in mind that the population of Hubei is 59,170,000. The province is slightly smaller than Nebraska, but with thirty times as many inhabitants. With this sort of population density, it’s a positive sign that just .11% (roughly 1 in 1000) of the population has caught COVID-19. Even if there were 52,000 unreported cases, that would mean only one out of every 500 people in Hubei caught the virus. Given the population density in most other countries is significantly lower than in China, we can expect that the coronavirus will have a much harder time spreading in much of the world. 4. There have been no reported deaths in young children. Though the outbreak has endured for more than nine weeks, there still have been no fatalities in children under the age of nine, with almost all infected simply experiencing cold-like symptoms. Moreover, only 2.4% of cases are in individuals under the age of 18. Kids and teenagers have been surprisingly resistant to the virus. The death rate for people aged 10 to 39 currently stands at just 0.2 percent. Those genuinely at risk from COVID-19 are the elderly. People aged 80 and up have a 14.8% to 21.9% chance of dying if infected. 5. The world already survived another pandemic just ten years ago. Remember H1N1, more commonly known as Swine Flu? This was the most recent pandemic (besides HIV/AIDS, which is still considered a pandemic). It began in early 2009 and lasted through late 2010. Between April 2009 and April 2010, there were approximately 60.8 million cases, 274,304 hospitalizations, and 12,469 deaths in the United States alone! Globally, it likely infected between 700 million and 1.4 billion people, resulting in 150,000 to 575,000 fatalities. While this loss of life was tragic, more than a decade later, many scarcely remember Swine Flu. The same will hopefully happen with COVID-19. Tags: COVID-19, Pandemic Disease, Coronavirus, Steven “Ross” Pomeroy, RealClear Science To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Can the Fed Save Us from Climate Change?
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 02:28 PM PST
by Dr. Ron Paul: The 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Act requires the Federal Reserve to “promote” stable prices and full employment. Of course, the Fed’s steady erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power has made prices anything but stable, while the boom-and-bust cycle created by the Fed ensures that periods of low unemployment will not last for long. Despite the difficulties the Fed faces fulfilling its “dual mandate,” Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently announced a new Fed mandate: to protect the financial system from being destabilized by climate change. Powell appears to have bought into the propaganda that “the science is settled” regarding the existence, causes, and effects of climate change. But the statement “the science is settled” is itself unscientific. Science is rarely settled as today’s new discoveries disprove yesterday’s consensus. In the case of climate change, many scientists dispute the claim that absent massive expansion of government power a climate apocalypse will soon be at hand. So far, the Fed’s actions regarding climate change include holding a conference and Chairman Powell indicating the Fed is likely to join the Network for Greening the Financial System. This network is composed in part of central banks from around the world that are attempting to work together to assess the risks of, and plan possible responses to, climate change. While Powell has not given details regarding other actions the Fed might take to protect the financial system from climate change, there are a number of actions that the Fed could take. For starters, Powell could signal that the Fed would be willing to increase its purchase of government debt if Congress passes Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal. The Fed, since its creation, has been monetizing federal debt, and thus enabling the growth of the welfare-warfare state. The Fed could implement “Green Quantitative Easing” by purchasing bonds of green energy and other companies whose products fit the environmentalist agenda. The Fed could also use its monetary and regulatory authority to “encourage” financial institutions to support “environmentally-friendly” businesses. Whatever policies the Fed adopts to protect the financial system from climate change, the result will be further erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power, increased government control over the economy, lower economic growth, increased crony capitalism, and a reduction in liberty and prosperity. Ironically, the Fed’s plans to address climate change will harm the environment. History shows that the most effective way to protect the environment is via a system of private property rights and free markets. Private property owners are better stewards of the environment than are government bureaucrats because private property owners have greater incentives to maintain the value of their property. This is why the greatest pollution in history was in the communist countries of the 20th century. The Fed’s failure to provide any details on how it will carry out its self-imposed climate change mandate is another reason why Congress must rein in the secretive, rogue central bank. A step in restoring a monetary policy that truly promotes prosperity is to pass the Audit the Fed bill so Congress and the people can at last learn the full truth about the Federal Reserve. Tags: Ron Paul, Ron Paul Institute, Can the Fed, Save Us from, Climate Change To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Nothing But Fear Itself . . .
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 02:21 PM PST . . . Democrats have nothing but fear during the Coronavirus epidemic because they care more about power than the American people.
