Good morning! Here is your news for Friday February 7, 2020.
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE DAILY SIGNAL
Feb 07, 2020
|
Good morning from Washington, where President Trump is thanking all but one GOP lawmaker for opposing his removal from office and giving his chief congressional enemies a piece of his mind. Fred Lucas reports, while Hans von Spakovsky assesses history’s verdict. Conservatives look to make a difference in better days ahead, Rachel del Guidice finds. Plus: legislation that favors union bosses, and the president’s shoutout to a pastor who overcomes. On this date in 1962, President John F. Kennedy orders a trade embargo on communist Cuba that will tank the island nation’s economy for decades. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add morningbell@heritage.org to your address book to ensure that you receive emails from us.
You are subscribed to this newsletter as rickbulow74@live.com. If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters, or opt out of this newsletter, please click here to update your subscription. |
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
POLITICO Playbook: The mess in the Democratic Party
Presented by Amazon
DRIVING THE DAY
WILL ROGERS FAMOUSLY once said this: “I’m not a member of an organized political party. I am a Democrat.” HE WAS A HUMORIST, so he was joking. But his words ring pretty true today.
LET’S REVIEW THE SITUATION DEMOCRATS find themselves in 270 days before Election Day.
THE RESULTS FROM THE FIRST NOMINATING CONTEST of the presidential race are in dispute. The DNC has ordered a recanvassing. Bitter recriminations are volleying back and forth from the candidates to the DNC to party officials in Iowa to the creator of an app that didn’t perform up to snuff.
THE PUTATIVE FRONTRUNNER — 36-year Senate veteran and former VP JOE BIDEN — made a dismal showing in Iowa, and has no clear immediate prospect for raising enough money to keep his creaking operation afloat.
THE RACE’S NEW LEADER, BERNIE SANDERS, is not even a member of the Democratic Party, and Republicans are salivating at the prospect of competing against an actual socialist after years of tagging all Democrats as socialists.
SANDERS’ TOP RIVAL PETE BUTTIGIEG, the former mayor of the fourth-largest city in Indiana, is bracing for a fresh round of press scrutiny and stepped-up attacks from other campaigns that have largely kept their powder dry until now.
THE IMPEACHMENT PUSH IN THE HOUSE led to a predictable acquittal in the Senate, and now President DONALD TRUMP seems determined — and, in fact, freed — to do whatever he wants. He’s vanquished nearly all dissent in the party, and grown his approval numbers.
NEW … PETE RISING AGAIN … BOSTON GLOBE: “Pete Buttigieg continues to surge in N.H. polling,” by Jeremy Fox: “Former South Bend, Ind., mayor Pete Buttigieg, building on his strong showing in the Iowa caucuses, continued his surge among likely Democratic New Hampshire presidential primary voters, putting him and Senator Bernie Sanders in a statistical dead heat in a Boston Globe/WBZ-TV/Suffolk University poll released Thursday night.
“Former vice president Joe Biden, whose campaign is stumbling after a disappointing fourth-place finish in Iowa, saw another modest dip in his numbers. That put him in fourth place behind Senator Elizabeth Warren in Thursday’s poll, the fourth of seven the Suffolk University Political Research Center is conducting in the run-up to the nation’s first primary on Tuesday.
“Sanders held steady at 24 percent, while Buttigieg nipped at his heels with 23 percent. Biden slipped to 11 percent, below Warren’s 13 percent.” Full results
YOWZA … BERNIE SANDERS to ANDERSON COOPER at a CNN town hall Thursday night … COOPER: “Given what happened in Iowa, and that the results still are not in, the DNC has now said they should recanvass. Do you want — are you going to call on the …”
SANDERS: “I think we should — we have got enough of Iowa.” (LAUGHTER) SANDERS: “I think we should move on to New Hampshire. The people — it really did distress me, because I went all over the state of Iowa, and the people there are really great people who take their responsibility of the first caucus in the country very, very seriously. And it is really sad that the Democratic Party of Iowa, if I may say so, screwed up the counting process quite so badly.” More from Stephanie Murray on Sanders in Manchester, N.H.
SNIPPET FROM JONATHAN MARTIN and REID EPSTEIN from NYT, A1: “James Carville, who has said [DNC Chairman Tom Perez] should resign, pointed to another controversy this week that has been overshadowed by the Iowa chaos: the ouster of the top aides who had been planning the party’s nominating convention in Milwaukee. He cited it as another sign of the party’s disarray. ‘We can’t count votes, put on a convention or deliver a winning message,’ said Mr. Carville, the longtime Clinton strategist.”
WHAT BLOOMBERG IS DOING … NYT’S ALEX BURNS and NICK CORASANITI in Manchester: “Bloomberg Pursues Wealthy Donors, but Not Their Checkbooks”
BIDEN M.I.A. — “His campaign on the line, Joe Biden goes missing in New Hampshire,” by WaPo’s Matt Viser, Cleve Wootson Jr. and Michael Scherer in Nashua, N.H.
… AND HOW PETE DID IT: “Behind the chaos: How a small-city mayor and a democratic socialist finished on top in Iowa,” by WaPo’s Michael Scherer, Holly Bailey, Sean Sullivan and Annie Linskey in Des Moines.
— MORE FROM ELENA SCHNEIDER: “Inside Buttigieg’s Iowa comeback”
WHAT THEY’RE READING IN MANCHESTER … UNION LEADER: “Friday’s debate a last chance to break through in New Hampshire” … “NH officials on the primary: We got this”
WHERE THEY ARE …
— BIDEN: Manchester for the debate.
— BLOOMBERG: Norfolk, Va., where he will appear with Richard Spencer, the Navy secretary Trump pushed out. NYT
— BUTTIGIEG: Manchester for the debate.
— SANDERS: Politics and Eggs at Saint Anselm College at 9:30 a.m.
— WARREN: Nothing public.
NEW … THE DCCC raised a half-million dollars online in the 24 hours after the State of the Union. The fundraising solicitation did not include the mention of Speaker NANCY PELOSI ripping the paper.
— THE NRSC has its weekend retreat at the Breakers in Palm Beach this weekend.
Good Friday morning. WHAT A YEAR this week has been.
BIG NYT TICK TOCK … CARL HULSE, NICK FANDOS and EMILY COCHRANE: “How Mitch McConnell Delivered Acquittal for Trump”: “The story of how Mr. McConnell held Republicans together — even in the face of stunning revelations about the president’s conduct and uneasiness in his party about Mr. Trump’s actions — reflects how a master Senate tactician deployed his command of procedure and keen political instincts to lock down a process that posed an existential threat to the president.
“In doing so, he may have cemented the president’s hold on his office and provided a defiant campaign message to propel him to re-election, uniting the party around a figure who brooks no dissent and dealing a death blow to Democrats’ hopes of removing him.
“‘If this was all about politics, and it was, at least at the moment I think it is fair to conclude that we won and they lost,’ Mr. McConnell said in an interview on Thursday in his Capitol office, before he headed to the White House, where he was effusively thanked by the president and received a standing ovation in the East Room.”
— QUOTE OF THE DAY: “‘What I have consistently said to [Trump] is I think I know more about the Senate than you do, which he usually concedes,’ Mr. McConnell recalled, saying he told the president to keep public commentary about impeachment to a minimum. ‘My consistent advice to him with regard to this subject was to avoid it — and for the most part, for the most part, he did.’”
VINDMAN UPDATE … BLOOMBERG’S JENNIFER JACOBS and NICK WADHAMS: “White House Weighs Ouster of Aide Who Testified Against Trump” … More from WaPo
BURGESS EVERETT SCOOP: “Bullock meets with Obama as Montana Senate deadline nears”: “Former President Barack Obama met privately with Montana Gov. Steve Bullock on Thursday in Washington, an adviser confirmed, as Democrats hold out hopes that the red-state governor makes a surprise, last-minute splash into the state’s Senate race.
“Bullock has consistently said he will not run for the Senate after dropping his own White House bid last year. And even after meeting with the former two-term president, Bullock is undeterred. ‘As he has said repeatedly, there will be a candidate for U.S. Senate in Montana against Steve Daines. It will not be Steve Bullock,’ said Matt McKenna, a longtime adviser for Bullock. McKenna said he had no knowledge of the details of the private conversation between the two.” POLITICO
107 HOUSE DEMOCRATS have signed a letter to the president, disapproving of the new Middle East peace plan. The letter
TRUMP’S FRIDAY — The president will leave the White House at 11 a.m. en route to Charlotte. He will travel to Central Piedmont Community College and speak at 1:20 p.m. at the Opportunity Now Summit. Afterward, he will fly back to Washington. Trump will leave the White House at 7 p.m. to travel to the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium. He will speak at the Republican Governors Association’s finance dinner at 7:30 p.m. Afterward, he will return to the White House.
SUNDAY SO FAR …
-
FOX
“Fox News Sunday” (live from Bedford, N.H.): Pete Buttigieg. Panel: Karl Rove, Julie Pace, Dana Perino and Juan Williams. Power Player segment: Lonnie Bunch.
-
ABC
“This Week”: Joe Biden. Panel: Yvette Simpson, Jon Karl, Barbara Comstock, Matthew Dowd and Jen Psaki.
-
NBC
“Meet The Press”: Panel: Joshua Johnson, Kasie Hunt, John Sununu and Claire McCaskill.
-
CNN
“State Of The Union”: Panel: Rick Santorum, Mia Love, Karen Finney and Wajahat Ali.
-
CNN
“Inside Politics”: Mike Shear, Jackie Kucinich, Catherine Lucey and Toluse Olorunnipa.
-
CBS
“Face the Nation”: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) … CBS’ Anthony Salvanto. Panel: Jamal Simmons, Jeffrey Goldberg, Gerald Seib and Salena Zito.
-
Gray TV
“Full Court Press With Greta Van Susteren”: Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).
-
Sinclair
“America This Week With Eric Bolling”: Alan Dershowitz … Hogan Gidley … Rudy Giuliani … Brad Parscale. Panel: Sebastian Gorka and Ameshia Cross.
SPOTTED at a book party for Phil Rucker and Carol Leonnig in honor of “A Very Stable Genius” ($18.36 on Amazon) at Sally Quinn’s house in Georgetown on Thursday evening: Marty Baron, Fred Ryan, Steve Ginsburg, Dan Balz, Seung Min Kim, Paul Kane, Wes Lowery, David Fahrenthold, Bob Costa, Josh Dawsey, Karen Tumulty, Peter Baker and Susan Glasser, George Conway, Mark Leibovich, Elisabeth Bumiller, Carl Hulse, Mike Shear, Katie Rogers, Annie Karni, Bill Hamilton, Andrea Mitchell, Kasie Hunt and Matt Rivera, Eli Stokols, Alan Berger, Rachel Adler, Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Ashley Parker and Mike Bender, and Michael Beschloss.
— PHIL AND CAROL’S book is in its SIXTH printing, and is on the NYT bestseller list for the second week in a row, clocking in at No. 2. CAA is selling the rights for TV/film adaptation.
PLAYBOOK READS
ROMNEY BACKSTORY … MERIDITH MCGRAW and NANCY COOK: “In the weeks leading up to the Senate trial, Trump gave Romney space to make a decision. He did not court or pressure him, or phone him directly and frequently as he often does with Republican lawmakers. Both Romney allies on Capitol Hill and advisers close to the White House told the president they believed Romney would ultimately vote to acquit him. With less than 24 hours to go until the impeachment vote, Romney allies kept signaling to Republican lawmakers and the White House that Romney was leaning toward acquittal. All the while, Romney’s office avoided contact with the White House.
“Then, on Tuesday afternoon, the chatter about Romney went silent, a fact White House aides reported to the president.
“Trump and White House officials later learned that Romney had given embargoed interviews to the Atlantic, The New York Times, and the Washington Post on his decision to convict Trump. Trump felt hoodwinked. And it showed.” POLITICO
PROBABLY NOT THE LAST TIME THEY’LL DISAGREE! … MEL ZANONA: “‘I don’t think Romney is effective in any shape or form,’ [Kevin] McCarthy told a group of reporters outside the House chamber. … While Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney of Wyoming said she disagreed with Romney’s decision, she had a different take than McCarthy: She called him a ‘man of conscience’ and said he is a ‘real value for us to have in the Senate.’ ‘Senator Romney is a good and honorable man,’ Cheney, the No. 3 House Republican, said in an interview. ‘And I don’t think anybody ought to question his faith.’” POLITICO
NYT’S ANNIE KARNI: “What It’s Like to Be the Face of Trump’s Super Bowl Ad”
CHARLIE MAHTESIAN in POLITICO MAGAZINE: “How Trump Rewired the Electoral Map: This presidential race will be fought on electoral terrain that would have been unthinkable four years ago, before everything blew up.” From the Mag’s latest issue, “The New Rules”
CORONAVIRUS UPDATE … AP: “Cruise ship turned away as virus alarm doctor dies in China,” by Ken Moritsugu and Mari Yamaguchi in Beijing: “Japan on Friday reported 41 new cases of a virus on a quarantined cruise ship and turned away another luxury liner while the death toll in mainland China rose to 636, including a doctor who got in trouble with authorities in the communist country for sounding an early warning about the disease threat.
“Following an online uproar over the government’s treatment of Dr. Li Wenliang, 34, the ruling Communist Party said it was sending an investigation team to ‘fully investigate relevant issues raised by the public’ regarding the case. Two docked cruise ships with thousands of passengers and crew members remained under 14-day quarantines in Hong Kong and Japan.” AP
— A GRIM NYT DISPATCH FROM WUHAN: “With the sick being herded into makeshift quarantine camps, with minimal medical care, a growing sense of abandonment and fear has taken hold in Wuhan, fueling the sense that the city and surrounding province of Hubei are being sacrificed for the greater good of China.” NYT
— WH deputy press secretary @JuddPDeere45: “Today [Thursday], @realDonaldTrump spoke with President Xi Jinping of China. President Trump expressed confidence in China’s strength and resilience in confronting the challenge of the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak.”
POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION … SECOND-TERM PLANS … WSJ’S ANDREW RESTUCCIA: “Senior aides — led by Chris Liddell, the White House’s deputy chief of staff for policy coordination — have been meeting since late last year to chart an agenda for the second term, according to administration officials. The discussions are in their initial stages, the officials said.
“The early outlines of the agenda are starting to emerge, but aides said Mr. Trump hasn’t yet signed off on the final details of the plan, though he is receiving regular briefings on the discussions. Among the issues under consideration: continuing the administration’s efforts to lower prescription drug prices, pushing for a broad infrastructure bill and taking another crack at reforming the country’s immigration system, the officials said.
“White House aides are still holding out hope that some of these things can get accomplished before the end of the first term, but lawmakers and some in the administration are pessimistic about the chances of finding common ground with Democratic lawmakers this year.
“Senior aides have also begun discussing ways to lower the deficit — which is projected to reach $1 trillion in 2020 — and cut taxes for the middle class, as well as roll back more Obama-era regulations. The president’s coming budget blueprint, set to be released Monday, is expected to shed more light on his policy priorities.” WSJ
MEDIAWATCH — Galina Espinoza is now president and editor-in-chief at Rewire.News. She previously was a senior director of digital enterprises at NBCUniversal.
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
TRANSITIONS — Jamie Smith is now chief communications officer at Ellucian. She previously was chief marketing officer at the Linux Foundation and is an Obama White House alum. … Rachel Goldberg is now head of U.S. government affairs at TransUnion. She previously was VP of government affairs at Guardian Life. … Luke Strange is now director of government relations at AEI. He previously was a director of government relations for foreign and defense policy.
WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Jessica Schneider, CNN justice correspondent, and Adam Harrison, project manager for John Moriarty & Associates, on Tuesday welcomed Lincoln Michael Robert Harrison, who came in at 7 lbs, 10 oz and 21 inches. Pic … Another pic
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Invariant’s Mary Beth Stanton. A fun fact about her: “I love to see women succeed on the biggest stages. I’ve seen Selena, Taylor, Demi, Nicki, Kesha, Britney, Ariana, Janelle, Charli, Robyn, Katy, Cher, Lizzo, J. Lo and Rihanna multiple times.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, now running for Senate, is 68 … Gay Talese is 88 … Roberta McCain is 108 … Dave Levinthal, editor-at-large for The Center for Public Integrity … former Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) is 85 … POLITICO’s Laura Barrón-López … Jessica Kershaw … Beth Frerking … Matt Aiello … Jeff Kearns, Bloomberg’s U.S. economy editor … Sterling Emerling … Jennifer Diamond Haber … Monica Medina, founder and publisher of Our Daily Planet (h/ts husband Ron Klain, Jon Haber and Miro Korenha) … Jim Burns … Robert Howard of North Carolina Democratic Party comms … former Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.) is 59 … former Rep. Stephen Fincher (R-Tenn.) is 47 … former Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) is 79 … former Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.) is 5-0 …
… James Gilbert, chief administrative law judge of the U.S. Postal Service … Carleton Bryant … Patrick Ferrise, producer of “The Press Pool” on SiriusXM POTUS … Veronica Molina, social media manager at J Strategies (h/t Adam Morey) … Jasmine Nazarett, senior comms manager for Community Change (h/t Molly Fluet) … Deborah Bodin Cohen … Julie Thomas … Frank Binzoni … Emily Hampsten, communications director for Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) … Bloomberg’s Colleen Murphy … Cameron Langford … Miguel L’Heureux … Jeanne McCann … Cappi Williamson … Jeff Marschner, director of media relations at the Hoover Institution, is 42 … Tiffany Win … Christine Grimaldi … John Criscuolo, a public policy advisor for Squire Patton Boggs … Marielle Kress … Sean Elsbernd
Follow us on Twitter
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DAYBREAK
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
THE HILL
|
Happy Friday! Today’s Smart Brevity™ count: 1,174 words … 4½ minutes.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
The globe’s eventual rebound from the coronavirus could help propel the U.S. economy to new heights right around the time of the presidential election, Axios Markets editor Dion Rabouin writes.
