Good morning! Here is your news briefing for Wednesday February 19, 2020
THE DAILY SIGNAL
Feb 19, 2020
|
Good morning from Washington, where the Trump administration outlines a new policy on socialist Venezuela and conservatives defend the attorney general from partisan revisionists. Fred Lucas has both stories. On the podcast, we look at the threat to freedom posed by the Chinese telecommunications company Huawei. Plus: judges who need to be reined in, the left’s takeover of U.S. colleges, and liberals’ wrongheaded anti-Trump attacks on national security grounds. Ten years ago today, pro golfer Tiger Woods makes a televised apology for marital infidelities and admits to “selfish” and “foolish” behavior, beginning a long road to a dramatic comeback. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add morningbell@heritage.org to your address book to ensure that you receive emails from us.
You are subscribed to this newsletter as rickbulow1974@gmail.com. If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters, or opt out of this newsletter, please click here to update your subscription. |
THE EPOCH TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAYBREAK
|
THE FLIP SIDE
BRIGHT
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
|
Copyright © 2020 MEDIADC, All rights reserved.Washington Examiner | A MediaDC Publication 1152 15th Street NW Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20005 |
You received this email because you are subscribed to Examiner Today from The Washington Examiner. Update your email preferences to choose the types of emails you receive.We respect your right to privacy – View our Policy Unsubscribe |
PJ MEDIA
The Morning Briefing: Michael Bloomberg Is Satan—Discuss
Hear Me Out
Michael Bloomberg, the former seventy-two-term mayor/dictator of New York City, has encountered a new, seemingly unbeatable foe as he rises in the polls: his past.
Politicians who have been in the public eye for a long time are target-rich environments when it comes to finding things from long ago to bite them in the you-know-what.
Bloomberg’s backside is under attack by a school of sharks right now.
When he is not torpedoing his chances of winning any votes in the Heartland by calling farmers stupid, Bloomy is being haunted by some straight-up racist comments from his not-too-distant past, when he said “black and Latino males” “don’t know how to find jobs, don’t know what their skill sets are, don’t know how to behave in the workplace,” at which point he was bailed out by an interviewer before saying something about his weekend plans to torture a litter of puppies.
He is at least an equal opportunity condescending moron, hating white midwesterners as much as he does people of color.
Let us not forget that when Bloomberg is not sweeping the hand of hate over entire demographics, he is Public Enemy No. 1 of every legal gun owner in America.
I have long contended that northeastern Republicans are really just moderate Democrats from a bygone era. Bloomberg is proof positive of that. He’s merely transitioned across the Democratic spectrum. His paternalistic condescension and authoritarian impulses — he’s the one who decided how much soda the people of his city should drink — make him a perfect Democrat.
One of the more interesting aspects of this 2020 Democratic political drama is that every seemingly “sane” alternative to Bernie Sanders who emerges as the Next Great Non-Socialist Hope ends up being a bigger publicity liability than the previous one. Bernie really doesn’t have to do much other than stand around belching up the word “Billionaires!” every few minutes whilst his opponents wage a “dumb stuff he/she said” war of attrition.
At the rate things are going this week, Bloomberg may yet emerge as the most awful person in a field of remarkably awful people. Stay tuned, we’ll let you know if any video is found of him complaining about nursing homes being a waste of real estate and advocating for their inhabitants to be euthanized en masse.
¿Dónde está la biblioteca, Elena?
The pattern won’t be broken anytime soon. Amy Klobuchar is the next up-and-comer in the Dem ranks and she’s already wandering into “OMG WILL SHE JUST SHUT UP” territory.
PJM Linktank
VodkaPundit: Death By Socialism: Sanders Takes Huge Lead Over Rivals
Obama Won’t Intervene in Primaries Even if Sanders Wins. Well… Unless…
Major Islamic Conference on Reform Concludes by Reinforcing Radicalism
[WATCH] Touching U.S. Army ‘Pershing’s Own’ Tribute to Rush’s Neil Peart
REPORT: Attorney General Barr to Quit Over Trump’s Tweeting?
Remember Those Aborted Baby Parts For Sale? Our Government Bought Them With Your Money
The Media, Like the Blacksmiths Before Them, Complain About No One Buying Their Product
Roger Stone Sentencing Will Go on Despite Request for New Trial
From the Mothership and Beyond
VA House Dems Punish Senator Who Helped Kill Northam Gun Ban Bill
File under “Missing the Point.” UConn Hosts 2A Panel With No Second Amendment Advocates
LOL #GameChanger or something. Cher Endorses Biden On Twitter: “Don’t Give Up Joe”
Team Bernie To MSNBC: You Know Who’s Been More Fair And Balanced To Us, Right?
Iowa Man Allegedly Kidnapped Woman And Forced Her To Watch ‘Roots’ To ‘Better Understand Her Racism’
The Plague Of “Squeegee Kids” Is Spreading
Trudeau Calls For Patience As Canadian Railways Have Been Shut Down For 12 Days By Protesters
That took an unexpected turn: Scientists program locusts to sniff out bombs, explosives
Can confirm. Ways Fitness Can Benefit Your Finances
It’s Time for the Supreme Court to Correct Google
Buttigieg on Private Insurance: ‘I Don’t Care’ if People Lose Preferred Coverage
Kira: Tragic Decline: Boy Scouts of America Declares Bankruptcy
Bee Me
The Kruiser Kabana
This Briefing is still 100% coronavirus-free.
___
PJ Media Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.”
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
|
DESERET NEWS
|
POLITICO PLAYBOOK
DRIVING THE DAY
G’MORNING, and happy debate day.
A NEW CHAPTER in the Democrat-on-Democrat war inside the party will be on full display tonight in Las Vegas when the entire field goes to battle with MIKE BLOOMBERG. BUT …
BREAKING … ANOTHER DEM-ON-DEM FIGHT is about to start. THE BIG TENT PROJECT — a Dem 501(c)(4) group aimed at boosting moderates — has $1 MILLION to spend in South Carolina and Nevada to bash Sen. BERNIE SANDERS (I-Vt.). The group’s executive director is JONATHAN KOTT, a former top aide to Sen. JOE MANCHIN (D-W.Va.). (C4s don’t have to disclose donors, so we won’t know who is behind this.)
THEY ARE RUNNING TWO ADS, as of now, spending $200,000. But the group views this effort as a test run, both in the pair of states and in the broader effort to try to whack SANDERS.
ONE AD accuses SANDERS of dumping waste in Latino communities — and making money off of it.
THE OTHER AD gets to some of the main misgivings centrist Dems have with Sanders: that his plans are too aggressive, and too expensive. It is not subtle. SCRIPT: “Socalist Bernie Sanders promises the world. But at what cost? Sixty trillion in new spending. Losing our private health care. Largest middle-class tax hike ever. The cost? Another four years of Donald Trump.”
— KOTT told us this: “Despite over 50 years in public life, Bernie Sanders has never been fully vetted. The Big Tent Project will shed light on his record of politically toxic policy proposals starting in Nevada and South Carolina. Voters need to understand that his well-known plans to kick union employees off their health care plans and end all private insurance, raise middle-class taxes and double the size of the government, and his less well-known radical views, like his efforts to dump nuclear waste in Hispanic communities, will repel many general-election voters.
“EITHER THIS STUFF IS DEBATED NOW, when Democrats have time to consider it fully, or it will come out in the fall, in a torrent of negative ads by the Trump team that would likely prove politically fatal. Democrats deserve the facts before they choose a nominee.”
ALSO GETTING IN ON THE AD GAME … “Pro-Klobuchar super PAC pumps money into Nevada and South Carolina,” by Elena Schneider and Maggie Severns: “A super PAC supporting Amy Klobuchar is dropping a seven-figure ad buy into Nevada and South Carolina, giving the Minnesota senator a much-needed financial boost.
“The super PAC, called Kitchen Table Conversations, was formed late last week at a crucial moment in the race for Klobuchar, who has only days to build on her surprise third-place finish in New Hampshire before a slew of big-ticket Democratic presidential contests begin.
“The group plans to air TV ads on broadcast and cable stations, as well as digital platforms, in Nevada and South Carolina, starting Wednesday. The group also plans to expand into the 14 Super Tuesday states later, according to a person familiar with the ad buy.” POLITICO
STATE OF PLAY — “NBC News/WSJ poll: Sanders opens up double-digit national lead in primary race,” by NBC’s Mark Murray
DEBATE PREVIEW … NYT, News Analysis, A1, MATT FLEGENHEIMER: “Michael Bloomberg Has to Debate Without a Net”: “After a mass introduction to the Democratic electorate on his terms, powered by hundreds of millions of dollars of his own money, Mr. Bloomberg is submitting for the first time to an uncontrolled setting on a national scale. This does not necessarily play to his strengths. … Perhaps most conspicuously, the debate on Wednesday will temporarily separate Mr. Bloomberg from the most powerful asset of his campaign: his campaign. …
“Mr. Bloomberg himself has been holed up in debate preparations, joining advisers for mock sessions in a rented warehouse-style space outside Manhattan, snacking on matzo with peanut butter during breaks from his aides’ play-acted swipes at his record. …
“Given the scope of Mr. Bloomberg’s resources, a merely serviceable debate performance would probably be treated as a victory. Some candidates rely on the debates for media oxygen and fund-raising, seeking breakthroughs like Ms. Klobuchar managed in New Hampshire, where an energetic performance helped vault her to a surprise third-place finish.” NYT
— NEW: BLOOMBERG’S campaign has released a video of people who switched candidates to support the former NYC mayor. These videos were taken by the campaign’s organizing staff. 1:15 video … A list of local officials who have switched their affiliation to back Bloomberg
BUT STILL NO SENATE DEM BACKERS, via Marianne LeVine: “Senate Dems embrace Bloomberg’s anti-Trump machine, but not his candidacy”
INTERESTING … CNBC’S @kaylatausche: “Bloomberg previously said on Iowa radio that he’d sell the company if he *ran* for president. Three Wall Street sources in touch w/ Bloomberg advisers abt this say Bloomberg would want to sell to a big tech company – and worries Pres. Trump’s DOJ or FTC could block the deal.”
NEW … L.A. TIMES: “Bernie Sanders takes wide lead in California primary, new poll finds,” by Michael Finnegan: “The survey by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California found Sanders favored by 32% of likely voters in the March 3 primary, followed by former Vice President Joe Biden, 14%, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, 13%, and two former mayors, Michael R. Bloomberg of New York and Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., both at 12%.
“The findings were particularly grim for Biden and Warren; each dropped by 10 percentage points from their standings in the institute’s poll in January. Sanders has been especially successful at consolidating support among Latinos and voters under 45 years old; a majority of both groups favored the Vermont senator, the poll found. … Under party rules, candidates must win at least 15% of the vote statewide or in a congressional district to capture any of California’s delegates. The survey’s margin of sampling error was 5.7%. It was conducted Feb. 7 to 17.” LAT
PETE BUTTIGIEG on Tuesday night at a CNN town hall in Las Vegas: “One thing about my marriage is it’s never involved me having to send hush money to a porn star after cheating on my spouse. … So they wanna debate family values, let’s debate family values. I’m ready.”
WHERE THEY ARE TODAY …
— BUTTIGIEG is joining the picket line with Culinary Workers Union Local 226 today outside the Palms Casino.
— KLOBUCHAR is also joining the picket line with Culinary Workers Union Local 226.
SIREN — “Barr has told those close to Trump he is considering quitting over the president’s tweets about Justice Dept. investigations,” by WaPo’s Matt Zapotosky, Josh Dawsey, John Wagner and Rachel Weiner: “Attorney General William P. Barr has told people close to President Trump — both inside and outside the White House — that he is considering quitting over Trump’s tweets about Justice Department investigations, three administration officials said, foreshadowing a possible confrontation between the president and his attorney general over the independence of the Justice Department.
“So far, Trump has defied Barr’s requests, both public and private, to keep quiet on matters of federal law enforcement. It was not immediately clear Tuesday whether Barr had made his posture known directly to Trump. The administration officials said Barr seemed to be sharing his position with advisers in hopes the president would get the message that he should stop weighing in publicly on the Justice Department’s ongoing criminal investigations.
“‘He has his limits,’ said one person familiar with Barr’s thinking, speaking on the condition of anonymity, like others, to discuss internal deliberations.” WaPo
— NYT goes softer: “Explicitly rebuffed, Mr. Barr was left by the end of the day to consider his own future. He expressed dissatisfaction to associates and his irritation soon fed news reports that he was considering resignation if the president continued to publicly weigh in on individual prosecutions of his own associates. But it was unclear whether that would persuade Mr. Trump to back off or only get his back up.”
Good Wednesday morning.
BREAKING … NYT: “China Targets 3 Wall Street Journal Reporters as Media Relations Sour,” by Alexandra Stevenson in Hong Kong: “China on Wednesday said it would revoke the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal reporters working in mainland China, in a significant escalation of Beijing’s pressure on the foreign news media. … The Journal identified the reporters as Josh Chin, its deputy bureau chief in Beijing and an American national; Chao Deng, an American; and Philip Wen, an Australian national.” NYT
TRUMPWORLD … ALEX ISENSTADT: “President Donald Trump’s campaign is bringing on an alum of the controversial data firm Cambridge Analytica, a move likely to raise alarms among Trump critics and data privacy advocates who worry the president will push the technological envelope to get reelected in 2020.
“Matt Oczkowski, who served as head of product at Cambridge before it went bankrupt and shut down in 2018, is helping oversee the Trump campaign’s data program, according to two people familiar with the hire. Cambridge gained notoriety for its work on psychological voter profiling and because it allegedly improperly obtained the personal information of tens of millions of Facebook users.” POLITICO
NEW: HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD and LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS are launching a $1 million ad campaign across eight congressional districts focused on thanking Democrats for their work on environmental issues. The initial campaign will run for two weeks focused on Reps. Kathy Castor (Fla.), Joe Cunningham (S.C.), Antonio Delgado (N.Y.), Andy Kim (N.J.), Elaine Luria (Va.), Elissa Slotkin (Mich.), Abigail Spanberger (Va.) and Xochitl Torres Small (N.M.). Example ad
BATTLE FOR THE SENATE — “‘Ground Zero’: Trump’s reelection, GOP Senate at stake out west,” by James Arkin and Gabby Orr with a Phoenix dateline: “President Donald Trump’s campaign rallies over the next two weeks are taking him straight into the heart of the Senate battleground map.
“Trump’s recent and upcoming rallies are counter-programming the Democratic presidential primaries in early voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. But in the next two weeks he’s also hitting Arizona, Colorado and North Carolina, a trio of states that feature vulnerable Republican senators and hold the key to the GOP maintaining control of the chamber. …
“The upcoming Trump rallies aren’t explicitly about the Senate map, but they do underscore the significant overlap between Trump’s path to a second term and Republicans’ Senate strategy. The GOP senators up for reelection have embraced the president, relying on his performance atop the ticket in their states.” POLITICO
TRUMP’S WEDNESDAY — The president will leave Las Vegas at 10:05 a.m. PST en route to Rancho Mirage, Calif. He will arrive at Porcupine Creek Golf Course at 10:25 a.m. and participate in a supporter roundtable followed by a joint fundraising committee lunch. Trump will depart at 12:25 p.m. and will travel to Bakersfield, Calif., the hometown of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who has been traveling with the president.
HE WILL ARRIVE at the JACO Hangar at 2:05 p.m. and deliver remarks on California water accessibility. Afterward, he will travel to Phoenix. Trump will arrive at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum at 6:15 p.m. MST and speak at a political rally at 7 p.m. Afterward, he will travel to Las Vegas for the evening.
PLAYBOOK READS
HOW THE PARDONS ARE PLAYING … NYT BANNER HOMEPAGE THIS MORNING: “Trump Grants Clemency to Prominent White Collar Criminals.” Subhed: “Efforts Help a Who’s Who of Political and Corporate Convicts.” The full list
— WSJ leads with Trump’s pardon of junk bond king Michael Milken, and notes this: “Mr. Milken has cultivated a rapport with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, a personal friend who flew on Mr. Milken’s private plane from Washington to California in January 2019, according to Mr. Milken.”
— AND THIS: “Typically, the Justice Department makes recommendations on whether to issue a pardon, though the power belongs to the president alone. Mr. Trump has previously circumvented the Justice Department entirely when issuing pardons and granting clemency, relying instead on his own connections. The Justice Department declined to say whether it had issued advice.
“A person familiar with Mr. Trump’s thinking said that many of the pardons had been pending for months, and that he had directed that everything be ready so that he could act. Mr. Trump finalized the timing of the announcement last week, the person said.”
POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics
NATASHA KORECKI: “I Covered Blago’s Trial From Start To Finish. Trump’s Commutation Isn’t Crazy.”
— BLAGO IS HOME, per AP: “‘I’m profoundly grateful to President Trump and it’s a profound and everlasting gratitude,’ Blagojevich said. ‘He didn’t have to do this, he’s a Republican president and I was a Democratic governor. I’ll have a lot more to say tomorrow.’”
— HAPPENING TODAY … PATTI BLAGOJEVICH (@pblagojevich): “Rod Blagojevich Homecoming Press Conference: Wednesday, Feb. 19, 2020 at the Blagojevich Family Residence. 11:00 am (CST).”
AFGHANISTAN. WHAT. A. MESS. — “Ghani Named Afghan Election Winner. His Opponent Claims Victory, Too,” by NYT’s Mujib Mashal, Najim Rahim and Fatima Faizi in Kabul: “President Ashraf Ghani on Tuesday was declared the winner of Afghanistan’s presidential vote after five months of delayed results and bitter dispute. But the announcement threatened to tip the country into a full-blown political crisis on the cusp of a U.S. peace deal with the Taliban.
“Just hours after the announcement, Mr. Ghani’s leading challenger, Abdullah Abdullah — who accuses Afghanistan’s election commission of favoring the incumbent — also declared himself the winner and said he would form a government of his own.” NYT
— Mujib Mashal (@MujMash): “In a sign of how complicated Afghan elections was going to be in larger scheme of things, about 15 hrs later still no initial reaction – let alone congrat messages to President Ghani – even from allies. Nothing from US, UN, or anyone else that I’ve seen.”
TRUMP VS. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, CORONAVIRUS EDITION — Another small example of how the president often sings from a completely different hymnal than his aides. Here’s Trump talking about the coronavirus: “I think President Xi is working very hard. President Xi loves the people of China, he loves his country and he’s doing a very good job with a very, very difficult situation.”
TRUMP ADDED that the U.S. is “working with him and helping him as of the last few days.”
— AND HERE’S his own economic adviser, LARRY KUDLOW, saying last week that the administration was “disappointed in the lack of transparency coming from the Chinese.”
MEDIAWATCH — BOSTON GLOBE: “Washington Post editor Martin Baron to deliver Harvard commencement address”
PLAYBOOKERS
Send tips to Eli Okun and Garrett Ross at politicoplaybook@politico.com.
SPOTTED at a party for Lachlan Markay and Asawin Suebsaeng’s new book, “Sinking in the Swamp” ($18.60 on Amazon), at the Upper East Side home of Molly Jong-Fast: Hayes Brown, Ben Collins, Taylor Lorenz, Vicky Ward, Michael Calderone, Aidan McLaughlin, Brian Stelter, Matt Latimer, Oliver Darcy, Noah Shachtman, Wendy Wolf, Terezia Cicel, Keith Urbahn, Max Tani, Nick Gillespie, Liz Nolan Brown, Anna Massagolia and John Avlon.