Tags: Nothing But Fear Itself, Democrats have nothing but fear, during the Coronavirus epidemic, because they care more about power than the American people To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Don’t Panic, Prepare
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 02:16 PM PST
The best way to fight contagion is to “come together”? Maybe not so much. What should we do? I mean, separately. Although there’s a flood of information about the scary new coronavirus (COVID-19), that information is fragmentary. Reliable tests for the virus are not easily available. It’s unclear how many people are really infected. But the fatality rate is apparently much higher than that of regular flu. The elderly and those with other medical problems are especially vulnerable. The virus is spreading fast despite (and because of) efforts to contain it. Cases have now been reported in 45 countries. COVID-19 may not yet be where you are or where I am. But what should we do now to be ready if and when things around us change drastically? One, stay informed. Two, follow advice about reducing the risk of infection, including such simple measures as carefully and frequently washing your hands. Three, stock up — on food, water, medicines, other emergency supplies — in case you must hunker down at home for a long time. When panic strikes, grocery shelves can empty out fast. You may not want to go where many people are congregating anyway. Some vendors specialize in providing bulk supplies of food at a discount: Wellness Meats, Bargain Wholesale, markets in your neighborhood. There’s also Walmart and Amazon, offering a wide variety of staples. You can trade advice and information at sites like emergency-preps.com. Such preparation won’t be wasted. If we’re lucky and the coronavirus threat fades as flu season wanes, we’ll be ready for some other emergency that comes along. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Don’t Panic, Prepare To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Heritage President Kay C. James Rallies the Troops at CPAC
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 02:00 PM PST Heritage Foundation President Kay C. James addressed the annual Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday, February 27, 2020. Below is a transcript of her remarks. Now here comes Mr. “Make America Great Again” Donald J. Trump. And he has in his first term embraced over 64 percent of The Heritage Foundation Mandate. Now, I agree with the president on almost everything, but there is one thing he said that I take issue with. The president said you’re going to get tired of winning. In fact, Mr. President, I ain’t no ways tired. You know, I been working on that, and I thought I should turn on ole’ Uncle Joe and Hillary to see how I could effect that black dialect and boy, all right. But I’m not tired. I ain’t no ways tired of winning, and I hope you aren’t either. We come to CPAC every year because we want to hear the fantastic speakers, we want to do some networking, we want to catch up with some old friends. I see some folks over here I haven’t seen in awhile. But what’s the real reason you’re here? You got it. We are here because the stakes are high. And ladies and gentleman, we face a battle today between those who want to preserve this nation and those who are working to bring her down from within. The question I have for you is, are you ready for the battle? Are you ready for the fight? I came to CPAC because I wanted to encourage you. I know there are times when we feel like we are outmanned. Figuratively speaking, outgunned, only figuratively. With so many people in the news media, in our education system, and the entertainment industry, who are all working against us. But let me tell you, I know what many of them don’t, that we have a stronger will to win because of what’s at stake. They don’t get it. You do. And you know, just like our Founders, we’re willing to work for a cause that is greater than any one of us. We’re at a pivotal time in history. We’re seeing our founding principles not just abandoned, but trashed. People are being told that free markets don’t work, that free speech is too dangerous, and that we need to give up even more of our liberty and income for an even bigger and more intrusive government. Our students in our public schools are lied to repeatedly and told that America is an imperialist nation. They’re told we’re the cause of the world’s problems, like poverty and pollution and global warming. It’s all our fault. In fact, the far left despises so much about America that they’re working to even rewrite American history, they’re trying to erase our American identity, and they’re trashing the fact that America is exceptional among the nations. Yes, I said it. And while you and I work to call Americans to unite around the torch of liberty, they work to create subgroups and divisions among us with their identity politics. The policies of the statists have wrought destruction. Rather than bringing prosperity, they bring decline. Rather than bringing unity, they sow divisiveness. Rather than protecting freedom, they subordinate it to an even more powerful, intrusive and bigger government. That’s not the America most people—even most moderates and liberals—want to live in. So, what are we going to do about this? How are we going to stop them? I have some suggestions. We’ve often heard the story that, when he was leaving Constitutional Hall, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether America would end up as a republic or a monarchy. He replied, “A republic—if you can keep it.” We intend to keep it. But when you leave CPAC, I want you to leave with these words ringing in your ears. The exact same character, determination, and sacrifice that were required to found this republic are now desperately needed to keep her. We have work to do. Our Founders pledged their lives, their fortunes, their sacred honor for the cause of freedom, and ladies and gentleman, every single CPACer here has to do the same. Fortunately, I don’t think