- Why it matters: With President Trump touting the stock market’s performance and jobs growth as key accomplishments, that bounce could become an accelerant in the race.
What’s happening: S&P Global expects the outbreak to “stabilize globally in April 2020, with virtually no new transmissions in May.”
- Most economists predict the world will get back to business as usual by the summer — and make up for lost time with accelerated economic growth in the second half of the year.
What we’re hearing: “We’re likely to return not just to normal, but above normal because of the U.S.-China trade deal,” Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco, tells Axios.
- “Once contagion is under control and stabilized, I think we’ll see a pop in consumer spending and corporate spending.”
The backdrop: U.S. economic data had been strengthening ahead of the outbreak.
- Consumer confidence has been holding at historically high levels; and a private payrolls survey released Wednesday showed the highest job growth in five years.
- Both the National Retail Federation and National Association of Manufacturers tell Axios they expect their industries — two of the economy’s laggards in 2019 — to see a return of job growth and investment this year.
Between the lines: The bullish expectations are based on the assumption that Trump won’t ratchet up tensions with China again or launch a second trade spat with Europe.
Suddenly believing the papers, President Trump stunned ministers from around the world by triumphantly brandishing post-impeachment headlines at the National Prayer Breakfast, an event that’s usually a rare bipartisan respite:
- “My family, our great country, and your president have been put through a terrible ordeal by some very dishonest and corrupt people.”
Three hours later, Trump held an hourlong post-impeachment celebration/grievance-fest in the East Room, entering to “Hail to the Chief”:
- “We went through hell, unfairly. Did nothing wrong. Did nothing wrong. I’ve done things wrong in my life, I will admit. [Laughter.] Not purposely, but I’ve done things wrong. But this is what the end result is.”
- Then he held up the front page of the Washington Post, to applause.
Not The Onion … Here’s today’s witty WashPost front page:
Speaker Pelosi said at a news conference yesterday: “That was not a State of the Union. That was … his state of mind.”
- “It’s appalling the things that he says, and then you say to me, tearing up his falsehoods, ‘Isn’t that the wrong message?’ No, it isn’t. … I have tried to be gracious with him.”
The five biggest U.S. stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Google’s parent company, Amazon and Facebook — have grown so explosively that they account for nearly 18% of the S&P 500 index by market value.
- Why it matters, from AP’s Stan Choe: Never before have five companies held such powerful sway over the index, according to Morgan Stanley strategists.
The history: The last time five stocks controlled this much of the S&P 500 was during the tech bubble at the turn of the millennium.
- That bubble eventually popped, and stocks like Cisco and GE shrank to become smaller players. Microsoft was also among them, but it has since climbed back to the top.
One difference between this time and the dot-com bubble is that many analysts don’t see prices as grossly over-inflated now.
- Each of today’s Big Five is producing strong growth even when the global economy has been stuck in a sluggish pace for years.
U.S. astronaut Christina Koch, who was part of the first all-female spacewalk, lands on the steppes of Kazakhstan after returning from the International Space Station in a Russian Soyuz space capsule.
- Why it matters, from Axios Space maestro Miriam Kramer: Koch’s 328-day mission, the longest spaceflight by a woman, is part of NASA’s effort to learn more about how the human body responds to long duration spaceflight, ahead of sending people to the Moon and eventually to Mars.
All at once, several simulators used to forecast planetary warming are saying we have less time than we thought, Bloomberg’s Eric Roston reports.
- Researchers don’t agree on how to interpret the hotter results.
Why it matters: These same models have successfully projected global warming for a half century, Bloomberg points out:
- “If the same amount of climate pollution will bring faster warming than previously thought, humanity would have less time to avoid the worst impacts.”
Netflix has taken down just nine pieces of content around the world in response to written government requests since it was founded 23 years ago, the company revealed for the first time, Axios’ Sara Fischer reports.
- To date, Netlix has received three written requests from the government of Singapore covering five pieces of content, and one each from New Zealand, Vietnam, Germany, and Saudi Arabia. All have been since 2015.
Why it matters: As Netflix aims to grow its business abroad, it wants to be transparent about the way it handles censorship efforts in markets it looks to invest in.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
Following the latest batch of Iowa results, Pete Buttigieg leads Bernie Sanders by two state delegate equivalents out of 2,152 counted — a margin of 0.09 percentage points, AP reports.
- There’s evidence the Iowa Democratic Party hasn’t accurately tabulated some of its results, including those released late yesterday that the party reported as complete.
- AP’s tabulation of the party’s results are at 99% of precincts reporting, with data missing from one of 1,765 precincts, among other issues.
DNC Chair Tom Perez asked the Iowa Democratic Party to conduct a recanvass — not a recount, but rather a check of the vote count.
- The Iowa party suggested it may not comply, saying it would conduct a recanvass if one was requested by one of the candidates.
Sally Buzbee, AP’s senior vice president and executive editor, said:
The Associated Press calls a race when there is a clear indication of a winner. Because of a tight margin between former Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Bernie Sanders and the irregularities in this year’s caucus process, it is not possible to determine a winner at this point.
Apple is partnering with ABC News to co-host tech giant’s first-ever political debate tonight (8 to 11 p.m. ET), in an effort to show off its growing investment in news, Axios’ Sara Fischer and Fadel Allassan report.
Tony Sayegh and Pam Bondi, who ran the White House impeachment war room, are returning to their former jobs following his acquittal, Axios’ Alayna Treene reports.
- Sayegh — who had been a top Treasury Department official for Trump, and has a close relationship with Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Don Jr. and Kimberly Guilfoyle— will return to Teneo as a managing director in New York. Today is his last day at the White House.
- Bondi, the former Florida attorney general and a member of Trump’s defense team during the trial, is due to depart by the end of next week.
Between the lines: Sayegh and Bondi worked behind the scenes to curry favor among Republicans to acquit Trump.
- Both aides plans to visit Washington often and support Trump from the outside — including on Fox News, where both are regulars.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
America’s most popular chains are spending millions and hiring thousands in the battle for the growing breakfast market, Axios’ Erica Pandey reports.
- Why it matters: As consumers increasingly use delivery apps for lunch and dinner, breakfast remains a final frontier for chains that want to build relationships with their diners by actually getting them to come into the store.
📬 Thanks for starting debate day with us. Please tell a friend about AM/PM.
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: DHS Spars With New York Over Immigration
Plus, reporting from the road in New Hampshire.
The Dispatch Staff | 1 min |
Happy Friday! Man, what a week it’s been, both inside D.C. and out—from the president’s acquittal to the (still!) ongoing insanity that was (is!) the Iowa caucuses. We’re sure next week will be much smoother.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- Ahead of next week’s New Hampshire primary, the New Hampshire debate will take place tonight. Seven candidates have qualified: Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Amy Klobuchar, Tom Steyer, and Andrew Yang.
- The Yang campaign laid off dozens of staffers this week after a poor showing at the Iowa caucuses Monday.
- One day after his acquittal, President Trump spent his Thursday in a sequence of public appearances in which he alternately took victory laps, praised the lawmakers who helped carry him safely through the process, and uttered maledictions against those who stood in his way. His most frequent targets: Nancy Pelosi and Mitt Romney. Speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast, Trump questioned the sincerity of the faith of both politicians, saying that “I don’t like people who use their faith as a justification for doing what they know is wrong.”
- The alleged perpetrator of the El Paso shooting that left 22 dead last August has been indicted with 90 federal hate-crime charges, with prosecutors arguing the attack amounted to “domestic terrorism.”
Want Sanctuary Cities? Say Goodbye to Global Entry.
This week, the Trump administration announced its latest effort to curb the rise of so-called sanctuary city laws that seek to block the federal government’s use of state and local resources to combat illegal immigration.
In December, New York State’s Green Light Law went into effect, allowing illegal immigrants without a Social Security number to obtain New York driver’s licenses and barring federal immigration authorities access to the state’s DMV records without a court order. Immigration enforcement officials argued that the law prevented them from accessing information that they use to “investigate and build cases against terrorists, and criminals who commit child sexual exploitation, human trafficking, and financial crimes.”
Now, the Department of Homeland Security has announced that it will bar New York residents from enrolling in Global Entry and other Trusted Traveler programs that require background checks to ease airport security, and that it will remove 1750,000 current New Yorkers from its rolls by year’s end. DHS argues that without the DMV data they are unable to “make an evidence-based assessment that those individuals who seek this benefit are low risk and meet the eligibility requirements.” (TSA Pre-check is not affected.)
New York officials are still considering their legal options but argued that the policy is punitive and retaliatory. And Ken Cuccinelli, the Department of Homeland Security’s acting deputy secretary, did little to quell that notion when he said other states considering such laws “should know that their citizens are going to lose the convenience of entering these Trusted Traveler Programs, just as New York’s did.”
This isn’t the first attempt to crack down on jurisdictions that bar federal immigration authorities access to state and local resources. The Department of Justice sued the state of California over its 2017 California Values Act, which it argued “openly seeks to undermine federal immigration enforcement.” The Supreme Court is currently deciding whether to hear arguments in that case this term.
But will this latest move pass constitutional muster? Maybe.
In 1987, the Supreme Court decided in South Dakota v. Dole that Congress could withhold highway funds from states that refused to raise their drinking age. But, as we all know, Congress gets a lot of leeway on how to spend its money. The executive branch is another story.
In 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that he would block two different sources of federal grant money from jurisdictions that didn’t share information with immigration authorities. This past year, the 9th Circuit upheld one because the department was only giving preference to cities that would use the money to focus on illegal immigration, and struck down the other, holding that the department couldn’t add special grant conditions not imposed by Congress.
Mayor Pete Is Having a Moment
Declan has been traipsing through the snows of New Hampshire this week in order to keep us up to date on the fast-changing race for the Democratic nomination, where Pete Buttigieg is surging. He reports on the zero-sum relationship between Buttigieg and Joe Biden in the Granite State. Much like Harry Potter and Lord Voldemort, “Neither can live while the other survives.” (Neither Buttigieg nor Biden is an evil, genocidal wizard—it’s just a fitting expression.) When a Buttigieg campaign event reached capacity before it began…
Buttigieg briefly addressed the disappointed crowd before a black SUV whisked him around to an alternate entrance. “I’m so sorry, it sounds like we have more than filled up and won’t be able to fit everybody into the space,” the candidate lamented, before launching into a 30-second pitch for his campaign. “We are taking no vote for granted. Obviously we feel a lot of momentum coming here, but I know how New Hampshire is never told what to do. Folks here think for themselves, and I’ll be doing everything that I can to earn every bit of support.”
Mayor Pete’s comments once inside the American Legion focused on military and veterans’ issues. “Every one has given so much, and raised their right hand and made a promise that amounts to a blank check to the people of the United States of America,” Buttigieg said of the country’s service members, pacing around in a navy suit and royal blue tie. “So when we talk about taking care of veterans, we are not talking about doing anybody a favor. We are talking about America’s way of keeping its promise that is made in return, and that is to look after you for the rest of your life.”
A topic that did not come up at the American Legion on Thursday afternoon? Joe Biden. For his part, after he placed a distant fourth in Monday’s disaster of an Iowa caucus, the former vice president’s campaign decided to do something he’s mostly avoided thus far: go on the offensive. The polls might be forcing his hand. The Monmouth poll out Thursday shows Biden in third with 17 percent, trailing Sanders (27 percent) and Buttigieg (22 percent). A WBZ/Boston Globe/Suffolk University poll that came out late Thursday is worse for Biden: Buttigieg (23 percent) is in a virtual tie with Sanders (24 percent) with Biden (11 percent) fourth behind Warren (13 percent).
“Mayor Pete likes to attack me,” Biden had said at an event in Somersworth, New Hampshire on Wednesday. “He calls me part of the old, failed Washington. Well really? Was it a failure that I went to Congress to get Obamacare passed into law? Was it a failure when I got passed the implementation of the Recovery Act that prevented an economic collapse, another Great Depression?”
Biden continued ticking off accomplishments: the Iran deal, the Paris Climate Accords, the Violence Against Women Act, the chemical weapons treaty, the Brady Bill. “I have great respect for Mayor Pete, and his service to this nation,” he said, a pair of teleprompters in front of him. “But I do believe it’s a risk—to be just straight up with you—for this party to nominate someone who’s never held a [sic] office higher than mayor of a town of 100,000 people in Indiana.”
Buttigieg responded in an interview on MSNBC. “As to the achievements of the Obama administration, I have enormous regard for those achievements. … But I think the bulk of the credit for the achievements of the Obama administration belong with President Obama.”
Nice Primary You’ve Got There …
Also up on the site today, Andrew has a look at recent Republican efforts to influence Democratic contests in Iowa, North Carolina, and South Carolina:
In South Carolina, which has open primaries and where the GOP canceled its own, a group of state GOP officials have decided to encourage their supporters to vote for Sen. Bernie Sanders, who, in the words of Greenville GOP Chairman Nate Leupp, is “the most socialistic, liberal candidate” in the race. The intent is both to help the primary chances of a candidate they feel will likely match up poorly against Trump and to demonstrate why the state should move to a closed primary.
In North Carolina, a GOP PAC called Faith and Power is spending upward of $1 million on ads supporting Senate candidate Erica Smith—a state senator waging an upstart campaign against establishment pick Cal Cunningham. The ad brags that Smith is the only candidate “endorsed by progressives and unions,” calls her “the No. 1 supporter of the Green New Deal,” and insists she is the race’s “only proven progressive.” Faith and Power hasn’t said anything publicly, but the aim is clearly to drag out the primary, to the benefit of GOP incumbent Thom Tillis in the general.
And the Iowa Democratic Party said Thursday that its troubles collecting and reporting the results of its caucus—which have caused a days-long national scandal—stemmed in part from Trump supporters who coordinated online to swarm the reporting hotline with prank calls supporting the president.
These various efforts—led, respectively, by GOP state politicians, GOP strategists, and a GOP-supporting online gang—underscore the degree to which Republican voters increasingly see politics as a zero-sum game in which a weaker Democratic party translates directly to a stronger America. Unsurprisingly, Democrats aren’t thrilled by the overtures.
“I definitely think it’s tacky and sloppy,” said Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic strategist from South Carolina. “I think that Republicans have gotten bold with wanting to interfere and influence elections for their own benefit.”
For campaigns to meddle in each other’s primaries isn’t new, although it isn’t exactly common. The most notable example came in 2012, when Missouri’s embattled Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill cut faux-attack ads on Republican challenger Todd Akin during his primary, which blasted him as “too conservative.” The ads worked: Akin won the primary, then promptly imploded in the general, and McCaskill punched her ticket to another term in D.C.
For the original deployment of the strategy, many people point to California governor’s race in 2002. In that race, unpopular Democratic incumbent Gray Davis managed to win re-election by torpedoing the strongest Republican opponent, Richard Riordan, in his primary, spending millions on ads pointing out Riordan’s flip-flopping history on abortion policy.
“What Riordan chose to do was run in the primary against Governor Davis, acting like this was a general election campaign, ignoring his Republican opponents, running ads against Governor Davis, shooting his mouth off about Governor Davis, and acting as if he was already the Republican nominee,” Garry South, who ran the Davis campaign that year, told The Dispatch. “So we said, okay, if he wants to play that game, we’ll run in the primary against him.”
Worth Your Time
- We touched on Trump’s remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast up top, but it’s worth re-emphasizing how much of a break from tradition they were at an event that has typically strived for bipartisanship and mutual grace. This Washington Post column by Michael Gerson is a good read on the subject.
- Remember the app that broke the Iowa caucuses? By a great stroke of luck, the New Yorker’s Andrew Marantz was already reporting on the company behind it—D.C.-based tech nonprofit consultancy Acronym—so he turned this interesting piece around pretty quickly. “[CEO Tara] McGowan doesn’t seem reckless or sinister enough to intentionally rig an election. Rather, she seems like a starry-eyed techno-utopian, prone to believing that a wide array of societal ills can be cured by another innovation, another round of investment, or another app.”
Presented Without Comment
Something Fun
Okay, look. Your Morning Dispatchers have strong feelings about the insidious power that the temptation of going viral wields over too many of our lives, causing busloads of Americans each day to do dumb things to themselves and each other in the hopes that a bunch of strangers will be able to see a recording of it and laugh. That’s particularly true when it’s parents doing dumb things to their kids, or letting their kids do dumb things to themselves, in pursuit of those sweet sweet internet points.
And yet—call us hypocrites, but we can’t help it: This video is hilarious.