ENGAGED — Andres Franzetti, CEO and co-founder of Risk Cooperative, and Ben Becker, managing principal at Precision Strategies, got engaged over the weekend on a trip with friends to celebrate Andres’ 40th birthday in Puerto Rico, where he popped the question. Instapic
WEEKEND WEDDING — Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) and Sofia Boza-Holman got married Saturday at the Convento de las Capuchinas in Antigua, Guatemala. Pic
BIRTHDAY OF THE DAY: Justin Rouse, managing supervisor at Vox Global, is 3-0. A trend that doesn’t get enough attention: “Last month was the hottest January ever recorded on Earth and climate change is already having devastating global impacts on ecosystems, infrastructure and health. If we don’t do something about it now, it will have irreversible consequences. Already you are hearing more about ‘resiliency’ than you are ‘prevention’ or ‘reversal,’ and I fear that we are witnessing the point of no return.” Playbook Q&A
BIRTHDAYS: Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) is 74 … Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) is 72 … Julie Terrell Radford, COS for Ivanka Trump, is 37 … Alexis Covey-Brandt … Andrew Ross Sorkin … Tamara Hinton … Howard Stringer is 78 … Gary Andres, GOP staff director at Ways and Means … John Stanton … Sean Conner … Andy Abboud … Chris Faulkner of Majority Strategies … John Gentzel, VP at DCI Group … Protocol Labs’ Rachel Horn … Kevin Bishop, comms director for Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), is 49 … Judy Kurtz of The Hill … Tucker Warren … Brandon VerVelde, comms director for Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.), is 32 … POLITICO’s Jen Plesniak … Sandeep Hulsandra … Melody Miller … Katharine Zaleski … John J. Miller … Peter Van Buren … Cat Blakely … Joshua Schank … Nick Solheim …
… Sarah Stillman, staff writer at The New Yorker, is 36 … Samantha Zalaznick … Ben Khouri, program manager at Potomac Communications Group, is 29 … Joe Vidulich, senior manager of government and policy affairs at Capital One, is 34 … William Thompson … Sara Misselhorn … Lane Mullin … Chase Kroll … Jason Bertsch, EVP at AEI … Kaitlyn Martin, government relations adviser at Cozen O’Connor Public Strategies … Stewart McLaurin, president of the White House Historical Association … Molly Weaver … Jim Green … Evan Feinman … Olga Ramirez Kornacki, director of the House-Radio TV Gallery … Ken Shepherd … Daniel Blum … Alicia Rose … Sam van Buren … Ginny Neel … Jill Lawrence … Fox News’ Louis Tartaglia … Gidi Mark … Jon Fishman is 55 … VOA journalist Daria Dieguts
Follow us on Twitter
THE SUNBURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE WASHINGTON POST MORNING HEADLINES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CAFFEINATED THOUGHTS
|
CONSERVATIVE DAILY NEWS
|
TOWNHALL
|
|
REALCLEARPOLITICS
|
||||||||||
|
THE FEDERALIST
|
AMERICAN THINKER
|
|
THE DISPATCH
The Morning Dispatch: Pardon Me?
Plus, an update on the primary election in Wisconsin’s 7th District.
The Dispatch Staff | 36 min | 1 |
Happy Wednesday! Now that we (and LeBron) got Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred to apologize, we can return to our regularly scheduled programming.
Quick Hits: Today’s Top Stories
- The ninth Democratic presidential debate will be held in Las Vegas tonight at 9 p.m. ET. Six candidates qualified, including, for the first time, former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg.
- The Washington Post reported that Attorney General Bill Barr “has told those close to Trump he is considering quitting over the president’s tweets about Justice Dept. investigations.” A spokeswoman for Barr responded, saying he “has no plans to resign.”
- Afghan President Ashraf Ghani officially won a second term after a five-month dispute over the election results. His opponent, Abdullah Abdullah, also declared victory and said he would form his own government.
- Sen. Chris Murphy confirmed he met with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif over the weekend, writing that he thinks “it’s dangerous to not talk to your enemies.” President Trump questioned whether such a meeting was a violation of the Logan Act.
Trump Goes on a Clemency Spree
President Trump signed executive grants of clemency for 11 people on Tuesday, including Michael Milken, the famous “junk bond king” who pleaded guilty to racketeering and securities fraud charges in 1990; Bernie Kerik, the former New York Police Department commissioner who pleaded guilty to multiple charges of tax fraud and lying to officials in 2010; and Rod Blagojevich, the former governor of Illinois who was convicted of wire fraud and soliciting bribes in 2011.
Milken and Kerik were pardoned after serving their time and both pardons were supported by Rudy Guiliani and a handful of other friends of the president. In the statement released by the White House, both were praised for their charitable work since re-entering society—Kerik “as a passionate advocate for criminal justice and prisoner re-entry reform” and Milken for giving “hundreds of millions of dollars in critical funding to medical research, education, and disadvantaged children.”
While both pardons may underscore the unfortunate importance of having politically powerful friends, the pardons themselves were largely ceremonial—the debt to society having already been paid. The pardon, for example, will not affect Milken’s lifetime ban from working in the securities industry according, to the White House. And in 2015, many had come to view Milken as a “more benign figure” who had become “a prominent philanthropist and supporter of public health and medical research,” as one story on CNBC put it.
Blagojevich, eight years into his 14-year sentence, is a different matter entirely.
In 2008, Blagojevich was impeached and removed from office after being charged with racketeering, bribery, wire fraud, and attempted extortion in what then Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald called “a political corruption crime spree.” The charges were related in part to Blagojevich’s attempts to sell former Sen. Barack Obama’s seat. In a recording made by the FBI, the former governor was heard to say, “I’ve got this thing, and it’s f—ing golden. … It’s a f—ing valuable thing, you just don’t give it away for nothing. If I don’t get what I want … I’ll just take the Senate seat myself.” Other charges, though, included attempts to extort the president of a children’s hospital “in exchange for a Medicaid rate increase for pediatric specialists” and a horse racing executive in exchange for the “timely signing of a bill that benefited the horse racing industry.”
He was convicted in 2011 on 17 counts. Prosecutors at the time asked for a 15 to 20 year sentence, citing “extensive corruption in office, the damage he caused to the integrity of Illinois government, and the need to deter others from similar acts” in a state where four of the previous nine governors had also been sent to jail. His defense attorneys argued that he was “a rambling man who didn’t mean the comments heard on wiretap tapes.” (Also, probably, trying to make a living and doing the best he can.)
The judge sentenced him to 14 years saying, “whatever good things you did for people as governor, and you did some, I am more concerned with the occasions when you wanted to use your powers … to do things that were only good for yourself.”
Since then, the case had gone through a series of appeals and rehearings. In 2015, the 7th Circuit overturned Blagojevich’s conviction on five of the 17 counts but wrote “the evidence, much of it from Blagojevich’s own mouth, is overwhelming.” The judge resentenced him to continue serving the original 14-year sentence, rejecting the distinction offered by his defense attorneys between “someone who enriches himself, and someone who … tries to raise funds to advance a political agenda.”
In 2018, Blagojevich appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court. His team argued that any quid pro quo corruption must be “explicit” under the law and cited the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to overturn the conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell stating that the law was now unclear on “the location of the line between lawful campaign solicitation and felony extortion.”
The Justice Department under Attorney General Jeff Sessions filed an opposing brief bluntly rejecting those arguments: “petitioner’s argument is without merit and this would be a poor case to address the argument in any event.”
After the Supreme Court rejected the appeal, Blagojevich’s wife appeared on Fox News to make her case to the president: “I see that the same people that did this to my family, the same people that secretly taped us and twisted the facts and perverted the law that ended up my husband in jail, these same people are trying to do the same thing they did to my husband, just on a much larger scale.”
Shortly after, President Trump said publicly that he was “thinking very seriously” about commuting the remainder of the sentence. “I thought he was treated unbelievably unfairly. He was given close to 18 years in prison, and a lot of people thought it was unfair, like a lot of other things. And it was the same gang—the Comey gang and all these sleazebags—that did it,” he said at the time.
Of course, it may be worth noting that Comey had been in the private sector since 2005 and did not become FBI director until 2013—two years after Blagojevich was convicted. Then again, given that the president today commuted the remainder of his sentence saying that he “watched his wife on television,” maybe not.
The Illinois Republican congressional delegation reacted to Trump’s decision with dismay. “Blagojevich is the face of public corruption in Illinois,” Reps. Darin LaHood, Adam Kinzinger, John Shimkus, Rodney Davis, and Mike Bost wrote. “Not once has he shown any remorse for his clear and documented record of egregious crimes that undermined the trust placed in him by voters.”
A Wisconsin Update
In last Thursday’s Morning Dispatch, we gave you a sneak preview of this week’s special election Republican primary in Wisconsin’s rural 7th District, which pitted Tom Tiffany, a longtime state legislator and Scott Walker ally, against Jason Church, a veteran and lawyer whose military career was cut short by an IED blast in Afghanistan and who positioned himself as the race’s Trumpier, more smashmouth alternative.
Well, the results are in: Tiffany carried the district handily, 57 percent to 42 percent, and winning 21 of the district’s 26 counties.
Tiffany will go on to face Democrat Tricia Zunker, a law professor, in the special election on May 12.
In a way, the primary’s outcome was not unexpected: Tiffany had long represented many in the district as a popular state assemblyman and senator, and had collected a number of important endorsements, including those of Walker and Sean Duffy, the district’s outgoing congressman.
But Church was a strong challenger, with a personal history that commanded respect and a coherent narrative behind his candidacy. While both candidates portrayed themselves as eager allies of the president, it was Church who, as Andrew reported last week, seemed to grasp more fully the zeitgeist that made the president so appealing to working-class voters in such districts in the first place.
In many ways, the ascendance of the Trump GOP has been a rebuke of the legacy of politicians like Scott Walker, who made their bones pushing policies—free markets, balanced budgets, union-busting—that Trump has ignored or actively subverted. Yet results like the one in WI-07 last night add a quirk to that narrative: For many Republican voters, it seems, there’s no real disconnect between Walker-style and Trump-style conservatism at all.
Worth Your Time
- At The Cut, Rebecca Traister has a deep look at Maine Sen. Susan Collins, and how she has adapted to the Trump era. “Collins has gone from pleasing an unusually high number of people, at least some of the time, to pleasing vanishingly few people almost never.”
- At the Washington Post, Greg Jaffe writes about how the war in Afghanistan shattered Joe Biden’s faith in American military power. “Biden talks about America in grand, almost Reaganesque, terms. It’s ‘an idea stronger than any army, bigger than any ocean, more powerful than any dictator or tyrant,’ he has said. But inside the Obama administration Biden was a consistent voice of caution.”
- Alex Burns, Nicholas Kulish, and a killer graphics team put together this New York Times piece mapping out Mike Bloomberg’s philanthropy and what it’s bought him. “Since leaving City Hall at the end of 2013, Mr. Bloomberg has become the single most important political donor to the Democratic Party and its causes,” the piece reads. But those donations often come with strings attached—either implicit or explicit.
Presented Without Comment
Okay, one comment: This is how you win Declan’s business.
Something Fun
Soccer isn’t the sport of choice for any of your Morning Dispatchers. (Editor’s note: It’s a close second to hockey for one of the editors, however, and Atletico Madrid’s gritty upset of Liverpool in the Champions League yesterday afternoon was one for the ages.) This clip from a pro match in Turkey got us thinking: Is that just because there aren’t enough dogs involved?
Toeing the Company Line
- David’s latest French Press dives into the campus free speech debate and why legal victories aren’t everything. “Just as college students are gaining freedom from the speech codes and official censorship of years past, many students feel under siege. They are free, but they don’t feel free.”
- If you enjoyed our review of Tevi Troy’s new book, Fight House, last week—great news! Troy joined Jonah on The Remnant to discuss intra-White House rivalries even further.
- You might have missed the news that Trump extended the national emergency so as to take more funds from the Pentagon to build his wall, but Andrew has a breakdown as well as reaction from congressional Republicans.
- Michael Mazza details China’s many human rights abuses—against its own people—and suggests an extreme but potentially effective move from the United States and the Western word: skip the 2022 Winter Olympics scheduled for Beijing.
Let Us Know
Who should Trump pardon next?
- Bernie Madoff: When one of your Morning Dispatchers saw Bernie Kerik’s name in an email he misread it as this, and it made total sense.
- Baby Yoda: He (she?) knows what he (she?) did.
- Hillary Clinton: Taking the “you can’t fire me I quit” approach to his failure to Lock Her Up.
- Pilot Pete: While technically not illegal, his decision to give a rose to Victoria instead of Kelsey on The Bachelor this week was borderline criminal.
- Roger Stone and Paul Manafort: Why keep delaying the inevitable?
Reporting by Declan Garvey (@declanpgarvey), Andrew Egger (@EggerDC), Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons), and Steve Hayes (@stephenfhayes).
Photograph of Rod Blagojevich by Scott Olson/Getty Images.
1 |
Top posts
THE FLIP SIDE
- Subscribe
- Past Issues
- RSS
- Translate
|
AMERICAN MINUTE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE HILL
|
AXIOS
🇨🇳 Breaking: “China revoked the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal reporters based in Beijing, the first time in the post-Mao era that the Chinese government has expelled multiple journalists from one international news organization at the same time,” the Journal reports (subscription).
- China’s Foreign Ministry said the move was punishment for a Feb. 3 “Global View” column by Walter Russell Mead: “China Is the Real Sick Man of Asia.”
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios
Top 2020 Democrats, armed with decades of opposition research, plan to savage Mike Bloomberg as a Democratic Trump — an egomaniac New York billionaire who’s stained by sexism and racial slights, and hell-bent on buying power and puppeteering mass media, Axios CEO Jim VandeHei writes.
- Why it matters: Bloomberg knows it’s coming, has rehearsed his retorts, readied ads and policy plans to deflect, and will unleash $1.5 billion more on ads and staff to clean up any damage.
- Tonight’s debate in Vegas, Bloomberg’s first time onstage with his rivals, should be a doozy.
The Bloomberg campaign sounds unfazed. Kevin Sheekey, Bloomberg’s top strategist, tells Axios: “Mike will defend his record of doing more to address issues of concern to Democratic voters than anyone else in the race.”
- Sheekey added, in what the campaign considers its trump card: “Voters are focused on electability.”
But check out what Bloomberg has coming at him. In public comments and private leaks of opposition research, this is rivals’ anti-Bloomberg argument:
- He bought power and silence: He hid behind $400 million in ads to buy his way to second place — after spending billions of dollars to ingratiate himself with would-be critics.
- He was crude and sexist: The N.Y. Times and WashPost unloaded detailed investigations of sexist language and behavior. The WashPost reported a lawsuit by a former Bloomberg LP saleswoman: “She alleged Bloomberg told her to ‘kill it’ when he learned she was pregnant,” which she interpreted as “have an abortion to keep her job.” Bloomberg denied that under oath and reached a confidential settlement, per the Post. The campaign said: “Mike simply does not tolerate any kind of discrimination or harassment.”
- When he was New York mayor, the city’s stop-and-frisk policy targeted black and Latino people. Bloomberg told a black church in Brooklyn in November: “I want you to know that I realize back then I was wrong.”
- He has Cheney-like authoritarian instincts: He called the NYPD the “seventh largest army in the world,” and joined George W. Bush in Muslim-targeting crackdowns in the years after 9/11. “I think people, the voters, want low crime,” Bloomberg told the N.Y. Times in an interview in 2018. “They don’t want kids to kill each other.”
- He censors and silences media. He owns one of the largest media companies in the world, with his journalists under orders not to cover his “wealth or personal life.” After he announced, Bloomberg News journalists were told in an internal memo: “We will continue our tradition of not investigating Mike (and his family and foundation) and we will extend the same policy to his rivals in the Democratic primaries.”
- He coddled China for business reasons. Bloomberg told PBS’ “Firing Line” in September, during a discussion of climate, that Xi Jinping “is not a dictator — he has to satisfy his constituents or he’s not gonna survive.” Michael Forsythe, one of the top journalistic diggers in Hong Kong, left Bloomberg News in 2013 and later joined the N.Y. Times, where he’s now an investigative reporter, after Bloomberg News sat on an exposé about financial shenanigans by the regime, because of fears that Bloomberg would be expelled from China. Bloomberg editors said the article wasn’t ready.
👀 Watch Joe Biden tonight: The former vice president has easily the most incentive to go after Bloomberg.
- Each is competing to be the Electable One; Biden was hacked off that Bloomberg promised not to run against him and then did; and, unlike the others, he has no interest in his money — or a job in his administration.
Attorney General Bill Barr has made clear to President Trump — both publicly and, repeatedly, in private conversations — that he can’t do his job if the president keeps publicly commenting on Justice Department criminal cases, Axios’ Jonathan Swan reports.
- Trump chose to ignore that warning yesterday when he tweeted again about Roger Stone’s case.
- The tweet could not have been timed worse — whether he was aware of that or not. It came only a few hours before a status conference call between the judge, Stone’s lawyers, and Justice Department prosecutors.
Barr’s spokesperson tweeted after multiple reports that the attorney general might leave:
- “Addressing Beltway rumors: The Attorney General has no plans to resign.”
Flashback … Lead of yesterday’s Axios PM: “Trump announced Tuesday that he would commute former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s 14-year prison sentence for extortion, bribery and corruption — as well as issue full pardons for former San Francisco 49ers owner Edward DeBartolo Jr., former NYPD Commissioner Bernie Kerik and financier Michael Milken.”
- Go deeper: List of yesterday pardons and commutations, “11 big and not-so-big names granted clemency by Trump.”
Mike Bloomberg’s campaign is sounding the alarm that Bernie Sanders will soon amass an unsurmountable delegate lead if the Democratic field stays split — and took the extraordinary step of suggesting laggards should drop out.
- Kevin Sheekey, Bloomberg’s top strategist, said: “The fact is if the state of this race remains status quo — with Biden, Pete and Amy in the race on Super Tuesday — Bernie is likely to open up a delegate lead that seems nearly impossible to overcome.”
- “I don’t think many people understand the dire circumstances here.”
Why it matters: Based on every national poll, plus steady access to money, Sanders is the indisputable — if underappreciated — frontrunner.
The Bloomberg campaign got high-profile validation of its theory:
- David Plouffe, Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign manager, tweeted in response to Nate Silver’s delegate projections through Super Tuesday — which show Sanders with 41%, followed by Bloomberg and Joe Biden with 18% each.
- “If this happens, Sanders would have a pledged delegate lead he’ll never relinquish.”
In a “State of the Race” memo to Bloomberg gurus Sheekey and Howard Wolfson, senior adviser Mitch Stewart and states director Dan Kanninen argue:
- “If Biden, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar remain in the race despite having no path to appreciably collecting delegates on Super Tuesday (and beyond), they will propel Sanders to a seemingly insurmountable delegate lead by siphoning votes away from [Bloomberg].”
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios
The coronavirus outbreak may be “at the brink” of a global pandemic, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, tells Axios’ Eileen Drage O’Reilly.
- What’s new: Signs people are infecting each other in a more sustainable fashion in China, an uptick in confirmed cases in Japan and Singapore, and research showing people without symptoms can infect each other are fueling concern that COVID-19 will develop into a pandemic.
What to watch: Stephen Morrison of the Center for Strategic and International Studies told Axios that despite efforts to prepare the American health care system for a pandemic, the U.S. is not ready.
- He pointed to the 2017-2018 flu season that killed at least 80,000 Americans as an example of when a sudden increase of cases “really overwhelmed the system.”
- “We’d be very quickly in trouble” if there was a sudden influx of ill people during a pandemic, Morrison said.
Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Mike Bloomberg makes billions of dollars from Wall Street every year. But his plan to rein in the financial sector is very aggressive, Axios chief financial correspondent Felix Salmon writes.
- If he were to become president, it would be fought vociferously by the biggest clients of Bloomberg LP, the financial-information company that’s the source of the candidate’s wealth.
Why it matters: Bloomberg’s detailed financial reform policy, released yesterday, could cost Wall Street trillions of dollars while significantly increasing regulatory scrutiny of financial activities.
- It’s a vision that would not be at all surprising coming from Elizabeth Warren, but that was less expected from an avatar of red-blooded capitalism.
At the top of Bloomberg’s wish list is for banks to hold significantly more capital on their balance sheets. He also calls for:
- A financial transactions tax, affecting mostly the very wealthy, that would raise about $500 billion over 10 years. Every stock, bond, and derivatives transaction would be taxed a tiny amount, helping to discourage socially-useless high-frequency trading.
- Allowing the Postal Service to provide banking services.
- Beefing up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The bottom line: Where President Trump deregulated Wall Street, Bloomberg wants to re-regulate it — and he wants to go significantly further than even former President Obama managed with the post-crisis Dodd-Frank legislation.
The Boston Globe, on the downtown lunch rush, where seconds count and a tense crowd waits in a salad place for the kale they preordered on their phones:
Even the order-ahead apps aren’t fast enough.
📬 Thanks for starting your day with us. Please tell a friend about AM/PM.
DESERET NEWS
THE BLAZE
More from TheBlaze
Listen live to Blaze Radio Tune in to the next generation of talk radio, featuring original content from hosts like Glenn Beck, Pat Gray, Stu Burguiere, Steve Deace and more!
One last thing … Far-left activist and comedian Chelsea Handler made a bold assumption after President Donald Trump granted clemency to eleven people on Tuesday, suggesting her social media followers “notice what color” all of the “criminals” are. But Handler herself appears to not have read past the headlines, and the Twittersphere was happy to enlig … Read more
Got friends?
© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in to receive emails from Blaze Media. 8275 S. Eastern Ave, Ste 200-245 Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123, USA |
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARRA NEWS SERVICE
ARRA News Service (in this message: 16 new items) |
- A Badge of Disgrace: The Fall of the Boy Scouts
- Vandalizing Our History, Bloomberg’s Blunders, Is America Ready
- The Attorney General’s Just Rejection of a Severe Prison Term for Roger Stone
- Trump’s Critics on the Economy: So Wrong, So Often
- If Duterte Wants Us Out, Let’s Go
- Madame Guillotine
- Virginia Assault Weapon Ban Fails
- Boozman Recognizes Military Service of 100-Year-Old WWII POW
- Time for Union Spending Transparency
- Political Bias and Anti-Americanism on College Campuses
- Pandemic . . .