we have to die for this cause, but we do have to dedicate our time and treasure to defending this nation against those who would destroy her. Now, let me tell you what that means. That means calling and writing your elected officials about proposed legislation. It means visiting their offices and making your voices heard at town-hall meetings. It means you don’t get to leave here on a sugar high, go home, and do nothing. It means you have to volunteer for candidates. It means you have to find candidates who will work for limited government, free-market principles and traditional American values—and go to work for them. It means being willing to speak up and educate others about the issues that are so important, and they may only hear it from you because they won’t get these messages through traditional sources. It also means teaching our children about our history. Teaching them that American exceptionalism is real. Teaching them that it’s okay to feel pride in their country. And one wouldn’t think that you would have to say this to an audience like this, but I’ve seen the data, and it’s important to say. It means multiplying our efforts to go out and find your neighbors, your friends, your church members, and there are many, who have not registered to vote. Get them registered, and get them to the polls. At The Heritage Foundation, we—like you—love this country. We bleed red, white and blue. And we want to help you and your organization. If we can be helpful in any way, you can find us at Heritage.org. Ladies and gentlemen, I hope you can tell I love this country. This is a very special country, and we are a truly blessed people. But right now, America needs our help to keep her special. One of my all-time favorite heroes is Harriet Tubman, and if you don’t know her story, look it up. Harriet risked her life to help slaves escape the South. She told them to go true north for their freedom. But she also told them, if you turn around and go back, I might have to shoot you, because you will put all of us at risk. That was one sassy woman. In other words, my friends, we need to stick together and stay the course. I’m asking you, my fellow conservatives, don’t turn around. We need you. We need you to stay in the fight. We need you to leave CPAC energized. Take all the knowledge and wisdom that you can get. Take all the skills that you can get through the workshops. This is not the mountaintop experience. Leave this place. Go home and go to work. This great country is worth it. Thank you so much, CPAC!——————— Tags: Heritage President, Kay C. James, Rallies the Troops, at CPAC To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
How the Left Seeks to Undermine America’s Elections
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 01:46 PM PST
by Jarrett Stepman: America’s free and fair elections are under threat at the local and state level and in the movement to switch to a national popular vote to pick presidents, speakers said Saturday at an annual gathering of conservative activists near Washington. Two panelists during a session at the Conservative Political Action Conference, known as CPAC, explained how the nation’s electoral system is under siege and why it matters. Harmeet Dhillon, a lawyer who is member of the Republican National Committee for California, said Democrats have manipulated elections and made it easier for voter fraud to take place. Republicans stood by and allowed “same-day voter registration,” Dhillon said, and “they’ve allowed no voter ID; less than a third of our states actually have voter ID, whether it’s a strong system or a weak system.” “Republicans have allowed so-called nonpartisan redistricting commissions that are effectively run by Democrats,” she said. A Republican donor, Dhillon said, backed the “top two” primary system in California, which effectively has kept Republicans off the general election ballot. She added: Trent England, director of Save Our States, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting the Electoral College, talked about the left’s efforts to fundamentally change how America elects presidents. England explained the National Popular Vote Compact, an effort to elect presidents based on the popular vote in each state rather than the Electoral College, and why he thinks the current system is essential: “After the convention,” England said, “this was a part of the Constitution that was popular with basically everybody.” One of most important aspects of the Electoral College system is that it enforces “checks and balances” in presidential elections, he said. That system ensures that the biggest cities and population centers are not the only places that have a say in picking presidents, England said. This forces candidates to appeal to wide swaths of the population. What the national popular vote movement is really about, he said, is rigging the system, undoing the work of the Founders, and “creating a political environment where they can systematically and permanently disenfranchise small towns and rural America.” America is “73% on the way to enacting the national popular vote,” he said, given how many states have joined the National Popular Vote Compact. Though proponents argue that it won’t destroy the Electoral College, England said, it effectively would do so. The Electoral College would go on as a “zombie” constitutional system that essentially would just “rubber stamp” the national popular vote, he said. Adopting the national popular vote to pick a president is a way to abolish the Electoral College without having to go through the lengthy and difficult process of amending the Constitution, England said. “If they did that, they would force chaos and fraud into the electoral system in a way we’ve never experienced because they could steal elections by stealing votes in Los Angeles and Chicago,” England said. “Today, all they can do in Chicago is steal Illinois.” CPAC, the largest annual national gathering of conservative activists, runs Thursday through Saturday at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland, just outside Washington. Tags: Jarrett Stepman, The Daily Signal, How the Left Seeks to. Undermines American’s Elections To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Christian Leaders Are Saying Lies About You