Toeing the Company Line
- On Wednesday, Thomas Joscelyn’s latest Vital Interests newsletter took a deep dive at the persistent threat presented by al Qaeda and like-minded jihadists. Joscelyn reported on the death of Qasim al-Raymi, a top figure in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, believed to have been taken out by a U.S. strike. Joscelyn wrote: “It is likely that Raymi played a leadership role not just in AQAP, but also in al-Qaeda’s global management team.” Yesterday, the White House confirmed al-Raymi’s killing and disclosed his senior role in the global terror group. “The United States conducted a counterterrorism operation in Yemen that successfully eliminated Qasim al-Rimi, a founder and the leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and a deputy to al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.” To add Vital Interests to your inbox each week, go to your preference page.
- For the latest episode of The Remnant podcast, Jonah was joined by “person from the internet/verified nobody” Bridget Phetasy to discuss meeting on Twitter, the culture wars, drug legalization, writing for Playboy, and the #MeToo movement. Give it a listen!
- In the latest French Press, David drills down on an odd quirk of contemporary political thought: the way our country continues to hand presidents more and more unchecked executive power while simultaneously insisting that having a good man be president isn’t that big of a deal.
Let Us Know
Due to the longevity of Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, the 2020 race has featured its fair share of Midwest Nice. Midwesterners are so naturally kind that they find it difficult to turn on the nasty. Their political shots often come across as passive aggressive — or just passive. Which of these thinly veiled affronts embodies that sentiment the most?
- “I have not denigrated your experience as a local official. I have been one. I just think you should respect our experience.”—Amy Klobuchar to Pete Buttigieg (Link)
- “You’re likable enough, Hillary.”—Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton (Link)
- “I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”—Ronald Reagan to Walter Mondale (Link)
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Photograph of Pete Buttigieg by Win McNamee/Getty Images.
Top posts
THE BLAZE
More from TheBlaze
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … In a Thursday night special, BlazeTV host Glenn Beck laid out the evidence implicating a possible international money laundering scheme linked to Ukrainian gas firm Burisma and former Burisma board member Hunter Biden.The links provided by Beck show that $1.8 million in U.S. taxpayer dollars sent to Ukraine during the Obama administration … Read more
Got friends?
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA |
ROLL CALL
Morning Headlines
Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to rip up President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address on live television enraged House Republicans. But it was Rep. Kay Granger, who once said Trump doesn’t deserve to be in the same room as war veterans, who led the effort to defend the president. Read More…
The president’s fiscal 2021 budget will not include funding for the licensing of Nevada’s Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, a senior administration official confirmed to CQ Roll Call on Thursday. President Donald Trump tweeted earlier what appeared to be a rejection of the long-debated plans for the federal site about 100 miles northwest […] Read More…
House Democrats shut down GOP attempt to admonish Pelosi over ripping SOTU
House Democrats on Thursday backed Speaker Nancy Pelosi in voting to kill a Republican resolution to disapprove of her ripping up President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech. Read More…
House Judiciary Democrats eye campaign finance measures
House members and political money experts debated comprehensive new campaign finance overhaul measures on Thursday, but they heard testimony from a Federal Election Commission member who suggested they might first want to address the existing campaign regulatory infrastructure. Read More…
Interior moves to speed energy development on formerly protected Utah land
Mining, logging and drilling in areas of southern Utah once part of two national monuments would be allowed under plans finalized Thursday by the Interior Department, igniting the anger of conservation groups and congressional Democrats. Read More…
Watch: Suspicious substance investigated outside Schiff’s office
Capitol Police closed off the hallway outside Rep. Adam B. Schiff’s office Thursday due to reports of a suspicious substance. The media was kept from approaching the corridor, but some lawmakers and staff were allowed through. Read More…
Scholar urges ‘great’ debates to improve Hill discourse
If the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress takes the advice of one congressional scholar, then regular Oxford-style debates may make their way to the House floor one day. Read More…
Democrats pan, Republicans applaud Kraninger’s tenure at CFPB
At a hearing Thursday, Democrats castigated Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Kathleen Kraninger, who wasn’t willing to say that her agency needs to exist. In contrast, Republicans applauded her lighter regulatory and enforcement touches. Read More…
CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Copyright 2020 CQ Roll Call. All rights reserved Privacy | Safely unsubscribe now.
1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
|
NBC
From NBC’s Chuck Todd, Mark Murray and Carrie Dann FIRST READ: What stands out after Iowa is Bernie Sanders’ limited crossover appeal Yes, Bernie Sanders could very well end up being the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination – if he wins New Hampshire and Nevada. And especially if Pete Buttigieg/Joe Biden/Michael Bloomberg split up the vote in the party’s moderate lane beginning on Super Tuesday. AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais But now that the dust – or more accurately, all the mess – has settled after Iowa, it becomes clear that Sanders only had an “ok” night in the Hawkeye State. He might have met expectations, but he certainly didn’t exceed them. Turnout was lower than expected. And the entrance poll showed him with limited crossover appeal outside of his young, very liberal base. Sanders got just 8 percent support from Iowa caucus-goers 45 and older. And among seniors 65-plus, it was just 4 percent. While he overperformed among “very liberal” Iowa Dems (43 percent), he underperformed among “somewhat liberals” (19 percent) and moderates (12 percent). He got just 12 percent support from white women college graduates – arguably the heart of the Dem resistance against Trump. And maybe most concerning of all for Sanders, he won more than half of the Iowa caucus-goers who said they supported him in 2016. But he barely registered (7 percent) among the 54 percent of all Iowa caucus-goers who said they backed Hillary Clinton four years ago. So his base – right now – is about half of the Democrats who supported him in 2016. But few else.
(He did overperform with the sliver of non-white Democrats in Iowa, but it’s unclear if that translates outside of the Hawkeye State.) So if he’s really going to be the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination, he’s got to win convincingly in New Hampshire. Remember, this is a state he carried with 61 percent of the vote in 2016.
Kneel before Trump One day later, so much stands out from President Trump’s remarks at the White House after his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial. His vulgar curse word. Calling Democrats and opponents “horrible” and “evil.” The attack on Mitt Romney. But maybe the biggest takeaway from the event is how Trump and Republican lawmakers made it clear that the GOP is Trump’s party – and how members of Congress are subservient to him. One by one, he recognized Republican senators and representatives – not for being impartial jurors, but for defending him and protecting him. “Mitch McConnell, I want to tell you: You did a fantastic job [in the impeachment trial].” “A man [Sen. Chuck Grassley] who got James Comey to choke, and he was just talking in his regular voice… Chuck Grassley is an incredible guy.” “You were unbelievable. You were tough. And you are something. And one of the greatest supporters on the impeachment hoax was [Sen.] Josh Hawley.” “A young woman who I didn’t know at all, but she’s been so supportive — and I’ve had great support from other people in that state. And she’s been so supportive, and she’s been downright nasty and mean about the unfairness to the President. And [Sen.] Kelly Loeffler, I appreciate very much.”
And the number of the day is… six. Six. That’s the number of times before yesterday that the word “bulls****” appeared in the 132,480 records in the American Presidency Project’s White House archives.
Of those six utterances, two were from musical artists (songwriter Diane Warren and rapper Kanye West.) The remaining four were said by Trump.
2020 VISION: It’s debate night in New Hampshire At 8:00 pm ET, seven of the Democratic presidential candidates participate in the ABC/WMUR debate from New Hampshire – the eighth round of Dem debates this season. Those seven candidates: Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Amy Klobuchar, Tom Steyer and Andrew Yang. The debate comes as a new Boston Globe/WBZ-TV/Suffolk poll shows Bernie Sanders at 24 percent, Pete Buttigieg at 23 percent, Elizabeth Warren at 13 percent and Joe Biden at 11 percent. No other candidate is in double digits. More from the poll: “Biden … dropped from 18 percent in Monday’s New Hampshire poll to 15 percent on Tuesday, and then 12 percent on Wednesday, before dropping Thursday to 11 percent,” the Boston Globe writes. On the flip side, “Buttigieg … saw a remarkable jump from the 11 percent he scored in Monday’s New Hampshire poll, catapulting him past Warren and Biden, nearly into first place.” Meanwhile, a Monmouth poll released Thursday shows these numbers: Sanders 24 percent, Buttigieg 20 percent, Biden 17 percent, Warren 13 percent, Klobuchar 9 percent.
On the campaign trail today: In addition to tonight’s Dem debate at 8:00 pm ET, Sanders participates in the Politics & Eggs event in Manchester… Tulsi Gabbard holds a town hall in Somersworth… Deval Patrick hits Concord and Manchester… And Republican Bill Weld is in New London… Outside of New Hampshire, Michael Bloomberg campaigns in Virginia
Dispatches from NBC’s campaign embeds: Pete Buttigieg received an endorsement Thursday from a swing-state Democrat, N.J – Rep. Andy Kim, per NBC’s Priscilla Thompson. “’I used to work at the White House,” Kim told NBC News. “I spent a lot of time in the Situation Room, a lot of time in the oval office on tough issues.’ Kim says he has seen first-hand the challenges a President Buttigieg might face, but that the candidate has been tested in hard times,’ and has a strong moral compass that would serve him well in the White House.” And New Hampshire officials are trying to assuage concerns that their primary will not have any reporting errors, or delayed reporting – and yes, that’s throwing some shade over at Iowa, NBC’s Julia Jester and Amanda Golden report: “NHDP Chairman Ray Buckley expressed full confidence in the NH primary, ‘We’ve had 100 years without an issue,’ Buckley said. ‘We have 100 percent confidence our local election officials along with our state officials will make sure everything runs perfectly.’ Plus, there will be an election day hotline with a team of attorneys ready to respond to issues, and every town will be visited by a polling place inspector from the DOJ.”
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
TWEET OF THE DAY: The Iowa caucuses – an unmitigated disaster
THE LID: How they did it Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we took a breath and tried to figure out what we can learn about Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders from their Iowa success.
SHAMELESS PLUG: New Toddcast! Don’t miss the latest Chuck Toddcast from this week. Jonathan Martin and Eugene Scott talk about EVERYTHING 2020 and how the App-ocalypse hit Democratic primary season.
ICYMI: News clips you shouldn’t miss The Iowa cataclysm: “NBC News review of Iowa caucus vote finds potential errors, inconsistencies.” The president is preparing to reassign Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman as he plans payback for his impeachment foes. Where was Joe Biden yesterday? Holed up with advisers trying to figure out how to save his presidential bid. Half a dozen women of color on Elizabeth Warren’s Nevada team have left amid complaints of a toxic work environment. Bloomberg is taking heat for referring to “some man wearing a dress” during a conversation about trans rights. Trump’s former secretary of the Navy will endorse Michael Bloomberg.
|
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
DESERET NEWS
|
IJR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TOWNHALL
FACEBOOK TWITTER |
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers. |
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
THE FEDERALIST
|
REDSTATE
|
|
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS
|
|||||||||||
|
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
CBS
|
|
|
|
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Buttigieg has a ‘women problem’ in New Hampshire after Iowa speech demonstrated ‘white male privilege’
- Democratic disaster: The Associated Press is ‘unable to declare’ a winner in Iowa
- U.S. military takes out another terrorist leader: Qasim al-Raymi of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
- Six women of color left Elizabeth Warren’s campaign after feeling ‘tokenized’
- John Harwood embraces CNN’s style of ‘journalism’ with ridiculous analysis of Trump speech
- Former Kentucky Deputy Jailer sentenced for repeatedly tasing suicidal inmate to punish him for cursing
- Hunter Biden’s confidential banking records released to Senate for investigation
- Grab your popcorn: The DNC is in full-blown panic over Bernie Sanders
- FiveThirtyEight projects Bernie Sanders to win EVERY remaining primary
- Dinesh D’Souza annihilates the NY Times’ contrasting coverage of two impeachment acquittals
Buttigieg has a ‘women problem’ in New Hampshire after Iowa speech demonstrated ‘white male privilege’
Posted: 07 Feb 2020 05:48 AM PST There were many complaints about South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s caucus-night declaration that he was moving onto New Hampshire “victorious.” Most thought it was presumptuous because a winner had not been declared in the Iowa caucus debacle. Some questioned his confidence since he had connections with Shadow Inc, the company that made the failed caucus app. Now, he’s facing a new round of criticism as prominent Democratic female leaders in New Hampshire are pointing their finger at his “white male privilege” that allowed him to even make such a claim. Even as of today, nobody is fully aware of what the outcome is in Iowa. It seems as if it was essentially a tie between Buttigieg and Senator Bernie Sanders, but officially nobody is willing to make the call, not even the Associated Press. Both campaigns are now claiming victory in the convoluted affair. This new issue hits the Buttigieg campaign just a few days before the New Hampshire primary.
By no means do we support Buttigieg, but we do find it humorous that he’s being attacked in such a petty way from the radical progressives in his party. Things have gotten to the point that literally anything a white male does can be attributed to white male privilege. The far-left (and if we’re being honest, even the “moderate” left lately) has unhinged itself from reality in an effort to build their post-truth society. It’s all about being “woke,” and so far Sanders is the only male candidate who seems to qualify enough. Perhaps it’s his extreme ideology that shields him from scrutiny. After all, Buttigieg is considered to be a “moderate” among his candidate peers. What this really comes down to is election positioning. Those in New Hampshire calling him out, as POLITICO noted, are supporters of Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren. With the possible exception of Joe Biden, nobody would benefit more from a Buttigieg collapse than the “moderate” Klobuchar and chameleon-like Warren who is trying (and failing) to pull support from both the far-left and moderate middle. Democrats have mastered the art of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Nobody, not Pete Buttigieg and not even Bernie Sanders, is truly “woke” enough to appease the bulk of the radical progressives making up the Democratic base today. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Buttigieg has a ‘women problem’ in New Hampshire after Iowa speech demonstrated ‘white male privilege’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Democratic disaster: The Associated Press is ‘unable to declare’ a winner in Iowa
Posted: 07 Feb 2020 04:55 AM PST The Associated press just announced that they won’t be able to declare a winner in Iowa. Meanwhile, Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee called for a “recanvass” of the results of the Iowa caucuses. Party chairman Perez declared ”Enough is enough” and called for this results to assure public confidence in the results.
It should be noted that Pete Buttigieg paid Shadow Inc, the Iowa caucus app company, tens of thousands of dollars in recent months. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Democratic disaster: The Associated Press is ‘unable to declare’ a winner in Iowa appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
U.S. military takes out another terrorist leader: Qasim al-Raymi of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 05:02 PM PST After days of speculation, the White House confirmed today that Qasim al-Raymi, emir of the terrorist group Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), was killed in airstrikes last week. The news was held for a week while U.S. intelligence sought confirmation of the terrorist leader’s demise. Last week, President Trump retweeted links speculating about the emir, but did not confirm with a Tweet of his own. Today, the White House released confirmation. There is no word whether anyone will receive the $10 million bounty for delivering information that alerted the United States to his whereabouts. Qasim al-Raymi has a history of terrorist activities dating back to the 1990s. He was linked to the 2008 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Sanaa and the 2009 “underwear bomber.” Recently, his group claimed responsibility for last year’s deadly shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola by a Saudi National.
This marks another major win for the Trump administration’s efforts against terrorists in the Middle East. Despite the accomplishments, mainstream media continues to suppress or downplay his success out of concern he will win reelection in November. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post U.S. military takes out another terrorist leader: Qasim al-Raymi of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Six women of color left Elizabeth Warren’s campaign after feeling ‘tokenized’
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 04:30 PM PST In November, at a time when there was still a semblance of hope for Elizabeth Warren’s chances of being the Democratic nominee for president, six of her staffers working for the Nevada branch of her campaign resigned. All six were women of color. All six felt their presence was taken for granted, that they were “tokenized” specifically based on their races and sex. Three of the women spoke out to POLITICO in a bombshell report that should sink Warren’s already-dismal hopes in the third race for the nomination. It’s an important race because it will be the first that has a strong minority population after mostly-Caucasian Iowa and New Hampshire. It’s also the one she once had the best chances of winning before Super Tuesday on March 3, but now those chances have slipped away. Her primary competitor in the radical progressive lane, fellow Senator Bernie Sanders, is looking like he’s the man to beat. But Warren has been trying to challenge his hyper-leftism while keeping a foot planted on the “unity” side of the Democratic Party. She wants the best of both worlds and she’s not gaining traction in either. Now, this report could be an existential threat that takes her out of the race before the end of the month.