- How Lord of the Rings Brings Modern Day Orcs to England
- President Trump Has Established More Pro-Life Policies Than Any Previous President
- Don’t Forget Justice Clarence Thomas In Black History Month Celebrations
- In Divisive Times, Remember: ‘There’s Something Amazing About Being an American’
- Idiot King Obama Tries to Take Credit for Trump’s Economy
A Badge of Disgrace: The Fall of the Boy Scouts
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 08:02 PM PST by Tony Perkins: It’s one of the saddest, most predictable “I-told-you-so” moments of our generation. The Boy Scouts, where future moon walkers and presidents learned the virtues and value of leadership, has finally collapsed. Turns out, the decade of compromise hasn’t been kind to the Scouts, who turned in their moral compass seven years ago to chase the approval of critics it could never win. Now, deep into the BSA’s self-imposed identity crisis, the group is filing for bankruptcy — an unhappy ending we all warned was coming. For those who knew the Scouts through their proud and honorable days, the demise has been slow and painful. But this is what comes of throwing up your hands on a century of conviction: irrelevance and, ultimately, insolvency. For 103 of its 110 years, the Boy Scouts were a pillar of principle — not that it was easy. As most of us know, the fight to live out your beliefs in this world can be an exhausting one. The Scouts spent years in court just for the freedom to stick to their moral code. They won — but to the organization’s dismay — the battle didn’t end. Waves of LGBT activists kept coming. The pressure built and built until finally, in 2013, under the leadership of Rex Tillerson, headquarters gave into the lie that compromise would be their salvation. Seven years later, the irony is: there’s nothing left to save. More than a half-decade into this radical experiment, the group that counted Martin Luther King, Jr., George W. Bush, and Buzz Aldrin as members is barely recognizable. A handful of local councils have managed to squeak by on solid reputations, but after the organization opened its arms to kids and leaders who identify as gay or transgender, membership became anemic. Then in a failed effort to fill the ranks they began recruiting girls, which not only angered its base — but pitted the organization in a legal war with Girl Scouts USA. Now, a program that used to be America’s finest, is knee-deep in Chapter 11. If you’re wondering where raising a white flag on core values leads, this is it. The Scouts are a case study in moral compromise — the story of anyone who exchanges the truth for cowardly conformism. Leaders at the BSA dropped their moral mandate to accommodate what they don’t believe. In the current climate, that’s called “inclusion.” To everyone else, it’s considered betrayal. Right now, too many churches, Christian colleges, even businesses are dangerously close to making the same mistake. They’re so desperate or fearful — or both — that they’re willing to water down who they are to protect the small space they’re standing on. There’s just one problem: the gospel’s truth isn’t up for negotiation. And in their rush to soften the blow of its confrontation, some believers are selling out their identity as followers of Jesus. Christians in Paul’s time were no different. Like humans throughout history, they craved acceptance. “I am astonished,” he wrote to the Galatians, “that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you to live in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel — which is really no gospel at all. Evidently, some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ… Am I now trying to win the approval of human beings or of God? …If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a servant of Christ.” The Boy Scouts wandered so far away from who they are that by the end of 2016, they even dropped their most defining characteristic: boys. In the end, it ruined them. That’s the destiny of any Christian who takes the naïve view that world can be placated. It can’t. True love, I Corinthians 13:6 tells us, is truth. It’s being salt and light in a draining, hostile, unforgiving culture. “Come out from them and be separate,” Paul urged, because he understands that in the end, it’s not our sameness with the world that transforms people. It’s our distinction of standing on truth in their midst. That may not be easy — but, as the Boy Scouts are finding out, it’s a whole lot better than the alternative. Tags: Tony Perkins, Family Research Council, Badge of Disgrace, Fall of the Boy Scouts To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Vandalizing Our History, Bloomberg’s Blunders, Is America Ready
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 07:48 PM PST
by Gary Bauer, Contributing Author: Vandalizing Our History I don’t think this latest outrage can be viewed in isolation. A few years ago, there was vandalism of Civil War memorials. President Trump warned it wouldn’t end there. The Lincoln Memorial was vandalized. President Andrew Jackson’s tomb in Tennessee was vandalized. A statue of Thomas Jefferson was vandalized. A monument to Francis Scott Key, author of the Star-Spangled Banner was attacked. The Betsy Ross flag is now considered a symbol of racism by many leftists. And, of course, the left’s reaction to the phrase “Make America Great Again” is also very revealing. You can understand why some might take issue with a particular policy or say, “There’s nothing in your agenda to do that.” But that’s not what many leftists are saying. No, their objection is that “America was never great” in the first place. (Here and here.) Why is the left so eager to denigrate and tear down our country? I hope authorities in historic Jamestown and Williamsburg, Virginia, took note of what happened this weekend in Plymouth and are adding security. What horrible event took place at Plymouth? There were no slaves there. The people vandalizing Plymouth Rock are making the statement that the whole American experiment is evil. They are the barbarians inside the gates. Not long ago, we taught our children an idealized version of our founders, which is, quite frankly, what a healthy society does. You want to place the creators of a nation on a pedestal. Then we slid into barely teaching about the founders at all. Now, we’re teaching again. But instead of putting the founders on a pedestal, we’re teaching that they were all evil, and, by the way, they were all white. We’re teaching our future leaders that the world would have been better off if there never had been an America. Younger generations of Americans are rejecting the idea of American exceptionalism and increasingly embracing the left’s radical view of our country. Polling finds that our nation’s youth are much more likely to believe that other countries are better than America. Why? Because they’ve been taught to believe that. President Trump and Vice President Pence are fighting against this every way they can. In the long run, whether our nation survives may well depend on this battle more than many of their other noteworthy accomplishments. Bloomberg’s Blunders Sen. Bernie Sanders was first at 31%, followed by Bloomberg at 19%, former Vice President Joe Biden at 15% and Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 12%. No other candidate received double-digit support. If he appears on stage tomorrow night, it will mark Bloomberg’s first appearance in a Democrat debate, and that is another controversy all by itself. But that’s the least of Bloomberg’s problems. The candidate has taken hits in recent days for allegedly racist and sexist remarks. Now, he’s been caught bashing farmers and blue-collar workers. Speaking in Oxford, England, about the technological changes in the economy, Bloomberg dismissed farmers and blue-collar workers as ignorant. He said: “I could teach anybody . . . to be a farmer. . . You dig a hole, you put a seed in, you put dirt on top, add water, up comes the corn. You could learn that. . . Now comes the information economy and [it] is fundamentally different. . . You have to have a different skill set, you have to have a lot more gray matter.” Just in case there was any confusion, Bloomberg thinks any idiot can be a farmer but to move gigabytes around you need to be a genius. It shows what he thinks about the Heartland of the country, and likely why he skipped the Iowa caucuses. There’s no questioning the value of IT workers in today’s modern economy. But people also like to be able to eat too! I know many people are worried about Bloomberg’s bank account. He’s doing his best to literally buy the election, already outspending all the major candidates combined. But in many ways, Bloomberg is the best foil for Trump because he is the epitome of an elite globalist versus Trump’s conservative/populism. Is America Ready? Do you hear anyone in the mainstream media proclaiming how historic Pete Buttigieg’s candidacy is, as the first serious gay contender? No. They don’t emphasize it because they suspect America isn’t ready for that. But the left is intent on calling anyone who raises the question a bigot. In fact, when Rush Limbaugh merely posed the question last week, the left and its media allies went nuts. While polling shows that most Americans would vote for a homosexual candidate, in my view, Buttigieg’s sexuality is relevant because of the policy positions he has taken. He has made it clear that the issue is personal to him, and that he will operate on the belief that the demands of gay rights movement and the transgender movement should trump religious liberty. Buttigieg has made it a point to redefine what Christianity teaches not only on marriage, but also on the sanctity of life. Trump Takes A Victory Lap Air Force One flew low and slow over the race track, and then the president and first lady took a “victory lap” in the presidential limousine, affectionately known as “The Beast.” NASCAR fans loved it! The crowd roared, and TV viewership hit a five-year high. Tags: Gary Bauer, Campaign for Working Families, Vandalizing Our History, Bloomberg’s Blunders, Is America Ready To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
The Attorney General’s Just Rejection of a Severe Prison Term for Roger Stone
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 06:21 PM PST
by Hans von Spakovsky: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is not happy—again. And neither are other elected Democrats who have mounted a full-scale attack against Attorney General William Barr for recommending a reasonable prison sentence for Roger Stone, rather than the draconian sentence Barr’s subordinates advocated in a court filing. Schumer, D-N.Y., wants the Justice Department inspector general to investigate Barr because Schumer thinks Barr gave Stone a sweetheart deal at President Donald Trump’s direction. Barr denies it. Whether the inspector general takes up the issue is anyone’s guess. But if his office does, its report no doubt will highlight the fact that all lawyers in the Justice Department work for the attorney general, and that every attorney general has the right to overrule (and even fire) his subordinates in any case. For his part, Barr told reporters that “the essential role of the attorney general is to keep law enforcement, the criminal process sacrosanct to make sure there is no political interference in it. And I have done that, and I will continue to do that.” Contrary to the claims against Barr of unfair “political interference” in the pending sentencing of Stone, his handling of the over-the-top recommendations by prosecutors demonstrates that he is doing exactly what attorneys general are supposed to do and that he is committed to restoring evenhanded enforcement of our nation’s laws. No one disputes that Stone was accused and convicted of several serious crimes—obstructing a congressional investigation, making false statements to Congress, and witness tampering. Let’s set aside questions that have arisen about the trial and conviction given the recent revelations that the jury foreperson, a former Democratic congressional candidate, exhibited an anti-Trump bias in numerous posts on social media (calling Trump a #KlanPresiden) and tweeted specifically about Stone’s arrest. Everyone agrees that Stone—once duly convicted—must be punished for his actions. But what is an appropriate punishment? And more importantly, who gets to decide? Those are the questions that came to the forefront when four career prosecutors recommended that Stone—a nonviolent, first-time offender—serve seven to nine years in prison, and even more so when Schumer requested that the inspector general investigate the overriding of the prosecutors’ recommendation by higher officials within the Justice Department. Stone’s base offense level under the federal sentencing guidelines—which are only advisory in nature—calls for him to serve 15 to 21 months in prison. The prosecutors on the case, however, submitted a sentencing memorandum arguing that several other enhancements should apply that would raise the proposed sentence to seven to nine years. Prosecutors argued that the biggest of these enhancements should apply because Stone threatened “to cause physical injury to a person, or property damage, in order to obstruct the administration of justice.” Their basis for that claim is several statements made by Stone when he told a potential witness—radio talk show host Randy Credico—that Credico should “prepare to die” and that Stone would take his dog away from him. True, these sound bad on their face. But Credico told the judge he did not take these bombastic threats seriously and never felt physically threatened. In fact, Credico said that these “bellicose tirades” were just “Stone being Stone. All bark and no bite.” Thus, when taken in context, this recommended enhancement seems like a stretch—something that would be more appropriately applied in an organized-crime case or gang-related case. If this single enhancement were removed, Stone’s guideline range would drop significantly, to 37 to 46 months in prison. Federal judges typically give great weight and serious consideration to the recommendations of the prosecutors on a given case. Here, the Justice Department filed an amended sentencing memorandum telling the judge that “the range of [approximately seven to nine years] presented as the applicable guidelines range would not be appropriate or serve the interests of justice in this case.” The Justice Department noted that a sentence of approximately seven to nine years “more typically has been imposed for defendants who have higher criminal history categories or who obstructed justice as part of a violent criminal organization.” In protest of this revised sentencing memo, the four prosecutors who made the original recommendation resigned from the case. One resigned from the Justice Department. Schumer and others claim that the recommended lower sentence is the result of undue political influence in the criminal justice process. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts are among other prominent Democrats criticizing Barr. Warren has called for Barr’s impeachment, as have others on the left and in the media. Really? What choice did those at the Justice Department have–up to and including Barr—but to step in and correct an unreasonable and unduly harsh sentencing recommendation? This is particularly the case in light of reports that the recommendation these prosecutors made was, in fact, far harsher than what they told senior leadership they were going to make to the court. This raises questions about whether the prosecutors misled Barr and other department leaders in the first place. It is the duty of the attorney general to lead the Justice Department by setting priorities and ensuring the fair administration of justice, devoid of political influence or pressure. Subordinates in the department, including all assistant U.S. attorneys and each of the 94 Senate-confirmed U.S. attorneys, work for the attorney general, not the other way around. If they don’t like the attorney general’s priorities, they can resign. This matter is complicated, of course, by President Donald Trump’s tweets about the sentencing recommendation for Stone. Yes, the president has a right to tweet. But it can complicate the case when this or any other president makes public statements about an ongoing federal criminal matter. It’s what President Barack Obama did in 2009 about the appropriateness of the death penalty for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused of being a planner of the 9/11 attacks. Here, it appears that Barr’s decision to amend the government’s sentencing memo took place before Trump’s tweet blasting the original sentencing memorandum as “horrible and very unfair.” This undercuts Schumer’s claims of political interference. Barr says the president’s tweets had nothing to do with his decision. Barr’s actions were necessitated by the initial unfair (and seemingly unjustified) recommendation of up to nine years in prison for a nonviolent, first-time offender. His actions as attorney general were an important step toward ensuring accountability in the Justice Department and fulfilled his promise to restore the impartial administration of justice for all of our nation’s citizens. Tags: Attorney General, Just Rejection, of a Severe Prison Term, Roger Stone, Hans von Spakovsky, The Heritage Foundation, The Daily Signal To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Trump’s Critics on the Economy: So Wrong, So Often
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 05:53 PM PST by Stephen Moore: There’s an old saying about baseball and life that no one ever had a 1.000 batting average. It turns out that’s not exactly true. At least when it comes to the Trump economy, anti-Trumpers defied the near-impossible statistical odds and somehow have batted 1.000 on their predictions. They managed to get it wrong every time. A chorus line of President Donald Trump’s critics, including the best and brightest minds of the liberal intelligentsia, predicted an economic and stock market free fall if Trumponomics were implemented. They weren’t just wrong; in many cases, they were fantastically wrong. So wrong that Paul Krugman, the leader of the Armageddon brigades four years ago, recently had to cry uncle. He begrudgingly admitted the Trump economy is doing “pretty well,” which is like saying that Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes had a “pretty good year.” Then, he insisted that Trump is a moron. Having worked as an economic adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign, I had to go to battle almost every day with the whiz kids who predicted economic apocalypse if Trump won. “Under Trump, I would expect a protracted recession to begin within 18 months,” moaned former presidents Bill Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s chief economist Larry Summers. Well, where is it? The former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, Eric Zitzewitz, warned on the eve of the election, “If Trump wins, we should expect a big markdown in expected future earnings for a wide range of stocks — and a likely crash in the broader market.” The market is up roughly 60%. The New York Times summarized a 2016 study by economist Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics by warning, “If Donald Trump were elected president and put in his stated policies, the United States would experience a lengthy recession, enormous job losses, much higher interest rates and diminished long-term growth prospects.” The economy under Trump has precisely the opposite result on every measure. Even more wrong was Steve Rattner, MSNBC’s economics guru (still!) and former Obama automobile czar, who told investors, “If the unlikely event happens and Trump wins, you will see a market crash of historic proportions, I think … The markets are terrified of him.” And in case there was any voter confusion about the menace that Trump represented, a Washington Post editorial in October 2016 declared, “A President Trump Could Destroy the World Economy.” There were dozens of stories about why the Trump tax cuts couldn’t and wouldn’t work. You might even say there was a “scientific consensus.” The purpose of this column is not to rub their noses in it — well, maybe a little. The truth is I’ve been wrong in some of my economic predictions over the years. I thought the Clinton presidency would be a disaster for the economy. Still, after his first two shaky years in the White House and a GOP takeover of Congress, Clinton announced that “the era of big government is over,” and the economy soared. I’ve admitted my mistake. I will readily concede that the economic winds could shift next week, and the economy could start to slip. My point is this: Where are the mea culpas from the liberals who got predictions about the economy upside down over the last three years? Their economic malpractice was the equivalent of a doctor amputating the wrong arm. I don’t have to recite the catalog of statistics on how good financial conditions are today. It’s all wrapped up in the recent Gallup poll, which finds nearly 9 out of 10 people feel good about their personal lives. Trump didn’t destroy the economy. He rebuilt it. Where is the humility from the left in admitting, “Hey, my economic worldview has been put to the test and proven all wrong? I better rethink this. Maybe tax cuts and deregulation and energy production really do fire up the supply side of the economy. Maybe putting America first really does help the stock market and raise incomes. Maybe everything I was taught in college and grad school about Keynesian economics is a fraud.” Alas, we hear none of that, just flimsy excuses for why they were so wrong about Trump. First, the economy was going to crash. Then, when it didn’t crash, the boom was just a “sugar high” from large budget deficits and tax cuts. Then, when the “high” lasted three years, we were told a recession was “right around the corner.” Then, when the recession didn’t happen and the economy picked up steam in the last six months, we heard that this was just the continuation of the Obama trend. So, this is the left’s line of reasoning: If the economy crashes, it’s Trump’s fault. If the economy soars, Obama gets the credit. The wonder of it all is that the anti-Trumpers are still squawking from their lofty perches as if nothing that happens in the real world — rather than in la-la land or on MSNBC — really matters. Being wrong five or 10 or 100 times isn’t punishable; it can even win you a Nobel Prize. It is the unique sanctuary of punditry and academia. If you hired a stock picker that consistently recommended losing stocks, would you keep that person on retainer? If you hired a contractor and the house collapsed, would you pay him? If a football team lost every game, would you give the coach a five-year contract extension? But the press keeps turning to the same sources no matter how many times they have been wrong on the economy. Then, they wonder why they receive criticism for being fake news. Tags: Stephen Moore, Steve Moore, Rasmussen Reports, Trump’s Critics, on the Economy, So Wrong, So Often To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
If Duterte Wants Us Out, Let’s Go
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 05:46 PM PST
by Patrick Buchanan: Time for Manila to take charge of its own defense. Indeed, what is the argument for a treaty that virtually dictates U.S. involvement in any future war in 7,600 islands 8,000 miles from the United States? Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has just given us notice he will be terminating the Visiting Forces Agreement that governs U.S. military personnel in the islands. His notification starts the clock running on a six-month deadline. If no new agreement is negotiated, the VFA is dissolved. What triggered the decision? Duterte was offended that one of his political allies who led his anti-drug campaign in the islands, which involves extrajudicial killings of drug dealers, had been denied a U.S. visa. Yet, Duterte has never been an enthusiast of the U.S. presence. In 2016, he told his Chinese hosts in Beijing: “I want, maybe in the next two years, my country free of the presence of foreign military troops. I want them out.” The Pentagon is shaken. If there is no VFA, how do we continue to move forces in and out to guarantee our ability to honor the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty? Defense Secretary Mark Esper called Duterte’s action “a step in the wrong direction.” President Donald Trump openly disagreed: “If they would like to do that, that’s fine. We’ll save a lot of money.” The Philippine Islands are among the largest recipients of foreign aid in East Asia, and we’ve provided $1.3 billion in military assistance over the last two decades. But money shouldn’t be the largest consideration here. Trump has been given a historic opportunity to reshape U.S. and Asia policy along the lines he ran on in 2016. He should tell Duterte that we accept his decision and that we, too, are giving notice of our decision to let the 1951 treaty lapse. And following expiration of that treaty, the U.S. will be absolved of any legal obligation to come to the defense of the Philippines. Time for Manila to take charge of its own defense. Indeed, what is the argument for a treaty that virtually dictates U.S. involvement in any future war in 7,600 islands 8,000 miles from the United States? When we negotiated the 1951 treaty, it was a different world. We had entered a Cold War with Stalin’s USSR. We were in a hot war in Korea that would cost 37,000 U.S. lives. Gen. Douglas MacArthur had just been relieved of his command of U.S. forces in Korea by Harry Truman. A disarmed Japan had not fully recovered from World War II. The Communist armies of Chairman Mao had overrun China and driven our Nationalist allies off the mainland. The Viet Minh were five years into a guerrilla war to drive the French out of Indochina. Today, the Cold War is long over. Vladimir Putin’s Russia is no threat to the Philippines. Nor is China, though Xi Jinping has occupied and fortified islets like Mischief Reef in the South China Sea that are within the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines. There is no U.S. vital interest at risk in these islands to justify an eternal war guarantee or treaty commitment to fight Beijing over rocks and reefs in the South China Sea. Trump should seize this opportunity to tell Duterte that when the VFA, which guarantees immunity for U.S. forces in the Philippines, is dissolved, the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty is dissolved. A message would be sent to Asia, and the world, that Trump was serious when he said that he intends to revisit and review all the defense alliances and war guarantees entered into 60 and 70 years ago, to address threats that no longer exist in a world that no longer exists. The U.S. has a long history with the Philippines, beginning in the War of 1898 with Spain, when Admiral George’s Dewey’s Asian squadron sank a Spanish fleet in Manila harbor, and we invaded, occupied and colonized the islands, thus emulating Europe’s imperial powers and abandoning the anti-colonial legacy of the Founding Fathers. “Take up the White Man’s burden,” Rudyard Kipling admonished us. After Filipino patriots fought for nearly four years to liberate their islands from the Americans, as they had from the Spanish, inflicting on U.S. soldiers and Marines thousands of casualties, the New York Herald replied to the Poet of Empire: “We’ve taken up the white man’s burden/Of ebony and brown/Now, will you tell, Rudyard/How we may put it down.” After Pearl Harbor in December 1941, the Japanese invaded and occupied the islands, until Gen. MacArthur made good in on his famous pledge on leaving Corregidor, “I shall return.” In 1944, we liberated the islands. A year after Japan’s surrender, on July 4, 1946, we granted the Philippines full independence. And that nation and people, far more populous and prosperous than in 1946, should take full custody of the defense of their own sovereignty and independence. At the end of the Cold War, nationalists in Manila ordered the U.S. to vacate the great naval base we had built at Subic Bay. We should have used that expulsion to let the 1951 security treaty lapse. Trump should not miss this opportunity. Tags: Patrick Buchanan, conservative, commentary, Philippines, If Duterte Wants Us Out, Let’s Go To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Madame Guillotine