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 01:23 PM PST by Mario Murillo Ministries: The one thing you want to do in 2020 is to defeat evil. And evil is about to take a nasty turn—a turn you need to beware of. The hate is going to turn away from Trump to you—specifically Christians who support Trump. The God haters have failed to bring down Trump. He has survived, yea, even grown more popular; thriving after all their attacks. The economy continues to amaze. Minorities have more jobs than ever. The Left is pulling its hair out as it tries to find a way to defeat our President. So, they went to the dark regions of hell to find out how to do it: shame the Christians. Take Chuck Todd, host of Meet the Press for an example. He portrays Trump supporters as people who have been trained from childhood to believe in what he calls ‘fairy tales’—people ‘who want to be lied to’—and he read this from a letter to the editor, “show me a person who believes in Noah’s Ark and I will show you a Trump voter.” And because Jesus clearly mentioned Noah and the ark in Matthew 24, this is an attack on our Lord. This is a direct shot at Christians. He is calling Bible believers buffoons, and by association, he is calling Jesus Christ a buffoon. Now I get to the darker side of all this: Christian leaders who are telling lies about you. Remember FBI Agent Peter Strzok who said, “Just went to a Southern Virginia Wal-Mart. I could SMELL the Trump support.” Well, Mark Galli Editor of Christianity Today magazine just gave us his version of that: “I know hardly anyone, let alone any evangelical Christian who voted for Trump. I describe evangelicals like me as ‘elite’ evangelicals … and this class of evangelicals has discovered that we have family members so different they seem like aliens in our midst. These other evangelicals often haven’t finished college, and if they have jobs (and apparently a lot of them don’t), they are blue-collar jobs or entry-level work. They don’t write books or give speeches; they don’t attend conferences of evangelicals for social justice or evangelicals for immigration reform. They are deeply suspicious of mainstream media. A lot of them voted for Donald Trump.” What you have here is so smug, and misguided that I can’t find a place to begin responding to it. Mark Galli is, by his own words, an elitist. He is better than you—you sad, redneck, illiterate Christian Trump supporter. He is smarter, he finished college and he has a job. You on the other hand are entry level, remedial and, God forbid, suspicious of the mainstream media. Worst of all, you don’t attend SJW conferences on immigration. Conferences that we now know were funded in part by George Soros—who doesn’t care about immigrants as much as he cares about dividing the church and creating a one-world government. Mark Galli is telling lies about you. He doesn’t understand that the evil one has riled him up and given him a wispy need for recognition from the intellectual community. For ten years I have watched a number of smart Christians seduced in Berkeley by the need to water down their faith in order to be accepted among the “intelligentsia.” Remember when Peter played the hypocrite and ate with Gentiles until the Jewish believers from Jerusalem arrived? Then he withdrew from the Gentile believers. Paul rebuked Peter publically, and wrote about it in the book of Galatians chapter 2! It’s the same thing. Guys like Mark Galli seem to need the approval of the media. Small wonder he appeared on CNN right after this. Lest you think it is wrong to name names, take a look at the long list of heretics mentioned by name in the New Testament. From Paul calling out Alexander and Hymenaeus, to John naming Diotrophes. It is biblical to warn the sheep about wolves. Mark Galli’s now infamous editorial where he called for Trump to be removed from office is his second lie. There is no evidence that Trump committed any impeachable offense. Nancy Pelosi found nothing. That’s why she hasn’t gone forward with the process and presented the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, holding up the trial she knows is going nowhere. Mark Galli took their false accusation, and stated it as fact. But he is not the only Christian Leader lying about you. Beth Moore tweeted Galli saying “My hat’s off to you, @markgalli. Respect.” She is commending someone for making a false accusation. She also lies by signaling that no true Christian man can support Trump. Her biggest lie is that she said the evangelical movement died in 2016. It is also possible to lie by omission. Neither of these leaders ever criticized Obama or the Christians who violated their conscience by voting for Obama. So let’s talk about Christian Trump supporters. 2.Most Christian Trump supporters are patriotic. They love America. They believe that we live in the greatest country on earth. They are angry that our laws and our Constitution are being disregarded by secular progressives. They are angry with professional athletes who disgrace our flag and national anthem. They stand with cops, the military, and first responders. 3. The majority of Christian Trump supporters are all about common sense. They believe:
Shaming Christians who support Trump will be the weapon of choice for 2020. But don’t you dare be ashamed! These Christian leaders who are lying about you, they are the ones who bear the real shame. Tags: Mario Murillo, Ministries, Christian Leaders, Saying Lies About You To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
NWFA is Nothing More Than Open Borders