Warren’s biggest challenge isn’t overcoming her competitors. They have generally avoided taking shots at her other than the during the fourth and fifth debates. Otherwise, a short-lived feud with Sanders and an ongoing back-and-forth against Michael Bloomberg are the only challenges she’s faced externally. Internally, her campaign is proving to be laden with many holes. Assuming she follows up a distant third-place finish in Iowa with a similar loss in New Hampshire, Nevada would have been her best shot. But she has a bigger problem than losing six staffers. According to reports, the campaign is not functioning properly in the state, bringing Spanish-language assets in late and failing to deliver on Spanish-speaking events. Nevada is nearly 1/3rd Hispanic with the vast majority of them being Democrats. These problems do not bode well for her potential to do well there. As her campaign crashes and burns following a promising start, Elizabeth Warren is faced with a serious question. Should she start making a play to be Sanders’ like-minded VP or even Bloomberg’s radical counterbalance? She won’t be the nominee either way. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Six women of color left Elizabeth Warren’s campaign after feeling ‘tokenized’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
John Harwood embraces CNN’s style of ‘journalism’ with ridiculous analysis of Trump speech
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 04:13 PM PST When John Harwood took the job as White House Correspondent for CNN, he was stepping out of the unambiguously biased world of CNBC and into the far-left wacky world of Jeff Zucker’s Trump-hating monstrosity. He has the experience to know exactly what would have been expected of him and it didn’t take long for him to fall into place exactly as Zucker wanted. He made that abundantly clear today following President Trump’s post-impeachment speech. Watch the video. Truly listen to what he’s saying. From analyzing how the lighting in the room was intentional based upon the darkness in the President’s mind to spinning the impeachment rationale of Republicans against them, he flashed his new CNN credentials like a seasoned, unhinged professional Trump-hater. There are two requirements to appear on CNN. The first is they must devote their hearts to taking down President Trump. The second is they must sacrifice their professional integrity to accomplish the first. Welcome to CNN, John Harwood. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post John Harwood embraces CNN’s style of ‘journalism’ with ridiculous analysis of Trump speech appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Former Kentucky Deputy Jailer sentenced for repeatedly tasing suicidal inmate to punish him for cursing
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 03:53 PM PST James Eakes, a former deputy jailer with the Fulton County Detention Center in Hickman, Kentucky, was sentenced today to 48 months in prison and one year of supervised release for willfully depriving a Kentucky citizen of his constitutional rights under color of law. On April 29, 2019, a federal jury convicted Eakes, 54, of willfully depriving an inmate of the right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by assaulting him with a dangerous weapon. According to evidence and testimony, Eakes repeatedly tased inmate L.B. after L.B. cursed at him. ‘The Department of Justice is committed to protecting victims from cruel and unusual punishment,’ said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband of the Civil Rights Division. ‘As demonstrated by this sentencing the Civil Rights Division will relentlessly pursue justice on behalf of those whose rights were abused.’ ‘Each of us in law enforcement take an oath to uphold the rights of all; we don’t get to pick and choose,’ said U.S. Attorney Russell Coleman for the Western District of Kentucky. ‘Victims will be protected, and those found to be violating the law will be prosecuted regardless of their position or what office they hold.’ ‘The FBI will not tolerate correctional officers who violate a person’s civil rights,’ said FBI Louisville Special Agent in Charge James Robert Brown Jr. ‘Former deputy jailer, Eakes, took an oath to protect the inmates under his control. Not only did he abuse his position of authority, but he also betrayed the public’s trust. As civil rights and color of law violations are a top priority of the FBI, we will continue to aggressively pursue law enforcement officials who abuse their power.’ The jury heard evidence that Eakes was first called to L.B.’s cell because L.B. told guards he was suicidal. As required by the jail’s procedures, Eakes and two other female deputy jailers then removed all of L.B.’s possessions from his cell and made L.B. strip naked. Eakes left the cell and closed the door, which automatically locked, leaving L.B. in his cell with only an anti-suicide garment. The evidence and testimony showed that, after he was locked in his cell, L.B. cursed at Eakes from behind the cell door. Eakes then ordered that the door be unlocked, removed his Taser from his holster, opened the door, and immediately shot L.B. with his Taser. Eakes then entered L.B.’s cell, and, while activating the Taser, repeatedly yelled at L.B. not to curse at him again. Despite the fact that L.B. took no aggressive action towards Eakes and remained slumped against the cell wall, Eakes tased L.B. two additional times. The FBI Louisville Field Office, Hopkinsville Resident Agency conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Madison Sewell of the Western District of Kentucky and Trial Attorney Zachary Dembo of the Civil Rights Division prosecuted the case. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Former Kentucky Deputy Jailer sentenced for repeatedly tasing suicidal inmate to punish him for cursing appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Hunter Biden’s confidential banking records released to Senate for investigation
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 01:44 PM PST Why was Hunter Biden, the son of former Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden, paid millions of dollars to sit on a board for a corrupt energy company despite knowing nothing about the industry? We may be on the verge of finding out as confidential bank records have been released to the Senate based on a November request. The irony, of course, is that the House of Representatives was deep into their impeachment inquiry of President Trump. House Democrats and their mainstream media puppets were claiming that neither Joe nor Hunter Biden did anything wrong despite clear quid pro quo by the former Vice President on behalf of his son. Now, Senate Republicans may have information to allow them to dig deeper into the Bidens. Of course, Democrats are already crying foul.
Democrats claimed vigorously the Bidens did nothing wrong and there was no reason to investigate them. Perhaps now, finally, we’ll get to see if that’s true. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Hunter Biden’s confidential banking records released to Senate for investigation appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Grab your popcorn: The DNC is in full-blown panic over Bernie Sanders
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 12:42 PM PST The moment it became clear Senator Bernie Sanders actually won Iowa, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez sprung into action. The only reason his Tweet didn’t come out sooner is because his phone was blowing up with terrified Democratic Establishment mega-donors demanding he take action. Conspiracy theories that the “gold standard” poll that mysteriously never came out because it showed Sanders in the lead were reignited by the debacle of the Iowa caucus itself. This drew more conspiracy theories that the company behind the app, Shadow Inc, was getting the results to Perez and the DNC first. It was at that point, the conspiracy theories postulate, that Perez or his puppetmasters called for caucus chaos to blunt the blow a Sanders victory in Iowa would create. These theories are wild, unimaginable… and totally plausible considering just how desperate the Democratic Establishment is right now. Preventing a Sanders nomination is their first and possibly only priority at this point, which makes the last two Tweets from Perez even more suspicious under examination than it is prima facie.
Many on Twitter on both sides of the aisle simply aren’t buying it.
As badly as the DNC wants Sanders gone, their efforts aren’t translating how they’d hoped. He’s gaining momentum despite their attempts to slow him down. Even FiveThirtyEight is putting him as the frontrunner in ALL remaining primaries. If Bernie Sanders miraculously “loses” Iowa or if the results are delayed for another week or more, the “revolution” we keep hearing about from Sanders supporters won’t rage against the GOP. They will tear down the DNC brick-by-corrupt-brick. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Grab your popcorn: The DNC is in full-blown panic over Bernie Sanders appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
FiveThirtyEight projects Bernie Sanders to win EVERY remaining primary
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 09:43 AM PST Polls are stupid. We learned that clearly in 2016 when all of the major polls except one predicted Hillary Clinton would be the winner of the presidential election. But as long as we’re a people that tries to look forward, we’ll always turn to the polls to see what they’re predicting. One of the most complex predictive models (which allegedly makes them superior to others) is FiveThirtyEight. Before 2016, they had an amazing track record of accuracy, but President Trump’s victory has been a scar on just about every predictive model, including FiveThirtyEight which gave Hillary Clinton a huge chance of winning. Nevertheless, we still look to them as arguably the most reliable model available, and that’s great news for Bernie Sanders. The Democratic Socialist has overcome his heart attack last year to jump into the lead by a mile, according to FiveThirtyEight. In fact, following what may or may not be a narrow loss in Iowa (we STILL don’t know for sure), FiveThirtyEight is projecting Sanders having the advantage in all remaining primaries and caucuses. Things can change quickly and their model is fluid, changing daily based on new data. Moreover, there’s the DNC and the Democratic Establishment which seems hellbent on subverting a Sanders nomination. They’ve called on everyone from President Obama and John Kerry to CNN and the Washington Post to try to not-so-subtly convince Democrats a Sanders nomination is bad news for the party. Apparently, voters aren’t heeding their warnings. They shouldn’t. Before the Iowa caucus on Monday, Joe Biden had a slight edge in the FiveThirtyEight model. But an utterly abysmal 4th-place showing turned the model sour for Biden. He’s still technically the second-most-likely candidate to win, but FiveThirtyEight now has a brokered convention as more likely than a Biden victory. As a conservative, my preference would be to see Sanders win the nomination. It has nothing to do with whether or not he’s the best opponent against President Trump or what would happen down-ballot. Anyone who claims to know either of those answers is delusional. But America needs a reckoning of sorts. We need to have the discussion about conservatism versus socialism and there’s no better time for that to happen than during a contentious presidential election cycle. Until that happens—and it WILL happen at some point—radical progressives will continue to wonder if their message would resonate with the masses if the DNC would simply get out of the way. Obviously, I’m supportive of President Trump’s agenda, but I believe America needs to see his ideas up against a Democratic Socialist sooner rather than later. I don’t want to wait for Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to come of age or Cenk Uyger to make his move. I want to see the grandfather of modern American socialism against the populist currently in the Oval Office. If the DNC doesn’t steal the nomination (again) away from Bernie Sanders, it seems like he’s in the driver’s seat to be the one to take on President Trump. I welcome this as we’ll get to see a proper contrast and stark debate from now until November. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post FiveThirtyEight projects Bernie Sanders to win EVERY remaining primary appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Dinesh D’Souza annihilates the NY Times’ contrasting coverage of two impeachment acquittals
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 08:42 AM PST When President Clinton was acquitted in his Senate impeachment trial, the NY Times took great pains in crafting the perfect headline that properly highlighted the fact that “no majority” voted to remove him from office. This was technically correct as the second Article for Obstruction of Justice was a tie, 50-50. There was “no majority” voting to remove President Trump from office, either. In fact, the majority voted to acquit. One might think a self-proclaimed fair and unbiased news outlet would highlight this in their headline since they did so the last time this situation arose. Nope. They didn’t. And conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza called them out for it.
The headline choice by the left-leaning editorial board of the NY Times went with this divisive headline instead: “Split Senate clears Trump on each count in finale of a bitter impeachment battle.” Let’s break that down with the same care the NY Times used to craft it. They picked the right words to convey their narrative, so let’s see what narrative they delivered this time compared to the one they delivered before. Here’s the Clinton headline: “Clinton acquitted decisively: No majority for either case.” They used the word “acquitted” because it’s a powerful legal term that invokes feelings of innocence. They, of course, didn’t use that word in the Trump headline, opting for the non-legal and more questionable term “cleared.” How did they characterize the two votes? President Trump had a “split Senate” while President Clinton’s vote was “decisive.” These are very different phrases with nearly opposite meanings, but here’s the problem. The combined votes for each trial were equal: 105 to acquit versus 95 to remove from office. How is one “split” and the other “decisive” if the same totals came out of the trials? The only difference: the NY Times loves Democrats and hates Republicans. More specifically, they adored Bill Clinton and revile Donald Trump, and that bias was evident in their headline. Let’s go back to their use of the word “decisively” in the Clinton headline. This was properly crafted to not only improve perceptions of the vote totals but more importantly to invoke closure to the topic altogether. For Trump’s headline, they used the word “finale” in reference to “a bitter impeachment battle.” Of all the wordsmithing they did, this was their masterstroke. Finales are most often associated with television shows. When a show is over, the conversation lives on. This is exactly what they hoped to achieve, that the “bitter impeachment battle” would continue, at least in the minds of voters. Just as there are still opinion pieces being posted regularly about shows like Breaking Bad and The Wire, so too does the NY Times editorial board hope that the topic of impeachment itself will live on until, at the very least, November 3, 2020. The NY Times has made a mockery of the profession of journalism many times in recent years. This is one of their most disingenuous attempts to work their agenda into their propaganda. Kudos to Dinesh D’Souza for point out their hypocrisy. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Dinesh D’Souza annihilates the NY Times’ contrasting coverage of two impeachment acquittals appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 17 new items) |
- At Prayer Breakfast, Trump Slams ‘Dishonest and Corrupt’ Politicians Who Pushed Impeachment
- Mom of Transgender Child Praises South Dakota Legislation
- National Prayer Breakfast, “Trump Acquitted,” Pelosi’s Planned Stunt
- Why Are Democrats So Unhappy?
- What Is Wrong With Speaker Pelosi?
- Virus Censorship
- The Political Tragedy of Mitt Romney
- To Boldly Go Where No Islamist Racist Has Gone Before
- Virginia Republicans: Don’t Run, Fight!
- The Blue Plate Special – Iowa Democratic Caucus Debacle
- One Woman’s Fight to Ensure No One Has an Abortion Because of Finances
- With Trump Acquitted, Will Voters Impeach Dems At The Ballot Box?
- Aussie Government’s Bush Fire Fiasco
- House Democrats’ Myopic Impeachment Crusade Undermined The Constitution
- These Are The Times People Will Remember
- Pentagon Adds Another Base for Quarantining Coronavirus Evacuees
- Over 1,500 Aliens With ICE Detainers Released from the Orange County Jail in 2019
At Prayer Breakfast, Trump Slams ‘Dishonest and Corrupt’ Politicians Who Pushed Impeachment
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 08:50 PM PST
by Fred Lucas: President Donald Trump didn’t let a prayerful audience stop him Thursday morning from calling political opponents who tried to remove him from office “dishonest and corrupt,” but he also didn’t accuse two major newspapers of running fake news on this particular day. Coming to the stage before speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast—one day after the Senate voted mostly along party lines to acquit him in the impeachment trial—the president held up copies of The Washington Post and USA Today with their banner headlines. The gesture prompted laughter from the audience. In a 26-minute speech at the Washington Hilton hotel, Trump emphasized his administration’s work to protect religious freedom at home and abroad. But the president also talked about the impeachment trial in which House Democrats accused him of abusing his power and obstructing Congress by connecting military aid to Ukraine with its agreement to investigate Democrats and election interference. “My family, our great country, and your president have been put through a terrible ordeal by some very dishonest and corrupt people,” Trump said at the 68th annual bipartisan event. “They have done everything possible to destroy us and by so doing, very badly hurt our nation. They know what they are doing is wrong, but they put themselves far ahead of our great country.” It’s not easy to like someone “when they impeach you for nothing,” Trump said. “I’m working very hard for you, I will tell you, and sometimes you don’t make it easy and I certainly don’t make it very easy, and I will continue that tradition, if I might, this morning,” he told the audience. “Weeks ago and again yesterday, courageous Republican politicians and leaders had the wisdom, fortitude, and strength to do what everyone knows was right,” the president said, referring to House and Senate lawmakers’ opposition to impeaching him. All but one, of course, as Trump made a less than subtle poke at Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, without mentioning his name. Romney invoked God and his faith Wednesday when explaining why he would become the only Republican to vote for the article of impeachment accusing Trump of abuse of power. “I don’t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong,” Trump said at the prayer breakfast. “Nor do I like people who say, ‘I pray for you,’ when they know that that’s not so. So many people have been hurt, and we can’t let that go on.” The second half of the president’s comment seemed to be a shot at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who was sitting at the head table. Pelosi routinely has said that the impeachment process was a time to be “prayerful” and that she was praying for Trump even as she got behind the effort to impeach him in the House. “In everything we do, we are creating a culture that protects freedom, and that includes religious freedom,” Trump said in his main remarks at the prayer breakfast, adding to bursts of applause: I also recently took executive action to stop taxpayer dollars from going to colleges and universities that spread the poison of anti-Semitism and bad things about Christianity. We are upholding the sanctity of life—sanctity of life. … And we’re pursuing medical breakthroughs to save premature babies, because every child is a sacred gift from God. … And to give former prisoners a second chance at life, which so many people in this room have worked on for so long, we passed criminal justice reform into law, and I signed it nine months ago. And it’s proving more and more that America is indeed a nation that believes in redemption. What’s happened with [former] prisoners is a miracle. … Something which wasn’t done nearly enough—I could almost say wasn’t done at all—we are standing up for persecuted Christians and religious minorities all around the world—like nobody has ever done. Last year, at the United Nations, I was honored to be the first president to host a meeting [on] religious freedom. … That was the first meeting of its kind ever held at the United Nations. There I called upon all nations to combat the terrible injustice of religious persecution. And people listened. … Religion in this country and religion all over the world—certain religions in particular—are under siege. We won’t let that happen. We are going to protect our religions.Near the end of his remarks, Trump, who grew up as a Presbyterian, drew appreciative laughter and applause after expressing gratitude for the work of those in the room and “for the love they show to religion”:They are brave. They are brilliant. They are fighters. They like people. And sometimes they hate people. I’m sorry. I apologize. I’m trying to learn. It’s not easy. It’s not easy. When they impeach you for nothing, then you’re supposed to like them? It’s not easy, folks. I do my best.Pelosi, who Tuesday night made a public spectacle of ripping up her copy of the president’s State of the Union address, spoke earlier at the prayer breakfast without addressing political developments. “We pray that moral clarity of faith moves us to demand justice for those who are suffering and we pray that commercial interests never blind us to the ongoing human rights struggle fought by so many throughout the world,” Pelosi, a Catholic, told the audience. Speaking later to reporters during her weekly press briefing, Pelosi said it was “inappropriate” for Trump to hold up the newspaper headlines and to get into partisan politics at the annual National Prayer Breakfast. “He’s talking about things that he knows little about—faith and prayer,” she said of the president. |
||
Mom of Transgender Child Praises South Dakota Legislation
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 08:20 PM PST
by Tony Perkins: “It’s an absolute nightmare for a mother to live through.” Elaine Davidson’s voice shook as she talked. “I found out about the surgeries after the fact,” she says haltingly. It was social media, she explained, where she first saw the photo of her daughter’s chest—bloody bandages covering the places where her breasts had been cut off. Elaine’s daughter was 17. She had a double mastectomy and hysterectomy without her parents ever knowing—and without a single psychologist signing off. In Oregon, Elaine says, kids as young as 14 can make this same decision without ever calling home. “These surgeries are done on an outpatient basis, which only required a few visits to a therapist with a master’s in social work. No psychologist, no psychiatrist, no years of therapy like many people think.” And these young, innocent bodies, she struggles to explain, are “permanently marred.” “This is a very, very mutilating surgery.” “I had previously raised concern to a therapist that I believe she’s on the autism spectrum. And I still do. But they dismissed it and instead just really pushed her toward medical transition. And I found out about the surgeries after the fact.” When her daughter decided to have a phalloplasty, Elaine started to cry. “I flew to Portland twice. I begged everyone I could. I begged her. I couldn’t stop it. All I could do was be there for her.” She watched, helplessly, as her daughter changed the course of her life forever. And she is determined that no parent should ever have to suffer that agony without a say again. She joined the Kelsey Coalition, a movement of parents from all across the political spectrum, who are pleading with schools, lawmakers, and doctors to stop pushing children into a lifestyle they can never escape. “I’m speaking out because I love my daughter … She has been a victim of ‘gender affirming’ medical procedures, and I was powerless to stop doctors from harming her.” “Why we are letting children make life-altering, permanent, irreversible decisions about their bodies and about their health when we have enough sense not to let them get tattoos until they’re 18 or drink until they’re 21?” Elaine wants to know. She, like the rest of the Kelsey Coalition, has been asking this question in South Dakota, where the first-ever bill to put an age restriction on gender transition surgery and treatments is moving through the Legislature. “I think this law in South Dakota is a good start,” she agrees. “Sixteen, though, is still extremely young … “ At this point, though, states need to start somewhere. And South Dakota’s Vulnerable Child Protection Act is a commonsense law that would make it illegal to mutilate gender-confused children. It’s time, Elaine insists, to help children “learn to love the bodies in which they were born. Isn’t that what the body-positivity movement is all about? Transgender-identifying children need our compassion, and they need our help. They need responsible adults to gently question their beliefs, not blindly affirm them. They need proper therapy and guidance, not drugs and surgeries.” |