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 05:37 PM PST by Paul Jacob, Contributing Author: A Maine woman running for the U.S. Senate has chosen for her campaign logo the guillotine. Yes, she calls herself a ‘democratic socialist.’ Well, on Twitter it is ‘DemSoc.’ Her name . . . No, start again. On the campaign Twitter page the candidate’s “preferred pronouns” are listed as “they/them.” So, their name is Bre, and they proudly promoted the new logo on February 5th: “I was gonna wait until tomorrow to show off these beauties, but Trump got acquitted and I feel like folks could use something to look forward to.” But . . . why? For my part, the blood running in the streets was my least favorite part of the French Revolution, and I would, uh, downplay it, no matter how murderous I might ever feel. You know, were I a DemSoc. Upon being challenged with its most famous historical use, she had a . . . politic . . . response: “I’m aware of the French Revolution, and how the story ends. A guillotine t-shirt reminds others about it in hopes that we’ll all be motivated to address the very serious problems with our government before a similarly violent uprising becomes inevitable.” When asked who it was for, she replied, “More of a ‘what.’ The guillotine is for the plutocratic & kleptocratic norms that have undermined our democratic process. We have to develop ways to subvert the stranglehold of wealth on our government. There will not be a more convenient revolution. The symbol is a reminder.” I wonder what she would say if her rivals chose as campaign logos the hangman’s noose and the electric chair. But hey, her, er, their guillotine is attractive, and, because it lacks a drop of red, emphasizes the ‘democratic’ part of ‘democratic socialism’ . . . by hiding the blood. This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Madame Guillotine To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Virginia Assault Weapon Ban Fails
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 05:27 PM PST Gun Dynamics: Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s push to ban the sale of assault weapons has failed after members of his own party balked at the proposal. Senators voted to shelve the bill for the year and ask the state crime commission to study the issue, an outcome that drew cheers from a committee room packed with gun advocates. Four moderate Democrats joined Republicans in Monday’s committee vote, rejecting legislation that would have prohibited the sale of certain semiautomatic firearms, including popular AR-15 style rifles, and banned the possession of magazines that hold more than 12 rounds. The bill was a top priority for Northam, a Democrat who has campaigned heavily for a broad package of gun-control measures. Source: Fox 5 DC Tags: Gun Dynamics, Virginia, Assault Weapon Ban, Fails To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Boozman Recognizes Military Service of 100-Year-Old WWII POW
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 04:03 PM PST
ARRA News Service: U.S. Senator John Boozman (R-AR) recognized the service and sacrifice of WWII veteran Eustace O. Roberts Jr. “June,” in ‘Salute to Veterans,’ a series recognizing the military service of Arkansans. During the winter of 1941, when he was taking a pause from his job with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, he followed a girl to Fort Smith. Instead of gaining a new love interest, he got a new job. “I saw a picture of Uncle Sam,” Roberts said. “I went to the old Goldman Hotel and said can I join the Army?” He joined the Army on May 8, 1941 in Little Rock and headed to San Francisco days later where he boarded a ship to begin the long journey to his assignment in the 60th Coast Artillery on Corregidor, the largest island in Manila Bay. “I was seasick before I got out from under the Golden Gate Bridge,” Roberts said. He was trained as an automotive mechanic. “Everything was mostly WWI stuff. Old petrol trucks and old equipment,” Roberts said. The mission of the 60th was to defend the bay. Roberts and his fellow soldiers valiantly did so at all costs. “We were playing poker in the parts room and a bomb hit in the back of our building,” Roberts said. He recalled his friend saying it was a test fire, but he knew it was much more severe. “It set off a lot of ammunition. We got all of our trucks out of there.” It earned his friend the nickname “Test Fire Nichols,” and for safeguarding the trucks, Roberts was awarded the Silver Star. Roberts remembers the battering of Corregidor by the Japanese military following the fall of the Philippines. For nearly a month, Roberts and Allied soldiers were hammered by bombs and artillery. “You get out of your hole or tunnel and go out to relieve yourself and there’s shrapnel be whizzing around everywhere,” he said. On May 6, the Commander of Allied forces in the Philippines surrendered Corregidor and Roberts and his fellow comrades were taken to a POW camp. For more than three years, Roberts was known by his POW number, four digits that are still easy for the 100-year-old to remember in both English and Japanese. You had to know it or “they’d beat the hell out of you,” he said. Roberts was one of 1,619 POWs loaded onto a ship to be transported to a camp in Japan in late 1944. “A lot of them were smothered to death within the first two hours because it was packed too full,” he said. “There were bodies two deep.” At one point during his captivity he was too weak to work in the coal mines as he was expected to do, so he was reassigned to farm detail. He survived harsh conditions, performing tiring forced work and receiving little food. “I got to be good ole friends with the boys on butchering detail because they’d bring in a bunch of meat all cooked up and get them to give me a little cup,” Roberts said. After the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese soldiers abandoned the POW camp. Roberts and fellow POWs, including others from Arkansas, found their way to safety. “I always thought I was going to make it back home. I always had that in mind,” Roberts said. In addition to the Silver Star, Roberts also earned the Purple Heart, Bronze Star and other military awards for his selfless sacrifice. After returning home from the war, Roberts married Glenda Marie Jones. They had four children and were married for 70 years. “June Roberts lived through unimaginable circumstances as a prisoner of war for more than three years. The accounts of his time as a POW are an important part of his life and our nation’s history. I am pleased to be able to collect and preserve his memories and share with future generations about the horrific events he lived through as a reminder that freedom is not free,” Boozman said. Boozman will submit Roberts’ entire interview to the Veterans History Project, an initiative of the Library of Congress’ American Folklife Center to collect and retain the oral histories of our nation’s veterans. U.S. Senator John Boozman recognizes military Service of 100-Year-Old WWII POW Eustace O Roberts Jr. Tags: Eustace O Roberts Jr., 100 years old, POW, WWWII To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Time for Union Spending Transparency
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 03:33 PM PST by Rick Manning: The U.S. Department of Labor is charged with overseeing activities of our nation’s labor unions by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, an act that resulted from a report by a Senate Committee chaired by Massachusetts Senator John F. Kennedy. Protecting union members from the theft and misuse of labor union funds was at the heart of the LMRDA, and transparency was identified as critical to providing this protection. In fact, the Kennedy report stated, “A union treasury should not be managed as the private property of union officers, however well intentioned, but as a fund governed by fiduciary standards appropriate to this type of organization. The members who are the real owners of the money and property of the organization are entitled to a full accounting of all transactions involving their property.” The report became the Senate version of the bill, and the Landrum-Griffin Act eventually passed the Senate by a 95-2 vote and the House by 352-52. Under Landrum-Griffin union dues are only to be spent to benefit union members and transparency in reporting is the only way union members can be certain that this fundamental principle is upheld. Yet, here we are more than 60 years after the passage of this landmark legislation still battling over unions providing basic transparency for their members. The latest iteration of this regulatory fight is over a proposed Labor Department rule requiring transparency for state public employee unions whose parent unions have a combination of public and private members. The rule was court tested in the George W. Bush administration, and rescinded by the Obama administration. Now, it is back for consideration by the Trump Labor Department. This proposed rule, known as the Intermediary Bodies rule, is particularly important due to the fact that the Labor Department’s Office of Labor-Management Standards has uncovered a significant amount of corruption in intermediate bodies in the audits it has conducted. Over the last several years, more than 5 percent of all criminal cases they have brought have involved intermediate bodies. In addition, over 13 percent of audits of intermediate bodies have resulted in criminal investigations. That is why swift and decisive action must be taken to open up these union books to their own members to ensure accountability. We know from past experience that requiring labor organizations to file annual reports makes a positive difference. For example, by examining these reports, Los Angeles Times writer Paul Pringle discovered that the president of a Service Employees International Union affiliate was lavishly spending the union’s funds on himself, his wife, and his mother-in-law. That investigation led to the union president’s removal from office; he was subsequently tried and convicted in federal court. The Department of Labor requested comments as to whether or not the filing threshold for intermediate bodies ($250,000 in annual revenues) should be raised. ALG does not believe that the threshold should be raised. A quarter of a million dollars is a significant amount of money, and it is not too much to ask of intermediate bodies that they file an annual report on their activities. This proposed rule is not a large change, but it is important. The rule reaffirms the rights of union members and the public to know how public employee unions are spending their funds and is in keeping with Congressional intent. Frankly, it is absurd that public employee unions are not currently required to provide a fuller accounting of how they are spending their money. When it comes to transparency, it is clear that the law requires it, and today’s labor unions fear it, as it makes them more accountable to their members making their political control just a little less firm, but most importantly, union members deserve to know how their dues money is spent. Tags: Rick Manning, Americans for Limited Government, To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Political Bias and Anti-Americanism on College Campuses
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 02:49 PM PST by Dr. Walter E. Williams: A recent Pew Research Center survey finds that only half of American adults think colleges and universities are having a positive effect on our nation. The leftward political bias, held by faculty members affiliated with the Democratic Party, at most institutions of higher education explains a lot of that disappointment. Professors Mitchell Langbert and Sean Stevens document this bias in “Partisan Registration and Contributions of Faculty in Flagship Colleges.” Langbert and Stevens conducted a new study of the political affiliation of 12,372 professors in the two leading private and two leading public colleges in 31 states. For party registration, they found a Democratic to Republican (D:R) ratio of 8.5:1, which varied by rank of institution and region. For donations to political candidates (using the Federal Election Commission database), they found a D:R ratio of 95:1, with only 22 Republican donors, compared with 2,081 Democratic donors. Several consistent findings have emerged from Langbert and Stevens’ study.
Then there’s a question about loyalty to our nation. Charles Lieber, former chairman of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard, was arrested earlier this year on accusations that he made a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement about work he did for a program run by the Chinese government that seeks to lure American talent to China. He was paid $50,000 a month and up to $158,000 in living expenses for his work, which involved cultivating young teachers and students, according to court documents. According to the Department of Justice, Lieber helped China “cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security.” It’s not just Harvard professors. Newly found court records reveal that Emory University neuroscientist Li Xiao-Jiang was fired in late 2019 after being charged with lying about his own ties to China. Li was part of the same Chinese program as Lieber. A jury found a University of California, Los Angeles, professor guilty of exporting stolen U.S. military technology to China. Newsweek reported that he was convicted June 26 on 18 federal charges. Meanwhile, NBC reported that federal prosecutors say that University of Texas professor Bo Mao attempted to steal U.S. technology by using his position as a professor to obtain access to protected circuitry and then handing it over to the Chinese telecommunications giant, Huawei. The true tragedy is that so many Americans are blind to the fact that today’s colleges and universities pose a threat on several fronts to the well-being of our nation. Tags: Walter Williams, commentary, Political Bias, Anti-Americanism, College Campuses To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Pandemic . . .
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 02:34 PM PST . . . Socialism has spread throughout the Democrat Party like a pandemic and now threatens the entire country, only KAG can save America.
Tags: Editorial Cartoon, AF Branco, Pandemic, Socialism has spread, throughout the Democrat Party, like a pandemic, now threatens the entire country, only KAG can save America To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
How Lord of the Rings Brings Modern Day Orcs to England
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 02:27 PM PST by Daniel Greenfield: efore The Hobbit movies could begin their trek through theaters, Warner Brothers and the Tolkien Estate had to settle their lawsuit over profits from the original movies for an undisclosed sum. Christopher Tolkien, the now deceased son of the author, stated that the settlement would “allow The Tolkien Trust to properly pursue its charitable objectives.” The Tolkien Trust was founded by Tolkien’s children in the seventies to use some of the income from the estate of the celebrated philologist and author for charitable works. Two generations later, these works appear to have drifted quite far from anything that the conservative scholar might have wished. John Ronald Reuel Tolkien was a staunch Catholic, a monarchist and proudly provincial. The Tolkien Trust funds fairly few Catholic and many international human rights causes. Its English charities would often have been best left unfunded considering the great harm that they do to the ‘shires’ of his land. In 2018 and 2017, the Tolkien Trust sent a total of 80,000 pounds to Asylum Welcome. AW welcomes “asylum seekers, refugees and detainees” coming to Oxford and Oxfordshire. It boasts of its accomplishments in bringing Sudanese, Somalis, and Syrians to Oxford. The majority of AW migrants come from Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia and Eritrea. AW partners with six Oxford and Oxfordshire “community organizations”. Two of them are Syrian, two Somali, and one Sudanese. Its Syrian Resettlement program notes its success in registering Syrian asylum seekers for “benefits”. That, in the name of an author who once raged at government taxation. Not satisfied with bringing Muslim migrants to Oxford, AW also runs services for detained migrants who are due to be removed and claims to have “played an important part in… facilitating their release”. Oxford, like many places in the United Kingdom, that have suffered from mass migration from some of these countries, has experienced its own sex grooming ring scandal. More recently, Salman Ahmad, a Muslim refugee, gang raped a woman in Oxford after only being in the country for four months. The orcs are about in Oxfordshire. The Tolkien Trust sent 80,000 pounds to RefuAid which funds Syrian migrants in the UK. RefuAid, among other things, urges supporters to lobby MPs to increase local resettlement numbers. 75,000 pounds were sent to Doctors of the World UK which advocates for helping refugees access the NHS. And pumped another 70,000 into the Koestler Trust which aids prisoners and immigration detainees. 60,000 pounds was sent to La Cimade, which aids thousands of migrants entering France. 50,000 was sent to SOS Mediterranee and 10,000 pounds to Pilotes Voluntaires, which help migrants reach Europe. The Tolkien Trust not only supports hypothetical, but actual Islamic terrorists by dispatching 190,000 pounds in the last two years to Reprieve. The British group boasts of having “led the fight for access to the men held at Guantánamo” and of having “secured freedom for more than 80 men.” Clive Stafford Smith, Reprieve’s founder, represented among others, Moazzam Begg, who returned to the UK and went on to found CAGE, a pro-terrorist group, and to urge sympathy for Al Qaeda. CAGE called Jihadi John, the ISIS killer of Britons like David Haines and Alan Henning, a “beautiful man”. Reprieve is currently working to free Haroon Gul, a senior commander of the Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin terror group, which has been allied with ISIS, and Towfiq Bihani, a member of an Al Qaeda family who knew the original head of ISIS and threatened beheadings and another 9/11 attack. In a tragic irony, the Tolkien Trust is using the proceeds from Lord of the Rings to fund modern day orcs. After September 11, some found inspiration in the invocation of the battle between good and evil of the films. Unbeknownst to them, the films may have ended up funding that very evil we were fighting. Using the proceeds of Tolkien’s explorations of Middle Earth, the Tolkien Trust is spending a good deal of money on Muslim charities and on organizations doing a great deal of work in the Middle East. In the last two years, the Tolkien Trust has sent 41,000 pounds to Basmeh and Zeitooneh, a Syrian refugee charity, 60,000 pounds together in the last two years to the Aladdin Project and Association IMAD, two Muslim dialogue organizations in France, and 300,000 pounds to Medecins du Monde and 400,000 to Medecins Sans Frontihres, the original group, for its work in Libya and Yemen. While J.R.R. Tolkien was conservative, the Tolkien Trust’s spending on matters unrelated to its founder is similar to any other leftist trust. There’s 10,000 pounds for Greenpeace, 50,000 for Peace Brigades International, which has a history of supporting Marxists, and 110,000 pounds for another anti-war group. Considering Tolkien’s views of the Spanish Civil War, he would not have supported PBI. This obsession with “international relations and peace building” would have been foreign to him. There’s plenty of money for criminal charities like the Howard League for Penal Reform, the Shannon Trust, the New Bridge Foundation, and the Prison Phoenix Trust. And for homeless charities. Yet for an organization funded by the work of Tolkien, a devout Christian, it’s striking how few Christian organizations are funded by the Trust. Last week, I wrote of how the Roddenberry Foundation was exploiting the funds of the Star Trek creator to subsidize Islamists and racists who hate this country, its achievements and its ideals. There is a similar tragedy in the work of another fantastic creator being used to fund agendas he would have loathed. The Trust is funded by some US copyrights of Lord of the Rings, along with assorted other J.R.R. Tolkien was profoundly suspicious of power, yet his Trust is used to fund the causes of a Sauronesque leftist political movement that believes in total power over all people for their own good. “I am not a ‘socialist’ in any sense – being adverse to ‘planning’,” Tolkien wrote. “most of all because the ‘planners’, when they acquire power, become so bad—but I would not say we had to suffer the malice of Sharkey and his Ruffians here. Though the spirit of ‘Isengard’, if not of Mordor, is always cropping up.” His Trust has imbibed the spirit of Isengard enough to embrace socialism and what comes with it. In the Scouring of the Shire, the final struggle of Lord of the Rings, the hobbits return home to discover a devastated socialist landscape with lists of rules and ‘sharers’ collecting all the food, where the native farmers have been intimidated by “squint-eyed and sallow-faced” robbers acting as tax collectors. If J.R.R. Tolkien were to return today, he would discover that his own Trust is filling the UK with orcs. Tags: Daniel Greenfield, Sultan Knish, How Lord of the Rings, Brings Modern Day Orcs, to England To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
President Trump Has Established More Pro-Life Policies Than Any Previous President
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 02:15 PM PST by Karen Cross: On Presidents’ Day we celebrate you, Mr. President! Pro-life President Donald J. Trump and his Administration have established more pro-life policies than any other president in history. Ever. In recognition of President Trump’s many pro-life achievements, on July 4, 2019, on the eve of its 49th annual convention, the National Right to Life Committee, the federation of state right-to-life affiliates and local chapters, endorsed pro-life President Donald Trump for his re-election. On that day, Carol Tobias, National Right to Life president, said The Trump Administration also cut off funding to the United Nations Population Fund because of that agency’s involvement with China’s forced abortion program. On this day we celebrate fewer tax dollars going toward pro-abortion policies because of President Trump’s policies. President Trump pledged “to veto any legislation that weakens current pro-life federal policies and laws, or that encourages the destruction of innocent human life at any state.” President Trump is committed to signing pro-life legislation, including:
On this day we celebrate the lives that will be saved due to President Trump’s pro-life policies. The importance of the 2020 elections cannot be overstated. It will determine who appoints justices to the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous federal judges to lower courts. The election will determine whether the U.S. Senate will continue to be led by pro-life Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), so the Senate can confirm more federal judges. On this day we celebrate the 192 federal judges, including U.S. Supreme Court Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, nominated by President Trump and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. And this election will determine whether pro-abortion Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) can continue to squelch protective pro-life legislation such as the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. On this day we celebrate President Trump’s interest in helping down-ballot pro-life candidates, furthering our ability to pass protective lifesaving legislation. On this day, it’s important that voters know the differences between the candidates. On this day, please thank President Trump for his pro-life tenacity!! Then, be sure to download and share this important information with your friends and family. For an updated downloadable presidential candidate comparison to see where the presidential candidates stand on life issues, go here. A summary of President Trump’s record on life issues is available here. Tags: Karen Cross, LifeNews, President Trump, Has Established, More Pro-Life Policies, Previous President To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Don’t Forget Justice Clarence Thomas In Black History Month Celebrations
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 02:00 PM PST . . . In remembering the legacy of extraordinary black Americans, why does Clarence Thomas always go ignored?