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 12:43 PM PST by John Velisek, Contributing Author: It is no secret that the progressive socialist wing of the Democrat Party considers the United States of America a rogue state. The Democrat Party was built on the backs of slaves by “white supremacists” for the benefit of the rich elite. For years we have heard that law enforcement is the problem. This was the excuse given for the countless illegal aliens who are felons being released across the nation. Even if the Federal Law (8 U. S.C. 1373 and 1644 makes sanctuary cites against the law, the safety of the citizens is secondary to the ability of the progressive socialists to flaunt the law for more potential voters. There are more than 300 sanctuary cities that ignore the rule of law and receive no penalty. Until this is ended, there will be more Gustavo Garcia committing armed robbery and carjacking before being put down by police. Started in Democrats districts, it shows the contempt the progressive socialist have for the rule of law, and the safety of the constituents they swore to protect. Combined with open borders, it is the culmination of the American hating leftists’ agenda to tear down the moral fiber and cultural background that is the foundation of this country. For three years, the progressive socialist have been stomping their feet like little children demanding that ICE and DHS be abolished. This is nothing more than an attempt to cripple the departments to facilitate the illegal entry to our country. They have lied about illegal aliens being forced to drink out of toilets, or being held in concentration camps, of the forced split of illegal families ever since President Trump took office. With a compliant media assisting them, they never acknowledge that all those factors were the brainchild of the Obama administration. The steps taken by President Trump has alleviated many of the challenges we face at the border, but that is of no importance to those who would turn us into a third world country. The New Way Forward Act (H.R. 5383) is a new bill festering in the Democrat House which would destroy our country through the further use of identity politics. I first learned of this bill through Tucker Carlson, who made the people of this country aware of this catastrophic legislation. It would, in effect, destroy our country and everything in it. In Tucker’s words, it could ruin and remake “our laws, our institutions, our freedoms, our history, and our values.” The progressive socialists have sponsored this bill with the original sponsors being Rep. Jesus Garcia of Illinois, Pramila Jaypal of Washington, Karen Bass of California, and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts. And of course, the Squad members have also shown a high affinity for this bill. Right now, there is no way for this bill to ever become law. Bernie Sanders has agreed with this bill, as have most of the other Presidential candidates for the leftists. They realize that until they can overwhelm the country with welfare recipients, illegal aliens and those willing to take taxpayer funding through socialist coercion, they will never be able to change our country in the third world. The 2020 elections are the bulwark against such an outcome. There are many questions pertaining to the NWFA, but the mainstream media is not discussing any aspect of the Act. Even with 44 progressive socialists cosponsoring the Act, it stands no chance of being passed in the House. You can rest assured that if the leftists ever regain control of our government, this will be the first order of business that they will force on the American citizens. A look at the NWFA is concerning. The promotional materials promulgated by those supporting the NWFA, it states that convictions should not lead to deportations. Under the NWFA act under the heading of “moral turpitude” would be eliminated as a justification for removal along with any aggravated felony. Illegal aliens who are convicted of passport fraud are immune to deportation along with robbery and child molestation. In support of destroying all aspects of law enforcement, the NWFA abolished all enforcement against illegal immigration. Also contained within this nation ending act is the so-called “right to come home.” It creatively allows tens of thousands of deported criminals to return to our country. Those convicted of sexual abuse, both human and drug trafficking, robbery, and felonious assault, will be allowed into the country. The NWFA required the use of taxpayer money to assist these criminals to return and requires that the American taxpayer money be used to bring back more than 480,000 felons and will do nothing to make our communities any safer. Once these criminals are here, the American taxpayer will then be required to pay for the free healthcare, housing, and welfare benefits that they will receive. The immigration law will be changed to subordinate the right of American citizens to criminal aliens. Border enforcement will be non-existent, and criminal aliens will be allowed to roam and commit atrocities as we have seen before at will. No longer with the rule of law have any significant meaning, and there will be no responsibility attached to what these criminal felons wish to do. The American culture will be something of the past on the progressive mad rush to make America a third world country. The law-abiding in our country will be forced to share the safe communities where they live with the government protected class of criminal aliens. Most impacted will be those urban minorities would are expected by our government to just accept that they may be living in close proximity to a child molester, or MS-13 gang member. The NWFA will allow criminal illegal aliens to roam with impunity, knowing that there will be no repercussions for whatever they do, which the American citizenry would be terrorized to the point of being fearful of leaving their own homes. The judiciary system would also be impacted in the pursuit of what the progressive socialists call a humanitarian purpose. Under the Act, if an immigration judge finds that family unity is more important than the crime committed, he can show discretion and let the felon remain in the country. This is nothing more than sanctuary cities on steroids. The