||
National Prayer Breakfast, “Trump Acquitted,” Pelosi’s Planned Stunt
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 07:58 PM PST
by Gary Bauer, Contributing Author: National Prayer Breakfast As he always does, Mike Pence spoke eloquently about the country’s respect for faith. He said, “I believe that prayer and faith are the thread that runs through every era of American history.” Pence noted that President Trump “has made it a practice of opening every Cabinet meeting in prayer.” And he repeated the president’s remarks from Tuesday’s State of the Union address that America does “not punish prayer, tear down crosses or muzzle our pastors.” The president’s speech was also excellent. He recalled America’s deep religious heritage, and our founding principle that our liberty comes from God, not government. President Trump recalled the faith of George Washington and the courageous patriots at Valley Forge, how the families of New York built St. Patrick’s Cathedral long before the city’s first iconic skyscrapers and how America’s civil rights movement was sustained by men and women of faith. Trump added that America is “eternally in the debt of our African American churches. . . For generations, they bravely fought for justice, and lifted up the conscience of our nation. And we are grateful beyond any measure.” The president also noted that his administration has dramatically increased efforts to combat Christian persecution overseas. As a presidential appointee to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, I can attest to the administration’s commitment to this critical issue. Yesterday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the formation of the International Religious Freedom Alliance. More than two dozen nations have already pledged to join the United States in this effort to defend religious freedom worldwide. The president once again condemned the “poison of anti-Semitism,” and reiterated his strong commitment to the sanctity of life, saying, “Every child is a sacred gift from God.” Two lines in the president’s remarks, however, have attracted most of the media’s attention, and I believe the president felt compelled to say them. There were a number of people he could have been referring to, but Nancy Pelosi stands out for the almost mocking way she repeatedly said she was “praying for the president” as she tried to destroy him and his family. Trump said, “I don’t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong. Nor do I like people who say, ‘I pray for you’ when they know that’s not so.” “Trump Acquitted” “It was evil. It was corrupt. It was dirty cops.” Trump said. “It was leakers and liars. This should never, ever happen to another president, ever.” He held up a copy of today’s Washington Post with it’s bold headline, “Trump Acquitted,” and jokingly said, “Maybe we’ll frame it. It’s the only good headline I’ve ever had in the Washington Post.” By the way, Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) is introducing a constitutional amendment to require a super-majority vote in the House to impeach a president, rather than just a simple majority. The point of Scott’s amendment is to ensure true bipartisan support for impeachment, which was Nancy Pelosi’s own standard. And I’m pleased to report that following the conclusion of the impeachment trial, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell immediately moved to begin confirming more of President Trump’s conservative judges! Depressed Democrats The long knives are out too, as the recriminations and finger-pointing begin. Referring specifically to the impeachment fiasco, another Democrat source said that the leadership was “steamrolled by the progressive wing of the party.” I’m with the president on this – I can’t feel sorry for Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, not after what they just put the country through. They should have had the courage to stand up to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s mean tweets, especially after Special Counsel Robert Mueller found nothing. But they caved to the pressure and the country suffered needlessly. And many Democrats are furious. For example:
Pelosi’s Planned Stunt But it seems she planned this stunt. Video has emerged that appears to show Pelosi pre-ripping a few pages of the president’s speech while the first lady is presenting Rush Limbaugh with the Medal of Freedom. Pelosi knew exactly what she was doing. As CNN‘s Brian Stelter put it, her stunt was “aggressively rude, and unapologetically meant to rile up her base. It was divisive, but effective.” Stelter wrote that Pelosi did it to take attention away from Trump’s speech. Speaking of which, a poll conducted by CBS News found that the president’s address was a home run. Seventy-six percent of those who watched the State of the Union liked what they heard, including 82% of independents and even 30% of self-identified Democrats. Here are other key findings:
By the way, several House Republicans filed a resolution disapproving of Pelosi’s actions. They wanted to hold Pelosi to the same standard as Joe Wilson, who was formally reprimanded for his State of the Union outburst. But House Democrats voted it down. The Chaos Continues Speaking in New Hampshire yesterday, Joe Biden said he couldn’t “sugar coat” his fourth-place showing, calling it “a gut punch.” Meanwhile, Tom Perez, chairman of the Democrat National Committee, today ordered a complete recanvassing of the Iowa results. Perez declared: “Enough is enough. In light of the problems that have emerged . . . and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democrat Party to immediately begin a recanvass.” |
||
Why Are Democrats So Unhappy?
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 07:23 PM PST by Bill Donohue: The Democrats are an unhappy people. This has nothing to do with their hatred of President Trump: it’s who they are. Gallup released a poll on February 6 measuring personal life satisfaction. The survey was broken down on the basis of age, sex, income, marital status, family status (e.g. those who have young children), education, race, and political preference. It was found that those who make over $100,000 a year are the most likely segment of the population to say they are satisfied with their personal life. In second place are Republicans. In last place are those who make less than $40,000. Democrats are second to last. Similarly, a Gallup poll released last month on happiness found that Republicans are happier than Democrats. Moreover, the gap is widening between Republicans and Democrats on the scale of being “very happy.” No data were collected based on income. Money may not buy happiness but it clearly has an impact on personal life satisfaction. That is easy to understand. But why are Democrats so unsatisfied and so relatively unhappy? Some might say that because African Americans are more likely to be Democrats and are more likely to be at the low end of the income scale, that racial discrimination is indirectly causing the outcome. That assumption is wrong. The real reason for this divide is religion, not race. Surveys done on wellbeing have consistently found that there is a positive correlation between religiosity (religious beliefs and practices) and happiness; the more religious a person is the happier he is likely to be. This is true worldwide. A survey by the Pew Research Center released last year that measured religion and happiness on a global scale found that “actively religious people are more likely than their less-religious peers to describe themselves as ‘very happy.’” We know from many surveys that blacks are much more religious than whites. Indeed, they have more in common with Republicans when it comes to religiosity than they do with white Democrats. The latter are the most secular segment of the population. So when religion is factored in, we are left with the conclusion that it is white secular Democrats who are the most dissatisfied and the least happy. It is not race and party preference that makes one happy or unhappy. What matters is religiosity. “Why Are Democrats So Unhappy?” The answer lies more with their lack of religious beliefs and practices—driven by white Democrats—than any other factor. |
||
What Is Wrong With Speaker Pelosi?
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 07:05 PM PST
by Marvin Covault, Lt.Gen (Ret): For 82 minutes during President Trump’s State of the Union address, 4 February, 2020, Speaker Pelosi shuffled the papers, chewed on her lip, mumbled at lot at Vice President Pence, scowled and mostly kept her seat as the chamber erupted in applause over 100 times. Let’s make sure we accurately define the venue. This was not a republican campaign speech or political debate. President Trump was there because Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution requires the President to periodically “give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.” Of the last 12 Presidents (Eisenhower through Trump) the Speaker of the House was of the opposite political party during 9 of those administrations. But, they all seemed to find it in their heart to honor the office of the president with a traditional and proper introduction, “Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the President of the United States.” Speaker Pelosi sent an instant, clear message that civility was out the door with her introduction, “Members of Congress, the President of the United States.” Keep in mind the requirement is to, “…. give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union….” With that in mind the content of the address should, therefore, be factual. To meet that requirement, the president proceeded to report to us that over the past 36 months:
And so it went for 82 minutes, factual data describing today’s state of the union. Back to the title question, What is Wrong with Speaker Pelosi? Since 2007, Pelosi has been either the minority leader in the House or, when in the majority, the Speaker of the House. From 2007 through 2016, all of the economic, foreign policy, trade and national security issues enumerated in the long “facts” paragraph above were real problems. The economy was awful, illegal immigration was out of control, foreign policy was a mess and trade deals were very disadvantageous to the US. This is not to say that those bad old days were Pelosi’s fault but for sure she was not instrumental in adopting solutions to any of them. Enter President Trump 36 months ago. He forced through the changes necessary to rapidly turn all the problems into success stories. Pelosi’s role during that period has been to lead the “resistance” and by her own recent admission spent 2 ½ years working to impeach the president. Special prosecutor Mueller was to take care of getting rid of Trump. Another failure. The Ukrainian fiasco was to deal the Trump presidency a lethal blow. Trump’s overall approval rating is up ten percent since the Pelosi impeachment fiasco began last fall and is higher than President Obama after his first three years in office. Given all that, how depressing, frustrating, agonizing must it have been for Pelosi to sit there, behind President Trump, listening to the actual state of the union with millions of Americans watching live as she sat on her hands and chewed her lower lip? Nothing is right in Pelosi’s world right now. Additionally, during the president’s address she demonstrated to all America how callous and uncaring she can be. The president’s guest list:
Every story was heart-wrenching, yet Pelosi sat on her hands unsmiling, not looking at those being honored. It was both disgusting and discouraging to watch. When President trump finished his address, Speaker Pelosi promptly stood up, ripped her copy of the speech in half (a clear violation of 18 U.S.C. 2071 and the Presidential Records Act of 1978.) and departed the House Chamber. On her way out a reporter asked her why she had ripped up the speech. She replied, “It was the courteous thing to do considering the alternatives.” Courteous? Alternatives? Pelosi is in a failed state of mind. While she has spent years in the nation’s senior leadership position (second in line to the presidency) her leadership skills are almost nonexistent. She is not a leader; she is a person obsessed with power in a leadership position. A frightening thought considering her position today. It is her way or the highway. There is a serious culture of blame and hate in this country. Every day in the mainstream media we can see, hear and read the hatemongers throwing gas on the hate fire. By most accounts Pelosi is vindictive, power hungry, obsessed with hate and is leading many democrats in exactly the wrong direction. Generally speaking, America is fed up with divisiveness. However, going forward we will automatically consider that actions speak louder than words. If and when she advocates for a bi-partisan approach to some issue, her demonstrative ripping up of the speech at the State of the Union on live TV for all to see will rule the day. Whatever effectiveness she had following the impeachment debacle, will now certainly be diminished. After taking an objective look at the actual State of the Union today, if you are a disciple of Speaker Pelosi, I have two questions for you.
—————————- |
||
Virus Censorship
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 05:45 PM PST by Kerby Anderson, Contributing Author: Here’s a trivia question. Why was the massive flu epidemic in 1918 called the Spanish flu? The pandemic originated in France and other countries. But news of it was censored during World War I. The pandemic only received greater press attention when it arrived in Spain in November. Spain was not involved in the war and had not imposed any wartime censorship. During that same time, the US government also tried to play down the Spanish flu lest it hurt the war effort. Paul Wolfowitz and Max Frost remind us that a Los Angeles health official declared there was “no cause for alarm.” An Arkansas newspaper described the disease as merely the “same old fever and chills.” All of this was happening while people were dying by the thousands. By the time three waves of the flu spread across the nations, 50 million people died. Perhaps you can see where I am going with this commentary. Censorship and secrecy make a deadly flu virus even more devastating. That is what seems to be happening in China. The Chinese Communist Party is all about social control and censorship. We really don’t know what is happening on the ground. We do know that the Chinese government has been taking extraordinary measures to restrict movement and thus the spread of the disease. Perhaps the current actions are due to China’s experience with the SARS outbreak that killed more than 700 people in 34 countries around the world. But we do have to wonder if we are getting accurate information from a government that assured us last month that the virus was “under control” and merely a “mild condition.” Censorship back in 1918 took a deadly virus and made it more lethal because common sense actions were implemented too late. We can only hope and pray this time that we are getting good information. |
||
The Political Tragedy of Mitt Romney
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 05:29 PM PST . . . The Utah senator’s vote to convict Trump is an example of why he lost in 2012. Romney has served his country, including saving the 2002 Winter Olympics while working for free and serving a term as governor of Massachusetts, also forgoing his salary. He twice ran for president, which takes an enormous commitment of time and energy that, in Romney’s case at least, indicates a deep love for the country and a desire to make it better. The same can be said for Trump’s decision to run for the office. Had Romney won in 2008 or 2012, our nation would have been spared all or some of the woeful Barack Obama years. As we noted in 2016, Romney was right about Trump’s numerous flaws. (If President Trump’s personal life had been closer to Romney’s, the GOP would potentially be in a much better position in the suburbs.) And Romney has been correct about our departure from the principles of the Founders. That said, despite grasping the problem, Romney is a deeply flawed messenger who is unable to bring himself to do what needs to be done in order to get back to those principles — partly because he has been on both sides of every important issue. Trump, character flaws and his own flip-flopping notwithstanding, has been willing to fight the Left. Arguably, Romney’s “good guy” persona has rendered him unable to deal with the realities we currently face. In 2012, he was viciously attacked as a tax cheat by Harry Reid and accused of wanting to put African Americans back in chains by Joe Biden. Had a fraction of the fire and energy Romney aims at Trump been directed at Reid and Biden in the 2012 election, Romney would have won and rendered Trump unnecessary. Instead, he’s relegated to throwing barbs at Trump from the Senate, even if he does support the president’s agenda 80% of the time (more than several other Republicans). While turning the other cheek may be good for the soul, in politics, it is unilateral disarmament. Romney’s vote to convict burned a lot of bridges and, in 2024, he will have to face the voters of Utah, who will render their verdict. He may well end up a one-term senator when he could have been a good president. That is the real tragedy. |
||
To Boldly Go Where No Islamist Racist Has Gone Before
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 05:09 PM PST by Daniel Greenfield: Even before Picard had aired, CBS All Access’ latest pathetic attempt to compete with Netflix by monetizing the Star Trek brand, had telegraphed that it would be another social justice disaster. Patrick Stewart had described the streaming series as “me responding to the world of Brexit and Trump”. The response is a social justice tantrum that, like its STD predecessor, is a train wreck that takes the obligatory shots at President Trump, FOX News, Brexit, and our refusal to admit Islamic terrorists. The latest ‘Woke Goes Broke’ entry though will still help finance the Roddenberry Foundation. And the Foundation, named after the original creator of the Star Trek TV series, will continue financing radicals. The Roddenberry Foundation has already announced its 2020 class of ‘fellows’. The criteria are not scientific research or literary excellence, but shrill leftist tantrums and identity politics bigotry. And the ‘class’ of those getting a $50,000 award includes Linda Sarsour: an Islamist bigot. Linda Sarsour fills the coveted Roddenberry Foundation ‘anti-Semitic’ slot previously held by Charlene Carruthers, a Women’s March board member, anti-Israel BDS activist, and admirer of Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan is the leader of the racist hate group, The Nation of Islam, who has praised Hitler. The Roddenberry Fellowship announced Sarsour’s place in its 2020 class after the outcry over her leadership of the Women’s March due to her support for Farrakhan and anti-Semitism. Around the time of the Roddenberry award, Sarsour had made yet another bigoted remark, claiming that Israel, “is built on the idea that Jews are supreme to everyone else.” Not a problem for the Roddenberry Foundation. There is a certain irony in a foundation named after a militant atheist promoting an Islamist who defends the abuse of women in Muslim countries. But it’s the same hypocrisy that transformed a leftist movement skeptical of religion into the biggest cheerleaders for a crude and violent belief system. Where Gene Roddenberry had once ridiculed religious people, “for most people, religion is nothing more than a substitute for a malfunctioning brain” and “if people need religion, ignore them”, the Roddenberry Foundation now funds Islamists who believe that the Koran must rule America. Last year’s Roddenberry Islamist was Alia Salem: the former head of CAIR’s Dallas-Forth Worth branch. CAIR, a Muslim Brotherhood organization with links to Hamas, has a theocratic vision of the future. CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad had declared, “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” And, presumably, throughout the galaxy and across the universe. If given a chance. Salem was named in 2019, the same year that Charlene Carruthers had also been named as one of the Roddenberry fellows. Carruthers had praised Farrakhan as “wise and selfless”, accused Israel of “apartheid” and praised the “righteous fight for BDS.” While Roddenberry was not Jewish, many members of the show’s cast, writing, production, and technical staff were. It is unfortunate that the Roddenberry Foundation is using the proceeds from their creative work to subsidize hatred of Jews. While Roddenberry has long since passed away, his resentment against the role of the Jewish figures involved in Star Trek had flared up in the past. “Gene was anti-Semitic, clearly,” Leonard Nimoy, the Jewish actor who had portrayed Spock, told a journalist. “I saw examples not only of him practicing anti-Semitism, but of him being callous about other peoples’ differences as well.” But the Roddenberry Foundation’s funding of bigots has less to do with Roddenberry’s own issues than with its embrace of militant identity politics. Another irony for a foundation funded with the proceeds of a series that had once condemned racial divisions and separatism as reactionary and destructive. Carruthers is one of a number of black nationalists funded by the Roddenberry Foundation. That includes Alica Garza, a co-founder of Black Lives Matter, who had declared that, “whiteness has no shame.” In her twisted racist mind, “whiteness” is a mythical evil force which “attempted to de-fang the power of Black Lives Matter as a slogan and a rallying cry with All Lives Matter.” The idea that all lives don’t matter is central to black nationalism as a supremacist ideology. Garza had also agreed with Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic comments about Jews. “My sister Ilhan correctly identified powerful forces, like AIPAC, that are shaping policy and practice not only in this country but all over the globe,” Garza said. “So much so that this president began to attack our sister and call her anti-Semitic.” This is the sort of gutter bigotry that the Roddenberry Foundation and the Star Trek brand now funds. And yet it’s another paradox for a foundation named after a former member of the LAPD to embrace racists who hate the police. Gene Roddenberry hadn’t merely worked for the LAPD while trying to kickstart his entertainment industry career, he had based Spock on the LAPD’s Chief William Parker. Parker, who made the LAPD what it is, has been a favorite whipping boy of contemporary noir LA movies. He’s also the man who called police, the “greatest dislocated minority in America”. Roddenberry had written speeches for Parker during the Watts Riots and during later riots, had called in favors from old pals at the LAPD to protect his sets, and had even pondered using a phaser rifle from Star Trek to deter potential rioters. During an even later riot, he had reportedly carried an actual rifle. If Roddenberry were around today, there’s little doubt that the people the foundation named after him funds would violently hate him. And, at some point, his name will have to come off the foundation. That auto-cannibalism is a fundamental element of progressive politics which devours its founders. Gene Roddenberry’s secular humanism is unfashionable in an age where progressive means embracing Islamism. His military and law enforcement background gave Star Trek a structure, but would soon be unfashionable even in his own time. His philandering feminism would set off #MeToo alarm bells today. Star Trek’s racial integration is equally outdated in an era when racial separatism is touted instead. Today the Roddenberry Foundation funds racialist activists who want to dismantle the criminal justice system and consider police officers to be racist murderers. That is the legacy of leftist politics. There is in the end no country, no planet, and no galaxy for dead lefties. Just their money. The original Star Trek with its love of naval tradition and disdain for hippies, its vision of racial integration and scientific progress, is as politically unfashionable as its creator. It endures in the great intellectual property garbage bin of Hollywood, which is no longer capable of creating anything new, but obsessively recycles all the old names, Star Wars, Star Trek. Lost in Space, and attaches them to disposable rants about Trump, Brexit, and whatever political meme is ascendant this year. And the money goes to fund leftist racists boldly going into a future where no bigot has gone before. |
||
Virginia Republicans: Don’t Run, Fight!