by Ken Blackwell, Contributing Author: Black History Month should be a celebration of African Americans who have helped transform our nation. Sadly, that is not the case. To be included in the Black History Month celebration, one must be a “progressive” or, at the very least, not conservative. No doubt that is why Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, one of the most influential black men in America, is routinely ignored, even marginalized instead of celebrated as a man who has played a decisive role in American history as well as black history; and serves as an inspiration to the African American community. The recent release of the documentary “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,” gives the American people a chance to finally become acquainted with Justice Thomas’ life struggles and accomplishments — it’s a story exemplifying the spirit of Black History Month. Trying to erase history Smithsonian officials faced intense backlash over the decision to snub the second black Supreme Court justice in history, when they granted exhibit space to Black Panthers, hip-hop and Black Lives Matter activists. Justice Clarence Thomas Try clicking on the exhibit titled, “Making a Way out of No Way” — an exhibit dedicated to African Americans who “… created possibilities in a world that denied them opportunities.” You won’t find a mention of Justice Thomas, even though the man’s life story represents the very essence of this exhibit. Clarence Thomas is right: Here’s why Supreme Court should revisit libel law overreach Time and time again, Thomas is ignored because he is a conservative black man who unabashedly supports limited government and defends the Constitution. Carrie Severino, who clerked for Justice Thomas at the Supreme Court, writes that he “often makes his calls for constitutional fidelity alone, like a biblical prophet crying out in the wilderness. But that doesn’t bother him, first because he didn’t take an oath to try to create coalitions, to make friends on the Court, or to please the chattering classes. He took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution.’” The release of “Created Equal” shines a much-needed light on Justice Thomas’ inspiring story and hopefully will help educate the American public about this great man. Thomas’ story is one of incredible perseverance After participating in a particularly violent protest at Harvard University during the turbulent 1960s, he wandered into a church on the campus of the College of the Holy Cross, where he was attending. He asked God to take the anger out of his heart. After this experience, he let go of his bitterness and embraced love and acceptance as his guiding principles. Thomas has maintained his faith and commitment to love, even when he has labelled the “wrong black guy” by powerful progressives. He has faced nonsensical questions and brutally racist attacks but has never given in to the urge to hate his opponents or stoop to their level. Unlike those who ignore and marginalize the justice, “Created Equal” lets Thomas speak for himself, as the bulk of the film consists of director Michael Pack interviewing Thomas and his wife Virginia about their journey. Listening to Thomas will likely stun viewers when they hear his compelling and emotional story. 25 years later: Clarence Thomas still dissents His life has been an inspiration to countless African-Americans like me, and that will be his legacy. Tags: Justice Clarence Thomas, Black History Month, Ken Blackwell To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
In Divisive Times, Remember: ‘There’s Something Amazing About Being an American’
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 01:19 PM PST
by Rob Bluey & Virginia Allen: The question that so many Americans are asking today is, how do we unite our nation once again? In the midst of so much division, how can we remember that we are “one nation under God?” Today’s guest is best-selling author, journalist, and political commentator Sophia Nelson, who dives into the topic of unity in America and exhorts us to remember that the Founding Fathers “never said we had to agree all the time.” “They never said we had to like each other all the time, because they didn’t,” Nelson says. “What they wanted was unity of purpose, and unity and loyalty to the Bill of Rights, and to the freedoms that keep us uniquely American.” Listen to today’s podcast episode or read the lightly edited transcript below. Rob Bluey: We are joined on The Daily Signal podcast by bestselling author, journalist, and political commentator Sophia Nelson. Sophia, thanks so much for being with us. Sophia Nelson: My pleasure. Bluey: Sophia, throughout the month of February we are excited to highlight the work of African Americans like yourself. I’d like to ask you to begin by sharing with our listeners how you originally got involved in media and politics. Nelson: Well, it’s a great story. I think I’d like to start with someone that your audience will be familiar with who was a mentor of mine, a guy named Ed Meese, former attorney general. We all love General Meese, and I want to send him much love right at the outset of this and thank him because but for him, I would not be where I am. He was someone that I knew from law school. When I was ready to start my career, I gave him a phone call and said, “I want to come work on the Hill. Can we make this happen?” He made a phone call to a former congressman then, Chris Cox, who was chair of one of the subcommittees, and the rest is history. It’s amazing what can happen through the power of connection. I bring up General Meese on purpose because I think that when we think about those who have been trailblazers like Kay Coles James, [The Heritage Foundation] president, and others, there’s always somebody in the shadows that’s helped us. There’s always somebody that’s opened a door for you that’s created an entry point. General Meese did that for me and it has just been, since that time, an amazing journey from being a young lawyer, committee counsel, to litigating in a big firm, to working at the U.S. Chamber [of Commerce], to you’re writing books. Now, as I like to say, I’m a recovering lawyer and I am enjoying being a journalist and a writer and a pundit. Bluey: I’m so glad you commented on General Meese. He is a great colleague of ours here at Heritage. He is certainly a connector in the way that you described. What an apt description for him. We, obviously, at The Daily Signal work in the media business. What was it like making that transition from going from law to politics and to now being somebody who is a well-known commentator? Nelson: It’s a very natural transition if you think about it, right? Particularly if you’re here in Washington. I don’t know if you were somewhere else in the country, say, if you were in Kansas or in New Mexico, or someplace where there’s not this 24/7 news cycle obsession. As you know, a lot of us go from working on Capitol Hill as staffers or even members of Congress themselves, attorneys, committee council, big trade associations, and the doors are always wide open for opportunity, to go into the private sector if you want, or to go into the public sector and go into media. Particularly, … a year like this where you have a presidential election and you’ve got the Congress will be up for election. It’s a big election year. They add more pundits to the roster every day. Most of them come from the Hill. Most of them are lawyers by background or journalists from major publications. It’s actually a pretty easy transition. For someone like myself that loves to talk and I love to write, it was a very easy transition. I love it. Virginia Allen: Sophia, did you always consider yourself a conservative or was there a point in time when you sort of stepped back and said, “Wow, I really identify with the conservative values?” Nelson: Well, as an African American woman now of, I hate to admit it, 50 years of age, it is what it is, it happens to you. I think that a lot of people don’t understand the journey of African Americans and conservative values. In my family, I can tell you, like many African American families going back generations, we can trace on my mother’s side in particular dating back to right after the Civil War. Republican members of our family engaged in politics all the way up through Dwight Eisenhower and into even Richard Nixon’s presidency. I grew up like many African Americans, certainly like Kay, in the black church, in the church. I grew up with a set of values. Mother, father taught me certain things. There was right, there was wrong. There’s what you do, there’s what you don’t do. I grew up in a military family. [The] Second Amendment was embraced in my household. I want your listeners to know that that’s not uncommon, particularly for someone in my age group, Gen X. Now maybe for millennials it’s a little bit different. Conservative values were always in the family and always on the table, and I think pulsating just vigorously throughout the black church and throughout the church. I think that for me it was a natural type of affiliation, but it was Jack Kemp that inspired me on my college campus. 1988 was the first time I could vote for a president that year. He was running in the primary and I heard him speak and that was it for me. I came home and announced that I was going to be a Republican. I’m not sure that went over so well with my folks who are, again, they’re baby boomers. They were a little more what I would call left-of-center than their parents, the Greatest Generation, who had certainly been Eisenhower Republicans. Before that, a legacy in the family dating all the way down from [Abraham] Lincoln to Teddy Roosevelt. I think that, for me, I like to say that I’m the Alex P. Keaton in the family. Now you’ve got to be old to know who Alex P. Keaton was. “Family Ties.” Michael J. Fox, his character, liberal parents. He’s the Reagan-loving conservative in the household. That was pretty much me growing up. It was a pretty natural affinity. My value system, my faith system would lend me to be more conservative. I think as I’ve aged—and they say women get more liberal and men get more conservative, that’s interesting—I think that I would comfortably call myself an independent conservative. I am not happy right now with either political party, if I’m going to be honest. I think they’re both just not where the country needs to be. But I think that common sense, conservative values, and being a compassionate conservative is something I really want to see us move toward in this next decade or so. Bluey: Thanks so much for sharing that great story, Sophia. We appreciate that historical perspective. Also, your mentioning Jack Kemp, who has inspired so many of us here at Heritage. Heritage is, of course, a nonpartisan organization itself. I think that we see that frustration with the political parties and I know we want to get to that a little bit later in the interview. I wanted to ask about a book that you wrote called “E Pluribus ONE: Reclaiming Our Founders’ Vision for a United America.” Tell us more about it and why you felt it was important to write. Nelson: Well, for those listening in your audience, of course “e pluribus” is the “out of many,” and I translated the word one, so I hearkened back to our founding motto, which was created by Charles Thomson in 1780, E Pluribus Unum. I just translated the word unum into one because I wanted the one to really stick out on the cover of the book. Now you’ve got it, you’ve seen it. It’s a pretty book cover. It’s very patriotic. I don’t know if you flipped over and seen the picture on the back, but I look kind of cool on the back picture there, so you should check that out. The one, I wanted the one to really jump out at everybody because I wrote this book, I penned it on a hunch that … I had an inkling that our current president would win. I just did. We can talk about that a little later when you get into the politics segment. I wanted to write a book that really reminded us that no matter whether we’re Democrat, Republican, conservative, or liberal, there’s something amazing about being an American. There’s something amazing about being able to be united even when we disagree. I think we’ve lost that, and I think we’ve lost it in a really big way. We’ve become very uncivil, incivil. We’ve become very unkind and we now want to look at our fellow American who doesn’t agree with us, and now they’re not an American or they’re not patriotic. That’s not the way this country was founded. This country was founded by 13 colonies. If you think that South Carolina and Massachusetts liked each other, you’re wrong. If you think that Rhode Island and Virginia had a lot in common, you’re wrong. They didn’t agree on much of anything. Certainly they show slavery was a huge dividing block between the colonies. Yet these men, these Founding Fathers as it were, and of course Founding Mothers too, but these Founding Fathers really understood that if they were going to defeat tyranny and elevate liberty, if they were going to create a new nation based on equality and the great things that [Thomas] Jefferson talks about in the Declaration of Independence, these truths that are self-evident that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator God, with certain unalienable rights, then they had to unite. They were going to have to get past their differences, and they were going to have to stand shoulder to shoulder and fight the tyrant in order to elevate liberty. As a woman of color, again, a lot of people say to me, “What are you doing writing a book about the Founding Fathers? Those guys are rogue. They had slaves. They were chauvinists.” All the things that people say. Well, they might be right about all that in one sense, but in another sense, these men were also brilliant. They were trailblazers. They were flawed. They were human. They had weaknesses. Yes. Do I like the notion that this country started half-slave and half-free? I do not. I am a direct lineal descendant of slaves on my mother’s side. Direct. A great, great, great, great grandfather who was a slave owner’s son, and they ran off together. We can talk about that story later. The point is that all of us [are] a part of this great American tapestry, this great journey, and I want us to embrace the men and women regardless, again, whether that had an “R” by their name or a “D” by their name or an “independent” by their name. I want people to understand the greatness of America is that we perfect this union. It was not born perfect. I think [Condoleezza] Rice said it best when she said that America’s great birth defect is slavery. I think that’s such a great way to put it. But I think that since that time we’ve tried to right that wrong. We’ve tried to perfect that union, and look at where we are. We had an African American president. We have women senators and governors, and CEOs. We have black astronauts. We have Latino members of Congress and statesmen. We have definitely perfected, we righted, and we continue to do that. The whole notion of “E Pluribus ONE” is that our Founders really had a vision for a united country. Their original vision as, like I said, put forth in 1780 when Sam Adams commissioned Charles Thomson to come up with a motto, and they came up with “E pluribus unum,” “Out of many, one,” they got it. They understood it was the unity that was going to keep this republic strong. They never said we had to agree all the time. They never said we had to like each other all the time, because they didn’t. What they wanted was unity of purpose, and unity and loyalty to the Bill of Rights, and to the freedoms that keep us uniquely American. I elevated that in the book by talking about our founding principles, by highlighting the men and women throughout history. Like I said, in every chapter there’s a male and a female. I wanted to show the men and the women, regardless of where they came from or who they were, that contributed to the greatness of this country, and how we keep it moving forward. Allen: Sophia, that is so critical to take the time to go back and remember where we have come from as a nation and what our history is. So what has people’s response been to the book? Nelson: Well, it’s now 2 years old. It was a genre switch for me. … My first two books, the first one earned a Pulitzer nod. I didn’t win, I got nominated. It got a best nonfiction book award. My second one, one of the best-selling women’s books of all time. I’ve written books about women, women’s inspiration, and women’s leadership. I really made a genre switch when I went to politics, but I wanted to take those same principles of inspiration, of connection, of courageous conversation, the things that I talk about to women and the world’s biggest companies and all around the globe, and I wanted to apply it to our body politic, to our public square. The response, I think was, it picked up … when it first came out, nobody wanted to buy the book because they were mad. Everybody was mad after the 2016 election. I mean this sincerely, nobody wanted to talk about unity. Nobody wanted to talk about why we needed to be one country. Then within about six months we couldn’t keep them in stock. As I talked about it more on TV and people began to see, “Oh my, we’re really divided. Oh, this isn’t good.” Then when Charlottesville happened, that was a game-changer. It really propelled me and the book into a different type of spotlight because people said, “Sophia got that. She saw it coming. She was trying to warn us and wave the flag and say, ‘Hey guys, we’ve got to figure this out.’” It has been a great response to the book. I get invited all over to speak. Colleges, companies, trade associations, all over, literally all over the world. I’ve been to Australia. I’ve been everywhere to talk about this great American experiment, and the light and the spark that I think is still the envy of the world. No matter how messy it might get over here, no matter how much we might poke at each other and try to fight with each other, we’re still the great envy of the rest of the world. It’s been a good response. I’ve been happy with it. Bluey: It’s no secret that you have been critical of President Donald Trump. If you sat down with the president today, how would you encourage him to go about advocating and advancing some of those principles that you write about in the book? Nelson: … I really would like to sit down with him, actually. I’d like to have him to my house and have some coffee with him and say, “Let me talk to you for a minute. Let me help you for a minute.” What I would tell him is, “Mr. President, you’ve got some good policies. You really do. You’ve done some good things. The problem is … ” I would tell him what I tell my young nieces and others when they don’t know how to get out of their own way. Sometimes we need to learn to not always say what we’re thinking. We certainly shouldn’t always tweet what we’re thinking. I think that … as the president of the United States, you’re in the most esteemed position in the world, what you say matters and how you say it matters even more. I get that this president isn’t, perhaps, like any other that we’ve had in the sense that he wasn’t in public life before, and he wasn’t a senator or a governor or something like that. I get that. Perhaps part of the appeal of him was that people wanted somebody who would go to Washington and do these unconventional things because I think we can all agree, whether we’re Democrats, Republicans, or independents, that Washington is broken. It’s not working and it hasn’t worked for a really long time. I really hope we can all at least agree on that. I think that I wish he would stand up and be a different kind of man. I wish he would act like a man of faith. I wish he would talk like one. I wish he would encourage and motivate and inspire because, as my grandmother used to say, who just turned 90 two weeks ago and she’s still awesome, she always tells me, “You can get more with honey than with vinegar.” That stuck with me. She’s right, I think you have more appeal to people when it’s how you say things and how you reach them. I think that this president probably could have had a very different presidency these last few years had he just tempered himself and understood more about how you have to manage Washington, and just how you talk to people. That’s what I would tell them. I think those principles of unity are so important. I think he’s had some monumental moments as a president with a lot of, like I said, Charlottesville. Some of those opportunities were missed moments for him where he really could have stepped up and stepped in and really brought the country together, which is what we’re really used to seeing presidents do. Whether it’s W, or Obama, or Reagan, or George Herbert Walker Bush, who I just thought was an amazing human being. I think he’s broken the mold a little bit. I’m not a fan. That’s true. I wish he would do better. Bluey: Well, I hope you do have an opportunity to have that sit-down meeting. I think that it would be certainly lively and educational. Taking a step behind Trump for a moment, I want to ask how conservatives, like those of us at The Heritage Foundation or The Daily Signal, can more effectively reach Americans. Be it minorities, young people, or women. What positive and uplifting messages should we be focusing on? Are there certain policy issues where you think that there’s common ground that we should focus on? Nelson: I do, and I’ve thought that for the last 30 years. Like I said, I’ve been a part of the Republican Party … since 1988. Recently I made a decision, it’s probably better for me to be an independent. I think that you can’t be at odds with everything your party does and still be a part of it. It’s really not the values or the policies, it’s who’s talking about it. For example, I’ve been saying for years, for decades to Republicans, the message is fine. It’s the messengers I have the problem with. If you want to talk to communities of color, if you want to talk to women, they need to see people that look like them in leadership roles and roles of authority. People that they can connect to, people who grew up in their neighborhood. One of the things I’ve always prided myself on, if I ever decide to run for office—and I’m sure I probably will, I think about it, we’re talking about it—I think that one of the things that I pride myself on is I will be able to go into any community, whether it is the black community with women, with other racial minorities, whether it’s talking to a group of white men that embrace the Confederate flag with guns, I’m not afraid to go talk to them. I don’t think you should be afraid of your fellow Americans. I think that if you run on your ideas and if you can talk about your ideas, and if you can sell people on why your idea is better than the other guy’s, not tearing the other guy down, not ripping them down, not talking about his family, not talking about what he did when he was 19 or 20. Who cares? What people want to hear is, how are you going to make my life better? I think conservatives have done themselves a disservice by running away. I know if Jack were on this interview, he’d agree with me. They’ve done a disservice by running away from constituencies that need their message, now more than ever. No community could benefit more from that Jack Kemp, urban entrepreneurial, lowered taxes, self-advancement message than the African American community in places like Chicago or places like Camden, New Jersey or Newark or the urban areas. Let’s face it, look at the top 50 cities in this country. When’s the last time a Republican’s run any of those cities? Then look at how bad off many of those cities are economically. It’s a difference of philosophy. It’s a difference of how we get the results. I think Republicans and conservatives are for health care. I think they’re for protecting the elderly. I think they want to feed hungry kids in this country. We always fail in how we talk about it … Next year, I’m going to make sure you guys are invited to the Christmas party. I say that because my Christmas party is always a really big deal. You’ve got a lot of different people in here. You might have Yamiche Alcindor from PBS and then you might have Shannon Bream from Fox News, and you’ll see them talking in a corner. I pride myself on having a party and gathering, particularly in my home, where people are different and they look different. I always point that out to them. Invariably, people break out in applause because they look around the room and they realize, yeah, I’ve not been in a room like this forever, where there are white men and black women and African American men, and Latinos, and Asians and again, they’re from all different political persuasions. I throw everybody into the same room together and they get along just fine, and they do great. I think we have to do more of that. We have to not be afraid of each other and not be afraid to talk about things. Conservatives need to go into black churches and need to not be afraid of that. … Just because you’re a white guy running for Congress doesn’t mean you shouldn’t go talk to the black people that live in your community. That’s stupid. If you have a message, share your message and don’t be afraid. You’d be amazed how people respond when one, you have the courage to show up and two, [you] give them a different way to look at things. Showing up is part of it where people respect you because you came to them and you said, “I don’t agree with how they want to do it, but here’s how I want to do it. Here’s what I think. I think that I can prove to you that this might work better for you, your kids, your family.” People tend to listen to that kind of stuff. I think we’ve just missed a tremendous opportunity by how we don’t venture out to take conservative values and messages to places that need them the most in this country. Allen: Sophia, we could not agree with you more. That’s something that we talk a lot about at Heritage, that importance of building unity and reaching across the aisle, and just the power of showing up. That’s a focus of The Heritage Foundation and of our president, Kay James. You’ve known and worked with Kay James. Nelson: Love her. Allen: Yeah. She’s wonderful. We love her so much. What role has she played in your own political journey? Nelson: Oh, wow. I look at Kay, Kay’s like another mom. She and my mom are age cohorts, they’re baby boomer women, both conservative women, both, I call them, both godly women, just about their families and their grandchildren, and just good women. Kay is a role model for me, not just certainly from a political or career type of perspective, but as a human being. I like the way she lives her life. That’s big to me. I talk about that a lot in my book … If you think about what just happened with the death of Kobe Bryant and his daughter, which tragic, just very tragic and sad and the other people, it makes us all stop. It makes us reflect on our living and our dying. When I think of who I want to be when I leave this earth, it’s a person like Kay James who has built something. She’s built legacy. You’ve probably been to the Gloucester Institute or you’re aware of it. The work that she does to pour into African American students and students of color to expose them to conservative ideas and values, and to give them a part of their history that they don’t necessarily always get in college or in high school. I also think that Kay has been an inspiration to those of us who are women of color who are more conservative, or even moderate, because there are very few of us. I can count the number of black conservative women I know who’ve reached the height, if you will, of politics or policy in Washington on one hand. Kay is at the top of that, and her ascension at Heritage to president, up to me, is this, I still can’t believe it because it’s pretty amazing. I say that because it’s probably something that no one thought would ever happen and I think she’s done an amazing job. I think that she is the right person for the times we live in because she knows how to talk to her community. She went to an HBCU [a historically black college or university]. She is grounded in her community so no one can challenge her on her love of her community, her loyalty to her community. It’s important to be able to walk in both worlds where Kay can be in a room full of conservative white men and do just as well as she could be in a room of all black pastors and talk to them just the same. That’s where we need to be in this country. I think she’s a great role model for how we create bridges and dialogues and opportunity to just stop with one another, break bread. We need to get back to some basics in this country. We’ve got to stop all the meanness, and all the unkindness, and giving each other a black eye. We’ve got to learn to sit down and have some coffee, have a glass of wine, and just talk and listen. You’ll be OK, you’ll survive it. It’s really OK. I think that Kay is really good at setting that type of example for me and for others. Bluey: That’s so true. Having worked with her closely for the last two years, it’s certainly opened my eyes to new ways of thinking about things. The challenges that she gives her staff are really incredible, and I will say, I’m a better person as a result of having her as a leader of Heritage and thankful for it. Nelson: If I might real quickly, you made me think of something that I wanted to say when I was talking about General Meese. I brought him up intentionally, and Jack Kemp, again, for your listeners to understand something very important now. I was a young woman in Washington, 30 years ago, I’m a young committee council and all those things. I was it. It was me. Kay was somewhere. I could call Kay, but that was pretty much it. There wasn’t a whole lot of us running around. I want people to understand that Ed Meese and Chris Cox and very conservative men took me under their wing—Dan Burton, who a lot of people were not very kind to in the media. [They] thought he was extreme and thought he was a little strange, whatever they said about them, conservative, but these guys took me under their wing, they elevated me professionally, they supported, they encouraged, and they were mentors. I think it’s so important for people to know that your mentor doesn’t have to look like you. They don’t have to just be from where you’re from. They can be someone that’s completely different from you, from a different generation. They can be a white male if you’re a young woman of color and they can help you. I feel very fortunate to have had that type of experience because I think it’s so important for this new generation to understand and I think they get it, actually. I think the millennials are pretty phenomenal in terms of … if you have kids and if you have young nieces and nephews or what have you, you’ve seen them. Their friends are like the U.N., they don’t see race, … they don’t, they are just all over the place. That is awesome. That’s very different from when I grew up, and certainly different from when Kay grew up. I’m optimistic about where I think we’re headed, but I think that we’ve got to get past our differences and that’s why I really try to focus on oneness and unity. Even when we disagree, we have to be unified in what America’s about, what her value is, why she’s so important, and why this republic must stand long after we’re gone. I just wanted to let people know that it’s, your mentors don’t always have to look like you. Bluey: Sophia, thanks for sharing that optimistic advice about our future. I know you have said that you believe in the best in people, and that’s great advice and words of wisdom for our readers. For those who want to follow your work and learn more about you, what would you recommend? How can they go about doing that? Nelson: Well, certainly, good old Google will give you everything. Bluey: It certainly will. Nelson: … If you like feisty Sophia, you want to follow me on Twitter, @IAmSophiaNelson. If you want a more calm version, you want to go to my Facebook page, Sophia A Nelson. Everything’s “I Am Sophia Nelson,” whether it’s on Instagram or Twitter. For your female audience, I certainly want to recommend to you, particularly, my second book, “The Woman Code: 20 Powerful Keys to Unlock Your Life,” because I think it’s a game-changer. … It’s a crossover book. It’s a Christian book, but it’s also a professional book. It’s about what it means to be a woman and living by a code. I think that, like I said, we need to get back to some basics. You can find me pretty easy, “I Am Sophia Nelson” on every platform. Allen: Sophia, thank you so much for your time today. We really appreciate it. Nelson: My pleasure. Thank you. Tags: Rob Bluey, Virginia Allen, Sophia Nelson, In Divisive Times, Remember, There’s Something Amazing, About Being an American To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
||
Idiot King Obama Tries to Take Credit for Trump’s Economy
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 12:57 PM PST by Stephen Kruiser: The Return of the Paste-Eating Lightbringer The Trump economy took off upward about an hour after he was sworn in three years ago and has been chugging along quite nicely ever since. Because every Democrat in America moved into an alternate reality in January, 2009, they have been insisting that all of this economic goodness is just really the magic touch of Obama reaching across time. It isn’t surprising that the Lightbringer’s devotees need to tell themselves this story, because the economic reality when he was in office was pretty dismal: Here it is, complete with my rather indelicate reply:
Our sister site Twitchy used that response of mine to inspire the headline for this post, which features several more choice reactions to Obama’s nonsense. Naturally, President Trump didn’t let this pass without comment.