progressives will pick and choose the liberal judges that want the case to go to, and allow the criminal illegal aliens to receive a “get out of jail free” card to continue the actions that had him arrested in the first place. The over 200-year assumption of our rule of law would no longer be valid. The NWFA would make the criminal felon the victim and invalidates the rule of law. Speak out against it, and, once again, you will be called a racist, a white supremacist. The NWFA also turns our country into a sanctuary nation. The NWFA prohibits state and local police from providing any assistance to ICE custody. A known gang member or even criminal aliens convicted of murder are not allowed to be turned over to ICE or and federal officials. The proponents of this bill ignore that “sanctuary cities”, or the nation as a whole, are illegal under 8 U.S.C. 1373 and 1644. Title II of the NWFA is amnesty for any illegal alien residing in our country. Title V looks to end the 287(g) program, which allows local police and sheriffs department to assist criminal immigration-related law enforcement. Title VI decriminalizes illegal immigration by voiding 8 U.S.C. 1325 and 1326. Title VII is called the “right to Come Home Bill,” forcing the American taxpayer to pay for criminal aliens from up to 20 years ago to return to the country. The NWFA is nothing more than the “Open Borders” that the progressive socialists have been clamoring for since the election of President Trump. It is a concerted effort to dilute the effectiveness of their opponents to retain the culture and the rule of law that has ruled this country since the inception of the founding fathers. The shuttering of detention facilities, the eradication of illegal immigration penalties, the prohibition of local law enforcement assisting the federal government is capturing criminal aliens, all lead to the total destruction of this country. This is what progressive socialists want for our country. The vote in 2020 is the only bulwark against this total destruction. Tags: John C. Velisek, NWFA, Nothing More Than, Open Borders To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Gaza, Elections and the Corbynization of the Democratic Party
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 12:18 PM PST
by Caroline B. Glick: The hundred rockets and missiles that Gazan terrorists launched into Israel this week served as yet another reminder that we have an account to manage with Gaza. Gaza, like Judea and Samaria, is a long-term problem that requires management, not resolution. To understand what needs to be done, we have to focus on the two sides of the problem. First, Gaza is a military problem. To successfully and permanently quell the security threat Gaza poses to Israel, the IDF requires the capacity to operate freely in Gaza – as it does in Judea and Samaria. Israel built its capacity to operate throughout Judea and Samaria during Operation Defensive Shield in 2002. In 1995, Israel signed the Interim Agreement with the PLO. The deal set out the basis for the transfer of authorities and powers to the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria. Area C encompasses the rest of Judea and Samaria, including all Israeli military installations, Israeli cities, towns and villages and Jordan Valley. There the PLO received limited civil authority and no military authority. From 1996, when the PLO set up shop in Judea and Samaria until Operation Defensive Shield in 2002, the PLO transformed Area A into one large terrorist infrastructure. The suicide bombers that massacred Israeli civilians on a near-daily basis from 2000 through 2002 were trained and equipped in the bomb factories and terror bases in Area A. Following a month in which 130 Israelis were slaughtered in suicide bombings and shootings, including 30 in the Seder massacre at the Park Hotel in Netanya, in April 2002, the government ordered the IDF to destroy the terrorist infrastructure in Judea and Samaria. The implication was clear. The strategic goal of the operation was to militarily transform Area A, where the PLO had a free hand to behave like the Taliban, into Area B, where the IDF was capable of breaking up terror cells before they got up and running. In the event, after one of the most complex urban warfare operations in history, and while sustaining significant battlefield losses, the IDF achieved the sought-after result. Since 2002, the IDF has been able to operate throughout Judea and Samaria. As a consequence, the PLO and its fellow terrorist groups have been unable to rebuild their suicide belt assembly lines or import or develop a rocket and missile industry. The military reality in Gaza is similar to the situation that held in Judea and Samaria on the eve of Defensive Shield – just with missiles and rockets and more arms concentrated in far denser population centers. There are many reasons Israel has not undertaken an operation like Defensive Shield in Gaza to date. But they can be watered down to a simple cost-benefit analysis. The price of such a Defensive Shield-Gaza would be extremely high while the benefits Israel would obtain remain fiercely debated. Rather than conduct a Defensive Shield, the government and IDF have adopted a strategy of minimizing risks and violence. The strategy is implemented at times by appeasing the Hamas regime through cash transfers from Qatar and the provision of work permits for Gazans in Israel. The strategy is implemented at times through military operations – generally conducted from the air to minimize risk to troops. Every few years, Israel is required as it was in 2014, 2011, 2010, and 2008-09 to carry out a limited ground operation in Gaza to scale back Hamas’s military capabilities. In the absence of a clear casus belli along the lines of a missile-launched Park Hotel massacre, it is hard to see Israel initiating an operation with a scope similar to that of Defensive Shield in Gaza. And so, in the coming years, Israel will be required to continue to act with varying degrees of force in Gaza to secure an acceptable