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 05:02 PM PST
by Richard McCarty: There seems to be a lot of resignation, defeatism, and despair over the damage that Democrats are doing to the Commonwealth of Virginia – which is exactly what the Democrats want – but that is the wrong response. Now is not the time to retreat or surrender; it is time to counterattack. As scandal-plagued Democrats mindlessly check off liberal agenda items to pander to special interest groups, they are handing Republicans issue after issue with which to rout them at the next election. Here is just some of the radical legislation that Virginia Democrats have proposed or advanced this year:
As if their legislative agenda were not bad enough, Democrat politicians are also huge embarrassments to the Commonwealth. For starters, Gov. Ralph Northam (D) admitted to wearing blackface but claims not to know why he had the nickname “Coonman” in college or how a photo of someone wearing a Klan outfit and another person in blackface wound up on his page in his medical school yearbook. State Sen. Joe Morrissey (D) is a disbarred attorney, who fathered a child with his 17-year-old secretary and served time in jail; unbelievably, Democrats have appointed him to the Judiciary Committee. Del. Ibraheem Samirah (D) is such an anti-Semite that he posted on social media that he thought it was “worse” to give money to Israel than to the KKK; he also has ties to Hamas, a terrorist organization. Del. Chris Hurst (D) was just caught drinking and driving, but escaped arrest due to his office. Del. Dawn Adams (D) was sued by a former staffer who alleged that the delegate required her to do private sector work without additional pay and that the delegate hacked her email account to hide the evidence. Finally, Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax (D) has been credibly accused by two women of forcible rape, and not a single Democrat – including Del. Eileen Filler-Corn (D), the first female House Speaker – lifted a finger to investigate or impeach Fairfax. To be sure, many conservatives across the Commonwealth are ready to fight. We have seen that in the massive turnout at many local government meetings where constituents have demanded their officials declare their areas Second Amendment sanctuaries. Those who may be feeling depressed at the current state of affairs in Virginia should take heart from these gun rights activists. There are no permanent majorities, and Virginia Democrats do not have anything close to huge legislative majorities. Just flipping eight seats, puts them right back where they so richly deserve to be — in the minority. So we should spend less time thinking about how we can split up the Commonwealth, or join another state, or move to a more Republican state; and we should spend more time thinking about how we can recruit more volunteers, appeal to more voters, raise more money, and recruit and train more quality candidates to take our Commonwealth back. As appalling as the Democrat agenda is, it is hard not to grudgingly respect their determination to conquer solidly Republican states, such as Texas. Republicans need to do much more long-term strategizing and be just as determined and subversive as Democrats are. After we send the Democrats packing in Virginia, who says that we cannot also flip New York, Illinois, or Oregon with enough time and resources? Virginia Democrats think that they can just buy a narrow legislative majority and turn a moderate, family-friendly, and business-friendly state, overnight, into a cesspool like California. They also think that there is nothing we can do about it. Let’s teach these arrogant Democrats a lesson they will not soon forget. Instead of looking for somewhere to flee from these radicals, we should be working to retake the Commonwealth. Virginia’s worth fighting for. Who’s with me? |
||
The Blue Plate Special – Iowa Democratic Caucus Debacle
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 03:22 PM PST by Paul Jacob, Contributing Author: The biggest stories don’t always come in threes, but they sure did this week. The Iowa Democratic Caucus debacle, President Trump’s State of the Union Address, and the Senate’s acquittal of the president after the House’s impeachment — big stories of big losses for Democrats. As I write this, we still lack a “winner” on the Democratic side in Iowa. Blame is publicly given to the goofy “app” the Iowa Democratic Party bought to make the caucusing and counting oh-so-much easier. But I wouldn’t blame Bernie supporters for engaging in a little conspiracy conjecturing — the maker of the app has close ties to the Clinton machine. And if you cannot sniff a concerted anti-Bernie agenda on the part of establishment Democrats, your sniffer is broken. Indeed, The Young Turks ably showed how major-media news sources skew stories away from the socialist from Vermont — by emphasizing the candidacies of Biden and Buttigieg.* One can see why centrist Democrats would want to scuttle a serious socialist movement within their party, but it may be too little too late. After decades of courting the Gimme-Gimme vote with Loot the Rich demagoguery, socialistic attitudes have long been on the menu. So getting a hot, steaming socialism served back at them as a Blue Plate Special? Priceless. Literally. But not costless. For the cost is reasonability and decorum. After Trump ceased speaking before Congress yesterday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi ripped up copies of the president’s address just to show her disdain for the president. But it also shows frustration. The speech is over. Impeachment is over. Iowa is, incredibly, not yet over. And Pelosi’s party — under her guidance — is in complete and utter disarray. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. * Ana Kasparian makes a pretty convincing case that Senator Bernie Sanders is the most popular of the three, and could even bring in independent voters. |
||
One Woman’s Fight to Ensure No One Has an Abortion Because of Finances
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 03:01 PM PST by Lauren Evans: Emily Berning, co-founder and president of Let Them Live, shares on “Problematic Women” that she saw a gap in the pro-life movement. “Crisis pregnancy centers are amazing. They do so much work and save so many lives, but a lot of them don’t have the funding to pay for rent for women that come in or car payments for an extended period of time,” she says. “That’s where we come in,” Berning, our Problematic Woman of the week, adds of her organization. “Because 73% of women who are getting abortions are doing it because of financial reasons.” Read the full interview with Berning, posted below, or listen on the podcast: Plus, this week we take a deep dive into Taylor Swift’s new documentary “Miss Americana” and her new political activism. We also look at some of the surprising new emojis coming out this year, including a gender-neutral Santa Claus and transgender flag. And we try to figure out what exactly a “classic millennial sex pickle” is. Lauren Evans: Welcome back to the show. It is now that time of the week, the time to crown our Problematic Woman of the Week. This week [our Problematic Woman] is someone who is so passionate about the life issue. She spends her livelihood going out and finding women who need help and need assistance and gets them that assistance. That woman is Emily Berning, the co-founder and president of Let Them Live, an organization whose mission reads, “Defending the defenseless against abortion worldwide.” Emily, you’re on the phone. Emily Berning: Yeah. Great to talk to you, Lauren. Evans: Yeah, we’re so excited. Can you tell our listeners a little bit about you? Berning: Yeah, absolutely. My name is Emily. … When I was in college I really started getting passionate about the life issue and I went to work for the Leadership Institute, and that’s where I met my husband who’s also very passionate about the life issue. We both live in Fort Wayne, Indiana, which is where our nonprofit Let Them Live is based out of. We are busy with three dogs and running the nonprofit. It’s a joy to be able to do what I’m passionate about with my husband day to day and know that we’re helping moms and unborn babies. Evans: That is so great. Emily, when did you really realize that you were pro-life? Berning: My parents growing up were pro-life. I grew up in the Catholic Church. I think it was always implied that you’re pro-life and I always had that base level, being against abortion, but I didn’t really understand what Roe v. Wade was. I didn’t really form my own opinions. When I was in college … I actually studied biology in college and I was on track to go to vet school. Then for some reason I sparked an interest in the topic of abortion. That’s when I really started reading a lot of books and forming my knowledge around the subject. Being a biology major in college, it was basically a no-brainer to be pro-life because being pro-life is pro-science. Really college and then afterward starting work with Leadership Institute, doing the actual activism on college campuses really cemented my belief. Evans: I want to actually talk a little bit about your time at LI and the activism that you did. What was your role at LI and how did doing activism in college and on college campuses prepare you to start an organization like Let Them Live? Berning: Yeah. I worked for LI first semester in the fall of 2017, I was a field representative for the North East, New England region. I was in the Massachusetts and Rhode Island and Connecticut area, then I also got moved up to Vermont. I had a lot of ground to cover and it was really awesome. It was a really great experience. I love LI and I learned so much about organizational leadership. Morton [Blackwell] taught us so many things about how to go out and be a self-starter and start these groups. I basically became a pro at getting other people’s groups started on college campuses. I think that really led into my ability to be able to start an organization myself. It also prepared me to handle a lot of the pushback that we get as a pro-life nonprofit on college campuses. College campuses are extremely hostile to any conservative pro-life viewpoint. Being on college campuses and helping students deal with that has also prepared me to deal with that flack on our end as well. Evans: There are so many great pro-life nonprofits out there. Why did you specifically want to start Let Them Live? Berning: Yes. There are definitely a ton of awesome pro-life nonprofits. I think at first glance, it can seem like the pro-life movement is pretty jam-packed already with nonprofits that fill every part of the pro-life movement. What we realized in forming Let Them Live was that there is an untapped market for financial aid and financial support for women who are on the edge, about to have an abortion, to help bring them back and choose life instead. Crisis pregnancy centers are amazing. They do so much work and save so many lives, but a lot of them don’t have the funding to pay for rent for women that come in or car payments for an extended period of time. Some of them can’t do that at all. That’s where we come in. Because 73% of women who are getting abortions are doing it because of financial reasons. That’s from the Guttmacher Institute. We thought, gosh, we can target that easily. Money is no problem … LI’s got the fundraising down. We’ve been to international school fundraising and things like that. We’ve learned so much. Then we thought we can absolutely fundraise for these moms—something that other organizations haven’t tried yet or haven’t been able to do yet or that’s just not their focus. We wanted to fill that area and supplement the rest of what the pro-life movement is doing. Evans: How do you do fundraising for these moms? Do you go out and do more direct mail? Do you out meet with donors? Do you fundraise online? Berning: Yeah, it’s a little bit of all that. We will be working on a direct mail program here pretty soon. My husband is actually … a social media guru. We built Let Them Live up from the ground on social media from zero likes to I think we have combined on our three social media platforms—Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter—we have probably over 70,000 followers. Because we built that up, we’ve been able to run a really effective crowdfunding campaign. Typically, what a situation will be is we ended up contacting or getting contact with a mom who’s referred to us possibly by a crisis pregnancy center or a sidewalk counselor. Then if it’s an emergency, which it usually is, the abortion is usually scheduled for the next day or the next week. We will run an emergency fundraiser for her on social media and crowdfund. We have an amazing donor base that have been so generous. We always contact our donors. They’re always very happy to help. Pro-life people are very eager and excited, for the most part, to contribute to something like this, because it is directly helping a mom choose life. Then we have a few other larger donors that we go to meet, have meetings with, things like that. It’s few different areas. I would say social media has been the biggest money-maker for Let Them Live and for these moms. Evans: … The money that you raise and you give to these women, where does that money typically go to? Berning: We never give money directly to the moms. That’s something that we always clarify and always make sure … all of our donors and everybody knows is that if we raised $25,000, … we’re not mailing a check to the mom for $25,000. We’re taking every step possible to ensure that the donor money is being used wisely. I feel I am a steward of their money, so I like to make sure that is taken care of. Typically, with a mom we will pay her landlord directly if that’s the problem. Or, gosh, the other day I paid a Verizon bill, I’ll pay gas bills and utility bills, things like that. We’re always paying money directly to where it’s being due. Evans: You mentioned that you work with crisis pregnancy centers and different folks to find these women, but once you find these women, what is your relationship with them like? Berning: Yeah. We actually are transitioning right now, which is great. We are bringing on a couple of crisis pregnancy counselors or people to connect with the pregnancy centers and manage the cases, manage the case load of the moms. For the longest time I’ve been the one and my husband’s been the one talking to the women. We will get to know them, get to know their situation a little bit, figure out their financial situation. It is a very deep, personal relationship because we are asking questions that other nonprofits probably won’t be asking these moms. We basically want to get to know them as a person. We try not to make it a very businessy because these moms are on the edge. Essentially, the pro-life movement does have to refocus on these moms because, ultimately, they’re the ones walking into that abortion clinic and they’re the ones who [are] ultimately deciding to do that. We want to reach them where they’re at. We will counsel them for as long as they need. Talk to them, be available to them. Then once they say, “OK, I can, I think I can accept your help,” we have a contract and an agreement for them to sign and then we can proceed with helping them. We have to have a verified ultrasound and things like that from our crisis pregnancy center. We do a lot of that back-end stuff as well. We do go visit them sometimes as well. We just got back from Atlanta a few weeks ago visiting one of the moms that we’re helping. She was just really struggling. Her parents don’t support her, the father of her child left and said, “Here’s money for an abortion.” She was really struggling so we decided to fly down to see her and that really helped nurture that relationship between us. Evans: How relieved are these women once they find out that this financial burden is taken off of them? Berning: My gosh. It’s like night and day, really. We have so many stories and comments and testimonies from these moms … We actually created a banner for CPAC [the Conservative Political Action Conference] because we’ll be tabling at CPAC, little shameless plug there. We have a banner of all these statements from the Let Them Live moms and a lot of them are so clear as day: “If you hadn’t helped me and relieved me of this financial burden, I would have made the worst decision of my life in having an abortion.” It’s just palpable. These moms … even if we’re just texting, it’s just so obvious that money was clouding their view and the burden of their bills was really hanging over them. I’m like anybody else, we all understand financial burden, we all understand having bills that have to be paid and maybe understanding that you may not have enough money in the bank to pay for those bills. Any financial help is such a relief and can really, really change a person’s mind. These women don’t want to have abortions. They don’t want to go in there and do that, but they feel they have no other option. When we come in and step in and help them take over their bills, they feel they are seeing with clear vision. Evans: Why do you think the financial burden drives so many women to having abortions? Berning: That’s a great question. I think a more broader look at this is human nature. A lot of people are motivated by money. We see that in our culture today, it’s ingrained in our culture, in American culture today. The having money means you have value and if you don’t have money, you’re going to have to do other things in order to make it work. I think that money, it’s a huge motivator for things. Lack of money is often the same way. Not having enough money makes you not really think correctly and makes you make drastic decisions. Even though most people would be OK without having an abortion and not having money. I think money is such a weird influence on human beings in general. That’s why we try to step in and take that burden away because at the end of the day, money is just money. If it’s $2,500 or $15,000, that will help ease a woman’s mind and help her to back out of that abortion, then we’re totally going to do it for her. Evans: Yeah. What a small value compared to a human life. Berning: Yeah, yeah. I think a lot of people put so much value on money in our society, but we don’t step back to think, “Well, gosh, what is this human life worth, though?” If a mom said, “I am $100,000 in debt and I don’t think I can do this,” we would find a way to get rid of that or at least help that burden, take that burden off of her. We would do it, for sure. Evans: That’s amazing. How does adoption play into what you guys do? Berning: Adoptions [are] very interesting and awesome. We’re huge, obviously, advocates of adoption. My sister-in-law was adopted from China 13 years ago and so we’re definitely huge advocates of adoption. We get reached out to all the time by adoptive couples, people ready to adopt saying, “If any of these moms decide that they want to put their baby up for adoption, we will do it. We’ll take care of all their expenses.” Things like that. … The wonderful part is that there are so many people ready and willing to take on another person’s child. The sad part is that … something very common that I hear is that, I’ll ask a mom, “Have you considered adoption?” She’ll say something along the lines of, “I couldn’t do that. It’d be too painful to put my child up for adoption. I will either keep it or kill it.” Basically, keep it or have an abortion. Some moms do consider it and then they don’t end up doing it. They’ll end up parenting. Yeah, sadly what I hear from the moms [is] that they don’t want to do an adoption and that they’ll either, like I said, have an abortion or keep it. This is definitely conversation that needs to be had. I do my very best to put that out there and in the social media sphere and outside pro-life people because I think a lot of people think it’s a very easy decision. On the outside looking in, sure, but the adoption process is very gruesome or grueling and it’s very difficult. For the moms it’s a very difficult decision, too. We get a lot