Perhaps one day historians won’t merely be leftist hack academics and a truthful accounting will be given of the overwhelming economic and foreign policy failures of the Obama years. For the near future we are going to suffer through largely fictionalized accounts of his “accomplishments.” Which he will no doubt keep sharing with us in that oblivious, irony-free way of his. Awkward
———————- Tags: Stephen Kruiser, PJ Media, Idiot, King Obama, Tries to Take Credit, for Trump’s Economy To share or post to your site, click on “Post Link”. Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and “Like” Facebook Page – Thanks! |
You are subscribed to email updates from ARRA News Service. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
NOQ REPORT
NOQ Report Daily |
- Different ballpark: How President Trump’s clemency numbers compare to President Obama’s
- Forced vasectomies in Alabama: Liz Wheeler shows why Rolanda Hollis is an idiot
- Why mainstream media won’t ‘Ask The Q’
- Why Bernie Sanders must hope for Biden (and everyone else) to stay in for Super Tuesday
- Star Trek: Shadow Prime Book I – Chapter 14
- Bloomberg’s big adventure: Praising dictators, dodging demonstrators and buying public sidewalks
- NBC touts Sanders, buries the lede: 67% of voters do not want a socialist president
- Indiana teach fired for exposing indoctrination in public schools through ‘Social-Emotion Learning’
- Mike Bloomberg will be on the defensive at the debate, but he’ll attack one guy
- Panic! at the Democrat primary
Different ballpark: How President Trump’s clemency numbers compare to President Obama’s
Posted: 19 Feb 2020 04:36 AM PST Democrats and mainstream media make for a funny couple. Neither has a sense for history and both try to distort it to serve their needs. Case-in-point: presidential clemency. The reaction from the left to President Trump’s pardons and commutations yesterday would make one think he’s a criminal’s best friend. They painted it as “abuse of power” (their new favorite accusation after “racist” and “dangerous” failed miserably) and put out more negative stories about it in one day than they did for President Obama’s entire eight-year occupation of the White House. This is, of course, expected as both Democrats and mainstream media will attack President Trump for any action, word, or Tweet. If he personally came up with a cure for the coronavirus they would accuse him of colluding with the Chinese to influence the 2020 election. In total, President Trump has granted clemency to 26 people. How does that compare to previous presidents. Over the last 44 years, the numbers have been pretty consistent with two notable exceptions. President G.H.W. Bush was low with 77 in is single term, followed by his son who had 200. President Reagan more than doubled that with 406, followed closely by President Clinton’s 459. Though only serving one term, President Carted was able to out-pardon them all with 566. President Trump’s 26 definitely don’t seem like a lot when we look at some of his predecessors. Combined, they have delivered 1734 pardons, commutations, or remissions. Oh, did I miss someone? It makes sense that mainstream media didn’t report much about President Obama’s granting of clemency because it would have kept them extremely busy. He was able to beat the combined totals of his five predecessors and his successor with 1927 pardons and or commutations. To put that into perspective, that’s granting clemency to someone every day-and-a-half for the entirety of his stint as president.
President Trump has granted clemency to 26 people in over three years and mainstream media “journalists” were fainting in newsrooms across America. President Obama granted clemency to over 77 times as many with nary a peep from the media. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Different ballpark: How President Trump’s clemency numbers compare to President Obama’s appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Forced vasectomies in Alabama: Liz Wheeler shows why Rolanda Hollis is an idiot
Posted: 19 Feb 2020 03:31 AM PST Alabama Representative Rolanda Hollis wanted to spark a conversation about men’s and women’s bodies. She introduced legislation that would mandate vasectomies on all men who either reached the age of 50 or had three children, whichever came first. It’s a ludicrous proposal intended as a comparison for removing abortion “rights” from women.
There are too many problems to list in one article, and even this One America News video of host Liz Wheeler only scratches the surface on how idiotic it was for Hollis to attempt to draw parallels. But the point was made nonetheless; blocking sperm from reaching a man’s semen is nothing like dismembering a small human being. There’s no comparison whatsoever.
Leftists will try anything to defend their “right” to have another human being killed through abortion. This desperate attempt at symbolism by Rolanda Hollis fell short in every possible way, as Liz Wheeler rightfully pointed out. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Forced vasectomies in Alabama: Liz Wheeler shows why Rolanda Hollis is an idiot appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Why mainstream media won’t ‘Ask The Q’
Posted: 19 Feb 2020 12:00 AM PST There’s a sad reality Americans must face today. Perhaps it’s always been like this and it simply hadn’t been exposed the way it has been the last four years. Whatever the reason, it’s clear and present today that if mainstream media plays something up as a “bombshell” like the Mueller investigation or the impeachment saga, it’s almost always a nothingburger meant to distract from something truly important. Conversely, if something is being downplayed by mainstream media like the coronavirus or QAnon, it’s much more important than they’re admitting. For the last several months, I’ve monitored QAnon from a distance. I never got too close—message boards have never really been my thing—but I watch for updates through Twitter and often check various YouTube channels for anything of substance. There are three observations I can make so far. The first is that the way they’re being characterized by mainstream media demonstrates a concerted attempt to stigmatize anything and anyone related to Q. They use scary phrases like “hate group” and “Deep State” and “pedophile rings” to keep the average Joe from learning anything about them other than what the people controlling the media want you to hear. Second, there are only two possible explanations for the people behind the information drops. They’re either highly skilled, clever, and knowledgeable people who can masterfully feign military and intelligence community insider knowledge that is often (though not alwasy) above reproach, or they’re part of the military and intelligence community itself. Third, those who follow QAnon do so for various reasons. It means different things to different people. But it all ties back to a singular truth that forces within and outside of government are working hard to destroy the President, preserve their cabal, and extend their already-vast reach to every corner of the globe. This is why it’s characterized as a “far-right” group even when a more accurate way to define them is as an anti-corruption group. Q sees corruption everywhere. Q is very likely correct. I do not believe the world is flat. Paul McCartney didn’t die and get replaced. Lizard people aren’t disguised as Hillary Clinton or Eric Holder. Conspiracy theories generally bore me because so many of them are manufactured specifically to discredit the conspiracy theory community itself. But every now and then, conspiracy theories turn out to be very real and many of the ideas QAnon is pushing fall into that category. I wouldn’t call myself a Q-supporter at this point. Perhaps I’m still just Q-curious. But it’s enthralling to see what is said and compare it to what actually happens in the real world. We may never know who is behind the Q drops. There are multiple reasons that make me not want to know, which is very rare for a journalist to admit. There’s a question that must be asked eventually, yet nobody with a camera and access to the President has been willing to ask it. The reason mainstream media won’t ask the question is the same reason they won’t allow anyone to utter the name “Eric Ciaramella.” They understand that QAnon is like Pandora’s Box. Once they open it, they won’t be able to close it and whatever comes out won’t be anything they want the people to know. Tonight, “Ask The Q” was trending on Twitter temporarily, apparently getting around their anti-Q algorithmic countermeasures. It led me to this video. Everyone should watch it, if only to dispel the propaganda surrounding the topic of QAnon. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Why mainstream media won’t ‘Ask The Q’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Why Bernie Sanders must hope for Biden (and everyone else) to stay in for Super Tuesday
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 10:26 PM PST Conventional wisdom tells us it’s better for one candidate when other candidates drop out. There are exceptions as it pertains to lanes; moderates may hope Senator Elizabeth Warren stays in, for example, because a good chunk of her supporters will flock to Senator Bernie Sanders when she leaves. But 2020 isn’t a conventional wisdom sort of year. In fact, there is a very good reason for Sanders to hope everyone who’s currently in will remain in the race through Super Tuesday. If they do, he could win it all then. Surging billionaire Mike Bloomberg hopes everyone else drops out before Super Tuesday. If they do, as unlikely as that is right now, then he’s probably going to get the nomination. It’s such an appealing notion that I wouldn’t be shocked if the DNC will be quietly reaching out to former Vice President Joe Biden, Senator Amy Klobuchar, and Mayor Pete Buttigieg sometime between now and March 2nd. Their calculus looks a whole lot better for Bloomberg if other “moderates” are out of the way. Let’s assume they all stay in. They probably won’t, but play along. Let’s assume the Nevada caucus and South Carolina primary results are good enough for everyone that they all keep going through Super Tuesday. A scenario plays out in which Sanders, despite the outrageous spending by Bloomberg, may end up getting nearly all of the delegates. With 1/3rd of the nation voting that day, it would essentially lock up the nomination for him even if Bloomberg spends $10 billion after that. The key is in the new rules for the DNC in which no state is winner-take-all UNLESS only one candidate surpasses the 15% viability threshold. Here’s how California, the big prize on Super Tuesday, looks now:
If these numbers were to somehow magically hold on Super Tuesday, ALL of California’s delegates would go to Sanders. Four of the other candidates are flirting with viability, but only Sanders achieves it. If that scenario plays out in other states as well, it’s game over. It’s a far-fetched scenario, but not impossible. It all depends on which candidates stick it out. If any one of them drops out before Super Tuesday, which is very likely, then Sanders will only get the biggest share of the delegates, but not all of them. Now let’s reverse the scenario. If Biden loses South Carolina, he’s pretty much done. If Klobuchar bombs in Nevada, which seems very likely, she’ll start angling for a VP nod. Warren is already being ignored by the press as her fall has been second only to Biden’s. Buttigieg will stay in regardless of what happens in Nevada and South Carolina as he already has a decent head start on delegates, enough to get him to the table on Super Tuesday. Tom Steyer and the rest of those still technically in the race are quickly becoming non-factors even though he’s polling fairly well in a couple of states. If Biden, Klobuchar, Warren, and Steyer drop out before Super Tuesday, it’s suddenly Bloomberg’s nomination to lose. He’ll get the lion’s share of Biden, Klobuchar, and Steyer supporters and even a handful of Warren supporters who blame Sanders for keeping Warren down. In that scenario, Sanders will be looking at around 35%-40% in California with Bloomberg around 45% and Buttigieg still in the teens trying to break the 15% threshold. It’s ironic that thanks to the DNC’s odd rules, Sanders’ success in the four early states may end up costing him dearly on Super Tuesday. But if the other candidates don’t get muscled out prematurely, he could end up being the big winner. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Why Bernie Sanders must hope for Biden (and everyone else) to stay in for Super Tuesday appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Star Trek: Shadow Prime Book I – Chapter 14
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 10:25 PM PST Welcome to the next exciting installment of Star Trek: Shadow Prime Book I. If you’ve ever wondered what Star Trek would be like as a modern, Tom Clancy-esque techno-thriller, you’ve come to the right place. Just in case you’ve missed the previous installments, you can find them here:
As I mentioned before, if you like this book and want to see it in print, ping Simon & Schuster and Pocket Books on social media and let them know! Especially now, since this is the FINAL chapter–and it ends on a bit of a cliffhanger… Chapter FourteenUSS Enterprise “Shock wave!” Data shouted, half a second before a wall of superheated plasma slammed into the ship. It smacked the primary hull like an uppercut to the jaw, hitting almost dead on at a flat angle, straight through with no shields standing in the way. Data held on as hard as he could, his fingers digging holes in the sides of the ops console, while his positronic brain handled navigation directly. With no way to tell where Enterprise was heading, though, Data was flying blind—and with no human intuition at his disposal, all he could do was hazard a guess. Until he heard Captain Picard’s voice rasping at him from behind. “Roll twenty degrees to starboard!” he ordered. Data complied. The maneuver reduced Enterprise’s profile relative to the wave, reducing some of the shearing stress—but just barely. In fact, the android fully expected the dome of the bridge to crack wide open and cast them into space. “Full impulse!” “Integrity fields at residual power only,” Data warned. “It is unlikely the ship can bear that kind of load, sir.” “Impulse at full, Data!” Picard repeated. “Get us clear!” “Full impulse, aye.” The sound of the main engine heaved sickly through the deck, which picked up a heavy vibration that quickly became a violent shudder. Picard managed to crawl back into his chair, pinned there by the sudden acceleration—a sure sign that the inertial dampeners had also failed. Data made sure that he kept Enterprise on a straight line, knowing that at impulse speeds even a slight turn could crush them all in an instant. If the ship doesn’t tear herself apart first, he thought. Data hoped that if it happened, for the sake of his crewmates, that it would be quick.
“Commander!” Barclay yelled, and kept yelling until his throat almost burst. The effort was useless, his voice swallowed up by a primal roar as the atmosphere in the hell hole got sucked into vacuum. The wind was worse than he could have imagined, drowning everything else out as it reached around him like some gigantic hand and dragged him toward oblivion. It had already forced the access hatch wide open, even as La Forge had tried to keep it closed, the temperature plummeting to subzero in mere seconds. “Commander!” Barclay called out again, but couldn’t even hear himself. Even worse, he could barely see through the blizzard of debris and ice blowing past his face. Turning away from the wind, he wiped his eyes and managed to find the escape hatch within reach. He pulled the locking pin and gave the wheel a hard spin to the open position, then turned back to give La Forge a hand—but when he did, he found himself alone. La Forge was gone. My God… Barclay’s breath came in short, rapid gasps now. His lungs refused to inflate fully, even with his oxygen mask on, as if his chest was hollow and his insides were seeking a way out. He knew the negative pressure would kill him in a matter of seconds, the freezing cold didn’t get him first, but he kept on peering through the maelstrom and searching for La Forge. Barclay spotted him near the end of the access tunnel, just outside the open hatch, trying to claw his way back inside. His face and hair were covered in frost, cut by rivulets of blood from the burst capillaries beneath his skin. Beyond that, the empty warp core chamber loomed like some gigantic maw, waiting for La Forge to fall in so it could devour him. “Hang on!” Barclay shouted, and stepped into the slipstream. The wind caught his body like a sail, nearly yanking him through the hatch. Barclay grabbed a handhold on the ceiling and held on, allowing his legs to go through first. He bounced around until he finally found a place to plant his feet, but by then they had gone so numb he barely felt them making contact. He then tried to move on to the next handhold, but couldn’t get his fingers to budge. They stuck like glue, nearly frozen solid against the bare metal. Crying out for strength, Barclay ripped his hand free. He felt the skin peeling from his fingers in sickening slow motion, like strips of wet tissue paper. The wind did the rest, sweeping him into the access tunnel where he inched his way down toward La Forge. The fingers of his ruined hand felt like glass, splintered and poised to shatter, but Barclay managed to get them wrapped around a nearby pipe. His other limbs jerked convulsively, muscles constricting as they began to shut down. Already half a corpse, it wouldn’t be long before the rest of him went the same way. But he would be damned if he ever gave up. “Geordi!” La Forge raised his head at the sound of his name, leaving a ragged patch of his own frostbitten cheek behind on the deck. He looked up and saw Barclay there, reaching for him. At first La Forge waved him off, his face an agonized plea for him to get the hell out of there while there was still a chance—but Barclay would have none of it. “I’m not leaving you!” La Forge, trembling, reached back toward him. “That’s it! Take my hand!” Barclay made a swipe for him but missed. He tried again, this time brushing against La Forge’s fingertips, but still came up with a fist full of nothing. Summoning the last reserves of his will, Barclay stretched out his arm—farther and farther, the bone seeming to pop loose from its socket, pain seeping through the numbness and breathing new life into him. And with that effort a roar escaped his lungs, precious breath spent in one final supplication that God Himself couldn’t ignore. “MOVE!” La Forge jumped. He reached out with both hands, with nowhere to go but down if Barclay failed to catch him. Barclay clambered to get a hold of him, his own grip slipping—and for one horrifying moment, it seemed as if both of them would tumble together into the void. He dug in, though, hooking his fingers around La Forge’s sleeve and hauling him up. He motioned toward the hatch. La Forge nodded. Barclay gave him a push while La Forge grabbed hold of the opening. Grimacing, the commander kicked madly for traction as he pulled himself through. Barclay, meanwhile, watched his vision grow dimmer as he drew the last of his oxygen from the pack. It was a strange sensation, really—not unlike drowning, but without the panic. More like going to sleep, now that he thought about it, unconsciousness slipping over him in a warm cascade, dulling all the pain and making him forget why he fought so hard against it… “Reg!” His eyes flew back open, lungs gasping for air where none existed. Barclay tore his mask off, his throat constricting against the falling pressure and vicious cold, and looked over to see La Forge waving at him to follow. “Your turn!” he shouted. Barclay didn’t hesitate. In the next five seconds he would either live or die, and at this point he didn’t care which—he just wanted it to be over. He let go of the pipe, his fingers snapping like dry twigs, and flopped down on the frozen deck. La Forge grabbed him the instant he hit, stopping the slide straight back into the hell hole, but had no strength left to drag Barclay inside. “Push! That’s an order!” Moving on autopilot, Barclay did as he was told. His legs felt like rubber, his feet a distant memory, but he kept on kicking until he inched far enough forward to reach the open hatch. La Forge took off his mask and gave him several last gulps of air, then cast the empty tank aside. As the commander looked at him, even with his VISOR on, Barclay understood the message behind that expression. This is it. No more time. Barclay hurled himself through as if the devil were chasing him. He crashed through the tiny space, banging his head and his elbows against every hard edge that presented itself. The thickening clay of his mind didn’t even register it as he kept plodding through—though he remained keenly aware of La Forge at his side, the only thing that seemed real to him now. Crawling together, they reached the sealed escape hatch on the opposite side of the room, its locking pin still dangling from when Barclay had pulled it. So close… La Forge gave the wheel a final half turn, and the hatch popped open. Fresh oxygen, so hot it burned them, blasted their faces before getting sucked down into the hell hole. Barclay drank it in so fast that his lungs seemed to burst, making him double over and gag, but he kept breathing. La Forge slapped him on the shoulder and motioned for him to go first, and at this point nothing could stop him. The need to get away from the cold, to reach that warmth, to live was so primal he could not resist. La Forge went in behind him, a tangle of arms and legs. Both of them then grabbed the hatch, pulling and fighting against the vortex that howled past, like a beast that meant to have them no matter what. That was when the terror descended in Barclay in full, and his limbs trembled more from panic than the ice that blistered him: knowing that death was right outside that door, and that it refused to be cheated. Then the hatch closed with a clang. La Forge spun the wheel back and locked it. Blessed silence descended, along with a welcome darkness. Head sliding against the bulkhead, Barclay fell into sweet unconsciousness.