quality of life for residents of southern Israel and to prevent Hamas from developing the capacity to pose a strategic threat to the country. This brings us to the second aspect of the complex, long-term problem of Gaza – the diplomatic challenge. And this, in turn, forces us to consider the strategic implications of socialist Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential run. Following Sanders’ landslide victory last Saturday in the Nevada caucuses, during Tuesday’s night Democratic debate, the radical senator from Vermont was center stage. Sanders is now the undisputed frontrunner in the race for the Democratic nomination. Towards the end of the debate, Sanders, who began referring to himself recently as “proud to be Jewish,” was asked about his view of Israel. He was also asked whether he plans to move the US Embassy in Israel to Tel Aviv. The question came following Sanders’ wild attack on AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby in Washington earlier in the week. On Sunday, Sanders announced that he wouldn’t be participating in AIPAC’s annual policy conference. AIPAC, he alleged, serves as a “platform” for “leaders who express bigotry and oppose basic Palestinian rights.” In response to the Israel questions Tuesday night, Sanders said, “I am very proud of being Jewish. I actually lived in Israel for some months. [He was a volunteer at a Communist kibbutz in the early 1960s, CBG] But what I happen to believe, right now, sadly, tragically, in Israel through Bibi Netanyahu you have a reactionary racist who is now running that country.” As to whether or not he would remove the embassy from Jerusalem, Sanders replied, that it was “something that we would take into consideration.” The primary threat Sanders poses to Israel, of course, is that he becomes the next President of the United States. But he poses an additional danger. If, as now seems likely, Sanders wins the Democratic nomination, he will transform the Democratic Party into an Americanized version of Jeremy Corbyn’s British Labour Party. Like Labour under Corbyn, the Democrats under Sanders will become an anti-Semitic party that supports the boycott of Israel and gives a warm and supportive shoulder to Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas and their allies and partners. Sanders and his Democratic Party will reject the morality of Zionism, the Jewish national liberation movement, just as Corbyn and his people have done. Sanders himself has said on numerous occasions that he sees Corbyn as his overseas twin and that his vision for the Democratic Party is to turn it into Corbyn’s Labour party in America. Which brings us back to Gaza. In a world where the best-case scenario has a Democratic Party that is openly hostile to Israel and its American Jewish supporters, and the worst-case scenario has the White House openly hostile to the Jewish state and its American Jewish supporters, how is Israel supposed to deal with Hamas/Gaza – the sweethearts of the radical left? Since then-president Dwight D. Eisenhower compelled then-Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to withdraw IDF forces from the Sinai in 1956, a central plank of Israel’s national security doctrine has been to avoid going to war without US support. A Corbynized Democratic party – not to mention a Corbynized White House – will not back any Israeli military operations in Gaza. Israel faced a similar quandary six years ago. In Operation Protective Edge, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz and then-Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon were blindsided when then-Secretary of State John Kerry adopted as the US position, Hamas’ ceasefire demands as presented by its representatives Turkey and Qatar. They were stunned again when then-President Barack Obama decided to prohibit US civilian flights to Ben-Gurion International Airport in the middle of the war. They were shocked when the administration embargoed the supply of Hellfire missiles to the IDF and they were flummoxed by the steady stream of condemnations of IDF operations by senior administration spokesmen and officials. At the time senior IDF officials directly involved in the General Staff deliberations revealed that Gantz did not comprehend the strategic implications of the administration’s behavior. A testament to the veracity of their claims came a year later when in defiance of Netanyahu, Gantz supported the 2015 nuclear deal the administration negotiated with Iran despite the fact that the agreement guaranteed Iran a nuclear arsenal within a decade and despite the fact that its inspection clauses were unenforceable. During Operation Protective Edge, Netanyahu realized immediately what was happening and took unprecedented steps to scuttle the administration’s efforts to coerce Israel into accepting Hamas’ ceasefire demands. Netanyahu created a coalition to bypass the Turkey-Qatar axis. Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE were members of the bloc. When Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi demanded to mediate between Israel and Hamas, as had been Egypt’s general practice for decades, the Obama administration couldn’t figure out an excuse to deny him the role. When Sisi rejected Hamas’ ceasefire demands and embraced Israel’s conditions, it was Obama and Kerry’s turn to be flummoxed. Parallel to those efforts, with support from key senators, Netanyahu worked with friendly governments – particularly Stephen Harper’s government in Canada and Silvio Berlusconi’s government in Italy to force the Obama administration to end its prohibition on civilian fights to Ben Gurion. These actions by Netanyahu secured the IDF the time and the diplomatic over to do what needed to be done on the ground in Gaza. The actions Netanyahu took were high risk. He couldn’t speak openly about the depth of the Obama administration’s animosity because doing so would have risked demoralizing the public and even instilling panic. He had to publicly support Obama and Kerry as they worked directly on Hamas’s behalf against Israel in order to keep channels of communication open and to preserve relations with more supportive Democrats. Today when it is clear that another campaign in Gaza is just around the corner, and that that campaign won’t be the last one, we need to consider both the military and diplomatic conditions under which those campaigns are likely to be undertaken. This is doubly true in light of the Corbynization of the Democratic Party. The Israeli public cannot influence the outcome of the US elections. But on Monday, it will determine how Israel will respond to aggression against it – whether that aggression emanates from Gaza or from Washington. |