of pro-life people that will comment on our posts saying, “Put it up for adoption. Put it up for adoption.” A lot of moms don’t want to make that decision. If it comes down to it and she says, “I would rather have an abortion than do an adoption,” we’re going to do everything we can to ensure that she doesn’t have that abortion and that will involve taking on her financial burden. I think the pro-life movement does need to shift a little bit and see that sentiment that the moms are having. Evans: One interesting component of Let Them Live is that you guys work with the pro-choice community, correct? Berning: Yeah, yeah. Honestly, in our minds, the more moms and babies we can help, the better. There is, I don’t know how big, but a portion of the pro-choice community that does things to support us and people that have donated to us before that identifies as pro-choice. We’re pretty proud to be a pro-life organization that bridges the gap. Evans: How do you think that the media and all the coverage that it gives to movements like “Shout Your Abortion,” how does that affect the young women that you guys are counseling and helping? Berning: I think that the culture, especially with the Shout Your Abortion movement and book, the culture is if you don’t know what to do in a situation, in a crisis pregnancy, it seems the default is to go have an abortion. It seems that the sentiment is you can just go have an abortion. It’s a quick fix to your problem. No problem at all. It’ll be in and out in a couple of hours and you’re done. You never have to think about it again. That’s the sentiment that the Shout Your Abortion campaign presented by picking and choosing only women who are masking a lot of the underlying feelings that come after abortion. Women that are in these crisis pregnancies are only hearing that abortion was amazing and abortion was the best thing they ever did. Things like that. They’re getting a very one-sided perspective. It’s actually awesome that you brought up “Shout Your Abortion” because after I read that book, I was really angry because I know so many women who are post-abortive that do not feel they want to shout it from the rooftop. I wrote a book called “Shout Your Abortion Too,” … which is essentially based off of “Shout Your Abortion.” It’s a platform for women and men who have had abortion experiences that regret it to share their story because they were left out of the conversation completely because they don’t have an abortion story that fits the narrative of the abortion lobby. “Shout Your Abortion Too” gave a voice and gives a voice to those as women and men as well that obviously were hurt by their abortion experiences. We’ve been circulating that around pregnancy centers, sending that directly to the moms to give them a more balanced view of the actual abortion to date. That book has actually helped four moms cancel their abortion by reading the book alone. I think it’s important that there’s a more balanced perspective of … how [abortion] can actually affect these moms. Evans: Wow, that sounds incredible. If any of our listeners want to read the book or buy the book for someone else, can you let us know where they can purchase that? Berning: Yeah. We are going to be putting it on Amazon pretty soon, but it is on our website letthemlive.org and it’s up there. We just ordered another round. They’re $30. The proceeds is all a donation to Let Them Live for the moms in crisis pregnancies. It’s going toward a good cause and you can be able to participate in the stories that are in there. Evans: Speaking of stories, before we wrap, I wanted to ask you, do you have one story that really shows the impact that your organization has? Berning: Yeah, absolutely. Let me pull it up really quick. It’s on one of our banners … I talked about the statements that we had from the moms and I think that some of these are very impactful. Maybe I can read you some of their quotes because there’s so many women that we’ve worked with that have become basically a part of our family. One mom, her name is Miriam and she was actually given money by the National Abortion Federation to go have an abortion. That’s another reason why we do it. We do it because there are organizations out there that are giving women money to have abortion. If there’s organizations giving women money to have abortions, there need to be organizations giving money to women to choose life. Evans: Absolutely. Berning: Miriam … texted me this, gosh, a couple of months ago and said, “I wouldn’t be this far in my pregnancy if it wasn’t for you. You have done a lot more than others have my whole life and it’s nice to not feel so alone for once.” That hit because a lot of these moms … don’t have family around, and if they do, they’re typically being pressured into abortion. They don’t really have any support and that breaks my heart because these are human beings trying to make it in life. It made me feel really good that we are there for Miriam. Atoria is another really great, great story and great save. Atoria lives in California and when she got in contact with us, she was about 19 weeks pregnant. … It’s really scary when we have moms in California because abortion is paid for. They can have abortion basically up until birth. It’s pretty much free for all in California. She was very back and forth. She canceled her abortion a few times and then rescheduled. One day she called us and she said, “I’m sorry, I have to have this abortion.” We knew she was so alone. My husband and I hopped on a red-eye immediately to fly to San Francisco. We went to her and we told her we were there for her and we showed her we were there for her and she started crying to me. She said, “Emily, I was about to have a two-day abortion and then after my abortion I was going to go to this one parking garage and jump off the parking garage and commit suicide.” I thought, “My God, if we hadn’t been there, not only would her baby had been aborted, but she would have jumped off a parking garage.” Evans: Wow. Berning: In that moment it hit me, there’s a reason we do this work and this is the dirty work that nobody wants to do. Everybody wants to do a lot of the froofy activism. Yes, it’s great to talk about how abortion is so bad and all these things, but at the end of the day, we have to get down and dirty. We have to get our hands dirty. We have to get into these situations with these moms to save their lives and to save their baby’s lives. It is not work that is fun. It’s heartbreaking, but it’s also rewarding because Atoria’s baby is going to be due March 1st and Miriam’s baby’s due March 7th. We’re going to be flying all over the place from coast to coast meeting these babies, seeing these moms enjoying life. That’s what I’m most looking forward to because we’ve been through so much with these moms. They’re our family and … it’s the best work. It really is. Evans: Wow. That is incredible. I just want to pivot, one last question we ask every guest on our show … is, do you consider yourself a feminist? Yes or no? Berning: Yeah, yeah. I hate that word though because I am not a feminist in the sense that how the left has taken that over. I hate what they’ve turned it into. I’m like a Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul feminist. The real feminists that fought for real rights for women, the right to vote and they were pro-life and they recognized the dignity of a pre-born child and they recognized the dignity of the woman and how abortion destroys that dignity. If I say I’m a feminist, I’m one of those feminists and not one of the women’s marchers wearing the pussy hat. Evans: Awesome. I love that. I love that everybody has such a great answer. It’s always different but it’s always so great. Berning: Yeah, we have to take that word back. Pro-life is pro-woman. There was a great graphic I saw. Our graphic designer for Let Them Live, she did something, it says “If your feminism is pro-abortion, it’s not feminism.” That’s the angle that the pro-life movement has to take. Evans: Yeah, no, that is great. If our listeners are interested in learning more about your organization, where can they go? Berning: Social media is the best place. Facebook: Let Them Live, Instagram, Twitter. Our Instagram is pretty popping right now. Also our website, letthemlive.org. Evans: That’s great. Emily, thank you so much for your time today. Berning: Yeah, thank you so much, Lauren. |
||
With Trump Acquitted, Will Voters Impeach Dems At The Ballot Box?
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 01:27 PM PST by J. Frank Bullitt, I & I Editorial Board: The impeachment of President Donald Trump, far from being a long national nightmare, was an extended Washington-based tantrum by Democrats. It’s going to be interesting to see how the public treats them in the November elections. Many will be reelected without drama. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is safe in her San Francisco seat, as is Rep. Adam Schiff, who won his wealthy, bright blue Los Angeles district with more than 78% of the votes in 2018. Rep. Zoe Lofgren, one of the seven impeachment managers, took nearly three-fourths of the votes from her district, which sits partly in Silicon Valley in the single-party state of California. Rep. Jerry Nadler will have no trouble in his New York City district. He’s been in the House since 1992 and won two years ago with more than 81% of the vote. But others who don’t represent exclusive, elitist enclaves might find that voters, weary of the impeachment charade, the promise of permanent impeachment, and the waste of public resources to sate revenge-minded politicians, dole out harsher treatment in 2020. Naturally the conventional media, and the “analysts” they consult with, believe that it will be the other way around, that the Senate Republicans who didn’t vote to remove Trump from office, and felt they had heard enough without demanding more witnesses, might be in trouble. “For the handful of senators who face tough reelection battles this year, their vote to acquit or convict Trump, or even to call witnesses in the trial, could loom large when voters consider whether to give them another six-year term,” Reuters said last month. The hard-left British Guardian was happy to report a few days ago that “grassroots activists are planning a massive ‘payback project’ designed to punish Republican senators at the ballot box.” Meanwhile, columnist Andres Oppenheimer called American University political historian Allan Lichtman, who told him that impeachment might cost Trump “dearly in the November elections.” For his part, Oppenheimer admitted that he is “afraid” the entire impeachment chapter “may be long forgotten before the election.” What won’t be forgotten, because Trump won’t let it, nor should he, is on the eve of his acquittal, Pelosi made a show of ripping up her copy of his State of the Union address. It was an act of disrespect not often seen. If it was an attempt to score political points, it failed to produce the effect she was looking for. “I’m a Democrat, but I no longer will vote Democrat,” a caller told C-Span shortly after the speaker’s theatrics, which were as much about the hatred that ignited the impeachment as they were about Trump’s address. Another said, “I’ve been a Democrat for 70-some years and what I saw tonight was appalling to me. … What I’ve seen tonight of the Democrat party, I am changing my mind. … I’ll probably stay home.” Yet another admitted “I used to be a Democrat.” But now she is “no longer.” The impeachment of Trump was nothing more than ugly partisan politics. And as Republican South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said from the Senate floor Wednesday, “the people of the United States are fed up with this crap.” Expect the fed-up voters of deep red Alabama to express their anger when Democratic Sen. Doug Jones, who voted for conviction, is on the fall ballot for reelection. Alabama voters favored Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 by a 63-35 margin, but Jones by fewer than 2 percentage points when he won the 2017 special election to replace Jeff Sessions. “I know that if I’m the senator from Alabama and I vote to throw Donald Trump out of office and off the ballot,” Scott Jennings, a GOP strategist, told the New York Times, “my chances” for reelection “drop from whatever they were to zero.” The carnage might also spill over to the House, where the Democrats hold a 35-seat majority. They can take no solace in polls that showed the public narrowly split on impeachment and removal. For one, the trend isn’t encouraging for them. Impeachment and removal faded from large support for last fall to a small gap in Trump’s favor. They also know the “fed up” voters are likely to be more motivated to go to the polls than those who might still be sulking that they couldn’t get rid of Trump. Democrats also have to deal with high congressional disapproval ratings. This is more of a problem for them than Republicans, because they own the House, where every member has to run for reelection every two years. “We feel very, very confident that come November [voters] are going to make the right decision and Speaker Pelosi’s term as speaker of the House will not go beyond this year,” House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Liz Cheney, Wyoming’s lone House member, said Wednesday. Odds are good voters will reject, as well, the Democratic presidential nominee in favor of Trump. He or she will simply be an extension of the House Democrats’ get-Trump cabal. Voters should also oust the likes of Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Lofgren, and the other Democrats behind the farce for dragging the country into their filthy hogpen. They of course won’t. But if they did, it would be the start of a better era. |
||
Aussie Government’s Bush Fire Fiasco
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 01:09 PM PST by Tom Balek, Contributing Author: I just returned from a bucket-list trip to Australia, during the height of the bush fire season, and found the bush was not the only thing burning. The left-leaning news media’s hair is ablaze as well. TV news channels covered the fires 24/7 with only an occasional break to promote President Trump’s impeachment or to bash Aussie Prime Minister Scott Morrison for vacationing during the fire crisis. Government officials jostled for position in front of the cameras day and night next to the ubiquitous deaf interpreters signing feverishly (why weren’t they obsoleted with the advent of closed-captioning?). Coverage of the brave firefighters and neighbors who gave their lives trying to save towns, farms and homes from the vicious fires, was absolutely in order. There are many heroes and much destruction. But the elite leftist globalists just could not pass up the opportunity to blast the “climate change” siren over the top. The state of Victoria on the southeast corner of Australia was particularly hard hit, as was part of New South Wales south of Sydney. We traveled extensively through NSW and Queensland, the adjacent state to the north. While we saw some evidence of burned rural areas, we did not run into any live fires, large burnouts, or damage to buildings. The fire damage we saw actually looked pretty minimal – relatively small areas of grass and undergrowth burned, but with new green grass filling in; a few trees destroyed, but most only lightly charred at the bottoms with indications that the trees remained alive and healthy. And we saw abundant wildlife and birds. While there was damage to animals, exaggeration was the order of the day in the news, with reports that “up to a billion animals have died“, conjuring up images of stacks of smoldering koalas and kangaroos. That number must include insects. We learned about some “koala hospitals” where people bring in the cute little critters who have been injured, but they care for dozens of animals, not thousands. Driving through the small towns in the bush and talking to the locals was illustrative. One retired small business owner said, “This is nothing new, we have had drought in this area all my life.” He blamed “the government and the greenies” for policy changes over the last decade that prohibit preventative burning and the clearing of dead brush for the buildup of fuel that, once lit, is very hard to stay ahead of. For example, one law mandates that for each tree removed from a yard, even dead ones, nine new trees must be planted. If you have a small yard that won’t accommodate nine trees, or if you have a lot of dead trees, forget it. Piers Akerman, a member of the NSW Rural Fire Service for six decades, wrote a scathing editorial in the Sydney Telegraph, saying the effect of “climate change” on bush fires is so small as to be immeasurable, blaming instead the government red tape that consumes much of the time and money that could be applied to managing fires. According to Akerman, “we’ve had at least 57 inquiries into bushfires since 1939 and each one has highlighted the need to reduce the amount of fuel that naturally accumulates in the bush. That’s a fact.” Akerman continued, “We know that Aboriginals burned this country for a number of reasons. Farmers used to use fire to preserve their properties and livestock, too, until the bureaucrats and activists got in the way.” I talked to another fire official from NSW who confirmed Akerman’s observations, and met an American fire official on our flight back to the USA who had been flown to Australia with a large group at taxpayer expense to “fight the fires”. She sure didn’t look or sound like she had been battling any deathly out-of-control blazes. My guess is she was ornamental at best. The bush fires of 2019-2020 and the persistent drought conditions in Australia are not to be taken lightly. Lives and property have been lost to the frighteningly virulent fires. Fortunately, it rained much of the time we were there, and the fire threat was greatly reduced. One small town in the Blue Mountains was very worried about the lake that is the source of their public water, but it healed from 9% capacity to 29% almost overnight, a two-year supply. Flooding replaced fires as the main concern in some areas, and we saw rivers and lakes looking pretty healthy. The worst of the extended drought appears to be over. Closer to home, our own Bureau of Land Management has been following similar fire protocols, as California has learned. It is only a matter of time before the dead undergrowth in the beetle-killed forests of Montana explode into a deadly fire on a scale that could dwarf the Aussie bush fires. |
||
House Democrats’ Myopic Impeachment Crusade Undermined The Constitution