“Reduce power!” Picard ordered. Data gradually bled off speed, taking Enterprise down to one-quarter impulse. At the same time, the deep shudder that reverberated her decks tapered off into a more benign thrum. Up ahead on the viewscreen, Picard watched the pocket of superheated gases that had enveloped the hull dissipate into the blackness of space, the outer reaches of the Bezzeret atmosphere left behind. The ship was finally clear—though the screeches and groans that still penetrated her frame reminded her captain of how badly she had been hurt. Picard took in the bridge around him. He stared through a smoky haze, while sparks erupted sporadically from smashed consoles and a cracked bulkheads. One set of turbolift doors had warped in the middle from where the frame had buckled around them, while the viewscreen itself hung askew, large swaths of dead pixels leaving jagged holes in the image it projected. To Picard, the bridge was almost unrecognizable. That it had all had happened in the space of seconds seemed incomprehensible. Aside from Data, not a single crewman was left standing. The android unplugged himself from ops and came over to assist his captain. Picard waved him off, motioning for Data to check on the others while he quietly assessed his own condition. His spine hurt like hell, and as he tried to straighten up in his chair it only got worse—probably a compression fracture, though his main concern was for the rest of the crew. Picard kept an eye Data as he checked on Lieutenant Worf first. “How is he?” Data felt for a pulse. “Alive,” he said, before moving on to the others. Picard winced. “Is the rest of the ship like this?” “With the limited diagnostics at my disposal, I cannot accurately asses the full extent of our condition,” the android replied. “The damage, however, is catastrophic—most likely beyond the ability to repair.” “You mean her back is broken.” “In so many words, sir.” Data finished with the last of the injured, and stood up to face Picard. “Two of the bridge crew are dead. The rest are unconscious and in need of medical attention. We should get them down to Sickbay immediately.” If we even have a Sickbay, Picard thought grimly. He tried the intercom button on his chair, but got nothing. He then tried his comm badge, which answered with a storm of radio traffic: voices on top of voices, jamming every available frequency with status reports and calls for help. Cutting through it all was impossible. Meanwhile, at the corner of his vision, Picard noticed some movement near the edge of the viewscreen. It appeared from the starboard—just a glint of silver so small that he could have just as easily missed it, had he not been suddenly gripped by a singular question. Where was Dauntless? The entire time Enterprise’s orbit had been decaying, when precious seconds could have made all the difference, she was nowhere to be found. Even with the vast difference in size between the two ships, there was nothing to prevent Dauntless from slapping a tractor beam on her wounded sister and attempting a rescue—and yet she had maintained her distance. All while Quintax watched Enterprise burn. “Data,” Picard said, pointing at the screen. “Can you augment that?” Data looked at him curiously. “I believe so, sir.” “Do it.” The android returned to to ops, plugging back in and making several attempts before the screen responded. The image blacked out completely for a moment, then blurred, then decomposed into static. When it finally cleared, the distinctive shape of an Excelsior-class vessel filled the screen, executing a hard turn on an approach vector. Dauntless. Her forward torpedo tubes glowed bright red. “Dauntless has activated her weapons,” Data said, telling Picard what he already knew. “Closing to point-blank range.” You murdering bastard. “Emergency evasive!” Picard snapped. “Impossible. With inertial dampeners down, we can maneuver on thrusters only.” “What about our weapons systems?” “Unavailable. Fire control is directed through the main computer.” Dauntless positioned herself on Enterprise’s flank, a perfect firing position. From that distance, Quintax couldn’t possibly miss—and all it would take was a single shot. Defiantly, Picard glared at the viewscreen, knowing there wasn’t a thing he could do about it; but if pure, unbridled hate could sear the space between the stars, he wanted to make damned sure that Quintax felt it before he pulled the trigger. “All right,” he seethed. “Finish it, then.” Enterprise shook, her unprotected hull taking the advance wave of a tremendous energy release. Picard closed his eyes for only one moment, preparing himself for the inevitable, then opened them again to face the same. He fully expected to see a salvo of torpedoes bearing down on his ship, perhaps phaser fire as well—the overkill of a pathetic man who couldn’t destroy them through sabotage, and now had to do the dirty work for himself. Except that there were no torpedoes closing in, and the fire that lit up the night over the Bezzeret home world did not consume what was left of Enterprise’s battered frame. Instead, it exploded from the enemy vessel’s shields. “Captain,” Data reported. “Another ship is firing on Dauntless.”
USS Thomas Paine “Federation starship, Excelsior-class,” Ensign Nomuri shouted from ops, his voice a tangle of apprehension and eagerness as he read from his console. “Distance from Enterprise—five thousand meters, closing fast!” Captain Rixx remained inscrutable in the center seat, though the heart that pounded against the inside of his ribcage was anything but. Having dropped out of warp only moments before, he barely even had a handle on the scene unfolding in front of him—except that it was bad, and that the next few seconds would bring an end to his life as he knew it. Even so, he never flinched. “Red alert,” he ordered. “Execute course to intercept.” “Aye, sir,” Lieutenant Marlowe replied from the conn. She poured on speed, aiming for that quickly narrowing gap between Enterprise and the other vessel. “Calculated time to intercept, fifteen seconds.” “You have a make on that ship?” “NCC-2577,” Marlowe said. “USS Dauntless.” “Raise her. Find out what the hell she’s doing.” “No response to any hails,” the comm officer reported. “Universal friend or foe isn’t transmitting either. Looks like we’ve got ourselves a rogue.” “Weapons are hot,” Nomuri added. “Detecting a lock on Enterprise—Jesus Christ, I think she means to shoot, skipper.” Gods, Rixx thought, seeing for the first time the beating Enterprise had taken—worse than anything he had seen since the carnage at Wolf. She valiantly tried to make way against Dauntless, but the best she could do wasn’t nearly good enough. “Full power to the phasers,” he said. “Forward banks, stand by for max range.” “Phasers, aye,” Marlowe affirmed. “Target enemy vessel’s upper shield grid.” Marlowe bit her lip as she fed in the numbers. “I have a solution.” Rixx lowered his voice to a snarl. “Fire.” Thomas Paine roared in on full impulse power, skipping off the Bezzeret atmosphere as she swung around to flank Dauntless. She then cut loose with a single blistering salvo, the upper and lower banks on her primary firing simultaneously. Two bright orange beams tracked and converged on the exact same spot, focusing their energy like a blow torch punching through steel. For less than a second, they opened up a hole barely ten centimeters wide—little more than a pinprick, but more than sufficient to allow a hard-hitting particle beam to get inside and touch the shield grid on Dauntless’s hull. Duranium vaporized on impact. Dauntless’s shields momentarily bottled the explosion, keeping the blast wave confined and magnifying its effect. A firestorm quickly spread across the dorsal side of her saucer section, engulfing her bridge before the rest of the grid shattered and her shields collapsed. From there it escaped into open space, flaming out in an instant but leaving behind the dull glow of rapidly cooling metal. Dauntless started listing to port. “Reading partial failure of enemy vessel’s deflectors!” Nomuri said, his tone echoing the bizarre mix of adrenaline and astonishment that surged across the bridge. “Her primary hull is wide open!” “Bring us about,” Rixx ordered, watching as Dauntless began a powered turn. She rolled at the same time, presenting her shielded ventral side to Thomas Paine’s line of fire—but sluggishly, as if her helmsman was slow to react. “Phasers, one-half power. Lock on enemy vessel’s impulse deck.” “Coming to course one-eight-zero, mark ten,” Marlowe said. “Target bearing matches, range one thousand meters.” “Fire.” Marlowe expertly piloted Thomas Paine into a deadly arc, swooping over Dauntless like a bird of prey with its claws outstretched for the kill. A quick series of bursts erupted from her lower bank in passing—three consecutive shots that punched holes through the unprotected casing around Dauntless’s main impulse engine, just aft of her bridge. The shots missed the fusion reactors—deliberately—but tore into the exhaust vents, setting up an explosive backwash that ripped through her already damaged primary and nearly tore her impulse deck clean off. Thomas Paine drew away from Dauntless as she started to burn for real. She made a listless turn on thrusters only, firing a single torpedo that careened into the Bezzeret atmosphere before detonating harmlessly. Rixx didn’t return fire. Now that he had Dauntless’s attention, he had something else in mind. “Enemy vessel breaking away from Enterprise,” Nomuri reported. “Matching course with us to pursue.” Just as I knew you would. “Should I increase speed?” Marlowe asked. “Negative,” Rixx snapped. “Stay ahead of him, but keep him close. Signal Enterprise and tell her to give us some room.” But a quick look at the viewscreen told Rixx that Picard had already guessed what he was going to do. Enterprise was already limping away on reverse thrusters, giving Thomas Paine enough space to insert herself between the two other ships. It was a dangerous maneuver, one that squandered their initiative—but a necessary one to prevent a stray shot from taking Enterprise out once and for all. Dauntless’s commander, getting wise, saw what Rixx was doing and took advantage. “Torpedo lock!” Nomuri shouted, his panel lighting up. Boxed in, Thomas Paine had nowhere to go. “Phasers!” Rixx ordered, already too late. Dauntless fired three torpedoes that closed the narrow distance between them in an instant, slamming into Thomas Paine amidships. The impact came so hard that it knocked them sideways, nearly out of control. Marlowe wrestled with the conn to right their course, while the bridge groaned and shuddered all around them. “Position of enemy vessel!” “Bearing zero-seven zero, mark five!” Nomuri answered, “He’s trying to slip past us, skipper!” “Increase speed to flank. Course: zero three zero, mark two.” Dauntless hurled another torpedo in her wake, grazing Thomas Paine’s starboard nacelle just as her impulse engines spun up to maximum speed. Rixx gripped the sides of his chair, watching as the Excelsior-class loomed larger and larger on the viewscreen, even as she tried to circle around and get a clear bead on Enterprise. At the same time, Marlowe executed a series of evasive moves, trying to make herself a hard target. “Don’t give them another chance, lieutenant,” Rixx told her. “Fire at will.” Marlowe didn’t hold back. Releasing a torpedo spread, she forced Dauntless into an evasive course of her own, driving the other ship exactly where she wanted it to go. There, Marlowe waited with every phaser bank charged to the hilt. She fired them off one at a time, concentrating on the crippled primary hull, landing one hard punch after another. Explosions lit up all around Dauntless’s bridge, smacking the ship back and forth, while her thrusters fired off at random trying to find a way out. Marlowe ended it with a final torpedo shot. The weapon struck Dauntless in the support pylon above her main deflector dish. The resulting explosion crushed the dish entirely, blowing large pieces of it out into space. After that, Dauntless fell still, the lights on her decks flickering on and off as she began to drift. “Cease fire!” Rixx said. Marlowe disengaged, but kept an active firing solution. Thomas Paine then reduced speed, leveling herself directly off of Dauntless’s bow. Rixx kept a cautious distance, waiting for the other ship to make another move—but she just hung there, ensconced in the mists of oxygen that vented from the openings in her hull. “Sensors,” he said. Nomuri ran through a quick scan. “Indeterminate,” he reported, looking up at Dauntless on the viewscreen. “She’s still got power, but weapons have gone to standby mode.” “Shall I open a hailing frequency, captain?” the comm officer asked. “Negative,” Rixx said firmly. “Let him sweat for a while. What’s Enterprise’s position?” Nomuri checked his console again. “Coming in on our six, holding station there.” “Good. Keep an eye on Dauntless. If she so much as twitches, finish her off.” Marlowe smiled tersely. “Yes, sir.” Rixx turned back toward communications. “Can you raise Enterprise?” “On screen, sir.” The image that appeared there was pocked with static, but clear enough for Rixx to get a small measure of what had happened. EMTs crawled all over Enterprise’s bridge, carting out at least one dead person and a whole slew of wounded. He recognized Worf, the Klingon security officer, who had a bandage wrapped around his head but still remained at his post. He also spotted the android Data, who moved from station to station trying to piece together what was left. From what Rixx could see, it wasn’t much. Jean-Luc Picard stood at the center of it all. Rixx had never seen a man who looked so close to the breaking point—and yet there he was, still giving orders, trying desperately to run a ship that was falling apart around him. Gods help the man. “Captain Picard,” Rixx said Picard turned around and greeted him with a weary nod. “Captain Rixx,” he replied. “Thank you for coming as I asked.” “I’m sorry for being late. What happened?” “Our computer system was sabotaged. We lost antimatter containment, but my engineer was able to dump the warp core before it blew.” Picard steadied himself against his chair, his face in obvious pain even as he attempted to hide it. “Captain Steven Quintax is at least partly responsible. Have you spoken with him yet?” “Only with phasers and torpedoes.” Picard’s nodded again, with some satisfaction. “I want him on the line,” he said. “He has some explaining to do.” “As you wish,” Rixx acknowledged. “Open frequency to Dauntless. Patch it in with the current transmission.” “Aye, sir,” the comm officer said, routing the message through his console. After a few moments, it beeped back at him affirmatively. “Dauntless is answering our hail—it’s Captain Quintax, sir.” All right, Picard, Rixx thought. It’s time to have your say.
USS Enterprise The last time Picard met Steven Quintax, he thought the man arrogant beyond redemption. Now he just appeared broken: slumped in the center seat, leaning to one side and with his uniform smeared with blood that Picard suspected was not his own. A glimpse at the edge of the viewscreen confirmed Picard’s observation, in the form of a crewman sprawled on the deck who stared at the back of his former commanding officer with wide, dead eyes. From the look of things, the rest of the bridge crew had suffered a similar fate. “Captain Picard,” Quintax said formally. He held a phaser in his right hand, which he twirled absently. His expression, though stoic in the extreme, quivered on the verge of cracking. Picard was direct: “What is the meaning of this?” Quintax’s lips twisted into a semblance of a smile. “You presented a problem,” he said. “This was my solution.” “That’s what you call attacking and nearly destroying my ship?” “It wasn’t anything personal,” Quintax explained, and in his madness he almost sounded as if he believed it. “I was only doing my duty—that’s what they train us to think, isn’t it? King and country sometimes require sacrifice, right?” Picard narrowed his eyes. “I’m not certain your crew would agree.” Quintax blinked, and the crack opened wider. “That’s tough talk coming from the beast of Wolf 359,” he said. “How many of your own did you kill that day, Picard? Compared to your record, mine pales in comparison.” Picard wanted to reach through the viewscreen and throttle him, but held himself back. “I’ll ask you one more time,” he said. “What is the meaning of this?” Quintax contemplated his phaser, waving the barrel in front of his own face. “You were warned to stop,” he told Picard. “I did everything I could to lead you off. All you had to do was look the other way. But you had to keep digging, didn’t you? You had to know the truth, no matter the cost.” “The truth about what? The Bezzeret?” “You think you know, but you don’t.” “Then tell me.” Quintax shook his head—right as he heard an insistent pounding against the turbolift doors behind him. He turned halfway toward the sound, listening to the shouts of his crew from belowdecks as they shouted to be allowed in. When Quintax didn’t answer, a bright light bored through the seam between the doors, followed by a shower of sparks that spilled down on the deck. It wouldn’t be long before the torch finished its work and they made it inside. Picard pressed even harder: “Tell me.” Quintax looked back at him, with an expression akin to pity. “Some things are better left alone, Picard.” “You know I can’t do that, Quintax.” “No,” Quintax said, “I suppose you can’t.” He then got up and wandered back to the science station, sitting down on the side of the console and activating relay to the ship’s computer. Picard knew what he was doing even before he uttered the words, but even then they seemed distant and unreal. “Computer—destruct sequence one, code one, CHARLIE-TANGO.” “Quintax—” Picard stammered. “Quintax, don’t do this!” Quintax ignored him. “Code seven-six-seven,” he continued. “Destruct seven.” “Think of your crew!” “I am,” Quintax said, and returned to the center seat as the computer started its countdown to self-destruct. He looked at Picard in earnest this time, a glimmer of sanity coming through in his final moments. “You’re a dead man too, Picard. You, your ship, your crew—he will see to that.” “Captain,” Rixx interrupted. “We’re reading a back flow of energy within Dauntless’s warp engines, on a path to overload. We need to get out of here now.” Picard kept his gaze on Quintax. “Who?” he demanded. “Who will see to it?” Quintax smiled again, just as the turbolift doors were yanked open. “Just tell Zeus, when you see him—SHADOW PRIME is still in effect.” He cut the transmission.
USS Thomas Paine “One hundred and eighty degrees about!” Rixx ordered. Up ahead on the screen, Dauntless spun out of view while Enterprise settled in. She was already underway, pouring on reverse thrusters and trying to break orbit. “Distance to Enterprise.” “Five thousand kilometers,” Nomuri said. “Borderline safe distance.” “Let’s give her a little help. Stand by tractor beam.” “Tractor beam, aye.” “Parallel course,” Rixx told Marlowe. “One-eighth impulse power.” She programmed the flight path. “Ready.” “Go.” Thomas Paine nudged forward—slower than Rixx would have wanted, but as fast as he dared given Enterprise’s condition. She overtook the Galaxy-class effortlessly, passing over the dorsal of the huge starship and taking a position just ahead of her. “Engage tractors.” The emitters fired away, releasing a wave blue energy that enveloped Enterprise stem to stern. The ship groaned under the stress of the sudden increase in mass. Nomuri compensated by lengthening the tractor beam, stretching it out to its operational limit and then some, keeping both hands on the control so he didn’t accidentally cut Enterprise loose. Rixx, meanwhile, watched as the other vessel gradually matched Thomas Paine’s velocity, quietly praying that she had enough structural integrity so that she didn’t fly apart. “Come on,” he said. “Just a little more.” Dauntless, however, couldn’t wait. “Enemy vessel’s engines reaching critical,” Nomuri said. “She’ll blow any second.” “What’s our distance?” “Distance to Dauntless.” “Eight thousand kilometers.” Rixx closed his eyes and hoped it was far enough.