||
Marxist Dreams And Soviet Realities
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 11:42 AM PST
by Ralph Raico: The sharp contrast that Alexis de Tocqueville drew in 1835 between the United States and Tsarist Russia—”the principle of the former is freedom; of the latter, servitude”1—became much sharper after 1917, when the Russian Empire was transformed into the Soviet Union. Like the United States, the Soviet Union is a nation founded on a distinct ideology. In the case of America, the ideology was fundamentally Lockean liberalism; its best expressions are the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. The Ninth Amendment, in particular, breathes the spirit of the worldview of late eighteenth-century America.2 The Founders believed that there exist natural, individual rights that, taken together, constitute a moral framework for political life. Translated into law, this framework defines the social space within which men voluntarily interact; it allows for the spontaneous coordination and ongoing mutual adjustment of the various plans that the members of society form to guide and fill their lives. The Soviet Union was founded on a very different ideology, Marxism, as understood and interpreted by V. I. Lenin. Marxism, with its roots in Hegelian philosophy, was a quite conscious revolt against the individual rights doctrine of the previous century. The leaders of the Bolshevik party (which changed its name to Communist in 1918) were virtually all revolutionary intellectuals, in accordance with the strategy set forth by Lenin in his 1902 work What Is to Be Done? They were avid students of the works of Marx and Engels published in their lifetimes or shortly thereafter and known to the theoreticians of the Second International. The Bolshevik leaders viewed themselves as the executors of the Marxist program, as those whom History had called upon to realize the apocalyptic transition to Communist society foretold by the founders of their faith. . . . Read the rest over at the Mises Institute. Tags: Ralph Raico, Marxist Dreams And Soviet Realities, Cato Institute, ISI, Intercollegiate Studies Institute To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
She is Young, Popular, has IQ of 157 & Fights Climate Activism
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 06:30 AM PST . . . This is Anti-Greta!
by Nzegwu I.: Like climate activist Greta Thunberg (17), Naomi Seibt is a teenager from Europe, with long blond hair and an articulated opinion about the climate. But the comparison did not end there. After all, the German Naomi Seibt (19) proclaims the opposite of her Swedish counterpart against all shared scientific insights, and she gets a lot of resonance. This week she speaks at a meeting of a right-wing conservative think tank in the United States, where American President Donald Trump is the headliner. Meet the anti-Greta. Who is Naomi Seibt? Seeing the many young people who participate in the weekly school strikes for the climate created an aversion to climate activism. It was different once. “I was an innocent young girl and thought I could save the world by planting trees and using reusable bags instead of plastic,” she says. She is no longer convinced of that. “I get shivers when I see the school strikers,” she says. “How they shout and be terrified and don’t want the world to end. Think twice.” What does she stand for? She points to other factors such as solar energy as driving forces for global warming. Although the amount of solar energy reaching the earth has been falling since the 1970s, according to measurements from the American government, among others. She does not like the predicate anti-Greta. “I am not an indoctrinated hand puppet. I don’t want to be the umpteenth scapegoat that gets a simple label like their other opponents. I want us to be critical of science. We cannot take away the hope of the younger generation for a good future and drive them into an eco-depression.” Remarkable: she does not shy away from referring to Thunberg herself. Two weeks ago, for example, she posted a video in which she criticized the mainstream media with the headline “How dare you”, a reference to a speech that Greta Thunberg made for the United Nations. What does she say about Greta Thunberg? How popular is Seibt? Where is Seibt still popping up? What is behind her message? He tells the Washington Post newspaper: ‘dismiss the message, distort the facts, distract the audience, and express dismay at the whole thing’. This means so much as reject the message, turn the facts around, distract the audience, and out of dismay at everything. “The goal is to create a resemblance with the original spokesperson and message. In this case, it is a false resemblance between a message based on climate science, and that went virally in an organic way, and a message based on climate skepticism that is trying to keep up and that is driven by paid promotion.” Tags: Nzegwu I., Naomi Seibt, Young, Popular, IQ of 157 & Fights Climate Activism To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
NATIOINAL JOURNAL
|
This email was sent to rickbulow74@live.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails you may unsubscribe at any time.
THE DAILY WIRE
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
A PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTERContact FPM Support Copyright 2016, frontpagemag.com |