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 01:00 PM PST Through Their Single-Minded Pursuit Of Impeachment, House Democrats Trampled On The Constitution’s Separation Of Powers, Attempting To Elevate The House Majority At The Expense Of The Senate, The Executive Branch, And The Supreme Court House Democrats Tried To Dictate Procedures To The Senate HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI (D-CA): “[J]ust to get this off the table right away, if we impeach the President immediately, everybody moves on to the next thing. The next thing for us will be when we see the process that is set forth in the Senate, then we’ll know the number of managers that we may have to go forward, and who we would choose…. When we see what they have, we’ll know who and how many we will send over.” (Speaker Pelosi, Press Conference, 12/19/2019) · SPEAKER PELOSI: “Clearly, do you understand, when we see what their process is, we will know who and how many we want to send over. Not until then.” (Speaker Pelosi, Press Conference, 12/19/2019) SPEAKER PELOSI: “[T]his morning, Leader McConnell said, ‘We’ll be glad to show [the resolution] to you when we unveil it.’ It is important that he immediately publish this resolution, so that, as I have said before, we can see the arena in which we will be participating …” (Speaker Pelosi, Letter to House Democrats, 1/07/2020) · SPEAKER PELOSI: “As I said right from the start, we need to see the arena in which we are sending our managers…. In October, we put forth H.R. 660, which is House Resolution – which talked about the terms under which we would proceed further – to further proceed with the investigation, so the people knew what the battlefield would look like. We expect to see that here.” (Speaker Pelosi, Press Conference, 1/09/2020) HOUSE MANAGER REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): “The desire is to get a commitment from the Senate that they’re going to have a fair trial, fair to the president, yes, but fair to the American people.” (CNN’s “State of the Union,” 1/5/2020) REP. JIM CLYBURN (D-SC): “I think that we have to ensure that the Senate will come to the table, work out a process through which we can have a fair and impartial trial. That’s what I think.” (CNN’s “New Day,” 12/19/2019) · REP. CLYBURN: “Why would the speaker of the House step into that without trying to determine exactly what the majority leader plans to do? So I applaud [the Speaker] for this. In fact, I was one of the ones arguing that this ought to be the case. And until we can get some assurances from the majority leader that he is going to allow for a fair and impartial trial to take place, we would be crazy to walk in there …” (CNN’s “New Day,” 12/19/2019) · CNN’s JOHN BERMAN: “As long as it takes — are you willing to hold the articles indefinitely if Mitch McConnell doesn’t concede the points that you’re asking him to? Are you suggesting it’s possible you will never transmit the articles of impeachment?” REP. CLYBURN: “If it were me, yes, that’s what I’m saying” (CNN’s “New Day,” 12/19/2019) House Democrats Declared That Only They Could Decide When The President Could Assert Executive Privilege HOUSE MANAGER REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): “To say that we are concerned that the White House will attempt to stonewall our investigation, much as they have stonewalled other committees in the past, it’s why I say the White House needs to understand that any action like that, that forces us to litigate or have to consider litigation, will be considered further evidence of obstruction of justice.” (Rep. Schiff, Press Conference, 10/2/2019) HOUSE MANAGER REP. ZOE LOFGREN (D-CA): “With all the back-and-forth about these documents, we have heard the phrase ‘executive privilege.’ The President and his lawyers keep saying—they talk about a vast legal right to justify hiding the truth, withholding information. But that is a distraction. That is not what the Constitution provides…. Here is the truth. The President, Members of Congress, judges, and the Supreme Court have recognized throughout our Nation’s history that Congress’s investigative powers are at their absolute peak during impeachment proceedings—your powers. Executive privilege cannot be a barrier to give absolute secrecy to cover up wrongdoing.” (Rep. Lofgren, Congressional Record, S.388, 1/21/2020) · REP. LOFGREN: “Michael Duffey defied the House’s subpoena. At the President’s direction, he refused to appear. The White House did not assert any privileges or immunities when it directed Duffey to defy Congress’s subpoena. It wasn’t a real exercise of executive privilege. They told him not to appear, and they had no reason why.” (Rep. Lofgren, Congressional Record, S.523, 1/23/2020) HOUSE MANAGER REP. JERRY NADLER (D-NY): “Make no mistake. President Trump had no legal grounds to block Ambassador Bolton’s testimony in this trial. Executive privilege is not a spell that the President can cast to cover up evidence of his own misconduct.” (Rep. Nadler, Congressional Record, S.426, 1/21/2020) HOUSE MANAGER REP. HAKEEM JEFFRIES (D-NY): “You will no doubt hear that the reason the President blocked all of these witnesses, including Mr. Mulvaney, from testifying is because of some lofty concern for the Office of the Presidency and the preservation of executive privilege. Let’s get real. How can blocking witnesses from telling the truth about the President’s misconduct help preserve the Office of the Presidency? This type of blanket obstruction undermines the credibility of the Office of the Presidency and deals the Constitution a potentially mortal death blow.” (Rep. Jeffries, Congressional Record, S.410, 1/21/2020) House Democrats, Aided By Their Senate Colleagues, Tried To Drag The Chief Justice Into Impeachment Proceedings, Predetermine Potential Litigation For The Supreme Court, And Undermine The Court’s Legitimacy HOUSE MANAGER REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): “[T]his amendment would … allow the Chief Justice and it would allow senators, the House managers, and the President’s counsel to make use of the experience of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to decide the questions of the relevance of witnesses.” (Rep. Schiff, Congressional Record, S.430, 1/21/2020) REP. SCHIFF: “We have a very capable justice sitting right behind me who can make decisions about the materiality of witnesses. We trust the Supreme Court Justice, the Chief Justice, to make those decisions.” (NBC’s “Meet the Press,” 1/26/2020) · REP. SCHIFF: “[T]he Senate rules allow the presiding officer to make judgments and to rule on issues of evidence, materiality, and privilege. That is permitted under your own rules. We don’t need to go up and down the courts. We have got a perfectly good judge right here.” (Rep. Schiff, Congressional Record, S.765, 1/31/2020) HOUSE MANAGER REP. ZOE LOFGREN (D-CA): “[H]ere’s the thing. The Chief Justice of the United States is presiding over this trial. If he signs a subpoena for a witness to come, we’re going to get that witness. We’re not going to be in court for three or four years. We’re going to get that witness promptly.” (CNN’s “State of the Union,” 1/26/2020) SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “[W]e had an amendment; it was Chris Van Hollen’s amendment, before McConnell’s resolution was adopted so we could offer it that said Roberts should have to rule. Now, still, the Senate rules would allow the Senate to overrule Roberts, but the weight of his ruling would matter. And we liked that. And we hoped that could happen.” (Sen. Schumer, Press Conference, 1/28/2020) · SEN. SCHUMER: “I’d just say this. If it’s a tie, it will be up to the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice knows that every trial has witnesses and documents.” (Sen. Schumer, Press Conference, 1/31/2020) SEN. SCHUMER: “If the U.S. Senate issues a bipartisan subpoena, signed by the Chief Justice, any lawyer would advise their client to comply. If someone like Mr. Mulvaney still refused, we’d make a motion asking the Chief Justice to order Mulvaney to comply. We could settle any and all potential claims of executive privilege right on the Senate floor.” (Sen. Schumer, Press Conference, 1/29/2020) · SEN. SCHUMER: “[M]y belief is, as I said, subpoenas with the Chief Justice’s signature on them with bipartisan support would get right through the courts …” (Sen. Schumer, Press Conference, 1/28/2020) · SEN. SCHUMER: “[W]ell if John Bolton wanted to come testify and it was a subpoena signed by the Chief Justice passed in a bipartisan way he would be here in a day. He could go to court but he would be testifying in a day.” (Sen. Schumer, Press Conference, 1/29/2020) SEN. ELZABETH WARREN (D-MA): “At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the Chief Justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?” (Congressional Record, S.717, 1/30/2020) Left-Wing Special Interest Group Demand Justice, Led By A Former Schumer Staffer, Ran An Ad Campaign Attacking Chief Justice John Roberts “Demand Justice announced a paid ad campaign calling out Chief Justice John Roberts’ failure so far to ensure a fair impeachment trial, and urging Americans to call the Supreme Court to demand he do so.” (Demand Justice, Press Release, 1/27/2020) “Brian Fallon is co-founder and executive director of Demand Justice. Fallon worked as the Director of Public Affairs for the U.S. Department of Justice during the Obama administration. Prior to that, he was a top aide in the United States Senate, working for New York Democrat Chuck Schumer. In 2016, Fallon served as the National Press Secretary for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.” (“Brian Fallon,” Demand Justice Website, Accessed 2/05/2020) · BRIAN FALLON: “I learned from [Chuck Schumer] more than I’ve learned in any other job.” (“How Hillary Clinton’s Press Secretary Self-Radicalized and Became a Resistance Leader,” The Daily Beast, 5/16/2019) DEMAND JUSTICE: “Senator Warren is right. This trial is a sham, John Roberts is hurting his own legitimacy by enabling it.” (Demand Justice, @WeDemandJustice, Twitter, 1/30/2020) · “Now, Roberts might even help Republicans cover up key evidence…. Roberts has the power to subpoena [John Bolton] and other potential witnesses. He has the authority and the responsibility to put truth and law above his party. He needs to hear from us every day until he does. Donald Trump isn’t above the law, and John Roberts shouldn’t be above hearing from the American people when he abuses his office to help Republicans.” (Demand Justice, Email, 1/29/2020) · “Republicans are breaking the rules, lying under oath, and suppressing evidence. But they aren’t doing it alone — they’ve had John Roberts’ help every step of the way.” (Demand Justice, @WeDemandJustice, Twitter, 1/30/2020) · “Tell John Roberts: Start acting like a judge, not a Republican politician. …” (Demand Justice, @WeDemandJustice, Twitter, 1/30/2020) · “Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans have stolen our democracy and John Roberts is driving the getaway car.” (Demand Justice, @WeDemandJustice, Twitter, 1/30/2020) · “John Roberts is enabling the Republican cover-up because he’s a partisan Republican.” (Demand Justice, @WeDemandJustice, Twitter, 1/29/2020) BRIAN FALLON: “What Warren gets, and few others in that chamber do, is that extending the Chief Justice the benefit of the doubt and sitting back and praying for him to do the right thing – on witnesses, on Roe, voting rights, money in politics – will get us nowhere. He needs to be challenged” (Brian Fallon, @brianefallon, Twitter, 1/30/2020) · FALLON: “Warren is the only Democrat so far to put Roberts on the spot.” (Brian Fallon, @brianefallon, Twitter, 1/30/2020) Tags: House Democrats, Myopic Impeachment Crusade, Undermined, The Constitution To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
These Are The Times People Will Remember
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 12:08 PM PST
by Frank Miniter: When Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City and the founder of multiple gun-control groups, announced he was running for president, he also said his news service would not investigate him or his rivals who are vying for the Democratic Party’s nomination. He said Bloomberg News, which has over 2,000 employees, would, however, keep investigating and writing opinion pieces about President Donald J. Trump. This means that the many reporters with Bloomberg News have basically been given marching orders to openly behave as operatives of the Democratic Party. This prompted David Martosko, the U.S. politics editor for the Daily Mail, to tweet: “I predict Trump rallies will include this: ‘Is there a Bloomberg reporter back there in the fake news section? They fly on Air Force One every day and chase me around but Little Mike won’t let them investigate ANY Democrats. It’s crooked as hell.’” The possibility of that being said by Trump at a campaign rally was quickly dashed, however, as the Trump administration responded by announcing that Bloomberg’s reporters would not be given press credentials to attend Trump’s campaign events. The thing is, Bloomberg’s anti-journalistic move is not surprising. His gun-control group Everytown for Gun Safety, for example, already won’t speak with reporters who won’t print its propaganda almost verbatim. Everytown isn’t interested in honest, bipartisan fact-finding on issues related to guns any more than Bloomberg is in this campaign. Even Bloomberg’s political website states: “Taking on the Gun Lobby: While other elected officials live in fear of the NRA, Mike has led the effort to stop gun violence and keep communities safe.” This declaration is hardly an attempt to bring people together to find the best ways to reduce homicide rates where they are high, such as in areas with stringent gun-control laws. Rather, it’s a political statement, a declaration from Bloomberg that he intends to do all he can to vanquish his political opponents—meaning you and this civil-liberties association. This is an election in which Bloomberg is all in with his $55-billion fortune. Whether he is the nominee or not, his money will be a big factor as he attempts to fool people into voting away their freedom for perceived security. Bloomberg is selling policies that don’t create better, freer and safer communities. After Bloomberg declared that his large news company would openly behave as a political machine, he went to Colorado to unveil the basic framework of his gun-control agenda, which (no surprises here) includes: So-called “universal” background checks; a new ban on popular semi-automatic rifles and so-called “high-capacity magazines;” raising the age to buy a gun of any type to 21; a two-day waiting period for all gun purchases; a gun-owner licensing scheme; a repeal of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act so that anti-gun activists can sue a gun maker out of business if a criminal uses its product illegally; and much more. These are positions that, unfortunately, all of the leading candidates now hoping to be the Democratic nominee pretty much agree on. Obviously, if you care about American freedom, this is not an election season to be complacent. This is an election in which our freedom will be on the ballot. |
||
Pentagon Adds Another Base for Quarantining Coronavirus Evacuees
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 11:54 AM PST by Oriana Pawlyk: The Pentagon says it will use yet another U.S. military base to host up to 75 people in need of quarantine and possible treatment for the new coronavirus from China. Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts agreed this week that Camp Ashland, a Nebraska National Guard base roughly 30 miles from Omaha, will house the latest evacuees at the request of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Defense Department said Wednesday. Officials told local news affiliates in Nebraska that the evacuees would arrive at Eppley Airfield in Omaha, where they will be ushered to a remote and isolated aircraft parking area before being brought to the base. Roughly 1,000 evacuees are being taken to four other bases — Travis Air Force Base and Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in California; Fort Carson in Colorado; and Lackland Air Force Base in Texas. Those bases are in addition to March Air Reserve Base in California, where nearly 200 evacuees arrived last week. Charter flights have been leaving China throughout the week to evacuate American citizens from Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province, where the coronavirus is believed to have originated. Roughly 350 passengers aboard two jetliners landed at Travis on Wednesday morning. Though none of the evacuees is showing symptoms of the virus, they will be quarantined at the base for the next two weeks, according to The Sacramento Bee. Similar restrictions are in effect at the other installations. HHS “will be responsible for all care, transportation, and security of the evacuees,” the DoD said in a statement Wednesday. “This includes limiting the movement of the evacuees on Camp Ashland.” The same policy applies to all bases being used for the quarantine effort, officials said. Military and DoD personnel “will not be in direct contact with the evacuees and will minimize contact with personnel supporting the evacuees,” according to the statement. “Should routine monitoring of the evacuees identify ill individuals, HHS has procedures in place to transport them to a local civilian medical facility. HHS will also ensure that no evacuated personnel are transferred to any DOD installation if they are infected or ill.” Earlier this week, Esper spoke with Air Force Gen. Terrence O’Shaughnessy, head of U.S. Northern Command, on new arrangements for the additional evacuees, DoD spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said. According to the World Health Organization, more than 3,000 new cases were confirmed in China over the last 24 hours, bringing the total to 24,363. So far, there have been no reports of confirmed cases of coronavirus among the evacuees at March, though a child was recently hospitalized after developing a fever, The Associated Press said. There are 12 confirmed cases of the coronavirus in the U.S. |
||
Over 1,500 Aliens With ICE Detainers Released from the Orange County Jail in 2019
Posted: 06 Feb 2020 11:28 AM PST by ICE: Orange County Sheriff’s Department confirms California’s SB54 has led to more crimes, victims. WASHINGTON — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Acting Director Matthew T. Albence has repeatedly expressed concerns about how state or local policies limiting cooperation with ICE can lead to more crime. According to data recently released from the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, in the two years since the implementation of California’s State Bill 54 (SB54), the sheriff’s department has rearrested more than 400 of those they released on whom ICE had active detainers. The aliens who were rearrested include those with charges including: rape, assault with a deadly weapon, child sex offenses, domestic violence, identify theft, and driving under the influence.“I applaud Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes for his continued efforts to explain why these sanctuary policies do not make sense when it comes public safety. This is exactly what ICE has said time and again. These policies do nothing but ensure that criminals are released back into the community, where many re-offend, instead of being turned over to ICE. These are preventable crimes, and more importantly, preventable victims. As the data released by Sheriff Barnes clearly demonstrates, all communities are safer when local law enforcement works with ICE.” – Acting ICE Director AlbenceThe Orange County Sheriff’s Department data showed: In 2019:
In 2018:
The Orange County Sheriff’s Department noted these numbers only reflect those arrested on new charges at the Orange County Jail; these statistics do not account for individuals who may have been released and committed crimes in other jurisdictions. SB 54 restricts law enforcement from notifying, transferring and communicating with ICE regarding certain offenders. “SB 54 has made our community less safe. The law has resulted in new crimes because my deputies were unable to communicate with their federal partners about individuals who committed serious offenses and present a threat to our community if released,” said Don Barnes, Orange County Sheriff-Coroner. “The two-year social science experiment with sanctuary laws must end. Rather than protect our immigrant community, the law has enabled offenders to be released, often times back into the immigrant communities they prey upon, and create new victims.” ICE lodges detainers on individuals who have been arrested on criminal charges and who ICE has probable cause to believe are removable aliens. The detainer asks the other law enforcement agency to notify ICE in advance of release and to maintain custody of the alien for a brief period of time so that ICE can take custody of that person in a safe and secure setting upon release from that agency’s custody. When law enforcement agencies fail to honor immigration detainers and release serious criminal offenders onto the streets, it undermines ICE’s ability to protect public safety and carry out its mission. |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
TWITCHY
|
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
|
This email was sent to rickbulow74@live.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails you may unsubscribe at any time.
HOT AIR
ADVERTISEMENT | ||||||||
|
|
|
|