USS Enterprise For the second time in a day, a supernova filled the skies above the Bezzeret home world. Picard watched it engulf Dauntless and spread outward, like a man watching a killer wave come onshore but with no way of outrunning it. In that state of mind, with his anger sublimating into acceptance, he waited for the wave to engulf him and finish the process of destroying his ship. He could expect no more of her. She had already given her all. And so it was that Enterprise shook. Picard felt the shocks reverberate through her decks, starting aft and quickly racing forward, like a wildfire infection that ravaged her frame from the inside out. He heard the screech of rending metal, the bang of breaking struts, the clear dome that covered the bridge splintering with a crack that sounded like the end of the world. To Picard, this was the crescendo that would end his life: the final movement of a violent symphony, with only the curtain left to fall. But then the shaking subsided, slowly withdrawing and slipping away beneath his feet, howling in protest one last time at having been cheated. Up on the viewscreen, what remained of Dauntless consumed itself in holy fire, flotsam cast out upon the expanding clouds of white-hot vapor until it was no more. Picard, almost transfixed by the sight, watched the fire extinguish itself—even as it rekindled inside of him, burning his heart black with its intensity. Zeus. Shadow Prime. You’re a dead man too, Picard. “Not yet,” he muttered to himself, then spoke up: “Get me Thomas Paine.” “On screen,” Lieutenant Worf said. The channel, still choked with static, cleared enough for Picard to see Rixx and his bridge crew. All of them shared the same expression: stunned, vacant—as if they had emerged from a severe beating but with no scars to prove it. “Once again, Captain, Rixx, you have my thanks,” Picard said. “It is my honor to help,” Rixx replied. “But this is by no means over.” “No,” Picard agreed, understanding fully what Rixx truly meant—that they were totally alone, with the various powers of both Starfleet and the Bezzeret High Council arrayed against them. As if on cue, the alarm on Thomas Paine sounded to remind them of that stark fact. Rixx’s crew immediately jumped back to their stations, rigging the ship to answer the new threat—though Picard’s instincts told him that they were overmatched. “Detecting three vessels dropping out of warp—make that four!” Nomuri called out. “Bearing two-five-nine, mark zero!” Rixx sat back down in his chair. “Identify.” “Bezzeret battleships,” Marlowe said, reading from her panel. “Configurations match Ursad’vree-class. Assuming attack formation.” “Maintain red alert.” Rixx then paused before a moment before adding, “Stand down weapons.” Marlowe shot him a look of disbelief. “Sir?” “You heard me,” Rixx snapped. “Shields at full, but no phasers or torpedoes. Let’s see what they want first.” Picard stood by, feeling helpless but admiring Rixx’s calm. The Bolian was playing it exactly as he would, knowing he was outgunned ten to one. Best to let the Bezzeret make the first move, rather that provoke them into a fight that Thomas Paine couldn’t win. Rixx patched the visual from his own screen over to Enterprise’s bridge, so Picard could see for himself the approaching battleships. They were graceless and utilitarian, the antithesis of Federation starships, but formidable—almost savage in their design. “Are you getting this?” Rixx asked. “Yes,” Picard answered. The Bezzeret assumed perfect firing positions, boxing in the two starships and cutting off any avenue of escape, their phaser banks fully charged and glowing bright orange. “It appears as though they mean business.” Whatever that business may have been, they weren’t forthcoming. The battleships only held station, pinging Thomas Paine and Enterprise with active sensors, louder and louder until the sound itself seemed on the verge of pulverizing them. Then, in the space of a second, the pings stopped—utterly, ominously, the silence that followed even more unbearable. Until Worf’s panel beeped. “Receiving transmission from the planet surface,” the Klingon said. Picard saw that Thomas Paine was getting the same signal. “Who is it?” he asked. “Unknown. It appears to be an automated message, audio only.” The captain frowned. “On speaker.” The message opened with a crackle of static. After a few moments, a familiar voice came through: steady, measured tones meant to convey an aura of control, but laden with heavy implications of disaster. Picard recognized it immediately. “This is Prime Minister Darelian of the Bezzeret High Council,” the voice announced. “An large explosion of unknown origin has occurred in the skies above our capital city, inflicting serious damage and loss of life. As of this time, we have not determined the cause of this explosion—however, with the presence of Federation starships within the same orbital proximity, our military high command has placed all forces on alert status until the possibility of a deliberate and unprovoked attack can be conclusively ruled out.” My God, Picard thought, the scale of Darelian’s deception becoming crystal clear. First she murders Dalton, then she conspires to destroy my ship—and now she blames us for everything. “Effective immediately,” the prime minister continued, “I have declared a planetwide state of martial law. This is in direct response to the events in our capital city, which have led to large scale riots against Federation facilities and personnel. Among these facilities was the scientific research station, which was in the process of being evacuated when it came under assault by protestors.” Picard felt his heart stop. Riker—Beverly… “It is with deepest regret that I inform you that all Federation personnel were killed during this incident. There are no survivors from the compound. I repeat, there are no survivors. Every effort will be made to return their bodies, but given the state of relations between the Federation and the Bezzeret people, and the unacceptable risk of further loss of life, to do so now is impossible. Under no circumstances will any Federation ship be allowed to approach the Bezzeret home world, nor any Federation national be permitted to set foot on Bezzeret soil. “As to the starships that remain in orbit, you are hereby ordered to leave the Bezzeret system. If you do not comply, you will be subject to immediate military sanction. It is my fondest hope that our peoples will find a way to resolve our differences before an open state of warfare exists between us—but do not put us to the test. Our resolve is strong and our will is great, as is our desire to see justice done. “This transmission will be repeated continuously.” Picard motioned for Worf to cut off the message. “Open a channel to the away team,” he said. Worf tried, but shook his head. “No response, captain.” Picard turned back toward the viewscreen, to the sight of those battleships hovering off of Enterprise’s bow. At this point, nothing was beyond the realm of possibility—and they would not wait much longer, of that he was certain. “Captain Rixx,” he finally spoke. “Are you in any condition to tow Enterprise out of this star system?” “We won’t make any kind of speed,” Rixx replied, “but we can do it.” “Then make it so. Also alert Fleet Command of our situation. Give them the coordinates of our rendezvous point as soon as you have a course plotted, and request that they render all measures of assistance.” He took a long, resigned breath. “With any luck, we can hold together long enough for them to reach us.” “It will be done,” Rixx said. “For what it’s worth, Picard—you did what you could.” With that, Rixx severed contact. Picard settled back into his chair, feeling the eyes of Lieutenant Worf and even Lieutenant Commander Data weighing heavily on him. He knew what they were thinking, because he already hated himself for it; but if leaving the away team behind was the price of saving his ship, then he would pay it—and him alone. But that didn’t mean that he believed, even for one second, that they were dead. For now, however, the fight was back on Earth, where the shadow fell. And Zeus awaited. The post Star Trek: Shadow Prime Book I – Chapter 14 appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Bloomberg’s big adventure: Praising dictators, dodging demonstrators and buying public sidewalks
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 04:39 PM PST The astounding revelations on Democratic candidate Michael Bloomberg keep coming out causing people to wonder how he even has a chance. He has insulted people, both high and low while showing a distinct admiration for dictators. His chief rival admitted socialist ‘breadline’ Bernie has his own issues in this area, making the case that neither of them are suitable for the Oval office. Both come across as would-be dictators, so it’s hard to decide which one would be the worse of the worst. There are a number of issues with the man, so it’s hard to pick out the most damaging revelations of the moment. But there are a couple of both high and low examples that make it clear Bloomberg should never be even close to the White House. Michael Bloomberg: Xi Jinping is Not a DictatorAs reported here a few months ago on a segment from the PBS program Firing Line with Margaret Hoover, Bloomberg made the startling assertion that the general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and president of China Xi Jinping is Not a Dictator. Because the man ‘has to satisfy his constituents’ or else he won’t survive. Apparently, Bloomberg has never heard of the Tiananmen Square massacre, where the ‘People’s Liberation Army’ ran over protesters with tanks and armored personnel carriers. Yes, the man who advocated ‘Socialism With Chinese Characteristics’ is somehow answerable to the people. One can easily envision Bloomberg wanting to be in the same position in the states. Liberty grabber elitistThen of course there are all the other revelations that keep pilling out. Oddly enough, Bloomberg is quite egalitarian in his denigrations of most people and professions, making it only a matter of time before everyone is maligned. The common thread in all of this is what we’ve known all along. Leftists in general and Bloomberg in particular have convinced themselves that they know better. After all, they are trying to save the children, the planet and the universe at large. So they can cut a few corners when it comes to the truth. The ends justify the means, even if the means are to our end. There is a distinct contrast with the political right and the political left, between the fundamental political philosophies of individualism and collectivism. While we on the conservative-right favor liberty over control, our comrades on the nation’s socialist left tend to favor control over liberty. This is because we on the conservative-right favor individual liberty and the individual while the socialist-left favors non-existent ‘collective rights’ and the collective. We value the life of the individual, they value the life of the collective. Dodging pro-liberty protestersFor some reason, many of the pro-liberty community have a deep hostility towards billionaire Bloomberg and his designs on everyone’s unalienable human rights. Perhaps it was his buying of a state legislature and ongoing attempts to decimate the common sense human right of self-preservation. This is why Bloomberg has to play a shell game with his events. This is why he has to sneak in the back door to events to avoid those from the individual liberty side of the aisle. In our last installment, he was greeted by a massive demonstration in Arlington, Virginia. The same thing occurred in ‘Gainsboro’ North Carolina with pro-liberty protesters braving a steady downpour to remind liberty grabber Bloomberg that guns save lives. The latest occurrence had more people at an event voicing support for our basic human rights; there is something about an incessant threat of gun confiscation that brings out the pro-liberty protesters. Buying public sidewalksOur last little look into the life of a would-be emperor, is the report of his staffers claiming that he had “purchased” a public sidewalk for one of his events. Yes, the man who claims a dictator is a man of the people has staff that thinks that he owns the ground we walk on. Hence, pro-freedom demonstrators were kept away, unable to voice their opinion to Bloomberg. Despite the fact that he’s made claims to the contrary. The bottom line: Both Bloomberg and Bernie are uniquely unqualified to be presidentThese days, diversity means that there is a variety of reasons why these two men are unfit for the highest office in the land. Both are uniquely unqualified in their own right. Bernie Sanders because he wants to buy votes with other people’s money, other wise known as socialism [see, it’s ‘social’ like social media, so it has to be good]. Never mind that his base ideology has never worked in the 400 years that it’s been tried. Or that it has a body count over 100 million. His secular faith system only promises a Utopia and always ends up in oppression and death. Conversely, Bloomberg believes that he knows better than anyone else and that he should be in control. His pontification over the years belies an elitist mindset while his failures prove this isn’t the case. He is a covert socialist that is obsessed with control of society, beginning with an elimination of individual liberty. Both have the common sense human right of self-defense as their first target, but it won’t end there. Socialism and control is the antithesis of liberty, something the left has to keep hidden beneath a blanket of lies, unattainable promises and false labels. That is why the left cannot win the next election. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Bloomberg’s big adventure: Praising dictators, dodging demonstrators and buying public sidewalks appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
NBC touts Sanders, buries the lede: 67% of voters do not want a socialist president
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 03:47 PM PST Progressive mainstream media wants to get rid of President Trump and they do not believe Senator Bernie Sanders is the guy for the job. How do mainstream media outlets try to influence elections like these? Their primary tool is blatant headline and talking point propaganda. NY Times, WaPo, and others pound their readers with incessant anti-Trump or anti-Sanders headlines. Meanwhile, CNN, MSNBC, and the networks continuously berate President Trump, Sanders, and their supporters through their hosts and guests. But there’s another technique that’s used from time to time that’s meant to infect a campaign from within. This is when they take a story that is seemingly positive towards a candidate, then they fill it with poisonous pills—news that will make them think twice about the candidate—so happy supporters of that candidate will read something that may concern them. NBC News, who is quickly picking up steam with their support of Mike Bloomberg, pulled such a trick today, and it worked. The headline of the story was great news for Bernie Bros: NBC News/WSJ poll: Sanders opens up double-digit national lead in primary race. That’s good news for Sanders, right? It certainly is until you get deeper into the article where the poison pills were planted. From the article:
Only one candidate identifies as a socialist. Only one candidate has had a heart attack, and it happened to be in the last year. Three candidates are over 75-years-old, but only one of them is a socialist who had a heart attack. This, folks, is a variation of a push poll. It’s subtle out of necessity; there’s no reason to completely ruin their credibility by asking questions that were not of journalistic interest. But we can tell it was a push poll by the wording of the heart attack question. None of the candidates have had a heart attack other than Sanders, so they could have easily asked if there were reservations about a candidate who has had one. But they intentionally noted that it was in the last year. The intention was clear. They wanted to alert people that Sanders has had a very recent heart attack, since much of America seems to have missed or forgotten that important piece of news. The reality is this: Breadline Bernie shouldn’t be the frontrunner, but we’re very happy he is. We’re rooting for him. It isn’t based on the reasons that many Democrats oppose him. They believe he would have less of a chance of defeating President Trump and that his presence at the top of the ticket will hurt down-ballot Democratic candidates. Those things may or may not be true; frankly, I’m skeptical considering the exact same things were said about candidate Trump. Passion drives voters, and next to the President, Sanders has the highest levels of passion behind him. The reason I am hopeful Sanders wins the nomination is because we need to have the conversation about socialism on the national stage. We need to have the opportunity to address all who may be considering following the Marxist revolution happening among radical progressives today. This nation will always have radicals, but now more than any time since the Great Depression, the specter of socialism is rising in popularity. We need to cut it off now and the only way to do that is to see Sanders get the nomination, then be handily defeated in November. Bernie Sanders clearly terrifies many in the Democratic Party and in mainstream media. They are pulling out all stops to discourage people from voting for him. Even a “positive” story was a trap designed to get Bernie Bros to share it. And it worked. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post NBC touts Sanders, buries the lede: 67% of voters do not want a socialist president appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Indiana teach fired for exposing indoctrination in public schools through ‘Social-Emotion Learning’
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 02:32 PM PST Most conservative parents whose children are in public schools are well aware of the far-left agenda to indoctrinate them into a radical progressive worldview. If you’re unaware, watch this video. Even if you’re aware, watch it anyway. This is a story of what happens when a teacher speaks out against Social-Emotional Learning (SEL), the “cool” new way to teach children how to think and feel. When “Jennifer” became fed up with how SEL was being forcefully implemented into Indiana schools’ curriculum, she wrote an article about it. Later that week, on Valentine’s Day, she was called into the principal’s office where she was fired. She wrote about a program called “Leader in Me.” They promote a social justice agenda and try to embed it into students in a way that’s lasting. As Jennifer, who founded Purple for Parents Indiana, said in the video, she isn’t opposed to teaching values to children, but it’s the duty and right of the parent to instill those values into their children, not the school. After being fired, she unenrolled her daughter. That should be a very clear statement to anyone when a teacher is so concerned about the curriculum that she’s willing to take her own daughter out of school to protect her. Purple for Parents started a GoFundMe for Jennifer and her family to help get through these hard times. The best-case scenario is home school, followed by private school. But not everyone has those options, so it’s imperative that if your kids are in public schools, you monitor what they’re being taught and speak out when it gets ridiculous. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Indiana teach fired for exposing indoctrination in public schools through ‘Social-Emotion Learning’ appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Mike Bloomberg will be on the defensive at the debate, but he’ll attack one guy
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 12:19 PM PST Billionaire Mike Bloomberg is going to be one of two targets on the debate stage on Wednesday night. The other is the frontrunner, Senator Bernie Sanders. But those who are expecting Bloomberg to go after everyone is sorely mistaken. He is going to target all of his firepower at Sanders alone for purely strategic reasons. Former Vice President Joe Biden will go after Bloomberg the hardest because he’s the one who has the most to lose from the newcomer’s rise. And when he hits Bloomberg, he won’t get much of an attack back. Why? Because the last thing Bloomberg wants to do is upset supporters—both votes and delegates—who will back Bloomberg when Biden drops out. Senator Amy Klobuchar, who surged in New Hampshire but likely won’t see much action the rest of primary season, will hit Bloomberg for his past policies. Senator Elizabeth Warren will go after him for being a greedy billionaire. Mayor Pete Buttigieg will jab at him over certain past policies but will otherwise leave him alone. Bloomberg won’t hit back very hard against any of them but will redirect his attacks towards President Trump. But when Sanders hits him, Bloomberg will hit back. He’ll do so for two reasons. First, the people least likely to support him, ever, are those who support Sanders. There’s really nothing for him to lose. More importantly, he’s going to position himself as the candidate who can defeat Sanders head-to-head, drawing in those in the Democratic Party who fear a Sanders nomination. They’re panicking and Bloomberg wants to be their Valium. The divide in the Democratic Party that has been taking shape since 2016 will become a full-blown schism on Wednesday. If Bloomberg does well at the debate, it will be hard for Sanders to maintain his momentum. If not, Sanders is the nominee. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Mike Bloomberg will be on the defensive at the debate, but he’ll attack one guy appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
Panic! at the Democrat primary
Posted: 18 Feb 2020 10:47 AM PST My hometown paper the Tampa Bay Times is a pretty good bellwether for the state of the Democrat primary race as it exists right now—and if their recent editorial is any indicator, the word that best describes it is panic. Much like its uber-leftist fellow traveler the New York Times, which couldn’t quite seem to make up its mind about who to endorse, the TBT editorial board has instead taken the rather unusual step of advising readers to do. . .well, nothing for now, because with everything so up in the air at this point, discretion is the better part of valor, I guess:
Did I happen to mention that the Tampa Bay Times has never endorsed a Republican for President in my lifetime?
So in other words, we don’t have the first clue as to where this thing is headed. Mind you, this is from the same paper that urged its readers to vote for Dukakis over Bush back in ’88, so when they’re telling their liberal audience to keep its powder dry, you know the prognosis isn’t good. Later on in the editorial, however, is where you get to the real meat and potatoes of the thing:
Ah, yes. The old reliable Democrat establishment party line—and TBT is toeing it harder than a social justice warrior trying to convince everyone that the new Charlie’s Angels is a good movie. Sure, we’re all socialists who basically want the same stuff as Bernie—but does he have to be so open about it? Whatever happened to fooling people into thinking we’re moderates? Then there’s this bit of fun:
The first question is valid. The second. . .well, let’s just say that it implies a lot that the Times isn’t mentioning out loud, and could very well be called out as a bigoted argument. It would be interesting, to say the least, to hear the editorial board explain exactly what they meant by that—but I wouldn’t hold my breath. The piece goes on to pose some genuine concerns about Amy Klobuchar and Joe Biden—the former whom they consider ill-equipped to build an organization that can effectively take on Trump, while the latter is all but pronounced DOA based on his declining poll numbers and the stink of loss that has followed him around since he crashed and burned in Iowa. But then the board has this to say about Mikey-Come-Lately Bloomberg, which makes it increasingly clear that they—much like the party establishment—are starting to view him as the White Knight come to save their voters from themselves:
Pretty tame questions compared to what they’re flinging at Bernie and Mayor Pete—which is pretty amazing, considering that they’ve emerged as the two front runners after Iowa and New Hampshire. One almost gets the sense that the party has already designated both of them as non-starters, and has already begun the process of seeing to it that neither snags the nomination—no matter what the actual vote tallies end up being. Sounds a lot like Hillary and her superdelegates when she snatched the nom back in 2016, doesn’t it? We now know from the DNC emails posted by Wikileaks that the Democrat Party had preordained that outcome, and that the actual vote mattered very little in how the nominating contest turned out. It merely served as an illusion for the base—a somewhat ham-handed attempt in retrospect—to convince Democrat primary voters that they actually had a say in who would get the nomination, when the decision that Clinton would win no matter what had already been made. This time around, of course, things are a bit more complicated with so many players remaining in the game—but, it seems, the party’s insistence that Bernie be excluded hasn’t changed much, except that Buttigieg has now joined him on the list of undesirables. That the media are joining in that effort only adds proof to that particular pudding. So if you’re a Bernie Bro or a member of Team Pete, best be prepared: your guy is probably about to get relegated to also-ran status, if the party establishment has anything to say about it. American Conservative MovementJoin fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
The post Panic! at the Democrat primary appeared first on NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NOQ Report – Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
REDSTATE
Four Horrible Supreme Court Rulings: Egregious Examples of Awful Judicial Activism
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the RedState.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.
Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions You can unsubscribe by clicking here. Or Send postal mail to: * Copyright RedState and its Content Providers. |
CBS
|
|
|
|
CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY
|
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE
|
BERNARD GOLDBERG
|
TWITCHY
|
|
NATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
NATIONAL JOURNAL
|
This email was sent to rickbulow74@live.com. If you no longer wish to receive these emails you may unsubscribe at any time.
GATEWAY PUNDIT
|
FRONTPAGE MAG
|